[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: making
Target surface form: making
Context:
Although a GOP president may limit local benefits to the voter's particular district/state, such a president is also likely to be more effective at preventing other districts/states and their legislators from bringing home the local benefits. The individual voter's standing consequently will be enhanced through lower taxes. While this theory is exceedingly simple, it appears to explain several things. First, why ticket splitting has increased and taken the peculiar pattern that it has over the past half century: Prior to the election of Franklin Roosevelt as president and the advent of the New Deal, government occupied a much smaller role in society and the prisoner's dilemma problem confronting voters in races for Congress was considerably less severe. Second, it explains why voters hold Congress in disdain but generally love their own congressional representatives: Any individual legislator's constituents appreciate the specific benefits that the legislator wins for them but not the overall cost associated with every other legislator doing likewise for his own constituency. Third, the theory suggests why legislators who pay too much attention to national policy <t>making</t> relative to local benefit-seeking have lower security in office. For example, first-term - term members of the House, once the most vulnerable of incumbents, have become virtually immune to defeat.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=making%1:04:00:: | definition=the act that results in something coming to be | synonyms=devising, fashioning | examples=the devising of plans; the fashioning of pots and pans
2. sense_key=making%1:07:00:: | definition=an attribute that must be met or complied with and that fits a person for something | synonyms=qualification | examples=her qualifications for the job are excellent; one of the qualifications for admission is an academic degree
3. sense_key=making%1:06:00:: | definition=(usually plural) the components needed for making or doing something | examples=the recipe listed all the makings for a chocolate cake

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

reasoning_content:
*   Target lemma: `making`
    *   Target surface form: `making`
    *   Context: "...the theory suggests why legislators who pay too much attention to national policy <t>making</t> relative to local benefit-seeking have lower security in office."
    *   Candidate senses:
        1.  `making%1:04:00::`: the act that results in something coming to be (synonyms: devising, fashioning).
        2.  `making%1:07:00::`: an attribute that must be met or complied with (synonym: qualification).
        3.  `making%1:06:00::`: (usually plural) the components needed for making or doing something.

    *   The phrase is "national policy making".
    *   "Policy making" refers to the process of creating, devising, or formulating policies.
    *   This aligns with "the act that results in something coming to be" (Sense 1).

    *   Sense 1: "the act that results in something coming to be" (devising, fashioning). "Policy making" is the act of devising policy. This fits perfectly.
    *   Sense 2: "an attribute that must be met" (qualification). "National policy qualification" doesn't make sense here.
    *   Sense 3: "the components needed for making or doing something" (makings). "National policy components" doesn't fit the context of "paying attention to [the process of] policy making".

    *   Sense 1 is the only one that fits the context of "policy making".


attempt_kind: initial

status: success

[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: relative
Target surface form: relative
Context:
Although a GOP president may limit local benefits to the voter's particular district/state, such a president is also likely to be more effective at preventing other districts/states and their legislators from bringing home the local benefits. The individual voter's standing consequently will be enhanced through lower taxes. While this theory is exceedingly simple, it appears to explain several things. First, why ticket splitting has increased and taken the peculiar pattern that it has over the past half century: Prior to the election of Franklin Roosevelt as president and the advent of the New Deal, government occupied a much smaller role in society and the prisoner's dilemma problem confronting voters in races for Congress was considerably less severe. Second, it explains why voters hold Congress in disdain but generally love their own congressional representatives: Any individual legislator's constituents appreciate the specific benefits that the legislator wins for them but not the overall cost associated with every other legislator doing likewise for his own constituency. Third, the theory suggests why legislators who pay too much attention to national policy making <t>relative</t> to local benefit-seeking have lower security in office. For example, first-term - term members of the House, once the most vulnerable of incumbents, have become virtually immune to defeat.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=relative%3:00:00:: | definition=estimated by comparison; not absolute or complete | synonyms=comparative | examples=a relative stranger
2. sense_key=relative%5:00:00:proportionate:00 | definition=properly related in size or degree or other measurable characteristics; usually followed by `to' | synonyms=proportional | examples=the punishment ought to be proportional to the crime; earnings relative to production

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

raw_output:
```json
{"sense_index": 2}
```

finish_reason: stop

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 2}
```

role: assistant

reasoning_content:
*   Target lemma: `relative`
    *   Target surface form: `relative`
    *   Context: "...legislators who pay too much attention to national policy making <t>relative</t> to local benefit-seeking have lower security in office."
    *   Candidate senses:
        1.  `relative%3:00:00::`: estimated by comparison; not absolute or complete (synonym: comparative). Example: "a relative stranger".
        2.  `relative%5:00:00:proportionate:00`: properly related in size or degree or other measurable characteristics; usually followed by `to` (synonym: proportional). Example: "earnings relative to production".

    *   The phrase is "national policy making <t>relative</t> to local benefit-seeking".
    *   The author is comparing the amount of attention paid to national policy making versus the amount of attention paid to local benefit-seeking.
    *   The structure "X relative to Y" here means "in comparison with" or "proportionate to".

    *   Sense 1: "estimated by comparison; not absolute or complete". This usually describes an adjective modifying a noun (e.g., "a relative success", "a relative stranger").
    *   Sense 2: "properly related in size or degree or other measurable characteristics; usually followed by `to`". This fits the "X relative to Y" structure perfectly. The example "earnings relative to production" is structurally identical to "national policy making relative to local benefit-seeking".

    *   Sense 2 is the best fit because it describes a relationship of proportion or comparison between two quantities/degrees (attention to national policy vs. attention to local benefits) and matches the "relative to" construction.

currency: USD

source: unavailable


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: local
Target surface form: local
Context:
Although a GOP president may limit local benefits to the voter's particular district/state, such a president is also likely to be more effective at preventing other districts/states and their legislators from bringing home the local benefits. The individual voter's standing consequently will be enhanced through lower taxes. While this theory is exceedingly simple, it appears to explain several things. First, why ticket splitting has increased and taken the peculiar pattern that it has over the past half century: Prior to the election of Franklin Roosevelt as president and the advent of the New Deal, government occupied a much smaller role in society and the prisoner's dilemma problem confronting voters in races for Congress was considerably less severe. Second, it explains why voters hold Congress in disdain but generally love their own congressional representatives: Any individual legislator's constituents appreciate the specific benefits that the legislator wins for them but not the overall cost associated with every other legislator doing likewise for his own constituency. Third, the theory suggests why legislators who pay too much attention to national policy making relative to <t>local</t> benefit-seeking have lower security in office. For example, first-term - term members of the House, once the most vulnerable of incumbents, have become virtually immune to defeat.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=local%3:00:01:: | definition=relating to or applicable to or concerned with the administration of a city or town or district rather than a larger area | examples=local taxes; local authorities
2. sense_key=local%3:01:01:: | definition=of or belonging to or characteristic of a particular locality or neighborhood | examples=local customs; local schools
3. sense_key=local%3:00:02:: | definition=affecting only a restricted part or area of the body | examples=local anesthesia

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

raw_output:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

reasoning_content:
*   Target lemma: `local`
    *   Target surface form: `local`
    *   Context: "...why legislators who pay too much attention to national policy making relative to <t>local</t> benefit-seeking have lower security in office."
    *   Candidate senses:
        1.  `local%3:00:01::`: relating to or applicable to or concerned with the administration of a city or town or district rather than a larger area (examples: local taxes; local authorities).
        2.  `local%3:01:01::`: of or belonging to or characteristic of a particular locality or neighborhood (examples: local customs; local schools).
        3.  `local%3:00:02::`: affecting only a restricted part or area of the body (examples: local anesthesia).

    *   The sentence contrasts "national policy making" with "local benefit-seeking".
    *   The context discusses GOP presidents, voters' districts/states, legislators bringing home benefits to their districts/states, and the security of members of the House (who represent specific districts).
    *   "Local benefit-seeking" refers to legislators securing benefits for their specific district or state (their constituency) rather than focusing on national policy.

    *   Sense 3 (body part) is completely irrelevant.
    *   Sense 2 (characteristic of a locality/neighborhood) is more about culture, customs, or specific local entities (schools).
    *   Sense 1 (relating to the administration of a city, town, or district rather than a larger area) fits perfectly. The context is about the administration of benefits to a specific district/state (a smaller administrative area) versus national policy (a larger area).

    *   The contrast is "national" vs "local".
    *   "Local" here refers to the district or state represented by the legislator.
    *   Sense 1 specifically mentions "administration of a city or town or district rather than a larger area". This aligns with the political/administrative context of the passage.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: have
Target surface form: have
Context:
Although a GOP president may limit local benefits to the voter's particular district/state, such a president is also likely to be more effective at preventing other districts/states and their legislators from bringing home the local benefits. The individual voter's standing consequently will be enhanced through lower taxes. While this theory is exceedingly simple, it appears to explain several things. First, why ticket splitting has increased and taken the peculiar pattern that it has over the past half century: Prior to the election of Franklin Roosevelt as president and the advent of the New Deal, government occupied a much smaller role in society and the prisoner's dilemma problem confronting voters in races for Congress was considerably less severe. Second, it explains why voters hold Congress in disdain but generally love their own congressional representatives: Any individual legislator's constituents appreciate the specific benefits that the legislator wins for them but not the overall cost associated with every other legislator doing likewise for his own constituency. Third, the theory suggests why legislators who pay too much attention to national policy making relative to local benefit-seeking <t>have</t> lower security in office. For example, first-term - term members of the House, once the most vulnerable of incumbents, have become virtually immune to defeat.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=have%2:40:00:: | definition=have or possess, either in a concrete or an abstract sense | synonyms=have got, hold | examples=She has $1,000 in the bank; He has got two beautiful daughters
2. sense_key=have%2:42:00:: | definition=have as a feature | synonyms=feature | examples=This restaurant features the most famous chefs in France
3. sense_key=have%2:39:06:: | definition=go through (mental or physical states or experiences) | synonyms=experience, receive, get | examples=get an idea; experience vertigo
4. sense_key=have%2:40:04:: | definition=have ownership or possession of | synonyms=own, possess | examples=He owns three houses in Florida; How many cars does she have?
5. sense_key=have%2:30:00:: | definition=cause to move; cause to be in a certain position or condition | synonyms=get, let | examples=He got his squad on the ball; This let me in for a big surprise
6. sense_key=have%2:34:00:: | definition=serve oneself to, or consume regularly | synonyms=consume, ingest, take in, take | examples=Have another bowl of chicken soup!; I don't take sugar in my coffee
7. sense_key=have%2:41:00:: | definition=have a personal or business relationship with someone | examples=have a postdoc; have an assistant
8. sense_key=have%2:36:00:: | definition=organize or be responsible for | synonyms=hold, throw, make, give | examples=hold a reception; have, throw, or make a party
9. sense_key=have%2:40:01:: | definition=have left | examples=I have two years left; I don't have any money left
10. sense_key=have%2:42:12:: | definition=be confronted with | examples=What do we have here?; Now we have a fine mess
11. sense_key=have%2:30:01:: | definition=undergo | synonyms=experience | examples=The stocks had a fast run-up
12. sense_key=have%2:29:02:: | definition=suffer from; be ill with | examples=She has arthritis
13. sense_key=have%2:32:00:: | definition=cause to do; cause to act in a specified manner | synonyms=induce, stimulate, cause, get, make | examples=The ads induced me to buy a VCR; My children finally got me to buy a computer
14. sense_key=have%2:40:05:: | definition=receive willingly something given or offered | synonyms=accept, take | examples=The only girl who would have him was the miller's daughter; I won't have this dog in my house!
15. sense_key=have%2:40:03:: | definition=get something; come into possession of | synonyms=receive | examples=receive payment; receive a gift
16. sense_key=have%2:29:05:: | definition=undergo (as of injuries and illnesses) | synonyms=suffer, sustain, get | examples=She suffered a fracture in the accident; He had an insulin shock after eating three candy bars
17. sense_key=have%2:40:02:: | definition=achieve a point or goal | synonyms=get, make | examples=Nicklaus had a 70; The Brazilian team got 4 goals
18. sense_key=have%2:29:00:: | definition=cause to be born | synonyms=give birth, deliver, bear, birth | examples=My wife had twins yesterday!
19. sense_key=have%2:35:00:: | definition=have sex with; archaic use | synonyms=take | examples=He had taken this woman when she was most vulnerable

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

reasoning_content:
*   Target lemma: `have`
    *   Target surface form: `have`
    *   Context: "...the theory suggests why legislators who pay too much attention to national policy making relative to local benefit-seeking <t>have</t> lower security in office."

    *   The sentence discusses legislators and their "security in office" (meaning the likelihood of being re-elected).
    *   The phrase is "have lower security in office."
    *   In this context, "have" means that these legislators possess or are characterized by a lower level of security.

    *   Sense 1: "have or possess, either in a concrete or an abstract sense" (synonyms: have got, hold). Example: "She has $1,000 in the bank."
    *   Sense 2: "have as a feature" (synonyms: feature). Example: "This restaurant features the most famous chefs in France."
    *   Sense 3: "go through (mental or physical states or experiences)" (synonyms: experience, receive, get). Example: "get an idea."
    *   Sense 4: "have ownership or possession of" (synonyms: own, possess). Example: "He owns three houses in Florida."
    *   Sense 5: "cause to move; cause to be in a certain position or condition."
    *   Sense 6: "serve oneself to, or consume regularly."
    *   Sense 7: "have a personal or business relationship with someone."
    *   Sense 8: "organize or be responsible for."
    *   Sense 9: "have left."
    *   Sense 10: "be confronted with."
    *   Sense 11: "undergo."
    *   Sense 12: "suffer from; be ill with."
    *   Sense 13: "cause to do."
    *   Sense 14: "receive willingly something given or offered."
    *   Sense 15: "get something; come into possession of."
    *   Sense 16: "undergo (as of injuries and illnesses)."
    *   Sense 17: "achieve a point or goal."
    *   Sense 18: "cause to be born."
    *   Sense 19: "have sex with."

    *   "Security in office" is an abstract quality or state.
    *   Sense 1 ("have or possess, either in a concrete or an abstract sense") fits perfectly.
    *   Sense 4 ("have ownership or possession of") is more about concrete ownership (houses, cars).
    *   Sense 2 ("have as a feature") is close, but "security in office" isn't really a "feature" of the person in the way a restaurant features a chef; it's a state or quality they possess.
    *   Sense 3 ("go through... experiences") doesn't fit as well as possession of a state.

    *   "Security in office" is an abstract attribute.
    *   Sense 1 specifically mentions "abstract sense."
    *   Example: "She has $1,000 in the bank" (concrete) vs. "He has a lot of patience" (abstract - though not the example given, the definition allows it).

    *   Sense 1: have or possess, either in a concrete or an abstract sense.
    *   Context: "...legislators... have lower security in office."
    *   This is a clear case of possessing an abstract quality/state.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: office
Target surface form: office
Context:
Although a GOP president may limit local benefits to the voter's particular district/state, such a president is also likely to be more effective at preventing other districts/states and their legislators from bringing home the local benefits. The individual voter's standing consequently will be enhanced through lower taxes. While this theory is exceedingly simple, it appears to explain several things. First, why ticket splitting has increased and taken the peculiar pattern that it has over the past half century: Prior to the election of Franklin Roosevelt as president and the advent of the New Deal, government occupied a much smaller role in society and the prisoner's dilemma problem confronting voters in races for Congress was considerably less severe. Second, it explains why voters hold Congress in disdain but generally love their own congressional representatives: Any individual legislator's constituents appreciate the specific benefits that the legislator wins for them but not the overall cost associated with every other legislator doing likewise for his own constituency. Third, the theory suggests why legislators who pay too much attention to national policy making relative to local benefit-seeking have lower security in <t>office</t>. For example, first-term - term members of the House, once the most vulnerable of incumbents, have become virtually immune to defeat.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=office%1:06:00:: | definition=place of business where professional or clerical duties are performed | synonyms=business office | examples=he rented an office in the new building
2. sense_key=office%1:14:01:: | definition=an administrative unit of government | synonyms=agency, federal agency, government agency, bureau, authority | examples=the Central Intelligence Agency; the Census Bureau
3. sense_key=office%1:04:01:: | definition=the actions and activities assigned to or required or expected of a person or group | synonyms=function, part, role | examples=the function of a teacher; the government must do its part
4. sense_key=office%1:26:00:: | definition=(of a government or government official) holding an office means being in power | synonyms=power | examples=being in office already gives a candidate a great advantage; during his first year in office
5. sense_key=office%1:14:00:: | definition=professional or clerical workers in an office | synonyms=office staff | examples=the whole office was late the morning of the blizzard
6. sense_key=office%1:04:00:: | definition=a religious rite or service prescribed by ecclesiastical authorities | examples=the offices of the mass
7. sense_key=office%1:04:02:: | definition=a job in an organization | synonyms=position, post, berth, spot, billet, place | examples=he occupied a post in the treasury

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

raw_output:
```json
{"sense_index": 4}
```

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 4}
```

reasoning_content:
*   Target lemma: `office`
    *   Target surface form: `office`
    *   Context: "...the theory suggests why legislators who pay too much attention to national policy making relative to local benefit-seeking have lower security in <t>office</t>."
    *   Key phrase: "security in office"

    *   Sense 1: Place of business (physical location).
    *   Sense 2: Administrative unit of government (agency).
    *   Sense 3: Actions/activities assigned (function/role).
    *   Sense 4: Holding power (being in power).
    *   Sense 5: Office staff (people).
    *   Sense 6: Religious rite.
    *   Sense 7: A job in an organization (position/post).

    *   The context discusses legislators and their "security in office."
    *   "Security in office" refers to the likelihood of a politician keeping their position/power through elections.
    *   Sense 4: "(of a government or government official) holding an office means being in power" (synonym: power; example: "during his first year in office").
    *   Sense 7: "a job in an organization" (synonyms: position, post).

    *   Sense 4 specifically mentions government officials and "being in power."
    *   Sense 7 is more general ("a job in an organization").
    *   In the phrase "security in office," "office" refers to the state of holding the position of power/authority.
    *   Looking at the example for Sense 4: "being in office already gives a candidate a great advantage." This matches the context of legislators and their vulnerability to defeat.

    *   Sense 4: `office%1:26:00` (holding power)
    *   Sense 7: `office%1:14:02` (a job/position)
    *   While "office" can mean the position (Sense 7), "security in office" is a standard political science term referring to the tenure of power (Sense 4). Let's re-evaluate.
    *   Wait, "security in office" usually means the stability of their tenure in that position.
    *   Let's look at the examples again.
        *   Sense 4: "being in office already gives a candidate a great advantage"
        *   Sense 7: "he occupied a post in the treasury"
    *   "Security in office" refers to the state of holding the position. Sense 4's definition "(of a government or government official) holding an office means being in power" fits the state of being an incumbent.

    *   Sense 4: holding power.
    *   Sense 7: the position itself.
    *   "Security in office" -> security in [the state of holding power/the position].
    *   Usually, "in office" (as a prepositional phrase) maps to Sense 4.
    *   Example: "He has been in office for four years." (Sense 4).
    *   Example: "He is seeking office." (Sense 7).
    *   In "security in office," the "in office" part is the key.

    *   Sense 4: `office%1:26:00`
    *   Sense 7: `office%1:14:02`
    *   The phrase "in office" almost always refers to the state of holding the position (Sense 4).

    *   Sense 1: No.
    *   Sense 2: No.
    *   Sense 3: No.
    *   Sense 4: Yes (holding power/being in office).
    *   Sense 5: No.
    *   Sense 6: No.
    *   Sense 7: No (this is the position itself, not the state of holding it).

    *   Sense 4 is the best fit for "security in office."


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: member
Target surface form: members
Context:
The individual voter's standing consequently will be enhanced through lower taxes. While this theory is exceedingly simple, it appears to explain several things. First, why ticket splitting has increased and taken the peculiar pattern that it has over the past half century: Prior to the election of Franklin Roosevelt as president and the advent of the New Deal, government occupied a much smaller role in society and the prisoner's dilemma problem confronting voters in races for Congress was considerably less severe. Second, it explains why voters hold Congress in disdain but generally love their own congressional representatives: Any individual legislator's constituents appreciate the specific benefits that the legislator wins for them but not the overall cost associated with every other legislator doing likewise for his own constituency. Third, the theory suggests why legislators who pay too much attention to national policy making relative to local benefit-seeking have lower security in office. For example, first-term - term <t>members</t> of the House, once the most vulnerable of incumbents, have become virtually immune to defeat. The one exception to this recent trend was the defeat of 13 of the 52 freshman Republicans brought into office in 1980 by the Reagan revolution and running for re-election in 1982.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=member%1:18:00:: | definition=one of the persons who compose a social group (especially individuals who have joined and participate in a group organization) | synonyms=fellow member | examples=only members will be admitted; a member of the faculty
2. sense_key=member%1:24:00:: | definition=anything that belongs to a set or class | examples=snakes are members of the class Reptilia; members of the opposite sex
3. sense_key=member%1:08:00:: | definition=an external body part that projects from the body | synonyms=extremity, appendage | examples=it is important to keep the extremities warm
4. sense_key=member%1:14:00:: | definition=an organization that is a member of another organization (especially a state that belongs to a group of nations) | examples=the library was a member of the interlibrary loan association; Canada is a member of the United Nations
5. sense_key=member%1:08:01:: | definition=the male organ of copulation (`member' is a euphemism) | synonyms=penis, phallus

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

reasoning_content:
*   Target lemma: `member`
    *   Target surface form: `members`
    *   Context: "For example, first-term - term <t>members</t> of the House, once the most vulnerable of incumbents, have become virtually immune to defeat."
    *   Candidate senses:
        1.  `member%1:18:00::`: one of the persons who compose a social group (especially individuals who have joined and participate in a group organization).
        2.  `member%1:24:00::`: anything that belongs to a set or class.
        3.  `member%1:08:00::`: an external body part that projects from the body.
        4.  `member%1:14:00::`: an organization that is a member of another organization.
        5.  `member%1:08:01::`: the male organ of copulation.

    *   The sentence refers to "first-term members of the House".
    *   "The House" refers to the House of Representatives (a legislative body).
    *   "Members of the House" are the individual legislators/representatives.
    *   These are people who belong to a social/political group/organization (the House).

    *   Sense 1: "one of the persons who compose a social group (especially individuals who have joined and participate in a group organization)". This fits perfectly.
    *   Sense 2: "anything that belongs to a set or class". This is too general. While a person is technically a member of a set, Sense 1 is more specific to people in organizations.
    *   Sense 3: "external body part". Incorrect.
    *   Sense 4: "an organization that is a member of another organization". Incorrect; these are individual people.
    *   Sense 5: "male organ". Incorrect.

    *   The target word "members" refers to the individual people serving in the House of Representatives.
    *   Sense 1 specifically describes persons who compose a social group or organization.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: vulnerable
Target surface form: vulnerable
Context:
The individual voter's standing consequently will be enhanced through lower taxes. While this theory is exceedingly simple, it appears to explain several things. First, why ticket splitting has increased and taken the peculiar pattern that it has over the past half century: Prior to the election of Franklin Roosevelt as president and the advent of the New Deal, government occupied a much smaller role in society and the prisoner's dilemma problem confronting voters in races for Congress was considerably less severe. Second, it explains why voters hold Congress in disdain but generally love their own congressional representatives: Any individual legislator's constituents appreciate the specific benefits that the legislator wins for them but not the overall cost associated with every other legislator doing likewise for his own constituency. Third, the theory suggests why legislators who pay too much attention to national policy making relative to local benefit-seeking have lower security in office. For example, first-term - term members of the House, once the most <t>vulnerable</t> of incumbents, have become virtually immune to defeat. The one exception to this recent trend was the defeat of 13 of the 52 freshman Republicans brought into office in 1980 by the Reagan revolution and running for re-election in 1982.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=vulnerable%3:00:00:: | definition=susceptible to attack | examples=a vulnerable bridge
2. sense_key=vulnerable%5:00:00:susceptible:00 | definition=susceptible to criticism or persuasion or temptation | examples=vulnerable to bribery; an argument vulnerable to refutation
3. sense_key=vulnerable%5:00:00:weak:00 | definition=capable of being wounded or hurt | examples=vulnerable parts of the body

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

reasoning_content:
*   Target word: "vulnerable"
    *   Context: "For example, first-term - term members of the House, once the most <t>vulnerable</t> of incumbents, have become virtually immune to defeat."
    *   Meaning in context: The text discusses legislators' security in office and their likelihood of being defeated in an election. "Vulnerable" here refers to the risk of losing an election (being defeated).

    *   Sense 1: `vulnerable%3:00:00::` | definition=susceptible to attack | examples=a vulnerable bridge. (Usually refers to physical or strategic attack).
    *   Sense 2: `vulnerable%5:00:00:susceptible:00` | definition=susceptible to criticism or persuasion or temptation | examples=vulnerable to bribery; an argument vulnerable to refutation. (Refers to psychological or logical susceptibility).
    *   Sense 3: `vulnerable%5:00:00:weak:00` | definition=capable of being wounded or hurt | examples=vulnerable parts of the body. (Refers to physical harm).

    *   The context is about political defeat ("immune to defeat").
    *   Is "defeat" in an election an "attack" (Sense 1)? In a political sense, yes, but Sense 1's example is a bridge.
    *   Is it "susceptible to criticism or persuasion" (Sense 2)? While criticism is part of it, the core meaning is the risk of losing the seat.
    *   Is it "capable of being wounded or hurt" (Sense 3)? This is usually physical.

    *Wait, let me re-evaluate the senses provided.*
    Sense 1: susceptible to attack.
    Sense 2: susceptible to criticism or persuasion or temptation.
    Sense 3: capable of being wounded or hurt.

    In political science, a "vulnerable incumbent" is one who is susceptible to being defeated (attacked by an opponent in an election).

    Let's look at the senses again.
    Sense 1: "susceptible to attack" (Example: a vulnerable bridge).
    Sense 2: "susceptible to criticism or persuasion or temptation" (Example: vulnerable to bribery).
    Sense 3: "capable of being wounded or hurt" (Example: vulnerable parts of the body).

    Comparing "susceptible to attack" (1) vs "susceptible to criticism" (2) vs "wounded or hurt" (3).
    Political defeat is often framed as a "political attack" or being "attacked" by an opponent. However, "susceptible to attack" in Sense 1 often implies physical or military attack.
    But Sense 2 is about bribery/persuasion/refutation.
    Sense 3 is about physical injury.

    Let's think about "vulnerable" in the context of elections. It means they are likely to lose.
    If I have to choose between 1, 2, and 3:
    1: Susceptible to attack.
    2: Susceptible to criticism/persuasion.
    3: Capable of being wounded/hurt.

    Actually, "susceptible to attack" (Sense 1) is the most common way to describe a political position that is open to challenge. Even though the example is a bridge, the core meaning "susceptible to attack" fits the concept of a political challenge better than "bribery" (Sense 2) or "physical wounds" (Sense 3).

    Let's double-check if there's a better fit.
    "vulnerable of incumbents... immune to defeat."
    Defeat is the result of a successful attack/challenge.

    Sense 1: susceptible to attack.
    Sense 2: susceptible to criticism or persuasion or temptation.
    Sense 3: capable of being wounded or hurt.

    If we look at WordNet's broader structure (though I only have these three), "vulnerable" often maps to "susceptible to attack" when referring to positions or people in a competitive environment.

    Let's re-read Sense 2: "susceptible to criticism or persuasion or temptation". This is more about internal weakness or being swayed.
    Sense 3: "capable of being wounded or hurt". This is physical.

    Therefore, Sense 1 ("susceptible to attack") is the best fit, as a political campaign is essentially an attack on the incumbent's record to cause their defeat.

    *Self-Correction:* Is "attack" too physical? In political contexts, "attack ads" and "attacking an opponent" are standard. A "vulnerable" candidate is one who is susceptible to these attacks.

    Sense 1: susceptible to attack.
    Sense 2: susceptible to criticism or persuasion or temptation.
    Sense 3: capable of being wounded or hurt.

    The context "immune to defeat" strongly parallels "susceptible to attack".

    Wait, let me look at Sense 2 again: "susceptible to criticism". Political defeat often comes from criticism. But "attack" is a broader and more fitting term for the overall process of losing an election.

    Let's check if "vulnerable" in "vulnerable incumbent" usually maps to "susceptible to attack".
    Yes, in many WSD datasets, "vulnerable" in a political context (likely to lose) is mapped to the sense of being open to attack/challenge.

    Final check:
    Sense 1: susceptible to attack.
    Sense 2: susceptible to criticism/persuasion/temptation.
    Sense 3: capable of being wounded/hurt.

    Sense 1 is the most appropriate.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: become
Target surface form: become
Context:
The individual voter's standing consequently will be enhanced through lower taxes. While this theory is exceedingly simple, it appears to explain several things. First, why ticket splitting has increased and taken the peculiar pattern that it has over the past half century: Prior to the election of Franklin Roosevelt as president and the advent of the New Deal, government occupied a much smaller role in society and the prisoner's dilemma problem confronting voters in races for Congress was considerably less severe. Second, it explains why voters hold Congress in disdain but generally love their own congressional representatives: Any individual legislator's constituents appreciate the specific benefits that the legislator wins for them but not the overall cost associated with every other legislator doing likewise for his own constituency. Third, the theory suggests why legislators who pay too much attention to national policy making relative to local benefit-seeking have lower security in office. For example, first-term - term members of the House, once the most vulnerable of incumbents, have <t>become</t> virtually immune to defeat. The one exception to this recent trend was the defeat of 13 of the 52 freshman Republicans brought into office in 1980 by the Reagan revolution and running for re-election in 1982.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=become%2:30:00:: | definition=enter or assume a certain state or condition | synonyms=go, get | examples=He became annoyed when he heard the bad news; It must be getting more serious
2. sense_key=become%2:42:01:: | definition=undergo a change or development | synonyms=turn | examples=The water turned into ice; Her former friend became her worst enemy
3. sense_key=become%2:42:00:: | definition=come into existence | examples=What becomes has duration
4. sense_key=become%2:42:03:: | definition=enhance the appearance of | synonyms=suit | examples=Mourning becomes Electra; This behavior doesn't suit you!

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

reasoning_content:
*   Target lemma: `become`
    *   Target surface form: `become`
    *   Context: "...first-term - term members of the House, once the most vulnerable of incumbents, have <t>become</t> virtually immune to defeat."
    *   Candidate senses:
        1.  `become%2:30:00::`: enter or assume a certain state or condition (e.g., "He became annoyed").
        2.  `become%2:42:01::`: undergo a change or development (e.g., "The water turned into ice").
        3.  `become%2:42:00::`: come into existence.
        4.  `become%2:42:03::`: enhance the appearance of (e.g., "Mourning becomes Electra").

    *   The sentence says: "...first-term members of the House... have become virtually immune to defeat."
    *   This means they have entered a state of being "virtually immune to defeat."
    *   It describes a change in state/condition (from being vulnerable to being immune).

    *   Sense 1: "enter or assume a certain state or condition". This fits perfectly. "Immune to defeat" is a state or condition.
    *   Sense 2: "undergo a change or development". This is similar, but usually implies a more fundamental transformation (like water to ice or friend to enemy).
    *   Sense 3: "come into existence". Not applicable.
    *   Sense 4: "enhance the appearance of". Not applicable.

    *   Sense 1 is the standard usage for "become [adjective]" (e.g., become annoyed, become immune).
    *   Sense 2 is more for "become [noun]" or a complete transformation.

    *   The target word "become" is followed by "virtually immune to defeat" (an adjective phrase).
    *   Sense 1: "enter or assume a certain state or condition" (Example: "He became annoyed"). This matches the pattern "become + adjective".


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: immune
Target surface form: immune
Context:
The individual voter's standing consequently will be enhanced through lower taxes. While this theory is exceedingly simple, it appears to explain several things. First, why ticket splitting has increased and taken the peculiar pattern that it has over the past half century: Prior to the election of Franklin Roosevelt as president and the advent of the New Deal, government occupied a much smaller role in society and the prisoner's dilemma problem confronting voters in races for Congress was considerably less severe. Second, it explains why voters hold Congress in disdain but generally love their own congressional representatives: Any individual legislator's constituents appreciate the specific benefits that the legislator wins for them but not the overall cost associated with every other legislator doing likewise for his own constituency. Third, the theory suggests why legislators who pay too much attention to national policy making relative to local benefit-seeking have lower security in office. For example, first-term - term members of the House, once the most vulnerable of incumbents, have become virtually <t>immune</t> to defeat. The one exception to this recent trend was the defeat of 13 of the 52 freshman Republicans brought into office in 1980 by the Reagan revolution and running for re-election in 1982.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=immune%3:01:00:: | definition=relating to the condition of immunity | examples=the immune system
2. sense_key=immune%5:00:00:exempt:00 | definition=secure against | examples=immune from taxation as long as he resided in Bermuda; immune from criminal prosecution
3. sense_key=immune%5:00:00:unsusceptible:00 | definition=relating to or conferring immunity (to disease or infection) | synonyms=resistant
4. sense_key=immune%5:00:00:unaffected:00 | definition=(usually followed by `to') not affected by a given influence | examples=immune to persuasion

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 4}
```

reasoning_content:
*   Target lemma: `immune`
    *   Target surface form: `immune`
    *   Context: "...first-term members of the House, once the most vulnerable of incumbents, have become virtually <t>immune</t> to defeat."
    *   Candidate senses:
        1.  `immune%3:01:00`: relating to the condition of immunity (e.g., immune system).
        2.  `immune%5:00:00:exempt:00`: secure against (e.g., immune from taxation, immune from criminal prosecution).
        3.  `immune%5:00:00:unsusceptible:00`: relating to or conferring immunity (to disease or infection) (synonym: resistant).
        4.  `immune%5:00:00:unaffected:00`: (usually followed by `to`) not affected by a given influence (e.g., immune to persuasion).

    *   The sentence says first-term members of the House have become "virtually immune to defeat."
    *   This means they are no longer vulnerable to losing their elections.
    *   It's not about biological immunity (Senses 1 and 3).
    *   It's not about legal exemption (Sense 2 - "immune from taxation").
    *   It's about being "not affected by" or "secure against" the possibility of defeat.

    *   Sense 2: "secure against" (examples: taxation, criminal prosecution).
    *   Sense 4: "not affected by a given influence" (example: persuasion).

    *   "Immune to defeat" means they are not susceptible to being defeated.
    *   Looking at Sense 4: "not affected by a given influence" (immune to persuasion). Defeat is an outcome, but the "influence" here is the electoral process or the risk of losing.
    *   Looking at Sense 2: "secure against" (immune from taxation). Being "secure against defeat" fits well.

    *Wait*, let's re-examine Sense 4: "not affected by a given influence".
    And Sense 2: "secure against".

    In the context of "immune to defeat", the person is not susceptible to the outcome of defeat.
    Comparing "immune from taxation" (Sense 2) and "immune to persuasion" (Sense 4).
    "Immune to defeat" is very similar to "immune to persuasion" in that it describes a state of being unaffected by a certain negative outcome or influence.

    Let's look at the WordNet definitions again:
    Sense 2: `exempt` - secure against.
    Sense 4: `unaffected` - not affected by a given influence.

    Is "defeat" an influence or is the person "exempt" from defeat? They aren't legally exempt from defeat; they are just very unlikely to be defeated. "Unaffected by" or "not susceptible to" fits better.

    Wait, let's look at Sense 4 again: "not affected by a given influence".
    Is "defeat" an influence? Not exactly.
    Is "defeat" something they are "secure against"? Yes.

    Let's check common usage. "Immune to criticism", "immune to defeat", "immune to pressure". These usually map to the "unaffected" sense.

    Let's re-evaluate Sense 2 vs Sense 4.
    Sense 2 (exempt): "immune from taxation", "immune from prosecution". These are usually legal or formal exemptions.
    Sense 4 (unaffected): "immune to persuasion", "immune to criticism". These are psychological or situational resistances.

    "Immune to defeat" is a situational resistance (they are so popular/secure that the risk of defeat doesn't affect them).

    Therefore, Sense 4 is the best fit.

    *   Sense 1: Biological (No)
    *   Sense 2: Legal/Formal exemption (No)
    *   Sense 3: Biological resistance (No)
    *   Sense 4: Unaffected by influence/outcome (Yes)

    Wait, let me double-check Sense 2 again. "Secure against".
    "Secure against defeat" is a very common phrase.
    But "immune to [something]" is the specific construction used in the text.
    Sense 4 specifically mentions "usually followed by 'to'".
    The text says "immune to defeat".

    Sense 2 examples use "from" ("immune from taxation", "immune from criminal prosecution").
    Sense 4 examples use "to" ("immune to persuasion").

    The target text uses "immune to defeat". This strongly points to Sense 4.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: defeat
Target surface form: defeat
Context:
The individual voter's standing consequently will be enhanced through lower taxes. While this theory is exceedingly simple, it appears to explain several things. First, why ticket splitting has increased and taken the peculiar pattern that it has over the past half century: Prior to the election of Franklin Roosevelt as president and the advent of the New Deal, government occupied a much smaller role in society and the prisoner's dilemma problem confronting voters in races for Congress was considerably less severe. Second, it explains why voters hold Congress in disdain but generally love their own congressional representatives: Any individual legislator's constituents appreciate the specific benefits that the legislator wins for them but not the overall cost associated with every other legislator doing likewise for his own constituency. Third, the theory suggests why legislators who pay too much attention to national policy making relative to local benefit-seeking have lower security in office. For example, first-term - term members of the House, once the most vulnerable of incumbents, have become virtually immune to <t>defeat</t>. The one exception to this recent trend was the defeat of 13 of the 52 freshman Republicans brought into office in 1980 by the Reagan revolution and running for re-election in 1982.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=defeat%1:11:00:: | definition=an unsuccessful ending to a struggle or contest | synonyms=licking | examples=it was a narrow defeat; the army's only defeat
2. sense_key=defeat%1:12:00:: | definition=the feeling that accompanies an experience of being thwarted in attaining your goals | synonyms=frustration

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

reasoning_content:
*   Target lemma: `defeat`
    *   Target surface form: `defeat`
    *   Context: "...first-term members of the House... have become virtually immune to <t>defeat</t>. The one exception to this recent trend was the defeat of 13 of the 52 freshman Republicans..."
    *   Candidate senses:
        1.  `defeat%1:11:00::`: an unsuccessful ending to a struggle or contest (synonyms: licking; examples: it was a narrow defeat; the army's only defeat).
        2.  `defeat%1:12:00::`: the feeling that accompanies an experience of being thwarted in attaining your goals (synonyms: frustration).

    *   The context discusses elections ("ticket splitting", "election of Franklin Roosevelt", "members of the House", "incumbents", "running for re-election").
    *   "immune to defeat" in the context of incumbents in the House refers to losing an election.
    *   "the defeat of 13 of the 52 freshman Republicans" refers to them losing their re-election bids.

    *   Sense 1: "an unsuccessful ending to a struggle or contest". An election is a contest. Losing an election is an unsuccessful ending to that contest.
    *   Sense 2: "the feeling that accompanies an experience of being thwarted... (frustration)". The context is not about the *feeling* of losing, but the *fact* of losing the election.

    *   Sense 1 is the correct fit.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: exception
Target surface form: exception
Context:
While this theory is exceedingly simple, it appears to explain several things. First, why ticket splitting has increased and taken the peculiar pattern that it has over the past half century: Prior to the election of Franklin Roosevelt as president and the advent of the New Deal, government occupied a much smaller role in society and the prisoner's dilemma problem confronting voters in races for Congress was considerably less severe. Second, it explains why voters hold Congress in disdain but generally love their own congressional representatives: Any individual legislator's constituents appreciate the specific benefits that the legislator wins for them but not the overall cost associated with every other legislator doing likewise for his own constituency. Third, the theory suggests why legislators who pay too much attention to national policy making relative to local benefit-seeking have lower security in office. For example, first-term - term members of the House, once the most vulnerable of incumbents, have become virtually immune to defeat. The one <t>exception</t> to this recent trend was the defeat of 13 of the 52 freshman Republicans brought into office in 1980 by the Reagan revolution and running for re-election in 1982. Because these freshmen placed far more emphasis on their partisan role -- spreading the Reagan revolution -- in national policy making, they were more vulnerable to defeat.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=exception%1:09:00:: | definition=a deliberate act of omission | synonyms=exclusion, elision | examples=with the exception of the children, everyone was told the news
2. sense_key=exception%1:09:01:: | definition=an instance that does not conform to a rule or generalization | examples=all her children were brilliant; the only exception was her last child; an exception tests the rule
3. sense_key=exception%1:10:00:: | definition=grounds for adverse criticism | examples=his authority is beyond exception

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 2}
```

reasoning_content:
*   Target lemma: `exception`
    *   Target surface form: `exception`
    *   Context: "The one <t>exception</t> to this recent trend was the defeat of 13 of the 52 freshman Republicans..."
    *   Candidate senses:
        1.  `exception%1:09:00::`: a deliberate act of omission (synonyms: exclusion, elision).
        2.  `exception%1:09:01::`: an instance that does not conform to a rule or generalization.
        3.  `exception%1:10:00::`: grounds for adverse criticism.

    *   The text discusses a "recent trend" (first-term members of the House becoming virtually immune to defeat).
    *   It then mentions "The one exception to this recent trend was the defeat of 13 of the 52 freshman Republicans...".
    *   In this context, "exception" refers to a specific case (the 1982 defeat of freshman Republicans) that does not follow the general rule or trend (immunity to defeat).

    *   Sense 1 (deliberate act of omission) doesn't fit.
    *   Sense 2 (instance that does not conform to a rule or generalization) fits perfectly. The "recent trend" is the generalization, and the 1982 defeat is the instance that doesn't conform.
    *   Sense 3 (grounds for adverse criticism) doesn't fit.

    *   Sense 2 is the correct choice.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: trend
Target surface form: trend
Context:
While this theory is exceedingly simple, it appears to explain several things. First, why ticket splitting has increased and taken the peculiar pattern that it has over the past half century: Prior to the election of Franklin Roosevelt as president and the advent of the New Deal, government occupied a much smaller role in society and the prisoner's dilemma problem confronting voters in races for Congress was considerably less severe. Second, it explains why voters hold Congress in disdain but generally love their own congressional representatives: Any individual legislator's constituents appreciate the specific benefits that the legislator wins for them but not the overall cost associated with every other legislator doing likewise for his own constituency. Third, the theory suggests why legislators who pay too much attention to national policy making relative to local benefit-seeking have lower security in office. For example, first-term - term members of the House, once the most vulnerable of incumbents, have become virtually immune to defeat. The one exception to this recent <t>trend</t> was the defeat of 13 of the 52 freshman Republicans brought into office in 1980 by the Reagan revolution and running for re-election in 1982. Because these freshmen placed far more emphasis on their partisan role -- spreading the Reagan revolution -- in national policy making, they were more vulnerable to defeat.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=trend%1:15:02:: | definition=a general direction in which something tends to move | synonyms=tendency | examples=the shoreward tendency of the current; the trend of the stock market
2. sense_key=trend%1:15:01:: | definition=general line of orientation | synonyms=course | examples=the river takes a southern course; the northeastern trend of the coast
3. sense_key=trend%1:09:00:: | definition=a general tendency to change (as of opinion) | synonyms=drift, movement | examples=not openly liberal but that is the trend of the book; a broad movement of the electorate to the right
4. sense_key=trend%1:09:02:: | definition=the popular taste at a given time | synonyms=vogue, style | examples=leather is the latest vogue; he followed current trends

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

raw_output:
```json
{"sense_index": 3}
```

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 3}
```

reasoning_content:
*   Target lemma: "trend"
    *   Context: "For example, first-term - term members of the House, once the most vulnerable of incumbents, have become virtually immune to defeat. The one exception to this recent <t>trend</t> was the defeat of 13 of the 52 freshman Republicans..."
    *   Meaning: The "trend" refers to the observation that first-term members of the House have become virtually immune to defeat. This is a general tendency or pattern of change in political outcomes over time.

    *   Sense 1: "a general direction in which something tends to move" (Synonym: tendency; Example: stock market).
    *   Sense 2: "general line of orientation" (Synonym: course; Example: river, coast).
    *   Sense 3: "a general tendency to change (as of opinion)" (Synonyms: drift, movement; Example: movement of the electorate to the right).
    *   Sense 4: "the popular taste at a given time" (Synonyms: vogue, style; Example: leather).

    *   Sense 2 (orientation/geography) is incorrect.
    *   Sense 4 (fashion/vogue) is incorrect.
    *   Sense 1 (general direction/tendency) and Sense 3 (general tendency to change, specifically mentioning the electorate/opinion) are close.
    *   The context describes a shift in the vulnerability of first-term members of the House (from vulnerable to immune). This is a change in a political pattern.
    *   Sense 3 specifically mentions "a general tendency to change (as of opinion)" and gives the example "a broad movement of the electorate to the right." This aligns very closely with the political context of the passage.
    *   Sense 1 is more general ("general direction in which something tends to move").

    *   The "trend" is that first-term members have become immune to defeat. This is a change in a political phenomenon.
    *   Sense 3's example "a broad movement of the electorate to the right" is almost a perfect parallel to "first-term members... have become virtually immune to defeat."

    *   Sense 1: General direction (stock market).
    *   Sense 3: Tendency to change (electorate/opinion).
    *   The context is about a change in the political landscape/behavior of voters/incumbents. Sense 3 is the most specific and fitting.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: defeat
Target surface form: defeat
Context:
While this theory is exceedingly simple, it appears to explain several things. First, why ticket splitting has increased and taken the peculiar pattern that it has over the past half century: Prior to the election of Franklin Roosevelt as president and the advent of the New Deal, government occupied a much smaller role in society and the prisoner's dilemma problem confronting voters in races for Congress was considerably less severe. Second, it explains why voters hold Congress in disdain but generally love their own congressional representatives: Any individual legislator's constituents appreciate the specific benefits that the legislator wins for them but not the overall cost associated with every other legislator doing likewise for his own constituency. Third, the theory suggests why legislators who pay too much attention to national policy making relative to local benefit-seeking have lower security in office. For example, first-term - term members of the House, once the most vulnerable of incumbents, have become virtually immune to defeat. The one exception to this recent trend was the <t>defeat</t> of 13 of the 52 freshman Republicans brought into office in 1980 by the Reagan revolution and running for re-election in 1982. Because these freshmen placed far more emphasis on their partisan role -- spreading the Reagan revolution -- in national policy making, they were more vulnerable to defeat.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=defeat%1:11:00:: | definition=an unsuccessful ending to a struggle or contest | synonyms=licking | examples=it was a narrow defeat; the army's only defeat
2. sense_key=defeat%1:12:00:: | definition=the feeling that accompanies an experience of being thwarted in attaining your goals | synonyms=frustration

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

reasoning_content:
*   Target lemma: `defeat`
    *   Target surface form: `defeat`
    *   Context: "...The one exception to this recent trend was the <t>defeat</t> of 13 of the 52 freshman Republicans brought into office in 1980 by the Reagan revolution and running for re-election in 1982."
    *   Candidate senses:
        1.  `defeat%1:11:00::`: an unsuccessful ending to a struggle or contest (synonyms: licking; examples: it was a narrow defeat; the army's only defeat).
        2.  `defeat%1:12:00::`: the feeling that accompanies an experience of being thwarted in attaining your goals (synonyms: frustration).

    *   The sentence discusses the "defeat of 13 of the 52 freshman Republicans" in an election.
    *   This refers to the outcome of an election (a contest), where they lost their seats.
    *   It does not refer to a feeling of frustration.

    *   Sense 1: "an unsuccessful ending to a struggle or contest". This fits perfectly with losing an election.
    *   Sense 2: "the feeling that accompanies an experience of being thwarted...". This does not fit.

    *   The correct sense is Sense 1.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: freshman
Target surface form: freshman
Context:
While this theory is exceedingly simple, it appears to explain several things. First, why ticket splitting has increased and taken the peculiar pattern that it has over the past half century: Prior to the election of Franklin Roosevelt as president and the advent of the New Deal, government occupied a much smaller role in society and the prisoner's dilemma problem confronting voters in races for Congress was considerably less severe. Second, it explains why voters hold Congress in disdain but generally love their own congressional representatives: Any individual legislator's constituents appreciate the specific benefits that the legislator wins for them but not the overall cost associated with every other legislator doing likewise for his own constituency. Third, the theory suggests why legislators who pay too much attention to national policy making relative to local benefit-seeking have lower security in office. For example, first-term - term members of the House, once the most vulnerable of incumbents, have become virtually immune to defeat. The one exception to this recent trend was the defeat of 13 of the 52 <t>freshman</t> Republicans brought into office in 1980 by the Reagan revolution and running for re-election in 1982. Because these freshmen placed far more emphasis on their partisan role -- spreading the Reagan revolution -- in national policy making, they were more vulnerable to defeat.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=freshman%1:18:00:: | definition=a first-year undergraduate | synonyms=fresher
2. sense_key=freshman%1:18:01:: | definition=any new participant in some activity | synonyms=newcomer, fledgling, fledgeling, starter, neophyte, newbie

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 2}
```

reasoning_content:
*   Target lemma: "freshman"
    *   Target surface form: "freshman"
    *   Context: "...the defeat of 13 of the 52 <t>freshman</t> Republicans brought into office in 1980 by the Reagan revolution and running for re-election in 1982. Because these freshmen placed far more emphasis on their partisan role..."
    *   Candidate senses:
        1.  `freshman%1:18:00`: a first-year undergraduate (fresher)
        2.  `freshman%1:18:01`: any new participant in some activity (newcomer, fledgling, etc.)

    *   The context refers to "freshman Republicans brought into office in 1980".
    *   These are members of the House of Representatives (politicians), not undergraduate students.
    *   They are "first-term members" (as mentioned earlier in the paragraph: "first-term - term members of the House").
    *   Therefore, "freshman" here means a new participant in the activity of serving in Congress.

    *   Sense 1 is specifically for undergraduate students.
    *   Sense 2 is a general term for any new participant in an activity.

    *   Sense 2 fits perfectly.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: republican
Target surface form: Republicans
Context:
While this theory is exceedingly simple, it appears to explain several things. First, why ticket splitting has increased and taken the peculiar pattern that it has over the past half century: Prior to the election of Franklin Roosevelt as president and the advent of the New Deal, government occupied a much smaller role in society and the prisoner's dilemma problem confronting voters in races for Congress was considerably less severe. Second, it explains why voters hold Congress in disdain but generally love their own congressional representatives: Any individual legislator's constituents appreciate the specific benefits that the legislator wins for them but not the overall cost associated with every other legislator doing likewise for his own constituency. Third, the theory suggests why legislators who pay too much attention to national policy making relative to local benefit-seeking have lower security in office. For example, first-term - term members of the House, once the most vulnerable of incumbents, have become virtually immune to defeat. The one exception to this recent trend was the defeat of 13 of the 52 freshman <t>Republicans</t> brought into office in 1980 by the Reagan revolution and running for re-election in 1982. Because these freshmen placed far more emphasis on their partisan role -- spreading the Reagan revolution -- in national policy making, they were more vulnerable to defeat.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=republican%1:18:01:: | definition=a member of the Republican Party
2. sense_key=republican%1:18:00:: | definition=an advocate of a republic (usually in opposition to a monarchy)
3. sense_key=republican%1:17:00:: | definition=a tributary of the Kansas River that flows from eastern Colorado eastward through Nebraska and Kansas | synonyms=Republican River

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

reasoning_content:
*   Target lemma: `republican`
    *   Target surface form: `Republicans`
    *   Context: "...the defeat of 13 of the 52 freshman Republicans brought into office in 1980 by the Reagan revolution and running for re-election in 1982."
    *   Candidate senses:
        1.  `republican%1:18:01::` - a member of the Republican Party
        2.  `republican%1:18:00::` - an advocate of a republic (usually in opposition to a monarchy)
        3.  `republican%1:17:00::` - a tributary of the Kansas River...

    *   The context mentions "freshman Republicans", "brought into office in 1980", "Reagan revolution", and "running for re-election in 1982".
    *   "Reagan revolution" refers to Ronald Reagan, the leader of the US Republican Party.
    *   "Brought into office" and "running for re-election" refer to political candidates/elected officials.
    *   Therefore, "Republicans" here refers to members of the Republican Party in the United States.

    *   Sense 1: "a member of the Republican Party" - Matches perfectly.
    *   Sense 2: "an advocate of a republic" - Too general; the context is specifically about the US political party.
    *   Sense 3: "a tributary of the Kansas River" - Completely irrelevant.

    *   The best sense is index 1.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: bring
Target surface form: brought
Context:
While this theory is exceedingly simple, it appears to explain several things. First, why ticket splitting has increased and taken the peculiar pattern that it has over the past half century: Prior to the election of Franklin Roosevelt as president and the advent of the New Deal, government occupied a much smaller role in society and the prisoner's dilemma problem confronting voters in races for Congress was considerably less severe. Second, it explains why voters hold Congress in disdain but generally love their own congressional representatives: Any individual legislator's constituents appreciate the specific benefits that the legislator wins for them but not the overall cost associated with every other legislator doing likewise for his own constituency. Third, the theory suggests why legislators who pay too much attention to national policy making relative to local benefit-seeking have lower security in office. For example, first-term - term members of the House, once the most vulnerable of incumbents, have become virtually immune to defeat. The one exception to this recent trend was the defeat of 13 of the 52 freshman Republicans <t>brought</t> into office in 1980 by the Reagan revolution and running for re-election in 1982. Because these freshmen placed far more emphasis on their partisan role -- spreading the Reagan revolution -- in national policy making, they were more vulnerable to defeat.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=bring%2:38:00:: | definition=take something or somebody with oneself somewhere | synonyms=convey, take | examples=Bring me the box from the other room; Take these letters to the boss
2. sense_key=bring%2:35:04:: | definition=cause to come into a particular state or condition | examples=Long hard years of on the job training had brought them to their competence; bring water to the boiling point
3. sense_key=bring%2:36:00:: | definition=cause to happen or to occur as a consequence | synonyms=work, play, wreak, make for | examples=I cannot work a miracle; wreak havoc
4. sense_key=bring%2:35:00:: | definition=go or come after and bring or take back | synonyms=get, convey, fetch | examples=Get me those books over there, please; Could you bring the wine?
5. sense_key=bring%2:30:00:: | definition=bring into a different state | synonyms=land | examples=this may land you in jail
6. sense_key=bring%2:35:02:: | definition=be accompanied by | examples=Can I bring my cousin to the dinner?
7. sense_key=bring%2:36:01:: | definition=advance or set forth in court; , | synonyms=institute | examples=bring charges; institute proceedings
8. sense_key=bring%2:40:02:: | definition=bestow a quality on | synonyms=lend, impart, bestow, contribute, add | examples=Her presence lends a certain cachet to the company; The music added a lot to the play
9. sense_key=bring%2:40:00:: | definition=be sold for a certain price | synonyms=fetch, bring in | examples=The painting brought $10,000; The old print fetched a high price at the auction
10. sense_key=bring%2:37:05:: | definition=attract the attention of | examples=The noise and the screaming brought the curious
11. sense_key=bring%2:32:03:: | definition=induce or persuade | examples=The confession of one of the accused brought the others to admit to the crime as well

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 2}
```

reasoning_content:
*   Target lemma: `bring`
    *   Target surface form: `brought`
    *   Context: "...the defeat of 13 of the 52 freshman Republicans <t>brought</t> into office in 1980 by the Reagan revolution..."
    *   Meaning: The Reagan revolution caused these freshman Republicans to be elected/placed into office.

    *   Sense 1: take something or somebody with oneself somewhere (convey, take). (Physical movement)
    *   Sense 2: cause to come into a particular state or condition. (Example: brought them to their competence).
    *   Sense 3: cause to happen or to occur as a consequence (work, play, wreak, make for). (Example: wreak havoc).
    *   Sense 4: go or come after and bring or take back (get, convey, fetch). (Physical movement)
    *   Sense 5: bring into a different state (land). (Example: land you in jail).
    *   Sense 6: be accompanied by. (Example: bring my cousin).
    *   Sense 7: advance or set forth in court (institute). (Example: bring charges).
    *   Sense 8: bestow a quality on (lend, impart). (Example: lends a certain cachet).
    *   Sense 9: be sold for a certain price (fetch). (Example: brought $10,000).
    *   Sense 10: attract the attention of. (Example: brought the curious).
    *   Sense 11: induce or persuade. (Example: brought the others to admit).

    *   The phrase is "brought into office".
    *   This means the Reagan revolution *caused* them to enter the state of being in office.
    *   Sense 2: "cause to come into a particular state or condition".
    *   Sense 3: "cause to happen or to occur as a consequence".
    *   Sense 5: "bring into a different state" (like "land you in jail").

    *   Sense 2 ("cause to come into a particular state or condition") fits well. Being "in office" is a state or condition.
    *   Sense 5 ("bring into a different state") is similar, but the example "land you in jail" is more about a sudden, often negative, transition.
    *   Sense 3 ("cause to happen or to occur as a consequence") usually refers to events (like "wreak havoc" or "work a miracle"), not people entering a state.

    *   "brought into office" $\approx$ "caused to enter the state of being in office".
    *   Sense 2: "cause to come into a particular state or condition".

    *   Sense 1: No (not physical transport).
    *   Sense 2: Yes (state of being in office).
    *   Sense 3: No (not an event occurring).
    *   Sense 4: No (not fetching).
    *   Sense 5: No (less fitting than 2).
    *   Sense 6: No.
    *   Sense 7: No.
    *   Sense 8: No.
    *   Sense 9: No.
    *   Sense 10: No.
    *   Sense 11: No.

    *   Sense 2: "cause to come into a particular state or condition".
    *   Example: "Long hard years of on the job training had brought them to their competence".
    *   Context: "freshman Republicans brought into office in 1980 by the Reagan revolution".
    *   The Reagan revolution (cause) $\rightarrow$ brought (caused to come into) $\rightarrow$ into office (state/condition).

    *   Wait, let me double-check Sense 5: "bring into a different state" (synonym: land). "Land you in jail".
    *   Is "into office" more like "into jail" (Sense 5) or "to their competence" (Sense 2)?
    *   "Land you in jail" is a very specific type of "bringing into a state".
    *   "Brought into office" is a common idiom. Let's look at Sense 2 again. "Cause to come into a particular state or condition". This is a broader and more accurate description of being elected to office.

    *   Sense 2: cause to come into a particular state or condition.
    *   Sense 5: bring into a different state (land).
    *   Comparing "brought them to their competence" (Sense 2) and "land you in jail" (Sense 5).
    *   "Brought into office" is very similar to "brought to power".
    *   Sense 2 seems the most general and fitting for "brought into office".

    *   Wait, let me re-read Sense 3: "cause to happen or to occur as a consequence".
    *   "The Reagan revolution brought [the Republicans] into office."
    *   Actually, looking at the structure: "the defeat of 13 of the 52 freshman Republicans [who were] brought into office in 1980 by the Reagan revolution".
    *   The "brought into office" part describes the Republicans.
    *   The Reagan revolution caused them to be in office.
    *   This is definitely "cause to come into a particular state or condition".

    *   Sense 2: cause to come into a particular state or condition.
    *   Sense 5: bring into a different state (land).
    *   If I have to choose the *best* one, Sense 2 is the standard definition for "bring someone to/into [a state]".

    *   Sense 2: "cause to come into a particular state or condition"
    *   Sense 5: "bring into a different state" (synonym: land)
    *   "Land" usually implies a result of an action (e.g., "that mistake landed him in jail").
    *   "Brought into office" is more about the result of a political movement.
    *   Sense 2 is a better fit.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: office
Target surface form: office
Context:
While this theory is exceedingly simple, it appears to explain several things. First, why ticket splitting has increased and taken the peculiar pattern that it has over the past half century: Prior to the election of Franklin Roosevelt as president and the advent of the New Deal, government occupied a much smaller role in society and the prisoner's dilemma problem confronting voters in races for Congress was considerably less severe. Second, it explains why voters hold Congress in disdain but generally love their own congressional representatives: Any individual legislator's constituents appreciate the specific benefits that the legislator wins for them but not the overall cost associated with every other legislator doing likewise for his own constituency. Third, the theory suggests why legislators who pay too much attention to national policy making relative to local benefit-seeking have lower security in office. For example, first-term - term members of the House, once the most vulnerable of incumbents, have become virtually immune to defeat. The one exception to this recent trend was the defeat of 13 of the 52 freshman Republicans brought into <t>office</t> in 1980 by the Reagan revolution and running for re-election in 1982. Because these freshmen placed far more emphasis on their partisan role -- spreading the Reagan revolution -- in national policy making, they were more vulnerable to defeat.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=office%1:06:00:: | definition=place of business where professional or clerical duties are performed | synonyms=business office | examples=he rented an office in the new building
2. sense_key=office%1:14:01:: | definition=an administrative unit of government | synonyms=agency, federal agency, government agency, bureau, authority | examples=the Central Intelligence Agency; the Census Bureau
3. sense_key=office%1:04:01:: | definition=the actions and activities assigned to or required or expected of a person or group | synonyms=function, part, role | examples=the function of a teacher; the government must do its part
4. sense_key=office%1:26:00:: | definition=(of a government or government official) holding an office means being in power | synonyms=power | examples=being in office already gives a candidate a great advantage; during his first year in office
5. sense_key=office%1:14:00:: | definition=professional or clerical workers in an office | synonyms=office staff | examples=the whole office was late the morning of the blizzard
6. sense_key=office%1:04:00:: | definition=a religious rite or service prescribed by ecclesiastical authorities | examples=the offices of the mass
7. sense_key=office%1:04:02:: | definition=a job in an organization | synonyms=position, post, berth, spot, billet, place | examples=he occupied a post in the treasury

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 4}
```

reasoning_content:
*   Target lemma: `office`
    *   Target surface form: `office`
    *   Context: "...the defeat of 13 of the 52 freshman Republicans brought into <t>office</t> in 1980 by the Reagan revolution and running for re-election in 1982."

    *   Sense 1: Place of business (physical location).
    *   Sense 2: Administrative unit of government (agency).
    *   Sense 3: Actions/activities assigned to a person (function/role).
    *   Sense 4: Holding power (being in office).
    *   Sense 5: Office staff (people).
    *   Sense 6: Religious rite.
    *   Sense 7: A job in an organization (position/post).

    *   The phrase is "brought into office".
    *   The context refers to "freshman Republicans" (elected officials) who were elected in 1980.
    *   "Brought into office" in this context means they were elected to their positions of power/authority.

    *   Sense 4: "(of a government or government official) holding an office means being in power". Example: "being in office already gives a candidate a great advantage".
    *   Sense 7: "a job in an organization". Synonyms: "position, post".

    *   "Brought into office" usually refers to the state of holding power or the act of assuming the position of authority.
    *   Comparing Sense 4 and Sense 7:
        *   Sense 4 focuses on the *state* of being in power (holding office).
        *   Sense 7 focuses on the *position* itself (the job).
    *   In the phrase "brought into office", "office" refers to the state of holding the elected position/power.
    *   Let's look at the examples for Sense 4: "being in office already gives a candidate a great advantage". This matches the context of elected officials.
    *   Let's look at the examples for Sense 7: "he occupied a post in the treasury". This is more about the specific job title/slot.

    *   "Brought into office" is a common idiom meaning elected to power.
    *   Sense 4 specifically mentions "government or government official" and "being in power".
    *   Sense 7 is more general ("job in an organization").

    *   Sense 4: holding an office means being in power.
    *   Sense 7: a job in an organization.
    *   The context is about elected politicians (Republicans) and their tenure/security in their roles. "Brought into office" refers to the transition to holding power.

    *   Wait, let's re-read Sense 4: "(of a government or government official) holding an office means being in power".
    *   Let's re-read Sense 7: "a job in an organization".
    *   "Brought into office" -> brought into the state of holding power.
    *   If I say "he was elected to office", I mean he was elected to a position of power.
    *   Looking at the provided senses again:
        *   Sense 4: `office%1:26:00` (power)
        *   Sense 7: `office%1:04:02` (position, post)
    *   In "brought into office", "office" is often used as an uncountable noun referring to the state of holding power.
    *   Example for Sense 4: "during his first year in office". This is very similar to "brought into office".

    *   Sense 4 is the most specific and accurate for elected government officials holding power.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: revolution
Target surface form: revolution
Context:
While this theory is exceedingly simple, it appears to explain several things. First, why ticket splitting has increased and taken the peculiar pattern that it has over the past half century: Prior to the election of Franklin Roosevelt as president and the advent of the New Deal, government occupied a much smaller role in society and the prisoner's dilemma problem confronting voters in races for Congress was considerably less severe. Second, it explains why voters hold Congress in disdain but generally love their own congressional representatives: Any individual legislator's constituents appreciate the specific benefits that the legislator wins for them but not the overall cost associated with every other legislator doing likewise for his own constituency. Third, the theory suggests why legislators who pay too much attention to national policy making relative to local benefit-seeking have lower security in office. For example, first-term - term members of the House, once the most vulnerable of incumbents, have become virtually immune to defeat. The one exception to this recent trend was the defeat of 13 of the 52 freshman Republicans brought into office in 1980 by the Reagan <t>revolution</t> and running for re-election in 1982. Because these freshmen placed far more emphasis on their partisan role -- spreading the Reagan revolution -- in national policy making, they were more vulnerable to defeat.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=revolution%1:11:01:: | definition=a drastic and far-reaching change in ways of thinking and behaving | examples=the industrial revolution was also a cultural revolution
2. sense_key=revolution%1:04:00:: | definition=the overthrow of a government by those who are governed
3. sense_key=revolution%1:11:00:: | definition=a single complete turn (axial or orbital) | synonyms=rotation, gyration | examples=the plane made three rotations before it crashed; the revolution of the earth about the sun takes one year

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

reasoning_content:
*   Target lemma: "revolution"
    *   Target surface form: "revolution"
    *   Context: "...the defeat of 13 of the 52 freshman Republicans brought into office in 1980 by the Reagan revolution and running for re-election in 1982. Because these freshmen placed far more emphasis on their partisan role -- spreading the Reagan revolution -- in national policy making..."
    *   Candidate senses:
        1.  `revolution%1:11:01::`: a drastic and far-reaching change in ways of thinking and behaving (e.g., industrial revolution).
        2.  `revolution%1:04:00::`: the overthrow of a government by those who are governed.
        3.  `revolution%1:11:00::`: a single complete turn (axial or orbital).

    *   The text refers to the "Reagan revolution."
    *   It discusses the election of 1980, the impact on national policy making, and the shift in the role of government.
    *   The "Reagan revolution" refers to the significant shift in political ideology and policy (conservative shift) that occurred during Ronald Reagan's presidency, not a violent overthrow of the government (sense 2) or a physical rotation (sense 3).
    *   Sense 1 describes a "drastic and far-reaching change in ways of thinking and behaving," which fits the concept of a political/ideological revolution (like the Industrial Revolution mentioned in the example).

    *   Sense 1: Drastic change in thinking/behaving. (Fits "Reagan revolution" as a shift in political paradigm).
    *   Sense 2: Overthrow of government. (Incorrect; Reagan was elected through a democratic process).
    *   Sense 3: Rotation. (Incorrect).

    *   The "Reagan revolution" is a well-known term for the shift toward neoliberalism and conservatism in the US. This is a change in "ways of thinking and behaving" (political ideology and governance).