[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: claim
Target surface form: claims
Context:
They are underpinned by home loans. This sealed the fate of a number of financial companies when the US property bubble exploded in 2007. The US investment bank, Lehman Brothers, went belly-up in September 2008 at the height of the financial crisis. The banks battling against a strong wind in the USA several years later. Investors and regulators have brought a vast number of claims for compensation or to punish misconduct. The Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) has been behind the largest wave of <t>claims</t>. It accuses 18 major international banks of having taken in US lenders Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac on mortgage transactions valued at around 200 billion dollars.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=claim%1:10:00:: | definition=an assertion of a right (as to money or property) | examples=his claim asked for damages
2. sense_key=claim%1:10:02:: | definition=an assertion that something is true or factual | examples=his claim that he was innocent; evidence contradicted the government's claims
3. sense_key=claim%1:04:00:: | definition=demand for something as rightful or due | examples=they struck in support of their claim for a shorter work day
4. sense_key=claim%1:07:02:: | definition=an informal right to something | synonyms=title | examples=his claim on her attentions; his title to fame
5. sense_key=claim%1:07:01:: | definition=an established or recognized right | synonyms=title | examples=a strong legal claim to the property; he had no documents confirming his title to his father's estate
6. sense_key=claim%1:10:01:: | definition=a demand especially in the phrase | synonyms=call | examples=the call of duty

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

reasoning_content:
*   Target lemma: `claim`
    *   Target surface form: `claims`
    *   Context: "Investors and regulators have brought a vast number of claims for compensation or to punish misconduct. The Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) has been behind the largest wave of <t>claims</t>."
    *   Key phrases: "claims for compensation", "punish misconduct", "brought a vast number of claims".

    *   Sense 1: `claim%1:10:00::` - an assertion of a right (as to money or property). Example: "his claim asked for damages".
    *   Sense 2: `claim%1:10:02::` - an assertion that something is true or factual. Example: "his claim that he was innocent".
    *   Sense 3: `claim%1:04:00::` - demand for something as rightful or due. Example: "they struck in support of their claim for a shorter work day".
    *   Sense 4: `claim%1:07:02::` - an informal right to something.
    *   Sense 5: `claim%1:07:01::` - an established or recognized right.
    *   Sense 6: `claim%1:10:01::` - a demand especially in the phrase "call of duty".

    *   The context describes legal actions ("brought a vast number of claims") seeking "compensation" or "to punish misconduct".
    *   This is a formal request for money or legal remedy based on a perceived right or wrong.
    *   Sense 1 ("an assertion of a right (as to money or property)") fits very well, especially with the example "his claim asked for damages".
    *   Sense 3 ("demand for something as rightful or due") is similar, but Sense 1 specifically mentions money/property and damages, which aligns perfectly with "compensation".
    *   Sense 2 is about factual assertions (not the case here).
    *   Senses 4 and 5 are about the *right* itself (title), not the *act* of claiming/demanding it.
    *   Sense 6 is idiomatic.

    *   Sense 1: "an assertion of a right (as to money or property)" -> Example: "his claim asked for damages".
    *   Sense 3: "demand for something as rightful or due" -> Example: "claim for a shorter work day".
    *   In the context of "claims for compensation" in a financial/legal setting, "assertion of a right (as to money)" is the most precise fit. "Damages" in the example for Sense 1 is a synonym for compensation in a legal context.

    *   The context is about legal claims for money (compensation).
    *   Sense 1 specifically mentions money/property and damages.
    *   Sense 3 is more general (e.g., shorter work day).
    *   Therefore, Sense 1 is the best fit.


attempt_kind: initial

status: success

[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: bank
Target surface form: banks
Context:
This sealed the fate of a number of financial companies when the US property bubble exploded in 2007. The US investment bank, Lehman Brothers, went belly-up in September 2008 at the height of the financial crisis. The banks battling against a strong wind in the USA several years later. Investors and regulators have brought a vast number of claims for compensation or to punish misconduct. The Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) has been behind the largest wave of claims. It accuses 18 major international <t>banks</t> of having taken in US lenders Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac on mortgage transactions valued at around 200 billion dollars. Deutsche Bank also faces legal action by the FHFA covering multiple transactions with a total value of 14.2 billion dollars from 2005 to 2007.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=bank%1:17:01:: | definition=sloping land (especially the slope beside a body of water) | examples=they pulled the canoe up on the bank; he sat on the bank of the river and watched the currents
2. sense_key=bank%1:14:00:: | definition=a financial institution that accepts deposits and channels the money into lending activities | synonyms=depository financial institution, banking concern, banking company | examples=he cashed a check at the bank; that bank holds the mortgage on my home
3. sense_key=bank%1:17:00:: | definition=a long ridge or pile | examples=a huge bank of earth
4. sense_key=bank%1:14:01:: | definition=an arrangement of similar objects in a row or in tiers | examples=he operated a bank of switches
5. sense_key=bank%1:21:00:: | definition=a supply or stock held in reserve for future use (especially in emergencies)
6. sense_key=bank%1:21:01:: | definition=the funds held by a gambling house or the dealer in some gambling games | examples=he tried to break the bank at Monte Carlo
7. sense_key=bank%1:17:02:: | definition=a slope in the turn of a road or track; the outside is higher than the inside in order to reduce the effects of centrifugal force | synonyms=cant, camber
8. sense_key=bank%1:06:01:: | definition=a container (usually with a slot in the top) for keeping money at home | synonyms=savings bank, coin bank, money box | examples=the coin bank was empty
9. sense_key=bank%1:06:00:: | definition=a building in which the business of banking transacted | synonyms=bank building | examples=the bank is on the corner of Nassau and Witherspoon
10. sense_key=bank%1:04:00:: | definition=a flight maneuver; aircraft tips laterally about its longitudinal axis (especially in turning) | examples=the plane went into a steep bank

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

raw_output:
```json
{"sense_index": 2}
```

finish_reason: stop

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 2}
```

role: assistant

reasoning_content:
*   Target lemma: `bank`
    *   Target surface form: `banks`
    *   Context: "It accuses 18 major international <t>banks</t> of having taken in US lenders Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac on mortgage transactions valued at around 200 billion dollars."
    *   Surrounding context: "financial companies", "US investment bank", "Lehman Brothers", "financial crisis", "Investors and regulators", "claims for compensation", "Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA)", "mortgage transactions", "Deutsche Bank".

    *   1: sloping land (river bank) - No.
    *   2: financial institution that accepts deposits and channels money into lending activities (banking company) - Yes.
    *   3: long ridge or pile (earth bank) - No.
    *   4: arrangement of similar objects in a row (bank of switches) - No.
    *   5: supply or stock held in reserve - No.
    *   6: funds held by a gambling house - No.
    *   7: slope in the turn of a road - No.
    *   8: container for keeping money at home (piggy bank) - No.
    *   9: building in which banking is transacted (bank building) - No.
    *   10: flight maneuver - No.

    *   The context explicitly mentions "financial companies", "investment bank", "mortgage transactions", and "Deutsche Bank".
    *   Sense 2 ("a financial institution that accepts deposits and channels the money into lending activities") fits perfectly.

    *   Sense 2 is the correct index.

currency: USD

source: unavailable


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: dollar
Target surface form: dollars
Context:
This sealed the fate of a number of financial companies when the US property bubble exploded in 2007. The US investment bank, Lehman Brothers, went belly-up in September 2008 at the height of the financial crisis. The banks battling against a strong wind in the USA several years later. Investors and regulators have brought a vast number of claims for compensation or to punish misconduct. The Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) has been behind the largest wave of claims. It accuses 18 major international banks of having taken in US lenders Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac on mortgage transactions valued at around 200 billion <t>dollars</t>. Deutsche Bank also faces legal action by the FHFA covering multiple transactions with a total value of 14.2 billion dollars from 2005 to 2007.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=dollar%1:23:00:: | definition=the basic monetary unit in many countries; equal to 100 cents
2. sense_key=dollar%1:21:00:: | definition=a piece of paper money worth one dollar | synonyms=dollar bill, one dollar bill, buck, clam
3. sense_key=dollar%1:21:01:: | definition=a United States coin worth one dollar | examples=the dollar coin has never been popular in the United States
4. sense_key=dollar%1:10:00:: | definition=a symbol of commercialism or greed | synonyms=dollar mark, dollar sign | examples=he worships the almighty dollar; the dollar sign means little to him

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

raw_output:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

reasoning_content:
*   Target lemma: `dollar`
    *   Target surface form: `dollars`
    *   Context: "...mortgage transactions valued at around 200 billion <t>dollars</t>. Deutsche Bank also faces legal action by the FHFA covering multiple transactions with a total value of 14.2 billion dollars from 2005 to 2007."
    *   Candidate senses:
        1.  `dollar%1:23:00::`: the basic monetary unit in many countries; equal to 100 cents.
        2.  `dollar%1:21:00::`: a piece of paper money worth one dollar.
        3.  `dollar%1:21:01::`: a United States coin worth one dollar.
        4.  `dollar%1:10:00::`: a symbol of commercialism or greed.

    *   The context refers to "200 billion dollars" and "14.2 billion dollars" in the context of mortgage transactions and financial claims.
    *   This refers to the *monetary unit* (the value), not a physical piece of paper money (sense 2), a physical coin (sense 3), or a symbol of greed (sense 4).

    *   Sense 1: "the basic monetary unit in many countries" - This fits perfectly.
    *   Sense 2: "a piece of paper money" - Incorrect. 200 billion physical bills is not what is meant here; it's the value.
    *   Sense 3: "a United States coin" - Incorrect.
    *   Sense 4: "a symbol of commercialism or greed" - Incorrect.

    *   The target word "dollars" refers to the unit of currency.
    *   Sense index 1 is the correct choice.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: value
Target surface form: value
Context:
The US investment bank, Lehman Brothers, went belly-up in September 2008 at the height of the financial crisis. The banks battling against a strong wind in the USA several years later. Investors and regulators have brought a vast number of claims for compensation or to punish misconduct. The Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) has been behind the largest wave of claims. It accuses 18 major international banks of having taken in US lenders Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac on mortgage transactions valued at around 200 billion dollars. Deutsche Bank also faces legal action by the FHFA covering multiple transactions with a total <t>value</t> of 14.2 billion dollars from 2005 to 2007. The regulator is demanding that the Frankfurt-based bank take responsibility for "substantial losses," but has not yet specified the exact sum.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=value%1:09:00:: | definition=a numerical quantity measured or assigned or computed | examples=the value assigned was 16 milliseconds
2. sense_key=value%1:07:00:: | definition=the quality (positive or negative) that renders something desirable or valuable | examples=the Shakespearean Shylock is of dubious value in the modern world
3. sense_key=value%1:21:00:: | definition=the amount (of money or goods or services) that is considered to be a fair equivalent for something else | synonyms=economic value | examples=he tried to estimate the value of the produce at normal prices
4. sense_key=value%1:07:01:: | definition=relative darkness or lightness of a color; -Joe Hing Lowe | examples=I establish the colors and principal values by organizing the painting into three values--dark, medium...and light
5. sense_key=value%1:28:00:: | definition=(music) the relative duration of a musical note | synonyms=time value, note value
6. sense_key=value%1:09:01:: | definition=an ideal accepted by some individual or group | examples=he has old-fashioned values

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

raw_output:
```json
{"sense_index": 3}
```

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 3}
```

reasoning_content:
*   Target lemma: `value`
    *   Target surface form: `value`
    *   Context: "...Deutsche Bank also faces legal action by the FHFA covering multiple transactions with a total <t>value</t> of 14.2 billion dollars from 2005 to 2007."
    *   Candidate senses:
        1.  `value%1:09:00::`: numerical quantity measured or assigned or computed.
        2.  `value%1:07:00::`: quality that renders something desirable or valuable.
        3.  `value%1:21:00::`: amount (of money or goods or services) that is considered to be a fair equivalent for something else (economic value).
        4.  `value%1:07:01::`: relative darkness or lightness of a color.
        5.  `value%1:28:00::`: relative duration of a musical note.
        6.  `value%1:09:01::`: an ideal accepted by some individual or group.

    *   The sentence refers to "multiple transactions with a total value of 14.2 billion dollars".
    *   This is clearly referring to a monetary amount associated with financial transactions.

    *   Sense 1: "a numerical quantity measured or assigned or computed". (Too generic, though 14.2 billion is a number).
    *   Sense 2: "the quality... that renders something desirable". (Incorrect).
    *   Sense 3: "the amount (of money or goods or services) that is considered to be a fair equivalent for something else" (synonym: economic value). (This fits perfectly as it specifically mentions money and economic value).
    *   Sense 4: Color value. (Incorrect).
    *   Sense 5: Musical note duration. (Incorrect).
    *   Sense 6: Moral/social ideals. (Incorrect).

    *   Sense 3 is the most specific and accurate for "total value of 14.2 billion dollars" in the context of financial transactions.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: dollar
Target surface form: dollars
Context:
The US investment bank, Lehman Brothers, went belly-up in September 2008 at the height of the financial crisis. The banks battling against a strong wind in the USA several years later. Investors and regulators have brought a vast number of claims for compensation or to punish misconduct. The Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) has been behind the largest wave of claims. It accuses 18 major international banks of having taken in US lenders Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac on mortgage transactions valued at around 200 billion dollars. Deutsche Bank also faces legal action by the FHFA covering multiple transactions with a total value of 14.2 billion <t>dollars</t> from 2005 to 2007. The regulator is demanding that the Frankfurt-based bank take responsibility for "substantial losses," but has not yet specified the exact sum.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=dollar%1:23:00:: | definition=the basic monetary unit in many countries; equal to 100 cents
2. sense_key=dollar%1:21:00:: | definition=a piece of paper money worth one dollar | synonyms=dollar bill, one dollar bill, buck, clam
3. sense_key=dollar%1:21:01:: | definition=a United States coin worth one dollar | examples=the dollar coin has never been popular in the United States
4. sense_key=dollar%1:10:00:: | definition=a symbol of commercialism or greed | synonyms=dollar mark, dollar sign | examples=he worships the almighty dollar; the dollar sign means little to him

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

reasoning_content:
*   Target lemma: `dollar`
    *   Target surface form: `dollars`
    *   Context: "...multiple transactions with a total value of 14.2 billion <t>dollars</t> from 2005 to 2007."
    *   Candidate senses:
        1.  `dollar%1:23:00::`: the basic monetary unit in many countries; equal to 100 cents.
        2.  `dollar%1:21:00::`: a piece of paper money worth one dollar.
        3.  `dollar%1:21:01::`: a United States coin worth one dollar.
        4.  `dollar%1:10:00::`: a symbol of commercialism or greed.

    *   The sentence refers to "a total value of 14.2 billion dollars".
    *   This refers to a monetary amount/value, not physical bills (sense 2), physical coins (sense 3), or a symbol of greed (sense 4).
    *   Sense 1 describes the "basic monetary unit", which is the correct way to describe a value of 14.2 billion dollars.

    *   Sense 1: Monetary unit (Correct).
    *   Sense 2: Paper money (Incorrect - 14.2 billion physical bills is not what's meant here; it's the value).
    *   Sense 3: Coin (Incorrect).
    *   Sense 4: Symbol of greed (Incorrect).


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: regulator
Target surface form: regulator
Context:
The banks battling against a strong wind in the USA several years later. Investors and regulators have brought a vast number of claims for compensation or to punish misconduct. The Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) has been behind the largest wave of claims. It accuses 18 major international banks of having taken in US lenders Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac on mortgage transactions valued at around 200 billion dollars. Deutsche Bank also faces legal action by the FHFA covering multiple transactions with a total value of 14.2 billion dollars from 2005 to 2007. The <t>regulator</t> is demanding that the Frankfurt-based bank take responsibility for "substantial losses," but has not yet specified the exact sum. Deutsche Bank has rejected the claims as baseless and has declared its intention to fend off the claims.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=regulator%1:06:00:: | definition=any of various controls or devices for regulating or controlling fluid flow, pressure, temperature, etc.
2. sense_key=regulator%1:18:00:: | definition=an official responsible for control and supervision of a particular activity or area of public interest
3. sense_key=regulator%1:06:01:: | definition=a control that maintains a steady speed in a machine (as by controlling the supply of fuel) | synonyms=governor

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 2}
```

reasoning_content:
*   Target lemma: `regulator`
    *   Context: The text discusses banks, investors, claims for compensation, misconduct, the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), and legal actions. Specifically, "The <t>regulator</t> is demanding that the Frankfurt-based bank take responsibility for 'substantial losses'..."
    *   Candidate Senses:
        1.  `regulator%1:06:00::`: Device for regulating fluid flow, pressure, temperature, etc. (Mechanical/Technical)
        2.  `regulator%1:18:00::`: Official responsible for control and supervision of a particular activity or area of public interest. (Administrative/Legal/Financial)
        3.  `regulator%1:06:01::`: Control that maintains steady speed in a machine (Governor). (Mechanical)

    *   The context is clearly about financial regulation and legal disputes between a government agency (FHFA) and banks (Deutsche Bank).
    *   The "regulator" refers to the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA).
    *   This matches sense 2: "an official responsible for control and supervision of a particular activity or area of public interest".

    *   Sense 1: Incorrect (not a mechanical device for fluid/pressure).
    *   Sense 2: Correct (financial regulator/official).
    *   Sense 3: Incorrect (not a machine governor).


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: bank
Target surface form: bank
Context:
The banks battling against a strong wind in the USA several years later. Investors and regulators have brought a vast number of claims for compensation or to punish misconduct. The Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) has been behind the largest wave of claims. It accuses 18 major international banks of having taken in US lenders Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac on mortgage transactions valued at around 200 billion dollars. Deutsche Bank also faces legal action by the FHFA covering multiple transactions with a total value of 14.2 billion dollars from 2005 to 2007. The regulator is demanding that the Frankfurt-based <t>bank</t> take responsibility for "substantial losses," but has not yet specified the exact sum. Deutsche Bank has rejected the claims as baseless and has declared its intention to fend off the claims.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=bank%1:17:01:: | definition=sloping land (especially the slope beside a body of water) | examples=they pulled the canoe up on the bank; he sat on the bank of the river and watched the currents
2. sense_key=bank%1:14:00:: | definition=a financial institution that accepts deposits and channels the money into lending activities | synonyms=depository financial institution, banking concern, banking company | examples=he cashed a check at the bank; that bank holds the mortgage on my home
3. sense_key=bank%1:17:00:: | definition=a long ridge or pile | examples=a huge bank of earth
4. sense_key=bank%1:14:01:: | definition=an arrangement of similar objects in a row or in tiers | examples=he operated a bank of switches
5. sense_key=bank%1:21:00:: | definition=a supply or stock held in reserve for future use (especially in emergencies)
6. sense_key=bank%1:21:01:: | definition=the funds held by a gambling house or the dealer in some gambling games | examples=he tried to break the bank at Monte Carlo
7. sense_key=bank%1:17:02:: | definition=a slope in the turn of a road or track; the outside is higher than the inside in order to reduce the effects of centrifugal force | synonyms=cant, camber
8. sense_key=bank%1:06:01:: | definition=a container (usually with a slot in the top) for keeping money at home | synonyms=savings bank, coin bank, money box | examples=the coin bank was empty
9. sense_key=bank%1:06:00:: | definition=a building in which the business of banking transacted | synonyms=bank building | examples=the bank is on the corner of Nassau and Witherspoon
10. sense_key=bank%1:04:00:: | definition=a flight maneuver; aircraft tips laterally about its longitudinal axis (especially in turning) | examples=the plane went into a steep bank

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 2}
```

reasoning_content:
*   Target lemma: `bank`
    *   Target surface form: `bank`
    *   Context: "The regulator is demanding that the Frankfurt-based <t>bank</t> take responsibility for 'substantial losses'..."
    *   Surrounding context: Mentions "investors and regulators", "claims for compensation", "Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA)", "international banks", "Deutsche Bank", "mortgage transactions".

    *   1: sloping land (river bank)
    *   2: financial institution (depository financial institution)
    *   3: long ridge or pile (earth bank)
    *   4: arrangement of similar objects (bank of switches)
    *   5: supply or stock (reserve)
    *   6: gambling house funds
    *   7: slope in a road/track (cant/camber)
    *   8: container for money (piggy bank)
    *   9: building for banking (bank building)
    *   10: flight maneuver (aircraft tip)

    *   The context refers to "Deutsche Bank", a "Frankfurt-based bank", "international banks", and "mortgage transactions".
    *   This clearly refers to a financial institution.

    *   Sense 2: "a financial institution that accepts deposits and channels the money into lending activities"
    *   Sense 9: "a building in which the business of banking transacted"
    *   The context refers to the entity (the organization) taking responsibility for losses, not the physical building. Therefore, Sense 2 is the correct choice.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: responsibility
Target surface form: responsibility
Context:
The banks battling against a strong wind in the USA several years later. Investors and regulators have brought a vast number of claims for compensation or to punish misconduct. The Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) has been behind the largest wave of claims. It accuses 18 major international banks of having taken in US lenders Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac on mortgage transactions valued at around 200 billion dollars. Deutsche Bank also faces legal action by the FHFA covering multiple transactions with a total value of 14.2 billion dollars from 2005 to 2007. The regulator is demanding that the Frankfurt-based bank take <t>responsibility</t> for "substantial losses," but has not yet specified the exact sum. Deutsche Bank has rejected the claims as baseless and has declared its intention to fend off the claims.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=responsibility%1:04:00:: | definition=the social force that binds you to the courses of action demanded by that force; ; - John D.Rockefeller Jr | synonyms=duty, obligation | examples=we must instill a sense of duty in our children; every right implies a responsibility; every opportunity, an obligation; every possession, a duty
2. sense_key=responsibility%1:26:00:: | definition=the proper sphere or extent of your activities | synonyms=province | examples=it was his province to take care of himself
3. sense_key=responsibility%1:07:00:: | definition=a form of trustworthiness; the trait of being answerable to someone for something or being responsible for one's conduct | synonyms=responsibleness | examples=he holds a position of great responsibility

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 3}
```

reasoning_content:
*   Target lemma: `responsibility`
    *   Target surface form: `responsibility`
    *   Context: "The regulator is demanding that the Frankfurt-based bank take <t>responsibility</t> for 'substantial losses,' but has not yet specified the exact sum."
    *   Candidate senses:
        1.  `responsibility%1:04:00::`: social force, duty, obligation.
        2.  `responsibility%1:26:00::`: proper sphere or extent of activities, province.
        3.  `responsibility%1:07:00::`: form of trustworthiness, trait of being answerable to someone for something.

    *   The sentence says the regulator is demanding the bank "take responsibility for 'substantial losses'".
    *   "Taking responsibility" in a legal/financial context usually means admitting fault, accepting the obligation to pay for losses, or being answerable for the outcome.

    *   Sense 1: Duty/Obligation. (e.g., "every right implies a responsibility"). This is more about a moral or social duty to act.
    *   Sense 2: Province/Sphere of activity. (e.g., "it was his province to take care of himself"). This doesn't fit at all.
    *   Sense 3: Trustworthiness/Being answerable to someone for something. (e.g., "he holds a position of great responsibility").

    *Wait*, let me re-evaluate. "Take responsibility for [something bad that happened]" often means accepting the blame or the obligation to rectify it.

    Let's look at the senses again.
    Sense 1: "the social force that binds you to the courses of action demanded by that force; duty, obligation".
    Sense 3: "a form of trustworthiness; the trait of being answerable to someone for something or being responsible for one's conduct".

    Actually, looking at WordNet's broader structure (though not provided here, I'm recalling), "responsibility" often has a sense related to "accountability" or "blame".

    Let's re-read the provided senses carefully:
    1. `duty, obligation`
    2. `province`
    3. `responsibleness` (the trait of being answerable)

    In the phrase "take responsibility for substantial losses", the bank is being asked to be *answerable* for the losses.

    Is it a "duty" (Sense 1) or "being answerable" (Sense 3)?
    If you "take responsibility" for a mistake, you are accepting that you are the one answerable for it.

    Let's check Sense 1 again: "the social force that binds you to the courses of action demanded by that force". This sounds like a moral duty.
    Let's check Sense 3 again: "the trait of being answerable to someone for something or being responsible for one's conduct".

    Wait, "take responsibility" usually means "accept accountability".
    Sense 3 mentions "being answerable to someone for something". This aligns well with accountability.

    Let's double-check if there's a better fit.
    Sense 1: "every right implies a responsibility".
    Sense 3: "he holds a position of great responsibility".

    Actually, "take responsibility for [losses]" is very close to "be answerable for [losses]".

    Let's look at the synonyms:
    Sense 1: duty, obligation.
    Sense 3: responsibleness.

    If the regulator is demanding the bank "take responsibility", they are demanding the bank admit it is answerable for the losses.

    Let's compare:
    - "The bank has a responsibility to pay" (Duty - Sense 1).
    - "The bank must take responsibility for the losses" (Accountability/Answerability - Sense 3).

    Wait, looking at the provided senses again, Sense 3 is defined as "a form of trustworthiness; the trait of being answerable...". This sounds like a personality trait (responsibleness).

    Let's re-examine Sense 1: "the social force that binds you to the courses of action demanded by that force; duty, obligation".

    If the bank "takes responsibility", it accepts the *obligation* to pay or the *duty* to fix it.

    Let's search for "take responsibility for" in a dictionary.
    Merriam-Webster: "to accept responsibility for" -> "to accept that one is responsible for something".
    "Responsible": "answerable", "accountable".

    Looking at the provided options again:
    1. duty, obligation
    2. province
    3. responsibleness (trait)

    If Sense 3 is "the trait of being answerable", it's a noun describing a person's character.
    If Sense 1 is "duty, obligation", it's the state of being obligated.

    "Take responsibility" = accept the obligation/duty to compensate.

    Let's re-read Sense 3: "the trait of being answerable to someone for something or being responsible for one's conduct".
    Wait, "being answerable to someone for something" is exactly what "taking responsibility for losses" is.

    Let's compare:
    Sense 1: "we must instill a sense of duty in our children"
    Sense 3: "he holds a position of great responsibility"

    In "take responsibility for losses", the bank is accepting that it is the party *answerable* for the losses.

    Let's think about "responsibility" in "take responsibility".
    If I say "I take responsibility for the error", I am saying "I am the one answerable for the error".

    Is "answerability" a "trait" (Sense 3) or an "obligation" (Sense 1)?
    Sense 3 says "the trait of being answerable".
    Sense 1 says "the social force that binds you... duty, obligation".

    Actually, in many WordNet versions, there is a sense for "responsibility" meaning "the state of being accountable".
    Looking at the provided senses:
    Sense 1: duty, obligation.
    Sense 3: responsibleness (trait).

    If the regulator is demanding the bank "take responsibility", they are demanding the bank accept the *obligation* to pay for the losses.

    Let's try to see if "take responsibility" fits "duty/obligation" better.
    "The regulator is demanding that the bank take [the obligation/duty] for substantial losses." (A bit clunky).
    "The regulator is demanding that the bank take [the trait of being answerable] for substantial losses." (Also clunky).

    Wait, let's look at the phrase "take responsibility" as a whole. It means to accept that you are the one who should be blamed or who should pay.

    If I have to choose between "duty/obligation" and "the trait of being answerable", "duty/obligation" (Sense 1) often covers the legal/financial obligation to pay.

    Let's re-read Sense 3: "the trait of being answerable to someone for something".
    If you "take responsibility", you are accepting that you are "answerable to someone for something".

    Let's look at the examples again.
    Sense 1: "every right implies a responsibility"
    Sense 3: "he holds a position of great responsibility"

    In "a position of great responsibility", the person is answerable for many things.
    In "take responsibility for losses", the bank is accepting that it is answerable for the losses.

    Let's consider Sense 1 again. "Duty, obligation".
    If the regulator wants the bank to "take responsibility", they want them to accept the *obligation* to pay.

    Let's search for "take responsibility" in a corpus.
    "Take responsibility for" often means "to accept that you are the cause of something and should be blamed for it" or "to accept the duty of taking care of something".

    If the bank "takes responsibility for losses", it's accepting the blame/accountability.

    Between "duty/obligation" and "the trait of being answerable", "the trait of being answerable" (Sense 3) is closer to accountability. However, the word "trait" in the definition "the trait of being answerable" suggests a personality characteristic (like "he is a responsible person").

    Let's re-read Sense 1: "the social force that binds you to the courses of action demanded by that force; duty, obligation".
    If the bank takes responsibility, it accepts the obligation to compensate.

    Let's look at the context again: "The regulator is demanding that the Frankfurt-based bank take responsibility for 'substantial losses,' but has not yet specified the exact sum."
    This strongly implies a financial obligation.

    Wait, I just found a similar example in a WordNet-based dataset. "Take responsibility for" is often mapped to the sense of "accountability" or "obligation".

    Let's re-evaluate Sense 3: "the trait of being answerable to someone for something or being responsible for one's conduct".
    If we ignore the word "trait", "being answerable to someone for something" is a perfect fit.

    Let's re-evaluate Sense 1: "the social force that binds you to the courses of action demanded by that force; duty, obligation".
    This is more about a general duty (like a parent's responsibility to their child).

    Let's compare:
    - "I take responsibility for the mistake." (I am answerable for it).
    - "I have a responsibility to help." (I have a duty to help).

    The context "take responsibility for 'substantial losses'" is more like "I take responsibility for the mistake."

    Therefore, Sense 3 ("being answerable to someone for something") is a better fit than Sense 1 ("duty, obligation").

    Wait, let me double-check the "trait" part of Sense 3.
    "a form of trustworthiness; the trait of being answerable to someone for something or being responsible for one's conduct"
    If it's a "trait", it's something you *have* (like "he has a lot of responsibility" - no, that's not right). "He is a man of great responsibility" (he is responsible/trustworthy).

    If the bank "takes responsibility", is it adopting a trait? No. It's accepting answerability.

    Let's look at Sense 1 again. "duty, obligation".
    If you "take responsibility for" something, you are accepting the *obligation* to deal with it.

    Let's search for "take responsibility" + "obligation".
    "To take responsibility is to accept an obligation."

    Let's search for "take responsibility" + "answerable".
    "To take responsibility is to be answerable."

    This is tough. Let's look at the examples again.
    Sense 1: "every right implies a responsibility"
    Sense 3: "he holds a position of great responsibility"

    In "a position of great responsibility", the person is in a role where they are answerable for many things. This is very similar to the bank being answerable for the losses.

    Let's think about the phrase "take responsibility".
    If you "take responsibility for your actions", you are accepting that you are answerable for them.

    Let's look at the senses one more time.
    1. duty, obligation
    2. province
    3. responsibleness (trait of being answerable)

    If I have to choose the *best* one:
    Sense 1 is about the *force* or the *duty* itself.
    Sense 3 is about the *state* or *trait* of being answerable.

    "Take responsibility" = accept the state of being answerable.

    Let's try to see if "take responsibility" is a common collocation for "duty".
    "Take responsibility" = "accept the duty".

    Actually, in many contexts, "taking responsibility" means accepting the *blame* or *accountability*.
    "Answerable" is a synonym for "accountable".

    Let's re-read Sense 3: "the trait of being answerable to someone for something".
    This is the closest to "accountability".

    Let's double-check Sense 1: "the social force that binds you to the courses of action demanded by that force". This is very abstract.

    Final check:
    Context: "take responsibility for 'substantial losses'"
    Sense 1: duty, obligation
    Sense 3: being answerable to someone for something

    If the bank takes responsibility, it accepts that it is answerable for the losses.

    Wait, I just noticed something. Sense 3 says "the trait of being answerable... or being responsible for one's conduct".
    The bank's "conduct" (the mortgage transactions) led to the losses. The regulator wants the bank to be answerable for that conduct.

    This fits Sense 3 very well.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: sum
Target surface form: sum
Context:
The banks battling against a strong wind in the USA several years later. Investors and regulators have brought a vast number of claims for compensation or to punish misconduct. The Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) has been behind the largest wave of claims. It accuses 18 major international banks of having taken in US lenders Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac on mortgage transactions valued at around 200 billion dollars. Deutsche Bank also faces legal action by the FHFA covering multiple transactions with a total value of 14.2 billion dollars from 2005 to 2007. The regulator is demanding that the Frankfurt-based bank take responsibility for "substantial losses," but has not yet specified the exact <t>sum</t>. Deutsche Bank has rejected the claims as baseless and has declared its intention to fend off the claims.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=sum%1:21:00:: | definition=a quantity of money | synonyms=sum of money, amount, amount of money | examples=he borrowed a large sum; the amount he had in cash was insufficient
2. sense_key=sum%1:09:01:: | definition=a quantity obtained by the addition of a group of numbers | synonyms=amount, total
3. sense_key=sum%1:14:00:: | definition=the final aggregate | synonyms=summation, sum total | examples=the sum of all our troubles did not equal the misery they suffered
4. sense_key=sum%1:09:00:: | definition=the choicest or most essential or most vital part of some idea or experience | synonyms=kernel, substance, core, center, centre, essence | examples=the gist of the prosecutor's argument; the heart and soul of the Republican Party
5. sense_key=sum%1:06:00:: | definition=the whole amount | synonyms=total, totality, aggregate
6. sense_key=sum%1:14:01:: | definition=a set containing all and only the members of two or more given sets | synonyms=union, join | examples=let C be the union of the sets A and B

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

reasoning_content:
*   Target lemma: `sum`
    *   Target surface form: `sum`
    *   Context: "...The regulator is demanding that the Frankfurt-based bank take responsibility for 'substantial losses,' but has not yet specified the exact <t>sum</t>."
    *   Candidate senses:
        1.  `sum%1:21:00::`: a quantity of money (synonyms: sum of money, amount, amount of money)
        2.  `sum%1:09:01::`: a quantity obtained by the addition of a group of numbers (synonyms: amount, total)
        3.  `sum%1:14:00::`: the final aggregate (synonyms: summation, sum total)
        4.  `sum%1:09:00::`: the choicest or most essential or most vital part of some idea or experience (synonyms: kernel, substance, core, center, centre, essence)
        5.  `sum%1:06:00::`: the whole amount (synonyms: total, totality, aggregate)
        6.  `sum%1:14:01::`: a set containing all and only the members of two or more given sets (synonyms: union, join)

    *   The context discusses banks, claims for compensation, mortgage transactions valued at 200 billion dollars, and legal action covering transactions with a total value of 14.2 billion dollars.
    *   The specific sentence is: "The regulator is demanding that the Frankfurt-based bank take responsibility for 'substantial losses,' but has not yet specified the exact <t>sum</t>."
    *   In this context, "sum" refers to the amount of money associated with the "substantial losses."

    *   Sense 1: "a quantity of money" - This fits perfectly. The "sum" refers to the monetary value of the losses.
    *   Sense 2: "a quantity obtained by the addition of a group of numbers" - While a sum of money is often calculated by addition, the primary meaning here is the monetary amount itself.
    *   Sense 3: "the final aggregate" - Too general; usually refers to a total of various things, not specifically money.
    *   Sense 4: "the choicest or most essential... part" - Incorrect.
    *   Sense 5: "the whole amount" - Similar to Sense 2 and 3, but Sense 1 is more specific to money.
    *   Sense 6: "a set containing all and only the members of two or more given sets" - Mathematical set theory; incorrect.

    *   The context is explicitly about money (billions of dollars, compensation, losses).
    *   Sense 1 specifically defines "sum" as "a quantity of money."

    *   Sense 1 is the most precise fit.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: claim
Target surface form: claims
Context:
Investors and regulators have brought a vast number of claims for compensation or to punish misconduct. The Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) has been behind the largest wave of claims. It accuses 18 major international banks of having taken in US lenders Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac on mortgage transactions valued at around 200 billion dollars. Deutsche Bank also faces legal action by the FHFA covering multiple transactions with a total value of 14.2 billion dollars from 2005 to 2007. The regulator is demanding that the Frankfurt-based bank take responsibility for "substantial losses," but has not yet specified the exact sum. Deutsche Bank has rejected the <t>claims</t> as baseless and has declared its intention to fend off the claims.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=claim%1:10:00:: | definition=an assertion of a right (as to money or property) | examples=his claim asked for damages
2. sense_key=claim%1:10:02:: | definition=an assertion that something is true or factual | examples=his claim that he was innocent; evidence contradicted the government's claims
3. sense_key=claim%1:04:00:: | definition=demand for something as rightful or due | examples=they struck in support of their claim for a shorter work day
4. sense_key=claim%1:07:02:: | definition=an informal right to something | synonyms=title | examples=his claim on her attentions; his title to fame
5. sense_key=claim%1:07:01:: | definition=an established or recognized right | synonyms=title | examples=a strong legal claim to the property; he had no documents confirming his title to his father's estate
6. sense_key=claim%1:10:01:: | definition=a demand especially in the phrase | synonyms=call | examples=the call of duty

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

reasoning_content:
*   Target lemma: `claim`
    *   Target surface form: `claims`
    *   Context: "Investors and regulators have brought a vast number of claims for compensation or to punish misconduct... Deutsche Bank has rejected the <t>claims</t> as baseless and has declared its intention to fend off the claims."

    *   Sense 1: `claim%1:10:00::` - an assertion of a right (as to money or property). Example: "his claim asked for damages".
    *   Sense 2: `claim%1:10:02::` - an assertion that something is true or factual. Example: "his claim that he was innocent".
    *   Sense 3: `claim%1:04:00::` - demand for something as rightful or due. Example: "they struck in support of their claim for a shorter work day".
    *   Sense 4: `claim%1:07:02::` - an informal right to something.
    *   Sense 5: `claim%1:07:01::` - an established or recognized right.
    *   Sense 6: `claim%1:10:01::` - a demand especially in the phrase (call of duty).

    *   The text mentions "claims for compensation or to punish misconduct."
    *   It mentions "legal action by the FHFA."
    *   The FHFA "accuses 18 major international banks."
    *   Deutsche Bank "rejected the claims as baseless."
    *   The context is clearly legal/financial, specifically regarding demands for money (compensation) based on alleged misconduct.

    *   Sense 1 (`claim%1:10:00::`): "an assertion of a right (as to money or property)". Example: "his claim asked for damages". This fits perfectly. A legal claim for compensation is an assertion of a right to money.
    *   Sense 2 (`claim%1:10:02::`): "an assertion that something is true or factual". While the claims are based on assertions of fact (misconduct), the "claims" being brought for compensation are the legal demands themselves.
    *   Sense 3 (`claim%1:04:00::`): "demand for something as rightful or due". This is similar to Sense 1, but Sense 1 specifically mentions money/property and damages, which aligns better with "compensation".
    *   Sense 4 & 5: These refer to the *right* itself (title), not the *assertion* or *demand* for it.
    *   Sense 6: Not applicable.

    *   Sense 1: "an assertion of a right (as to money or property)" -> Example: "his claim asked for damages".
    *   Sense 3: "demand for something as rightful or due" -> Example: "claim for a shorter work day".
    *   The context says "claims for compensation". This is almost identical to "claim asked for damages".

    *   Sense 1 is the most precise fit for legal claims for money/compensation.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: intention
Target surface form: intention
Context:
Investors and regulators have brought a vast number of claims for compensation or to punish misconduct. The Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) has been behind the largest wave of claims. It accuses 18 major international banks of having taken in US lenders Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac on mortgage transactions valued at around 200 billion dollars. Deutsche Bank also faces legal action by the FHFA covering multiple transactions with a total value of 14.2 billion dollars from 2005 to 2007. The regulator is demanding that the Frankfurt-based bank take responsibility for "substantial losses," but has not yet specified the exact sum. Deutsche Bank has rejected the claims as baseless and has declared its <t>intention</t> to fend off the claims.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=intention%1:09:00:: | definition=an anticipated outcome that is intended or that guides your planned actions | synonyms=purpose, intent, aim, design | examples=his intent was to provide a new translation; good intentions are not enough
2. sense_key=intention%1:09:01:: | definition=(usually plural) the goal with respect to a marriage proposal | examples=his intentions are entirely honorable
3. sense_key=intention%1:04:00:: | definition=an act of intending; a volition that you intend to carry out | examples=my intention changed once I saw her

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

reasoning_content:
*   Target lemma: `intention`
    *   Target surface form: `intention`
    *   Context: "Deutsche Bank has rejected the claims as baseless and has declared its <t>intention</t> to fend off the claims."

    *   Sense 1: `intention%1:09:00::` - an anticipated outcome that is intended or that guides your planned actions (synonyms: purpose, intent, aim, design).
    *   Sense 2: `intention%1:09:01::` - (usually plural) the goal with respect to a marriage proposal.
    *   Sense 3: `intention%1:04:00::` - an act of intending; a volition that you intend to carry out.

    *   The sentence says Deutsche Bank "declared its intention to fend off the claims."
    *   This means the bank has a plan or a goal (to fend off the claims) and is stating its will/volition to do so.
    *   Sense 2 (marriage proposal) is clearly incorrect.
    *   Sense 1 (anticipated outcome/purpose/aim) vs. Sense 3 (act of intending/volition).

    *   Sense 1: "an anticipated outcome that is intended or that guides your planned actions" (purpose, aim).
    *   Sense 3: "an act of intending; a volition that you intend to carry out".

    *   In the phrase "declared its intention to [do something]", it usually refers to the *will* or *plan* to perform an action.
    *   Comparing "intention to fend off" with the examples:
        *   Sense 1: "his intent was to provide a new translation" (purpose/aim).
        *   Sense 3: "my intention changed once I saw her" (volition/act of intending).

    *   Wait, let's look closer at the WordNet distinctions.
    *   `intention%1:04:00` (volition) is often used for the *state* of intending.
    *   `intention%1:09:00` (purpose/aim) is often used for the *goal* itself.

    *   "declared its intention to fend off the claims" -> The bank is stating its *aim* or *purpose* in the legal battle, or its *volition* to act.
    *   Usually, "intention to [verb]" maps well to both, but "purpose" (Sense 1) fits "fend off the claims" as a goal. However, "volition" (Sense 3) fits the act of deciding to do it.

    *   Let's re-read:
        *   Sense 1: "an anticipated outcome that is intended or that guides your planned actions"
        *   Sense 3: "an act of intending; a volition that you intend to carry out"

    *   If I say "I have the intention to go," am I describing the *goal* (going) or the *act of intending* (the volition)?
    *   In legal/formal contexts ("declared its intention to"), it's typically the volition/determination to act.

    *   Let's check synonyms for Sense 1: purpose, intent, aim, design.
    *   Let's check synonyms for Sense 3: (none provided, but definition is "act of intending").

    *   Actually, looking at common WordNet usage:
        *   `intention%1:04:00` is often the general "will" or "plan".
        *   `intention%1:09:00` is more about the "objective".

    *   "declared its intention to fend off the claims" -> This is a statement of will/plan.

    *   Let's re-evaluate Sense 1: "an anticipated outcome that is intended or that guides your planned actions". Fending off the claims is the outcome they want.
    *   Let's re-evaluate Sense 3: "an act of intending; a volition that you intend to carry out".

    *   In many WSD datasets (like SemCor), "intention to [do something]" is often mapped to the "volition/plan" sense.

    *   Let's look at the examples again.
        *   Sense 1: "his intent was to provide a new translation" (This looks very similar to "intention to fend off the claims").
        *   Sense 3: "my intention changed once I saw her".

    *   Wait, "his intent was to provide a new translation" (Sense 1) is almost identical in structure to "intention to fend off the claims".

    *   Let's double-check the definitions again.
        *   Sense 1: anticipated outcome / guides planned actions.
        *   Sense 3: act of intending / volition.

    *   If the bank "declared its intention", it is declaring its *will* (volition) to act. But the *content* of that intention is the goal (fending off claims).

    *   Let's search for "declared its intention to" in corpora. It's a very common phrase.
    *   Usually, "intention" in "intention to [verb]" is the plan/aim.

    *   Let's compare Sense 1 and Sense 3 again.
        *   Sense 1: purpose, intent, aim.
        *   Sense 3: act of intending, volition.

    *   If I say "My intention is to win," is "to win" the anticipated outcome (Sense 1) or the act of intending (Sense 3)? "To win" is the outcome. The "intention" is the thing that guides the action.

    *   Let's look at the WordNet hierarchy if possible (mentally).
        *   `intention%1:04:00` is under `volition`.
        *   `intention%1:09:00` is under `purpose`.

    *   "Declared its intention to fend off the claims" -> The bank is stating its *purpose* or *aim*.

    *   Let's re-read Sense 3: "an act of intending; a volition that you intend to carry out".
    *   Let's re-read Sense 1: "an anticipated outcome that is intended or that guides your planned actions".

    *   Actually, "intention to [do something]" is most frequently mapped to the "purpose/aim" sense (Sense 1) when it describes the goal.

    *   Let's try to see if there's a nuance.
        *   "I have every intention of going" (Volition/Sense 3).
        *   "My intention in doing this was to help" (Purpose/Sense 1).
        *   "The company declared its intention to expand" (Plan/Aim/Sense 1).

    *   Wait, "declared its intention to fend off" is very similar to "declared its intention to expand". This is a statement of a goal/plan.

    *   Let's look at the examples again.
        *   Sense 1: "his intent was to provide a new translation"
        *   Sense 3: "my intention changed once I saw her"

    *   The example for Sense 1 ("his intent was to provide a new translation") is a perfect match for the structure "intention to fend off the claims".

    *   Sense 1: anticipated outcome / guides planned actions. (Synonyms: purpose, intent, aim).
    *   Sense 3: act of intending / volition.

    *   "intention to fend off the claims" -> The goal is to fend off the claims. This guides their planned actions (legal defense).

    *   Therefore, Sense 1 is the best fit.

    *   Wait, let me double-check Sense 3 one more time. "an act of intending; a volition that you intend to carry out".
    *   If the bank "declared its intention", it's declaring its *will*.
    *   But the example "his intent was to provide a new translation" is listed under Sense 1. "Intent" and "intention" are used interchangeably here.

    *   Let's compare:
        1. "His intent was to provide a new translation." (Sense 1)
        2. "Deutsche Bank declared its intention to fend off the claims."

    *   These are structurally and semantically almost identical. Both describe a goal that guides future action.

    *   Sense 1: purpose, intent, aim, design.
    *   Sense 3: act of intending, volition.

    *   "Intention to fend off" = "Aim to fend off" or "Purpose to fend off". (Sense 1)
    *   "Intention to fend off" = "Volition to fend off". (Sense 3)

    *   While both are close, the example provided for Sense 1 is a much stronger match for the sentence structure.

    *   Sense 1: `intention%1:09:00`
    *   Sense 2: `intention%1:09:01`
    *   Sense 3: `intention%1:04:00`

    *   Wait, the prompt asks for the index.
    *   Candidate senses:
        1. sense_key=intention%1:09:00::
        2. sense_key=intention%1:09:01::
        3. sense_key=intention%1:04:00::

    *   So Sense 1 is `intention%1:09:00`.

    *   Is there any reason it would be Sense 3?
    *   Sense 3: "an act of intending; a volition that you intend to carry out".
    *   Example: "my intention changed once I saw her".
    *   This example focuses on the *state* of intending, which can change.
    *   The bank's "intention to fend off the claims" is more of a stated goal/aim.

    *   Let's re-verify Sense 1: "an anticipated outcome that is intended or that guides your planned actions".
    *   "Fending off the claims" is the anticipated outcome.

    *   Conclusion: Sense 1 is the most appropriate.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: claim
Target surface form: claims
Context:
Investors and regulators have brought a vast number of claims for compensation or to punish misconduct. The Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) has been behind the largest wave of claims. It accuses 18 major international banks of having taken in US lenders Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac on mortgage transactions valued at around 200 billion dollars. Deutsche Bank also faces legal action by the FHFA covering multiple transactions with a total value of 14.2 billion dollars from 2005 to 2007. The regulator is demanding that the Frankfurt-based bank take responsibility for "substantial losses," but has not yet specified the exact sum. Deutsche Bank has rejected the claims as baseless and has declared its intention to fend off the <t>claims</t>.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=claim%1:10:00:: | definition=an assertion of a right (as to money or property) | examples=his claim asked for damages
2. sense_key=claim%1:10:02:: | definition=an assertion that something is true or factual | examples=his claim that he was innocent; evidence contradicted the government's claims
3. sense_key=claim%1:04:00:: | definition=demand for something as rightful or due | examples=they struck in support of their claim for a shorter work day
4. sense_key=claim%1:07:02:: | definition=an informal right to something | synonyms=title | examples=his claim on her attentions; his title to fame
5. sense_key=claim%1:07:01:: | definition=an established or recognized right | synonyms=title | examples=a strong legal claim to the property; he had no documents confirming his title to his father's estate
6. sense_key=claim%1:10:01:: | definition=a demand especially in the phrase | synonyms=call | examples=the call of duty

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

reasoning_content:
*   Target lemma: `claim`
    *   Target surface form: `claims`
    *   Context: "Investors and regulators have brought a vast number of claims for compensation or to punish misconduct... Deutsche Bank has rejected the claims as baseless and has declared its intention to fend off the <t>claims</t>."
    *   Key phrases: "claims for compensation", "punish misconduct", "legal action", "rejected the claims as baseless", "fend off the claims".

    *   Sense 1: `claim%1:10:00::` - an assertion of a right (as to money or property). Example: "his claim asked for damages".
    *   Sense 2: `claim%1:10:02::` - an assertion that something is true or factual. Example: "his claim that he was innocent".
    *   Sense 3: `claim%1:04:00::` - demand for something as rightful or due. Example: "they struck in support of their claim for a shorter work day".
    *   Sense 4: `claim%1:07:02::` - an informal right to something.
    *   Sense 5: `claim%1:07:01::` - an established or recognized right.
    *   Sense 6: `claim%1:10:01::` - a demand especially in the phrase (call of duty).

    *   The context describes legal actions brought by investors and regulators for compensation or punishment.
    *   "Claims for compensation" strongly aligns with Sense 1 ("assertion of a right (as to money or property)") and Sense 3 ("demand for something as rightful or due").
    *   However, Sense 1 specifically mentions "damages" in its example ("his claim asked for damages"), which is exactly what "compensation" refers to in a legal context.
    *   Sense 2 refers to factual assertions. While the claims are called "baseless" (suggesting the facts are disputed), the core of the "claims" being "fended off" are the legal demands for money/compensation.
    *   Comparing Sense 1 and Sense 3: Sense 1 is more specific to money/property/damages, whereas Sense 3 is a more general demand for something rightful (like a shorter work day). In a legal/financial context involving compensation, Sense 1 is the standard fit.

    *   "Investors and regulators have brought a vast number of claims for compensation..."
    *   "Deutsche Bank has rejected the claims as baseless..."
    *   "fend off the claims."
    *   This is a legal context. A "claim for compensation" is a formal assertion of a right to money.

    *   Sense 1: assertion of a right (as to money or property). Example: "his claim asked for damages".
    *   This matches perfectly.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: document
Target surface form: document
Context:
This <t>document</t> is a summary of the European Public Assessment Report (EPAR). It explains how the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) assessed the studies performed, to reach their recommendations on how to use the medicine.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=document%1:10:00:: | definition=writing that provides information (especially information of an official nature) | synonyms=written document, papers
2. sense_key=document%1:06:00:: | definition=anything serving as a representation of a person's thinking by means of symbolic marks
3. sense_key=document%1:21:00:: | definition=a written account of ownership or obligation
4. sense_key=document%1:10:01:: | definition=(computer science) a computer file that contains text (and possibly formatting instructions) using seven-bit ASCII characters | synonyms=text file

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

reasoning_content:
*   Target lemma: `document`
    *   Target surface form: `document`
    *   Context: "This <t>document</t> is a summary of the European Public Assessment Report (EPAR). It explains how the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) assessed the studies performed, to reach their recommendations on how to use the medicine."

    *   Sense 1: `document%1:10:00::` - writing that provides information (especially information of an official nature). Synonyms: written document, papers.
    *   Sense 2: `document%1:06:00::` - anything serving as a representation of a person's thinking by means of symbolic marks.
    *   Sense 3: `document%1:21:00::` - a written account of ownership or obligation.
    *   Sense 4: `document%1:10:01::` - (computer science) a computer file that contains text...

    *   The context describes a "summary of the European Public Assessment Report (EPAR)".
    *   It explains the assessment process of a committee (CHMP) regarding medicine.
    *   This is clearly an official piece of writing providing information.

    *   Sense 1 (official information) fits perfectly.
    *   Sense 2 (representation of thinking) is too broad.
    *   Sense 3 (ownership/obligation) is incorrect (it's not a deed or a contract).
    *   Sense 4 (computer file) is too specific to the technical format; while it might be a digital file, the *meaning* in context is the official information it contains.

Sense 1 is the best fit.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: public
Target surface form: Public
Context:
This document is a summary of the European <t>Public</t> Assessment Report (EPAR). It explains how the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) assessed the studies performed, to reach their recommendations on how to use the medicine.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=public%3:00:00:: | definition=not private; open to or concerning the people as a whole | examples=the public good; public libraries
2. sense_key=public%5:00:00:common:02 | definition=affecting the people or community as a whole | examples=community leaders; community interests

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

reasoning_content:
*   Target lemma: `public`
    *   Target surface form: `Public`
    *   Context: "This document is a summary of the European <t>Public</t> Assessment Report (EPAR). It explains how the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) assessed the studies performed, to reach their recommendations on how to use the medicine."
    *   Candidate senses:
        1.  `public%3:00:00::`: not private; open to or concerning the people as a whole (e.g., public good, public libraries).
        2.  `public%5:00:00:common:02`: affecting the people or community as a whole (e.g., community leaders, community interests).

    *   The phrase is "European Public Assessment Report".
    *   In this context, "Public" describes the "Assessment Report".
    *   A "Public Assessment Report" is a report that is made available to the general public (not private/confidential).
    *   It is "open to" the people as a whole.

    *   Sense 1: "not private; open to or concerning the people as a whole". This fits perfectly. A public report is one that is not private.
    *   Sense 2: "affecting the people or community as a whole". This is more about the *impact* or *scope* of something (like community interests), rather than the *accessibility* or *status* of a document.

    *   Sense 1 is the standard meaning for "public" when referring to documents, reports, or institutions that are open to the general population.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: assessment
Target surface form: Assessment
Context:
This document is a summary of the European Public <t>Assessment</t> Report (EPAR). It explains how the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) assessed the studies performed, to reach their recommendations on how to use the medicine.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=assessment%1:09:00:: | definition=the classification of someone or something with respect to its worth | synonyms=appraisal
2. sense_key=assessment%1:21:00:: | definition=an amount determined as payable | examples=the assessment for repairs outraged the club's membership
3. sense_key=assessment%1:07:00:: | definition=the market value set on assets
4. sense_key=assessment%1:04:00:: | definition=the act of judging or assessing a person or situation or event | synonyms=judgment, judgement | examples=they criticized my judgment of the contestants

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

raw_output:
```json
{"sense_index": 4}
```

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 4}
```

reasoning_content:
*   Target lemma: `assessment`
    *   Target surface form: `Assessment`
    *   Context: "This document is a summary of the European Public <t>Assessment</t> Report (EPAR). It explains how the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) assessed the studies performed, to reach their recommendations on how to use the medicine."

    *   Sense 1: `assessment%1:09:00::` - the classification of someone or something with respect to its worth (synonym: appraisal).
    *   Sense 2: `assessment%1:21:00::` - an amount determined as payable (e.g., assessment for repairs).
    *   Sense 3: `assessment%1:07:00::` - the market value set on assets.
    *   Sense 4: `assessment%1:04:00::` - the act of judging or assessing a person or situation or event (synonyms: judgment, judgement).

    *   The context refers to a "European Public Assessment Report (EPAR)".
    *   The second sentence clarifies: "It explains how the Committee... *assessed* the studies performed, to reach their recommendations..."
    *   This describes a process of evaluation, judgment, or analysis of scientific studies to make a decision/recommendation.

    *   Sense 1 (classification of worth/appraisal) is close, but usually refers to value or quality in a more general or financial sense.
    *   Sense 2 (amount payable) is incorrect (financial tax/fee).
    *   Sense 3 (market value) is incorrect (financial).
    *   Sense 4 (act of judging or assessing a person or situation or event) fits best. The "assessment" in EPAR is the act of judging the scientific data/studies to reach a conclusion.

    *   Sense 4: "the act of judging or assessing a person or situation or event". The "situation" or "event" here is the set of studies performed for a medicine. This is the process of scientific judgment.

    *   Sense 1: "classification... with respect to its worth".
    *   Sense 4: "the act of judging or assessing...".
    *   In the context of a regulatory report (EPAR), the "Assessment" is the evaluative process (the act of judging the evidence). Sense 4 is the most general and accurate description of this process.

    *   Sense 1 is often used for performance reviews or property appraisals.
    *   Sense 4 is used for the process of evaluation/judgment.
    *   The context "assessed the studies performed" strongly aligns with the "act of judging" (Sense 4).


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: report
Target surface form: Report
Context:
This document is a summary of the European Public Assessment <t>Report</t> (EPAR). It explains how the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) assessed the studies performed, to reach their recommendations on how to use the medicine.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=report%1:10:03:: | definition=a written document describing the findings of some individual or group | synonyms=study, written report | examples=this accords with the recent study by Hill and Dale
2. sense_key=report%1:10:01:: | definition=the act of informing by verbal report | synonyms=account | examples=he heard reports that they were causing trouble; by all accounts they were a happy couple
3. sense_key=report%1:10:00:: | definition=a short account of the news | synonyms=news report, story, account, write up | examples=the report of his speech; the story was on the 11 o'clock news
4. sense_key=report%1:11:00:: | definition=a sharp explosive sound (especially the sound of a gun firing) | examples=they heard a violent report followed by silence
5. sense_key=report%1:10:04:: | definition=a written evaluation of a student's scholarship and deportment | synonyms=report card | examples=his father signed his report card
6. sense_key=report%1:10:02:: | definition=an essay (especially one written as an assignment) | synonyms=composition, paper, theme | examples=he got an A on his composition
7. sense_key=report%1:09:00:: | definition=the general estimation that the public has for a person | synonyms=reputation | examples=he acquired a reputation as an actor before he started writing; he was a person of bad report

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

reasoning_content:
*   Target lemma: `report`
    *   Target surface form: `Report`
    *   Context: "This document is a summary of the European Public Assessment <t>Report</t> (EPAR). It explains how the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) assessed the studies performed, to reach their recommendations on how to use the medicine."

    *   Sense 1: `report%1:10:03::` - a written document describing the findings of some individual or group (synonyms: study, written report).
    *   Sense 2: `report%1:10:01::` - the act of informing by verbal report (synonyms: account).
    *   Sense 3: `report%1:10:00::` - a short account of the news (synonyms: news report, story, account, write up).
    *   Sense 4: `report%1:11:00::` - a sharp explosive sound (gun firing).
    *   Sense 5: `report%1:10:04::` - a written evaluation of a student's scholarship and deportment (report card).
    *   Sense 6: `report%1:10:02::` - an essay (assignment).
    *   Sense 7: `report%1:09:00::` - general estimation that the public has for a person (reputation).

    *   The context refers to the "European Public Assessment Report (EPAR)".
    *   It is described as a "document" that "explains how the Committee... assessed the studies performed".
    *   This is a formal written document describing findings/assessments of a group (the CHMP).

    *   Sense 1 (written document describing findings) fits perfectly.
    *   Sense 2 (verbal report) is incorrect.
    *   Sense 3 (news report) is incorrect.
    *   Sense 4 (sound) is incorrect.
    *   Sense 5 (student report card) is incorrect.
    *   Sense 6 (student essay) is incorrect.
    *   Sense 7 (reputation) is incorrect.

    *   The best sense is Sense 1.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: explain
Target surface form: explains
Context:
This document is a summary of the European Public Assessment Report (EPAR). It <t>explains</t> how the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) assessed the studies performed, to reach their recommendations on how to use the medicine. If you need more information about your medical condition or your treatment, read the Package Leaflet (also part of the EPAR) or contact your doctor or pharmacist.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=explain%2:32:00:: | definition=make plain and comprehensible | synonyms=explicate | examples=He explained the laws of physics to his students
2. sense_key=explain%2:32:01:: | definition=define | examples=The committee explained their plan for fund-raising to the Dean
3. sense_key=explain%2:32:02:: | definition=serve as a reason or cause or justification of | synonyms=excuse | examples=Your need to sleep late does not excuse your late arrival at work; Her recent divorce may explain her reluctance to date again

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

reasoning_content:
*   Target lemma: `explain`
    *   Target surface form: `explains`
    *   Context: "This document is a summary of the European Public Assessment Report (EPAR). It <t>explains</t> how the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) assessed the studies performed..."
    *   Candidate senses:
        1.  `make plain and comprehensible` (explicate) - Example: "He explained the laws of physics to his students"
        2.  `define` - Example: "The committee explained their plan for fund-raising to the Dean"
        3.  `serve as a reason or cause or justification of` (excuse) - Example: "Your need to sleep late does not excuse your late arrival at work"

    *   The sentence says: "It [the document] explains how the Committee... assessed the studies performed..."
    *   The document is providing a detailed account or making the process of assessment clear and comprehensible to the reader.

    *   Sense 1: "make plain and comprehensible". This fits well. The document is clarifying/explicating the process of assessment.
    *   Sense 2: "define". While "explaining a plan" is similar to "defining a plan", the context here is about *how* something was done (the process of assessment), which is more about making it comprehensible (Sense 1) than providing a definition (Sense 2).
    *   Sense 3: "serve as a reason or cause or justification". This doesn't fit. The document isn't acting as a reason for the assessment; it's describing the assessment.

    *   Sense 1 is the most general and accurate description of a document describing a process to make it understandable.

    *   Sense 1: make plain and comprehensible.
    *   Sense 2: define.
    *   Sense 3: serve as a reason.
    *   The document "explains how" (describes the process to make it clear). This aligns best with Sense 1.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: committee
Target surface form: Committee
Context:
This document is a summary of the European Public Assessment Report (EPAR). It explains how the <t>Committee</t> for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) assessed the studies performed, to reach their recommendations on how to use the medicine. If you need more information about your medical condition or your treatment, read the Package Leaflet (also part of the EPAR) or contact your doctor or pharmacist.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=committee%1:14:00:: | definition=a special group delegated to consider some matter;  - Milton Berle | synonyms=commission | examples=a committee is a group that keeps minutes and loses hours
2. sense_key=committee%1:14:01:: | definition=a self-constituted organization to promote something | synonyms=citizens committee

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

reasoning_content:
*   Target lemma: "committee"
    *   Target surface form: "Committee"
    *   Context: "This document is a summary of the European Public Assessment Report (EPAR). It explains how the <t>Committee</t> for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) assessed the studies performed, to reach their recommendations on how to use the medicine."
    *   Candidate senses:
        1.  `committee%1:14:00`: a special group delegated to consider some matter; synonyms=commission.
        2.  `committee%1:14:01`: a self-constituted organization to promote something; synonyms=citizens committee.

    *   The "Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP)" is a formal body within the European Medicines Agency (EMA).
    *   Its purpose is to assess studies and provide recommendations on the use of medicines.
    *   This is a delegated task (regulatory assessment) within a larger organizational structure (EMA/EU).

    *   Sense 1: "a special group delegated to consider some matter". This fits perfectly. The CHMP is delegated the task of assessing medicinal products.
    *   Sense 2: "a self-constituted organization to promote something". The CHMP is not self-constituted; it is a formal regulatory body established by law/regulation. It doesn't "promote" something in the sense of an advocacy group (like a citizens committee), but rather evaluates and recommends.

    *   Sense 1 is the best fit.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: product
Target surface form: Products
Context:
This document is a summary of the European Public Assessment Report (EPAR). It explains how the Committee for Medicinal <t>Products</t> for Human Use (CHMP) assessed the studies performed, to reach their recommendations on how to use the medicine. If you need more information about your medical condition or your treatment, read the Package Leaflet (also part of the EPAR) or contact your doctor or pharmacist.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=product%1:06:01:: | definition=commodities offered for sale | synonyms=merchandise, ware | examples=good business depends on having good merchandise; that store offers a variety of products
2. sense_key=product%1:06:00:: | definition=an artifact that has been created by someone or some process | synonyms=production | examples=they improve their product every year; they export most of their agricultural production
3. sense_key=product%1:09:00:: | definition=a quantity obtained by multiplication | synonyms=mathematical product | examples=the product of 2 and 3 is 6
4. sense_key=product%1:27:00:: | definition=a chemical substance formed as a result of a chemical reaction | examples=a product of lime and nitric acid
5. sense_key=product%1:19:00:: | definition=a consequence of someone's efforts or of a particular set of circumstances | examples=skill is the product of hours of practice; his reaction was the product of hunger and fatigue
6. sense_key=product%1:14:00:: | definition=the set of elements common to two or more sets | synonyms=intersection, Cartesian product | examples=the set of red hats is the intersection of the set of hats and the set of red things

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

reasoning_content:
*   Target lemma: `product`
    *   Target surface form: `Products`
    *   Context: "This document is a summary of the European Public Assessment Report (EPAR). It explains how the Committee for Medicinal <t>Products</t> for Human Use (CHMP) assessed the studies performed..."
    *   Candidate senses:
        1.  `product%1:06:01::`: commodities offered for sale (merchandise, ware).
        2.  `product%1:06:00::`: an artifact that has been created by someone or some process (production).
        3.  `product%1:09:00::`: a quantity obtained by multiplication (mathematical product).
        4.  `product%1:27:00::`: a chemical substance formed as a result of a chemical reaction.
        5.  `product%1:19:00::`: a consequence of someone's efforts or of a particular set of circumstances.
        6.  `product%1:14:00::`: the set of elements common to two or more sets (intersection, Cartesian product).

    *   The phrase is "Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP)".
    *   "Medicinal Products" refers to medicines, drugs, or pharmaceutical goods.
    *   Medicines are commodities offered for sale (pharmaceuticals).

    *   Sense 1: "commodities offered for sale" (merchandise, ware). This fits well because medicines are commercial goods.
    *   Sense 2: "an artifact that has been created by someone or some process". This is more general. While a medicine is an artifact, "medicinal products" in a regulatory context (like the CHMP) almost always refers to the commercialized goods.
    *   Sense 3: Mathematical product. (Incorrect)
    *   Sense 4: Chemical substance formed as a result of a chemical reaction. While medicines are chemical substances, the term "Medicinal Products" refers to the finished drug product (the commodity), not just the result of a specific reaction.
    *   Sense 5: Consequence of efforts. (Incorrect)
    *   Sense 6: Set intersection. (Incorrect)

    *   In regulatory and legal contexts (like the EU's EPAR), "medicinal product" is a technical term for a medicine intended for use in humans or animals. This aligns most closely with "commodities offered for sale" (Sense 1) rather than just a general "artifact" (Sense 2) or a "chemical substance" (Sense 4).

    *   Sense 1: commodities offered for sale.
    *   Sense 2: an artifact created by someone/process.
    *   Comparing 1 and 2: "Medicinal products" are specifically items produced for sale/distribution in the healthcare market. Sense 1 is more precise for "products" in the sense of commercial goods.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: human
Target surface form: Human
Context:
This document is a summary of the European Public Assessment Report (EPAR). It explains how the Committee for Medicinal Products for <t>Human</t> Use (CHMP) assessed the studies performed, to reach their recommendations on how to use the medicine. If you need more information about your medical condition or your treatment, read the Package Leaflet (also part of the EPAR) or contact your doctor or pharmacist.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=human%3:01:00:: | definition=characteristic of humanity | examples=human nature
2. sense_key=human%3:01:01:: | definition=relating to a person | examples=the experiment was conducted on 6 monkeys and 2 human subjects
3. sense_key=human%3:00:00:: | definition=having human form or attributes as opposed to those of animals or divine beings | examples=human beings; the human body

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 3}
```

reasoning_content:
*   Target lemma: "human"
    *   Target surface form: "Human"
    *   Context: "Committee for Medicinal Products for <t>Human</t> Use (CHMP)"
    *   Candidate senses:
        1.  `human%3:01:00::` (characteristic of humanity) - e.g., human nature.
        2.  `human%3:01:01::` (relating to a person) - e.g., human subjects.
        3.  `human%3:00:00::` (having human form or attributes as opposed to those of animals or divine beings) - e.g., human beings; the human body.

    *   The phrase is "Medicinal Products for Human Use".
    *   This refers to medicines intended for use by people (humans), as opposed to veterinary medicines (for animals).

    *   Sense 1: "characteristic of humanity" (abstract qualities like empathy, error). Not applicable here.
    *   Sense 2: "relating to a person" (often used in research or specific contexts like "human subjects").
    *   Sense 3: "having human form or attributes as opposed to those of animals or divine beings" (the biological species *Homo sapiens*).

    *   "Human Use" in a medical/regulatory context (like the CHMP) distinguishes between medicines for humans and medicines for animals.
    *   Sense 3 defines "human" as opposed to animals.
    *   Sense 2 defines "human" as relating to a person.
    *   Looking at the examples:
        *   Sense 2: "human subjects" (specific individuals in a study).
        *   Sense 3: "human beings", "the human body".
    *   "Medicinal Products for Human Use" refers to the species (humans) rather than a specific person or a characteristic of humanity.

    *   Sense 3 is the most general term for the species/biological entity, which fits the distinction between human and veterinary medicine.

    *   Wait, let me re-evaluate Sense 2 vs Sense 3.
    *   Sense 2: "relating to a person".
    *   Sense 3: "having human form or attributes as opposed to those of animals...".
    *   In "Human Use", "human" is an adjective modifying "use".
    *   Is it "relating to a person" or "having human form/attributes"?
    *   Actually, "human use" means use by humans (the species).
    *   Comparing "human subjects" (Sense 2) and "human beings" (Sense 3).
    *   "Human use" is very similar to "human beings".
    *   Let's look at the WordNet hierarchy if possible (mentally).
    *   `human%3:00:00` is the noun/adjective for the species.
    *   `human%3:01:01` is the adjective "relating to a person".
    *   In the context of "Medicinal Products for Human Use", it's about the target species.

    *   Sense 3: "having human form or attributes as opposed to those of animals..."
    *   Sense 2: "relating to a person".
    *   Usually, "human use" is contrasted with "veterinary use". This contrast is species-based. Sense 3 explicitly mentions "as opposed to those of animals".

    *   Sense 1: No.
    *   Sense 2: Possible, but "relating to a person" is often more specific or individual.
    *   Sense 3: Best fit because it defines the species distinction (human vs animal).