[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: right
Target surface form: Right
Context:
Is immigration a burden or an opportunity for the economy? Immigration policy under Nicolas Sarkozy was criticised from various aspects a congestion of police, legal and administrative services subjected to a policy of numbers and the compatibility of that policy with the self-proclaimed status of the country as the country of French human rights. More recently, it is administrative harassment of foreign students, which is topical, with the minister of the interior ("Libération" on 23 May) declaring that France "does not need foreign talent, bricklayers and waiters." But it is only rarely analyzed from the economic viewpoint. There is a lot of consensus between the Left and the Right on this subject. On the <t>Right</t>, the tone was set by Jacques Chirac, who declared in 1976 that "900,000 unemployed would not become a problem in a country with 2 million of foreign workers," and on the Left by Michel Rocard explaining in 1990 that France "can not accommodate all the world's misery." The only difference, the degree of generosity

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=right%1:07:00:: | definition=an abstract idea of that which is due to a person or governmental body by law or tradition or nature; ; - Eleanor Roosevelt | examples=they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights; Certain rights can never be granted to the government but must be kept in the hands of the people
2. sense_key=right%1:15:00:: | definition=location near or direction toward the right side; i.e. the side to the south when a person or object faces east | examples=he stood on the right
3. sense_key=right%1:06:00:: | definition=the piece of ground in the outfield on the catcher's right | synonyms=right field
4. sense_key=right%1:14:00:: | definition=those who support political or social or economic conservatism; those who believe that things are better left unchanged | synonyms=right wing
5. sense_key=right%1:08:00:: | definition=the hand that is on the right side of the body | synonyms=right hand | examples=he writes with his right hand but pitches with his left; hit him with quick rights to the body
6. sense_key=right%1:04:00:: | definition=a turn toward the side of the body that is on the south when the person is facing east | examples=take a right at the corner
7. sense_key=right%1:07:01:: | definition=anything in accord with principles of justice | synonyms=rightfulness | examples=he feels he is in the right; the rightfulness of his claim
8. sense_key=right%1:21:00:: | definition=(frequently plural) the interest possessed by law or custom in some intangible thing | examples=mineral rights; film rights

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 4}
```

reasoning_content:
*   Target lemma: `right`
    *   Target surface form: `Right`
    *   Context: "There is a lot of consensus between the Left and the Right on this subject. On the <t>Right</t>, the tone was set by Jacques Chirac..."
    *   Candidate senses:
        1.  `right%1:07:00::`: abstract idea of what is due (human rights).
        2.  `right%1:15:00::`: location/direction (right side).
        3.  `right%1:06:00::`: baseball right field.
        4.  `right%1:14:00::`: political/social/economic conservatism (right wing).
        5.  `right%1:08:00::`: right hand.
        6.  `right%1:04:00::`: a turn toward the right.
        7.  `right%1:07:01::`: accord with principles of justice.
        8.  `right%1:21:00::`: legal interest in intangible thing.

    *   The sentence mentions "consensus between the Left and the Right".
    *   It mentions "Jacques Chirac" (a political figure).
    *   It discusses "immigration policy".
    *   The "Left" and "Right" here clearly refer to political spectrums.

    *   Sense 4: "those who support political or social or economic conservatism; those who believe that things are better left unchanged | synonyms=right wing". This matches perfectly.

    *   Sense 1 (human rights) is mentioned earlier in the text ("French human rights"), but the target word is in the sentence "On the Right, the tone was set by Jacques Chirac".
    *   Sense 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8 are irrelevant.


attempt_kind: initial

status: success

[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: tone
Target surface form: tone
Context:
Is immigration a burden or an opportunity for the economy? Immigration policy under Nicolas Sarkozy was criticised from various aspects a congestion of police, legal and administrative services subjected to a policy of numbers and the compatibility of that policy with the self-proclaimed status of the country as the country of French human rights. More recently, it is administrative harassment of foreign students, which is topical, with the minister of the interior ("Libération" on 23 May) declaring that France "does not need foreign talent, bricklayers and waiters." But it is only rarely analyzed from the economic viewpoint. There is a lot of consensus between the Left and the Right on this subject. On the Right, the <t>tone</t> was set by Jacques Chirac, who declared in 1976 that "900,000 unemployed would not become a problem in a country with 2 million of foreign workers," and on the Left by Michel Rocard explaining in 1990 that France "can not accommodate all the world's misery." The only difference, the degree of generosity

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=tone%1:10:01:: | definition=the quality of a person's voice | synonyms=tone of voice | examples=he began in a conversational tone; he spoke in a nervous tone of voice
2. sense_key=tone%1:07:02:: | definition=(linguistics) a pitch or change in pitch of the voice that serves to distinguish words in tonal languages | examples=the Beijing dialect uses four tones
3. sense_key=tone%1:07:01:: | definition=(music) the distinctive property of a complex sound (a voice or noise or musical sound) | synonyms=timbre, timber, quality | examples=the timbre of her soprano was rich and lovely; the muffled tones of the broken bell summoned them to meet
4. sense_key=tone%1:26:01:: | definition=the general atmosphere of a place or situation and the effect that it has on people | synonyms=spirit, feel, feeling, flavor, flavour, look | examples=the feel of the city excited him; a clergyman improved the tone of the meeting
5. sense_key=tone%1:07:00:: | definition=a quality of a given color that differs slightly from another color | synonyms=shade, tint, tincture | examples=after several trials he mixed the shade of pink that she wanted
6. sense_key=tone%1:10:02:: | definition=a notation representing the pitch and duration of a musical sound | synonyms=note, musical note | examples=the singer held the note too long
7. sense_key=tone%1:09:00:: | definition=a steady sound without overtones | synonyms=pure tone | examples=they tested his hearing with pure tones of different frequencies
8. sense_key=tone%1:26:02:: | definition=the elastic tension of living muscles, arteries, etc. that facilitate response to stimuli | synonyms=tonicity, tonus | examples=the doctor tested my tonicity
9. sense_key=tone%1:10:00:: | definition=a musical interval of two semitones | synonyms=whole tone, step, whole step
10. sense_key=tone%1:07:03:: | definition=the quality of something (an act or a piece of writing) that reveals the attitudes and presuppositions of the author | examples=the general tone of articles appearing in the newspapers is that the government should withdraw; from the tone of her behavior I gathered that I had outstayed my welcome

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

raw_output:
```json
{"sense_index": 10}
```

finish_reason: stop

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 10}
```

role: assistant

reasoning_content:
*   Target lemma: `tone`
    *   Target surface form: `tone`
    *   Context: "On the Right, the <t>tone</t> was set by Jacques Chirac, who declared in 1976 that '900,000 unemployed would not become a problem in a country with 2 million of foreign workers,' and on the Left by Michel Rocard explaining in 1990 that France 'can not accommodate all the world's misery.'"

    *   Sense 1: Quality of a person's voice (auditory).
    *   Sense 2: Linguistics (pitch in tonal languages).
    *   Sense 3: Music (timbre/quality of sound).
    *   Sense 4: General atmosphere of a place or situation.
    *   Sense 5: Color shade.
    *   Sense 6: Musical note.
    *   Sense 7: Pure tone (physics/hearing).
    *   Sense 8: Muscle tension.
    *   Sense 9: Musical interval.
    *   Sense 10: Quality of something (act/writing) revealing attitudes and presuppositions.

    *   The sentence says "the tone was set by Jacques Chirac, who declared...".
    *   Chirac's declaration established the general attitude, approach, or mood regarding immigration policy for the political Right.
    *   This isn't about the sound of his voice (Sense 1), but about the *nature* of the discourse or the *attitude* expressed.
    *   Comparing Sense 4 (general atmosphere of a place or situation) and Sense 10 (quality of something that reveals attitudes and presuppositions).
    *   Sense 10 specifically mentions "the quality of something (an act or a piece of writing) that reveals the attitudes and presuppositions of the author." Chirac's declaration is an act/statement that reveals an attitude.
    *   Sense 4 is more about the "feel" or "spirit" of a place or meeting.
    *   In political discourse, "setting the tone" usually refers to establishing the general attitude or character of the discussion/policy.
    *   Let's re-read Sense 10: "the quality of something (an act or a piece of writing) that reveals the attitudes and presuppositions of the author". Example: "the general tone of articles appearing in the newspapers is that the government should withdraw". This fits very well with a political declaration setting the stage for others.

    *   Sense 4: "the general atmosphere of a place or situation and the effect that it has on people".
    *   Sense 10: "the quality of something (an act or a piece of writing) that reveals the attitudes and presuppositions of the author".
    *   The context is about political positions and declarations. Chirac's statement *set the tone* for the Right's approach. This is an expression of attitude. Sense 10 is more precise for "the tone of a statement/discourse".

    *   "the tone was set by Jacques Chirac, who declared..."
    *   This refers to the general attitude or character of the political discourse on the Right.
    *   Sense 10: "the quality of something (an act or a piece of writing) that reveals the attitudes and presuppositions of the author".
    *   Sense 4: "the general atmosphere of a place or situation".
    *   While "setting the tone" can sometimes be Sense 4, in the context of a specific declaration revealing a political stance, Sense 10 is a stronger fit. However, "setting the tone" often refers to the general atmosphere (Sense 4). Let's look at the examples again.
    *   Sense 4 example: "a clergyman improved the tone of the meeting".
    *   Sense 10 example: "the general tone of articles appearing in the newspapers is that the government should withdraw".
    *   The context "the tone was set by Jacques Chirac, who declared..." is very similar to the newspaper example in Sense 10. It's about the *content/attitude* of the communication.

    *   Sense 10 is about the quality of an act/writing revealing attitudes.
    *   Sense 4 is about the atmosphere of a place/situation.
    *   The "tone" here is the character of the political position/discourse. This aligns better with Sense 10.

currency: USD

source: unavailable


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: problem
Target surface form: problem
Context:
Is immigration a burden or an opportunity for the economy? Immigration policy under Nicolas Sarkozy was criticised from various aspects a congestion of police, legal and administrative services subjected to a policy of numbers and the compatibility of that policy with the self-proclaimed status of the country as the country of French human rights. More recently, it is administrative harassment of foreign students, which is topical, with the minister of the interior ("Libération" on 23 May) declaring that France "does not need foreign talent, bricklayers and waiters." But it is only rarely analyzed from the economic viewpoint. There is a lot of consensus between the Left and the Right on this subject. On the Right, the tone was set by Jacques Chirac, who declared in 1976 that "900,000 unemployed would not become a <t>problem</t> in a country with 2 million of foreign workers," and on the Left by Michel Rocard explaining in 1990 that France "can not accommodate all the world's misery." The only difference, the degree of generosity

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=problem%1:26:00:: | definition=a state of difficulty that needs to be resolved | synonyms=job | examples=she and her husband are having problems; it is always a job to contact him
2. sense_key=problem%1:10:00:: | definition=a question raised for consideration or solution | examples=our homework consisted of ten problems to solve
3. sense_key=problem%1:09:00:: | definition=a source of difficulty | synonyms=trouble | examples=one trouble after another delayed the job; what's the problem?

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

raw_output:
```json
{"sense_index": 3}
```

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 3}
```

reasoning_content:
*   Target lemma: `problem`
    *   Target surface form: `problem`
    *   Context: "...Jacques Chirac, who declared in 1976 that '900,000 unemployed would not become a <t>problem</t> in a country with 2 million of foreign workers'..."
    *   Candidate senses:
        1.  `problem%1:26:00::`: a state of difficulty that needs to be resolved (synonym: job).
        2.  `problem%1:10:00::`: a question raised for consideration or solution (e.g., homework).
        3.  `problem%1:09:00::`: a source of difficulty (synonym: trouble).

    *   The sentence is about unemployment and foreign workers.
    *   Chirac is saying that having 900,000 unemployed people would not be a "problem" (a source of difficulty, a trouble, a burden) given the presence of 2 million foreign workers.
    *   It's not a "question raised for consideration" (sense 2).
    *   It's not exactly a "state of difficulty that needs to be resolved" in the sense of a specific task or a general state of being (sense 1), but rather the *existence* of the unemployed people acting as a source of difficulty or trouble for the economy/society.

    *   Sense 1: "a state of difficulty that needs to be resolved" (e.g., "she and her husband are having problems").
    *   Sense 3: "a source of difficulty" (synonym: trouble) (e.g., "what's the problem?").

    In the context "900,000 unemployed would not become a problem", the "problem" refers to the *situation* or the *group of people* being a source of trouble/difficulty for the state.

    Comparing "state of difficulty" (1) vs "source of difficulty" (3):
    If something "becomes a problem", it usually means it becomes a source of trouble.
    Example: "The noise is becoming a problem." (The noise is the source of difficulty).
    Example: "We are having problems with the car." (The car is the source of difficulty).

    Sense 3 ("source of difficulty", synonym "trouble") fits best here. The unemployed people (or the fact of their unemployment) would be the source of difficulty.

    *   Sense 1: "a state of difficulty that needs to be resolved" (often used for personal problems or systemic issues).
    *   Sense 3: "a source of difficulty" (often used for things that cause trouble).

    "900,000 unemployed would not become a problem" -> "900,000 unemployed would not become a source of difficulty/trouble."

    Let's re-evaluate Sense 1: "a state of difficulty that needs to be resolved".
    If the unemployment *situation* is the problem, it's a state of difficulty. But the phrasing "become a problem" strongly suggests the source of the trouble.

    Wait, let's look at the synonyms.
    Sense 1: job (this is a very specific usage, like "it's a real job to get him to listen").
    Sense 3: trouble.

    "900,000 unemployed would not become a trouble" (slightly awkward phrasing, but "be a problem" = "be a trouble/source of trouble").

    Actually, looking at WordNet's typical distinctions:
    - `problem%1:09:00` (source of difficulty) is often used for things that cause trouble.
    - `problem%1:26:00` (state of difficulty) is often used for the situation itself.

    In "become a problem", the "problem" is the thing causing the difficulty.

    Let's check Sense 3 again: "a source of difficulty".
    Example: "what's the problem?" (What is the source of the difficulty?).
    Example: "one trouble after another delayed the job".

    Let's check Sense 1 again: "a state of difficulty that needs to be resolved".
    Example: "she and her husband are having problems".

    In the context of the economy and unemployment, the "problem" is the source of the economic/social strain.

    Sense 3 seems the most appropriate for "become a problem" in this context.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: country
Target surface form: country
Context:
Is immigration a burden or an opportunity for the economy? Immigration policy under Nicolas Sarkozy was criticised from various aspects a congestion of police, legal and administrative services subjected to a policy of numbers and the compatibility of that policy with the self-proclaimed status of the country as the country of French human rights. More recently, it is administrative harassment of foreign students, which is topical, with the minister of the interior ("Libération" on 23 May) declaring that France "does not need foreign talent, bricklayers and waiters." But it is only rarely analyzed from the economic viewpoint. There is a lot of consensus between the Left and the Right on this subject. On the Right, the tone was set by Jacques Chirac, who declared in 1976 that "900,000 unemployed would not become a problem in a <t>country</t> with 2 million of foreign workers," and on the Left by Michel Rocard explaining in 1990 that France "can not accommodate all the world's misery." The only difference, the degree of generosity

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=country%1:14:00:: | definition=a politically organized body of people under a single government | synonyms=state, nation, land, commonwealth, res publica, body politic | examples=the state has elected a new president; African nations
2. sense_key=country%1:15:00:: | definition=the territory occupied by a nation | synonyms=state, land | examples=he returned to the land of his birth; he visited several European countries
3. sense_key=country%1:14:01:: | definition=the people who live in a nation or country | synonyms=nation, land | examples=a statement that sums up the nation's mood; the news was announced to the nation
4. sense_key=country%1:15:01:: | definition=an area outside of cities and towns | synonyms=rural area | examples=his poetry celebrated the slower pace of life in the country
5. sense_key=country%1:15:02:: | definition=a particular geographical region of indefinite boundary (usually serving some special purpose or distinguished by its people or culture or geography) | synonyms=area | examples=it was a mountainous area; Bible country

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

raw_output:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

reasoning_content:
*   Target lemma: `country`
    *   Target surface form: `country`
    *   Context: "...Jacques Chirac, who declared in 1976 that '900,000 unemployed would not become a problem in a <t>country</t> with 2 million of foreign workers'..."
    *   Candidate senses:
        1.  Politically organized body of people under a single government (state, nation).
        2.  Territory occupied by a nation (land).
        3.  The people who live in a nation or country (nation, land).
        4.  Area outside of cities and towns (rural area).
        5.  Particular geographical region of indefinite boundary (area).

    *   The sentence is: "900,000 unemployed would not become a problem in a country with 2 million of foreign workers."
    *   The context discusses immigration policy, the economy, and the capacity of France (the country in question) to handle unemployed people and foreign workers.
    *   "A country with 2 million of foreign workers" refers to the political entity/state (France) that manages its labor market and population.

    *   Sense 1: Politically organized body of people under a single government (state, nation).
    *   Sense 2: Territory occupied by a nation (land).
    *   Sense 3: The people who live in a nation or country (nation, land).
    *   Sense 4: Rural area.
    *   Sense 5: Geographical region of indefinite boundary.

    *   Is it the *territory* (Sense 2)? Not primarily. The focus is on the economic/political capacity to handle unemployment and workers.
    *   Is it the *people* (Sense 3)? Not primarily. It's about the entity that *has* the workers.
    *   Is it the *politically organized body* (Sense 1)? Yes. The context is about government policy, the economy, and the state's ability to manage its population.

    *   Sense 1 (state/nation) fits best when talking about a country in terms of its government, economy, and policy.
    *   Sense 2 (territory) fits when talking about geography or borders.
    *   Sense 3 (people) fits when talking about the national mood or the population as a collective.

    In "a country with 2 million of foreign workers," the "country" is the political entity (France) that manages the labor force. This aligns most closely with Sense 1.

    *Wait, let me double-check Sense 1 vs Sense 2.*
    Sense 1: "a politically organized body of people under a single government" (state, nation).
    Sense 2: "the territory occupied by a nation" (state, land).

    In the phrase "a country with 2 million of foreign workers," the "country" is the entity that possesses the workers. This is usually the political entity (the state).

    Let's look at the examples:
    Sense 1: "the state has elected a new president; African nations"
    Sense 2: "he returned to the land of his birth; he visited several European countries"

    The context "900,000 unemployed would not become a problem in a country with 2 million of foreign workers" is discussing the economic capacity of the state.

    Comparing Sense 1 and Sense 2:
    Sense 1 is the "body politic" or "state".
    Sense 2 is the "territory".

    Usually, when talking about economic problems (unemployment) and labor forces (foreign workers), we are referring to the state/nation as a political and economic unit.

    Let's check Sense 3: "the people who live in a nation or country".
    "900,000 unemployed would not become a problem in [the people who live in a nation] with 2 million of foreign workers." - This doesn't fit as well as Sense 1.

    Sense 1 is the most appropriate.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: worker
Target surface form: workers
Context:
Is immigration a burden or an opportunity for the economy? Immigration policy under Nicolas Sarkozy was criticised from various aspects a congestion of police, legal and administrative services subjected to a policy of numbers and the compatibility of that policy with the self-proclaimed status of the country as the country of French human rights. More recently, it is administrative harassment of foreign students, which is topical, with the minister of the interior ("Libération" on 23 May) declaring that France "does not need foreign talent, bricklayers and waiters." But it is only rarely analyzed from the economic viewpoint. There is a lot of consensus between the Left and the Right on this subject. On the Right, the tone was set by Jacques Chirac, who declared in 1976 that "900,000 unemployed would not become a problem in a country with 2 million of foreign <t>workers</t>," and on the Left by Michel Rocard explaining in 1990 that France "can not accommodate all the world's misery." The only difference, the degree of generosity

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=worker%1:18:00:: | definition=a person who works at a specific occupation | examples=he is a good worker
2. sense_key=worker%1:18:01:: | definition=a member of the working class (not necessarily employed) | synonyms=proletarian, prole | examples=workers of the world--unite!
3. sense_key=worker%1:05:01:: | definition=sterile member of a colony of social insects that forages for food and cares for the larvae
4. sense_key=worker%1:18:02:: | definition=a person who acts and gets things done | synonyms=actor, doer | examples=he's a principal actor in this affair; when you want something done get a doer

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

reasoning_content:
*   Target lemma: `worker`
    *   Target surface form: `workers`
    *   Context: "...Jacques Chirac, who declared in 1976 that '900,000 unemployed would not become a problem in a country with 2 million of foreign workers'..."
    *   Candidate senses:
        1.  `worker%1:18:00::`: a person who works at a specific occupation.
        2.  `worker%1:18:01::`: a member of the working class (not necessarily employed).
        3.  `worker%1:05:01::`: sterile member of a colony of social insects.
        4.  `worker%1:18:02::`: a person who acts and gets things done.

    *   The sentence discusses immigration, the economy, unemployment, and "foreign workers."
    *   Jacques Chirac is talking about the number of foreign people employed (or available for employment) in the country compared to the number of unemployed people.
    *   "Foreign workers" in this context refers to people who have come to the country to work in various occupations.

    *   Sense 1: "a person who works at a specific occupation." This fits well.
    *   Sense 2: "a member of the working class (not necessarily employed)." This is more of a sociological/political category (proletarian). While "foreign workers" often belong to the working class, the primary meaning here is people who are employed/working.
    *   Sense 3: "sterile member of a colony of social insects." Clearly incorrect.
    *   Sense 4: "a person who acts and gets things done." Clearly incorrect.

    *   Sense 1 is the general term for someone who works.
    *   Sense 2 is specifically about class identity.
    *   In the phrase "2 million of foreign workers," the focus is on the fact that they are people who work (or are employed as laborers), not necessarily their class identity as "proletarians," although the two overlap. However, in economic discussions about immigration and unemployment, "worker" usually refers to the labor force (people who work).

    *   Wait, let's look at the context again: "900,000 unemployed would not become a problem in a country with 2 million of foreign workers".
    *   This is contrasting "unemployed" with "workers".
    *   If "unemployed" is the opposite of "employed/working", then "workers" here refers to people who are currently employed or are part of the labor force.
    *   Sense 1: "a person who works at a specific occupation".
    *   Sense 2: "a member of the working class".
    *   Usually, "foreign workers" refers to migrant laborers. This fits Sense 1 (people who work) better than Sense 2 (a political/social class), although it's close. However, Sense 1 is the most direct description of someone who is employed.

    *   Sense 1: General occupation.
    *   Sense 2: Class-based (proletarian).
    *   In the context of "unemployed" vs "workers", the distinction is employment status. Sense 1 describes the status of working.

    *   Sense 1: "a person who works at a specific occupation"
    *   Sense 2: "a member of the working class (not necessarily employed)"
    *   If the context is "unemployed" vs "workers", Sense 2 ("not necessarily employed") would be contradictory. Therefore, Sense 1 is the correct choice.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: left
Target surface form: Left
Context:
Is immigration a burden or an opportunity for the economy? Immigration policy under Nicolas Sarkozy was criticised from various aspects a congestion of police, legal and administrative services subjected to a policy of numbers and the compatibility of that policy with the self-proclaimed status of the country as the country of French human rights. More recently, it is administrative harassment of foreign students, which is topical, with the minister of the interior ("Libération" on 23 May) declaring that France "does not need foreign talent, bricklayers and waiters." But it is only rarely analyzed from the economic viewpoint. There is a lot of consensus between the Left and the Right on this subject. On the Right, the tone was set by Jacques Chirac, who declared in 1976 that "900,000 unemployed would not become a problem in a country with 2 million of foreign workers," and on the <t>Left</t> by Michel Rocard explaining in 1990 that France "can not accommodate all the world's misery." The only difference, the degree of generosity

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=left%1:15:00:: | definition=location near or direction toward the left side; i.e. the side to the north when a person or object faces east | examples=she stood on the left
2. sense_key=left%1:14:00:: | definition=those who support varying degrees of social or political or economic change designed to promote the public welfare | synonyms=left wing
3. sense_key=left%1:08:00:: | definition=the hand that is on the left side of the body | synonyms=left hand | examples=jab with your left
4. sense_key=left%1:06:00:: | definition=the piece of ground in the outfield on the catcher's left | synonyms=left field | examples=the batter flied out to left
5. sense_key=left%1:04:00:: | definition=a turn toward the side of the body that is on the north when the person is facing east | examples=take a left at the corner

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

raw_output:
```json
{"sense_index": 2}
```

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 2}
```

reasoning_content:
*   Target lemma: "left"
    *   Target surface form: "Left"
    *   Context: "There is a lot of consensus between the Left and the Right on this subject. On the Right, the tone was set by Jacques Chirac... and on the Left by Michel Rocard..."
    *   Candidate senses:
        1.  Location/direction (left side).
        2.  Political group (those who support social/political/economic change for public welfare; left wing).
        3.  Hand (left hand).
        4.  Baseball field (left field).
        5.  Turn (turn toward the left).

    *   The context mentions "the Left and the Right" in the context of immigration policy, political figures (Jacques Chirac, Michel Rocard), and political consensus.
    *   This clearly refers to political ideologies/wings.

    *   Sense 2: "those who support varying degrees of social or political or economic change designed to promote the public welfare | synonyms=left wing" matches perfectly.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: france
Target surface form: France
Context:
Is immigration a burden or an opportunity for the economy? Immigration policy under Nicolas Sarkozy was criticised from various aspects a congestion of police, legal and administrative services subjected to a policy of numbers and the compatibility of that policy with the self-proclaimed status of the country as the country of French human rights. More recently, it is administrative harassment of foreign students, which is topical, with the minister of the interior ("Libération" on 23 May) declaring that France "does not need foreign talent, bricklayers and waiters." But it is only rarely analyzed from the economic viewpoint. There is a lot of consensus between the Left and the Right on this subject. On the Right, the tone was set by Jacques Chirac, who declared in 1976 that "900,000 unemployed would not become a problem in a country with 2 million of foreign workers," and on the Left by Michel Rocard explaining in 1990 that <t>France</t> "can not accommodate all the world's misery." The only difference, the degree of generosity

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=france%1:15:00:: | definition=a republic in western Europe; the largest country wholly in Europe | synonyms=French Republic
2. sense_key=france%1:18:00:: | definition=French writer of sophisticated novels and short stories (1844-1924) | synonyms=Anatole France, Jacques Anatole Francois Thibault

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

reasoning_content:
*   Target lemma: `france`
    *   Target surface form: `France`
    *   Context: A discussion about immigration policy, Nicolas Sarkozy, Jacques Chirac, Michel Rocard, and the economy. Specifically, the sentence: "...and on the Left by Michel Rocard explaining in 1990 that <t>France</t> 'can not accommodate all the world's misery.'"
    *   Candidate senses:
        1.  `france%1:15:00::`: a republic in western Europe; the largest country wholly in Europe (synonym: French Republic).
        2.  `france%1:18:00::`: French writer of sophisticated novels and short stories (1844-1924) (synonym: Anatole France).

    *   The context discusses immigration policy, government ministers, and political figures (Sarkozy, Chirac, Rocard).
    *   The phrase "France 'can not accommodate all the world's misery'" clearly refers to the nation/country, not a specific writer.

    *   Sense 1 is the country (French Republic).
    *   Sense 2 is the writer (Anatole France).

    *   Sense 1 is the correct fit.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: misery
Target surface form: misery
Context:
Is immigration a burden or an opportunity for the economy? Immigration policy under Nicolas Sarkozy was criticised from various aspects a congestion of police, legal and administrative services subjected to a policy of numbers and the compatibility of that policy with the self-proclaimed status of the country as the country of French human rights. More recently, it is administrative harassment of foreign students, which is topical, with the minister of the interior ("Libération" on 23 May) declaring that France "does not need foreign talent, bricklayers and waiters." But it is only rarely analyzed from the economic viewpoint. There is a lot of consensus between the Left and the Right on this subject. On the Right, the tone was set by Jacques Chirac, who declared in 1976 that "900,000 unemployed would not become a problem in a country with 2 million of foreign workers," and on the Left by Michel Rocard explaining in 1990 that France "can not accommodate all the world's <t>misery</t>." The only difference, the degree of generosity

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=misery%1:26:00:: | definition=a state of ill-being due to affliction or misfortune | synonyms=wretchedness, miserableness | examples=the misery and wretchedness of those slums is intolerable
2. sense_key=misery%1:12:00:: | definition=a feeling of intense unhappiness | examples=she was exhausted by her misery and grief

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

reasoning_content:
*   Target lemma: `misery`
    *   Target surface form: `misery`
    *   Context: "...Michel Rocard explaining in 1990 that France 'can not accommodate all the world's misery.'"
    *   Candidate senses:
        1.  `misery%1:26:00::`: a state of ill-being due to affliction or misfortune (synonyms: wretchedness, miserableness; example: the misery and wretchedness of those slums is intolerable).
        2.  `misery%1:12:00::`: a feeling of intense unhappiness (example: she was exhausted by her misery and grief).

    *   The sentence is about immigration and the capacity of a country (France) to "accommodate" the world's misery.
    *   "Accommodate" in this context suggests providing shelter, resources, or relief to people living in poor conditions.
    *   "The world's misery" refers to the collective state of poverty, suffering, and hardship experienced by people globally, rather than a personal internal feeling of unhappiness.

    *   Sense 1: "a state of ill-being due to affliction or misfortune" (wretchedness). This fits the context of global poverty and hardship.
    *   Sense 2: "a feeling of intense unhappiness". This is an internal emotional state. While people in misery feel unhappy, the context of "accommodating" it refers to the external condition/state of being.

    *   Sense 1 is the best fit because it describes the objective state of suffering/poverty (ill-being) that a country would try to "accommodate" through immigration or aid.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: difference
Target surface form: difference
Context:
Immigration policy under Nicolas Sarkozy was criticised from various aspects a congestion of police, legal and administrative services subjected to a policy of numbers and the compatibility of that policy with the self-proclaimed status of the country as the country of French human rights. More recently, it is administrative harassment of foreign students, which is topical, with the minister of the interior ("Libération" on 23 May) declaring that France "does not need foreign talent, bricklayers and waiters." But it is only rarely analyzed from the economic viewpoint. There is a lot of consensus between the Left and the Right on this subject. On the Right, the tone was set by Jacques Chirac, who declared in 1976 that "900,000 unemployed would not become a problem in a country with 2 million of foreign workers," and on the Left by Michel Rocard explaining in 1990 that France "can not accommodate all the world's misery." The only <t>difference</t>, the degree of generosity In 2005, the fear of invasion of the national territory by hordes of Polish plumbers was felt both on the Left and on the Right.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=difference%1:07:00:: | definition=the quality of being unlike or dissimilar | examples=there are many differences between jazz and rock
2. sense_key=difference%1:11:00:: | definition=a variation that deviates from the standard or norm | synonyms=deviation, divergence, departure | examples=the deviation from the mean
3. sense_key=difference%1:10:00:: | definition=a disagreement or argument about something important | synonyms=dispute, difference of opinion, conflict | examples=he had a dispute with his wife; there were irreconcilable differences
4. sense_key=difference%1:24:00:: | definition=a significant change | examples=the difference in her is amazing; his support made a real difference
5. sense_key=difference%1:23:00:: | definition=the number that remains after subtraction; the number that when added to the subtrahend gives the minuend | synonyms=remainder

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

reasoning_content:
*   Target lemma: "difference"
    *   Context: "There is a lot of consensus between the Left and the Right on this subject. On the Right, the tone was set by Jacques Chirac... and on the Left by Michel Rocard... The only <t>difference</t>, the degree of generosity..."
    *   Analysis: The text discusses the consensus between the Left and Right political wings regarding immigration. It then mentions that the "only difference" is the "degree of generosity." This refers to the quality of being unlike or dissimilar between the two positions (the Left's position vs. the Right's position).

    *   Sense 1: "the quality of being unlike or dissimilar" (e.g., differences between jazz and rock).
    *   Sense 2: "a variation that deviates from the standard or norm" (e.g., deviation from the mean).
    *   Sense 3: "a disagreement or argument about something important" (e.g., dispute, difference of opinion).
    *   Sense 4: "a significant change" (e.g., the difference in her is amazing).
    *   Sense 5: "the number that remains after subtraction" (mathematical).

    *   The context says "There is a lot of consensus... The only difference, the degree of generosity."
    *   It's contrasting the positions of the Left and the Right.
    *   Is it a "disagreement" (Sense 3)? While they might disagree on the degree of generosity, the sentence structure "The only difference, the degree of generosity" points to the *distinction* or *dissimilarity* between the two views, rather than the act of arguing or the state of being in conflict.
    *   Is it "the quality of being unlike or dissimilar" (Sense 1)? Yes. The difference between the Left's view and the Right's view is the degree of generosity. This fits the "unlike or dissimilar" definition perfectly.

    *   Sense 1: Dissimilarity. (Fits well: The difference between A and B is X).
    *   Sense 3: Disagreement. (Less likely: "The only disagreement, the degree of generosity" works, but "difference" here is used to identify the specific point of divergence/dissimilarity in their otherwise similar views).

    *   "There is a lot of consensus... The only difference [between them], [is] the degree of generosity."
    *   This is a classic use of "difference" to mean a point of dissimilarity.

    *   Sense 1: quality of being unlike or dissimilar.
    *   Sense 2: deviation from norm.
    *   Sense 3: dispute/conflict.
    *   Sense 4: significant change.
    *   Sense 5: mathematical remainder.

    Sense 1 is the most accurate.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: degree
Target surface form: degree
Context:
Immigration policy under Nicolas Sarkozy was criticised from various aspects a congestion of police, legal and administrative services subjected to a policy of numbers and the compatibility of that policy with the self-proclaimed status of the country as the country of French human rights. More recently, it is administrative harassment of foreign students, which is topical, with the minister of the interior ("Libération" on 23 May) declaring that France "does not need foreign talent, bricklayers and waiters." But it is only rarely analyzed from the economic viewpoint. There is a lot of consensus between the Left and the Right on this subject. On the Right, the tone was set by Jacques Chirac, who declared in 1976 that "900,000 unemployed would not become a problem in a country with 2 million of foreign workers," and on the Left by Michel Rocard explaining in 1990 that France "can not accommodate all the world's misery." The only difference, the <t>degree</t> of generosity In 2005, the fear of invasion of the national territory by hordes of Polish plumbers was felt both on the Left and on the Right.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=degree%1:07:00:: | definition=a position on a scale of intensity or amount or quality | synonyms=grade, level | examples=a moderate grade of intelligence; a high level of care is required
2. sense_key=degree%1:26:01:: | definition=a specific identifiable position in a continuum or series or especially in a process | synonyms=level, stage, point | examples=a remarkable degree of frankness; at what stage are the social sciences?
3. sense_key=degree%1:10:00:: | definition=an award conferred by a college or university signifying that the recipient has satisfactorily completed a course of study | synonyms=academic degree | examples=he earned his degree at Princeton summa cum laude
4. sense_key=degree%1:23:00:: | definition=a measure for arcs and angles | synonyms=arcdegree | examples=there are 360 degrees in a circle
5. sense_key=degree%1:09:00:: | definition=the highest power of a term or variable
6. sense_key=degree%1:23:03:: | definition=a unit of temperature on a specified scale | examples=the game was played in spite of the 40-degree temperature
7. sense_key=degree%1:07:01:: | definition=the seriousness of something (e.g., a burn or crime) | examples=murder in the second degree; a second degree burn

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

reasoning_content:
*   Target lemma: `degree`
    *   Target surface form: `degree`
    *   Context: "The only difference, the <t>degree</t> of generosity"
    *   Surrounding text: Discussing immigration policy, consensus between Left and Right, and the difference being the "degree of generosity".

    *   Sense 1: `degree%1:07:00::` - a position on a scale of intensity or amount or quality (synonyms: grade, level). Example: "a moderate grade of intelligence".
    *   Sense 2: `degree%1:26:01::` - a specific identifiable position in a continuum or series or especially in a process (synonyms: level, stage, point). Example: "a remarkable degree of frankness".
    *   Sense 3: `degree%1:10:00::` - academic degree.
    *   Sense 4: `degree%1:23:00::` - measure for arcs and angles.
    *   Sense 5: `degree%1:09:00::` - highest power of a term or variable.
    *   Sense 6: `degree%1:23:03::` - unit of temperature.
    *   Sense 7: `degree%1:07:01::` - seriousness of something (e.g., burn or crime).

    *   The phrase is "the degree of generosity".
    *   "Generosity" is a quality.
    *   "Degree" here refers to how much generosity is present (the amount or intensity of the quality).
    *   Comparing Sense 1 and Sense 2:
        *   Sense 1: "a position on a scale of intensity or amount or quality" (synonyms: grade, level).
        *   Sense 2: "a specific identifiable position in a continuum or series or especially in a process" (synonyms: level, stage, point).
    *   "Degree of generosity" fits better with "amount or quality" (Sense 1) or "identifiable position in a continuum" (Sense 2).
    *   Let's look at the examples:
        *   Sense 1: "a moderate grade of intelligence" (intelligence is a quality).
        *   Sense 2: "a remarkable degree of frankness" (frankness is a quality).
    *   Wait, Sense 1 and Sense 2 are very similar. Let's re-examine.
    *   Sense 1: "a position on a scale of intensity or amount or quality".
    *   Sense 2: "a specific identifiable position in a continuum or series or especially in a process".
    *   "Degree of generosity" describes the *extent* or *amount* of generosity.
    *   In many WordNet versions, "degree" as in "extent" is often mapped to the sense of "amount/intensity".
    *   Let's look at the synonyms:
        *   Sense 1: grade, level.
        *   Sense 2: level, stage, point.
    *   "The degree of generosity" is more about the *amount* (how generous) than a *stage* in a process.
    *   Comparing "a moderate grade of intelligence" (Sense 1) and "a remarkable degree of frankness" (Sense 2). Both are qualities.
    *   Actually, looking closer at the definitions:
        *   Sense 1: "a position on a scale of intensity or amount or quality"
        *   Sense 2: "a specific identifiable position in a continuum or series or especially in a process"
    *   "Generosity" is a quality. The "degree of generosity" is the amount of that quality.
    *   Sense 1 seems to fit "amount or quality" more directly.
    *   Let's double-check Sense 2 again: "identifiable position in a continuum... especially in a process". Generosity isn't really a process.
    *   Therefore, Sense 1 is the better fit.

    *   Sense 1: position on a scale of intensity/amount/quality. (Fits "degree of generosity")
    *   Sense 2: position in a continuum/series/process. (Less fit)
    *   Sense 3-7: Clearly incorrect.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: generosity
Target surface form: generosity
Context:
Immigration policy under Nicolas Sarkozy was criticised from various aspects a congestion of police, legal and administrative services subjected to a policy of numbers and the compatibility of that policy with the self-proclaimed status of the country as the country of French human rights. More recently, it is administrative harassment of foreign students, which is topical, with the minister of the interior ("Libération" on 23 May) declaring that France "does not need foreign talent, bricklayers and waiters." But it is only rarely analyzed from the economic viewpoint. There is a lot of consensus between the Left and the Right on this subject. On the Right, the tone was set by Jacques Chirac, who declared in 1976 that "900,000 unemployed would not become a problem in a country with 2 million of foreign workers," and on the Left by Michel Rocard explaining in 1990 that France "can not accommodate all the world's misery." The only difference, the degree of <t>generosity</t> In 2005, the fear of invasion of the national territory by hordes of Polish plumbers was felt both on the Left and on the Right.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=generosity%1:07:00:: | definition=the trait of being willing to give your money or time | synonyms=generousness
2. sense_key=generosity%1:04:00:: | definition=acting generously | synonyms=unselfishness

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

reasoning_content:
*   Target lemma: `generosity`
    *   Target surface form: `generosity`
    *   Context: A discussion about immigration policy in France, contrasting the views of the Right (Chirac) and the Left (Rocard). Both agree that France cannot take everyone, but they differ in the "degree of generosity."
    *   Candidate senses:
        1.  `generosity%1:07:00::`: the trait of being willing to give your money or time (generousness).
        2.  `generosity%1:04:00::`: acting generously (unselfishness).

    *   The text discusses immigration policy.
    *   The "degree of generosity" refers to how welcoming or open the country is to immigrants (how much "space" or "opportunity" it is willing to give).
    *   Sense 1 focuses on the *trait* of being willing to give money or time.
    *   Sense 2 focuses on the *act* or *quality* of acting generously (unselfishness).

    *   In the context of national policy, "generosity" isn't necessarily about an individual's trait of giving money, but rather the general spirit or quality of the policy (how generous the policy is).
    *   However, looking at the WordNet definitions provided:
        *   Sense 1: "the trait of being willing to give your money or time"
        *   Sense 2: "acting generously" (synonym: unselfishness)
    *   Wait, let's look closer. "The only difference, the degree of generosity."
    *   Is it a "trait" (Sense 1) or "acting generously" (Sense 2)?
    *   Usually, "generosity" in a political context refers to the willingness to be lenient, open, or providing (which aligns with the general concept of being generous).
    *   Sense 1 is more about the *disposition* (trait).
    *   Sense 2 is more about the *action/quality* (unselfishness).
    *   Comparing "the trait of being willing to give" vs "acting generously".
    *   In "the degree of generosity", it refers to the extent to which the policy is generous. This is a quality of the approach.
    *   Let's re-evaluate the WordNet senses. Often, "generosity" as a trait (Sense 1) is used to describe the quality of a person or an entity (like a government).
    *   Sense 2 ("acting generously") is more about the specific instance or the general quality of unselfishness.
    *   Actually, looking at standard WordNet:
        *   `generosity%1:07:00` is often listed as "the quality of being generous".
        *   `generosity%1:04:00` is often listed as "the quality of being generous" as well, but sometimes distinguished by "unselfishness".
    *   Let's look at the provided definitions again:
        1. "the trait of being willing to give your money or time"
        2. "acting generously"
    *   The "degree of generosity" in immigration policy refers to the willingness to accept people (giving them entry/opportunity). This fits "the trait of being willing to give" (Sense 1) better than "acting generously" (Sense 2), as it describes the characteristic of the policy/stance.
    *   Wait, "acting generously" (Sense 2) is almost a gerund-like definition. "The degree of acting generously" sounds awkward. "The degree of the trait of being willing to give" (Sense 1) makes more sense.

    *   Sense 1: Trait of being willing to give.
    *   Sense 2: Acting generously / unselfishness.
    *   In the context of "the degree of generosity" regarding immigration, it's about the willingness to be open/giving. This is a trait/characteristic of the policy.

    *   Sense 1: trait of being willing to give money or time.
    *   Sense 2: acting generously / unselfishness.
    *   Immigration policy isn't exactly about "money or time" in the literal sense of a personal donation, but it is about the "willingness to give" (opportunity, residency).
    *   Sense 2 is "acting generously".
    *   Usually, "degree of [noun]" refers to a quality or trait.
    *   Let's check if there's a better fit. "Generosity" here means the extent to which the policy is lenient or welcoming.
    *   Between "trait of being willing to give" and "acting generously", the "trait" (Sense 1) is a more natural fit for "degree of...".

    *   Sense 1: generosity%1:07:00 (trait)
    *   Sense 2: generosity%1:04:00 (acting generously)
    *   The context is about the *extent* (degree) of the quality. Sense 1 describes the quality/trait.

    *   Wait, let me re-read. "The only difference, the degree of generosity."
    *   If I say "the degree of unselfishness" (Sense 2), it works.
    *   If I say "the degree of the trait of being willing to give" (Sense 1), it also works.
    *   However, Sense 1 specifically mentions "money or time". Immigration policy isn't primarily about giving money or time.
    *   Sense 2 is "acting generously" / "unselfishness".
    *   Is "unselfishness" a better fit for immigration policy? Not necessarily.
    *   Is "willing to give" a better fit? Yes, in the sense of giving access/rights.
    *   Let's look at the senses again.
    *   Sense 1: `generosity%1:07:00` - the trait of being willing to give your money or time.
    *   Sense 2: `generosity%1:04:00` - acting generously.
    *   Actually, in many WordNet versions, `generosity%1:04:00` is the general "quality of being generous".
    *   Let's re-examine the provided definitions.
    *   1: "the trait of being willing to give your money or time"
    *   2: "acting generously"
    *   This is a tough one because neither is a perfect fit for "immigration policy". But "the trait of being willing to give" (Sense 1) is a more standard definition of generosity as a quality, whereas "acting generously" (Sense 2) describes the action. "Degree of generosity" refers to the quality.

    *   Wait, I just noticed Sense 2's synonym is "unselfishness".
    *   Sense 1's synonym is "generousness".
    *   "Generousness" and "generosity" are often interchangeable.
    *   Let's think about "degree of generosity". It means how generous the policy is.
    *   If the policy is "generous", it is "willing to give" (entry, rights, etc.).
    *   Sense 1: "the trait of being willing to give your money or time".
    *   Sense 2: "acting generously".
    *   If I have to choose the *best* one, Sense 1 describes the *disposition* (the trait), which is what "degree of" usually modifies.

    *   Let's double-check the WordNet sense keys if possible (though I shouldn't use them in the answer).
    *   `generosity%1:07:00` is often "the quality of being generous".
    *   `generosity%1:04:00` is often "the quality of being generous".
    *   Wait, the provided definitions are:
        1. the trait of being willing to give your money or time
        2. acting generously
    *   If Sense 2 is "acting generously", it's more of a description of the behavior.
    *   If Sense 1 is "the trait of being willing to give", it's the quality.
    *   "The degree of [quality]" is the standard construction.

    *   Let's reconsider Sense 2: "acting generously". Could "generosity" here mean the act of being generous? "The only difference, the degree of [the act of being generous]." No, that doesn't sound right.
    *   "The only difference, the degree of [the trait of being willing to give]." This sounds better.

    *   Wait, let me look at the context again. "France can not accommodate all the world's misery." "The only difference, the degree of generosity."
    *   This means the difference is how much they are willing to give/accommodate.
    *   This aligns well with "the trait of being willing to give".

    *   Sense 1: trait of being willing to give money or time.
    *   Sense 2: acting generously / unselfishness.
    *   While "money or time" is specific, "willing to give" is the core of the sense.
    *   Sense 2 is "acting generously", which is more about the action than the quality.
    *   Therefore, Sense 1 is the better fit for "degree of generosity".


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: fear
Target surface form: fear
Context:
More recently, it is administrative harassment of foreign students, which is topical, with the minister of the interior ("Libération" on 23 May) declaring that France "does not need foreign talent, bricklayers and waiters." But it is only rarely analyzed from the economic viewpoint. There is a lot of consensus between the Left and the Right on this subject. On the Right, the tone was set by Jacques Chirac, who declared in 1976 that "900,000 unemployed would not become a problem in a country with 2 million of foreign workers," and on the Left by Michel Rocard explaining in 1990 that France "can not accommodate all the world's misery." The only difference, the degree of generosity In 2005, the <t>fear</t> of invasion of the national territory by hordes of Polish plumbers was felt both on the Left and on the Right. Both sides see immigrants as a burden on the French economy and on French society.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=fear%1:12:00:: | definition=an emotion experienced in anticipation of some specific pain or danger (usually accompanied by a desire to flee or fight) | synonyms=fearfulness, fright
2. sense_key=fear%1:12:01:: | definition=an anxious feeling | synonyms=concern, care | examples=care had aged him; they hushed it up out of fear of public reaction
3. sense_key=fear%1:12:02:: | definition=a feeling of profound respect for someone or something | synonyms=reverence, awe, veneration | examples=the fear of God; the Chinese reverence for the dead

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 2}
```

reasoning_content:
*   Target lemma: "fear"
    *   Target surface form: "fear"
    *   Context: "...the <t>fear</t> of invasion of the national territory by hordes of Polish plumbers was felt both on the Left and on the Right."
    *   Candidate senses:
        1.  `fear%1:12:00::`: an emotion experienced in anticipation of some specific pain or danger (usually accompanied by a desire to flee or fight). Synonyms: fearfulness, fright.
        2.  `fear%1:12:01::`: an anxious feeling. Synonyms: concern, care. Example: "they hushed it up out of fear of public reaction".
        3.  `fear%1:12:02::`: a feeling of profound respect for someone or something. Synonyms: reverence, awe, veneration.

    *   The context describes a political climate where immigrants (specifically "Polish plumbers") are seen as a "burden" and an "invasion."
    *   The "fear of invasion" refers to a widespread anxiety or concern about the socio-economic impact of immigration.
    *   It's not a sudden "fright" or "panic" (Sense 1), nor is it "reverence" (Sense 3).
    *   It aligns best with "an anxious feeling" or "concern" (Sense 2).

    *   Sense 1: "emotion experienced in anticipation of some specific pain or danger (usually accompanied by a desire to flee or fight)". While "invasion" sounds like danger, in this political context, it's a metaphorical/societal danger, leading to anxiety/concern rather than a fight-or-flight response.
    *   Sense 2: "an anxious feeling" (synonyms: concern, care). This fits the context of political discourse and societal anxiety about immigration. The example "fear of public reaction" is very similar to "fear of invasion" in terms of being a generalized anxiety about a potential outcome.
    *   Sense 3: "profound respect". Clearly incorrect.

    *   The "fear of invasion" in this context is a collective anxiety/concern about the consequences of immigration. Sense 2 is the most appropriate fit.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: invasion
Target surface form: invasion
Context:
More recently, it is administrative harassment of foreign students, which is topical, with the minister of the interior ("Libération" on 23 May) declaring that France "does not need foreign talent, bricklayers and waiters." But it is only rarely analyzed from the economic viewpoint. There is a lot of consensus between the Left and the Right on this subject. On the Right, the tone was set by Jacques Chirac, who declared in 1976 that "900,000 unemployed would not become a problem in a country with 2 million of foreign workers," and on the Left by Michel Rocard explaining in 1990 that France "can not accommodate all the world's misery." The only difference, the degree of generosity In 2005, the fear of <t>invasion</t> of the national territory by hordes of Polish plumbers was felt both on the Left and on the Right. Both sides see immigrants as a burden on the French economy and on French society.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=invasion%1:04:00:: | definition=the act of invading; the act of an army that invades for conquest or plunder
2. sense_key=invasion%1:11:00:: | definition=any entry into an area not previously occupied | synonyms=encroachment, intrusion | examples=an invasion of tourists; an invasion of locusts
3. sense_key=invasion%1:11:01:: | definition=(pathology) the spread of pathogenic microorganisms or malignant cells to new sites in the body | examples=the tumor's invasion of surrounding structures

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 2}
```

reasoning_content:
*   Target lemma: `invasion`
    *   Target surface form: `invasion`
    *   Context: "...the fear of <t>invasion</t> of the national territory by hordes of Polish plumbers was felt both on the Left and on the Right."
    *   Candidate senses:
        1.  `invasion%1:04:00::`: the act of invading; the act of an army that invades for conquest or plunder.
        2.  `invasion%1:11:00::`: any entry into an area not previously occupied; synonyms: encroachment, intrusion; examples: an invasion of tourists; an invasion of locusts.
        3.  `invasion%1:11:01::`: (pathology) the spread of pathogenic microorganisms or malignant cells to new sites in the body.

    *   The context refers to "hordes of Polish plumbers" entering the "national territory."
    *   This is not a military invasion for conquest or plunder (Sense 1).
    *   This is not a medical/pathological spread of cells (Sense 3).
    *   This describes a large number of people (migrants/workers) entering a country, which fits the "any entry into an area not previously occupied" or "invasion of tourists" example in Sense 2.

    *   Sense 1: Military/Conquest. (Incorrect)
    *   Sense 2: General entry/intrusion (e.g., tourists, locusts). (Correct)
    *   Sense 3: Medical. (Incorrect)


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: territory
Target surface form: territory
Context:
More recently, it is administrative harassment of foreign students, which is topical, with the minister of the interior ("Libération" on 23 May) declaring that France "does not need foreign talent, bricklayers and waiters." But it is only rarely analyzed from the economic viewpoint. There is a lot of consensus between the Left and the Right on this subject. On the Right, the tone was set by Jacques Chirac, who declared in 1976 that "900,000 unemployed would not become a problem in a country with 2 million of foreign workers," and on the Left by Michel Rocard explaining in 1990 that France "can not accommodate all the world's misery." The only difference, the degree of generosity In 2005, the fear of invasion of the national <t>territory</t> by hordes of Polish plumbers was felt both on the Left and on the Right. Both sides see immigrants as a burden on the French economy and on French society.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=territory%1:15:00:: | definition=a region marked off for administrative or other purposes | synonyms=district, territorial dominion, dominion
2. sense_key=territory%1:09:00:: | definition=an area of knowledge or interest | examples=his questions covered a lot of territory
3. sense_key=territory%1:15:01:: | definition=the geographical area under the jurisdiction of a sovereign state | synonyms=soil | examples=American troops were stationed on Japanese soil

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 3}
```

reasoning_content:
*   Target lemma: `territory`
    *   Context: "...the fear of invasion of the national <t>territory</t> by hordes of Polish plumbers was felt both on the Left and on the Right."
    *   Candidate senses:
        1.  `territory%1:15:00::`: a region marked off for administrative or other purposes (district, territorial dominion).
        2.  `territory%1:09:00::`: an area of knowledge or interest.
        3.  `territory%1:15:01::`: the geographical area under the jurisdiction of a sovereign state (soil).

    *   The sentence mentions "invasion of the national territory".
    *   "National territory" refers to the land/geographical area of a country (France, in this context).
    *   "Invasion" implies crossing a border into a sovereign state's land.

    *   Sense 1: Administrative region. While a country is administrative, "national territory" usually refers to the whole sovereign area.
    *   Sense 2: Area of knowledge. Not applicable here.
    *   Sense 3: Geographical area under the jurisdiction of a sovereign state. This fits perfectly with "national territory" and the concept of "invasion".

    *   Sense 3 is the most precise fit for "national territory" in the context of a sovereign state (France) and the fear of "invasion".


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: horde
Target surface form: hordes
Context:
More recently, it is administrative harassment of foreign students, which is topical, with the minister of the interior ("Libération" on 23 May) declaring that France "does not need foreign talent, bricklayers and waiters." But it is only rarely analyzed from the economic viewpoint. There is a lot of consensus between the Left and the Right on this subject. On the Right, the tone was set by Jacques Chirac, who declared in 1976 that "900,000 unemployed would not become a problem in a country with 2 million of foreign workers," and on the Left by Michel Rocard explaining in 1990 that France "can not accommodate all the world's misery." The only difference, the degree of generosity In 2005, the fear of invasion of the national territory by <t>hordes</t> of Polish plumbers was felt both on the Left and on the Right. Both sides see immigrants as a burden on the French economy and on French society.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=horde%1:14:00:: | definition=a vast multitude | synonyms=host, legion
2. sense_key=horde%1:14:02:: | definition=a nomadic community
3. sense_key=horde%1:14:01:: | definition=a moving crowd | synonyms=drove, swarm

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 3}
```

reasoning_content:
*   Target lemma: `horde`
    *   Target surface form: `hordes`
    *   Context: "...the fear of invasion of the national territory by <t>hordes</t> of Polish plumbers was felt both on the Left and on the Right."
    *   Candidate senses:
        1.  `horde%1:14:00::` - a vast multitude (synonyms: host, legion)
        2.  `horde%1:14:02::` - a nomadic community
        3.  `horde%1:14:01::` - a moving crowd (synonyms: drove, swarm)

    *   The context describes a "fear of invasion" by "hordes of Polish plumbers."
    *   This is a metaphorical or hyperbolic use of the word to describe a large number of people (immigrants/workers) entering a country.
    *   Sense 2 (nomadic community) is clearly incorrect.
    *   Sense 1 (vast multitude) refers to a very large number of people.
    *   Sense 3 (moving crowd) refers to a crowd in motion (like a swarm or drove).

    *   "Hordes of Polish plumbers" suggests a large, overwhelming number of people.
    *   While "moving crowd" (Sense 3) might seem applicable because they are moving into the country, "vast multitude" (Sense 1) better captures the sense of an overwhelming number/quantity often associated with the "invasion" rhetoric.
    *   However, looking at the synonyms:
        *   Sense 1: host, legion (often used for armies or massive numbers).
        *   Sense 3: drove, swarm (often used for people moving in large numbers, often with a slightly negative connotation of being pests or uncontrolled).
    *   In the phrase "hordes of [people]", it usually means a large number of people.
    *   Let's re-evaluate "moving crowd" vs "vast multitude".
    *   "Invasion... by hordes" strongly implies a mass movement.
    *   Comparing "vast multitude" (1) and "moving crowd" (3):
        *   "Vast multitude" is more about the size.
        *   "Moving crowd" is more about the action/nature of the group.
    *   In the context of "invasion", the "moving" aspect is inherent, but the "vast multitude" aspect is the core of the fear.
    *   Wait, let's look at how "horde" is typically used in this specific "invasion" trope. It usually means a large, disorganized, or threatening group.
    *   Sense 1: a vast multitude.
    *   Sense 3: a moving crowd.
    *   "Drove" and "swarm" (Sense 3) are very close to how "hordes" is used when describing people arriving in large numbers.
    *   However, "vast multitude" (Sense 1) is a more general term for a huge number.
    *   Let's check common usage: "hordes of tourists", "hordes of shoppers". These are often categorized as "moving crowds" or "swarms".
    *   But "invasion by hordes" sounds more like "legions" or a "vast multitude".
    *   Let's look at the WordNet distinctions again.
        *   `horde%1:14:00` (vast multitude)
        *   `horde%1:14:01` (moving crowd)
    *   If the focus is on the *number* (multitude), it's 1. If the focus is on the *movement/crowd* (swarm), it's 3.
    *   "Invasion... by hordes" emphasizes the overwhelming number coming in.
    *   Actually, "swarm" and "drove" (Sense 3) are often used for people moving from one place to another (e.g., "they came in droves").
    *   "Hordes of Polish plumbers" fits the "came in droves/swarms" pattern.

    *   Sense 1: vast multitude (host, legion).
    *   Sense 3: moving crowd (drove, swarm).
    *   "Hordes of [people]" is almost always used to mean a large number of people, often moving.
    *   In the context of "invasion", the movement is key.
    *   Let's compare "a host of" vs "a swarm of".
    *   "A host of" is often used for a large number of things (not necessarily people).
    *   "A swarm of" is used for people moving in a disorganized way.
    *   "Hordes" in the context of immigrants/workers is usually meant to evoke a sense of an uncontrolled, moving mass.

    *   Sense 1: vast multitude.
    *   Sense 3: moving crowd.
    *   Looking at typical WordNet-based WSD tasks, "hordes of tourists" or "hordes of people" often maps to "moving crowd" (Sense 3) because of the "swarm/drove" synonym.
    *   "Invasion... by hordes" implies the movement.

    *   Sense 1: vast multitude.
    *   Sense 3: moving crowd.
    *   If I have to choose the *best* one: "hordes of Polish plumbers" describes people moving into a country. "Drove" and "swarm" are perfect synonyms for this.

    *   Wait, let me double-check. Is "vast multitude" more appropriate for "invasion"?
    *   "Legion" (Sense 1) is often used for armies.
    *   "Swarm" (Sense 3) is often used for pests or large groups of people.
    *   The phrase "hordes of Polish plumbers" is meant to be derogatory/fear-mongering, similar to "swarms".

    *   Sense 1: vast multitude.
    *   Sense 3: moving crowd.
    *   The context "invasion of the national territory by hordes" strongly suggests the movement of a crowd.

    *   Sense 1: vast multitude.
    *   Sense 3: moving crowd.
    *   Actually, many corpora map "hordes of [people]" to the "vast multitude" sense when the emphasis is on the sheer number, and "moving crowd" when the emphasis is on the movement.
    *   "Invasion... by hordes" emphasizes both, but "invasion" already provides the movement. "Hordes" provides the scale and the nature of the group.
    *   Let's look at the synonyms again. "Host, legion" vs "drove, swarm".
    *   "Drove" and "swarm" are much closer to the connotation of "hordes of [workers/tourists]".

    *   Sense 1: vast multitude.
    *   Sense 3: moving crowd.
    *   I will go with Sense 3.

    *   Wait, let me think one more time. "Vast multitude" is very general. "Moving crowd" is more specific.
    *   "Hordes of Polish plumbers" -> "Swarms of Polish plumbers" (Sense 3) vs "Legions of Polish plumbers" (Sense 1).
    *   "Swarms" feels more natural in this derogatory context than "legions".

    *   Sense 1: vast multitude.
    *   Sense 3: moving crowd.
    *   The "invasion" context makes "moving crowd" (Sense 3) a very strong fit.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: left
Target surface form: Left
Context:
More recently, it is administrative harassment of foreign students, which is topical, with the minister of the interior ("Libération" on 23 May) declaring that France "does not need foreign talent, bricklayers and waiters." But it is only rarely analyzed from the economic viewpoint. There is a lot of consensus between the Left and the Right on this subject. On the Right, the tone was set by Jacques Chirac, who declared in 1976 that "900,000 unemployed would not become a problem in a country with 2 million of foreign workers," and on the Left by Michel Rocard explaining in 1990 that France "can not accommodate all the world's misery." The only difference, the degree of generosity In 2005, the fear of invasion of the national territory by hordes of Polish plumbers was felt both on the <t>Left</t> and on the Right. Both sides see immigrants as a burden on the French economy and on French society.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=left%1:15:00:: | definition=location near or direction toward the left side; i.e. the side to the north when a person or object faces east | examples=she stood on the left
2. sense_key=left%1:14:00:: | definition=those who support varying degrees of social or political or economic change designed to promote the public welfare | synonyms=left wing
3. sense_key=left%1:08:00:: | definition=the hand that is on the left side of the body | synonyms=left hand | examples=jab with your left
4. sense_key=left%1:06:00:: | definition=the piece of ground in the outfield on the catcher's left | synonyms=left field | examples=the batter flied out to left
5. sense_key=left%1:04:00:: | definition=a turn toward the side of the body that is on the north when the person is facing east | examples=take a left at the corner

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 2}
```

reasoning_content:
*   Target lemma: "left"
    *   Target surface form: "Left"
    *   Context: "There is a lot of consensus between the Left and the Right on this subject... the fear of invasion of the national territory by hordes of Polish plumbers was felt both on the <t>Left</t> and on the Right."
    *   Candidate senses:
        1.  Location/direction (left side).
        2.  Political group supporting social/political/economic change (left wing).
        3.  The left hand.
        4.  Left field (baseball).
        5.  A turn toward the left.

    *   The context discusses political views ("minister of the interior", "consensus between the Left and the Right", "Jacques Chirac", "Michel Rocard").
    *   The phrase "on the Left and on the Right" clearly refers to political ideologies/wings.

    *   Sense 2: "those who support varying degrees of social or political or economic change designed to promote the public welfare" (synonym: left wing). This matches the political context perfectly.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: right
Target surface form: Right
Context:
More recently, it is administrative harassment of foreign students, which is topical, with the minister of the interior ("Libération" on 23 May) declaring that France "does not need foreign talent, bricklayers and waiters." But it is only rarely analyzed from the economic viewpoint. There is a lot of consensus between the Left and the Right on this subject. On the Right, the tone was set by Jacques Chirac, who declared in 1976 that "900,000 unemployed would not become a problem in a country with 2 million of foreign workers," and on the Left by Michel Rocard explaining in 1990 that France "can not accommodate all the world's misery." The only difference, the degree of generosity In 2005, the fear of invasion of the national territory by hordes of Polish plumbers was felt both on the Left and on the <t>Right</t>. Both sides see immigrants as a burden on the French economy and on French society.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=right%1:07:00:: | definition=an abstract idea of that which is due to a person or governmental body by law or tradition or nature; ; - Eleanor Roosevelt | examples=they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights; Certain rights can never be granted to the government but must be kept in the hands of the people
2. sense_key=right%1:15:00:: | definition=location near or direction toward the right side; i.e. the side to the south when a person or object faces east | examples=he stood on the right
3. sense_key=right%1:06:00:: | definition=the piece of ground in the outfield on the catcher's right | synonyms=right field
4. sense_key=right%1:14:00:: | definition=those who support political or social or economic conservatism; those who believe that things are better left unchanged | synonyms=right wing
5. sense_key=right%1:08:00:: | definition=the hand that is on the right side of the body | synonyms=right hand | examples=he writes with his right hand but pitches with his left; hit him with quick rights to the body
6. sense_key=right%1:04:00:: | definition=a turn toward the side of the body that is on the south when the person is facing east | examples=take a right at the corner
7. sense_key=right%1:07:01:: | definition=anything in accord with principles of justice | synonyms=rightfulness | examples=he feels he is in the right; the rightfulness of his claim
8. sense_key=right%1:21:00:: | definition=(frequently plural) the interest possessed by law or custom in some intangible thing | examples=mineral rights; film rights

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

raw_output:
```json
{"sense_index": 4}
```

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 4}
```

reasoning_content:
*   Target lemma: "right"
    *   Target surface form: "Right"
    *   Context: "There is a lot of consensus between the Left and the Right on this subject. On the Right, the tone was set by Jacques Chirac... the fear of invasion... was felt both on the Left and on the Right."
    *   Key phrases: "between the Left and the Right", "On the Right", "on the Left and on the Right".

    *   Sense 1: Legal/natural rights (unalienable Rights).
    *   Sense 2: Direction/location (right side).
    *   Sense 3: Baseball (right field).
    *   Sense 4: Political conservatism (right wing).
    *   Sense 5: Right hand.
    *   Sense 6: A turn toward the right.
    *   Sense 7: Justice/rightfulness.
    *   Sense 8: Legal interest (mineral rights).

    *   The context explicitly mentions "the Left and the Right" in the context of political figures (Jacques Chirac, Michel Rocard) and political views on immigration and the economy.
    *   This clearly refers to political orientation.
    *   Sense 4: "those who support political or social or economic conservatism; those who believe that things are better left unchanged | synonyms=right wing".

    *   Sense 4 matches perfectly.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: side
Target surface form: sides
Context:
But it is only rarely analyzed from the economic viewpoint. There is a lot of consensus between the Left and the Right on this subject. On the Right, the tone was set by Jacques Chirac, who declared in 1976 that "900,000 unemployed would not become a problem in a country with 2 million of foreign workers," and on the Left by Michel Rocard explaining in 1990 that France "can not accommodate all the world's misery." The only difference, the degree of generosity In 2005, the fear of invasion of the national territory by hordes of Polish plumbers was felt both on the Left and on the Right. Both <t>sides</t> see immigrants as a burden on the French economy and on French society. The only difference resides in the degree of generosity, which one deigns to grant to immigrants.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=side%1:15:02:: | definition=a place within a region identified relative to a center or reference location | examples=they always sat on the right side of the church; he never left my side
2. sense_key=side%1:14:00:: | definition=one of two or more contesting groups | examples=the Confederate side was prepared to attack
3. sense_key=side%1:08:00:: | definition=either the left or right half of a body | examples=he had a pain in his side
4. sense_key=side%1:15:00:: | definition=a surface forming part of the outside of an object | synonyms=face | examples=he examined all sides of the crystal; dew dripped from the face of the leaf
5. sense_key=side%1:06:00:: | definition=an extended outer surface of an object | examples=he turned the box over to examine the bottom side; they painted all four sides of the house
6. sense_key=side%1:09:00:: | definition=an aspect of something (as contrasted with some other implied aspect) | examples=he was on the heavy side; he is on the purchasing side of the business
7. sense_key=side%1:15:01:: | definition=a line segment forming part of the perimeter of a plane figure | examples=the hypotenuse of a right triangle is always the longest side
8. sense_key=side%1:14:01:: | definition=a family line of descent | examples=he gets his brains from his father's side
9. sense_key=side%1:13:00:: | definition=a lengthwise dressed half of an animal's carcass used for food | synonyms=side of meat
10. sense_key=side%1:10:00:: | definition=an opinion that is held in opposition to another in an argument or dispute | synonyms=position | examples=there are two sides to every question
11. sense_key=side%1:17:01:: | definition=an elevated geological formation | synonyms=slope, incline | examples=he climbed the steep slope; the house was built on the side of a mountain
12. sense_key=side%1:11:00:: | definition=(sports) the spin given to a ball by striking it on one side or releasing it with a sharp twist | synonyms=English

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 2}
```

reasoning_content:
*   Target lemma: `side`
    *   Target surface form: `sides`
    *   Context: "There is a lot of consensus between the Left and the Right on this subject... Both <t>sides</t> see immigrants as a burden on the French economy and on French society."
    *   Key entities: "the Left" and "the Right" (political factions).
    *   Usage: "Both sides" refers to the Left and the Right.

    *   1: place within a region relative to center (e.g., right side of church).
    *   2: one of two or more contesting groups (e.g., Confederate side).
    *   3: left or right half of a body.
    *   4: surface forming part of the outside of an object.
    *   5: extended outer surface of an object.
    *   6: an aspect of something.
    *   7: line segment of a plane figure.
    *   8: family line of descent.
    *   9: half of an animal's carcass.
    *   10: an opinion held in opposition to another (position).
    *   11: elevated geological formation (slope).
    *   12: spin given to a ball (sports).

    *   The context refers to "the Left" and "the Right," which are political groups/factions.
    *   "Both sides" refers to these two groups.
    *   Sense 2: "one of two or more contesting groups" fits perfectly.
    *   Sense 10: "an opinion that is held in opposition to another" is close, but "Both sides see immigrants as a burden" suggests the *groups* holding the opinion, not the opinions themselves.

    *   Sense 2: "one of two or more contesting groups" (e.g., "the Confederate side was prepared to attack").
    *   Sense 10: "an opinion that is held in opposition to another in an argument or dispute" (e.g., "there are two sides to every question").
    *   In the sentence "Both sides see immigrants as a burden," the "sides" are the actors (the Left and the Right), which are groups. Therefore, Sense 2 is the most accurate.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: burden
Target surface form: burden
Context:
But it is only rarely analyzed from the economic viewpoint. There is a lot of consensus between the Left and the Right on this subject. On the Right, the tone was set by Jacques Chirac, who declared in 1976 that "900,000 unemployed would not become a problem in a country with 2 million of foreign workers," and on the Left by Michel Rocard explaining in 1990 that France "can not accommodate all the world's misery." The only difference, the degree of generosity In 2005, the fear of invasion of the national territory by hordes of Polish plumbers was felt both on the Left and on the Right. Both sides see immigrants as a <t>burden</t> on the French economy and on French society. The only difference resides in the degree of generosity, which one deigns to grant to immigrants.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=burden%1:09:01:: | definition=an onerous or difficult concern | synonyms=load, encumbrance, incumbrance, onus | examples=the burden of responsibility; that's a load off my mind
2. sense_key=burden%1:06:01:: | definition=weight to be borne or conveyed | synonyms=load, loading
3. sense_key=burden%1:10:00:: | definition=the central meaning or theme of a speech or literary work | synonyms=effect, essence, core, gist
4. sense_key=burden%1:09:00:: | definition=the central idea that is expanded in a document or discourse

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

reasoning_content:
*   Target lemma: `burden`
    *   Target surface form: `burden`
    *   Context: "Both sides see immigrants as a <t>burden</t> on the French economy and on French society."
    *   Candidate senses:
        1.  `burden%1:09:01::`: an onerous or difficult concern (synonyms: load, encumbrance, onus; example: burden of responsibility).
        2.  `burden%1:06:01::`: weight to be borne or conveyed (synonyms: load, loading).
        3.  `burden%1:10:00::`: the central meaning or theme of a speech or literary work (synonyms: effect, essence, core, gist).
        4.  `burden%1:09:00::`: the central idea that is expanded in a document or discourse.

    *   The sentence says "Both sides see immigrants as a burden on the French economy and on French society."
    *   In this context, "burden" refers to something that is perceived as a cost, a strain, or a difficult responsibility/concern for the economy and society.
    *   It is not a physical weight (sense 2).
    *   It is not the central theme of a speech or document (senses 3 and 4).
    *   It fits the description of an "onerous or difficult concern" or an "encumbrance" (sense 1).

    *   Sense 1: "an onerous or difficult concern" (load, encumbrance, onus). This matches the idea of immigrants being a strain or cost to the economy/society.
    *   Sense 2: "weight to be borne or conveyed" (physical load). Not applicable.
    *   Sense 3: "central meaning or theme". Not applicable.
    *   Sense 4: "central idea". Not applicable.

    *   The best fit is sense 1.