[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: politician
Target surface form: politicians
Context:
Why ca not we teach our children to read, write and reckon? It's not that we do not know how to, because we do. It's that we do not want to. And the reason we do not want to is that effective education would require us to relinquish some cherished metaphysical beliefs about human nature in general and the human nature of young people in particular, well as to violate some cherished vested interests. These beliefs so dominate our educational establishment, our media, our <t>politicians</t>, and even our parents that it seems almost blasphemous to challenge them. Here is an example.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=politician%1:18:01:: | definition=a leader engaged in civil administration
2. sense_key=politician%1:18:00:: | definition=a person active in party politics | synonyms=politico, pol, political leader
3. sense_key=politician%1:18:02:: | definition=a schemer who tries to gain advantage in an organization in sly or underhanded ways

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The target word is "politicians" in the context: "These beliefs so dominate our educational establishment, our media, our politicians, and even our parents that it seems almost blasphemous to challenge them."
The context refers to politicians as a group of people active in politics, alongside the educational establishment, media, and parents.
Sense 1: a leader engaged in civil administration.
Sense 2: a person active in party politics (politico, pol, political leader).
Sense 3: a schemer who tries to gain advantage in an organization in sly or underhanded ways.

In this context, "politicians" refers to people active in party politics or political leaders in general, not specifically schemers (sense 3) or just civil administrators (sense 1). Sense 2 is the most general and appropriate for "our politicians" as a societal group.

Let's check the context again: "our educational establishment, our media, our politicians, and even our parents". This is a general reference to political figures/leaders. Sense 2 fits best.
Sense 2: a person active in party politics.
Synonyms: politico, pol, political leader.

I will choose sense 2.


attempt_kind: initial

status: success

[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: even
Target surface form: even
Context:
Why ca not we teach our children to read, write and reckon? It's not that we do not know how to, because we do. It's that we do not want to. And the reason we do not want to is that effective education would require us to relinquish some cherished metaphysical beliefs about human nature in general and the human nature of young people in particular, well as to violate some cherished vested interests. These beliefs so dominate our educational establishment, our media, our politicians, and <t>even</t> our parents that it seems almost blasphemous to challenge them. Here is an example.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=even%4:02:00:: | definition=used as an intensive especially to indicate something unexpected | examples=even an idiot knows that; declined even to consider the idea
2. sense_key=even%4:02:03:: | definition=in spite of; notwithstanding | examples=even when he is sick, he works; even with his head start she caught up with him
3. sense_key=even%4:02:01:: | definition=to a greater degree or extent; used with comparisons | synonyms=yet, still | examples=looked sick and felt even worse; an even (or still) more interesting problem
4. sense_key=even%4:02:04:: | definition=to the full extent | examples=loyal even unto death

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

finish_reason: stop

role: assistant

reasoning_content:
The target word is "even" in the context: "These beliefs so dominate our educational establishment, our media, our politicians, and even our parents that it seems almost blasphemous to challenge them."
The word "even" is used to indicate something unexpected or surprising in a list of things dominated by these beliefs (educational establishment, media, politicians, and even our parents).
Let's look at the candidate senses:
1. sense_key=even%4:02:00:: | definition=used as an intensive especially to indicate something unexpected | examples=even an idiot knows that; declined even to consider the idea
2. sense_key=even%4:02:03:: | definition=in spite of; notwithstanding | examples=even when he is sick, he works; even with his head start she caught up with him
3. sense_key=even%4:02:01:: | definition=to a greater degree or extent; used with comparisons | synonyms=yet, still | examples=looked sick and felt even worse; an even (or still) more interesting problem
4. sense_key=even%4:02:04:: | definition=to the full extent | examples=loyal even unto death

Sense 1 fits perfectly: "used as an intensive especially to indicate something unexpected". The parents are an unexpected addition to the list of entities dominated by these beliefs, or it emphasizes the extent of the domination.
"even our parents" -> intensive to indicate something unexpected.

Let's double check.
"even an idiot knows that" -> "even our parents"
Yes, sense 1 is the best fit.
Sense index: 1.
End of thought.

format: unknown

native_finish_reason: stop

provider: Alibaba

currency: USD


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: parent
Target surface form: parents
Context:
Why ca not we teach our children to read, write and reckon? It's not that we do not know how to, because we do. It's that we do not want to. And the reason we do not want to is that effective education would require us to relinquish some cherished metaphysical beliefs about human nature in general and the human nature of young people in particular, well as to violate some cherished vested interests. These beliefs so dominate our educational establishment, our media, our politicians, and even our <t>parents</t> that it seems almost blasphemous to challenge them. Here is an example.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=parent%1:18:00:: | definition=a father or mother; one who begets or one who gives birth to or nurtures and raises a child; a relative who plays the role of guardian
2. sense_key=parent%1:03:00:: | definition=an organism (plant or animal) from which younger ones are obtained

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The target word is "parents" in the context: "These beliefs so dominate our educational establishment, our media, our politicians, and even our parents that it seems almost blasphemous to challenge them."
The context talks about teaching children, human nature of young people, and the role of parents in relation to children.
Sense 1: a father or mother; one who begets or one who gives birth to or nurtures and raises a child; a relative who plays the role of guardian.
Sense 2: an organism (plant or animal) from which younger ones are obtained.

Sense 1 is clearly the best fit, as it refers to human parents raising children.
I will return {"sense_index": 1}.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: seem
Target surface form: seems
Context:
Why ca not we teach our children to read, write and reckon? It's not that we do not know how to, because we do. It's that we do not want to. And the reason we do not want to is that effective education would require us to relinquish some cherished metaphysical beliefs about human nature in general and the human nature of young people in particular, well as to violate some cherished vested interests. These beliefs so dominate our educational establishment, our media, our politicians, and even our parents that it <t>seems</t> almost blasphemous to challenge them. Here is an example.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=seem%2:39:00:: | definition=give a certain impression or have a certain outward aspect | synonyms=look, appear | examples=She seems to be sleeping; This appears to be a very difficult problem
2. sense_key=seem%2:39:01:: | definition=seem to be true, probable, or apparent | synonyms=appear | examples=It seems that he is very gifted; It appears that the weather in California is very bad
3. sense_key=seem%2:42:00:: | definition=appear to exist | examples=There seems no reason to go ahead with the project now
4. sense_key=seem%2:39:02:: | definition=appear to one's own mind or opinion | examples=I seem to be misunderstood by everyone; I can't seem to learn these Chinese characters

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The target word is "seems" in the context: "These beliefs so dominate our educational establishment, our media, our politicians, and even our parents that it seems almost blasphemous to challenge them."
The structure is "it seems [adjective] to [verb]".
Let's look at the candidate senses:
1. seem%2:39:00:: give a certain impression or have a certain outward aspect (look, appear). Example: She seems to be sleeping.
2. seem%2:39:01:: seem to be true, probable, or apparent (appear). Example: It seems that he is very gifted.
3. seem%2:42:00:: appear to exist. Example: There seems no reason to go ahead with the project now.
4. seem%2:39:02:: appear to one's own mind or opinion. Example: I seem to be misunderstood by everyone.

Wait, "it seems almost blasphemous to challenge them."
Is it sense 1 or 2?
Sense 1: give a certain impression or have a certain outward aspect. "it seems almost blasphemous" -> it gives the impression of being blasphemous.
Sense 2: seem to be true, probable, or apparent. "It seems that he is very gifted" -> "it seems almost blasphemous" could be "it appears to be true that it is blasphemous".
Let's check WordNet for "seem".
seem v
1. seem, appear, look (give a certain impression or have a certain outward aspect; "She seems to be sleeping"; "This appears to be a very difficult problem"; "The project looks promising"; "It seems like a good idea"; "The house looked sad")
2. seem, appear (seem to be true, probable, or apparent; "It seems that he is very gifted"; "It appears that the weather in California is very bad")
3. seem (appear to exist; "There seems no reason to go ahead with the project now")
4. seem (appear to one's own mind or opinion; "I seem to be misunderstood by everyone"; "I can't seem to learn these Chinese characters")

In "it seems almost blasphemous to challenge them", "it" is a dummy subject for "to challenge them". "To challenge them seems almost blasphemous."
This matches "give a certain impression or have a certain outward aspect" or "seem to be true, probable, or apparent".
Wait, "It seems like a good idea" is in sense 1. "It seems almost blasphemous" is similar to "It seems like a good idea".
Let's check the examples for sense 1: "It seems like a good idea".
"it seems almost blasphemous to challenge them" -> "to challenge them seems almost blasphemous".
Is it sense 1? "give a certain impression or have a certain outward aspect".
Let's consider sense 1 vs sense 2.
Sense 1: "She seems to be sleeping", "This appears to be a very difficult problem", "It seems like a good idea".
Sense 2: "It seems that he is very gifted", "It appears that the weather in California is very bad".
The structure "it seems [adjective] to [verb]" is very close to "It seems like a good idea" or "This appears to be a very difficult problem".
Therefore, sense 1 is the best fit.

Let's double check.
"it seems almost blasphemous to challenge them"
"it" is the dummy subject.
Sense 1: give a certain impression or have a certain outward aspect.
Synonyms: look, appear.
Examples: She seems to be sleeping; This appears to be a very difficult problem; It seems like a good idea.
Yes, "it seems almost blasphemous" fits "give a certain impression".

Let's review sense 1:
sense_key=seem%2:39:00::
definition=give a certain impression or have a certain outward aspect
synonyms=look, appear
examples=She seems to be sleeping; This appears to be a very difficult problem

Wait, "it seems almost blasphemous" -> "it gives the impression of being blasphemous".
I will choose sense 1.
Let's consider if it could be 2. "seem to be true, probable, or apparent". "It seems that it is almost blasphemous to challenge them." But the text says "it seems almost blasphemous to challenge them", which is "it seems [adj] to [verb]". This is exactly like "This appears to be a very difficult problem" or "It seems like a good idea".
So sense 1 is the most appropriate.
I will output {"sense_index": 1}.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: blasphemous
Target surface form: blasphemous
Context:
Why ca not we teach our children to read, write and reckon? It's not that we do not know how to, because we do. It's that we do not want to. And the reason we do not want to is that effective education would require us to relinquish some cherished metaphysical beliefs about human nature in general and the human nature of young people in particular, well as to violate some cherished vested interests. These beliefs so dominate our educational establishment, our media, our politicians, and even our parents that it seems almost <t>blasphemous</t> to challenge them. Here is an example.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=blasphemous%5:00:00:irreverent:00 | definition=grossly irreverent toward what is held to be sacred | synonyms=profane, sacrilegious | examples=blasphemous rites of a witches' Sabbath; profane utterances against the Church
2. sense_key=blasphemous%5:00:00:dirty:02 | definition=characterized by profanity or cursing | synonyms=blue, profane | examples=foul-mouthed and blasphemous; blue language

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The target word is "blasphemous".
Context: "These beliefs so dominate our educational establishment, our media, our politicians, and even our parents that it seems almost blasphemous to challenge them."
The context implies that challenging these cherished metaphysical beliefs is considered grossly irreverent toward what is held to be sacred (the beliefs).
Sense 1: grossly irreverent toward what is held to be sacred.
Sense 2: characterized by profanity or cursing.
The context is not about cursing or profanity, but about challenging sacred beliefs, which is irreverent.
Therefore, Sense 1 is the best fit.
Sense index: 1.
JSON output: {"sense_index": 1}


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: challenge
Target surface form: challenge
Context:
Why ca not we teach our children to read, write and reckon? It's not that we do not know how to, because we do. It's that we do not want to. And the reason we do not want to is that effective education would require us to relinquish some cherished metaphysical beliefs about human nature in general and the human nature of young people in particular, well as to violate some cherished vested interests. These beliefs so dominate our educational establishment, our media, our politicians, and even our parents that it seems almost blasphemous to <t>challenge</t> them. Here is an example.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=challenge%2:32:01:: | definition=take exception to | synonyms=dispute, gainsay | examples=She challenged his claims
2. sense_key=challenge%2:32:00:: | definition=issue a challenge to | examples=Fischer challenged Spassky to a match
3. sense_key=challenge%2:32:03:: | definition=ask for identification | examples=The illegal immigrant was challenged by the border guard
4. sense_key=challenge%2:32:02:: | definition=raise a formal objection in a court of law | synonyms=take exception

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The target word is "challenge" in the context: "These beliefs so dominate our educational establishment, our media, our politicians, and even our parents that it seems almost blasphemous to challenge them."
The context means to dispute, question, or take exception to these beliefs.
Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=challenge%2:32:01:: | definition=take exception to | synonyms=dispute, gainsay | examples=She challenged his claims
2. sense_key=challenge%2:32:00:: | definition=issue a challenge to | examples=Fischer challenged Spassky to a match
3. sense_key=challenge%2:32:03:: | definition=ask for identification | examples=The illegal immigrant was challenged by the border guard
4. sense_key=challenge%2:32:02:: | definition=raise a formal objection in a court of law | synonyms=take exception

Sense 1 fits perfectly: "take exception to", "dispute", "gainsay". "challenge them" means to dispute or take exception to these beliefs.
Sense 2 is about issuing a challenge to a match/competition.
Sense 3 is about asking for identification.
Sense 4 is about raising a formal objection in a court of law.

Therefore, sense 1 is the best fit.
I will return {"sense_index": 1}.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: here
Target surface form: Here
Context:
Why ca not we teach our children to read, write and reckon? It's not that we do not know how to, because we do. It's that we do not want to. And the reason we do not want to is that effective education would require us to relinquish some cherished metaphysical beliefs about human nature in general and the human nature of young people in particular, well as to violate some cherished vested interests. These beliefs so dominate our educational establishment, our media, our politicians, and even our parents that it seems almost blasphemous to challenge them. <t>Here</t> is an example. If I were to ask a sample of American parents, "Do you wish the elementary schools to encourage creativity in your children? "the near-unanimous answer would be, "Yes, of course. "

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=here%4:02:00:: | definition=in or at this place; where the speaker or writer is | examples=I work here; turn here
2. sense_key=here%4:02:02:: | definition=in this circumstance or respect or on this point or detail | examples=what do we have here?; here I must disagree
3. sense_key=here%4:02:01:: | definition=to this place (especially toward the speaker) | synonyms=hither | examples=come here, please
4. sense_key=here%4:02:04:: | definition=at this time; now | examples=we'll adjourn here for lunch and discuss the remaining issues this afternoon

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The target word is "Here" in the context: "Here is an example."
The context is introducing an example.
Let's look at the candidate senses:
1. in or at this place; where the speaker or writer is (I work here; turn here)
2. in this circumstance or respect or on this point or detail (what do we have here?; here I must disagree)
3. to this place (especially toward the speaker) (come here, please)
4. at this time; now (we'll adjourn here for lunch...)

Wait, "Here is an example."
Is it sense 1 or sense 2?
"Here is an example" -> in this circumstance or respect or on this point or detail? Or "in or at this place"?
Actually, "Here is an example" is often considered sense 1 (in or at this place; where the speaker or writer is) or sense 2 (in this circumstance or respect or on this point or detail).
Let's check WordNet for "here".
Sense 1: in or at this place; where the speaker or writer is. "I work here", "turn here". "Here is an example" fits "where the speaker or writer is" (in this text, at this point in the text).
Wait, "Here is an example" -> "in this circumstance or respect or on this point or detail" (sense 2)?
Let's search for "Here is an example" in WordNet or similar corpora.
Actually, "here" in "Here is an example" is often sense 1.
Let's re-read sense 1: "in or at this place; where the speaker or writer is". The writer is presenting the example *here* in the text.
Let's re-read sense 2: "in this circumstance or respect or on this point or detail". Examples: "what do we have here?", "here I must disagree".
"Here is an example" -> "in or at this place" (in this text).
Wait, "Here is an example" is a presentational "here".
In WordNet, "here" has:
1. in or at this place; where the speaker or writer is
2. in this circumstance or respect or on this point or detail
3. to this place
4. at this time; now

Is "Here is an example" sense 1? Yes, "here" refers to the place in the text.
Let's consider "Here is an example." -> "in or at this place; where the speaker or writer is".
Let's check if there is a better fit.
"Here is an example." -> "in or at this place" (sense 1).
Let's think if "here" in "Here is an example" is sense 1.
Yes, "here" = at this place (in the text).
Let's double check.
"Here is an example."
Sense 1: in or at this place; where the speaker or writer is.
Sense 2: in this circumstance or respect or on this point or detail.
I will go with 1.
Wait, let's look at similar examples. "Here is a list of..." -> sense 1.
"Here is an example." -> sense 1.
Let's choose 1.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: example
Target surface form: example
Context:
Why ca not we teach our children to read, write and reckon? It's not that we do not know how to, because we do. It's that we do not want to. And the reason we do not want to is that effective education would require us to relinquish some cherished metaphysical beliefs about human nature in general and the human nature of young people in particular, well as to violate some cherished vested interests. These beliefs so dominate our educational establishment, our media, our politicians, and even our parents that it seems almost blasphemous to challenge them. Here is an <t>example</t>. If I were to ask a sample of American parents, "Do you wish the elementary schools to encourage creativity in your children? "the near-unanimous answer would be, "Yes, of course. "

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=example%1:09:00:: | definition=an item of information that is typical of a class or group | synonyms=illustration, instance, representative | examples=this patient provides a typical example of the syndrome; there is an example on page 10
2. sense_key=example%1:09:02:: | definition=a representative form or pattern | synonyms=model | examples=I profited from his example
3. sense_key=example%1:09:01:: | definition=something to be imitated | synonyms=exemplar, model, good example | examples=an exemplar of success; a model of clarity
4. sense_key=example%1:10:00:: | definition=punishment intended as a warning to others | synonyms=deterrent example, lesson, object lesson | examples=they decided to make an example of him
5. sense_key=example%1:11:00:: | definition=an occurrence of something | synonyms=case, instance | examples=it was a case of bad judgment; another instance occurred yesterday
6. sense_key=example%1:04:00:: | definition=a task performed or problem solved in order to develop skill or understanding | synonyms=exercise | examples=you must work the examples at the end of each chapter in the textbook

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "example" in the given context.
Context: "Here is an <t>example</t>. If I were to ask a sample of American parents, "Do you wish the elementary schools to encourage creativity in your children? "the near-unanimous answer would be, "Yes, of course. ""
The word "example" here refers to an item of information that is typical of a class or group, or an instance used to illustrate a point.
Let's look at the candidate senses:
1. sense_key=example%1:09:00:: | definition=an item of information that is typical of a class or group | synonyms=illustration, instance, representative | examples=this patient provides a typical example of the syndrome; there is an example on page 10
2. sense_key=example%1:09:02:: | definition=a representative form or pattern | synonyms=model | examples=I profited from his example
3. sense_key=example%1:09:01:: | definition=something to be imitated | synonyms=exemplar, model, good example | examples=an exemplar of success; a model of clarity
4. sense_key=example%1:10:00:: | definition=punishment intended as a warning to others | synonyms=deterrent example, lesson, object lesson | examples=they decided to make an example of him
5. sense_key=example%1:11:00:: | definition=an occurrence of something | synonyms=case, instance | examples=it was a case of bad judgment; another instance occurred yesterday
6. sense_key=example%1:04:00:: | definition=a task performed or problem solved in order to develop skill or understanding | synonyms=exercise | examples=you must work the examples at the end of each chapter in the textbook

In the context, "Here is an example" introduces an illustration or instance of the previously mentioned point (that people hold cherished beliefs and it's blasphemous to challenge them, illustrated by the hypothetical question to parents).
Sense 1 fits perfectly: "an item of information that is typical of a class or group" or "illustration, instance".
Sense 5 is "an occurrence of something" (case, instance), but Sense 1 is more about an illustrative item of information, which matches "Here is an example" followed by a hypothetical scenario used to illustrate the point.
Wait, let's re-read Sense 1: "an item of information that is typical of a class or group" -> "illustration, instance".
Let's check Sense 5: "an occurrence of something" -> "case, instance".
The context says: "Here is an example. If I were to ask a sample of American parents..." This is an illustration of the point.
Sense 1 is the best fit.

Let's double check.
"Here is an example." -> "Here is an illustration."
Sense 1: illustration, instance, representative.
Sense 5: case, instance.
Sense 1 is definitely the standard sense for "Here is an example" when introducing an illustrative scenario.

Let's review the examples for Sense 1: "this patient provides a typical example of the syndrome; there is an example on page 10".
Yes, Sense 1 is the correct choice.
The output format must be exactly `{"sense_index": 1}`.
I will output `{"sense_index": 1}`.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: ask
Target surface form: ask
Context:
It's not that we do not know how to, because we do. It's that we do not want to. And the reason we do not want to is that effective education would require us to relinquish some cherished metaphysical beliefs about human nature in general and the human nature of young people in particular, well as to violate some cherished vested interests. These beliefs so dominate our educational establishment, our media, our politicians, and even our parents that it seems almost blasphemous to challenge them. Here is an example. If I were to <t>ask</t> a sample of American parents, "Do you wish the elementary schools to encourage creativity in your children? "the near-unanimous answer would be, "Yes, of course. "But what do we mean, specifically, by "creativity "?

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=ask%2:32:00:: | definition=inquire about | synonyms=inquire, enquire | examples=I asked about their special today; He had to ask directions several times
2. sense_key=ask%2:32:01:: | definition=make a request or demand for something to somebody | examples=She asked him for a loan
3. sense_key=ask%2:32:02:: | definition=direct or put; seek an answer to | examples=ask a question
4. sense_key=ask%2:32:05:: | definition=consider obligatory; request and expect | synonyms=require, expect | examples=We require our secretary to be on time; Aren't we asking too much of these children?
5. sense_key=ask%2:32:04:: | definition=address a question to and expect an answer from | examples=Ask your teacher about trigonometry; The children asked me about their dead grandmother
6. sense_key=ask%2:42:00:: | definition=require as useful, just, or proper | synonyms=necessitate, postulate, need, require, take, involve | examples=It takes nerve to do what she did; success usually requires hard work
7. sense_key=ask%2:32:09:: | definition=require or ask for as a price or condition | examples=He is asking $200 for the table; The kidnappers are asking a million dollars in return for the release of their hostage

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The target word is "ask" in the context: "If I were to ask a sample of American parents, 'Do you wish the elementary schools to encourage creativity in your children?'"
The speaker is addressing a question to the parents and expecting an answer from them.
Let's look at the candidate senses:
1. inquire about (I asked about their special today)
2. make a request or demand for something to somebody (She asked him for a loan)
3. direct or put; seek an answer to (ask a question)
4. consider obligatory; request and expect (require, expect)
5. address a question to and expect an answer from (Ask your teacher about trigonometry; The children asked me about their dead grandmother)
6. require as useful, just, or proper (necessitate, postulate, need, require, take, involve)
7. require or ask for as a price or condition (He is asking $200 for the table)

In the context, "ask a sample of American parents, 'Do you wish...'"
This perfectly matches sense 5: "address a question to and expect an answer from". The object is "a sample of American parents", and the question is "'Do you wish the elementary schools to encourage creativity in your children?'".

Let's check sense 5:
sense_key=ask%2:32:04:: | definition=address a question to and expect an answer from | examples=Ask your teacher about trigonometry; The children asked me about their dead grandmother

Yes, "ask [someone] [a question]" or "ask [someone], '[question]'" is exactly sense 5.
Sense 3 is "ask a question" (direct or put; seek an answer to), but here the object is the person being asked ("a sample of American parents").
Sense 5 is the best fit.
Let's double check.
"ask a sample of American parents" -> address a question to and expect an answer from.
Matches sense 5.
Index is 5.
JSON format: {"sense_index": 5}
Done.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: sample
Target surface form: sample
Context:
It's not that we do not know how to, because we do. It's that we do not want to. And the reason we do not want to is that effective education would require us to relinquish some cherished metaphysical beliefs about human nature in general and the human nature of young people in particular, well as to violate some cherished vested interests. These beliefs so dominate our educational establishment, our media, our politicians, and even our parents that it seems almost blasphemous to challenge them. Here is an example. If I were to ask a <t>sample</t> of American parents, "Do you wish the elementary schools to encourage creativity in your children? "the near-unanimous answer would be, "Yes, of course. "But what do we mean, specifically, by "creativity "?

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=sample%1:09:00:: | definition=a small part of something intended as representative of the whole
2. sense_key=sample%1:09:01:: | definition=items selected at random from a population and used to test hypotheses about the population | synonyms=sample distribution, sampling
3. sense_key=sample%1:17:00:: | definition=all or part of a natural object that is collected and preserved as an example of its class

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The target word is "sample" in the context: "If I were to ask a sample of American parents, 'Do you wish the elementary schools to encourage creativity in your children?'"
The context refers to a group of American parents selected to represent the whole population of American parents, used to test a hypothesis or gather opinions.
Sense 1: a small part of something intended as representative of the whole.
Sense 2: items selected at random from a population and used to test hypotheses about the population.
Sense 3: all or part of a natural object that is collected and preserved as an example of its class.

In this context, "a sample of American parents" refers to a group of people selected from a population (American parents) to answer a question, which is a statistical or survey sample.
Sense 2 fits perfectly: "items selected at random from a population and used to test hypotheses about the population".
Wait, Sense 1 is "a small part of something intended as representative of the whole".
Let's check the examples for Sense 2: "sample distribution, sampling".
Is "sample of American parents" a statistical sample? Yes.
Let's consider Sense 1 vs Sense 2.
Sense 1: "a small part of something intended as representative of the whole" (e.g., a sample of fabric, a sample of food).
Sense 2: "items selected at random from a population and used to test hypotheses about the population" (e.g., a sample of voters, a sample of parents).
The context is about asking a sample of American parents a question to see their answer, which is a survey/poll context. This aligns with Sense 2.

Let's double check WordNet.
sample%1:09:00:: -> a small part of something intended as representative of the whole
sample%1:09:01:: -> items selected at random from a population and used to test hypotheses about the population

"a sample of American parents" -> items selected from a population.
Therefore, Sense 2 is the best fit.
Let's review the prompt: "Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}."
So I will return {"sense_index": 2}.
Wait, is "sample of American parents" necessarily "selected at random"? The text says "If I were to ask a sample of American parents...". It implies a statistical sample.
Sense 2 is definitely the intended sense for a group of people in a survey context.
Let's confirm.
"items selected at random from a population and used to test hypotheses about the population"
Yes, this is the statistical sense of sample.
I will choose 2.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: american
Target surface form: American
Context:
It's not that we do not know how to, because we do. It's that we do not want to. And the reason we do not want to is that effective education would require us to relinquish some cherished metaphysical beliefs about human nature in general and the human nature of young people in particular, well as to violate some cherished vested interests. These beliefs so dominate our educational establishment, our media, our politicians, and even our parents that it seems almost blasphemous to challenge them. Here is an example. If I were to ask a sample of <t>American</t> parents, "Do you wish the elementary schools to encourage creativity in your children? "the near-unanimous answer would be, "Yes, of course. "But what do we mean, specifically, by "creativity "?

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=american%3:01:01:: | definition=of or relating to the United States of America or its people or language or culture | examples=American citizens; American English
2. sense_key=american%3:01:00:: | definition=of or relating to or characteristic of the continents and islands of the Americas | examples=the American hemisphere; American flora and fauna

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The target word is "American" in the context: "If I were to ask a sample of American parents, 'Do you wish the elementary schools to encourage creativity in your children?'"
The context refers to parents in the United States of America.
Sense 1: of or relating to the United States of America or its people or language or culture.
Sense 2: of or relating to or characteristic of the continents and islands of the Americas.

Sense 1 is the best fit.
I will return {"sense_index": 1}.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: parent
Target surface form: parents
Context:
It's not that we do not know how to, because we do. It's that we do not want to. And the reason we do not want to is that effective education would require us to relinquish some cherished metaphysical beliefs about human nature in general and the human nature of young people in particular, well as to violate some cherished vested interests. These beliefs so dominate our educational establishment, our media, our politicians, and even our parents that it seems almost blasphemous to challenge them. Here is an example. If I were to ask a sample of American <t>parents</t>, "Do you wish the elementary schools to encourage creativity in your children? "the near-unanimous answer would be, "Yes, of course. "But what do we mean, specifically, by "creativity "?

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=parent%1:18:00:: | definition=a father or mother; one who begets or one who gives birth to or nurtures and raises a child; a relative who plays the role of guardian
2. sense_key=parent%1:03:00:: | definition=an organism (plant or animal) from which younger ones are obtained

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The target word is "parents" in the context of "American parents" and "your children".
The context talks about parents of children, specifically "a father or mother; one who begets or one who gives birth to or nurtures and raises a child".
Sense 1: a father or mother; one who begets or one who gives birth to or nurtures and raises a child; a relative who plays the role of guardian.
Sense 2: an organism (plant or animal) from which younger ones are obtained.

The context clearly refers to human parents of children.
Therefore, sense 1 is the best fit.
I will return {"sense_index": 1}.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: encourage
Target surface form: encourage
Context:
It's not that we do not know how to, because we do. It's that we do not want to. And the reason we do not want to is that effective education would require us to relinquish some cherished metaphysical beliefs about human nature in general and the human nature of young people in particular, well as to violate some cherished vested interests. These beliefs so dominate our educational establishment, our media, our politicians, and even our parents that it seems almost blasphemous to challenge them. Here is an example. If I were to ask a sample of American parents, "Do you wish the elementary schools to <t>encourage</t> creativity in your children? "the near-unanimous answer would be, "Yes, of course. "But what do we mean, specifically, by "creativity "?

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=encourage%2:41:00:: | definition=contribute to the progress or growth of | synonyms=promote, advance, boost, further | examples=I am promoting the use of computers in the classroom
2. sense_key=encourage%2:37:00:: | definition=inspire with confidence; give hope or courage to
3. sense_key=encourage%2:32:00:: | definition=spur on | examples=His financial success encouraged him to look for a wife

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The target word is "encourage" in the context: "Do you wish the elementary schools to encourage creativity in your children?"
The context is about schools fostering, promoting, or contributing to the progress or growth of creativity in children.
Let's look at the candidate senses:
1. sense_key=encourage%2:41:00:: | definition=contribute to the progress or growth of | synonyms=promote, advance, boost, further | examples=I am promoting the use of computers in the classroom
2. sense_key=encourage%2:37:00:: | definition=inspire with confidence; give hope or courage to
3. sense_key=encourage%2:32:00:: | definition=spur on | examples=His financial success encouraged him to look for a wife

In the context, "encourage creativity" means to promote, foster, or contribute to the growth of creativity. This aligns perfectly with sense 1 (contribute to the progress or growth of, promote, advance, boost, further).
Sense 2 is about giving hope or courage.
Sense 3 is about spurring on (like encouraging someone to do something).

Therefore, sense 1 is the best fit.
Let's double check. "encourage creativity" -> promote creativity. Yes, sense 1.
Output format: {"sense_index": 1}


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: child
Target surface form: children
Context:
It's not that we do not know how to, because we do. It's that we do not want to. And the reason we do not want to is that effective education would require us to relinquish some cherished metaphysical beliefs about human nature in general and the human nature of young people in particular, well as to violate some cherished vested interests. These beliefs so dominate our educational establishment, our media, our politicians, and even our parents that it seems almost blasphemous to challenge them. Here is an example. If I were to ask a sample of American parents, "Do you wish the elementary schools to encourage creativity in your <t>children</t>? "the near-unanimous answer would be, "Yes, of course. "But what do we mean, specifically, by "creativity "?

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=child%1:18:00:: | definition=a young person of either sex | synonyms=kid, youngster, minor, shaver, nipper, small fry | examples=she writes books for children; they're just kids
2. sense_key=child%1:18:01:: | definition=a human offspring (son or daughter) of any age | synonyms=kid | examples=they had three children; they were able to send their kids to college
3. sense_key=child%1:18:06:: | definition=an immature childish person | synonyms=baby | examples=he remained a child in practical matters as long as he lived; stop being a baby!
4. sense_key=child%1:18:07:: | definition=a member of a clan or tribe | examples=the children of Israel

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The target word is "children" in the context: "If I were to ask a sample of American parents, 'Do you wish the elementary schools to encourage creativity in your children?'"
The context talks about parents and their offspring, specifically young people in elementary schools.
Sense 1: a young person of either sex (kid, youngster, minor, shaver, nipper, small fry). Examples: she writes books for children; they're just kids.
Sense 2: a human offspring (son or daughter) of any age. Examples: they had three children; they were able to send their kids to college.
Wait, "your children" in the context of parents. "American parents... your children". This refers to their offspring.
Let's check the examples for Sense 2: "they had three children; they were able to send their kids to college".
Is it Sense 1 or Sense 2?
"young people in particular" is mentioned earlier, but the specific phrase is "American parents, 'Do you wish the elementary schools to encourage creativity in your children?'"
"your children" refers to the offspring of the parents.
Sense 2 definition: "a human offspring (son or daughter) of any age".
Sense 1 definition: "a young person of either sex".
In WordNet, "child" as offspring is sense 2 (child%1:18:01::).
Let's see: "parents" and "your children". The relationship is parent-offspring.
Therefore, Sense 2 is the most appropriate.
Let's double check.
"they had three children" -> offspring.
"your children" -> offspring of the parents.
Yes, Sense 2.
Wait, let's look at the context again: "the human nature of young people in particular... American parents... your children".
Even though they are young people, the word "children" here is used in relation to "parents", making it "offspring".
Sense 2: a human offspring (son or daughter) of any age.
I will choose 2.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: answer
Target surface form: answer
Context:
It's not that we do not know how to, because we do. It's that we do not want to. And the reason we do not want to is that effective education would require us to relinquish some cherished metaphysical beliefs about human nature in general and the human nature of young people in particular, well as to violate some cherished vested interests. These beliefs so dominate our educational establishment, our media, our politicians, and even our parents that it seems almost blasphemous to challenge them. Here is an example. If I were to ask a sample of American parents, "Do you wish the elementary schools to encourage creativity in your children? "the near-unanimous <t>answer</t> would be, "Yes, of course. "But what do we mean, specifically, by "creativity "?

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=answer%1:10:01:: | definition=a statement (either spoken or written) that is made to reply to a question or request or criticism or accusation | synonyms=reply, response | examples=I waited several days for his answer; he wrote replies to several of his critics
2. sense_key=answer%1:10:02:: | definition=a statement that solves a problem or explains how to solve the problem | synonyms=solution, result, resolution, solvent | examples=they were trying to find a peaceful solution; the answers were in the back of the book
3. sense_key=answer%1:10:00:: | definition=the speech act of replying to a question
4. sense_key=answer%1:10:03:: | definition=the principal pleading by the defendant in response to plaintiff's complaint; in criminal law it consists of the defendant's plea of `guilty' or `not guilty' (or nolo contendere); in civil law it must contain denials of all allegations in the plaintiff's complaint that the defendant hopes to controvert and it can contain affirmative defenses or counterclaims
5. sense_key=answer%1:04:00:: | definition=a nonverbal reaction | examples=his answer to any problem was to get drunk; their answer was to sue me

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The target word is "answer" in the context: "If I were to ask a sample of American parents, "Do you wish the elementary schools to encourage creativity in your children? "the near-unanimous <t>answer</t> would be, "Yes, of course. ""
The context describes a reply to a question ("Do you wish...").
Sense 1: a statement (either spoken or written) that is made to reply to a question or request or criticism or accusation. Synonyms: reply, response. Examples: I waited several days for his answer.
Sense 3: the speech act of replying to a question.
Wait, "the near-unanimous answer would be, 'Yes, of course.'" This is a statement made to reply to a question.
Let's check the examples. "I waited several days for his answer" -> statement.
"the near-unanimous answer would be, 'Yes, of course.'" -> this is a statement (the words "Yes, of course").
Is it sense 1 or sense 3?
Sense 1: a statement (either spoken or written) that is made to reply to a question or request or criticism or accusation.
Sense 3: the speech act of replying to a question.
The text says "the near-unanimous answer would be, 'Yes, of course.'" This refers to the statement itself ("Yes, of course").
Therefore, sense 1 is the best fit.
Let's double check.
"the near-unanimous answer would be, 'Yes, of course.'"
"answer" here is the statement "Yes, of course."
Sense 1: a statement (either spoken or written) that is made to reply to a question or request or criticism or accusation.
Sense 3: the speech act of replying to a question.
The word "answer" is followed by "would be, 'Yes, of course.'" which is a statement.
So sense 1 is correct.
Let's review the options.
1. sense_key=answer%1:10:01:: | definition=a statement (either spoken or written) that is made to reply to a question or request or criticism or accusation
3. sense_key=answer%1:10:00:: | definition=the speech act of replying to a question
Since it specifies the content of the answer ("Yes, of course"), it is the statement itself, not the speech act.
I will choose 1.
End of thought.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: mean
Target surface form: mean
Context:
It's that we do not want to. And the reason we do not want to is that effective education would require us to relinquish some cherished metaphysical beliefs about human nature in general and the human nature of young people in particular, well as to violate some cherished vested interests. These beliefs so dominate our educational establishment, our media, our politicians, and even our parents that it seems almost blasphemous to challenge them. Here is an example. If I were to ask a sample of American parents, "Do you wish the elementary schools to encourage creativity in your children? "the near-unanimous answer would be, "Yes, of course. "But what do we <t>mean</t>, specifically, by "creativity "? No one can say.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=mean%2:32:01:: | definition=mean or intend to express or convey | synonyms=intend | examples=You never understand what I mean!; what do his words intend?
2. sense_key=mean%2:42:00:: | definition=have as a logical consequence | synonyms=entail, imply | examples=The water shortage means that we have to stop taking long showers
3. sense_key=mean%2:32:03:: | definition=denote or connote | synonyms=intend, signify, stand for | examples=`maison' means `house' in French; An example sentence would show what this word means
4. sense_key=mean%2:31:00:: | definition=have in mind as a purpose | synonyms=intend, think | examples=I mean no harm; I only meant to help you
5. sense_key=mean%2:42:03:: | definition=have a specified degree of importance | examples=My ex-husband means nothing to me; Happiness means everything
6. sense_key=mean%2:31:01:: | definition=intend to refer to | synonyms=think of, have in mind | examples=I'm thinking of good food when I talk about France; Yes, I meant you when I complained about people who gossip!
7. sense_key=mean%2:31:05:: | definition=destine or designate for a certain purpose | examples=These flowers were meant for you

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "mean" in the given context.
Context: "But what do we <t>mean</t>, specifically, by "creativity "? No one can say."
The sentence is asking for the definition or the specific denotation/connotation of the word "creativity".
Let's look at the candidate senses:
1. mean or intend to express or convey (You never understand what I mean!)
2. have as a logical consequence (entail, imply)
3. denote or connote (intend, signify, stand for) - examples: 'maison' means 'house' in French; An example sentence would show what this word means.
4. have in mind as a purpose (intend, think)
5. have a specified degree of importance
6. intend to refer to (think of, have in mind)
7. destine or designate for a certain purpose

In the context, "what do we mean, specifically, by 'creativity'?", the speaker is asking for the definition or what the word "creativity" denotes or connotes.
Sense 3: denote or connote. Synonyms: intend, signify, stand for. Example: An example sentence would show what this word means.
This perfectly matches "what do we mean, specifically, by 'creativity'?" which is asking for the meaning/denotation of the word.

Let's double check.
"what do we mean, specifically, by 'creativity'?" -> What does the word "creativity" denote or connote?
Sense 3 is "denote or connote".
Sense 1 is "mean or intend to express or convey".
Sense 6 is "intend to refer to".

"what do we mean by X" is asking for the definition or denotation of X.
Sense 3: denote or connote. Example: An example sentence would show what this word means.
This fits perfectly.
Let's review the examples for sense 3:
- 'maison' means 'house' in French
- An example sentence would show what this word means

The context is asking for the specific meaning of the word "creativity".
Therefore, sense 3 is the best fit.
Another option: sense 1 "mean or intend to express or convey". But sense 3 is specifically about denoting or connoting a word/concept.
"what do we mean, specifically, by 'creativity'?" -> What does 'creativity' denote or connote?
Yes, sense 3.
Let's check sense 3 again.
sense_key=mean%2:32:03:: | definition=denote or connote | synonyms=intend, signify, stand for | examples=`maison' means `house' in French; An example sentence would show what this word means

I will output {"sense_index": 3}.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: one
Target surface form: one
Context:
And the reason we do not want to is that effective education would require us to relinquish some cherished metaphysical beliefs about human nature in general and the human nature of young people in particular, well as to violate some cherished vested interests. These beliefs so dominate our educational establishment, our media, our politicians, and even our parents that it seems almost blasphemous to challenge them. Here is an example. If I were to ask a sample of American parents, "Do you wish the elementary schools to encourage creativity in your children? "the near-unanimous answer would be, "Yes, of course. "But what do we mean, specifically, by "creativity "? No <t>one</t> can say. In practice, it ends up being equated with a "self-expression "that encourages the youngsters' "self-esteem. "

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=one%1:23:00:: | definition=the smallest whole number or a numeral representing this number | synonyms=1, I, ace, single, unity | examples=he has the one but will need a two and three to go with it; they had lunch at one
2. sense_key=one%1:09:00:: | definition=a single person or thing | examples=he is the best one; this is the one I ordered

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The target word is "one" in the context: "No one can say."
The phrase "No one" means "no single person".
Sense 1: the smallest whole number or a numeral representing this number.
Sense 2: a single person or thing.
In "No one", "one" refers to a single person.
Therefore, sense 2 is the best fit.
Let's double check.
"No one can say." -> "No single person can say."
Sense 2: a single person or thing.
Matches perfectly.
Sense index: 2.
Format: {"sense_index": 2}


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: equate
Target surface form: equated
Context:
These beliefs so dominate our educational establishment, our media, our politicians, and even our parents that it seems almost blasphemous to challenge them. Here is an example. If I were to ask a sample of American parents, "Do you wish the elementary schools to encourage creativity in your children? "the near-unanimous answer would be, "Yes, of course. "But what do we mean, specifically, by "creativity "? No one can say. In practice, it ends up being <t>equated</t> with a "self-expression "that encourages the youngsters' "self-esteem. "The result is a generation of young people whose ignorance and intellectual incompetence is matched only by their good opinion of themselves.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=equate%2:31:00:: | definition=consider or describe as similar, equal, or analogous | synonyms=compare, liken | examples=We can compare the Han dynasty to the Romans; You cannot equate success in financial matters with greed
2. sense_key=equate%2:42:00:: | definition=be equivalent or parallel, in mathematics | synonyms=correspond
3. sense_key=equate%2:30:00:: | definition=make equal, uniform, corresponding, or matching | synonyms=equal, match, equalize, equalise | examples=let's equalize the duties among all employees in this office; The company matched the discount policy of its competitors

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The target word is "equated" in the context: "In practice, it ends up being equated with a 'self-expression' that encourages the youngsters' 'self-esteem.'"
The context talks about how "creativity" is considered or described as similar to "self-expression".
Sense 1: consider or describe as similar, equal, or analogous (synonyms: compare, liken). Example: "You cannot equate success in financial matters with greed". This perfectly matches "equated with a 'self-expression'".
Sense 2: be equivalent or parallel, in mathematics.
Sense 3: make equal, uniform, corresponding, or matching (synonyms: equal, match, equalize).

Sense 1 is the best fit.
I will return {"sense_index": 1}.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: encourage
Target surface form: encourages
Context:
These beliefs so dominate our educational establishment, our media, our politicians, and even our parents that it seems almost blasphemous to challenge them. Here is an example. If I were to ask a sample of American parents, "Do you wish the elementary schools to encourage creativity in your children? "the near-unanimous answer would be, "Yes, of course. "But what do we mean, specifically, by "creativity "? No one can say. In practice, it ends up being equated with a "self-expression "that <t>encourages</t> the youngsters' "self-esteem. "The result is a generation of young people whose ignorance and intellectual incompetence is matched only by their good opinion of themselves.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=encourage%2:41:00:: | definition=contribute to the progress or growth of | synonyms=promote, advance, boost, further | examples=I am promoting the use of computers in the classroom
2. sense_key=encourage%2:37:00:: | definition=inspire with confidence; give hope or courage to
3. sense_key=encourage%2:32:00:: | definition=spur on | examples=His financial success encouraged him to look for a wife

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The target word is "encourages" in the context: "In practice, it ends up being equated with a 'self-expression' that encourages the youngsters' 'self-esteem.'"
The context talks about self-expression that contributes to the progress or growth of the youngsters' self-esteem, or inspires them with confidence.
Let's look at the candidate senses:
1. sense_key=encourage%2:41:00:: | definition=contribute to the progress or growth of | synonyms=promote, advance, boost, further | examples=I am promoting the use of computers in the classroom
2. sense_key=encourage%2:37:00:: | definition=inspire with confidence; give hope or courage to
3. sense_key=encourage%2:32:00:: | definition=spur on | examples=His financial success encouraged him to look for a wife

"encourages the youngsters' self-esteem" -> promotes, boosts, furthers the youngsters' self-esteem.
Sense 1: contribute to the progress or growth of (promote, advance, boost, further). This fits "encourages the youngsters' self-esteem" perfectly, as it means to boost or promote it.
Sense 2: inspire with confidence; give hope or courage to. (e.g., encourage a person). Here the object is "self-esteem", not a person. You don't "inspire with confidence" a self-esteem; you boost or promote it.
Sense 3: spur on. (e.g., encourage someone to do something).

Therefore, sense 1 is the best fit.
Let's double check. "encourages the youngsters' self-esteem" -> promotes/boosts the youngsters' self-esteem.
Yes, sense 1.
Context: "a 'self-expression' that encourages the youngsters' 'self-esteem.'"
Synonyms for sense 1: promote, advance, boost, further. "boosts the youngsters' self-esteem" makes perfect sense.
Sense 1 is the correct choice.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: result
Target surface form: result
Context:
Here is an example. If I were to ask a sample of American parents, "Do you wish the elementary schools to encourage creativity in your children? "the near-unanimous answer would be, "Yes, of course. "But what do we mean, specifically, by "creativity "? No one can say. In practice, it ends up being equated with a "self-expression "that encourages the youngsters' "self-esteem. "The <t>result</t> is a generation of young people whose ignorance and intellectual incompetence is matched only by their good opinion of themselves. The whole notion of "creativity "in education was (and is) part and parcel of a romantic rebellion against disciplined instruction, which was (and is) regarded as "authoritarian, "a repression and frustration of the latent talents and the wonderful, if as yet undefined, potentialities inherent in the souls of all our children.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=result%1:19:00:: | definition=a phenomenon that follows and is caused by some previous phenomenon | synonyms=consequence, effect, outcome, event, issue, upshot | examples=the magnetic effect was greater when the rod was lengthwise; his decision had depressing consequences for business
2. sense_key=result%1:10:00:: | definition=a statement that solves a problem or explains how to solve the problem | synonyms=solution, answer, resolution, solvent | examples=they were trying to find a peaceful solution; the answers were in the back of the book
3. sense_key=result%1:11:00:: | definition=something that results | synonyms=resultant, final result, outcome, termination | examples=he listened for the results on the radio
4. sense_key=result%1:10:01:: | definition=the semantic role of the noun phrase whose referent exists only by virtue of the activity denoted by the verb in the clause | synonyms=resultant role

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The target word is "result" in the context: "The result is a generation of young people whose ignorance and intellectual incompetence is matched only by their good opinion of themselves."
This refers to a phenomenon that follows and is caused by some previous phenomenon (the equating of creativity with self-expression, etc.).
Let's check the candidate senses:
1. sense_key=result%1:19:00:: | definition=a phenomenon that follows and is caused by some previous phenomenon | synonyms=consequence, effect, outcome, event, issue, upshot
2. sense_key=result%1:10:00:: | definition=a statement that solves a problem or explains how to solve the problem
3. sense_key=result%1:11:00:: | definition=something that results | synonyms=resultant, final result, outcome, termination
4. sense_key=result%1:10:01:: | definition=the semantic role of the noun phrase whose referent exists only by virtue of the activity denoted by the verb in the clause

Sense 1 fits perfectly: "a phenomenon that follows and is caused by some previous phenomenon" (consequence, effect, outcome). The result is a generation of young people... (a consequence of the educational approach).
Wait, sense 1 is "a phenomenon that follows and is caused by some previous phenomenon".
Sense 3 is "something that results".
Let's look at the synonyms for sense 1: consequence, effect, outcome, event, issue, upshot.
In the context, "The result is a generation of young people..." This is a consequence or effect.
Let's check WordNet for "result".
Sense 1: a phenomenon that follows and is caused by some previous phenomenon. "the magnetic effect was greater when the rod was lengthwise", "his decision had depressing consequences for business".
Sense 3: something that results. "he listened for the results on the radio".
The context describes a consequence of a previous phenomenon (the romantic rebellion against disciplined instruction, equating creativity with self-expression). So sense 1 is the best fit.
Let's double check. "The result is a generation of young people..." -> consequence, effect.
Yes, sense 1.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: generation
Target surface form: generation
Context:
Here is an example. If I were to ask a sample of American parents, "Do you wish the elementary schools to encourage creativity in your children? "the near-unanimous answer would be, "Yes, of course. "But what do we mean, specifically, by "creativity "? No one can say. In practice, it ends up being equated with a "self-expression "that encourages the youngsters' "self-esteem. "The result is a <t>generation</t> of young people whose ignorance and intellectual incompetence is matched only by their good opinion of themselves. The whole notion of "creativity "in education was (and is) part and parcel of a romantic rebellion against disciplined instruction, which was (and is) regarded as "authoritarian, "a repression and frustration of the latent talents and the wonderful, if as yet undefined, potentialities inherent in the souls of all our children.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=generation%1:14:01:: | definition=all the people living at the same time or of approximately the same age | synonyms=coevals, contemporaries
2. sense_key=generation%1:14:00:: | definition=group of genetically related organisms constituting a single step in the line of descent
3. sense_key=generation%1:28:00:: | definition=the normal time between successive generations | examples=they had to wait a generation for that prejudice to fade
4. sense_key=generation%1:28:01:: | definition=a stage of technological development or innovation | examples=the third generation of computers
5. sense_key=generation%1:11:00:: | definition=a coming into being | synonyms=genesis
6. sense_key=generation%1:04:01:: | definition=the production of heat or electricity | examples=dams were built for the generation of electricity
7. sense_key=generation%1:04:00:: | definition=the act of producing offspring or multiplying by such production | synonyms=multiplication, propagation

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The target word is "generation" in the context: "The result is a generation of young people whose ignorance and intellectual incompetence is matched only by their good opinion of themselves."
The context refers to a group of young people living at the same time or of approximately the same age.
Sense 1: "all the people living at the same time or of approximately the same age" (synonyms: coevals, contemporaries).
This perfectly matches "a generation of young people".
Sense 2: genetically related organisms.
Sense 3: normal time between successive generations.
Sense 4: stage of technological development.
Sense 5: a coming into being.
Sense 6: production of heat or electricity.
Sense 7: act of producing offspring.

Therefore, Sense 1 is the best fit.
I will return {"sense_index": 1}.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: young
Target surface form: young
Context:
Here is an example. If I were to ask a sample of American parents, "Do you wish the elementary schools to encourage creativity in your children? "the near-unanimous answer would be, "Yes, of course. "But what do we mean, specifically, by "creativity "? No one can say. In practice, it ends up being equated with a "self-expression "that encourages the youngsters' "self-esteem. "The result is a generation of <t>young</t> people whose ignorance and intellectual incompetence is matched only by their good opinion of themselves. The whole notion of "creativity "in education was (and is) part and parcel of a romantic rebellion against disciplined instruction, which was (and is) regarded as "authoritarian, "a repression and frustration of the latent talents and the wonderful, if as yet undefined, potentialities inherent in the souls of all our children.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=young%3:00:00:: | definition=(used of living things especially persons) in an early period of life or development or growth | synonyms=immature | examples=young people
2. sense_key=young%5:00:00:early:02 | definition=(of crops) harvested at an early stage of development; before complete maturity | synonyms=new | examples=new potatoes; young corn
3. sense_key=young%5:00:01:young:00 | definition=suggestive of youth; vigorous and fresh | synonyms=youthful, vernal | examples=he is young for his age
4. sense_key=young%5:00:00:new:00 | definition=being in its early stage | examples=a young industry; the day is still young
5. sense_key=young%5:00:00:inexperienced:00 | definition=not tried or tested by experience | synonyms=unseasoned, untested, untried | examples=unseasoned artillery volunteers; still untested in battle

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The target word is "young" in the context: "The result is a generation of young people whose ignorance and intellectual incompetence is matched only by their good opinion of themselves."
The phrase is "young people".
Sense 1: (used of living things especially persons) in an early period of life or development or growth. Synonyms: immature. Examples: young people.
Sense 2: (of crops) harvested at an early stage of development.
Sense 3: suggestive of youth; vigorous and fresh.
Sense 4: being in its early stage.
Sense 5: not tried or tested by experience.

The context explicitly says "young people", which matches the example for Sense 1 exactly.
Therefore, Sense 1 is the best fit.
I will return {"sense_index": 1}.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: people
Target surface form: people
Context:
Here is an example. If I were to ask a sample of American parents, "Do you wish the elementary schools to encourage creativity in your children? "the near-unanimous answer would be, "Yes, of course. "But what do we mean, specifically, by "creativity "? No one can say. In practice, it ends up being equated with a "self-expression "that encourages the youngsters' "self-esteem. "The result is a generation of young <t>people</t> whose ignorance and intellectual incompetence is matched only by their good opinion of themselves. The whole notion of "creativity "in education was (and is) part and parcel of a romantic rebellion against disciplined instruction, which was (and is) regarded as "authoritarian, "a repression and frustration of the latent talents and the wonderful, if as yet undefined, potentialities inherent in the souls of all our children.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=people%1:14:00:: | definition=(plural) any group of human beings (men or women or children) collectively | examples=old people; there were at least 200 people in the audience
2. sense_key=people%1:14:01:: | definition=the body of citizens of a state or country | synonyms=citizenry | examples=the Spanish people
3. sense_key=people%1:14:02:: | definition=members of a family line | examples=his people have been farmers for generations; are your people still alive?
4. sense_key=people%1:14:03:: | definition=the common people generally | synonyms=multitude, masses, mass, hoi polloi, the great unwashed | examples=separate the warriors from the mass; power to the people

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The target word is "people" in the context: "The result is a generation of young <t>people</t> whose ignorance and intellectual incompetence is matched only by their good opinion of themselves."
The context refers to a group of human beings, specifically "young people".
Sense 1: (plural) any group of human beings (men or women or children) collectively. Examples: old people; there were at least 200 people in the audience.
Sense 2: the body of citizens of a state or country.
Sense 3: members of a family line.
Sense 4: the common people generally.

"Young people" fits perfectly with Sense 1, which includes "old people" as an example.
Therefore, the best sense is 1.
I will return {"sense_index": 1}.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: incompetence
Target surface form: incompetence
Context:
Here is an example. If I were to ask a sample of American parents, "Do you wish the elementary schools to encourage creativity in your children? "the near-unanimous answer would be, "Yes, of course. "But what do we mean, specifically, by "creativity "? No one can say. In practice, it ends up being equated with a "self-expression "that encourages the youngsters' "self-esteem. "The result is a generation of young people whose ignorance and intellectual <t>incompetence</t> is matched only by their good opinion of themselves. The whole notion of "creativity "in education was (and is) part and parcel of a romantic rebellion against disciplined instruction, which was (and is) regarded as "authoritarian, "a repression and frustration of the latent talents and the wonderful, if as yet undefined, potentialities inherent in the souls of all our children.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=incompetence%1:07:00:: | definition=lack of physical or intellectual ability or qualifications | synonyms=incompetency
2. sense_key=incompetence%1:26:00:: | definition=inability of a part or organ to function properly

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The target word is "incompetence".
Context: "The result is a generation of young people whose ignorance and intellectual incompetence is matched only by their good opinion of themselves."
The context talks about "intellectual incompetence", which refers to a lack of intellectual ability or qualifications.
Candidate sense 1: lack of physical or intellectual ability or qualifications.
Candidate sense 2: inability of a part or organ to function properly.

Sense 1 is clearly the best fit.
Sense index: 1.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: match
Target surface form: matched
Context:
Here is an example. If I were to ask a sample of American parents, "Do you wish the elementary schools to encourage creativity in your children? "the near-unanimous answer would be, "Yes, of course. "But what do we mean, specifically, by "creativity "? No one can say. In practice, it ends up being equated with a "self-expression "that encourages the youngsters' "self-esteem. "The result is a generation of young people whose ignorance and intellectual incompetence is <t>matched</t> only by their good opinion of themselves. The whole notion of "creativity "in education was (and is) part and parcel of a romantic rebellion against disciplined instruction, which was (and is) regarded as "authoritarian, "a repression and frustration of the latent talents and the wonderful, if as yet undefined, potentialities inherent in the souls of all our children.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=match%2:42:00:: | definition=be compatible, similar or consistent; coincide in their characteristics | synonyms=fit, correspond, check, jibe, gibe, tally | examples=The two stories don't agree in many details; The handwriting checks with the signature on the check
2. sense_key=match%2:40:00:: | definition=provide funds complementary to | examples=The company matched the employees' contributions
3. sense_key=match%2:35:08:: | definition=bring two objects, ideas, or people together | synonyms=mate, couple, pair, twin | examples=This fact is coupled to the other one; Matchmaker, can you match my daughter with a nice young man?
4. sense_key=match%2:42:01:: | definition=be equal to in quality or ability | synonyms=equal, touch, rival | examples=Nothing can rival cotton for durability; Your performance doesn't even touch that of your colleagues
5. sense_key=match%2:30:01:: | definition=make correspond or harmonize | synonyms=fit | examples=Match my sweater
6. sense_key=match%2:41:00:: | definition=satisfy or fulfill | synonyms=meet, cope with | examples=meet a need; this job doesn't match my dreams
7. sense_key=match%2:35:10:: | definition=give or join in marriage
8. sense_key=match%2:33:00:: | definition=set into opposition or rivalry | synonyms=pit, oppose, play off | examples=let them match their best athletes against ours; pit a chess player against the Russian champion
9. sense_key=match%2:30:00:: | definition=be equal or harmonize | examples=The two pieces match
10. sense_key=match%2:30:07:: | definition=make equal, uniform, corresponding, or matching | synonyms=equal, equalize, equalise, equate | examples=let's equalize the duties among all employees in this office; The company matched the discount policy of its competitors

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The target word is "matched" in the context: "The result is a generation of young people whose ignorance and intellectual incompetence is matched only by their good opinion of themselves."
The meaning here is that their ignorance and intellectual incompetence is equal to, or as great as, their good opinion of themselves.
Let's look at the candidate senses:
1. be compatible, similar or consistent; coincide in their characteristics (fit, correspond, check, jibe, gibe, tally)
2. provide funds complementary to
3. bring two objects, ideas, or people together (mate, couple, pair, twin)
4. be equal to in quality or ability (equal, touch, rival) - "Nothing can rival cotton for durability; Your performance doesn't even touch that of your colleagues"
5. make correspond or harmonize
6. satisfy or fulfill
7. give or join in marriage
8. set into opposition or rivalry
9. be equal or harmonize
10. make equal, uniform, corresponding, or matching

"matched only by" means "equal to in quality or ability" or "rivalled only by".
Sense 4: "be equal to in quality or ability" (synonyms: equal, touch, rival).
Example: "Nothing can rival cotton for durability" -> "ignorance is matched only by their good opinion" -> "ignorance is rivalled only by their good opinion".
This fits perfectly.
Let's double check.
"matched only by" -> "equal to in quality or ability" -> sense 4.
Yes, sense 4 is the best fit.
Context: "whose ignorance and intellectual incompetence is matched only by their good opinion of themselves."
Synonyms for sense 4: equal, touch, rival.
"rivalled only by their good opinion of themselves" makes perfect sense.
Therefore, sense 4.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: only
Target surface form: only
Context:
Here is an example. If I were to ask a sample of American parents, "Do you wish the elementary schools to encourage creativity in your children? "the near-unanimous answer would be, "Yes, of course. "But what do we mean, specifically, by "creativity "? No one can say. In practice, it ends up being equated with a "self-expression "that encourages the youngsters' "self-esteem. "The result is a generation of young people whose ignorance and intellectual incompetence is matched <t>only</t> by their good opinion of themselves. The whole notion of "creativity "in education was (and is) part and parcel of a romantic rebellion against disciplined instruction, which was (and is) regarded as "authoritarian, "a repression and frustration of the latent talents and the wonderful, if as yet undefined, potentialities inherent in the souls of all our children.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=only%4:02:02:: | definition=and nothing more | synonyms=merely, simply, just, but | examples=I was merely asking; it is simply a matter of time
2. sense_key=only%4:02:01:: | definition=without any others being included or involved | synonyms=entirely, exclusively, solely, alone | examples=was entirely to blame; a school devoted entirely to the needs of problem children
3. sense_key=only%4:02:00:: | definition=with nevertheless the final result | examples=He arrived only to find his wife dead; We won only to lose again in the next round
4. sense_key=only%4:02:04:: | definition=in the final outcome | examples=These news will only make you more upset
5. sense_key=only%4:02:06:: | definition=except that | examples=It was the same story; only this time she came out better
6. sense_key=only%4:02:03:: | definition=never except when | synonyms=only if, only when | examples=call me only if your cold gets worse
7. sense_key=only%4:02:05:: | definition=as recently as | examples=I spoke to him only an hour ago

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The target word is "only" in the context: "The result is a generation of young people whose ignorance and intellectual incompetence is matched <t>only</t> by their good opinion of themselves."
The phrase is "matched only by".
This means "matched exclusively by" or "matched solely by".
Let's look at the candidate senses:
1. and nothing more (merely, simply, just, but)
2. without any others being included or involved (entirely, exclusively, solely, alone)
3. with nevertheless the final result
4. in the final outcome
5. except that
6. never except when
7. as recently as

"matched only by" means "matched exclusively by" or "matched solely by".
Sense 2: "without any others being included or involved" (entirely, exclusively, solely, alone).
Example: "was entirely to blame; a school devoted entirely to the needs of problem children"
"matched solely by" fits perfectly.

Let's check sense 1: "merely, simply, just, but". "matched merely by" doesn't fit as well as "matched solely by".
"matched only by" -> "matched exclusively by".
Therefore, sense 2 is the best fit.
Let's double check.
"whose ignorance and intellectual incompetence is matched only by their good opinion of themselves."
This means nothing else matches it, exclusively their good opinion of themselves matches it.
So sense 2.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: good
Target surface form: good
Context:
Here is an example. If I were to ask a sample of American parents, "Do you wish the elementary schools to encourage creativity in your children? "the near-unanimous answer would be, "Yes, of course. "But what do we mean, specifically, by "creativity "? No one can say. In practice, it ends up being equated with a "self-expression "that encourages the youngsters' "self-esteem. "The result is a generation of young people whose ignorance and intellectual incompetence is matched only by their <t>good</t> opinion of themselves. The whole notion of "creativity "in education was (and is) part and parcel of a romantic rebellion against disciplined instruction, which was (and is) regarded as "authoritarian, "a repression and frustration of the latent talents and the wonderful, if as yet undefined, potentialities inherent in the souls of all our children.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=good%3:00:01:: | definition=having desirable or positive qualities especially those suitable for a thing specified | examples=good news from the hospital; a good report card
2. sense_key=good%5:00:00:ample:00 | definition=having the normally expected amount | synonyms=full | examples=gives full measure; gives good measure
3. sense_key=good%3:00:02:: | definition=morally admirable
4. sense_key=good%5:00:00:reputable:00 | definition=deserving of esteem and respect | synonyms=estimable, honorable, respectable | examples=all respectable companies give guarantees; ruined the family's good name
5. sense_key=good%5:00:00:advantageous:00 | definition=promoting or enhancing well-being | synonyms=beneficial | examples=an arms limitation agreement beneficial to all countries; the beneficial effects of a temperate climate
6. sense_key=good%5:00:00:nice:00 | definition=agreeable or pleasing | examples=we all had a good time; good manners
7. sense_key=good%5:00:00:righteous:00 | definition=of moral excellence | synonyms=just, upright | examples=a genuinely good person; a just cause
8. sense_key=good%5:00:00:skilled:00 | definition=having or showing knowledge and skill and aptitude | synonyms=adept, expert, practiced, proficient, skillful, skilful | examples=adept in handicrafts; an adept juggler
9. sense_key=good%5:00:00:complete:00 | definition=thorough | examples=had a good workout; gave the house a good cleaning
10. sense_key=good%5:00:00:close:02 | definition=with or in a close or intimate relationship | synonyms=dear, near | examples=a good friend; my sisters and brothers are near and dear
11. sense_key=good%5:00:01:sound:00 | definition=financially sound | synonyms=dependable, safe, secure | examples=a good investment; a secure investment
12. sense_key=good%5:00:00:opportune:00 | definition=most suitable or right for a particular purpose | synonyms=right, ripe | examples=a good time to plant tomatoes; the right time to act
13. sense_key=good%5:00:00:fortunate:00 | definition=resulting favorably | synonyms=well | examples=it's a good thing that I wasn't there; it is good that you stayed
14. sense_key=good%5:00:00:operative:00 | definition=exerting force or influence | synonyms=effective, in effect, in force | examples=the law is effective immediately; a warranty good for two years
15. sense_key=good%5:00:00:pleasing:00 | definition=capable of pleasing | examples=good looks
16. sense_key=good%5:00:00:intellectual:00 | definition=appealing to the mind | synonyms=serious | examples=good music; a serious book
17. sense_key=good%5:00:00:healthy:00 | definition=in excellent physical condition | synonyms=sound | examples=good teeth; I still have one good leg
18. sense_key=good%5:00:00:healthful:00 | definition=tending to promote physical well-being; beneficial to health | synonyms=salutary | examples=beneficial effects of a balanced diet; a good night's sleep
19. sense_key=good%5:00:00:genuine:00 | definition=not forged | synonyms=honest | examples=a good dollar bill
20. sense_key=good%5:00:00:fresh:01 | definition=not left to spoil | synonyms=undecomposed, unspoiled, unspoilt | examples=the meat is still good
21. sense_key=good%5:00:00:discriminating:00 | definition=generally admired | examples=good taste

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The target word is "good" in the context: "The result is a generation of young people whose ignorance and intellectual incompetence is matched only by their <t>good</t> opinion of themselves."
The phrase is "good opinion of themselves".
This means they have a high, favorable, or positive opinion of themselves.
Let's look at the candidate senses:
1. having desirable or positive qualities especially those suitable for a thing specified (good news, good report card)
2. having the normally expected amount (full measure, good measure)
3. morally admirable
4. deserving of esteem and respect (respectable)
5. promoting or enhancing well-being (beneficial)
6. agreeable or pleasing (good time, good manners)
7. of moral excellence (just, upright)
8. having or showing knowledge and skill and aptitude (skilled)
9. thorough (good workout)
10. with or in a close or intimate relationship (good friend)
11. financially sound (good investment)
12. most suitable or right for a particular purpose (good time to plant)
13. resulting favorably (good thing)
14. exerting force or influence (effective)
15. capable of pleasing (good looks)
16. appealing to the mind (serious)
17. in excellent physical condition (good teeth)
18. tending to promote physical well-being (good night's sleep)
19. not forged (good dollar bill)
20. not left to spoil (meat is still good)
21. generally admired (good taste)

Wait, "good opinion" -> positive, favorable.
Sense 1: "having desirable or positive qualities especially those suitable for a thing specified"
Is there a better sense?
Let's check "good opinion". "good" here means positive, favorable.
Sense 1: "having desirable or positive qualities especially those suitable for a thing specified"
Let's see if there is another sense.
"good" as in "good opinion" -> positive.
Sense 1 fits "positive qualities".
Let's review the options.
1. sense_key=good%3:00:01:: | definition=having desirable or positive qualities especially those suitable for a thing specified | examples=good news from the hospital; a good report card
This matches "good opinion" (a positive opinion).

Let's check if there's any other sense.
"good" modifying "opinion".
"good" = positive, favorable.
Sense 1 is the most general "positive" sense.
"good opinion" -> positive opinion.
I will choose 1.
Wait, let's double check.
"good opinion of themselves" -> positive opinion.
Sense 1: "having desirable or positive qualities especially those suitable for a thing specified"
Yes, "good" here means positive.
I'll select 1.