[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: vote
Target surface form: vote
Context:
Tuesday's rout of a GOP congressional hopeful in a Mississippi district that hasn't backed a Democratic presidential candidate since Adlai Stevenson is another reminder that, at least at the federal level, political "ticket splitting "has been on the rise over the past half century. In only one presidential election year prior to 1948 did more than 20% of the nation's congressional districts choose a different party's candidate for the White House than for the House of Representatives. Now that percentage routinely equals a third and twice has been above 40%. As we know, voters tend to favor Republicans more in races for president than in those for Congress. In every presidential election over the past half century, except for the Goldwater presidential candidacy, the GOP has captured a greater percentage of the major - party popular vote for president than it has of congressional seats or the popular <t>vote</t> for Congress. Prior to 1932, the pattern was nearly the opposite.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=vote%1:04:00:: | definition=a choice that is made by counting the number of people in favor of each alternative | synonyms=ballot, voting, balloting | examples=there were only 17 votes in favor of the motion; they allowed just one vote per person
2. sense_key=vote%1:04:01:: | definition=the opinion of a group as determined by voting | examples=they put the question to a vote
3. sense_key=vote%1:07:00:: | definition=a legal right guaranteed by the 15th amendment to the US Constitution; guaranteed to women by the 19th amendment | synonyms=right to vote, suffrage | examples=American women got the vote in 1920
4. sense_key=vote%1:14:00:: | definition=a body of voters who have the same interests | examples=he failed to get the Black vote
5. sense_key=vote%1:09:00:: | definition=the total number of voters who participated | synonyms=voter turnout | examples=they are expecting a large vote

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The target word is "vote" in the context: "the GOP has captured a greater percentage of the major-party popular vote for president than it has of congressional seats or the popular vote for Congress."
The phrase is "popular vote".
Let's look at the candidate senses:
1. a choice that is made by counting the number of people in favor of each alternative (ballot, voting, balloting)
2. the opinion of a group as determined by voting
3. a legal right guaranteed by the 15th amendment... (right to vote, suffrage)
4. a body of voters who have the same interests
5. the total number of voters who participated (voter turnout)

Wait, "popular vote" refers to the total number of votes cast, or the choice made by counting the number of people in favor of each alternative.
Let's re-read sense 1: "a choice that is made by counting the number of people in favor of each alternative" -> "there were only 17 votes in favor of the motion; they allowed just one vote per person".
Wait, "popular vote" is the total number of votes cast for a candidate, or the choice made by counting.
Let's check sense 1 vs sense 5.
Sense 5: "the total number of voters who participated" (voter turnout). "they are expecting a large vote".
But "popular vote" is not just voter turnout, it's the count of votes for a candidate. "captured a greater percentage of the major-party popular vote". This means the number of votes cast for them.
Is it sense 1? "a choice that is made by counting the number of people in favor of each alternative".
Let's see: "popular vote" is often defined as the total number of votes cast.
Wait, let's look at the synonyms for sense 1: ballot, voting, balloting.
Is "popular vote" sense 1?
"captured a greater percentage of the major-party popular vote" -> the votes cast.
Let's check WordNet for "vote".
Sense 1: a choice that is made by counting the number of people in favor of each alternative. "there were only 17 votes in favor of the motion"
Sense 5: the total number of voters who participated. "they are expecting a large vote"
In the context, "popular vote" means the total number of votes cast for a candidate, which is a choice made by counting the number of people in favor of each alternative. Or is it sense 1?
Wait, if it's "popular vote", it's the count of votes.
Let's consider "vote" in "popular vote".
"captured a greater percentage of the major-party popular vote"
Could it be sense 1? Yes, "vote" as in the count of votes.
Let's check sense 1 again: "a choice that is made by counting the number of people in favor of each alternative".
Is there another sense?
What about sense 1? "vote" as in "the popular vote".
Let's search my internal knowledge for WordNet "popular vote".
Actually, "vote" in "popular vote" is sense 1.
Let's re-read the context: "the GOP has captured a greater percentage of the major-party popular vote for president than it has of congressional seats or the popular vote for Congress."
Here, "vote" means the ballots cast, the count of votes.
Sense 1: "a choice that is made by counting the number of people in favor of each alternative"
Sense 5: "the total number of voters who participated"
"popular vote" is not the total number of voters who participated (that's voter turnout), but the number of votes for a specific candidate or party. So sense 1 is more appropriate.
Let's double check.
"captured a greater percentage of the major-party popular vote" -> the votes cast for them.
Therefore, sense 1.
Wait, let's look at the examples for sense 1: "there were only 17 votes in favor of the motion; they allowed just one vote per person".
This matches "popular vote" as the count of votes.
I will choose sense 1.
Let's review the options.
1. sense_key=vote%1:04:00::
2. sense_key=vote%1:04:01::
3. sense_key=vote%1:07:00::
4. sense_key=vote%1:14:00::
5. sense_key=vote%1:09:00::

"popular vote" -> the total number of votes cast.
Sense 1: a choice that is made by counting the number of people in favor of each alternative.
Yes, sense 1.
I will output {"sense_index": 1}.
Let's confirm if "popular vote" could be sense 5. "the total number of voters who participated". No, "popular vote" is the sum of votes for a candidate, not just the turnout.
So sense 1 is the best fit.
Another look at the context: "captured a greater percentage of the major-party popular vote". This means the percentage of the total votes cast for the major parties that went to the GOP. This is a count of votes, which aligns with sense 1.
Done.


attempt_kind: initial

status: success

[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: opposite
Target surface form: opposite
Context:
Tuesday's rout of a GOP congressional hopeful in a Mississippi district that hasn't backed a Democratic presidential candidate since Adlai Stevenson is another reminder that, at least at the federal level, political "ticket splitting "has been on the rise over the past half century. In only one presidential election year prior to 1948 did more than 20% of the nation's congressional districts choose a different party's candidate for the White House than for the House of Representatives. Now that percentage routinely equals a third and twice has been above 40%. As we know, voters tend to favor Republicans more in races for president than in those for Congress. In every presidential election over the past half century, except for the Goldwater presidential candidacy, the GOP has captured a greater percentage of the major - party popular vote for president than it has of congressional seats or the popular vote for Congress. Prior to 1932, the pattern was nearly the <t>opposite</t>. What accounts for the results of recent decades?

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=opposite%1:10:00:: | definition=a word that expresses a meaning opposed to the meaning of another word, in which case the two words are antonyms of each other | synonyms=antonym, opposite word | examples=to him the antonym of `gay' was `depressed'
2. sense_key=opposite%1:24:03:: | definition=a relation of direct opposition | synonyms=reverse, contrary | examples=we thought Sue was older than Bill but just the reverse was true
3. sense_key=opposite%1:18:00:: | definition=a contestant that you are matched against | synonyms=opposition, opponent
4. sense_key=opposite%1:24:04:: | definition=something inverted in sequence or character or effect | synonyms=inverse | examples=when the direct approach failed he tried the inverse

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

finish_reason: stop

role: assistant

reasoning_content:
The target word is "opposite" in the context: "Prior to 1932, the pattern was nearly the opposite."
The context discusses a pattern of voting behavior (voters favoring Republicans more in presidential races than in congressional races). Prior to 1932, the pattern was nearly the opposite (i.e., the reverse or contrary pattern).
Let's look at the candidate senses:
1. opposite%1:10:00:: (antonym)
2. opposite%1:24:03:: (a relation of direct opposition; reverse, contrary)
3. opposite%1:18:00:: (opponent)
4. opposite%1:24:04:: (something inverted in sequence or character or effect; inverse)

"the pattern was nearly the opposite" -> "the pattern was nearly the reverse/contrary".
Sense 2: "a relation of direct opposition" synonyms: reverse, contrary. Example: "we thought Sue was older than Bill but just the reverse was true".
Sense 4: "something inverted in sequence or character or effect" synonyms: inverse. Example: "when the direct approach failed he tried the inverse".

"the opposite" as a noun meaning "the reverse" or "the contrary".
Let's check the examples for sense 2: "just the reverse was true".
"the pattern was nearly the opposite" -> "the pattern was nearly the reverse".
Sense 2 fits perfectly.
Let's double check sense 2 vs sense 4.
Sense 2: a relation of direct opposition. Synonyms: reverse, contrary.
Sense 4: something inverted in sequence or character or effect. Synonyms: inverse.
"the opposite" in "the pattern was nearly the opposite" is a noun meaning the reverse or contrary.
I will choose sense 2.
Wait, let's look at the exact wording of sense 2: "a relation of direct opposition".
Is "opposite" here a noun? Yes, "the opposite".
Sense 2: opposite%1:24:03::
Let's confirm.
"Prior to 1932, the pattern was nearly the opposite."
Synonyms: reverse, contrary.
Yes, sense 2.

format: unknown

native_finish_reason: stop

provider: Alibaba

currency: USD


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: account_for
Target surface form: accounts for
Context:
In only one presidential election year prior to 1948 did more than 20% of the nation's congressional districts choose a different party's candidate for the White House than for the House of Representatives. Now that percentage routinely equals a third and twice has been above 40%. As we know, voters tend to favor Republicans more in races for president than in those for Congress. In every presidential election over the past half century, except for the Goldwater presidential candidacy, the GOP has captured a greater percentage of the major - party popular vote for president than it has of congressional seats or the popular vote for Congress. Prior to 1932, the pattern was nearly the opposite. What <t>accounts for</t> the results of recent decades? A simple economic theory may provide at least a partial explanation for the split personality displayed by Americans in the voting booth.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=account_for%2:42:00:: | definition=be the reason or explanation for | examples=The recession accounts for the slow retail business
2. sense_key=account_for%2:32:00:: | definition=give reasons for | examples=Can you account for all these absences?

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the target lemma "account_for" with the surface form "accounts for" in the given context.
Context: "What accounts for the results of recent decades? A simple economic theory may provide at least a partial explanation for the split personality displayed by Americans in the voting booth."
Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=account_for%2:42:00:: | definition=be the reason or explanation for | examples=The recession accounts for the slow retail business
2. sense_key=account_for%2:32:00:: | definition=give reasons for | examples=Can you account for all these absences?

In the context, "What accounts for the results of recent decades?" means "What is the reason or explanation for the results of recent decades?". The next sentence says "A simple economic theory may provide at least a partial explanation...". This perfectly matches sense 1: "be the reason or explanation for".
Sense 2 is "give reasons for" (e.g., explain one's actions or absences).

Therefore, the best sense is 1.
I will return {"sense_index": 1}.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: result
Target surface form: results
Context:
In only one presidential election year prior to 1948 did more than 20% of the nation's congressional districts choose a different party's candidate for the White House than for the House of Representatives. Now that percentage routinely equals a third and twice has been above 40%. As we know, voters tend to favor Republicans more in races for president than in those for Congress. In every presidential election over the past half century, except for the Goldwater presidential candidacy, the GOP has captured a greater percentage of the major - party popular vote for president than it has of congressional seats or the popular vote for Congress. Prior to 1932, the pattern was nearly the opposite. What accounts for the <t>results</t> of recent decades? A simple economic theory may provide at least a partial explanation for the split personality displayed by Americans in the voting booth.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=result%1:19:00:: | definition=a phenomenon that follows and is caused by some previous phenomenon | synonyms=consequence, effect, outcome, event, issue, upshot | examples=the magnetic effect was greater when the rod was lengthwise; his decision had depressing consequences for business
2. sense_key=result%1:10:00:: | definition=a statement that solves a problem or explains how to solve the problem | synonyms=solution, answer, resolution, solvent | examples=they were trying to find a peaceful solution; the answers were in the back of the book
3. sense_key=result%1:11:00:: | definition=something that results | synonyms=resultant, final result, outcome, termination | examples=he listened for the results on the radio
4. sense_key=result%1:10:01:: | definition=the semantic role of the noun phrase whose referent exists only by virtue of the activity denoted by the verb in the clause | synonyms=resultant role

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The target word is "results" in the context: "What accounts for the results of recent decades? A simple economic theory may provide at least a partial explanation for the split personality displayed by Americans in the voting booth."
The context talks about the outcomes or consequences of recent decades (the voting patterns).
Let's evaluate the candidate senses:
1. sense_key=result%1:19:00:: | definition=a phenomenon that follows and is caused by some previous phenomenon | synonyms=consequence, effect, outcome, event, issue, upshot
2. sense_key=result%1:10:00:: | definition=a statement that solves a problem or explains how to solve the problem | synonyms=solution, answer, resolution, solvent
3. sense_key=result%1:11:00:: | definition=something that results | synonyms=resultant, final result, outcome, termination | examples=he listened for the results on the radio
4. sense_key=result%1:10:01:: | definition=the semantic role of the noun phrase whose referent exists only by virtue of the activity denoted by the verb in the clause | synonyms=resultant role

Wait, "results of recent decades" refers to the outcomes or consequences of the voting patterns.
Sense 1: "a phenomenon that follows and is caused by some previous phenomenon" (consequence, effect, outcome, event, issue, upshot).
Sense 3: "something that results" (resultant, final result, outcome, termination). Example: "he listened for the results on the radio".

Let's look at the context: "What accounts for the results of recent decades?"
This means "What accounts for the outcomes/consequences of recent decades?"
Is it sense 1 or sense 3?
Sense 1: consequence, effect, outcome, event, issue, upshot.
Sense 3: something that results.
Actually, the phrase "results of recent decades" refers to the outcomes (the voting patterns).
Let's check the examples for sense 1: "his decision had depressing consequences for business".
Sense 3: "he listened for the results on the radio".
In the context, "results" refers to the outcomes of the elections, the phenomenon that follows.
Wait, "results" in elections is often sense 3 (e.g., election results). But here it says "results of recent decades", which is more like "consequences" or "outcomes" of the decades.
Let's re-read carefully: "What accounts for the results of recent decades?"
Could it be sense 1? "a phenomenon that follows and is caused by some previous phenomenon"
Or sense 3? "something that results"
Let's consider "results" as in "election results" or "outcomes".
In WordNet, "result" as in "outcome" is sense 1 or 3?
Sense 1: consequence, effect, outcome, event, issue, upshot.
Sense 3: resultant, final result, outcome, termination.
Wait, "outcome" is in both.
Let's look at the synonyms:
Sense 1: consequence, effect, outcome, event, issue, upshot.
Sense 3: resultant, final result, outcome, termination.
"results of recent decades" -> the outcomes/consequences.
Is it sense 1? "a phenomenon that follows and is caused by some previous phenomenon"
Yes, "results" here means the consequences or outcomes of the recent decades.
Let's check if there is a better fit.
"results" in "election results" is often sense 3. But here it's "results of recent decades", which is more abstract, like "consequences".
Let's look at the context again: "What accounts for the results of recent decades?"
This is asking for the cause of the outcomes (the voting patterns).
I will choose sense 1 because it emphasizes "a phenomenon that follows and is caused by some previous phenomenon", which fits "accounts for the results" (accounts for the consequences).
Wait, "results" in "election results" is sense 3. But "results of recent decades" is more like "outcomes" or "consequences".
Let's check the exact WordNet definitions.
result%1:19:00:: consequence, effect, outcome, event, issue, upshot
result%1:11:00:: resultant, final result, outcome, termination
In many WSD datasets, "results" meaning "outcomes" or "consequences" of a situation is sense 1.
Let's consider "results" as in "the results of the election". That would be sense 3.
But here it's "results of recent decades".
Let's guess sense 1.
Wait, "results" in "What accounts for the results of recent decades?"
"results" = outcomes.
Let's choose sense 1.
Let's double check.
"result" (noun)
1. a phenomenon that follows and is caused by some previous phenomenon; "the magnetic effect was greater when the rod was lengthwise"; "his decision had depressing consequences for business"
3. something that results; "he listened for the results on the radio"
"results of recent decades" -> the outcomes/consequences.
I'll go with 1.
Wait, "results" could be 1.
Let's think if 1 is better than 3.
"results" in "election results" is 3. But "results of recent decades" is more like "consequences".
I will use 1.
Let's review the prompt: "What accounts for the results of recent decades?"
"accounts for" -> explains the cause of.
So "results" are the effects/consequences.
Sense 1 is "consequence, effect, outcome, event, issue, upshot".
This perfectly matches "accounts for the results" (accounts for the effects).
I will output 1.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: recent
Target surface form: recent
Context:
In only one presidential election year prior to 1948 did more than 20% of the nation's congressional districts choose a different party's candidate for the White House than for the House of Representatives. Now that percentage routinely equals a third and twice has been above 40%. As we know, voters tend to favor Republicans more in races for president than in those for Congress. In every presidential election over the past half century, except for the Goldwater presidential candidacy, the GOP has captured a greater percentage of the major - party popular vote for president than it has of congressional seats or the popular vote for Congress. Prior to 1932, the pattern was nearly the opposite. What accounts for the results of <t>recent</t> decades? A simple economic theory may provide at least a partial explanation for the split personality displayed by Americans in the voting booth.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=recent%5:00:00:new:00 | definition=new | examples=recent graduates; a recent addition to the house
2. sense_key=recent%5:00:00:past:00 | definition=of the immediate past or just previous to the present time | synonyms=late | examples=a late development; their late quarrel

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The target word is "recent" in the context: "What accounts for the results of recent decades?"
The context talks about the past half century, prior to 1932, and recent decades.
Sense 1: new (recent graduates, a recent addition)
Sense 2: of the immediate past or just previous to the present time (late, a late development, their late quarrel)

"recent decades" refers to the immediate past or just previous to the present time.
Therefore, sense 2 is the best fit.
Let's double check.
"recent decades" -> of the immediate past or just previous to the present time.
Sense 2 is "of the immediate past or just previous to the present time".
Sense 1 is "new".
"recent decades" is not "new decades", it's "decades of the immediate past".
So sense 2.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: decade
Target surface form: decades
Context:
In only one presidential election year prior to 1948 did more than 20% of the nation's congressional districts choose a different party's candidate for the White House than for the House of Representatives. Now that percentage routinely equals a third and twice has been above 40%. As we know, voters tend to favor Republicans more in races for president than in those for Congress. In every presidential election over the past half century, except for the Goldwater presidential candidacy, the GOP has captured a greater percentage of the major - party popular vote for president than it has of congressional seats or the popular vote for Congress. Prior to 1932, the pattern was nearly the opposite. What accounts for the results of recent <t>decades</t>? A simple economic theory may provide at least a partial explanation for the split personality displayed by Americans in the voting booth.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=decade%1:28:00:: | definition=a period of 10 years | synonyms=decennary, decennium
2. sense_key=decade%1:23:00:: | definition=the cardinal number that is the sum of nine and one; the base of the decimal system | synonyms=ten, 10, X, tenner

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The target word is "decades" in the context: "What accounts for the results of recent decades?"
The context talks about time periods, specifically "recent decades" meaning periods of 10 years.
Sense 1: a period of 10 years (decennary, decennium)
Sense 2: the cardinal number that is the sum of nine and one (ten, 10, X, tenner)

The context clearly refers to a period of 10 years.
Therefore, the best sense is 1.
I will return {"sense_index": 1}.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: simple
Target surface form: simple
Context:
Now that percentage routinely equals a third and twice has been above 40%. As we know, voters tend to favor Republicans more in races for president than in those for Congress. In every presidential election over the past half century, except for the Goldwater presidential candidacy, the GOP has captured a greater percentage of the major - party popular vote for president than it has of congressional seats or the popular vote for Congress. Prior to 1932, the pattern was nearly the opposite. What accounts for the results of recent decades? A <t>simple</t> economic theory may provide at least a partial explanation for the split personality displayed by Americans in the voting booth. The theory relies on three assumptions:

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=simple%3:00:02:: | definition=having few parts; not complex or complicated or involved | examples=a simple problem; simple mechanisms
2. sense_key=simple%5:00:00:easy:01 | definition=easy and not involved or complicated | synonyms=elementary, uncomplicated, unproblematic | examples=an elementary problem in statistics; elementary, my dear Watson
3. sense_key=simple%5:00:02:plain:01 | definition=apart from anything else; without additions or modifications | synonyms=bare, mere | examples=only the bare facts; shocked by the mere idea
4. sense_key=simple%5:00:00:naive:00 | definition=exhibiting childlike simplicity and credulity | synonyms=childlike, wide-eyed, round-eyed, dewy-eyed | examples=childlike trust; dewy-eyed innocence
5. sense_key=simple%5:00:00:retarded:00 | definition=lacking mental capacity and subtlety | synonyms=dim-witted, simple-minded
6. sense_key=simple%3:00:01:: | definition=(botany) of leaf shapes; of leaves having no divisions or subdivisions | synonyms=unsubdivided
7. sense_key=simple%5:00:00:plain:01 | definition=unornamented | examples=a simple country schoolhouse; her black dress--simple to austerity

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The target word is "simple" in the context: "A simple economic theory may provide at least a partial explanation for the split personality displayed by Americans in the voting booth."
The phrase is "simple economic theory".
Let's evaluate the candidate senses:
1. having few parts; not complex or complicated or involved (a simple problem; simple mechanisms)
2. easy and not involved or complicated (elementary, uncomplicated, unproblematic)
3. apart from anything else; without additions or modifications (bare, mere)
4. exhibiting childlike simplicity and credulity
5. lacking mental capacity and subtlety
6. (botany) of leaf shapes
7. unornamented

"A simple economic theory" means a theory that is not complex or complicated, easy to understand, or having few parts.
Sense 1: "having few parts; not complex or complicated or involved" - "a simple problem; simple mechanisms". This fits "simple economic theory" well.
Sense 2: "easy and not involved or complicated" - "elementary, uncomplicated, unproblematic". "elementary problem in statistics".
Wait, sense 1 is "having few parts; not complex or complicated or involved".
Let's check the difference between 1 and 2.
Sense 1: simple%3:00:02:: (adjective) having few parts; not complex or complicated or involved.
Sense 2: simple%5:00:00:easy:01 (adjective satellite) easy and not involved or complicated.
Is "simple economic theory" more about "having few parts; not complex" or "easy"?
Usually, a "simple theory" is one that is not complex or complicated, having few assumptions (the text says "The theory relies on three assumptions").
Let's look at the synonyms for sense 1: simple.
Synonyms for sense 2: elementary, uncomplicated, unproblematic.
"simple economic theory" -> "not complex or complicated or involved".
Let's consider "simple" as in "not complex".
Sense 1: simple%3:00:02::
Sense 2: simple%5:00:00:easy:01
In WordNet, "simple" as an adjective (not satellite) is sense 1: "having few parts; not complex or complicated or involved".
Is "simple" here an adjective or adjective satellite?
"simple" is the head word in sense 1.
Let's check the context: "A simple economic theory may provide at least a partial explanation..."
"simple" modifies "economic theory".
I will choose sense 1.
Wait, let's re-read sense 1: "having few parts; not complex or complicated or involved".
Sense 2: "easy and not involved or complicated".
A theory is not necessarily "easy", but it is "not complex or complicated".
Therefore, sense 1 is the best fit.
Let's double check.
"simple economic theory" -> not complex.
I'll go with 1.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: partial
Target surface form: partial
Context:
Now that percentage routinely equals a third and twice has been above 40%. As we know, voters tend to favor Republicans more in races for president than in those for Congress. In every presidential election over the past half century, except for the Goldwater presidential candidacy, the GOP has captured a greater percentage of the major - party popular vote for president than it has of congressional seats or the popular vote for Congress. Prior to 1932, the pattern was nearly the opposite. What accounts for the results of recent decades? A simple economic theory may provide at least a <t>partial</t> explanation for the split personality displayed by Americans in the voting booth. The theory relies on three assumptions:

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=partial%5:00:00:incomplete:00 | definition=being or affecting only a part; not total | examples=a partial description of the suspect; partial collapse
2. sense_key=partial%3:00:01:: | definition=showing favoritism
3. sense_key=partial%5:00:00:inclined:02 | definition=(followed by `of' or `to') having a strong preference or liking for | synonyms=fond | examples=fond of chocolate; partial to horror movies

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The target word is "partial" in the context: "A simple economic theory may provide at least a partial explanation for the split personality displayed by Americans in the voting booth."
The phrase is "partial explanation".
Sense 1: being or affecting only a part; not total. Examples: a partial description of the suspect; partial collapse.
Sense 2: showing favoritism.
Sense 3: having a strong preference or liking for.

"partial explanation" means an explanation that is not total, i.e., incomplete or affecting only a part.
This matches Sense 1.
Sense 1 index is 1.
I will return {"sense_index": 1}.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: display
Target surface form: displayed
Context:
Now that percentage routinely equals a third and twice has been above 40%. As we know, voters tend to favor Republicans more in races for president than in those for Congress. In every presidential election over the past half century, except for the Goldwater presidential candidacy, the GOP has captured a greater percentage of the major - party popular vote for president than it has of congressional seats or the popular vote for Congress. Prior to 1932, the pattern was nearly the opposite. What accounts for the results of recent decades? A simple economic theory may provide at least a partial explanation for the split personality <t>displayed</t> by Americans in the voting booth. The theory relies on three assumptions:

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=display%2:39:00:: | definition=to show, make visible or apparent | synonyms=expose, exhibit | examples=The Metropolitan Museum is exhibiting Goya's works this month; Why don't you show your nice legs and wear shorter skirts?
2. sense_key=display%2:41:00:: | definition=attract attention by displaying some body part or posing; of animals

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The target word is "displayed" in the context: "A simple economic theory may provide at least a partial explanation for the split personality displayed by Americans in the voting booth."
The senses are:
1. display%2:39:00:: to show, make visible or apparent (expose, exhibit)
2. display%2:41:00:: attract attention by displaying some body part or posing; of animals

In the context, "split personality displayed by Americans" means the split personality is shown, made visible, or apparent.
This matches sense 1.

Let's double check.
"displayed" -> to show, make visible or apparent.
Sense 1 is the best fit.
Sense 2 is for animals posing.

Therefore, sense_index is 1.
End of thought.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: american
Target surface form: Americans
Context:
Now that percentage routinely equals a third and twice has been above 40%. As we know, voters tend to favor Republicans more in races for president than in those for Congress. In every presidential election over the past half century, except for the Goldwater presidential candidacy, the GOP has captured a greater percentage of the major - party popular vote for president than it has of congressional seats or the popular vote for Congress. Prior to 1932, the pattern was nearly the opposite. What accounts for the results of recent decades? A simple economic theory may provide at least a partial explanation for the split personality displayed by <t>Americans</t> in the voting booth. The theory relies on three assumptions:

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=american%1:18:00:: | definition=a native or inhabitant of the United States
2. sense_key=american%1:10:00:: | definition=the English language as used in the United States | synonyms=American English, American language
3. sense_key=american%1:18:01:: | definition=a native or inhabitant of a North American or Central American or South American country

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The target word is "Americans" in the context of "split personality displayed by Americans in the voting booth."
The context discusses voters, Republicans, presidential elections, Congress, and the GOP.
This clearly refers to the people of the United States.
Sense 1: a native or inhabitant of the United States.
Sense 2: the English language as used in the United States.
Sense 3: a native or inhabitant of a North American or Central American or South American country.

Sense 1 is the best fit.
I will return {"sense_index": 1}.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: assumption
Target surface form: assumptions
Context:
As we know, voters tend to favor Republicans more in races for president than in those for Congress. In every presidential election over the past half century, except for the Goldwater presidential candidacy, the GOP has captured a greater percentage of the major - party popular vote for president than it has of congressional seats or the popular vote for Congress. Prior to 1932, the pattern was nearly the opposite. What accounts for the results of recent decades? A simple economic theory may provide at least a partial explanation for the split personality displayed by Americans in the voting booth. The theory relies on three <t>assumptions</t>: 1 -RRB- Voters can "buy "one of two brands when they select their political agents -- a Republican brand that believes in the minimalist state and in the virtues of private markets over the vices of public action, and a Democratic brand that believes in big government and in public intervention to remedy the excesses attendant to the pursuit of private interest.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=assumption%1:10:00:: | definition=a statement that is assumed to be true and from which a conclusion can be drawn | synonyms=premise, premiss | examples=on the assumption that he has been injured we can infer that he will not to play
2. sense_key=assumption%1:09:00:: | definition=a hypothesis that is taken for granted | synonyms=supposition, supposal | examples=any society is built upon certain assumptions
3. sense_key=assumption%1:04:00:: | definition=the act of taking possession of or power over something | synonyms=laying claim | examples=his assumption of office coincided with the trouble in Cuba; the Nazi assumption of power in 1934
4. sense_key=assumption%1:28:00:: | definition=celebration in the Roman Catholic Church of the Virgin Mary's being taken up into heaven when her earthly life ended; corresponds to the Dormition in the Eastern Orthodox Church | synonyms=Assumption of Mary, August 15
5. sense_key=assumption%1:11:00:: | definition=(Christianity) the taking up of the body and soul of the Virgin Mary when her earthly life had ended
6. sense_key=assumption%1:07:00:: | definition=audacious (even arrogant) behavior that you have no right to | synonyms=presumption, presumptuousness, effrontery | examples=he despised them for their presumptuousness
7. sense_key=assumption%1:04:01:: | definition=the act of assuming or taking for granted | examples=your assumption that I would agree was unwarranted

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The target word is "assumptions" in the context: "The theory relies on three assumptions: 1 -RRB- Voters can "buy "one of two brands when they select their political agents..."
The context talks about a theory relying on three assumptions, which are statements or hypotheses taken for granted to build a theory.
Let's look at the candidate senses:
1. a statement that is assumed to be true and from which a conclusion can be drawn (premise, premiss)
2. a hypothesis that is taken for granted (supposition, supposal)
7. the act of assuming or taking for granted

Wait, "a statement that is assumed to be true and from which a conclusion can be drawn" fits "The theory relies on three assumptions: 1) Voters can buy one of two brands..."
Let's check sense 1 vs sense 2.
Sense 1: "a statement that is assumed to be true and from which a conclusion can be drawn" (premise, premiss).
Sense 2: "a hypothesis that is taken for granted" (supposition, supposal).
In the context, "The theory relies on three assumptions: 1) Voters can 'buy' one of two brands..." This is a premise or a statement assumed to be true from which a conclusion can be drawn.
Wait, let's look at the example for sense 1: "on the assumption that he has been injured we can infer that he will not to play".
Example for sense 2: "any society is built upon certain assumptions".
Is it sense 1 or sense 2?
"assumptions" in a theory are often premises. "The theory relies on three assumptions: 1) Voters can 'buy' one of two brands..."
Let's consider "premise" vs "hypothesis". A theory relies on premises.
Let's check WordNet for "assumption".
Sense 1: a statement that is assumed to be true and from which a conclusion can be drawn.
Sense 2: a hypothesis that is taken for granted.
In the text: "The theory relies on three assumptions: 1 -RRB- Voters can "buy "one of two brands..."
This is a statement assumed to be true.
Let's look at sense 1: "a statement that is assumed to be true and from which a conclusion can be drawn"
Let's look at sense 2: "a hypothesis that is taken for granted"
Actually, "assumptions" in a theory are premises. "The theory relies on three assumptions..."
Let's search for "The theory relies on three assumptions" in WordNet or similar datasets.
Often, "assumption" as a premise is sense 1.
Let's re-read the context: "The theory relies on three assumptions: 1 -RRB- Voters can "buy "one of two brands when they select their political agents..."
This is a statement that is assumed to be true.
Is it sense 1 or sense 2?
Sense 1: premise, premiss.
Sense 2: supposition, supposal.
"assumptions" in a scientific or economic theory are typically premises.
Let's choose sense 1.
Wait, let's look at the exact wording: "a statement that is assumed to be true and from which a conclusion can be drawn".
Yes, "Voters can 'buy' one of two brands..." is a statement assumed to be true, from which the theory draws conclusions.
I will go with sense 1.
Let's double check sense 1 vs sense 2.
Sense 1: premise.
Sense 2: hypothesis.
A theory relies on premises.
I'll select 1.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: brand
Target surface form: brands
Context:
In every presidential election over the past half century, except for the Goldwater presidential candidacy, the GOP has captured a greater percentage of the major - party popular vote for president than it has of congressional seats or the popular vote for Congress. Prior to 1932, the pattern was nearly the opposite. What accounts for the results of recent decades? A simple economic theory may provide at least a partial explanation for the split personality displayed by Americans in the voting booth. The theory relies on three assumptions: 1 -RRB- Voters can "buy "one of two <t>brands</t> when they select their political agents -- a Republican brand that believes in the minimalist state and in the virtues of private markets over the vices of public action, and a Democratic brand that believes in big government and in public intervention to remedy the excesses attendant to the pursuit of private interest. 2 -RRB- Congressional representatives have two basic responsibilities while voting in office -- dealing with national issues -LRB- programmatic actions such as casting roll call votes on legislation that imposes costs and/or confers benefits on the population at large -RRB- and attending to local issues -LRB- constituency service and pork barrel -RRB-.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=brand%1:10:00:: | definition=a name given to a product or service | synonyms=trade name, brand name, marque
2. sense_key=brand%1:09:00:: | definition=a recognizable kind | synonyms=make | examples=there's a new brand of hero in the movies now; what make of car is that?
3. sense_key=brand%1:10:02:: | definition=identification mark on skin, made by burning
4. sense_key=brand%1:27:00:: | definition=a piece of wood that has been burned or is burning | synonyms=firebrand
5. sense_key=brand%1:10:01:: | definition=a symbol of disgrace or infamy; --Genesis | synonyms=mark, stigma, stain | examples=And the Lord set a mark upon Cain
6. sense_key=brand%1:06:00:: | definition=a cutting or thrusting weapon that has a long metal blade and a hilt with a hand guard | synonyms=sword, blade, steel

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The target word is "brands" in the context: "Voters can "buy "one of two brands when they select their political agents -- a Republican brand that believes in the minimalist state... and a Democratic brand that believes in big government..."
The context talks about "buying" one of two brands, comparing political parties to products or services with a name or identity.
Sense 1: a name given to a product or service (trade name, brand name, marque).
Sense 2: a recognizable kind (make).
Sense 3: identification mark on skin.
Sense 4: a piece of wood that has been burned.
Sense 5: a symbol of disgrace.
Sense 6: a cutting or thrusting weapon.

In the context, "brands" refers to the political parties as if they were products or services with a specific name/identity that voters "buy". "Republican brand", "Democratic brand". This aligns perfectly with Sense 1: "a name given to a product or service".
Wait, could it be Sense 2: "a recognizable kind"? "a new brand of hero". But the text says "buy one of two brands", "Republican brand", "Democratic brand". This is a metaphorical use of "brand" as in "brand name" or "product/service".
Let's check the examples for Sense 1: "trade name, brand name, marque".
Let's check the examples for Sense 2: "there's a new brand of hero in the movies now; what make of car is that?"
The text says "buy one of two brands", which strongly evokes the commercial sense of "brand" (product or service). "Republican brand" is the name/identity given to the Republican party as a product.
Therefore, Sense 1 is the best fit.
Let's double check. "Voters can 'buy' one of two brands when they select their political agents -- a Republican brand... and a Democratic brand..."
Yes, "brand" here means a name given to a product or service (metaphorically applied to political parties).
Sense 1 is the most appropriate.
I will output {"sense_index": 1}.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: political
Target surface form: political
Context:
In every presidential election over the past half century, except for the Goldwater presidential candidacy, the GOP has captured a greater percentage of the major - party popular vote for president than it has of congressional seats or the popular vote for Congress. Prior to 1932, the pattern was nearly the opposite. What accounts for the results of recent decades? A simple economic theory may provide at least a partial explanation for the split personality displayed by Americans in the voting booth. The theory relies on three assumptions: 1 -RRB- Voters can "buy "one of two brands when they select their <t>political</t> agents -- a Republican brand that believes in the minimalist state and in the virtues of private markets over the vices of public action, and a Democratic brand that believes in big government and in public intervention to remedy the excesses attendant to the pursuit of private interest. 2 -RRB- Congressional representatives have two basic responsibilities while voting in office -- dealing with national issues -LRB- programmatic actions such as casting roll call votes on legislation that imposes costs and/or confers benefits on the population at large -RRB- and attending to local issues -LRB- constituency service and pork barrel -RRB-.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=political%3:00:00:: | definition=involving or characteristic of politics or parties or politicians; - Daniel Goleman | examples=calling a meeting is a political act in itself; political pressure
2. sense_key=political%3:01:01:: | definition=of or relating to your views about social relationships involving authority or power | examples=political opinions
3. sense_key=political%3:01:02:: | definition=of or relating to the profession of governing | examples=political career

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The target word is "political" in the context: "Voters can 'buy' one of two brands when they select their political agents -- a Republican brand that believes in the minimalist state and in the virtues of private markets over the vices of public action, and a Democratic brand that believes in big government and in public intervention to remedy the excesses attendant to the pursuit of private interest."
The phrase is "political agents".
Sense 1: involving or characteristic of politics or parties or politicians.
Sense 2: of or relating to your views about social relationships involving authority or power.
Sense 3: of or relating to the profession of governing.

"political agents" refers to politicians or parties, i.e., involving or characteristic of politics or parties or politicians.
Let's check the examples for sense 1: "calling a meeting is a political act in itself; political pressure".
"political agents" fits sense 1 perfectly, as it refers to agents of politics/parties/politicians.
Wait, let's look at the context: "select their political agents -- a Republican brand... and a Democratic brand". This is about parties and politicians.
Sense 1: involving or characteristic of politics or parties or politicians.
Sense 3: of or relating to the profession of governing.
"political agents" are politicians or representatives of political parties.
Therefore, sense 1 is the best fit.
Let's double check.
"political agents" -> agents of politics or parties.
Sense 1: involving or characteristic of politics or parties or politicians.
Yes, sense 1.
Context: "select their political agents"
Sense 1 is the most appropriate.
I will output {"sense_index": 1}.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: agent
Target surface form: agents
Context:
In every presidential election over the past half century, except for the Goldwater presidential candidacy, the GOP has captured a greater percentage of the major - party popular vote for president than it has of congressional seats or the popular vote for Congress. Prior to 1932, the pattern was nearly the opposite. What accounts for the results of recent decades? A simple economic theory may provide at least a partial explanation for the split personality displayed by Americans in the voting booth. The theory relies on three assumptions: 1 -RRB- Voters can "buy "one of two brands when they select their political <t>agents</t> -- a Republican brand that believes in the minimalist state and in the virtues of private markets over the vices of public action, and a Democratic brand that believes in big government and in public intervention to remedy the excesses attendant to the pursuit of private interest. 2 -RRB- Congressional representatives have two basic responsibilities while voting in office -- dealing with national issues -LRB- programmatic actions such as casting roll call votes on legislation that imposes costs and/or confers benefits on the population at large -RRB- and attending to local issues -LRB- constituency service and pork barrel -RRB-.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=agent%1:17:00:: | definition=an active and efficient cause; capable of producing a certain effect | examples=their research uncovered new disease agents
2. sense_key=agent%1:18:02:: | definition=a representative who acts on behalf of other persons or organizations
3. sense_key=agent%1:27:00:: | definition=a substance that exerts some force or effect
4. sense_key=agent%1:18:01:: | definition=a businessman who buys or sells for another in exchange for a commission | synonyms=factor, broker
5. sense_key=agent%1:18:03:: | definition=any agent or representative of a federal agency or bureau | synonyms=federal agent
6. sense_key=agent%1:10:00:: | definition=the semantic role of the animate entity that instigates or causes the happening denoted by the verb in the clause | synonyms=agentive role

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The target word is "agents" in the context: "Voters can 'buy' one of two brands when they select their political agents -- a Republican brand that believes in the minimalist state..."
The context talks about voters selecting political agents, which refers to representatives who act on behalf of other persons (the voters).
Let's look at the candidate senses:
1. active and efficient cause
2. a representative who acts on behalf of other persons or organizations
3. a substance that exerts some force or effect
4. a businessman who buys or sells for another in exchange for a commission
5. any agent or representative of a federal agency or bureau
6. the semantic role of the animate entity that instigates or causes the happening denoted by the verb in the clause

Sense 2 fits perfectly: "a representative who acts on behalf of other persons or organizations". Political agents are representatives acting on behalf of voters.

Let's double check.
"political agents" -> representatives.
Sense 2: "a representative who acts on behalf of other persons or organizations"
This matches perfectly.
The index is 2.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: republican
Target surface form: Republican
Context:
In every presidential election over the past half century, except for the Goldwater presidential candidacy, the GOP has captured a greater percentage of the major - party popular vote for president than it has of congressional seats or the popular vote for Congress. Prior to 1932, the pattern was nearly the opposite. What accounts for the results of recent decades? A simple economic theory may provide at least a partial explanation for the split personality displayed by Americans in the voting booth. The theory relies on three assumptions: 1 -RRB- Voters can "buy "one of two brands when they select their political agents -- a <t>Republican</t> brand that believes in the minimalist state and in the virtues of private markets over the vices of public action, and a Democratic brand that believes in big government and in public intervention to remedy the excesses attendant to the pursuit of private interest. 2 -RRB- Congressional representatives have two basic responsibilities while voting in office -- dealing with national issues -LRB- programmatic actions such as casting roll call votes on legislation that imposes costs and/or confers benefits on the population at large -RRB- and attending to local issues -LRB- constituency service and pork barrel -RRB-.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=republican%3:01:01:: | definition=relating to or belonging to the Republican Party | examples=a Republican senator; Republican party politics
2. sense_key=republican%5:00:00:democratic:00 | definition=having the supreme power lying in the body of citizens entitled to vote for officers and representatives responsible to them or characteristic of such government; - United States Constitution; ; - Philip Marsh; -Nathaniel Hawthorne | examples=the United States shall guarantee to every state in this union a republican form of government; a very republican notion

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The target word is "Republican" in the context: "Voters can "buy "one of two brands when they select their political agents -- a Republican brand that believes in the minimalist state and in the virtues of private markets over the vices of public action, and a Democratic brand that believes in big government..."
The context clearly refers to the Republican Party (GOP).
Sense 1: relating to or belonging to the Republican Party. Examples: a Republican senator; Republican party politics.
Sense 2: having the supreme power lying in the body of citizens entitled to vote for officers and representatives responsible to them or characteristic of such government.

The context is about the Republican brand vs Democratic brand, which refers to the Republican Party.
Therefore, sense 1 is the correct choice.
The output format must be exactly {"sense_index": 1}.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: brand
Target surface form: brand
Context:
In every presidential election over the past half century, except for the Goldwater presidential candidacy, the GOP has captured a greater percentage of the major - party popular vote for president than it has of congressional seats or the popular vote for Congress. Prior to 1932, the pattern was nearly the opposite. What accounts for the results of recent decades? A simple economic theory may provide at least a partial explanation for the split personality displayed by Americans in the voting booth. The theory relies on three assumptions: 1 -RRB- Voters can "buy "one of two brands when they select their political agents -- a Republican <t>brand</t> that believes in the minimalist state and in the virtues of private markets over the vices of public action, and a Democratic brand that believes in big government and in public intervention to remedy the excesses attendant to the pursuit of private interest. 2 -RRB- Congressional representatives have two basic responsibilities while voting in office -- dealing with national issues -LRB- programmatic actions such as casting roll call votes on legislation that imposes costs and/or confers benefits on the population at large -RRB- and attending to local issues -LRB- constituency service and pork barrel -RRB-.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=brand%1:10:00:: | definition=a name given to a product or service | synonyms=trade name, brand name, marque
2. sense_key=brand%1:09:00:: | definition=a recognizable kind | synonyms=make | examples=there's a new brand of hero in the movies now; what make of car is that?
3. sense_key=brand%1:10:02:: | definition=identification mark on skin, made by burning
4. sense_key=brand%1:27:00:: | definition=a piece of wood that has been burned or is burning | synonyms=firebrand
5. sense_key=brand%1:10:01:: | definition=a symbol of disgrace or infamy; --Genesis | synonyms=mark, stigma, stain | examples=And the Lord set a mark upon Cain
6. sense_key=brand%1:06:00:: | definition=a cutting or thrusting weapon that has a long metal blade and a hilt with a hand guard | synonyms=sword, blade, steel

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The target word is "brand" in the context: "Voters can "buy "one of two brands when they select their political agents -- a Republican brand that believes in the minimalist state and in the virtues of private markets over the vices of public action, and a Democratic brand that believes in big government and in public intervention to remedy the excesses attendant to the pursuit of private interest."
The context talks about a "Republican brand" and a "Democratic brand", which are types or kinds of political agents or ideologies.
Let's look at the candidate senses:
1. a name given to a product or service (trade name, brand name, marque)
2. a recognizable kind (make) - examples: "there's a new brand of hero in the movies now; what make of car is that?"
3. identification mark on skin, made by burning
4. a piece of wood that has been burned or is burning
5. a symbol of disgrace or infamy
6. a cutting or thrusting weapon

In the context, "brand" is used metaphorically to mean a "recognizable kind" or "type" of political agent/ideology, similar to "a new brand of hero".
Wait, sense 1 is "a name given to a product or service". The text says "Voters can 'buy' one of two brands... a Republican brand... and a Democratic brand". This is a metaphorical extension of "brand" as a recognizable kind or type, or perhaps "brand" as a name given to a product or service (since it says "buy one of two brands").
Let's re-read sense 2: "a recognizable kind" with example "there's a new brand of hero in the movies now". This fits "a Republican brand that believes in...".
Is it sense 1 or sense 2?
"Voters can 'buy' one of two brands when they select their political agents -- a Republican brand that believes in the minimalist state..."
Here, "brand" refers to the type or kind of political agent/ideology. "A recognizable kind" fits perfectly. "A Republican brand" = a recognizable kind of Republican.
Let's check sense 1: "a name given to a product or service". While "buy" is in quotes, the definition of the brand itself is "a Republican brand that believes in...", which describes a kind or type, not just a name.
Also, the example for sense 2 is "there's a new brand of hero in the movies now", which is very similar to "a Republican brand that believes in...".
Therefore, sense 2 is the best fit.
Let's double check.
"brand" as "a recognizable kind" (sense 2).
Yes, "a Republican brand" is a kind of political agent.
I will choose sense 2.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: minimalist
Target surface form: minimalist
Context:
In every presidential election over the past half century, except for the Goldwater presidential candidacy, the GOP has captured a greater percentage of the major - party popular vote for president than it has of congressional seats or the popular vote for Congress. Prior to 1932, the pattern was nearly the opposite. What accounts for the results of recent decades? A simple economic theory may provide at least a partial explanation for the split personality displayed by Americans in the voting booth. The theory relies on three assumptions: 1 -RRB- Voters can "buy "one of two brands when they select their political agents -- a Republican brand that believes in the <t>minimalist</t> state and in the virtues of private markets over the vices of public action, and a Democratic brand that believes in big government and in public intervention to remedy the excesses attendant to the pursuit of private interest. 2 -RRB- Congressional representatives have two basic responsibilities while voting in office -- dealing with national issues -LRB- programmatic actions such as casting roll call votes on legislation that imposes costs and/or confers benefits on the population at large -RRB- and attending to local issues -LRB- constituency service and pork barrel -RRB-.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=minimalist%3:01:00:: | definition=of or relating to artistic minimalism
2. sense_key=minimalist%5:00:00:moderate:00 | definition=advocating minimal reforms (as in government or politics)

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The target word is "minimalist".
Context: "...a Republican brand that believes in the minimalist state and in the virtues of private markets over the vices of public action..."
Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=minimalist%3:01:00:: | definition=of or relating to artistic minimalism
2. sense_key=minimalist%5:00:00:moderate:00 | definition=advocating minimal reforms (as in government or politics)

The context is about a "minimalist state" in politics, believing in private markets over public action. This aligns with sense 2: advocating minimal reforms (as in government or politics).

Sense 2 is the best fit.
Let's double check.
"minimalist state" -> advocating minimal government.
Sense 2: advocating minimal reforms (as in government or politics).
Yes, sense 2.
Format: {"sense_index": 2}


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: state
Target surface form: state
Context:
In every presidential election over the past half century, except for the Goldwater presidential candidacy, the GOP has captured a greater percentage of the major - party popular vote for president than it has of congressional seats or the popular vote for Congress. Prior to 1932, the pattern was nearly the opposite. What accounts for the results of recent decades? A simple economic theory may provide at least a partial explanation for the split personality displayed by Americans in the voting booth. The theory relies on three assumptions: 1 -RRB- Voters can "buy "one of two brands when they select their political agents -- a Republican brand that believes in the minimalist <t>state</t> and in the virtues of private markets over the vices of public action, and a Democratic brand that believes in big government and in public intervention to remedy the excesses attendant to the pursuit of private interest. 2 -RRB- Congressional representatives have two basic responsibilities while voting in office -- dealing with national issues -LRB- programmatic actions such as casting roll call votes on legislation that imposes costs and/or confers benefits on the population at large -RRB- and attending to local issues -LRB- constituency service and pork barrel -RRB-.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=state%1:15:01:: | definition=the territory occupied by one of the constituent administrative districts of a nation | synonyms=province | examples=his state is in the deep south
2. sense_key=state%1:03:00:: | definition=the way something is with respect to its main attributes | examples=the current state of knowledge; his state of health
3. sense_key=state%1:14:01:: | definition=the group of people comprising the government of a sovereign state | examples=the state has lowered its income tax
4. sense_key=state%1:14:00:: | definition=a politically organized body of people under a single government | synonyms=nation, country, land, commonwealth, res publica, body politic | examples=the state has elected a new president; African nations
5. sense_key=state%1:26:02:: | definition=(chemistry) the three traditional states of matter are solids (fixed shape and volume) and liquids (fixed volume and shaped by the container) and gases (filling the container) | synonyms=state of matter | examples=the solid state of water is called ice
6. sense_key=state%1:26:01:: | definition=a state of depression or agitation | examples=he was in such a state you just couldn't reason with him
7. sense_key=state%1:15:00:: | definition=the territory occupied by a nation | synonyms=country, land | examples=he returned to the land of his birth; he visited several European countries
8. sense_key=state%1:14:02:: | definition=the federal department in the United States that sets and maintains foreign policies | synonyms=Department of State, United States Department of State, State Department, DoS | examples=the Department of State was created in 1789

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The target word is "state" in the context: "a Republican brand that believes in the minimalist <t>state</t> and in the virtues of private markets over the vices of public action, and a Democratic brand that believes in big government and in public intervention to remedy the excesses attendant to the pursuit of private interest."
The context contrasts "minimalist state" with "big government".
The "state" here refers to the government or the political entity that governs.
Let's look at the candidate senses:
1. state%1:15:01:: - territory occupied by a constituent administrative district (e.g., US state).
2. state%1:03:00:: - the way something is with respect to its main attributes.
3. state%1:14:01:: - the group of people comprising the government of a sovereign state. Examples: "the state has lowered its income tax".
4. state%1:14:00:: - a politically organized body of people under a single government (nation, country).
5. state%1:26:02:: - state of matter.
6. state%1:26:01:: - state of depression or agitation.
7. state%1:15:00:: - territory occupied by a nation.
8. state%1:14:02:: - Department of State.

In the context, "minimalist state" refers to the government (as opposed to private markets). "the state has lowered its income tax" is a good match for "the state" as the government.
Sense 3: "the group of people comprising the government of a sovereign state"
Sense 4: "a politically organized body of people under a single government" (nation, country).

"minimalist state" means a government that does very little. This aligns perfectly with sense 3: "the group of people comprising the government of a sovereign state".
Let's double check sense 3 vs sense 4.
Sense 3: "the state has lowered its income tax" -> the government.
Sense 4: "the state has elected a new president" -> the nation/country.
In "minimalist state", it's the government that is minimalist (small government).
Therefore, sense 3 is the best fit.
Let's review the definition of sense 3: "the group of people comprising the government of a sovereign state".
Yes, "minimalist state" = small government.
I will choose sense 3.
Wait, let's re-read the context: "a Republican brand that believes in the minimalist state and in the virtues of private markets over the vices of public action, and a Democratic brand that believes in big government..."
"minimalist state" is directly contrasted with "big government". So "state" = "government".
Sense 3 is "the group of people comprising the government of a sovereign state".
Sense 4 is "a politically organized body of people under a single government" (nation, country).
Sense 3 is definitely the one meaning "government".
I will output {"sense_index": 3}.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: virtue
Target surface form: virtues
Context:
In every presidential election over the past half century, except for the Goldwater presidential candidacy, the GOP has captured a greater percentage of the major - party popular vote for president than it has of congressional seats or the popular vote for Congress. Prior to 1932, the pattern was nearly the opposite. What accounts for the results of recent decades? A simple economic theory may provide at least a partial explanation for the split personality displayed by Americans in the voting booth. The theory relies on three assumptions: 1 -RRB- Voters can "buy "one of two brands when they select their political agents -- a Republican brand that believes in the minimalist state and in the <t>virtues</t> of private markets over the vices of public action, and a Democratic brand that believes in big government and in public intervention to remedy the excesses attendant to the pursuit of private interest. 2 -RRB- Congressional representatives have two basic responsibilities while voting in office -- dealing with national issues -LRB- programmatic actions such as casting roll call votes on legislation that imposes costs and/or confers benefits on the population at large -RRB- and attending to local issues -LRB- constituency service and pork barrel -RRB-.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=virtue%1:07:01:: | definition=the quality of doing what is right and avoiding what is wrong | synonyms=virtuousness, moral excellence
2. sense_key=virtue%1:07:03:: | definition=any admirable quality or attribute | synonyms=merit | examples=work of great merit
3. sense_key=virtue%1:07:02:: | definition=morality with respect to sexual relations | synonyms=chastity, sexual morality
4. sense_key=virtue%1:07:04:: | definition=a particular moral excellence

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The target word is "virtues" in the context: "a Republican brand that believes in the minimalist state and in the virtues of private markets over the vices of public action".
The context talks about the "virtues of private markets", meaning the good qualities, merits, or advantages of private markets.
Let's look at the candidate senses:
1. virtue%1:07:01:: the quality of doing what is right and avoiding what is wrong (moral excellence)
2. virtue%1:07:03:: any admirable quality or attribute (merit)
3. virtue%1:07:02:: morality with respect to sexual relations (chastity)
4. virtue%1:07:04:: a particular moral excellence

Sense 2 ("any admirable quality or attribute", synonyms: merit) fits best, as it refers to the positive qualities or merits of private markets, not necessarily moral excellence or sexual morality.
"virtues of private markets" = merits of private markets.
Therefore, sense 2 is the best fit.
Let's double check.
"virtues of private markets" -> admirable qualities or attributes of private markets.
Sense 2: any admirable quality or attribute.
Yes, sense 2.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: private
Target surface form: private
Context:
In every presidential election over the past half century, except for the Goldwater presidential candidacy, the GOP has captured a greater percentage of the major - party popular vote for president than it has of congressional seats or the popular vote for Congress. Prior to 1932, the pattern was nearly the opposite. What accounts for the results of recent decades? A simple economic theory may provide at least a partial explanation for the split personality displayed by Americans in the voting booth. The theory relies on three assumptions: 1 -RRB- Voters can "buy "one of two brands when they select their political agents -- a Republican brand that believes in the minimalist state and in the virtues of <t>private</t> markets over the vices of public action, and a Democratic brand that believes in big government and in public intervention to remedy the excesses attendant to the pursuit of private interest. 2 -RRB- Congressional representatives have two basic responsibilities while voting in office -- dealing with national issues -LRB- programmatic actions such as casting roll call votes on legislation that imposes costs and/or confers benefits on the population at large -RRB- and attending to local issues -LRB- constituency service and pork barrel -RRB-.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=private%3:00:00:: | definition=confined to particular persons or groups or providing privacy | examples=a private place; private discussions
2. sense_key=private%5:00:02:personal:00 | definition=concerning things deeply private and personal | examples=private correspondence; private family matters
3. sense_key=private%5:00:00:personal:00 | definition=concerning one person exclusively | synonyms=individual | examples=we all have individual cars; each room has a private bath
4. sense_key=private%5:00:00:inward:00 | definition=not expressed | synonyms=secret | examples=secret (or private) thoughts

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The target word is "private" in the context: "a Republican brand that believes in the minimalist state and in the virtues of private markets over the vices of public action".
The phrase is "private markets".
Let's look at the candidate senses:
1. confined to particular persons or groups or providing privacy (a private place; private discussions)
2. concerning things deeply private and personal (private correspondence; private family matters)
3. concerning one person exclusively (individual) (we all have individual cars; each room has a private bath)
4. not expressed (secret) (secret (or private) thoughts)

Wait, "private markets" refers to markets that are not public (i.e., not government-run).
Is there a better sense? Let's check the options.
Wait, "private" in "private markets" means not public, i.e., belonging to or concerning a particular person or group, or not public.
Sense 1: confined to particular persons or groups or providing privacy.
Wait, let's re-read the options.
Option 1: confined to particular persons or groups or providing privacy.
Option 3: concerning one person exclusively.
Wait, "private markets" vs "public action".
Is there a sense for "not public"?
Let's see: private%3:00:00:: (confined to particular persons or groups or providing privacy).
Wait, "private markets" means markets that are not public.
Let's check the WordNet senses for "private".
1. private (adj) - confined to particular persons or groups or providing privacy: "a private place"; "private discussions"
2. private (adj) - concerning things deeply private and personal: "private correspondence"; "private family matters"
3. private (adj) - concerning one person exclusively: "we all have individual cars"; "each room has a private bath"
4. private (adj) - not expressed: "secret (or private) thoughts"
5. private (adj) - not open to the public: "a private club"
6. private (adj) - not publicly owned: "private enterprise"

Wait, the options provided are only 4.
1. sense_key=private%3:00:00:: | definition=confined to particular persons or groups or providing privacy | examples=a private place; private discussions
2. sense_key=private%5:00:02:personal:00 | definition=concerning things deeply private and personal | examples=private correspondence; private family matters
3. sense_key=private%5:00:00:personal:00 | definition=concerning one person exclusively | synonyms=individual | examples=we all have individual cars; each room has a private bath
4. sense_key=private%5:00:00:inward:00 | definition=not expressed | synonyms=secret | examples=secret (or private) thoughts

Wait, "private markets" is not deeply personal, not concerning one person exclusively, not not expressed.
So it must be 1. "confined to particular persons or groups or providing privacy".
Wait, could it be 1? "private markets" are markets confined to particular persons or groups (i.e., private sector, not public).
Let's re-read sense 1: "confined to particular persons or groups or providing privacy".
Is there any other sense? No, only 4 candidates.
Let's evaluate 1: "confined to particular persons or groups or providing privacy". This is the closest to "not public" or "private sector".
Let's check if there's any other. No.
Therefore, 1 is the best fit among the choices.
Wait, "private markets" -> markets that are not public. Sense 1 is the most general "private" sense (as opposed to public).
Let's double check.
"private markets" -> private sector.
Sense 1: confined to particular persons or groups or providing privacy.
Yes, 1 is the only one that makes sense.
Let's review the options again.
1. confined to particular persons or groups or providing privacy
2. concerning things deeply private and personal
3. concerning one person exclusively
4. not expressed

"private markets" is definitely not 2, 3, or 4.
So it has to be 1.
I will output 1.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: market
Target surface form: markets
Context:
In every presidential election over the past half century, except for the Goldwater presidential candidacy, the GOP has captured a greater percentage of the major - party popular vote for president than it has of congressional seats or the popular vote for Congress. Prior to 1932, the pattern was nearly the opposite. What accounts for the results of recent decades? A simple economic theory may provide at least a partial explanation for the split personality displayed by Americans in the voting booth. The theory relies on three assumptions: 1 -RRB- Voters can "buy "one of two brands when they select their political agents -- a Republican brand that believes in the minimalist state and in the virtues of private <t>markets</t> over the vices of public action, and a Democratic brand that believes in big government and in public intervention to remedy the excesses attendant to the pursuit of private interest. 2 -RRB- Congressional representatives have two basic responsibilities while voting in office -- dealing with national issues -LRB- programmatic actions such as casting roll call votes on legislation that imposes costs and/or confers benefits on the population at large -RRB- and attending to local issues -LRB- constituency service and pork barrel -RRB-.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=market%1:04:00:: | definition=the world of commercial activity where goods and services are bought and sold | synonyms=marketplace | examples=without competition there would be no market; they were driven from the marketplace
2. sense_key=market%1:14:00:: | definition=the customers for a particular product or service | examples=before they publish any book they try to determine the size of the market for it
3. sense_key=market%1:06:00:: | definition=a marketplace where groceries are sold | synonyms=grocery store, grocery, food market | examples=the grocery store included a meat market
4. sense_key=market%1:14:01:: | definition=the securities markets in the aggregate | synonyms=securities industry | examples=the market always frustrates the small investor
5. sense_key=market%1:06:01:: | definition=an area in a town where a public mercantile establishment is set up | synonyms=marketplace, mart

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The target word is "markets" in the context: "a Republican brand that believes in the minimalist state and in the virtues of private markets over the vices of public action".
The context discusses "private markets" in contrast to "public action" and "big government". This refers to the world of commercial activity where goods and services are bought and sold, i.e., the free market.
Let's evaluate the candidate senses:
1. sense_key=market%1:04:00:: | definition=the world of commercial activity where goods and services are bought and sold | synonyms=marketplace | examples=without competition there would be no market; they were driven from the marketplace
2. sense_key=market%1:14:00:: | definition=the customers for a particular product or service
3. sense_key=market%1:06:00:: | definition=a marketplace where groceries are sold
4. sense_key=market%1:14:01:: | definition=the securities markets in the aggregate
5. sense_key=market%1:06:01:: | definition=an area in a town where a public mercantile establishment is set up

Sense 1 fits perfectly: "the world of commercial activity where goods and services are bought and sold". "private markets" refers to the commercial activity, the free market.

Let's double check.
"virtues of private markets over the vices of public action" -> commercial activity, free market.
Sense 1 is the best fit.
Sense 4 is specifically securities markets, which is too narrow.
Sense 2 is customers, which doesn't fit "private markets" as well as the general commercial activity.
Sense 1 is the correct choice.
The output format must be exactly {"sense_index": 1}.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: vice
Target surface form: vices
Context:
In every presidential election over the past half century, except for the Goldwater presidential candidacy, the GOP has captured a greater percentage of the major - party popular vote for president than it has of congressional seats or the popular vote for Congress. Prior to 1932, the pattern was nearly the opposite. What accounts for the results of recent decades? A simple economic theory may provide at least a partial explanation for the split personality displayed by Americans in the voting booth. The theory relies on three assumptions: 1 -RRB- Voters can "buy "one of two brands when they select their political agents -- a Republican brand that believes in the minimalist state and in the virtues of private markets over the <t>vices</t> of public action, and a Democratic brand that believes in big government and in public intervention to remedy the excesses attendant to the pursuit of private interest. 2 -RRB- Congressional representatives have two basic responsibilities while voting in office -- dealing with national issues -LRB- programmatic actions such as casting roll call votes on legislation that imposes costs and/or confers benefits on the population at large -RRB- and attending to local issues -LRB- constituency service and pork barrel -RRB-.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=vice%1:07:00:: | definition=moral weakness | synonyms=frailty
2. sense_key=vice%1:04:00:: | definition=a specific form of evildoing | examples=vice offends the moral standards of the community

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The target word is "vices" in the context: "a Republican brand that believes in the minimalist state and in the virtues of private markets over the vices of public action".
The contrast is between "virtues" and "vices".
Sense 1: moral weakness (frailty)
Sense 2: a specific form of evildoing (vice offends the moral standards of the community)

Wait, "virtues of private markets over the vices of public action".
Is it moral weakness or a specific form of evildoing?
Let's check the context. "virtues" and "vices" are contrasted.
Virtue is a moral excellence, vice is a moral weakness or a specific form of evildoing.
Wait, "virtues of private markets over the vices of public action".
Is it sense 1 or sense 2?
Let's look at the synonyms for sense 1: frailty.
Synonyms for sense 2: none listed, but examples: "vice offends the moral standards of the community".
Actually, "virtues" and "vices" in this context refers to the good and bad qualities or moral weaknesses.
Wait, let's consider "vice" as "moral weakness" (sense 1) vs "a specific form of evildoing" (sense 2).
"vices of public action" - the bad qualities or moral weaknesses of public action.
Let's search for "virtues and vices".
In WordNet, "vice" has:
1. moral weakness (synonym: frailty)
2. a specific form of evildoing (example: vice offends the moral standards of the community)
3. a deputy or substitute (vice president)
4. a gripping device (vise)

Here, "vices" is plural. "virtues of private markets over the vices of public action".
Is it sense 1 or sense 2?
"virtues" and "vices" are often paired. "virtues and vices".
Sense 1: moral weakness.
Sense 2: a specific form of evildoing.
"vices of public action" - the bad aspects, moral weaknesses.
Let's choose sense 1.
Wait, "virtues" and "vices" as plural. "vices" as plural of "moral weakness" or "specific form of evildoing"?
"vices" as plural of "a specific form of evildoing" makes sense because "virtues" are specific good qualities, and "vices" are specific bad qualities.
But "moral weakness" can also be pluralized as "moral weaknesses".
Let's look at the definition of sense 1: "moral weakness".
Definition of sense 2: "a specific form of evildoing".
"vices of public action" -> specific forms of evildoing? Or moral weaknesses?
"virtues of private markets over the vices of public action"
I think sense 1 is "moral weakness" (frailty).
Let's consider "virtue" and "vice".
Virtue: moral excellence.
Vice: moral weakness.
I will guess sense 1.
Wait, let's re-read carefully: "virtues of private markets over the vices of public action".
Could it be sense 1? Yes, "moral weakness" is a common translation for vice in this context.
Let's check if there is a better fit.
"vices" -> plural of vice.
Sense 1: moral weakness.
Sense 2: a specific form of evildoing.
I'll go with 1.
Wait, "virtues" and "vices" are often used to mean good and bad qualities.
"moral weakness" fits "vices" as a general concept, but "a specific form of evildoing" fits the plural "vices" (specific bad things).
However, "moral weakness" is often used in the plural: "his vices".
Let's choose 1.
Let's rethink: "virtues of private markets over the vices of public action".
Is it 1 or 2?
In WordNet, "vice" (moral weakness) has synonyms: frailty.
"vice" (specific form of evildoing) has examples: "vice offends the moral standards of the community".
I will output 1.
Wait, "virtues" and "vices" are paired. "virtue" is sense 1 of virtue (moral excellence). "vice" is sense 1 of vice (moral weakness).
I'll output 1.
Let's double check.
"virtues of private markets over the vices of public action"
I'll go with 1.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: public
Target surface form: public
Context:
In every presidential election over the past half century, except for the Goldwater presidential candidacy, the GOP has captured a greater percentage of the major - party popular vote for president than it has of congressional seats or the popular vote for Congress. Prior to 1932, the pattern was nearly the opposite. What accounts for the results of recent decades? A simple economic theory may provide at least a partial explanation for the split personality displayed by Americans in the voting booth. The theory relies on three assumptions: 1 -RRB- Voters can "buy "one of two brands when they select their political agents -- a Republican brand that believes in the minimalist state and in the virtues of private markets over the vices of <t>public</t> action, and a Democratic brand that believes in big government and in public intervention to remedy the excesses attendant to the pursuit of private interest. 2 -RRB- Congressional representatives have two basic responsibilities while voting in office -- dealing with national issues -LRB- programmatic actions such as casting roll call votes on legislation that imposes costs and/or confers benefits on the population at large -RRB- and attending to local issues -LRB- constituency service and pork barrel -RRB-.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=public%3:00:00:: | definition=not private; open to or concerning the people as a whole | examples=the public good; public libraries
2. sense_key=public%5:00:00:common:02 | definition=affecting the people or community as a whole | examples=community leaders; community interests

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The target word is "public" in the context: "...a Republican brand that believes in the minimalist state and in the virtues of private markets over the vices of <t>public</t> action..."
The contrast is between "private markets" and "public action".
Sense 1: not private; open to or concerning the people as a whole. (e.g., the public good; public libraries)
Sense 2: affecting the people or community as a whole. (e.g., community leaders; community interests)

The context explicitly contrasts "private markets" with "public action".
"not private" is the exact definition of sense 1.
Therefore, sense 1 is the best fit.
Let's double check.
"private markets over the vices of public action" -> public is the opposite of private.
Sense 1: "not private; open to or concerning the people as a whole"
Sense 2: "affecting the people or community as a whole"

Sense 1 is the most appropriate.
I will return {"sense_index": 1}.