[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: particular
Target surface form: particular
Context:
For follow-up treatment, the animal owner can administer the tablets to the dog. Also, the treatment of vomiting should only be together with other supportive measure or other veterinary therapy while addressing the underlying causes of the vomiting. What is the risk associated with Cerenia? Cerenia was generally well tolerated when administered daily at dosages up to 5 times the recommended doses for an extended period of time (up to 3 times the recommended maximum duration of treatment). What are the precautions for the person who gives the medicine or comes into contact with the animal? Cerenia does not represent a <t>particular</t> risk for people.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=particular%5:00:00:specific:00 | definition=unique or specific to a person or thing or category | synonyms=peculiar, special | examples=the particular demands of the job; has a particular preference for Chinese art
2. sense_key=particular%5:00:02:specific:00 | definition=separate and distinct from others of the same group or category | examples=interested in one particular artist; a man who wishes to make a particular woman fall in love with him
3. sense_key=particular%5:00:00:uncommon:00 | definition=surpassing what is common or usual or expected | synonyms=especial, exceptional, special | examples=he paid especial attention to her; exceptional kindness
4. sense_key=particular%5:00:00:primary:00 | definition=first and most important | synonyms=special | examples=his special interest is music; she gets special (or particular) satisfaction from her volunteer work
5. sense_key=particular%5:00:00:fastidious:00 | definition=exacting especially about details | synonyms=finical, finicky, fussy, picky | examples=a finicky eater; fussy about clothes
6. sense_key=particular%5:00:00:careful:00 | definition=providing specific details or circumstances | examples=a particular description of the room

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to disambiguate the word "particular" in the context "Cerenia does not represent a particular risk for people."

Let me analyze the context: This is about a veterinary medicine (Cerenia) and whether it poses risk to humans who handle it. "Cerenia does not represent a particular risk for people" means it doesn't pose any specific/special/noteworthy risk to people.

The phrase "a particular risk" here means a specific, noteworthy, or special risk - beyond what is common/usual. The negation "does not represent a particular risk" means there's no exceptional/special risk.

Let me consider the senses:
1. unique or specific to a person or thing or category - "the particular demands of the job" - specific to something
2. separate and distinct from others - "one particular artist" - a specific one among many
3. surpassing what is common or usual or expected - "especial, exceptional, special" - "he paid especial attention to her"
4. first and most important - primary
5. exacting about details - finicky
6. providing specific details

In "does not represent a particular risk for people" - this is saying there's no special/exceptional/unusual risk. The word "particular" here means "special" or "exceptional" - beyond the ordinary. The phrase "no particular risk" is idiomatic meaning "no special/noteworthy risk."

Actually, let me think more carefully. "A particular risk" could mean:
- a specific risk (sense 1 or 2)
- a special/exceptional risk (sense 3)

In negative constructions like "not a particular risk," "no particular reason," "nothing particular," the meaning is typically "special/noteworthy/exceptional" - i.e., sense 3. "I don't have any particular preference" means no special/strong preference.

"Cerenia does not represent a particular risk for people" = Cerenia does not pose any special/exceptional/unusual risk to people. This aligns with sense 3: surpassing what is common or usual or expected (especial, exceptional, special).

The example "he paid especial attention to her" - especial = particular = beyond ordinary. "No particular risk" = no exceptional risk.

So the answer should be sense 3.

Wait, let me reconsider. Could it be sense 1? "specific to a person or thing or category" - "particular risk for people" = risk specific to people? No, the sentence is "does not represent a particular risk FOR people" meaning it doesn't pose risk to people. The "for people" is the affected party, not the category specificity.

The idiomatic phrase "not ... particular" strongly suggests sense 3 (special/exceptional). "It's nothing particular" = nothing special. "No particular reason" = no special reason.

Yes, sense 3 is best.


attempt_kind: initial

status: success

[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: risk
Target surface form: risk
Context:
For follow-up treatment, the animal owner can administer the tablets to the dog. Also, the treatment of vomiting should only be together with other supportive measure or other veterinary therapy while addressing the underlying causes of the vomiting. What is the risk associated with Cerenia? Cerenia was generally well tolerated when administered daily at dosages up to 5 times the recommended doses for an extended period of time (up to 3 times the recommended maximum duration of treatment). What are the precautions for the person who gives the medicine or comes into contact with the animal? Cerenia does not represent a particular <t>risk</t> for people.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=risk%1:26:00:: | definition=a source of danger; a possibility of incurring loss or misfortune | synonyms=hazard, jeopardy, peril, endangerment | examples=drinking alcohol is a health hazard
2. sense_key=risk%1:04:00:: | definition=a venture undertaken without regard to possible loss or injury | synonyms=peril, danger | examples=he saw the rewards but not the risks of crime; there was a danger he would do the wrong thing
3. sense_key=risk%1:07:02:: | definition=the probability of becoming infected given that exposure to an infectious agent has occurred | synonyms=risk of infection
4. sense_key=risk%1:07:01:: | definition=the probability of being exposed to an infectious agent | synonyms=risk of exposure

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

finish_reason: stop

role: assistant

reasoning_content: The context: "Cerenia does not represent a particular risk for people." This is about the medicine not being a source of danger/hazard to people who administer or come into contact. Sense 1 = a source of danger; possibility of loss/misfortune, synonyms hazard. Fits "represent a risk for people" = pose a hazard. Sense 2 is venture undertaken without regard... not fit. Senses 3/4 infection probability not fit. Answer JSON only sense_index 1.

format: unknown

native_finish_reason: stop

provider: Moonshot AI

currency: USD


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: people
Target surface form: people
Context:
For follow-up treatment, the animal owner can administer the tablets to the dog. Also, the treatment of vomiting should only be together with other supportive measure or other veterinary therapy while addressing the underlying causes of the vomiting. What is the risk associated with Cerenia? Cerenia was generally well tolerated when administered daily at dosages up to 5 times the recommended doses for an extended period of time (up to 3 times the recommended maximum duration of treatment). What are the precautions for the person who gives the medicine or comes into contact with the animal? Cerenia does not represent a particular risk for <t>people</t>.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=people%1:14:00:: | definition=(plural) any group of human beings (men or women or children) collectively | examples=old people; there were at least 200 people in the audience
2. sense_key=people%1:14:01:: | definition=the body of citizens of a state or country | synonyms=citizenry | examples=the Spanish people
3. sense_key=people%1:14:02:: | definition=members of a family line | examples=his people have been farmers for generations; are your people still alive?
4. sense_key=people%1:14:03:: | definition=the common people generally | synonyms=multitude, masses, mass, hoi polloi, the great unwashed | examples=separate the warriors from the mass; power to the people

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content: The context says "Cerenia does not represent a particular risk for people." Here "people" refers to human beings generally, specifically the person who gives the medicine or comes into contact with the animal. This is sense 1: any group of human beings collectively. Not citizenry, family line, or common people. Answer sense_index 1.