[User]
Which numbered sense of "moderate" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: Alimta is not recommended for use in patients with <t>moderate</t> or severe kidney problems.

Senses:
1. definition=being within reasonable or average limits; not excessive or extreme | examples=moderate prices
2. definition=not extreme | examples=a moderate penalty
3. definition=marked by avoidance of extravagance or extremes | examples=moderate in his demands

reasoning_content:
The user is asking me to identify which numbered sense of "moderate" is used in the given sentence. Let me analyze the sentence and the definitions.

 Sentence: "Alimta is not recommended for use in patients with <t>moderate</t> or severe kidney problems."

 The word "moderate" here is describing the severity of kidney problems. It's being used in a medical context to indicate a level of severity that is between mild and severe.

 Let me look at the three senses:

 1. "being within reasonable or average limits; not excessive or extreme" - examples: moderate prices
    This seems to be about something being within average limits, not too high or too low.

 2. "not extreme" - examples: a moderate penalty
    This is about avoiding extremes. In the context of medical severity, "moderate" means neither mild nor severe - it's in the middle, not extreme.

 3. "marked by avoidance of extravagance or extremes" - examples: moderate in his demands
    This seems to describe a person's behavior or attitude - someone who avoids extravagance.

 Now, looking at the sentence: "moderate or severe kidney problems"

 Here, "moderate" is describing the degree or severity of kidney problems. In medical terminology, severity is often classified as mild, moderate, or severe.

 "Moderate" in this context means neither mild nor severe - it's an intermediate level. It's "not extreme" in the sense that it's not severe, but it's also not mild.

 Let me think about which definition fits best:

 Definition 1: "being within reasonable or average limits; not excessive or extreme"
 This could fit, as moderate kidney problems are within a certain range - not excessive.

 Definition 2: "not extreme"
 This also fits. Moderate kidney problems are not extreme (not severe).

 Definition 3: This is about a person's behavior, so it doesn't fit.

 Now I need to distinguish between 1 and 2.

 Definition 1 examples: "moderate prices" - prices that are not too high, reasonable.
 Definition 2 examples: "a moderate penalty" - a penalty that is not extreme, not too harsh.

 In medical contexts, when we say "moderate kidney problems," we mean problems that are of intermediate severity - not mild, not severe.

 Looking at the definitions more carefully:

 1. "being within reasonable or average limits; not excessive or extreme"
    This emphasizes being within limits, reasonable.

 2. "not extreme"
    This is simpler - just not being at the extreme end.

 In the phrase "moderate or severe," we have a progression:
 - moderate (middle level)
 - severe (extreme/high level)

 Actually, wait. Let me reconsider. In medical severity scales, we typically have:
 - Mild
 - Moderate
 - Severe

 So "moderate" is the middle category.

 The phrase is "moderate or severe" - so these are two categories of severity.

 Definition 2 says "not extreme" with the example "a moderate penalty."

 Actually, looking at the example "a moderate penalty" - a moderate penalty is one that is not extreme, not too harsh.

 In the medical context, "moderate" kidney problems would be problems that are not extreme (not severe), but also not mild.

 But actually, in the phrase "moderate or severe," both are conditions where the drug is not recommended.

 Let me think about the semantic focus.

 Definition 1: "being within reasonable or average limits; not excessive or extreme"
 This suggests something that is acceptable, within normal bounds.

 Definition 2: "not extreme"
 This is more about the degree or intensity.

 In medical terminology, "moderate" describes the degree of severity.

 Looking at the examples:
 1. moderate prices - prices that are not too high, reasonable
 2. a moderate penalty - a penalty that is not extreme

 "Moderate kidney problems" - kidney problems that are not extreme (not severe).

 Actually, I think definition 2 fits best.

 But let me look at definition 1 again: "being within reasonable or average limits; not excessive or extreme"

 In medical contexts, "moderate" means of medium degree or intensity.

 The key is that in the sentence, "moderate" is paired with "severe."

 Severe means extreme, serious, harsh.
 Moderate means not extreme, not severe.

 Definition 2 is "not extreme."

 Definition 1 is "being within reasonable or average limits; not excessive or extreme."

 Both 1 and 2 mention "not extreme."

 But definition 1 emphasizes "reasonable or average limits" and "not excessive."
 Definition 2 is simply "not extreme."

 In the context of medical conditions:
 - "Moderate" means of medium severity.
 - It is not extreme (that's severe).

 The example for definition 2 is "a moderate penalty" - a penalty that is not extreme.

 The example for definition 1 is "moderate prices" - prices that are reasonable, not excessive.

 Now, kidney problems that are "moderate" are not reasonable or average - they are medical problems. We don't want kidney problems to be "reasonable" or "within average limits" in the sense of being acceptable.

 Rather, "moderate" here describes the intensity or severity level - it is not extreme (not severe).

 Actually, looking at standard dictionary definitions:

 Moderate can mean:
 1. Average in amount, intensity, quality, or degree
 2. Not extreme

 In medical contexts, "moderate" typically means of medium severity - between mild and severe.

 Definition 1: "being within reasonable or average limits; not excessive or extreme"
 This could apply to the degree of the problem.

 Definition 2: "not extreme"
 This also applies.

 But let's look at the exact wording of the definitions provided:

 1. definition=being within reasonable or average limits; not excessive or extreme | examples=moderate prices
 2. definition=not extreme | examples=a moderate penalty
 3. definition=marked by avoidance of extravagance or extremes | examples=moderate in his demands

 The key difference between 1 and 2:

 Definition 1 focuses on being within reasonable/average limits. This is often used for quantities, amounts, or degrees that are acceptable or normal.

 Definition 2 is simply "not extreme" - which can apply to severity.

 In the sentence "moderate or severe kidney problems":
 - "Severe" means extreme, serious.
 - "Moderate" means not extreme, not severe (but more than mild).

 The example "a moderate penalty" suggests a penalty that is not extreme - not too harsh.

 Similarly, "moderate kidney problems" are kidney problems that are not extreme/severe.

 Actually, looking at medical usage, "moderate" is a specific level of severity.

 But I need to choose between the given definitions.

 Let me think about "moderate prices" vs "a moderate penalty."

 "Moderate prices" - prices that are not too high, reasonable, within average limits.
 "A moderate penalty" - a penalty that is not extreme, not too severe.

 "Moderate kidney problems" - problems that are not extreme, not severe.

 Actually, in the phrase "moderate or severe," moderate is distinguished from severe.

 Severe = extreme
 Moderate = not extreme

 This matches definition 2.

 Definition 1 emphasizes "within reasonable or average limits."

 Are moderate kidney problems "within reasonable limits"? Not really - kidney problems are never reasonable or within acceptable limits. They are medical conditions of a certain severity.

 Rather, "moderate" here describes the degree or intensity - it is not at the extreme end (severe), but it is also not at the mild end.

 Definition 2 "not extreme" with the example "a moderate penalty" seems to fit best.

 A penalty can be mild, moderate, or severe.
 Similarly, kidney problems can be mild, moderate, or severe.

 "A moderate penalty" is a penalty that is not extreme.
 "Moderate kidney problems" are problems that are not extreme.

 Definition 1 with "moderate prices" is about something being reasonable, not excessive.

 I think the answer is 2.

 But let me double-check.

 Another way to think about it:

 Definition 1: This is about things being within a normal, acceptable range. Like prices that aren't too high.
 Definition 2: This is about degree or intensity not being at the extreme.
 Definition 3: This is about a person's behavior.

 Medical severity levels:
 - Mild: not serious
 - Moderate: medium, not extreme
 - Severe: extreme, serious

 So "moderate" = not extreme.

 That matches definition 2.

 The example "a moderate penalty" also fits this pattern - a penalty that is not extreme (not too harsh).

 Therefore, the answer should be 2.

 Wait, but I want to be careful. Let me look at the exact wording again.

 Definition 1: "being within reasonable or average limits; not excessive or extreme"

 The phrase "not excessive or extreme" appears in definition 1.

 Definition 2: "not extreme"

 So both mention "not extreme."

 But definition 1 has the primary meaning as "within reasonable or average limits."
 Definition 2 is simply "not extreme."

 In the medical context, "moderate" kidney problems are not necessarily "within reasonable or average limits" in the sense of being acceptable. They are medical conditions of intermediate severity.

 The phrase "not extreme" captures the meaning better.

 Also, looking at the examples:
 - Definition 1: moderate prices (quantitative - amount)
 - Definition 2: a moderate penalty (qualitative - degree of severity)

 Kidney problems are being described by severity, which is similar to a penalty being described by severity.

 A penalty has severity: mild, moderate, severe.
 Medical conditions have severity: mild, moderate, severe.

 Prices have amount: low, moderate, high.

 So "moderate" in "moderate kidney problems" is like "moderate" in "moderate penalty" - both describe severity/degree.

 "Moderate prices" describes amount/cost.

 Therefore, sense 2 is the correct answer.

 Actually, looking at WordNet or similar lexical databases might help, but I need to reason based on the given definitions.

 Let me consider if there's any chance it's definition 1.

 Definition 1: "being within reasonable or average limits; not excessive or extreme"

 Could moderate kidney problems be described as "within reasonable or average limits"?

 Well, in medical terms, there are ranges of severity. Moderate is a range. It is within certain limits.

 But the key distinguishing feature is the example.

 Example for 1: moderate prices
 Example for 2: a moderate penalty

 "Moderate kidney problems" is parallel to "a moderate penalty" - both are describing the severity of something negative.

 "Moderate prices" is describing something neutral or positive (prices that are good - not too high).

 Kidney problems are negative. A penalty is negative.

 We describe the severity of negative things as mild, moderate, or severe.

 For prices, we describe them as low, moderate, or high.

 So the usage pattern matches definition 2.

 I believe the answer is 2.


attempt_kind: initial

status: success

[User]
Which numbered sense of "severe" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: Alimta is not recommended for use in patients with moderate or <t>severe</t> kidney problems.

Senses:
1. definition=intensely or extremely bad or unpleasant in degree or quality | examples=severe pain
2. definition=very strong or vigorous | examples=strong winds
3. definition=severely simple | examples=a stark interior
4. definition=unsparing and uncompromising in discipline or judgment; - H.G.Wells | examples=a parent severe to the pitch of hostility
5. definition=causing fear or anxiety by threatening great harm | examples=a dangerous operation
6. definition=very bad in degree or extent | examples=a severe worldwide depression

finish_reason: stop

role: assistant

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to identify which numbered sense of "severe" is used in the given sentence.

 Sentence: "Alimta is not recommended for use in patients with moderate or <t>severe</t> kidney problems."

 Let me analyze the context:
 - The word "severe" is describing "kidney problems"
 - It's paired with "moderate" suggesting a scale of severity/intensity
 - In medical contexts, when describing conditions or problems, "severe" typically means very bad, serious, or intense in degree

 Now let's look at the senses:

 1. "intensely or extremely bad or unpleasant in degree or quality" - examples: severe pain
    - This could fit, as kidney problems can be unpleasant/bad.

 2. "very strong or vigorous" - examples: strong winds
    - This doesn't fit well with "kidney problems." We don't usually describe medical conditions as "vigorous."

 3. "severely simple" - examples: a stark interior
    - This is about aesthetic simplicity, not medical conditions.

 4. "unsparing and uncompromising in discipline or judgment" - examples: a parent severe to the pitch of hostility
    - This is about personality/behavior, not medical conditions.

 5. "causing fear or anxiety by threatening great harm" - examples: a dangerous operation
    - While severe kidney problems might cause fear, the primary meaning here is about the extent/degree of the problem, not specifically about causing fear.

 6. "very bad in degree or extent" - examples: a severe worldwide depression
    - This fits well. "Severe kidney problems" means kidney problems that are very bad in degree or extent. The pairing with "moderate" also supports this - it's a scale from moderate to very bad.

 Comparing 1 and 6:
 - Sense 1: "intensely or extremely bad or unpleasant in degree or quality"
 - Sense 6: "very bad in degree or extent"

 Both seem close. However, sense 6 specifically mentions "in degree or extent" which aligns perfectly with the medical context where conditions are graded (moderate vs severe). The example "a severe worldwide depression" also shows usage with conditions/states.

 Sense 1 focuses more on the quality of being unpleasant (like pain), while sense 6 focuses on the extent/degree of the condition.

 In medical terminology, "severe" when describing a condition like "kidney problems" refers to the extent or seriousness of the condition - how bad it is. This aligns best with sense 6.

 However, let me reconsider. Sense 1 says "intensely or extremely bad or unpleasant in degree or quality" - this also fits medical conditions.

 But looking at the examples:
 - Sense 1: severe pain (focus on the intensity of sensation)
 - Sense 6: severe worldwide depression (focus on the extent/seriousness of the condition)

 "Kidney problems" is a condition/state, similar to "depression" in the example. Therefore, sense 6 seems most appropriate.

 Actually, looking at standard dictionary definitions, sense 6 appears to be the most accurate for describing medical conditions in terms of their seriousness or extent.

 Wait, let me look more carefully at the distinction:
 - Sense 1: intensely or extremely bad or unpleasant (focus on the subjective experience of badness/unpleasantness)
 - Sense 6: very bad in degree or extent (focus on the objective seriousness)

 In the sentence "severe kidney problems," we're talking about the objective medical assessment of how bad the kidney problems are, not necessarily how unpleasant they feel (though they likely are unpleasant). The contrast with "moderate" suggests a scale of seriousness/degree.

 Therefore, sense 6 is the best match.

 But I should double-check. In many dictionary frameworks (like WordNet, which this seems to be based on):
 - Sense 1 might correspond to something like "severe pain"
 - Sense 6 corresponds to "severe depression" or serious conditions

 Given the example for sense 6 is "a severe worldwide depression," and kidney problems are a medical condition similar to depression (in terms of being a health condition graded by severity), sense 6 is correct.

 Actually, looking at the exact wording:
 Sense 6: "very bad in degree or extent" | examples=a severe worldwide depression

 This matches "severe kidney problems" perfectly - kidney problems that are very bad in degree or extent.

 The answer should be 6.

format: unknown

native_finish_reason: stop

provider: Chutes

currency: USD


[User]
Which numbered sense of "problem" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: Alimta is not recommended for use in patients with moderate or severe kidney <t>problems</t>.

Senses:
1. definition=a state of difficulty that needs to be resolved | examples=she and her husband are having problems
2. definition=a question raised for consideration or solution | examples=our homework consisted of ten problems to solve
3. definition=a source of difficulty | examples=one trouble after another delayed the job

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to identify which sense of the word "problem" is used in the given sentence. The sentence is: "Alimta is not recommended for use in patients with moderate or severe kidney <t>problems</t>."

 Let me analyze the three senses:

 1. "a state of difficulty that needs to be resolved" - examples: she and her husband are having problems
    - This refers to general difficulties or troubles in life/situations.

 2. "a question raised for consideration or solution" - examples: our homework consisted of ten problems to solve
    - This refers to puzzles, mathematical questions, or things needing intellectual solution.

 3. "a source of difficulty" - examples: one trouble after another delayed the job
    - This refers to something that causes difficulty or trouble.

 Now, looking at the sentence: "kidney problems"
 - This refers to medical conditions or difficulties with the kidneys.
 - "Kidney problems" means difficulties or disorders related to the kidneys.
 - This fits sense 1: "a state of difficulty that needs to be resolved" or sense 3: "a source of difficulty".

 Let me think more carefully.

 Sense 1: "a state of difficulty that needs to be resolved" - this is about situations that are problematic.
 Sense 3: "a source of difficulty" - this is about things that cause problems.

 In medical context, "kidney problems" refers to disorders, diseases, or dysfunctions of the kidney. These are conditions that constitute a difficulty or trouble.

 Looking at the examples:
 - Sense 1 example: "she and her husband are having problems" - this is about relationship difficulties.
 - Sense 3 example: "one trouble after another delayed the job" - this is about obstacles/sources of difficulty.

 Actually, looking at WordNet or similar lexical databases (which this format resembles):
 - Sense 1 is often the general "difficulty" sense
 - Sense 2 is the "question/puzzle" sense
 - Sense 3 is the "trouble" sense as a concrete thing

 In the sentence "kidney problems", we're talking about medical conditions. The kidneys are experiencing difficulties (malfunctioning). This is most like sense 1 or sense 3.

 But let me look at the specific definitions again:

 1. "a state of difficulty that needs to be resolved"
    - This suggests the problem is the state itself.
    - "Having problems" fits here.

 3. "a source of difficulty"
    - This suggests the problem is what causes the difficulty.
    - "one trouble after another" - the troubles are the sources.

 Actually, in medical contexts like "kidney problems", "heart problems", "liver problems" - these refer to disorders or diseases.

 If I look at standard dictionary definitions:
 - Problem can mean:
   a) A matter or situation regarded as unwelcome or harmful and needing to be dealt with and overcome (state of difficulty)
   b) An inquiry starting from given conditions to investigate or demonstrate a fact, result, or law (mathematical/technical question)
   c) A thing that is difficult to achieve or accomplish (source of difficulty)

 Wait, looking at the examples provided:
 - Sense 1: "she and her husband are having problems" - this is about experiencing difficulties.
 - Sense 3: "one trouble after another delayed the job" - this is about things that cause delay/trouble.

 "Kidney problems" - are the kidneys having difficulties (sense 1), or are the kidneys a source of difficulty for the patient (sense 3)?

 Actually, in medical terminology, when we say "kidney problems", we mean that the kidneys are not functioning properly - they are in a state of difficulty/disease. But we could also view them as a source of difficulty for the patient's health.

 However, looking at the pattern of these senses, this looks like it might be from WordNet or a similar resource.

 In WordNet:
 problem#1: trouble, problem - a source of difficulty; "one trouble after another delayed the job"
 problem#2: problem, job - a state of difficulty that needs to be resolved; "she and her husband are having problems"
 problem#3: problem - a question raised for consideration or solution; "our homework consisted of ten problems to solve"

 Wait, I need to check the order. The user lists:
 1. definition=a state of difficulty that needs to be resolved
 2. definition=a question raised for consideration or solution
 3. definition=a source of difficulty

 So:
 Sense 1 = state of difficulty (the situation is problematic)
 Sense 2 = question/puzzle
 Sense 3 = source of difficulty (the thing causing the trouble)

 In "kidney problems", the kidneys have disorders. This is a medical condition.

 Is it sense 1 or sense 3?

 "Patients with kidney problems" - the patients have a medical condition characterized by difficulty in kidney function.

 Actually, looking at typical usage:
 - "I'm having problems with my car" = sense 1 (state of difficulty)
 - "The car is a problem" = sense 3 (source of difficulty)

 But "kidney problems" is plural. We say "kidney problems" to mean disorders of the kidney.

 Let me think about the example for sense 3: "one trouble after another delayed the job"
 Here, "trouble" is used as a countable noun meaning "a thing that causes difficulty."

 The example for sense 1: "she and her husband are having problems"
 Here, "problems" refers to difficulties in their relationship.

 Now, "kidney problems" - this refers to medical disorders. Are these "states of difficulty" or "sources of difficulty"?

 Actually, looking at medical usage, "kidney problems" means the kidneys are not working well - they are experiencing difficulty functioning. This would be sense 1.

 But wait - in the context of the patient, the kidney problems are a source of difficulty for the patient's health. But the phrase is "kidney problems" not "a problem."

 Let me reconsider WordNet. In WordNet:
 - sense 1: "problem, job" - a state of difficulty that needs to be resolved
 - sense 2: "problem" - a question raised for consideration or solution
 - sense 3: "trouble, problem" - a source of difficulty

 Actually, looking at the actual WordNet 3.0 or 3.1:

 problem.n.01: a state of difficulty that needs to be resolved; "what is the problem?"
 problem.n.02: a question raised for consideration or solution; "a homework problem"
 problem.n.03: trouble, problem - a source of difficulty; "one trouble after another"

 So the mapping is:
 1. problem.n.01 - state of difficulty
 2. problem.n.02 - question
 3. problem.n.03 - source of difficulty (trouble)

 Now, "kidney problems" - in medical contexts, this is most similar to sense 1 or sense 3.

 But "trouble" in sense 3 is often used as "he's having trouble" or "the car is giving me trouble" or "one trouble after another."

 Actually, looking at the example for sense 3: "one trouble after another delayed the job" - this suggests discrete instances of trouble/difficulty.

 For "kidney problems", this refers to medical conditions or disorders.

 I think the best fit is sense 1: "a state of difficulty that needs to be resolved" - because kidney problems are difficulties with the kidney function that need medical attention.

 However, sense 3 "a source of difficulty" could also fit because kidney problems are a source of difficulty for the patient.

 But looking at the specific wording:
 Sense 1: "a state of difficulty that needs to be resolved"
 Sense 3: "a source of difficulty"

 Medical conditions like "kidney problems" are typically classified under sense 1 in lexical databases when they refer to the condition itself being a difficulty.

 Actually, let me look for similar examples. "Heart problems" - would this be sense 1 or 3?

 In many lexical semantic datasets, medical conditions are often sense 1.

 But I want to be careful. The phrase is "kidney problems" - plural.

 "Patients with kidney problems" means patients who have difficulties with their kidney function.

 I think sense 1 is correct: "a state of difficulty that needs to be resolved"

 Wait, but let me reconsider sense 3. The example "one trouble after another delayed the job" - troubles here are things that cause the delay. They are the obstacles.

 In "kidney problems", are the kidneys causing difficulty for the patient, or are the kidneys in a state of difficulty?

 Actually, both interpretations are possible, but in medical terminology, we usually say someone "has kidney problems" meaning they have a medical condition - a disorder. This is most like sense 1.

 But I'm not entirely sure. Let me think about "liver problems", "heart problems", "back problems."

 These are all medical conditions where the organ is not functioning properly. They are difficulties.

 However, looking at the distinction between sense 1 and sense 3:
 - Sense 1 focuses on the situation being difficult
 - Sense 3 focuses on something being the cause of difficulty

 "She and her husband are having problems" (sense 1) - they are experiencing difficulty.
 "The car is a problem" (sense 3) - the car is causing difficulty.

 "Patients with kidney problems" - the patients are experiencing the problems, so it's like sense 1. The kidney problems are states of difficulty affecting the patient.

 Actually, looking at it again: the patient has the problem. The kidney problem is a difficulty the patient has.

 I think sense 1 is the answer.

 But let me double-check by considering if it could be sense 2. No, definitely not sense 2 - that's for questions, puzzles, homework problems.

 So it's between 1 and 3.

 "Kidney problems" as a medical condition is a "state of difficulty" (the kidneys are in a difficult state, not functioning well).

 Sense 3 "a source of difficulty" would be like "The main problem is the lack of funding" - where the problem is the source.

 Actually, looking at the example for sense 3 again: "one trouble after another delayed the job"
 Here, the troubles are the things that delayed the job. They are the sources of the delay.

 In "kidney problems", the kidney problems are the source of the patient's health issues. So this could be sense 3.

 But "kidney problems" can also be viewed as the medical condition itself - the state of the kidneys being impaired.

 I need to decide which is more likely in the context of word sense disambiguation datasets.

 In many WSD datasets, medical conditions like "heart problems" are tagged as sense 1.

 Actually, looking at the specific definitions provided:
 1. a state of difficulty that needs to be resolved
 3. a source of difficulty

 "Kidney problems" in the sentence are medical disorders. These are difficulties that need to be resolved (treated).

 I think the answer is 1.

 Wait, I should reconsider. In the sentence "Alimta is not recommended for use in patients with moderate or severe kidney problems", the word "problems" refers to medical disorders or dysfunctions.

 Let me search my knowledge for how "problems" is used in similar medical contexts in WSD tasks.

 Actually, thinking about it more carefully:
 - Sense 1: "having problems" - experiencing difficulties
 - Sense 3: "a problem" - something that causes trouble

 But "kidney problems" is plural. We don't typically say "kidney problem" (singular) to mean a source of difficulty. We say "kidney problems" to mean medical difficulties with the kidneys.

 I think sense 1 is correct.

 However, I want to look at the exact wording of sense 3's example: "one trouble after another delayed the job"
 This is about discrete instances of trouble.

 Medical "problems" are more like sense 1 - states of difficulty.

 I'm going to go with 1.

 Actually, no. Let me reconsider one more time.

 In WordNet:
 - problem#1: a state of difficulty that needs to be resolved (e.g., "what is the problem?")
 - problem#2: a question raised for consideration or solution
 - problem#3: trouble, problem - a source of difficulty (e.g., "one trouble after another")

 Now, "kidney problems" - are these troubles/sources of difficulty or states of difficulty?

 Actually, looking at the gloss for problem#3: "a source of difficulty"
 And the example involves "trouble" used as a countable noun.

 "Kidney problems" are medical troubles. They are things that are wrong with the kidneys.

 But in the phrase "patients with kidney problems", the patients have these problems. The problems are conditions they possess.

 I think both 1 and 3 are defensible, but 1 is more likely because:
 1. Medical conditions are often categorized as "states" or "conditions"
 2. The phrase "having problems" in sense 1 is similar to "patients with problems"
 3. Sense 3 emphasizes the causative aspect - the thing causing the difficulty. While kidney problems do cause difficulty, the phrase emphasizes the condition itself.

 Actually, looking at similar words: "heart condition" vs "heart problem"
 A heart problem is a difficulty with the heart.

 I found a similar example in my training: "heart problems" is usually sense 1.

 But I'm going to reconsider sense 3 one more time. The definition is "a source of difficulty."
 Is a kidney problem a source of difficulty? Yes.
 Is it a state of difficulty? Also yes.

 But looking at the examples:
 Sense 1: "she and her husband are having problems" - this is about people experiencing difficulties in their relationship.
 Sense 3: "one trouble after another delayed the job" - this is about things causing delay.

 Medical problems are more like the first - they are conditions people have.

 Actually, no. Let me think about "The car has problems."
 Is this sense 1 or 3?
 "The car has problems" = the car is experiencing difficulties (sense 1)
 "The car is a problem" = the car is a source of difficulty (sense 3)

 "Patients with kidney problems" = patients who have difficulties with their kidneys (sense 1).

 Yes, I think 1 is correct.

 Final answer: 1

provider: Novita


[User]
Which numbered sense of "more" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: For <t>more</t> information, see the Summary of Product Characteristics (also part of the EPAR).

Senses:
1. definition=(comparative of `much' used with mass nouns) a quantifier meaning greater in size or amount or extent or degree | examples=more land
2. definition=(comparative of `many' used with count nouns) quantifier meaning greater in number | examples=a hall with more seats

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to identify which numbered sense of "more" is used in the given sentence.

 Sentence: "For <t>more</t> information, see the Summary of Product Characteristics (also part of the EPAR)."

 The word "more" here modifies "information".

 Let me look at the two senses provided:

 1. definition=(comparative of `much' used with mass nouns) a quantifier meaning greater in size or amount or extent or degree | examples=more land
 2. definition=(comparative of `many' used with count nouns) quantifier meaning greater in number | examples=a hall with more seats

 "Information" is a mass noun (uncountable noun). You can't say "one information, two informations" in standard English. It's treated as a quantity, not as individual countable items.

 Sense 1 is for mass nouns (comparative of 'much').
 Sense 2 is for count nouns (comparative of 'many').

 Since "information" is a mass noun, and "more" here means "additional" or "greater in amount" (comparative of much), the correct sense is 1.

 The phrase "more information" means a greater amount of information, not a greater number of informations (which would be ungrammatical).

 Therefore, the answer is 1.


[User]
Which numbered sense of "information" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: For more <t>information</t>, see the Summary of Product Characteristics (also part of the EPAR).

Senses:
1. definition=a message received and understood
2. definition=knowledge acquired through study or experience or instruction
3. definition=formal accusation of a crime
4. definition=a collection of facts from which conclusions may be drawn | examples=statistical data
5. definition=(communication theory) a numerical measure of the uncertainty of an outcome | examples=the signal contained thousands of bits of information

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to identify which numbered sense of "information" is used in the given sentence.

 Sentence: "For more <t>information</t>, see the Summary of Product Characteristics (also part of the EPAR)."

 The sentence is referring to additional details or data about a product (likely a pharmaceutical product given the reference to "Summary of Product Characteristics" and "EPAR" which stands for European Public Assessment Report).

 Let's look at the senses:
 1. definition=a message received and understood
 2. definition=knowledge acquired through study or experience or instruction
 3. definition=formal accusation of a crime
 4. definition=a collection of facts from which conclusions may be drawn | examples=statistical data
 5. definition=(communication theory) a numerical measure of the uncertainty of an outcome | examples=the signal contained thousands of bits of information

 Sense 3 is clearly wrong - it's about legal/criminal context.

 Sense 5 is about information theory/math - not relevant here.

 Sense 1 (a message received and understood) - could fit, but seems a bit general.

 Sense 2 (knowledge acquired through study...) - could fit, but "for more information" usually refers to additional facts/data.

 Sense 4 (a collection of facts from which conclusions may be drawn) - This seems to fit best. In the context of a "Summary of Product Characteristics," the "information" refers to factual data about the product, which is a collection of facts.

 However, looking at typical dictionary definitions:
 - Sense 1 might correspond to "facts provided or learned about something"
 - Sense 4 mentions "statistical data" and "collection of facts"

 Actually, looking at WordNet or similar lexical databases (which these definitions resemble):
 - Sense 1: "info, information" - a message received and understood
 - Sense 2: "knowledge" - knowledge acquired through study...
 - Sense 4: "data" - a collection of facts from which conclusions may be drawn

 In the sentence "For more information, see...", the word "information" typically refers to additional facts or details. This aligns with sense 4 or possibly sense 1.

 But sense 4 specifically mentions "a collection of facts from which conclusions may be drawn" and gives the example "statistical data". In the context of a Summary of Product Characteristics, this is factual data about the medicinal product.

 However, in common usage, "for more information" is a standard phrase where "information" means "facts or details provided".

 Let me reconsider the source of these definitions. They look like WordNet definitions.

 WordNet senses for "information":
 1. information, info -- (a message received and understood)
 2. information -- (knowledge acquired through study or experience or instruction)
 3. information -- (formal accusation of a crime)
 4. data, information -- (a collection of facts from which conclusions may be drawn; "statistical data")
 5. information, selective information, entropy -- ((communication theory) a numerical measure of the uncertainty of an outcome)

 In the sentence "For more information, see...", the usage is typically sense 1 or sense 4. But in the context of referring to a document (Summary of Product Characteristics), it's asking for more factual content.

 Actually, looking at typical usage in technical/regulatory contexts like EPAR (European Public Assessment Report), "information" here refers to factual data about the medicine.

 But let's think about the most common sense. When someone says "For more information, see...", they mean "for more details/facts".

 Sense 4 is "a collection of facts from which conclusions may be drawn" - this is "data".

 Sense 2 is "knowledge acquired..."

 Sense 1 is "a message received..."

 In this medical/regulatory context, referring to a Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC), the information contained therein is factual data about the medicinal product (indications, dosage, contraindications, etc.). This is best described as sense 4: a collection of facts.

 However, I should check if sense 1 might be more appropriate. Sense 1 is quite broad - any message received and understood. Sense 4 is more specific to factual data.

 Actually, looking at the example provided for sense 4: "statistical data". The SmPC contains data about the drug.

 But wait, let me look at the exact wording again: "For more information, see the Summary..."

 This is an extremely common phrase. In dictionary examples, this usually falls under the general definition of "facts or details about something".

 If I have to choose between these specific WordNet senses:
 - Sense 1 is too broad (any message)
 - Sense 2 is about knowledge in one's head
 - Sense 4 is about data/facts as a collection

 Sense 4 seems the most appropriate for referring to the content of a technical document like a Summary of Product Characteristics.

 However, I should be careful. In many lexical sense disambiguation tasks, "information" in the phrase "for more information" is often classified as sense 1 (the general meaning) or sense 2.

 But looking at the specific definitions provided:
 1. "a message received and understood" - emphasizes the reception/understanding aspect
 2. "knowledge acquired..." - emphasizes learning/knowledge
 4. "a collection of facts..." - emphasizes data/facts

 The Summary of Product Characteristics is literally a collection of facts/data about a medicinal product. So sense 4 fits well.

 But I recall that in some datasets (like SemCor or similar), "information" in "for more information" is often tagged as sense 1.

 Let me reconsider. The sentence is directing the reader to a document for more content. The "information" is the content of the document - the facts and details.

 Sense 4: "a collection of facts from which conclusions may be drawn"

 This seems to fit the content of a Summary of Product Characteristics, which presents factual data about a pharmaceutical product.

 However, sense 1 "a message received and understood" could also work, as the document conveys a message.

 But given the specific example "statistical data" for sense 4, and the technical nature of the document (EPAR, SmPC), sense 4 seems most appropriate.

 Wait, I should check if there's a standard answer for this type of question. This looks like it could be from a specific dataset like WordNet Sense Disambiguation.

 In WordNet 3.0:
 - "information#1" (message): "a message received and understood"
 - "information#2" (knowledge): "knowledge acquired through study or experience or instruction"
 - "information#3" (charge): "formal accusation of a crime"
 - "information#4" (data): "a collection of facts from which conclusions may be drawn" - also known as "data"
 - "information#5" (entropy): communication theory

 Given the context is a medical document (Summary of Product Characteristics), which contains factual data, sense 4 is the best fit.

 Actually, looking at the sentence again: "For more information..." - this is a very generic use. It could be sense 1.

 But let's look at the distinction between sense 1 and sense 4:
 - Sense 1: "a message received and understood" - focuses on the communication aspect, the act of informing
 - Sense 4: "a collection of facts..." - focuses on the content as data/facts

 In modern usage, especially with technical documents, sense 4 is appropriate.

 However, I want to double-check. Is the user asking about a specific dataset example? The formatting suggests this might be from a specific task or dataset.

 If this is from the WordNet SensEval or similar, "information" in "for more information" is often sense 1.

 But let's look at the example for sense 4 again: "statistical data". The Summary of Product Characteristics does contain statistical data from clinical trials, but it also contains other types of information.

 Actually, looking carefully at the sentence structure, "information" here is uncountable (no article), referring to the general concept of additional details.

 Between sense 1 and sense 4:
 - Sense 1 treats information as a message (countable or uncountable?)
 - Sense 4 treats information as data (often uncountable, but "a collection" suggests countable usage? No, "information" can be the head noun)

 The definition for sense 4 says "a collection of facts" - this describes what the information is.

 I think sense 4 is the most accurate for technical/factual content in a regulatory document.

 However, I'm concerned that sense 1 might be the intended answer for this specific example if it's from a particular corpus.

 Let me reconsider sense 2: "knowledge acquired..."
 This doesn't fit well because the sentence isn't talking about the knowledge in someone's head, but about written content in a document.

 Sense 3 is clearly wrong.

 Sense 5 is clearly wrong.

 So it's between 1 and 4.

 In the context of "For more information, see...", if we interpret "information" as meaning "additional facts/details", then sense 4 is correct.

 If we interpret it as "additional communication/message", then sense 1 is correct.

 But sense 4 explicitly mentions "statistical data", which is relevant to pharmaceutical summaries.

 Also, sense 1 is very general. Sense 4 is specific to factual/data content.

 Given that the EPAR (European Public Assessment Report) and SmPC contain scientific data and facts, sense 4 is the most precise choice.

 I'll go with 4.

 Wait, one more check: Could it be sense 2? "Knowledge acquired through study..." - the document provides knowledge, but sense 2 emphasizes the acquisition by a person, whereas the document contains the information (facts) themselves. So sense 4 is better.

 Final decision: 4

provider: DigitalOcean


[User]
Which numbered sense of "see" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: For more information, <t>see</t> the Summary of Product Characteristics (also part of the EPAR).

Senses:
1. definition=perceive by sight or have the power to perceive by sight | examples=You have to be a good observer to see all the details
2. definition=perceive (an idea or situation) mentally | examples=Now I see!
3. definition=perceive or be contemporaneous with | examples=We found Republicans winning the offices
4. definition=imagine; conceive of; see in one's mind | examples=I can't see him on horseback!
5. definition=deem to be | examples=She views this quite differently from me
6. definition=get to know or become aware of, usually accidentally | examples=I learned that she has two grown-up children
7. definition=see or watch | examples=view a show on television
8. definition=come together | examples=I'll probably see you at the meeting
9. definition=find out, learn, or determine with certainty, usually by making an inquiry or other effort | examples=I want to see whether she speaks French
10. definition=be careful or certain to do something; make certain of something | examples=He verified that the valves were closed
11. definition=go to see for professional or business reasons | examples=You should see a lawyer
12. definition=go to see for a social visit | examples=I went to see my friend Mary the other day
13. definition=go to see a place, as for entertainment | examples=We went to see the Eiffel Tower in the morning
14. definition=take charge of or deal with | examples=Could you see about lunch?
15. definition=receive as a specified guest | examples=the doctor will see you now
16. definition=date regularly; have a steady relationship with | examples=Did you know that she is seeing an older man?
17. definition=see and understand, have a good eye | examples=The artist must first learn to see
18. definition=deliberate or decide | examples=See whether you can come tomorrow
19. definition=observe as if with an eye | examples=The camera saw the burglary and recorded it
20. definition=observe, check out, and look over carefully or inspect | examples=The customs agent examined the baggage
21. definition=go or live through | examples=We had many trials to go through
22. definition=accompany or escort | examples=I'll see you to the door
23. definition=match or meet | examples=I saw the bet of one of my fellow players
24. definition=make sense of; assign a meaning to | examples=What message do you see in this letter?

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to identify which numbered sense of "see" is used in the given sentence.

 Sentence: "For more information, <t>see</t> the Summary of Product Characteristics (also part of the EPAR)."

 This is a common usage in technical writing, references, and documentation. When a text says "see [reference]" or "see [document]", it means to consult or refer to that document for more information.

 Let me look at the senses:

 1. perceive by sight - No, this is not about visual perception.
 2. perceive mentally - No, not about understanding an idea.
 3. perceive or be contemporaneous with - No.
 4. imagine - No.
 5. deem to be - No.
 6. get to know accidentally - No.
 7. see or watch - No, not about watching.
 8. come together - No.
 9. find out, learn, or determine - This is close, but let's check others.
 10. be careful or certain - No.
 11. go to see for professional reasons - Not quite.
 12. go to see for social visit - No.
 13. go to see a place for entertainment - No.
 14. take charge of or deal with - "See about" is different from "see" alone.
 15. receive as a guest - No.
 16. date regularly - No.
 17. see and understand - No.
 18. deliberate or decide - "See whether" is different.
 19. observe as if with an eye - No.
 20. observe, check out, inspect - This could be close, but "see" in references is more about consulting.
 21. go or live through - No.
 22. accompany - No.
 23. match or meet - No.
 24. make sense of - No.

 Wait, let me reconsider. In the context "For more information, see the Summary...", this is directing the reader to consult or refer to another document.

 Looking at sense 9: "find out, learn, or determine with certainty, usually by making an inquiry or other effort" - examples: "I want to see whether she speaks French"

 Actually, looking at standard dictionary definitions, "see" meaning "refer to" or "consult" is often sense 9 in some classifications, or it might be considered similar to "find out by looking."

 But let me look more carefully. Sense 9 says "find out, learn, or determine with certainty, usually by making an inquiry or other effort". The example is "I want to see whether she speaks French."

 However, in the sentence "see the Summary of Product Characteristics", it's an imperative directing the reader to look at or consult that document.

 Sense 7: "see or watch" - examples: "view a show on television" - not quite right.
 Sense 20: "observe, check out, and look over carefully or inspect" - examples: "The customs agent examined the baggage"

 Actually, looking at WordNet or similar lexical databases (which this seems to be based on), sense 9 might be the one for "see" meaning to consult or refer to.

 Wait, let me check sense 9 again: "find out, learn, or determine with certainty, usually by making an inquiry or other effort"

 And sense 18: "deliberate or decide" - example: "See whether you can come tomorrow"

 But the specific usage "see page 5" or "see the appendix" is usually classified as sense 9 in WordNet: "find out, learn, or determine with certainty, usually by making an inquiry or other effort" - though that doesn't seem to fit perfectly.

 Actually, looking at the example for sense 9: "I want to see whether she speaks French" - this is about finding out.

 But "see the Summary" is about consulting a reference.

 Let me look at sense 7 again: "see or watch" - "view a show on television"

 Sense 20: "observe, check out, and look over carefully or inspect"

 Hmm. Actually, in many lexical databases, "see" when used to mean "refer to" (as in "see page 10") is often sense 9.

 But let me check if there's a better match.

 Sense 1 is the basic visual sense.
 Sense 24 is about interpreting meaning.

 Actually, looking at the sentence structure: "For more information, see [document]" - this is an instruction to consult the document.

 In WordNet 3.0, the sense for "see" meaning "go to see for a social visit" is different from "go to see for professional reasons."

 Wait, I think I need to look at this more systematically. The sentence is instructing the reader to look at or consult the Summary of Product Characteristics.

 This is similar to:
 - "See page 10 for details"
 - "See the manual for instructions"

 In WordNet, this is typically sense 9: "find out, learn, or determine with certainty, usually by making an inquiry or other effort" - though the definition seems a bit off for this usage.

 Actually, looking at the examples provided in the senses:
 Sense 9 example: "I want to see whether she speaks French"
 Sense 18 example: "See whether you can come tomorrow"

 But "see the Summary" doesn't have "whether" - it's a direct object.

 Let me reconsider sense 7: "see or watch" - "view a show on television"
 Sense 20: "observe, check out, and look over carefully or inspect"

 Actually, looking at standard lexicographic practice, "see" in the sense of "refer to" or "consult" is often grouped with sense 9 or it might be sense 7.

 But wait - I should look at whether this is from a specific dataset. The format looks like it could be from WordNet or a similar resource.

 In WordNet 3.0 for the verb "see":
 - Sense 1: perceive by sight
 - Sense 2: perceive mentally
 - ...
 - Sense 9: "determine, check, find out, see, ascertain, watch, learn" - find out, learn, or determine with certainty, usually by making an inquiry or other effort

 Actually, looking at the definition for sense 9 in the prompt: "find out, learn, or determine with certainty, usually by making an inquiry or other effort"

 The usage "see the Summary of Product Characteristics" is about consulting a source to find out information. This fits with sense 9.

 However, there's also the possibility that it's sense 7 "see or watch" or sense 20 "observe, check out, and look over carefully."

 But in academic and technical writing, when you say "see [reference]", it's specifically directing the reader to consult that reference for information, which aligns with "find out, learn... by making an inquiry."

 Actually, looking more carefully at sense 20: "observe, check out, and look over carefully or inspect" - example: "The customs agent examined the baggage"

 And sense 7: "see or watch" - example: "view a show on television"

 The phrase "For more information, see..." is a cross-reference. In WordNet, this is sense 9.

 Let me verify by looking at the other senses again to make sure none fits better.

 Sense 1: visual perception - no
 Sense 2: understand - no
 Sense 3: witness - no
 Sense 4: imagine - no
 Sense 5: deem - no
 Sense 6: learn accidentally - no
 Sense 7: watch - close, but not exactly
 Sense 8: meet - no
 Sense 9: find out by inquiry - yes, consulting a document to find out information
 Sense 10: make certain - no
 Sense 11: visit professional - no
 Sense 12: visit social - no
 Sense 13: visit place - no
 Sense 14: take charge (see about) - no
 Sense 15: receive guest - no
 Sense 16: date - no
 Sense 17: have good eye - no
 Sense 18: decide (see whether) - no
 Sense 19: camera seeing - no
 Sense 20: inspect - possible, but less likely than 9
 Sense 21: experience - no
 Sense 22: escort - no
 Sense 23: match bet - no
 Sense 24: interpret - no

 Between sense 7, 9, and 20:
 - Sense 7 is about viewing/watching (passive reception)
 - Sense 9 is about finding out/determining (active inquiry)
 - Sense 20 is about inspecting/examining (careful look)

 The phrase "For more information, see..." implies going to that document to obtain the information, i.e., to find out the information by consulting the document. This is an active effort to learn something, which fits sense 9.

 However, I want to double-check. In many dictionaries, "see" meaning "refer to" is a separate sense. Looking at the list, sense 9 seems to be the closest match for "consult" or "refer to."

 Actually, looking at the example for sense 9: "I want to see whether she speaks French" - this is about checking or finding out.

 The sentence "see the Summary of Product Characteristics" is indeed asking the reader to consult (check) that document to find out the information.

 Therefore, the answer should be 9.

 Wait, I should also consider if it could be sense 20. "Observe, check out, and look over carefully or inspect." When you "see" a reference in a text, are you inspecting it? Not really. You're consulting it.

 Sense 7: "see or watch" - "view a show" - this is about entertainment or observation.

 Actually, looking at Merriam-Webster or similar, "see" in the sense of "to look up or consult" is a valid sense.

 Given the options, sense 9 is the best fit because it involves making an effort to find out or learn something, which is what consulting a reference document is about.

 But let me reconsider one more time. Could it be sense 1? No, because it's not about visual perception in the physical sense, but about reading/consulting a document.

 Actually, in some lexical databases, "see" when used as "see page 5" is considered a separate sense of "refer to" or "consult." If that's not explicitly listed, we have to find the closest.

 Sense 9: "find out, learn, or determine with certainty, usually by making an inquiry or other effort"
 - Consulting a document is making an effort to find out information.

 Sense 20: "observe, check out, and look over carefully or inspect"
 - This implies a more thorough examination.

 In technical writing, "see" is used to point to where information can be found. The reader is expected to go to that source to find out the information. This aligns with sense 9.

 I think the answer is 9.

 Actually, looking at the example for sense 18: "See whether you can come tomorrow" - this is about determining/deciding.

 And sense 9: "I want to see whether she speaks French" - also about determining.

 But "see the Summary" doesn't have "whether." However, the structure "see [noun phrase]" as an imperative to consult is functionally similar to "find out by consulting."

 I think 9 is correct.

 Let me see if there's any other possibility. Sense 24? "make sense of; assign a meaning to" - example: "What message do you see in this letter?" - No, that's about interpretation.

 Sense 2? "perceive (an idea) mentally" - "Now I see!" - No.

 So I'll go with 9.


[User]
Which numbered sense of "product" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: For more information, see the Summary of <t>Product</t> Characteristics (also part of the EPAR).

Senses:
1. definition=commodities offered for sale | examples=good business depends on having good merchandise
2. definition=an artifact that has been created by someone or some process | examples=they improve their product every year
3. definition=a quantity obtained by multiplication | examples=the product of 2 and 3 is 6
4. definition=a chemical substance formed as a result of a chemical reaction | examples=a product of lime and nitric acid
5. definition=a consequence of someone's efforts or of a particular set of circumstances | examples=skill is the product of hours of practice
6. definition=the set of elements common to two or more sets | examples=the set of red hats is the intersection of the set of hats and the set of red things

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to identify which sense of the word "product" is used in the given sentence. The sentence is: "For more information, see the Summary of <t>Product</t> Characteristics (also part of the EPAR)."

The context suggests this is likely referring to a pharmaceutical or medical context, given the mention of "EPAR" (European Public Assessment Report) and "Summary of Product Characteristics" (SPC).

Looking at the senses:
1. Commodities offered for sale - general commercial goods
2. An artifact created by someone or some process - manufactured items, things produced
3. Quantity obtained by multiplication - mathematical term
4. Chemical substance formed as a result of a chemical reaction - chemistry term
5. Consequence of efforts or circumstances - abstract result
6. Set of elements common to sets - mathematical set theory

In the context of "Summary of Product Characteristics" in a pharmaceutical/medical document (EPAR refers to European Medicines Agency documents), "Product" here refers to a medicinal product, which is typically a drug or pharmaceutical preparation.

Looking at sense 2: "an artifact that has been created by someone or some process" - this would cover manufactured items including pharmaceutical products.

Sense 1 "commodities offered for sale" is also possible, but in pharmaceutical regulatory contexts, "product" specifically refers to the medicinal preparation itself (the artifact created by a process).

However, looking more carefully at sense 1 vs sense 2:
- Sense 1 focuses on goods for sale/merchandise
- Sense 2 focuses on things created by a process

In pharmaceutical contexts, "Product" in "Summary of Product Characteristics" refers to the medicinal product - the specific drug formulation. This aligns better with sense 2 (something created by a process) or potentially sense 1.

But actually, in the context of EPAR (European Public Assessment Report), this is definitely referring to a medicinal product. A medicinal product is defined as a substance or combination of substances presented as having properties for treating or preventing disease.

Let me reconsider the examples:
- Sense 1: "good business depends on having good merchandise" - very commercial/marketing focused
- Sense 2: "they improve their product every year" - could be software, manufactured goods, etc.

But actually, looking at the sentence structure "Summary of Product Characteristics", this is a standard regulatory term (SmPC). In this context, "Product" refers to the medicinal product - which is an artifact created by a manufacturing process.

However, I should also consider if it could be sense 1. Sense 1 is about commodities/merchandise. While medicines are commodities, in the specific regulatory phrase "Summary of Product Characteristics", it refers to the specific medicinal preparation.

But looking at the definitions again carefully:
1. commodities offered for sale
2. an artifact that has been created by someone or some process

In the pharmaceutical context, "Product" here is the medicinal product - which is manufactured (created by a process). So sense 2 seems most appropriate.

Wait, let me think about whether it could be sense 4: "a chemical substance formed as a result of a chemical reaction". While medicines involve chemicals, the product itself is not typically referred to as a chemical product in this context (though it could be). But "Product" in pharmaceutical regulation refers to the finished medicinal product, not just a chemical substance from a reaction.

Sense 2 is the best fit: "an artifact that has been created by someone or some process".

Actually, looking at the examples for sense 2: "they improve their product every year" - this suggests manufactured goods that can be improved upon, which fits with drug formulations.

Sense 1 example: "good business depends on having good merchandise" - this is more about retail/commercial goods.

Therefore, the answer should be 2.

But let me double-check. Could it be sense 1? In some contexts, "product" could mean merchandise. But "Summary of Product Characteristics" is a technical regulatory document title. It describes the properties of the specific medicinal product (the drug). This is closer to sense 2.

Also, note that "product" is capitalized in the sentence ("<t>Product</t>"), suggesting it's part of a proper noun or specific terminology, consistent with the formal regulatory phrase "Summary of Product Characteristics".

Final check: EPAR stands for European Public Assessment Report, which is related to the European Medicines Agency (EMA). The SmPC (Summary of Product Characteristics) is a standard document for every authorized medicinal product in the EU. The "product" here is definitely the medicinal preparation - an artifact created by pharmaceutical manufacturing processes.

Therefore, sense 2 is correct.


[User]
Which numbered sense of "part" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: For more information, see the Summary of Product Characteristics (also <t>part</t> of the EPAR).

Senses:
1. definition=something determined in relation to something that includes it | examples=he wanted to feel a part of something bigger than himself
2. definition=something less than the whole of a human artifact | examples=the rear part of the house
3. definition=a portion of a natural object | examples=they analyzed the river into three parts
4. definition=that which concerns a person with regard to a particular role or situation | examples=it requires vigilance on our part
5. definition=the extended spatial location of something | examples=the farming regions of France
6. definition=the actions and activities assigned to or required or expected of a person or group | examples=the function of a teacher
7. definition=an actor's portrayal of someone in a play | examples=she played the part of Desdemona
8. definition=assets belonging to or due to or contributed by an individual person or group | examples=he wanted his share in cash
9. definition=one of the portions into which something is regarded as divided and which together constitute a whole | examples=the written part of the exam
10. definition=a line of scalp that can be seen when sections of hair are combed in opposite directions | examples=his part was right in the middle
11. definition=the melody carried by a particular voice or instrument in polyphonic music | examples=he tried to sing the tenor part
12. definition=the part played by a person in bringing about a result | examples=I am proud of my contribution in advancing the project

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to identify which numbered sense of "part" is used in the given sentence.

Sentence: "For more information, see the Summary of Product Characteristics (also <t>part</t> of the EPAR)."

The word "part" here means a component or section of a larger document (the EPAR - European Public Assessment Report).

Let me look at the senses:

1. something determined in relation to something that includes it | examples=he wanted to feel a part of something bigger than himself
   - This is about being a member or component of a whole in an abstract sense. "Part of the EPAR" could fit here - it's something determined in relation to something that includes it.

2. something less than the whole of a human artifact | examples=the rear part of the house
   - This is a physical part of a human-made object. A document is a human artifact, but "part" here is referring to a section/component of a document set. But the example is physical.

3. a portion of a natural object | examples=they analyzed the river into three parts
   - Natural object, not applicable.

4. that which concerns a person with regard to a particular role or situation | examples=it requires vigilance on our part
   - Not applicable.

5. the extended spatial location of something | examples=the farming regions of France
   - Not applicable.

6. the actions and activities assigned to or required or expected of a person or group | examples=the function of a teacher
   - Not applicable.

7. an actor's portrayal of someone in a play | examples=she played the part of Desdemona
   - Not applicable.

8. assets belonging to or due to or contributed by an individual person or group | examples=he wanted his share in cash
   - Not applicable.

9. one of the portions into which something is regarded as divided and which together constitute a whole | examples=the written part of the exam
   - This seems very applicable. The Summary of Product Characteristics is one portion/section of the EPAR document. "The written part of the exam" is similar - a portion into which something is divided.

10. a line of scalp... | Not applicable.

11. the melody carried by a particular voice or instrument... | Not applicable.

12. the part played by a person in bringing about a result | Not applicable.

Now between 1 and 9:

Sense 1: "something determined in relation to something that includes it" - This is a very general sense. The example "he wanted to feel a part of something bigger than himself" suggests membership or inclusion in a group/whole.

Sense 9: "one of the portions into which something is regarded as divided and which together constitute a whole" - This specifically refers to a subdivision of a larger whole. The example "the written part of the exam" fits perfectly with "part of the EPAR" because an exam has multiple parts, and the EPAR has multiple sections/documents.

However, looking closely at the sentence: "Summary of Product Characteristics (also part of the EPAR)". The EPAR is a document/report. The Summary of Product Characteristics is a component/section of it.

Sense 1 is often used for "part of a group/whole" in a more abstract or membership way. Sense 9 is specifically about portions into which something is divided.

But wait, let me reconsider sense 1. The definition is "something determined in relation to something that includes it". This is actually the "part of" relation in mereology. The example "he wanted to feel a part of something bigger than himself" is about being a component/member.

Sense 9: "one of the portions into which something is regarded as divided and which together constitute a whole". This implies the whole is divided into parts. Is the EPAR divided into parts? Yes, it consists of several documents including the Summary of Product Characteristics.

Actually, looking at WordNet senses (which these seem to be based on):

WordNet sense 1: something determined in relation to something that includes it; "he wanted to feel a part of something bigger than himself"; "I read a portion of the manuscript"; "the smaller component is hard to reach"; "the animal constituent of plankton"
- This is the general part-whole relation.

WordNet sense 9: one of the portions into which something is regarded as divided and which together constitute a whole; "the written part of the exam"; "the finance section of the company"; "the BBC's engineering division"
- This is about a section/division of a larger entity.

In the sentence, "Summary of Product Characteristics" is a document that is part of the EPAR. The EPAR (European Public Assessment Report) is a comprehensive document that includes several sections. The Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) is indeed a specific section/component of it.

Between sense 1 and 9:
- Sense 1 is broader and more about the mereological relation.
- Sense 9 is about a portion/section of a divided whole.

The phrase "also part of the EPAR" suggests that the Summary of Product Characteristics is a component document of the larger EPAR package.

In WordNet, "part" sense 1 (noun) is the general part-whole relation. Sense 9 is specifically about a portion into which something is divided.

But looking at the example for sense 9: "the written part of the exam". This is very similar to "the Summary of Product Characteristics (also part of the EPAR)". Both refer to a section/portion of a larger document or set.

However, sense 1's example "he wanted to feel a part of something bigger than himself" is more about belonging. But the definition "something determined in relation to something that includes it" is very general.

Actually, I think sense 1 might be the correct WordNet sense for "part of" in this context. Let me think about how WordNet distinguishes them.

WordNet 3.1:
- Sense 1: part, portion, component part, component, constituent - something determined in relation to something that includes it; "he wanted to feel a part of something bigger than himself"; "I read a portion of the manuscript"; "the smaller component is hard to reach"; "the animal constituent of plankton"
- Sense 9: part, section, division - one of the portions into which something is regarded as divided and which together constitute a whole; "the written part of the exam"; "the finance section of the company"; "the BBC's engineering division"

Wait, "I read a portion of the manuscript" in sense 1 is very similar to "part of the EPAR". But "the written part of the exam" in sense 9 is also similar.

The key difference:
- Sense 1: component, constituent - emphasizes being a piece or segment of something (can be physical or abstract)
- Sense 9: section, division - emphasizes being one of the subdivisions of a whole

In the sentence, the Summary of Product Characteristics is a document that constitutes one portion of the EPAR. The EPAR is divided into parts (sections, annexes, etc.). So sense 9 seems very appropriate.

But let me look at the exact wording again. "Summary of Product Characteristics (also part of the EPAR)". This is saying the SmPC is included within the EPAR. It's a constituent document.

In many lexical semantic datasets, "part" in "part of the EPAR" would likely be sense 1 because it's the general "part-whole" relation. But sense 9 is also plausible.

Let me reconsider the definitions carefully:

Sense 1: "something determined in relation to something that includes it"
- This is the most general sense. The SmPC is determined in relation to the EPAR which includes it.

Sense 9: "one of the portions into which something is regarded as divided and which together constitute a whole"
- This suggests the EPAR is regarded as divided into portions, and the SmPC is one such portion.

In the context of regulatory documents, the EPAR is indeed divided into sections/parts. The SmPC is one specific section. So sense 9 fits well.

However, looking at the example for sense 1: "I read a portion of the manuscript" - this is about a document too. A manuscript can be read in portions. But "portion" there might be a quantity, not a named section.

Actually, I think I need to look at this from the perspective of how these sense inventories are typically used. The sentence is from a medical/regulatory context. The SmPC is a specific document that is part of the EPAR package.

Sense 2 is about human artifacts (physical parts like "rear part of the house"). A document is a human artifact, but "part" here isn't referring to a physical piece.

Sense 9 seems the most accurate because it refers to a portion of a whole that is divided into parts. The EPAR is a whole, and the Summary of Product Characteristics is one of its portions/sections.

But wait - is the SmPC really "one of the portions into which [the EPAR] is regarded as divided"? The EPAR consists of several documents: the scientific discussion, the SmPC, the labeling, etc. Yes, it's divided into parts.

Let me check if there's any other sense that could fit better.
Sense 8: assets belonging to... (share) - no.
Sense 6: function/role - no.
Sense 4: "on our part" - no.

I think the choice is between 1 and 9.

In WordNet, sense 1 is the most frequent and general sense. The hypernym for sense 1 is "relation" (specifically a part-whole relation). The hypernym for sense 9 is "conceptualization" or something similar? Actually, let me recall: sense 9 (part, section, division) has hypernym "concept" or "abstraction"?

Actually, looking at the definitions provided:
Sense 1: "something determined in relation to something that includes it"
Sense 9: "one of the portions into which something is regarded as divided and which together constitute a whole"

The phrase "regarded as divided" in sense 9 is key. Is the EPAR regarded as divided into portions? Yes, it's a structured document.

But "part" in "part of the EPAR" could simply mean "a component of" without implying the EPAR is explicitly divided. However, since the EPAR is a formal document with defined sections, sense 9 is appropriate.

Let me think about the example "the written part of the exam". An exam has a written part and perhaps an oral part. The EPAR has a Summary of Product Characteristics part. This is a very close parallel.

The example for sense 1 "he wanted to feel a part of something bigger than himself" is about belonging to a group or entity, not about being a section of a document.

Another example given for sense 1 in WordNet is "the animal constituent of plankton" - this is about composition. The SmPC is a constituent of the EPAR.

But in the provided list, sense 1's definition is "something determined in relation to something that includes it". This is extremely broad. Sense 9 is more specific about portions/sections.

Given the instruction to return only the number, and considering that "Summary of Product Characteristics" is a specific section/portion of the EPAR, I think sense 9 is the intended answer.

Wait, I should double-check. In some semantic tasks, "part of" where the part is a document within a larger document package might be sense 1. But the example "the written part of the exam" in sense 9 is almost exactly parallel: a component section of a larger assessment/document.

Actually, looking at the sentence structure: "(also part of the EPAR)" - this is a parenthetical note explaining that the Summary of Product Characteristics is included in the EPAR. It's saying "this thing is part of that thing".

If I look at WordNet sense 1 examples again: "I read a portion of the manuscript" - this is exactly about documents. So sense 1 clearly applies to documents. But "portion of the manuscript" implies a piece of it, not necessarily a named section. However, "component" and "constituent" in the synonyms suggest any piece.

Sense 9 examples: "the written part of the exam", "the finance section of the company", "the BBC's engineering division". These are about named sections or divisions.

The Summary of Product Characteristics is indeed a named, specific section of the EPAR. So sense 9 is better.

But I want to be careful. Let me see if I can find how this specific sentence is annotated in datasets. This looks like it could be from the Word Sense Disambiguation (WSD) test data, possibly from the medical/health domain. The sentence mentions "Summary of Product Characteristics" and "EPAR" (European Public Assessment Report). This is likely from a pharmaceutical regulatory text.

In the SemCor or other WSD datasets, "part" is a very common word. Let me think about which sense is most likely.

Actually, looking at the definition of sense 1 again: "something determined in relation to something that includes it". This is a bit philosophical. The examples "he wanted to feel a part of something bigger than himself" suggests an emotional connection or membership.

Sense 9: "one of the portions into which something is regarded as divided and which together constitute a whole". This is structural.

The SmPC is structurally a portion of the EPAR. So 9.

However, I recall that in WordNet, sense 1 of "part" is the most common and is generally the default for "part of" relations. But sense 9 is also common for "part" meaning "section".

Let me look at the exact wording of the question. It says "Which numbered sense... is used in the sentence below?" This implies there is a specific correct answer.

Given the example "the written part of the exam" under sense 9, and the fact that the sentence is about a document (Summary of Product Characteristics) being a part of another document (EPAR), the parallel is very strong. The "written part of the exam" is a subdivision of the exam; the SmPC is a subdivision/section of the EPAR.

Therefore, the answer should be 9.

Wait, I want to reconsider sense 1. Is there any reason it would be 1? The definition "something determined in relation to something that includes it" - the SmPC is determined in relation to the EPAR which includes it. But that's true of almost any part-whole relation. The question is whether sense 9 is more specific and accurate.

In WSD, we generally prefer the most specific sense that applies. Since the EPAR is a document that is divided into sections, and the SmPC is one such section, sense 9 is more specific than sense 1.

Also, note that sense 2 is "something less than the whole of a human artifact". A document is a human artifact. Could it be 2? The example is "the rear part of the house" - physical. The EPAR is an artifact but "part" here isn't physical. So probably not 2.

Sense 9 explicitly mentions "the written part of the exam" - a document. So 9 is strongly indicated.

I'll go with 9.

provider: SiliconFlow


[User]
Which numbered sense of "active" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: The <t>active</t> substance in Alimta, pemetrexed, is a cytotoxic medicine (a medicine that kills cells that are dividing, such as cancer cells), which belongs to the group antimetabolites.

Senses:
1. definition=tending to become more severe or wider in scope | examples=active tuberculosis
2. definition=engaged in or ready for military or naval operations | examples=on active duty
3. definition=disposed to take action or effectuate change | examples=a director who takes an active interest in corporate operations
4. definition=taking part in an activity | examples=an active member of the club
5. definition=characterized by energetic activity | examples=an active toddler
6. definition=exerting influence or producing a change or effect | examples=an active ingredient
7. definition=full of activity or engaged in continuous activity | examples=an active seaport
8. definition=in operation | examples=keep hope alive
9. definition=(of the sun) characterized by an increased occurrence of sunspots and flares and radio emissions
10. definition=expressing that the subject of the sentence has the semantic function of actor: | examples=Hemingway favors active constructions
11. definition=(used of verbs (e.g. `to run') and participial adjectives (e.g. `running' in `running water')) expressing action rather than a state of being
12. definition=(of e.g. volcanos) capable of erupting
13. definition=(of e.g. volcanos) erupting or liable to erupt | examples=active volcanos
14. definition=engaged in full-time work | examples=active duty

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to identify which numbered sense of "active" is used in the given sentence.

Sentence: "The <t>active</t> substance in Alimta, pemetrexed, is a cytotoxic medicine (a medicine that kills cells that are dividing, such as cancer cells), which belongs to the group antimetabolites."

Let me look at the senses:

1. tending to become more severe or wider in scope - e.g., active tuberculosis
2. engaged in or ready for military or naval operations - e.g., on active duty
3. disposed to take action or effectuate change - e.g., a director who takes an active interest
4. taking part in an activity - e.g., an active member of the club
5. characterized by energetic activity - e.g., an active toddler
6. exerting influence or producing a change or effect - e.g., an active ingredient
7. full of activity or engaged in continuous activity - e.g., an active seaport
8. in operation - e.g., keep hope alive (this example seems odd, maybe "active" as in "active volcano"? No, that's later)
9. (of the sun) characterized by an increased occurrence of sunspots...
10. expressing that the subject of the sentence has the semantic function of actor - grammatical sense
11. (used of verbs and participial adjectives) expressing action rather than a state of being - grammatical sense
12. (of e.g. volcanos) capable of erupting
13. (of e.g. volcanos) erupting or liable to erupt - e.g., active volcanos
14. engaged in full-time work - e.g., active duty

Now, in the sentence: "The active substance in Alimta..."

This refers to the ingredient in a medicine that has the therapeutic effect - the "active ingredient" or "active substance." This is a common phrase in pharmacology and chemistry.

Looking at sense 6: "exerting influence or producing a change or effect | examples=an active ingredient"

Yes, this matches perfectly. The "active substance" means the substance that is exerting the pharmacological effect - producing a change or effect in the body (killing cancer cells).

Sense 1 could be tempting because it mentions "active tuberculosis" which is a medical term, but "active substance" in the context of drug composition refers to the ingredient that has the biological activity (sense 6).

Sense 6 explicitly mentions "active ingredient" as an example, and "active substance" is synonymous with "active ingredient" in pharmaceutical contexts.

Therefore, the answer is 6.

provider: AtlasCloud


[User]
Which numbered sense of "substance" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: The active <t>substance</t> in Alimta, pemetrexed, is a cytotoxic medicine (a medicine that kills cells that are dividing, such as cancer cells), which belongs to the group antimetabolites.

Senses:
1. definition=the real physical matter of which a person or thing consists | examples=DNA is the substance of our genes
2. definition=the choicest or most essential or most vital part of some idea or experience | examples=the gist of the prosecutor's argument
3. definition=the idea that is intended | examples=What is the meaning of this proverb?
4. definition=material of a particular kind or constitution | examples=the immune response recognizes invading substances
5. definition=considerable capital (wealth or income) | examples=he is a man of means
6. definition=what a communication that is about something is about
7. definition=a particular kind or species of matter with uniform properties | examples=shigella is one of the most toxic substances known to man

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to identify which numbered sense of "substance" is used in the given sentence.

Sentence: "The active <t>substance</t> in Alimta, pemetrexed, is a cytotoxic medicine (a medicine that kills cells that are dividing, such as cancer cells), which belongs to the group antimetabolites."

Let me look at the senses:

1. definition=the real physical matter of which a person or thing consists | examples=DNA is the substance of our genes
2. definition=the choicest or most essential or most vital part of some idea or experience | examples=the gist of the prosecutor's argument
3. definition=the idea that is intended | examples=What is the meaning of this proverb?
4. definition=material of a particular kind or constitution | examples=the immune response recognizes invading substances
5. definition=considerable capital (wealth or income) | examples=he is a man of means
6. definition=what a communication that is about something is about
7. definition=a particular kind or species of matter with uniform properties | examples=shigella is one of the most toxic substances known to man

In the sentence, "substance" refers to the active chemical/medicinal component in a drug (Alimta). It's referring to a specific kind of matter with uniform properties - pemetrexed.

Sense 7 says: "a particular kind or species of matter with uniform properties" with example "shigella is one of the most toxic substances known to man". This seems to fit best because pemetrexed is a specific chemical compound (a particular kind of matter with uniform properties).

Sense 4 says: "material of a particular kind or constitution" with example "the immune response recognizes invading substances". This could also fit, but sense 7 seems more precise because we're talking about a specific chemical entity.

Sense 1 says "the real physical matter of which a person or thing consists" - this is more about the fundamental material making up something.

Sense 7 is specifically about "a particular kind or species of matter with uniform properties" - this is exactly what a chemical compound like pemetrexed is.

Wait, let me reconsider. In pharmacology, "active substance" typically means the active ingredient, which is a specific chemical entity.

Sense 4: "material of a particular kind or constitution" - this is broader.
Sense 7: "a particular kind or species of matter with uniform properties" - this is more specific and fits chemical substances better.

The example for 7: "shigella is one of the most toxic substances known to man" - wait, shigella is a bacterium, not a chemical substance. But it's still referring to a specific kind of matter/entity.

Actually, looking at WordNet senses (which this appears to be based on):
Sense 1: physical matter (substance1)
Sense 2: kernel, substance, core, center, centre, essence, gist, heart, heart and soul, inwardness, marrow, meat, nub, pith, sum, nitty-gritty (the choicest or most essential or most vital part of some idea or experience)
Sense 3: meaning, substance (the idea that is intended)
Sense 4: material, stuff (the tangible substance that goes into the makeup of a physical object) - wait, the definition given is "material of a particular kind or constitution"
Sense 5: means, substance (considerable capital)
Sense 6: message, content, subject matter, substance (what a communication is about)
Sense 7: substance (a particular kind or species of matter with uniform properties)

Actually, looking at the exact definitions provided:
4. definition=material of a particular kind or constitution | examples=the immune response recognizes invading substances
7. definition=a particular kind or species of matter with uniform properties | examples=shigella is one of the most toxic substances known to man

In the sentence, "active substance" refers to the active ingredient/chemical compound. In WordNet, sense 7 is specifically "a particular kind or species of matter with uniform properties" and the example includes "toxic substances". Chemical substances are exactly "particular kind or species of matter with uniform properties."

Sense 4's example "invading substances" could be allergens, pathogens, etc. - materials of particular kind.

But "active substance" in a medicinal context is almost certainly sense 7. Pemetrexed is a specific chemical compound - a species of matter with uniform properties.

Let me double-check by considering if it could be sense 4. "Material of a particular kind or constitution" - yes, a medicine is material. But sense 7 is more specific to chemical/kind of matter.

Actually, looking at standard WordNet:
- WordNet 3.1 sense 1: "the real physical matter of which a person or thing consists"
- WordNet 3.1 sense 4: "material of a particular kind or constitution" (e.g., "the immune response recognizes invading substances")
- WordNet 3.1 sense 7: "a particular kind or species of matter with uniform properties" (e.g., "shigella is one of the most toxic substances known to man")

Wait, I think I need to be careful. The example for sense 7 mentions "shigella" which is actually an organism (bacterium), not a chemical substance. But the definition says "a particular kind or species of matter with uniform properties."

In pharmacology, an active substance is the specific chemical entity. I think sense 7 is the best fit.

But let me reconsider sense 1: "the real physical matter of which a person or thing consists" - no, that's like "the substance of the rock is silica."

Sense 4: "material of a particular kind or constitution" - this could work for a drug ingredient.

However, in many lexical semantic datasets (like WordNet), "substance" sense 7 is used for chemical substances. The example "shigella is one of the most toxic substances known to man" - actually, looking at this again, maybe the example is slightly off, or maybe it's referring to shiga toxin? No, it says shigella. But regardless, the definition "a particular kind or species of matter with uniform properties" is the hypernym for chemical substances, elements, compounds, etc.

Sense 4 "material of a particular kind or constitution" is broader and includes things like "abrasive material" etc.

Given the context of a pharmaceutical active ingredient, which is a specific chemical compound with uniform properties, sense 7 is the most appropriate.

Wait, I should verify if this is from a specific dataset like WordNet or OntoNotes. The format looks like WordNet.

In WordNet 3.0/3.1:
substance.n.01: the real physical matter of which a person or thing consists
substance.n.02: the choicest or most essential or most vital part of some idea or experience
substance.n.03: the idea that is intended
substance.n.04: material of a particular kind or constitution
substance.n.05: considerable capital (wealth or income)
substance.n.06: what a communication that is about something is about
substance.n.07: a particular kind or species of matter with uniform properties

Yes, and the example for 07 is "shigella is one of the most toxic substances known to man" (actually in WordNet it might be different, but the user provided the example).

Actually, looking at the user's example for 7: "shigella is one of the most toxic substances known to man" - this seems like it might be a mistake in the prompt or from a specific dataset. Shigella is a bacterium. But the definition "a particular kind or species of matter with uniform properties" still clearly points to chemical/physical substance types.

For "active substance" in a drug, this is definitely sense 7. Pemetrexed is a chemical compound, a particular kind of matter with uniform properties.

Therefore, the answer is 7.

Let me make sure it's not sense 4. "Material of a particular kind or constitution" - the immune response recognizes invading substances. These could be proteins, polysaccharides, etc. But an active pharmaceutical ingredient is more precisely described as "a particular kind or species of matter with uniform properties" because it's a pure(ish) compound with specific chemical properties.

Yes, 7 is correct.


[User]
Which numbered sense of "medicine" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: The active substance in Alimta, pemetrexed, is a cytotoxic <t>medicine</t> (a medicine that kills cells that are dividing, such as cancer cells), which belongs to the group antimetabolites.

Senses:
1. definition=the branches of medical science that deal with nonsurgical techniques
2. definition=(medicine) something that treats or prevents or alleviates the symptoms of disease
3. definition=the learned profession that is mastered by graduate training in a medical school and that is devoted to preventing or alleviating or curing diseases and injuries | examples=he studied medicine at Harvard
4. definition=punishment for one's actions | examples=you have to face the music

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to identify which numbered sense of "medicine" is used in the given sentence.

Let me analyze the sentence:
"The active substance in Alimta, pemetrexed, is a cytotoxic <t>medicine</t> (a medicine that kills cells that are dividing, such as cancer cells), which belongs to the group antimetabolites."

Here, "medicine" refers to a substance/drug that treats disease (specifically cancer). It's referring to a pharmaceutical product, something that treats or prevents or alleviates symptoms of disease.

Let me look at the senses:
1. "the branches of medical science that deal with nonsurgical techniques" - This refers to the field of medicine as a science/branch. Not this one.
2. "(medicine) something that treats or prevents or alleviates the symptoms of disease" - This matches. It's a substance/drug.
3. "the learned profession that is mastered by graduate training in a medical school and that is devoted to preventing or alleviating or curing diseases and injuries" - This refers to the profession. Not this one.
4. "punishment for one's actions" - This is the idiom "face the music" type usage. Not this one.

The sentence is talking about pemetrexed being a cytotoxic medicine (substance/drug). So sense 2 is correct.

Wait, let me double-check. The word "medicine" in the sentence is clearly referring to a pharmaceutical compound/substance. Sense 2 says "something that treats or prevents or alleviates the symptoms of disease." That fits perfectly.

The answer should be just the number: 2.


[User]
Which numbered sense of "medicine" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: The active substance in Alimta, pemetrexed, is a cytotoxic medicine (a <t>medicine</t> that kills cells that are dividing, such as cancer cells), which belongs to the group antimetabolites.

Senses:
1. definition=the branches of medical science that deal with nonsurgical techniques
2. definition=(medicine) something that treats or prevents or alleviates the symptoms of disease
3. definition=the learned profession that is mastered by graduate training in a medical school and that is devoted to preventing or alleviating or curing diseases and injuries | examples=he studied medicine at Harvard
4. definition=punishment for one's actions | examples=you have to face the music

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to identify which numbered sense of "medicine" is used in the given sentence. Let me analyze the sentence and the definitions.

Sentence: "The active substance in Alimta, pemetrexed, is a cytotoxic medicine (a <t>medicine</t> that kills cells that are dividing, such as cancer cells), which belongs to the group antimetabolites."

The word "medicine" here is referring to a substance/drug that treats disease (specifically cancer). It's describing pemetrexed as a type of medicine (cytotoxic medicine) that kills dividing cells.

Let me look at the senses:

1. "the branches of medical science that deal with nonsurgical techniques" - This refers to the field of medicine as a science/branch of knowledge. Not this one.

2. "(medicine) something that treats or prevents or alleviates the symptoms of disease" - This refers to a substance, drug, or medication. This matches the context where pemetrexed is described as a "cytotoxic medicine" - it's a substance/drug that treats disease (cancer).

3. "the learned profession that is mastered by graduate training in a medical school and that is devoted to preventing or alleviating or curing diseases and injuries" - This refers to the profession of being a doctor. Not this one.

4. "punishment for one's actions" - This is an idiomatic usage (face the music). Not relevant here.

The context is clearly about a pharmaceutical substance - pemetrexed is a drug/medication. So sense 2 is correct.

Wait, let me double-check. The sentence says "pemetrexed is a cytotoxic medicine" and then explains in parentheses what that medicine does. It's definitely referring to the substance/drug definition.

Sense 2: "(medicine) something that treats or prevents or alleviates the symptoms of disease"

Yes, this is the correct sense. The answer should be 2.

provider: Phala