[User]
Which numbered sense of "baby" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: Mr. Quinlan, 30 years old, knew he carried a damaged gene, having lost an eye to the rare tumor when he was only two months old -- after his mother had suffered the same fate when she was a <t>baby</t>.

Senses:
1. definition=a very young child (birth to 1 year) who has not yet begun to walk or talk | examples=the baby began to cry again
2. definition=the youngest member of a group (not necessarily young) | examples=the baby of the family
3. definition=an immature childish person | examples=he remained a child in practical matters as long as he lived
4. definition=an unborn child; a human fetus | examples=I felt healthy and very feminine carrying the baby
5. definition=(slang) sometimes used as a term of address for attractive young women
6. definition=a very young mammal | examples=baby rabbits
7. definition=a project of personal concern to someone | examples=this project is his baby

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to identify which sense of "baby" is used in the given sentence. Let me analyze the sentence and the definitions.

Sentence: "Mr. Quinlan, 30 years old, knew he carried a damaged gene, having lost an eye to the rare tumor when he was only two months old -- after his mother had suffered the same fate when she was a <t>baby</t>."

The word "baby" here refers to the mother when she was very young. The context suggests she was a very young child when she lost an eye to the tumor.

Let me look at the senses:

1. definition=a very young child (birth to 1 year) who has not yet begun to walk or talk | examples=the baby began to cry again
2. definition=the youngest member of a group (not necessarily young) | examples=the baby of the family
3. definition=an immature childish person | examples=he remained a child in practical matters as long as he lived
4. definition=an unborn child; a human fetus | examples=I felt healthy and very feminine carrying the baby
5. definition=(slang) sometimes used as a term of address for attractive young women
6. definition=a very young mammal | examples=baby rabbits
7. definition=a project of personal concern to someone | examples=this project is his baby

The sentence says "when she was a baby" referring to the mother suffering the same fate (losing an eye to the tumor) when she was a baby.

Comparing with sense 1: "a very young child (birth to 1 year) who has not yet begun to walk or talk" - this fits because it refers to when the mother was an infant/very young child.

Sense 2 is about being the youngest member of a group, which doesn't fit here.
Sense 3 is about an immature childish person, which is a metaphorical usage and doesn't fit.
Sense 4 is about an unborn child/fetus, which doesn't fit.
Sense 5 is slang for attractive young women, which doesn't fit the context of medical history.
Sense 6 is about a very young mammal, but the mother is human.
Sense 7 is metaphorical about a project.

The most appropriate sense is 1, referring to a very young child (birth to 1 year).

Wait, let me double-check. The sentence mentions the mother suffered the same fate "when she was a baby." The comparison is with Mr. Quinlan who was "two months old" when he lost his eye. Two months old is definitely a baby in the sense of definition 1 (birth to 1 year).

So the mother was also a baby (very young child) when she suffered the same fate.

Therefore, the answer is 1.


attempt_kind: initial

status: success

[User]
Which numbered sense of "isolation" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: Because of the <t>isolation</t> of the retinoblastoma tumor-suppressor gene, it became possible last January to find out what threat the Quinlan baby faced.

Senses:
1. definition=a state of separation between persons or groups
2. definition=a feeling of being disliked and alone
3. definition=the act of isolating something; setting something apart from others
4. definition=(psychiatry) a defense mechanism in which memory of an unacceptable act or impulse is separated from the emotion originally associated with it
5. definition=a country's withdrawal from international politics | examples=he opposed a policy of American isolation

finish_reason: stop

role: assistant

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to identify which numbered sense of "isolation" is used in the given sentence. Let me analyze the sentence:

"Because of the <t>isolation</t> of the retinoblastoma tumor-suppressor gene, it became possible last January to find out what threat the Quinlan baby faced."

The context here is about a gene - specifically the retinoblastoma tumor-suppressor gene. In scientific/biological contexts, when we talk about "isolating" a gene, we mean identifying and separating it from other genetic material, or extracting it for study.

Let me look at the definitions:
1. "a state of separation between persons or groups" - This is about people or groups, not genes.
2. "a feeling of being disliked and alone" - This is an emotional/psychological state, not applicable to genes.
3. "the act of isolating something; setting something apart from others" - This fits! In biology, isolating a gene means identifying and separating it from the genome or extracting it.
4. "(psychiatry) a defense mechanism..." - This is a psychological term, not applicable here.
5. "a country's withdrawal from international politics" - This is about geopolitics, not biology.

The sentence is talking about the isolation (identification/separation) of a specific gene, which allowed scientists to understand the threat faced by the Quinlan baby (likely referring to a case involving retinoblastoma, a malignant tumor of the retina).

So the correct sense is #3: "the act of isolating something; setting something apart from others"

This is the scientific usage where "isolation" refers to the process of separating or identifying a specific biological entity (the gene) from its context.

The answer should be: 3

format: unknown

native_finish_reason: stop

provider: DeepInfra

currency: USD


[User]
Which numbered sense of "become" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: Because of the isolation of the retinoblastoma tumor-suppressor gene, it <t>became</t> possible last January to find out what threat the Quinlan baby faced.

Senses:
1. definition=enter or assume a certain state or condition | examples=He became annoyed when he heard the bad news
2. definition=undergo a change or development | examples=The water turned into ice
3. definition=come into existence | examples=What becomes has duration
4. definition=enhance the appearance of | examples=Mourning becomes Electra

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to identify which numbered sense of "become" is used in the given sentence. Let me analyze the sentence and the definitions.

Sentence: "Because of the isolation of the retinoblastoma tumor-suppressor gene, it <t>became</t> possible last January to find out what threat the Quinlan baby faced."

The structure here is "it became possible" - this is an idiomatic construction where "become" means to enter or assume a certain state or condition.

Let me look at the definitions:

1. definition=enter or assume a certain state or condition | examples=He became annoyed when he heard the bad news
   - This fits "became possible" - "possible" is a state/condition that was entered.

2. definition=undergo a change or development | examples=The water turned into ice
   - This suggests a transformation from one thing to another, like "became a doctor" or "became ice". While "became possible" involves a change, the specific meaning here is about entering a state.

3. definition=come into existence | examples=What becomes has duration
   - This is more philosophical/existential. Not the right sense here.

4. definition=enhance the appearance of | examples=Mourning becomes Electra
   - This is the archaic/poetic usage meaning "to be suitable or appropriate to" or "to look good on". Not relevant here.

The phrase "it became possible" clearly matches sense 1: entering or assuming a certain state or condition. The "it" refers to the situation, and "possible" is the state that was assumed.

The example given for sense 1 is "He became annoyed" - "annoyed" is an adjective describing a state, just like "possible" is an adjective describing a state.

Sense 2 examples usually involve nouns or more substantial changes: "turned into ice", "became a teacher", etc.

So the answer should be 1.

provider: Novita


[User]
Which numbered sense of "possible" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: Because of the isolation of the retinoblastoma tumor-suppressor gene, it became <t>possible</t> last January to find out what threat the Quinlan baby faced.

Senses:
1. definition=capable of happening or existing | examples=a breakthrough may be possible next year
2. definition=existing in possibility | examples=a potential problem

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to identify which sense of "possible" is used in the given sentence. The sentence is: "Because of the isolation of the retinoblastoma tumor-suppressor gene, it became <t>possible</t> last January to find out what threat the Quinlan baby faced."

I need to choose between:
1. capable of happening or existing (examples: a breakthrough may be possible next year)
2. existing in possibility (examples: a potential problem)

Let me analyze the sentence structure. The phrase is "it became possible to find out..." This means that it became capable of happening/existing to find out what threat the baby faced. In other words, finding out became feasible or achievable.

Sense 1: "capable of happening or existing" - This fits because the isolation of the gene made it capable/feasible to find out the threat. It became possible (doable, achievable) to find out.

Sense 2: "existing in possibility" - This seems to refer to something that is potential rather than actual. The example given is "a potential problem." But in the sentence, "possible" is describing the capability of an action (finding out), not describing something as potential.

The construction "it became possible to [do something]" typically means that doing that thing became feasible or achievable, which aligns with sense 1.

Sense 2 seems to be about describing something as being potential (like "a possible solution" = a potential solution), whereas sense 1 is about capability or feasibility.

In the sentence: "it became possible to find out..." = it became feasible/capable of happening to find out...

This is clearly sense 1.

Wait, let me double-check. The example for sense 1 is "a breakthrough may be possible next year" - this suggests capability/feasibility. The example for sense 2 is "a potential problem" - this suggests something that exists as a possibility.

In the target sentence, "possible" is predicated of an action (to find out). It became possible to do something. This is about the capability of the action being realized.

Therefore, the answer is 1.


[User]
Which numbered sense of "last" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: Because of the isolation of the retinoblastoma tumor-suppressor gene, it became possible <t>last</t> January to find out what threat the Quinlan baby faced.

Senses:
1. definition=immediately past | examples=last Thursday
2. definition=coming after all others in time or space or degree or being the only one remaining | examples=the last time I saw Paris
3. definition=occurring at or forming an end or termination | examples=his concluding words came as a surprise
4. definition=most unlikely or unsuitable | examples=the last person we would have suspected
5. definition=occurring at the time of death | examples=his last words
6. definition=conclusive in a process or progression | examples=the final answer
7. definition=highest in extent or degree | examples=to the last measure of human endurance
8. definition=not to be altered or undone | examples=the judge's decision is final
9. definition=lowest in rank or importance | examples=last prize

reasoning_content:
We need to determine which numbered sense of "last" is used in the given sentence. The sentence is:

"Because of the isolation of the retinoblastoma tumor-suppressor gene, it became possible <t>last</t> January to find out what threat the Quinlan baby faced."

The word "last" is tagged as <t>last</t>. We need to identify which sense definition matches the usage.

Let's parse the sentence: "it became possible last January to find out..." So "last January" refers to the January that is immediately past. In other words, the most recent January before the time of speaking/writing.

Now let's examine the senses:

1. definition=immediately past | examples=last Thursday
2. definition=coming after all others in time or space or degree or being the only one remaining | examples=the last time I saw Paris
3. definition=occurring at or forming an end or termination | examples=his concluding words came as a surprise
4. definition=most unlikely or unsuitable | examples=the last person we would have suspected
5. definition=occurring at the time of death | examples=his last words
6. definition=conclusive in a process or progression | examples=the final answer
7. definition=highest in extent or degree | examples=to the last measure of human endurance
8. definition=not to be altered or undone | examples=the judge's decision is final
9. definition=lowest in rank or importance | examples=last prize

The phrase "last January" is a time expression meaning the January immediately preceding the current time. This matches sense 1: "immediately past" with example "last Thursday". So the answer should be 1.

But let's double-check other senses to ensure no other fits. Sense 2 is "coming after all others in time or space or degree or being the only one remaining". That could be "the last January" meaning the final January (e.g., the last January of a series). But "last January" as a time reference is the most recent past January, not the final one in a sequence. The phrase "last January" is ambiguous: it could mean "the previous January" (immediately past) or "the final January" (e.g., "the last January of the 20th century"). However, in the context of the sentence: "it became possible last January to find out..." it strongly suggests the previous January, i.e., the one just before the time of the statement. That is sense 1.

Sense 2 example: "the last time I saw Paris". That is also a time reference, but "the last time" means the most recent occurrence? Actually "the last time I saw Paris" could mean the most recent time or the final time. But sense 2 definition says "coming after all others in time or space or degree or being the only one remaining". That includes "the last time" meaning the final occurrence. But "last January" is a specific type of usage: the immediately preceding period. In many dictionaries, "last" used with a time noun (last week, last month, last year) is defined as "immediately past". So sense 1 is correct.

Thus the answer is 1.

The user wants only the number. So output "1".

provider: StreamLake


[User]
Which numbered sense of "find_out" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: Because of the isolation of the retinoblastoma tumor-suppressor gene, it became possible last January to <t>find out</t> what threat the Quinlan baby faced.

Senses:
1. definition=establish after a calculation, investigation, experiment, survey, or study | examples=find the product of two numbers
2. definition=get to know or become aware of, usually accidentally | examples=I learned that she has two grown-up children
3. definition=find out, learn, or determine with certainty, usually by making an inquiry or other effort | examples=I want to see whether she speaks French
4. definition=trap; especially in an error or in a reprehensible act | examples=He was caught out

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to identify which sense of "find_out" is used in the given sentence.

The sentence is: "Because of the isolation of the retinoblastoma tumor-suppressor gene, it became possible last January to <t>find out</t> what threat the Quinlan baby faced."

Let me analyze the sentence:
- Context: Scientific/medical context about isolating a gene
- Action: finding out what threat the baby faced
- Implication: This is about determining or learning information through investigation or study

Now let's look at the senses:

1. "establish after a calculation, investigation, experiment, survey, or study" - examples mention finding products of numbers. This seems more mathematical or experimental in a quantitative sense.

2. "get to know or become aware of, usually accidentally" - examples: "I learned that she has two grown-up children". This suggests accidental discovery.

3. "find out, learn, or determine with certainty, usually by making an inquiry or other effort" - examples: "I want to see whether she speaks French". This suggests intentional effort to determine something.

4. "trap; especially in an error or in a reprehensible act" - examples: "He was caught out". This is about catching someone.

In the sentence, "find out" is used in the context of scientific discovery (isolation of a gene) to determine what threat the baby faced. This is an intentional investigation/determination, not accidental. It's about learning/determining information through scientific inquiry.

Sense 3 seems to fit best: "find out, learn, or determine with certainty, usually by making an inquiry or other effort"

Sense 1 is more about establishing facts through calculation or experiment in a quantitative way, but here it's about determining a threat/medical condition, which fits better with sense 3's "determine with certainty, usually by making an inquiry or other effort."

Actually, looking more carefully:
Sense 1: "establish after a calculation, investigation, experiment, survey, or study"
Sense 3: "find out, learn, or determine with certainty, usually by making an inquiry or other effort"

The context mentions "Because of the isolation of the retinoblastoma tumor-suppressor gene" - this is a scientific investigation. The phrase "find out what threat" suggests determining or establishing the nature of the threat through scientific means.

Both 1 and 3 could potentially fit, but sense 1 emphasizes "establish after... investigation, experiment" while sense 3 emphasizes "learn or determine with certainty... by making an inquiry."

Given the scientific context of gene isolation and determining a medical threat, sense 1 or 3 could work. However, sense 3 is the more general "find out" meaning that applies to learning/determining information, while sense 1 is more specific to establishing facts through systematic study.

Wait, looking at the example for sense 1: "find the product of two numbers" - this seems very mathematical. The definition mentions calculation, investigation, experiment, survey, or study.

The example for sense 3: "I want to see whether she speaks French" - this is about determining something through inquiry.

In the sentence, it's about determining what threat the baby faced using the isolated gene information. This is essentially establishing the facts through scientific investigation (the isolation of the gene).

But actually, looking at standard dictionary definitions, "find out" in the sense of discovering information through investigation usually maps to sense 3. Sense 1 seems to be more about "find" as in calculating or determining a specific value, whereas "find out" as a phrasal verb is typically sense 2 or 3.

Sense 2 is accidental ("usually accidentally").
Sense 3 is intentional ("usually by making an inquiry or other effort").

In this sentence, the isolation of the gene made it possible to determine the threat. This was a deliberate scientific effort, not accidental. So it's sense 3.

Let me double-check by looking at the definitions again:
1. establish after a calculation, investigation, experiment, survey, or study
2. get to know or become aware of, usually accidentally
3. find out, learn, or determine with certainty, usually by making an inquiry or other effort
4. trap; especially in an error or in a reprehensible act

Actually, looking at WordNet or similar lexical databases (which this format resembles), sense 1 might be for the verb "find" rather than "find out" specifically? No, the senses are labeled for "find_out".

Wait, the example for sense 1 is "find the product of two numbers" - that uses "find" not "find out". But the sense is labeled for "find_out".

Let me reconsider. The word being analyzed is "find_out" (as a multi-word expression).

Sense 1 definition mentions calculation, investigation, etc. - this could fit scientific contexts.
Sense 3 is also about inquiry.

But the key difference:
- Sense 1: establish after calculation/investigation (emphasis on establishing a fact through systematic process)
- Sense 3: learn or determine with certainty by inquiry (emphasis on the act of discovering/learning)

In the sentence: "it became possible... to find out what threat the Quinlan baby faced"

This is about determining/learning what the specific threat was. This aligns with sense 3.

Also, looking at the accidental vs intentional distinction:
- The sentence describes a scientific breakthrough (isolation of gene) enabling the determination of the threat. This is not accidental (sense 2).
- It's not about trapping someone (sense 4).
- Between 1 and 3: Sense 1 seems more about deriving results from data/calculation, while sense 3 is about discovering information. The phrase "find out what threat" suggests learning/discovering the nature of the threat, which is sense 3.

Therefore, the answer should be 3.


[User]
Which numbered sense of "threat" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: Because of the isolation of the retinoblastoma tumor-suppressor gene, it became possible last January to find out what <t>threat</t> the Quinlan baby faced.

Senses:
1. definition=something that is a source of danger | examples=earthquakes are a constant threat in Japan
2. definition=a warning that something unpleasant is imminent | examples=they were under threat of arrest
3. definition=declaration of an intention or a determination to inflict harm on another | examples=his threat to kill me was quite explicit
4. definition=a person who inspires fear or dread | examples=he was the terror of the neighborhood

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to identify which numbered sense of "threat" is used in the given sentence.

 Sentence: "Because of the isolation of the retinoblastoma tumor-suppressor gene, it became possible last January to find out what <t>threat</t> the Quinlan baby faced."

 Let me analyze the context:
 - The sentence is about the Quinlan baby (likely referring to a medical case involving retinoblastoma, a malignant tumor of the retina)
 - The "threat" here refers to the danger or risk posed by the disease/condition
 - The baby "faced" a threat - meaning there was a source of danger or risk to the baby's health/life

 Now let's look at the senses:

 1. "something that is a source of danger" - examples: earthquakes are a constant threat in Japan
    - This fits well. The disease/condition is a source of danger to the baby.

 2. "a warning that something unpleasant is imminent" - examples: they were under threat of arrest
    - This doesn't fit. There's no warning being issued here; it's about an actual danger/risk.

 3. "declaration of an intention or a determination to inflict harm on another" - examples: his threat to kill me was quite explicit
    - This doesn't fit. No one is declaring an intention to harm the baby; it's about a medical condition posing danger.

 4. "a person who inspires fear or dread" - examples: he was the terror of the neighborhood
    - This doesn't fit. The threat isn't a person; it's the medical condition/disease.

 So sense 1 is the correct answer. The "threat" refers to the danger posed by the retinoblastoma (or the risk associated with it) to the baby.

 Wait, let me double-check. The sentence says "what threat the Quinlan baby faced" - this could mean what danger the baby was in due to the condition. Yes, that's sense 1.

 Actually, looking more carefully: "find out what threat the Quinlan baby faced" - this means determining the nature of the danger or risk that the medical condition presented to the baby. So yes, it's a source of danger.

 The answer should be: 1

provider: ModelRun


[User]
Which numbered sense of "baby" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: Because of the isolation of the retinoblastoma tumor-suppressor gene, it became possible last January to find out what threat the Quinlan <t>baby</t> faced.

Senses:
1. definition=a very young child (birth to 1 year) who has not yet begun to walk or talk | examples=the baby began to cry again
2. definition=the youngest member of a group (not necessarily young) | examples=the baby of the family
3. definition=an immature childish person | examples=he remained a child in practical matters as long as he lived
4. definition=an unborn child; a human fetus | examples=I felt healthy and very feminine carrying the baby
5. definition=(slang) sometimes used as a term of address for attractive young women
6. definition=a very young mammal | examples=baby rabbits
7. definition=a project of personal concern to someone | examples=this project is his baby

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to identify which sense of "baby" is used in the given sentence. Let me analyze the sentence:

"Because of the isolation of the retinoblastoma tumor-suppressor gene, it became possible last January to find out what threat the Quinlan <t>baby</t> faced."

This sentence refers to the "Quinlan baby." This is likely referring to Karen Ann Quinlan, a famous case from the 1970s involving a woman in a persistent vegetative state. However, looking at the context, it mentions "retinoblastoma tumor-suppressor gene" and finding out what threat the baby faced.

Wait, actually, looking more carefully: retinoblastoma is a malignant tumor of the retina, typically occurring in children. The "Quinlan baby" here likely refers to a specific baby with the last name Quinlan who had retinoblastoma or was at risk for it.

But looking at the senses:
1. A very young child (birth to 1 year)
2. The youngest member of a group
3. An immature childish person
4. An unborn child; a human fetus
5. Slang for attractive young women
6. A very young mammal
7. A project of personal concern

In the context of the sentence, "the Quinlan baby" refers to a specific infant/young child named Quinlan who faced a threat (likely related to the retinoblastoma gene). This would be sense 1: a very young child.

But wait, let me reconsider. Is this referring to Karen Ann Quinlan? Karen Ann Quinlan was not a baby when she was in the news - she was 21 years old when she fell into a coma. However, the sentence mentions "retinoblastoma" which is a childhood cancer of the retina.

Actually, looking at the sentence again: "the isolation of the retinoblastoma tumor-suppressor gene" - this is scientific language. The Quinlan baby might be a specific case study or a specific child being referred to in a medical context.

But regardless of the specific historical reference, the word "baby" here is being used to refer to a human infant/young child. It's not referring to the youngest member of a group (sense 2), not an immature person (sense 3), not an unborn child (sense 4) - though it could potentially be a fetus if testing was done in utero, but retinoblastoma typically presents in early childhood, not prenatally (though it can be congenital).

Actually, retinoblastoma can be detected prenatally or in infancy. But "baby" here most likely refers to an infant or very young child.

Sense 1: "a very young child (birth to 1 year) who has not yet begun to walk or talk"

This seems to fit best. The Quinlan baby would be a specific young child/infant with the last name Quinlan.

Sense 4 is "an unborn child; a human fetus" - this is possible if referring to prenatal testing, but the phrase "what threat the Quinlan baby faced" suggests an existing child, not necessarily a fetus. Also, sense 1 is the most common meaning of baby when referring to a human child in a medical context like this.

Sense 6 is "a very young mammal" - this is for animals, not humans.

So the answer should be 1.

But let me double-check. Is there any chance this is sense 2? "The youngest member of a group" - like "the baby of the family"? The construction "the Quinlan baby" suggests a specific baby with the surname Quinlan, not necessarily the youngest member of the Quinlan family, though it could be. But given the medical context about retinoblastoma (which affects young children), it's almost certainly referring to an actual baby/infant.

Sense 7? "A project of personal concern" - no, this is clearly a human child.

Sense 4? If this is about genetic testing, it could be a fetus. But "baby" is less commonly used for fetuses in formal medical literature - "fetus" is preferred, though "baby" is used colloquially. However, the definition in sense 4 says "an unborn child; a human fetus" and gives the example "I felt healthy and very feminine carrying the baby" which suggests the speaker is pregnant.

In the given sentence, "what threat the Quinlan baby faced" - if it's a genetic threat related to retinoblastoma, and the gene was isolated, they could be testing a fetus. But without more context suggesting pregnancy, sense 1 is safer.

Actually, looking up the context (in my internal knowledge), this sentence appears to be from a specific text. The "Quinlan baby" refers to a specific case. But regardless, the word is used to mean a young human child.

Therefore, the answer is 1.


[User]
Which numbered sense of "face" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: Because of the isolation of the retinoblastoma tumor-suppressor gene, it became possible last January to find out what threat the Quinlan baby <t>faced</t>.

Senses:
1. definition=deal with (something unpleasant) head on | examples=You must confront your problems
2. definition=oppose, as in hostility or a competition | examples=You must confront your opponent
3. definition=be oriented in a certain direction, often with respect to another reference point; be opposite to | examples=The house looks north
4. definition=be opposite | examples=the facing page
5. definition=turn so as to face; turn the face in a certain direction | examples=Turn and face your partner now
6. definition=present somebody with something, usually to accuse or criticize | examples=We confronted him with the evidence
7. definition=turn so as to expose the face | examples=face a playing card
8. definition=line the edge (of a garment) with a different material | examples=face the lapels of the jacket
9. definition=cover the front or surface of | examples=The building was faced with beautiful stones

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to identify which numbered sense of "face" is used in the given sentence. Let me analyze the sentence and the definitions.

Sentence: "Because of the isolation of the retinoblastoma tumor-suppressor gene, it became possible last January to find out what threat the Quinlan baby <t>faced</t>."

The word "faced" here is used in the context of "what threat the Quinlan baby faced." This means the baby was dealing with or confronting a threat.

Let me look at the definitions:

1. definition=deal with (something unpleasant) head on | examples=You must confront your problems
2. definition=oppose, as in hostility or a competition | examples=You must confront your opponent
3. definition=be oriented in a certain direction, often with respect to another reference point; be opposite to | examples=The house looks north
4. definition=be opposite | examples=the facing page
5. definition=turn so as to face; turn the face in a certain direction | examples=Turn and face your partner now
6. definition=present somebody with something, usually to accuse or criticize | examples=We confronted him with the evidence
7. definition=turn so as to expose the face | examples=face a playing card
8. definition=line the edge (of a garment) with a different material | examples=face the lapels of the jacket
9. definition=cover the front or surface of | examples=The building was faced with beautiful stones

The sentence uses "faced" in the sense of dealing with a threat. The baby is facing a threat - meaning the baby has to deal with or confront an unpleasant situation (the threat).

Definition 1 says "deal with (something unpleasant) head on" with the example "You must confront your problems." This matches "faced a threat" - dealing with something unpleasant.

Definition 2 is about opposing someone in hostility or competition, which doesn't fit as well because a threat isn't necessarily an opponent you're competing against.

Definition 6 is about presenting someone with something to accuse or criticize, which is "confront" in a different sense (confronting someone with evidence), not "facing a threat."

So the correct sense is 1: "deal with (something unpleasant) head on."

The phrase "what threat the Quinlan baby faced" means what threat the baby had to deal with or confront. This aligns perfectly with sense 1.

Let me double-check:
- Sense 1: deal with (something unpleasant) head on - YES, a threat is something unpleasant, and facing it means dealing with it.
- Sense 2: oppose in hostility or competition - this is more active opposition, like facing an opponent.
- Sense 6: present somebody with something - this is transitive with a different structure (confront someone with something).

The structure here is "faced a threat" which is dealing with something unpleasant.

Therefore, the answer is 1.


[User]
Which numbered sense of "use" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: A test <t>using</t> new "genetic probes "showed that little Will Quinlan had not inherited a damaged retinoblastoma supressor gene and, therefore, faced no more risk than other children of developing the rare cancer.

Senses:
1. definition=put into service; make work or employ for a particular purpose or for its inherent or natural purpose | examples=use your head!
2. definition=take or consume (regularly or habitually) | examples=She uses drugs rarely
3. definition=use up, consume fully | examples=The legislature expended its time on school questions
4. definition=seek or achieve an end by using to one's advantage | examples=She uses her influential friends to get jobs
5. definition=avail oneself to | examples=apply a principle
6. definition=habitually do something (use only in the past tense) | examples=She used to call her mother every week but now she calls only occasionally

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to identify which numbered sense of "use" is used in the given sentence. The target word is marked with <t></t> tags: "using".

Sentence: "A test <t>using</t> new 'genetic probes' showed that little Will Quinlan had not inherited a damaged retinoblastoma supressor gene and, therefore, faced no more risk than other children of developing the rare cancer."

Let me analyze the sentence:
- "A test using new 'genetic probes'..."
- Here, "using" is a present participle modifying "test"
- The test is employing/utilizing new genetic probes
- The meaning is about employing something for a particular purpose

Now let's look at the senses:

1. "put into service; make work or employ for a particular purpose or for its inherent or natural purpose" | examples="use your head!"
   - This seems to fit. The test is employing/utilizing genetic probes.

2. "take or consume (regularly or habitually)" | examples="She uses drugs rarely"
   - This is about consumption, like using drugs. Doesn't fit.

3. "use up, consume fully" | examples="The legislature expended its time on school questions"
   - This is about exhausting/depleting. Doesn't fit.

4. "seek or achieve an end by using to one's advantage" | examples="She uses her influential friends to get jobs"
   - This is about exploiting or taking advantage of something for personal gain. While the test is using probes, it's not really about seeking an end by using to one's advantage in the manipulative sense. It's more about the basic employment of a tool.

5. "avail oneself to" | examples="apply a principle"
   - This is similar to making use of, but let's see... "avail oneself to" usually means to make use of an opportunity or resource. This could potentially fit, but sense 1 seems more direct.

6. "habitually do something (use only in the past tense)" | examples="She used to call her mother every week..."
   - This is the "used to" construction. Doesn't fit here.

Between sense 1 and sense 5:
Sense 1: "put into service; make work or employ for a particular purpose..."
Sense 5: "avail oneself to" (though this phrasing is a bit odd - usually it's "avail oneself of")

Actually, looking at sense 5 again: "avail oneself to" - this might mean to utilize or make use of. But sense 1 is the primary definition of using a tool or method.

In the sentence, "a test using new genetic probes" means a test that employs or utilizes new genetic probes. This matches sense 1: "put into service; make work or employ for a particular purpose..."

The test is employing the genetic probes for the purpose of testing/detecting something.

Sense 4 is about using something to one's advantage (exploiting), which doesn't fit here because the test isn't exploiting the probes in that sense - it's just utilizing them as tools.

Therefore, the answer should be 1.

Wait, let me double-check sense 5. "avail oneself to" - actually, looking at standard definitions, sense 5 might be "avail oneself of" meaning to utilize. But in many lexical databases, sense 1 covers the general "employ/utilize" meaning.

Let me reconsider the example for sense 5: "apply a principle". This suggests sense 5 is about applying or utilizing something.

But sense 1 has the example "use your head!" which is about employing a faculty, and the definition mentions "employ for a particular purpose".

Actually, looking at WordNet or similar lexical databases (which this seems to be based on):
Sense 1 usually corresponds to the basic transitive use: utilize, employ.
Sense 4 is about exploiting.
Sense 5 might be about practicing or applying (as in "use care").

But in this sentence: "A test using new genetic probes" - this is clearly the basic utilization sense. The test employs/utilizes genetic probes.

So the answer is 1.

Let me verify by checking if there's any ambiguity:
- Could it be sense 4? "seek or achieve an end by using to one's advantage" - while the test does use probes to achieve an end (showing the result), the phrase "to one's advantage" suggests a beneficiary, usually a person or agent acting with intention to benefit. Here it's just a test using technology.
- Could it be sense 5? "avail oneself to" - this is usually reflexive. "The test avails itself to..." doesn't fit well.

Sense 1 is definitely the best fit.

Final answer: 1


[User]
Which numbered sense of "new" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: A test using <t>new</t> "genetic probes "showed that little Will Quinlan had not inherited a damaged retinoblastoma supressor gene and, therefore, faced no more risk than other children of developing the rare cancer.

Senses:
1. definition=not of long duration; having just (or relatively recently) come into being or been made or acquired or discovered | examples=a new law
2. definition=original and of a kind not seen before | examples=the computer produced a completely novel proof of a well-known theorem
3. definition=lacking training or experience | examples=the new men were eager to fight
4. definition=having no previous example or precedent or parallel | examples=a time of unexampled prosperity
5. definition=other than the former one(s); different | examples=they now have a new leaders
6. definition=unaffected by use or exposure | examples=it looks like new
7. definition=(of a new kind or fashion) gratuitously new | examples=newfangled ideas
8. definition=in use after medieval times | examples=New Eqyptian was the language of the 18th to 21st dynasties
9. definition=used of a living language; being the current stage in its development | examples=Modern English
10. definition=(of crops) harvested at an early stage of development; before complete maturity | examples=new potatoes
11. definition=unfamiliar | examples=new experiences

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to identify which numbered sense of "new" is used in the given sentence. Let me analyze the sentence and the definitions.

Sentence: "A test using <t>new</t> "genetic probes "showed that little Will Quinlan had not inherited a damaged retinoblastoma supressor gene and, therefore, faced no more risk than other children of developing the rare cancer."

The word "new" here modifies "genetic probes". Let me look at the context. The sentence is talking about a test using new genetic probes.

Let me examine each sense:

1. "not of long duration; having just (or relatively recently) come into being or been made or acquired or discovered" - examples: a new law
   - This could fit. The genetic probes could be recently developed or discovered.

2. "original and of a kind not seen before" - examples: the computer produced a completely novel proof
   - This suggests something completely novel/unique. While the probes might be novel, sense 1 seems more general for recently developed technology.

3. "lacking training or experience" - examples: the new men were eager to fight
   - This applies to people, not objects like genetic probes.

4. "having no previous example or precedent or parallel" - examples: a time of unexampled prosperity
   - This is similar to sense 2 but stronger. It suggests unprecedented.

5. "other than the former one(s); different" - examples: they now have a new leaders
   - This suggests replacement or change from previous ones. The sentence doesn't suggest these probes are replacing old ones, but rather that they are recently developed.

6. "unaffected by use or exposure" - examples: it looks like new
   - This refers to condition (unused), not the development of technology.

7. "(of a new kind or fashion) gratuitously new" - examples: newfangled ideas
   - This has a negative connotation of being unnecessarily new. The context doesn't suggest this.

8. "in use after medieval times" - examples: New Eqyptian was the language of the 18th to 21st dynasties
   - This is specific to historical periods.

9. "used of a living language; being the current stage in its development" - examples: Modern English
   - Specific to languages.

10. "(of crops) harvested at an early stage of development; before complete maturity" - examples: new potatoes
    - Specific to crops/food.

11. "unfamiliar" - examples: new experiences
    - While the probes might be unfamiliar to some, the primary meaning here is likely about them being recently developed.

Now, looking at the context: "A test using new 'genetic probes'..."
Genetic probes are a technology. When we say "new genetic probes" in a medical/scientific context, we typically mean probes that have been recently developed, made, or discovered.

Sense 1: "not of long duration; having just (or relatively recently) come into being or been made or acquired or discovered"
This fits best. The genetic probes are recently developed technology.

Sense 2: "original and of a kind not seen before" - this is possible, but "new" in scientific contexts usually means recently developed (sense 1) rather than necessarily being completely unprecedented (sense 2).

Sense 5: "other than the former one(s); different" - this could work if they replaced older probes, but the sentence doesn't emphasize replacement.

Sense 11: "unfamiliar" - possible, but less likely than sense 1.

The most common sense of "new" when describing technology or methods is sense 1: recently come into being or been made.

Let me double-check the example for sense 1: "a new law" - laws are created, they haven't existed for long.
For sense 2: "the computer produced a completely novel proof" - this emphasizes originality and uniqueness.

In the sentence, "new genetic probes" most likely refers to probes that were recently developed or discovered (sense 1), not necessarily that they are completely unprecedented or original in a way never seen before (though they might be), but simply that they are recent developments.

Actually, looking more carefully at sense 2: "original and of a kind not seen before" - the word "novel" is used in the definition. Genetic probes could be described as new in the sense of being a new type of technology.

But sense 1 is the most general and common meaning: "not of long duration; having just (or relatively recently) come into being or been made or acquired or discovered."

In WordNet or similar lexical databases, sense 1 is usually the most general sense of recent origin.

Let me think about the specific context. The sentence mentions "new genetic probes" as a testing method. This is likely referring to a recently developed technology.

Between sense 1 and sense 2:
- Sense 1 emphasizes recency in time (recently made/discovered)
- Sense 2 emphasizes novelty/uniqueness (never seen before)

Without more context suggesting these probes are completely unprecedented, sense 1 is safer. However, in scientific writing, "new" often implies both.

But looking at the example for sense 2: "the computer produced a completely novel proof of a well-known theorem" - this emphasizes something creative and original.

For sense 1: "a new law" - recently enacted.

Genetic probes that are "new" are likely recently developed (sense 1).

Wait, let me reconsider sense 5: "other than the former one(s); different" - "they now have a new leader"
This is about replacement.

Sense 11: "unfamiliar" - "new experiences"

I think sense 1 is the correct answer. The probes are new because they have recently been developed or discovered.

Actually, looking at the exact wording again: "A test using new 'genetic probes'..."
This is describing the state of the probes - they are recently developed.

Yes, sense 1.

But let me also consider if it could be sense 2. If the genetic probes are a new invention, sense 2 could apply. However, sense 1 is the broader category that includes recently invented things.

Actually, looking at standard dictionary sense ordering, sense 1 is almost always the "recently made/created" sense.

Let me verify by looking at the definitions more carefully:
1. not of long duration; having just (or relatively recently) come into being or been made or acquired or discovered
2. original and of a kind not seen before

The key difference is that sense 2 requires the thing to be unprecedented/original, while sense 1 just requires it to be recent.

"New genetic probes" - genetic probes have existed for a while. These specific ones might be recently developed versions. So sense 1 fits better than sense 2, unless the context suggests these are a completely novel type of probe never seen before.

Given the context is about a specific medical test, and it mentions "new genetic probes" without emphasizing their unprecedented nature, sense 1 is most appropriate.

Therefore, the answer is 1.


[User]
Which numbered sense of "genetic" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: A test using new "<t>genetic</t> probes "showed that little Will Quinlan had not inherited a damaged retinoblastoma supressor gene and, therefore, faced no more risk than other children of developing the rare cancer.

Senses:
1. definition=occurring among members of a family usually by heredity | examples=an inherited disease
2. definition=of or relating to or produced by or being a gene | examples=genic combinations
3. definition=pertaining to or referring to origin | examples=genetic history reconstructs the origins of a literary work
4. definition=of or relating to the science of genetics | examples=genetic research

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to identify which numbered sense of "genetic" is used in the given sentence.

The sentence is: "A test using new "<t>genetic</t> probes "showed that little Will Quinlan had not inherited a damaged retinoblastoma supressor gene and, therefore, faced no more risk than other children of developing the rare cancer."

Let me analyze the context:
- The sentence mentions "genetic probes"
- These probes are used to test for a specific gene (retinoblastoma suppressor gene)
- The test determines whether the gene was inherited
- "Genetic probes" are tools used in molecular biology to detect specific DNA sequences

Now let's look at the senses:

1. "occurring among members of a family usually by heredity" - This refers to inherited traits/diseases. While the sentence mentions inheritance, "genetic probes" themselves are not defined as "occurring among members of a family."

2. "of or relating to or produced by or being a gene" - This seems relevant. Genetic probes are related to genes - they are used to detect specific genes or DNA sequences.

3. "pertaining to or referring to origin" - This is more about origins/etymology, not biological genes.

4. "of or relating to the science of genetics" - This could also fit, as genetic probes are used in genetics research/testing.

Let me think more carefully. "Genetic probes" are typically DNA or RNA sequences used to detect complementary sequences in DNA samples. They are literally related to genes - they are pieces of genetic material used to find other genetic material.

Sense 2 says "of or relating to or produced by or being a gene" - genetic probes are related to genes, yes.

Sense 4 says "of or relating to the science of genetics" - this is also true.

But which is more specific and accurate?

"Genetic probe" is a technical term. A genetic probe is a fragment of DNA or RNA used to detect specific nucleic acid sequences. It is "of or relating to genes" - it's literally made of genetic material (DNA/RNA).

Looking at the examples:
- Sense 2 example: "genic combinations" - note "genic" is related to gene
- Sense 4 example: "genetic research" - relating to the field of genetics

"Genetic probes" are specifically molecules (DNA/RNA) that are related to genes. They are used to detect genes. So sense 2 seems most appropriate: "of or relating to or produced by or being a gene."

Actually, let me reconsider. In the context of WordNet or similar lexical databases (which this format resembles), "genetic" sense 2 often refers to things pertaining to genes specifically, while sense 4 refers to the broader field of genetics.

"Genetic probe" is a term where "genetic" modifies "probe" to indicate that the probe is used to detect genetic material/genes. So it's "relating to genes."

But wait, looking at the sentence again: "genetic probes" are used to test for a specific gene. This is definitely biological.

Let me check if there's a standard dictionary definition alignment. In many dictionaries:
- Sense 1: hereditary/familial
- Sense 2: relating to genes (molecular level)
- Sense 3: relating to origin (etymological)
- Sense 4: relating to genetics (the science)

"Genetic probe" most closely aligns with sense 2 (relating to genes) or sense 4 (relating to genetics).

However, "genetic material" relates to genes (sense 2). "Genetic testing" could relate to the science (sense 4) or to genes (sense 2).

But looking at the specific wording:
- Sense 2: "of or relating to or produced by or being a gene"
- Sense 4: "of or relating to the science of genetics"

A "genetic probe" is a tool used in genetics (the science), but it is also literally a piece of genetic material (relating to genes).

I think the key is that "genetic" in "genetic probe" refers to the fact that these probes detect genes. They are probes for genes. So sense 2.

But let me double-check by considering the other senses to make sure I'm not missing something:
- Sense 1: This would be like "genetic disease" meaning inherited disease. But "genetic probes" aren't inherited.
- Sense 3: This would be like "genetic history" of a word or concept. Not relevant here.

So it's between 2 and 4.

In many lexical databases (like WordNet), "genetic" sense 2 is the "gene" sense, and sense 4 is the "genetics" sense.

"Genetic probe" - is this more about the science or about the gene itself?

Actually, looking at the example for sense 2: "genic combinations" - "genic" is an adjective form specifically meaning "relating to genes."

And for sense 4: "genetic research" - research in the field of genetics.

"Genetic probes" are used in genetic research, but they are also literally genetic material. However, the term emphasizes their use in the study of genes.

I think sense 2 is the best fit because "genetic probe" specifically means a probe (made of DNA/RNA) that hybridizes with target genetic sequences. It is defined by its relationship to genes.

Wait, I should consider: is this from WordNet? The format looks like WordNet.

In WordNet 3.0 or similar:
- genetic#1: occurring among members of a family usually by heredity; "an inherited disease"
- genetic#2: of or relating to or produced by or being a gene; "genic combinations"
- genetic#3: pertaining to or referring to origin; "genetic history..."
- genetic#4: of or relating to the science of genetics; "genetic research"

Given that "genetic probes" are tools for detecting genes, and the sentence is talking about testing for a specific gene (retinoblastoma suppressor gene), sense 2 seems correct.

But I want to be careful. Could it be sense 4? "Genetic testing" is often categorized under the science of genetics.

However, "genetic probe" as a compound noun specifically refers to DNA probes - probes made of genetic material. So "genetic" here means "relating to genes."

I think the answer is 2.

Let me verify by searching my internal knowledge about how these senses are distinguished. Sense 2 is the "gene" sense (molecular biology level), while sense 4 is the "genetics" sense (field of study).

"Genetic probe" = DNA probe = relates to genes (sense 2).

Yes, I'll go with 2.


[User]
Which numbered sense of "show" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: A test using new "genetic probes "<t>showed</t> that little Will Quinlan had not inherited a damaged retinoblastoma supressor gene and, therefore, faced no more risk than other children of developing the rare cancer.

Senses:
1. definition=give an exhibition of to an interested audience | examples=She shows her dogs frequently
2. definition=establish the validity of something, as by an example, explanation or experiment | examples=The experiment demonstrated the instability of the compound
3. definition=provide evidence for | examples=The blood test showed that he was the father
4. definition=make visible or noticeable | examples=She showed her talent for cooking
5. definition=show in, or as in, a picture | examples=This scene depicts country life
6. definition=give expression to | examples=She showed her disappointment
7. definition=indicate a place, direction, person, or thing; either spatially or figuratively | examples=I showed the customer the glove section
8. definition=be or become visible or noticeable | examples=His good upbringing really shows
9. definition=indicate a certain reading; of gauges and instruments | examples=The thermometer showed thirteen degrees below zero
10. definition=give evidence of, as of records | examples=The diary shows his distress that evening
11. definition=take (someone) to their seats, as in theaters or auditoriums | examples=The usher showed us to our seats
12. definition=finish third or better in a horse or dog race | examples=he bet $2 on number six to show

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to identify which numbered sense of "show" is used in the given sentence.

Let me analyze the sentence:
"A test using new 'genetic probes' <t>showed</t> that little Will Quinlan had not inherited a damaged retinoblastoma supressor gene and, therefore, faced no more risk than other children of developing the rare cancer."

The word "showed" here means that the test provided evidence or proved that something was the case (that Will Quinlan had not inherited the damaged gene).

Now let me look at the definitions:

1. give an exhibition of to an interested audience - This is about displaying something physically, like showing dogs. Not this one.

2. establish the validity of something, as by an example, explanation or experiment - This is close. It mentions establishing validity through experiment.

3. provide evidence for - This looks very promising. The test provided evidence that he didn't have the gene. The example given is "The blood test showed that he was the father" which is very similar to our sentence about a test showing genetic information.

4. make visible or noticeable - This is about displaying or revealing something visually or obviously. Not quite right.

5. show in, or as in, a picture - This is about depicting. Not this one.

6. give expression to - This is about expressing emotions. Not this one.

7. indicate a place, direction, person, or thing - This is about pointing out or showing someone where something is. Not this one.

8. be or become visible or noticeable - This is an intransitive use meaning something becomes apparent. The sentence uses "showed" transitively with a that-clause.

9. indicate a certain reading; of gauges and instruments - This is about meters and gauges showing specific readings. While a test is involved, this is more about numerical readings from instruments.

10. give evidence of, as of records - This is about records showing something. The example is "The diary shows his distress". This is close, but our sentence is about a test providing evidence.

11. take (someone) to their seats - Not relevant.

12. finish third or better in a horse or dog race - Not relevant.

Between senses 2, 3, and 10:

Sense 2: "establish the validity of something, as by an example, explanation or experiment" - The test is an experiment that established the validity of the claim that he didn't have the gene.

Sense 3: "provide evidence for" - The test provided evidence that he didn't have the gene. Example: "The blood test showed that he was the father"

Sense 10: "give evidence of, as of records" - This seems more about the subject being the thing that contains the evidence (like a diary showing distress), whereas in our sentence, the test is actively revealing/proving something.

Looking at the example for sense 3: "The blood test showed that he was the father" - this is almost exactly parallel to our sentence where a test showed genetic information.

Sense 2 focuses more on demonstrating or proving through experiment, while sense 3 focuses on providing evidence.

In the sentence, "A test... showed that..." - this is clearly about providing evidence or proof of a genetic condition. The example under sense 3 ("The blood test showed that he was the father") is extremely similar to our sentence structure and context.

Actually, let me reconsider sense 2 vs sense 3 more carefully.

Sense 2: establish the validity of something, as by an example, explanation or experiment | examples=The experiment demonstrated the instability of the compound

Sense 3: provide evidence for | examples=The blood test showed that he was the father

Sense 10: give evidence of, as of records | examples=The diary shows his distress that evening

The sentence says the test "showed" that something was true (that he had not inherited the gene). This is about providing evidence or proof.

Sense 3's example "The blood test showed that he was the father" is almost identical in structure and meaning to our sentence. Both involve medical/genetic tests proving/showing a biological fact.

Sense 2 is more about demonstrating how something works or proving a theory (like demonstrating instability).

Sense 10 is more about inanimate objects or records containing evidence that can be read.

Therefore, sense 3 is the best fit.

Wait, let me double-check sense 9 too: "indicate a certain reading; of gauges and instruments | examples=The thermometer showed thirteen degrees below zero"

Is a genetic test showing a result similar to a thermometer showing a temperature? Maybe. But the example under sense 3 is explicitly about a blood test showing paternity, which is much closer to our example of a genetic test showing inheritance patterns.

The key difference is that sense 9 is about indicating specific numerical readings or measurements from instruments, while sense 3 is about providing evidence for a conclusion or fact.

Our sentence is about proving a negative (had not inherited) and establishing a risk level - this is providing evidence for a medical/genetic conclusion, not just displaying a numerical reading.

Therefore, the answer should be 3.

provider: Moonshot AI


[User]
Which numbered sense of "little" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: A test using new "genetic probes "showed that <t>little</t> Will Quinlan had not inherited a damaged retinoblastoma supressor gene and, therefore, faced no more risk than other children of developing the rare cancer.

Senses:
1. definition=limited or below average in number or quantity or magnitude or extent | examples=a little dining room
2. definition=(quantifier used with mass nouns) small in quantity or degree; not much or almost none or (with `a') at least some | examples=little rain fell in May
3. definition=(of children and animals) young, immature | examples=what a big little boy you are
4. definition=(informal) small and of little importance | examples=a fiddling sum of money
5. definition=(of a voice) faint | examples=a little voice
6. definition=low in stature; not tall | examples=he was short and stocky
7. definition=lowercase | examples=little a
8. definition=small in a way that arouses feelings (of tenderness or its opposite depending on the context) | examples=a nice little job

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to identify which numbered sense of "little" is used in the given sentence. The word "little" is marked with <t></t> tags in the sentence.

Sentence: "A test using new "genetic probes "showed that <t>little</t> Will Quinlan had not inherited a damaged retinoblastoma supressor gene and, therefore, faced no more risk than other children of developing the rare cancer."

Looking at the context, "little Will Quinlan" refers to a child (Will Quinlan). The word "little" here is used to describe a young child.

Now let's look at the senses:

1. limited or below average in number or quantity or magnitude or extent - This refers to size/quantity, not age.
2. (quantifier used with mass nouns) small in quantity or degree - This refers to amount.
3. (of children and animals) young, immature - This fits! "little Will Quinlan" means young Will Quinlan.
4. (informal) small and of little importance - This refers to importance.
5. (of a voice) faint - This refers to sound/volume.
6. low in stature; not tall - This refers to height.
7. lowercase - This refers to letters.
8. small in a way that arouses feelings (of tenderness or its opposite depending on the context) - This could potentially fit as an affectionate term, but sense 3 is more specific to children being young.

The phrase "little Will Quinlan" clearly refers to Will Quinlan being a young child. The context mentions "inherited" and "other children", confirming that Will Quinlan is a child.

Sense 3 is "(of children and animals) young, immature" with the example "what a big little boy you are".

This matches perfectly.

Sense 8 could be tempting because it's about arousing feelings of tenderness, and "little" can be used affectionately, but the specific context here is about a child's medical condition (genetic testing), and "little" is being used to indicate he is a young child, not just small/tender.

Therefore, the answer is 3.

provider: DigitalOcean


[User]
Which numbered sense of "inherit" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: A test using new "genetic probes "showed that little Will Quinlan had not <t>inherited</t> a damaged retinoblastoma supressor gene and, therefore, faced no more risk than other children of developing the rare cancer.

Senses:
1. definition=obtain from someone after their death | examples=I inherited a castle from my French grandparents
2. definition=receive from a predecessor | examples=The new chairman inherited many problems from the previous chair
3. definition=receive by genetic transmission | examples=I inherited my good eyesight from my mother

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to identify which numbered sense of "inherit" is used in the given sentence.

Let me analyze the sentence:
"A test using new 'genetic probes' showed that little Will Quinlan had not <t>inherited</t> a damaged retinoblastoma supressor gene and, therefore, faced no more risk than other children of developing the rare cancer."

Key context clues:
- "genetic probes" - this refers to genetic testing
- "retinoblastoma supressor gene" - this is a specific gene
- The context is about genetic transmission from parents to children

Now let me look at the three senses:
1. obtain from someone after their death (e.g., inheriting property, money, etc.)
2. receive from a predecessor (e.g., inheriting problems, positions, etc.)
3. receive by genetic transmission (e.g., inheriting traits, genes from parents)

The sentence is clearly talking about inheriting a gene - genetic transmission from parents to child. This matches sense 3.

The answer should be: 3

provider: AtlasCloud


[User]
Which numbered sense of "damaged" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: A test using new "genetic probes "showed that little Will Quinlan had not inherited a <t>damaged</t> retinoblastoma supressor gene and, therefore, faced no more risk than other children of developing the rare cancer.

Senses:
1. definition=harmed or injured or spoiled | examples=I won't buy damaged goods
2. definition=being unjustly brought into disrepute | examples=a discredited politician

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to identify which numbered sense of "damaged" is used in the given sentence.

The sentence is: "A test using new 'genetic probes' showed that little Will Quinlan had not inherited a <t>damaged</t> retinoblastoma supressor gene and, therefore, faced no more risk than other children of developing the rare cancer."

The two senses provided are:
1. definition=harmed or injured or spoiled | examples=I won't buy damaged goods
2. definition=being unjustly brought into disrepute | examples=a discredited politician

Analyzing the sentence:
- The word "damaged" modifies "retinoblastoma supressor gene"
- In genetics/biology, a "damaged gene" refers to a gene that has been harmed, injured, altered in a negative way (mutated or defective)
- This fits sense 1: "harmed or injured or spoiled"
- Sense 2 refers to reputation, being discredited or brought into disrepute (like a damaged reputation), which doesn't fit a gene

Therefore, the correct sense is 1.

I need to return only the number.


[User]
Which numbered sense of "face" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: A test using new "genetic probes "showed that little Will Quinlan had not inherited a damaged retinoblastoma supressor gene and, therefore, <t>faced</t> no more risk than other children of developing the rare cancer.

Senses:
1. definition=deal with (something unpleasant) head on | examples=You must confront your problems
2. definition=oppose, as in hostility or a competition | examples=You must confront your opponent
3. definition=be oriented in a certain direction, often with respect to another reference point; be opposite to | examples=The house looks north
4. definition=be opposite | examples=the facing page
5. definition=turn so as to face; turn the face in a certain direction | examples=Turn and face your partner now
6. definition=present somebody with something, usually to accuse or criticize | examples=We confronted him with the evidence
7. definition=turn so as to expose the face | examples=face a playing card
8. definition=line the edge (of a garment) with a different material | examples=face the lapels of the jacket
9. definition=cover the front or surface of | examples=The building was faced with beautiful stones

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to identify which numbered sense of "face" is used in the given sentence. Let me analyze the sentence and the definitions.

Sentence: "A test using new 'genetic probes' showed that little Will Quinlan had not inherited a damaged retinoblastoma supressor gene and, therefore, <t>faced</t> no more risk than other children of developing the rare cancer."

The word "faced" here is used in the context of "faced no more risk". This means he was confronted with or had to deal with risk, or perhaps it's about being in a situation where risk is present.

Let me look at the definitions:

1. definition=deal with (something unpleasant) head on | examples=You must confront your problems
2. definition=oppose, as in hostility or a competition | examples=You must confront your opponent
3. definition=be oriented in a certain direction, often with respect to another reference point; be opposite to | examples=The house looks north
4. definition=be opposite | examples=the facing page
5. definition=turn so as to face; turn the face in a certain direction | examples=Turn and face your partner now
6. definition=present somebody with something, usually to accuse or criticize | examples=We confronted him with the evidence
7. definition=turn so as to expose the face | examples=face a playing card
8. definition=line the edge (of a garment) with a different material | examples=face the lapels of the jacket
9. definition=cover the front or surface of | examples=The building was faced with beautiful stones

Wait, looking at the sentence again: "faced no more risk"

This is similar to "face the risk" or "face danger" - meaning to be confronted with or to have to deal with.

Definition 1 says "deal with (something unpleasant) head on" - examples "You must confront your problems"

But in the sentence "faced no more risk", it's not necessarily about dealing with it head on, but rather being in the position of having that risk, or being confronted with that risk.

Actually, looking at definition 1: "deal with (something unpleasant) head on" - this is about actively confronting something.

But "faced no more risk" suggests a state of being exposed to or having the risk, or being confronted with the risk.

Let me think about the verb "face" in this context. "Face" can mean:
- To be turned toward
- To be opposite to
- To confront or deal with
- To have something in front of you or ahead of you

In "faced no more risk", it means he was not confronted with risk, or he did not have to face/encounter the risk.

Actually, looking at the definitions provided, definition 1 seems closest: "deal with (something unpleasant) head on"

But wait - "faced no more risk" is more about the state of being exposed to risk or having risk ahead of him.

Let me reconsider. The phrase "face risk" means to be in a situation where risk is present or imminent, or to confront the possibility of something bad happening.

Definition 1: "deal with (something unpleasant) head on"
Definition 2: "oppose, as in hostility or a competition"

Actually, looking at standard dictionary definitions of "face":
- To be positioned with the face toward
- To confront or meet
- To be confronted with

The phrase "face risk" or "face danger" typically means to be exposed to or confronted with risk/danger.

Looking at the definitions again:

1. deal with (something unpleasant) head on
2. oppose, as in hostility or a competition
3. be oriented in a certain direction, often with respect to another reference point; be opposite to
4. be opposite
5. turn so as to face; turn the face in a certain direction
6. present somebody with something, usually to accuse or criticize
7. turn so as to expose the face
8. line the edge (of a garment) with a different material
9. cover the front or surface of

Hmm, none of these seem to perfectly capture "be confronted with" or "have ahead of one" in the sense of future risk.

But definition 1 "deal with (something unpleasant) head on" is about confronting or dealing with problems.

Actually, looking at the example for definition 1: "You must confront your problems" - this suggests that sense 1 of "face" means to confront or deal with.

In the sentence "faced no more risk", it means he was not confronted with risk, or he did not have risk to deal with.

Wait, I need to be careful. The word is "faced" in "faced no more risk".

Let me look at this differently. In many dictionaries, "face" when used with abstract nouns like "risk", "danger", "problem" means to be confronted with or to have to deal with.

Definition 1 says "deal with (something unpleasant) head on" - this seems to fit best, even though the example uses "confront" as the gloss.

Actually, looking at the example sentence for definition 1: "You must confront your problems" - this is using "confront" as the verb in the example, but the definition is for "face".

Wait, I think I need to read these more carefully. These are senses of the word "face", so:

Sense 1: face = deal with (something unpleasant) head on
Example given: "You must confront your problems" - wait, that doesn't use the word "face".

Hmm, the examples might be illustrating the meaning, not necessarily using the target word. Or they might be using "confront" as a synonym.

Let me assume the definitions are:
1. To deal with or confront (something unpleasant) head on
2. To oppose in hostility or competition
3. To be oriented in a certain direction
4. To be opposite
5. To turn so as to face
6. To present somebody with something (to accuse or criticize)
7. To turn so as to expose the face
8. To line the edge of a garment
9. To cover the front or surface

In "faced no more risk", the meaning is about being confronted with or exposed to risk.

This is closest to sense 1: dealing with or confronting something unpleasant (risk is unpleasant).

But actually, looking at the specific phrase "face risk", it often means to be exposed to the possibility of something bad happening.

However, among the given options, sense 1 seems the most appropriate because:
- Risk is something unpleasant
- "Face" here means to be confronted with or have to deal with

But let me double-check. Could it be sense 3 or 4 about being opposite or oriented? No, that doesn't make sense with "risk".

Could it be sense 6? "present somebody with something" - no, the subject is the one facing the risk, not presenting it to someone else.

Sense 1 is the only one that makes sense with abstract concepts like "risk".

Actually, looking at WordNet or similar lexical databases, the sense of "face" meaning "deal with" or "confront" is a common sense.

The sentence says he "faced no more risk" - meaning he was not confronted with risk, or he did not have risk to deal with.

I think the answer is 1.

Wait, let me reconsider the exact wording. The definition says "deal with (something unpleasant) head on".

In the sentence, "faced no more risk" - is this about dealing with risk? Or is it about being in a situation where risk exists?

Actually, "face" in "face the risk" can mean:
1. To accept or deal with the unpleasant reality of risk
2. To be turned toward or confronted with risk

But looking at the specific definitions provided:

Definition 1: "deal with (something unpleasant) head on"
Definition 2: "oppose, as in hostility or a competition"

Definition 1 is the only one that fits abstract objects like "risk".

Actually, I should check if there's a sense about "being confronted with" or "having ahead of one."

Looking at the list again, I see that definition 3 is about orientation ("be oriented in a certain direction"), definition 4 is "be opposite", definition 5 is about turning.

None of these other definitions work with "risk" as the object.

Definition 6 is about presenting something to someone.
Definition 7 is about exposing the face of something.
Definition 8 is about garment lining.
Definition 9 is about covering a surface.

So only definition 1 or 2 could work with "risk", and definition 2 is about opposing in hostility or competition, which doesn't fit "risk" well.

Definition 1: "deal with (something unpleasant) head on" - risk is unpleasant, and facing risk means dealing with it or being confronted with it.

I think 1 is the answer.

But wait - I want to be very careful. Let me look at the example again for definition 1: "You must confront your problems"

The word "confront" is used in the example. This suggests that sense 1 of "face" is synonymous with "confront" in the sense of dealing with problems.

In the sentence "faced no more risk", this is indeed the sense - he did not have to confront or deal with risk.

Actually, looking at it again, "face" in this context might be intransitive or used with a preposition? No, it's transitive: "faced no more risk".

"He faced risk" = He was confronted with risk / He had risk to deal with.

Yes, sense 1.

But I want to check one more thing. Is there any chance this is sense 3 or 4? No, those are about physical orientation.

Is there any chance the answer is something else?

Let me think about the phrase "face the risk" in terms of WordNet.

In WordNet, "face" has several senses:
1. face, confront - deal with (something unpleasant) head on
2. confront, face, face up - present somebody with something, usually to accuse or criticize
3. front, look, face - be oriented in a certain direction
4. face - be opposite
5. face - turn so as to face; turn the face in a certain direction
6. confront, face - oppose, as in hostility or a competition
7. face - cover the front or surface of

Looking at these, sense 1 matches the definition given in the problem as sense 1.

Sense 6 in WordNet (oppose) matches sense 2 in the problem.

Sense 3 in WordNet (be oriented) matches sense 3 in the problem.

Sense 4 in WordNet (be opposite) matches sense 4 in the problem.

Sense 5 in WordNet (turn so as to face) matches sense 5 in the problem.

Sense 2 in WordNet (present somebody with something) matches sense 6 in the problem.

Sense 7 in WordNet (cover the front) matches sense 9 in the problem.

Sense 7 in the problem (turn so as to expose the face) might be a specific sense.
Sense 8 in the problem is about garments.

So the mapping seems clear.

In WordNet, the sentence "faced no more risk" would use sense 1: deal with (something unpleasant) head on.

The verb "face" in "face risk" means to be confronted with or to have to deal with.

Therefore, the answer is 1.

Actually, I want to double-check the exact wording of the sentence once more: "faced no more risk than other children"

This is saying he was in the same situation as other children regarding risk - he had the same amount of risk to deal with (which was none or minimal).

Actually, reading it carefully: "had not inherited... and, therefore, faced no more risk than other children"

This means because he didn't inherit the gene, he did not face (was not confronted with) any additional risk beyond what normal children face.

"Face" here means to be confronted with, to have ahead of one, to be in the position of dealing with.

This is sense 1.

I'm confident the answer is 1.


[User]
Which numbered sense of "more" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: A test using new "genetic probes "showed that little Will Quinlan had not inherited a damaged retinoblastoma supressor gene and, therefore, faced no <t>more</t> risk than other children of developing the rare cancer.

Senses:
1. definition=(comparative of `much' used with mass nouns) a quantifier meaning greater in size or amount or extent or degree | examples=more land
2. definition=(comparative of `many' used with count nouns) quantifier meaning greater in number | examples=a hall with more seats

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to identify which numbered sense of "more" is used in the given sentence.

The sentence is: "A test using new "genetic probes "showed that little Will Quinlan had not inherited a damaged retinoblastoma supressor gene and, therefore, faced no <t>more</t> risk than other children of developing the rare cancer."

The key phrase is "no more risk than other children".

Looking at the two senses:
1. Sense 1: comparative of `much' used with mass nouns - meaning greater in size or amount or extent or degree. Example: "more land"
2. Sense 2: comparative of `many' used with count nouns - meaning greater in number. Example: "a hall with more seats"

The word "risk" in the sentence is a mass noun (uncountable noun). We don't say "one risk, two risks" in this context (though "risk" can sometimes be countable in specific contexts, here it's referring to the degree/amount of risk, not the number of risks).

The structure "no more risk than" is comparing the amount/degree of risk, not the number of risks. This aligns with sense 1, which is used with mass nouns and refers to greater amount or extent.

Sense 2 is for count nouns (like "seats"), where we're talking about greater number.

Therefore, the correct answer is 1.


[User]
Which numbered sense of "risk" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: A test using new "genetic probes "showed that little Will Quinlan had not inherited a damaged retinoblastoma supressor gene and, therefore, faced no more <t>risk</t> than other children of developing the rare cancer.

Senses:
1. definition=a source of danger; a possibility of incurring loss or misfortune | examples=drinking alcohol is a health hazard
2. definition=a venture undertaken without regard to possible loss or injury | examples=he saw the rewards but not the risks of crime
3. definition=the probability of becoming infected given that exposure to an infectious agent has occurred
4. definition=the probability of being exposed to an infectious agent

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to identify which numbered sense of "risk" is used in the given sentence. Let me analyze the sentence and the definitions.

Sentence: "A test using new 'genetic probes' showed that little Will Quinlan had not inherited a damaged retinoblastoma supressor gene and, therefore, faced no more <t>risk</t> than other children of developing the rare cancer."

The sentence is saying that because Will didn't inherit the damaged gene, he doesn't face any more risk than other children of developing the cancer. This is talking about the probability or likelihood of developing the cancer.

Now let's look at the senses:

1. "a source of danger; a possibility of incurring loss or misfortune" - This seems like a general definition of risk as a hazard or danger. Example given is about drinking alcohol being a health hazard.

2. "a venture undertaken without regard to possible loss or injury" - This is about taking a risk, like engaging in risky behavior. Example mentions "rewards but not the risks of crime."

3. "the probability of becoming infected given that exposure to an infectious agent has occurred" - This is specifically about probability of infection/disease given exposure.

4. "the probability of being exposed to an infectious agent" - This is about probability of exposure.

Wait, the sentence is about developing cancer (a disease), not specifically about infectious agents. But looking at senses 3 and 4, they both mention "infectious agent" specifically.

Let me reconsider. The sentence mentions "risk... of developing the rare cancer." This is about the probability of developing a disease.

Sense 3 says "probability of becoming infected" - but cancer isn't typically described as an infection, though it is a disease.

Sense 1 says "a source of danger; a possibility of incurring loss or misfortune" - this could fit, as the risk here is the possibility of developing cancer.

But looking more carefully at the context: "faced no more risk than other children of developing the rare cancer" - this is comparing the probability/likelihood of developing the disease.

Actually, looking at standard WordNet or similar lexical databases (which this format resembles), sense 1 is usually the general "hazard" sense, sense 2 is the "venture" sense, and senses 3 and 4 are specific to epidemiology/infectious diseases.

However, the sentence is using "risk" in the sense of "the possibility of developing the disease" - which aligns most closely with sense 1: "a possibility of incurring loss or misfortune" or specifically the possibility of developing the disease.

But wait, sense 3 mentions "probability of becoming infected" - while the sentence mentions "developing" cancer. Cancer is not an infectious disease in the typical sense (though some cancers are caused by infectious agents, retinoblastoma is a genetic cancer).

Actually, looking at the definitions again:
- Sense 1: "a source of danger; a possibility of incurring loss or misfortune" - this is the general sense of risk as a hazard.
- Sense 2: "a venture undertaken..." - this is about risk-taking behavior.
- Sense 3: "the probability of becoming infected given that exposure..." - epidemiological sense.
- Sense 4: "the probability of being exposed..." - epidemiological sense.

The sentence is using "risk" to mean the probability/chance of developing the disease. In medical/epidemiological contexts, "risk" often means the probability of developing a condition.

But strictly speaking, based on the definitions provided:
- Sense 1 mentions "possibility" which is close to probability.
- Sense 3 mentions "probability" but specifically of "becoming infected."

The sentence mentions "developing the rare cancer" not "becoming infected."

However, in many lexical databases, sense 3 might be generalized to include developing diseases, not just infections, or there might be a broader sense.

Let me think about this differently. The word "risk" in the sentence is a noun referring to the chance/probability of something bad happening (developing cancer).

Sense 1: "a source of danger; a possibility of incurring loss or misfortune" - This defines risk as the danger itself or the possibility of misfortune. "He faced risk" = he faced danger/possibility of misfortune.

Sense 2: This is about a venture or undertaking.

Sense 3: This is specifically about probability of infection given exposure.

Sense 4: This is about probability of exposure.

Given that the sentence compares "risk... of developing the rare cancer" across different children, and it's about genetic predisposition to a disease, this is most similar to sense 3 in terms of meaning (probability of developing a disease), even though cancer isn't strictly an "infection."

But actually, looking at the exact wording, sense 3 specifies "infected" and "infectious agent." Cancer is not an infectious disease (usually), so sense 3 might not fit perfectly.

Sense 1 is the most general: "a possibility of incurring loss or misfortune" - developing cancer is certainly a misfortune, and the sentence is talking about the possibility of this happening.

But I need to be careful. In many standardized tests and lexical databases (like WordNet), the sense of "risk" when talking about the probability of disease is often sense 1, or sometimes a specific sense.

Wait, I should look at the pattern. The user is asking for a numbered sense. This looks like it could be from WordNet or a similar resource.

In WordNet 3.0, the senses of "risk" as a noun are:
1. hazard, jeopardy, peril, risk, endangerment -- (a source of danger; a possibility of incurring loss or misfortune; "drinking alcohol is a health hazard")
2. risk, peril, danger -- (a venture undertaken without regard to possible loss or injury; "he saw the rewards but not the risks of crime")
3. risk, risk of infection -- (the probability of becoming infected given that exposure to an infectious agent has occurred)
4. risk, risk of exposure -- (the probability of being exposed to an infectious agent)

Given these exact definitions, the sentence mentions "risk... of developing the rare cancer."

Cancer is not an infectious agent (in the context of retinoblastoma, which is genetic), so senses 3 and 4 which specifically mention "infectious agent" don't seem to fit.

Sense 2 is about a venture or undertaking, which doesn't fit.

Sense 1 is "a source of danger; a possibility of incurring loss or misfortune" - this seems to fit best. The risk here is the possibility of developing cancer (incurring misfortune).

However, there's a subtlety. In medical contexts, when we say "risk of developing cancer," we often mean the probability or likelihood. Sense 1 uses "possibility" which is somewhat different from "probability" but related.

But given the choices, and the fact that senses 3 and 4 are specifically about infectious agents and this is about genetic cancer, sense 1 is the only one that fits.

Wait, let me reconsider sense 3. Is it possible that in this specific lexical database, "risk" sense 3 is used for probability of disease in general, not just infectious disease? The definition says "becoming infected" which is very specific.

Actually, looking at the sentence again: "faced no more risk than other children of developing the rare cancer."

This is comparing the probability of developing the disease. In epidemiological and medical genetics contexts, this is technically "risk" in the sense of probability of disease occurrence.

But given the specific definitions provided:
- Sense 1: possibility of incurring loss or misfortune
- Sense 2: venture undertaken
- Sense 3: probability of becoming infected given exposure
- Sense 4: probability of being exposed

None of these perfectly capture "probability of developing genetic cancer." However, sense 1 is the most general and can encompass this meaning. The "possibility of incurring loss or misfortune" (developing cancer) fits.

But I should check if there's any other interpretation. Could this be sense 3, interpreting "developing" as analogous to "becoming infected"? In some broad sense, developing a disease is similar to becoming infected, but the definition specifically mentions "infectious agent" and "infected."

Retinoblastoma is a malignant tumor of the retina, caused by mutations in the RB1 tumor suppressor gene. It's not infectious.

Therefore, sense 3 and 4 are out because they refer specifically to infectious agents.

Sense 2 is out because it's not about a venture.

Sense 1 is the correct answer: "a source of danger; a possibility of incurring loss or misfortune."

The answer should be 1.

But wait, I want to double-check. Is there any chance this is from a specific dataset where sense 3 is broader? The examples given for sense 1 is "drinking alcohol is a health hazard" - this is similar to our sentence in that both are health-related risks.

Actually, looking at the example for sense 1: "drinking alcohol is a health hazard" - this treats risk as the hazard itself. But in our sentence, "faced no more risk" - this is facing the possibility of developing cancer.

I think 1 is still the best fit.

However, I recall that in some contexts, "risk" in medical probability contexts might be classified differently. But strictly based on the provided definitions:

Sense 1: possibility of incurring loss or misfortune - developing cancer is a misfortune, and he faces the possibility of it.
Sense 3: probability of becoming infected - cancer is not an infection.

So the answer is 1.

Let me reconsider one more time. The sentence says he "faced no more risk... of developing the rare cancer." This means he had no greater probability/chance of developing it than other children.

Sense 3 mentions "probability" which is the right concept, but restricts it to "becoming infected." If we ignore the "infected" part and focus on "probability of... given that exposure... has occurred" - in genetics, having the gene could be seen as "exposure" to the risk factor, and developing cancer is the outcome.

But the definition specifically says "infectious agent." I think I have to go with sense 1 as the intended answer, or possibly sense 3 if the system is using a loose interpretation.

Actually, looking at the WordNet definitions again, sense 3 is specifically:
S: (n) risk, risk of infection (the probability of becoming infected given that exposure to an infectious agent has occurred)

Sense 4 is:
S: (n) risk, risk of exposure (the probability of being exposed to an infectious agent)

These are very specific to infectious diseases.

Sense 1 is the general sense.

Given that retinoblastoma is genetic, not infectious, it must be sense 1.

Therefore, the answer is 1.


[User]
Which numbered sense of "other" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: A test using new "genetic probes "showed that little Will Quinlan had not inherited a damaged retinoblastoma supressor gene and, therefore, faced no more risk than <t>other</t> children of developing the rare cancer.

Senses:
1. definition=not the same one or ones already mentioned or implied; - the White Queen | examples=today isn't any other day
2. definition=recently past | examples=the other evening
3. definition=belonging to the distant past | examples=the early inhabitants of Europe
4. definition=very unusual; different in character or quality from the normal or expected; - Lance Morrow | examples=a strange, other dimension...where his powers seemed to fail

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to identify which numbered sense of "other" is used in the given sentence. Let me analyze the sentence and the definitions.

Sentence: "A test using new 'genetic probes' showed that little Will Quinlan had not inherited a damaged retinoblastoma supressor gene and, therefore, faced no more risk than <t>other</t> children of developing the rare cancer."

The word "other" here is modifying "children". It means children besides Will Quinlan - children not previously mentioned or implied in the specific context of the risk comparison.

Let me look at the senses:

1. "not the same one or ones already mentioned or implied" - examples: "today isn't any other day", "the White Queen" (wait, that example seems odd, but the definition fits)

   This seems to fit. "Other children" means children other than Will Quinlan (the one already mentioned).

2. "recently past" - examples: "the other evening"

   This doesn't fit. We're not talking about time here.

3. "belonging to the distant past" - examples: "the early inhabitants of Europe"

   This doesn't fit. The sentence is comparing risk among children, not talking about the past.

4. "very unusual; different in character or quality from the normal or expected" - examples: "a strange, other dimension"

   This doesn't fit. "Other children" here means the rest of the children, not unusual children.

So sense 1 is the correct answer. The word "other" is being used to refer to children who are not the one already mentioned (Will Quinlan).

The definition says "not the same one or ones already mentioned or implied" which matches perfectly - Will Quinlan is the one mentioned, and "other children" refers to children who are not him.

Therefore, the answer is 1.