[User]
Which numbered sense of "belief" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: And the reason we do not want to is that effective education would require us to relinquish some cherished metaphysical <t>beliefs</t> about human nature in general and the human nature of young people in particular, well as to violate some cherished vested interests.

Senses:
1. definition=any cognitive content held as true
2. definition=a vague idea in which some confidence is placed | examples=his impression of her was favorable

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to identify which numbered sense of "belief" is used in the given sentence. The sentence is:

"And the reason we do not want to is that effective education would require us to relinquish some cherished metaphysical <t>beliefs</t> about human nature in general and the human nature of young people in particular, well as to violate some cherished vested interests."

The two senses provided are:
1. definition=any cognitive content held as true
2. definition=a vague idea in which some confidence is placed | examples=his impression of her was favorable

Let me analyze the context of the word "beliefs" in this sentence.

The sentence talks about "metaphysical beliefs" about human nature. These are described as "cherished" and something people would need to "relinquish" for effective education.

Sense 1: "any cognitive content held as true" - This is a broad definition that covers convictions, principles, accepted truths, doctrines, etc. Metaphysical beliefs would fit here - they are cognitive contents (ideas, propositions) that are held as true by the believers.

Sense 2: "a vague idea in which some confidence is placed" - This seems to refer more to impressions, hunches, or vague notions. The example given is "his impression of her was favorable." This doesn't seem to fit with "metaphysical beliefs" which are typically more substantial than vague ideas - they are philosophical positions or convictions about the nature of reality/human nature.

Metaphysical beliefs are specific convictions or accepted truths about metaphysics (the fundamental nature of reality, existence, etc.). This aligns more with sense 1: cognitive content held as true.

Also, looking at the phrase "cherished metaphysical beliefs" - these are substantial convictions, not vague ideas.

Therefore, the answer should be 1.

provider: StreamLake


attempt_kind: initial

status: success

[User]
Which numbered sense of "young" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: And the reason we do not want to is that effective education would require us to relinquish some cherished metaphysical beliefs about human nature in general and the human nature of <t>young</t> people in particular, well as to violate some cherished vested interests.

Senses:
1. definition=(used of living things especially persons) in an early period of life or development or growth | examples=young people
2. definition=(of crops) harvested at an early stage of development; before complete maturity | examples=new potatoes
3. definition=suggestive of youth; vigorous and fresh | examples=he is young for his age
4. definition=being in its early stage | examples=a young industry
5. definition=not tried or tested by experience | examples=unseasoned artillery volunteers

finish_reason: stop

role: assistant

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to identify which sense of "young" is used in the given sentence.

 Let me analyze the sentence:
 "And the reason we do not want to is that effective education would require us to relinquish some cherished metaphysical beliefs about human nature in general and the human nature of <t>young</t> people in particular, well as to violate some cherished vested interests."

 The word "young" here modifies "people". It refers to persons in an early period of life.

 Now let's look at the senses:
 1. definition=(used of living things especially persons) in an early period of life or development or growth | examples=young people
 2. definition=(of crops) harvested at an early stage of development; before complete maturity | examples=new potatoes
 3. definition=suggestive of youth; vigorous and fresh | examples=he is young for his age
 4. definition=being in its early stage | examples=a young industry
 5. definition=not tried or tested by experience | examples=unseasoned artillery volunteers

 Sense 1 explicitly mentions "young people" as an example and defines it as used of living things especially persons in an early period of life. This matches perfectly with "young people" in the sentence.

 Sense 2 is about crops, not relevant.
 Sense 3 is about being suggestive of youth or vigorous, but the context here is about "young people" meaning people who are actually young in age, not just suggestive of youth.
 Sense 4 is about industries or things being in early stages, not people.
 Sense 5 is about lack of experience, not the age characteristic.

 The phrase "young people" clearly refers to people in an early period of life, which is sense 1.

 The answer should be: 1

format: unknown

native_finish_reason: stop

currency: USD


[User]
Which numbered sense of "people" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: And the reason we do not want to is that effective education would require us to relinquish some cherished metaphysical beliefs about human nature in general and the human nature of young <t>people</t> in particular, well as to violate some cherished vested interests.

Senses:
1. definition=(plural) any group of human beings (men or women or children) collectively | examples=old people
2. definition=the body of citizens of a state or country | examples=the Spanish people
3. definition=members of a family line | examples=his people have been farmers for generations
4. definition=the common people generally | examples=separate the warriors from the mass

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to identify which sense of the word "people" is used in the given sentence. The word is marked with <t></t> tags in the sentence.

Let me look at the sentence: "And the reason we do not want to is that effective education would require us to relinquish some cherished metaphysical beliefs about human nature in general and the human nature of young <t>people</t> in particular, well as to violate some cherished vested interests."

The phrase is "young people". This refers to young human beings collectively.

Now let me look at the senses:
1. definition=(plural) any group of human beings (men or women or children) collectively | examples=old people
2. definition=the body of citizens of a state or country | examples=the Spanish people
3. definition=members of a family line | examples=his people have been farmers for generations
4. definition=the common people generally | examples=separate the warriors from the mass

"Young people" means young human beings collectively. Looking at sense 1: "(plural) any group of human beings (men or women or children) collectively" with example "old people".

"Young people" fits sense 1 perfectly - it's a collective term for human beings (specifically young ones). The example "old people" is parallel to "young people" - both refer to groups of human beings defined by age.

Sense 2 refers to citizens of a state/country (e.g., "the French people").
Sense 3 refers to family members/ancestry (e.g., "his people").
Sense 4 refers to the common people/masses as opposed to elite or warriors.

"Young people" clearly matches sense 1.

The answer is 1.

provider: Moonshot AI


[User]
Which numbered sense of "violate" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: And the reason we do not want to is that effective education would require us to relinquish some cherished metaphysical beliefs about human nature in general and the human nature of young people in particular, well as to <t>violate</t> some cherished vested interests.

Senses:
1. definition=fail to agree with; be in violation of; as of rules or patterns | examples=This sentence violates the rules of syntax
2. definition=act in disregard of laws, rules, contracts, or promises | examples=offend all laws of humanity
3. definition=destroy | examples=Don't violate my garden
4. definition=violate the sacred character of a place or language | examples=desecrate a cemetery
5. definition=force (someone) to have sex against their will | examples=The woman was raped on her way home at night
6. definition=destroy and strip of its possession | examples=The soldiers raped the beautiful country

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to identify which numbered sense of "violate" is used in the given sentence.

 Sentence: "And the reason we do not want to is that effective education would require us to relinquish some cherished metaphysical beliefs about human nature in general and the human nature of young people in particular, well as to <t>violate</t> some cherished vested interests."

 Let me analyze the context:
 - The sentence is talking about effective education requiring us to do things we don't want to do
 - It mentions relinquishing metaphysical beliefs
 - It mentions violating "some cherished vested interests"

 Now let's look at the definitions:

 1. fail to agree with; be in violation of; as of rules or patterns | examples=This sentence violates the rules of syntax
    - This seems to be about breaking rules or not conforming to patterns.

 2. act in disregard of laws, rules, contracts, or promises | examples=offend all laws of humanity
    - This is about disregarding laws, rules, etc.

 3. destroy | examples=Don't violate my garden
    - Physical destruction.

 4. violate the sacred character of a place or language | examples=desecrate a cemetery
    - Desecration, profaning something sacred.

 5. force (someone) to have sex against their will | examples=The woman was raped on her way home at night
    - Sexual assault.

 6. destroy and strip of its possession | examples=The soldiers raped the beautiful country
    - This is about plundering, raping (in the sense of pillaging).

 Now, looking at the context: "violate some cherished vested interests"

 "Vested interests" refers to established rights or benefits. To violate vested interests would mean to infringe upon them, disregard them, or act against them.

 This seems closest to sense 2: "act in disregard of laws, rules, contracts, or promises" - though "vested interests" aren't exactly laws or rules, they are established rights.

 Or sense 1: "fail to agree with; be in violation of" - this could work too.

 But let's think more carefully. "Vested interests" are typically talked about being "violated" in the sense of being infringed upon or disregarded.

 Actually, looking at the definitions again:
 - Sense 1: fail to agree with; be in violation of (rules or patterns)
 - Sense 2: act in disregard of (laws, rules, contracts, or promises)

 The phrase "violated interests" is a common collocation where "violate" means to infringe upon or disregard someone's rights or interests. This aligns with sense 2 - acting in disregard of something (though interests aren't exactly laws/rules, they are similar to rights).

 Wait, let me reconsider. In many dictionaries, "violate" when used with "rights" or "interests" often falls under the general definition of breaking or disregarding rules/laws/rights.

 But looking at the specific options given:
 - Option 1 mentions "rules or patterns"
 - Option 2 mentions "laws, rules, contracts, or promises"

 "Vested interests" could be considered similar to rights or contracts/promises in a broad sense.

 However, I should look at whether there's a better fit. The sentence is saying that effective education would require violating vested interests - meaning going against these interests, infringing upon them.

 In many semantic datasets (like WordNet), "violate" + "interests" would map to the sense of infringing upon rights or acting against.

 But looking at the specific definitions provided:
 1. fail to agree with; be in violation of; as of rules or patterns
 2. act in disregard of laws, rules, contracts, or promises

 Actually, "vested interests" are not explicitly mentioned in either, but sense 2 seems broader in terms of social norms and established rights, while sense 1 seems more about technical violations (like syntax rules).

 Wait, I should check if "violate interests" is more like sense 1 or 2.

 Actually, looking at the example for sense 1: "This sentence violates the rules of syntax" - this is about non-conformance.
 Sense 2 example: "offend all laws of humanity" - this is about disregarding laws.

 "Vested interests" are established rights or benefits. To violate them is to infringe upon them. This is closer to sense 2 (disregarding rights/laws) than sense 1 (failing to agree with patterns).

 But actually, looking at standard WordNet senses (which this seems to be based on):
 - Sense 1: go against, as of rules and laws (e.g., "This sentence violates the rules of syntax")
 - Sense 2: commit a sin; violate a law of God or a moral law (often "offend")
 - Sense 3: treat irreverently or disrespectfully (desecrate)
 - Sense 4: assault sexually (rape)
 - Sense 5: destroy (ravage)

 Wait, the numbering here might be different. Let me look at the examples given in the question:

 1. fail to agree with; be in violation of; as of rules or patterns | examples=This sentence violates the rules of syntax
 2. act in disregard of laws, rules, contracts, or promises | examples=offend all laws of humanity
 3. destroy | examples=Don't violate my garden
 4. violate the sacred character of a place or language | examples=desecrate a cemetery
 5. force (someone) to have sex against their will | examples=The woman was raped on her way home at night
 6. destroy and strip of its possession | examples=The soldiers raped the beautiful country

 This looks like it might be from a specific lexical resource. The phrase "violate vested interests" typically means to infringe upon or act against those interests.

 Between sense 1 and 2:
 - Sense 1 seems more about technical non-conformance (syntax rules)
 - Sense 2 seems more about disregarding established norms, laws, or agreements

 "Vested interests" are similar to rights or established privileges. Violating them would be disregarding them or infringing upon them.

 I think sense 2 is the best fit: "act in disregard of laws, rules, contracts, or promises"

 Though "vested interests" aren't exactly laws, they are established rights, and violating them means acting in disregard of them.

 Actually, looking at the sentence again: "violate some cherished vested interests" - this is parallel to "relinquish some cherished metaphysical beliefs". Both are things that would be given up or gone against.

 In many contexts, "violate interests" is synonymous with "harm interests" or "go against interests", which could fit sense 1 (fail to agree with) or sense 2 (act in disregard of).

 But given that "vested interests" implies established rights or privileges, and the context is about social/political obstacles to education reform, sense 2 seems most appropriate - acting in disregard of established rights/interests.

 However, I should double-check if there's any other interpretation. Could it be sense 3 (destroy)? "Don't violate my garden" suggests physical damage. But "violate vested interests" doesn't mean destroy the interests, it means infringe upon them.

 Could it be sense 4 (desecrate)? No, that's about sacred things.
 Could it be sense 5 or 6? No, those are about sexual assault and plundering.

 So it's between 1 and 2.

 Looking at the example for sense 1: "This sentence violates the rules of syntax" - this is about a grammatical rule being broken.
 Looking at the example for sense 2: "offend all laws of humanity" - this is about moral/legal laws.

 "Vested interests" are more like established rights or privileges that certain groups have. Violating them is more like disregarding them (sense 2) than failing to conform to a pattern (sense 1).

 Actually, looking at WordNet or similar resources, the sense "violate" + "rights/interests" usually maps to the "infringe upon" sense, which is often grouped with disregarding laws/rules.

 I believe the answer is 2.

 Wait, let me reconsider the exact wording. The sentence says effective education would require us to "violate some cherished vested interests."

 In political/social discourse, when we say a policy would "violate vested interests," we mean it would go against the interests of those who have a stake in the current system, or infringe upon their established rights/privileges.

 This is definitely closest to sense 2.

 But I want to make sure about sense 1. Is there any way this is sense 1? "Fail to agree with... as of rules or patterns" - vested interests aren't really rules or patterns. They're stakes or rights.

 So sense 2 is correct: "act in disregard of laws, rules, contracts, or promises" - though "vested interests" aren't explicitly listed, they are treated similarly to rights or established privileges in this context.

 Actually, looking at the definition again: "act in disregard of laws, rules, contracts, or promises" - this is quite broad. Vested interests could be seen as implicit contracts or established rights.

 I think 2 is the answer.

 Let me verify by searching my internal knowledge of how "violate" is used with "interests". In phrases like "violate someone's interests" or "violate the interests of a group", it means to act against those interests, to harm them, or to infringe upon rights. This aligns with the "disregard" sense.

 Therefore, the answer should be 2.

provider: ModelRun


[User]
Which numbered sense of "belief" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: These <t>beliefs</t> so dominate our educational establishment, our media, our politicians, and even our parents that it seems almost blasphemous to challenge them.

Senses:
1. definition=any cognitive content held as true
2. definition=a vague idea in which some confidence is placed | examples=his impression of her was favorable

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to identify which numbered sense of "belief" is used in the given sentence.

The sentence is: "These <t>beliefs</t> so dominate our educational establishment, our media, our politicians, and even our parents that it seems almost blasphemous to challenge them."

The two senses provided are:
1. definition=any cognitive content held as true
2. definition=a vague idea in which some confidence is placed | examples=his impression of her was favorable

Let me analyze the context:
- The word "beliefs" is plural and refers to things that "dominate our educational establishment, our media, our politicians, and even our parents"
- These beliefs are described as being so dominant that "it seems almost blasphemous to challenge them"
- This suggests these are firmly held convictions, principles, or doctrines that are widely accepted within these institutions

Sense 1: "any cognitive content held as true" - This is the general, broad definition of belief as something accepted as true or real. This fits well with the context of beliefs dominating institutions and being challenging to question.

Sense 2: "a vague idea in which some confidence is placed" - This suggests something more tentative, vague, or impressionistic. The example given ("his impression of her was favorable") suggests something more like an impression or notion rather than a firmly held conviction.

In the sentence, "beliefs" refers to established convictions or principles that are deeply entrenched in institutions (educational establishment, media, politicians, parents). These are not "vague ideas" but rather specific convictions or doctrines that are held as true and are dominant enough that challenging them seems "blasphemous."

Therefore, Sense 1 is the correct answer. The beliefs referred to are cognitive content held as true (and strongly held, at that), not vague impressions.

The answer should be just the number: 1

provider: DeepInfra


[User]
Which numbered sense of "so" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: These beliefs <t>so</t> dominate our educational establishment, our media, our politicians, and even our parents that it seems almost blasphemous to challenge them.

Senses:
1. definition=to a very great extent or degree | examples=the idea is so obvious
2. definition=in a manner that facilitates | examples=he observed the snakes so he could describe their behavior
3. definition=in such a condition or manner, especially as expressed or implied | examples=They're happy and I hope they will remain so
4. definition=to a certain unspecified extent or degree | examples=I can only go so far with this student
5. definition=in the same way; also | examples=I was offended and so was he
6. definition=in the way indicated; ; ; (`thusly' is a nonstandard variant) | examples=hold the brush so
7. definition=(usually followed by `that') to an extent or degree as expressed | examples=he was so tired he could hardly stand
8. definition=subsequently or soon afterward (often used as sentence connectors) | examples=then he left
9. definition=(used to introduce a logical conclusion) from that fact or reason or as a result | examples=therefore X must be true
10. definition=in truth (often tends to intensify) | examples=they said the car would break down and indeed it did

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to identify which numbered sense of "so" is used in the given sentence.

 Sentence: "These beliefs <t>so</t> dominate our educational establishment, our media, our politicians, and even our parents that it seems almost blasphemous to challenge them."

 Let me analyze the sentence structure:
 - "These beliefs so dominate... that it seems almost blasphemous..."
 - This looks like the "so...that..." construction indicating degree or extent.
 - The word "so" here is modifying "dominate" (a verb), indicating to what extent the beliefs dominate.

 Now let's look at the options:

 1. "to a very great extent or degree" - examples: "the idea is so obvious"
    - This could fit. "So" here modifies "obvious" (adjective) or could modify verbs too.

 2. "in a manner that facilitates" - examples: "he observed the snakes so he could describe..."
    - This is "so that" meaning "in order that". But in our sentence, "so" comes before "dominate" and is followed later by "that", but the structure is "so dominate... that..." not "so [subject] could..."

 3. "in such a condition or manner..." - examples: "They're happy and I hope they will remain so"
    - This is using "so" as a pronoun substituting for a previously mentioned state.

 4. "to a certain unspecified extent or degree" - examples: "I can only go so far"
    - This is "so" meaning "to such an extent" but limited, often with "only" or indicating a limit.

 5. "in the same way; also" - examples: "I was offended and so was he"
    - This is the "also" meaning.

 6. "in the way indicated" - examples: "hold the brush so"
    - This is demonstrative "so" (like "thus").

 7. "(usually followed by `that') to an extent or degree as expressed" - examples: "he was so tired he could hardly stand"
    - This looks like the "so...that..." construction indicating result/extent. The example shows "so tired" (modifying adjective) followed by result clause.

 8. "subsequently or soon afterward" - examples: "then he left"
    - This is temporal "so" (rare in modern English, more like "then").

 9. "(used to introduce a logical conclusion)..." - examples: "therefore X must be true"
    - This is the conjunction "so" meaning "therefore".

 10. "in truth (often tends to intensify)" - examples: "they said the car would break down and indeed it did"
     - This seems like an archaic or dialectal use, or perhaps emphasizing "so" as in "so very tired"?

 Wait, looking at the sentence again: "These beliefs so dominate our educational establishment... that it seems almost blasphemous..."

 This is definitely the "so...that..." construction. The word "so" is modifying the verb "dominate" to indicate the degree/extent of the domination, and this leads to the result clause "that it seems almost blasphemous..."

 Now, is this sense 1 or sense 7?

 Sense 1: "to a very great extent or degree" - example "the idea is so obvious"
 Sense 7: "(usually followed by `that') to an extent or degree as expressed" - example "he was so tired he could hardly stand"

 The key difference is that sense 7 explicitly mentions being followed by "that" and expressing the extent/degree that leads to a result. The example "he was so tired he could hardly stand" shows the "so...that..." construction (with "that" optionally omitted or implied).

 In the given sentence, we have "so dominate... that..." which fits the pattern of sense 7: to an extent or degree as expressed (followed by "that").

 However, sense 1 could also apply as "to a very great extent" but sense 7 is more specific to the "so...that..." construction which is clearly present here.

 Let me check the exact wording of sense 7 again: "(usually followed by `that') to an extent or degree as expressed"

 And sense 1: "to a very great extent or degree"

 Actually, looking at the example for sense 1: "the idea is so obvious" - this could be standalone or followed by "that". But sense 7 specifically mentions the "that" construction.

 In many dictionaries, "so" meaning "to such a great extent" (intensifier) followed by "that" is a specific usage.

 But wait, looking at the example for sense 7: "he was so tired he could hardly stand" - here "so" modifies the adjective "tired".

 In our sentence, "so" modifies the verb "dominate".

 Let me reconsider sense 1: "to a very great extent or degree" - this can modify verbs, adjectives, or adverbs.

 Sense 7 seems to specifically refer to the correlative construction with "that".

 Actually, looking carefully at the definitions:
 - Sense 1: "to a very great extent or degree" - this is the general intensifier use.
 - Sense 7: "(usually followed by `that') to an extent or degree as expressed" - this specifically references the "so...that..." construction.

 The sentence clearly uses "so...that...", so sense 7 seems most appropriate.

 But let me double-check if there's any other possibility.

 Could it be sense 10? "in truth (often tends to intensify)" - no, that's not the meaning here.

 Sense 9? "therefore" - no, that's not it.

 Sense 4? "to a certain unspecified extent" - "I can only go so far" - this implies a limit, not the case here.

 So it's between 1 and 7.

 The example for 7 explicitly mentions the "that" construction: "he was so tired he could hardly stand" (where "that" is implicit or optional: "so tired that he could hardly stand").

 The sentence has: "so dominate... that..."

 Therefore, sense 7 is the best match.

 Wait, I should check if sense 1 could also cover this. The example "the idea is so obvious" doesn't show the "that" construction explicitly, though it could be implied. But sense 7 specifically calls out the "that" construction.

 In many dictionary sense listings for "so":
 - One sense is "to such a great extent" (intensifier) - often with "that"
 - Another specific sense might be the "so that" (in order that) - which is sense 2 here.

 But sense 7 is specifically: "(usually followed by `that') to an extent or degree as expressed"

 This matches perfectly: "so dominate... that it seems..."

 The number is 7.


[User]
Which numbered sense of "educational" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: These beliefs so dominate our <t>educational</t> establishment, our media, our politicians, and even our parents that it seems almost blasphemous to challenge them.

Senses:
1. definition=relating to the process of education | examples=educational psychology
2. definition=providing knowledge | examples=an educational film

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to identify which sense of "educational" is used in the given sentence. The sentence is: "These beliefs so dominate our <t>educational</t> establishment, our media, our politicians, and even our parents that it seems almost blasphemous to challenge them."

The two senses provided are:
1. relating to the process of education | examples=educational psychology
2. providing knowledge | examples=an educational film

Let me analyze the sentence. The phrase is "educational establishment".

"Educational establishment" refers to institutions or systems related to education - like schools, universities, the educational system as a whole. This is about the process/institution of education, not about something that provides knowledge in the sense of being instructive.

Sense 1: "relating to the process of education" - this fits "educational establishment" because an educational establishment is an institution involved in the process of education (schools, universities, etc.).

Sense 2: "providing knowledge" - this would fit something like "an educational film" or "an educational experience" where the thing itself teaches or provides knowledge. But "educational establishment" isn't describing something that provides knowledge in that sense; it's describing an establishment that is part of the education system.

So the answer should be 1.

Let me double-check:
- "Educational psychology" (example for sense 1) is psychology related to education as a process/field.
- "Educational establishment" is the establishment/system of education.
- "Educational film" (example for sense 2) is a film that educates/provides knowledge.

Yes, sense 1 is correct.


[User]
Which numbered sense of "establishment" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: These beliefs so dominate our educational <t>establishment</t>, our media, our politicians, and even our parents that it seems almost blasphemous to challenge them.

Senses:
1. definition=the act of forming or establishing something | examples=the constitution of a PTA group last year
2. definition=an organization founded and united for a specific purpose
3. definition=the persons (or committees or departments etc.) who make up a body for the purpose of administering something | examples=he claims that the present administration is corrupt
4. definition=a public or private structure (business or governmental or educational) including buildings and equipment for business or residence
5. definition=any large organization
6. definition=(ecology) the process by which a plant or animal becomes established in a new habitat
7. definition=the cognitive process of establishing a valid proof

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to identify which sense of "establishment" is used in the given sentence. Let me analyze the sentence and the definitions.

Sentence: "These beliefs so dominate our educational <t>establishment</t>, our media, our politicians, and even our parents that it seems almost blasphemous to challenge them."

The word "establishment" here is modified by "educational" and appears in a list with "our media, our politicians, and even our parents."

Let me look at each sense:

1. "the act of forming or establishing something" - This refers to the action/process of establishing, not a group of people or institution. The sentence is talking about something that can be "dominated" by beliefs, and is listed alongside "media" and "politicians" - so it's not referring to an act.

2. "an organization founded and united for a specific purpose" - This could fit, but let's look at others.

3. "the persons (or committees or departments etc.) who make up a body for the purpose of administering something" - This refers to the people who run/administer something. The example mentions "administration."

4. "a public or private structure (business or governmental or educational) including buildings and equipment for business or residence" - This refers to physical structures/buildings. But in the context, "educational establishment" alongside "media" and "politicians" suggests people or institutions, not physical buildings.

5. "any large organization" - This is a broad definition.

6. "(ecology) the process by which a plant or animal becomes established in a new habitat" - This is clearly ecological and doesn't fit.

7. "the cognitive process of establishing a valid proof" - This is about mental processes/proof, doesn't fit.

Now, looking at the context: "educational establishment" is parallel to "media" and "politicians."

"Politicians" are people.
"Media" can refer to the industry/institution or the people in it.

The phrase "educational establishment" here likely refers to the people or the system/administration running education.

Looking at sense 3: "the persons (or committees or departments etc.) who make up a body for the purpose of administering something" - this seems to fit well with the context of people who control/dominate the educational system.

Looking at sense 2: "an organization founded and united for a specific purpose" - this could also work, but sense 3 is more specific about the people/administrators.

Looking at sense 5: "any large organization" - too vague.

Wait, let me reconsider. In common usage, "the establishment" often refers to the ruling elite or the dominant group in society.

Sense 3 says: "the persons (or committees or departments etc.) who make up a body for the purpose of administering something" with an example about "administration."

But in the sentence, it's "educational establishment" - this could mean:
- The educational system as a whole (institution)
- The people running education
- The physical buildings (unlikely given context)

Given the parallel structure with "media" and "politicians" - these are all groups of people or institutions comprised of people who have influence.

Sense 2: "an organization founded and united for a specific purpose" - educational establishment as an organization.

Sense 3: "the persons... who make up a body for the purpose of administering something" - the administrators.

Let me check the examples provided for sense 3: "he claims that the present administration is corrupt" - this suggests sense 3 is about the administrative body/leadership.

In the sentence, "educational establishment" is likely referring to the educational system or the powers that be in education.

Actually, looking at the definitions again, sense 3 seems to be specifically about the people who administer something (like an administration).

Sense 2 is about an organization.

Sense 4 mentions "educational" specifically in the definition: "a public or private structure (business or governmental or educational) including buildings and equipment for business or residence" - but this refers to physical structures/buildings.

However, in the context of the sentence, "educational establishment" is grouped with abstract/conceptual entities that can be dominated by beliefs: "our educational establishment, our media, our politicians."

Wait, "media" could be physical (newspapers, TV stations) or abstract (the press as an institution).
"Politicians" are people.
"Parents" are people.

So "establishment" here is likely referring to people or the institution made up of people.

Between sense 2 (organization) and sense 3 (persons/administrators).

Sense 3 examples: "he claims that the present administration is corrupt" - this shows it's about the governing body.

But "educational establishment" in common parlance often refers to the institution of education or the system.

Let me look at sense 5: "any large organization" - this is very broad.

Actually, looking carefully at sense 4: "a public or private structure (business or governmental or educational) including buildings and equipment for business or residence"

The word "educational" appears in this definition. However, the definition emphasizes "structure... including buildings and equipment" - physical aspects.

But in the sentence, the context suggests that beliefs dominate these entities. Beliefs dominate people, media (institution), politicians (people). They don't dominate buildings in the sense of physical domination.

So sense 4 is unlikely.

Sense 3: "the persons (or committees or departments etc.) who make up a body for the purpose of administering something"

This fits because the educational establishment would be the people/committees running education, alongside politicians (people running government) and media (people/institutions running news).

Sense 2: "an organization founded and united for a specific purpose"

This is also plausible.

However, looking at the example for sense 3: "he claims that the present administration is corrupt" - the word "administration" here parallels "establishment."

Also, in WordNet or similar lexical databases, "establishment" sense 3 often corresponds to the people in charge.

Let me reconsider sense 4. Even though it mentions "educational," the definition focuses on physical structures. But sometimes "establishment" can mean an institution.

Actually, looking at the sentence structure again: "our educational establishment, our media, our politicians"

This looks like a list of powerful groups in society.

"The Establishment" with a capital E refers to the ruling class or dominant groups.

Sense 3 captures this best: "the persons (or committees or departments etc.) who make up a body for the purpose of administering something"

Sense 2 is "an organization" - more general.
Sense 3 is specifically about the governing/administering persons.

Given the context of domination by beliefs, and the parallel with politicians (who are people in power), sense 3 seems most appropriate.

However, I should double-check if there's a sense that fits "educational establishment" as an institution.

Sense 4 explicitly mentions "educational" in its definition: "a public or private structure (business or governmental or educational) including buildings and equipment for business or residence"

But as I noted, this seems physical.

Wait, looking at the definition of sense 4 again: "a public or private structure (business or governmental or educational) including buildings and equipment..."

Actually, in many dictionaries, sense 4 might be the right one if we interpret "structure" broadly, but the mention of "buildings and equipment" makes it seem physical.

Let me reconsider sense 2 vs 3.

Sense 2: organization
Sense 3: the persons/administrators

In the sentence "educational establishment," if we mean the school system as an institution, sense 2 might work.
If we mean the people running education, sense 3 works.

But looking at the example provided for sense 3: "he claims that the present administration is corrupt" - this suggests sense 3 is equivalent to "administration."

The sentence has "educational establishment" parallel to "politicians" and "media."

Politicians = people in government
Media = the press/journalists
Educational establishment = educators/administrators in education

This fits sense 3.

Sense 5: "any large organization" - too vague, and usually not the specific sense.

Actually, looking at standard WordNet senses for "establishment":

1. constitution, establishment, formation, organization, organisation - the act of forming or establishing something
2. institution, establishment - an organization founded and united for a specific purpose
3. administration, governance, governing body, establishment, brass, organization, organisation - the persons (or committees or departments etc.) who make up a body for the purpose of administering something
4. establishment - a public or private structure (business or governmental or educational) including buildings and equipment for business or residence
5. establishment - any large organization
6. establishment, ecesis - (ecology) the process by which a plant or animal becomes established in a new habitat
7. establishment, validation - the cognitive process of establishing a valid proof

Given that, and looking at the sentence: "These beliefs so dominate our educational establishment..."

If we look at sense 4: "a public or private structure (business or governmental or educational) including buildings and equipment..."

This explicitly mentions "educational" and is definition 4.

But does it fit the context? "Beliefs dominate our educational [buildings and equipment]"? That doesn't make sense. Beliefs dominate people or institutions (as entities), not physical buildings.

Sense 3: "the persons... who make up a body for the purpose of administering something" - "Beliefs dominate our educational [administrators/people in charge]" - this makes sense.

Sense 2: "an organization... - "Beliefs dominate our educational [organization]" - this also makes sense.

But between 2 and 3, which is better?

Sense 3 specifically captures the idea of the governing body, the people in charge. In the context of "the establishment" as a term for the powers that be, sense 3 is more accurate.

Also, looking at the list: "educational establishment, our media, our politicians"

Politicians are people.
Media refers to the institution or the people in it.
Educational establishment as "the persons who administer education" fits the pattern of powerful groups.

Therefore, sense 3 is the most likely answer.

Wait, I want to be careful. Let me check if sense 4 could be interpreted non-physically.

Definition 4: "a public or private structure (business or governmental or educational) including buildings and equipment for business or residence"

The phrase "including buildings and equipment" suggests it's primarily about the physical plant. So when they say "educational" here, they mean a school building or campus.

But in the sentence, "beliefs dominate our educational establishment" alongside "media" and "politicians" - this is clearly metaphorical or about institutional control, not physical domination of buildings.

So sense 4 is out.

Between sense 2 and 3:

Sense 2 is general: any organization founded for a purpose.
Sense 3 is specific: the administering/governing body.

"The educational establishment" is an idiom referring to the system and people in charge of education.

Sense 3's example is "administration" which is very close to how "establishment" is used here.

Therefore, the answer should be 3.

Let me double-check by searching my knowledge of how these senses are distinguished.

Sense 2 (institution/organization) examples: "a research institution", "the institution of marriage"
Sense 3 (administration) examples: "the Establishment" (ruling class), "the university administration"

In the given sentence, "educational establishment" is being used similarly to how one might say "the medical establishment" or "the political establishment" - referring to the people in power in that field.

This is sense 3.

The answer is 3.


[User]
Which numbered sense of "politician" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: These beliefs so dominate our educational establishment, our media, our <t>politicians</t>, and even our parents that it seems almost blasphemous to challenge them.

Senses:
1. definition=a leader engaged in civil administration
2. definition=a person active in party politics
3. definition=a schemer who tries to gain advantage in an organization in sly or underhanded ways

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to identify which sense of "politician" is used in the given sentence. Let me analyze the sentence and the three senses provided.

Sentence: "These beliefs so dominate our educational establishment, our media, our <t>politicians</t>, and even our parents that it seems almost blasphemous to challenge them."

The sentence is talking about "politicians" in the context of groups that dominate beliefs along with educational establishment, media, and parents. This seems to be referring to elected officials or people in government positions.

Let me look at the three senses:

1. "a leader engaged in civil administration" - This refers to people holding public office, government officials, elected representatives, etc.

2. "a person active in party politics" - This refers to someone involved in political party activities, campaigning, party organization, etc. This is broader than just holding office.

3. "a schemer who tries to gain advantage in an organization in sly or underhanded ways" - This is the pejorative sense, referring to someone manipulative and scheming.

In the given sentence, "politicians" is grouped with "educational establishment," "media," and "parents." This appears to be referring to public figures or people in positions of societal influence, specifically those in government or civil administration.

The context suggests these are people in public life who help shape or dominate beliefs - this would be elected officials or government leaders. This aligns most closely with sense 1: "a leader engaged in civil administration."

Sense 2 is possible but narrower - it emphasizes party politics specifically, whereas the sentence seems to be using "politicians" more broadly to mean those in government or public office.

Sense 3 is clearly not right because there's no indication of scheming or underhanded behavior in the sentence.

Actually, let me reconsider. The phrase "educational establishment, our media, our politicians" suggests institutions or groups in society. "Politicians" here likely means people holding political office or involved in governance.

Sense 1: "a leader engaged in civil administration" - this fits people in government, elected officials.
Sense 2: "a person active in party politics" - this is more about the activity of politics rather than the office.

In common usage, when we say "politicians dominate our beliefs" alongside media and educational establishment, we're talking about government officials, legislators, people in civil administration. This is sense 1.

Wait, I should think about this more carefully. The word "politician" can mean:
- Someone who holds political office (sense 1)
- Someone who is active in politics, including party officials, campaign workers, etc. (sense 2)
- Someone who is manipulative/scheming (sense 3)

The context "educational establishment, media, politicians" suggests a list of influential groups in society. "Politicians" here means people in government or elected officials. This is most consistent with sense 1.

However, I want to be careful. Let me think about whether sense 2 could fit. "A person active in party politics" - this would include party activists, operatives, etc. But in the context of dominating beliefs alongside the media and educational establishment, it seems more likely to refer to actual office holders or government leaders.

Actually, looking at standard dictionary definitions:
- Sense 1 is like "a person who is professionally involved in politics, especially as a holder of or a candidate for an elected office"
- Sense 2 is like "a person who is active in party politics"
- Sense 3 is the derogatory sense

The sentence is from a text (possibly about education or social issues) where the author is listing powerful groups: educational establishment, media, politicians, parents. "Politicians" here clearly means government officials or elected representatives.

I believe the answer is 1.

But let me double-check. Could it be sense 2? If the author meant party activists, that might fit, but "politicians" typically refers to office holders in such contexts. Also, "politicians" plural, grouped with "media" and "educational establishment" as institutions or professional groups.

Sense 1: "a leader engaged in civil administration" - yes, this fits elected officials and government administrators.
Sense 2: "a person active in party politics" - this is broader and includes people who aren't necessarily in government.

Given the parallel structure with "educational establishment" (institution) and "media" (institution/profession), "politicians" most likely refers to the profession of politics or those in political office - sense 1.

I think the answer is 1.


[User]
Which numbered sense of "even" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: These beliefs so dominate our educational establishment, our media, our politicians, and <t>even</t> our parents that it seems almost blasphemous to challenge them.

Senses:
1. definition=used as an intensive especially to indicate something unexpected | examples=even an idiot knows that
2. definition=in spite of; notwithstanding | examples=even when he is sick, he works
3. definition=to a greater degree or extent; used with comparisons | examples=looked sick and felt even worse
4. definition=to the full extent | examples=loyal even unto death

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to identify which sense of the word "even" is used in the given sentence. The word "even" is marked with <t></t> tags in the sentence.

Sentence: "These beliefs so dominate our educational establishment, our media, our politicians, and <t>even</t> our parents that it seems almost blasphemous to challenge them."

Let me analyze the sentence structure:
- The sentence is saying that beliefs dominate various groups: educational establishment, media, politicians, and parents.
- The word "even" is used before "our parents" to add emphasis.
- It suggests that it's surprising or notable that parents are also dominated by these beliefs, perhaps implying that parents might be expected to think differently or be an exception.

Now let's look at the senses:

1. "used as an intensive especially to indicate something unexpected" - examples: "even an idiot knows that"
   - This seems to fit. The use of "even" before "our parents" suggests that it's unexpected or notable that parents are included in this list of dominated groups. It emphasizes that the domination extends to parents as well, which might be surprising.

2. "in spite of; notwithstanding" - examples: "even when he is sick, he works"
   - This would be used to indicate a contrast or concession. The sentence isn't saying "in spite of our parents" or indicating a contrast with parents. It's adding parents to a list.

3. "to a greater degree or extent; used with comparisons" - examples: "looked sick and felt even worse"
   - This is used for comparative degree. There's no comparison here like "even more" or "even worse." It's just "even our parents."

4. "to the full extent" - examples: "loyal even unto death"
   - This is archaic or formal usage meaning "up to" or "unto." Not applicable here.

Looking at the context:
"These beliefs so dominate our educational establishment, our media, our politicians, and even our parents..."

The word "even" is emphasizing that the domination extends to parents, perhaps suggesting that parents are the last group one would expect to be dominated by these beliefs, or that the domination is so pervasive it reaches parents too.

This matches sense 1: "used as an intensive especially to indicate something unexpected."

The structure "and even X" typically means "and also X, which is surprising or notable."

So the answer should be 1.

provider: AtlasCloud


[User]
Which numbered sense of "parent" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: These beliefs so dominate our educational establishment, our media, our politicians, and even our <t>parents</t> that it seems almost blasphemous to challenge them.

Senses:
1. definition=a father or mother; one who begets or one who gives birth to or nurtures and raises a child; a relative who plays the role of guardian
2. definition=an organism (plant or animal) from which younger ones are obtained

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to identify which numbered sense of "parent" is used in the given sentence.

Sentence: "These beliefs so dominate our educational establishment, our media, our politicians, and even our <t>parents</t> that it seems almost blasphemous to challenge them."

Senses:
1. definition=a father or mother; one who begets or one who gives birth to or nurtures and raises a child; a relative who plays the role of guardian
2. definition=an organism (plant or animal) from which younger ones are obtained

Looking at the context:
- The sentence mentions "educational establishment", "media", "politicians", and "parents"
- These are all groups of people/institutions that influence society/education
- "Parents" here refers to human parents (fathers and mothers) who influence beliefs in society

Sense 1 refers to human parents (father or mother).
Sense 2 refers to biological organisms in a biological/technical context.

Given that "parents" is listed alongside "politicians", "media", and "educational establishment" as groups in society that hold beliefs, this clearly refers to human parents (sense 1), not biological organisms (sense 2).

Therefore, the answer is 1.

provider: DigitalOcean


[User]
Which numbered sense of "seem" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: These beliefs so dominate our educational establishment, our media, our politicians, and even our parents that it <t>seems</t> almost blasphemous to challenge them.

Senses:
1. definition=give a certain impression or have a certain outward aspect | examples=She seems to be sleeping
2. definition=seem to be true, probable, or apparent | examples=It seems that he is very gifted
3. definition=appear to exist | examples=There seems no reason to go ahead with the project now
4. definition=appear to one's own mind or opinion | examples=I seem to be misunderstood by everyone

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to identify which numbered sense of "seem" is used in the given sentence. Let me analyze the sentence and the definitions.

 Sentence: "These beliefs so dominate our educational establishment, our media, our politicians, and even our parents that it <t>seems</t> almost blasphemous to challenge them."

 The structure here is: "it seems [adjective phrase] to [verb]" or more specifically "it seems almost blasphemous to challenge them."

 Let me look at the senses:

 1. "give a certain impression or have a certain outward aspect" - Example: "She seems to be sleeping"
    - This is about outward appearance or impression of a subject. The structure is typically "[Subject] seems [to be/to do something]".

 2. "seem to be true, probable, or apparent" - Example: "It seems that he is very gifted"
    - This uses the impersonal "it" construction: "It seems that..." or "It seems [adjective]" indicating that something appears to be true or probable.

 3. "appear to exist" - Example: "There seems no reason to go ahead with the project now"
    - This is the "there seems" construction indicating existence.

 4. "appear to one's own mind or opinion" - Example: "I seem to be misunderstood by everyone"
    - This is about personal perception, usually with first person subjects.

 In the target sentence: "it seems almost blasphemous to challenge them"

 This is using the impersonal "it" construction where "it" is a dummy subject. The meaning is that it appears/probable/true that challenging these beliefs is almost blasphemous.

 This matches sense 2: "seem to be true, probable, or apparent" with the example "It seems that he is very gifted" (similar structure with impersonal "it").

 Sense 1 would be more like "He seems blasphemous" (describing the outward aspect of a person).

 Sense 3 would be "There seems no reason..." (existential).

 Sense 4 would be "I seem to be..." (personal opinion/perception).

 Therefore, the answer is 2.


[User]
Which numbered sense of "blasphemous" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: These beliefs so dominate our educational establishment, our media, our politicians, and even our parents that it seems almost <t>blasphemous</t> to challenge them.

Senses:
1. definition=grossly irreverent toward what is held to be sacred | examples=blasphemous rites of a witches' Sabbath
2. definition=characterized by profanity or cursing | examples=foul-mouthed and blasphemous

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to identify which sense of "blasphemous" is used in the given sentence. Let me analyze the sentence and the two definitions provided.

Sentence: "These beliefs so dominate our educational establishment, our media, our politicians, and even our parents that it seems almost <t>blasphemous</t> to challenge them."

Key context: The sentence is talking about challenging widely held beliefs that dominate various institutions. The word "blasphemous" here is used metaphorically to describe the act of challenging these entrenched beliefs.

Now let's look at the two senses:

Sense 1: "grossly irreverent toward what is held to be sacred"
- Examples: "blasphemous rites of a witches' Sabbath"
- This refers to being disrespectful toward sacred or holy things, or things treated as sacred/untouchable

Sense 2: "characterized by profanity or cursing"
- Examples: "foul-mouthed and blasphemous"
- This refers to using curse words, swearing, or profane language

In the sentence, "blasphemous" is describing the act of challenging dominant beliefs. It's not about using curse words or foul language. Rather, it's about treating those dominant beliefs as if they were sacred/untouchable, and therefore challenging them would be seen as irreverent or sacrilegious.

The context suggests that these beliefs are treated as "sacred" in a metaphorical sense - they are so dominant and unquestioned that challenging them feels like committing blasphemy (i.e., being irreverent toward something held sacred).

Therefore, Sense 1 is the correct answer. The word is being used to mean showing irreverence toward something treated as sacred (the dominant beliefs), not using profanity or cursing.

Wait, let me double-check. The sentence says "it seems almost blasphemous to challenge them" - meaning that challenging these dominant beliefs is treated as if it were an act of sacrilege against something holy or sacred. This fits Sense 1: "grossly irreverent toward what is held to be sacred."

Sense 2 is about cursing and foul language, which doesn't fit the context of challenging beliefs in an educational/political context.

So the answer is 1.


[User]
Which numbered sense of "challenge" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: These beliefs so dominate our educational establishment, our media, our politicians, and even our parents that it seems almost blasphemous to <t>challenge</t> them.

Senses:
1. definition=take exception to | examples=She challenged his claims
2. definition=issue a challenge to | examples=Fischer challenged Spassky to a match
3. definition=ask for identification | examples=The illegal immigrant was challenged by the border guard
4. definition=raise a formal objection in a court of law

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to identify which numbered sense of "challenge" is used in the given sentence.

 Sentence: "These beliefs so dominate our educational establishment, our media, our politicians, and even our parents that it seems almost blasphemous to <t>challenge</t> them."

 The word "challenge" here is used in the context of questioning or disputing beliefs that dominate various institutions.

 Let's look at the senses:
 1. definition=take exception to | examples=She challenged his claims
 2. definition=issue a challenge to | examples=Fischer challenged Spassky to a match
 3. definition=ask for identification | examples=The illegal immigrant was challenged by the border guard
 4. definition=raise a formal objection in a court of law

 In the sentence, "challenge" means to question, dispute, or take exception to the beliefs. This matches sense 1: "take exception to" with the example "She challenged his claims."

 Sense 2 is about inviting someone to a competition or duel.
 Sense 3 is about asking for ID (like challenging someone to prove who they are).
 Sense 4 is a specific legal usage.

 The sentence is talking about challenging (questioning/disputing) dominant beliefs, which fits sense 1.

 So the answer should be: 1


[User]
Which numbered sense of "here" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: <t>Here</t> is an example.

Senses:
1. definition=in or at this place; where the speaker or writer is | examples=I work here
2. definition=in this circumstance or respect or on this point or detail | examples=what do we have here?
3. definition=to this place (especially toward the speaker) | examples=come here, please
4. definition=at this time; now | examples=we'll adjourn here for lunch and discuss the remaining issues this afternoon

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to identify which numbered sense of "here" is used in the sentence "Here is an example."

Let me analyze the sentence: "Here is an example."

In this sentence, "here" is being used to present something, to indicate that what follows (an example) is being given at this point in the discourse. It's similar to saying "This is an example" or "In this place/context, I provide an example."

Looking at the options:
1. "in or at this place; where the speaker or writer is" - This refers to physical location. While "Here is..." can indicate physical presence (like pointing to something), in the context of "Here is an example," it's often used discourse-deictically to indicate the current point in speech/writing.

2. "in this circumstance or respect or on this point or detail" - This seems like it could fit for discourse uses where "here" refers to the current point or detail being discussed.

3. "to this place (especially toward the speaker)" - This implies movement toward the speaker (directional), which doesn't fit.

4. "at this time; now" - This refers to temporal use, like "Here we go" meaning now we start.

Actually, looking at standard dictionary definitions, "Here is..." when introducing something (like "Here is an example") is typically considered a demonstrative use that can fall under sense 1 (place/position) or sometimes sense 2 (circumstance/point).

But let me think about the specific examples given:
- Sense 1: "I work here" - clearly physical location
- Sense 2: "what do we have here?" - could be physical or metaphorical
- Sense 3: "come here" - directional movement
- Sense 4: "we'll adjourn here" - temporal (though could be place too)

Wait, "Here is an example" - is this indicating a place (the place where the text is, or the place in the discourse) or is it indicating a circumstance?

In many linguistic analyses, when "here" is used to introduce something presentational (like "Here is your coffee" or "Here is an example"), it typically falls under the locational sense (sense 1), indicating "in this place" (where the speaker is, or where the writing is).

However, sometimes "here" introducing a sentence like "Here is an example" can be seen as referring to the current point in the discourse, which might align with sense 2.

Let me reconsider the specific example "what do we have here?" for sense 2. That seems to be about a specific circumstance or situation.

Actually, looking carefully at standard dictionary definitions:
- Sense 1 (place): "Here is your book" - pointing to a location
- Sense 2 (circumstance/respect): "Here I agree with you" - in this respect/point

For "Here is an example," this is most likely Sense 1, treating the example as being located at the current position (in the text or in the physical space if presenting something).

But wait, there's also the possibility that this is an existential or presentational "here" which some might classify differently.

Let me look at the example for sense 2 again: "what do we have here?" - this is discovering something in a particular circumstance.

Actually, looking at the sentence "Here is an example" - this is introducing or presenting an example at this point in the discourse. This is most commonly classified as the spatial/locative sense (sense 1), extended metaphorically to the "place" in the text or communication.

However, sense 2 says "in this circumstance or respect or on this point or detail." If we consider the current point in the discourse as a "point or detail," then sense 2 might fit.

But traditionally, "Here is..." for presentation is considered the basic locative sense. The word "here" in "Here is an example" functions as a spatial deictic pointing to the current location (which could be physical or the locus of the discourse).

Given the choices:
1. "in or at this place" - This is the most general and basic sense. "Here is an example" means "at this place (in the text/discourse) is an example."
2. "in this circumstance..." - More abstract, about conditions or respects.

I think the answer is 1. When we say "Here is an example," we are indicating that the example is located here (at this position in the text or where the speaker is presenting).

Wait, I should reconsider. In some dictionaries, "Here is..." when used to present something is specifically distinguished from other uses. But given the options provided:

Sense 1: Physical location "I work here"
Sense 2: Circumstance/respect/point "what do we have here?"

Actually, looking at sense 2's example: "what do we have here?" - this is often said when discovering something, like opening a box and saying "what do we have here?" or looking at a situation.

"Here is an example" is more straightforwardly about location/presence. The example is located here (at this point).

Actually, looking at the Oxford English Dictionary or similar:
- Sense 1: In this place, at this point or spot (the most common use)
- Sense 2: In the present life or state; at this point in a series or succession; now
- Sense 3: In this matter, respect, or particular

"Here is an example" = "An example is here (in this place/position)."

So I believe the answer is 1.

But let me double-check. Could it be 4? "At this time; now"? "Here is an example" - no, it's not primarily temporal. It's about the presentation/location of the example.

Could it be 2? "In this circumstance or respect"? Maybe, if we think of "here" meaning "in this respect" - but "an example" isn't really a circumstance or respect, it's an entity being presented.

Therefore, the answer should be 1.

Wait, looking at the sentence again: "<t>Here</t> is an example."

In many computational linguistics or word sense disambiguation tasks, "Here" at the beginning of a sentence introducing an example is often tagged as the locative sense (place).

Actually, looking at WordNet or similar lexical databases might help. In WordNet, "here" has:
1. (in or to this place)
2. (in this circumstance or respect)
3. (at this point; in time or space)

But the specific numbering in the question is:
1. place
2. circumstance/respect
3. to this place (directional)
4. time

Given these options, "Here is an example" uses "here" to indicate the place where the example is located (in this text, at this point). So it appears to be sense 1.

However, there's a nuance. When "here" is used to introduce something (presentational here), it's sometimes considered a different usage, but among the given options, 1 is the best fit.

Actually, I want to reconsider sense 2. "in this circumstance or respect or on this point or detail"

Could "Here is an example" mean "On this point (the point being discussed), here is an example"?

For instance, if I'm discussing a concept and say "Here is an example," I could mean "At this point in my explanation..." which could relate to sense 2 (detail/point) or sense 4 (time).

But "Here is an example" is most parallel to "This is an example," where "here" = "this place."

I think 1 is the safest answer.

Final check:
- "I work here" = physical location (sense 1)
- "Here is an example" = the example is located here (in this document, at this point) = sense 1, extended from physical space to discourse space.

Yes, the answer is 1.


[User]
Which numbered sense of "example" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: Here is an <t>example</t>.

Senses:
1. definition=an item of information that is typical of a class or group | examples=this patient provides a typical example of the syndrome
2. definition=a representative form or pattern | examples=I profited from his example
3. definition=something to be imitated | examples=an exemplar of success
4. definition=punishment intended as a warning to others | examples=they decided to make an example of him
5. definition=an occurrence of something | examples=it was a case of bad judgment
6. definition=a task performed or problem solved in order to develop skill or understanding | examples=you must work the examples at the end of each chapter in the textbook

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to identify which numbered sense of "example" is used in the sentence "Here is an <t>example</t>."

 Let me look at the sentence: "Here is an example."

 This is a very generic usage. Let me analyze each sense:

 1. "an item of information that is typical of a class or group" - This could fit. "Here is an example" often means "here is a typical instance of something."

 2. "a representative form or pattern" - This seems more abstract. "I profited from his example" suggests a model or pattern to follow, but "Here is an example" is more about showing a specific instance.

 3. "something to be imitated" - This would be like a role model. "Here is an example" could mean this in some contexts, but usually, this sense is more about exemplary behavior (exemplar).

 4. "punishment intended as a warning to others" - This is "make an example of someone." The sentence "Here is an example" doesn't suggest punishment.

 5. "an occurrence of something" - This is similar to sense 1 but more general. "It was a case of bad judgment" - this seems like "case" rather than "example" in the sense of illustration.

 6. "a task performed or problem solved in order to develop skill or understanding" - This is like a worked example in a textbook.

 Now, looking at the specific sentence "Here is an example" - this is a very common phrase used when presenting a specific instance that represents a larger category. This aligns most closely with sense 1: "an item of information that is typical of a class or group."

 However, sense 6 is also possible if it's referring to a textbook exercise, but without context suggesting a textbook or learning exercise, sense 1 is more general and likely.

 Sense 2 is about a pattern or model (like "lead by example"), which is different from "here is an example" which usually introduces a specific instance.

 Sense 3 is about something to be imitated (an exemplar), which is more specific than just "an example."

 Sense 4 is clearly wrong for this context.

 Sense 5 uses "case" in the example sentence, suggesting it's about specific occurrences or instances, but sense 1 seems more precise for the general usage of "example" as a representative item.

 Actually, looking carefully:
 - Sense 1: "this patient provides a typical example of the syndrome" - this is showing a specific instance that represents the class.
 - Sense 5: "it was a case of bad judgment" - this seems to equate "example" with "case" or "instance" in a more general sense.

 But "Here is an example" is most commonly used to introduce a typical representative of a class, which is sense 1.

 Wait, I should consider if it could be sense 6. If someone says "Here is an example" while teaching, they might be showing a worked problem. But sense 6 specifically mentions "task performed or problem solved" and the example given is "you must work the examples at the end of each chapter."

 Without additional context, "Here is an example" is most likely sense 1. It's the most general definition that fits the decontextualized sentence.

 Let me double-check the exact wording of sense 1: "an item of information that is typical of a class or group"

 And the example given: "this patient provides a typical example of the syndrome"

 "Here is an example" would fit this pattern - presenting a typical item from a class.

 Sense 2: "a representative form or pattern" - this is more abstract, like a template or model.

 Sense 3: "something to be imitated" - this has a normative connotation (should be imitated).

 So I think the answer is 1.

 But let me reconsider if it could be 6. In educational contexts, "Here is an example" often introduces a worked problem. However, sense 6 is quite specific about being for "developing skill or understanding" through working problems. The phrase "Here is an example" is broader than just educational exercises.

 Given the lack of context, sense 1 is the safest and most general answer that covers the usage of presenting a typical instance of something.

 Actually, looking at WordNet or similar lexical databases (which this seems to be based on), sense 1 is usually the first and most common sense - a representative instance.

 So my answer is: 1

provider: Venice


[User]
Which numbered sense of "ask" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: If I were to <t>ask</t> a sample of American parents, "Do you wish the elementary schools to encourage creativity in your children? "the near-unanimous answer would be, "Yes, of course. "

Senses:
1. definition=inquire about | examples=I asked about their special today
2. definition=make a request or demand for something to somebody | examples=She asked him for a loan
3. definition=direct or put; seek an answer to | examples=ask a question
4. definition=consider obligatory; request and expect | examples=We require our secretary to be on time
5. definition=address a question to and expect an answer from | examples=Ask your teacher about trigonometry
6. definition=require as useful, just, or proper | examples=It takes nerve to do what she did
7. definition=require or ask for as a price or condition | examples=He is asking $200 for the table

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to identify which numbered sense of "ask" is used in the given sentence. Let me analyze the sentence and the definitions.

Sentence: "If I were to <t>ask</t> a sample of American parents, 'Do you wish the elementary schools to encourage creativity in your children?' the near-unanimous answer would be, 'Yes, of course.'"

Looking at the context:
- The subject is asking a question to a group of people (a sample of American parents)
- The structure is: ask [someone] [a question]
- It's about addressing a question to someone and expecting an answer

Now let's look at the senses:

1. definition=inquire about | examples=I asked about their special today
   - This is inquiring ABOUT something, not directly asking a person a question.

2. definition=make a request or demand for something to somebody | examples=She asked him for a loan
   - This is asking FOR something, requesting an object or favor.

3. definition=direct or put; seek an answer to | examples=ask a question
   - This is about posing a question generally, but doesn't emphasize addressing it TO someone specific.

4. definition=consider obligatory; request and expect | examples=We require our secretary to be on time
   - This is more about requiring, not asking a question.

5. definition=address a question to and expect an answer from | examples=Ask your teacher about trigonometry
   - This fits: addressing a question TO someone (a sample of American parents) and expecting an answer.

6. definition=require as useful, just, or proper | examples=It takes nerve to do what she did
   - This is about requiring/involving, not asking questions.

7. definition=require or ask for as a price or condition | examples=He is asking $200 for the table
   - This is about pricing/setting conditions.

In the sentence, the structure is "ask a sample of American parents [question]" - so it's addressing a question to a group of people and expecting an answer. This matches sense 5.

Sense 3 is "ask a question" generally, but sense 5 specifically involves addressing it TO someone: "address a question to and expect an answer from."

The example for sense 5 is "Ask your teacher about trigonometry" - which matches the pattern in the sentence: Ask [person] [about something/question].

Actually, looking more carefully:
- "Ask your teacher about trigonometry" = Ask [person] about [topic]
- In the sentence: "ask a sample of American parents, 'Do you wish...'" = Ask [person] [direct question]

Both involve addressing a question to someone.

Sense 3 is "direct or put; seek an answer to" with example "ask a question". This is more general.

But the sentence specifically mentions asking a specific group of people (a sample of American parents), so sense 5 seems most appropriate: "address a question to and expect an answer from."

Let me double-check:
- Sense 5: "address a question to and expect an answer from"
- The sentence: asking a sample of parents a question and expecting an answer (the near-unanimous answer would be...)

Yes, this matches perfectly.

Wait, let me reconsider sense 3 vs sense 5.

Sense 3: "direct or put; seek an answer to" - example: "ask a question"
Sense 5: "address a question to and expect an answer from" - example: "Ask your teacher about trigonometry"

The key difference is that sense 5 involves addressing the question TO a specific person/entity, while sense 3 is more about the act of seeking an answer generally.

In the given sentence, "ask a sample of American parents" clearly indicates the recipients of the question are specified. Therefore, sense 5 is correct.

Actually, looking at the example for sense 3 again: "ask a question" - this could mean just posing a question without necessarily specifying who is being asked.

But in the sentence, we have both the recipients (a sample of American parents) and the question content. So sense 5 is the best fit.

Let me verify by looking at sense 1: "inquire about" - this would be "ask about creativity" or something, but here we're asking people directly.

Sense 2: "make a request" - asking for something to be given/done.

Sense 5 is definitely the right choice.


[User]
Which numbered sense of "sample" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: If I were to ask a <t>sample</t> of American parents, "Do you wish the elementary schools to encourage creativity in your children? "the near-unanimous answer would be, "Yes, of course. "

Senses:
1. definition=a small part of something intended as representative of the whole
2. definition=items selected at random from a population and used to test hypotheses about the population
3. definition=all or part of a natural object that is collected and preserved as an example of its class

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to identify which numbered sense of "sample" is used in the given sentence.

 Sentence: "If I were to ask a <t>sample</t> of American parents, "Do you wish the elementary schools to encourage creativity in your children? "the near-unanimous answer would be, "Yes, of course. ""

 Senses:
 1. definition=a small part of something intended as representative of the whole
 2. definition=items selected at random from a population and used to test hypotheses about the population
 3. definition=all or part of a natural object that is collected and preserved as an example of its class

 Let me analyze the context:
 - The sentence is talking about asking a group of American parents a question
 - This is clearly a statistical/survey context
 - "A sample of American parents" refers to a subset of the population of American parents selected to represent the whole group

 Now let's look at the definitions:

 Sense 1: "a small part of something intended as representative of the whole" - This is a general definition that could apply to many contexts, including a group of people.

 Sense 2: "items selected at random from a population and used to test hypotheses about the population" - This is specifically about statistical sampling, random selection, and testing hypotheses. The sentence mentions asking a question to gather opinions/data, which fits the statistical research context.

 Sense 3: "all or part of a natural object that is collected and preserved as an example of its class" - This is about physical specimens (like rock samples, tissue samples, etc.), not people being surveyed.

 Now, is it Sense 1 or Sense 2?

 The sentence is about surveying parents - this is clearly a statistical/research context. The phrase "ask a sample of American parents" implies a statistical sample used for research/survey purposes.

 However, looking closely:
 - Sense 1 is the general definition of a sample (a subset representing a whole)
 - Sense 2 is specifically about statistical hypothesis testing with random selection

 In the sentence, the speaker is hypothesizing about what would happen if they asked a group of parents. This is about statistical sampling methodology.

 But wait, let me reconsider. Sense 2 specifically mentions "items selected at random from a population and used to test hypotheses about the population."

 In the sentence: "If I were to ask a sample of American parents..." - this is describing a hypothetical survey. A sample in survey research is indeed "items selected at random from a population" (though not always strictly random, but that's the technical definition).

 However, Sense 1 is broader: "a small part of something intended as representative of the whole." This could also apply to a group of people.

 But looking at typical dictionary sense distinctions:
 - Sense 1 is usually the general sense (a specimen or small part showing what the whole is like)
 - Sense 2 is the statistical sense (a subset of a population used for statistical analysis)
 - Sense 3 is the physical object sense (specimen)

 In this context, since it's about surveying people to get their opinions, and the context implies statistical inference (asking a sample to generalize to all American parents), Sense 2 seems most appropriate.

 Actually, looking at WordNet or similar lexical databases:
 - Sense 1 often corresponds to "a small part representative of the whole" (general)
 - Sense 2 often corresponds to the statistical definition involving random selection and hypothesis testing
 - Sense 3 is about physical specimens

 The sentence is definitely using the statistical sense. When we talk about "a sample of American parents" in the context of asking them questions to understand the views of all American parents, we're using the statistical definition of sample.

 Therefore, the answer should be 2.

 Wait, let me double-check. Could it be Sense 1?

 Sense 1: "a small part of something intended as representative of the whole"
 - A sample of American parents is indeed a small part of all American parents intended to be representative.

 Sense 2: "items selected at random from a population and used to test hypotheses about the population"
 - This is more specific to statistical methodology.

 In many dictionary hierarchies, Sense 1 is the hypernym and Sense 2 is the specific statistical hyponym. But the question asks which numbered sense is used.

 Given that the sentence is about conducting a survey/poll (asking questions to test what parents think), and the context implies using this sample to infer something about the population (implied by the structure of the argument), Sense 2 is the most precise fit.

 However, some might argue that Sense 1 is sufficient. But looking at the specific wording of Sense 2: "items selected at random from a population and used to test hypotheses about the population" - the sentence describes exactly this scenario: selecting parents (items) from the population of American parents to ask a question (test a hypothesis about what they wish).

 Actually, looking at the sentence again: "If I were to ask a sample of American parents..." - this is a hypothetical scenario about surveying. The phrase "test hypotheses" in Sense 2 is quite technical, but asking "Do you wish..." is essentially testing the hypothesis that parents want schools to encourage creativity.

 I think Sense 2 is the intended answer because:
 1. It's about people (parents), not physical objects (ruling out 3)
 2. It's about statistical sampling for research/survey purposes, not just any representative part (like a sample of cheese or a sample of fabric)

 Actually, looking at typical word sense disambiguation datasets (like WordNet), the senses might be:
 1. sample (n.) - a small part representative of the whole
 2. sample (n.) - statistics: items selected from a population
 3. sample (n.) - a physical specimen

 Given the context is clearly statistical/sociological research (asking questions to a group to understand the larger group), Sense 2 is correct.

 Final check: The sentence is from a text about education research or social science. "A sample of American parents" in this context is definitely the statistical sense.

 Answer: 2

provider: Phala


[User]
Which numbered sense of "american" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: If I were to ask a sample of <t>American</t> parents, "Do you wish the elementary schools to encourage creativity in your children? "the near-unanimous answer would be, "Yes, of course. "

Senses:
1. definition=of or relating to the United States of America or its people or language or culture | examples=American citizens
2. definition=of or relating to or characteristic of the continents and islands of the Americas | examples=the American hemisphere

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to identify which sense of "American" is used in the given sentence. The sentence is: "If I were to ask a sample of <t>American</t> parents, "Do you wish the elementary schools to encourage creativity in your children? "the near-unanimous answer would be, "Yes, of course. ""

The two senses provided are:
1. definition=of or relating to the United States of America or its people or language or culture | examples=American citizens
2. definition=of or relating to or characteristic of the continents and islands of the Americas | examples=the American hemisphere

In the sentence, "American parents" refers to parents from the United States of America. The context is about elementary schools and encouraging creativity, which is a topic typically discussed in the context of the United States education system.

Sense 1 refers specifically to the United States of America.
Sense 2 refers to the continents and islands of the Americas (North America, South America, Central America, etc.) collectively.

When people refer to "American parents" in the context of elementary schools and surveys about education, they almost always mean parents from the United States, not parents from the entire Western Hemisphere.

Therefore, the correct sense is 1.


[User]
Which numbered sense of "parent" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: If I were to ask a sample of American <t>parents</t>, "Do you wish the elementary schools to encourage creativity in your children? "the near-unanimous answer would be, "Yes, of course. "

Senses:
1. definition=a father or mother; one who begets or one who gives birth to or nurtures and raises a child; a relative who plays the role of guardian
2. definition=an organism (plant or animal) from which younger ones are obtained

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to identify which numbered sense of "parent" is used in the given sentence.

Sentence: "If I were to ask a sample of American <t>parents</t>, 'Do you wish the elementary schools to encourage creativity in your children?' the near-unanimous answer would be, 'Yes, of course.'"

Senses:
1. definition=a father or mother; one who begets or one who gives birth to or nurtures and raises a child; a relative who plays the role of guardian
2. definition=an organism (plant or animal) from which younger ones are obtained

In the sentence, "parents" refers to human fathers and mothers being asked about their children's elementary schools. This clearly matches sense 1, which is about human parents (father or mother, one who begets/gives birth to/nurtures and raises a child).

Sense 2 is about biological organisms in general (plants or animals), which doesn't fit the context of American parents being asked about elementary schools and their children.

So the answer is 1.

The user wants only the number returned.

provider: SiliconFlow


[User]
Which numbered sense of "encourage" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: If I were to ask a sample of American parents, "Do you wish the elementary schools to <t>encourage</t> creativity in your children? "the near-unanimous answer would be, "Yes, of course. "

Senses:
1. definition=contribute to the progress or growth of | examples=I am promoting the use of computers in the classroom
2. definition=inspire with confidence; give hope or courage to
3. definition=spur on | examples=His financial success encouraged him to look for a wife

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to identify which numbered sense of "encourage" is used in the given sentence.

 Let me analyze the sentence:
 "If I were to ask a sample of American parents, 'Do you wish the elementary schools to <t>encourage</t> creativity in your children?' the near-unanimous answer would be, 'Yes, of course.'"

 The context is about schools encouraging creativity in children. This means fostering, promoting, or contributing to the development of creativity.

 Now let's look at the senses:
 1. definition=contribute to the progress or growth of | examples=I am promoting the use of computers in the classroom
 2. definition=inspire with confidence; give hope or courage to
 3. definition=spur on | examples=His financial success encouraged him to look for a wife

 Sense 1 seems to fit best. "Contribute to the progress or growth of" creativity - this matches the context of schools fostering or promoting creativity in children.

 Sense 2 is about inspiring confidence or giving hope/courage. While related, the specific context of encouraging creativity is more about fostering its development rather than just giving confidence.

 Sense 3 is about spurring on, which implies motivating someone to take action. The example shows external success motivating someone to do something. This doesn't quite fit with encouraging creativity, which is more about nurturing or fostering a quality.

 Actually, let me reconsider. In the context of education and creativity, "encourage" could mean:
 - To foster/promote the development of creativity (Sense 1)
 - To give confidence to be creative (Sense 2)

 But looking at the definitions provided:
 Sense 1: "contribute to the progress or growth of" - This fits well with encouraging creativity, as it means helping creativity to grow and develop.
 Sense 2: "inspire with confidence; give hope or courage to" - This is more about emotional support.
 Sense 3: "spur on" - This is about motivating action.

 In educational contexts, when we say schools should "encourage creativity," we typically mean they should foster it, nurture it, contribute to its growth and development. This aligns with Sense 1.

 The example for Sense 1 is "I am promoting the use of computers in the classroom" - "promoting" here is similar to encouraging in the sense of fostering or contributing to progress.

 So the answer should be 1.


[User]
Which numbered sense of "child" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: If I were to ask a sample of American parents, "Do you wish the elementary schools to encourage creativity in your <t>children</t>? "the near-unanimous answer would be, "Yes, of course. "

Senses:
1. definition=a young person of either sex | examples=she writes books for children
2. definition=a human offspring (son or daughter) of any age | examples=they had three children
3. definition=an immature childish person | examples=he remained a child in practical matters as long as he lived
4. definition=a member of a clan or tribe | examples=the children of Israel

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to identify which sense of "child" is used in the given sentence. Let me analyze the sentence and the definitions.

Sentence: "If I were to ask a sample of American parents, 'Do you wish the elementary schools to encourage creativity in your <t>children</t>?' the near-unanimous answer would be, 'Yes, of course.'"

The context is about American parents being asked about their children in the context of elementary schools.

Let me look at the senses:

1. definition=a young person of either sex | examples=she writes books for children
   - This refers to young people in general, not necessarily one's own offspring.

2. definition=a human offspring (son or daughter) of any age | examples=they had three children
   - This refers to one's own children, offspring. The example "they had three children" suggests biological or adopted offspring.

3. definition=an immature childish person | examples=he remained a child in practical matters as long as he lived
   - This is metaphorical, referring to someone who behaves immaturely.

4. definition=a member of a clan or tribe | examples=the children of Israel
   - This is a biblical or tribal usage.

In the sentence, the word "children" is preceded by "your" and the context is parents talking about their own children who attend elementary school.

"your children" - this indicates possession, referring to the parents' offspring.

Sense 2 says "a human offspring (son or daughter) of any age" and the example is "they had three children." This fits best because:
- It's about parents' own offspring
- The phrase "your children" indicates the children belong to the parents
- Elementary school context suggests these are the parents' kids

Sense 1 is more general - "a young person of either sex" - this could be any child, not necessarily one's own. But here it's specifically "your children" addressed to parents, so it's about their offspring.

Sense 2 is the most appropriate because it refers to offspring. The parents are being asked about their own children (offspring).

Wait, let me double-check. The sentence says "American parents" and asks about "your children."

Sense 1: "a young person of either sex" - general
Sense 2: "a human offspring (son or daughter) of any age" - specific relationship

When parents refer to "their children," they are referring to their offspring. So sense 2 is correct.

But let me also consider: could it be sense 1?

Sense 1 example: "she writes books for children" - this means books for young people in general.
Sense 2 example: "they had three children" - this means they had three offspring.

In the sentence: "your children" - the parents' children. This is clearly referring to their offspring.

So the answer should be 2.

Actually, looking more carefully at sense 1: "a young person of either sex"
And sense 2: "a human offspring (son or daughter) of any age"

The key distinction is that sense 2 emphasizes the relationship of being someone's offspring, while sense 1 is just a young person.

In the phrase "your children", the possessive "your" indicates that these are the offspring of the parents being addressed. Therefore, sense 2 is the correct answer.

The context of elementary schools also suggests these are school-age children, but the defining characteristic is that they are the offspring of the parents being asked.

So the answer is 2.

provider: Chutes