[User]
Which numbered sense of "best" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: If we want to understand how it works, the <t>best</t> thing we can do is to realize that our input is being converted into MathML although it is not necessary to know MathML.

Senses:
1. definition=(superlative of `good') having the most positive qualities | examples=the best film of the year
2. definition=(comparative and superlative of `well') wiser or more advantageous and hence advisable | examples=it would be better to speak to him
3. definition=having desirable or positive qualities especially those suitable for a thing specified | examples=good news from the hospital
4. definition=having the normally expected amount | examples=gives full measure
5. definition=morally admirable
6. definition=deserving of esteem and respect | examples=all respectable companies give guarantees
7. definition=promoting or enhancing well-being | examples=an arms limitation agreement beneficial to all countries
8. definition=agreeable or pleasing | examples=we all had a good time
9. definition=of moral excellence | examples=a genuinely good person
10. definition=having or showing knowledge and skill and aptitude | examples=adept in handicrafts
11. definition=thorough | examples=had a good workout
12. definition=with or in a close or intimate relationship | examples=a good friend
13. definition=financially sound | examples=a good investment
14. definition=most suitable or right for a particular purpose | examples=a good time to plant tomatoes
15. definition=resulting favorably | examples=it's a good thing that I wasn't there
16. definition=exerting force or influence | examples=the law is effective immediately
17. definition=capable of pleasing | examples=good looks
18. definition=appealing to the mind | examples=good music
19. definition=in excellent physical condition | examples=good teeth
20. definition=tending to promote physical well-being; beneficial to health | examples=beneficial effects of a balanced diet
21. definition=not forged | examples=a good dollar bill
22. definition=not left to spoil | examples=the meat is still good
23. definition=generally admired | examples=good taste

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to identify which numbered sense of "best" is used in the given sentence.

 Sentence: "If we want to understand how it works, the <t>best</t> thing we can do is to realize that our input is being converted into MathML although it is not necessary to know MathML."

 The word "best" here is used as a superlative form. Let me look at the senses:

 1. definition=(superlative of `good') having the most positive qualities | examples=the best film of the year
 2. definition=(comparative and superlative of `well') wiser or more advantageous and hence advisable | examples=it would be better to speak to him
 3. definition=having desirable or positive qualities especially those suitable for a thing specified | examples=good news from the hospital
 ...
 14. definition=most suitable or right for a particular purpose | examples=a good time to plant tomatoes

 Looking at the sentence: "the best thing we can do" - this means the most suitable, most advisable, or most advantageous action.

 Sense 1: "having the most positive qualities" - this is the general superlative of good, referring to quality.
 Sense 2: "wiser or more advantageous and hence advisable" - this seems to fit "the best thing we can do" because it's about what is most advisable or advantageous to do.
 Sense 14: "most suitable or right for a particular purpose" - this could also fit, as "the best thing to do" implies the most suitable action.

 However, looking closely at sense 2: "(comparative and superlative of `well') wiser or more advantageous and hence advisable"

 The example given is "it would be better to speak to him" - which uses "better" (comparative).

 In the sentence, "best" is modifying "thing" - "the best thing". This is a noun phrase where "best" is an adjective.

 Sense 1 is "(superlative of `good') having the most positive qualities"
 Sense 2 is "(comparative and superlative of `well')..."

 "Best" can be the superlative of "good" or "well". When modifying a noun (thing), it's the superlative of "good".

 But let's look at the specific meaning. "The best thing we can do" implies the most advisable or most suitable course of action.

 Sense 2 specifically mentions "wiser or more advantageous and hence advisable" and notes it's the comparative and superlative of "well". But "well" as an adjective means "in good health" or "satisfactory" (when referring to health), or it can be an adverb. Actually, looking at the definition, sense 2 seems to be using "well" in the sense of "advisable" - as in "it is well to do something" (archaic?) or perhaps they mean the adverb "well" used in predicative position?

 Actually, looking at standard dictionary definitions:
 - Sense 1 seems to be the general "superlative of good" meaning highest quality.
 - Sense 2 seems to be specifically about "well" in the sense of advisable/prudent.

 But in the sentence "the best thing we can do", this is clearly about what is most advisable or most suitable.

 Let me check sense 14 again: "most suitable or right for a particular purpose" - example: "a good time to plant tomatoes".

 "The best thing we can do" = the most suitable thing we can do. This seems to fit sense 14.

 But wait, sense 1 is the general superlative: "having the most positive qualities".

 Actually, looking at WordNet or similar lexical databases (which this format resembles), sense 1 is usually the superlative of "good" in general, while sense 2 might be specifically about "well" as in healthy or advisable.

 Let me reconsider. The phrase "the best thing to do" is an idiom meaning the most advisable course of action.

 Sense 2: "wiser or more advantageous and hence advisable" - this captures the "advisable" aspect.
 Sense 14: "most suitable or right for a particular purpose" - this captures the "suitable" aspect.

 Which is better? In WordNet, "best" as an adjective has these senses:
 1. (superlative of `good') having the most positive qualities
 2. (comparative and superlative of `well') wiser or more advantageous and hence advisable

 The example for sense 2 is "it would be better to speak to him" - using "better".

 In the given sentence, "best" is used in "the best thing we can do", which parallels "it would be better..." - it's about what action is most advisable.

 However, sense 1 is the broader, more common usage. But sense 1 examples include "the best film of the year" - which is about quality ranking.

 "The best thing we can do" is less about quality ranking and more about advisability/suitability.

 But looking at the provided list, sense 2 specifically mentions "wiser or more advantageous and hence advisable", which matches the context of "the best thing we can do" (the most advisable action).

 Actually, looking carefully at the sentence structure: "the best thing" - here "best" is an adjective modifying "thing".

 In WordNet 3.0 or similar:
 - Sense 1: best (adj) - (superlative of `good') having the most positive qualities
 - Sense 2: best (adj) - (comparative and superlative of `well') wiser or more advantageous and hence advisable

 The distinction is that sense 1 is the superlative of "good" (quality), while sense 2 is the superlative of "well" (advisability/prudence).

 The phrase "the best thing to do" is typically classified under sense 2 in WordNet-style databases because it relates to what is advisable or advantageous, not necessarily what is of the highest quality.

 However, I should verify if sense 14 applies. Sense 14 is "most suitable or right for a particular purpose" - but looking at the list, sense 14 is actually a sense of "good", not "best". Wait, the list provided has 23 senses, and they seem to be senses of "good" based on the definitions (e.g., "having desirable or positive qualities", "morally admirable", etc.), but the question asks which sense of "best" is used.

 Actually, looking at the list again:
 1. definition=(superlative of `good')...
 2. definition=(comparative and superlative of `well')...
 3. definition=having desirable... (this is "good")
 ...

 Wait, senses 3-23 appear to be definitions of "good", not "best". But the question asks which sense of "best" is used. This suggests that the list is actually showing the senses of "best" (with some possibly inherited from "good" or listed for comparison), or there's a confusion.

 Actually, looking closely: the definitions for senses 3-23 use "good" in the definition text (e.g., "having desirable or positive qualities especially those suitable for a thing specified" - this is a definition of "good"). But the word being analyzed is "best".

 This looks like a word sense disambiguation task where "best" is the target word, and the senses provided include:
 - Sense 1: superlative of good
 - Sense 2: superlative of well (advisable)
 - Senses 3-23: these appear to be senses of "good" rather than "best", but perhaps they are meant to be available for "best" as well? Or this is a poorly formatted list where only senses 1 and 2 apply to "best", and the rest are distractors or errors?

 Actually, looking at the pattern, it seems like the list might be the senses of "good" and "best" combined, or it's a list where "best" can map to these senses as the superlative.

 But "best" is the superlative form. It can mean:
 1. Most excellent (superlative of good)
 2. Most advisable (superlative of well)

 Given the sentence "the best thing we can do", this is clearly the "most advisable" sense - sense 2.

 Sense 1 would be used in "the best film", "the best candidate", etc. - referring to quality.

 Sense 2 is used when talking about courses of action being advisable: "the best thing to do", "the best course of action".

 Therefore, the answer should be 2.

 But let me double-check if any other sense could fit. Sense 14 says "most suitable or right for a particular purpose". If "best" is considered as the superlative of "good" in sense 14, then "the best thing" = the most suitable thing. This could also fit.

 However, sense 2 explicitly mentions "wiser or more advantageous and hence advisable", which is exactly what "the best thing we can do" means.

 In standard lexical databases like WordNet:
 - best#1: (superlative of `good') having the most positive qualities
 - best#2: (comparative and superlative of `well') wiser or more advantageous and hence advisable

 The example for best#2 is often something like "it would be better to..." or "the best thing to do..."

 So I will go with 2.


attempt_kind: initial

status: success

[User]
Which numbered sense of "thing" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: If we want to understand how it works, the best <t>thing</t> we can do is to realize that our input is being converted into MathML although it is not necessary to know MathML.

Senses:
1. definition=a special situation | examples=this thing has got to end
2. definition=an action | examples=how could you do such a thing?
3. definition=a special abstraction | examples=a thing of the spirit
4. definition=an artifact | examples=how does this thing work?
5. definition=an event | examples=a funny thing happened on the way to the...
6. definition=a vaguely specified concern | examples=several matters to attend to
7. definition=a statement regarded as an object | examples=to say the same thing in other terms
8. definition=an entity that is not named specifically | examples=I couldn't tell what the thing was
9. definition=any attribute or quality considered as having its own existence | examples=the thing I like about her is ...
10. definition=a special objective | examples=the thing is to stay in bounds
11. definition=a persistent illogical feeling of desire or aversion | examples=he has a thing about seafood
12. definition=a separate and self-contained entity

finish_reason: stop

role: assistant

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to identify which sense of the word "thing" is used in the given sentence. The sentence is: "If we want to understand how it works, the best <t>thing</t> we can do is to realize that our input is being converted into MathML although it is not necessary to know MathML."

I need to look at the 12 senses provided and determine which one fits.

Let me analyze the context:
- "the best thing we can do" refers to an action or course of action that can be taken.
- It's talking about what action to take: realizing that input is being converted into MathML.

Now let's look at the options:

1. definition=a special situation | examples=this thing has got to end - This doesn't fit. It's not referring to a situation.

2. definition=an action | examples=how could you do such a thing? - This seems promising. "The best thing we can do" refers to the best action/course of action we can take.

3. definition=a special abstraction | examples=a thing of the spirit - Not an abstraction.

4. definition=an artifact | examples=how does this thing work? - Not a physical object/artifact.

5. definition=an event | examples=a funny thing happened on the way to the... - Not an event.

6. definition=a vaguely specified concern | examples=several matters to attend to - Could be, but "thing" here is more specific - it's referring to a specific action (realizing something).

7. definition=a statement regarded as an object | examples=to say the same thing in other terms - Not a statement.

8. definition=an entity that is not named specifically | examples=I couldn't tell what the thing was - In this case, "thing" is specified (realizing that our input...).

9. definition=any attribute or quality considered as having its own existence | examples=the thing I like about her is ... - This is different construction. "The thing I like" = "what I like". But in our sentence, it's "the best thing we can do".

10. definition=a special objective | examples=the thing is to stay in bounds - This is interesting. "The thing is to..." vs "the best thing we can do is to..."

Wait, let me reconsider sense 2 vs sense 10.

Sense 2: an action. Example: "how could you do such a thing?" - Here "thing" refers to an action that was done.

Sense 10: a special objective. Example: "the thing is to stay in bounds" - Here "thing" refers to the goal/objective.

In the sentence: "the best thing we can do is to realize..." - This is describing an action (realizing something).

Actually, looking at sense 8: "an entity that is not named specifically". But here it is named - it's "to realize that..."

Looking at sense 2 again: "an action". The example "how could you do such a thing?" shows "thing" as the object of "do", referring to an action.

In our sentence, "thing" is the object of "do" (the best thing we can do).

So sense 2 seems to fit: "the best action we can take is..."

But let me check sense 10 again: "a special objective". The example "the thing is to stay in bounds" is similar to "the thing we can do is to realize..."

Actually, looking at the examples:
- Sense 2: "how could you do such a thing?" - implies thing = action
- Sense 10: "the thing is to stay in bounds" - implies thing = what is important/the objective

In "the best thing we can do", "thing" refers to the action of realizing...

But wait, there's also sense 12: "a separate and self-contained entity". This is very general.

Let me think about the specific construction "the best thing we can do". This is an idiomatic expression where "thing" means "action" or "course of action".

Sense 2 is defined as "an action".
Sense 10 is defined as "a special objective".

"Realizing that our input is being converted..." is an action (mental action), not necessarily an objective. The objective would be understanding how it works, but the thing we can do is realize...

Actually, looking at the WordNet senses (which these seem to be based on):

Sense 1: special situation ("this thing has got to end")
Sense 2: action ("how could you do such a thing?")
Sense 3: abstraction ("a thing of the spirit")
Sense 4: artifact ("how does this thing work?")
Sense 5: event ("a funny thing happened...")
Sense 6: concern/matter ("several things to attend to")
Sense 7: statement ("to say the same thing...")
Sense 8: unnamed entity ("I couldn't tell what the thing was")
Sense 9: attribute ("the thing I like...")
Sense 10: objective ("the thing is to...")
Sense 11: feeling ("he has a thing about...")
Sense 12: entity (general)

In the sentence "the best thing we can do is...", "thing" refers to the action of realizing something. It's synonymous with "action" or "step" here.

Sense 2 specifically mentions "an action" with the example "how could you do such a thing?" which involves "do" + "thing".

Sense 6 mentions "a vaguely specified concern" with example "several matters to attend to" - this is close, but "thing" in our sentence isn't really a concern/matter in the sense of "matters to attend to".

Sense 8: "an entity that is not named specifically" - but it is named: "to realize that..."

Actually, looking carefully at sense 8: "examples=I couldn't tell what the thing was" - this suggests an unknown or unspecified object. In our sentence, the thing is specified (realizing...).

Sense 2 seems best: "an action". The phrase "the best thing we can do" = "the best action we can take".

Wait, I should check if there's a sense about "course of action" or similar. Sense 2 says "an action". That seems right.

But let me double-check sense 10: "a special objective". Is "realizing that our input is being converted" an objective? No, it's the means to achieve the objective (understanding how it works). But "the best thing we can do" treats the realization as the action to take.

Actually, looking at the WordNet entry for "thing":
- Sense 2: "an action; 'how could you do such a thing?'"
- Sense 6: "a vaguely specified concern; 'things haven't been going so well lately'"

I think Sense 2 is correct.

But wait, looking at sense 8 again: "an entity that is not named specifically". Is "to realize that..." considered naming the entity? The infinitive clause specifies what the thing is. So it's not "not named specifically".

Sense 2: The example "how could you do such a thing" - here "thing" refers to a deed/action.

In "the best thing we can do", "thing" refers to a deed/action (realizing...).

Therefore, the answer should be 2.

But I want to make sure. Let me consider if it could be sense 6 (a vaguely specified concern). "Several things to attend to" - this is similar to tasks/actions. But sense 2 is explicitly "an action".

Sense 12 is very general: "a separate and self-contained entity". While technically true, sense 2 is more specific and accurate.

Let me reconsider sense 10: "a special objective". Examples: "the thing is to stay in bounds". "The thing" here means "the important point" or "the objective". In "the best thing we can do is to realize...", "thing" could mean "the best course of action" which is close to objective but more specifically it's the action itself.

Actually, looking at dictionaries:
"The thing to do" = the course of action that should be taken.
"Thing" here means "action" or "deed".

So I maintain that sense 2 is correct.

One more check: sense 9: "any attribute or quality...". "The thing I like about her" - here "thing" = what/aspect. But "the best thing we can do" - here "thing" is not an attribute, it's an action.

Sense 7: "a statement". No.

Sense 5: "an event". No.

Sense 4: "an artifact". No.

Sense 3: "abstraction". No.

Sense 1: "special situation". No.

So it's between 2, 6, 8, 10, 12.

Sense 6: matters/concerns. "Several matters to attend to". This is close but usually implies tasks/issues. "Realizing..." is an action, not really a matter/concern in the sense of "things to deal with".

Sense 8: unnamed entity. But we know what it is.

Sense 10: objective. "The thing is to..." is different from "the thing we can do is...". The first emphasizes what is important/necessary. The second emphasizes the action taken.

Sense 12: general entity.

Sense 2: action.

I think 2 is the best fit.

format: unknown

native_finish_reason: stop

provider: DigitalOcean

currency: USD


[User]
Which numbered sense of "do" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: If we want to understand how it works, the best thing we can <t>do</t> is to realize that our input is being converted into MathML although it is not necessary to know MathML.

Senses:
1. definition=engage in | examples=make love, not war
2. definition=carry out or perform an action | examples=John did the painting, the weeding, and he cleaned out the gutters
3. definition=get (something) done | examples=I did my job
4. definition=proceed or get along | examples=How is she doing in her new job?
5. definition=give rise to; cause to happen or occur, not always intentionally | examples=cause a commotion
6. definition=carry out or practice; as of jobs and professions | examples=practice law
7. definition=be sufficient; be adequate, either in quality or quantity | examples=A few words would answer
8. definition=create or design, often in a certain way | examples=Do my room in blue
9. definition=behave in a certain manner; show a certain behavior; conduct or comport oneself | examples=You should act like an adult
10. definition=spend time in prison or in a labor camp | examples=He did six years for embezzlement
11. definition=carry on or function | examples=We could do with a little more help around here
12. definition=arrange attractively | examples=dress my hair for the wedding
13. definition=travel or traverse (a distance) | examples=This car does 150 miles per hour

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to identify which sense of "do" is used in the given sentence. The sentence is: "If we want to understand how it works, the best thing we can <t>do</t> is to realize that our input is being converted into MathML although it is not necessary to know MathML."

Let me analyze the sentence structure. The phrase is "the best thing we can do is to realize..."

Here, "do" means what action we can take or perform. It's about performing an action or carrying something out.

Let me look at the senses:
1. engage in - "make love, not war" - This is about engaging in specific activities, often contrasted.
2. carry out or perform an action - "John did the painting..." - This seems to fit. We can perform the action of realizing...
3. get (something) done - "I did my job" - This is about completing tasks.
4. proceed or get along - "How is she doing..." - This is about progress or state.
5. give rise to; cause - "cause a commotion" - This is about causing something.
6. carry out or practice; as of jobs and professions - "practice law" - This is about professional practice.
7. be sufficient; be adequate - "A few words would answer" - This is about sufficiency.
8. create or design - "Do my room in blue" - This is about decorating/creating.
9. behave in a certain manner - "You should act like an adult" - This is about behavior.
10. spend time in prison - "He did six years..." - Specific to prison time.
11. carry on or function - "We could do with a little more help..." - This is about managing or functioning.
12. arrange attractively - "dress my hair..." - This is about arranging/decorating.
13. travel or traverse - "This car does 150 miles per hour" - This is about speed/distance.

In the sentence "the best thing we can do is to realize...", the word "do" is referring to performing an action. The phrase "we can do" means "we can perform" or "we can carry out."

Sense 2: "carry out or perform an action" seems to be the best fit. The examples include "John did the painting, the weeding..." which shows performing various actions.

Sense 3 is "get (something) done" which is more about completing a specific job or task. While related, the usage here is more general - "the best thing we can do" is a general expression about what action to take.

Actually, let me think more carefully. "The best thing we can do" is an idiomatic expression meaning "the best action we can take" or "the best course of action."

Sense 2: carry out or perform an action
Sense 3: get (something) done

Let me look at the examples again:
Sense 2 examples: "John did the painting, the weeding, and he cleaned out the gutters" - this is performing specific actions.
Sense 3 examples: "I did my job" - this is completing a duty or task.

In "the best thing we can do is realize...", we're talking about performing the action of realizing. This aligns with sense 2.

But wait, there's also sense 11: "carry on or function" - "We could do with a little more help around here". Actually, looking at the definition of sense 11: "carry on or function". The example "We could do with..." is actually about needing something, not about carrying on.

Let me reconsider sense 11. The definition says "carry on or function" and the example is "We could do with a little more help around here". Actually, "do with" is a phrasal verb meaning "manage with" or "get by with". But the sentence in question is "we can do is to realize", not "do with".

Looking at the sentence structure: "the best thing we can do" - here "do" is being used as a verb referring to what action is available or possible to take.

This is a general use of "do" to refer to an action. Sense 2 "carry out or perform an action" covers this.

Sense 3 "get (something) done" is more specific to completing tasks or duties.

Actually, looking at WordNet or similar lexical databases might help, but I need to work with the definitions provided.

Another way to think about it: In "what we can do", "do" is often used as a pro-verb, standing in for a more specific verb. But here, it's actually defined by the infinitive phrase "to realize that...". So we're performing the action of realizing.

This is clearly a sense of performing/carrying out an action, which is sense 2.

But let me also consider sense 1: "engage in". The example is "make love, not war" which suggests engaging in an activity. This is close, but "engage in" often implies participating in an ongoing activity, whereas "carry out or perform" is about executing an action.

Actually, looking at the sentence again: "the best thing we can do is to realize..."

In many dictionaries, this use of "do" falls under the general meaning of "perform" or "execute".

Between sense 2 and sense 3:
- Sense 2: carry out or perform an action (general)
- Sense 3: get (something) done (complete, accomplish)

I think sense 2 is the correct answer because:
1. "The best thing we can do" is about choosing what action to perform
2. It's not specifically about getting a job done or completing a duty (sense 3)
3. It's about performing the specific action of realizing something

Wait, I should look at whether there's a better match.

Sense 11: "carry on or function" - no, this doesn't fit.
Sense 7: "be sufficient; be adequate" - "that will do" - not this one.
Sense 9: "behave in a certain manner" - no, it's not about behavior.

Let me think about sense 2 vs sense 3 once more.
Sense 2: "carry out or perform an action" - the subject is the agent performing the action.
Sense 3: "get (something) done" - focus on completion.

In "we can do is realize", we're performing the action of realizing. This is sense 2.

Actually, looking at similar sentences in lexical databases:
"What shall I do?" - this is usually sense 2 (perform an action).
"The best we can do is..." - this is also about performing an action.

I think the answer is 2.

But let me double-check by considering if it could be any other sense.
Could it be sense 1 "engage in"? "Engage in" usually takes a direct object that is an activity (engage in war, engage in conversation). Here, the object is "the best thing", which is a bit abstract, but the infinitive "to realize" explains what the thing is.

Actually, looking at the syntax: "the best thing [that] we can do"
The relative clause "we can do" has "do" with the antecedent "thing" as its object (elliptical).
"we can do [the best thing]"
"we can perform [the best thing]"

The "best thing" is the action of realizing.

Yes, this is performing/carrying out an action = sense 2.

One more check: Could it be sense 3 "get (something) done"?
"I did my job" - the job is the object.
"we can do [the thing]" - we can accomplish the thing.
But sense 3 is specifically about getting something done, completing it. The emphasis in the sentence is on what action to take (performing the realization), not on completing a task.

Actually, looking at the definitions again carefully:
2. carry out or perform an action
3. get (something) done

The example for 2: "John did the painting, the weeding, and he cleaned out the gutters" - these are activities John performed.
The example for 3: "I did my job" - focus on duty/task completion.

In our sentence, "the best thing we can do" refers to the optimal course of action. This aligns with performing an action (sense 2) rather than completing a job/duty (sense 3).

Therefore, the answer is 2.

provider: StreamLake


[User]
Which numbered sense of "realize" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: If we want to understand how it works, the best thing we can do is to <t>realize</t> that our input is being converted into MathML although it is not necessary to know MathML.

Senses:
1. definition=be fully aware or cognizant of
2. definition=perceive (an idea or situation) mentally | examples=Now I see!
3. definition=make real or concrete; give reality or substance to | examples=our ideas must be substantiated into actions
4. definition=earn on some commercial or business transaction; earn as salary or wages | examples=How much do you make a month in your new job?
5. definition=convert into cash; of goods and property
6. definition=expand or complete (a part in a piece of baroque music) by supplying the harmonies indicated in the figured bass

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to identify which numbered sense of "realize" is used in the given sentence.

 Sentence: "If we want to understand how it works, the best thing we can do is to <t>realize</t> that our input is being converted into MathML although it is not necessary to know MathML."

 Let me analyze the sentence:
 - The context is about understanding how something works
 - The word "realize" is used with "that our input is being converted into MathML"
 - This suggests becoming aware of or understanding a fact

 Now let's look at the senses:

 1. definition=be fully aware or cognizant of
    - This fits. "Realize that..." means to become aware that something is true.

 2. definition=perceive (an idea or situation) mentally | examples=Now I see!
    - This is similar to sense 1, but "perceive mentally" is close. However, sense 1 is more about awareness/cognizance.

 3. definition=make real or concrete; give reality or substance to
    - This would be like "realize a dream" or "realize a plan" - making something happen. Doesn't fit here.

 4. definition=earn on some commercial or business transaction; earn as salary or wages
    - This is about earning money. Doesn't fit.

 5. definition=convert into cash; of goods and property
    - This is about selling assets for cash. Doesn't fit.

 6. definition=expand or complete (a part in a piece of baroque music) by supplying the harmonies indicated in the figured bass
    - This is a technical musical term. Doesn't fit.

 The sentence uses "realize" to mean understanding or becoming aware of a fact (that input is being converted into MathML).

 Between sense 1 and sense 2:
 - Sense 1: "be fully aware or cognizant of"
 - Sense 2: "perceive (an idea or situation) mentally"

 Both are close. However, sense 1 is the standard definition for "realize" meaning to become aware of something. Sense 2 with the example "Now I see!" suggests more of a sudden insight or understanding (like "I see!" or "I understand!").

 In the given sentence, it's about being aware that something is happening - "realize that our input is being converted..." This is the "become aware" or "be cognizant of" meaning.

 Actually, looking at standard dictionary definitions:
 - Sense 1 (be fully aware) is the most common meaning for "realize" when followed by a "that" clause indicating awareness of a fact.
 - Sense 2 seems to be more about perceiving or understanding mentally in the sense of "seeing" or comprehending.

 The example for sense 2 is "Now I see!" which suggests it's about understanding or comprehending.

 But in the sentence "realize that our input is being converted...", this is clearly about becoming aware of a fact, which aligns with sense 1.

 Let me double-check:
 - "I realize that he is busy" = I am aware that he is busy (Sense 1)
 - "I realize my mistake" = I become aware of my mistake (Sense 1)

 Sense 2 with "Now I see!" example might be more about the act of perceiving or the moment of understanding.

 Actually, looking at WordNet or similar lexical databases (which this format resembles):
 - Sense 1: recognize, realise, realize, recognise - be fully aware or cognizant of
 - Sense 2: understand, realize, realise, see - perceive (an idea or situation) mentally

 The distinction might be subtle. But in the sentence provided, "realize that our input is being converted..." is about recognizing or being aware of a fact. This is sense 1.

 However, sense 2 "perceive mentally" could also fit. But the example "Now I see!" suggests understanding or grasping mentally.

 Let me think about the specific context again:
 "the best thing we can do is to realize that our input is being converted into MathML"

 This is about recognizing or understanding that a conversion is taking place. Both 1 and 2 could work, but sense 1 (be fully aware or cognizant of) is the primary definition for this usage.

 Actually, looking at standard word sense disambiguation datasets (like WordNet), the sense "perceive mentally" (sense 2) is often distinguished from "become aware of" (sense 1).

 Wait, let me reconsider the exact wording:
 Sense 1: "be fully aware or cognizant of"
 Sense 2: "perceive (an idea or situation) mentally"

 In many dictionaries, these might be grouped together or distinguished. But given the example for sense 2 is "Now I see!", this suggests the "understand" or "comprehend" meaning.

 The sentence is saying "we should realize that..." meaning "we should be aware that..." or "we should understand that..."

 But "be fully aware or cognizant of" (sense 1) is the most accurate for "realize that..." constructions when talking about becoming aware of a fact.

 Let me check if there's any chance it could be sense 3? No, that's "make real" - like realizing a dream. Not applicable.

 Sense 4 and 5 are financial.

 Sense 6 is musical.

 So it's between 1 and 2.

 In WordNet 3.0 or 3.1:
 - realize#1: recognize, recognise, realize, realise, agnize, agnise - be fully aware or cognizant of
 - realize#2: understand, realize, realise, see - perceive (an idea or situation) mentally

 The example "Now I see!" goes with sense 2.

 But in the sentence "realize that our input is being converted...", this is typically sense 1 (become aware of a fact).

 However, looking at the exact wording of sense 2: "perceive (an idea or situation) mentally" - this could also fit.

 But I think sense 1 is the intended answer because:
 1. It's the most common sense for "realize" + that-clause
 2. The definition "be fully aware or cognizant of" directly matches the context of understanding how something works by being aware of the underlying conversion process.

 Actually, looking more carefully at the sentence structure: "If we want to understand how it works, the best thing we can do is to realize that..."

 This suggests that "realize" here means to understand or become aware of the fact. This aligns with sense 1.

 I should go with 1.

 Wait, let me reconsider sense 2. The example "Now I see!" suggests a moment of insight or understanding. The sentence is talking about understanding how something works, and realizing that the input is converted. This could be either.

 But in standard lexical semantic resources, "realize" meaning "become aware of a fact" is usually the first sense.

 Let me verify by looking at similar examples:
 - "I didn't realize you were here" -> sense 1 (be aware)
 - "I realize now that I was wrong" -> sense 1 (be aware)

 Sense 2 with "Now I see!" is more like "I understand" or "I perceive".

 Actually, looking at the definitions again:
 1. be fully aware or cognizant of
 2. perceive (an idea or situation) mentally

 These are very similar. But sense 1 is about awareness of facts, while sense 2 is about mental perception.

 Given the context is about understanding a technical process (input conversion), and the phrase "be fully aware or cognizant of" fits best with "realize that our input is being converted", I believe the answer is 1.

 Final check: Could it be any other sense? No.

 Answer: 1

provider: Novita


[User]
Which numbered sense of "convert" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: If we want to understand how it works, the best thing we can do is to realize that our input is being <t>converted</t> into MathML although it is not necessary to know MathML.

Senses:
1. definition=change from one system to another or to a new plan or policy | examples=We converted from 220 to 110 Volt
2. definition=change the nature, purpose, or function of something | examples=convert lead into gold
3. definition=change religious beliefs, or adopt a religious belief | examples=She converted to Buddhism
4. definition=exchange or replace with another, usually of the same kind or category | examples=Could you convert my dollars into pounds?
5. definition=cause to adopt a new or different faith | examples=The missionaries converted the Indian population
6. definition=score an extra point or points after touchdown by kicking the ball through the uprights or advancing the ball into the end zone | examples=Smith converted and his team won
7. definition=complete successfully | examples=score a penalty shot or free throw
8. definition=score (a spare)
9. definition=make (someone) agree, understand, or realize the truth or validity of something | examples=He had finally convinced several customers of the advantages of his product
10. definition=exchange a penalty for a less severe one
11. definition=change in nature, purpose, or function; undergo a chemical change | examples=The substance converts to an acid

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to identify which numbered sense of "convert" is used in the given sentence.

 Sentence: "If we want to understand how it works, the best thing we can do is to realize that our input is being <t>converted</t> into MathML although it is not necessary to know MathML."

 The key here is that "input" is being converted "into MathML". This is about changing from one format/system (input) to another format (MathML).

 Let me look at the senses:

 1. change from one system to another or to a new plan or policy | examples=We converted from 220 to 110 Volt
 2. change the nature, purpose, or function of something | examples=convert lead into gold
 3. change religious beliefs, or adopt a religious belief | examples=She converted to Buddhism
 4. exchange or replace with another, usually of the same kind or category | examples=Could you convert my dollars into pounds?
 5. cause to adopt a new or different faith | examples=The missionaries converted the Indian population
 6. score an extra point or points after touchdown by kicking the ball through the uprights or advancing the ball into the end zone | examples=Smith converted and his team won
 7. complete successfully | examples=score a penalty shot or free throw
 8. score (a spare)
 9. make (someone) agree, understand, or realize the truth or validity of something | examples=He had finally convinced several customers of the advantages of his product
 10. exchange a penalty for a less severe one
 11. change in nature, purpose, or function; undergo a chemical change | examples=The substance converts to an acid

 The sentence is about converting input into MathML. This is changing from one format/system (the input format) to another system/format (MathML).

 Sense 1 mentions "change from one system to another" - this seems relevant.
 Sense 2 mentions "change the nature, purpose, or function" - this could also fit.
 Sense 4 mentions "exchange or replace with another, usually of the same kind or category" - converting currency or units.
 Sense 11 mentions "change in nature, purpose, or function; undergo a chemical change"

 However, looking closely at the example for sense 1: "We converted from 220 to 110 Volt" - this is about changing electrical systems.
 Looking at sense 4: "Could you convert my dollars into pounds?" - this is about currency exchange.
 Looking at sense 2: "convert lead into gold" - this is about changing the nature/substance.

 The sentence is about converting data/input from one format to another (into MathML). This is most similar to sense 1 (changing from one system to another) or sense 4 (exchange/replace).

 But sense 4 specifically mentions "exchange or replace with another, usually of the same kind or category" and gives currency as an example. Converting input to MathML is changing from one representation system to another.

 Actually, looking at WordNet or similar lexical databases (since this looks like a WordNet-style sense inventory):

 Sense 1: "change from one system to another or to a new plan or policy" - example: "We converted from 220 to 110 Volt"
 Sense 2: "change the nature, purpose, or function of something" - example: "convert lead into gold"
 Sense 4: "exchange or replace with another, usually of the same kind or category" - example: "Could you convert my dollars into pounds?"

 Converting input to MathML is about changing the representation format. This is closest to sense 1 (system conversion) or sense 4 (exchange).

 But wait, sense 2 "convert lead into gold" is about transmutation/changing nature. Sense 11 is similar but specifically mentions chemical change.

 In computational contexts, "convert" usually maps to sense 1 or sense 4.

 Sense 1: "change from one system to another" - this fits well because you're changing from one markup/format system to another (MathML).
 Sense 4: "exchange or replace with another, usually of the same kind or category" - this is often used for currency, units, etc.

 Actually, looking at the example for sense 4: "Could you convert my dollars into pounds?" - this is about currency conversion.
 Looking at sense 1: "We converted from 220 to 110 Volt" - this is about electrical systems.

 Converting input data to MathML is more like changing from one system/format to another. I think sense 1 is the best fit.

 But let me reconsider sense 2: "change the nature, purpose, or function of something" with example "convert lead into gold". This is about transformation of substance.

 And sense 11: "change in nature, purpose, or function; undergo a chemical change" with example "The substance converts to an acid".

 The input is being transformed into MathML. This is a data transformation.

 In many lexical resources, converting data from format A to format B falls under sense 1 (change from one system to another).

 However, looking at the specific wording:
 - Sense 1: "change from one system to another or to a new plan or policy"
 - Sense 2: "change the nature, purpose, or function of something"
 - Sense 4: "exchange or replace with another, usually of the same kind or category"

 Converting input to MathML is changing the format/representation system. This aligns with sense 1.

 But I should check if there's a specific sense for data conversion. Looking at the list, sense 1 seems to be the most appropriate for converting from one format/system to another.

 Wait, sense 4 might also be a candidate: "exchange or replace with another, usually of the same kind or category". Converting input to MathML could be seen as exchanging one representation for another of the same content.

 However, sense 1's example "We converted from 220 to 110 Volt" is about changing electrical systems, which is analogous to changing data formats (from input format to MathML).

 Sense 2's example "convert lead into gold" is about alchemy/transmutation, which is different.

 I think the answer is 1.

 But let me double-check by looking at how WordNet actually defines these senses. This looks like it could be from WordNet 3.0 or similar.

 WordNet 3.0 senses for "convert" (verb):
 1. convert - change the nature, purpose, or function of something; "convert lead into gold"; "convert hotels into jails"; "convert slaves to laborers"
 2. convert - change from one system to another or to a new plan or policy; "We converted from 220 to 110 Volt"
 3. convert - change religious beliefs, or adopt a religious belief; "She converted to Buddhism"
 4. convert - exchange or replace with another, usually of the same kind or category; "Could you convert my dollars into pounds?"; "He changed his name"; "convert centimeters into inches"
 5. convert - cause to adopt a new or different faith; "The missionaries converted the Indian population"
 6. convert - score an extra point or points after touchdown by kicking the ball through the uprights or advancing the ball into the end zone; "Smith converted and his team won"
 7. convert - complete successfully; "score a penalty shot or free throw"
 8. convert - score (a spare)
 9. convert - make (someone) agree, understand, or realize the truth or validity of something; "He had finally convinced several customers of the advantages of his product"
 10. convert - exchange a penalty for a less severe one
 11. convert - change in nature, purpose, or function; undergo a chemical change; "The substance converts to an acid"

 Wait, looking at the user's list:
 Sense 1: change from one system to another...
 Sense 2: change the nature, purpose, or function...
 Sense 11: change in nature, purpose, or function; undergo a chemical change...

 This seems to have sense 1 and 2 swapped compared to WordNet, or sense 11 is a separate sense.

 Actually, looking carefully:
 The user's sense 1 = "change from one system to another"
 The user's sense 2 = "change the nature, purpose, or function"
 The user's sense 11 = "change in nature, purpose, or function; undergo a chemical change"

 This is confusing. Sense 2 and 11 seem very similar.

 But regardless, for converting input to MathML:
 - It's not religious (3, 5)
 - It's not sports (6, 7, 8)
 - It's not convincing someone (9)
 - It's not exchanging penalties (10)
 - It's not chemical change (11)

 It's between 1, 2, and 4.

 Sense 4: "exchange or replace with another, usually of the same kind or category" - examples include currency conversion and unit conversion (inches to centimeters).

 Converting input to MathML is essentially converting from one markup language/format to another. This is very similar to converting dollars to pounds or centimeters to inches. It's a transformation of representation.

 However, sense 1 "change from one system to another" also fits.

 In many NLP datasets (like SemCor or similar), when data is converted from one format to another, it's often tagged with the "system" sense or the "exchange" sense depending on the specific resource.

 But looking at the example for sense 4: "Could you convert my dollars into pounds?" and potentially "convert centimeters into inches" (though not listed, it's implied by the definition), this is about converting representations/values.

 The example for sense 1 is "We converted from 220 to 110 Volt" which is about changing the electrical system.

 Converting input to MathML is changing the data format/system. I think sense 1 is slightly better, but sense 4 is also plausible.

 However, looking at the specific phrasing "converted into MathML", this parallels "convert into gold" (sense 2) or "convert to an acid" (sense 11).

 But "convert lead into gold" is about changing the substance itself, whereas converting input to MathML is changing the encoding/representation, not the underlying meaning/content.

 Actually, looking at sense 2 again: "change the nature, purpose, or function of something". Converting a hotel into a jail changes its purpose. Converting lead into gold changes its nature.

 Converting input to MathML doesn't change the nature or purpose of the input - it's still mathematical content, just in a different format. So sense 2 is not right.

 Sense 11 mentions chemical change, so that's out.

 So it's between 1 and 4.

 Sense 1: system change (220V to 110V)
 Sense 4: exchange/replace of same kind (dollars to pounds)

 Converting data from input format to MathML is more like changing systems (from input system to MathML system) or exchanging representations.

 In WordNet, the "exchange" sense (usually sense 4 in WordNet 3.0) covers currency and units. The "system" sense (usually sense 2 in WordNet 3.0) covers things like converting to the metric system, or changing voltage.

 Given that MathML is a markup language/system, and we're converting from one system (the input format) to another (MathML), sense 1 seems most appropriate.

 But I should verify: in the sentence, "our input is being converted into MathML". This is a data conversion. In computational linguistics sense inventories, this typically maps to the "change from one system to another" sense or the "exchange" sense.

 Given the options, and that sense 4 explicitly mentions currency which is about value exchange, while sense 1 mentions electrical systems which is about technical systems, and MathML is a technical system, I lean toward sense 1.

 However, looking at the user's sense 2: "change the nature, purpose, or function of something" - this is actually WordNet sense 1.
 User's sense 1: "change from one system to another" - this is WordNet sense 2.
 User's sense 4: "exchange or replace..." - this is WordNet sense 3 or 4.

 In WordNet 3.0:
 - Sense 1: change the nature, purpose, or function of something (convert lead into gold)
 - Sense 2: change from one system to another (convert from 220 to 110 Volt)
 - Sense 3: change religious beliefs...
 - Sense 4: exchange or replace with another... (convert dollars to pounds)

 So the user has:
 1 = WordNet 2
 2 = WordNet 1
 4 = WordNet 4

 For "convert input into MathML", this is changing from one format/system to another. This corresponds to WordNet sense 2, which is the user's sense 1.

 Therefore, the answer should be 1.

 Wait, I need to be careful. Is converting input to MathML changing the "system" or "exchanging" representations?

 In WordNet, sense 4 (user's sense 4) is "exchange or replace with another, usually of the same kind or category". This includes unit conversions and currency conversions.

 Converting to MathML is converting from one markup language to another. This could be seen as exchanging one representation for another (sense 4), or changing from one system to another (sense 1).

 But given that MathML is a specific technical system/format, and the input is being transformed into that system, sense 1 (change from one system to another) is the best fit.

 Final check: The sentence is about data conversion - transforming input data into MathML format. This is a change of system/representation. Answer: 1.

provider: Chutes


[User]
Which numbered sense of "necessary" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: If we want to understand how it works, the best thing we can do is to realize that our input is being converted into MathML although it is not <t>necessary</t> to know MathML.

Senses:
1. definition=absolutely essential
2. definition=unavoidably determined by prior circumstances | examples=the necessary consequences of one's actions

reasoning_content:
The user is asking me to identify which sense of "necessary" is used in the given sentence. The sentence is:
"If we want to understand how it works, the best thing we can do is to realize that our input is being converted into MathML although it is not <t>necessary</t> to know MathML."

The two senses provided are:
1. definition=absolutely essential
2. definition=unavoidably determined by prior circumstances | examples=the necessary consequences of one's actions

Let me analyze the sentence. The phrase "it is not necessary to know MathML" means that knowing MathML is not absolutely essential or required. You don't have to know MathML to understand how it works, even though the input is being converted into MathML.

Looking at sense 1: "absolutely essential" - this fits because "not necessary" means "not absolutely essential" or "not required."

Looking at sense 2: "unavoidably determined by prior circumstances" - this doesn't fit. The sentence isn't saying that knowing MathML is not unavoidably determined by prior circumstances. The context is about whether something is required or essential for understanding, not about causal determinism or inevitable consequences.

Sense 2 seems to be about logical or causal necessity - like "necessary consequences" where one thing necessarily follows from another. But in the given sentence, "necessary" is about whether something is required or essential for a purpose (understanding how it works).

So the correct sense is 1.

The answer should be just the number: 1.

provider: Moonshot AI


[User]
Which numbered sense of "know" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: If we want to understand how it works, the best thing we can do is to realize that our input is being converted into MathML although it is not necessary to <t>know</t> MathML.

Senses:
1. definition=be cognizant or aware of a fact or a specific piece of information; possess knowledge or information about | examples=I know that the President lied to the people
2. definition=know how to do or perform something | examples=She knows how to knit
3. definition=be aware of the truth of something; have a belief or faith in something; regard as true beyond any doubt | examples=I know that I left the key on the table
4. definition=be familiar or acquainted with a person or an object | examples=She doesn't know this composer
5. definition=have firsthand knowledge of states, situations, emotions, or sensations | examples=I know the feeling!
6. definition=accept (someone) to be what is claimed or accept his power and authority | examples=The Crown Prince was acknowledged as the true heir to the throne
7. definition=have fixed in the mind | examples=I know Latin
8. definition=have sexual intercourse with | examples=This student sleeps with everyone in her dorm
9. definition=know the nature or character of | examples=we all knew her as a big show-off
10. definition=be able to distinguish, recognize as being different | examples=The child knows right from wrong
11. definition=perceive as familiar | examples=I know this voice!

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to identify which numbered sense of "know" is used in the given sentence.

 Sentence: "If we want to understand how it works, the best thing we can do is to realize that our input is being converted into MathML although it is not necessary to <t>know</t> MathML."

 Let me analyze the context:
 - The sentence is talking about understanding how something works
 - It mentions that input is being converted into MathML
 - It says it is not necessary to "know" MathML

 Here, "know" MathML means to have knowledge of MathML, to be familiar with it, to understand it, or to possess information about it.

 Let me look at the senses:

 1. "be cognizant or aware of a fact or a specific piece of information; possess knowledge or information about" - This could fit. It means having knowledge about MathML.

 2. "know how to do or perform something" - This would mean knowing how to use/create MathML. This is also possible, but the context suggests having knowledge of the language itself, not necessarily the skill to perform something with it.

 3. "be aware of the truth of something; have a belief or faith in something; regard as true beyond any doubt" - This is about believing something is true, not about knowing a subject/language.

 4. "be familiar or acquainted with a person or an object" - This is about familiarity with a person or object. MathML is a markup language (an object/system), so this could fit.

 5. "have firsthand knowledge of states, situations, emotions, or sensations" - This is about experiencing feelings/sensations.

 6. "accept (someone) to be what is claimed or accept his power and authority" - This is about acknowledging someone.

 7. "have fixed in the mind" - This is about memorizing or having learned something (like a language). "I know Latin" - this means I have knowledge of Latin.

 8. "have sexual intercourse with" - Not relevant.

 9. "know the nature or character of" - This is about understanding what someone/something is like.

 10. "be able to distinguish, recognize as being different" - This is about discrimination between options.

 11. "perceive as familiar" - This is about recognition.

 Now, looking at the specific context: "it is not necessary to know MathML"

 MathML is a markup language (like HTML, XML). When we say we "know" a language like MathML, HTML, Latin, French, etc., we typically mean we have knowledge of it, we are familiar with it, or we have learned it.

 Looking at sense 7: "have fixed in the mind" with example "I know Latin" - this seems very close. Knowing a language means having learned it, having it fixed in the mind.

 Looking at sense 4: "be familiar or acquainted with a person or an object" - MathML could be considered an object (a language system), but the examples given is "She doesn't know this composer" which is about a person.

 Looking at sense 1: "be cognizant or aware of a fact or a specific piece of information; possess knowledge or information about" - This is about knowing facts. "I know that the President lied" - knowing a fact.

 But "know MathML" is more about knowing a subject/field/language, not just being aware of a specific fact.

 Sense 7 with "I know Latin" is the closest parallel. Knowing MathML is like knowing Latin - it's having knowledge of a language or system.

 However, let me reconsider sense 4: "be familiar or acquainted with a person or an object". Is MathML an object? In a broad sense, yes - it's a language, a technology, a system. But the example "She doesn't know this composer" suggests personal acquaintance.

 Sense 1 is about possessing knowledge or information about something. "possess knowledge or information about" - this could work for MathML.

 But let's look at the example for sense 7 again: "I know Latin". This is exactly parallel to "know MathML". Both are languages (computer language vs human language).

 Actually, looking more carefully at the definitions:

 Sense 1: "be cognizant or aware of a fact or a specific piece of information; possess knowledge or information about"
 Example: "I know that the President lied to the people"
 This is propositional knowledge - knowing that something is the case.

 Sense 7: "have fixed in the mind"
 Example: "I know Latin"
 This is knowledge of a subject/language - having learned it.

 Sense 4: "be familiar or acquainted with a person or an object"
 Example: "She doesn't know this composer"
 This is acquaintance knowledge.

 In the sentence "it is not necessary to know MathML", the meaning is that you don't need to have knowledge of MathML, you don't need to be familiar with it, you don't need to understand it.

 This aligns best with sense 7 "have fixed in the mind" (i.e., have learned/be familiar with as a subject) or sense 4 "be familiar or acquainted with".

 But sense 7's example "I know Latin" is almost exactly parallel to "know MathML".

 However, sense 4 could also work if we consider MathML as an object that one can be acquainted with.

 Let me look at sense 9: "know the nature or character of" - example: "we all knew her as a big show-off". This is about understanding the character/nature.

 Actually, looking at standard dictionary senses, "know" when used with a language or subject (like "know English", "know math", "know programming") usually means to have knowledge of that subject, to be proficient in it or familiar with it.

 Between sense 1, 4, and 7:

 Sense 1 is about knowing facts (knowing that...).
 Sense 4 is about being acquainted with persons or objects.
 Sense 7 is about having something fixed in the mind (like a language).

 The example "I know Latin" in sense 7 is the smoking gun. MathML is a language (mathematical markup language). Therefore, sense 7 is the best fit.

 Wait, let me double-check sense 4. "be familiar or acquainted with a person or an object". Could MathML be an "object"? In philosophy, languages are sometimes considered abstract objects. But in the context of WordNet or similar lexical databases (which this looks like), sense 4 is typically for personal acquaintance ("I know John", "I know that composer").

 Sense 7 is for knowing languages, knowing systems, having knowledge fixed in the mind.

 Actually, looking at the example for sense 1 again: "possess knowledge or information about". This is quite broad. But the example "I know that the President lied" suggests it's propositional.

 Let me reconsider the exact wording in the sentence: "it is not necessary to know MathML."

 This means: one does not need to have knowledge of MathML, one does not need to be familiar with MathML, one does not need to understand MathML.

 In many lexical databases (like WordNet), the sense for knowing a language is distinct from knowing a fact or knowing a person.

 Sense 7: "have fixed in the mind" - this is the "know" as in "know a language", "know the alphabet", etc.

 But actually, looking at the definition "have fixed in the mind", it might be more about memorization.

 Let me look at sense 4 again: "be familiar or acquainted with a person or an object". If MathML is considered an object (the language/system), then this could fit.

 But the example "She doesn't know this composer" is clearly about a person.

 Sense 9: "know the nature or character of" - example about knowing someone as a show-off.

 Hmm.

 Let me think about this differently. In the sentence, "know MathML" means to understand MathML, to be knowledgeable about it.

 This is closest to sense 1 or sense 7.

 But sense 1 says "be cognizant or aware of a fact or a specific piece of information". MathML is not a fact, it's a language/system.

 Sense 7 says "have fixed in the mind" with example "I know Latin". This is exactly it.

 Actually, looking at WordNet (which this appears to be based on), sense 7 is:
 "have fixed in the mind; 'I know Latin'; 'She knows her tables'"

 Sense 4 is:
 "be familiar or acquainted with a person or an object; 'I don't know this word'; 'She doesn't know this composer'"

 Wait, "I don't know this word" - that's interesting. A word is an object or linguistic unit. So "know MathML" could be sense 4 if MathML is treated as a subject/field that one is acquainted with.

 But "I know Latin" vs "I don't know this word" - Latin is a language, "this word" is a specific lexical item.

 MathML is a language (like Latin), not just a word. So sense 7 seems better.

 However, looking at sense 4's example "I don't know this word" - if you don't know a word, you are not acquainted with it. If you know MathML, you are acquainted with the language.

 But actually, in WordNet, the sense for knowing a language is typically:
 "know: be able to communicate in a language; 'She knows French'"

 Or it might be grouped with having knowledge.

 Let me reconsider all options carefully:

 1. know that (propositional) - "I know that X"
 2. know how (procedural) - "know how to knit"
 3. know that (certainty) - similar to 1
 4. be acquainted with - "know him", "know this word"
 5. experience - "know the feeling"
 6. acknowledge/accept
 7. have in mind/memorized - "know Latin", "know the alphabet"
 8. biblical sense
 9. know as/understand character - "know her as..."
 10. discriminate - "know right from wrong"
 11. recognize - "know this voice"

 The sentence: "it is not necessary to know MathML"

 This is saying you don't need to be familiar with MathML, you don't need to have knowledge of it.

 This could be sense 4 (acquainted with) or sense 7 (have fixed in mind).

 But "I know Latin" (sense 7) is the strongest parallel. MathML is a markup language, just as Latin is a language.

 However, sense 4 includes "I don't know this word" which is linguistic knowledge.

 Actually, looking at WordNet 3.1 or similar:

 The senses listed look like they might be from WordNet.

 In WordNet, the entry for "know" has these senses (approximately):

 1. know, cognize (be cognizant of)
 2. know (know how to do something)
 3. know (be aware of the truth of)
 4. know (be familiar with)
 5. know (have firsthand knowledge)
 6. acknowledge, recognize (accept as valid)
 7. know (have fixed in the mind)
 8. know (have sex with)
 9. know (know the nature of)
 10. distinguish (know right from wrong)
 11. recognize (perceive as familiar)

 Actually, looking at the specific wording:

 Sense 4: "be familiar or acquainted with a person or an object"
 Example: "She doesn't know this composer"

 Sense 7: "have fixed in the mind"
 Example: "I know Latin"

 "Know MathML" is most analogous to "know Latin". Both are languages. Therefore, sense 7 is the answer.

 But wait, is MathML a language that you "have fixed in your mind"? Or is it something you are "familiar with"?

 Actually, looking at the example for sense 4 again: "She doesn't know this composer". Composers are people.

 But "I don't know this word" - words are objects.

 MathML is a system/language.

 In many dictionaries, "know a language" is a distinct sense.

 Given the options, sense 7 with "I know Latin" is the closest match to "know MathML".

 However, I should also consider sense 1: "possess knowledge or information about". If you know MathML, you possess knowledge about it.

 But the example for sense 1 is "I know that the President lied" which is propositional knowledge (knowing that).

 The example for sense 7 is "I know Latin" which is subject knowledge (knowing a field/subject).

 MathML is a subject/field/language, so sense 7 is better.

 Let me verify by checking if there's any other sense that could fit.

 Sense 9: "know the nature or character of" - example "we all knew her as a big show-off". This is about knowing what someone is like.

 Sense 11: "perceive as familiar" - "I know this voice". This is recognition.

 So between 1, 4, and 7:

 - 1 is for facts/propositions
 - 4 is for persons/objects (acquaintance)
 - 7 is for subjects/languages learned

 The answer is 7.

 Actually, looking at the sentence once more: "it is not necessary to know MathML"

 In programming/documentation contexts, this usually means "you don't need to be familiar with MathML" or "you don't need to understand MathML".

 This aligns with sense 4 (be familiar/acquainted with) or sense 7 (have knowledge of).

 But given that "I know Latin" is the example for 7, and MathML is a language, I'll go with 7.

 Wait, I want to double-check sense 4's scope. Could "MathML" be an "object"? In WordNet, sense 4 (wordnet.princeton.edu) is:
 S: (v) know (be familiar or acquainted with a person or an object) "She doesn't know this composer"

 The gloss says "a person or an object". MathML is neither a person nor a physical object, but it is an entity.

 However, sense 7 is:
 S: (v) know (have fixed in the mind) "I know Latin"

 This is specifically for languages, facts, etc. that one has learned and retained.

 Actually, looking at the actual WordNet entry might help clarify. Since I don't have direct access, I need to reason based on the examples.

 The example "I know Latin" is the key. Latin is a language. MathML is a language. Therefore, sense 7.

 But let me also consider: could it be sense 1?

 Sense 1: "be cognizant or aware of a fact or a specific piece of information"
 If the sentence were "it is not necessary to know that MathML is a markup language", that would be sense 1.
 But "know MathML" means know the language itself, not just a fact about it.

 Therefore, sense 7 is correct.

 Actually, one more check: sense 4 with "I don't know this word" - a word is part of a language. MathML is a language. But "this word" is specific, while "MathML" is the whole system.

 I think 7 is the safest answer.

 Final check: The user asks for the number only.

 Answer: 7

provider: AtlasCloud


[User]
Which numbered sense of "base" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: I have <t>based</t> the syntax basically on common sense, it should not be hard for anyone.

Senses:
1. definition=use as a basis for; found on | examples=base a claim on some observation
2. definition=situate as a center of operations | examples=we will base this project in the new lab
3. definition=use (purified cocaine) by burning it and inhaling the fumes

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to identify which numbered sense of "base" is used in the given sentence.

Sentence: "I have <t>based</t> the syntax basically on common sense, it should not be hard for anyone."

The word "based" here is used in the phrase "based the syntax ... on common sense". This means using common sense as a foundation or basis for the syntax.

Looking at the senses:
1. definition=use as a basis for; found on | examples=base a claim on some observation
2. definition=situate as a center of operations | examples=we will base this project in the new lab
3. definition=use (purified cocaine) by burning it and inhaling the fumes

Sense 1 matches perfectly: "use as a basis for; found on". The example "base a claim on some observation" parallels "based the syntax on common sense".

Sense 2 involves physical location/situation ("base this project in the new lab"), which doesn't fit.
Sense 3 is about drug use, which is completely unrelated.

Therefore, the answer is 1.

provider: SiliconFlow


[User]
Which numbered sense of "hard" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: I have based the syntax basically on common sense, it should not be <t>hard</t> for anyone.

Senses:
1. definition=not easy; requiring great physical or mental effort to accomplish or comprehend or endure | examples=a difficult task
2. definition=dispassionate | examples=took a hard look
3. definition=resisting weight or pressure
4. definition=very strong or vigorous | examples=strong winds
5. definition=characterized by effort to the point of exhaustion; especially physical effort | examples=worked their arduous way up the mining valley
6. definition=produced without vibration of the vocal cords | examples=unvoiced consonants such as `p' and `k' and `s'
7. definition=(of light) transmitted directly from a pointed light source
8. definition=(of speech sounds); produced with the back of the tongue raised toward or touching the velum | examples=Russian distinguished between hard consonants and palatalized or soft consonants
9. definition=given to excessive indulgence of bodily appetites especially for intoxicating liquors | examples=a hard drinker
10. definition=being distilled rather than fermented; having a high alcoholic content | examples=hard liquor
11. definition=unfortunate or hard to bear | examples=had hard luck
12. definition=dried out | examples=hard dry rolls left over from the day before

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to identify which numbered sense of "hard" is used in the given sentence.

 Sentence: "I have based the syntax basically on common sense, it should not be <t>hard</t> for anyone."

 The word "hard" here means "difficult" or "not easy".

 Looking at the senses:
 1. definition=not easy; requiring great physical or mental effort to accomplish or comprehend or endure | examples=a difficult task
 2. definition=dispassionate | examples=took a hard look
 3. definition=resisting weight or pressure
 4. definition=very strong or vigorous | examples=strong winds
 5. definition=characterized by effort to the point of exhaustion; especially physical effort | examples=worked their arduous way up the mining valley
 6. definition=produced without vibration of the vocal cords | examples=unvoiced consonants such as `p' and `k' and `s'
 7. definition=(of light) transmitted directly from a pointed light source
 8. definition=(of speech sounds); produced with the back of the tongue raised toward or touching the velum | examples=Russian distinguished between hard consonants and palatalized or soft consonants
 9. definition=given to excessive indulgence of bodily appetites especially for intoxicating liquors | examples=a hard drinker
 10. definition=being distilled rather than fermented; having a high alcoholic content | examples=hard liquor
 11. definition=unfortunate or hard to bear | examples=had hard luck
 12. definition=dried out | examples=hard dry rolls left over from the day before

 The sentence says "it should not be hard for anyone" meaning it should not be difficult for anyone to understand or do. This matches sense 1: "not easy; requiring great physical or mental effort to accomplish or comprehend or endure".

 The answer is 1.


[User]
Which numbered sense of "closely" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: I ve looked <t>closely</t> to maxima and maple s syntax so they look very similar.

Senses:
1. definition=in a close relation or position in time or space | examples=the onsets were closely timed
2. definition=in an attentive manner | examples=he remained close on his guard
3. definition=in a close manner | examples=the two phenomena are intimately connected

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to identify which numbered sense of "closely" is used in the given sentence.

 Sentence: "I ve looked <t>closely</t> to maxima and maple s syntax so they look very similar."

 Let me analyze the sentence:
 - The person has looked "closely" at Maxima and Maple's syntax
 - The result is that they look very similar
 - This suggests careful examination or attentive observation

 Now let's look at the senses:

 1. "in a close relation or position in time or space" - examples: "the onsets were closely timed"
    - This refers to physical or temporal proximity/closeness
    - Doesn't fit well with "looked closely to syntax"

 2. "in an attentive manner" - examples: "he remained close on his guard" (wait, the example seems a bit odd, but the definition says "attentive manner")
    - This would mean carefully examining, paying close attention
    - "Looked closely" typically means examined carefully/attentively

 3. "in a close manner" - examples: "the two phenomena are intimately connected"
    - This seems to refer to close connection or relationship between things
    - The example suggests connection/intimacy

 In the sentence "I ve looked closely to maxima and maple s syntax", the word "closely" is modifying "looked" (or "looked to").

 Actually, looking at the sentence structure again: "looked closely to" - this might be a typo for "looked closely at" or it could mean "looked closely to" as in "paid close attention to".

 But wait, let me reconsider the senses. The sentence is comparing Maxima and Maple's syntax and saying they look similar. The person looked "closely" at them.

 If I look "closely" at something, I examine it carefully - that's sense 2 (attentive manner).

 However, let me look at sense 3 again: "in a close manner" with the example "the two phenomena are intimately connected". This seems to describe the relationship between things.

 But in the sentence, "closely" describes how the looking was done, not the relationship between the syntaxes. The relationship is described by "similar".

 Actually, looking at the sentence again: "I ve looked closely to maxima and maple s syntax so they look very similar."

 Wait, could "closely" here mean something like "in a way that shows closeness/similarity"? No, that doesn't make sense grammatically. "Looked closely" is the verb phrase.

 Let me reconsider sense 1: "in a close relation or position in time or space"
 - This would be like "closely spaced", "closely timed"
 - Not fitting for examining syntax

 Sense 2: "in an attentive manner"
 - "He watched closely"
 - "She looked closely at the details"
 - This fits: examining the syntax carefully/attentively

 Sense 3: "in a close manner"
 - This is vague, but the example "intimately connected" suggests a tight relationship
 - Could this mean "closely" as in "closely related"?
 - But in the sentence, "closely" modifies "looked", not the relationship between the syntaxes.

 Actually, looking at the example for sense 2: "he remained close on his guard" - this seems like it might be a different usage. But the definition says "in an attentive manner".

 Let me think about the phrase "looked closely". This is a very common collocation meaning "examined carefully" or "observed attentively". This would be sense 2.

 But wait, I should check if there's any other interpretation. Could "closely" here mean something like "in a close way" referring to the similarity? No, the word order is "looked closely to", so it's modifying the verb "looked".

 Actually, looking at the sentence once more: "I ve looked closely to maxima and maple s syntax so they look very similar."

 Is it possible that "closely" is being used to mean "in a close relation" (sense 1) or "in a close manner" (sense 3) in the sense of "similarly"? Like "closely resembling"? But here it's "looked closely to", not "closely similar".

 The structure is:
 - Subject: I
 - Verb: ve looked
 - Adverb: closely
 - Prepositional phrase: to maxima and maple s syntax
 - Result clause: so they look very similar

 "Looked closely to" is likely a non-native speaker's way of saying "looked closely at" or "paid close attention to". It means examining carefully.

 Therefore, sense 2: "in an attentive manner" is the correct answer.

 But let me double-check sense 3. Could "in a close manner" mean carefully? The example "the two phenomena are intimately connected" suggests it's about the degree of connection, not about attentiveness.

 Sense 1 is about time/space proximity.

 So yes, sense 2 is the best fit.

 Wait, I should reconsider the example given for sense 2: "he remained close on his guard". This is a bit strange. Usually we say "remained close" or "stood close guard". But "close on his guard" might mean something else. However, the definition clearly states "in an attentive manner", which aligns with "closely" meaning carefully/attentively.

 Actually, looking at standard dictionary definitions of "closely":
 1. In a close manner; near in space or time
 2. In a close manner; intimately; carefully; attentively

 So sense 2 in the list provided seems to be the "attentively/carefully" meaning.

 The sentence is about examining syntax carefully to see that they are similar.

 Therefore, the answer is 2.

 But let me reconsider one more time. Is there any chance it's sense 3? "In a close manner" - could this mean carefully? The example "intimately connected" suggests tight connection. If I look at something "in a close manner", could that mean carefully? Maybe, but "intimately connected" is about relationship, not about observation.

 Sense 2 explicitly mentions "attentive manner", which is exactly what "look closely" means.

 So I'm confident the answer is 2.


[User]
Which numbered sense of "look" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: I ve looked closely to maxima and maple s syntax so they <t>look</t> very similar.

Senses:
1. definition=perceive with attention; direct one's gaze towards | examples=She looked over the expanse of land
2. definition=give a certain impression or have a certain outward aspect | examples=She seems to be sleeping
3. definition=have a certain outward or facial expression | examples=How does she look?
4. definition=search or seek | examples=We looked all day and finally found the child in the forest
5. definition=be oriented in a certain direction, often with respect to another reference point; be opposite to | examples=The house looks north
6. definition=take charge of or deal with | examples=Could you see about lunch?
7. definition=convey by one's expression | examples=She looked her devotion to me
8. definition=look forward to the probable occurrence of | examples=We were expecting a visit from our relatives
9. definition=accord in appearance with | examples=You don't look your age!
10. definition=have faith or confidence in | examples=you can count on me to help you any time

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to identify which numbered sense of "look" is used in the given sentence.

 Sentence: "I ve looked closely to maxima and maple s syntax so they <t>look</t> very similar."

 The word "look" in the sentence is marked with <t></t> tags, so it's the word "look" in "they look very similar."

 Let me analyze the sentence:
 - The speaker has looked closely at Maxima and Maple's syntax
 - As a result, "they look very similar"
 - Here "they" refers to the syntax of Maxima and Maple (computer algebra systems)
 - The meaning is that they give the impression of being similar, or they appear to be similar

 Now let's look at the senses:

 1. perceive with attention; direct one's gaze towards - This is about actively looking at something with eyes. Not this one.

 2. give a certain impression or have a certain outward aspect - Examples: "She seems to be sleeping", "They look very similar" - This fits. It means to appear or seem.

 3. have a certain outward or facial expression - This is specifically about facial expressions. Not this one.

 4. search or seek - Not this one.

 5. be oriented in a certain direction - Not this one.

 6. take charge of or deal with - Not this one.

 7. convey by one's expression - Not this one.

 8. look forward to the probable occurrence of - Not this one.

 9. accord in appearance with - Example: "You don't look your age!" - This is about matching or corresponding in appearance. The sentence says "they look very similar" which is about appearing similar, not about matching a specific standard or age.

 10. have faith or confidence in - Not this one.

 Sense 2 seems to be the best fit: "give a certain impression or have a certain outward aspect" - the syntax gives the impression of being similar, or appears to be similar.

 The example given for sense 2 is "She seems to be sleeping" which aligns with the meaning of appearing/seeming.

 So the answer should be 2.

provider: ModelRun


[User]
Which numbered sense of "very" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: I ve looked closely to maxima and maple s syntax so they look <t>very</t> similar.

Senses:
1. definition=used as intensifiers; `real' is sometimes used informally for `really'; `rattling' is informal | examples=she was very gifted
2. definition=precisely so | examples=on the very next page

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to identify which sense of "very" is used in the given sentence. The sentence is: "I ve looked closely to maxima and maple s syntax so they look <t>very</t> similar."

The two senses provided are:
1. definition=used as intensifiers; `real' is sometimes used informally for `really'; `rattling' is informal | examples=she was very gifted
2. definition=precisely so | examples=on the very next page

Let me analyze the sentence. The word "very" is modifying "similar" - "they look very similar."

In this context, "very" is being used as an intensifier to emphasize the degree of similarity. It's saying they are extremely or highly similar.

Sense 1 says "used as intensifiers" and gives the example "she was very gifted" - where "very" intensifies "gifted."

Sense 2 says "precisely so" and gives the example "on the very next page" - where "very" means "exact" or "precise" (like "the very thing I wanted").

In the sentence "they look very similar," "very" is clearly functioning as an intensifier/adverb of degree modifying the adjective "similar." This matches sense 1.

Sense 2 would be used in contexts like "the very same day" or "at the very beginning" where it means "exact" or "precise."

Therefore, the answer is 1.

provider: Phala


[User]
Which numbered sense of "similar" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: I ve looked closely to maxima and maple s syntax so they look very <t>similar</t>.

Senses:
1. definition=marked by correspondence or resemblance | examples=similar food at similar prices
2. definition=having the same or similar characteristics | examples=all politicians are alike
3. definition=resembling or similar; having the same or some of the same characteristics; often used in combination | examples=suits of like design
4. definition=(of words) expressing closely related meanings
5. definition=capable of replacing or changing places with something else; permitting mutual substitution without loss of function or suitability | examples=interchangeable electric outlets

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to identify which numbered sense of "similar" is used in the given sentence.

 Sentence: "I ve looked closely to maxima and maple s syntax so they look very <t>similar</t>."

 Let me analyze the sentence:
 - The speaker is comparing the syntax of Maxima and Maple (which are computer algebra systems/mathematical software)
 - They say the syntax looks "very similar"
 - This means the syntax of both systems resembles each other or has comparable characteristics

 Now let's look at the senses:

 1. "marked by correspondence or resemblance" - examples: similar food at similar prices
    - This seems to fit. The syntax of Maxima and Maple corresponds to each other or resembles each other.

 2. "having the same or similar characteristics" - examples: all politicians are alike
    - This also seems close. The syntax has similar characteristics.

 3. "resembling or similar; having the same or some of the same characteristics; often used in combination" - examples: suits of like design
    - This is very similar to sense 2.

 4. "(of words) expressing closely related meanings"
    - This is about words/semantics, not syntax of programming languages. Doesn't fit.

 5. "capable of replacing or changing places with something else; permitting mutual substitution without loss of function or suitability" - examples: interchangeable electric outlets
    - This is about being interchangeable. While similar syntax might imply some interchangeability, the sentence is specifically about appearance/looks ("they look very similar"), not about being interchangeable or substitutable.

 Now between senses 1, 2, and 3:

 Sense 1: "marked by correspondence or resemblance"
 Sense 2: "having the same or similar characteristics"
 Sense 3: "resembling or similar; having the same or some of the same characteristics; often used in combination"

 The sentence says "they look very similar" - this is about visual or structural resemblance between the two syntaxes.

 Looking at the examples:
 - Sense 1: "similar food at similar prices" - this is about correspondence
 - Sense 2: "all politicians are alike" - this is about shared characteristics
 - Sense 3: "suits of like design" - this is about resemblance

 Actually, looking carefully at the definitions:

 Sense 1 emphasizes "correspondence or resemblance" - this seems to be the most general and commonly used sense for things that look alike or correspond to each other.

 Sense 2 emphasizes "same or similar characteristics" - this is also close.

 Sense 3 says "resembling or similar" which is somewhat circular, and mentions "often used in combination" (like "like design").

 The sentence is comparing two things (Maxima and Maple syntax) and saying they look similar/resemble each other.

 In WordNet or similar lexical databases, sense 1 is usually the primary sense: "marked by correspondence or resemblance."

 Let me think about the specific context. The user is comparing programming languages' syntax. When we say two syntaxes look similar, we mean they resemble each other or correspond to each other in structure.

 Sense 1: "marked by correspondence or resemblance" - this fits well.
 Sense 2: "having the same or similar characteristics" - this also fits.
 Sense 3: "resembling or similar..." - this is very close to sense 1 and 2.

 But looking at the exact wording:
 - Sense 1: "marked by correspondence or resemblance"
 - Sense 2: "having the same or similar characteristics"
 - Sense 3: "resembling or similar; having the same or some of the same characteristics; often used in combination"

 The phrase "they look very similar" suggests visual or structural resemblance.

 In many lexical databases (like WordNet), the senses are ordered by frequency. Sense 1 is typically the most common.

 However, I need to look at the specific definitions given to determine which one is intended.

 Actually, looking at the example for sense 2: "all politicians are alike" - this suggests that sense 2 is about things being alike/equal in nature.

 The example for sense 1: "similar food at similar prices" - this is about things that correspond or resemble each other.

 The example for sense 3: "suits of like design" - this uses "like" and mentions combination.

 The sentence is: "they look very similar" - this is about appearance/resemblance.

 Between sense 1 and sense 3, both mention resemblance. But sense 1 says "marked by correspondence or resemblance" while sense 3 says "resembling or similar; having the same or some of the same characteristics; often used in combination."

 The key might be in the phrase "often used in combination" in sense 3. The word "similar" in the sentence is not used in combination (like "similar-looking" or "like-minded"), it's used as a predicate adjective: "they look very similar."

 Sense 2 has the example "all politicians are alike" which uses "alike" (which is related to "like" and "similar").

 Actually, looking at standard dictionary entries for "similar":

 In WordNet 3.0:
 1. similar (adj) - marked by correspondence or resemblance; "similar food at similar prices"; "problems similar to mine"; "they wore similar coats"
 2. alike(p), similar, like - having the same or similar characteristics; "all politicians are alike"; "they looked utterly alike"; "friends are generally alike in background and taste"
 3. like, similar - resembling or similar; having the same or some of the same characteristics; often used in combination; "suits of like design"; "a limited circle of like minds"; "members of the cat family have like dispositions"; "as like as two peas in a pod"; "doglike devotion"; "a dreamlike quality"
 4. similar - (of words) expressing closely related meanings
 5. exchangeable, interchangeable, similar, standardised, standardized - capable of replacing or changing places with something else; permitting mutual substitution without loss of function or suitability; "interchangeable electric outlets"

 Wait, looking at these WordNet definitions:

 Sense 1: "marked by correspondence or resemblance" - example includes "they wore similar coats"
 Sense 2: "having the same or similar characteristics" - example includes "they looked utterly alike"
 Sense 3: "resembling or similar; having the same or some of the same characteristics; often used in combination"

 The sentence "they look very similar" - the word "look" suggests appearance/resemblance.

 In WordNet sense 1, the example "they wore similar coats" is about resemblance.
 In WordNet sense 2, the example "they looked utterly alike" is about appearance.

 But the question is asking which numbered sense from the provided list.

 Looking at the provided list again:
 1. definition=marked by correspondence or resemblance | examples=similar food at similar prices
 2. definition=having the same or similar characteristics | examples=all politicians are alike
 3. definition=resembling or similar; having the same or some of the same characteristics; often used in combination | examples=suits of like design
 4. definition=(of words) expressing closely related meanings
 5. definition=capable of replacing or changing places with something else; permitting mutual substitution without loss of function or suitability | examples=interchangeable electric outlets

 The sentence compares the syntax of two programming languages and says they look very similar.

 This is about resemblance or correspondence.

 Sense 1 seems to be the best fit: "marked by correspondence or resemblance"
 - The syntax of Maxima and Maple corresponds or shows resemblance.

 Sense 2 is also possible: "having the same or similar characteristics"
 - The syntax has similar characteristics.

 But sense 1 is the broader, more general sense of similarity/resemblance.

 However, looking at the example for sense 2: "all politicians are alike" - this is about being alike, which is very similar to "similar."

 Actually, I need to be careful. The user says "Return only the number of the correct sense."

 Let me analyze the specific context. The sentence is about comparing the syntax of Maxima and Maple. The user says "they look very similar."

 In many lexical sense inventories, sense 1 is the default sense for general similarity.

 But let me look at the distinction between senses 1, 2, and 3 more carefully.

 Sense 1: "marked by correspondence or resemblance"
 - This is about two things that correspond to each other or resemble each other.
 - Example: "similar food at similar prices"

 Sense 2: "having the same or similar characteristics"
 - This is about the inherent characteristics being the same.
 - Example: "all politicians are alike"

 Sense 3: "resembling or similar; having the same or some of the same characteristics; often used in combination"
 - This mentions "often used in combination" which suggests compound adjectives or specific syntactic patterns.
 - Example: "suits of like design" - here "like" is used in combination with "design".

 The sentence uses "similar" as a predicate adjective: "they look very similar." It's not used in combination (like "similar-looking" or "similar in design").

 So sense 3 is probably not correct because of the "often used in combination" note.

 Between sense 1 and sense 2:

 Sense 1 emphasizes correspondence/resemblance between two things.
 Sense 2 emphasizes having shared characteristics.

 When we say "they look similar," we are typically saying they resemble each other visually or in appearance. This is sense 1.

 Actually, looking at WordNet again, the distinction is subtle. But in most dictionaries, the primary sense of "similar" is about resemblance or likeness.

 Given the example for sense 1 is "similar food at similar prices" - this is about things that are alike in some way.
 Given the example for sense 2 is "all politicians are alike" - this is about a group sharing characteristics.

 The sentence is comparing two specific things (Maxima syntax and Maple syntax) and saying they look similar. This is a direct comparison showing resemblance.

 I think sense 1 is the answer.

 But let me reconsider sense 2. "Having the same or similar characteristics" - syntax has characteristics, and they are saying the characteristics are similar.

 However, the phrase "they look very similar" emphasizes the appearance/resemblance aspect, which aligns with sense 1 "marked by correspondence or resemblance."

 Also, looking at the WordNet mapping:
 Sense 1 in the list matches WordNet sense 1: similar (marked by correspondence or resemblance)
 Sense 2 in the list matches WordNet sense 2: alike, similar, like (having the same or similar characteristics)
 Sense 3 in the list matches WordNet sense 3: like, similar (resembling or similar... often used in combination)

 In the sentence "they look very similar", the word "look" makes it about appearance/resemblance.

 In WordNet, sense 1 includes the example "they wore similar coats" which is about appearance.
 Sense 2 includes "they looked utterly alike" which is also about appearance.

 This is tricky. Let me think about the difference.

 Sense 2 uses "alike" in the example and definition. "Alike" suggests equality or close identity.
 Sense 1 is about correspondence or resemblance, which can be partial.

 When comparing programming language syntax, they are not identical but they resemble each other.

 Actually, looking at the exact wording of sense 2: "having the same or similar characteristics"
 This is somewhat circular (defining similar as having similar characteristics).

 But the key might be in the word "alike" in the example. Sense 2 seems to be synonymous with "alike."

 Sense 1 is the general sense of similarity.

 I think the answer is 1.

 But I want to double-check. Could it be sense 3?

 Sense 3: "resembling or similar; having the same or some of the same characteristics; often used in combination"

 The phrase "often used in combination" is a strong clue. This sense is for when "similar" is used in compounds or with other words (like "similar in nature", "of similar design").

 In the sentence, "similar" stands alone as a predicate complement: "look very similar."

 So sense 3 is unlikely.

 Sense 4 is about words expressing related meanings - not applicable here.
 Sense 5 is about being interchangeable - not applicable here.

 So it's between 1 and 2.

 Let me look at the examples again:
 Sense 1: "similar food at similar prices" - this is about two separate instances of food and prices that resemble each other.
 Sense 2: "all politicians are alike" - this is about a class of entities sharing characteristics.

 The sentence compares two specific things: Maxima's syntax and Maple's syntax. It says they look similar. This is like saying "similar coats" (sense 1 example).

 Therefore, sense 1 is the correct answer.

 Actually, I should verify by looking at how these senses are typically distinguished.

 In many semantic tagging tasks (like SemCor or similar), sense 1 is the most frequent and general sense.

 The sentence is making a comparison between two entities based on appearance ("look"). This is classic sense 1 territory.

 I'll go with 1.

provider: DeepInfra