[User]
Which numbered sense of "patient" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: Alimta is used in combination with cisplatin in <t>patients</t> who have not been treated before, and on its own in patients who have received another type of chemotherapy in the past.

Senses:
1. definition=a person who requires medical care | examples=the number of emergency patients has grown rapidly
2. definition=the semantic role of an entity that is not the agent but is directly involved in or affected by the happening denoted by the verb in the clause

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to identify which sense of the word "patient" is used in the given sentence. The word is marked with <t></t> tags in the sentence.

Sentence: "Alimta is used in combination with cisplatin in <t>patients</t> who have not been treated before, and on its own in patients who have received another type of chemotherapy in the past."

The two senses provided are:
1. definition=a person who requires medical care | examples=the number of emergency patients has grown rapidly
2. definition=the semantic role of an entity that is not the agent but is directly involved in or affected by the happening denoted by the verb in the clause

Let me analyze the sentence. The word "patients" in this context refers to people who receive medical treatment (Alimta and cisplatin are chemotherapy drugs). These are clearly people who require medical care - they are receiving treatment for conditions (likely cancer, given the mention of Alimta and cisplatin).

Sense 1 refers to the noun "patient" meaning a sick person who receives medical treatment.

Sense 2 refers to the grammatical/linguistic term "patient" - a semantic role in linguistics (the recipient of an action, like "the ball" in "John hit the ball"). This is a technical linguistic term.

In the given sentence, "patients" refers to human beings receiving medical treatment, not to a semantic role in a linguistic sense. The sentence is discussing medical treatment of actual people, not analyzing the grammar of a sentence.

Therefore, the correct sense is 1.

Wait, let me double-check. Is there any way this could be sense 2?
Sense 2 would be used in a linguistic context, like "In the sentence 'The boy kicked the ball,' the ball plays the role of patient."
But in the given sentence, "patients" clearly refers to the people being treated with the drugs Alimta and cisplatin. This is the medical definition.

So the answer is 1.


attempt_kind: initial

status: success

[User]
Which numbered sense of "treat" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: Alimta is used in combination with cisplatin in patients who have not been <t>treated</t> before, and on its own in patients who have received another type of chemotherapy in the past.

Senses:
1. definition=interact in a certain way | examples=Do right by her
2. definition=subject to a process or treatment, with the aim of readying for some purpose, improving, or remedying a condition | examples=process cheese
3. definition=provide treatment for | examples=The doctor treated my broken leg
4. definition=act on verbally or in some form of artistic expression | examples=This book deals with incest
5. definition=provide with a gift or entertainment | examples=Grandmother always treated us to the circus
6. definition=provide with choice or abundant food or drink | examples=Don't worry about the expensive wine--I'm treating
7. definition=engage in negotiations in order to reach an agreement | examples=they had to treat with the King
8. definition=regard or consider in a specific way | examples=I treated his advances as a joke

finish_reason: stop

role: assistant

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to identify which numbered sense of "treat" is used in the given sentence.

Sentence: "Alimta is used in combination with cisplatin in patients who have not been <t>treated</t> before, and on its own in patients who have received another type of chemotherapy in the past."

Key context: "Alimta" is a medication (pemetrexed), "cisplatin" is a chemotherapy drug, and the context is about medical treatment - specifically chemotherapy for patients.

The word "treated" here refers to receiving medical treatment/care. The patients have not been given medical treatment before.

Let me look at the senses:
1. interact in a certain way - "Do right by her" - this is about behavior/interaction, not medical
2. subject to a process or treatment, with the aim of readying for some purpose... - examples "process cheese" - this is about processing materials, not medical treatment of patients
3. provide treatment for - examples "The doctor treated my broken leg" - This is medical treatment! The doctor provides medical care.
4. act on verbally or in some form of artistic expression - "This book deals with incest" - about discussing topics
5. provide with a gift or entertainment - "Grandmother always treated us to the circus" - paying for entertainment
6. provide with choice or abundant food or drink - "Don't worry about the expensive wine--I'm treating" - paying for food/drink
7. engage in negotiations - "they had to treat with the King" - diplomatic negotiations
8. regard or consider in a specific way - "I treated his advances as a joke" - considering something as something

Sense 3 is clearly the medical sense: "provide treatment for" or "give medical care to."

In the sentence, "patients who have not been treated before" means patients who have not received medical treatment (chemotherapy) before.

So the answer is 3.

format: unknown

native_finish_reason: stop

provider: StreamLake

currency: USD


[User]
Which numbered sense of "patient" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: Alimta is used in combination with cisplatin in patients who have not been treated before, and on its own in <t>patients</t> who have received another type of chemotherapy in the past.

Senses:
1. definition=a person who requires medical care | examples=the number of emergency patients has grown rapidly
2. definition=the semantic role of an entity that is not the agent but is directly involved in or affected by the happening denoted by the verb in the clause

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to identify which sense of "patient" is used in the given sentence. The sentence is: "Alimta is used in combination with cisplatin in patients who have not been treated before, and on its own in <t>patients</t> who have received another type of chemotherapy in the past."

The two senses provided are:
1. definition=a person who requires medical care | examples=the number of emergency patients has grown rapidly
2. definition=the semantic role of an entity that is not the agent but is directly involved in or affected by the happening denoted by the verb in the clause

Let me analyze the sentence. The word "patients" here refers to people who are receiving medical treatment (chemotherapy). This is clearly referring to human beings who require medical care.

Sense 1 is the common noun meaning - a person receiving medical treatment.
Sense 2 is a linguistic/semantic term referring to the grammatical role in a sentence (like "patient" in linguistics, contrasting with "agent").

In the given sentence, "patients" refers to actual people receiving chemotherapy, not to a grammatical role. Therefore, it is sense 1.

The sentence is talking about Alimta (a drug) being used in combination with cisplatin for people who haven't been treated before, and used alone for people who have received other chemotherapy. These are clearly medical patients (people).

So the answer should be 1.

provider: ModelRun


[User]
Which numbered sense of "type" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: Alimta is used in combination with cisplatin in patients who have not been treated before, and on its own in patients who have received another <t>type</t> of chemotherapy in the past.

Senses:
1. definition=a subdivision of a particular kind of thing | examples=what type of sculpture do you prefer?
2. definition=a person of a specified kind (usually with many eccentricities) | examples=a real character
3. definition=(biology) the taxonomic group whose characteristics are used to define the next higher taxon
4. definition=printed characters | examples=small type is hard to read
5. definition=all of the tokens of the same symbol | examples=the word `element' contains five different types of character
6. definition=a small metal block bearing a raised character on one end; produces a printed character when inked and pressed on paper | examples=he dropped a case of type, so they made him pick them up

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to identify which numbered sense of "type" is used in the given sentence.

 Sentence: "Alimta is used in combination with cisplatin in patients who have not been treated before, and on its own in patients who have received another <t>type</t> of chemotherapy in the past."

 The word "type" here is used in the context of "another type of chemotherapy". This refers to a category, kind, or subdivision of chemotherapy.

 Looking at the senses:
 1. definition=a subdivision of a particular kind of thing | examples=what type of sculpture do you prefer?
 2. definition=a person of a specified kind (usually with many eccentricities) | examples=a real character
 3. definition=(biology) the taxonomic group whose characteristics are used to define the next higher taxon
 4. definition=printed characters | examples=small type is hard to read
 5. definition=all of the tokens of the same symbol | examples=the word `element' contains five different types of character
 6. definition=a small metal block bearing a raised character on one end; produces a printed character when inked and pressed on paper | examples=he dropped a case of type, so they made him pick them up

 Sense 1 matches perfectly: "a subdivision of a particular kind of thing" - here referring to a subdivision/kind of chemotherapy.

 Sense 2 is about a person/character - not applicable.
 Sense 3 is biological taxonomy - not applicable.
 Sense 4 is about typography/printing - not applicable in this medical context.
 Sense 5 is about symbols/characters - not applicable.
 Sense 6 is about physical printing blocks - not applicable.

 The answer is 1.

provider: DigitalOcean


[User]
Which numbered sense of "past" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: Alimta is used in combination with cisplatin in patients who have not been treated before, and on its own in patients who have received another type of chemotherapy in the <t>past</t>.

Senses:
1. definition=the time that has elapsed | examples=forget the past
2. definition=a earlier period in someone's life (especially one that they have reason to keep secret) | examples=reporters dug into the candidate's past
3. definition=a verb tense that expresses actions or states in the past

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to identify which numbered sense of the word "past" is used in the given sentence. The word "past" is marked with <t></t> tags in the sentence.

 Sentence: "Alimta is used in combination with cisplatin in patients who have not been treated before, and on its own in patients who have received another type of chemotherapy in the <t>past</t>."

 Let me analyze the three senses provided:

 1. definition=the time that has elapsed | examples=forget the past
 2. definition=a earlier period in someone's life (especially one that they have reason to keep secret) | examples=reporters dug into the candidate's past
 3. definition=a verb tense that expresses actions or states in the past

 Now, looking at the usage in the sentence: "in the past"

 The phrase "in the past" refers to a previous time period, specifically referring to the time before now when the patients received another type of chemotherapy. This matches sense 1: "the time that has elapsed" or time that has gone by.

 Sense 2 refers to a person's life history or background, often with connotations of secrets or personal history. This doesn't fit because the sentence is talking about medical treatment history, not necessarily a personal secretive past, but more importantly, sense 2 is usually used in contexts like "a shady past" or referring to someone's biography. However, "in the past" as a time reference is more aligned with sense 1.

 Actually, looking more carefully:
 - Sense 1: "the time that has elapsed" - this is the general concept of past time.
 - Sense 2: "an earlier period in someone's life" - this is more specific to personal history.

 In the sentence, "in the past" refers to a previous time period when the treatment occurred. This is a general temporal reference, not specifically about someone's personal life history (though it is about their medical history, the phrase "in the past" here functions as a temporal adverbial phrase meaning "previously" or "before now").

 The phrase "in the past" is a very common collocation with sense 1. For example, "in the past, people believed..." or "I received treatment in the past."

 Sense 3 is clearly about grammar/verb tense, which doesn't apply here.

 So the answer should be 1.

 Wait, let me double-check sense 2. Could this be sense 2? "An earlier period in someone's life (especially one that they have reason to keep secret)" - the example is "reporters dug into the candidate's past."

 In the medical sentence, it says "patients who have received another type of chemotherapy in the past." This refers to the patients' medical history. While this is technically an earlier period in their lives, the specific phrasing "in the past" with the definite article and as a temporal adverbial phrase strongly suggests sense 1. Sense 2 is usually used without "in the" in the same way, or rather, when we say "in the past" we almost always mean sense 1 (temporal). When we refer to sense 2, we might say "in his past" or "has a past" but "in the past" as a time adverbial is sense 1.

 Also, the definition of sense 2 mentions "especially one that they have reason to keep secret" which doesn't apply to chemotherapy treatment history in a medical context (though patients might want to keep it private, it's not the primary connotation).

 Therefore, sense 1 is the correct answer.

 The answer is 1.


[User]
Which numbered sense of "medicine" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: The <t>medicine</t> can only be obtained with a prescription.

Senses:
1. definition=the branches of medical science that deal with nonsurgical techniques
2. definition=(medicine) something that treats or prevents or alleviates the symptoms of disease
3. definition=the learned profession that is mastered by graduate training in a medical school and that is devoted to preventing or alleviating or curing diseases and injuries | examples=he studied medicine at Harvard
4. definition=punishment for one's actions | examples=you have to face the music

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to identify which numbered sense of "medicine" is used in the sentence: "The <t>medicine</t> can only be obtained with a prescription."

Let me look at the sentence and the senses:

Sentence: "The medicine can only be obtained with a prescription."

This refers to a substance/drug that treats disease and requires a prescription to obtain.

Sense 1: "the branches of medical science that deal with nonsurgical techniques" - This refers to the field/practice of internal medicine, etc. Not a physical substance.

Sense 2: "(medicine) something that treats or prevents or alleviates the symptoms of disease" - This refers to a drug, pill, substance. This fits "can only be obtained with a prescription."

Sense 3: "the learned profession that is mastered by graduate training in a medical school and that is devoted to preventing or alleviating or curing diseases and injuries" - This refers to the profession/field of study. Not a physical substance.

Sense 4: "punishment for one's actions" - This is the idiom "face the music" type usage, clearly not relevant.

So the correct answer is 2.

The user wants only the number returned.

provider: SiliconFlow


[User]
Which numbered sense of "only" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: The medicine can <t>only</t> be obtained with a prescription.

Senses:
1. definition=and nothing more | examples=I was merely asking
2. definition=without any others being included or involved | examples=was entirely to blame
3. definition=with nevertheless the final result | examples=He arrived only to find his wife dead
4. definition=in the final outcome | examples=These news will only make you more upset
5. definition=except that | examples=It was the same story; only this time she came out better
6. definition=never except when | examples=call me only if your cold gets worse
7. definition=as recently as | examples=I spoke to him only an hour ago

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to identify which numbered sense of "only" is used in the sentence "The medicine can <t>only</t> be obtained with a prescription."

 Let me analyze the sentence: "The medicine can only be obtained with a prescription."

 This means the medicine cannot be obtained without a prescription. It is restricted to being obtained specifically when one has a prescription, and not in other circumstances.

 Let's look at the senses:

 1. "and nothing more" | examples="I was merely asking" - This is about mere-ness or just doing one thing. Like "I only asked" meaning I did nothing else but ask. Doesn't fit.

 2. "without any others being included or involved" | examples="was entirely to blame" - This suggests exclusivity. But the example "was entirely to blame" doesn't match well. Actually, looking at it again, this might mean "solely" or "exclusively". But let's check others.

 3. "with nevertheless the final result" | examples="He arrived only to find his wife dead" - This is the "only to" construction indicating an unfortunate result. Not our case.

 4. "in the final outcome" | examples="These news will only make you more upset" - This suggests an outcome or result that might be contrary to expectations, or additionality. Like "it will only make things worse." Not quite right.

 5. "except that" | examples="It was the same story; only this time she came out better" - This is used as a conjunction meaning "but" or "except". Not our case.

 6. "never except when" | examples="call me only if your cold gets worse" - This means "exclusively when" or "only in the circumstance that". This fits! "The medicine can only be obtained with a prescription" means "The medicine can be obtained never except when you have a prescription" or "only if/when you have a prescription."

 7. "as recently as" | examples="I spoke to him only an hour ago" - This is about time. Not our case.

 So sense 6 seems to fit best: "never except when" - indicating a condition or restriction. The medicine is restricted to being obtained under the specific condition of having a prescription.

 Actually, let me reconsider sense 2: "without any others being included or involved". This could potentially mean "exclusively" or "solely". But the example "was entirely to blame" suggests something slightly different. Actually, sense 2 might be trying to capture the meaning of "solely" or "exclusively" in terms of being the only one.

 But sense 6 specifically mentions the conditional/exclusionary aspect: "never except when" with the example "call me only if your cold gets worse." This is very similar to "can only be obtained with a prescription" - both specify a necessary condition.

 However, I should also consider if sense 1 fits. "The medicine can merely be obtained with a prescription" - no, that doesn't make sense. It suggests the medicine is unimportant or something.

 Sense 6 is definitely the best fit: "never except when" or "only if/when".

 Wait, let me double-check the exact wording of sense 6: "never except when" | examples="call me only if your cold gets worse"

 Yes, "call me only if" means "never call me except when your cold gets worse" or "call me exclusively in the circumstance that your cold gets worse."

 Similarly, "can only be obtained with a prescription" means "can be obtained never except when one has a prescription" or "can be obtained exclusively when one has a prescription."

 So the answer is 6.


[User]
Which numbered sense of "obtain" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: The medicine can only be <t>obtained</t> with a prescription.

Senses:
1. definition=come into possession of | examples=How did you obtain the visa?
2. definition=receive a specified treatment (abstract) | examples=These aspects of civilization do not find expression or receive an interpretation
3. definition=be valid, applicable, or true | examples=This theory still holds

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to identify which numbered sense of "obtain" is used in the sentence: "The medicine can only be <t>obtained</t> with a prescription."

 Let me look at the three senses provided:

 1. definition=come into possession of | examples=How did you obtain the visa?
 2. definition=receive a specified treatment (abstract) | examples=These aspects of civilization do not find expression or receive an interpretation
 3. definition=be valid, applicable, or true | examples=This theory still holds

 Now, analyzing the sentence: "The medicine can only be obtained with a prescription."

 In this context, "obtained" means to get, acquire, or come into possession of the medicine. You need a prescription to get the medicine.

 Sense 1: "come into possession of" - This fits perfectly. The medicine can only be come into possession of (gotten/acquired) with a prescription.

 Sense 2: "receive a specified treatment (abstract)" - This doesn't fit. The medicine isn't receiving a treatment.

 Sense 3: "be valid, applicable, or true" - This doesn't fit. We're not talking about the medicine being valid or true in this context.

 So the answer is 1.

 Wait, let me double-check sense 2. The example given is "These aspects of civilization do not find expression or receive an interpretation" - this seems like it might be about the word "receive" rather than "obtain"? Or is this about "obtain" meaning something like "receive" in an abstract sense?

 Actually, looking at standard dictionary definitions of "obtain":
 - Sense 1 is the common meaning: to get, acquire, procure
 - Sense 2 might be referring to a more archaic or specific usage where "obtain" means to prevail or be customary? Or perhaps it's about "obtain" as in receiving something?
 - Sense 3: "be valid, applicable, or true" - this is a specific sense of "obtain" that exists (e.g., "These conditions no longer obtain")

 But in the sentence "The medicine can only be obtained with a prescription," it's clearly about acquiring/getting the medicine, which matches sense 1.

 The answer is 1.

provider: AtlasCloud


[User]
Which numbered sense of "prescription" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: The medicine can only be obtained with a <t>prescription</t>.

Senses:
1. definition=directions prescribed beforehand; the action of prescribing authoritative rules or directions | examples=I tried to follow her prescription for success
2. definition=a drug that is available only with written instructions from a doctor or dentist to a pharmacist | examples=he told the doctor that he had been taking his prescription regularly
3. definition=written instructions for an optician on the lenses for a given person
4. definition=written instructions from a physician or dentist to a druggist concerning the form and dosage of a drug to be issued to a given patient

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to identify which numbered sense of "prescription" is used in the sentence: "The medicine can only be obtained with a <t>prescription</t>."

 Let me analyze the sentence: "The medicine can only be obtained with a prescription." This means that to get the medicine, you need a written authorization from a doctor.

 Now let's look at the senses:

 1. "directions prescribed beforehand; the action of prescribing authoritative rules or directions" - This is about general rules or directions, like a prescription for success. Not about medicine specifically.

 2. "a drug that is available only with written instructions from a doctor or dentist to a pharmacist" - This defines the drug itself as being a prescription drug. The example says "he told the doctor that he had been taking his prescription regularly" - here "prescription" refers to the medication.

 3. "written instructions for an optician on the lenses for a given person" - This is specifically for glasses/lenses.

 4. "written instructions from a physician or dentist to a druggist concerning the form and dosage of a drug to be issued to a given patient" - This is the written document/authorization itself.

 In the sentence "The medicine can only be obtained with a prescription", the word "prescription" refers to the written authorization/document that allows you to obtain the medicine.

 Let me check sense 2 vs sense 4 more carefully:

 Sense 2: "a drug that is available only with written instructions..." - This defines prescription as the drug itself (a prescription drug).
 Sense 4: "written instructions from a physician..." - This defines prescription as the written document.

 In the sentence "The medicine can only be obtained with a prescription", we are talking about needing the written authorization (the prescription document) to get the medicine.

 However, looking at sense 2 again: "a drug that is available only with written instructions..." - the definition says it's a drug, but the example "he told the doctor that he had been taking his prescription regularly" suggests "prescription" can mean the medication.

 But in our target sentence: "The medicine can only be obtained with a prescription" - here "prescription" is the thing you need to obtain the medicine. You obtain the medicine WITH a prescription. This suggests the prescription is the authorization/document, not the medicine itself.

 Actually, looking more carefully:
 - Sense 2: defines "prescription" as the drug/medication ("a drug that is available only with...")
 - Sense 4: defines "prescription" as the written instructions/document

 In "The medicine can only be obtained with a prescription", the medicine is the drug, and the prescription is the document/authorization required to get it. So sense 4 seems correct.

 Wait, let me reconsider sense 2. The definition says "a drug that is available only with written instructions..." - this is defining a type of drug (a prescription drug). But in the sentence, "prescription" is the thing you obtain the medicine WITH. You don't obtain medicine with a drug. You obtain medicine with a written authorization.

 So sense 4 is the correct answer: "written instructions from a physician or dentist to a druggist concerning the form and dosage of a drug to be issued to a given patient"

 Actually, looking at the example for sense 2: "he told the doctor that he had been taking his prescription regularly" - here "prescription" clearly means the medication.

 In our sentence: "The medicine can only be obtained with a prescription" - this is saying you need a written order to get the medicine. This matches sense 4.

 Let me double-check by looking at standard dictionary definitions. Usually:
 - Sense 1: The act of prescribing (general)
 - Sense 2: A prescription drug (the medication itself)
 - Sense 3: For eyeglasses
 - Sense 4: The written document/order

 In "obtained with a prescription", we need the written document (sense 4), not the drug (sense 2).

 Actually, looking at sense 2 again: "a drug that is available only with written instructions..." - this is saying the prescription IS the drug. But the phrase "with a prescription" suggests the prescription is the means by which you get the medicine.

 So the answer should be 4.

 But wait, I should look at the exact wording of sense 2: "a drug that is available only with written instructions from a doctor or dentist to a pharmacist"

 If sense 2 is "a drug...", then in the sentence "The medicine can only be obtained with a prescription", if prescription meant sense 2, it would mean "The medicine can only be obtained with a drug" which doesn't make sense because the medicine IS the drug.

 Therefore, it must be sense 4: the written instructions.

 Actually, looking at typical WordNet or similar sense groupings:
 - Sense 2 often refers to the medication itself (prescription drug)
 - Sense 4 refers to the written order

 The sentence says you obtain medicine WITH a prescription. This is sense 4.

 Answer: 4

provider: Chutes


[User]
Which numbered sense of "use" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: How is Alimta <t>used</t>?

Senses:
1. definition=put into service; make work or employ for a particular purpose or for its inherent or natural purpose | examples=use your head!
2. definition=take or consume (regularly or habitually) | examples=She uses drugs rarely
3. definition=use up, consume fully | examples=The legislature expended its time on school questions
4. definition=seek or achieve an end by using to one's advantage | examples=She uses her influential friends to get jobs
5. definition=avail oneself to | examples=apply a principle
6. definition=habitually do something (use only in the past tense) | examples=She used to call her mother every week but now she calls only occasionally

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to identify which numbered sense of "use" is used in the sentence "How is Alimta <t>used</t>?"

 Let me analyze the sentence: "How is Alimta used?"

 Alimta is a medication (pemetrexed), a chemotherapy drug. The sentence is asking how this drug is employed or utilized - essentially, how it is put into service or employed for a particular purpose.

 Now let's look at the senses:

 1. "put into service; make work or employ for a particular purpose or for its inherent or natural purpose" - This fits. Asking how Alimta is used means asking how it is employed/put into service for its medical purpose.

 2. "take or consume (regularly or habitually)" - This would be like "She uses drugs" meaning she takes/consumes them. But "How is Alimta used?" is asking about the general employment/application of the drug, not about someone habitually consuming it.

 3. "use up, consume fully" - This would be like expending something completely. Not fitting here.

 4. "seek or achieve an end by using to one's advantage" - This implies using something/someone as a means to an end for personal advantage. Not fitting for asking how a drug is medically employed.

 5. "avail oneself to" - This is similar to making use of something for oneself. Example given is "apply a principle". This could potentially fit, but sense 1 seems more direct for asking how a medication is employed medically.

 6. "habitually do something (use only in the past tense)" - This is the "used to" construction. The sentence uses "is used" not "used to", so this is definitely not it.

 Between 1 and 5:
 Sense 1: "put into service; make work or employ for a particular purpose"
 Sense 5: "avail oneself to" (examples: apply a principle)

 Actually, looking at sense 5 more carefully: "avail oneself to" - this usually means to make use of something. But in the context of "How is Alimta used?", we're talking about how the drug is employed/put into service medically.

 Sense 1 is the most general definition of using something for its intended purpose or function. When we ask "How is X used?" about a tool, drug, or device, we're asking how it is put into service or employed for its purpose.

 Therefore, the answer should be 1.

 Wait, let me double-check if this could be sense 2. "take or consume" - if the sentence were "How is Alimta used?" in the context of a patient asking how to take the medication, it could potentially mean "how is it taken/consumed". But the passive construction "is used" with a drug name typically refers to its medical application/employment (sense 1), whereas "use" as in consuming/taking would more likely be active voice or referring to patient behavior.

 Actually, looking at medical contexts: "How is Alimta used?" would typically be asking about the therapeutic use - how it is administered, what it's for, etc. This is sense 1.

 Sense 1 examples include "use your head" which is about employing/putting into service.

 I think 1 is correct.

 But let me reconsider sense 5: "avail oneself to" - example "apply a principle". This is about utilizing something. But sense 1 is more about putting into service/employing for a purpose.

 In WordNet or similar lexical databases, sense 1 is typically the most general sense of "use" as in utilizing something for its purpose.

 The sentence "How is Alimta used?" is asking about the method of employment or application of the drug. This aligns with sense 1.

 Final check:
 - Sense 1: put into service; make work or employ for a particular purpose
 - Sentence: How is Alimta [put into service/employed]?

 Yes, this matches.

 Answer: 1


[User]
Which numbered sense of "only" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: Alimta should <t>only</t> be given under the supervision of a doctor who is qualified in the use of anticancer chemotherapy.

Senses:
1. definition=and nothing more | examples=I was merely asking
2. definition=without any others being included or involved | examples=was entirely to blame
3. definition=with nevertheless the final result | examples=He arrived only to find his wife dead
4. definition=in the final outcome | examples=These news will only make you more upset
5. definition=except that | examples=It was the same story; only this time she came out better
6. definition=never except when | examples=call me only if your cold gets worse
7. definition=as recently as | examples=I spoke to him only an hour ago

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to identify which sense of "only" is used in the given sentence. Let me analyze the sentence first.

Sentence: "Alimta should <t>only</t> be given under the supervision of a doctor who is qualified in the use of anticancer chemotherapy."

The word "only" here is modifying "be given under the supervision..." - it's restricting the circumstances under which Alimta should be given. It means "exclusively" or "solely" under those conditions, or it could be interpreted as "nothing more than" under those conditions.

Let me look at the definitions:

1. "and nothing more" - examples: "I was merely asking" - This seems like a restrictive meaning, limiting the action.
2. "without any others being included or involved" - examples: "was entirely to blame" - This suggests exclusivity, sole condition.
3. "with nevertheless the final result" - examples: "He arrived only to find his wife dead" - This is about an unexpected or unfortunate result.
4. "in the final outcome" - examples: "These news will only make you more upset" - This suggests a result or consequence.
5. "except that" - examples: "It was the same story; only this time she came out better" - This is contrastive.
6. "never except when" - examples: "call me only if your cold gets worse" - This is conditional, restricting when something happens.
7. "as recently as" - examples: "I spoke to him only an hour ago" - Temporal restriction.

Now, analyzing the sentence structure: "Alimta should only be given under the supervision..."

This means Alimta should be given exclusively/solely under those conditions, and not otherwise. Or it could mean "merely" or "just" under those conditions.

But let's look more carefully. The sentence is saying that the administration of Alimta is restricted to situations where there is supervision by a qualified doctor.

Sense 6 says "never except when" - examples: "call me only if your cold gets worse". This matches the pattern "only [conditional]".

Sense 2 says "without any others being included or involved" - this could also fit, meaning exclusively under supervision.

Sense 1 says "and nothing more" - merely/just.

Let me think about the specific nuances.

In the sentence "Alimta should only be given under the supervision...", the word "only" is restricting the circumstances of administration. It's saying that administration should happen exclusively under those conditions.

But looking at sense 6: "never except when" - this seems like a strong candidate because it's about the condition/circumstance: "never be given except when under supervision..."

However, sense 2 "without any others being included or involved" also seems plausible - meaning exclusively under supervision.

Let me look at the examples again:
- Sense 1: "I was merely asking" - this minimizes the action.
- Sense 2: "was entirely to blame" - this suggests sole responsibility, exclusivity.
- Sense 6: "call me only if your cold gets worse" - this restricts the condition under which to call.

In "Alimta should only be given under the supervision...", we're restricting the circumstances under which it should be given. This aligns with sense 6: "never except when" - Alimta should never be given except when under the supervision...

But wait, sense 2 could also work: "Alimta should be given without any others [circumstances] being involved" i.e., exclusively under supervision.

Let me reconsider the specific definitions.

Sense 1: "and nothing more" - this is about mere-ness, minimization.
Sense 2: "without any others being included or involved" - this is about exclusivity, being the sole case.
Sense 6: "never except when" - this is about conditional restriction.

In medical/pharmaceutical contexts, "should only be given under supervision" means it should exclusively be given under those conditions, or it should not be given except under those conditions. Both senses 2 and 6 seem relevant.

But looking at the example for sense 6: "call me only if your cold gets worse" - this is clearly conditional. The structure is [verb] only [condition].

In our sentence: "should only be given [condition: under supervision]"

The word "only" here is positioned before "be given", not directly before the condition "under supervision". But semantically, it applies to the condition.

Actually, looking carefully: "Alimta should only be given under the supervision..."

This could be parsed as:
- "Alimta should [only be given] [under supervision]" = exclusively administered in this way
- Or "Alimta should be given [only under supervision]" = exclusively in these circumstances

But sense 6 specifically says "never except when". The example is "call me only if your cold gets worse" which means "never call me except when/if your cold gets worse".

So "Alimta should only be given under supervision" = "Alimta should never be given except under supervision".

This seems to match sense 6.

However, let me check sense 2 again: "without any others being included or involved". The example is "was entirely to blame". This refers to the extent of blame - no one else was to blame.

In our sentence, it's about the restriction of the action to specific circumstances.

Actually, looking at standard dictionaries, the use of "only" to mean "exclusively" or "solely" (restricting to specific circumstances) is often categorized as sense 2 or similar.

But let's look at the example for sense 6 again: "call me only if your cold gets worse". This restricts the calling to the condition of the cold getting worse.

Similarly, "Alimta should only be given under supervision" restricts the giving to the condition of supervision.

I think sense 6 is the best fit: "never except when".

Wait, but sense 2 is "without any others being included or involved". If we interpret "under supervision of a doctor" as the exclusive circumstance, then sense 2 could work.

Let me consider if there's a standard way these senses are distinguished.

Sense 1: I was merely asking (minimizer)
Sense 2: entirely/solely (exclusive)
Sense 3: only to find (resultative, adversative)
Sense 4: will only make (resultative, additive?)
Sense 5: except that (contrastive)
Sense 6: never except when (conditional restriction)
Sense 7: as recently as (temporal)

In "Alimta should only be given under supervision", the meaning is that Alimta is not allowed to be given in any other circumstances. This is a restriction on the conditions of administration.

Sense 6 "never except when" captures this conditional restriction perfectly.

Sense 2 "without any others being included" is broader and could apply to many exclusive situations, but sense 6 specifically captures the "except when" aspect.

But let me check if the sentence could mean "Alimta should merely be given..." (sense 1). No, that doesn't make sense in context.

Could it be sense 4? "in the final outcome" - no, that's about results.

Sense 3? "with nevertheless the final result" - no.

Sense 5? "except that" - no.

Sense 7? "as recently as" - no.

So it's between 1, 2, and 6.

Sense 1 is about "merely" - minimizing the extent. "I was merely asking" - I wasn't demanding, I was just asking.

Sense 2 is about exclusivity - nothing/no one else involved.

Sense 6 is about conditional exclusivity - only under certain conditions.

The phrase "under the supervision of..." specifies the condition. So "only be given under supervision" means "be given exclusively under supervision" or "never be given except when under supervision".

Both 2 and 6 seem possible, but 6 seems more precise because "under supervision" is a circumstance/condition, not just an additional participant.

However, looking at the example for sense 2: "was entirely to blame". This is about the scope of blame - only this person, no one else.

In our sentence, it's about the scope of administration - only under these conditions, not under other conditions.

Actually, "entirely to blame" and "only be given under supervision" are different syntactic patterns. "Entirely" modifies "to blame" (adjective-like), while "only" modifies the verb phrase "be given under supervision" or just "be given".

But wait. Let me reconsider sense 1. "I was merely asking" - "merely" is synonymous with "only" in this sense. Could "Alimta should merely be given under supervision" work? It would mean "Alimta should just be given under supervision and nothing else [should happen]"? No, that doesn't fit. It should be given and that's all? No, the meaning is restrictive regarding circumstances.

So between 2 and 6.

Let me look up how these specific senses are defined in standard lexical databases, perhaps WordNet or similar.

WordNet has:
1. sole, sole(a), lone(a), lonesome(a), only(a), sole(a), solitary(a) - being the only one; single and isolated from others
2. alone, only - exclusive of anyone or anything else

But these are adjectival senses. The word "only" here is an adverb.

As an adverb:
1. merely, simply, just, only, but - and nothing more
2. entirely, exclusively, solely, alone, only - without any others being included or involved

Sense 6 in the list seems to correspond to a conditional use: "never except when".

Looking at the example for sense 6: "call me only if your cold gets worse" - this is clearly restricting the condition under which the calling should happen.

Our sentence: "Alimta should only be given under the supervision..." - this is restricting the condition under which the giving should happen.

The parallel is strong:
- call me [only if...]
- be given [only under...]

So sense 6 seems correct.

But let me double-check sense 2. "without any others being included or involved". Could this fit? "Alimta should be given without any others [circumstances? doctors?] being involved..." No, the sentence specifies under what condition it should be given, not that other people shouldn't be involved.

Actually, it does imply that it shouldn't be given without supervision, i.e., no other circumstances (like self-administration) should be involved. So sense 2 could work.

However, sense 6 is more specific about the conditional nature. The phrase "never except when" directly captures the meaning "under no circumstances other than".

Given the example for sense 2 is "was entirely to blame", which is about sole responsibility (no one else to blame), and the example for sense 6 is "call me only if..." which is about conditional restriction, I think sense 6 is the intended answer for a sentence involving "only" restricting the circumstances of an action.

But I'm not entirely certain. Let me see if there's any other clue.

The sentence: "Alimta should only be given under the supervision..."

If we interpret this as: "The only circumstance under which Alimta should be given is under the supervision..."

This is essentially "never except when".

Therefore, sense 6.

Wait, I should also consider if it could be sense 1. "Alimta should just/merely be given..." No, that would imply something like "it doesn't need to be injected, just given orally" or something, which is not the meaning. The meaning is clearly restrictive regarding the supervision requirement.

So I'll go with sense 6.

Actually, looking at the definitions once more:

2. definition=without any others being included or involved | examples=was entirely to blame

If "only" means "exclusively", then "Alimta should exclusively be given under supervision" makes sense.

6. definition=never except when | examples=call me only if your cold gets worse

"Alimta should never be given except when under supervision" also makes sense.

Which one is the better match for the specific sense tagged in the database these senses come from?

These look like they could be from WordNet or a similar lexical resource.

In WordNet, adverb "only":
- Sense 1: merely, simply, just, only, but
- Sense 2: entirely, exclusively, solely, alone, only

But sense 6 "never except when" sounds like it could be WordNet sense 3 or 4? Let me recall.

WordNet 3.1 for adverb "only":
1. (used to introduce a restriction) "Only the champion remained" - restrictive
2. and nothing more - "I was merely asking"
3. (intensifier) "an only child"
4. without anyone or anything else - "he was entirely to blame"
5. in the final outcome - "These news will only make you more upset"
6. except that - "It was the same story; only this time she came out better"
7. never except when - "call me only if your cold gets worse"
8. as recently as - "I spoke to him only an hour ago"

If these match the user's list:
1. and nothing more -> WordNet sense 2
2. without any others being included or involved -> WordNet sense 4 (entirely, exclusively...)
3. with nevertheless the final result -> WordNet sense ...? maybe 5? "He arrived only to find his wife dead" - this is a resultative use.
4. in the final outcome -> WordNet sense 5?
5. except that -> WordNet sense 6
6. never except when -> WordNet sense 7
7. as recently as -> WordNet sense 8

So the user's sense 6 corresponds to WordNet sense 7: "never except when".

Now, "Alimta should only be given under the supervision..."

In WordNet, sense 7 (user's 6) is illustrated with "call me only if your cold gets worse". This is a conditional.

But "Alimta should only be given under supervision" - is this the same structure?

"call me [only if ...]"
"be given [only under ...]"

Yes, the "only" is restricting the condition/circumstance.

Alternatively, could it be WordNet sense 4 (user's 2): "exclusively"?
"Alimta should exclusively be given under supervision" - this emphasizes that this is the only context for giving it.

But given the specific example for sense 6, and the fact that "under supervision" is a circumstance (like "if your cold gets worse"), I think sense 6 is correct.

However, I should check if "under supervision" is treated as a condition or as a manner.

"Under the supervision of a doctor" - this is a circumstance of administration.

In the example "call me only if...", "if your cold gets worse" is a condition.

"Under supervision" could be seen as the condition under which it should be given.

Therefore, sense 6.

But let me reconsider sense 2 once more. "without any others being included or involved". If we parse the sentence as "Alimta should be given only [in this manner]", where "only" modifies the adverbial "under supervision", then it's saying that no other manner of administration is permitted. This is exclusivity of manner/circumstance.

I think both 2 and 6 are defensible, but 6 is more specific to the conditional/circumstantial restriction, while 2 is broader exclusivity.

Given the example "was entirely to blame" for sense 2, which is about the scope of blame (complete blame), and "call me only if" for sense 6, which is about conditional restriction, I think the conditional restriction is the better fit for the medical supervision sentence.

Therefore, the answer is 6.

Wait, I want to check if there's any chance it's sense 1. "and nothing more". Could it mean "Alimta should merely be given..."? As in "just give it, don't worry about anything else"? No, that's contrary to the meaning. The sentence is emphasizing

native_finish_reason: error

message: Upstream idle timeout exceeded

error_type: timeout


[User]
Which numbered sense of "only" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: Alimta should <t>only</t> be given under the supervision of a doctor who is qualified in the use of anticancer chemotherapy.

Senses:
1. definition=and nothing more | examples=I was merely asking
2. definition=without any others being included or involved | examples=was entirely to blame
3. definition=with nevertheless the final result | examples=He arrived only to find his wife dead
4. definition=in the final outcome | examples=These news will only make you more upset
5. definition=except that | examples=It was the same story; only this time she came out better
6. definition=never except when | examples=call me only if your cold gets worse
7. definition=as recently as | examples=I spoke to him only an hour ago

[User] Your previous answer was invalid. Choose one candidate index between 1 and 7. Return only the integer.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to identify which sense of "only" is used in the given sentence. The sentence is: "Alimta should <t>only</t> be given under the supervision of a doctor who is qualified in the use of anticancer chemotherapy."

Let me analyze the sentence and the definitions:

1. "and nothing more" / "merely" - This would mean "exclusively" or "solely" in the sense of limitation.
2. "without any others being included or involved" / "entirely" - This suggests exclusivity, alone, solely.
3. "with nevertheless the final result" - This indicates an unexpected or disappointing result.
4. "in the final outcome" - This suggests a consequence or result.
5. "except that" - This is used as a conjunction meaning "but".
6. "never except when" - This sets a condition, meaning "only if".
7. "as recently as" - This refers to time.

In the sentence "Alimta should only be given under the supervision of a doctor...", the word "only" is restricting the circumstances under which Alimta should be given. It means "exclusively" or "solely" - it should be given under supervision and not otherwise.

Looking at the definitions:
- Definition 1: "and nothing more" / "merely" - This fits with the idea of exclusivity/restriction.
- Definition 2: "without any others being included or involved" / "entirely" - This also suggests exclusivity.

Wait, let me look more carefully at the examples to distinguish between 1 and 2.

Definition 1 examples: "I was merely asking" - this suggests "just" or "simply".
Definition 2 examples: "was entirely to blame" - this suggests "alone" or "exclusively".

In the sentence "Alimta should only be given under the supervision...", the meaning is that it should be given exclusively/solely under supervision, or it should be given and nothing else (but that doesn't make sense). Actually, it means "exclusively" or "solely" - i.e., under no other circumstances.

But looking at definition 6: "never except when" / "call me only if your cold gets worse" - this seems to match "only be given under..." meaning "never be given except under..."

Let me reconsider. The sentence structure is: "should only be given under [condition]"

This is similar to "call me only if..." (definition 6).

But definition 6 says "never except when" and the example is "call me only if your cold gets worse". This sets a condition.

In our sentence: "Alimta should only be given under the supervision..." - this is setting a condition for when it should be given. It means "Alimta should be given under supervision and not otherwise" or "Alimta should never be given except under supervision."

Definition 2: "without any others being included or involved" - this could also fit, meaning the administration should involve no one else but a qualified doctor, or should happen in no other circumstance.

But let's look at the specific wording of definition 2: "without any others being included or involved" - this seems to focus on exclusion of other entities, whereas the sentence is about exclusion of other circumstances.

Definition 1: "and nothing more" - "I was merely asking" - this is about the extent or nature of an action.

Actually, looking at standard dictionary definitions:
- Sense 1 (merely/just): "I was only asking"
- Sense 2 (exclusively/alone): "This is for your eyes only"
- Sense 6 (condition): "Only if you finish your homework"

In the sentence "Alimta should only be given under the supervision...", the word "only" is restricting the circumstances - it's saying that the only circumstance in which it should be given is under supervision. This aligns with "never except when" (definition 6).

However, definition 2 "without any others being included or involved" could also be interpreted as "under no other circumstances" or "exclusively under these circumstances."

But looking at the example for definition 2: "was entirely to blame" - this suggests "solely" or "alone" in terms of responsibility/subject.

Looking at definition 6 example: "call me only if your cold gets worse" - this is clearly conditional.

The sentence "Alimta should only be given under..." is setting a condition on when it should be given. It should only (exclusively) be given under supervision.

But wait, is it sense 2 or sense 6?

Sense 2: "without any others being included or involved" - this is about exclusivity of participants or elements.
Sense 6: "never except when" - this is about conditions/circumstances.

The sentence is about the circumstances under which the drug should be administered. It should be administered exclusively under supervision. This could be either 2 or 6 depending on interpretation.

But let's look at the exact wording again. The sentence emphasizes that it should be given under supervision and not otherwise - i.e., exclusively under supervision.

In many dictionary frameworks:
- Sense corresponding to "exclusively" (no others) = sense 2
- Sense corresponding to "except when" = sense 6

The example for sense 6 is "call me only if your cold gets worse" - this is a conditional clause.
The sentence "Alimta should only be given under..." has "only" modifying "be given under..." which is similar to "only if..."

Actually, looking carefully: "call me only if..." vs "should only be given under..."

In "call me only if...", "only" modifies the conditional "if".
In "should only be given under...", "only" modifies "under the supervision..." or the whole predicate.

But "under the supervision" is a prepositional phrase indicating circumstances, similar to a condition.

However, definition 2 "without any others being included or involved" seems to be the broader sense of "exclusively" or "solely".

Let me check if there's a standard way these senses are distinguished. Usually:
- Sense 1: Merely, just (minimizing)
- Sense 2: Solely, exclusively (no one/no thing else)
- Sense 6: Except that, but (conjunction) or "only if" (conditional)

Wait, definition 5 is "except that" (conjunction).
Definition 6 is "never except when" (conditional adverb).

The sentence structure is: [Subject] should [only] [verb phrase]
This is adverbial use restricting the verb.

If I compare "He was only asking" (sense 1) vs "It should only be done by experts" (sense 2 or 6?).

"It should only be done by experts" = "It should be done by experts and by no one else" (sense 2: without others being involved) OR "It should never be done except when by experts" (sense 6).

But sense 6 specifically mentions "never except when" and the example is "call me only if..." which is a specific type of conditional.

Actually, looking at the sentence again: "Alimta should only be given under the supervision..."

This is most similar to sense 2: "without any others being included or involved" - meaning no other circumstances, no other way.

But let me reconsider sense 1: "and nothing more". Could it be "merely be given under supervision"? No, that doesn't fit. The sentence isn't saying "merely/just be given", it's saying "exclusively be given under these circumstances".

Sense 2 seems the best fit: "without any others being included or involved" - i.e., without any other circumstances being involved, or exclusively under this condition.

But I need to be careful. Let me look at the example for sense 2 again: "was entirely to blame". This is "He was only to blame" meaning "solely to blame", "alone to blame".

And sense 6: "call me only if your cold gets worse" - this restricts the calling to the condition of the cold getting worse.

The Alimta sentence restricts the giving to the condition of being under supervision.

However, "under the supervision" is not exactly a temporal condition like "if", but it functions similarly as a restriction on when/where/how.

But in many lexical databases (like WordNet or similar), "only" sense 2 is often the "exclusively" sense, and sense 6 is the "only if" sense.

Given the example for sense 6 is specifically "call me only if...", and the Alimta sentence uses "only" with "under" (a prepositional phrase indicating circumstance), it might be sense 2.

But actually, looking at standard definitions:
- "Only" meaning "and no one else" or "and nothing else" is the primary exclusive sense.
- "Only" meaning "except when" is a specific conditional use.

The sentence "Alimta should only be given under supervision" means "Alimta should be given under supervision and not in other situations" - this is the exclusive sense (sense 2).

However, if we parse it as "Alimta should be given [only under the supervision...]", it could be seen as restricting the prepositional phrase.

Let me check if there's any other clue. The user mentioned my previous answer was invalid, but I haven't given a previous answer in this conversation. This might be a template or a continuation, but I should treat it as a fresh question.

Given the constraint to choose between 1 and 7, and the analysis:

- 1: merely/just - doesn't fit well because we're not minimizing the action, we're restricting it.
- 2: exclusively/without others - fits well.
- 3: unexpected result - doesn't fit.
- 4: final outcome - doesn't fit.
- 5: except that (conjunction) - doesn't fit grammatically.
- 6: never except when - could fit but is more specific to conditional clauses with "if" or "when".
- 7: as recently as - temporal, doesn't fit.

Between 2 and 6, sense 2 is the more general "exclusively" sense which covers "under no other circumstances", while sense 6 is specifically for conditional clauses.

The example for sense 6 uses "if", while the sentence uses "under". Although "under" implies condition, it's not the same syntactic structure as "only if".

Therefore, sense 2 is the most appropriate.

Wait, I should reconsider sense 1. "And nothing more" - could this mean "nothing more than under supervision"? Like "solely under supervision"? In some dictionaries, "only" meaning "solely" is sense 1, and "merely" is a separate sense or related.

But looking at the provided definitions:
1. definition=and nothing more | examples=I was merely asking
2. definition=without any others being included or involved | examples=was entirely to blame

"I was merely asking" suggests limitation of the action to just asking, not demanding.
"Was entirely to blame" suggests sole responsibility.

In "Alimta should only be given under supervision", we are saying that the giving should be limited exclusively to situations under supervision. This is closer to sense 2 (without others involved) than sense 1 (and nothing more).

Actually, looking at WordNet or similar resources often used for these exercises:
Sense 1: with reference to the result: "It will only make you sad" (sense 4 here?)
Sense 2: exclusive of anyone or anything else: "She was the only one there"

But here the definitions are specific.

Let me look at the example for sense 4: "These news will only make you more upset" - this is about the result/effect.

Sense 3: "He arrived only to find his wife dead" - this is "only to" indicating an unfortunate result.

Sense 4: "in the final outcome" - similar to result.

So senses 3 and 4 are about outcomes/results.

Sense 5 is "except that" - contrastive.

Sense 7 is temporal.

So it's between 1, 2, and 6.

Sense 1: "and nothing more" - minimizing.
Sense 2: "without any others" - exclusive.
Sense 6: "never except when" - conditional restriction.

The sentence is imposing a restriction: the drug should be administered exclusively by/under qualified supervision. It should not be given otherwise.

This is the exclusive sense (sense 2).

However, if we interpret "only" as modifying the condition "under supervision", it could be sense 6. But sense 6's example is "only if", which is a conjunction phrase, whereas here we have "only" modifying the verb phrase "be given under...".

Actually, looking at the syntax:
"Alimta should only be given under..."

This can be parsed as:
- "only" modifies "be given under..." meaning "exclusively be given under..."
- Or "only" modifies "under..." meaning "given exclusively under..."

Either way, it means "exclusively".

Between sense 1 and 2, sense 2 is clearly about exclusion of others, while sense 1 is about "nothing more/merely".

"I was merely asking" vs "Alimta should merely be given under supervision" - the latter doesn't make sense because "merely" would trivialize the importance, whereas the sentence is emphasizing the restriction/importance of supervision.

Therefore, sense 2 is correct.

But let me double-check sense 6. If the sentence were "Alimta should be given only under supervision", it would clearly be restrictive. But it says "should only be given". The placement of "only" can shift, but the meaning remains restrictive.

Actually, looking at the exact wording of sense 6: "never except when". This is a paraphrase of "only if/when".

The sentence does not have "when" or "if", it has "under". While "under" implies a condition, it's not the same as the explicit conditional structure in sense 6's example.

Therefore, I will go with 2.

Wait, I recall that in some specific lexical semantic datasets (like the one this might be from), "only" in the sense of "exclusively" when referring to circumstances might be classified differently.

But given the options, and that sense 2 explicitly mentions "without any others being included or involved", and the sentence is about not involving anyone other than a qualified doctor (or not being given in any other circumstances), sense 2 fits.

Final check:
- Sense 1: minimizes ("just", "merely") - not correct.
- Sense 2: exclusive ("solely", "alone") - correct.
- Sense 3: "only to" + verb (unexpected result) - not correct.
- Sense 4: resultative - not correct.
- Sense 5: conjunction "but" - not correct.
- Sense 6: conditional "if/when" - possible but less likely than 2.
- Sense 7: temporal "as recently as" - not correct.

The answer is 2.


[User]
Which numbered sense of "give" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: Alimta should only be <t>given</t> under the supervision of a doctor who is qualified in the use of anticancer chemotherapy.

Senses:
1. definition=cause to have, in the abstract sense or physical sense | examples=She gave him a black eye
2. definition=be the cause or source of | examples=He gave me a lot of trouble
3. definition=transfer possession of something concrete or abstract to somebody | examples=I gave her my money
4. definition=convey or reveal information | examples=Give one's name
5. definition=convey, as of a compliment, regards, attention, etc.; bestow | examples=Don't pay him any mind
6. definition=organize or be responsible for | examples=hold a reception
7. definition=convey or communicate; of a smile, a look, a physical gesture | examples=Throw a glance
8. definition=give as a present; make a gift of | examples=What will you give her for her birthday?
9. definition=cause to happen or be responsible for | examples=His two singles gave the team the victory
10. definition=dedicate | examples=give thought to
11. definition=give or supply | examples=The cow brings in 5 liters of milk
12. definition=transmit (knowledge or skills) | examples=give a secret to the Russians
13. definition=bring about | examples=The trompe l'oeil-illusion establishes depth
14. definition=leave with; give temporarily | examples=Can I give you my keys while I go in the pool?
15. definition=emit or utter | examples=Give a gulp
16. definition=endure the loss of | examples=He gave his life for his children
17. definition=place into the hands or custody of | examples=hand me the spoon, please
18. definition=give entirely to a specific person, activity, or cause | examples=She committed herself to the work of God
19. definition=give (as medicine) | examples=I gave him the drug
20. definition=give or convey physically | examples=She gave him First Aid
21. definition=bestow | examples=give homage
22. definition=bestow, especially officially | examples=grant a degree
23. definition=move in order to make room for someone for something | examples=The park gave way to a supermarket
24. definition=give food to | examples=Feed the starving children in India
25. definition=contribute to some cause | examples=I gave at the office
26. definition=break down, literally or metaphorically | examples=The wall collapsed
27. definition=estimate the duration or outcome of something | examples=He gave the patient three months to live
28. definition=execute and deliver | examples=Give bond
29. definition=deliver in exchange or recompense | examples=I'll give you three books for four CDs
30. definition=afford access to | examples=the door opens to the patio
31. definition=present to view | examples=He gave the sign to start
32. definition=perform for an audience | examples=Pollini is giving another concert in New York
33. definition=be flexible under stress of physical force | examples=This material doesn't give
34. definition=propose | examples=He gave the first of many toasts at the birthday party
35. definition=accord by verdict | examples=give a decision for the plaintiff
36. definition=manifest or show | examples=This student gives promise of real creativity
37. definition=offer in good faith | examples=He gave her his word
38. definition=submit for consideration, judgment, or use | examples=give one's opinion
39. definition=guide or direct, as by behavior of persuasion | examples=You gave me to think that you agreed with me
40. definition=allow to have or take | examples=I give you two minutes to respond
41. definition=inflict as a punishment | examples=She gave the boy a good spanking
42. definition=occur | examples=what gives?
43. definition=consent to engage in sexual intercourse with a man | examples=She gave herself to many men
44. definition=proffer (a body part) | examples=She gave her hand to her little sister

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to identify which numbered sense of "give" is used in the sentence: "Alimta should only be <t>given</t> under the supervision of a doctor who is qualified in the use of anticancer chemotherapy."

Alimta is a medication (pemetrexed), an anticancer chemotherapy drug. The sentence is saying the drug should only be administered/given to patients by a qualified doctor.

Looking at the senses:
1. cause to have, abstract or physical - too general
2. be cause/source of - no
3. transfer possession - no, not transferring ownership
4. convey/reveal info - no
5. bestow regards - no
6. organize - no
7. convey gesture - no
8. give as present - no
9. cause to happen - no
10. dedicate - no
11. give or supply - maybe, but usually about producing/supplying naturally
12. transmit knowledge - no
13. bring about - no
14. leave with temporarily - no
15. emit/utter - no
16. endure loss - no
17. place into hands/custody - close but not quite
18. give entirely to cause - no
19. give (as medicine) - "I gave him the drug" - this fits perfectly!
20. give/convey physically (First Aid) - close, but 19 is specifically medicine
21. bestow homage - no
22. grant officially - no
23. move to make room - no
24. give food to - no, though similar to administering
25. contribute - no
26. break down - no
27. estimate - no
28. execute and deliver - no
29. deliver in exchange - no
30. afford access - no
31. present to view - no
32. perform - no
33. be flexible - no
34. propose - no
35. accord by verdict - no
36. manifest - no
37. offer in good faith - no
38. submit - no
39. guide - no
40. allow to have/take - possible, but 19 is more specific
41. inflict punishment - no
42. occur - no
43. consent to sex - no
44. proffer body part - no

Sense 19: "give (as medicine)" with example "I gave him the drug" is the exact sense used here. The sentence is about administering a drug (Alimta) as medicine.

So the answer is 19.


[User]
Which numbered sense of "doctor" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: Alimta should only be given under the supervision of a <t>doctor</t> who is qualified in the use of anticancer chemotherapy.

Senses:
1. definition=a licensed medical practitioner | examples=I felt so bad I went to see my doctor
2. definition=(Roman Catholic Church) a title conferred on 33 saints who distinguished themselves through the orthodoxy of their theological teaching | examples=the Doctors of the Church greatly influenced Christian thought down to the late Middle Ages
3. definition=children take the roles of physician or patient or nurse and pretend they are at the physician's office | examples=the children explored each other's bodies by playing the game of doctor
4. definition=a person who holds Ph.D. degree (or the equivalent) from an academic institution | examples=she is a doctor of philosophy in physics

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to identify which sense of "doctor" is used in the given sentence. Let me analyze the sentence and the definitions.

Sentence: "Alimta should only be given under the supervision of a <t>doctor</t> who is qualified in the use of anticancer chemotherapy."

Key context:
- "Alimta" is a medication (pemetrexed, used for cancer treatment)
- "given under the supervision of" - implies medical supervision
- "qualified in the use of anticancer chemotherapy" - clearly refers to medical expertise

Now let's look at the senses:

1. definition=a licensed medical practitioner | examples=I felt so bad I went to see my doctor
   - This fits perfectly. The sentence is talking about someone supervising the administration of a medication (Alimta) who is qualified in anticancer chemotherapy. This is clearly a medical doctor.

2. definition=(Roman Catholic Church) a title conferred on 33 saints who distinguished themselves through the orthodoxy of their theological teaching | examples=the Doctors of the Church greatly influenced Christian thought down to the late Middle Ages
   - This is a religious title, not relevant to administering chemotherapy.

3. definition=children take the roles of physician or patient or nurse and pretend they are at the physician's office | examples=the children explored each other's bodies by playing the game of doctor
   - This refers to a children's game, not a real medical professional.

4. definition=a person who holds Ph.D. degree (or the equivalent) from an academic institution | examples=she is a doctor of philosophy in physics
   - While this is a valid sense of "doctor," the context specifically mentions being "qualified in the use of anticancer chemotherapy," which requires a medical license, not just a PhD. A PhD in physics wouldn't be qualified to supervise chemotherapy administration.

The correct sense is clearly #1 - a licensed medical practitioner.

The answer should be just the number: 1


[User]
Which numbered sense of "use" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: Alimta should only be given under the supervision of a doctor who is qualified in the <t>use</t> of anticancer chemotherapy.

Senses:
1. definition=the act of using | examples=he warned against the use of narcotic drugs
2. definition=what something is used for | examples=the function of an auger is to bore holes
3. definition=a particular service | examples=he put his knowledge to good use
4. definition=(economics) the utilization of economic goods to satisfy needs or in manufacturing | examples=the consumption of energy has increased steadily
5. definition=(psychology) an automatic pattern of behavior in reaction to a specific situation; may be inherited or acquired through frequent repetition | examples=owls have nocturnal habits
6. definition=exerting shrewd or devious influence especially for one's own advantage | examples=his manipulation of his friends was scandalous
7. definition=(law) the exercise of the legal right to enjoy the benefits of owning property | examples=we were given the use of his boat

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to identify which numbered sense of "use" is used in the given sentence. Let me analyze the sentence and the definitions.

Sentence: "Alimta should only be given under the supervision of a doctor who is qualified in the <t>use</t> of anticancer chemotherapy."

The word "use" here refers to the act or practice of using anticancer chemotherapy. Let me look at the options:

1. definition=the act of using | examples=he warned against the use of narcotic drugs
   - This seems to fit. The sentence is talking about a doctor being qualified in the act or practice of using anticancer chemotherapy.

2. definition=what something is used for | examples=the function of an auger is to bore holes
   - This refers to the function or purpose, not the act itself. The sentence isn't about what anticancer chemotherapy is used for, but about the act of administering it.

3. definition=a particular service | examples=he put his knowledge to good use
   - This refers to putting something into service or utilizing it in a specific way. The phrase "put to use" is different from "qualified in the use of."

4. definition=(economics) the utilization of economic goods to satisfy needs or in manufacturing | examples=the consumption of energy has increased steadily
   - This is specifically about economics and consumption, which doesn't fit the medical context.

5. definition=(psychology) an automatic pattern of behavior in reaction to a specific situation; may be inherited or acquired through frequent repetition | examples=owls have nocturnal habits
   - This is about habits or automatic behaviors, not about medical expertise or the act of using a treatment.

6. definition=exerting shrewd or devious influence especially for one's own advantage | examples=his manipulation of his friends was scandalous
   - This is about manipulation, clearly not relevant.

7. definition=(law) the exercise of the legal right to enjoy the benefits of owning property | examples=we were given the use of his boat
   - This is a legal term about property rights, not applicable here.

Looking at sense 1: "the act of using" with the example "he warned against the use of narcotic drugs." This is very similar to the sentence structure: "qualified in the use of anticancer chemotherapy."

Both refer to the act, practice, or manner of using something (narcotic drugs / anticancer chemotherapy).

Therefore, the answer is 1.

provider: Moonshot AI


[User]
Which numbered sense of "dose" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: The recommended <t>dose</t> of Alimta is 500 mg per square metre of body surface area (calculated using the patient s height and weight).

Senses:
1. definition=a measured portion of medicine taken at any one time
2. definition=the quantity of an active agent (substance or radiation) taken in or absorbed at any one time
3. definition=a communicable infection transmitted by sexual intercourse or genital contact
4. definition=street name for lysergic acid diethylamide

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to identify which numbered sense of "dose" is used in the given sentence.

 Sentence: "The recommended <t>dose</t> of Alimta is 500 mg per square metre of body surface area (calculated using the patient s height and weight)."

 Let me analyze the sentence:
 - Alimta is a medication (pemetrexed, used for cancer treatment)
 - The context is medical/pharmaceutical
 - It mentions "500 mg per square metre of body surface area" which is a measurement of medication amount
 - It's talking about a recommended amount of medicine for a patient

 Now let's look at the senses:
 1. "a measured portion of medicine taken at any one time" - This fits well. It's about medicine (Alimta) and mentions a measured amount (500 mg per square metre).
 2. "the quantity of an active agent (substance or radiation) taken in or absorbed at any one time" - This is broader and could include substances or radiation, not just medicine. While technically correct, sense 1 is more specific to medicine.
 3. "a communicable infection transmitted by sexual intercourse or genital contact" - This is clearly wrong (this would be like "a dose of clap" or slang for venereal disease, but that's not the context here).
 4. "street name for lysergic acid diethylamide" - This is slang for LSD, clearly wrong in this medical context.

 Between sense 1 and sense 2:
 Sense 1 specifically mentions "medicine" which matches perfectly with Alimta (a pharmaceutical drug).
 Sense 2 mentions "active agent" which is broader and more technical, but could apply.

 However, looking at typical dictionary definitions, sense 1 is the standard definition for medical dosing. The sentence is clearly talking about a prescription medication dosage.

 Actually, looking more carefully at the wording:
 Sense 1: "a measured portion of medicine taken at any one time"
 Sense 2: "the quantity of an active agent (substance or radiation) taken in or absorbed at any one time"

 The sentence mentions "Alimta" which is a medicine, and specifies the amount in mg per square metre. This aligns perfectly with sense 1.

 However, I should consider if sense 2 might be intended because "Alimta" is the active agent? But Alimta is the brand name for pemetrexed, which is the medicine.

 Actually, looking at standard WordNet or similar dictionary senses, often sense 1 is the general "measured portion of medicine" and sense 2 is the technical "quantity of active agent."

 But in this context, both could apply. However, sense 1 is the most common and direct meaning when talking about recommended amounts of prescription drugs.

 Wait, looking at the examples typically associated with these senses:
 Sense 1 examples usually involve "take a dose," "prescribed dose," etc.
 Sense 2 might be used for radiation, poison, or other substances that aren't strictly "medicine" in the clinical sense, or in scientific contexts.

 Given that Alimta is clearly a medicine (chemotherapy drug), and the text reads like a drug label or medical guideline, sense 1 seems most appropriate.

 But I should double-check: is there any reason this would be sense 2? The phrase "active agent" might distinguish it from the formulation (which includes inactive ingredients). But the sentence refers to "dose of Alimta" where Alimta is the medicine (brand name).

 Actually, looking at typical word sense disambiguation datasets (like WordNet), let me think about how these senses are distinguished:

 Sense 1 (medicine): "a measured portion of medicine taken at any one time"
 Sense 2 (active agent): "the quantity of an active agent (substance or radiation) taken in or absorbed at any one time"

 The key difference is that sense 1 specifies "medicine" while sense 2 is broader. Since Alimta is definitely a medicine, sense 1 is correct.

 Also, sense 3 and 4 are clearly wrong (slang meanings).

 Therefore, the answer is 1.


[User]
Which numbered sense of "mg" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: The recommended dose of Alimta is 500 <t>mg</t> per square metre of body surface area (calculated using the patient s height and weight).

Senses:
1. definition=one thousandth (1/1,000) gram
2. definition=a light silver-white ductile bivalent metallic element; in pure form it burns with brilliant white flame; occurs naturally only in combination (as in magnesite and dolomite and carnallite and spinel and olivine)

reasoning_content:
The user is asking me to identify which sense of "mg" is used in the given sentence. The sentence is: "The recommended dose of Alimta is 500 <t>mg</t> per square metre of body surface area (calculated using the patient s height and weight)."

 Let me look at the two senses:

 1. definition=one thousandth (1/1,000) gram
 2. definition=a light silver-white ductile bivalent metallic element; in pure form it burns with brilliant white flame; occurs naturally only in combination (as in magnesite and dolomite and carnallite and spinel and olivine)

 Sense 1 is clearly referring to "milligram" which is a unit of mass equal to one thousandth of a gram.

 Sense 2 is referring to the chemical element magnesium (Mg).

 In the sentence, we have "500 mg" in the context of a "recommended dose" of a medication (Alimta). This is clearly referring to a dosage measurement. When we talk about drug dosages, "mg" stands for milligrams, which is a unit of mass.

 The context is medical/pharmaceutical - talking about the dose of a medication. The phrase "500 mg per square metre" is a standard way of expressing drug dosage based on body surface area.

 Therefore, sense 1 is the correct answer.

 Sense 2 is describing the element magnesium, which doesn't make sense in this context. You wouldn't say "500 magnesium per square metre" - that doesn't make grammatical or scientific sense in this context.

 The answer is 1.

provider: DeepInfra


[User]
Which numbered sense of "body" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: The recommended dose of Alimta is 500 mg per square metre of <t>body</t> surface area (calculated using the patient s height and weight).

Senses:
1. definition=the entire structure of an organism (an animal, plant, or human being) | examples=he felt as if his whole body were on fire
2. definition=a group of persons associated by some common tie or occupation and regarded as an entity | examples=the whole body filed out of the auditorium
3. definition=a natural object consisting of a dead animal or person | examples=they found the body in the lake
4. definition=an individual 3-dimensional object that has mass and that is distinguishable from other objects | examples=heavenly body
5. definition=the body excluding the head and neck and limbs | examples=they moved their arms and legs and bodies
6. definition=a collection of particulars considered as a system | examples=a body of law
7. definition=the property of holding together and retaining its shape | examples=wool has more body than rayon
8. definition=the central message of a communication | examples=the body of the message was short
9. definition=the main mass of a thing
10. definition=a resonating chamber in a musical instrument (as the body of a violin)
11. definition=the external structure of a vehicle | examples=the body of the car was badly rusted

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to identify which numbered sense of "body" is used in the given sentence.

Sentence: "The recommended dose of Alimta is 500 mg per square metre of <t>body</t> surface area (calculated using the patient s height and weight)."

Let me analyze the context:
- This is a medical/pharmaceutical context
- It refers to "body surface area"
- It's calculated using patient's height and weight
- This refers to the physical body of a human being

Now let's look at the senses:

1. definition=the entire structure of an organism (an animal, plant, or human being) | examples=he felt as if his whole body were on fire
- This seems to fit. "Body surface area" refers to the surface area of the entire physical structure of the human body.

2. definition=a group of persons associated by some common tie or occupation and regarded as an entity | examples=the whole body filed out of the auditorium
- This refers to a group/collective body (like a governing body). Doesn't fit.

3. definition=a natural object consisting of a dead animal or person | examples=they found the body in the lake
- This refers to a corpse. Doesn't fit.

4. definition=an individual 3-dimensional object that has mass and that is distinguishable from other objects | examples=heavenly body
- This refers to physical objects in general (like celestial bodies). While a human body is a 3D object, "body surface area" in medical context specifically refers to the organism, not just any object.

5. definition=the body excluding the head and neck and limbs | examples=they moved their arms and legs and bodies
- This refers to the torso/trunk specifically. But "body surface area" includes the entire surface including head, neck, and limbs.

6. definition=a collection of particulars considered as a system | examples=a body of law
- Abstract collection. Doesn't fit.

7. definition=the property of holding together and retaining its shape | examples=wool has more body than rayon
- Texture/consistency property. Doesn't fit.

8. definition=the central message of a communication | examples=the body of the message was short
- Part of a text/document. Doesn't fit.

9. definition=the main mass of a thing
- Could potentially fit, but less specific than sense 1.

10. definition=a resonating chamber in a musical instrument (as the body of a violin)
- Specific to instruments. Doesn't fit.

11. definition=the external structure of a vehicle | examples=the body of the car was badly rusted
- Vehicle body. Doesn't fit.

Sense 1 is the best fit: "the entire structure of an organism (an animal, plant, or human being)".

In medical contexts, "body surface area" (BSA) refers to the total surface area of the human body (the entire organism), calculated from height and weight. This matches sense 1 perfectly.

Sense 5 might be tempting because it mentions body parts, but it specifically excludes head and limbs, whereas body surface area includes the entire surface.

Sense 9 "the main mass of a thing" is too vague and not the specific meaning used in medical terminology for BSA calculations.

Therefore, the answer is 1.


[User]
Which numbered sense of "calculate" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: The recommended dose of Alimta is 500 mg per square metre of body surface area (<t>calculated</t> using the patient s height and weight).

Senses:
1. definition=make a mathematical calculation or computation
2. definition=judge to be probable
3. definition=keep an account of
4. definition=predict in advance
5. definition=specifically design a product, event, or activity for a certain public
6. definition=have faith or confidence in | examples=you can count on me to help you any time

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to identify which numbered sense of "calculate" is used in the given sentence.

 Sentence: "The recommended dose of Alimta is 500 mg per square metre of body surface area (<t>calculated</t> using the patient s height and weight)."

 The word "calculated" here refers to determining the body surface area using mathematical formulas based on height and weight (like the Du Bois formula or similar).

 Let's look at the senses:
 1. definition=make a mathematical calculation or computation
 2. definition=judge to be probable
 3. definition=keep an account of
 4. definition=predict in advance
 5. definition=specifically design a product, event, or activity for a certain public
 6. definition=have faith or confidence in | examples=you can count on me to help you any time

 Sense 1 fits perfectly because calculating body surface area from height and weight involves mathematical computation.

 Sense 2 (judge to be probable) doesn't fit - it's not about probability.
 Sense 3 (keep an account of) doesn't fit - it's not accounting/bookkeeping.
 Sense 4 (predict in advance) - while calculation can be used for prediction, here it's specifically about computing a value from known measurements.
 Sense 5 (design for a certain public) - clearly wrong.
 Sense 6 (have faith/confidence) - this is actually a different word/usage ("count on" vs "calculate").

 So the answer is 1.


[User]
Which numbered sense of "use" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: The recommended dose of Alimta is 500 mg per square metre of body surface area (calculated <t>using</t> the patient s height and weight).

Senses:
1. definition=put into service; make work or employ for a particular purpose or for its inherent or natural purpose | examples=use your head!
2. definition=take or consume (regularly or habitually) | examples=She uses drugs rarely
3. definition=use up, consume fully | examples=The legislature expended its time on school questions
4. definition=seek or achieve an end by using to one's advantage | examples=She uses her influential friends to get jobs
5. definition=avail oneself to | examples=apply a principle
6. definition=habitually do something (use only in the past tense) | examples=She used to call her mother every week but now she calls only occasionally

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to identify which numbered sense of "use" is used in the given sentence. The word "use" appears as "using" in the sentence (marked with <t></t> tags).

Let me analyze the sentence:
"The recommended dose of Alimta is 500 mg per square metre of body surface area (calculated <t>using</t> the patient s height and weight)."

The sentence is talking about calculating something by employing or utilizing the patient's height and weight.

Now let's look at the senses:

1. "put into service; make work or employ for a particular purpose or for its inherent or natural purpose" - examples: "use your head!"
   This seems to fit. The calculation is employing/utilizing the patient's height and weight.

2. "take or consume (regularly or habitually)" - examples: "She uses drugs rarely"
   This doesn't fit. We're not consuming height and weight.

3. "use up, consume fully" - examples: "The legislature expended its time on school questions"
   This doesn't fit. We're not using up the height and weight.

4. "seek or achieve an end by using to one's advantage" - examples: "She uses her influential friends to get jobs"
   This implies using something for personal gain or advantage. While one could argue this fits, it's more about utilizing something as a tool/method rather than exploiting for advantage.

5. "avail oneself to" - examples: "apply a principle"
   This could potentially fit, but let's look closer. "Avail oneself to" usually means to make use of something available to you.

6. "habitually do something (use only in the past tense)" - examples: "She used to call her mother every week..."
   This doesn't fit because it's not in the past tense "used to" construction.

Between sense 1 and sense 5:
Sense 1: "put into service; make work or employ for a particular purpose..."
Sense 5: "avail oneself to..."

The sentence says "calculated using the patient's height and weight" - this means employing the height and weight data in the calculation process. This is essentially "putting into service" or "employing for a particular purpose."

Actually, looking at sense 5 again: "avail oneself to; apply a principle; practice a custom; follow a practice". The example is "apply a principle".

But sense 1 seems more general: "put into service; make work or employ for a particular purpose or for its inherent or natural purpose". Examples include "use your head", "use the wing of the sparrow for your arrow", etc.

In the sentence, we are utilizing/employing the height and weight to calculate the body surface area. This is employing data/measurements for a calculation.

Sense 1 is the general definition of utilizing something as a tool or resource. Sense 4 is about exploiting something for advantage. Sense 5 is about availing oneself of something.

"Calculated using the patient's height and weight" = employing the height and weight values in the calculation.

This is clearly sense 1: "put into service; make work or employ for a particular purpose..."

Wait, let me double-check by looking at typical WordNet or similar dictionary senses (since the format looks like WordNet).

In WordNet:
- Sense 1: use, utilize, utilise, apply, employ (put into service; make work or employ for a particular purpose...)
- Sense 5: use (avail oneself to; "apply a principle"; "practice a religion"; "use care when going down the stairs")

Sense 5 examples include: "apply a principle", "practice a religion", "resort to...", "fall back on..."

But "calculated using" means the calculation method employs/utilizes the height and weight variables.

Actually, looking at the exact wording:
Sense 1: "put into service; make work or employ for a particular purpose or for its inherent or natural purpose"
Sense 5 (in WordNet often sense 4 or 6): "avail oneself to"

Sense 1 is definitely the best fit. We are employing the height and weight measurements for the calculation.

Let me verify by elimination:
- 2: consume regularly - no
- 3: use up - no
- 4: use to one's advantage - not really about advantage, just about methodology
- 6: past tense habit - no

So it's between 1 and 5.

Sense 5 "avail oneself to" is often used like "use the stairs", "use caution", etc.
Sense 1 is the general transitive use.

"Calculated using X" means X is the instrument/method employed in the calculation. This is sense 1.

Actually, looking at the examples provided for sense 5: "apply a principle" - this is close to "using a formula/method".

But "using height and weight" refers to using the measurements/data, not availing oneself of an opportunity or applying an abstract principle.

Sense 1 seems correct.

The answer should be 1.


[User]
Which numbered sense of "patient" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: The recommended dose of Alimta is 500 mg per square metre of body surface area (calculated using the <t>patient</t> s height and weight).

Senses:
1. definition=a person who requires medical care | examples=the number of emergency patients has grown rapidly
2. definition=the semantic role of an entity that is not the agent but is directly involved in or affected by the happening denoted by the verb in the clause

reasoning_content:
The user is asking me to identify which sense of the word "patient" is used in the given sentence. Let me analyze the sentence and the two senses provided.

 Sentence: "The recommended dose of Alimta is 500 mg per square metre of body surface area (calculated using the <t>patient</t> s height and weight)."

 The word "patient" here refers to a person who is receiving medical treatment (specifically the drug Alimta). The sentence is talking about calculating dosage based on the patient's physical characteristics (height and weight).

 Now let's look at the two senses:

 1. definition=a person who requires medical care | examples=the number of emergency patients has grown rapidly

 2. definition=the semantic role of an entity that is not the agent but is directly involved in or affected by the happening denoted by the verb in the clause

 Sense 1 is the common medical definition - a person receiving medical treatment. This fits the context because the sentence is discussing medical dosage for a person being treated.

 Sense 2 is a linguistic/semantic definition referring to the grammatical role of "patient" (similar to "theme" or "undergoer") in a sentence. This is a technical term in linguistics describing the semantic role of an entity that undergoes an action.

 In the given sentence, "patient" clearly refers to a human being who is receiving medical care/dosage calculation, not a grammatical semantic role. The phrase "patient's height and weight" indicates we are talking about a physical person.

 Therefore, the correct sense is 1.

 Let me double-check:
 - The sentence is from a medical context (drug dosage)
 - It refers to calculating based on a person's height and weight
 - This person is receiving medical treatment (the drug Alimta)
 - This matches sense 1: "a person who requires medical care"

 Sense 2 would be used in a linguistic analysis of a sentence, like "In the sentence 'The boy hit the ball,' the ball is the patient of the action." But that's not what's happening here.

 The answer is 1.

provider: Novita