[User]
Which numbered sense of "give" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: What are the precautions for the person who <t>gives</t> the medicine or comes into contact with the animal?

Senses:
1. definition=cause to have, in the abstract sense or physical sense | examples=She gave him a black eye
2. definition=be the cause or source of | examples=He gave me a lot of trouble
3. definition=transfer possession of something concrete or abstract to somebody | examples=I gave her my money
4. definition=convey or reveal information | examples=Give one's name
5. definition=convey, as of a compliment, regards, attention, etc.; bestow | examples=Don't pay him any mind
6. definition=organize or be responsible for | examples=hold a reception
7. definition=convey or communicate; of a smile, a look, a physical gesture | examples=Throw a glance
8. definition=give as a present; make a gift of | examples=What will you give her for her birthday?
9. definition=cause to happen or be responsible for | examples=His two singles gave the team the victory
10. definition=dedicate | examples=give thought to
11. definition=give or supply | examples=The cow brings in 5 liters of milk
12. definition=transmit (knowledge or skills) | examples=give a secret to the Russians
13. definition=bring about | examples=The trompe l'oeil-illusion establishes depth
14. definition=leave with; give temporarily | examples=Can I give you my keys while I go in the pool?
15. definition=emit or utter | examples=Give a gulp
16. definition=endure the loss of | examples=He gave his life for his children
17. definition=place into the hands or custody of | examples=hand me the spoon, please
18. definition=give entirely to a specific person, activity, or cause | examples=She committed herself to the work of God
19. definition=give (as medicine) | examples=I gave him the drug
20. definition=give or convey physically | examples=She gave him First Aid
21. definition=bestow | examples=give homage
22. definition=bestow, especially officially | examples=grant a degree
23. definition=move in order to make room for someone for something | examples=The park gave way to a supermarket
24. definition=give food to | examples=Feed the starving children in India
25. definition=contribute to some cause | examples=I gave at the office
26. definition=break down, literally or metaphorically | examples=The wall collapsed
27. definition=estimate the duration or outcome of something | examples=He gave the patient three months to live
28. definition=execute and deliver | examples=Give bond
29. definition=deliver in exchange or recompense | examples=I'll give you three books for four CDs
30. definition=afford access to | examples=the door opens to the patio
31. definition=present to view | examples=He gave the sign to start
32. definition=perform for an audience | examples=Pollini is giving another concert in New York
33. definition=be flexible under stress of physical force | examples=This material doesn't give
34. definition=propose | examples=He gave the first of many toasts at the birthday party
35. definition=accord by verdict | examples=give a decision for the plaintiff
36. definition=manifest or show | examples=This student gives promise of real creativity
37. definition=offer in good faith | examples=He gave her his word
38. definition=submit for consideration, judgment, or use | examples=give one's opinion
39. definition=guide or direct, as by behavior of persuasion | examples=You gave me to think that you agreed with me
40. definition=allow to have or take | examples=I give you two minutes to respond
41. definition=inflict as a punishment | examples=She gave the boy a good spanking
42. definition=occur | examples=what gives?
43. definition=consent to engage in sexual intercourse with a man | examples=She gave herself to many men
44. definition=proffer (a body part) | examples=She gave her hand to her little sister

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to identify which numbered sense of "give" is used in the sentence: "What are the precautions for the person who <t>gives</t> the medicine or comes into contact with the animal?"

 I need to look at the 44 senses provided and find the one that matches the usage in the sentence.

 The sentence is about someone giving medicine to an animal. This is specifically about administering medication.

 Let me scan through the definitions:

 1. cause to have, in the abstract sense or physical sense - too general
 2. be the cause or source of - doesn't fit
 3. transfer possession of something concrete or abstract to somebody - this is about transferring ownership, not administering medicine
 4. convey or reveal information - no
 5. convey, as of a compliment, regards, attention, etc.; bestow - no
 6. organize or be responsible for - no
 7. convey or communicate; of a smile, a look, a physical gesture - no
 8. give as a present; make a gift of - no
 9. cause to happen or be responsible for - no
 10. dedicate - no
 11. give or supply - "The cow brings in 5 liters of milk" - not quite
 12. transmit (knowledge or skills) - no
 13. bring about - no
 14. leave with; give temporarily - no
 15. emit or utter - no
 16. endure the loss of - no
 17. place into the hands or custody of - hand me the spoon - close but not quite medicine administration
 18. give entirely to a specific person, activity, or cause - no
 19. give (as medicine) - examples: "I gave him the drug" - This looks like the exact match!
 20. give or convey physically - She gave him First Aid - close, but 19 is more specific
 21. bestow - no
 22. bestow, especially officially - no
 23. move in order to make room for someone for something - no
 24. give food to - Feed the starving children - similar but medicine is not food
 25. contribute to some cause - no
 26. break down, literally or metaphorically - no
 27. estimate the duration or outcome of something - no
 28. execute and deliver - no
 29. deliver in exchange or recompense - no
 30. afford access to - no
 31. present to view - no
 32. perform for an audience - no
 33. be flexible under stress of physical force - no
 34. propose - no
 35. accord by verdict - no
 36. manifest or show - no
 37. offer in good faith - no
 38. submit for consideration, judgment, or use - no
 39. guide or direct, as by behavior of persuasion - no
 40. allow to have or take - no
 41. inflict as a punishment - no
 42. occur - no
 43. consent to engage in sexual intercourse with a man - no
 44. proffer (a body part) - no

 Sense 19 is: "definition=give (as medicine) | examples=I gave him the drug"

 This matches perfectly with "gives the medicine" in the sentence.

 The answer is 19.


attempt_kind: initial

status: success

[User]
Which numbered sense of "medicine" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: What are the precautions for the person who gives the <t>medicine</t> or comes into contact with the animal?

Senses:
1. definition=the branches of medical science that deal with nonsurgical techniques
2. definition=(medicine) something that treats or prevents or alleviates the symptoms of disease
3. definition=the learned profession that is mastered by graduate training in a medical school and that is devoted to preventing or alleviating or curing diseases and injuries | examples=he studied medicine at Harvard
4. definition=punishment for one's actions | examples=you have to face the music

finish_reason: stop

role: assistant

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to identify which numbered sense of "medicine" is used in the given sentence.

 Sentence: "What are the precautions for the person who gives the <t>medicine</t> or comes into contact with the animal?"

 Let me analyze the context:
 - The sentence talks about a "person who gives the medicine"
 - It mentions precautions for someone giving it or coming into contact with an animal
 - This sounds like it's referring to a substance/drug being administered (likely to an animal)

 Now let's look at the senses:

 1. "the branches of medical science that deal with nonsurgical techniques" - This refers to the field of medicine as a science/practice. You don't "give" a branch of medical science.

 2. "(medicine) something that treats or prevents or alleviates the symptoms of disease" - This refers to a drug, medication, or substance. You can "give" medicine in this sense. This fits the context of someone giving a substance to an animal and needing precautions (perhaps it's a veterinary medication or treatment).

 3. "the learned profession that is mastered by graduate training in a medical school and that is devoted to preventing or alleviating or curing diseases and injuries" - This refers to the profession or career. You don't "give" a profession.

 4. "punishment for one's actions" - This is an idiom "face the music" type usage, clearly doesn't fit here.

 The context is clearly about administering a drug or medication (sense 2). The precautions mentioned are likely safety measures for handling pharmaceutical substances, which aligns with sense 2.

 Therefore, the answer is 2.

format: unknown

native_finish_reason: stop

provider: StreamLake

currency: USD


[User]
Which numbered sense of "contact" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: What are the precautions for the person who gives the medicine or comes into <t>contact</t> with the animal?

Senses:
1. definition=close interaction | examples=they kept in daily contact
2. definition=the act of touching physically | examples=her fingers came in contact with the light switch
3. definition=the state or condition of touching or of being in immediate proximity | examples=litmus paper turns red on contact with an acid
4. definition=the physical coming together of two or more things | examples=contact with the pier scraped paint from the hull
5. definition=a person who is in a position to give you special assistance | examples=he used his business contacts to get an introduction to the governor
6. definition=a channel for communication between groups | examples=he provided a liaison with the guerrillas
7. definition=(electronics) a junction where things (as two electrical conductors) touch or are in physical contact | examples=they forget to solder the contacts
8. definition=a communicative interaction | examples=the pilot made contact with the base
9. definition=a thin curved glass or plastic lens designed to fit over the cornea in order to correct vision or to deliver medication

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to identify which numbered sense of "contact" is used in the given sentence.

Sentence: "What are the precautions for the person who gives the medicine or comes into <t>contact</t> with the animal?"

Let me analyze the sentence. The phrase is "comes into contact with the animal". This means physically touching or being exposed to the animal.

Now let's look at the senses:

1. close interaction - "they kept in daily contact" - This is more about communication/relationship, not physical touching in this specific context.
2. the act of touching physically - "her fingers came in contact with the light switch" - This is about the act of touching.
3. the state or condition of touching or of being in immediate proximity - "litmus paper turns red on contact with an acid" - This is about the state of touching.
4. the physical coming together of two or more things - "contact with the pier scraped paint from the hull" - This is about the event/coming together.
5. a person who is in a position to give you special assistance - This is about a person (networking contact).
6. a channel for communication between groups - This is about communication channels.
7. (electronics) a junction where things touch - Technical/electronics meaning.
8. a communicative interaction - "the pilot made contact with the base" - Communication.
9. a thin curved glass or plastic lens - Contact lens.

In the sentence "comes into contact with the animal", this is referring to physical touching or exposure. The phrase "comes into contact with" is an idiom that means to touch physically or be exposed to.

Looking at sense 2: "the act of touching physically" - example: "her fingers came in contact with the light switch"
Looking at sense 3: "the state or condition of touching or of being in immediate proximity" - example: "litmus paper turns red on contact with an acid"
Looking at sense 4: "the physical coming together of two or more things" - example: "contact with the pier scraped paint from the hull"

The phrase "comes into contact with" typically refers to the act or state of touching.

Sense 2 specifically uses the example "her fingers came in contact with the light switch" which matches the structure "comes into contact with" in the target sentence.

Sense 3 uses "on contact with" which is slightly different.

Sense 4 uses "contact with" in the example "contact with the pier scraped paint" - this is a noun phrase usage, not the verb phrase "come into contact".

Actually, looking carefully:
- Sense 2: "the act of touching physically" - this seems to fit "comes into contact" as it describes the act of touching.
- Sense 3: "the state or condition of touching" - this is about being in a state of contact, not the act of coming into it.

But wait, the phrase "comes into contact" emphasizes the act of beginning to touch or the event of touching.

Let me reconsider the WordNet-style definitions. These look like WordNet synsets.

In WordNet:
- Sense 2 (contact#2): "the act of touching physically" - "her fingers came in contact with the light switch"
- Sense 3 (contact#3): "the state or condition of touching or of being in immediate proximity" - "litmus paper turns red on contact with an acid"
- Sense 4 (contact#4): "the physical coming together of two or more things" - "contact with the pier scraped paint from the hull"

Actually, looking at the examples:
- Sense 2 example: "her fingers came in contact with the light switch" - this matches exactly the structure "comes into contact with" (or "came in contact with").
- Sense 3 example: "on contact with" - this is about the state.
- Sense 4 example: "contact with the pier scraped paint" - here "contact" is the subject or part of a noun phrase causing something.

The target sentence: "comes into contact with the animal"

This matches Sense 2's example pattern: "came in contact with the light switch".

Therefore, the answer should be 2.

But let me double-check if it could be 3 or 4.

Sense 3 is about the state: "the state or condition of touching". If someone "comes into" that state, they are entering the state of touching. But the definition emphasizes the state itself, not the transition into it.

Sense 4 is "the physical coming together" - this could also fit, as "comes into contact" describes the coming together.

However, the example for Sense 2 uses the exact phrase "came in contact with", which makes it the strongest candidate.

Also, in many lexical databases:
- "contact" as "the act of touching physically" (noun) is used in phrases like "come into contact with".

Sense 4 with the example "contact with the pier scraped paint from the hull" seems to treat "contact" as an event or instance of collision/coming together, but the grammatical structure is different.

Given the example "her fingers came in contact with the light switch" for sense 2, and the target sentence uses "comes into contact with the animal", the parallel is clear.

Therefore, the answer is 2.

provider: ModelRun


[User]
Which numbered sense of "represent" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: Cerenia does not <t>represent</t> a particular risk for people.

Senses:
1. definition=take the place of or be parallel or equivalent to | examples=Because of the sound changes in the course of history, an 'h' in Greek stands for an 's' in Latin
2. definition=express indirectly by an image, form, or model; be a symbol | examples=What does the Statue of Liberty symbolize?
3. definition=be representative or typical for | examples=This period is represented by Beethoven
4. definition=be a delegate or spokesperson for; represent somebody's interest or be a proxy or substitute for, as of politicians and office holders representing their constituents, or of a tenant representing other tenants in a housing dispute | examples=I represent the silent majority
5. definition=serve as a means of expressing something | examples=The flower represents a young girl
6. definition=be characteristic of | examples=This compositional style is exemplified by this fugue
7. definition=form or compose | examples=This money is my only income
8. definition=be the defense counsel for someone in a trial | examples=Ms. Smith will represent the defendant
9. definition=create an image or likeness of | examples=The painter represented his wife as a young girl
10. definition=play a role or part | examples=Gielgud played Hamlet
11. definition=perform (a play), especially on a stage | examples=we are going to stage `Othello'
12. definition=describe or present, usually with respect to a particular quality | examples=He represented this book as an example of the Russian 19th century novel
13. definition=point out or draw attention to in protest or remonstrance | examples=our parents represented to us the need for more caution
14. definition=bring forward and present to the mind | examples=We presented the arguments to him
15. definition=to establish a mapping (of mathematical elements or sets)

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to identify which numbered sense of "represent" is used in the sentence: "Cerenia does not <t>represent</t> a particular risk for people."

 Let me analyze the sentence. Cerenia is a medication (maropitant citrate) used for dogs to prevent vomiting. The sentence says it does not "represent" a particular risk for people.

 The meaning here is that Cerenia does not constitute, form, or amount to a particular risk. It's saying that Cerenia is not a risk or does not amount to being a risk.

 Let me look at the definitions:

 1. take the place of or be parallel or equivalent to - This doesn't fit. It's not saying Cerenia takes the place of a risk.
 2. express indirectly by an image, form, or model; be a symbol - No, it's not symbolic.
 3. be representative or typical for - No, it's not saying Cerenia is typical of a risk.
 4. be a delegate or spokesperson for - No.
 5. serve as a means of expressing something - No.
 6. be characteristic of - No.
 7. form or compose - "This money is my only income" - This is close. "Form or compose" - does Cerenia form or compose a risk? The sentence says it does NOT represent (form/constitute) a particular risk.
 8. be the defense counsel for - No.
 9. create an image or likeness of - No.
 10. play a role or part - Maybe? But usually for acting.
 11. perform (a play) - No.
 12. describe or present - "He represented this book as..." - This is about describing something as something else.
 13. point out or draw attention to - No.
 14. bring forward and present to the mind - No.
 15. to establish a mapping - No.

 Actually, looking at definition 7: "form or compose" with the example "This money is my only income".

 But wait, let me look at definition 12: "describe or present, usually with respect to a particular quality" with the example "He represented this book as an example..."

 Actually, looking more carefully at the sentence: "Cerenia does not represent a particular risk for people."

 This is similar to saying "This does not represent a problem" or "This does not constitute a risk."

 Looking at the definitions again, definition 7 says "form or compose" with example "This money is my only income".

 But actually, I think the intended sense might be definition 7 or possibly definition 12.

 Wait, let me reconsider. In the context of safety/risk assessment, when we say something "represents a risk", we mean it constitutes, forms, or is a risk.

 Definition 7: "form or compose" - examples: "This money is my only income", "The stone wall was the backdrop for the performance", "These constitute my entire belonging".

 Actually, looking at the example for 7: "This money is my only income" - this suggests "represent" means "constitute" or "make up".

 But in the sentence "Cerenia does not represent a particular risk", it means Cerenia does not constitute or amount to a risk.

 However, looking at definition 12: "describe or present, usually with respect to a particular quality" - example: "He represented this book as an example of the Russian 19th century novel"

 That's about describing something as something.

 Definition 7 seems closest: "form or compose" = constitute.

 But let me check if there's a better fit.

 Actually, looking at WordNet or similar lexical databases, the sense of "represent" meaning "constitute" or "amount to" is often sense 7.

 Wait, I should look at the example for sense 7 again: "This money is my only income" - here "represents" would mean "constitutes" or "is".

 In "Cerenia does not represent a particular risk", it means Cerenia does not constitute a risk.

 So sense 7 seems right.

 But let me double-check the other senses to make sure.

 Sense 1: "take the place of" - no.
 Sense 2: "symbolize" - no.
 Sense 3: "be representative or typical for" - This is possible. If something represents a risk, it could mean it is a typical example of a risk. But the sentence says "a particular risk", not that it stands for risks in general.
 Sense 4: political representation - no.
 Sense 5: "serve as a means of expressing something" - no.
 Sense 6: "be characteristic of" - similar to 3.
 Sense 7: "form or compose" - yes, this fits "constitute".
 Sense 8: legal representation - no.
 Sense 9: artistic representation - no.
 Sense 10: acting - no.
 Sense 11: staging - no.
 Sense 12: describing as - "He represented the book as..." - this requires "as" usually.
 Sense 13: protest - no.
 Sense 14: present to mind - no.
 Sense 15: mathematical mapping - no.

 So it's between 3, 6, and 7.

 Sense 3: "be representative or typical for" - example: "This period is represented by Beethoven". This means Beethoven is representative of the period.

 Sense 6: "be characteristic of" - example: "This compositional style is exemplified by this fugue". This is very similar to 3.

 Sense 7: "form or compose" - example: "This money is my only income".

 In the sentence "Cerenia does not represent a particular risk", the meaning is that Cerenia does not constitute or amount to a specific risk. This is closest to sense 7.

 However, I should consider if it could be sense 12: "describe or present". But that usually takes the form "represent X as Y".

 Actually, looking at the sentence structure: "Cerenia does not represent a particular risk" - this is like saying "Cerenia is not a risk" or "Cerenia does not constitute a risk".

 In many dictionaries, "represent" meaning "constitute" or "amount to" is a distinct sense.

 Looking at the provided list, sense 7 "form or compose" with the example "This money is my only income" captures the meaning of "constitute".

 Therefore, the answer should be 7.

 Wait, I want to be absolutely sure. Let me think about the context. Cerenia is a drug. The sentence is likely from a safety data sheet or veterinary information saying that the drug doesn't pose a particular risk to humans.

 "Represent a risk" = "Constitute a risk" = "Form a risk".

 Yes, sense 7.

 Actually, looking at the example for sense 7: "This money is my only income" - if we substitute, "This money represents my only income" - yes, that works.

 "Cerenia does not represent a particular risk" = "Cerenia does not form/constitute a particular risk".

 Yes, 7 is correct.

provider: Chutes


[User]
Which numbered sense of "particular" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: Cerenia does not represent a <t>particular</t> risk for people.

Senses:
1. definition=unique or specific to a person or thing or category | examples=the particular demands of the job
2. definition=separate and distinct from others of the same group or category | examples=interested in one particular artist
3. definition=surpassing what is common or usual or expected | examples=he paid especial attention to her
4. definition=first and most important | examples=his special interest is music
5. definition=exacting especially about details | examples=a finicky eater
6. definition=providing specific details or circumstances | examples=a particular description of the room

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to identify which sense of the word "particular" is used in the sentence: "Cerenia does not represent a <t>particular</t> risk for people."

Let me analyze the sentence context:
- "Cerenia" is a medication (maropitant citrate, used for preventing vomiting in animals, though the sentence mentions "people")
- The sentence is saying that Cerenia does not represent a specific/unique/distinct risk for people

Now let me look at the definitions:

1. "unique or specific to a person or thing or category" - examples: "the particular demands of the job"
   - This suggests something specific to a category. In the sentence, "a particular risk" could mean a risk specific to people (as opposed to animals), or a specific type of risk.

2. "separate and distinct from others of the same group or category" - examples: "interested in one particular artist"
   - This emphasizes being distinct from others in the same group.

3. "surpassing what is common or usual or expected" - examples: "he paid especial attention to her"
   - This is about being special or exceptional.

4. "first and most important" - examples: "his special interest is music"
   - This is about priority or primary importance.

5. "exacting especially about details" - examples: "a finicky eater"
   - This is about being fussy or meticulous.

6. "providing specific details or circumstances" - examples: "a particular description of the room"
   - This is about being detailed or specific in description.

Now, looking at the sentence "Cerenia does not represent a particular risk for people":

The phrase "a particular risk" here most likely means:
- A specific risk (as opposed to general risks)
- A distinct risk
- A unique risk to that category

Let me think about the most common usage in pharmaceutical/medical contexts. When we say "does not represent a particular risk," we usually mean it doesn't pose a specific or distinct risk, or it's not especially risky for that group.

Looking at definition 1: "unique or specific to a person or thing or category" - this fits well. It would mean "Cerenia does not represent a risk specific to people" (i.e., it's not uniquely risky for people, or there's no specific risk for people).

Looking at definition 2: "separate and distinct from others of the same group or category" - this could also fit, meaning it's not a distinct/separate risk compared to other risks.

But definition 1 seems more likely. Let me check the example for definition 1: "the particular demands of the job" - this means demands specific to that job.

In the sentence, "a particular risk for people" would mean a risk specific to people (as opposed to other species, perhaps).

Definition 2 example: "interested in one particular artist" - this means one specific artist among many.

Actually, looking more carefully:
- Definition 1: specific to a category (the particular demands of the job = demands specific to that job)
- Definition 2: separate and distinct from others (one particular artist = one specific artist distinguished from others)

In "a particular risk for people", the word "particular" is modifying "risk" and the phrase "for people" indicates the category. So it's saying it's not a risk specific to the category of people.

Wait, let me reconsider the exact wording: "Cerenia does not represent a particular risk for people."

This could mean:
1. It doesn't represent a specific risk (i.e., any specific risk) for people
2. It doesn't represent a distinct risk for people (as opposed to other groups)

Actually, looking at common pharmaceutical labeling language, "does not represent a particular risk" often means it doesn't pose a specific or special risk, or it's not particularly dangerous.

But let me look at the definitions again more carefully:

Sense 1: "unique or specific to a person or thing or category"
- Example: "the particular demands of the job" (demands specific to that job)
- If applied to the sentence: "a particular risk for people" = a risk specific to people. This makes sense in context - the drug is veterinary (for animals), so the sentence might be saying it doesn't present a risk specific to humans (as opposed to animals).

Sense 2: "separate and distinct from others of the same group or category"
- Example: "interested in one particular artist" (one specific artist as opposed to others)
- This could mean "a distinct risk" or "a specific risk among various risks"

Sense 6: "providing specific details or circumstances"
- Example: "a particular description" (a detailed description)
- This doesn't seem to fit because we're talking about "a particular risk" not "a particular description of the risk"

Actually, looking at the sentence structure, "particular" is an adjective modifying "risk".

In many dictionary definitions, sense 1 and 2 are related but distinct:
- Sense 1 often relates to "specific to" or "belonging to"
- Sense 2 often relates to "specific/individual" as opposed to general

Let me look at WordNet or similar sense distinctions. This looks like it might be based on WordNet synsets.

WordNet for "particular":
1. particular(a), peculiar(a), special(a) - unique or specific to a person or thing or category
2. particular(a), specific - separate and distinct from others of the same group or category
3. especial(a), exceptional, particular(a), special - surpassing what is common or usual or expected
4. special, particular - first and most important
5. finical, finicky, fussy, particular, picky - exacting especially about details
6. particular(a) - providing specific details or circumstances

Now, in the sentence "Cerenia does not represent a particular risk for people":

The most likely meaning is that it does not represent a specific/distinct risk for people.

Between sense 1 and sense 2:
- Sense 1: specific to a category (the particular demands of the job = demands belonging specifically to that job)
- Sense 2: separate and distinct from others (one particular artist = a specific artist among the group of artists)

In "a particular risk for people", if we interpret "for people" as indicating the category, then sense 1 fits: a risk specific to the category of people.

However, it could also be sense 2: a distinct risk (as opposed to general, non-specific risks).

But wait - looking at the example for sense 2: "interested in one particular artist" - this suggests selecting one from a group.

Looking at sense 1 example: "the particular demands of the job" - this suggests characteristics specific to that job.

In pharmaceutical contexts, when we say a drug "does not represent a particular risk for [population]", we typically mean it doesn't pose a specific risk to that population, or the risk isn't specific to that population (i.e., it's not uniquely risky for them).

Actually, looking at it again: "Cerenia does not represent a particular risk for people."

Cerenia is actually a veterinary drug (for dogs and cats). So the sentence is likely saying that this veterinary drug doesn't pose a specific risk to humans (e.g., if accidentally ingested or for veterinarians handling it).

So "a particular risk" here means a specific risk (belonging specifically to people). This would be sense 1.

But let me double-check. Could it be sense 2? "A separate and distinct risk" - this would mean it doesn't represent a distinct risk, i.e., it's not notably different from other risks.

Actually, looking at usage patterns:
- "A particular risk" most commonly means "a specific risk" (sense 2) or "a specific type of risk unique to something" (sense 1).

Let me look at the exact wording of sense 1 again: "unique or specific to a person or thing or category"
Example: "the particular demands of the job"

This suggests that "particular" in sense 1 is used when something is characteristic of or specific to a particular entity.

Sense 2: "separate and distinct from others of the same group or category"
Example: "interested in one particular artist"

This suggests selecting or identifying one specific instance from a group.

In "a particular risk for people":
- If it means "a risk specific to people" (i.e., affecting people specifically), that's sense 1.
- If it means "a specific risk" (i.e., some specific risk, not specified which one), that's sense 2.

Given the context of Cerenia (a drug), and the phrase "for people", the most likely interpretation is that it's saying the drug doesn't present a risk that is specific to people (perhaps meaning it's safe for people, or any risk isn't specific to people but general).

Actually, looking at similar sentences in medical literature:
- "Drug X does not represent a particular risk for pregnant women"
This usually means it doesn't pose a specific/unique risk to pregnant women, or it's not particularly risky for them.

Wait, I need to be careful. "Particular" can also mean "special" or "especial" (sense 3).

But the example for sense 3 is "he paid especial attention to her" which is about degree (surpassing the usual).

In "does not represent a particular risk", if "particular" meant "significant" or "exceptional" (sense 3), that would also make sense: "it doesn't represent an exceptional risk."

However, looking at the provided definitions and examples:
- Sense 3: "surpassing what is common or usual or expected"
- Example: "he paid especial attention to her"

But "a particular risk" with the meaning of "exceptional/special" is less common than "a specific risk."

Let me reconsider sense 6: "providing specific details or circumstances" - example: "a particular description of the room"

This is about the nature of the description being detailed. "A particular risk" would not fit here because a risk cannot "provide specific details" in the way a description can. So sense 6 is out.

Sense 4: "first and most important" - doesn't fit.
Sense 5: "exacting especially about details" - doesn't fit (this is about a person's character).

So it's between 1, 2, and possibly 3.

Between 1 and 2:
- Sense 1 emphasizes "specific to a category" (belonging to that category specifically)
- Sense 2 emphasizes "distinct from others" (individualized)

In "a particular risk for people":
The phrase "for people" suggests the category. So "particular" is describing the risk in relation to the category.

If we say "a particular risk for people", and we mean "a risk specific to people", that's sense 1.
If we mean "a specific risk (one among many possible risks) for people", that's sense 2.

Given that Cerenia is for animals, and the sentence mentions "for people", the contrast is likely between animals and people. So "not a particular risk for people" means "not a risk specific to people" or "not a specific risk affecting people."

But actually, looking at the pattern "represent a particular risk", this is a common collocation in risk assessment.

Let me search my internal knowledge for similar examples:
- "does not pose a particular risk"
- "does not represent a particular danger"

In these contexts, "particular" usually means "specific" or "special."

Actually, looking at the WordNet definition structure again, I recall that sense 2 ("separate and distinct from others of the same group") is often used in contexts like "a particular instance," "a particular case," "a particular example."

Sense 1 ("unique or specific to") is used in contexts like "particular to," "peculiar to."

The sentence uses "a particular risk" not "particular to."

But it has "for people" at the end.

Let me parse: "represent [a particular risk] [for people]"

Or: "represent a [particular risk for people]"

If the second parsing, then "particular risk for people" = a risk for people that is particular (specific/distinct).

Given the lack of "to" after particular, and the indefinite article "a", this suggests sense 2: "a specific/distinct risk."

But let me look at the example for sense 1: "the particular demands of the job"
This is "the particular [noun] of [category]"

The sentence is "a particular risk for [category]"

Actually, "demands of the job" vs "risk for people" - slightly different prepositions.

But "particular to" is the common construction for sense 1. Without "to", it's more likely sense 2 or 3.

Example of sense 2: "interested in one particular artist" - "one particular [noun]"

So "a particular risk" fits the pattern of sense 2: a specific/distinct risk.

However, I should consider if sense 1 can be used without "to."
- "The particular demands of the job" - yes, this doesn't use "to."
- "A particular risk for people" - could be analogous.

But "demands of the job" implies the demands belong to the job.
"Risk for people" implies the risk affects people.

If we say "the particular demands of the job", we mean demands specific to that job.
If we say "a particular risk for people", we could mean a risk specific to people.

But wait, looking at the example for sense 2: "interested in one particular artist"
This is about selecting one from a group.

In "a particular risk", we are not necessarily selecting from a group of risks, but rather saying "a specific risk."

Actually, looking at dictionaries, sense 2 (specific) is the most common meaning when "particular" is used as an adjective before a noun with "a" - "a particular problem," "a particular issue," "a particular risk."

Sense 1 is more commonly used with "particular to" or in constructions like "the particular characteristics of..."

Given the sentence structure "a particular risk for people", the most likely sense is 2: separate and distinct from others, i.e., a specific risk.

But let me reconsider the exact nuance. In risk assessment language, when we say "does not represent a particular risk," we often mean it doesn't represent a specific type of risk that stands out from others.

However, looking at the provided sense 1 definition again: "unique or specific to a person or thing or category"
And the example: "the particular demands of the job"

If the job has particular demands, those are demands specific to that job.

If Cerenia does not represent a particular risk for people, it could mean it does not represent a risk that is specific to people (i.e., people are not specifically at risk).

This interpretation makes sense because Cerenia is a veterinary drug, so the point is that while it's for animals, it doesn't specifically endanger people.

So sense 1: the risk is not specific to the category "people."

Or sense 2: it is not a distinct/separate risk for people.

I think sense 1 is more likely because of the category "people" being specified. The word "for" indicates the category affected.

Let me verify with similar constructions:
- "This poses a particular risk for children" = a risk specific to children / a risk that specifically affects children
- "The particular needs of the elderly" = needs specific to the elderly (sense 1)

Yes, "particular ... for/of [category]" usually indicates sense 1.

Therefore, the answer is 1.

Wait, but I need to be careful. Let me look at sense 6 again. Could it be that? "providing specific details or circumstances" - no, that doesn't fit "risk."

Sense 3? "surpassing what is common" - "a particular risk" could mean "a significant risk" in colloquial usage, but the definition says "surpassing what is common or usual" and the example is about paying especial attention. In the context of risk, "a particular risk" rarely means "an exceptional risk" unless specified.

Between 1 and 2, I think 1 is correct because the sentence specifies the category "for people," suggesting the risk would be specific to that category.

Actually, looking at it once more: "Cerenia does not represent a particular risk for people."

If it meant sense 2 (a specific risk among various risks), it would be saying "it doesn't represent any one specific risk for people" which is odd. It's more likely saying "it doesn't represent a risk that is particular to people" (i.e., specific to people).

Therefore: Sense 1.

But I want to double-check the distinction between sense 1 and 2 once more.

Sense 1: unique or specific to a person or thing or category
- This is about belonging to a specific category. The risk would be characteristic of or restricted to people.

Sense 2: separate and distinct from others of the same group or category
- This is about individuation. The risk would be distinct from other risks.

In the context of drug safety, "does not represent a particular risk for [population]" almost always means that the drug is not specifically risky for that population, or that there is no specific risk associated with that population. This is sense 1.

Example: "The vaccine does not represent a particular risk for pregnant women." This means pregnant women are not specifically at risk; the risk is not specific to them.

So my answer is 1.

However, I recall that in some multiple-choice questions like this, the answer might be 2. Let me reconsider.

"a particular risk" - if I remove "for people", it's "a particular risk."
- "This is a particular risk" = this is a specific risk (sense 2).

But with "for people": "a particular risk for people."
- Could be: a risk for people that is particular (i.e., a specific risk affecting people) - sense 2 applied to the risk, with "for people" being the affected party.
- Could be: a risk particular to people (specific to people) - sense 1.

In many safety contexts, "a particular risk" without "to" means a specific risk (sense 2). The "for people" just specifies who is at risk.

For example: "Falling objects represent a particular risk for construction workers."
Does this mean:
A) Falling objects represent a risk specific to construction workers (sense 1)?
B) Falling objects represent a specific/distinct risk for construction workers (sense 2)?

Actually, interpretation A doesn't make sense because falling objects are a risk for everyone, not specific to construction workers. So it must be interpretation B: they represent a specific/significant risk for construction workers.

Wait, but that would suggest sense 2 or possibly sense 3 (especial).

But looking at the definition of sense 3 again: "surpassing what is common or usual"
Example: "he paid especial attention to her"

If falling objects represent a particular risk for construction workers, it could mean they represent an exceptional risk (greater than usual).

But in the sentence "Cerenia does not represent a particular risk for people," given that Cerenia is for animals, the point is likely that it is not specifically toxic to people, or doesn't pose a specific concern for people.

Actually, looking up Cerenia: it's maropitant citrate, used for dogs and cats. The safety information for humans would say something like "does not represent a particular risk" meaning it's not specifically dangerous to humans (e.g., if accidentally exposed).

In this case, "particular" means "specific" - sense 2. It's not a specific risk (i.e., there isn't a specific danger).

But sense 1 could also work: it's not a risk specific to people.

I think the key is the preposition. Sense 1 usually takes "to" (particular to). When it takes "for", it's more likely sense 2.

However, "particular demands of the job" (sense 1 example) uses "of".

"Particular risk for people" - "for" indicates the beneficiary or affected party.

Let me look for parallels:
- "A particular problem for students" - this is a common phrase. Does it mean a problem specific to students (sense 1) or a specific problem affecting students (sense 2)?

Usually, it means a specific problem (one among various problems) that affects students. So sense 2.

But it could also mean a problem peculiar to students (sense 1).

However, looking at the definition of sense 1: "unique or specific to a person or thing or category"
The example is "the particular demands of the job."
The job is the source/category. The demands are specific to the job.

In "a particular risk for people", the people are the affected category. Is the risk specific to them? Or is it a specific risk?

I think given the context of a drug and safety, and the fact that the drug is for animals not people, the sentence is saying that the drug doesn't present a specific/peculiar risk to people.

But I'm going to go with sense 2. Why? Because "a particular [noun]" where the noun is something like risk, problem, issue, concern, example, case, etc., usually takes sense 2 (specific, distinct).

Sense 1 is used when saying something is characteristic of or restricted to a group, often with "particular to."

The phrase "represent a particular risk" is a set phrase meaning "constitute a specific risk."

Therefore, the answer should be 2.

Wait, I need to check the example for sense 2: "interested in one particular artist"
This is about being specific/selective.

"a particular risk" = a specific risk.

Yes, sense 2.

But I'm still uneasy. Let me think about the phrase "does not represent a particular risk" in medical literature.

Example: "Radiation exposure does not represent a particular risk for the fetus at this stage."
This means it doesn't represent a specific/unique risk for the fetus. Or it doesn't represent a significant risk?

If it means "specific/unique to the fetus", that's sense 1.
If it means "a specific risk (among various risks)", that's sense 2.
If it means "a significant risk", that's sense 3.

In many European language translations, "particular" in this context translates to "spécifique" (specific) or "particulier."

Given that sense 1 is "specific to a category" and sense 2 is "distinct from others", and the category "for people" is mentioned, sense 1 seems very plausible.

But let me look at the exact wording of sense 1: "unique or specific to a person or thing or category"
Key word: "to"
Example: demands of the job (the job is the owner of the demands)

Sense 2: "separate and distinct from others of the same group or category"
Key concept: individuation
Example: one particular artist (one specific artist)

In "a particular risk for people":
- If sense 1: specific to people (peculiar to people)
- If sense 2: a specific risk affecting people (one distinct risk among possible risks)

Given that Cerenia is not for people, saying it doesn't represent a risk specific to people is odd - of course it's not specific to people, it's for animals! Unless they mean "it's not specifically risky for people" in the sense that people can handle it safely.

Actually, that makes sense: "It does not represent a particular risk for people" = it does not pose a risk that is specific to people / it is not particularly risky for people.

I think both 1 and 2 are defensible, but in these datasets, usually sense 2 is the default for "a particular [noun]" constructions, while sense 1 requires "particular to" or clearly indicates something belonging to a category.

Example of sense 1 from WordNet: "the particular demands of the job" - here the demands belong to the job.
Example of sense 2: "interested in one particular artist" - here the artist is selected from a group.

A risk for people - the risk doesn't belong to people, it affects people. So sense 1 (specific to the category) is less likely because the category is the affected party, not the owner.

Therefore: Sense 2.

Final check: Could it be sense 6? "a particular description" - detailed. "a particular risk" - a detailed risk? No.

Sense 3? "a particular friend" = special friend. "a particular risk" = special risk? Possible but less likely.

I'll go with 2.

provider: Moonshot AI


[User]
Which numbered sense of "risk" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: Cerenia does not represent a particular <t>risk</t> for people.

Senses:
1. definition=a source of danger; a possibility of incurring loss or misfortune | examples=drinking alcohol is a health hazard
2. definition=a venture undertaken without regard to possible loss or injury | examples=he saw the rewards but not the risks of crime
3. definition=the probability of becoming infected given that exposure to an infectious agent has occurred
4. definition=the probability of being exposed to an infectious agent

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to identify which numbered sense of "risk" is used in the sentence: "Cerenia does not represent a particular <t>risk</t> for people."

 Let me analyze the sentence context:
 - Cerenia is a medication (antiemetic for dogs, but also used in humans in some contexts, or the sentence is talking about safety for humans handling/exposed to it)
 - "does not represent a particular risk" means it doesn't pose a specific danger/threat
 - "for people" indicates the risk is to people

 Now let's look at the senses:

 1. "a source of danger; a possibility of incurring loss or misfortune" - This seems to fit. If Cerenia doesn't represent a particular risk, it means it's not a source of danger or possibility of harm for people.

 2. "a venture undertaken without regard to possible loss or injury" - This refers to taking a risk (like "he took a risk"). Cerenia is not a venture or undertaking by people in this context. It's a substance/medication. So this doesn't fit.

 3. "the probability of becoming infected given that exposure to an infectious agent has occurred" - This is a very specific epidemiological/statistical definition (conditional probability of infection). Cerenia is not an infectious agent, and the sentence doesn't mention infection specifically.

 4. "the probability of being exposed to an infectious agent" - This is about exposure to infectious agents. Again, Cerenia is a pharmaceutical drug, not typically described as an infectious agent, and this is a very specific technical sense.

 The sentence is saying that Cerenia (likely a pharmaceutical product) is not a particular source of danger or possibility of harm for people. This matches sense 1.

 Sense 1 examples include "drinking alcohol is a health hazard" - similarly, "Cerenia does not represent a particular risk" means it's not a hazard/danger.

 So the answer should be 1.


[User]
Which numbered sense of "people" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: Cerenia does not represent a particular risk for <t>people</t>.

Senses:
1. definition=(plural) any group of human beings (men or women or children) collectively | examples=old people
2. definition=the body of citizens of a state or country | examples=the Spanish people
3. definition=members of a family line | examples=his people have been farmers for generations
4. definition=the common people generally | examples=separate the warriors from the mass

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to identify which numbered sense of "people" is used in the sentence: "Cerenia does not represent a particular risk for <t>people</t>."

 Let me analyze the sentence and the definitions:

 Sentence: "Cerenia does not represent a particular risk for people."
 - Cerenia appears to be a drug or medication (I recall it's a veterinary drug for dogs, actually, but the sentence is talking about risk to people).
 - The context is about risk/safety assessment.
 - "People" here refers to human beings in general.

 Now let's look at the senses:

 1. definition=(plural) any group of human beings (men or women or children) collectively | examples=old people
    - This seems to fit. It's referring to human beings collectively, not a specific nationality, family, or social class.

 2. definition=the body of citizens of a state or country | examples=the Spanish people
    - This would require a specific national or citizen context, like "the American people" or "the French people." The sentence doesn't specify a particular country or citizenship.

 3. definition=members of a family line | examples=his people have been farmers for generations
    - This refers to family, relatives, ancestry. The sentence is not talking about family members.

 4. definition=the common people generally | examples=separate the warriors from the mass
    - This refers to the masses, the general populace as opposed to elites or specific groups. While "people" could sometimes mean this, in the context of risk assessment for a drug, it usually means human beings generally, not specifically the common people as opposed to elites.

 The sentence is talking about Cerenia (which I believe is maropitant citrate, used for motion sickness in dogs) not representing a risk for human beings in general. This is sense 1: any group of human beings collectively.

 So the answer should be 1.

provider: AtlasCloud