[User]
Which numbered sense of "state" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: You must understand, I haven't been in this <t>state</t> too long.

Senses:
1. definition=the territory occupied by one of the constituent administrative districts of a nation | examples=his state is in the deep south
2. definition=the way something is with respect to its main attributes | examples=the current state of knowledge
3. definition=the group of people comprising the government of a sovereign state | examples=the state has lowered its income tax
4. definition=a politically organized body of people under a single government | examples=the state has elected a new president
5. definition=(chemistry) the three traditional states of matter are solids (fixed shape and volume) and liquids (fixed volume and shaped by the container) and gases (filling the container) | examples=the solid state of water is called ice
6. definition=a state of depression or agitation | examples=he was in such a state you just couldn't reason with him
7. definition=the territory occupied by a nation | examples=he returned to the land of his birth
8. definition=the federal department in the United States that sets and maintains foreign policies | examples=the Department of State was created in 1789

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to identify which numbered sense of "state" is used in the sentence: "You must understand, I haven't been in this <t>state</t> too long."

 Let me analyze the sentence context. The phrase "in this state" suggests a condition or emotional/mental condition. The speaker is saying they haven't been in "this state" (condition/emotional state) for too long.

 Now let's look at the options:

 1. Territory/administrative district - doesn't fit. The sentence is about a personal condition, not a geographic location.

 2. The way something is with respect to its main attributes - this is a general definition of "state" as in condition, but let's see if there's a more specific one.

 3. Group of people comprising the government - doesn't fit.

 4. Politically organized body of people - doesn't fit.

 5. Chemistry states of matter - doesn't fit the context.

 6. A state of depression or agitation - "he was in such a state you just couldn't reason with him" - This fits well. The sentence "I haven't been in this state too long" suggests an emotional or mental condition, likely depression, agitation, or some similar condition.

 7. Territory occupied by a nation - geographic, doesn't fit.

 8. Federal department - doesn't fit.

 Between options 2 and 6:
 - Option 2 is the general definition of "state" as a condition or attribute.
 - Option 6 is specifically "a state of depression or agitation."

 The example for option 6 is: "he was in such a state you just couldn't reason with him" - this matches the usage pattern in the target sentence: "in this state."

 The sentence "You must understand, I haven't been in this state too long" strongly suggests an emotional or psychological state (like depression, agitation, excitement, etc.), which aligns with sense 6.

 However, I should consider if it could be sense 2. Sense 2 is broader: "the way something is with respect to its main attributes." But the specific example context of the sentence (personal, emotional) points more toward sense 6.

 Actually, looking carefully at sense 6: "a state of depression or agitation" - this is a specific type of emotional state. The sentence could be referring to being in a state of depression, confusion, or agitation.

 But let me reconsider. Could it be sense 2? "The current state of knowledge" - this is about the condition of something. "In this state" could mean "in this condition."

 However, the phrase "in such a state" or "in this state" when referring to a person's condition is very commonly used to mean emotional state (depression, agitation, excitement, etc.). This is exactly what sense 6 describes.

 The example for sense 6: "he was in such a state you just couldn't reason with him" - this is clearly about an emotional/mental condition.

 The target sentence: "You must understand, I haven't been in this state too long" - this sounds like someone explaining that they haven't been in their current emotional/mental condition (perhaps depression, confusion, or some other agitated state) for very long.

 Therefore, the answer is 6.

 Wait, let me double-check if there's any other interpretation. Could it be a physical state? Like a state of matter? No, that's sense 5 and clearly not it. Could it be a geographical state? No. Could it be the government? No.

 It's either 2 or 6. Sense 2 is the general "condition" meaning. Sense 6 is the specific "depression or agitation" meaning.

 In WordNet (which these definitions look like they come from), sense 2 is usually the hypernym (more general), and sense 6 is a specific hyponym.

 But looking at the example for sense 2: "the current state of knowledge" - this is about the condition of something abstract.

 The example for sense 6: "he was in such a state you just couldn't reason with him" - this is about a person's emotional condition.

 The target sentence uses "I" - first person, so it's about the speaker's personal condition. This aligns with sense 6.

 Also, the phrase "in this state" with the personal context strongly suggests the emotional/mental meaning.

 Therefore, the answer is 6.


attempt_kind: initial

status: success

[User]
Which numbered sense of "come" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: I <t>came</t> out here to retire.

Senses:
1. definition=move toward, travel toward something or somebody or approach something or somebody | examples=He came singing down the road
2. definition=reach a destination; arrive by movement or progress | examples=She arrived home at 7 o'clock
3. definition=come to pass; arrive, as in due course | examples=The first success came three days later
4. definition=reach or enter a state, relation, condition, use, or position | examples=The water came to a boil
5. definition=to be the product or result | examples=Melons come from a vine
6. definition=be found or available | examples=These shoes come in three colors; The furniture comes unassembled
7. definition=come forth | examples=A scream came from the woman's mouth
8. definition=be a native of | examples=She hails from Kalamazoo
9. definition=extend or reach | examples=The water came up to my waist
10. definition=exist or occur in a certain point in a series | examples=Next came the student from France
11. definition=cover a certain distance | examples=She came a long way
12. definition=come under, be classified or included | examples=fall into a category
13. definition=happen as a result | examples=Nothing good will come of this
14. definition=add up in number or quantity | examples=The bills amounted to $2,000
15. definition=develop into | examples=This idea will never amount to anything
16. definition=be received | examples=News came in of the massacre in Rwanda
17. definition=come to one's mind; suggest itself | examples=It occurred to me that we should hire another secretary
18. definition=come from; be connected by a relationship of blood, for example | examples=She was descended from an old Italian noble family
19. definition=proceed or get along | examples=How is she doing in her new job?
20. definition=experience orgasm | examples=she could not come because she was too upset
21. definition=have a certain priority | examples=My family comes first

finish_reason: stop

role: assistant

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to identify which numbered sense of "come" is used in the sentence "I came out here to retire."

 Let me analyze the sentence: "I came out here to retire."

 The context suggests movement from one place to another - the speaker moved to a new location (out here) for the purpose of retiring. This involves physical travel or movement toward a destination.

 Looking at the senses:
 1. "move toward, travel toward something or somebody or approach something or somebody" - This fits. The person traveled to this location.
 2. "reach a destination; arrive by movement or progress" - This also could fit, as they arrived at the destination.
 3. "come to pass; arrive, as in due course" - This is about events happening in time, not physical movement.
 4. "reach or enter a state, relation, condition, use, or position" - This is about entering a state, not physical travel.
 5. "to be the product or result" - Not relevant.
 6. "be found or available" - Not relevant.
 7. "come forth" - Not quite right.
 8. "be a native of" - Not relevant.
 9. "extend or reach" - Not relevant.
 10. "exist or occur in a certain point in a series" - Not relevant.
 11. "cover a certain distance" - This could work, but usually implies the distance itself is the focus.
 12. "come under, be classified or included" - Not relevant.
 13. "happen as a result" - Not relevant.
 14. "add up in number or quantity" - Not relevant.
 15. "develop into" - Not relevant.
 16. "be received" - Not relevant.
 17. "come to one's mind" - Not relevant.
 18. "come from; be connected by a relationship of blood" - Not relevant.
 19. "proceed or get along" - Not relevant.
 20. "experience orgasm" - Not relevant.
 21. "have a certain priority" - Not relevant.

 Between sense 1 and sense 2:
 Sense 1: "move toward, travel toward something or somebody or approach something or somebody"
 Sense 2: "reach a destination; arrive by movement or progress"

 The sentence "I came out here to retire" emphasizes the act of traveling/moving to this location. "Came out here" suggests movement from somewhere else to this place.

 However, looking closely at sense 2: "reach a destination; arrive by movement or progress" - this focuses on the arrival at the destination.

 In "I came out here to retire", the focus is on the movement/travel to this place. "Out here" indicates a direction/location that was approached.

 Actually, looking at the examples:
 Sense 1 example: "He came singing down the road" - this is about moving along a path.
 Sense 2 example: "She arrived home at 7 o'clock" - this is about reaching the destination.

 "I came out here" - this is similar to "He came singing down the road" in that it describes the movement toward a place. But it also involves arriving at the destination.

 Let me think about the subtle difference. Sense 1 is about the process of moving toward, while sense 2 is about the completion (reaching/arriving).

 In "I came out here to retire", the speaker is explaining why they moved to this location. The act of "coming" here was the journey/movement.

 But actually, looking at typical dictionary definitions, "come" in the sense of traveling to a place can be covered by both. However, looking at the specific wording:

 Sense 1: "move toward, travel toward something or somebody or approach something or somebody"
 Sense 2: "reach a destination; arrive by movement or progress"

 The phrase "came out here" suggests both the movement and the arrival. But the key is "out here" which indicates the destination.

 Wait, looking at sense 1 again: "move toward, travel toward something or somebody or approach something or somebody"
 And sense 2: "reach a destination; arrive by movement or progress"

 In many lexical databases (like WordNet), sense 1 is often the basic motion sense (move toward), while sense 2 is specifically about arriving.

 But in the sentence "I came out here to retire", the person has already arrived (or is speaking from the destination), and is referring to the act of coming here.

 Actually, looking at the example for sense 2: "She arrived home at 7 o'clock" - this suggests sense 2 is synonymous with "arrive".

 The sentence "I came out here to retire" uses "came" to mean traveled/moved to this place. This is the basic locomotion sense.

 Let me reconsider sense 1 vs sense 2 more carefully.

 Sense 1 examples: "He came singing down the road" - movement along a path toward the speaker or a destination.
 Sense 2 examples: "She arrived home at 7 o'clock" - reaching the destination.

 "I came out here" - this implies "I traveled to this place" or "I moved to this place."

 If I look at WordNet (which this seems to be based on), sense 1 is usually "come, come up" - move toward, travel toward. Sense 2 is "arrive, get, come" - reach a destination.

 The difference is subtle. But "come out here" emphasizes the movement from one place to another, approaching the current location.

 Actually, looking at the phrase "come out here", this is an idiom or common phrase meaning to travel to this location (which is somewhat distant or removed from the original location).

 Given the options, sense 1 seems most appropriate: "move toward, travel toward something or somebody or approach something or somebody"

 But wait, let me check if there's a better fit. Is there a sense about changing location permanently? Like moving residence?

 Looking through the list:
 4. "reach or enter a state, relation, condition, use, or position" - could "come out here" mean entering the state of being here? Maybe, but this is usually for abstract states or conditions like "come to a boil", "come to an end".

 11. "cover a certain distance" - "She came a long way" - this focuses on the distance covered.

 In "I came out here to retire", the focus is on the relocation/movement to this place for the purpose of retiring.

 I think sense 1 is the best fit: travel toward / move toward / approach.

 But let me double-check sense 2. If the definition is "reach a destination; arrive by movement or progress", and the example is "She arrived home at 7 o'clock", then sense 2 emphasizes the arrival.

 In "I came out here to retire", the person is already there (speaking from the destination), so they have arrived. But the verb "came" describes the action of traveling there.

 Actually, looking at typical usage, "come" in "I came here" usually maps to sense 1 (move toward) or sense 2 (arrive).

 But given the specific definitions provided:
 1. move toward, travel toward... approach
 2. reach a destination; arrive...

 The phrase "came out here" involves both, but "out here" suggests the destination is distant or emphasized.

 However, looking at the example for sense 1: "He came singing down the road" - this is movement along a path.
 And sense 2: "She arrived home at 7 o'clock" - this is arrival.

 "I came out here" is more like "I traveled to this place" which is closer to sense 1.

 But I should consider: is there any other sense that fits better?

 Sense 8: "be a native of" - no, that's "come from"
 Sense 18: "come from; be connected by a relationship of blood" - no

 What about sense 4: "reach or enter a state, relation, condition, use, or position" - "The water came to a boil"
 Could "came out here" be entering the state of being retired here? No, the "to retire" is the purpose, not the state entered by "came". The "came" is the physical movement.

 I think the answer is either 1 or 2.

 Let me look for clues in the wording. The user asks for the "numbered sense". These look like WordNet senses.

 In WordNet 3.0 or similar:
 - Sense 1: come, come up - move toward, travel toward...
 - Sense 2: arrive, get, come - reach a destination...

 The sentence "I came out here to retire" - if we replace "came" with the definition:
 - "I moved toward out here to retire" (awkward)
 - "I traveled toward out here to retire" (awkward)
 - "I approached out here to retire" (awkward)
 - "I reached a destination out here to retire" (possible)
 - "I arrived out here to retire" (good)

 "Arrive out here" works well. "Move toward out here" is less natural because "out here" is the destination, not just a direction.

 Actually, "come here" is standard English for "move to this place" or "arrive at this place".

 Given that sense 2 specifically mentions "arrive" and the example uses "arrived", and "came" is often synonymous with "arrived" in this context, sense 2 might be the intended answer.

 But sense 1 includes "travel toward" which also fits.

 Let me think about the phrase "come out". Is that a phrasal verb? "Come out" can mean emerge, or travel to a place (come out to the country).

 If "come out" is treated as movement toward, it's sense 1.
 If it's treated as arrival at a destination, it's sense 2.

 However, looking at the specific context of retirement and "out here" (implying a rural or distant location), this is about relocating, i.e., moving to a new place to live.

 In lexical semantics, "come" meaning "travel to a place where the speaker is" is usually the first sense (deictic motion toward).

 But looking at the provided definitions carefully:
 1. "move toward, travel toward something or somebody or approach something or somebody"
 2. "reach a destination; arrive by movement or progress"

 The key difference is that sense 1 allows for the journey not being complete (approaching), while sense 2 requires the destination to be reached (arrive).

 In "I came out here to retire", the speaker is already at the location (out here), so the destination has been reached. Therefore, sense 2 might be more accurate.

 However, sense 1 is the broader category of motion toward, which includes arriving.

 But wait, looking at the example for sense 1 again: "He came singing down the road" - this could mean he was approaching along the road, or traveling along the road toward the speaker.

 Actually, in many dictionary sense inventories, "come" as in "come to a place" is sense 1, while "come" as in "arrive" is sense 2, but they are closely related.

 Let me check if there's a sense specifically for "come" meaning "to travel or move to a place" vs "to arrive".

 Looking at the list again, is there any other candidate?
 Sense 11: "cover a certain distance" - "She came a long way" - this is about the extent of the journey, not just the fact of traveling to a place.

 I think the best answer is 1 or 2.

 Given the example for sense 2 is "She arrived home...", and "I came out here" is very similar to "I arrived here", I lean toward sense 2.

 But "came" in "I came here" is the past tense of "come", and in many lexical databases, the primary sense of "come" is the deictic motion verb (sense 1).

 Let me reconsider the exact wording of sense 1: "move toward, travel toward something or somebody or approach something or somebody"
 And sense 2: "reach a destination; arrive by movement or progress"

 If I say "I came out here", I am saying I traveled to this place (sense 1) and/or I arrived at this place (sense 2).

 But "out here" emphasizes the destination as being distant or in a specific location. The phrase "to retire" indicates purpose.

 In WordNet-style distinctions, sense 2 (arrive) is often distinguished from sense 1 (approach/move toward) by whether the focus is on the endpoint being reached.

 Given that the person is speaking from the location (having successfully moved there for retirement), the "arrive" sense (2) seems technically correct, but the "travel toward" sense (1) is also correct.

 However, looking at the example for sense 1: "He came singing down the road" - this focuses on the manner of movement.
 And sense 2: "She arrived home at 7 o'clock" - this focuses on the successful reaching of the destination.

 "I came out here to retire" focuses on the successful relocation (reaching the destination to retire), so sense 2 seems appropriate.

 But I'm not entirely sure. Let me see if there's a pattern in how these senses are distinguished.

 Actually, looking at sense 4: "reach or enter a state, relation, condition, use, or position" - examples: "The water came to a boil", "come into contact with a terrorist group", "her face came to life"

 This is about entering states, not physical locations.

 What about sense 9? "extend or reach" - "The water came up to my waist" - this is about extent, not travel.

 I think I need to choose between 1 and 2.

 Upon reflection, in most semantic tagging tasks (like SemCor or similar), "come" in "come here" or "come to X" is usually tagged as sense 1 (motion toward), while "come" when it specifically means "arrive" (often with time expressions) might be sense 2.

 But the example for sense 2 is "She arrived home at 7 o'clock" which parallels "I came out here".

 Actually, looking carefully: "I came out here to retire."
 This could mean: "I moved to this location in order to retire here."

 If we look at the verb "come" in isolation from "out", it's clearly motion/arrival.

 I think the safest answer is 1, as it's the primary sense of physical motion toward a place. But 2 is also plausible.

 Wait, I should look at whether "come out" is being treated as a phrasal verb. "Come out" can mean to emerge (sense 7: come forth), or to travel to a rural area from a city, or to appear.

 But "come out here" is just "come" + "out here" (adverbial phrase indicating location).

 Let me check if there's a sense for "come" meaning "to move one's residence".
 No specific sense for that. It would fall under general motion (sense 1) or arrival (sense 2).

 Given the options, and that sense 1 is the most general and common sense for physical movement to a location, and sense 2 is specifically about arrival (reaching the destination), and the sentence emphasizes the purpose of the move (to retire) rather than just the arrival event, I think sense 1 is slightly better.

 But I'm torn. Let me think about how a human would interpret this.

 If someone says "I came out here to retire", they mean they traveled/moved to this place. Both 1 and 2 capture aspects of this.

 However, looking at the exact wording of the definitions:
 1. "move toward, travel toward something or somebody or approach something or somebody"
 2. "reach a destination; arrive by movement or progress"

 The word "approach" in sense 1 suggests getting closer but not necessarily arriving, whereas sense 2 is definitely about having arrived.

 Since the person is speaking from the location and has retired (or is retiring) there, they have definitely arrived. So sense 2 is accurate.

 But "travel toward" in sense 1 also works for completed journeys.

 I think I'll go with 1, as it's the standard motion sense, and "come out here" is an instance of directed motion.

 Actually, looking at similar sentences in semantic databases:
 "I came to New York" - usually sense 1 (motion toward).
 "She came to see me" - sense 1.

 But "The train came at 5 o'clock" - might be sense 2 (arrival).

 In "I came out here to retire", the focus is on the relocation (the act of moving), not just the arrival time.

 I think 1 is the intended answer.

 Wait, I should reconsider sense 4: "reach or enter a state, relation, condition, use, or position"
 Could "came out here" mean entering the state of being out here? No, that's stretching it.

 What about sense 11: "cover a certain distance"?
 "I came a long way" - but here we have "came out here", not "came a long way".

 I think 1 is correct.

 But let me double-check by searching my internal knowledge of WordNet senses for "come".

 WordNet 3.1 senses for "come" (verb):
 1. come, come up - move toward, travel toward something or somebody or approach something or somebody
 2. arrive, get, come - reach a destination; arrive by movement or progress
 3. come - come to pass; arrive, as in due course
 4. come - reach or enter a state, relation, condition, use, or position
 5. come, follow - to be the product or result
 6. come - be found or available
 7. issue forth, come - come forth
 8. hail, come - be a native of
 9. come - extend or reach
 10. come - exist or occur in a certain point in a series
 11. come - cover a certain distance
 12. fall, come - come under, be classified or included
 13. come - happen as a result
 14. total, number, add up, come, amount - add up in number or quantity
 15. come, add up, amount - develop into
 16. come, come in - be received
 17. occur, come - come to one's mind; suggest itself
 18. derive, come, descend - come from; be connected by a relationship of blood, for example
 19. do, fare, make out, come, get along - proceed or get along
 20. come - experience orgasm
 21. come - have a certain priority

 Now, for "I came out here to retire":
 - It's not 3 (due course)
 - It's not 4 (enter a state) - though "come to retire" might look like it, "out here" makes it physical location
 - It's not 5 (product/result)
 - It's not 6 (available)
 - It's not 7 (come forth)
 - It's not 8 (native of)
 - It's not 9 (extend)
 - It's not 10 (in a series)
 - It's not 11 (cover distance) - no distance specified
 - It's not 12 (classified)
 - It's not 13 (happen as result)
 - It's not 14/15 (add up/develop into)
 - It's not 16 (be received)
 - It's not 17 (come to mind)
 - It's not 18 (descend from)
 - It's not 19 (proceed/get along)
 - It's not 20 (orgasm)
 - It's not 21 (priority)

 So it's between 1 and 2.

 In WordNet, sense 1 is the most frequent and general. Sense 2 is specifically for arrival.

 The sentence "I came out here to retire" describes the act of traveling to this location. In WordNet annotation guidelines, this would likely be sense 1.

 However, some might argue for sense 2 because the person has arrived.

 But looking at the example for sense 2: "She arrived home at 7 o'clock" - this emphasizes the arrival at a specific time. The sentence in question emphasizes the purpose (to retire) and the destination (out here), not the arrival event itself.

 Therefore, sense 1 is more appropriate.

 Final check: Is there any chance it's sense 4? "Reach or enter a state..." - "I came out here" could mean "I entered the state of being out here"? No, that's not how we interpret physical location changes. We interpret them as motion.

 So I'll go with 1.

format: unknown

native_finish_reason: stop

provider: Chutes

currency: USD


[User]
Which numbered sense of "retire" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: I came out here to <t>retire</t>.

Senses:
1. definition=go into retirement; stop performing one's work or withdraw from one's position | examples=He retired at age 68
2. definition=withdraw from active participation | examples=He retired from chess
3. definition=pull back or move away or backward | examples=The enemy withdrew
4. definition=withdraw from circulation or from the market, as of bills, shares, and bonds
5. definition=break from a meeting or gathering | examples=We adjourned for lunch
6. definition=make (someone) retire | examples=The director was retired after the scandal
7. definition=dispose of (something no longer useful or needed) | examples=She finally retired that old coat
8. definition=lose interest | examples=he retired from life when his wife died
9. definition=cause to be out on a fielding play
10. definition=cause to get out | examples=The pitcher retired three batters
11. definition=prepare for sleep | examples=I usually turn in at midnight

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to identify which numbered sense of "retire" is used in the sentence: "I came out here to <t>retire</t>."

Let me analyze the sentence and the provided senses:

Sentence: "I came out here to retire."
Context suggests someone moved to a location (came out here) in order to retire. This typically means stopping work, ending one's career, or entering retirement.

Looking at the senses:
1. "go into retirement; stop performing one's work or withdraw from one's position" - examples: "He retired at age 68"
2. "withdraw from active participation" - examples: "He retired from chess"
3. "pull back or move away or backward" - examples: "The enemy withdrew"
4. "withdraw from circulation or from the market, as of bills, shares, and bonds"
5. "break from a meeting or gathering" - examples: "We adjourned for lunch"
6. "make (someone) retire" - examples: "The director was retired after the scandal"
7. "dispose of (something no longer useful or needed)" - examples: "She finally retired that old coat"
8. "lose interest" - examples: "he retired from life when his wife died"
9. "cause to be out on a fielding play"
10. "cause to get out" - examples: "The pitcher retired three batters"
11. "prepare for sleep" - examples: "I usually turn in at midnight"

In the sentence "I came out here to retire", the speaker is saying they came to this location for the purpose of entering retirement (stopping work). This matches sense 1: "go into retirement; stop performing one's work or withdraw from one's position."

Sense 2 is about withdrawing from active participation in a specific activity (like chess), but the sentence implies a general life/career retirement.
Sense 6 is transitive (making someone else retire), but here it's intransitive.
Sense 11 is about sleeping, which doesn't fit the context of "came out here" (moving to a location).
Sense 7 is about disposing of objects.
Sense 8 is about losing interest in life.

Sense 1 is the most common meaning of retiring from work/career.

So the answer should be 1.

provider: DigitalOcean


[User]
Which numbered sense of "do" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: That's why I -- why I <t>do</t> a free job now and then.

Senses:
1. definition=engage in | examples=make love, not war
2. definition=carry out or perform an action | examples=John did the painting, the weeding, and he cleaned out the gutters
3. definition=get (something) done | examples=I did my job
4. definition=proceed or get along | examples=How is she doing in her new job?
5. definition=give rise to; cause to happen or occur, not always intentionally | examples=cause a commotion
6. definition=carry out or practice; as of jobs and professions | examples=practice law
7. definition=be sufficient; be adequate, either in quality or quantity | examples=A few words would answer
8. definition=create or design, often in a certain way | examples=Do my room in blue
9. definition=behave in a certain manner; show a certain behavior; conduct or comport oneself | examples=You should act like an adult
10. definition=spend time in prison or in a labor camp | examples=He did six years for embezzlement
11. definition=carry on or function | examples=We could do with a little more help around here
12. definition=arrange attractively | examples=dress my hair for the wedding
13. definition=travel or traverse (a distance) | examples=This car does 150 miles per hour

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to identify which numbered sense of "do" is used in the sentence: "That's why I -- why I <t>do</t> a free job now and then."

Let me look at the sentence structure and context:
- "I do a free job now and then"
- This means the person performs or carries out a free job occasionally.

Now let's examine the senses:

1. engage in | examples=make love, not war - This is quite general, but "engage in" could fit, though the examples suggest more about activities in general.

2. carry out or perform an action | examples=John did the painting, the weeding, and he cleaned out the gutters - This seems close. "Did the painting" = performed the painting.

3. get (something) done | examples=I did my job - This also seems close. "I did my job" is similar to "I do a free job."

4. proceed or get along | examples=How is she doing in her new job? - This is about progress/success, not about performing a specific task.

5. give rise to; cause to happen or occur | examples=cause a commotion - This is about causing something, not performing work.

6. carry out or practice; as of jobs and professions | examples=practice law - This is about practicing a profession, which might fit, but "a free job" suggests a specific task rather than a profession.

7. be sufficient | examples=A few words would answer - Not relevant here.

8. create or design | examples=Do my room in blue - Not about performing work.

9. behave in a certain manner | examples=You should act like an adult - Not relevant.

10. spend time in prison | examples=He did six years - Not relevant.

11. carry on or function | examples=We could do with a little more help - "Do with" is an idiom here, different from our usage.

12. arrange attractively | examples=dress my hair - Not relevant.

13. travel or traverse | examples=This car does 150 miles - Not relevant.

Now between 2, 3, and 6:

Sense 2: "carry out or perform an action" - examples include "did the painting, the weeding"
Sense 3: "get (something) done" - example "I did my job"
Sense 6: "carry out or practice; as of jobs and professions" - example "practice law"

The phrase "do a free job" suggests performing a specific task or piece of work.

Looking at sense 3: "get (something) done" with example "I did my job" - this seems very close. When you "do a job," you are getting that job done.

Looking at sense 2: "carry out or perform an action" - "did the painting" - also fits.

Looking at sense 6: This is specifically about practicing a profession (like "practice law", "do medicine"). "A free job" doesn't sound like a profession, it sounds like a specific task.

Between 2 and 3:
- Sense 2 emphasizes performing an action (doing the activity)
- Sense 3 emphasizes getting something done (completing the task)

The example for sense 3 is "I did my job" which is almost exactly parallel to "I do a free job."

However, looking at WordNet or standard dictionary definitions for "do":
Sense 2 seems to be: "perform, execute" - carry out or perform an action
Sense 3 seems to be: "accomplish, achieve" - get (something) done

But wait, let me look more carefully at the specific wording given:

Sense 2: "carry out or perform an action" - examples include specific tasks like painting, weeding
Sense 3: "get (something) done" - example is "I did my job"

Actually, in many lexical databases:
- Sense 2 might correspond to performing activities/tasks
- Sense 3 might correspond to completing/achieving

But the example "I did my job" for sense 3 is very similar to "I do a free job."

However, looking at the example for sense 2: "John did the painting, the weeding..." - this is about performing specific tasks.

"I do a free job" - this means I perform a free job, I carry out a free job.

Sense 6 is about professions: "practice law" - this is different from doing a specific job.

I think the answer is either 2 or 3.

Let me think about the subtle difference:
- Sense 2: "carry out or perform an action" - focuses on the execution
- Sense 3: "get (something) done" - focuses on the completion/result

When someone says "I do a free job now and then," they mean they perform free work occasionally. This is about the activity of working, not necessarily about completing a specific objective (though that is implied).

But "I did my job" (sense 3 example) is very similar.

Wait, I should look at standard WordNet sense numbering for "do" as these look like WordNet definitions.

In WordNet 3.0 or similar:
- do, perform (carry out or perform an action) - this is sense 1 or 2
- do, accomplish, achieve (get something done) - this is another sense

Actually, looking at the exact phrasing:
1. make love, not war - this is "engage in"
2. John did the painting... - this is "perform, execute"
3. I did my job - this is "accomplish, action, carry out, execute"

Hmm, the distinction between 2 and 3 is subtle.

Sense 2: "carry out or perform an action" - this is about the general performance of activities
Sense 3: "get (something) done" - this is about accomplishing or completing

In the sentence "I do a free job now and then":
- "Job" here means a piece of work
- "Do a job" = perform a piece of work

This matches sense 2 best: "carry out or perform an action" where the examples show "did the painting, the weeding" - specific tasks.

Sense 3 with "I did my job" - "my job" could mean one's employment or one's duty.

But "a free job" suggests a specific piece of work, not one's profession.

Also, sense 6 is specifically about professions/practices.

Let me reconsider sense 1: "engage in" - "make love, not war". This is about participating in an activity. "Do a free job" could be "engage in a free job."

But sense 1 examples "make love, not war" suggest more general activities or behaviors, while sense 2 has specific tasks (painting, weeding).

"Do a job" is a very common collocation for performing work.

Looking at the answer choices again, I think sense 2 or 3 is most likely.

But let me check if there's a more specific sense. The phrase "do a job" often means to perform a specific task.

Sense 2: carry out or perform an action
Sense 3: get (something) done

The example for sense 3 is "I did my job" which is almost exactly the structure: do + job.

The example for sense 2 is "did the painting" - do + specific task.

Both are close. But "get (something) done" emphasizes completion, while "carry out or perform" emphasizes the activity.

"I do a free job now and then" - this is habitual (now and then), suggesting the activity of performing free work.

However, looking at standard semantic categorization:
Sense 2 is usually the general sense of performing/executing.
Sense 3 is about accomplishing.

But in many lexical resources, "do one's job" is sense 2 (perform).

Wait, I notice sense 6: "carry out or practice; as of jobs and professions" - examples=practice law.

This is about practicing a profession. "Do law", "do medicine."

But "a free job" is not a profession, it's a specific piece of work.

Let me look at sense 3 again: "get (something) done" | examples=I did my job.

This is very compelling because the example is "did my job" and the sentence has "do a free job."

But is there a difference between "do my job" (sense 3) and "do a job" (in the sentence)?

"I did my job" = I completed my responsibility / I performed my work duties.
"I do a free job" = I perform free work occasionally.

Actually, looking at the example for sense 2: "John did the painting, the weeding, and he cleaned out the gutters"
This is a list of specific tasks.

The sentence says "do a free job" - this is performing a piece of work for free.

I think sense 2 is the best fit: "carry out or perform an action."

But let me double-check sense 1: "engage in" - this is also possible.
"Make love, not war" - these are general activities.
"Do a free job" - this is a specific instance of work.

Sense 2 seems most appropriate for specific tasks like "do the painting", "do a job."

Actually, looking at WordNet:
One sense of "do" is "perform, execute" with examples like "do the projects"
Another is "accomplish, achieve" like "did his job"

The distinction is:
- Perform/execute (sense 2): focus on the action itself
- Accomplish/achieve (sense 3): focus on the result

In the context "I do a free job now and then", it's about the habitual action of performing free work. The focus is on the activity, not necessarily the completion.

However, "I did my job" (sense 3 example) is very idiomatic.

Let me think about this differently. The user says these are numbered senses. I need to pick the number.

Given that sense 3 has the exact collocation "did my job" and the sentence has "do a... job", sense 3 is very likely.

But wait - sense 3 definition: "get (something) done"
Sense 2 definition: "carry out or perform an action"

"Do a job" typically means to perform the work.

Actually, looking at standard dictionary definitions:
- Do: perform, execute
- Do: accomplish, complete

"I did the job" can mean either.

But looking at the examples provided:
Sense 2: John did the painting, the weeding, and he cleaned out the gutters
Sense 3: I did my job

"John did the painting" = John performed the painting work.
"I did my job" = I performed/completed my job duties.

The sentence: "I do a free job" - this is more like "I perform free work" which is similar to "John did the painting."

But "job" in "free job" could mean:
1. A piece of work (like painting a house) - sense 2
2. One's employment - sense 3 or 6
3. A specific task - sense 2

"Now and then" suggests occasionally, which fits with doing occasional pieces of work.

I think sense 2 is the safest answer.

However, looking at sense 3 again: "get (something) done" with example "I did my job."

In many lexical databases, there's a sense for "do" meaning "work on" or "perform" as in performing one's duties.

But let me consider: could it be sense 6?
"carry out or practice; as of jobs and professions"
Example: practice law
This is about having a profession. "I do law" = I practice law.
But "I do a free job" - if "job" means profession, then yes. But "a free job" suggests a specific instance or type of work, not a profession. Also, "now and then" suggests occasional instances, not a regular profession.

So not sense 6.

Between 2 and 3:
The key might be in the exact wording of the definitions as provided.

Sense 2: "carry out or perform an action"
Sense 3: "get (something) done"

"Do a free job" - is this carrying out an action or getting something done?

Both fit, but "perform an action" is more general and covers "do a job."

Actually, looking at WordNet 3.1 or similar:
do (v.)
1. engage in
2. perform, execute
3. accomplish, achieve

The example "I did my job" is often listed under the "accomplish" sense or the "perform" sense depending on the resource.

But given that sense 2 has the example about John doing specific tasks (painting, weeding), and sense 3 has "I did my job", I need to see which fits better.

"Do a free job" - "job" here is a count noun with "a", suggesting a piece of work.
In "I did my job", "job" is a role or duty.

Actually, "did my job" could mean performed my duties or completed my assigned work.

Let me reconsider sense 1: "engage in" with examples "make love, not war."
"Make love" and "not war" are activities.
"Do a free job" is engaging in a free job.

But sense 1 is usually for general activities, while sense 2 is for specific tasks.

I think the answer is 2 or 3.

Let me look for clues in the wording "free job."
If someone says "I do a free job now and then," they mean they occasionally work for free on specific projects or tasks.

This matches sense 2 best: "carry out or perform an action" with the examples showing specific tasks.

Sense 3 "get (something) done" emphasizes the completion aspect more.

Also, the example for sense 3 is "I did my job" where "my job" is singular and refers to one's role.
The sentence has "a free job" which is indefinite and occasional.

I think the answer is 2.

But I want to double-check. Could it be 3?

Sense 3: get (something) done | I did my job
This is about accomplishing or completing work.

When you say "I do a job," you are performing it.

Actually, looking at similar datasets (like WordNet), sense 2 corresponds to:
"perform, execute, do"
- examples: "John did the painting, the weeding..."

Sense 3 corresponds to:
"accomplish, achieve, do"
- examples: "I did my job"

In "John did the painting," it's about the activity.
In "I did my job," it's about fulfilling one's duty.

The sentence: "I do a free job now and then"
This is about the activity of working on free projects.

I think 2 is correct.

Wait, I should consider if there's any other sense.
Sense 6: practice (a profession) - no, because of "now and then" and "a" free job.
Sense 1: engage in - possible, but less specific than 2.

I believe the answer is 2.

Actually, looking more carefully at sense 3: "get (something) done"
This is the sense where you cause something to be completed.
"I did my job" = I got my job done.

But in the sentence, "I do a free job" doesn't necessarily emphasize completion, just the performance.

Also, looking at the examples again:
Sense 2: John did the painting, the weeding...
These are parallel to "do a job"

Sense 3: I did my job
This is about one's own job.

The pattern "do + article + job" fits sense 2 better (did the painting, do a job).
"My job" in sense 3 is a possessive construction referring to one's employment.

Therefore, sense 2 is the best match.

provider: Moonshot AI


[User]
Which numbered sense of "free" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: That's why I -- why I do a <t>free</t> job now and then.

Senses:
1. definition=able to act at will; not hampered; not under compulsion or restraint | examples=free enterprise
2. definition=unconstrained or not chemically bound in a molecule or not fixed and capable of relatively unrestricted motion | examples=free expansion
3. definition=costing nothing | examples=complimentary tickets
4. definition=not occupied or in use | examples=a free locker
5. definition=not fixed in position | examples=the detached shutter fell on him
6. definition=not held in servitude | examples=after the Civil War he was a free man
7. definition=not taken up by scheduled activities | examples=a free hour between classes
8. definition=completely wanting or lacking | examples=writing barren of insight
9. definition=not literal | examples=a loose interpretation of what she had been told

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to identify which numbered sense of "free" is used in the sentence: "That's why I -- why I do a <t>free</t> job now and then."

Looking at the sentence, "free job" likely means a job that doesn't cost anything or that the person does without getting paid.

Let me examine the definitions:

1. able to act at will; not hampered; not under compulsion or restraint - This refers to freedom/liberty, not cost.
2. unconstrained or not chemically bound... - Scientific/chemical meaning.
3. costing nothing - This means free of charge, complimentary, without cost.
4. not occupied or in use - Available, not being used.
5. not fixed in position - Movable, detached.
6. not held in servitude - Liberty/freedom from slavery.
7. not taken up by scheduled activities - Having spare time.
8. completely wanting or lacking - Devoid of something.
9. not literal - Figurative, loose.

In the sentence "do a free job now and then", this most likely means doing work without pay, or work that costs nothing. Definition 3 "costing nothing" fits best here. A "free job" would be work done voluntarily without compensation, or perhaps services offered without charge.

Let me double-check. Could it mean something else?
- Could it mean "unoccupied job" (sense 4)? No, that doesn't make sense - you don't "do" an unoccupied job in that sense.
- Could it mean "not under compulsion" (sense 1)? "Free job" as in voluntary work? Maybe, but sense 3 is more direct for "free" modifying a service/task when talking about cost.
- The phrase "now and then" suggests occasional work, possibly volunteer work or pro bono work, which would be "costing nothing" (unpaid).

Actually, looking carefully: "do a free job" - this could mean doing a task without charging for it, or doing work that is complimentary.

Definition 3: costing nothing | examples=complimentary tickets

Yes, this matches. If someone does a "free job", they are doing work that costs nothing (i.e., they don't charge for it).

So the answer should be 3.


[User]
Which numbered sense of "job" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: That's why I -- why I do a free <t>job</t> now and then.

Senses:
1. definition=the principal activity in your life that you do to earn money | examples=he's not in my line of business
2. definition=a specific piece of work required to be done as a duty or for a specific fee | examples=estimates of the city's loss on that job ranged as high as a million dollars
3. definition=a workplace; as in the expression | examples=on the job
4. definition=an object worked on; a result produced by working | examples=he held the job in his left hand and worked on it with his right
5. definition=the responsibility to do something | examples=it is their job to print the truth
6. definition=the performance of a piece of work | examples=she did an outstanding job as Ophelia
7. definition=a damaging piece of work | examples=dry rot did the job of destroying the barn
8. definition=a state of difficulty that needs to be resolved | examples=she and her husband are having problems
9. definition=a Jewish hero in the Old Testament who maintained his faith in God in spite of afflictions that tested him
10. definition=any long-suffering person who withstands affliction without despairing
11. definition=(computer science) a program application that may consist of several steps but is a single logical unit
12. definition=a book in the Old Testament containing Job's pleas to God about his afflictions and God's reply
13. definition=a crime (especially a robbery) | examples=the gang pulled off a bank job in St. Louis

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to identify which numbered sense of "job" is used in the sentence: "That's why I -- why I do a free <t>job</t> now and then."

 Let me analyze the sentence context:
 - "do a free job now and then"
 - This suggests doing a specific piece of work occasionally, without payment
 - The phrase "now and then" implies it's not the principal activity (not sense 1)
 - It's not referring to a workplace (sense 3)
 - It's not an object being worked on (sense 4)
 - It's not a responsibility in the sense of an obligation/duty to do something (sense 5)
 - It could potentially be sense 2: "a specific piece of work required to be done as a duty or for a specific fee"
 - Or sense 6: "the performance of a piece of work"

 Let me look more carefully:
 - "do a free job" - this suggests performing a specific task or piece of work
 - Sense 2: "a specific piece of work required to be done as a duty or for a specific fee" - examples include "estimates of the city's loss on that job ranged as high as a million dollars"
 - Sense 6: "the performance of a piece of work" - examples include "she did an outstanding job as Ophelia"

 The key difference:
 - Sense 2 focuses on the piece of work itself as a task/assignment
 - Sense 6 focuses on the performance/execution of the work

 In the sentence "do a free job", "job" refers to a specific piece of work or task that is done. The phrase "do a job" often aligns with sense 2 - doing a specific task.

 However, looking at sense 6: "the performance of a piece of work" - this would be like "she did a good job" where "job" refers to how well something was done.

 In "do a free job now and then", the speaker is saying they occasionally do a specific piece of work for free. This aligns with sense 2: a specific piece of work required to be done...

 Wait, let me reconsider. "Do a job" can mean:
 1. Do a specific task (sense 2)
 2. Perform work (sense 6)

 But sense 6 is defined as "the performance of a piece of work" - this is more about the quality or act of performing, often used in phrases like "do a good job", "do an outstanding job".

 In this sentence, "do a free job" likely means performing a specific piece of work without charge. The word "free" modifies the job as being without payment. This fits sense 2: "a specific piece of work required to be done as a duty or for a specific fee" - though here it's explicitly "free" so no fee, but it's still a specific piece of work.

 Actually, looking at the example for sense 2: "estimates of the city's loss on that job ranged as high as a million dollars" - this refers to a specific contract or piece of work.

 The sentence "I do a free job now and then" suggests occasionally taking on a specific piece of work (like a gig, task, or project) and doing it for free.

 Sense 1 is about the principal activity/occupation - but "now and then" suggests this is occasional, not the principal activity.

 Sense 2 seems the best fit: a specific piece of work.

 Let me double-check sense 6. The example is "she did an outstanding job as Ophelia" - here "job" refers to her performance/acting. If the sentence were "I do a good job" it might be sense 6, but "do a free job" emphasizes the nature of the work (unpaid) rather than the quality of performance.

 Therefore, sense 2 is the correct answer.


[User]
Which numbered sense of "tell" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: You should have <t>told</t> me about her before ".

Senses:
1. definition=express in words | examples=He said that he wanted to marry her
2. definition=let something be known | examples=Tell them that you will be late
3. definition=narrate or give a detailed account of | examples=Tell what happened
4. definition=give instructions to or direct somebody to do something with authority | examples=I said to him to go home
5. definition=discern or comprehend | examples=He could tell that she was unhappy
6. definition=inform positively and with certainty and confidence | examples=I tell you that man is a crook!
7. definition=give evidence | examples=he was telling on all his former colleague
8. definition=mark as different | examples=We distinguish several kinds of maple

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to identify which numbered sense of "tell" is used in the sentence: "You should have <t>told</t> me about her before."

 Let me analyze the sentence and the definitions:

 Sentence: "You should have told me about her before."
 Context: Someone is saying that another person should have informed them about "her" (some woman) earlier.

 Now let's look at the senses:

 1. "express in words" - examples: "He said that he wanted to marry her"
    - This is very general. While "tell" does express in words, this sense seems to be more about the act of speaking generally.

 2. "let something be known" - examples: "Tell them that you will be late"
    - This is about informing someone of something.

 3. "narrate or give a detailed account of" - examples: "Tell what happened"
    - This is about storytelling or giving details.

 4. "give instructions to or direct somebody to do something with authority" - examples: "I said to him to go home"
    - This is about commanding or ordering.

 5. "discern or comprehend" - examples: "He could tell that she was unhappy"
    - This is about perceiving or recognizing something.

 6. "inform positively and with certainty and confidence" - examples: "I tell you that man is a crook!"
    - This is about asserting something strongly.

 7. "give evidence" - examples: "he was telling on all his former colleague"
    - This is about snitching or reporting someone.

 8. "mark as different" - examples: "We distinguish several kinds of maple"
    - This is about distinguishing or differentiating.

 Now, in the sentence "You should have told me about her before", the meaning is that the speaker wishes they had been informed about this woman earlier. It's about communicating information to someone.

 Looking at sense 2: "let something be known" with the example "Tell them that you will be late" - this fits well. The structure "tell someone about something" is about informing someone.

 Sense 1 is too general. Sense 3 is about narrating in detail. Sense 4 is about commanding. Sense 5 is about perceiving. Sense 6 is about asserting strongly (often with "I tell you"). Sense 7 is about snitching. Sense 8 is about distinguishing.

 The sentence is about informing someone of something - letting them know about a situation or person. This matches sense 2.

 Wait, let me reconsider sense 1 vs sense 2.

 Sense 1: "express in words" - This is very broad. The example "He said that he wanted to marry her" uses "said", not "tell". Actually, looking at the example, it seems like this might be a definition for "say" rather than specifically for "tell" in the sense of informing.

 Actually, looking at standard dictionary definitions:
 - Sense 1 seems to correspond to "say" or general verbal expression
 - Sense 2 "let something be known" fits "tell" in the sense of informing
 - The sentence "You should have told me about her" means "You should have informed me about her" or "You should have let me know about her"

 This aligns with sense 2.

 Let me double-check if it could be sense 3: "narrate or give a detailed account of". While "tell" can mean to narrate (tell a story), "tell me about her" is more about informing than narrating a detailed account. Though there is overlap, sense 2 seems more accurate for the general meaning of informing someone.

 Actually, looking at the example for sense 3: "Tell what happened" - this is asking for a narration.

 But "tell me about her" is asking for information, not necessarily a detailed narrative.

 Sense 2: "let something be known" - example: "Tell them that you will be late" - this is about communicating information.

 The sentence "You should have told me about her before" is clearly about the speaker wishing they had been informed earlier. This is sense 2.

 Wait, I should also consider if it could be sense 6: "inform positively and with certainty and confidence" - example: "I tell you that man is a crook!" This is an emphatic use, often with "I tell you". The sentence in question doesn't have that emphatic quality.

 So the answer should be 2.

 But let me look again at the exact wording. The sentence is: "You should have told me about her before."

 This is definitely about informing/letting someone know. That's sense 2.

 Actually, looking at WordNet or similar lexical databases (which these definitions seem to resemble), sense 2 is typically the "inform" sense.

 Let me verify the other senses to make sure:
 - Sense 7 is "tell on" (inform against)
 - Sense 8 is "tell apart" (distinguish)
 - Sense 5 is "tell" as in "I can tell" (perceive)
 - Sense 4 is "tell" as in "tell someone to do something" (order)
 - Sense 3 is "tell" as in "tell a story" (narrate)

 The sentence uses "told me about her" - this is the ditransitive or prepositional use where you inform someone of something.

 Yes, sense 2 is correct.

provider: DeepInfra


[User]
Which numbered sense of "feel" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: Haney <t>felt</t> a twinge of annoyance when he heard the now familiar line again.

Senses:
1. definition=undergo an emotional sensation or be in a particular state of mind | examples=She felt resentful
2. definition=come to believe on the basis of emotion, intuitions, or indefinite grounds | examples=I feel that he doesn't like me
3. definition=perceive by a physical sensation, e.g., coming from the skin or muscles | examples=He felt the wind
4. definition=be conscious of a physical, mental, or emotional state | examples=My cold is gone--I feel fine today
5. definition=have a feeling or perception about oneself in reaction to someone's behavior or attitude | examples=She felt small and insignificant
6. definition=undergo passive experience of: | examples=We felt the effects of inflation
7. definition=be felt or perceived in a certain way | examples=The ground feels shaky
8. definition=grope or feel in search of something | examples=He felt for his wallet
9. definition=examine by touch | examples=Feel this soft cloth!
10. definition=examine (a body part) by palpation | examples=The nurse palpated the patient's stomach
11. definition=find by testing or cautious exploration | examples=He felt his way around the dark room
12. definition=produce a certain impression | examples=It feels nice to be home again
13. definition=pass one's hands over the sexual organs of | examples=He felt the girl in the movie theater

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to identify which numbered sense of "feel" is used in the given sentence.

Sentence: "Haney <t>felt</t> a twinge of annoyance when he heard the now familiar line again."

Let me analyze the sentence:
- Subject: Haney
- Verb: felt
- Object: a twinge of annoyance
- Context: when he heard the now familiar line again

The key phrase here is "a twinge of annoyance." This is clearly an emotion. Haney is experiencing the emotion of annoyance.

Now let me look at the definitions:

1. definition=undergo an emotional sensation or be in a particular state of mind | examples=She felt resentful
   - This seems to fit. "Annoyance" is an emotion, and "twinge of annoyance" is an emotional sensation.

2. definition=come to believe on the basis of emotion, intuitions, or indefinite grounds | examples=I feel that he doesn't like me
   - This is about forming a belief or opinion. The sentence doesn't say Haney believed something; it says he felt an emotion (annoyance).

3. definition=perceive by a physical sensation, e.g., coming from the skin or muscles | examples=He felt the wind
   - This is about physical touch/sensation. Annoyance is not a physical sensation from skin or muscles in this context.

4. definition=be conscious of a physical, mental, or emotional state | examples=My cold is gone--I feel fine today
   - This is about being conscious of one's state. While Haney is conscious of annoyance, definition 1 seems more specific about "undergoing an emotional sensation."

5. definition=have a feeling or perception about oneself in reaction to someone's behavior or attitude | examples=She felt small and insignificant
   - This involves self-perception or how one feels about oneself. "Annoyance" is not about self-perception in this way, and "felt small" is about self-image, whereas "felt annoyance" is experiencing an emotion.

6. definition=undergo passive experience of: | examples=We felt the effects of inflation
   - This is about experiencing effects of something. While one could argue annoyance is an effect, definition 1 is more precise for emotions.

7. definition=be felt or perceived in a certain way | examples=The ground feels shaky
   - This is intransitive with the subject being the thing that feels a certain way. Here, Haney is the subject feeling something.

8. definition=grope or feel in search of something | examples=He felt for his wallet
   - Physical groping/searching. Not relevant.

9. definition=examine by touch | examples=Feel this soft cloth!
   - Physical touching. Not relevant.

10. definition=examine (a body part) by palpation | examples=The nurse palpated the patient's stomach
    - Medical examination. Not relevant.

11. definition=find by testing or cautious exploration | examples=He felt his way around the dark room
    - Figurative or physical exploration. Not relevant.

12. definition=produce a certain impression | examples=It feels nice to be home again
    - Impersonal construction. Not relevant.

13. definition=pass one's hands over the sexual organs of | examples=He felt the girl in the movie theater
    - Sexual touching. Not relevant.

The best fit is definition 1: "undergo an emotional sensation or be in a particular state of mind"
- "Annoyance" is an emotion
- "Felt a twinge of annoyance" means experiencing that emotional sensation
- The example "She felt resentful" is very similar - resentful is an emotion, just like annoyance.

Let me double-check definition 4: "be conscious of a physical, mental, or emotional state"
- Example: "My cold is gone--I feel fine today" - this is about overall state of being
- While Haney is conscious of annoyance, the phrase "undergo an emotional sensation" in definition 1 captures the specific nature of experiencing the emotion "annoyance" as it happens.

Definition 1 is the most accurate. The sentence describes Haney undergoing the emotional sensation of annoyance.

Actually, let me reconsider definition 4 vs 1 more carefully.

Definition 1: undergo an emotional sensation or be in a particular state of mind
Definition 4: be conscious of a physical, mental, or emotional state

The phrase "a twinge of annoyance" suggests a specific emotional sensation occurring. Definition 1 specifically mentions "undergo an emotional sensation."

Definition 4 focuses on being conscious of a state. While related, definition 1 is more about the experience of the emotion itself.

Also looking at the examples:
- Definition 1: "She felt resentful" - resentful is an adjective describing an emotional state
- Definition 4: "My cold is gone--I feel fine today" - "fine" is a general state of well-being

"Annoyance" is a specific emotion, so definition 1 fits better.

Also, definition 6: "undergo passive experience of" - examples: "We felt the effects of inflation"
This is about experiencing effects, not emotions.

I think the answer is clearly 1.

provider: Novita


[User]
Which numbered sense of "twinge" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: Haney felt a <t>twinge</t> of annoyance when he heard the now familiar line again.

Senses:
1. definition=a sudden sharp feeling | examples=pangs of regret
2. definition=a sharp stab of pain

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to identify which sense of "twinge" is used in the given sentence.

 Sentence: "Haney felt a <t>twinge</t> of annoyance when he heard the now familiar line again."

 The word "twinge" is being used with "of annoyance" - this describes an emotional feeling rather than a physical pain.

 Looking at the senses:
 1. definition=a sudden sharp feeling | examples=pangs of regret
 2. definition=a sharp stab of pain

 "Annoyance" is an emotion/feeling, not a physical pain. Sense 1 mentions "a sudden sharp feeling" and the example "pangs of regret" (which is emotional). Sense 2 is specifically about physical pain.

 Therefore, sense 1 is the correct answer.

provider: AtlasCloud


[User]
Which numbered sense of "annoyance" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: Haney felt a twinge of <t>annoyance</t> when he heard the now familiar line again.

Senses:
1. definition=the psychological state of being irritated or annoyed
2. definition=anger produced by some annoying irritation
3. definition=an unpleasant person who is annoying or exasperating
4. definition=something or someone that causes trouble; a source of unhappiness | examples=washing dishes was a nuisance before we got a dish washer
5. definition=the act of troubling or annoying someone

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to identify which numbered sense of "annoyance" is used in the given sentence.

 Sentence: "Haney felt a twinge of <t>annoyance</t> when he heard the now familiar line again."

 Let me analyze the sentence:
 - "Haney felt a twinge of annoyance" - This suggests an internal feeling, an emotional state
 - It's something Haney experienced/feels
 - It's described as a "twinge" (a sudden, sharp feeling)

 Now let's look at the senses:

 1. definition=the psychological state of being irritated or annoyed
    - This refers to the internal feeling or state of being annoyed
    - "Felt a twinge of annoyance" fits this well - it's describing his psychological state

 2. definition=anger produced by some annoying irritation
    - This emphasizes anger specifically
    - The sentence mentions "twinge" which suggests a mild irritation rather than anger
    - Also, this is more about the result (anger) caused by irritation

 3. definition=an unpleasant person who is annoying or exasperating
    - This would refer to a person
    - In the sentence, "annoyance" is what Haney felt, not a person
    - So this doesn't fit

 4. definition=something or someone that causes trouble; a source of unhappiness
    - This refers to the cause/source of annoyance
    - Example: "The noisy neighbor is an annoyance"
    - But in the sentence, Haney feels the annoyance, so it's the feeling, not the source
    - Wait, actually looking carefully: "felt a twinge of annoyance" - this is the feeling, not the source
    - Sense 4 refers to the thing causing the feeling (like the example "washing dishes was a nuisance")
    - So this doesn't fit

 5. definition=the act of troubling or annoying someone
    - This refers to the action/behavior of annoying
    - "The annoyance of his neighbors with loud music"
    - But in the sentence, it's what Haney felt, not an act he performed

 So the best fit is sense 1: the psychological state of being irritated or annoyed.

 Let me double-check:
 - Sense 1: psychological state/feeling → "felt a twinge of annoyance" ✓
 - Sense 2: anger specifically → too strong, and "twinge" suggests mild irritation
 - Sense 3: a person → "felt a twinge of [person]" doesn't make sense
 - Sense 4: the source/cause → "felt a twinge of [source]" doesn't make sense
 - Sense 5: the act → "felt a twinge of [act/behavior]" doesn't make sense

 Therefore, the answer is 1.

provider: StreamLake


[User]
Which numbered sense of "hear" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: Haney felt a twinge of annoyance when he <t>heard</t> the now familiar line again.

Senses:
1. definition=perceive (sound) via the auditory sense
2. definition=get to know or become aware of, usually accidentally | examples=I learned that she has two grown-up children
3. definition=examine or hear (evidence or a case) by judicial process | examples=The jury had heard all the evidence
4. definition=receive a communication from someone | examples=We heard nothing from our son for five years
5. definition=listen and pay attention | examples=Listen to your father

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to identify which numbered sense of "hear" is used in the given sentence.

 Sentence: "Haney felt a twinge of annoyance when he <t>heard</t> the now familiar line again."

 The word "heard" here refers to perceiving sound - specifically hearing someone say a line (likely dialogue or a repeated phrase).

 Let's look at the senses:
 1. perceive (sound) via the auditory sense - This fits. He perceived the sound of the line being spoken.
 2. get to know or become aware of, usually accidentally - This is more like "I heard that..." or "I heard about..." which is about receiving information, not the physical act of hearing.
 3. examine or hear (evidence or a case) by judicial process - This is legal context, not applicable here.
 4. receive a communication from someone - This would be like "I heard from him" meaning received a letter/call.
 5. listen and pay attention - This implies active listening/heeding, but the sentence suggests he perceived the sound (which annoyed him), not necessarily that he was paying attention in the sense of heeding advice.

 The sentence describes Haney perceiving a spoken line with his ears - the physical auditory perception. This is sense 1.

 The phrase "the now familiar line" suggests spoken words, and "heard" means he perceived those sounds.

 So the answer is 1.

provider: Venice


[User]
Which numbered sense of "familiar" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: Haney felt a twinge of annoyance when he heard the now <t>familiar</t> line again.

Senses:
1. definition=well known or easily recognized | examples=a familiar figure
2. definition=within normal everyday experience; common and ordinary; not strange | examples=familiar ordinary objects found in every home
3. definition=(usually followed by `with') well informed about or knowing thoroughly | examples=conversant with business trends
4. definition=having mutual interests or affections; of established friendship | examples=on familiar terms

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to identify which numbered sense of "familiar" is used in the given sentence.

Sentence: "Haney felt a twinge of annoyance when he heard the now <t>familiar</t> line again."

Let me analyze the sentence:
- "Haney felt a twinge of annoyance" - Haney is annoyed
- "when he heard the now familiar line again" - when he heard a line that is now familiar again

The word "familiar" here describes the "line" (presumably a phrase or sentence that has been spoken before).

Now let's look at the senses:

1. "well known or easily recognized" - examples: "a familiar figure"
   - This seems to fit. If he heard the line "again", it means he has heard it before, so it's well known to him. It's easily recognized because he's heard it before.

2. "within normal everyday experience; common and ordinary; not strange" - examples: "familiar ordinary objects found in every home"
   - This suggests something that is typical or usual in general, not necessarily something recognized from previous exposure. The example suggests things that are commonly found, not necessarily something recognized from previous experience.

3. "(usually followed by `with') well informed about or knowing thoroughly" - examples: "conversant with business trends"
   - This requires "with" after familiar, which isn't the case here. The structure is "familiar line", not "familiar with..."

4. "having mutual interests or affections; of established friendship" - examples: "on familiar terms"
   - This refers to relationships between people, not to a line of text or speech.

So sense 1 seems correct: the line is well known or easily recognized because Haney has heard it before (implied by "again" and the annoyance at hearing it repeatedly).

Sense 2 could potentially be confusing, but "familiar" in sense 2 usually means "commonplace" or "ordinary" in a general sense, whereas here the context suggests recognition from previous exposure ("again"). The "now familiar" suggests it has become recognizable through repeated exposure, not that it's inherently ordinary.

Therefore, the answer is 1.


[User]
Which numbered sense of "wild" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: Then a <t>wild</t> thought ran circles through his clouded brain.

Senses:
1. definition=marked by extreme lack of restraint or control | examples=wild talk
2. definition=in a natural state; not tamed or domesticated or cultivated | examples=wild geese
3. definition=in a state of extreme emotion | examples=wild with anger
4. definition=deviating widely from an intended course | examples=a wild bullet
5. definition=(of colors or sounds) intensely vivid or loud | examples=a violent clash of colors
6. definition=without a basis in reason or fact | examples=baseless gossip
7. definition=talking or behaving irrationally | examples=a raving lunatic
8. definition=involving risk or danger | examples=skydiving is a hazardous sport
9. definition=fanciful and unrealistic; foolish | examples=a fantastic idea of his own importance
10. definition=located in a dismal or remote area; desolate | examples=a desert island
11. definition=intensely enthusiastic about or preoccupied with | examples=crazy about cars and racing
12. definition=without civilizing influences; ; ; ; -Margaret Meade | examples=barbarian invaders
13. definition=(of the elements) as if showing violent anger | examples=angry clouds on the horizon

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to identify which numbered sense of "wild" is used in the sentence: "Then a <t>wild</t> thought ran circles through his clouded brain."

Let me analyze the sentence. The word "wild" here modifies "thought". The context suggests an irrational, strange, or perhaps risky/dangerous thought, or maybe an enthusiastic one? Let me look at the definitions:

1. marked by extreme lack of restraint or control (wild talk) - This could fit if the thought is unrestrained.
2. in a natural state; not tamed (wild geese) - Doesn't fit a thought.
3. in a state of extreme emotion (wild with anger) - "Wild thought" doesn't mean the thought is experiencing emotion.
4. deviating widely from an intended course (a wild bullet) - Could fit if the thought is erratic, but usually this is for physical objects.
5. intensely vivid or loud - Not really fitting for a thought in this context.
6. without a basis in reason or fact (baseless gossip) - This could fit. A wild thought could be one without reason.
7. talking or behaving irrationally (a raving lunatic) - This refers to people behaving, not thoughts.
8. involving risk or danger - A wild thought could be risky/dangerous.
9. fanciful and unrealistic; foolish (a fantastic idea of his own importance) - This seems like a strong candidate. "Wild thought" often means a fanciful, unrealistic, or crazy idea.
10. located in a dismal or remote area - Doesn't fit.
11. intensely enthusiastic about or preoccupied with - Usually followed by "about", not used to describe the thought itself.
12. without civilizing influences - Doesn't fit a thought.
13. of the elements showing violent anger - Doesn't fit.

Now between options 1, 6, 8, and 9.

Definition 1: "marked by extreme lack of restraint or control" - examples: wild talk. This suggests uncontrolled speech or behavior.

Definition 6: "without a basis in reason or fact" - examples: baseless gossip. This suggests the thought is unfounded.

Definition 9: "fanciful and unrealistic; foolish" - examples: a fantastic idea. This suggests imagination or fantasy.

Definition 8: "involving risk or danger" - This would be if the thought itself was dangerous to have.

The phrase "wild thought" commonly means a sudden, perhaps strange or unrealistic idea. Looking at the example for sense 9: "a fantastic idea of his own importance" - this is similar to "wild thought."

But let me look at sense 1 again: "marked by extreme lack of restraint or control" with example "wild talk". Is a "wild thought" similar to "wild talk"? Maybe, but "wild talk" is about speech being unrestrained, while "wild thought" in this sentence seems to be about the nature of the thought itself - perhaps erratic, strange, or irrational.

Actually, looking at standard dictionary definitions, "wild" when modifying "thought", "idea", or "scheme" often means "fantastic", "bizarre", "highly imaginative", or "without reasonable basis."

Sense 9 says "fanciful and unrealistic; foolish" with the example "a fantastic idea of his own importance."

Sense 6 says "without a basis in reason or fact" with example "baseless gossip."

Between 6 and 9, which is better? "Wild thought" suggests something more active than just "without basis" - it suggests something unrestrained, perhaps crazy or fantastic.

But let's look at the sentence again: "Then a wild thought ran circles through his clouded brain."

The phrase "ran circles" suggests something erratic, moving around wildly.

Actually, looking at WordNet or similar lexical databases (since this looks like a WordNet-style question), sense 9 seems to match best: "fanciful and unrealistic; foolish."

Wait, let me reconsider sense 1: "marked by extreme lack of restraint or control". The example is "wild talk". Could "wild thought" be similar? A thought that lacks restraint?

And sense 6: "without a basis in reason or fact" - baseless.

And sense 9: "fanciful and unrealistic; foolish" - fantastic.

In many dictionary classifications:
- Wild meaning "not based on sound reasoning or probability" (e.g., a wild guess, wild scheme) - this aligns with sense 9 or 6.

Actually, looking at the example for sense 9: "a fantastic idea of his own importance" - this is an unrealistic, foolish idea.

The sentence says "a wild thought ran circles through his clouded brain." "Clouded brain" suggests confusion or intoxication/illness. A "wild thought" in this context is likely an irrational, strange, or erratic thought.

Sense 7 is about people "talking or behaving irrationally" - not applicable to thoughts directly.

Sense 9 "fanciful and unrealistic; foolish" seems the best fit for a thought that is irrational or strange.

But let me check if there's a sense that means "erratic" or "uncontrolled". Sense 1 is "marked by extreme lack of restraint or control". While the example is "wild talk", this could extend to thoughts. However, "wild talk" is about the manner of speaking, while "wild thought" is about the content.

Sense 6: "without a basis in reason or fact" - this is close to "wild guess".

Actually, "wild guess" is a very common collocation. Which sense would that be? It would be sense 6 (without basis) or sense 9 (fanciful/unrealistic).

But "wild thought" in literary contexts often means a sudden, impulsive, perhaps risky or crazy idea.

Let me reconsider all options carefully:

1. Extreme lack of restraint: This could work if the thought is unrestrained by logic or reason.
2. Natural/untamed: No.
3. Extreme emotion: No.
4. Deviating from course: Maybe, if metaphorical, but usually physical.
5. Intensely vivid: Maybe, but not the primary meaning here.
6. Without basis in reason: Strong candidate.
7. Behaving irrationally: Applies to agents, not thoughts.
8. Involving risk: Possible, if the thought is dangerous.
9. Fanciful and unrealistic: Strong candidate.
10. Remote area: No.
11. Enthusiastic about: No.
12. Uncivilized: No.
13. Angry elements: No.

Between 1, 6, and 9.

Definition 1 emphasizes lack of restraint/control. Definition 6 emphasizes lack of reason/fact. Definition 9 emphasizes being fanciful/foolish.

In the sentence "ran circles through his clouded brain", the imagery suggests something chaotic, erratic, perhaps crazy or irrational.

"Clouded brain" implies confusion or diminished capacity. A "wild thought" in such a brain would likely be an irrational, perhaps paranoid or fantastic notion.

Sense 9: "fanciful and unrealistic; foolish" - this captures the idea of a thought that isn't grounded in reality, which fits with "clouded brain."

Sense 6 is also close, but "without a basis in reason" is more about being unjustified (like gossip), while "fanciful and unrealistic" captures the imaginative, perhaps bizarre nature of the thought.

However, looking at the example for sense 1: "wild talk" - this is about uncontrolled speech. Is "wild thought" about uncontrolled thinking? Maybe.

But I think sense 9 is the best fit. Wait, let me reconsider sense 6 vs 9.

Sense 6: "without a basis in reason or fact" - synonyms would be baseless, unfounded.
Sense 9: "fanciful and unrealistic; foolish" - synonyms would be fantastic, absurd.

"Wild thought" in literature: "A wild thought occurred to him" usually means a sudden, perhaps crazy or risky idea. Like "I had a wild thought - let's quit our jobs and move to Tahiti!" This would be sense 9 (fanciful, unrealistic) or sense 8 (risky).

But the context here "clouded brain" suggests mental confusion, perhaps illness or drunkenness. The thought is "running circles" - erratic.

Actually, looking at WordNet 3.0 or similar:
- Sense 1 might correspond to WordNet sense "marked by extreme lack of restraint or control"
- Sense 9 corresponds to "fanciful and unrealistic; foolish"

In WordNet, "wild" has these rough groupings:
1. Living in a state of nature (wild animals) - matches sense 2
2. Without civilizing influences (wild tribes) - matches sense 12
3. Marked by extreme lack of restraint or control (wild parties) - matches sense 1
4. In a state of extreme emotion (wild with anger) - matches sense 3
5. Deviant from the intended course (wild pitch) - matches sense 4
6. Without basis in reason or fact (wild accusations) - matches sense 6
7. Intensely enthusiastic about (wild about cars) - matches sense 11
8. Involving risk or danger (wild financial schemes) - matches sense 8
9. Located in a dismal or remote area - matches sense 10
10. (Of colors/sounds) intensely vivid - matches sense 5
11. Talking or behaving irrationally - this might be sense 7
12. Fanciful and unrealistic - sense 9
13. Of the elements showing violent anger - sense 13

Actually, "wild thought" in the context of "clouded brain" suggests an irrational thought.

Sense 7 is "talking or behaving irrationally" - but that's for people.
Sense 6 is "without a basis in reason or fact" - this could be it.
Sense 9 is "fanciful and unrealistic" - this could also be it.

But "fanciful" usually implies imagination, creativity. "Without basis in reason" implies falsehood or irrationality.

Given "clouded brain", the thought is likely irrational or confused, not necessarily fanciful or imaginative.

Wait, I should look for the most standard classification. This looks like it could be from WordNet. Let me think about WordNet specifically.

In WordNet, "wild" as an adjective:

One sense is: "marked by extreme lack of restraint or control" - e.g., "wild talk", "wild parties"
Another is: "without a basis in reason or fact" - e.g., "wild accusations", "baseless gossip"
Another is: "talking or behaving irrationally" - e.g., "raving lunatic"
Another is: "fanciful and unrealistic" - e.g., "a fantastic idea"

For "wild thought":
- If it means a strange, crazy idea: sense 9 (fanciful/unrealistic)
- If it means an uncontrolled thought: sense 1
- If it means irrational: sense 6 or 7

But "wild thought" as a phrase is most commonly similar to "wild idea" - meaning a fanciful, perhaps unrealistic or risky notion.

Sense 9: "fanciful and unrealistic; foolish" - this is exactly "wild idea".

Sense 8: "involving risk or danger" - also possible for "wild idea" (a wild scheme).

But given the example for sense 9 is "a fantastic idea of his own importance", and "fantastic" here means "wild" in the sense of unrealistic, this seems to be the right category.

Also, the phrase "ran circles" suggests something erratic and perhaps crazy/foolish.

I think the answer is 9.

But let me reconsider sense 1. Is "wild thought" like "wild talk"? "Wild talk" is uncontrolled, excited, perhaps violent speech. A "wild thought" could be an uncontrolled thought. But the modifier "wild" when applied to mental contents (thoughts, ideas, schemes) in the sense of "uncontrolled" is less common than in the sense of "fanciful/absurd" or "without basis."

Actually, looking at the sentence again: "Then a wild thought ran circles through his clouded brain."

This suggests the thought is erratic, perhaps paranoid or delusional. "Clouded brain" suggests mental confusion.

If I have to choose between:
- 1 (lack of restraint)
- 6 (without basis)
- 9 (fanciful/unrealistic)

I think 9 is best, but 6 is also reasonable.

However, looking at the exact wording of the definitions:
6. without a basis in reason or fact | examples=baseless gossip
9. fanciful and unrealistic; foolish | examples=a fantastic idea of his own importance

"Baseless gossip" is about spreading information without foundation.
"A fantastic idea of his own importance" is about having an unrealistic self-image.

"Wild thought" in the sentence is singular and seems to be an idea that occurs to him. It's not necessarily "baseless" in the sense of being unfounded information, but rather "fanciful" or "foolish" given his confused mental state.

Actually, I want to check if there's a sense that means "crazy" or "insane" in terms of ideas. Sense 7 is about people behaving. Sense 9 covers "foolish" ideas.

Another possibility: Is it sense 1? "marked by extreme lack of restraint or control"
Could "wild thought" mean a thought that is unrestrained? In some contexts, yes. But the example "wild talk" suggests the manner is wild, not the content. "Wild thought" would be the content itself is wild (strange, irrational).

I think 9 is the answer.

Wait, I should consider if it could be sense 6. "Without a basis in reason or fact" - a delirious thought (from a clouded brain) would certainly be without basis in reason. But "baseless gossip" is the example, which is about spreading false info. A thought isn't necessarily gossip.

Sense 9's example: "a fantastic idea of his own importance" - this is a thought/idea.

The parallelism between "fantastic idea" and "wild thought" is strong.

Therefore, I believe the answer is 9.


[User]
Which numbered sense of "thought" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: Then a wild <t>thought</t> ran circles through his clouded brain.

Senses:
1. definition=the content of cognition; the main thing you are thinking about | examples=it was not a good idea
2. definition=the process of using your mind to consider something carefully | examples=thinking always made him frown
3. definition=the organized beliefs of a period or group or individual | examples=19th century thought
4. definition=a personal belief or judgment that is not founded on proof or certainty | examples=my opinion differs from yours

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to identify which numbered sense of "thought" is used in the sentence: "Then a wild <t>thought</t> ran circles through his clouded brain."

Let me analyze the sentence:
- "a wild thought" - this suggests a specific idea or notion that occurred to him
- "ran circles through his clouded brain" - this suggests the thought was moving through his mind, implying it's a specific instance of thinking or an idea

Now let's look at the senses:

1. "the content of cognition; the main thing you are thinking about" - examples: "it was not a good idea"
   - This seems to refer to a specific idea or notion. The example "it was not a good idea" suggests this is about a particular thought/idea.

2. "the process of using your mind to consider something carefully" - examples: "thinking always made him frown"
   - This refers to the act or process of thinking itself, not a specific thought content.

3. "the organized beliefs of a period or group or individual" - examples: "19th century thought"
   - This refers to collective thinking or philosophical systems, not an individual fleeting thought.

4. "a personal belief or judgment that is not founded on proof or certainty" - examples: "my opinion differs from yours"
   - This refers to opinions or beliefs, which are more stable than a "wild thought" that "ran circles."

In the sentence, "a wild thought" suggests a specific idea or notion that occurred to the person - the content of what he was thinking. It's not the process of thinking (sense 2), not a body of beliefs (sense 3), and not an opinion/judgment (sense 4).

Sense 1 fits best: "the content of cognition; the main thing you are thinking about" - a wild idea or notion that ran through his brain.

The example "it was not a good idea" supports this - "thought" here is similar to "idea."

So the answer should be 1.


[User]
Which numbered sense of "clouded" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: Then a wild thought ran circles through his <t>clouded</t> brain.

Senses:
1. definition=made troubled or apprehensive or distressed in appearance | examples=his face was clouded with unhappiness
2. definition=filled or abounding with clouds
3. definition=mentally disordered | examples=a mind clouded by sorrow
4. definition=unclear in form or expression; ; - H.G.Wells | examples=the blurred aims of the group

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to identify which numbered sense of "clouded" is used in the sentence: "Then a wild thought ran circles through his <t>clouded</t> brain."

Let me analyze the sentence:
- The word "clouded" is modifying "brain"
- The context suggests a mental state - "wild thought ran circles through his... brain"
- This implies confusion, mental disorder, or lack of clarity in thinking

Now let's look at the senses:
1. "made troubled or apprehensive or distressed in appearance" - This refers to facial expression or appearance, not the brain itself. Example mentions "his face was clouded"
2. "filled or abounding with clouds" - This is literal, referring to sky/weather
3. "mentally disordered" - Example: "a mind clouded by sorrow" - This fits with "brain" and mental state
4. "unclear in form or expression" - This refers to aims, expressions, or forms being unclear, not specifically a mental state of a person

The sentence is talking about a "brain" that is "clouded" - this is clearly referring to a mental state where thinking is confused or disordered. Sense 3 specifically mentions "mentally disordered" and gives the example "a mind clouded by sorrow."

While sense 4 mentions "unclear," it's about "form or expression" generally, not specifically mental capacity. Sense 3 is the most precise fit for describing a brain that is confused or not thinking clearly.

Therefore, the answer is 3.