[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: country
Target surface form: country
Context:
Is immigration a burden or an opportunity for the economy? Immigration policy under Nicolas Sarkozy was criticised from various aspects a congestion of police, legal and administrative services subjected to a policy of numbers and the compatibility of that policy with the self-proclaimed status of the country as the country of French human rights. More recently, it is administrative harassment of foreign students, which is topical, with the minister of the interior ("Libération" on 23 May) declaring that France "does not need foreign talent, bricklayers and waiters." But it is only rarely analyzed from the economic viewpoint. There is a lot of consensus between the Left and the Right on this subject. On the Right, the tone was set by Jacques Chirac, who declared in 1976 that "900,000 unemployed would not become a problem in a <t>country</t> with 2 million of foreign workers," and on the Left by Michel Rocard explaining in 1990 that France "can not accommodate all the world's misery." The only difference, the degree of generosity

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=country%1:14:00:: | definition=a politically organized body of people under a single government | synonyms=state, nation, land, commonwealth, res publica, body politic | examples=the state has elected a new president; African nations
2. sense_key=country%1:15:00:: | definition=the territory occupied by a nation | synonyms=state, land | examples=he returned to the land of his birth; he visited several European countries
3. sense_key=country%1:14:01:: | definition=the people who live in a nation or country | synonyms=nation, land | examples=a statement that sums up the nation's mood; the news was announced to the nation
4. sense_key=country%1:15:01:: | definition=an area outside of cities and towns | synonyms=rural area | examples=his poetry celebrated the slower pace of life in the country
5. sense_key=country%1:15:02:: | definition=a particular geographical region of indefinite boundary (usually serving some special purpose or distinguished by its people or culture or geography) | synonyms=area | examples=it was a mountainous area; Bible country

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the lemma "country" in the given context. Let me analyze the specific occurrence:

The target word appears in the phrase: "in a <t>country</t> with 2 million of foreign workers"

Context around it:
- "900,000 unemployed would not become a problem in a country with 2 million of foreign workers"
- This is a quote from Jacques Chirac in 1976
- It's talking about France specifically (implied by the broader context about French immigration policy)
- The sentence is comparing the number of unemployed to the number of foreign workers within a specific political entity

Now let me look at the candidate senses:

1. sense_key=country%1:14:00:: | definition=a politically organized body of people under a single government | synonyms=state, nation, land, commonwealth, res publica, body politic | examples=the state has elected a new president; African nations

2. sense_key=country%1:15:00:: | definition=the territory occupied by a nation | synonyms=state, land | examples=he returned to the land of his birth; he visited several European countries

3. sense_key=country%1:14:01:: | definition=the people who live in a nation or country | synonyms=nation, land | examples=a statement that sums up the nation's mood; the news was announced to the nation

4. sense_key=country%1:15:01:: | definition=an area outside of cities and towns | synonyms=rural area | examples=his poetry celebrated the slower pace of life in the country

5. sense_key=country%1:15:02:: | definition=a particular geographical region of indefinite boundary (usually serving some special purpose or distinguished by its people or culture or geography) | synonyms=area | examples=it was a mountainous area; Bible country

Analysis:
- Sense 4 (rural area) is clearly wrong - the context is about unemployment and foreign workers, not countryside vs city.
- Sense 5 (geographical region) seems wrong too - this is talking about France as a political/economic entity, not just a geographical region.
- Sense 3 (the people) - while "country" can refer to the populace, here the focus seems to be on the political/economic entity that contains workers and unemployed people. The phrase "in a country" suggests a location/container rather than just the people themselves.
- Between sense 1 (politically organized body) and sense 2 (territory occupied by a nation):
  - Sense 1 emphasizes the political organization/government aspect (state, nation, body politic)
  - Sense 2 emphasizes the physical territory/land aspect

The phrase "in a country with 2 million of foreign workers" - this is talking about France as a nation-state, a political entity that has workers within it. However, looking at the examples:
- Sense 2 examples: "he returned to the land of his birth; he visited several European countries" - this seems more geographical/territorial
- Sense 1 examples: "the state has elected a new president; African nations" - this seems more political/governmental

But wait, looking at the specific usage: "in a country with 2 million of foreign workers" - this could be interpreted as either:
1. A political entity (sense 1) that organizes workers
2. A territory (sense 2) where workers reside

However, given the broader context about immigration policy, the economy, and the political discussion about unemployment and foreign workers, this is referring to France as a nation-state - a political entity.

But looking at the examples again for sense 2: "he visited several European countries" - this is very similar to our usage where we're talking about France as a country.

Actually, looking more carefully at WordNet sense distinctions:
- Sense 1 (country%1:14:00) is grouped under noun.person (14) - "body of people", "res publica" - this is the political entity sense.
- Sense 2 (country%1:15:00) is grouped under noun.location (15) - "territory occupied by a nation" - this is the land/territory sense.

In the sentence "in a country with 2 million of foreign workers", "country" is being used as a container/location where these workers exist, but more specifically as the political entity (France) that has these workers within its jurisdiction.

However, looking at the specific phrase "in a country", this is most commonly sense 2 when referring to the nation as a place. But sense 1 is also possible.

Let me look at the earlier occurrence in the text for clues: "compatibility of that policy with the self-proclaimed status of the country as the country of French human rights"

Here "the country" refers to France as a political entity (sense 1 - the nation state).

But the specific target instance is: "in a <t>country</t> with 2 million of foreign workers"

I think the distinction is subtle. Let me look at the definition of sense 1 again: "a politically organized body of people under a single government"
And sense 2: "the territory occupied by a nation"

In the phrase "in a country with...", we're talking about the political entity (the nation) having workers. But this could also be interpreted as the territory.

However, looking at standard WSD for "country" when referring to nation-states like France, and especially when talking about economic/political matters (unemployment, workers), sense 1 (the political entity) or sense 2 (the territory/nation) could both fit.

But actually, looking at the examples provided:
- Sense 1: "the state has elected a new president; African nations" - emphasizes the political aspect
- Sense 2: "he returned to the land of his birth; he visited several European countries" - emphasizes the geographical aspect

In our sentence, "in a country with 2 million of foreign workers" - this is similar to saying "in a nation with..." or "in a state with...". It's referring to the political entity that contains and organizes these workers.

Wait, I should look at the WordNet hierarchy more carefully. Sense 1 is under noun.group (14) - "a politically organized body of people". Sense 2 is under noun.location (15) - "the territory occupied by a nation".

Given that the context is about economic policy, unemployment, and immigration, and the phrase "in a country with..." refers to the political jurisdiction, I believe sense 1 is the best fit. This is the "nation" sense - the political entity.

But I need to be careful. Let me reconsider sense 2. "He visited several European countries" - this is clearly sense 2. Is our target more like this, or more like "the state has elected a new president"?

"900,000 unemployed would not become a problem in a country with 2 million of foreign workers"

This is talking about the economic capacity of the nation-state to absorb unemployment. It's referring to France as a political-economic entity.

However, looking at the first occurrence in the passage: "the self-proclaimed status of the country as the country of French human rights" - here "country" refers to France as an entity, likely sense 1.

But for the specific target, I think sense 1 is correct: the politically organized body of people (nation/state).

Wait, let me check if there's a pattern in WordNet. Usually:
- Sense 1: the nation as a political entity (the state)
- Sense 2: the country as a place/territory
- Sense 3: the people of the nation

In many WSD datasets, when "country" refers to something like "France" or "Germany" in a political/economic context, it can be either sense 1 or 2 depending on whether the emphasis is on the government/people or the land.

But looking at the specific lexical context "in a country with...", this seems to pattern with sense 2 examples like "he visited several European countries" - both treat the country as a container/location.

However, the subject matter (unemployment, workers) suggests the political entity.

Let me look at the synonyms again:
Sense 1: state, nation, land, commonwealth, res publica, body politic
Sense 2: state, land

"State" appears in both. "Nation" is only in sense 1.

Could we substitute "nation" here? "in a nation with 2 million foreign workers" - yes.
Could we substitute "land"? "in a land with 2 million foreign workers" - possible but less likely, sounds more poetic.

Could we substitute "territory"? Not exactly listed, but implied in sense 2.

Given that "nation" works well as a substitute and is listed as a synonym for sense 1, and the context is political/economic (immigration policy, unemployment), I think sense 1 is the best choice.

But I should double-check sense 3: "the people who live in a nation or country". Could "country" here mean the people? "in a people with 2 million foreign workers" - no, that doesn't work. So not sense 3.

Between 1 and 2, sense 1 seems more appropriate for discussing economic policy and unemployment statistics.

Actually, looking at the specific wording again: "a country with 2 million of foreign workers" - this is referring to the country as an entity that contains workers. In WordNet, sense 2 is specifically "the territory occupied by a nation" - this is the physical land. Sense 1 is the political body.

Given the examples:
- Sense 1: "the state has elected a new president" (political action)
- Sense 2: "he returned to the land of his birth; he visited several European countries" (geographical location)

The target seems closer to sense 2 because it's about being "in" a country (location), and "visiting countries" is similar to the container metaphor. But economic statistics (unemployment, workers) are properties of the political entity (sense 1).

I think I need to choose sense 1. The context is about immigration policy, which is a function of the state/government (sense 1). The quote is discussing the relationship between unemployed and foreign workers within the political entity.

Final decision: sense_index: 1

Wait, I should verify the sense keys again to make sure I'm mapping correctly:
1. country%1:14:00:: - a politically organized body of people under a single government
2. country%1:15:00:: - the territory occupied by a nation

Yes, sense 1 is the political entity, sense 2 is the territory.

Given the context of immigration policy, economic burden, and the specific mention of France as a political actor earlier in the text ("the country of French human rights"), sense 1 is the most appropriate.


attempt_kind: initial

status: success

[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: worker
Target surface form: workers
Context:
Is immigration a burden or an opportunity for the economy? Immigration policy under Nicolas Sarkozy was criticised from various aspects a congestion of police, legal and administrative services subjected to a policy of numbers and the compatibility of that policy with the self-proclaimed status of the country as the country of French human rights. More recently, it is administrative harassment of foreign students, which is topical, with the minister of the interior ("Libération" on 23 May) declaring that France "does not need foreign talent, bricklayers and waiters." But it is only rarely analyzed from the economic viewpoint. There is a lot of consensus between the Left and the Right on this subject. On the Right, the tone was set by Jacques Chirac, who declared in 1976 that "900,000 unemployed would not become a problem in a country with 2 million of foreign <t>workers</t>," and on the Left by Michel Rocard explaining in 1990 that France "can not accommodate all the world's misery." The only difference, the degree of generosity

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=worker%1:18:00:: | definition=a person who works at a specific occupation | examples=he is a good worker
2. sense_key=worker%1:18:01:: | definition=a member of the working class (not necessarily employed) | synonyms=proletarian, prole | examples=workers of the world--unite!
3. sense_key=worker%1:05:01:: | definition=sterile member of a colony of social insects that forages for food and cares for the larvae
4. sense_key=worker%1:18:02:: | definition=a person who acts and gets things done | synonyms=actor, doer | examples=he's a principal actor in this affair; when you want something done get a doer

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

finish_reason: stop

role: assistant

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation (WSD) on the word "workers" in the given context.

 Let me analyze the context:
 - The text discusses immigration policy in France
 - It mentions "foreign workers" in the context of Jacques Chirac's statement: "900,000 unemployed would not become a problem in a country with 2 million of foreign workers"
 - This is clearly referring to people who work, specifically foreign laborers/employees
 - The context is economic - discussing unemployment, immigration, and the labor force

 Now let's look at the candidate senses:

 1. sense_key=worker%1:18:00:: | definition=a person who works at a specific occupation | examples=he is a good worker
    - This seems to fit. It refers to people who work at specific occupations. The context mentions "foreign workers" in an economic/labor context.

 2. sense_key=worker%1:18:01:: | definition=a member of the working class (not necessarily employed) | synonyms=proletarian, prole | examples=workers of the world--unite!
    - This is more about the working class as a social/political category. While the text mentions "workers" in a political context (Chirac's statement), it's specifically about employed foreign labor, not the working class as a Marxist/socialist concept. The example "workers of the world--unite!" suggests this is the political/class sense.

 3. sense_key=worker%1:05:01:: | definition=sterile member of a colony of social insects that forages for food and cares for the larvae
    - This is about ants, bees, etc. Clearly not relevant here.

 4. sense_key=worker%1:18:02:: | definition=a person who acts and gets things done | synonyms=actor, doer | examples=he's a principal actor in this affair; when you want something done get a doer
    - This is about someone who is effective/action-oriented. Not relevant to the context of foreign labor/employment.

 The context is clearly about foreign people who work in France - "foreign workers" as in people employed in specific occupations. This matches sense 1: "a person who works at a specific occupation."

 Sense 2 (proletarian) is too specific to the Marxist/socialist concept of working class, and while the text mentions political figures, the specific usage here is about employed foreign labor, not the working class as a social category.

 Therefore, the best sense is sense 1.

 Wait, let me double-check the sense keys. The user wants the sense index (1, 2, 3, or 4), not the WordNet sense key.

 So I should return: {"sense_index": 1}

 Let me verify:
 - The context mentions "foreign workers" alongside "bricklayers and waiters" (mentioned earlier in the text: "France 'does not need foreign talent, bricklayers and waiters'")
 - Bricklayers and waiters are specific occupations
 - Therefore "workers" here refers to people working at specific occupations
 - This aligns with sense 1: "a person who works at a specific occupation"

 Sense 2 would be more appropriate if it were talking about the working class as a collective political entity, like "the workers control the means of production" or "workers of the world unite." But here it's about individual foreign nationals working in specific jobs.

 Yes, sense 1 is correct.

format: unknown

native_finish_reason: stop

provider: DeepInfra

currency: USD


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: left
Target surface form: Left
Context:
Is immigration a burden or an opportunity for the economy? Immigration policy under Nicolas Sarkozy was criticised from various aspects a congestion of police, legal and administrative services subjected to a policy of numbers and the compatibility of that policy with the self-proclaimed status of the country as the country of French human rights. More recently, it is administrative harassment of foreign students, which is topical, with the minister of the interior ("Libération" on 23 May) declaring that France "does not need foreign talent, bricklayers and waiters." But it is only rarely analyzed from the economic viewpoint. There is a lot of consensus between the Left and the Right on this subject. On the Right, the tone was set by Jacques Chirac, who declared in 1976 that "900,000 unemployed would not become a problem in a country with 2 million of foreign workers," and on the <t>Left</t> by Michel Rocard explaining in 1990 that France "can not accommodate all the world's misery." The only difference, the degree of generosity

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=left%1:15:00:: | definition=location near or direction toward the left side; i.e. the side to the north when a person or object faces east | examples=she stood on the left
2. sense_key=left%1:14:00:: | definition=those who support varying degrees of social or political or economic change designed to promote the public welfare | synonyms=left wing
3. sense_key=left%1:08:00:: | definition=the hand that is on the left side of the body | synonyms=left hand | examples=jab with your left
4. sense_key=left%1:06:00:: | definition=the piece of ground in the outfield on the catcher's left | synonyms=left field | examples=the batter flied out to left
5. sense_key=left%1:04:00:: | definition=a turn toward the side of the body that is on the north when the person is facing east | examples=take a left at the corner

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation (WSD) on the target word "Left" (capitalized in the text as "<t>Left</t>") in the given context.

 Let me analyze the context:
 - The text discusses immigration policy in France
 - It mentions "There is a lot of consensus between the Left and the Right on this subject."
 - It mentions "On the Right, the tone was set by Jacques Chirac..." and "on the <t>Left</t> by Michel Rocard..."
 - This is clearly referring to political groups/ideologies - the Left (political left wing) vs the Right (political right wing)

 Now let's look at the candidate senses:

 1. sense_key=left%1:15:00:: - This is about spatial location/direction (north when facing east). Not relevant here.
 2. sense_key=left%1:14:00:: - "those who support varying degrees of social or political or economic change designed to promote the public welfare" with synonyms "left wing". This matches perfectly with the political context of "Left and Right".
 3. sense_key=left%1:08:00:: - This is about the left hand (body part). Not relevant.
 4. sense_key=left%1:06:00:: - This is about baseball/field position (left field). Not relevant.
 5. sense_key=left%1:04:00:: - This is about turning left (direction). Not relevant.

 The context clearly contrasts "the Left" with "the Right" in a political discussion, referring to political factions or ideologies. This matches sense 2, which refers to political groups supporting social/political/economic change (left wing).

 The answer should be: {"sense_index": 2}

provider: DigitalOcean


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: france
Target surface form: France
Context:
Is immigration a burden or an opportunity for the economy? Immigration policy under Nicolas Sarkozy was criticised from various aspects a congestion of police, legal and administrative services subjected to a policy of numbers and the compatibility of that policy with the self-proclaimed status of the country as the country of French human rights. More recently, it is administrative harassment of foreign students, which is topical, with the minister of the interior ("Libération" on 23 May) declaring that France "does not need foreign talent, bricklayers and waiters." But it is only rarely analyzed from the economic viewpoint. There is a lot of consensus between the Left and the Right on this subject. On the Right, the tone was set by Jacques Chirac, who declared in 1976 that "900,000 unemployed would not become a problem in a country with 2 million of foreign workers," and on the Left by Michel Rocard explaining in 1990 that <t>France</t> "can not accommodate all the world's misery." The only difference, the degree of generosity

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=france%1:15:00:: | definition=a republic in western Europe; the largest country wholly in Europe | synonyms=French Republic
2. sense_key=france%1:18:00:: | definition=French writer of sophisticated novels and short stories (1844-1924) | synonyms=Anatole France, Jacques Anatole Francois Thibault

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the target word "France" in the given context.

 Let me analyze the context:
 - The text discusses immigration policy in France
 - It mentions Nicolas Sarkozy (former French president)
 - It mentions Jacques Chirac (former French president)
 - It mentions Michel Rocard (former French prime minister)
 - It discusses France as a country dealing with immigration, unemployment, foreign workers, etc.
 - The specific sentence with the target is: "Michel Rocard explaining in 1990 that France 'can not accommodate all the world's misery.'"

 Now let's look at the candidate senses:
 1. sense_key=france%1:15:00:: | definition=a republic in western Europe; the largest country wholly in Europe | synonyms=French Republic
    - This refers to the country France.

 2. sense_key=france%1:18:00:: | definition=French writer of sophisticated novels and short stories (1844-1924) | synonyms=Anatole France, Jacques Anatole Francois Thibault
    - This refers to Anatole France, the writer.

 Clearly, in the context of immigration policy, presidents, prime ministers, and the country accommodating "all the world's misery," the reference is to the country France, not the writer Anatole France.

 The context is about:
 - Immigration policy
 - Administrative services
 - Foreign students
 - Unemployment
 - Foreign workers
 - The country as a whole

 This clearly points to sense 1 (the country), not sense 2 (the writer).

 Therefore, the answer should be {"sense_index": 1}.

provider: ModelRun


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: misery
Target surface form: misery
Context:
Is immigration a burden or an opportunity for the economy? Immigration policy under Nicolas Sarkozy was criticised from various aspects a congestion of police, legal and administrative services subjected to a policy of numbers and the compatibility of that policy with the self-proclaimed status of the country as the country of French human rights. More recently, it is administrative harassment of foreign students, which is topical, with the minister of the interior ("Libération" on 23 May) declaring that France "does not need foreign talent, bricklayers and waiters." But it is only rarely analyzed from the economic viewpoint. There is a lot of consensus between the Left and the Right on this subject. On the Right, the tone was set by Jacques Chirac, who declared in 1976 that "900,000 unemployed would not become a problem in a country with 2 million of foreign workers," and on the Left by Michel Rocard explaining in 1990 that France "can not accommodate all the world's <t>misery</t>." The only difference, the degree of generosity

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=misery%1:26:00:: | definition=a state of ill-being due to affliction or misfortune | synonyms=wretchedness, miserableness | examples=the misery and wretchedness of those slums is intolerable
2. sense_key=misery%1:12:00:: | definition=a feeling of intense unhappiness | examples=she was exhausted by her misery and grief

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation (WSD) for the word "misery" in the given context. Let me analyze the context carefully.

The target sentence is: "Michel Rocard explaining in 1990 that France 'can not accommodate all the world's <t>misery</t>.'"

This is a famous quote often rendered as "France cannot accommodate all the misery of the world" or similar. Let me look at the two candidate senses:

1. misery%1:26:00:: - definition: a state of ill-being due to affliction or misfortune; synonyms: wretchedness, miserableness; examples: "the misery and wretchedness of those slums is intolerable"
2. misery%1:12:00:: - definition: a feeling of intense unhappiness; examples: "she was exhausted by her misery and grief"

Now, in the context of "France cannot accommodate all the world's misery," what is being referred to?

This is a statement about immigration policy. Rocard is saying that France cannot take in all the poor, suffering, wretched people from around the world. Here "misery" refers to the collective suffering, poverty, and wretched conditions of people in other parts of the world - not to a specific feeling of unhappiness in an individual.

Sense 1 (misery%1:26:00::) refers to "a state of ill-being due to affliction or misfortune" - this aligns with the collective suffering, poverty, and wretchedness of people. The synonyms "wretchedness, miserableness" and the example "the misery and wretchedness of those slums" suggest this refers to objective conditions of suffering and poverty.

Sense 2 (misery%1:12:00::) refers to "a feeling of intense unhappiness" - this is a subjective emotional state. While the world's poor certainly feel unhappy, the phrase "the world's misery" in this political context refers to the mass of suffering people or the condition of suffering/poverty itself, not specifically to the emotion.

The phrase "all the world's misery" is a metonymy or collective reference to all the suffering people or the state of suffering in the world. This aligns with sense 1.

Also, looking at the broader context about immigration, unemployment, foreign workers, etc., the reference is to the economic and social burden of accommodating people living in poverty and suffering (misery as wretchedness/ill-being), not to a feeling.

Therefore, sense 1 (index 1) is the correct choice.

Wait, let me double-check the indices. The user listed:
1. sense_key=misery%1:26:00::
2. sense_key=misery%1:12:00::

So sense 1 is the state of ill-being, sense 2 is the feeling.

The JSON should be {"sense_index": 1} or {"sense_index": 2}.

I believe it's sense 1.

Let me verify with the famous quote. Michel Rocard said: "La France ne peut pas accueillir toute la misère du monde." In French, "misère" can mean both extreme poverty/suffering (objective condition) and unhappiness. But in this political context, it clearly refers to the poverty and suffering of the world's poor - the objective state of ill-being, not the subjective feeling.

The English translation "misery" here captures the same sense - the wretchedness and poverty, aligning with sense 1.

Therefore, the answer is {"sense_index": 1}.

provider: Moonshot AI


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: difference
Target surface form: difference
Context:
Immigration policy under Nicolas Sarkozy was criticised from various aspects a congestion of police, legal and administrative services subjected to a policy of numbers and the compatibility of that policy with the self-proclaimed status of the country as the country of French human rights. More recently, it is administrative harassment of foreign students, which is topical, with the minister of the interior ("Libération" on 23 May) declaring that France "does not need foreign talent, bricklayers and waiters." But it is only rarely analyzed from the economic viewpoint. There is a lot of consensus between the Left and the Right on this subject. On the Right, the tone was set by Jacques Chirac, who declared in 1976 that "900,000 unemployed would not become a problem in a country with 2 million of foreign workers," and on the Left by Michel Rocard explaining in 1990 that France "can not accommodate all the world's misery." The only <t>difference</t>, the degree of generosity In 2005, the fear of invasion of the national territory by hordes of Polish plumbers was felt both on the Left and on the Right.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=difference%1:07:00:: | definition=the quality of being unlike or dissimilar | examples=there are many differences between jazz and rock
2. sense_key=difference%1:11:00:: | definition=a variation that deviates from the standard or norm | synonyms=deviation, divergence, departure | examples=the deviation from the mean
3. sense_key=difference%1:10:00:: | definition=a disagreement or argument about something important | synonyms=dispute, difference of opinion, conflict | examples=he had a dispute with his wife; there were irreconcilable differences
4. sense_key=difference%1:24:00:: | definition=a significant change | examples=the difference in her is amazing; his support made a real difference
5. sense_key=difference%1:23:00:: | definition=the number that remains after subtraction; the number that when added to the subtrahend gives the minuend | synonyms=remainder

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "difference" in the given context.

 Let me analyze the context:

 The text discusses immigration policy in France under Nicolas Sarkozy and compares positions between the Left and the Right. It mentions that there is a lot of consensus between Left and Right on immigration. Then it says: "The only <t>difference</t>, the degree of generosity"

 The sentence structure is: "The only difference, the degree of generosity"

 This suggests that the "difference" between the Left and Right is being discussed - specifically, the only point of dissimilarity or distinction between them is "the degree of generosity."

 Let me look at the candidate senses:

 1. sense_key=difference%1:07:00:: | definition=the quality of being unlike or dissimilar | examples=there are many differences between jazz and rock
    - This seems to fit. It's about the quality of being unlike or dissimilar between two things (Left vs Right).

 2. sense_key=difference%1:11:00:: | definition=a variation that deviates from the standard or norm | synonyms=deviation, divergence, departure | examples=the deviation from the mean
    - This is more statistical or about deviation from a norm. Doesn't fit well here.

 3. sense_key=difference%1:10:00:: | definition=a disagreement or argument about something important | synonyms=dispute, difference of opinion, conflict | examples=he had a dispute with his wife; there were irreconcilable differences
    - This is about a disagreement or conflict. While Left and Right might disagree, the context here is saying they mostly agree, and the "only difference" is the degree of generosity. It's not framing it as a dispute or argument, but rather as a point of distinction/dissimilarity.

 4. sense_key=difference%1:24:00:: | definition=a significant change | examples=the difference in her is amazing; his support made a real difference
    - This is about change over time or impact. Not applicable here.

 5. sense_key=difference%1:23:00:: | definition=the number that remains after subtraction; the number that when added to the subtrahend gives the minuend | synonyms=remainder
    - Mathematical sense. Not applicable.

 So it's between sense 1 and sense 3.

 Sense 1: "the quality of being unlike or dissimilar" - this is about the distinction or contrast between two things.

 Sense 3: "a disagreement or argument about something important" - this is about a conflict or dispute.

 In the context: "The only difference, the degree of generosity" - this is saying that the only point of distinction/dissimilarity between Left and Right positions is the degree of generosity. It's not saying they have a disagreement or argument (though they might), but rather identifying the specific dimension along which they differ.

 The phrase "the only difference" here means "the only point of distinction" or "the only way they differ." This aligns with sense 1: the quality of being unlike or dissimilar.

 Also, looking at the example for sense 1: "there are many differences between jazz and rock" - this is comparing two things and identifying points of dissimilarity. Similarly, the text is comparing Left and Right and identifying the degree of generosity as the only point of dissimilarity.

 Sense 3 examples: "he had a dispute with his wife; there were irreconcilable differences" - this suggests a conflict or quarrel. The text isn't framing this as a quarrel but as a comparative distinction.

 Therefore, sense 1 is the best fit.

 Wait, let me double-check the WordNet sense keys to make sure I understand the indexing correctly. The user lists them as:
 1. sense_key=difference%1:07:00::
 2. sense_key=difference%1:11:00::
 3. sense_key=difference%1:10:00::
 4. sense_key=difference%1:24:00::
 5. sense_key=difference%1:23:00::

 So the index numbers correspond to the order given: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5.

 I should return {"sense_index": 1}.

 But let me reconsider sense 3 carefully. Could "difference" here mean a disagreement? "The only difference, the degree of generosity" - could this mean "the only disagreement is about the degree of generosity"?

 Actually, looking at the context again: "There is a lot of consensus between the Left and the Right on this subject... The only difference, the degree of generosity"

 This is saying that despite consensus, there is one point where they differ - the degree of generosity. This is describing a dimension of variation between the two positions, not necessarily a dispute or conflict. It's a neutral statement about dissimilarity.

 Sense 1 (quality of being unlike or dissimilar) captures this better than sense 3 (disagreement/argument).

 Also, in WordNet, sense 1 (difference%1:07:00::) is typically the first sense, often the most general or common one, referring to the state or quality of differing.

 The example "there are many differences between jazz and rock" is exactly parallel to "the only difference [between Left and Right], the degree of generosity."

 So I'm confident the answer is sense_index: 1.

provider: Chutes


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: degree
Target surface form: degree
Context:
Immigration policy under Nicolas Sarkozy was criticised from various aspects a congestion of police, legal and administrative services subjected to a policy of numbers and the compatibility of that policy with the self-proclaimed status of the country as the country of French human rights. More recently, it is administrative harassment of foreign students, which is topical, with the minister of the interior ("Libération" on 23 May) declaring that France "does not need foreign talent, bricklayers and waiters." But it is only rarely analyzed from the economic viewpoint. There is a lot of consensus between the Left and the Right on this subject. On the Right, the tone was set by Jacques Chirac, who declared in 1976 that "900,000 unemployed would not become a problem in a country with 2 million of foreign workers," and on the Left by Michel Rocard explaining in 1990 that France "can not accommodate all the world's misery." The only difference, the <t>degree</t> of generosity In 2005, the fear of invasion of the national territory by hordes of Polish plumbers was felt both on the Left and on the Right.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=degree%1:07:00:: | definition=a position on a scale of intensity or amount or quality | synonyms=grade, level | examples=a moderate grade of intelligence; a high level of care is required
2. sense_key=degree%1:26:01:: | definition=a specific identifiable position in a continuum or series or especially in a process | synonyms=level, stage, point | examples=a remarkable degree of frankness; at what stage are the social sciences?
3. sense_key=degree%1:10:00:: | definition=an award conferred by a college or university signifying that the recipient has satisfactorily completed a course of study | synonyms=academic degree | examples=he earned his degree at Princeton summa cum laude
4. sense_key=degree%1:23:00:: | definition=a measure for arcs and angles | synonyms=arcdegree | examples=there are 360 degrees in a circle
5. sense_key=degree%1:09:00:: | definition=the highest power of a term or variable
6. sense_key=degree%1:23:03:: | definition=a unit of temperature on a specified scale | examples=the game was played in spite of the 40-degree temperature
7. sense_key=degree%1:07:01:: | definition=the seriousness of something (e.g., a burn or crime) | examples=murder in the second degree; a second degree burn

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation (WSD) for the word "degree" in the given context.

Let me analyze the context:
- The text discusses immigration policy in France
- It mentions consensus between Left and Right on immigration
- It quotes Jacques Chirac and Michel Rocard making similar restrictive statements about immigration
- Then it says: "The only difference, the <t>degree</t> of generosity"
- This is referring to the only difference between Left and Right being the "degree of generosity" - meaning how generous/generousness they are, or the extent/amount of generosity

Now let's look at the candidate senses:

1. sense_key=degree%1:07:00:: | definition=a position on a scale of intensity or amount or quality | synonyms=grade, level | examples=a moderate grade of intelligence; a high level of care is required
   - This seems to fit. "Degree of generosity" means a position on a scale of generosity - how generous or not generous.

2. sense_key=degree%1:26:01:: | definition=a specific identifiable position in a continuum or series or especially in a process | synonyms=level, stage, point | examples=a remarkable degree of frankness; at what stage are the social sciences?
   - This also could fit. "A remarkable degree of frankness" is similar to "degree of generosity".

3. sense_key=degree%1:10:00:: | definition=an award... | synonyms=academic degree
   - Not relevant. Not talking about diplomas.

4. sense_key=degree%1:23:00:: | definition=a measure for arcs and angles
   - Not relevant.

5. sense_key=degree%1:09:00:: | definition=the highest power of a term or variable
   - Mathematical term, not relevant.

6. sense_key=degree%1:23:03:: | definition=a unit of temperature
   - Not relevant.

7. sense_key=degree%1:07:01:: | definition=the seriousness of something (e.g., a burn or crime)
   - Not relevant. Not talking about burns or crimes.

So it's between sense 1 and sense 2.

Sense 1: "a position on a scale of intensity or amount or quality" - synonyms: grade, level
Sense 2: "a specific identifiable position in a continuum or series or especially in a process" - synonyms: level, stage, point

The phrase is "the degree of generosity". This is talking about the extent or amount of generosity.

Looking at the examples:
- Sense 1 examples: "a moderate grade of intelligence", "a high level of care"
- Sense 2 examples: "a remarkable degree of frankness", "at what stage are the social sciences?"

"Degree of generosity" is very similar to "degree of frankness" in sense 2's example. However, sense 1 also talks about "amount or quality".

Let me check the WordNet sense keys more carefully:
- degree%1:07:00:: - this is the "grade, level" sense - a position on a scale
- degree%1:26:01:: - this is the "level, stage, point" sense - a specific identifiable position in a continuum

Actually, looking at the example for sense 2: "a remarkable degree of frankness" - this is exactly the same construction as "the degree of generosity" in the text.

But sense 1 has examples like "a moderate grade of intelligence" which is also similar.

Let me think about the subtle difference:
- Sense 1 seems to be about gradations on a scale (intensity, amount, quality) - like degrees of comparison (comparative/superlative), or levels of intensity
- Sense 2 seems to be about stages or points in a process or series

Wait, looking at the actual WordNet definitions:
- Sense 1 (degree%1:07:00): "a position on a scale of intensity or amount or quality" - this is the general "extent" meaning
- Sense 2 (degree%1:26:01): "a specific identifiable position in a continuum or series or especially in a process" - this is more about steps/stages

In the phrase "the degree of generosity", we're talking about how generous (the amount/extent of generosity), not a specific stage in a process.

But the example "a remarkable degree of frankness" is under sense 2. Let me reconsider.

Actually, looking at WordNet:
- degree%1:07:00:: is the hypernym for various specific types of degrees
- degree%1:26:01:: seems to be about "stage, point, level" as in steps

But "degree of frankness" and "degree of generosity" are about the extent or amount of a quality.

Let me look at the synonyms again:
- Sense 1: grade, level
- Sense 2: level, stage, point

Both have "level" as a synonym.

But "grade" in sense 1 suggests a ranked position (like grades in school, or grades of quality).

The phrase "degree of generosity" is measuring the amount or extent of generosity - how generous the policy is. This fits sense 1: "a position on a scale of intensity or amount or quality".

However, the example "a remarkable degree of frankness" suggests sense 2 might also cover this usage.

Let me check the actual WordNet entries to be sure.

In WordNet 3.0/3.1:
- degree (n) 1: a position on a scale of intensity or amount or quality (e.g., "a moderate grade of intelligence"; "a high level of care is required"; "it is all a matter of degree")
- degree (n) 2: a specific identifiable position in a continuum or series or especially in a process (e.g., "a remarkable degree of frankness"; "at what stage are the social sciences?")

Actually, looking at standard WordNet:
Sense 1 is the general "extent" sense.
Sense 2 is more about "point/stage/level" in a series or process.

But "degree of generosity" = extent of generosity. This is clearly sense 1.

Wait, the example "a remarkable degree of frankness" is listed under sense 2 in the candidate list provided. But in standard WordNet, I need to check which sense this belongs to.

Actually, looking at the candidate list provided by the user:
- Candidate 1 has examples: "a moderate grade of intelligence; a high level of care is required"
- Candidate 2 has examples: "a remarkable degree of frankness; at what stage are the social sciences?"

The phrase in the text is "the degree of generosity" - comparing the generosity of Left vs Right immigration policies. This is about the extent or amount of generosity.

This is closest to candidate 1: "a position on a scale of intensity or amount or quality".

But candidate 2 also mentions "a remarkable degree of frankness" which is structurally identical.

However, looking at the definitions:
- Candidate 1: scale of intensity or amount or quality
- Candidate 2: specific identifiable position in a continuum or series or especially in a process

"Generosity" is a quality. So "degree of generosity" = position on a scale of quality (generosity). This fits candidate 1 perfectly.

Candidate 2 seems more about temporal stages or steps in a process ("at what stage are the social sciences?"), though "degree of frankness" is an outlier there or refers to a specific point on a frankness scale.

Actually, looking carefully at WordNet:
- Sense 1:07:00 is "attribute -> magnitude -> degree"
- Sense 1:26:01 is "state -> degree, level, stage, point"

In WordNet, "degree" sense 1 is the general sense of "extent or amount" and includes the phrase "it is all a matter of degree".

Sense 2 is about specific points or stages.

In the context: "The only difference, the degree of generosity" - this means the only difference is how generous (the amount of generosity) each side is. This is about the extent or amount - candidate 1.

Also, looking at the synonyms:
- Candidate 1: grade, level
- Candidate 2: level, stage, point

"Grade of generosity" doesn't sound right. "Level of generosity" works. "Stage of generosity" doesn't fit. "Point of generosity" doesn't fit well.

Therefore, candidate 1 is the best fit.

But wait, I should double-check the WordNet sense keys:
- degree%1:07:00:: -> noun.attribute (07)
- degree%1:26:01:: -> noun.state (26) or noun.cognition? Let me check.

Actually, WordNet lexicographer file numbers:
- 07 = attribute
- 26 = state or condition? No, let me recall:
  - 07: attribute
  - 26: ?

Actually, looking at standard WordNet lexname mapping:
- noun.attribute (07)
- noun.state (26?) - actually I think:
  - 09: cognition
  - 10: communication
  - 23: quantity? No...

Wait, the format is: degree%1:XX:YY::
- 1 = noun
- XX = lexicographer file number
- YY = sense number in that file

Common lexicographer files:
- 07: attribute
- 09: cognition
- 10: communication
- 23: quantity? No, usually:
  - 23 is often "phenomenon" or something else?

Actually, standard WordNet 3.0 lexicographer files include:
- noun.artifact (06)
- noun.attribute (07)
- noun.body (08)
- noun.cognition (09)
- noun.communication (10)
- noun.food (13)
- noun.group (14)
- noun.location (15)
- noun.possession (16)
- noun.process (26) - yes, 26 is process!

So:
- degree%1:07:00:: = noun.attribute
- degree%1:26:01:: = noun.process

That makes sense:
- Sense 1 (attribute): a position on a scale of intensity or amount or quality (an attribute of something)
- Sense 2 (process): a specific identifiable position in a continuum or series or especially in a process (a stage in a process)

In the text, "degree of generosity" refers to the attribute of generosity (how much generosity), not a stage in a process.

Therefore, sense 1 (degree%1:07:00::) is correct.

The index is 1.

So the answer is {"sense_index": 1}.

provider: AtlasCloud


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: generosity
Target surface form: generosity
Context:
Immigration policy under Nicolas Sarkozy was criticised from various aspects a congestion of police, legal and administrative services subjected to a policy of numbers and the compatibility of that policy with the self-proclaimed status of the country as the country of French human rights. More recently, it is administrative harassment of foreign students, which is topical, with the minister of the interior ("Libération" on 23 May) declaring that France "does not need foreign talent, bricklayers and waiters." But it is only rarely analyzed from the economic viewpoint. There is a lot of consensus between the Left and the Right on this subject. On the Right, the tone was set by Jacques Chirac, who declared in 1976 that "900,000 unemployed would not become a problem in a country with 2 million of foreign workers," and on the Left by Michel Rocard explaining in 1990 that France "can not accommodate all the world's misery." The only difference, the degree of <t>generosity</t> In 2005, the fear of invasion of the national territory by hordes of Polish plumbers was felt both on the Left and on the Right.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=generosity%1:07:00:: | definition=the trait of being willing to give your money or time | synonyms=generousness
2. sense_key=generosity%1:04:00:: | definition=acting generously | synonyms=unselfishness

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation on the word "generosity" in the given context.

 Let me analyze the context:
 - The text discusses immigration policy in France
 - It mentions consensus between Left and Right on immigration
 - It quotes Jacques Chirac and Michel Rocard about not being able to accommodate all immigrants
 - The key sentence is: "The only difference, the degree of <t>generosity</t>"
 - This refers to the degree of willingness to accept immigrants/refugees

 Now let's look at the candidate senses:

 1. sense_key=generosity%1:07:00:: | definition=the trait of being willing to give your money or time | synonyms=generousness
    - This is about the trait/quality of being generous with money or time
    - It's a personal characteristic (noun.attribute in WordNet terms, based on the 1:07 lexicographer file)

 2. sense_key=generosity%1:04:00:: | definition=acting generously | synonyms=unselfishness
    - This is about the action/behavior of being generous
    - It's an act or action (noun.act in WordNet terms, based on the 1:04 lexicographer file)

 In the context, "generosity" refers to how generous/open a country is in terms of immigration policy - essentially, how willing the country is to "give" asylum/residence to immigrants. This is metaphorical extension of generosity.

 The text says: "The only difference, the degree of generosity" - referring to the difference between Left and Right on immigration policy. It's talking about the trait or quality of the country's policy/position regarding how welcoming/open they are to immigrants.

 But wait, let me think more carefully. In WordNet:
 - 1:07:00 is likely the attribute/trait sense (the quality of being generous)
 - 1:04:00 is likely the act sense (the act of being generous)

 The context is talking about "the degree of generosity" - this is referring to the extent to which the country is willing to accept immigrants. This is metaphorical - it's about the trait/characteristic of being generous (in this case, with visas/residency), not about a specific act of generosity.

 However, looking at the glosses:
 Sense 1: "the trait of being willing to give your money or time" - This is a trait/attribute.
 Sense 2: "acting generously" - This is an action/behavior.

 In the immigration context, when we say a country shows "generosity" towards immigrants, we usually mean the trait/quality of being generous (willing to give shelter/opportunity), not a specific act.

 But actually, looking closely at the sentence: "The only difference, the degree of generosity" - this is comparing how generous (open/welcoming) different political sides are regarding immigration. This is clearly referring to the trait or quality of being generous.

 However, there's a nuance. In political discourse about immigration, "generosity" often refers to the policy stance - how liberal/open the policy is. This maps better to sense 1 (the trait) because:
 1. It's "degree of generosity" - degree applies to qualities/traits
 2. It's comparing the Left and Right's stance/characteristic regarding immigration
 3. It's not referring to a specific act, but to the general disposition/policy orientation

 Wait, let me reconsider sense 2: "acting generously" - synonyms: unselfishness. This is about the behavior/action.

 In the context: "The only difference, the degree of generosity" between Left and Right on immigration. This refers to how generous their stance is - i.e., the trait of being willing to give/accept.

 Actually, looking at WordNet structure, generosity%1:07:00:: is the attribute sense (quality/trait), and generosity%1:04:00:: is the act sense.

 In this political context, they're talking about the "generosity" of the immigration policy - meaning how liberal/open it is. This is metaphorical use of the quality of being generous.

 But I need to be careful. Let me look at actual WordNet entries to verify.

 In WordNet:
 generosity (noun)
 1. generosity, generousness -- (the trait of being willing to give your money or time)
 2. generosity, unselfishness -- (acting generously)

 Sense 1 is the quality/attribute (lexicographer file: noun.attribute)
 Sense 2 is the act/behavior (lexicographer file: noun.act)

 In the sentence: "The only difference, the degree of generosity"
 - "Degree of generosity" suggests a measurable quality or attribute
 - It refers to the extent to which the country is generous in accepting immigrants
 - It's talking about the characteristic/trait of the policy or the country's stance

 However, one could argue that in the context of "France can not accommodate all the world's misery," the "generosity" refers to the act of accommodating/taking in people (acting generously).

 But "degree of generosity" as a phrase strongly suggests the attribute sense (sense 1) - the trait or quality of being generous. You can have a "degree" of a trait (more or less generous), whereas "acting generously" is more binary (you either act generously or you don't, though you can have degrees of generous actions).

 Actually, looking at the examples:
 - For sense 1 (trait): "his generosity was legendary"
 - For sense 2 (act): "the generosity of his donation"

 In the text: "The only difference, the degree of generosity" - this is parallel to saying "the only difference is how generous they are" - referring to their trait/quality of being generous.

 Moreover, the context is about the compatibility of policy with human rights status, and the "generosity" of the country in accepting immigrants. This is clearly sense 1 - the trait of being willing to give (in this case, give residence/asylum).

 The metaphorical extension of "give your money or time" to "give residence/asylum" is straightforward and keeps it in sense 1.

 Sense 2 "acting generously" would be more about specific generous actions, not the general policy stance or degree of openness.

 Therefore, sense 1 (generosity%1:07:00::) is the correct choice.

 But wait, I should double-check. The gloss for sense 1 mentions "money or time" specifically. Does this exclude the extension to "accepting immigrants"?

 In WSD, we often need to look at whether the usage is metaphorical extension of the core sense. The core sense of generosity is willingness to give resources. In immigration context, "generosity" refers to willingness to give residence/opportunity to foreigners. This is conceptually closer to the trait sense (sense 1) than the act sense (sense 2).

 Also, "degree of generosity" is a collocation that suggests a scalar property, which aligns with sense 1 (trait).

 Let me reconsider if sense 2 could fit. "Acting generously" - are they talking about the act of accepting immigrants? The text mentions "can not accommodate all the world's misery" - accommodation is an act. But the phrase is "the degree of generosity" - this frames it as a quality/amount, not just the act itself.

 Actually, looking at the political discourse, when people say "degree of generosity" in immigration contexts, they mean how generous the policy is - i.e., the trait/attribute of the policy or the country.

 I should go with sense 1.

 Sense index: 1

 Wait, the user wants the format like {"sense_index": 3} - but the senses are numbered 1 and 2. So I should return {"sense_index": 1} or {"sense_index": 2}.

 The senses are:
 1. sense_key=generosity%1:07:00::
 2. sense_key=generosity%1:04:00::

 So if I choose sense 1, I return {"sense_index": 1}.

 But let me verify once more. Is there any reason to think it's sense 2?

 Sense 2: "acting generously" - examples might be "he showed generosity by donating" or "the generosity of the gift."

 In the text, is "generosity" referring to an act or a trait?

 "The only difference, the degree of generosity"

 If it were referring to acts, we might say "the only difference is their generosity" (meaning their acts), but "degree of generosity" strongly suggests a quality that can vary in intensity.

 Also, the preceding sentences talk about positions/statements ("tone was set by...", "explaining that..."), which are stances/positions, not acts. The generosity here refers to how welcoming/open the stance is.

 Moreover, in the broader context of immigration policy analysis, "generosity" refers to the liberality of the policy - a characteristic of the policy.

 Therefore, sense 1 is correct.

 Final check: Could this be an ironic usage or specific technical usage? The text quotes people saying France can't take everyone, and notes the only difference between Left and Right is the "degree of generosity." This is referring to how generous (willing to accept) they are.

 Yes, sense 1.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: fear
Target surface form: fear
Context:
More recently, it is administrative harassment of foreign students, which is topical, with the minister of the interior ("Libération" on 23 May) declaring that France "does not need foreign talent, bricklayers and waiters." But it is only rarely analyzed from the economic viewpoint. There is a lot of consensus between the Left and the Right on this subject. On the Right, the tone was set by Jacques Chirac, who declared in 1976 that "900,000 unemployed would not become a problem in a country with 2 million of foreign workers," and on the Left by Michel Rocard explaining in 1990 that France "can not accommodate all the world's misery." The only difference, the degree of generosity In 2005, the <t>fear</t> of invasion of the national territory by hordes of Polish plumbers was felt both on the Left and on the Right. Both sides see immigrants as a burden on the French economy and on French society.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=fear%1:12:00:: | definition=an emotion experienced in anticipation of some specific pain or danger (usually accompanied by a desire to flee or fight) | synonyms=fearfulness, fright
2. sense_key=fear%1:12:01:: | definition=an anxious feeling | synonyms=concern, care | examples=care had aged him; they hushed it up out of fear of public reaction
3. sense_key=fear%1:12:02:: | definition=a feeling of profound respect for someone or something | synonyms=reverence, awe, veneration | examples=the fear of God; the Chinese reverence for the dead

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "fear" in the given context.

 Let me analyze the context:
 - The text discusses administrative harassment of foreign students and immigration issues in France
 - It mentions Jacques Chirac and Michel Rocard's statements about foreign workers and immigration
 - The specific sentence is: "In 2005, the <t>fear</t> of invasion of the national territory by hordes of Polish plumbers was felt both on the Left and on the Right."
 - This refers to the "Polish plumber" stereotype/meme from around 2005 regarding EU expansion and immigration fears
 - The context suggests anxiety/worry about economic competition/immigration rather than:
   1. A specific emotion of fright/fearfulness (sense 1) - this is more about being scared of immediate danger
   2. Profound respect/reverence (sense 3) - clearly not this
   3. An anxious feeling/concern (sense 2) - this fits best as it's about worry/anxiety regarding a potential future event (invasion of territory by workers)

 Looking at the candidates:
 1. sense_key=fear%1:12:00:: - "an emotion experienced in anticipation of some specific pain or danger (usually accompanied by a desire to flee or fight)" - synonyms: fearfulness, fright
    - This is more about being scared/terrified, fight or flight response

 2. sense_key=fear%1:12:01:: - "an anxious feeling" - synonyms: concern, care - examples: "care had aged him; they hushed it up out of fear of public reaction"
    - This fits better. The context is about anxiety/concern regarding immigration/economic impact, not terror or fright. The example "fear of public reaction" is similar to "fear of invasion" in structure - both refer to anxiety about potential negative outcomes.

 3. sense_key=fear%1:12:02:: - "a feeling of profound respect" - clearly wrong

 The context describes a political anxiety/concern about immigration ("invasion of the national territory by hordes of Polish plumbers"). This is not a physical danger fight-or-flight fear (sense 1), but rather a societal anxiety/concern (sense 2).

 The phrase "fear of invasion" here is metaphorical - it's about economic competition and immigration, not literal military invasion causing terror. It's about concern/worry regarding the impact on the economy and society.

 Therefore, sense 2 (fear%1:12:01::) is the best choice.

 Wait, let me reconsider sense 1 vs sense 2 carefully.

 Sense 1: "an emotion experienced in anticipation of some specific pain or danger (usually accompanied by a desire to flee or fight)"
 - This could apply to "fear of invasion" literally
 - But in this context, "invasion" is used metaphorically for immigration
 - The text says "fear of invasion of the national territory by hordes of Polish plumbers" - this is clearly referring to the political discourse around the "Polish plumber" meme, which was about economic competition, not literal military invasion
 - The tone is analytical/political, not describing a primal terror response

 Sense 2: "an anxious feeling" with synonyms concern, care
 - Examples include "fear of public reaction"
 - This fits the political anxiety about immigration and economic impact

 The key distinction in WordNet:
 - Sense 1 (fear%1:12:00::) is the basic emotion of fear, fright, fearfulness
 - Sense 2 (fear%1:12:01::) is more like worry, concern, care - "an anxious feeling"

 Given the context discusses political consensus and economic viewpoints, and the "fear" is about immigration impact on the economy, this is clearly the "concern/worry" type of fear (sense 2), not the "fright/terror" type (sense 1).

 Also, looking at the example for sense 2: "they hushed it up out of fear of public reaction" - this is very similar to the usage here: "fear of invasion..." - both are about anxiety regarding potential negative developments.

 So the answer should be sense_index: 2.

provider: Phala


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: invasion
Target surface form: invasion
Context:
More recently, it is administrative harassment of foreign students, which is topical, with the minister of the interior ("Libération" on 23 May) declaring that France "does not need foreign talent, bricklayers and waiters." But it is only rarely analyzed from the economic viewpoint. There is a lot of consensus between the Left and the Right on this subject. On the Right, the tone was set by Jacques Chirac, who declared in 1976 that "900,000 unemployed would not become a problem in a country with 2 million of foreign workers," and on the Left by Michel Rocard explaining in 1990 that France "can not accommodate all the world's misery." The only difference, the degree of generosity In 2005, the fear of <t>invasion</t> of the national territory by hordes of Polish plumbers was felt both on the Left and on the Right. Both sides see immigrants as a burden on the French economy and on French society.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=invasion%1:04:00:: | definition=the act of invading; the act of an army that invades for conquest or plunder
2. sense_key=invasion%1:11:00:: | definition=any entry into an area not previously occupied | synonyms=encroachment, intrusion | examples=an invasion of tourists; an invasion of locusts
3. sense_key=invasion%1:11:01:: | definition=(pathology) the spread of pathogenic microorganisms or malignant cells to new sites in the body | examples=the tumor's invasion of surrounding structures

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation (WSD) for the word "invasion" in the given context.

Let me analyze the context:
- The text discusses immigration to France
- It mentions "fear of invasion of the national territory by hordes of Polish plumbers"
- This is metaphorical language comparing immigration to an invasion
- The "invasion" here refers to entry of people (Polish plumbers/immigrants) into the national territory
- It's not about military conquest (sense 1), though it uses military/metaphorical language
- It's not about pathology/medicine (sense 3)
- It's about entry into an area not previously occupied by these specific people (immigrants entering France)

Looking at the candidate senses:
1. sense_key=invasion%1:04:00:: - Military invasion (army, conquest, plunder) - This is the literal military sense.
2. sense_key=invasion%1:11:00:: - Any entry into an area not previously occupied; encroachment, intrusion. Examples: "an invasion of tourists; an invasion of locusts"
3. sense_key=invasion%1:11:01:: - Pathology sense (tumor invasion)

In the context, "invasion of the national territory by hordes of Polish plumbers" is clearly using "invasion" metaphorically to mean a large influx/entry of people into a territory. This matches sense 2, which includes examples like "an invasion of tourists" - showing it's used for large groups entering an area, not necessarily military.

The text mentions "hordes" which suggests a large number of people entering, which fits sense 2's definition of "any entry into an area not previously occupied" with the connotation of being overwhelming or unwelcome (like tourists or locusts).

Sense 1 would require an army and conquest/plunder, which isn't literally meant here (though metaphorically it might evoke that, the actual sense used is the general "entry into an area" sense).

Sense 3 is medical and clearly wrong.

Therefore, the best sense is sense 2 (index 2): invasion%1:11:00::

Wait, I need to check the indexing. The user lists:
1. sense_key=invasion%1:04:00::
2. sense_key=invasion%1:11:00::
3. sense_key=invasion%1:11:01::

So sense_index should be 2.

The definition for sense 2 is: "any entry into an area not previously occupied" with synonyms "encroachment, intrusion" and examples "an invasion of tourists; an invasion of locusts".

The context describes Polish plumbers (immigrants) entering the national territory, which fits "entry into an area not previously occupied" metaphorically. The "hordes" language suggests the locusts/tourists type of usage.

Yes, sense 2 is correct.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: territory
Target surface form: territory
Context:
More recently, it is administrative harassment of foreign students, which is topical, with the minister of the interior ("Libération" on 23 May) declaring that France "does not need foreign talent, bricklayers and waiters." But it is only rarely analyzed from the economic viewpoint. There is a lot of consensus between the Left and the Right on this subject. On the Right, the tone was set by Jacques Chirac, who declared in 1976 that "900,000 unemployed would not become a problem in a country with 2 million of foreign workers," and on the Left by Michel Rocard explaining in 1990 that France "can not accommodate all the world's misery." The only difference, the degree of generosity In 2005, the fear of invasion of the national <t>territory</t> by hordes of Polish plumbers was felt both on the Left and on the Right. Both sides see immigrants as a burden on the French economy and on French society.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=territory%1:15:00:: | definition=a region marked off for administrative or other purposes | synonyms=district, territorial dominion, dominion
2. sense_key=territory%1:09:00:: | definition=an area of knowledge or interest | examples=his questions covered a lot of territory
3. sense_key=territory%1:15:01:: | definition=the geographical area under the jurisdiction of a sovereign state | synonyms=soil | examples=American troops were stationed on Japanese soil

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "territory" in the given context.

Let me analyze the context:
- The text discusses immigration to France
- "In 2005, the fear of invasion of the national <t>territory</t> by hordes of Polish plumbers was felt both on the Left and on the Right."
- "national territory" - this refers to the physical geographical area of France as a sovereign state
- The phrase "invasion of the national territory" strongly suggests the physical land/country under the jurisdiction of France

Now let's look at the candidate senses:

1. territory%1:15:00:: - a region marked off for administrative or other purposes (synonyms: district, territorial dominion, dominion)
2. territory%1:09:00:: - an area of knowledge or interest (example: his questions covered a lot of territory)
3. territory%1:15:01:: - the geographical area under the jurisdiction of a sovereign state (synonyms: soil; example: American troops were stationed on Japanese soil)

The context is about "national territory" being invaded by immigrants/workers. This clearly refers to the geographical area under the jurisdiction of a sovereign state (France).

Sense 3 fits best because:
- It mentions "geographical area under the jurisdiction of a sovereign state"
- The synonym is "soil" which fits with "national soil" being invaded
- The example mentions troops stationed on Japanese soil, which is similar to the concept of national territory
- The context is about national borders and sovereignty

Sense 1 is about administrative regions (like districts), which is too generic and doesn't capture the sovereign state aspect.
Sense 2 is metaphorical (area of knowledge), which clearly doesn't fit.

Therefore, the best sense is sense 3 (territory%1:15:01::).

Wait, let me double-check the indexing. The user lists:
1. sense_key=territory%1:15:00::
2. sense_key=territory%1:09:00::
3. sense_key=territory%1:15:01::

So sense_index should be 3.

The user wants only a JSON object: {"sense_index": 3}

provider: SiliconFlow


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: horde
Target surface form: hordes
Context:
More recently, it is administrative harassment of foreign students, which is topical, with the minister of the interior ("Libération" on 23 May) declaring that France "does not need foreign talent, bricklayers and waiters." But it is only rarely analyzed from the economic viewpoint. There is a lot of consensus between the Left and the Right on this subject. On the Right, the tone was set by Jacques Chirac, who declared in 1976 that "900,000 unemployed would not become a problem in a country with 2 million of foreign workers," and on the Left by Michel Rocard explaining in 1990 that France "can not accommodate all the world's misery." The only difference, the degree of generosity In 2005, the fear of invasion of the national territory by <t>hordes</t> of Polish plumbers was felt both on the Left and on the Right. Both sides see immigrants as a burden on the French economy and on French society.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=horde%1:14:00:: | definition=a vast multitude | synonyms=host, legion
2. sense_key=horde%1:14:02:: | definition=a nomadic community
3. sense_key=horde%1:14:01:: | definition=a moving crowd | synonyms=drove, swarm

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "hordes" in the given context.

Let me analyze the context:
- The text discusses immigration fears in France
- Specifically mentions "the fear of invasion of the national territory by hordes of Polish plumbers"
- This is metaphorical language describing large numbers of immigrants/workers coming into France
- The phrase "hordes of Polish plumbers" suggests a large, potentially overwhelming group of people

Now let's look at the candidate senses:

1. sense_key=horde%1:14:00:: | definition=a vast multitude | synonyms=host, legion
   - This refers to a very large number of people/entities
   - "Host" and "legion" both mean large numbers
   - In the context, "hordes of Polish plumbers" means a vast multitude of Polish plumbers

2. sense_key=horde%1:14:02:: | definition=a nomadic community
   - This refers to a specific type of social organization, typically nomadic groups
   - Polish plumbers are not being described as a nomadic community here
   - This doesn't fit the context

3. sense_key=horde%1:14:01:: | definition=a moving crowd | synonyms=drove, swarm
   - This emphasizes movement and crowding
   - "Drove" and "swarm" suggest a moving mass
   - While there is a sense of invasion/movement, the primary meaning here seems to be about large numbers rather than specifically a moving crowd

Wait, let me reconsider. The context mentions "fear of invasion" and "hordes of Polish plumbers."

In WordNet, the senses for "horde" are:
- Sense 1: a vast multitude (host, legion) - emphasizes large number
- Sense 2: a nomadic community - specific anthropological/sociological term
- Sense 3: a moving crowd (drove, swarm) - emphasizes movement

The phrase "hordes of Polish plumbers" in this political context is using "horde" to mean a vast number/multitude. While "invasion" suggests movement, the word "hordes" itself is being used to emphasize the large quantity of workers that were feared. The "Polish plumber" was a stereotype in EU politics about large numbers of workers from Eastern Europe.

Actually, looking more carefully at WordNet's organization:
- horde%1:14:00:: is "a vast multitude" - this is the most general sense for a large group
- horde%1:14:01:: is "a moving crowd" - this is more specific about physical movement
- horde%1:14:02:: is "a nomadic community" - very specific

In the context "hordes of Polish plumbers," this is clearly metaphorical. It's not referring to a nomadic community. Between "vast multitude" and "moving crowd," I think "vast multitude" (sense 1) fits best because:
1. The context is about economic/social burden of large numbers of immigrants
2. The phrase parallels "2 million foreign workers" and "all the world's misery" - emphasizing quantity
3. While "invasion" implies movement, "hordes" here is being used to mean "massive numbers" - the Polish plumber trope was about fears of mass migration in terms of quantity overwhelming the labor market

However, I should double-check. "Hordes" often carries a connotation of barbarian invasions (like the Golden Horde), which connects to sense 2 (nomadic community) historically, but in modern usage when applied to immigrants, it's typically sense 1 or 3.

Actually, looking at typical WSD for "horde":
- "Hordes of tourists" -> usually sense 1 (vast multitude)
- "The Mongol hordes" -> could be sense 2 (nomadic community) or sense 1
- "A horde of people rushed in" -> sense 3 (moving crowd)

In this case, "hordes of Polish plumbers" - are they moving? The text mentions "invasion of the national territory," which does suggest movement across borders. But the core meaning is about the large number.

Wait, I need to be careful. Let me think about how WordNet distinguishes these.

Sense 1: "a vast multitude" - synonyms: host, legion. This is about number.
Sense 3: "a moving crowd" - synonyms: drove, swarm. This is about a crowd in motion.

Given that the context explicitly mentions "invasion" which is about entering/moving into territory, and given that "hordes" is often used with "of" to describe groups of people arriving, sense 3 might be relevant. But "hordes of X" is such a common collocation for simply meaning "lots of X."

Let me reconsider the examples and typical usage. In the context of immigration fears, when someone says "hordes of immigrants," they mean vast numbers. The word "horde" derives from Mongol hordes (sense 2), but when applied to Polish plumbers, it's being used as a vast multitude.

Actually, looking at the sentence structure: "hordes of Polish plumbers" - this is a quantifying construction similar to "lots of," "multitudes of." This strongly points to sense 1.

But let me check if there's any reason to prefer sense 3. "Drove" and "swarm" both imply movement. "Swarm" in particular suggests people moving together en masse. "Invasion" also suggests movement. However, the primary contrast in the text is between the Left and Right views on accommodating immigrants, framed in economic terms - "burden on the French economy." This is about numbers/quantity, not about the physical act of moving.

I think sense 1 (vast multitude) is the best fit. The "invasion" is metaphorical (cultural/economic), not literal military movement.

Wait, I want to make sure about the indexing. The user lists:
1. sense_key=horde%1:14:00::
2. sense_key=horde%1:14:02::
3. sense_key=horde%1:14:01::

So:
- Index 1 = horde%1:14:00:: (vast multitude)
- Index 2 = horde%1:14:02:: (nomadic community)
- Index 3 = horde%1:14:01:: (moving crowd)

I need to return {"sense_index": 1} or {"sense_index": 3}.

Given that this is about "hordes of Polish plumbers" in the context of immigration fears and economic burden, and the phrase is parallel to "2 million foreign workers" and "all the world's misery," the emphasis is clearly on vast numbers/multitude. So sense 1.

Actually, let me reconsider one more time. Could it be sense 3 because of "invasion"? An invasion involves movement. "Hordes" + "invasion" might suggest the "moving crowd" sense. But "hordes" is the noun being modified by "of Polish plumbers" - it's the object of the preposition "by." The "fear of invasion... by hordes." If it were "the hordes invading," that might be clearer for sense 3. But "invasion by hordes" - the hordes are the agents of invasion, which implies they are numerous.

Also, in many WSD datasets, "hordes of [people]" where it's hyperbolic about large numbers tends to be tagged as the "multitude" sense.

I think I'm confident in sense 1. The answer should be {"sense_index": 1}.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: left
Target surface form: Left
Context:
More recently, it is administrative harassment of foreign students, which is topical, with the minister of the interior ("Libération" on 23 May) declaring that France "does not need foreign talent, bricklayers and waiters." But it is only rarely analyzed from the economic viewpoint. There is a lot of consensus between the Left and the Right on this subject. On the Right, the tone was set by Jacques Chirac, who declared in 1976 that "900,000 unemployed would not become a problem in a country with 2 million of foreign workers," and on the Left by Michel Rocard explaining in 1990 that France "can not accommodate all the world's misery." The only difference, the degree of generosity In 2005, the fear of invasion of the national territory by hordes of Polish plumbers was felt both on the <t>Left</t> and on the Right. Both sides see immigrants as a burden on the French economy and on French society.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=left%1:15:00:: | definition=location near or direction toward the left side; i.e. the side to the north when a person or object faces east | examples=she stood on the left
2. sense_key=left%1:14:00:: | definition=those who support varying degrees of social or political or economic change designed to promote the public welfare | synonyms=left wing
3. sense_key=left%1:08:00:: | definition=the hand that is on the left side of the body | synonyms=left hand | examples=jab with your left
4. sense_key=left%1:06:00:: | definition=the piece of ground in the outfield on the catcher's left | synonyms=left field | examples=the batter flied out to left
5. sense_key=left%1:04:00:: | definition=a turn toward the side of the body that is on the north when the person is facing east | examples=take a left at the corner

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "left" in the given context.

 Let me analyze the context:
 - The text discusses political positions: "consensus between the Left and the Right"
 - It mentions "On the Right, the tone was set by Jacques Chirac..."
 - It mentions "on the Left by Michel Rocard..."
 - It says "the fear of invasion... was felt both on the <t>Left</t> and on the Right"
 - "Both sides see immigrants..."

 This is clearly referring to political groups/ideologies - the Left (left wing) and the Right (right wing) in politics.

 Now let's look at the candidate senses:

 1. sense_key=left%1:15:00:: - This is about physical location/direction (left side)
 2. sense_key=left%1:14:00:: - This is about "those who support varying degrees of social or political or economic change designed to promote the public welfare" with synonym "left wing"
 3. sense_key=left%1:08:00:: - This is about the left hand (body part)
 4. sense_key=left%1:06:00:: - This is about left field in baseball
 5. sense_key=left%1:04:00:: - This is about a turn (direction)

 The context clearly uses "Left" to refer to the political left wing, as opposed to "the Right" (political right wing). The text discusses political figures (Jacques Chirac on the Right, Michel Rocard on the Left) and political viewpoints on immigration.

 Therefore, sense 2 is the correct one: "those who support varying degrees of social or political or economic change designed to promote the public welfare" (left wing).

 The answer should be: {"sense_index": 2}


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: right
Target surface form: Right
Context:
More recently, it is administrative harassment of foreign students, which is topical, with the minister of the interior ("Libération" on 23 May) declaring that France "does not need foreign talent, bricklayers and waiters." But it is only rarely analyzed from the economic viewpoint. There is a lot of consensus between the Left and the Right on this subject. On the Right, the tone was set by Jacques Chirac, who declared in 1976 that "900,000 unemployed would not become a problem in a country with 2 million of foreign workers," and on the Left by Michel Rocard explaining in 1990 that France "can not accommodate all the world's misery." The only difference, the degree of generosity In 2005, the fear of invasion of the national territory by hordes of Polish plumbers was felt both on the Left and on the <t>Right</t>. Both sides see immigrants as a burden on the French economy and on French society.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=right%1:07:00:: | definition=an abstract idea of that which is due to a person or governmental body by law or tradition or nature; ; - Eleanor Roosevelt | examples=they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights; Certain rights can never be granted to the government but must be kept in the hands of the people
2. sense_key=right%1:15:00:: | definition=location near or direction toward the right side; i.e. the side to the south when a person or object faces east | examples=he stood on the right
3. sense_key=right%1:06:00:: | definition=the piece of ground in the outfield on the catcher's right | synonyms=right field
4. sense_key=right%1:14:00:: | definition=those who support political or social or economic conservatism; those who believe that things are better left unchanged | synonyms=right wing
5. sense_key=right%1:08:00:: | definition=the hand that is on the right side of the body | synonyms=right hand | examples=he writes with his right hand but pitches with his left; hit him with quick rights to the body
6. sense_key=right%1:04:00:: | definition=a turn toward the side of the body that is on the south when the person is facing east | examples=take a right at the corner
7. sense_key=right%1:07:01:: | definition=anything in accord with principles of justice | synonyms=rightfulness | examples=he feels he is in the right; the rightfulness of his claim
8. sense_key=right%1:21:00:: | definition=(frequently plural) the interest possessed by law or custom in some intangible thing | examples=mineral rights; film rights

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "right" (capitalized as "Right" and "Right" in the text) in the given context.

Let me analyze the context:
- The text discusses political positions: "There is a lot of consensus between the Left and the Right on this subject."
- It mentions "On the Right, the tone was set by Jacques Chirac..."
- It contrasts "the Left and the Right"
- It mentions "felt both on the Left and on the Right"
- This is clearly referring to political groups/ideologies

Now let's look at the candidate senses:

1. sense_key=right%1:07:00:: - This is about abstract rights (legal/moral rights). Example mentions "unalienable Rights". Not the right sense here.

2. sense_key=right%1:15:00:: - This is about direction/location (right side). Not political.

3. sense_key=right%1:06:00:: - This is about baseball (right field). Not relevant.

4. sense_key=right%1:14:00:: - "those who support political or social or economic conservatism; those who believe that things are better left unchanged" with synonym "right wing". This matches perfectly with the context discussing "Left and Right" in politics.

5. sense_key=right%1:08:00:: - This is about the right hand. Not relevant.

6. sense_key=right%1:04:00:: - This is about turning right. Not relevant.

7. sense_key=right%1:07:01:: - This is about being correct/just ("in the right"). Not relevant to political groups.

8. sense_key=right%1:21:00:: - This is about legal interests (mineral rights, film rights). Not relevant.

The context clearly uses "Right" to refer to the political right wing, as contrasted with "Left". The examples show Jacques Chirac representing the Right, and it's contrasted with Michel Rocard on the Left. This is clearly sense 4.

The target surface form appears twice in the context:
1. "There is a lot of consensus between the Left and the Right on this subject."
2. "On the Right, the tone was set by Jacques Chirac..."
3. "the fear of invasion... was felt both on the Left and on the <t>Right</t>."

The <t> tags mark the specific instance, but all instances in this text refer to the political meaning.

So the answer should be sense_index 4.

provider: StreamLake