[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: action
Target surface form: actions
Context:
This way, and since Real Madrid will finish as leader of its group, both players will fulfil the prescribed sanction during the next game of league, against Auxerre, and will be able to get rid of the cards the following phase. Finally, the committee of discipline of the UEFA has sanctioned with two games the trainer of the team, Jose Mourinho, and with different economic amounts the implied players. The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of football. It is so extended that it part of the ethos, of the unwritten rules, but followed nonetheless by this sport. Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician. Anyway, the debate deals with if that type of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport, that is to say, if with these actions fraud is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful <t>actions</t> with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense. The matter examines the type of damage that is brought to the sporting spirit.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=action%1:04:02:: | definition=something done (usually as opposed to something said) | examples=there were stories of murders and other unnatural actions
2. sense_key=action%1:26:00:: | definition=the state of being active | synonyms=activity, activeness | examples=his sphere of activity; he is out of action
3. sense_key=action%1:04:03:: | definition=a military engagement | synonyms=military action | examples=he saw action in Korea
4. sense_key=action%1:22:00:: | definition=a process existing in or produced by nature (rather than by the intent of human beings) | synonyms=natural process, natural action, activity | examples=the action of natural forces; volcanic activity
5. sense_key=action%1:10:00:: | definition=the series of events that form a plot | examples=his novels always have a lot of action
6. sense_key=action%1:07:00:: | definition=the trait of being active and energetic and forceful | examples=a man of action
7. sense_key=action%1:06:00:: | definition=the operating part that transmits power to a mechanism | synonyms=action mechanism | examples=the piano had a very stiff action
8. sense_key=action%1:04:01:: | definition=a judicial proceeding brought by one party against another; one party prosecutes another for a wrong done or for protection of a right or for prevention of a wrong | synonyms=legal action, action at law
9. sense_key=action%1:04:04:: | definition=an act by a government body or supranational organization | examples=recent federal action undermined the segregationist position; the United Nations must have the power to propose and organize action without being hobbled by irrelevant issues
10. sense_key=action%1:04:00:: | definition=the most important or interesting work or activity in a specific area or field | examples=the action is no longer in technology stocks but in municipal bonds; gawkers always try to get as close to the action as possible

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation (WSD) for the word "actions" in the given context. The target lemma is "action" and the surface form is "actions" (plural).

 Let me analyze the context carefully:

 The relevant sentence is: "Anyway, the debate deals with if that type of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport, that is to say, if with these actions fraud is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful <t>actions</t> with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense."

 The context is about football (soccer) players getting yellow cards intentionally to serve suspensions in less important matches. The text discusses whether these "actions" constitute fraud against the spirit of the sport, even if they comply with the letter of the regulations.

 So what does "actions" refer to here? It refers to the specific things done by the players/trainer - the provocative behavior, the intentional getting of yellow cards, the dramatization, etc. These are things done or carried out.

 Now let's look at the candidate senses:

 1. sense_key=action%1:04:02:: | definition=something done (usually as opposed to something said) | examples=there were stories of murders and other unnatural actions
    - This seems like a general sense referring to deeds or things done. The example mentions "murders and other unnatural actions" - things that were done.

 2. sense_key=action%1:26:00:: | definition=the state of being active | synonyms=activity, activeness | examples=his sphere of activity; he is out of action
    - This refers to the state or condition of being active, not specific acts.

 3. sense_key=action%1:04:03:: | definition=a military engagement | synonyms=military action | examples=he saw action in Korea
    - Military context, not relevant here.

 4. sense_key=action%1:22:00:: | definition=a process existing in or produced by nature (rather than by the intent of human beings) | synonyms=natural process, natural action, activity | examples=the action of natural forces; volcanic activity
    - Natural processes, not human intentional acts.

 5. sense_key=action%1:10:00:: | definition=the series of events that form a plot | examples=his novels always have a lot of action
    - Narrative/plot sense, not relevant.

 6. sense_key=action%1:07:00:: | definition=the trait of being active and energetic and forceful | examples=a man of action
    - Personality trait, not specific deeds.

 7. sense_key=action%1:06:00:: | definition=the operating part that transmits power to a mechanism | synonyms=action mechanism | examples=the piano had a very stiff action
    - Mechanical part, not relevant.

 8. sense_key=action%1:04:01:: | definition=a judicial proceeding brought by one party against another; one party prosecutes another for a wrong done or for protection of a right or for prevention of a wrong | synonyms=legal action, action at law
    - Legal proceedings, not relevant here.

 9. sense_key=action%1:04:04:: | definition=an act by a government body or supranational organization | examples=recent federal action undermined the segregationist position; the United Nations must have the power to propose and organize action without being hobbled by irrelevant issues
    - Government/institutional acts, not individual player behavior.

 10. sense_key=action%1:04:00:: | definition=the most important or interesting work or activity in a specific area or field | examples=the action is no longer in technology stocks but in municipal bonds; gawkers always try to get as close to the action as possible
     - "Where the action is" - focus of activity, not specific deeds.

 Now, looking at sense 1 again: "something done (usually as opposed to something said)" - examples include "there were stories of murders and other unnatural actions"

 In the context, "these actions" refers to the specific things the players did (getting yellow cards intentionally, the provocation, etc.). These are deeds, things done. The text contrasts these actions with the spirit of the sport, discussing whether they constitute fraud.

 Sense 1 seems to be the best fit. It's the general sense referring to deeds or things done, as opposed to words. The context is discussing specific behaviors/acts performed by the players.

 Let me double-check if any other sense could fit:

 - Sense 9 (government acts)? No, these are individual player actions, not governmental.
 - Sense 8 (legal action)? No, not a lawsuit.
 - Sense 2 (state of being active)? "They are respectful actions" - this refers to specific instances, not a state.
 - Sense 10 (the important activity)? No, it's referring to specific deeds.

 Sense 1: "something done" - the players did something (provoked yellow cards), these are the actions being discussed.

 The index for sense 1 is: sense_key=action%1:04:02::

 Wait, I need to be careful about the indexing. The user asks for "sense_index". Looking at the format, they want something like {"sense_index": 3}. But the senses are labeled 1-10 in the list. So I should return the number from the list (1-10).

 Sense 1 in the list is: sense_key=action%1:04:02::
 Sense 2 is: sense_key=action%1:26:00::
 etc.

 So the answer should be {"sense_index": 1}.

 Let me verify the WordNet sense keys to make sure I understand the numbering correctly. The numbering in the candidate list is 1-10, so I should return the ordinal position in that list.

 Yes, sense 1 is the correct choice. The context refers to specific things done by the players (getting yellow cards intentionally), which are "something done" as opposed to something said. The definition mentions "usually as opposed to something said" which fits the debate about whether these actions (deeds) violate the spirit of the sport even if they follow the written rules.

 The phrase "they are respectful actions with the sport regulation" means they are compliant deeds/acts with respect to the regulations.

 So: {"sense_index": 1}


attempt_kind: initial

status: success

[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: regulation
Target surface form: regulation
Context:
This way, and since Real Madrid will finish as leader of its group, both players will fulfil the prescribed sanction during the next game of league, against Auxerre, and will be able to get rid of the cards the following phase. Finally, the committee of discipline of the UEFA has sanctioned with two games the trainer of the team, Jose Mourinho, and with different economic amounts the implied players. The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of football. It is so extended that it part of the ethos, of the unwritten rules, but followed nonetheless by this sport. Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician. Anyway, the debate deals with if that type of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport, that is to say, if with these actions fraud is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful actions with the sport <t>regulation</t>, but they seem to elude its sense. The matter examines the type of damage that is brought to the sporting spirit.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=regulation%1:10:00:: | definition=an authoritative rule | synonyms=ordinance
2. sense_key=regulation%1:09:00:: | definition=a principle or condition that customarily governs behavior | synonyms=rule | examples=it was his rule to take a walk before breakfast; short haircuts were the regulation
3. sense_key=regulation%1:26:00:: | definition=the state of being controlled or governed
4. sense_key=regulation%1:22:00:: | definition=(embryology) the ability of an early embryo to continue normal development after its structure has been somehow damaged or altered
5. sense_key=regulation%1:04:01:: | definition=the act of bringing to uniformity; making regular | synonyms=regularization, regularisation
6. sense_key=regulation%1:04:00:: | definition=the act of controlling or directing according to rule | synonyms=regulating | examples=fiscal regulations are in the hands of politicians

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

finish_reason: stop

role: assistant

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation (WSD) on the word "regulation" in the provided context.

 First, let me understand the context:
 - The text discusses football (soccer) and specifically about getting yellow cards intentionally.
 - It mentions "not prohibited specifically by the regulation"
 - It says "they are respectful actions with the sport regulation"
 - The context is about rules/laws governing the sport of football/soccer.

 Now let's look at the candidate senses:

 1. sense_key=regulation%1:10:00:: | definition=an authoritative rule | synonyms=ordinance
    - This seems to be about a specific rule or law (like an ordinance).

 2. sense_key=regulation%1:09:00:: | definition=a principle or condition that customarily governs behavior | synonyms=rule | examples=it was his rule to take a walk before breakfast; short haircuts were the regulation
    - This refers to a general principle or custom that governs behavior. The example "short haircuts were the regulation" suggests this is about conventions or standards.

 3. sense_key=regulation%1:26:00:: | definition=the state of being controlled or governed
    - This is an abstract state/condition of being regulated.

 4. sense_key=regulation%1:22:00:: | definition=(embryology) the ability of an early embryo to continue normal development after its structure has been somehow damaged or altered
    - This is a technical biological term, clearly not relevant here.

 5. sense_key=regulation%1:04:01:: | definition=the act of bringing to uniformity; making regular | synonyms=regularization, regularisation
    - This is about the process of making something regular/uniform.

 6. sense_key=regulation%1:04:00:: | definition=the act of controlling or directing according to rule | synonyms=regulating | examples=fiscal regulations are in the hands of politicians
    - This is about the act/process of regulating (the action).

 Now, analyzing the specific context:
 - "not prohibited specifically by the regulation"
 - "respectful actions with the sport regulation"

 The word is used to refer to the set of rules or the rulebook that governs the sport. It's referring to the codified rules of football/soccer.

 Let me think about the distinction between sense 1 and sense 2:
 - Sense 1 (regulation%1:10:00::): "an authoritative rule" - This is a countable noun referring to a specific rule.
 - Sense 2 (regulation%1:09:00::): "a principle or condition that customarily governs behavior" - This refers to a general rule or custom.

 However, looking at the phrase "the sport regulation" or "by the regulation", it seems to be referring to the collective body of rules or a specific authoritative rule.

 Wait, looking at sense 6: "the act of controlling or directing according to rule" - this seems to refer to the activity/process.

 But in the phrase "not prohibited specifically by the regulation", "regulation" appears to refer to the set of written rules (the rulebook/regulations) that govern the sport.

 Let me reconsider the WordNet senses more carefully:

 Sense 1: regulation%1:10:00:: - "an authoritative rule" - This is a specific rule issued by an authority.
 Sense 2: regulation%1:09:00:: - "a principle or condition that customarily governs behavior" - This is like a convention or custom.

 In the context: "not prohibited specifically by the regulation" - this is referring to the official rules of the sport (UEFA regulations, football regulations). This would be an authoritative rule or set of rules.

 However, sense 1 is marked as "an authoritative rule" (singular), while sense 6 relates to "fiscal regulations" (plural referring to the act or the rules themselves?).

 Actually, looking at the examples:
 - Sense 6 example: "fiscal regulations are in the hands of politicians"
 - Sense 1: no example given but "ordinance" as synonym
 - Sense 2: "short haircuts were the regulation" - this suggests a custom/norm

 In the text: "respectful actions with the sport regulation" - this seems to refer to the body of rules governing the sport.

 Looking at standard WordNet entries:
 - Regulation can mean:
   1. A rule or directive made and maintained by an authority (sense 1)
   2. The action or process of regulating or being regulated (sense 6, 5)
   3. A principle or rule in specific contexts (sense 2)

 "Sport regulation" typically refers to the codified rules of the sport (the rulebook).

 Between sense 1 and sense 2:
 - Sense 1 emphasizes "authoritative rule" (like a law or official rule)
 - Sense 2 emphasizes "customarily governs behavior" (like a custom or convention)

 The context mentions UEFA, committee of discipline, sanctioned, etc. These are official, authoritative contexts. The "regulation" here refers to the official rules established by the governing body (UEFA), not just customs or conventions (though the text mentions ethos and unwritten rules separately).

 The phrase "not prohibited specifically by the regulation" contrasts with the "ethos" and "unwritten rules" mentioned earlier. So "the regulation" here refers specifically to the written, official rules (authoritative rules) as opposed to the unwritten ethos.

 Therefore, sense 1 seems most appropriate: "an authoritative rule" or the set of such rules.

 However, looking at sense 6: "the act of controlling or directing according to rule" - this doesn't fit because we're not talking about the act of regulating, but the rules themselves.

 Sense 3: "the state of being controlled or governed" - doesn't fit.

 Sense 5: "the act of bringing to uniformity" - doesn't fit.

 Sense 4: embryology - definitely not.

 So it's between 1 and 2.

 Sense 2's example: "short haircuts were the regulation" - this suggests something like "the regulation style" or the normal custom. But the context here is about official football rules, not customs.

 Also, the text contrasts "the regulation" (written rules) with "the ethos, of the unwritten rules". This strongly suggests sense 1 (authoritative rule) rather than sense 2 (customary principle).

 Additionally, "regulation" in sports contexts (UEFA regulations, FIFA regulations) typically maps to sense 1 - authoritative rules/ordinances.

 Wait, I should check if there's a sense that refers to the collective body of regulations. Sense 1 is singular "an authoritative rule", but it can also refer to the entire body (like "the regulations").

 Actually, looking at the WordNet structure:
 - 1:10:00 is likely the noun referring to a specific rule (countable)
 - 1:09:00 is likely referring to a general principle or custom

 But regulation can also refer to the entire regulatory framework.

 Let me reconsider sense 6: "the act of controlling or directing according to rule" with example "fiscal regulations are in the hands of politicians". Here "regulations" is plural and refers to the rules themselves (fiscal rules), not the act. This suggests that sense 6 might actually cover the meaning of "rules" as well, or the example is using it in a slightly different way.

 Actually, looking carefully:
 - sense_key=regulation%1:04:00:: (noun.act) - the act of controlling...
 - But the example "fiscal regulations" suggests the result or the rules themselves.

 Let me think about how WordNet distinguishes these. Usually:
 - %1:10:00 is noun.communication (a message or rule as communication)
 - %1:04:00 is noun.act (the act/process)
 - %1:09:00 is noun.cognition or noun.attribute?

 Actually, looking at the lexicographer files:
 - 1:10:00 -> noun.communication (rule/law)
 - 1:09:00 -> noun.cognition? Actually, "principle or condition" might be noun.state or noun.attribute?
 - 1:26:00 -> noun.state
 - 1:22:00 -> noun.process or noun.phenomenon?
 - 1:04: -> noun.act

 Standard WordNet for "regulation":
 - Sense 1: noun.communication: "an authoritative rule"
 - Sense 2: noun.cognition: "a principle or condition that customarily governs behavior"
 - Sense 3: noun.state: "the state of being controlled or governed"
 - Sense 4: noun.process: "(embryology) the ability of an early embryo..."
 - Sense 5: noun.act: "the act of bringing to uniformity..."
 - Sense 6: noun.act: "the act of controlling or directing according to rule" (regulating)

 In the context: "not prohibited specifically by the regulation"

 This refers to the official rules of the game. This is definitely sense 1 (an authoritative rule) or the collective authoritative rules. The text mentions UEFA, which is an authority making rules.

 "respectful actions with the sport regulation" - again referring to the official rules.

 Sense 2 refers to customs ("short haircuts were the regulation"), but here the text explicitly contrasts "the regulation" with "unwritten rules", so it must be the written, authoritative ones.

 Therefore, sense 1 is the correct choice.

 Wait, let me double-check sense 6. Could "regulation" here mean "the act of regulating"? The phrase "respectful actions with the sport regulation" - if "regulation" meant "the act of controlling", it would be "respectful actions with the sport controlling" which doesn't make sense. It clearly refers to the rules themselves.

 "Fulfil the prescribed sanction during the next game of league" - referring to specific rules.

 So yes, sense 1.

 But I want to make sure about the indexing. The user says "Choose the single best indexed sense" and the candidates are numbered 1-6. So I should return the index number.

 The instruction says: "Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}."

 So if I choose sense 1, I return {"sense_index": 1}.

 Let me verify once more by looking at the actual context clues:

 1. "not prohibited specifically by the regulation" - refers to written laws/rules
 2. "respectful actions with the sport regulation" - actions that comply with the rules
 3. Contrasted with "ethos" and "unwritten rules" earlier in the text
 4. UEFA is mentioned as the disciplinary committee

 This clearly points to sense 1: an authoritative rule.

 Sense 2 is about customary behavior ("it was his rule to take a walk"), but here we're talking about official UEFA football regulations.

 Therefore, the answer is sense_index: 1.

format: unknown

native_finish_reason: stop

provider: DigitalOcean

currency: USD


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: matter
Target surface form: matter
Context:
Finally, the committee of discipline of the UEFA has sanctioned with two games the trainer of the team, Jose Mourinho, and with different economic amounts the implied players. The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of football. It is so extended that it part of the ethos, of the unwritten rules, but followed nonetheless by this sport. Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician. Anyway, the debate deals with if that type of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport, that is to say, if with these actions fraud is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful actions with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense. The <t>matter</t> examines the type of damage that is brought to the sporting spirit. One of the advantages that include the sport spirit is the physical integrity of the opposite players, aspect that with these actions wasn't put into danger, that is to say, there was no violent game.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=matter%1:09:01:: | definition=a vaguely specified concern | synonyms=affair, thing | examples=several matters to attend to; it is none of your affair
2. sense_key=matter%1:09:00:: | definition=some situation or event that is thought about | synonyms=topic, subject, issue | examples=he kept drifting off the topic; he had been thinking about the subject for several years
3. sense_key=matter%1:03:00:: | definition=that which has mass and occupies space | examples=physicists study both the nature of matter and the forces which govern it
4. sense_key=matter%1:09:02:: | definition=a problem | examples=is anything the matter?
5. sense_key=matter%1:07:00:: | definition=(used with negation) having consequence | examples=they were friends and it was no matter who won the games
6. sense_key=matter%1:10:00:: | definition=written works (especially in books or magazines) | examples=he always took some reading matter with him on the plane

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation (WSD) on the word "matter" in the given context.

 Let me analyze the context:
 - The text discusses a disciplinary case involving Jose Mourinho and Real Madrid players
 - It talks about provoking yellow cards, debate about whether this behavior contradicts sporting principles
 - The specific sentence: "The <t>matter</t> examines the type of damage that is brought to the sporting spirit."

 Looking at the candidate senses:

 1. sense_key=matter%1:09:01:: | definition=a vaguely specified concern | synonyms=affair, thing | examples=several matters to attend to; it is none of your affair
    - This could fit as "the matter" referring to a concern or affair.

 2. sense_key=matter%1:09:00:: | definition=some situation or event that is thought about | synonyms=topic, subject, issue | examples=he kept drifting off the topic; he had been thinking about the subject for several years
    - This refers to a topic or subject being discussed. The text mentions "the debate" and "the matter examines..." - this seems to fit well as the matter (topic/subject) examines something.

 3. sense_key=matter%1:03:00:: | definition=that which has mass and occupies space
    - This is the physical substance sense. Doesn't fit here.

 4. sense_key=matter%1:09:02:: | definition=a problem | examples=is anything the matter?
    - This is usually used in questions like "what's the matter?" or "is anything the matter?" referring to a problem or difficulty. The context here doesn't suggest a problem in that sense.

 5. sense_key=matter%1:07:00:: | definition=(used with negation) having consequence
    - Usually used in phrases like "no matter" or "it doesn't matter". Doesn't fit here.

 6. sense_key=matter%1:10:00:: | definition=written works (especially in books or magazines)
    - This refers to reading material. Doesn't fit.

 Now between sense 1 and sense 2:
 - Sense 1: "a vaguely specified concern" - synonyms: affair, thing
 - Sense 2: "some situation or event that is thought about" - synonyms: topic, subject, issue

 The context: "The matter examines the type of damage..."
 This suggests "matter" is the subject/topic being discussed or examined. It's referring to the case/debate being discussed in the text.

 However, looking closely at the sentence structure: "The matter examines..." - this suggests "matter" is the subject doing the examining. But actually, reading carefully: "The <t>matter</t> examines the type of damage..."

 Wait, that seems odd. Usually a "matter" doesn't "examine" something. Let me re-read.

 Actually, looking at the context again: "The debate deals with if that type of behavior... contradicts the principles of the sport... The matter examines the type of damage that is brought to the sporting spirit."

 It seems like "the matter" here refers to the subject/issue at hand - the specific topic being discussed (the case of Mourinho and the yellow card provocation).

 Sense 2 (topic, subject, issue) seems most appropriate because:
 - It's referring to a situation/event being thought about/discussed
 - The synonyms topic, subject, issue fit well
 - The text is discussing a debate about a specific incident

 Sense 1 (affair, thing) could also work, but "topic/subject/issue" seems more precise for a discussion/debate context.

 Actually, looking at WordNet sense distinctions:
 - Sense 1: matter%1:09:01:: - "a vaguely specified concern" - "several matters to attend to"
 - Sense 2: matter%1:09:00:: - "some situation or event that is thought about" - "he kept drifting off the topic"

 In the context: "The matter examines..." - this is referring to the subject matter of the debate. It's the issue being discussed.

 But wait, is it possible that "matter" here refers to a legal or disciplinary case? Like "the matter before the court"? That would align with sense 1 (affair) or sense 2 (subject/issue).

 Looking at the examples for sense 1: "several matters to attend to; it is none of your affair"
 Looking at examples for sense 2: "he kept drifting off the topic; he had been thinking about the subject for several years"

 The context suggests this is a specific issue/subject being debated: "the debate deals with... The matter examines..."

 I think sense 2 is the best fit. The word "matter" here refers to the topic/subject/issue under discussion (the specific case of the yellow card provocation and whether it constitutes fraud).

 However, I should double-check if sense 1 could be better. "A vaguely specified concern" - the text is quite specific about what is being discussed. It's not vague. It's a specific disciplinary case. So sense 2 seems better.

 Also, looking at the phrase "the matter" in legal or formal contexts often refers to the case/subject under consideration, which aligns with sense 2 (topic, subject, issue).

 Therefore, the best sense is sense 2 (index 2).

 Wait, I need to check the indexing. The user lists:
 1. sense_key=matter%1:09:01::
 2. sense_key=matter%1:09:00::
 3. sense_key=matter%1:03:00::
 4. sense_key=matter%1:09:02::
 5. sense_key=matter%1:07:00::
 6. sense_key=matter%1:10:00::

 So sense 2 corresponds to sense_key=matter%1:09:00:: (the one with topic, subject, issue).

 Actually, looking at WordNet, the sense keys encode the lexicographer file, lexid, etc. But the user has provided the indices 1-6. I need to return the index number (1-6), not the sense key.

 The user asks: "Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}."

 So I should return {"sense_index": 2} if I choose the second one in the list.

 Let me reconsider if sense 1 could be correct. "A vaguely specified concern" - is the matter vaguely specified? The text has been quite specific about what happened. It's talking about a specific debate. "Affair" could work, but "topic/subject/issue" seems more appropriate for something that "examines" damage to sporting spirit.

 Actually, looking at the sentence again: "The matter examines the type of damage..."

 This is slightly unusual phrasing. Usually, we might say "The matter of X examines..." or "This matter examines..." where "matter" means the case/subject under discussion.

 In legal English, "the matter" often refers to the case or proceedings.

 But comparing the definitions:
 - Sense 1: "a vaguely specified concern" - this seems less formal, more like "business" or "affair"
 - Sense 2: "some situation or event that is thought about" - this fits a debate or discussion topic

 Given the context involves a debate about sporting principles, and the matter is what examines the damage, it's referring to the subject/topic of discussion.

 I think sense 2 is correct.

 But let me check if there's any chance it's sense 4: "a problem". "Is anything the matter?" - this doesn't fit. The text isn't saying "is anything the matter?" or referring to a problem in that sense.

 Sense 5: "having consequence" - usually with negation "no matter". Not this.

 Sense 6: written works. No.

 Sense 3: physical substance. No.

 So it's between 1 and 2.

 Looking at the gloss for sense 1 again: "a vaguely specified concern"
 Looking at the gloss for sense 2 again: "some situation or event that is thought about"

 The context describes a specific situation (the provocation of yellow cards, the debate, etc.). This is a specific event being thought about and discussed. Therefore sense 2.

 Also, the synonyms for sense 2 are "topic, subject, issue" - all of which fit well here. The text discusses "the debate" and then refers to "the matter" - which is essentially the subject of the debate.

 Therefore, the answer should be {"sense_index": 2}.

provider: ModelRun


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: type
Target surface form: type
Context:
Finally, the committee of discipline of the UEFA has sanctioned with two games the trainer of the team, Jose Mourinho, and with different economic amounts the implied players. The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of football. It is so extended that it part of the ethos, of the unwritten rules, but followed nonetheless by this sport. Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician. Anyway, the debate deals with if that type of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport, that is to say, if with these actions fraud is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful actions with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense. The matter examines the <t>type</t> of damage that is brought to the sporting spirit. One of the advantages that include the sport spirit is the physical integrity of the opposite players, aspect that with these actions wasn't put into danger, that is to say, there was no violent game.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=type%1:09:00:: | definition=a subdivision of a particular kind of thing | examples=what type of sculpture do you prefer?
2. sense_key=type%1:18:00:: | definition=a person of a specified kind (usually with many eccentricities) | synonyms=character, eccentric, case | examples=a real character; a strange character
3. sense_key=type%1:14:01:: | definition=(biology) the taxonomic group whose characteristics are used to define the next higher taxon
4. sense_key=type%1:10:01:: | definition=printed characters | examples=small type is hard to read
5. sense_key=type%1:10:00:: | definition=all of the tokens of the same symbol | examples=the word `element' contains five different types of character
6. sense_key=type%1:06:00:: | definition=a small metal block bearing a raised character on one end; produces a printed character when inked and pressed on paper | examples=he dropped a case of type, so they made him pick them up

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "type" in the given context.

Let me analyze the context:
"The matter examines the <t>type</t> of damage that is brought to the sporting spirit."

Here, "type" is used to refer to a kind or category of damage. It's asking what kind/category of damage is being done to the sporting spirit.

Let me look at the candidate senses:

1. sense_key=type%1:09:00:: | definition=a subdivision of a particular kind of thing | examples=what type of sculpture do you prefer?
   - This seems to fit. "What type of sculpture" = "what kind of sculpture". In the context: "the type of damage" = "the kind of damage".

2. sense_key=type%1:18:00:: | definition=a person of a specified kind (usually with many eccentricities) | synonyms=character, eccentric, case | examples=a real character; a strange character
   - This refers to a person. The context is about damage, not a person. Doesn't fit.

3. sense_key=type%1:14:01:: | definition=(biology) the taxonomic group whose characteristics are used to define the next higher taxon
   - Biology-specific. Context is about sports/football. Doesn't fit.

4. sense_key=type%1:10:01:: | definition=printed characters | examples=small type is hard to read
   - Typography. Context is not about printing. Doesn't fit.

5. sense_key=type%1:10:00:: | definition=all of the tokens of the same symbol | examples=the word `element' contains five different types of character
   - Also typography/symbols. Doesn't fit.

6. sense_key=type%1:06:00:: | definition=a small metal block bearing a raised character on one end; produces a printed character when inked and pressed on paper | examples=he dropped a case of type, so they made him pick them up
   - Physical printing press type. Doesn't fit.

So sense 1 is clearly the best fit. The phrase "that type of behavior" earlier in the text also uses "type" in the same sense (kind/category of behavior), and "the type of damage" means "the kind of damage".

The answer should be {"sense_index": 1}.

provider: SiliconFlow


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: damage
Target surface form: damage
Context:
Finally, the committee of discipline of the UEFA has sanctioned with two games the trainer of the team, Jose Mourinho, and with different economic amounts the implied players. The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of football. It is so extended that it part of the ethos, of the unwritten rules, but followed nonetheless by this sport. Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician. Anyway, the debate deals with if that type of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport, that is to say, if with these actions fraud is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful actions with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense. The matter examines the type of <t>damage</t> that is brought to the sporting spirit. One of the advantages that include the sport spirit is the physical integrity of the opposite players, aspect that with these actions wasn't put into danger, that is to say, there was no violent game.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=damage%1:11:00:: | definition=the occurrence of a change for the worse | synonyms=harm, impairment
2. sense_key=damage%1:11:01:: | definition=loss of military equipment | synonyms=equipment casualty
3. sense_key=damage%1:04:00:: | definition=the act of damaging something or someone | synonyms=harm, hurt, scathe
4. sense_key=damage%1:21:00:: | definition=the amount of money needed to purchase something | synonyms=price, terms | examples=the price of gasoline; he got his new car on excellent terms
5. sense_key=damage%1:04:01:: | definition=any harm or injury resulting from a violation of a legal right | synonyms=wrong, legal injury

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "damage" in the given context.

 Let me analyze the context:
 - The text discusses football (soccer), specifically about Jose Mourinho and Real Madrid players getting yellow cards intentionally (provocation of a yellow card).
 - It mentions this behavior is not prohibited specifically by regulation but may contradict principles of the sport.
 - The key sentence is: "The matter examines the type of <t>damage</t> that is brought to the sporting spirit."
 - It discusses whether this behavior causes "damage" to the sporting spirit.
 - It mentions that one advantage of sport spirit is physical integrity of players, which wasn't put in danger (no violent game).

 Now let's look at the candidate senses:

 1. sense_key=damage%1:11:00:: | definition=the occurrence of a change for the worse | synonyms=harm, impairment
    - This is a general sense of damage as a change for the worse or harm/impairment.

 2. sense_key=damage%1:11:01:: | definition=loss of military equipment | synonyms=equipment casualty
    - This is specific to military context. Not relevant here.

 3. sense_key=damage%1:04:00:: | definition=the act of damaging something or someone | synonyms=harm, hurt, scathe
    - This refers to the act of causing damage.

 4. sense_key=damage%1:21:00:: | definition=the amount of money needed to purchase something | synonyms=price, terms
    - This is about cost/price. Not relevant here.

 5. sense_key=damage%1:04:01:: | definition=any harm or injury resulting from a violation of a legal right | synonyms=wrong, legal injury
    - This is legal terminology. While the text mentions regulation and rules, it's not specifically about legal rights violation in a legal sense, but rather about sporting spirit.

 Now, the phrase is "damage that is brought to the sporting spirit". This is talking about harm or impairment to the sporting spirit.

 Sense 1 (damage%1:11:00::) is "the occurrence of a change for the worse" with synonyms harm, impairment. This fits well with "damage to the sporting spirit" - it's talking about the harm or impairment caused to the spirit of the sport.

 Sense 3 (damage%1:04:00::) is "the act of damaging something or someone". While the text could be interpreted as examining the act, the phrase "type of damage" suggests we're looking at the result or the nature of the harm itself, not the act. The phrase "brought to" suggests something is being done to the sporting spirit, resulting in damage/harm to it.

 Let me check the WordNet senses more carefully. In WordNet:
 - damage%1:11:00:: is the state/condition of being damaged (the occurrence of a change for the worse)
 - damage%1:04:00:: is the act of damaging

 The context: "The matter examines the type of damage that is brought to the sporting spirit."

 This is similar to "damage to one's reputation" or "damage to the environment". This typically refers to the harm/impairment itself (the result), not the act of damaging.

 Also, looking at the synonyms:
 - Sense 1: harm, impairment
 - Sense 3: harm, hurt, scathe

 Both have "harm" as a synonym. But sense 1 is a noun referring to the state/occurrence of change for worse, while sense 3 is the act.

 The phrase "brought to" suggests the damage is being inflicted upon the sporting spirit. This would be the result - the harm/impairment to the spirit.

 Also, the text later says "One of the advantages that include the sport spirit is the physical integrity..." and discusses whether there was violent game. It's discussing the nature of the harm/damage to the spirit.

 Sense 1 seems most appropriate: "the occurrence of a change for the worse" or harm/impairment to the sporting spirit.

 Wait, let me reconsider sense 3. "The act of damaging something or someone" - is the text talking about the act or the result?

 "The matter examines the type of damage that is brought to the sporting spirit."

 If I say "the damage to the car", I usually mean the harm/impairment (sense 1), not the act of damaging (sense 3).

 Also, looking at the examples in WordNet for these senses might help (though not provided here, I can infer).

 Sense 1: "the occurrence of a change for the worse" - this is the general concept of damage as harm or detriment.
 Sense 3: "the act of damaging" - this emphasizes the action.

 In the context, they're examining what kind of harm is done to the sporting spirit - is it serious harm? Is it moral harm? etc. It's about the nature of the impairment.

 Therefore, sense 1 (damage%1:11:00::) is the best choice.

 But wait, I should check if sense 5 could apply: "any harm or injury resulting from a violation of a legal right". The text mentions "regulation" and "fraud", but it's specifically about sporting spirit and unwritten rules, not legal rights per se. Also, the phrase "damage to the sporting spirit" doesn't fit the legal injury definition as well as the general harm definition.

 So between 1 and 3:
 - "damage" as the result/harm (sense 1)
 - "damage" as the act (sense 3)

 The phrase "type of damage" and "brought to" strongly suggests the result, not the act. You bring harm to something, you bring impairment to something.

 Therefore, the answer should be sense_index: 1.

 Wait, I need to be careful about the indexing. The user lists:
 1. sense_key=damage%1:11:00::
 2. sense_key=damage%1:11:01::
 3. sense_key=damage%1:04:00::
 4. sense_key=damage%1:21:00::
 5. sense_key=damage%1:04:01::

 So if I choose sense 1, the index is 1.
 If I choose sense 3, the index is 3.

 Let me double-check by looking at the actual WordNet entries to make sure I understand the distinction correctly.

 In WordNet 3.0/3.1:
 - damage.n.01: the occurrence of a change for the worse (synonyms: harm, impairment) - lexname: noun.event or noun.state? Actually %1:11:00 suggests noun.attribute or similar. Wait, the format is %1:POS:XX:YY where POS is 11 for noun? No, in WordNet sense keys, %1 means noun, %2 means verb, %3 means adjective, %4 means adverb.

 The format is: lemma%pos_type:lex_filenum:lex_id
 Where pos_type is:
 1 - noun
 2 - verb
 3 - adjective
 4 - adverb

 So:
 - damage%1:11:00:: - noun, lex file 11 (noun.attribute?), lex id 00
 - damage%1:11:01:: - noun, lex file 11, lex id 01
 - damage%1:04:00:: - noun, lex file 04 (noun.act?), lex id 00
 - damage%1:21:00:: - noun, lex file 21 (noun.possession?), lex id 00
 - damage%1:04:01:: - noun, lex file 04, lex id 01

 Lex file 04 is noun.act (act/action/activity).
 Lex file 11 is noun.attribute (attribute/property).

 So:
 - Sense 1: noun.attribute - the occurrence of a change for the worse (a state/attribute of being damaged)
 - Sense 2: noun.artifact? No, 11 is attribute. Wait, let me check standard WordNet lexicographer file numbers:
   - 04 is noun.act
   - 11 is noun.attribute
   - 21 is noun.possession? No, 21 might be noun.quantity or noun.possession.

 Actually, looking at standard WordNet lex file numbers:
 - noun.act: 04
 - noun.attribute: 11
 - noun.possession: 13? No, let me recall...

 Actually, the numbers are:
 - 00 - adj.all
 - 01 - adj.pert
 - 02 - adv.all
 - 03 - noun.Tops (unique beginner for nouns)
 - 04 - noun.act
 - 05 - noun.animal
 - 06 - noun.artifact
 - 07 - noun.attribute
 - 08 - noun.body
 - 09 - noun.cognition
 - 10 - noun.communication
 - 11 - noun.event? No...

 Wait, I should verify. Actually, looking at the sense keys provided:
 - damage%1:11:00:: - this is likely noun.attribute (11)
 - damage%1:04:00:: - this is noun.act (04)

 But the definition for sense 1 says "the occurrence of a change for the worse" which sounds like an event or state. In WordNet:
 - damage.n.01: the occurrence of a change for the worse (lexname: noun.event)
 - damage.n.02: loss of military equipment (lexname: noun.event)
 - damage.n.03: the act of damaging something or someone (lexname: noun.act)
 - damage.n.04: the amount of money needed to purchase something (lexname: noun.possession) - wait, that's "price", not damage. Actually damage.n.04 is "price"?? No, that doesn't make sense.

 Wait, looking at the candidate senses again:
 4. sense_key=damage%1:21:00:: | definition=the amount of money needed to purchase something | synonyms=price, terms

 This is clearly the sense of "damage" as in "what's the damage?" (slang for cost/price). So this is a separate sense.

 Let me map them:
 1. damage%1:11:00:: - occurrence of a change for the worse (general harm)
 2. damage%1:11:01:: - loss of military equipment (specific)
 3. damage%1:04:00:: - the act of damaging
 4. damage%1:21:00:: - price/cost (slang)
 5. damage%1:04:01:: - legal injury

 Actually, looking at WordNet 3.1:
 - damage.n.01: the occurrence of a change for the worse (lexname: noun.event)
 - damage.n.02: loss of military equipment (lexname: noun.event)
 - damage.n.03: the act of damaging something or someone (lexname: noun.act)
 - damage.n.04: the amount of money needed to purchase something (lexname: noun.possession) - yes, this is the slang sense.
 - damage.n.05: any harm or injury resulting from a violation of a legal right (lexname: noun.act)

 Wait, damage.n.05 is also noun.act? That seems odd for a legal injury, but okay.

 But the sense keys don't match my expectation. %1:11:00 - if 11 is noun.event, then:
 - damage%1:11:00:: = damage.n.01 (occurrence of change for worse)
 - damage%1:11:01:: = damage.n.02 (military equipment loss)
 - damage%1:04:00:: = damage.n.03 (act of damaging)
 - damage%1:21:00:: = damage.n.04 (price) - 21 would be noun.possession?
 - damage%1:04:01:: = damage.n.05 (legal injury)

 Actually, checking WordNet lexicographer file numbers:
 - 04 = noun.act
 - 11 = noun.attribute? No, 11 is usually noun.event in some versions? Let me check...

 Actually, standard WordNet 3.0 file numbers:
 - noun.act: 04
 - noun.attribute: 07
 - noun.event: 11

 Yes! So:
 - 04 = noun.act
 - 11 = noun.event

 So:
 1. damage%1:11:00:: = noun.event - occurrence of a change for the worse
 2. damage%1:11:01:: = noun.event - loss of military equipment
 3. damage%1:04:00:: = noun.act - the act of damaging
 4. damage%1:21:00:: = ? - probably noun.possession (21) - price/cost
 5. damage%1:04:01:: = noun.act - legal injury

 So sense 1 is the event/occurrence of damage (the result), sense 3 is the act.

 In the context: "the type of damage that is brought to the sporting spirit"

 This is clearly referring to the harm itself (the event/state of the sporting spirit being harmed), not the act of harming it. The act would be the behavior described earlier (provoking yellow cards), but the damage itself is the harm to the spirit.

 Therefore, sense 1 is correct.

 The phrase "brought to" indicates the damage is being applied to the spirit, resulting in a state of harm/impairment.

 Also, the text discusses "if with these actions fraud is committed" and "they are respectful actions with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense" - it's about the effect/outcome (damage/harm) to the spirit.

 So the answer is index 1.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: advantage
Target surface form: advantages
Context:
The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of football. It is so extended that it part of the ethos, of the unwritten rules, but followed nonetheless by this sport. Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician. Anyway, the debate deals with if that type of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport, that is to say, if with these actions fraud is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful actions with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense. The matter examines the type of damage that is brought to the sporting spirit. One of the <t>advantages</t> that include the sport spirit is the physical integrity of the opposite players, aspect that with these actions wasn't put into danger, that is to say, there was no violent game. Another of these advantages to which it is alluded to with the fare-play is to avoid that the team of the lawbreaker players takes advantage unjustly of the opposite team, which did not happen either.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=advantage%1:07:00:: | definition=the quality of having a superior or more favorable position | synonyms=vantage | examples=the experience gave him the advantage over me
2. sense_key=advantage%1:23:00:: | definition=(tennis) first point scored after deuce
3. sense_key=advantage%1:07:01:: | definition=benefit resulting from some event or action | synonyms=reward | examples=it turned out to my advantage; reaping the rewards of generosity

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "advantages" in the given context. The target lemma is "advantage" and the surface form is "advantages".

Let me analyze the context:

The text is discussing football (soccer), specifically about yellow cards, fair play, and the sporting spirit. The key sentence is:
"One of the <t>advantages</t> that include the sport spirit is the physical integrity of the opposite players..."

And later: "Another of these advantages to which it is alluded to with the fare-play is to avoid that the team of the lawbreaker players takes advantage unjustly of the opposite team..."

So here, "advantages" refers to benefits or positive aspects that are part of the sporting spirit/fair play. It's talking about what benefits or good things are included in the concept of sport spirit - specifically physical integrity of players and avoiding unjust advantage.

Now let's look at the candidate senses:

1. sense_key=advantage%1:07:00:: | definition=the quality of having a superior or more favorable position | synonyms=vantage | examples=the experience gave him the advantage over me
   - This refers to a superior position or edge over someone else. While the text mentions "takes advantage unjustly", the specific instance of "advantages" in the target refers to benefits/aspects of sport spirit, not a competitive edge.

2. sense_key=advantage%1:23:00:: | definition=(tennis) first point scored after deuce
   - This is a specific tennis term. The context is about football/soccer, not tennis, and the usage doesn't match the tennis scoring system.

3. sense_key=advantage%1:07:01:: | definition=benefit resulting from some event or action | synonyms=reward | examples=it turned out to my advantage; reaping the rewards of generosity
   - This refers to a benefit or positive outcome. In the context, "One of the advantages that include the sport spirit" means one of the benefits/positive aspects that are part of the sporting spirit. This fits well with "benefit resulting from some event or action" or more broadly interpreted as beneficial aspects.

Wait, let me reconsider sense 1 vs sense 3.

Sense 1: "the quality of having a superior or more favorable position" - this is about being in a better position than others (competitive advantage).

Sense 3: "benefit resulting from some event or action" - this is about a positive outcome or benefit.

In the text: "One of the advantages that include the sport spirit is the physical integrity of the opposite players..."

Here, "advantages" seems to mean "beneficial aspects" or "positive features" of the sporting spirit. It's listing what benefits are included in the concept of fair play/sporting spirit.

Actually, looking more carefully at the Spanish-influenced English (this appears to be translated from Spanish), "advantages" here seems to mean something like "benefits" or "positive aspects" that are part of the sporting spirit.

Sense 3 fits best: "benefit resulting from some event or action" - though the gloss says "resulting from some event or action", the examples show "it turned out to my advantage" which is about benefit. The word "advantages" in the context refers to beneficial aspects or benefits of the sporting spirit.

Sense 1 is about having a superior position (vantage), which doesn't fit because the text isn't saying the sporting spirit has a superior position over something else; rather, it's listing components/benefits of the sporting spirit.

Also, later in the text: "Another of these advantages to which it is alluded to with the fare-play..." - again referring to benefits/aspects of fair play.

So sense 3 (index 3) is the correct choice.

Wait, I need to check the indexing. The user lists:
1. sense_key=advantage%1:07:00::
2. sense_key=advantage%1:23:00::
3. sense_key=advantage%1:07:01::

So index 3 corresponds to sense_key=advantage%1:07:01::.

The definition is "benefit resulting from some event or action" with synonyms "reward".

Yes, this matches. The "advantages" in the context are benefits of the sporting spirit (physical integrity, fair play).

Therefore, the answer should be {"sense_index": 3}.

provider: Phala


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: integrity
Target surface form: integrity
Context:
The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of football. It is so extended that it part of the ethos, of the unwritten rules, but followed nonetheless by this sport. Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician. Anyway, the debate deals with if that type of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport, that is to say, if with these actions fraud is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful actions with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense. The matter examines the type of damage that is brought to the sporting spirit. One of the advantages that include the sport spirit is the physical <t>integrity</t> of the opposite players, aspect that with these actions wasn't put into danger, that is to say, there was no violent game. Another of these advantages to which it is alluded to with the fare-play is to avoid that the team of the lawbreaker players takes advantage unjustly of the opposite team, which did not happen either.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=integrity%1:26:00:: | definition=an undivided or unbroken completeness or totality with nothing wanting | synonyms=unity, wholeness | examples=the integrity of the nervous system is required for normal development; he took measures to insure the territorial unity of Croatia
2. sense_key=integrity%1:07:00:: | definition=moral soundness | examples=he expects to find in us the common honesty and integrity of men of business; they admired his scrupulous professional integrity

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "integrity" in the given context.

 Let me analyze the context:
 - The text is discussing football (soccer), specifically about yellow cards, provocation, and sporting spirit.
 - The specific sentence containing "integrity" is: "One of the advantages that include the sport spirit is the physical <t>integrity</t> of the opposite players, aspect that with these actions wasn't put into danger, that is to say, there was no violent game."

 Key clues:
 1. "physical integrity" - this suggests the physical completeness/wholeness of the players
 2. "wasn't put into danger" - implies safety from harm
 3. "there was no violent game" - confirms we're talking about physical safety/bodily integrity
 4. "opposite players" - referring to opposing team players in a sports context

 Now let's look at the candidate senses:

 Sense 1: integrity%1:26:00::
 - Definition: an undivided or unbroken completeness or totality with nothing wanting
 - Synonyms: unity, wholeness
 - Examples: "the integrity of the nervous system is required for normal development"; "he took measures to insure the territorial unity of Croatia"
 - This refers to physical completeness, wholeness, structural integrity

 Sense 2: integrity%1:07:00::
 - Definition: moral soundness
 - Examples: "he expects to find in us the common honesty and integrity of men of business"; "they admired his scrupulous professional integrity"
 - This refers to ethical/moral character, honesty

 In the context:
 - The text mentions "physical integrity" specifically
 - It's contrasted with "violent game" and danger to players
 - This clearly refers to the physical wholeness/safety of the players' bodies - not being injured, maintaining their complete physical state
 - This matches Sense 1 (wholeness, completeness) rather than Sense 2 (moral soundness)

 While "integrity" can refer to moral character in sports (fair play, etc.), the modifier "physical" and the contrast with "violent game" and "put into danger" clearly indicates we're talking about bodily integrity - the state of being uninjured, whole, complete physically.

 Therefore, Sense 1 is the correct choice.

 The user wants the output as: {"sense_index": 1}

provider: StreamLake


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: player
Target surface form: players
Context:
The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of football. It is so extended that it part of the ethos, of the unwritten rules, but followed nonetheless by this sport. Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician. Anyway, the debate deals with if that type of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport, that is to say, if with these actions fraud is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful actions with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense. The matter examines the type of damage that is brought to the sporting spirit. One of the advantages that include the sport spirit is the physical integrity of the opposite <t>players</t>, aspect that with these actions wasn't put into danger, that is to say, there was no violent game. Another of these advantages to which it is alluded to with the fare-play is to avoid that the team of the lawbreaker players takes advantage unjustly of the opposite team, which did not happen either.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=player%1:18:01:: | definition=a person who participates in or is skilled at some game | synonyms=participant
2. sense_key=player%1:18:02:: | definition=someone who plays a musical instrument (as a profession) | synonyms=musician, instrumentalist
3. sense_key=player%1:18:00:: | definition=a theatrical performer | synonyms=actor, histrion, thespian, role player
4. sense_key=player%1:18:04:: | definition=a person who pursues a number of different social and sexual partners simultaneously
5. sense_key=player%1:18:03:: | definition=an important participant (as in a business deal) | examples=he was a major player in setting up the corporation

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "players" in the given context. Let me analyze the context carefully.

The context is about football (soccer), discussing yellow cards, teams, Real Madrid, Mourinho, physical integrity of players, violent game, etc.

The target word "players" appears in the phrase: "physical integrity of the opposite <t>players</t>" and later "team of the lawbreaker players".

Looking at the candidate senses:
1. sense_key=player%1:18:01:: | definition=a person who participates in or is skilled at some game | synonyms=participant
2. sense_key=player%1:18:02:: | definition=someone who plays a musical instrument (as a profession) | synonyms=musician, instrumentalist
3. sense_key=player%1:18:00:: | definition=a theatrical performer | synonyms=actor, histrion, thespian, role player
4. sense_key=player%1:18:04:: | definition=a person who pursues a number of different social and sexual partners simultaneously
5. sense_key=player%1:18:03:: | definition=an important participant (as in a business deal) | examples=he was a major player in setting up the corporation

The context is clearly about sports - specifically football/soccer. The word "players" refers to athletes who participate in the game of football.

Sense 1 fits perfectly: "a person who participates in or is skilled at some game" with synonym "participant". This matches the context of football players participating in a sport.

Sense 2 is about musicians - not relevant.
Sense 3 is about actors/theatrical performers - not relevant (though Mourinho is mentioned as a technician, the "players" here are clearly athletes).
Sense 4 is about social/sexual partners - not relevant.
Sense 5 is about business deals - not relevant.

Therefore, the correct sense is index 1.

Wait, I need to check the indexing. The user lists:
1. sense_key=player%1:18:01::
2. sense_key=player%1:18:02::
3. sense_key=player%1:18:00::
4. sense_key=player%1:18:04::
5. sense_key=player%1:18:03::

So the indices are 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 corresponding to the order listed. Sense 1 is the one about participating in a game.

Actually, looking at WordNet sense keys, the format is lemma%pos:lex_filenum:lex_id:head_word:head_id. But here the user has provided indexed senses numbered 1-5. I should return the index number from the list provided.

Sense 1: player%1:18:01:: - a person who participates in or is skilled at some game
This is the correct sense for athletes in football.

The context mentions:
- "world of football"
- "team of the Real Madrid organization"
- "physical integrity of the opposite players"
- "violent game"
- "team of the lawbreaker players"

All of these refer to athletes/footballers who participate in the sport/game.

So the answer should be {"sense_index": 1}.

provider: Novita


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: aspect
Target surface form: aspect
Context:
The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of football. It is so extended that it part of the ethos, of the unwritten rules, but followed nonetheless by this sport. Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician. Anyway, the debate deals with if that type of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport, that is to say, if with these actions fraud is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful actions with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense. The matter examines the type of damage that is brought to the sporting spirit. One of the advantages that include the sport spirit is the physical integrity of the opposite players, <t>aspect</t> that with these actions wasn't put into danger, that is to say, there was no violent game. Another of these advantages to which it is alluded to with the fare-play is to avoid that the team of the lawbreaker players takes advantage unjustly of the opposite team, which did not happen either.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=aspect%1:09:00:: | definition=a distinct feature or element in a problem | synonyms=facet | examples=he studied every facet of the question
2. sense_key=aspect%1:07:02:: | definition=a characteristic to be considered
3. sense_key=aspect%1:09:01:: | definition=the visual percept of a region | synonyms=view, prospect, scene, vista, panorama | examples=the most desirable feature of the park are the beautiful views
4. sense_key=aspect%1:24:00:: | definition=the beginning or duration or completion or repetition of the action of a verb
5. sense_key=aspect%1:07:01:: | definition=the feelings expressed on a person's face | synonyms=expression, look, facial expression, face | examples=a sad expression; a look of triumph

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation on the word "aspect" in the given context.

 Let me analyze the context:

 The sentence containing "aspect" is: "One of the advantages that include the sport spirit is the physical integrity of the opposite players, <t>aspect</t> that with these actions wasn't put into danger, that is to say, there was no violent game."

 So "aspect" here refers to "physical integrity of the opposite players" - it's describing a particular feature or element of the situation being discussed.

 Let me look at the candidate senses:

 1. sense_key=aspect%1:09:00:: | definition=a distinct feature or element in a problem | synonyms=facet | examples=he studied every facet of the question
 2. sense_key=aspect%1:07:02:: | definition=a characteristic to be considered
 3. sense_key=aspect%1:09:01:: | definition=the visual percept of a region | synonyms=view, prospect, scene, vista, panorama | examples=the most desirable feature of the park are the beautiful views
 4. sense_key=aspect%1:24:00:: | definition=the beginning or duration or completion or repetition of the action of a verb
 5. sense_key=aspect%1:07:01:: | definition=the feelings expressed on a person's face | synonyms=expression, look, facial expression, face | examples=a sad expression; a look of triumph

 The context is talking about "physical integrity of the opposite players" as an "aspect" that wasn't put into danger. This is clearly referring to a distinct feature or element of the situation - specifically, one facet or dimension of the sporting spirit/ethical considerations.

 Sense 1 seems to fit best: "a distinct feature or element in a problem" with synonym "facet". The example "he studied every facet of the question" aligns with how "aspect" is being used here - referring to a particular facet or dimension of the issue (physical integrity).

 Sense 2 says "a characteristic to be considered" - this is close but more general. Sense 1 specifically mentions "distinct feature or element in a problem" which fits better with the context of analyzing a debate about sporting ethics.

 Sense 3 is about visual perception (views, scenes), which doesn't fit.
 Sense 4 is grammatical (verb aspect), which doesn't fit.
 Sense 5 is about facial expressions, which doesn't fit.

 So the best choice is sense 1 (index 1).

 Wait, let me double-check the indexing. The user asks for "sense_index" in the JSON. Looking at the candidate senses, they are numbered 1, 2, 3, 4, 5. So I should return {"sense_index": 1}.

 Actually, looking carefully at the format:
 - Candidate sense 1 has key aspect%1:09:00::
 - Candidate sense 2 has key aspect%1:07:02::
 - etc.

 The question asks for the "single best indexed sense". The instructions say "Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}."

 So I need to return the index number (1, 2, 3, 4, or 5) corresponding to the best sense.

 My analysis says sense 1 is the best fit.

 Let me verify once more:
 - The text discusses "physical integrity of the opposite players" as an "aspect"
 - This is a distinct feature or element of the situation being analyzed
 - Synonym "facet" fits well here: "physical integrity... is a facet that wasn't put into danger"
 - Sense 2 "a characteristic to be considered" is also plausible but less specific than sense 1
 - The example for sense 1 "he studied every facet of the question" parallels the usage here where different facets/aspects of the sporting spirit are being examined

 Yes, sense 1 is the correct choice.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: action
Target surface form: actions
Context:
The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of football. It is so extended that it part of the ethos, of the unwritten rules, but followed nonetheless by this sport. Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician. Anyway, the debate deals with if that type of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport, that is to say, if with these actions fraud is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful actions with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense. The matter examines the type of damage that is brought to the sporting spirit. One of the advantages that include the sport spirit is the physical integrity of the opposite players, aspect that with these <t>actions</t> wasn't put into danger, that is to say, there was no violent game. Another of these advantages to which it is alluded to with the fare-play is to avoid that the team of the lawbreaker players takes advantage unjustly of the opposite team, which did not happen either.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=action%1:04:02:: | definition=something done (usually as opposed to something said) | examples=there were stories of murders and other unnatural actions
2. sense_key=action%1:26:00:: | definition=the state of being active | synonyms=activity, activeness | examples=his sphere of activity; he is out of action
3. sense_key=action%1:04:03:: | definition=a military engagement | synonyms=military action | examples=he saw action in Korea
4. sense_key=action%1:22:00:: | definition=a process existing in or produced by nature (rather than by the intent of human beings) | synonyms=natural process, natural action, activity | examples=the action of natural forces; volcanic activity
5. sense_key=action%1:10:00:: | definition=the series of events that form a plot | examples=his novels always have a lot of action
6. sense_key=action%1:07:00:: | definition=the trait of being active and energetic and forceful | examples=a man of action
7. sense_key=action%1:06:00:: | definition=the operating part that transmits power to a mechanism | synonyms=action mechanism | examples=the piano had a very stiff action
8. sense_key=action%1:04:01:: | definition=a judicial proceeding brought by one party against another; one party prosecutes another for a wrong done or for protection of a right or for prevention of a wrong | synonyms=legal action, action at law
9. sense_key=action%1:04:04:: | definition=an act by a government body or supranational organization | examples=recent federal action undermined the segregationist position; the United Nations must have the power to propose and organize action without being hobbled by irrelevant issues
10. sense_key=action%1:04:00:: | definition=the most important or interesting work or activity in a specific area or field | examples=the action is no longer in technology stocks but in municipal bonds; gawkers always try to get as close to the action as possible

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "actions" in the given context. The target lemma is "action" and the surface form is "actions".

Let me analyze the context carefully:

The text discusses football (soccer) and specifically mentions "actions" in the context of behavior that might constitute fraud or violate sporting spirit, even if not explicitly prohibited by regulations.

Key phrases:
- "if with these actions fraud is committed"
- "they are respectful actions with the sport regulation"
- "aspect that with these actions wasn't put into danger"
- "there was no violent game"

The word "actions" here refers to things done by players (specifically the provocative behavior of getting yellow cards, the "dramatization orchestrated by Mourinho", etc.). These are things people do, deeds, or behaviors.

Now let's look at the candidate senses:

1. sense_key=action%1:04:02:: | definition=something done (usually as opposed to something said) | examples=there were stories of murders and other unnatural actions
   - This seems to fit well. It refers to things done/deeds as opposed to words. The context is about behaviors/actions taken by players.

2. sense_key=action%1:26:00:: | definition=the state of being active | synonyms=activity, activeness | examples=his sphere of activity; he is out of action
   - This refers to the state of being active, not specific deeds. Doesn't fit.

3. sense_key=action%1:04:03:: | definition=a military engagement | synonyms=military action | examples=he saw action in Korea
   - Military context. Not relevant here.

4. sense_key=action%1:22:00:: | definition=a process existing in or produced by nature (rather than by the intent of human beings) | synonyms=natural process, natural action, activity | examples=the action of natural forces; volcanic activity
   - Natural processes. Not relevant.

5. sense_key=action%1:10:00:: | definition=the series of events that form a plot | examples=his novels always have a lot of action
   - Narrative/plot. Not relevant.

6. sense_key=action%1:07:00:: | definition=the trait of being active and energetic and forceful | examples=a man of action
   - Personal trait. Not quite right.

7. sense_key=action%1:06:00:: | definition=the operating part that transmits power to a mechanism | synonyms=action mechanism | examples=the piano had a very stiff action
   - Mechanical part. Not relevant.

8. sense_key=action%1:04:01:: | definition=a judicial proceeding brought by one party against another; one party prosecutes another for a wrong done or for protection of a right or for prevention of a wrong | synonyms=legal action, action at law
   - Legal proceedings. Not relevant.

9. sense_key=action%1:04:04:: | definition=an act by a government body or supranational organization | examples=recent federal action undermined the segregationist position; the United Nations must have the power to propose and organize action without being hobbled by irrelevant issues
   - Government/organizational acts. Not quite right, though close in that it refers to acts, but specifically governmental.

10. sense_key=action%1:04:00:: | definition=the most important or interesting work or activity in a specific area or field | examples=the action is no longer in technology stocks but in municipal bonds; gawkers always try to get as close to the action as possible
    - "Where the action is" - exciting activity. Not quite right.

Sense 1 seems the best fit: "something done (usually as opposed to something said)". The context discusses specific behaviors/deeds by players (provoking yellow cards, dramatization, etc.) and whether these actions constitute fraud or violate sporting spirit.

The examples for sense 1 include "there were stories of murders and other unnatural actions" - which shows it refers to deeds/acts committed.

In the text: "if with these actions fraud is committed" - clearly referring to the deeds/behaviors done by the players.

Therefore, the best sense is sense_key=action%1:04:02:: which corresponds to sense_index 1 (based on the ordering provided).

Wait, I need to check the indexing. The user asks for the "sense_index". Looking at the list:
1. sense_key=action%1:04:02::
2. sense_key=action%1:26:00::
3. sense_key=action%1:04:03::
4. sense_key=action%1:22:00::
5. sense_key=action%1:10:00::
6. sense_key=action%1:07:00::
7. sense_key=action%1:06:00::
8. sense_key=action%1:04:01::
9. sense_key=action%1:04:04::
10. sense_key=action%1:04:00::

So sense 1 is the first one in the list.

But wait, I should verify if any other sense could fit better.

Sense 9: "an act by a government body or supranational organization" - the text mentions "team of the Real Madrid organization" but the actions are by players/Mourinho, not really governmental. And the definition specifies government body or supranational organization.

Sense 1 is definitely the best: "something done (usually as opposed to something said)" - referring to the provocative behaviors, the dramatization, etc. These are things done/said (though the definition says as opposed to something said, the examples show it means deeds/acts).

Actually, looking at the gloss again: "something done (usually as opposed to something said)". The context mentions "dramatization" which could involve words, but the focus is on the behavioral acts - provoking yellow cards, etc.

Sense 1 is the general sense of a deed or act.

Therefore, the answer should be {"sense_index": 1}.

provider: DeepInfra


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: danger
Target surface form: danger
Context:
The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of football. It is so extended that it part of the ethos, of the unwritten rules, but followed nonetheless by this sport. Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician. Anyway, the debate deals with if that type of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport, that is to say, if with these actions fraud is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful actions with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense. The matter examines the type of damage that is brought to the sporting spirit. One of the advantages that include the sport spirit is the physical integrity of the opposite players, aspect that with these actions wasn't put into <t>danger</t>, that is to say, there was no violent game. Another of these advantages to which it is alluded to with the fare-play is to avoid that the team of the lawbreaker players takes advantage unjustly of the opposite team, which did not happen either.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=danger%1:26:00:: | definition=the condition of being susceptible to harm or injury | examples=you are in no danger; there was widespread danger of disease
2. sense_key=danger%1:04:00:: | definition=a venture undertaken without regard to possible loss or injury | synonyms=risk, peril | examples=he saw the rewards but not the risks of crime; there was a danger he would do the wrong thing
3. sense_key=danger%1:26:01:: | definition=a cause of pain or injury or loss | examples=he feared the dangers of traveling by air
4. sense_key=danger%1:15:00:: | definition=a dangerous place | examples=He moved out of danger

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "danger" in the given context.

 Let me analyze the context:
 - The text is about football/soccer, specifically discussing yellow cards, provocation, and the "sporting spirit"
 - The specific sentence containing the target word: "One of the advantages that include the sport spirit is the physical integrity of the opposite players, aspect that with these actions wasn't put into <t>danger</t>, that is to say, there was no violent game."

 Key phrase: "put into danger"
 - This is a common collocation meaning to expose something/someone to the risk of harm or injury
 - The context clarifies: "that is to say, there was no violent game" - meaning the physical integrity of players was not threatened/put at risk

 Now let's look at the candidate senses:

 1. sense_key=danger%1:26:00:: | definition=the condition of being susceptible to harm or injury | examples=you are in no danger; there was widespread danger of disease
    - This refers to the state/condition of being in danger
    - "put into danger" fits here - putting something into a state of being susceptible to harm
    - The example "you are in no danger" parallels "wasn't put into danger"

 2. sense_key=danger%1:04:00:: | definition=a venture undertaken without regard to possible loss or injury | synonyms=risk, peril | examples=he saw the rewards but not the risks of crime; there was a danger he would do the wrong thing
    - This seems to be about a risky action or venture
    - Doesn't fit "put into danger" - you don't put something into a venture
    - The synonyms are risk/peril as actions/ventures

 3. sense_key=danger%1:26:01:: | definition=a cause of pain or injury or loss | examples=he feared the dangers of traveling by air
    - This refers to the source/cause of harm (the danger itself)
    - "put into danger" doesn't fit well here - you don't put something into a cause
    - The example shows "dangers" as things to be feared (the threats themselves)

 4. sense_key=danger%1:15:00:: | definition=a dangerous place | examples=He moved out of danger
    - This is a location/place
    - "put into danger" could work spatially, but the context is about physical integrity of players, not a place
    - The example "moved out of danger" suggests a physical location

 Analysis:
 - The phrase "put into danger" means to cause something to be in a state where it is susceptible to harm
 - The context is about physical integrity not being threatened/endangered
 - Sense 1 (the condition of being susceptible to harm or injury) fits best
 - The negation "wasn't put into danger" parallels the example "you are in no danger"

 Wait, let me reconsider sense 3. Could "danger" here mean the cause/source?
 - "put into danger" - if danger is a cause, you don't really put something into a cause
 - But you can "put someone in danger" meaning expose them to the risk (condition)

 Actually, looking at WordNet structure:
 - danger%1:26:00:: is the state/condition (being in danger)
 - danger%1:26:01:: is the causal agent (the thing that causes danger)

 "Put into danger" clearly means to place something into the state/condition of being susceptible to harm.

 Also, the explanatory clause "that is to say, there was no violent game" indicates that the state/condition of being at risk was not present.

 Therefore, sense 1 is the correct choice.

 Wait, I need to check the sense indices. The user asks for the sense_index. Looking at the candidates:
 1. sense_key=danger%1:26:00::
 2. sense_key=danger%1:04:00::
 3. sense_key=danger%1:26:01::
 4. sense_key=danger%1:15:00::

 So sense_index would be 1.

 But let me double-check by looking at the actual WordNet senses to make sure I'm interpreting correctly.

 In WordNet 3.0/3.1:
 - danger.n.01: the condition of being susceptible to harm or injury ("you are in no danger")
 - danger.n.02: a venture undertaken without regard to possible loss or injury ("he saw the rewards but not the risks of crime")
 - danger.n.03: a cause of pain or injury or loss ("he feared the dangers of traveling by air")
 - danger.n.04: a dangerous place ("He moved out of danger")

 Yes, so:
 - Index 1: danger%1:26:00:: (the condition/state)
 - Index 2: danger%1:04:00:: (the venture/risk)
 - Index 3: danger%1:26:01:: (the cause)
 - Index 4: danger%1:15:00:: (the place)

 The context: "physical integrity ... wasn't put into danger"
 This means the physical integrity was not placed into a state of being susceptible to harm.

 This matches sense 1.

 The phrase "put into danger" is equivalent to "endanger" - to cause to be in danger (the state).

 So the answer should be {"sense_index": 1}.