[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: law
Target surface form: law
Context:
Sport and fraud <t>law</t> Tricks such as those of Alonso and Ramos before the Ajax demonstrate wittiness but not the will to get remove of a sanction.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=law%1:14:00:: | definition=the collection of rules imposed by authority | synonyms=jurisprudence | examples=civilization presupposes respect for the law; the great problem for jurisprudence to allow freedom while enforcing order
2. sense_key=law%1:10:00:: | definition=legal document setting forth rules governing a particular kind of activity | examples=there is a law against kidnapping
3. sense_key=law%1:09:00:: | definition=a rule or body of rules of conduct inherent in human nature and essential to or binding upon human society | synonyms=natural law
4. sense_key=law%1:09:01:: | definition=a generalization that describes recurring facts or events in nature | synonyms=law of nature | examples=the laws of thermodynamics
5. sense_key=law%1:09:02:: | definition=the branch of philosophy concerned with the law and the principles that lead courts to make the decisions they do | synonyms=jurisprudence, legal philosophy
6. sense_key=law%1:04:00:: | definition=the learned profession that is mastered by graduate study in a law school and that is responsible for the judicial system | synonyms=practice of law | examples=he studied law at Yale
7. sense_key=law%1:14:01:: | definition=the force of policemen and officers | synonyms=police, police force, constabulary | examples=the law came looking for him

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "law" in the given context.

Context: "Sport and fraud <t>law</t> Tricks such as those of Alonso and Ramos before the Ajax demonstrate wittiness but not the will to get remove of a sanction."

Let me analyze the context:
- The phrase is "Sport and fraud law"
- It seems to be referring to a specific domain or field of law
- The context mentions "Tricks such as those of Alonso and Ramos before the Ajax" - this refers to football/soccer players (Xabi Alonso and Sergio Ramos playing for Real Madrid against Ajax)
- The text discusses "fraud" in the context of sports, specifically tricks to avoid sanctions/cards in football
- "Sport and fraud law" appears to be a compound noun phrase referring to the legal field dealing with sports and fraud

Now let's look at the candidate senses:

1. sense_key=law%1:14:00:: | definition=the collection of rules imposed by authority | synonyms=jurisprudence | examples=civilization presupposes respect for the law; the great problem for jurisprudence to allow freedom while enforcing order
   - This refers to law as a general concept/system of rules
   - "Sport and fraud law" could fit here as a specific domain within the general collection of rules

2. sense_key=law%1:10:00:: | definition=legal document setting forth rules governing a particular kind of activity | examples=there is a law against kidnapping
   - This refers to a specific statute or legal document
   - "Sport and fraud law" doesn't sound like a single document, but rather a field/area

3. sense_key=law%1:09:00:: | definition=a rule or body of rules of conduct inherent in human nature and essential to or binding upon human society | synonyms=natural law
   - This is natural law, inherent rules
   - Doesn't fit "sport and fraud law" which is clearly positive law (man-made)

4. sense_key=law%1:09:01:: | definition=a generalization that describes recurring facts or events in nature | synonyms=law of nature | examples=the laws of thermodynamics
   - Scientific laws
   - Not relevant here

5. sense_key=law%1:09:02:: | definition=the branch of philosophy concerned with the law and the principles that lead courts to make the decisions they do | synonyms=jurisprudence, legal philosophy
   - This is the academic study/philosophy of law
   - "Sport and fraud law" sounds like a substantive field of law, not just the philosophy of it

6. sense_key=law%1:04:00:: | definition=the learned profession that is mastered by graduate study in a law school and that is responsible for the judicial system | synonyms=practice of law | examples=he studied law at Yale
   - This refers to the profession or the field of study as a career
   - "Sport and fraud law" could be a specialization within the profession, but the context seems to be about the rules themselves or the legal domain

7. sense_key=law%1:14:01:: | definition=the force of policemen and officers | synonyms=police, police force, constabulary | examples=the law came looking for him
   - This refers to law enforcement/police
   - Doesn't fit "sport and fraud law"

Now, looking at "Sport and fraud law" - this appears to be a heading or title referring to the body of legal rules concerning sports and fraud. This is most likely sense 1: "the collection of rules imposed by authority" (jurisprudence in the broad sense).

However, I should also consider if it could be sense 6 (the profession/field of study). But the context discusses specific tricks and sanctions, suggesting the actual rules/regulations rather than the profession.

Sense 1 (law%1:14:00::) is defined as "the collection of rules imposed by authority" with synonym "jurisprudence". This is the broad sense of law as a system.

But wait, looking at the WordNet hierarchy:
- 1:14 usually refers to groups/collections of people or things (noun.group)
- 1:10 refers to documents/communication (noun.communication)
- 1:09 refers to cognition/ideas (noun.cognition)
- 1:04 refers to acts/activities (noun.act)

Actually, looking at the sense keys:
- law%1:14:00:: - noun.group - the collection of rules imposed by authority
- law%1:10:00:: - noun.communication - legal document
- law%1:09:00:: - noun.cognition - natural law
- law%1:09:01:: - noun.cognition - law of nature (scientific)
- law%1:09:02:: - noun.cognition - legal philosophy
- law%1:04:00:: - noun.act - practice of law (profession)
- law%1:14:01:: - noun.group - police force

In the phrase "Sport and fraud law", "law" is being used to mean the field or body of law dealing with sports and fraud. This is closest to sense 1: "the collection of rules imposed by authority".

However, I should consider if "Sport and fraud law" could be interpreted as "the law [regarding] sport and fraud" where "law" means the legal field (sense 6 - the profession), or the body of rules (sense 1).

Given the examples for sense 1: "civilization presupposes respect for the law" - this is the general concept of law.
Given the examples for sense 6: "he studied law at Yale" - this is the academic subject/profession.

"Sport and fraud law" is parallel to phrases like "criminal law", "contract law", "environmental law" - these refer to branches or domains of law. In WordNet, these would likely map to sense 1 (the collection of rules in a specific domain) or possibly sense 6 (the field of study).

But looking at the definition of sense 1: "the collection of rules imposed by authority" - this can be specialized: "the collection of rules [regarding sports and fraud] imposed by authority".

Sense 6 is specifically about the profession: "the learned profession that is mastered by graduate study..."

The context is discussing specific tricks and sanctions, which suggests the rules themselves, not the profession. So sense 1 seems best.

Wait, I should double-check the context. The sentence is: "Sport and fraud law Tricks such as those of Alonso and Ramos before the Ajax demonstrate wittiness but not the will to get remove of a sanction."

This looks like it might be a heading: "Sport and fraud law" followed by a discussion. Or it could be "Sport and fraud law tricks..." meaning tricks related to sport and fraud law.

Actually, looking closely: "Sport and fraud <t>law</t> Tricks" - this suggests "law" is between "fraud" and "Tricks". So: "Sport and fraud law. Tricks such as..." or "Sport and fraud law tricks..."

If it's "Sport and fraud law tricks", then "law" is attributive/modifying "tricks", meaning "legal tricks in sport and fraud" or "tricks regarding sport and fraud law".

But the most natural reading is that "Sport and fraud law" is a noun phrase, possibly a heading or topic, and "Tricks" starts the next sentence or clause.

Given "Sport and fraud law" as a compound term, this refers to the legal domain covering sports and fraud. This is sense 1.

But let me reconsider sense 2: "legal document setting forth rules governing a particular kind of activity". Could "Sport and fraud law" refer to a specific statute? Unlikely, as it's too broad. It's a field.

Sense 1 is the best fit: the collection of rules imposed by authority (specifically regarding sport and fraud).

Actually, looking at the WordNet definitions again, sense 1 is often the general sense of "law" as in "the law" (the legal system). Sense 6 is the profession.

In many WSD datasets, when "law" is used in compounds like "criminal law", "commercial law", it is often mapped to sense 1.

Therefore, I choose sense 1.

Wait, I need to be careful. The index in the output should correspond to the numbering in the candidate list. The user lists:
1. sense_key=law%1:14:00::
2. sense_key=law%1:10:00::
3. sense_key=law%1:09:00::
4. sense_key=law%1:09:01::
5. sense_key=law%1:09:02::
6. sense_key=law%1:04:00::
7. sense_key=law%1:14:01::

So if I choose sense 1 (law%1:14:00::), the output should be {"sense_index": 1}.

Let me double-check if any other sense could fit better.

Could it be sense 6 (the profession)? "He practices sport and fraud law" - this would work, but the context doesn't clearly indicate the profession. It mentions "sanction" which is a legal concept, and "tricks" which are actions. The text seems to be discussing the rules themselves.

Could it be sense 2 (a specific legal document)? "The sport and fraud law [of 2020]"? No, there's no article suggesting a specific document.

Sense 1 is definitely the best choice.

One final check: is there any chance "law" here refers to "police" (sense 7)? "The law came looking for him" - no, "Sport and fraud law" doesn't mean police.

So the answer is sense 1.


attempt_kind: initial

status: success

[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: trick
Target surface form: Tricks
Context:
Sport and fraud law <t>Tricks</t> such as those of Alonso and Ramos before the Ajax demonstrate wittiness but not the will to get remove of a sanction. The expulsion presumably forged by two players of Real Madrid (Xabi Alonso and Sergio Ramos) in the game played on the 23rd of November against Ajax in European Champions League has caused rivers of ink to be written about if such behavior is or is not unsportsmanlike and if, both players should be sanctioned by UEFA.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=trick%1:04:05:: | definition=a cunning or deceitful action or device | synonyms=fast one | examples=he played a trick on me; he pulled a fast one and got away with it
2. sense_key=trick%1:28:00:: | definition=a period of work or duty
3. sense_key=trick%1:04:04:: | definition=an attempt to get you to do something foolish or imprudent | examples=that offer was a dirty trick
4. sense_key=trick%1:04:00:: | definition=a ludicrous or grotesque act done for fun and amusement | synonyms=antic, joke, prank, caper, put-on
5. sense_key=trick%1:04:02:: | definition=an illusory feat; considered magical by naive observers | synonyms=magic trick, conjuring trick, magic, legerdemain, conjuration, thaumaturgy
6. sense_key=trick%1:18:00:: | definition=a prostitute's customer | synonyms=whoremaster, whoremonger, john
7. sense_key=trick%1:04:01:: | definition=(card games) in a single round, the sequence of cards played by all the players; the high card is the winner

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

finish_reason: stop

role: assistant

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "trick" (surface form "Tricks") in the given context.

Let me analyze the context:
- The text is about sports (football/soccer) and fraud law
- It mentions "Tricks such as those of Alonso and Ramos before the Ajax"
- These tricks "demonstrate wittiness but not the will to get remove of a sanction"
- It refers to expulsions presumably forged by two players
- The behavior is being discussed as potentially unsportsmanlike

The context describes players intentionally getting yellow cards/expulsions (presumably to serve suspensions in less important matches). This is a deceptive, cunning action to manipulate the rules/sanctions.

Now let's look at the candidate senses:

1. sense_key=trick%1:04:05:: | definition=a cunning or deceitful action or device | synonyms=fast one | examples=he played a trick on me; he pulled a fast one and got away with it
   - This fits well. The players' actions were cunning/deceitful attempts to manipulate the system (get suspended intentionally to clear their record for future important matches).

2. sense_key=trick%1:28:00:: | definition=a period of work or duty
   - Doesn't fit. Not about work shifts.

3. sense_key=trick%1:04:04:: | definition=an attempt to get you to do something foolish or imprudent | examples=that offer was a dirty trick
   - This is close, but the players aren't trying to get someone else to do something foolish - they're performing a deceitful action themselves.

4. sense_key=trick%1:04:00:: | definition=a ludicrous or grotesque act done for fun and amusement | synonyms=antic, joke, prank, caper, put-on
   - Doesn't fit. While it mentions "wittiness", the context is about serious rule manipulation, not fun/amusement.

5. sense_key=trick%1:04:02:: | definition=an illusory feat; considered magical by naive observers | synonyms=magic trick, conjuring trick, magic, legerdemain, conjuration, thaumaturgy
   - Doesn't fit. Not about magic.

6. sense_key=trick%1:18:00:: | definition=a prostitute's customer | synonyms=whoremaster, whoremonger, john
   - Doesn't fit. Wrong domain entirely.

7. sense_key=trick%1:04:01:: | definition=(card games) in a single round, the sequence of cards played by all the players; the high card is the winner
   - Doesn't fit. Not about card games.

Between sense 1 and sense 3:
- Sense 1: "a cunning or deceitful action or device" - This describes the players' actions perfectly. They committed intentional fouls to get cards (a deceitful manipulation of the rules).
- Sense 3: "an attempt to get you to do something foolish or imprudent" - This would imply the players are tricking someone else into doing something foolish. But here, the "trick" is the action itself (getting intentionally booked), not an attempt to make someone else act foolishly.

The context mentions "Tricks such as those of Alonso and Ramos" referring to their intentional fouls/expulsions to manipulate sanctions. This is clearly a "cunning or deceitful action" (sense 1).

The phrase "he played a trick on me" from the examples of sense 1 is metaphorically similar - the players are playing a trick on the system/authorities.

Therefore, the best sense is sense 1 (index 1).

Wait, I need to check the indexing. The user lists:
1. sense_key=trick%1:04:05::
2. sense_key=trick%1:28:00::
3. sense_key=trick%1:04:04::
4. sense_key=trick%1:04:00::
5. sense_key=trick%1:04:02::
6. sense_key=trick%1:18:00::
7. sense_key=trick%1:04:01::

So sense 1 is the first one in the list.

Actually, looking carefully at the context again: "Tricks such as those of Alonso and Ramos before the Ajax demonstrate wittiness but not the will to get remove of a sanction."

The "tricks" here refer to the intentional getting of yellow cards/red cards to serve suspensions strategically. This is indeed a cunning/deceitful action (sense 1).

Sense 3 is about tricking someone into doing something foolish. That's not quite right because the players aren't tricking Ajax or the referee into doing something foolish - they are themselves performing a deceptive act to gain an advantage.

Actually, looking at sense 3 again: "an attempt to get you to do something foolish or imprudent". This could potentially fit if we consider they tricked the referee into giving them cards... but that's not quite right. They didn't trick the referee - they intentionally committed fouls. The referee correctly gave them cards. The "trick" is on the system/rules, not on a person being made to do something foolish.

Sense 1 is definitely the best fit: "a cunning or deceitful action or device".

The answer should be {"sense_index": 1}.

format: unknown

native_finish_reason: stop

provider: ModelRun

currency: USD


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: will
Target surface form: will
Context:
Sport and fraud law Tricks such as those of Alonso and Ramos before the Ajax demonstrate wittiness but not the <t>will</t> to get remove of a sanction. The expulsion presumably forged by two players of Real Madrid (Xabi Alonso and Sergio Ramos) in the game played on the 23rd of November against Ajax in European Champions League has caused rivers of ink to be written about if such behavior is or is not unsportsmanlike and if, both players should be sanctioned by UEFA.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=will%1:09:00:: | definition=the capability of conscious choice and decision and intention; - George Meredith | synonyms=volition | examples=the exercise of their volition we construe as revolt
2. sense_key=will%1:09:01:: | definition=a fixed and persistent intent or purpose | examples=where there's a will there's a way
3. sense_key=will%1:10:00:: | definition=a legal document declaring a person's wishes regarding the disposal of their property when they die | synonyms=testament

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation on the word "will" in the given context.

Let me analyze the context:
- The text is about football (soccer) players Alonso and Ramos allegedly getting themselves deliberately booked/expelled in a match against Ajax
- The sentence says: "Tricks such as those of Alonso and Ramos before the Ajax demonstrate wittiness but not the will to get remove of a sanction."
- Actually, looking closely at the text: "demonstrate wittiness but not the <t>will</t> to get remove of a sanction" - this seems like it might be a translation or non-native English. It probably means "not the will to get rid of/remove a sanction" or something similar.
- Wait, let me reread: "demonstrate wittiness but not the will to get remove of a sanction" - this is awkward English. It probably means "not the will to avoid a sanction" or "not the will to get rid of a sanction" or perhaps "not the will to accept/face a sanction"?
- Actually, looking at the broader context: The players presumably deliberately got themselves sent off (expelled) to... wait, why would they want to get expelled deliberately? Usually players avoid sanctions. But in this case, they might have wanted to get booked to serve a suspension in a less important match?
- Actually, the text says: "the expulsion presumably forged by two players... has caused rivers of ink to be written about if such behavior is or is not unsportsmanlike"
- The key phrase is: "demonstrate wittiness but not the will to get remove of a sanction"
- Maybe it means: "demonstrate wittiness but not the will to get rid of a sanction" - i.e., they don't show the determination/desire to avoid the sanction?
- Or maybe: "demonstrate wittiness but not the will to accept removal of a sanction"?
- Actually, looking at it again: "not the will to get remove of a sanction" - this is likely a typo for "not the will to get rid of a sanction" or similar.

But regardless of the exact grammatical awkwardness, the meaning seems to be about:
- The players demonstrated cleverness/cunning (wittiness)
- But they did not demonstrate the "will" (intention/determination/purpose) regarding the sanction

Now let's look at the candidate senses:

1. sense_key=will%1:09:00:: | definition=the capability of conscious choice and decision and intention; - George Meredith | synonyms=volition | examples=the exercise of their volition we construe as revolt
   - This is about the capability/power of choosing, volition itself.

2. sense_key=will%1:09:01:: | definition=a fixed and persistent intent or purpose | examples=where there's a will there's a way
   - This is about having a strong intention, determination, or purpose. The example "where there's a will there's a way" suggests determination or resolve.

3. sense_key=will%1:10:00:: | definition=a legal document declaring a person's wishes regarding the disposal of their property when they die | synonyms=testament
   - This is clearly about a legal will/testament. Not relevant here.

So it's between sense 1 and sense 2.

Sense 1 (volition/capability of conscious choice): This refers to the faculty or power of making conscious choices. It's more about the general capacity to choose.

Sense 2 (fixed and persistent intent or purpose): This refers to a specific intention or determination to achieve something. The example "where there's a will there's a way" illustrates this - it means determination or resolve.

In the context: "demonstrate wittiness but not the will to..."
- This seems to mean they don't show the determination/desire/intention to deal with the sanction in a proper way, or they lack the determination to avoid such tricks?
- Actually, reading carefully: The tricks demonstrate wittiness but not the will to get remove of a sanction......
- Wait, perhaps it means: "not the will to get rid of a sanction" - i.e., they don't show the proper intention/desire to avoid being sanctioned (they accepted the sanction by deliberately getting booked)?
- Or perhaps it's saying: they showed cunning but not the "will" (in the sense of volition/intention) to actually remove/avoid the sanction?

Actually, looking at the phrase "will to get remove of a sanction" - this is very garbled. But I think the intended meaning is something like: "the will to get rid of a sanction" or "the will to avoid a sanction".

But the key is: "will" here means "intention" or "determination" or "desire".

Sense 2 is defined as "a fixed and persistent intent or purpose" - this fits better with the idea of having the determination/intention to do something (like avoid a sanction).

Sense 1 is more about the general faculty of volition itself.

The phrase "the will to [do something]" typically uses "will" in sense 2 (intent/purpose/determination), not sense 1 (the faculty of volition).

For example:
- "He has the will to succeed" = he has the determination/intention to succeed (sense 2)
- "The will to power" (Nietzsche) = the desire/drive for power (sense 2)
- "Where there's a will there's a way" (sense 2)

Sense 1 would be used in contexts like:
- "freedom of the will" (philosophical discussions about free will)
- "an act of will"
- "the will as a faculty"

In this sports context, saying players don't show "the will to..." means they don't show the intention/determination/desire to...

Therefore, sense 2 (will%1:09:01::) is the best choice.

Wait, let me double-check the context. The sentence is: "demonstrate wittiness but not the will to get remove of a sanction."

Actually, could it mean "will" as in "last will and testament"? No, that's clearly sense 3 and makes no sense here.

Could it mean the legal document? No.

So it's definitely between 1 and 2.

The phrase structure "the will to [verb]" almost always uses sense 2 (fixed and persistent intent or purpose).

Examples of "will to":
- "the will to live"
- "the will to power"
- "the will to survive"
- "the will to win"

These all refer to determination, drive, intention - not the abstract faculty of volition.

Therefore, sense 2 is correct.

Sense index: 2

Wait, the user asks me to return {"sense_index": 2} - but I need to check which index corresponds to which sense.

Looking at the candidates:
1. sense_key=will%1:09:00::
2. sense_key=will%1:09:01::
3. sense_key=will%1:10:00::

So sense 2 is the second one (will%1:09:01::).

Therefore: {"sense_index": 2}

But let me reconsider if it could be sense 1. Sense 1 is "the capability of conscious choice and decision and intention". This is more like "free will" - the capacity itself. In the context "not the will to...", if we interpret it as "not the faculty/capacity to choose to...", it could fit, but that's less likely.

The example for sense 1: "the exercise of their volition we construe as revolt" - this is talking about volition as an abstract concept.

The example for sense 2: "where there's a will there's a way" - this is about having determination/intention.

In the given sentence: "not the will to get remove of a sanction" - this parallels structures like "not the will to survive", "not the will to fight", etc. It means they lack the determination/desire to deal with the sanction properly (or to avoid it).

Actually, looking at the context again: The players deliberately got themselves booked (expelled) - this is a trick to manipulate the system (perhaps to serve a suspension in a less important match). The text says this demonstrates "wittiness" (cleverness) but not "the will to get remove of a sanction" - this is confusing.

Wait, maybe "get remove" is a typo for "get rid of"? "not the will to get rid of a sanction" - meaning they don't have the proper intention/desire to avoid sanctions, so they accept this manipulation instead?

Or maybe it's saying they don't have the will (in the sense of volition/intention) that would lead to avoiding sanctions properly?

Regardless, "will" here clearly means "intention" or "determination", which maps to sense 2.

One final check: Could "will" here mean "volition" in the philosophical sense? Like "exercise of volition"? The text says "demonstrate wittiness but not the will..." - wittiness is a quality, so "will" here is likely also a quality or state of mind - specifically, the quality of being determined or having proper intent. This fits sense 2 (fixed and persistent intent) better than sense 1 (the capability itself).

Yes, I'm confident it's sense 2.

So the answer is {"sense_index": 2}.

provider: DigitalOcean


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: expulsion
Target surface form: expulsion
Context:
Sport and fraud law Tricks such as those of Alonso and Ramos before the Ajax demonstrate wittiness but not the will to get remove of a sanction. The <t>expulsion</t> presumably forged by two players of Real Madrid (Xabi Alonso and Sergio Ramos) in the game played on the 23rd of November against Ajax in European Champions League has caused rivers of ink to be written about if such behavior is or is not unsportsmanlike and if, both players should be sanctioned by UEFA. As we all know, a few minutes before the end of the game (that their team had already won), both players deliberately wasted time which made the referee show the second yellow card to both of them.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=expulsion%1:04:01:: | definition=the act of forcing out someone or something | synonyms=ejection, exclusion, riddance | examples=the ejection of troublemakers by the police; the child's expulsion from school
2. sense_key=expulsion%1:04:02:: | definition=squeezing out by applying pressure | synonyms=extrusion | examples=an unexpected extrusion of toothpaste from the bottom of the tube; the expulsion of pus from the pimple
3. sense_key=expulsion%1:04:00:: | definition=the act of expelling or projecting or ejecting | synonyms=projection, ejection, forcing out

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "expulsion" in the given context.

 Let me analyze the context:
 - The text is about football (soccer) players Xabi Alonso and Sergio Ramos getting expelled from a game
 - They deliberately wasted time to get second yellow cards (which results in expulsion from the game)
 - The expulsion was presumably "forged" (intentionally gotten) to avoid future sanctions (accumulation of yellow cards)
 - This is about being sent off/removed from a football match

 Now let's look at the candidate senses:

 1. sense_key=expulsion%1:04:01:: | definition=the act of forcing out someone or something | synonyms=ejection, exclusion, riddance | examples=the ejection of troublemakers by the police; the child's expulsion from school
    - This seems to fit: being forced out of the game/match
    - "expulsion from school" is similar to expulsion from a game
    - "ejection of troublemakers" - being sent off the field

 2. sense_key=expulsion%1:04:02:: | definition=squeezing out by applying pressure | synonyms=extrusion | examples=an unexpected extrusion of toothpaste from the bottom of the tube; the expulsion of pus from the pimple
    - This is about physical squeezing/extrusion of substances
    - Not relevant to being sent off a football field

 3. sense_key=expulsion%1:04:00:: | definition=the act of expelling or projecting or ejecting | synonyms=projection, ejection, forcing out
    - This seems more about physical projection (like throwing something out)
    - The examples would likely involve physical objects being thrown/projected
    - While "ejection" is similar, "projection" suggests a different meaning (like projecting an image or throwing something forward)

 Comparing sense 1 and sense 3:
 - Sense 1 focuses on forcing someone out (exclusion, riddance) - social/organizational removal
 - Sense 3 focuses on the physical act of projecting/ejecting (like a volcano ejecting lava, or a gun ejecting a shell)

 In the context of football/soccer, when a player gets a red card (or second yellow), they are "expelled" from the game - meaning they are forced to leave, excluded from further participation. This matches sense 1 (forcing out someone).

 The examples in sense 1 include "the child's expulsion from school" which is directly analogous to a player's expulsion from a game.

 Sense 3 seems more about the physical mechanics of ejection (like a pilot ejecting from a plane, or a volcano ejecting material).

 Therefore, sense 1 (expulsion%1:04:01::) is the best fit.

 Wait, let me double-check the WordNet sense keys. The user lists:
 1. expulsion%1:04:01::
 2. expulsion%1:04:02::
 3. expulsion%1:04:00::

 In WordNet, the format is lemma%ss_type:lex_filenum:lex_id:head_word:head_id
 But here they seem to be using a simplified format or the user has provided specific sense keys.

 Actually, looking at standard WordNet 3.0:
 - expulsion.n.01: the act of expelling or projecting or ejecting (synonyms: projection, ejection, forcing out)
 - expulsion.n.02: the act of forcing out someone or something (synonyms: ejection, exclusion, riddance)
 - expulsion.n.03: squeezing out by applying pressure (synonym: extrusion)

 But the indices in the prompt are:
 1. expulsion%1:04:01:: (forcing out someone)
 2. expulsion%1:04:02:: (squeezing out)
 3. expulsion%1:04:00:: (projecting/ejecting)

 So the mapping seems to be:
 - Index 1 in the list = expulsion.n.02 (forcing out someone)
 - Index 2 in the list = expulsion.n.03 (squeezing out)
 - Index 3 in the list = expulsion.n.01 (projecting/ejecting)

 The context is about football players being sent off the field - this is clearly "forcing out someone" (sense 1 in the candidate list).

 The text mentions: "the referee show the second yellow card to both of them" which results in them being removed from the game. This is exclusion/ejection from the game.

 So the answer should be sense_index: 1.

 Let me verify once more:
 - "The expulsion presumably forged by two players..." - they intentionally got themselves expelled/removed from the game
 - This is about being forced to leave the game (exclusion)
 - Not about physical projection (sense 3)
 - Not about squeezing toothpaste (sense 2)

 Yes, sense 1 is correct.

provider: Phala


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: player
Target surface form: players
Context:
Sport and fraud law Tricks such as those of Alonso and Ramos before the Ajax demonstrate wittiness but not the will to get remove of a sanction. The expulsion presumably forged by two <t>players</t> of Real Madrid (Xabi Alonso and Sergio Ramos) in the game played on the 23rd of November against Ajax in European Champions League has caused rivers of ink to be written about if such behavior is or is not unsportsmanlike and if, both players should be sanctioned by UEFA. As we all know, a few minutes before the end of the game (that their team had already won), both players deliberately wasted time which made the referee show the second yellow card to both of them.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=player%1:18:01:: | definition=a person who participates in or is skilled at some game | synonyms=participant
2. sense_key=player%1:18:02:: | definition=someone who plays a musical instrument (as a profession) | synonyms=musician, instrumentalist
3. sense_key=player%1:18:00:: | definition=a theatrical performer | synonyms=actor, histrion, thespian, role player
4. sense_key=player%1:18:04:: | definition=a person who pursues a number of different social and sexual partners simultaneously
5. sense_key=player%1:18:03:: | definition=an important participant (as in a business deal) | examples=he was a major player in setting up the corporation

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "players" in the given context.

 Context analysis:
 - The text is about sports (football/soccer specifically)
 - It mentions "Alonso and Ramos" who are famous football players
 - It mentions "Real Madrid" which is a football club
 - It mentions "Ajax" which is another football club
 - It mentions "European Champions League" which is a football competition
 - It mentions "referee", "yellow card", "expulsion" - all football terminology
 - The players are described as participating in a game/match

 Candidate senses:
 1. player%1:18:01:: - a person who participates in or is skilled at some game | synonyms=participant
 2. player%1:18:02:: - someone who plays a musical instrument (as a profession) | synonyms=musician, instrumentalist
 3. player%1:18:00:: - a theatrical performer | synonyms=actor, histrion, thespian, role player
 4. player%1:18:04:: - a person who pursues a number of different social and sexual partners simultaneously
 5. player%1:18:03:: - an important participant (as in a business deal) | examples=he was a major player in setting up the corporation

 Analysis:
 - Sense 1 refers to someone who participates in a game/sport. This fits perfectly as Alonso and Ramos are football players participating in a Champions League match.
 - Sense 2 refers to musicians. Not relevant here.
 - Sense 3 refers to actors. Not relevant here.
 - Sense 4 refers to someone with multiple romantic/sexual partners. Not relevant here.
 - Sense 5 refers to an important participant in business deals. While "player" can be used metaphorically in business, here it's literal sports context.

 The context clearly describes athletes/footballers participating in a sports game (European Champions League match). Therefore, sense 1 is the correct choice.

 The index requested is the sense number. Looking at the format:
 - sense_key=player%1:18:01:: corresponds to sense_index 1
 - sense_key=player%1:18:02:: corresponds to sense_index 2
 - sense_key=player%1:18:00:: corresponds to sense_index 3 (note the 00)
 - sense_key=player%1:18:04:: corresponds to sense_index 4
 - sense_key=player%1:18:03:: corresponds to sense_index 5

 Wait, I need to be careful about the indexing. The user asks for "sense_index" and the candidates are numbered 1-5 in the list. However, looking at the WordNet sense keys:
 - player%1:18:01:: is listed as candidate 1
 - player%1:18:02:: is listed as candidate 2
 - player%1:18:00:: is listed as candidate 3
 - player%1:18:04:: is listed as candidate 4
 - player%1:18:03:: is listed as candidate 5

 But the question asks for the "best indexed sense". The sense keys contain the lexicographer file number (18) and then the sense number (01, 02, 00, 04, 03).

 However, the user lists them as:
 1. sense_key=player%1:18:01::
 2. sense_key=player%1:18:02::
 3. sense_key=player%1:18:00::
 4. sense_key=player%1:18:04::
 5. sense_key=player%1:18:03::

 So if I choose the first one (the sports participant), the answer should be {"sense_index": 1}.

 Let me double-check the WordNet sense ordering. In WordNet, the sense numbers after the last :: usually indicate the sense number, but they can be 00, 01, 02, etc. The order in the candidate list is:
 1. player%1:18:01:: (game participant)
 2. player%1:18:02:: (musician)
 3. player%1:18:00:: (actor) - note this is 00, which is often the first sense, but here it's listed third
 4. player%1:18:04:: (womanizer/playboy)
 5. player%1:18:03:: (business participant)

 Actually, looking at WordNet, the most common sense for "player" is the sports participant. The sense keys might be ordered differently than the frequency.

 But the user has explicitly numbered them 1-5. So I should return the number corresponding to the correct entry in the list.

 Entry 1: game participant - this is the correct sense for football players.
 Entry 2: musician - incorrect
 Entry 3: actor - incorrect
 Entry 4: womanizer - incorrect
 Entry 5: business participant - incorrect (though metaphorically one could say they are "players" in the game, the specific context is about actual sports players in a football match)

 Therefore, the answer is {"sense_index": 1}.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: game
Target surface form: game
Context:
Sport and fraud law Tricks such as those of Alonso and Ramos before the Ajax demonstrate wittiness but not the will to get remove of a sanction. The expulsion presumably forged by two players of Real Madrid (Xabi Alonso and Sergio Ramos) in the <t>game</t> played on the 23rd of November against Ajax in European Champions League has caused rivers of ink to be written about if such behavior is or is not unsportsmanlike and if, both players should be sanctioned by UEFA. As we all know, a few minutes before the end of the game (that their team had already won), both players deliberately wasted time which made the referee show the second yellow card to both of them.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=game%1:04:00:: | definition=a contest with rules to determine a winner | examples=you need four people to play this game
2. sense_key=game%1:04:03:: | definition=a single play of a sport or other contest | examples=the game lasted two hours
3. sense_key=game%1:04:01:: | definition=an amusement or pastime | examples=they played word games; he thought of his painting as a game that filled his empty time
4. sense_key=game%1:05:00:: | definition=animal hunted for food or sport
5. sense_key=game%1:28:00:: | definition=(tennis) a division of play during which one player serves
6. sense_key=game%1:23:00:: | definition=(games) the score at a particular point or the score needed to win | examples=the game is 6 all; he is serving for the game
7. sense_key=game%1:13:00:: | definition=the flesh of wild animals that is used for food
8. sense_key=game%1:09:00:: | definition=a secret scheme to do something (especially something underhand or illegal) | synonyms=plot, secret plan | examples=they concocted a plot to discredit the governor; I saw through his little game from the start
9. sense_key=game%1:06:00:: | definition=the game equipment needed in order to play a particular game | examples=the child received several games for his birthday
10. sense_key=game%1:04:02:: | definition=your occupation or line of work | synonyms=biz | examples=he's in the plumbing game; she's in show biz
11. sense_key=game%1:04:04:: | definition=frivolous or trifling behavior | examples=for actors, memorizing lines is no game; for him, life is all fun and games

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "game" in the given context.

 Let me analyze the context:
 - The text is about a football (soccer) match between Real Madrid and Ajax in the European Champions League
 - It mentions "the game played on the 23rd of November against Ajax"
 - It discusses players getting expelled/sent off during this game
 - It mentions "a few minutes before the end of the game"

 Now let's look at the candidate senses:

 1. game%1:04:00:: - a contest with rules to determine a winner (general contest)
 2. game%1:04:03:: - a single play of a sport or other contest (specific instance/match)
 3. game%1:04:01:: - an amusement or pastime
 4. game%1:05:00:: - animal hunted for food or sport
 5. game%1:28:00:: - (tennis) a division of play during which one player serves
 6. game%1:23:00:: - (games) the score at a particular point or the score needed to win
 7. game%1:13:00:: - the flesh of wild animals that is used for food
 8. game%1:09:00:: - a secret scheme to do something (plot)
 9. game%1:06:00:: - the game equipment needed in order to play a particular game
 10. game%1:04:02:: - your occupation or line of work
 11. game%1:04:04:: - frivolous or trifling behavior

 The context clearly refers to a specific football match between Real Madrid and Ajax. This is a sporting contest.

 Sense 1: "a contest with rules to determine a winner" - This is more general, referring to the concept of a game.
 Sense 2: "a single play of a sport or other contest" - This refers to a specific instance/match/event. The example given is "the game lasted two hours" which fits perfectly with the context talking about a specific match on a specific date.

 The phrase "the game played on the 23rd of November" indicates a specific sporting event/match, not the general concept of a game, not equipment, not a scheme, etc.

 Sense 2 (game%1:04:03::) seems to be the best fit because:
 - It refers to a single play/instance of a sport
 - The example "the game lasted two hours" aligns with talking about a specific match
 - The context is talking about a specific Champions League match on November 23rd

 Sense 1 is also possible (a contest), but Sense 2 is more specific to a single instance/match of a sport, which fits better when referring to "the game played on the 23rd of November" - a specific scheduled sporting event.

 Let me double-check the WordNet definitions:
 - Sense 1: "a contest with rules to determine a winner" - this is the general sense
 - Sense 2: "a single play of a sport or other contest" - this is the specific match/event sense

 In sports journalism and general usage, when we say "the game against Ajax on November 23rd", we are referring to a specific match (a single play of a sport), not the general concept of a contest.

 Therefore, sense index 2 is the correct answer.

 Wait, I need to check the indexing. The user lists:
 1. sense_key=game%1:04:00::
 2. sense_key=game%1:04:03::
 3. sense_key=game%1:04:01::
 ...

 So sense 2 in the list corresponds to game%1:04:03::.

 Actually, looking carefully:
 - Item 1 in the list is sense_key=game%1:04:00::
 - Item 2 in the list is sense_key=game%1:04:03::
 - Item 3 in the list is sense_key=game%1:04:01::

 So if I choose sense 2, I should return {"sense_index": 2}.

 But let me verify if sense 1 could be correct. Sense 1 is "a contest with rules to determine a winner". While a football match is indeed a contest with rules, the specific phrasing "the game played on the 23rd" strongly suggests a specific instance rather than the general concept. The example for sense 2 ("the game lasted two hours") also strongly supports that this sense refers to specific matches/events.

 Also, looking at the WordNet hierarchy:
 - game%1:04:00:: is the first sense (contest)
 - game%1:04:03:: is the second sense listed here (single play)

 In standard WordNet, game%1:04:00:: is "a contest with rules to determine a winner" and game%1:04:03:: is "a single play of a sport or other contest".

 The context is definitely referring to a specific match (single play), not the abstract concept of a contest.

 So the answer should be sense_index: 2.

 Wait, I should verify the exact wording of the target: "in the <t>game</t> played on the 23rd of November against Ajax"

 Yes, this is referring to a specific sporting event that took place on a specific date. This aligns perfectly with sense 2: "a single play of a sport or other contest".

 The other senses are clearly wrong:
 - 3: amusement/pastime - too general, not specific enough
 - 4: hunted animal - no
 - 5: tennis division - no, this is football/soccer
 - 6: score - no, it's referring to the match itself
 - 7: flesh of animals - no
 - 8: secret scheme - while there is talk of tricks/fraud, the specific phrase "the game played on the 23rd" refers to the match, not the scheme
 - 9: equipment - no
 - 10: occupation - no
 - 11: frivolous behavior - no

 So it's between 1 and 2. Sense 2 is more precise for a specific scheduled sporting event.

 Therefore: {"sense_index": 2}

provider: Chutes


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: ink
Target surface form: ink
Context:
Sport and fraud law Tricks such as those of Alonso and Ramos before the Ajax demonstrate wittiness but not the will to get remove of a sanction. The expulsion presumably forged by two players of Real Madrid (Xabi Alonso and Sergio Ramos) in the game played on the 23rd of November against Ajax in European Champions League has caused rivers of <t>ink</t> to be written about if such behavior is or is not unsportsmanlike and if, both players should be sanctioned by UEFA. As we all know, a few minutes before the end of the game (that their team had already won), both players deliberately wasted time which made the referee show the second yellow card to both of them.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=ink%1:27:01:: | definition=a liquid used for printing or writing or drawing
2. sense_key=ink%1:08:00:: | definition=dark protective fluid ejected into the water by cuttlefish and other cephalopods

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation (WSD) for the word "ink" in the given context.

 Context analysis:
 The sentence is: "The expulsion presumably forged by two players of Real Madrid (Xabi Alonso and Sergio Ramos) in the game played on the 23rd of November against Ajax in European Champions League has caused rivers of <t>ink</t> to be written about if such behavior is or is not unsportsmanlike..."

 The phrase is "rivers of ink to be written". This is an idiom or metaphorical expression meaning "a lot has been written" or "much has been written about this topic".

 Candidate senses:
 1. sense_key=ink%1:27:01:: | definition=a liquid used for printing or writing or drawing
 2. sense_key=ink%1:08:00:: | definition=dark protective fluid ejected into the water by cuttlefish and other cephalopods

 The context clearly refers to writing (articles, commentary, reports) about the incident. "Rivers of ink" is a common metaphor referring to the large amount of writing/printing that has been done on a subject. This uses sense 1 - the liquid used for writing/printing.

 Sense 2 refers to the biological fluid from cephalopods, which is not relevant here.

 Therefore, the correct sense is 1 (ink%1:27:01::).

 The user wants the output as a JSON object: {"sense_index": 1} (where the index corresponds to the numbered list provided - 1 or 2).

 Wait, looking at the candidate senses:
 1. sense_key=ink%1:27:01::
 2. sense_key=ink%1:08:00::

 So the index to return should be 1.

 I need to make sure I don't hedge and choose the single best indexed sense. The context "rivers of ink to be written" clearly points to the writing/printing liquid, not cephalopod ink.

 The output format should be exactly: {"sense_index": 1}

provider: AtlasCloud


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: behavior
Target surface form: behavior
Context:
Sport and fraud law Tricks such as those of Alonso and Ramos before the Ajax demonstrate wittiness but not the will to get remove of a sanction. The expulsion presumably forged by two players of Real Madrid (Xabi Alonso and Sergio Ramos) in the game played on the 23rd of November against Ajax in European Champions League has caused rivers of ink to be written about if such <t>behavior</t> is or is not unsportsmanlike and if, both players should be sanctioned by UEFA. As we all know, a few minutes before the end of the game (that their team had already won), both players deliberately wasted time which made the referee show the second yellow card to both of them.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=behavior%1:04:00:: | definition=manner of acting or controlling yourself | synonyms=behaviour, conduct, doings
2. sense_key=behavior%1:26:00:: | definition=the action or reaction of something (as a machine or substance) under specified circumstances | synonyms=behaviour | examples=the behavior of small particles can be studied in experiments
3. sense_key=behavior%1:07:00:: | definition=(behavioral attributes) the way a person behaves toward other people | synonyms=demeanor, demeanour, behaviour, conduct, deportment
4. sense_key=behavior%1:04:01:: | definition=(psychology) the aggregate of the responses or reactions or movements made by an organism in any situation | synonyms=behaviour

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation (WSD) for the word "behavior" in a specific context.

Context analysis:
- The text is about football (soccer) players Xabi Alonso and Sergio Ramos getting deliberately yellow cards
- The specific phrase is: "such <t>behavior</t> is or is not unsportsmanlike"
- This refers to the deliberate wasting of time to get yellow cards (strategic fouling/card accumulation)
- The question is whether this conduct/way of acting is unsportsmanlike

Candidate senses analysis:

1. sense_key=behavior%1:04:00:: | definition=manner of acting or controlling yourself | synonyms=behaviour, conduct, doings
   - This seems to fit well. It refers to the manner of acting, the way they controlled themselves (deliberately wasting time to get cards).

2. sense_key=behavior%1:26:00:: | definition=the action or reaction of something (as a machine or substance) under specified circumstances | synonyms=behaviour | examples=the behavior of small particles can be studied in experiments
   - This is for physical objects, machines, substances. Not applicable to human actions in sports.

3. sense_key=behavior%1:07:00:: | definition=(behavioral attributes) the way a person behaves toward other people | synonyms=demeanor, demeanour, behaviour, conduct, deportment
   - This focuses on how a person behaves toward other people (demeanor, deportment). While related, the context is more about the specific actions (getting yellow cards deliberately) rather than general demeanor toward others. However, "conduct" is a synonym here.

4. sense_key=behavior%1:04:01:: | definition=(psychology) the aggregate of the responses or reactions or movements made by an organism in any situation | synonyms=behaviour
   - This is a technical psychology definition, referring to aggregate responses of an organism. Too technical/scientific for this sports context.

Comparing sense 1 and sense 3:
- Sense 1: "manner of acting or controlling yourself" - focuses on the action itself, the conduct, the doings
- Sense 3: focuses on behavioral attributes, demeanor, deportment - how one behaves toward others

The context emphasizes the specific actions (deliberately wasting time to get yellow cards) and whether this constitutes unsportsmanlike conduct. "Unsportsmanlike behavior" is a common collocation referring to specific actions/conduct in sports.

Sense 1 has synonyms: behaviour, conduct, doings
Sense 3 has synonyms: demeanor, demeanour, behaviour, conduct, deportment

Both have "conduct" as a synonym. However, sense 1 emphasizes "manner of acting" while sense 3 emphasizes "the way a person behaves toward other people."

In the phrase "such behavior is or is not unsportsmanlike", we're talking about the specific actions (the tricks, the deliberate wasting of time) - i.e., the manner of acting. This aligns best with sense 1.

Also, looking at the examples implied by the glosses:
- Sense 1 examples would be like "good behavior", "bad behavior", "his behavior was unacceptable"
- Sense 3 examples would be more about "his demeanor was formal", "she has a pleasant deportment"

Given that the context discusses specific actions (tricks, deliberately wasting time) and whether they should be sanctioned, sense 1 (manner of acting) is the best fit.

Wait, let me double-check the WordNet sense keys and indices. The user lists them as:
1. behavior%1:04:00::
2. behavior%1:26:00::
3. behavior%1:07:00::
4. behavior%1:04:01::

In WordNet:
- behavior%1:04:00:: is indeed "manner of acting or controlling yourself"
- behavior%1:07:00:: is "behavioral attributes... toward other people"
- behavior%1:04:01:: is the psychology one
- behavior%1:26:00:: is the physical one

The context is about human actions in a sports setting - specifically the deliberate act of getting yellow cards. This is clearly about "manner of acting" (sense 1) rather than "demeanor toward others" (sense 3) or psychology/physical objects.

The phrase "unsportsmanlike behavior" typically maps to sense 1 in WordNet datasets.

Therefore, the answer should be sense_index: 1.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: player
Target surface form: players
Context:
Sport and fraud law Tricks such as those of Alonso and Ramos before the Ajax demonstrate wittiness but not the will to get remove of a sanction. The expulsion presumably forged by two players of Real Madrid (Xabi Alonso and Sergio Ramos) in the game played on the 23rd of November against Ajax in European Champions League has caused rivers of ink to be written about if such behavior is or is not unsportsmanlike and if, both <t>players</t> should be sanctioned by UEFA. As we all know, a few minutes before the end of the game (that their team had already won), both players deliberately wasted time which made the referee show the second yellow card to both of them.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=player%1:18:01:: | definition=a person who participates in or is skilled at some game | synonyms=participant
2. sense_key=player%1:18:02:: | definition=someone who plays a musical instrument (as a profession) | synonyms=musician, instrumentalist
3. sense_key=player%1:18:00:: | definition=a theatrical performer | synonyms=actor, histrion, thespian, role player
4. sense_key=player%1:18:04:: | definition=a person who pursues a number of different social and sexual partners simultaneously
5. sense_key=player%1:18:03:: | definition=an important participant (as in a business deal) | examples=he was a major player in setting up the corporation

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "players" in the given context.

Let me analyze the context:
- The text is about sports (football/soccer specifically)
- It mentions Xabi Alonso and Sergio Ramos
- They are described as "players of Real Madrid"
- They were playing in a game against Ajax in the European Champions League
- They got yellow cards for wasting time
- The context is clearly about sports/athletes

Now let's look at the candidate senses:

1. sense_key=player%1:18:01:: | definition=a person who participates in or is skilled at some game | synonyms=participant
   - This fits sports context. "Game" here can mean sports game. Football is a game.

2. sense_key=player%1:18:02:: | definition=someone who plays a musical instrument (as a profession) | synonyms=musician, instrumentalist
   - This is about music, not relevant here.

3. sense_key=player%1:18:00:: | definition=a theatrical performer | synonyms=actor, histrion, thespian, role player
   - This is about acting/theater, not relevant.

4. sense_key=player%1:18:04:: | definition=a person who pursues a number of different social and sexual partners simultaneously
   - This is slang for someone who dates multiple people, not relevant.

5. sense_key=player%1:18:03:: | definition=an important participant (as in a business deal) | examples=he was a major player in setting up the corporation
   - This is metaphorical/business usage, not literal sports players.

The context clearly refers to football/soccer players. They are participants in a sports game (football match).

Sense 1 is "a person who participates in or is skilled at some game" with synonym "participant". This is the correct sense for athletes/football players.

The index for this sense is 1 (player%1:18:01::).

Wait, let me check the indexing. The user lists them as:
1. sense_key=player%1:18:01::
2. sense_key=player%1:18:02::
3. sense_key=player%1:18:00::
4. sense_key=player%1:18:04::
5. sense_key=player%1:18:03::

So the indices are:
- Index 1: participant in games (sports)
- Index 2: musician
- Index 3: actor
- Index 4: sexual/social partner pursuer
- Index 5: business participant

Actually, looking at the WordNet sense keys:
- player%1:18:01:: is the sports/games participant
- player%1:18:00:: is the actor
- player%1:18:02:: is the musician
- player%1:18:03:: is the business participant
- player%1:18:04:: is the womanizer/romantic pursuer

But the user has numbered them 1-5 in the list. So I need to return the index from the list (1, 2, 3, 4, or 5), not the WordNet offset.

The correct sense is clearly #1: "a person who participates in or is skilled at some game" referring to Alonso and Ramos who are football players.

So the answer should be {"sense_index": 1}


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: minute
Target surface form: minutes
Context:
Sport and fraud law Tricks such as those of Alonso and Ramos before the Ajax demonstrate wittiness but not the will to get remove of a sanction. The expulsion presumably forged by two players of Real Madrid (Xabi Alonso and Sergio Ramos) in the game played on the 23rd of November against Ajax in European Champions League has caused rivers of ink to be written about if such behavior is or is not unsportsmanlike and if, both players should be sanctioned by UEFA. As we all know, a few <t>minutes</t> before the end of the game (that their team had already won), both players deliberately wasted time which made the referee show the second yellow card to both of them. This way, and since Real Madrid will finish as leader of its group, both players will fulfil the prescribed sanction during the next game of league, against Auxerre, and will be able to get rid of the cards the following phase.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=minute%1:28:00:: | definition=a unit of time equal to 60 seconds or 1/60th of an hour | synonyms=min | examples=he ran a 4 minute mile
2. sense_key=minute%1:28:01:: | definition=an indefinitely short time | synonyms=moment, mo, second, bit | examples=wait just a moment; in a mo
3. sense_key=minute%1:28:02:: | definition=a particular point in time | synonyms=moment, second, instant | examples=the moment he arrived the party began
4. sense_key=minute%1:23:00:: | definition=a unit of angular distance equal to a 60th of a degree | synonyms=arcminute, minute of arc
5. sense_key=minute%1:10:00:: | definition=a short note | examples=the secretary keeps the minutes of the meeting
6. sense_key=minute%1:07:00:: | definition=distance measured by the time taken to cover it | synonyms=hour | examples=we live an hour from the airport; its just 10 minutes away

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation (WSD) on the word "minutes" (target lemma: minute) in the given context.

Context analysis:
- The text is about a football/soccer game
- It mentions "a few minutes before the end of the game"
- This refers to time measurement in the context of a sports match
- The players wasted time a few minutes before the end

Candidate senses analysis:
1. minute%1:28:00:: - a unit of time equal to 60 seconds or 1/60th of an hour. This is the standard time measurement unit. Example: "he ran a 4 minute mile"
2. minute%1:28:01:: - an indefinitely short time (moment, instant). Example: "wait just a moment"
3. minute%1:28:02:: - a particular point in time. Example: "the moment he arrived"
4. minute%1:23:00:: - angular distance (arcminute) - not relevant here
5. minute%1:10:00:: - meeting minutes/notes - not relevant here
6. minute%1:07:00:: - distance measured by time - example: "10 minutes away" - this is about spatial distance measured in time units

The context "a few minutes before the end of the game" clearly refers to a specific duration of time (plural of minute as a unit of time). It's referring to a quantity of time (a few units of 60 seconds), not an indefinitely short time, not a point in time, not angular measurement, not meeting notes, and not distance.

Sense 1 is the standard unit of time measurement. "A few minutes" means a few units of 60 seconds.

Sense 2 (indefinitely short time) is possible but less likely because "a few minutes" suggests a specific measurable duration rather than an indefinite short moment. Also, in sports contexts, "minutes" usually refers to the actual time units.

Sense 6 is about distance ("10 minutes away"), which doesn't fit here.

Therefore, the best sense is sense 1: "a unit of time equal to 60 seconds or 1/60th of an hour".

The JSON should be: {"sense_index": 1}


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: end
Target surface form: end
Context:
Sport and fraud law Tricks such as those of Alonso and Ramos before the Ajax demonstrate wittiness but not the will to get remove of a sanction. The expulsion presumably forged by two players of Real Madrid (Xabi Alonso and Sergio Ramos) in the game played on the 23rd of November against Ajax in European Champions League has caused rivers of ink to be written about if such behavior is or is not unsportsmanlike and if, both players should be sanctioned by UEFA. As we all know, a few minutes before the <t>end</t> of the game (that their team had already won), both players deliberately wasted time which made the referee show the second yellow card to both of them. This way, and since Real Madrid will finish as leader of its group, both players will fulfil the prescribed sanction during the next game of league, against Auxerre, and will be able to get rid of the cards the following phase.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=end%1:15:00:: | definition=either extremity of something that has length | synonyms=terminal | examples=the end of the pier; she knotted the end of the thread
2. sense_key=end%1:28:00:: | definition=the point in time at which something ends | synonyms=ending | examples=the end of the year; the ending of warranty period
3. sense_key=end%1:11:00:: | definition=the concluding parts of an event or occurrence | synonyms=last, final stage | examples=the end was exciting; I had to miss the last of the movie
4. sense_key=end%1:09:02:: | definition=the state of affairs that a plan is intended to achieve and that (when achieved) terminates behavior intended to achieve it | synonyms=goal | examples=the ends justify the means
5. sense_key=end%1:09:00:: | definition=a final part or section | examples=we have given it at the end of the section since it involves the calculus; Start at the beginning and go on until you come to the end
6. sense_key=end%1:26:00:: | definition=a final state | synonyms=destruction, death | examples=he came to a bad end; the so-called glorious experiment came to an inglorious end
7. sense_key=end%1:15:02:: | definition=the surface at either extremity of a three-dimensional object | examples=one end of the box was marked `This side up'
8. sense_key=end%1:18:00:: | definition=(football) the person who plays at one end of the line of scrimmage | examples=the end managed to hold onto the pass
9. sense_key=end%1:15:01:: | definition=a boundary marking the extremities of something | examples=the end of town
10. sense_key=end%1:15:03:: | definition=one of two places from which people are communicating to each other | examples=the phone rang at the other end; both ends wrote at the same time
11. sense_key=end%1:04:00:: | definition=the part you are expected to play | examples=he held up his end
12. sense_key=end%1:10:00:: | definition=the last section of a communication | synonyms=conclusion, close, closing, ending | examples=in conclusion I want to say...
13. sense_key=end%1:06:02:: | definition=a piece of cloth that is left over after the rest has been used or sold | synonyms=remainder, remnant, oddment
14. sense_key=end%1:04:02:: | definition=(American football) a position on the line of scrimmage | examples=no one wanted to play end

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "end" in the given context.

 Context analysis:
 - The sentence is: "As we all know, a few minutes before the <t>end</t> of the game (that their team had already won), both players deliberately wasted time..."
 - This refers to the final part/period of a football/soccer game.
 - The phrase "end of the game" refers to the concluding part of the event.

 Looking at the candidate senses:

 1. sense_key=end%1:15:00:: - either extremity of something that has length (physical end, like end of pier) - Not right, a game doesn't have physical length in this sense.

 2. sense_key=end%1:28:00:: - the point in time at which something ends - This could work, as it refers to a point in time. Examples: "the end of the year"

 3. sense_key=end%1:11:00:: - the concluding parts of an event or occurrence - This also fits well. Examples: "the end was exciting; I had to miss the last of the movie". This refers to the final stage/last part of the game.

 4. sense_key=end%1:09:02:: - goal/purpose - Not relevant here.

 5. sense_key=end%1:09:00:: - a final part or section - This is more abstract, like end of a section/document.

 6. sense_key=end%1:26:00:: - final state/destruction - Not relevant.

 7. sense_key=end%1:15:02:: - surface at extremity of 3D object - Physical, not relevant.

 8. sense_key=end%1:18:00:: - football player position - Not relevant (though context is football, this refers to the position, not the end of the game).

 9. sense_key=end%1:15:01:: - boundary marking extremities - Physical boundary.

 10. sense_key=end%1:15:03:: - place of communication - Not relevant.

 11. sense_key=end%1:04:00:: - part you are expected to play - Not relevant.

 12. sense_key=end%1:10:00:: - last section of a communication - Not relevant (not a written/spoken communication).

 13. sense_key=end%1:06:02:: - piece of cloth - Not relevant.

 14. sense_key=end%1:04:02:: - American football position - Not relevant.

 Now comparing sense 2 and sense 3:
 - Sense 2 (end%1:28:00::): "the point in time at which something ends" - This emphasizes the temporal point.
 - Sense 3 (end%1:11:00::): "the concluding parts of an event or occurrence" - This emphasizes the final stage/period.

 In the context "a few minutes before the end of the game", this refers to the final part/stage of the game, not just a single point in time. The phrase "a few minutes before" suggests a duration leading up to the conclusion, fitting better with "concluding parts" rather than just a point in time.

 Also, looking at the examples for sense 3: "the end was exciting; I had to miss the last of the movie" - these refer to the final part of an event/movie, similar to the final part of a game.

 Sense 2 examples: "the end of the year; the ending of warranty period" - these are more about the termination point.

 In sports contexts, "the end of the game" typically refers to the concluding phase/stage (like the final minutes), which aligns with sense 3.

 However, I should check if there's a specific sports sense. Looking at the list, sense 8 and 14 are about football positions, not the temporal end.

 Actually, looking carefully at WordNet:
 - Sense 3 is end%1:11:00:: which is under noun.event (1:11)
 - Sense 2 is end%1:28:00:: which is under noun.time (1:28)

 The context "a few minutes before the end of the game" - the game is an event. The "end" here is the final stage of the event. This matches sense 3 best.

 Wait, let me reconsider. "End of the game" could be interpreted as:
 1. The point when the game ends (time)
 2. The final part/phase of the game (event stage)

 Given the phrase "a few minutes before the end", this implies the end is a point in time (the whistle), and a few minutes before that point. This would favor sense 2.

 But sense 3 examples include "the end was exciting" which refers to the concluding parts (plural) of an event.

 Let me look at the exact wording again: "a few minutes before the <t>end</t> of the game"

 If I say "a few minutes before the end of the movie", am I referring to:
 - The point when the movie ends (sense 2)?
 - The concluding parts of the movie (sense 3)?

 Actually, "before the end" usually means before the termination point. But "the end" itself in "the end of the game" is ambiguous between the final moment and the final period.

 However, looking at the synonyms:
 - Sense 2: ending
 - Sense 3: last, final stage

 "Final stage" fits well with "end of the game" in a sports context. The final minutes are often called "the end of the game."

 But let's look at the examples provided in the candidate list:
 - Sense 2: "the end of the year; the ending of warranty period"
 - Sense 3: "the end was exciting; I had to miss the last of the movie"

 In the context, the players wasted time "a few minutes before the end". This is referring to the temporal boundary. However, the phrase "the end of the game" is often used to mean the final portion.

 Actually, looking at standard WordNet disambiguation:
 - "End of the year" -> sense 2 (time)
 - "End of the movie" -> could be sense 3 (event) or sense 2 (time)

 But "the end was exciting" clearly refers to the content of the final part, not just the time point.

 In this specific context: "a few minutes before the end of the game (that their team had already won)"

 The parenthetical suggests the game was already decided, and they were in the final minutes. This refers to the final stage/period of the game.

 Also, if it were just a point in time, "a few minutes before the end" would be slightly odd phrasing - you'd usually say "a few minutes before the end of the game" meaning before the game ends (point), but the "end" itself as a noun phrase refers to the conclusion.

 I think sense 3 (end%1:11:00::) is the best fit because:
 1. A game is an event/occurrence
 2. The "end" refers to the concluding parts/final stage
 3. The examples "the end was exciting" parallel "the end of the game" in a sports context

 Wait, I should verify the WordNet sense keys to make sure I have the right indices.

 The user provided:
 1. sense_key=end%1:15:00::
 2. sense_key=end%1:28:00::
 3. sense_key=end%1:11:00::
 ...

 So sense index 3 corresponds to end%1:11:00::.

 Actually, looking at the instruction: "Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}."

 So I need to return the index number from the list provided (1-14).

 My choice is between index 2 and index 3.

 Index 2: end%1:28:00:: (time)
 Index 3: end%1:11:00:: (event)

 In WordNet:
 - end%1:28:00:: is "the point in time at which something ends"
 - end%1:11:00:: is "the concluding parts of an event or occurrence"

 The phrase "end of the game" in sports commentary usually refers to the final stage (e.g., "at the end of the game, the score was..."). But "before the end" suggests the temporal boundary.

 However, consider: "I had to miss the last of the movie" (example for sense 3) vs "the ending of warranty period" (example for sense 2).

 "The end of the game" is more like "the last of the movie" (final part of an event) than "the ending of warranty period" (termination of a time period).

 Also, the context mentions "the game (that their team had already won)" - this describes the event, and the end is the final stage of that event.

 I will go with sense_index: 3.

 But let me double-check if there's any other sense that could fit.
 - Sense 5: "a final part or section" - this is for text/sections, not events.
 - Sense 12: "the last section of a communication" - for texts/speeches.

 So it's definitely between 2 and 3.

 In many WSD datasets, "end of the game" is annotated as sense 3 (the event sense) when referring to the final part of the match, and sense 2 when referring to the time point.

 Given "a few minutes before the end", this implies the end is a temporal point (the whistle). But "end" as "final stage" can also work with "before the end" (before the final stage concludes).

 Actually, looking at the example for sense 3: "I had to miss the last of the movie" - "the last" here refers to the final part. "Before the last of the movie" would be unusual.

 But "before the end of the movie" is common.

 I think both are defensible, but sense 2 (temporal) might be slightly better for "before the end". However, sense 3 is also very strong.

 Let me check WordNet examples for end%1:28:00:: (sense 2):
 "the end of the year"
 "the ending of warranty period"

 And for end%1:11:00:: (sense 3):
 "the end was exciting"
 "I had to miss the last of the movie"

 The context: "a few minutes before the end of the game (that their team had already won)"

 If the team had already won, the game is in its final stage. The players are wasting time in the final minutes. This is the "end" as in the final stage of the event.

 Also, the word "game" is an event, so "end of the game" maps naturally to the event sense.

 I will choose 3.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: game
Target surface form: game
Context:
Sport and fraud law Tricks such as those of Alonso and Ramos before the Ajax demonstrate wittiness but not the will to get remove of a sanction. The expulsion presumably forged by two players of Real Madrid (Xabi Alonso and Sergio Ramos) in the game played on the 23rd of November against Ajax in European Champions League has caused rivers of ink to be written about if such behavior is or is not unsportsmanlike and if, both players should be sanctioned by UEFA. As we all know, a few minutes before the end of the <t>game</t> (that their team had already won), both players deliberately wasted time which made the referee show the second yellow card to both of them. This way, and since Real Madrid will finish as leader of its group, both players will fulfil the prescribed sanction during the next game of league, against Auxerre, and will be able to get rid of the cards the following phase.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=game%1:04:00:: | definition=a contest with rules to determine a winner | examples=you need four people to play this game
2. sense_key=game%1:04:03:: | definition=a single play of a sport or other contest | examples=the game lasted two hours
3. sense_key=game%1:04:01:: | definition=an amusement or pastime | examples=they played word games; he thought of his painting as a game that filled his empty time
4. sense_key=game%1:05:00:: | definition=animal hunted for food or sport
5. sense_key=game%1:28:00:: | definition=(tennis) a division of play during which one player serves
6. sense_key=game%1:23:00:: | definition=(games) the score at a particular point or the score needed to win | examples=the game is 6 all; he is serving for the game
7. sense_key=game%1:13:00:: | definition=the flesh of wild animals that is used for food
8. sense_key=game%1:09:00:: | definition=a secret scheme to do something (especially something underhand or illegal) | synonyms=plot, secret plan | examples=they concocted a plot to discredit the governor; I saw through his little game from the start
9. sense_key=game%1:06:00:: | definition=the game equipment needed in order to play a particular game | examples=the child received several games for his birthday
10. sense_key=game%1:04:02:: | definition=your occupation or line of work | synonyms=biz | examples=he's in the plumbing game; she's in show biz
11. sense_key=game%1:04:04:: | definition=frivolous or trifling behavior | examples=for actors, memorizing lines is no game; for him, life is all fun and games

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "game" in the given context.

 Let me analyze the context:
 - The text is about a football (soccer) match between Real Madrid and Ajax in the European Champions League
 - It mentions "the game played on the 23rd of November against Ajax"
 - It mentions "a few minutes before the end of the <t>game</t> (that their team had already won)"
 - This is clearly referring to a specific sporting event/contest

 Now let's look at the candidate senses:

 1. sense_key=game%1:04:00:: | definition=a contest with rules to determine a winner | examples=you need four people to play this game
    - This is a general contest with rules. Could fit, but let's see others.

 2. sense_key=game%1:04:03:: | definition=a single play of a sport or other contest | examples=the game lasted two hours
    - This refers to a specific instance/instance of a sport/contest. The example "the game lasted two hours" suggests a specific match/event.
    - The context mentions "the game played on the 23rd of November" and "the end of the game" - this fits perfectly with "a single play of a sport or other contest"

 3. sense_key=game%1:04:01:: | definition=an amusement or pastime | examples=they played word games; he thought of his painting as a game that filled his empty time
    - This is more general, referring to games as activities for fun. Not specific to a competitive sport match.

 4. sense_key=game%1:05:00:: | definition=animal hunted for food or sport
    - Not relevant here.

 5. sense_key=game%1:28:00:: | definition=(tennis) a division of play during which one player serves
    - Specific to tennis, not football/soccer.

 6. sense_key=game%1:23:00:: | definition=(games) the score at a particular point or the score needed to win | examples=the game is 6 all; he is serving for the game
    - This is about score, not the match itself.

 7. sense_key=game%1:13:00:: | definition=the flesh of wild animals that is used for food
    - Not relevant.

 8. sense_key=game%1:09:00:: | definition=a secret scheme...
    - Not relevant.

 9. sense_key=game%1:06:00:: | definition=the game equipment...
    - Not relevant.

 10. sense_key=game%1:04:02:: | definition=your occupation or line of work...
    - Not relevant.

 11. sense_key=game%1:04:04:: | definition=frivolous or trifling behavior...
    - Not relevant.

 So it's between sense 1 and sense 2.

 Sense 1: "a contest with rules to determine a winner" - this is the general concept of a game.
 Sense 2: "a single play of a sport or other contest" - this is a specific instance/match.

 The context clearly refers to a specific match that took place on November 23rd between Real Madrid and Ajax. The phrase "the end of the game" and "the game played on the 23rd" indicates a specific sporting event/instance.

 Therefore, sense 2 (game%1:04:03::) is the best fit.

 Wait, let me double-check the sense indices. The user lists them as:
 1. sense_key=game%1:04:00::
 2. sense_key=game%1:04:03::
 3. sense_key=game%1:04:01::
 ...

 So sense 2 in the list corresponds to game%1:04:03::.

 Actually, looking at the WordNet sense keys:
 - game%1:04:00:: is the first sense (general contest)
 - game%1:04:03:: is the second sense listed (single play of a sport)
 - game%1:04:01:: is the third sense listed (amusement)

 The question asks for the "sense_index" in the JSON. Looking at the instruction: "Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}."

 This suggests I should return the index number from the list provided (1-indexed).

 So if I choose sense 2 (game%1:04:03::), I should return {"sense_index": 2}.

 Let me verify:
 - The context is about a specific football match: "the game played on the 23rd of November against Ajax"
 - "a few minutes before the end of the game"
 - This is clearly referring to a specific instance of a sporting contest, not the general concept of "game" as a contest with rules.

 Therefore, the correct sense is:
 2. sense_key=game%1:04:03:: | definition=a single play of a sport or other contest | examples=the game lasted two hours

 So the answer should be: {"sense_index": 2}

provider: DeepInfra


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: team
Target surface form: team
Context:
Sport and fraud law Tricks such as those of Alonso and Ramos before the Ajax demonstrate wittiness but not the will to get remove of a sanction. The expulsion presumably forged by two players of Real Madrid (Xabi Alonso and Sergio Ramos) in the game played on the 23rd of November against Ajax in European Champions League has caused rivers of ink to be written about if such behavior is or is not unsportsmanlike and if, both players should be sanctioned by UEFA. As we all know, a few minutes before the end of the game (that their <t>team</t> had already won), both players deliberately wasted time which made the referee show the second yellow card to both of them. This way, and since Real Madrid will finish as leader of its group, both players will fulfil the prescribed sanction during the next game of league, against Auxerre, and will be able to get rid of the cards the following phase.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=team%1:14:00:: | definition=a cooperative unit (especially in sports) | synonyms=squad
2. sense_key=team%1:14:01:: | definition=two or more draft animals that work together to pull something

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "team" in the given context.

Let me analyze the context:
- The text is about a football (soccer) match involving Real Madrid and Ajax
- It mentions "their team had already won"
- "Their" refers to the two players (Xabi Alonso and Sergio Ramos) mentioned earlier
- Real Madrid is a football club/sports team
- The context is clearly about sports

Now let's look at the candidate senses:
1. sense_key=team%1:14:00:: | definition=a cooperative unit (especially in sports) | synonyms=squad
2. sense_key=team%1:14:01:: | definition=two or more draft animals that work together to pull something

Sense 1 refers to a sports team or cooperative unit in sports. This fits perfectly because:
- The context is about Real Madrid (a football/soccer team)
- It mentions "their team" referring to the sports team the players belong to
- The synonym "squad" also fits sports contexts

Sense 2 refers to draft animals (like horses or oxen) working together to pull something. This is clearly not the meaning here - we're talking about human athletes playing football, not animals pulling carts.

Therefore, the correct sense is sense 1 (team%1:14:00::).

The user wants me to return only a JSON object like {"sense_index": 3}, but since the senses are indexed 1 and 2 in the candidate list, I should return {"sense_index": 1}.

Wait, let me check the instructions again: "Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}."

The example shows index 3, but my candidates are indexed 1 and 2. I should return the index of the sense I choose, which is 1.

So the answer should be: {"sense_index": 1}


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: player
Target surface form: players
Context:
Sport and fraud law Tricks such as those of Alonso and Ramos before the Ajax demonstrate wittiness but not the will to get remove of a sanction. The expulsion presumably forged by two players of Real Madrid (Xabi Alonso and Sergio Ramos) in the game played on the 23rd of November against Ajax in European Champions League has caused rivers of ink to be written about if such behavior is or is not unsportsmanlike and if, both players should be sanctioned by UEFA. As we all know, a few minutes before the end of the game (that their team had already won), both <t>players</t> deliberately wasted time which made the referee show the second yellow card to both of them. This way, and since Real Madrid will finish as leader of its group, both players will fulfil the prescribed sanction during the next game of league, against Auxerre, and will be able to get rid of the cards the following phase.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=player%1:18:01:: | definition=a person who participates in or is skilled at some game | synonyms=participant
2. sense_key=player%1:18:02:: | definition=someone who plays a musical instrument (as a profession) | synonyms=musician, instrumentalist
3. sense_key=player%1:18:00:: | definition=a theatrical performer | synonyms=actor, histrion, thespian, role player
4. sense_key=player%1:18:04:: | definition=a person who pursues a number of different social and sexual partners simultaneously
5. sense_key=player%1:18:03:: | definition=an important participant (as in a business deal) | examples=he was a major player in setting up the corporation

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the target word "players" (lemma: player) in the given context.

Let me analyze the context:
- The text is about sports (football/soccer specifically)
- It mentions "Alonso and Ramos" who are famous football players
- It mentions "Real Madrid" and "Ajax" which are football clubs
- It discusses behavior in a "game" (match)
- It mentions "referee", "yellow card", "expulsion", "sanction" - all sports terminology
- The target word "players" refers to Xabi Alonso and Sergio Ramos who are professional footballers/athletes

Now let's look at the candidate senses:

1. sense_key=player%1:18:01:: | definition=a person who participates in or is skilled at some game | synonyms=participant
   - This fits perfectly. They are participating in a football game (sport).

2. sense_key=player%1:18:02:: | definition=someone who plays a musical instrument (as a profession) | synonyms=musician, instrumentalist
   - Not relevant. They are not musicians in this context.

3. sense_key=player%1:18:00:: | definition=a theatrical performer | synonyms=actor, histrion, thespian, role player
   - Not relevant. They are not actors in this context (though one might argue they were "acting" to get cards, the primary sense is still sports participants).

4. sense_key=player%1:18:04:: | definition=a person who pursues a number of different social and sexual partners simultaneously
   - Not relevant. This is about dating/relationships.

5. sense_key=player%1:18:03:: | definition=an important participant (as in a business deal) | examples=he was a major player in setting up the corporation
   - Not relevant. This is about business/politics, not sports.

The correct sense is clearly sense 1: "a person who participates in or is skilled at some game" - referring to sports participants.

The context mentions:
- "game played on the 23rd of November"
- "Real Madrid" vs "Ajax"
- "referee"
- "yellow card"
- "expulsion"
- "unsportsmanlike"

All of these point to sports context. Therefore, sense index 1 is the correct choice.

Wait, I need to check the indexing. The user lists:
1. sense_key=player%1:18:01::
2. sense_key=player%1:18:02::
3. sense_key=player%1:18:00::
4. sense_key=player%1:18:04::
5. sense_key=player%1:18:03::

The sense indices in the list are 1, 2, 3, 4, 5. The sense keys have offsets (01, 02, 00, 04, 03) but I should go by the list index (1-5).

Sense 1 is: player%1:18:01:: "a person who participates in or is skilled at some game"

This is the sports player sense.

Sense 3 is the actor sense.

So the answer should be {"sense_index": 1}.

Let me double-check the WordNet sense ordering. Usually:
- player%1:18:00:: = actor (theatrical performer)
- player%1:18:01:: = participant in a game (sports)
- player%1:18:02:: = musician
- player%1:18:03:: = important participant (business)
- player%1:18:04:: = womanizer/person with many partners

But in the candidate list provided:
1. is player%1:18:01:: (sports)
2. is player%1:18:02:: (musician)
3. is player%1:18:00:: (actor)
4. is player%1:18:04:: (womanizer)
5. is player%1:18:03:: (business)

So yes, the sports sense is index 1 in this list.

The context is clearly about football/soccer players. They are described as participating in a game, getting cards, being part of Real Madrid team, etc.

Therefore: {"sense_index": 1}

provider: StreamLake