[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: mathematical
Target surface form: mathematical
Context:
kalgebra is a mathematical calculator based on content markup MathML language. Nowadays it is capable to make simple MathML operations (arithmetic and logical) and to representate 2D and 3D graphs. It is actually not necessary to know MathML to use kalgebra. kalgebra is a MathML based graph calculator. Although it was initially MathML oriented it can now be used by everyone with little <t>mathematical</t> knowledge. Here's a screenshot of kalgebra main window

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=mathematical%3:01:00:: | definition=of or pertaining to or of the nature of mathematics | examples=a mathematical textbook; slide rules and other mathematical instruments
2. sense_key=mathematical%3:00:00:: | definition=relating to or having ability to think in or work with numbers | synonyms=numerical | examples=tests for rating numerical aptitude; a mathematical whiz
3. sense_key=mathematical%5:00:00:unquestionable:00 | definition=beyond question | examples=a mathematical certainty
4. sense_key=mathematical%5:00:00:possible:00 | definition=statistically possible though highly improbable | examples=have a mathematical chance of making the playoffs
5. sense_key=mathematical%5:00:00:exact:00 | definition=characterized by the exactness or precision of mathematics | examples=mathematical precision

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "mathematical" in the given context.

Context analysis:
- kalgebra is a mathematical calculator based on MathML
- It can be used by everyone with little mathematical knowledge
- The context is about a calculator/software that does math operations, graphs, etc.
- "little mathematical knowledge" means knowledge of mathematics - the field/subject of math.

Candidate senses:
1. mathematical%3:01:00:: - of or pertaining to or of the nature of mathematics (pertaining to mathematics as a field/subject)
2. mathematical%3:00:00:: - relating to or having ability to think in or work with numbers (synonyms: numerical) - this is about numerical aptitude/ability
3. mathematical%5:00:00:unquestionable:00 - beyond question (e.g., mathematical certainty)
4. mathematical%5:00:00:possible:00 - statistically possible though highly improbable
5. mathematical%5:00:00:exact:00 - characterized by exactness or precision

In the phrase "little mathematical knowledge", this refers to knowledge of mathematics as a subject/field. Sense 1 fits best: "of or pertaining to or of the nature of mathematics". Examples include "a mathematical textbook" - knowledge of mathematics is similar (pertaining to the field of math).

Sense 2 is about numerical aptitude/ability to work with numbers. While related, "mathematical knowledge" in the context of using a calculator refers to knowledge of math concepts, not innate numerical ability.

Sense 3 would be "mathematical certainty" - not applicable.
Sense 4 would be "mathematical chance" - not applicable.
Sense 5 would be "mathematical precision" - not applicable.

Therefore, the best sense is index 1.

Wait, let me double-check WordNet adjective sense numbering. The sense keys:
- mathematical%3:01:00:: - This is adjective satellite? No, %3:01:00 is adjective (pertainym)?
Actually in WordNet:
- %3:00:00:: is usually adjective (non-pertainym)
- %3:01:00:: is usually adjective (pertainym) - "of or pertaining to..."

But the user labels them as sense 1, 2, 3, 4, 5. I need to return the index.

Sense 1: pertaining to mathematics
Sense 2: numerical aptitude

"mathematical knowledge" = knowledge pertaining to mathematics. This is clearly sense 1.

The example "a mathematical textbook" parallels "mathematical knowledge" - both are about the subject of mathematics.

So the answer is {"sense_index": 1}.

provider: SiliconFlow


attempt_kind: initial

status: success

[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: here
Target surface form: Here
Context:
kalgebra is a mathematical calculator based on content markup MathML language. Nowadays it is capable to make simple MathML operations (arithmetic and logical) and to representate 2D and 3D graphs. It is actually not necessary to know MathML to use kalgebra. kalgebra is a MathML based graph calculator. Although it was initially MathML oriented it can now be used by everyone with little mathematical knowledge. <t>Here</t>'s a screenshot of kalgebra main window kalgebra main window

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=here%4:02:00:: | definition=in or at this place; where the speaker or writer is | examples=I work here; turn here
2. sense_key=here%4:02:02:: | definition=in this circumstance or respect or on this point or detail | examples=what do we have here?; here I must disagree
3. sense_key=here%4:02:01:: | definition=to this place (especially toward the speaker) | synonyms=hither | examples=come here, please
4. sense_key=here%4:02:04:: | definition=at this time; now | examples=we'll adjourn here for lunch and discuss the remaining issues this afternoon

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

finish_reason: stop

role: assistant

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation (WSD) for the word "Here" in the given context.

 Context analysis:
 - The text is describing a software called "kalgebra" which is a mathematical calculator.
 - The sentence containing the target word is: "Here's a screenshot of kalgebra main window kalgebra main window"
 - This appears to be introducing or presenting a screenshot to the reader.
 - "Here's" is a contraction of "Here is".
 - The usage seems to be presenting something to the reader at this point in the text/discourse.

 Candidate senses analysis:
 1. sense_key=here%4:02:00:: | definition=in or at this place; where the speaker or writer is | examples=I work here; turn here
    - This refers to physical location where the speaker is.
    - In the context, the writer is not physically at a location, but rather presenting something in the text.
    - However, in written discourse, "here" can refer to the current position in the text/document.
    - "Here's a screenshot" = "In this place (in this document/text), there is a screenshot"

 2. sense_key=here%4:02:02:: | definition=in this circumstance or respect or on this point or detail | examples=what do we have here?; here I must disagree
    - This refers to a specific point in an argument or discussion.
    - "Here I must disagree" - indicates a specific point in reasoning.
    - The context is not about disagreeing or a specific point in an argument, but about presenting a visual element.

 3. sense_key=here%4:02:01:: | definition=to this place (especially toward the speaker) | synonyms=hither | examples=come here, please
    - This implies movement toward the speaker ("hither").
    - "Come here" - directional.
    - The context is not about movement or direction toward the speaker.

 4. sense_key=here%4:02:04:: | definition=at this time; now | examples=we'll adjourn here for lunch and discuss the remaining issues this afternoon
    - This refers to temporal "now".
    - "We'll adjourn here" = "We'll adjourn now".
    - While "Here's" could potentially mean "Now is", the primary meaning in "Here's a screenshot" is locative/deictic, pointing to the current position in the text where the screenshot appears.

 Comparing sense 1 and sense 4:
 - Sense 1: "in or at this place; where the speaker or writer is"
 - Sense 4: "at this time; now"

 In the phrase "Here's a screenshot...", we are presenting something that is located at the current position in the document/text. This is a spatial/locative use applied metaphorically to the text itself (the "place" in the document).

 However, looking at the examples:
 - Sense 1 examples: "I work here", "turn here" - physical location
 - Sense 4 examples: "we'll adjourn here for lunch" - this could be interpreted as temporal, but could also be locative.

 Actually, looking carefully at "Here's a screenshot", this is a presentational construction. The "here" refers to the current location in the text/discourse where the screenshot is being shown.

 In WordNet, sense 1 (here%4:02:00::) is the most general spatial sense, which is often extended to discourse deixis (pointing to a location in the text).

 Sense 2 is about "in this circumstance/respect" - used when making a point in an argument.

 Let me reconsider the specific usage: "Here's a screenshot..."
 This is introducing something. It's saying "At this point in the text, there is a screenshot."

 This aligns best with sense 1: "in or at this place; where the speaker or writer is" - extended to mean "at this place in the text/document."

 Sense 4 ("at this time; now") would fit if it were "Here we go" or "Here it begins" emphasizing the temporal moment, but "Here's a screenshot" is clearly about the location/presence of the screenshot in the document.

 Wait, let me look at the WordNet senses more carefully. The sense keys are:
 - here%4:02:00:: - in or at this place
 - here%4:02:02:: - in this circumstance or respect
 - here%4:02:01:: - to this place (hither)
 - here%4:02:04:: - at this time; now

 The numbering suggests:
 - 00 is the first/default sense (spatial location)
 - 01 is directional (to here)
 - 02 is abstract/circumstantial
 - 04 is temporal

 In "Here's a screenshot...", the word "here" is functioning as a presentative, indicating that what follows is located at the current position in the discourse. This is a deictic use pointing to the text itself.

 This is most similar to sense 1, though it's a metaphorical extension of the spatial sense to the textual domain.

 However, I should check if there's any chance it's sense 4. "Here" can mean "now" in some contexts, but "Here's a screenshot" is not saying "Now is a screenshot" - it's saying "In this location (of the document) is a screenshot."

 Therefore, sense 1 is the best choice.

 But wait, looking at the example for sense 2: "what do we have here?" - this is also presentational, indicating discovery or presentation of something at the current location. But the definition says "in this circumstance or respect or on this point or detail" which seems more abstract.

 Actually, "what do we have here?" is about discovering something at the current location, which aligns with sense 1 (spatial).

 Let me reconsider sense 2. The definition "in this circumstance or respect or on this point or detail" suggests a more abstract usage, like "Here we see the problem" meaning "at this point in the argument."

 In "Here's a screenshot", we are physically (in the document) pointing to where the image is. This is the basic spatial sense applied to the document as a space.

 Therefore, sense 1 (here%4:02:00::) is correct.

 Double-checking: Is there any possibility it's sense 4? "We'll adjourn here" - this could mean "at this time" or "at this point in the proceedings." But "Here's a screenshot" is clearly about spatial location in the text, not time.

 So the answer should be sense_index: 1.

 Wait, I need to be careful about the indexing. The user asks for the "sense_index" which corresponds to the numbered list provided:
 1. sense_key=here%4:02:00::
 2. sense_key=here%4:02:02::
 3. sense_key=here%4:02:01::
 4. sense_key=here%4:02:04::

 So if I choose sense_key=here%4:02:00::, the sense_index is 1.

 If I choose sense_key=here%4:02:02::, the sense_index is 2.

 And so on.

 My analysis points to sense 1 (here%4:02:00::).

 Final check: The context is technical documentation describing software. "Here's a screenshot" is a standard way to introduce a figure in a document. The "here" refers to the current location in the document where the figure appears. This is the spatial/deictic sense.

 Yes, sense_index: 1.

format: unknown

native_finish_reason: stop

provider: Chutes

currency: USD


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: main
Target surface form: main
Context:
kalgebra is a mathematical calculator based on content markup MathML language. Nowadays it is capable to make simple MathML operations (arithmetic and logical) and to representate 2D and 3D graphs. It is actually not necessary to know MathML to use kalgebra. kalgebra is a MathML based graph calculator. Although it was initially MathML oriented it can now be used by everyone with little mathematical knowledge. Here's a screenshot of kalgebra <t>main</t> window kalgebra main window

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=main%5:00:00:important:00 | definition=most important element | synonyms=chief, primary, principal, master | examples=the chief aim of living; the main doors were of solid glass
2. sense_key=main%3:00:02:: | definition=(of a clause) capable of standing syntactically alone as a complete sentence | synonyms=independent | examples=the main (or independent) clause in a complex sentence has at least a subject and a verb
3. sense_key=main%5:00:00:intense:00 | definition=of force; of the greatest possible intensity | examples=by main strength

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation on the word "main" in the given context.

Context analysis:
- The text is about "kalgebra", which is a mathematical calculator
- The specific phrase is "kalgebra main window"
- This refers to the primary or principal window of the application
- It's describing the most important window of the software, likely the primary interface window

Candidate senses analysis:

1. sense_key=main%5:00:00:important:00 | definition=most important element | synonyms=chief, primary, principal, master | examples=the chief aim of living; the main doors were of solid glass
   - This sense means "most important" or "primary"
   - "Main window" fits here - it's the primary/important window of the application
   - Synonyms like "primary", "principal" match well with "main window" in software context
   - The example "the main doors" is similar in usage - referring to the primary entrance

2. sense_key=main%3:00:02:: | definition=(of a clause) capable of standing syntactically alone as a complete sentence | synonyms=independent
   - This is specifically about grammar/syntax - independent clauses
   - Has nothing to do with software windows
   - Irrelevant to the context

3. sense_key=main%5:00:00:intense:00 | definition=of force; of the greatest possible intensity
   - This refers to "main strength" (archaic/poetic usage)
   - "By main strength" means using great force
   - Doesn't fit "main window" at all

Clearly, sense 1 is the correct choice. In software terminology, the "main window" refers to the primary window, the most important one, the principal interface. This aligns perfectly with sense 1 (most important element, chief, primary, principal).

The JSON output should be: {"sense_index": 1}

provider: DigitalOcean


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: window
Target surface form: window
Context:
kalgebra is a mathematical calculator based on content markup MathML language. Nowadays it is capable to make simple MathML operations (arithmetic and logical) and to representate 2D and 3D graphs. It is actually not necessary to know MathML to use kalgebra. kalgebra is a MathML based graph calculator. Although it was initially MathML oriented it can now be used by everyone with little mathematical knowledge. Here's a screenshot of kalgebra main <t>window</t> kalgebra main window

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=window%1:06:00:: | definition=a framework of wood or metal that contains a glass windowpane and is built into a wall or roof to admit light or air
2. sense_key=window%1:06:01:: | definition=a transparent opening in a vehicle that allow vision out of the sides or back; usually is capable of being opened
3. sense_key=window%1:06:02:: | definition=a transparent panel (as of an envelope) inserted in an otherwise opaque material
4. sense_key=window%1:17:00:: | definition=an opening that resembles a window in appearance or function | examples=he could see them through a window in the trees
5. sense_key=window%1:28:00:: | definition=the time period that is considered best for starting or finishing something | examples=the expanded window will give us time to catch the thieves; they had a window of less than an hour when an attack would have succeeded
6. sense_key=window%1:06:04:: | definition=a pane of glass in a window | synonyms=windowpane | examples=the ball shattered the window
7. sense_key=window%1:06:05:: | definition=an opening in a wall or screen that admits light and air and through which customers can be served | examples=he stuck his head in the window
8. sense_key=window%1:06:03:: | definition=(computer science) a rectangular part of a computer screen that contains a display different from the rest of the screen

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation (WSD) on the word "window" in the given context.

 Context analysis:
 - The text is about "kalgebra", which is a mathematical calculator software
 - It mentions "Here's a screenshot of kalgebra main <t>window</t> kalgebra main window"
 - This is clearly referring to a graphical user interface (GUI) element in a computer program
 - The phrase "main window" is commonly used in computing to refer to the primary rectangular area on a screen where an application displays its content

 Candidate sense analysis:
 1. window%1:06:00:: - Physical framework with glass in a wall/roof (building architecture) - Not relevant, this is software
 2. window%1:06:01:: - Vehicle window - Not relevant
 3. window%1:06:02:: - Transparent panel in an envelope - Not relevant
 4. window%1:17:00:: - Opening resembling a window (metaphorical) - Not the best fit, though could be stretched, but there's a specific computer sense
 5. window%1:28:00:: - Time period - Not relevant
 6. window%1:06:04:: - Pane of glass - Physical object, not relevant
 7. sense_key=window%1:06:05:: - Opening in wall/screen for serving customers - Physical, not relevant
 8. window%1:06:03:: - (computer science) a rectangular part of a computer screen that contains a display different from the rest of the screen - This matches perfectly!

 The context explicitly mentions:
 - "kalgebra" is a software/calculator
 - "screenshot" implies computer display
 - "main window" is standard terminology for the primary application window in GUI computing

 Sense 8 (index 8 in the list, or sense_key window%1:06:03::) is clearly the correct choice.

 The user wants the output as: {"sense_index": 8}

 Wait, let me check the indexing. The candidate senses are numbered 1-8. The computer science one is number 8 in the list provided.

 So the answer should be: {"sense_index": 8}

provider: AtlasCloud


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: main
Target surface form: main
Context:
Nowadays it is capable to make simple MathML operations (arithmetic and logical) and to representate 2D and 3D graphs. It is actually not necessary to know MathML to use kalgebra. kalgebra is a MathML based graph calculator. Although it was initially MathML oriented it can now be used by everyone with little mathematical knowledge. Here's a screenshot of kalgebra main window kalgebra <t>main</t> window kalgebra main window consists in a Console tab, a 2D Graph tab, a 3D Graph tab and a Dictionary tab.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=main%5:00:00:important:00 | definition=most important element | synonyms=chief, primary, principal, master | examples=the chief aim of living; the main doors were of solid glass
2. sense_key=main%3:00:02:: | definition=(of a clause) capable of standing syntactically alone as a complete sentence | synonyms=independent | examples=the main (or independent) clause in a complex sentence has at least a subject and a verb
3. sense_key=main%5:00:00:intense:00 | definition=of force; of the greatest possible intensity | examples=by main strength

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "main" in the given context.

Context analysis:
- The text is about a software called "kalgebra" which is a MathML based graph calculator
- The specific phrase is "kalgebra main window"
- It describes the interface: "kalgebra main window consists in a Console tab, a 2D Graph tab..."
- This is referring to the primary or principal window of the application - the main window as opposed to secondary windows or dialogs

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=main%5:00:00:important:00 | definition=most important element | synonyms=chief, primary, principal, master | examples=the chief aim of living; the main doors were of solid glass
2. sense_key=main%3:00:02:: | definition=(of a clause) capable of standing syntactically alone as a complete sentence | synonyms=independent | examples=the main (or independent) clause in a complex sentence has at least a subject and a verb
3. sense_key=main%5:00:00:intense:00 | definition=of force; of the greatest possible intensity | examples=by main strength

Analysis:
- Sense 2 is about grammar (clauses), clearly not applicable here since we're talking about a software window.
- Sense 3 is about force/intensity ("by main strength"), not applicable to a window.
- Sense 1 means "most important element", synonyms include chief, primary, principal. This fits "main window" - the primary window of the application, the most important one, the principal interface.

The phrase "main window" is a common collocation referring to the primary or principal window of an application, which aligns with sense 1 (most important element, chief, primary, principal).

Therefore, the correct sense is index 1.

I need to return: {"sense_index": 1}

provider: DeepInfra


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: window
Target surface form: window
Context:
Nowadays it is capable to make simple MathML operations (arithmetic and logical) and to representate 2D and 3D graphs. It is actually not necessary to know MathML to use kalgebra. kalgebra is a MathML based graph calculator. Although it was initially MathML oriented it can now be used by everyone with little mathematical knowledge. Here's a screenshot of kalgebra main window kalgebra main <t>window</t> kalgebra main window consists in a Console tab, a 2D Graph tab, a 3D Graph tab and a Dictionary tab.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=window%1:06:00:: | definition=a framework of wood or metal that contains a glass windowpane and is built into a wall or roof to admit light or air
2. sense_key=window%1:06:01:: | definition=a transparent opening in a vehicle that allow vision out of the sides or back; usually is capable of being opened
3. sense_key=window%1:06:02:: | definition=a transparent panel (as of an envelope) inserted in an otherwise opaque material
4. sense_key=window%1:17:00:: | definition=an opening that resembles a window in appearance or function | examples=he could see them through a window in the trees
5. sense_key=window%1:28:00:: | definition=the time period that is considered best for starting or finishing something | examples=the expanded window will give us time to catch the thieves; they had a window of less than an hour when an attack would have succeeded
6. sense_key=window%1:06:04:: | definition=a pane of glass in a window | synonyms=windowpane | examples=the ball shattered the window
7. sense_key=window%1:06:05:: | definition=an opening in a wall or screen that admits light and air and through which customers can be served | examples=he stuck his head in the window
8. sense_key=window%1:06:03:: | definition=(computer science) a rectangular part of a computer screen that contains a display different from the rest of the screen

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "window" in the given context.

 Context analysis:
 - The text is about "kalgebra", which is described as a "MathML based graph calculator"
 - It mentions "Here's a screenshot of kalgebra main window"
 - It describes the window as consisting of tabs: "Console tab, a 2D Graph tab, a 3D Graph tab and a Dictionary tab"
 - This is clearly referring to a graphical user interface (GUI) element in computer software

 Candidate sense analysis:
 1. window%1:06:00:: - Physical framework with glass in a wall/roof (building architecture) - Not correct, this is about software
 2. window%1:06:01:: - Vehicle window - Not correct
 3. window%1:06:02:: - Transparent panel in an envelope - Not correct
 4. window%1:17:00:: - Opening resembling a window (metaphorical/physical) - Not the best fit
 5. window%1:28:00:: - Time period - Not correct
 6. window%1:06:04:: - Pane of glass - Not correct
 7. window%1:06:05:: - Opening in wall/screen for serving customers - Not correct (physical)
 8. window%1:06:03:: - (computer science) a rectangular part of a computer screen that contains a display different from the rest of the screen - This matches perfectly!

 The context clearly describes a software application (kalgebra) with a "main window" containing tabs. This is the computer science sense of "window" - a rectangular area on a computer screen displaying content.

 Therefore, the correct sense is index 8 (window%1:06:03::).

 Wait, let me check the indexing. The user lists:
 1. sense_key=window%1:06:00::
 2. sense_key=window%1:06:01::
 3. sense_key=window%1:06:02::
 4. sense_key=window%1:17:00::
 5. sense_key=window%1:28:00::
 6. sense_key=window%1:06:04::
 7. sense_key=window%1:06:05::
 8. sense_key=window%1:06:03::

 So sense 8 is the computer science one.

 The answer should be: {"sense_index": 8}


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: main
Target surface form: main
Context:
It is actually not necessary to know MathML to use kalgebra. kalgebra is a MathML based graph calculator. Although it was initially MathML oriented it can now be used by everyone with little mathematical knowledge. Here's a screenshot of kalgebra main window kalgebra main window kalgebra <t>main</t> window consists in a Console tab, a 2D Graph tab, a 3D Graph tab and a Dictionary tab. Below these tabs you will find an input field to type your functions or do your calculations.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=main%5:00:00:important:00 | definition=most important element | synonyms=chief, primary, principal, master | examples=the chief aim of living; the main doors were of solid glass
2. sense_key=main%3:00:02:: | definition=(of a clause) capable of standing syntactically alone as a complete sentence | synonyms=independent | examples=the main (or independent) clause in a complex sentence has at least a subject and a verb
3. sense_key=main%5:00:00:intense:00 | definition=of force; of the greatest possible intensity | examples=by main strength

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation (WSD) on the word "main" in the given context.

 Context analysis:
 - The text is about kalgebra, a MathML based graph calculator
 - The specific phrase is "kalgebra main window" or "kalgebra <t>main</t> window"
 - It describes the components of this window: Console tab, 2D Graph tab, etc.
 - The word "main" is modifying "window" - referring to the primary or principal window of the application

 Candidate senses:
 1. sense_key=main%5:00:00:important:00 | definition=most important element | synonyms=chief, primary, principal, master | examples=the chief aim of living; the main doors were of solid glass
 2. sense_key=main%3:00:02:: | definition=(of a clause) capable of standing syntactically alone as a complete sentence | synonyms=independent | examples=the main (or independent) clause in a complex sentence has at least a subject and a verb
 3. sense_key=main%5:00:00:intense:00 | definition=of force; of the greatest possible intensity | examples=by main strength

 Analysis:
 - Sense 2 is about grammar/clauses - clearly not applicable here as we're talking about a software window
 - Sense 3 is about force/intensity - "by main strength" - archaic usage, not applicable to a window
 - Sense 1 means "most important", "chief", "primary", "principal" - this fits perfectly with "main window" meaning the primary or principal window of the application

 The phrase "main window" is a common collocation referring to the primary window of a software application, as opposed to secondary windows, dialogs, etc. This aligns with sense 1 (most important, principal).

 Therefore, the correct sense is index 1.

 I need to return: {"sense_index": 1}


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: window
Target surface form: window
Context:
It is actually not necessary to know MathML to use kalgebra. kalgebra is a MathML based graph calculator. Although it was initially MathML oriented it can now be used by everyone with little mathematical knowledge. Here's a screenshot of kalgebra main window kalgebra main window kalgebra main <t>window</t> consists in a Console tab, a 2D Graph tab, a 3D Graph tab and a Dictionary tab. Below these tabs you will find an input field to type your functions or do your calculations.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=window%1:06:00:: | definition=a framework of wood or metal that contains a glass windowpane and is built into a wall or roof to admit light or air
2. sense_key=window%1:06:01:: | definition=a transparent opening in a vehicle that allow vision out of the sides or back; usually is capable of being opened
3. sense_key=window%1:06:02:: | definition=a transparent panel (as of an envelope) inserted in an otherwise opaque material
4. sense_key=window%1:17:00:: | definition=an opening that resembles a window in appearance or function | examples=he could see them through a window in the trees
5. sense_key=window%1:28:00:: | definition=the time period that is considered best for starting or finishing something | examples=the expanded window will give us time to catch the thieves; they had a window of less than an hour when an attack would have succeeded
6. sense_key=window%1:06:04:: | definition=a pane of glass in a window | synonyms=windowpane | examples=the ball shattered the window
7. sense_key=window%1:06:05:: | definition=an opening in a wall or screen that admits light and air and through which customers can be served | examples=he stuck his head in the window
8. sense_key=window%1:06:03:: | definition=(computer science) a rectangular part of a computer screen that contains a display different from the rest of the screen

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "window" in the given context.

 Context analysis:
 - The text is about "kalgebra", which is described as a "MathML based graph calculator"
 - The specific sentence mentions: "Here's a screenshot of kalgebra main window kalgebra main window kalgebra main <t>window</t> consists in a Console tab, a 2D Graph tab, a 3D Graph tab and a Dictionary tab."
 - This is clearly referring to a graphical user interface (GUI) element in a computer application
 - The description mentions tabs (Console tab, 2D Graph tab, etc.) which are typical GUI elements
 - It mentions "screenshot" which implies computer software

 Candidate sense analysis:
 1. window%1:06:00:: - Physical window in a wall/roof with glass - Not relevant (this is software)
 2. window%1:06:01:: - Vehicle window - Not relevant
 3. window%1:06:02:: - Transparent panel in an envelope - Not relevant
 4. window%1:17:00:: - Opening resembling a window (metaphorical) - Not the best fit
 5. window%1:28:00:: - Time period - Not relevant
 6. window%1:06:04:: - Pane of glass - Not relevant
 7. window%1:06:05:: - Opening in a wall/screen for serving customers - Not relevant (physical)
 8. window%1:06:03:: - "(computer science) a rectangular part of a computer screen that contains a display different from the rest of the screen" - This matches perfectly!

 The context is clearly about computer software (kalgebra calculator), mentioning screenshots, tabs, and the main interface of the application. This is definitely the computer science sense of "window" (GUI window).

 Therefore, the correct sense is index 8 (window%1:06:03::).

 Wait, let me check the indexing. The user lists:
 1. sense_key=window%1:06:00::
 2. sense_key=window%1:06:01::
 3. sense_key=window%1:06:02::
 4. sense_key=window%1:17:00::
 5. sense_key=window%1:28:00::
 6. sense_key=window%1:06:04::
 7. sense_key=window%1:06:05::
 8. sense_key=window%1:06:03::

 So the computer science sense is listed as item 8.

 The answer should be: {"sense_index": 8}

provider: ModelRun


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: consist
Target surface form: consists
Context:
It is actually not necessary to know MathML to use kalgebra. kalgebra is a MathML based graph calculator. Although it was initially MathML oriented it can now be used by everyone with little mathematical knowledge. Here's a screenshot of kalgebra main window kalgebra main window kalgebra main window <t>consists</t> in a Console tab, a 2D Graph tab, a 3D Graph tab and a Dictionary tab. Below these tabs you will find an input field to type your functions or do your calculations.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=consist%2:42:00:: | definition=originate (in) | synonyms=dwell, lie, lie in | examples=The problems dwell in the social injustices in this country
2. sense_key=consist%2:42:04:: | definition=have its essential character; be comprised or contained in; be embodied in | examples=The payment consists in food; What does love consist in?
3. sense_key=consist%2:42:02:: | definition=be consistent in form, tenor, or character; be congruous | examples=Desires are to be satisfied only so far as consists with an approved end
4. sense_key=consist%2:42:01:: | definition=be composed of | synonyms=comprise | examples=The land he conquered comprised several provinces; What does this dish consist of?

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "consists" in the given context.

 Let me analyze the context:
 - The sentence is: "Here's a screenshot of kalgebra main window kalgebra main window kalgebra main window <t>consists</t> in a Console tab, a 2D Graph tab, a 3D Graph tab and a Dictionary tab."
 - The structure is: [Subject] consists in [list of components]
 - The subject is "kalgebra main window" (or the screenshot/description thereof)
 - The components listed are: "a Console tab, a 2D Graph tab, a 3D Graph tab and a Dictionary tab"

 Now let's look at the candidate senses:

 1. sense_key=consist%2:42:00:: | definition=originate (in) | synonyms=dwell, lie, lie in | examples=The problems dwell in the social injustices in this country
    - This means "to be situated in" or "to have its source in"
    - Example structure: "The problems consist in..."
    - Doesn't fit well here because we're talking about what the window is made up of, not where it originates from

 2. sense_key=consist%2:42:04:: | definition=have its essential character; be comprised or contained in; be embodied in | examples=The payment consists in food; What does love consist in?
    - This is about the essential nature or character of something
    - Example: "The payment consists in food" - meaning the essential character of the payment is food
    - "What does love consist in?" - asking about the essential nature of love
    - The structure here is "consists in" + [the essential nature/character]
    - In our context: "consists in a Console tab..." - this could potentially fit if we're saying the essential character of the window is these tabs, but...

 3. sense_key=consist%2:42:02:: | definition=be consistent in form, tenor, or character; be congruous | examples=Desires are to be satisfied only so far as consists with an approved end
    - This is about being consistent or congruous with something
    - Usually used with "consist with"
    - Example: "consists with an approved end"
    - Doesn't fit our context at all

 4. sense_key=consist%2:42:01:: | definition=be composed of | synonyms=comprise | examples=The land he conquered comprised several provinces; What does this dish consist of?
    - This means "to be made up of" or "to comprise"
    - Usually used with "consist of" (not "consist in")
    - Example: "What does this dish consist of?"
    - The example shows "comprised" as a synonym

 Wait, I need to look carefully at the preposition used in the target sentence. The target sentence uses "consists in", not "consists of".

 The sentence is: "kalgebra main window ... consists in a Console tab, a 2D Graph tab..."

 However, looking at the context, it seems like the author might be using "consists in" to mean "is composed of" or "comprises", even though standard English would typically use "consists of" for that meaning.

 But let's look at sense 2 again: "have its essential character; be comprised or contained in; be embodied in" with examples "The payment consists in food; What does love consist in?"

 And sense 4: "be composed of" with example "What does this dish consist of?"

 The key difference is:
 - Sense 2: "consist in" - refers to essence, nature, or meaning (The beauty consists in its simplicity)
 - Sense 4: "consist of" - refers to composition, what something is made up of (The team consists of five members)

 In the given context, the window is made up of/has these tabs. It's describing the composition/structure of the window, not its essential abstract character.

 However, the text literally says "consists in", not "consists of". This could be:
 1. A non-native speaker error
 2. Using "consist in" in the sense of "is comprised of" (sense 2 mentions "be comprised or contained in")
 3. Actually meaning sense 2 (essential character)

 But looking at the content: listing the tabs that make up the window - this is clearly about composition, not essential character.

 Sense 2's definition says "have its essential character; be comprised or contained in; be embodied in". The "be comprised" part might cover this usage, even with "in".

 But wait, looking at the examples for sense 2: "The payment consists in food" - this could mean the payment is made of food (composition) OR the essential nature of the payment is food. But "What does love consist in?" is clearly about essential nature.

 Actually, looking carefully at WordNet:
 - consist%2:42:01:: is "be composed of" - typically used with "of"
 - consist%2:42:04:: is "have its essential character; be comprised or contained in; be embodied in" - typically used with "in"

 But in the sentence, we have a list of physical components (tabs) that make up the window. This is clearly a compositional relationship.

 However, the preposition is "in", not "of".

 Let me reconsider. Is it possible the text has an error and should be "consists of"? Or is "consists in" being used correctly here to mean "is composed of"?

 In some varieties of English or older usage, "consist in" might be used for composition, but standard modern English uses "consist of" for composition and "consist in" for essential character.

 But looking at the gloss for sense 2: "have its essential character; be comprised or contained in; be embodied in" - the phrase "be comprised" suggests composition.

 And the example: "The payment consists in food" - if I receive food as payment, the payment consists in (is composed of) food.

 So sense 2 can cover both essential character and composition when used with "in".

 Sense 4 is specifically "be composed of" and the example uses "consist of".

 Given that the text uses "consists in", and sense 2 is the one associated with "consist in" (based on examples), and sense 4 is associated with "consist of", I should probably choose sense 2.

 But wait, let me check if there's any chance this is sense 1 "originate (in)". No, that doesn't make sense here.

 Sense 3 is about being consistent with something - clearly wrong.

 So it's between sense 2 and sense 4.

 The sentence structure: "[Subject] consists in [list of parts]"
 - If we interpret this as "The window is composed of these tabs" -> sense 4 (but sense 4 usually takes "of")
 - If we interpret this as "The window has its essential character in these tabs" or "The composition of the window is embodied in these tabs" -> sense 2

 Actually, looking at the WordNet sense keys:
 - consist%2:42:01:: is "be composed of"
 - consist%2:42:04:: is "have its essential character..."

 The numbers at the end (01, 02, 04) are the sense numbers. Usually, the most common sense has the lowest number or specific numbering.

 In WordNet:
 - consist%2:42:00:: (dwell, lie in)
 - consist%2:42:01:: (be composed of)
 - consist%2:42:02:: (be consistent)
 - consist%2:42:04:: (have its essential character)

 Wait, there's no 03? Anyway.

 The key distinction in WordNet is:
 - Sense 01: be composed of (used with 'of')
 - Sense 04: have its essential character (used with 'in')

 But the example for sense 04 includes: "The payment consists in food" which looks like composition.

 Actually, looking up WordNet definitions (mentally):
 - "consist of" = be composed of (sense 01)
 - "consist in" = have as a main feature or essential character (sense 04)

 But in the sentence, we are describing what the window contains/is made of: tabs. This is compositional.

 However, the preposition is "in".

 If I have to choose between:
 - Sense 01 (be composed of) but with wrong preposition "in" instead of "of"
 - Sense 04 (essential character/comprised in) with correct preposition "in" but maybe slightly off meaning

 Actually, looking at the gloss for sense 04 again: "have its essential character; be comprised or contained in; be embodied in"

 The phrase "be comprised... in" suggests that something is comprised in something else. But here the window comprises the tabs, not the other way around.

 Wait, "be comprised or contained in" - this suggests the subject is contained in something else. But here, the tabs are contained in the window, not the window contained in the tabs.

 The sentence is: "kalgebra main window ... consists in a Console tab..."

 If "consist in" means "be contained in", then the window would be contained in the tabs, which is backwards.

 So sense 04 doesn't work if it means "be contained in".

 Let me look at the example for sense 04: "The payment consists in food"
 Does this mean:
 a) The payment is contained in food? No.
 b) The essential character of the payment is food? Yes.
 c) The payment is comprised of food? Yes.

 So "consist in" can mean "be comprised of" in the sense of composition.

 But in standard English, "consist of" is for composition, "consist in" is for essence.

 However, WordNet sense 04 includes both "essential character" and "be comprised".

 Given the context is clearly about the parts that make up the whole (the window has these tabs), and the only sense that deals with parts/composition is sense 01 (be composed of) and possibly sense 04 (be comprised), but sense 01 is the primary "be composed of" sense...

 But sense 01's example is "What does this dish consist of?" - clearly expecting "of".

 The target has "in".

 This is tricky. Let me look at the actual usage in the text again.

 "kalgebra main window ... consists in a Console tab, a 2D Graph tab, a 3D Graph tab and a Dictionary tab."

 This is almost certainly a non-native English speaker using "consists in" when they mean "consists of". They are listing the components.

 Therefore, despite the preposition "in", they intend sense 01 (be composed of).

 But sense 04 also involves composition (be comprised).

 However, sense 04 emphasizes "essential character" first. The example "What does love consist in?" is about essence, not parts.

 The example "The payment consists in food" - if I pay you in food, the payment consists of food. This is about the substance/material of the payment.

 In our case, the window consists of tabs. These are parts/components.

 Sense 01 is the best fit for parts/components, even if the preposition is wrong in the text.

 But I need to check if sense 04 could apply. Does the window have its essential character in these tabs? Is it saying the essence of the window is these tabs? That's a bit philosophical. It's more straightforwardly saying the window is made up of these tabs.

 Also, looking at the synonyms:
 - Sense 01: comprise
 - Sense 04: (no synonyms listed, but implied: inhere, lie in?)

 The word "comprise" is listed as a synonym for sense 01. The sentence could be rewritten as "The window comprises a Console tab..." which works perfectly.

 Therefore, despite the "in" vs "of" issue, sense 01 is the correct semantic choice.

 Wait, but the instructions say to use the sentence context, examples, and synonyms. The preposition is part of the context. If the text uses "in", and sense 04 is defined with "in", and sense 01 with "of", maybe I should choose sense 04?

 But sense 04's definition includes "be contained in". If the window consists in the tabs, that would mean the window is contained in the tabs, which is wrong. It should be the tabs are contained in the window.

 Unless... "consist in" means the tabs consist in the window? No, the subject is "kalgebra main window".

 Let me reconsider sense 04's definition: "have its essential character; be comprised or contained in; be embodied in"

 The subject of "consist" is the thing that has the essential character, or is comprised/contained/embodied.

 So if X consists in Y, then:
 - X has its essential character in Y
 - X is comprised in Y (X is part of Y?)
 - X is contained in Y
 - X is embodied in Y

 This would mean the window is contained in the tabs, which is backwards.

 But the example "The payment consists in food" - the payment is not contained in food (unless the food contains the payment, like a payment inside a food item, which makes no sense). Rather, the payment IS food.

 So "consist in" = "is essentially" or "consists of (material)".

 For the window, it consists of tabs. The tabs are the material/substance of the window.

 So sense 04 could work.

 But sense 01 is "be composed of", which is exactly what we want, even if the preposition is technically "of" not "in".

 Given that this is likely a non-native speaker error (using "in" instead of "of"), and the meaning is clearly compositional, I should choose sense 01.

 However, looking at the sense indices:
 1. consist%2:42:00:: (originate)
 2. consist%2:42:04:: (essential character)
 3. consist%2:42:02:: (be consistent)
 4. consist%2:42:01:: (be composed of)

 The user lists them as:
 1. sense_key=consist%2:42:00::
 2. sense_key=consist%2:42:04::
 3. sense_key=consist%2:42:02::
 4. sense_key=consist%2:42:01::

 So sense 01 in WordNet is listed as candidate 4.
 Sense 04 in WordNet is listed as candidate 2.

 The question asks for the "best indexed sense". The index refers to the candidate number (1, 2, 3, or 4), not the WordNet sense number.

 So I need to return {"sense_index": 4} if I choose "be composed of", or {"sense_index": 2} if I choose "essential character".

 Given the context is about the parts that compose the whole, and "comprise" is a synonym, and the example "The land he conquered comprised several provinces" is similar to "The window consists of several tabs", I choose candidate 4 (sense_key=consist%2:42:01::).

 Even though the preposition is "in", the semantic content is clearly "be composed of".

 Actually, looking at the text once more: "consists in a Console tab..."

 Could "consist in" here mean "is located in"? No, that would be sense 1 (originate, dwell).

 Could it mean "is embodied in"? The window is embodied in the tabs? No, the tabs are part of the window.

 I think the safest choice is sense 01 (candidate 4) because the meaning is compositional, listing parts of a whole.

 Final check: Is there any interpretation where "consists in" is correct here and means something else?

 "Consists in" can mean "is based on" or "is found in" in some contexts, but here it's listing components.

 I think the author meant "consists of".

 So I'll go with candidate 4.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: console
Target surface form: Console
Context:
It is actually not necessary to know MathML to use kalgebra. kalgebra is a MathML based graph calculator. Although it was initially MathML oriented it can now be used by everyone with little mathematical knowledge. Here's a screenshot of kalgebra main window kalgebra main window kalgebra main window consists in a <t>Console</t> tab, a 2D Graph tab, a 3D Graph tab and a Dictionary tab. Below these tabs you will find an input field to type your functions or do your calculations.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=console%1:06:03:: | definition=a small table fixed to a wall or designed to stand against a wall | synonyms=console table
2. sense_key=console%1:06:02:: | definition=a scientific instrument consisting of displays and an input device that an operator can use to monitor and control a system (especially a computer system)
3. sense_key=console%1:06:01:: | definition=an ornamental scroll-shaped bracket (especially one used to support a wall fixture) | examples=the bust of Napoleon stood on a console
4. sense_key=console%1:06:00:: | definition=housing for electronic instruments, as radio or television | synonyms=cabinet

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation (WSD) on the word "Console" in the given context.

Context analysis:
- The text is about "kalgebra", which is described as a "MathML based graph calculator"
- It mentions "kalgebra main window consists in a <t>Console</t> tab, a 2D Graph tab, a 3D Graph tab and a Dictionary tab"
- It mentions "Below these tabs you will find an input field to type your functions or do your calculations"
- This is clearly referring to a computer interface element - specifically a console in the sense of a terminal or command-line interface where users can input commands/calculations

Candidate senses analysis:
1. sense_key=console%1:06:03:: - "a small table fixed to a wall or designed to stand against a wall" (console table) - This is furniture, not relevant to software.
2. sense_key=console%1:06:02:: - "a scientific instrument consisting of displays and an input device that an operator can use to monitor and control a system (especially a computer system)" - This fits! It's about a computer system interface with displays and input.
3. sense_key=console%1:06:01:: - "an ornamental scroll-shaped bracket" - This is architectural/decorative, not relevant.
4. sense_key=console%1:06:00:: - "housing for electronic instruments, as radio or television" (cabinet) - This is physical housing, not a software tab/interface.

The context clearly describes a software application (kalgebra) with tabs, including a "Console" tab where users can type functions and calculations. This matches sense 2: "a scientific instrument consisting of displays and an input device that an operator can use to monitor and control a system (especially a computer system)".

While the gloss mentions "scientific instrument", in modern usage this extends to computer consoles/terminals. The key elements are "displays", "input device", and "monitor and control a system" - which fits the software console context where users input mathematical expressions and see results.

Therefore, the best sense is index 2.

Wait, let me check the indices again. The user lists them as:
1. sense_key=console%1:06:03::
2. sense_key=console%1:06:02::
3. sense_key=console%1:06:01::
4. sense_key=console%1:06:00::

So sense 2 is the one about "a scientific instrument consisting of displays and an input device..."

Actually, looking at WordNet, the typical ordering for "console" is:
- console%1:06:00:: - housing for electronic instruments, as radio or television
- console%1:06:01:: - an ornamental scroll-shaped bracket
- console%1:06:02:: - a scientific instrument...
- console%1:06:03:: - a small table...

But the user has provided specific indices. According to the user's list:
- Index 1: console table (furniture)
- Index 2: scientific instrument with displays and input device (computer console)
- Index 3: ornamental bracket
- Index 4: housing for electronic instruments (cabinet)

The context describes a software console in a calculator application (kalgebra), which is definitively the computer system sense - the interface where users type commands/calculations.

So the answer should be: {"sense_index": 2}


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: 3d
Target surface form: 3D
Context:
It is actually not necessary to know MathML to use kalgebra. kalgebra is a MathML based graph calculator. Although it was initially MathML oriented it can now be used by everyone with little mathematical knowledge. Here's a screenshot of kalgebra main window kalgebra main window kalgebra main window consists in a Console tab, a 2D Graph tab, a <t>3D</t> Graph tab and a Dictionary tab. Below these tabs you will find an input field to type your functions or do your calculations.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=3-d%1:10:00:: | definition=a movie with images having three dimensional form or appearance | synonyms=three-D
2. sense_key=3-d%1:09:00:: | definition=having a three-dimensional form or appearance | synonyms=three-D | examples=aren't dreams always in 3-D?

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the target word "3d" (surface form "3D") in the given context.

 Context analysis:
 - The text is about "kalgebra", which is a MathML based graph calculator
 - It mentions different tabs: Console tab, 2D Graph tab, 3D Graph tab, and Dictionary tab
 - The "3D" here refers to "3D Graph" - this is about three-dimensional graphing/calculus visualization
 - It's referring to three-dimensional space/form in a mathematical/graphical context

 Candidate senses:
 1. sense_key=3-d%1:10:00:: - definition: a movie with images having three dimensional form or appearance | synonyms=three-D
    - This is about movies (cinema, films)

 2. sense_key=3-d%1:09:00:: - definition: having a three-dimensional form or appearance | synonyms=three-D | examples="aren't dreams always in 3-D?"
    - This is about having three-dimensional form or appearance in general

 Analysis:
 - The context is about a graph calculator with a "3D Graph tab"
 - This refers to three-dimensional graphs (graphs in 3D space)
 - It's not referring to a movie (sense 1)
 - It's referring to the property of being three-dimensional (sense 2)
 - The "3D Graph" means a graph that has three-dimensional form/appearance - plotting in 3D space

 Sense 2 (3-d%1:09:00::) fits better because:
 - It refers to having a three-dimensional form or appearance
 - In the context of a "3D Graph", it means a graph that is three-dimensional (has depth, width, height)
 - Sense 1 is specifically about movies, which doesn't fit a graph calculator context

 The example for sense 2 ("aren't dreams always in 3-D?") suggests the general concept of three-dimensionality, which applies to graphs as well.

 Therefore, the best sense is index 2.

provider: StreamLake


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: below
Target surface form: Below
Context:
kalgebra is a MathML based graph calculator. Although it was initially MathML oriented it can now be used by everyone with little mathematical knowledge. Here's a screenshot of kalgebra main window kalgebra main window kalgebra main window consists in a Console tab, a 2D Graph tab, a 3D Graph tab and a Dictionary tab. <t>Below</t> these tabs you will find an input field to type your functions or do your calculations. If we want to understand how it works, the best thing we can do is to realize that our input is being converted into MathML although it is not necessary to know MathML.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=below%4:02:01:: | definition=in or to a place that is lower | synonyms=at a lower place, to a lower place, beneath
2. sense_key=below%4:02:00:: | definition=at a later place | examples=see below
3. sense_key=below%4:02:02:: | definition=(in writing) see below | synonyms=infra | examples=vide infra
4. sense_key=below%4:02:06:: | definition=on a floor below | synonyms=downstairs, down the stairs, on a lower floor | examples=the tenants live downstairs
5. sense_key=below%4:02:03:: | definition=further down | synonyms=under | examples=see under for further discussion

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "Below" in the given context.

 Let me analyze the context:
 - The text is describing the KAlgebra application interface
 - It mentions: "kalgebra main window consists in a Console tab, a 2D Graph tab, a 3D Graph tab and a Dictionary tab. Below these tabs you will find an input field..."
 - This is describing the spatial/layout relationship in a GUI (Graphical User Interface)
 - The input field is located physically/spatially lower than the tabs

 Now let's look at the candidate senses:

 1. sense_key=below%4:02:01:: | definition=in or to a place that is lower | synonyms=at a lower place, to a lower place, beneath
    - This seems to fit spatial location "in or to a place that is lower"
    - The input field is in a place that is lower than the tabs

 2. sense_key=below%4:02:00:: | definition=at a later place | examples=see below
    - This refers to later in a text/document, not spatial

 3. sense_key=below%4:02:02:: | definition=(in writing) see below | synonyms=infra | examples=vide infra
    - This is specifically for written references, not spatial GUI layout

 4. sense_key=below%4:02:06:: | definition=on a floor below | synonyms=downstairs, down the stairs, on a lower floor | examples=the tenants live downstairs
    - This is specifically for building floors/stories, not applicable to software interface tabs

 5. sense_key=below%4:02:03:: | definition=further down | synonyms=under | examples=see under for further discussion
    - This could work but seems more oriented to text position or "further down" in a list/text

 The context is clearly describing a spatial relationship in a software interface - the input field is located spatially lower than the tabs.

 Sense 1 ("in or to a place that is lower") is the most general spatial sense and fits best for describing the position of UI elements where one is lower than another.

 Sense 4 is too specific to building floors.
 Sense 2 and 3 are about textual references.
 Sense 5 could work but "further down" often implies a sequence or text, whereas sense 1 is more directly about spatial position "in... a place that is lower".

 The synonyms for sense 1 include "beneath" which fits well with the GUI description (the input field is beneath the tabs).

 Therefore, the best sense is sense 1 (index 1).

 Wait, let me double-check the sense indices. The user lists them as:
 1. sense_key=below%4:02:01::
 2. sense_key=below%4:02:00::
 3. sense_key=below%4:02:02::
 4. sense_key=below%4:02:06::
 5. sense_key=below%4:02:03::

 So I need to return the index number from this list (1-5), not the WordNet offset.

 The answer should be: {"sense_index": 1}


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: find
Target surface form: find
Context:
kalgebra is a MathML based graph calculator. Although it was initially MathML oriented it can now be used by everyone with little mathematical knowledge. Here's a screenshot of kalgebra main window kalgebra main window kalgebra main window consists in a Console tab, a 2D Graph tab, a 3D Graph tab and a Dictionary tab. Below these tabs you will <t>find</t> an input field to type your functions or do your calculations. If we want to understand how it works, the best thing we can do is to realize that our input is being converted into MathML although it is not necessary to know MathML.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=find%2:40:02:: | definition=come upon, as if by accident; meet with | synonyms=happen, chance, bump, encounter | examples=We find this idea in Plato; I happened upon the most wonderful bakery not very far from here
2. sense_key=find%2:39:02:: | definition=discover or determine the existence, presence, or fact of | synonyms=detect, observe, discover, notice | examples=She detected high levels of lead in her drinking water; We found traces of lead in the paint
3. sense_key=find%2:40:00:: | definition=come upon after searching; find the location of something that was missed or lost | synonyms=regain | examples=Did you find your glasses?; I cannot find my gloves!
4. sense_key=find%2:32:00:: | definition=establish after a calculation, investigation, experiment, survey, or study | synonyms=determine, find out, ascertain | examples=find the product of two numbers; The physicist who found the elusive particle won the Nobel Prize
5. sense_key=find%2:31:10:: | definition=come to believe on the basis of emotion, intuitions, or indefinite grounds | synonyms=feel | examples=I feel that he doesn't like me; I find him to be obnoxious
6. sense_key=find%2:39:01:: | definition=perceive or be contemporaneous with | synonyms=witness, see | examples=We found Republicans winning the offices; You'll see a lot of cheating in this school
7. sense_key=find%2:40:01:: | definition=get something or somebody for a specific purpose | synonyms=line up, get hold, come up | examples=I found this gadget that will serve as a bottle opener; I got hold of these tools to fix our plumbing
8. sense_key=find%2:36:00:: | definition=make a discovery, make a new finding | synonyms=discover | examples=Roentgen discovered X-rays; Physicists believe they found a new elementary particle
9. sense_key=find%2:31:09:: | definition=make a discovery | synonyms=discover | examples=She found that he had lied to her; The story is false, so far as I can discover
10. sense_key=find%2:40:03:: | definition=obtain through effort or management | examples=She found the time and energy to take care of her aging parents; We found the money to send our sons to college
11. sense_key=find%2:32:01:: | definition=decide on and make a declaration about | synonyms=rule | examples=find someone guilty
12. sense_key=find%2:30:00:: | definition=receive a specified treatment (abstract) | synonyms=receive, get, obtain, incur | examples=These aspects of civilization do not find expression or receive an interpretation; His movie received a good review
13. sense_key=find%2:39:05:: | definition=perceive oneself to be in a certain condition or place | examples=I found myself in a difficult situation; When he woke up, he found himself in a hospital room
14. sense_key=find%2:40:15:: | definition=get or find back; recover the use of | synonyms=recover, retrieve, regain | examples=She regained control of herself; She found her voice and replied quickly
15. sense_key=find%2:38:10:: | definition=succeed in reaching; arrive at | examples=The arrow found its mark
16. sense_key=find%2:30:13:: | definition=accept and make use of one's personality, abilities, and situation | synonyms=find oneself | examples=My son went to Berkeley to find himself

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "find" in the given context. Let me analyze the context carefully.

Context: "Below these tabs you will find an input field to type your functions or do your calculations."

The sentence says that below the tabs, the user will "find" an input field. This is describing the location of something in a user interface. It's telling the user where to locate/encounter/see the input field.

Let me look at the candidate senses:

1. come upon, as if by accident; meet with - This suggests accidental encounter, which doesn't fit. The input field is intentionally placed there.
2. discover or determine the existence, presence, or fact of - This is about detecting or noticing, like finding traces of lead.
3. come upon after searching; find the location of something that was missed or lost - This is about locating something that was lost or searching for it. While the user might be "searching" for the input field, it's more about the field being located there/available there.
4. establish after a calculation, investigation... - This is about determining through study, not relevant here.
5. come to believe on the basis of emotion... - Not relevant.
6. perceive or be contemporaneous with - This is about witnessing or seeing something happen.
7. get something or somebody for a specific purpose - This is about obtaining/lining up something.
8. make a discovery, make a new finding - About discovering something new scientifically.
9. make a discovery - Similar to 8.
10. obtain through effort or management - Getting something through effort.
11. decide on and make a declaration about - Legal/administrative finding.
12. receive a specified treatment (abstract) - Not relevant.
13. perceive oneself to be in a certain condition - Not relevant.
14. get or find back; recover the use of - Recovering something lost.
15. succeed in reaching; arrive at - The arrow found its mark. This could work metaphorically, but...
16. accept and make use of one's personality - Finding oneself.

Looking at sense 2 (find%2:39:02::): "discover or detect, observe, discover, notice" - examples: "We found traces of lead". This is about detecting existence.

But actually, looking at the context "you will find an input field", this is a common usage in technical documentation where "find" means "encounter/locate/see" something that exists in a particular place.

Let me reconsider sense 1: "come upon, as if by accident; meet with". No, it's not accidental.

Sense 3: "come upon after searching; find the location of something that was missed or lost". The input field isn't necessarily lost or missed, but this sense covers locating something.

But actually, looking at sense 2: "discover or determine the existence, presence, or fact of". This is close, but usually used for scientific/empirical discovery.

Wait, let me look at sense 2 more carefully: "discover or determine the existence, presence, or fact of". Examples: "She detected high levels of lead", "We found traces of lead".

In the context of software documentation: "Below these tabs you will find an input field" - this is describing where something is located. It's similar to "you will see" or "you will encounter" or "there is".

Actually, looking at the examples for sense 6: "perceive or be contemporaneous with" - "We found Republicans winning the offices". That's different.

Looking at sense 15: "succeed in reaching; arrive at" - "The arrow found its mark". This is metaphorical.

But the most common sense for "you will find X below/there" in instructional text is usually sense 1 or 3, but let me look...

Actually, looking at WordNet sense 2:40:00 "come upon after searching; find the location of something that was missed or lost" - but here there's no implication of searching or something being lost.

Wait, I should look at the definition more carefully. WordNet sense 2:39:00 might be what I need but it's not in the list.

Let me look at the list again. The user provided specific senses.

Sense 2: find%2:39:02:: - discover or determine the existence, presence, or fact of
Sense 1: find%2:40:02:: - come upon, as if by accident; meet with
Sense 3: find%2:40:00:: - come upon after searching; find the location of something that was missed or lost

In the sentence "Below these tabs you will find an input field", the meaning is that the input field is located there, and the user will encounter/see it there. This is a common locative/existential use of "find" in technical writing.

Actually, looking at sense 2 again: "discover or determine the existence, presence, or fact of" - this is about finding evidence or detecting something.

But sense 1 "come upon" might be the closest, even though the "by accident" part isn't perfect. Actually, looking at the examples for sense 1: "We find this idea in Plato" - this is about encountering/coming across something in a text or location. "I happened upon the most wonderful bakery" - accidental.

But there's a sense missing in the list that is often used for "you will find..." - the sense of "to perceive, experience, or encounter (something) in a particular place or situation".

Let me reconsider sense 3: "come upon after searching; find the location of something that was missed or lost". The example "Did you find your glasses?" suggests searching for something specific that was lost. But "you will find an input field" doesn't imply the field was lost.

Let me look at sense 15: "succeed in reaching; arrive at". No, that's not it.

Actually, looking at sense 2:40:02 (sense 1 in the list): "come upon, as if by accident; meet with". The "meet with" part might fit. "You will meet with an input field below these tabs."

But actually, looking at sense find%2:39:02:: (sense 2 in the list): "discover or determine the existence, presence, or fact of".

Wait, I think I need to look at what WordNet actually says for these senses. In WordNet, the sense "come upon, meet with" (find%2:40:02::) can be used for "We found this idea in Plato" which is similar to finding something in a text or interface.

But actually, the best fit might be sense 3: "come upon after searching; find the location of something". Even though the user isn't explicitly searching, the context is describing the location of UI elements, which implies the user is looking for them.

However, looking at sense 1 again: the example "We find this idea in Plato" is very close to "Below these tabs you will find an input field". Both indicate the location of something (an idea in Plato's work, an input field below tabs).

But wait, the definition says "as if by accident" which doesn't fit UI documentation.

Let me reconsider sense 2:40:01 (sense 7 in the list): "get something or somebody for a specific purpose". No, that's about obtaining.

Sense 12 (find%2:30:00::): "receive a specified treatment (abstract)". No.

Actually, looking at the gloss for sense 2:39:02 again: "discover or determine the existence, presence, or fact of". This is about detecting/perceiving.

But in the sentence "you will find an input field", it's more about the field being there for you to use/see.

I think the intended answer is sense 3 (find%2:40:00::) "come upon after searching; find the location of something that was missed or lost" - because in UI documentation, "find" often refers to locating UI elements. However, the "missed or lost" part is problematic.

Wait, there's sense 13: find%2:39:05:: "perceive oneself to be in a certain condition or place". That's "find oneself", not applicable.

Let me look at sense 6: "perceive or be contemporaneous with". Example: "We found Republicans winning". This is about witnessing something happening.

Sense 2: "She detected high levels of lead". This is discovering existence.

Actually, looking at standard WordNet sense disambiguation for "you will find X there", the sense is usually find%2:40:00 (locating something) or find%2:40:02 (come upon).

But let me look at the specific sentence again: "Below these tabs you will find an input field to type your functions or do your calculations."

This is standard software documentation language. The meaning is "located there" or "you will see/encounter there".

Among the choices, sense 3 (find%2:40:00::) seems most appropriate: "find the location of something". Even though it's not strictly "after searching" or "missed or lost", this is the sense used for locating objects.

But sense 1 (find%2:40:02::) with "come upon, meet with" - the example "We find this idea in Plato" is actually quite similar. When we say "we find this idea in Plato", we mean it is located there/encountered there.

However, the "as if by accident" in the gloss is the problem.

Let me reconsider sense 2 (find%2:39:02::): "discover or determine the existence, presence, or fact of". If you "find an input field", you discover its presence/location. The examples include finding traces of lead (discovering existence/location).

But sense 3 is specifically about location: "find the location of something".

Actually, looking at the WordNet hierarchy, find%2:40:00:: is the specific sense for locating lost objects, while find%2:40:02:: is for coming upon unexpectedly.

But there's another sense... wait, sense 15: "succeed in reaching; arrive at". "The arrow found its mark". This is metaphorical location.

I think for UI documentation "you will find X", the best available option is sense 3 (index 3: find%2:40:00::), as it involves finding the location of something. Even though the "missed or lost" part doesn't fit perfectly, it's the closest among the options for "locating where something is".

Alternatively, could it be sense 1? "come upon, as if by accident; meet with". In the context of "We find this idea in Plato", this is used for textual/abstract locations.

Actually, looking at the examples for sense 1:
- "We find this idea in Plato" (locating an idea in a text)
- "I happened upon the most wonderful bakery not very far from here" (accidental encounter)

For sense 3:
- "Did you find your glasses?" (locating lost item)
- "I cannot find my gloves!" (locating lost item)

For the UI context "you will find an input field below", this is really saying "there is an input field below, and you will encounter/see it there". This is closest to sense 1's example "We find this idea in Plato", which is about encountering/locating something in a particular place (Plato's works).

But let's look at sense 2 (find%2:39:02::): "discover or determine the existence, presence, or fact of". Examples: "She detected high levels of lead", "We found traces of lead". This is empirical discovery.

Actually, I think sense 3 is still the best fit because it specifically mentions "find the location of", which is what the sentence is about - the location of the input field relative to the tabs.

The fact that it's not "missed or lost" is a limitation of the gloss, but among the choices, it's the one about locating the position of something.

Wait, let me check if there's a sense like "to perceive, see, encounter" that's not about accident or searching.

Sense 6: "perceive or be contemporaneous with" - examples about witnessing events.

Sense 13: "perceive oneself to be..."

Sense 2 is "detect, observe, discover, notice".

Actually, looking at this again, sense 2:39:02 might be it: "discover or determine the existence, presence, or fact of". If you "find" an input field in a UI, you are discovering its presence/location. But the examples are about scientific detection (lead traces).

Sense 3:40:00 is about searching for lost items.

Sense 1:40:02 is about coming upon accidentally or in a text ("We find this idea in Plato").

Given the example "We find this idea in Plato" for sense 1, and the sentence "Below these tabs you will find an input field", I think sense 1 is actually the intended answer. Both involve locating/encountering something within a structured space (a text, a UI). The "as if by accident" is part of the gloss but the example shows it can be used for deliberate location in a text.

However, sense 3 could also be argued since you're locating the input field.

But let's look at the verb frames. "find" in "you will find an input field" takes a direct object (the input field) and a location (below these tabs).

In WordNet, sense 3 (find%2:40:00) is typically for "find" as in "I found my keys" - recovering lost items.
Sense 1 (find%2:40:02) is for "find" as in "I found this quote in the book" or "I happened upon a nice restaurant".

In UI documentation, "you will find X there" is analogous to "you will encounter X there" or "X is located there". Between the two, sense 1 ("come upon, meet with") seems closer to the usage of encountering something in a particular location, supported by the Plato example which also involves textual/spatial location.

But I'm still uncertain. Let me reconsider sense 2:40:01 (sense 7): "get something or somebody for a specific purpose". No.

What about sense 10 (find%2:40:03::): "obtain through effort or management". No.

Actually, looking at sense 15 (find%2:38:10::): "succeed in reaching; arrive at". "The arrow found its mark". This is the only one with a clear locative meaning without implying loss or accident. But it's usually for projectiles or abstract success.

Given the options, I think sense 3 (find%2:40:00::) is the most likely intended answer for WSD systems dealing with "find" meaning "locate", despite the "missed or lost" aspect being imperfect for this context. Or sense 1.

Let me check if there's any other clue. The context is about a calculator interface. The input field is part of the interface. "Below these tabs you will find an input field" - this is instructing the user where to look to locate the input field.

In many WSD datasets, "find" in the sense of "locate (an object)" is tagged with sense 3 (find%2:40:00) even when the object isn't strictly lost, because that's the closest sense.

But actually, looking at WordNet 3.0/3.1 data:
- find%2:40:00 -> "come upon after searching; find the location of something that was missed or lost"
- find%2:40:02 -> "come upon, as if by accident; meet with"

And there's find%2:39:00? No, the list given is what I have to choose from.

I think I'll go with sense 3 (index 3) because it's about finding the location of something, which matches "find an input field [located] below these tabs".

Wait, I need to be careful about the indexing. The user lists them as:
1. sense_key=find%2:40:02::
2. sense_key=find%2:39:02::
3. sense_key=find%2:40:00::
...

So index 3 corresponds to sense_key find%2:40:00::.

Yes.

But let me reconsider the "MathML" context. Is there any scientific discovery sense? No, this is purely about UI description.

One more check: could it be sense 2 (find%2:39:02::) "discover or determine the existence, presence, or fact of" - as in "you will discover the presence of an input field"? That's a stretch.

Could it be sense 13 (find%2:39:05::) "perceive oneself to be in a certain condition or place"? No, that's reflexive "find oneself".

Could it be sense 12 (find%2:30:00::) "receive a specified treatment"? No.

I think it's between 1 and 3.

Sense 1: "We find this idea in Plato" - this is exactly parallel to "You will find an input field below the tabs". Both say that something exists/is located in/at a place.

Sense 3: "Did you find your glasses?" - this is about recovering lost items.

Given that the Plato example in sense 1 is a direct parallel (locating something in a domain/text/interface), and sense 3 requires the object to be lost/missed (which an input field in a manual is not), I think sense 1 is actually the better choice, despite the "accident" part of the gloss. The "meet with" part covers it.

Actually, looking at the gloss again for sense 1: "come upon, as if by accident; meet with". The "meet with" part covers the "encounter/locate" meaning without the accident connotation. The examples split: "We find this idea in Plato" (deliberate textual location) vs "happened upon" (accident).

So sense 1 covers both accidental and deliberate textual/spatial encounter.

Therefore, sense 1 (index 1) is the answer.

But I should verify if there's any convention that "find" in software manuals maps to sense 3. In SemCor or other datasets, "find" meaning "locate (a UI element)" is often annotated... I'm not sure. But logically, sense 1 has the Plato example which is very similar.

However, looking at the synonyms for sense 1: happen, chance, bump, encounter. "Encounter" fits. "Bump into" is accidental, "encounter" can be neutral.

For sense 3: regain. This is about getting back what you had.

So sense 1 is better.

Wait, I want to check one more thing. Is there a sense like "to have" or "there is"? No.

According to some WSD guidelines, when "find" means "discover by study/research", it's sense 4 (index 4). When it means "detect/observe", it's sense 2.

For UI elements: "You will find the button on the right" - this is typically sense 3 or 1.

Given the strong parallel with "We find this idea in Plato" (sense 1), I will choose index 1.

Actually, looking at the JSON format required: {"sense_index": 1}

But wait, I should check if the user counts from 0 or 1. The list is numbered 1-16, so index 1 means the first one.

Let me double-check the target.

Target surface form: find
Context: "you will <t>find</t> an input field"

Sense 1 (find%2:40:02::): come upon, as if by accident; meet with
Sense 2 (find%2:39:02::): discover or determine the existence, presence, or fact of
Sense 3 (find%2:40:00::): come upon after searching; find the location of something that was missed or lost

I think I'm overthinking this. In many lexical resources, the sense "find" = "locate" (transitive) is distinct from "find" = "discover" and "find" = "recover". Sense 3 is specifically "after searching" and "missed or lost". The input field was never lost.

Sense 2 is about detecting existence (traces of lead).

Sense 1 is about meeting with/coming upon. The example "We find this idea in Plato" is the most analogous.

Therefore: {"sense_index": 1}

But I recall that in WordNet, "find" in the sense of "locate" (even if not lost) is sometimes mapped to sense 3 by systems because it's the only specific "locate" sense. But strictly speaking, sense 3 requires "after searching" and "missed or lost".

Sense 1: "come upon, as if by accident; meet with". The "meet with" part.

Sense 15: "succeed in reaching; arrive at". The arrow found its mark.

Actually, looking at sense 15 examples: "The arrow found its mark". This is about reaching a target. "Below these tabs you will find an input field" - will the user's gaze/action reach the input field? Maybe, but it's a stretch.

I think I'll go with 1.

No, actually, looking at this again, I think the answer is 3. Why? Because in WSD tasks, "find" when used to mean "locate an object in a scene" (like UI documentation) is usually classified as the "find the location of something" sense, even if the gloss mentions "lost". The gloss is schematic, as the instructions say. So we should use the context: the user is trying to locate the input field in the interface. The schematic gloss for sense 3 is "find the location of something".

The gloss for sense 1 is schematic too: "come upon, as if by accident" - but the UI location is not accidental.

So between "accidental" and "lost", which is easier to ignore? Probably "lost", because finding the location of UI elements is exactly what users do in documentation - they search for them.

Also, the synonym for sense 3 is "regain" (which implies getting back something lost), but for sense 1, the synonyms are "happen, chance, bump" which are strongly accidental.

Therefore, sense 3 is the least wrong, or the best fit if we interpret the schematic gloss generously as "find the location of".

But actually, looking at the instructions: "WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense."

So I should look at synonyms too.
Sense 1 synonyms: happen, chance, bump, encounter. "Encounter" works.
Sense 3 synonyms: regain. This doesn't work for an input field you never had.

Examples:
Sense 1: "We find this idea in Plato" (location in text), "I happened upon..." (accident)
Sense 3: "Did you find your glasses?" (locating lost item), "I cannot find my gloves!" (locating lost item)

The Plato example (sense 1) supports the location-in-a-structure meaning.
The glasses example (sense 3) supports recovering lost items.

The UI context is location in a structure (the window), similar to location in a text (Plato).

Therefore, sense 1 is better supported by the examples and synonyms ("encounter").

Final decision: {"sense_index": 1}


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: type
Target surface form: type
Context:
kalgebra is a MathML based graph calculator. Although it was initially MathML oriented it can now be used by everyone with little mathematical knowledge. Here's a screenshot of kalgebra main window kalgebra main window kalgebra main window consists in a Console tab, a 2D Graph tab, a 3D Graph tab and a Dictionary tab. Below these tabs you will find an input field to <t>type</t> your functions or do your calculations. If we want to understand how it works, the best thing we can do is to realize that our input is being converted into MathML although it is not necessary to know MathML.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=type%2:32:00:: | definition=write by means of a keyboard with types | synonyms=typewrite | examples=type the acceptance letter, please
2. sense_key=type%2:31:00:: | definition=identify as belonging to a certain type | synonyms=typecast | examples=Such people can practically be typed

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "type" in the given context.

 Context: "Below these tabs you will find an input field to <t>type</t> your functions or do your calculations."

 Candidate senses:
 1. sense_key=type%2:32:00:: | definition=write by means of a keyboard with types | synonyms=typewrite | examples=type the acceptance letter, please
 2. sense_key=type%2:31:00:: | definition=identify as belonging to a certain type | synonyms=typecast | examples=Such people can practically be typed

 Analysis:
 - The context is about using a software application (kalgebra) where there's an input field to "type" functions or calculations.
 - This clearly refers to entering text/data via a keyboard.
 - Sense 1 matches this: "write by means of a keyboard with types" (though "with types" seems like a typo in the gloss, it likely means "with type/keys"). The synonym "typewrite" and example "type the acceptance letter, please" both indicate entering text via keyboard.
 - Sense 2 is about categorizing/classifying something ("identify as belonging to a certain type"), which doesn't fit the context of entering data into an input field.

 Therefore, sense 1 is the correct choice.

 The user wants the output as: {"sense_index": 1}


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: function
Target surface form: functions
Context:
kalgebra is a MathML based graph calculator. Although it was initially MathML oriented it can now be used by everyone with little mathematical knowledge. Here's a screenshot of kalgebra main window kalgebra main window kalgebra main window consists in a Console tab, a 2D Graph tab, a 3D Graph tab and a Dictionary tab. Below these tabs you will find an input field to type your <t>functions</t> or do your calculations. If we want to understand how it works, the best thing we can do is to realize that our input is being converted into MathML although it is not necessary to know MathML.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=function%1:24:00:: | definition=(mathematics) a mathematical relation such that each element of a given set (the domain of the function) is associated with an element of another set (the range of the function) | synonyms=mathematical function, single-valued function, map, mapping
2. sense_key=function%1:07:00:: | definition=what something is used for | synonyms=purpose, role, use | examples=the function of an auger is to bore holes; ballet is beautiful but what use is it?
3. sense_key=function%1:04:00:: | definition=the actions and activities assigned to or required or expected of a person or group | synonyms=office, part, role | examples=the function of a teacher; the government must do its part
4. sense_key=function%1:24:01:: | definition=a relation such that one thing is dependent on another | examples=height is a function of age; price is a function of supply and demand
5. sense_key=function%1:14:00:: | definition=a formal or official social gathering or ceremony | examples=it was a black-tie function
6. sense_key=function%1:11:00:: | definition=a vaguely specified social event | synonyms=affair, occasion, social occasion, social function | examples=the party was quite an affair; an occasion arranged to honor the president
7. sense_key=function%1:10:00:: | definition=a set sequence of steps, part of larger computer program | synonyms=routine, subroutine, subprogram, procedure

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "functions" in the given context.

 Context analysis:
 - The text is about "kalgebra", which is described as a "MathML based graph calculator"
 - It mentions "type your functions or do your calculations"
 - It mentions "input is being converted into MathML"
 - This is clearly a mathematical context involving calculations and graphing

 Candidate sense analysis:
 1. sense_key=function%1:24:00:: - (mathematics) a mathematical relation such that each element of a given set (the domain of the function) is associated with an element of another set (the range of the function). Synonyms: mathematical function, single-valued function, map, mapping.
    - This fits perfectly. The context is about a graph calculator where users type mathematical functions to be plotted or calculated.

 2. sense_key=function%1:07:00:: - what something is used for (purpose, role, use)
    - Doesn't fit. Not talking about the purpose of something.

 3. sense_key=function%1:04:00:: - the actions and activities assigned to or required or expected of a person or group (office, part, role)
    - Doesn't fit. Not talking about roles or duties of people.

 4. sense_key=function%1:24:01:: - a relation such that one thing is dependent on another (height is a function of age)
    - This is related to mathematical functions but more specifically about dependency relationships. While close, sense 1 is more specific to the mathematical concept of a function as used in graphing calculators.

 5. sense_key=function%1:14:00:: - a formal or official social gathering or ceremony
    - Doesn't fit. Not a social event.

 6. sense_key=function%1:11:00:: - a vaguely specified social event
    - Doesn't fit. Not a social event.

 7. sense_key=function%1:10:00:: - a set sequence of steps, part of larger computer program (routine, subroutine, subprogram, procedure)
    - This could potentially fit since it's software, but the context specifically mentions "MathML", "graph calculator", "2D Graph tab", "3D Graph tab", and "calculations". This strongly points to mathematical functions rather than programming subroutines. Also, the text says "type your functions" in the context of doing calculations and graphing, which is classic mathematical function terminology.

 Comparison between sense 1 and sense 7:
 - Sense 1 is specifically about mathematical relations/mappings
 - Sense 7 is about programming routines
 - The context emphasizes "MathML" (Mathematical Markup Language), "graph calculator", "2D Graph", "3D Graph", and "calculations"
 - While kalgebra is software, the specific mention of graphing and MathML points to mathematical functions (f(x) = ...) rather than programming functions/subroutines

 Therefore, sense 1 is the best choice.

 The user wants the output as: {"sense_index": 1}

 Wait, let me double-check the sense indices. The user lists them as:
 1. sense_key=function%1:24:00::
 2. sense_key=function%1:07:00::
 3. sense_key=function%1:04:00::
 4. sense_key=function%1:24:01::
 5. sense_key=function%1:14:00::
 6. sense_key=function%1:11:00::
 7. sense_key=function%1:10:00::

 So the mathematical function is index 1.

 Actually, looking at sense 4: "a relation such that one thing is dependent on another" - this is also mathematical but more about the concept of dependency (like "price is a function of supply"). In the context of a graph calculator where you type "functions" to plot them, sense 1 (mathematical relation with domain and range) is the correct one.

 The context: "type your functions or do your calculations" - in a graph calculator, you type mathematical functions like f(x) = x^2 to plot them.

 Yes, sense 1 is correct.