[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: perform
Target surface form: performed
Context:
This document is a summary of the European Public Assessment Report (EPAR). It explains how the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) assessed the studies <t>performed</t>, to reach their recommendations on how to use the medicine. If you need more information about your medical condition or your treatment, read the Package Leaflet (also part of the EPAR) or contact your doctor or pharmacist.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=perform%2:36:00:: | definition=carry out or perform an action | synonyms=execute, do | examples=John did the painting, the weeding, and he cleaned out the gutters; the skater executed a triple pirouette
2. sense_key=perform%2:41:02:: | definition=perform a function | examples=Who will perform the wedding?
3. sense_key=perform%2:36:01:: | definition=give a performance (of something) | examples=Horowitz is performing at Carnegie Hall tonight; We performed a popular Gilbert and Sullivan opera
4. sense_key=perform%2:41:00:: | definition=get (something) done | synonyms=do | examples=I did my job

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation on the word "performed" in the given context.

 Context analysis:
 - The text is about a European Public Assessment Report (EPAR) for medicinal products
 - The CHMP (Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use) assessed studies that were "performed"
 - These studies were conducted/carried out to reach recommendations on medicine usage

 Candidate senses:
 1. perform%2:36:00:: - carry out or perform an action (synonyms: execute, do)
    - Examples: John did the painting, the skater executed a triple pirouette
    - This seems to mean carrying out/executing an action or task

 2. perform%2:41:02:: - perform a function
    - Example: Who will perform the wedding?
    - This seems more ceremonial or functional in a specific role

 3. perform%2:36:01:: - give a performance (of something)
    - Examples: Horowitz is performing at Carnegie Hall, performed a Gilbert and Sullivan opera
    - This is about entertainment/artistic performance

 4. perform%2:41:00:: - get (something) done (synonym: do)
    - Example: I did my job
    - This is about accomplishing or completing tasks

 Comparing the context with the senses:
 - "Studies performed" refers to scientific/medical studies that were carried out or executed
 - Sense 1 (carry out or perform an action) fits best: "carry out or perform an action" - studies are actions or investigations carried out by researchers
 - Sense 4 (get something done) could also fit, but "get something done" is more general and less specific to the execution of actions like studies
 - Sense 1 examples include "John did the painting" which is similar to "studies were performed" - both are tasks/actions being executed

 Sense 1 vs Sense 4 distinction:
 - Sense 1 seems to focus on the execution/carrying out of actions (execution)
 - Sense 4 seems to focus on accomplishing/getting done (completion)

 In scientific contexts, we say "studies were performed" or "studies were conducted" - this aligns with sense 1 (carry out or perform an action).

 The phrase "studies performed" means studies that were carried out/executed/conducted.

 Looking at the examples:
 - Sense 1: "John did the painting, the weeding..." - parallel to studies being done/carried out
 - Sense 4: "I did my job" - more about completing a duty

 In the context of CHMP assessing studies, they are assessing the studies that were carried out (executed).

 Therefore, sense 1 (perform%2:36:00::) is the best fit.

 Wait, let me double-check sense 4. The definition is "get (something) done" with synonym "do". Example: "I did my job".

 But sense 1 has synonyms "execute, do" and definition "carry out or perform an action".

 The key difference:
 - Sense 1: carry out or perform an action (execute, do)
 - Sense 4: get (something) done (do)

 In WordNet, sense 4 is often used for "do" in the sense of managing, achieving, or dealing with something ("I did my job", "she did the competition"), while sense 1 is more about the physical or concrete execution of actions.

 Actually, looking carefully:
 - perform%2:36:00:: is the general "carry out, execute" sense
 - perform%2:41:00:: is specifically aligned with "do" as in accomplish

 But in the context of "studies performed", this is clearly the execution/conduct of studies, which is sense 1.

 However, I should verify WordNet sense distinctions. In WordNet:
 - perform.v.01 (perform%2:36:00::): "carry out or perform an action" - "John did the painting, the weeding..."
 - perform.v.02 (perform%2:36:01::): "perform a function" - "Who will perform the wedding?"
 - perform.v.03 (perform%2:36:02::): "give a performance (of something)" - "Horowitz is performing..."
 - perform.v.04 (perform%2:41:00::): "get (something) done" - "I did my job"

 Wait, the user lists:
 1. sense_key=perform%2:36:00::
 2. sense_key=perform%2:41:02::
 3. sense_key=perform%2:36:01::
 4. sense_key=perform%2:41:00::

 So the indices are:
 1. carry out or perform an action (execute, do)
 2. perform a function (wedding example)
 3. give a performance (concert example)
 4. get something done (do - job example)

 "Studies performed" clearly refers to carrying out/executing studies. This matches sense 1.

 The phrase "assessed the studies performed" means the studies that were carried out/executed.

 Therefore, the answer is sense 1.

 But wait, looking at sense 4 again: "get (something) done" with example "I did my job". Could "studies performed" mean "studies that were gotten done"? That seems less likely than "studies that were carried out/executed".

 In scientific/medical English, "performed" in "studies performed" is equivalent to "conducted" or "carried out", which matches sense 1.

 Final check: Is there any ambiguity with sense 2 (perform a function)? No, studies don't perform functions in this sense; rather, people perform studies.

 Is there ambiguity with sense 3 (entertainment)? No.

 So sense 1 is clearly the best choice.


attempt_kind: initial

status: success

[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: reach
Target surface form: reach
Context:
This document is a summary of the European Public Assessment Report (EPAR). It explains how the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) assessed the studies performed, to <t>reach</t> their recommendations on how to use the medicine. If you need more information about your medical condition or your treatment, read the Package Leaflet (also part of the EPAR) or contact your doctor or pharmacist.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=reach%2:38:01:: | definition=reach a destination, either real or abstract | synonyms=make, attain, hit, arrive at, gain | examples=We hit Detroit by noon; The water reached the doorstep
2. sense_key=reach%2:38:00:: | definition=reach a point in time, or a certain state or level | synonyms=hit, attain | examples=The thermometer hit 100 degrees; This car can reach a speed of 140 miles per hour
3. sense_key=reach%2:35:00:: | definition=move forward or upward in order to touch; also in a metaphorical sense | synonyms=reach out | examples=Government reaches out to the people
4. sense_key=reach%2:32:00:: | definition=be in or establish communication with | synonyms=get through, get hold of, contact | examples=Our advertisements reach millions; He never contacted his children after he emigrated to Australia
5. sense_key=reach%2:41:00:: | definition=to gain with effort | synonyms=achieve, accomplish, attain | examples=she achieved her goal despite setbacks
6. sense_key=reach%2:42:00:: | definition=to extend as far as | synonyms=extend to, touch | examples=The sunlight reached the wall; Can he reach?
7. sense_key=reach%2:38:06:: | definition=reach a goal, e.g., | synonyms=make, get to, progress to | examples=make the first team; We made it!
8. sense_key=reach%2:40:00:: | definition=place into the hands or custody of | synonyms=pass, hand, pass on, turn over, give | examples=hand me the spoon, please; Turn the files over to me, please
9. sense_key=reach%2:33:00:: | definition=to exert much effort or energy | synonyms=strive, strain | examples=straining our ears to hear

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

finish_reason: stop

role: assistant

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "reach" in the given context.

 Context analysis:
 - The sentence is: "It explains how the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) assessed the studies performed, to reach their recommendations on how to use the medicine."
 - The subject is the CHMP (Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use)
 - They assessed studies
 - The purpose is "to reach their recommendations"
 - So they are trying to arrive at or achieve their recommendations through assessment

 Looking at the candidate senses:

 1. sense_key=reach%2:38:01:: | definition=reach a destination, either real or abstract | synonyms=make, attain, hit, arrive at, gain
    - This is about reaching a destination. While "recommendations" could be seen as an abstract destination, this sense seems more physical or spatial.

 2. sense_key=reach%2:38:00:: | definition=reach a point in time, or a certain state or level | synonyms=hit, attain
    - This is about reaching a point in time, state or level. Not quite right for "recommendations".

 3. sense_key=reach%2:35:00:: | definition=move forward or upward in order to touch; also in a metaphorical sense | synonyms=reach out
    - Physical movement or metaphorical reaching out. Not fitting here.

 4. sense_key=reach%2:32:00:: | definition=be in or establish communication with | synonyms=get through, get hold of, contact
    - About communication. Not relevant.

 5. sense_key=reach%2:41:00:: | definition=to gain with effort | synonyms=achieve, accomplish, attain
    - This fits well. The committee assessed studies to gain/achieve their recommendations. It implies effort was involved (assessing studies) to arrive at the recommendations.

 6. sense_key=reach%2:42:00:: | definition=to extend as far as | synonyms=extend to, touch
    - Spatial extension. Not relevant.

 7. sense_key=reach%2:38:06:: | definition=reach a goal, e.g., | synonyms=make, get to, progress to
    - This could also fit. "Reach their recommendations" could be seen as reaching a goal.

 8. sense_key=reach%2:40:00:: | definition=place into the hands or custody of | synonyms=pass, hand
    - Physical transfer. Not relevant.

 9. sense_key=reach%2:33:00:: | definition=to exert much effort or energy | synonyms=strive, strain
    - This is about the act of striving, not the result. The sentence is about the result (recommendations).

 Now comparing sense 5 and sense 7:
 - Sense 5: "to gain with effort" - synonyms: achieve, accomplish, attain
 - Sense 7: "reach a goal" - synonyms: make, get to, progress to

 In the context, the CHMP is assessing studies to arrive at/formulate their recommendations. This is about achieving or arriving at a conclusion/decision.

 Sense 5 (reach%2:41:00::) seems to be the "achieve" sense, which fits well with "reach a decision/conclusion/recommendation".

 Sense 7 (reach%2:38:06::) is also about reaching a goal, but looking at the examples "make the first team; We made it!", it seems more about achieving a position or succeeding in getting somewhere.

 Actually, looking carefully at WordNet:
 - reach%2:41:00:: is typically "achieve, accomplish, attain, reach" - to gain with effort
 - reach%2:38:06:: is "reach, make, get to, progress to" - reach a goal

 But in many WSD datasets, "reach a decision" or "reach a conclusion" is often mapped to sense 1 or sense 5 depending on the specific WordNet version.

 Let me look at the definitions again:
 1. reach a destination, either real or abstract - "We hit Detroit by noon; The water reached the doorstep"
 5. to gain with effort - "she achieved her goal despite setbacks"
 7. reach a goal, e.g., - "make the first team; We made it!"

 The phrase "reach their recommendations" means to arrive at or come to their recommendations. In WordNet, "reach a decision" is often sense 1 (abstract destination) or sense 5 (achieve).

 But looking at the examples for sense 1: "We hit Detroit by noon; The water reached the doorstep" - these are very concrete/physical or clearly spatial.
 Examples for sense 5: "she achieved her goal despite setbacks" - this is about achieving something through effort.
 Examples for sense 7: "make the first team; We made it!" - this is about succeeding in getting to a state.

 However, "reach a decision" is a common collocation. In WordNet 3.0/3.1, "reach a decision" is typically:
 - reach%2:31:00:: (if it's about mental activity - "reach a conclusion")
 But that's not in the list.

 Wait, looking at the sense keys provided:
 - reach%2:38:01:: (motion sense - arrive at)
 - reach%2:38:00:: (change state - hit a level)
 - reach%2:35:00:: (touch)
 - reach%2:32:00:: (contact)
 - reach%2:41:00:: (gain with effort - achieve)
 - reach%2:42:00:: (extend to)
 - reach%2:38:06:: (reach a goal)
 - reach%2:40:00:: (hand over)
 - reach%2:33:00:: (strive)

 In standard WordNet:
 - Sense 1 (reach%2:38:01::) is the "arrive at, hit, attain" sense for destinations.
 - Sense 5 (reach%2:41:00::) is the "achieve, accomplish, attain" sense.

 The difference:
 - Sense 1 is about arriving at a place or point (including abstract).
 - Sense 5 is about achieving something through effort.

 In the context: "assessed the studies performed, to reach their recommendations"
 This implies they worked (assessed) to arrive at the recommendations. This could be sense 1 (arrive at abstract destination) or sense 5 (achieve).

 However, "reach recommendations" is similar to "reach a decision" or "reach a conclusion". In many lexical resources, this is treated as the "arrive at" sense (sense 1).

 But let's look at the synonyms:
 Sense 1: make, attain, hit, arrive at, gain
 Sense 5: achieve, accomplish, attain

 "Attain" appears in both.

 Actually, looking at WordNet 3.1:
 - reach%2:38:01:: "reach a destination, either real or abstract" - Examples: "We hit Detroit by noon", "The water reached the doorstep", "I have to hit the MAC machine before the weekend starts"
 - reach%2:41:00:: "to gain with effort" - Examples: "she achieved her goal despite setbacks"

 The phrase "reach a conclusion" or "reach a decision" is typically mapped to reach%2:38:01:: in WordNet because it's seen as arriving at an abstract destination.

 However, sense 7: reach%2:38:06:: "reach a goal" - Examples: "make the first team", "We made it!", "She may not make the grade"

 Wait, I need to check if sense 7 is actually "reach a goal" in the sense of achieving it, or getting to it.

 Looking at the definition: "reach a goal, e.g.," - this is vague.

 But in the context of the CHMP assessing studies, they are performing an evaluation to arrive at recommendations. This is a process of deliberation leading to a conclusion.

 In WordNet, "reach" with "conclusion", "decision", "verdict", "recommendation" is typically:
 - If it's about the mental act of concluding: reach%2:31:00:: (not in list)
 - If it's about arriving at: reach%2:38:01::

 But given the options, and the fact that "recommendations" are the result of an effortful process (assessing studies), sense 5 (achieve/accomplish) or sense 1 (arrive at abstract destination) are the main contenders.

 Let me reconsider the examples:
 Sense 1 examples: "We hit Detroit by noon; The water reached the doorstep" - very concrete.
 Sense 5 examples: "she achieved her goal despite setbacks" - effortful achievement.

 The context mentions "assessed the studies performed" which indicates effort. So sense 5 seems strong.

 But "reach a decision" is very commonly sense 1 in many annotations.

 Wait, looking at the sense keys again carefully:
 - reach%2:38:01:: - this is the "arrive" sense (verb.motion)
 - reach%2:41:00:: - this is the "achieve" sense (verb.possession? or verb.creation?)

 Actually, in WordNet:
 - reach%2:38:01:: is under verb.motion
 - reach%2:41:00:: is under verb.possession (or similar)

 But "reach recommendations" - you don't possess recommendations, you formulate them or arrive at them.

 Actually, looking at the gloss for sense 5: "to gain with effort" - you gain recommendations? That sounds odd. You arrive at recommendations.

 Let me check sense 7: "reach a goal, e.g.," - this could be "reach a decision"?

 Actually, looking at standard WSD datasets like SemCor or Senseval:
 - "reach" in "reach a conclusion" is often tagged as sense 1 (reach%2:38:01::) - the abstract destination sense.

 But let's look at the provided synonyms for sense 1: "make, attain, hit, arrive at, gain"
 And for sense 5: "achieve, accomplish, attain"

 "Attain" is in both.

 However, the key difference is that sense 1 is about reaching a destination (point/place), while sense 5 is about gaining something through effort.

 In the sentence: "to reach their recommendations"
 The recommendations are the endpoint of the assessment process. They are arriving at the recommendations.

 I think sense 1 (reach%2:38:01::) is the best fit because:
 1. "Recommendations" is treated as an abstract destination or point that is arrived at.
 2. The structure "reach [conclusion/decision/recommendation]" is standard for this sense.
 3. While effort is involved (assessed), the core meaning is arriving at the endpoint.

 However, sense 5 is also plausible if we view recommendations as an achievement.

 But looking at the examples for sense 5: "she achieved her goal despite setbacks" - this is about personal achievement of a goal.
 Examples for sense 1: "The water reached the doorstep" - this is about extension to a point, but also "We hit Detroit by noon" - arrival.

 Actually, I think I should look at whether "reach" in this context is more like "arrive at" or "achieve".

 "The committee... assessed the studies... to reach their recommendations"
 This is similar to "The jury deliberated to reach a verdict."
 "Reach a verdict" is typically sense 1 (arrive at abstract destination).

 Also, sense 7 "reach a goal" with examples "make the first team" seems to be about achieving a status or position, not about formulating a recommendation.

 Therefore, I choose sense 1: reach%2:38:01:: (reach a destination, either real or abstract).

 Wait, but I need to be careful. The user says "Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense."

 Let me double-check sense 5 vs sense 1.

 Sense 1: reach a destination, either real or abstract
 - This includes abstract destinations like conclusions, decisions, agreements, etc.

 Sense 5: to gain with effort
 - This is about achieving something like a goal, success, etc.

 In the context of a committee making recommendations, they are arriving at a conclusion/decision. This is an abstract destination.

 So sense 1 is correct.

 But let me check if there's any other sense that could fit.
 Sense 7: reach a goal - could this be it? "Recommendations" could be seen as a goal.
 But the examples "make the first team; We made it!" suggest this is about succeeding in getting into a group or achieving a level, not about the deliberative process of a committee.

 Therefore, sense 1 is the best choice.

 Actually, looking at the WordNet entry for reach%2:38:01::, the examples include "We hit Detroit by noon" (concrete) and the gloss says "either real or abstract". Abstract destinations would include agreements, conclusions, etc.

 So I'll go with sense 1.

 Wait, I should verify the sense numbering. The user lists:
 1. sense_key=reach%2:38:01::
 2. sense_key=reach%2:38:00::
 3. sense_key=reach%2:35:00::
 4. sense_key=reach%2:32:00::
 5. sense_key=reach%2:41:00::
 6. sense_key=reach%2:42:00::
 7. sense_key=reach%2:38:06::
 8. sense_key=reach%2:40:00::
 9. sense_key=reach%2:33:00::

 So sense_index should be 1.

 But I want to make sure about sense 5 (reach%2:41:00::). Is it possible that "reach their recommendations" means they achieved them? Like, they succeeded in making them?
 "The committee worked hard to reach their recommendations" - this could imply they finally succeeded in formulating them after effort.

 However, the more standard interpretation is that they arrived at the recommendations as a conclusion.

 Also, looking at the synonyms for sense 5: achieve, accomplish, attain. You don't really "accomplish recommendations" or "achieve recommendations" - you make them or arrive at them. You can "attain" a goal, but "attain recommendations" is odd.

 Whereas for sense 1: arrive at recommendations, hit upon recommendations (though "hit" is less formal), make recommendations (in the sense of arrive at), gain recommendations? "Gain" is a bit odd but possible.

 Actually, "make recommendations" is a very common collocation, and "make" is listed as a synonym for sense 1.

 Therefore, sense 1 is the best fit.

 Final check: The context is about a committee assessing studies to arrive at recommendations. This is clearly the abstract destination sense.

 Answer: {"sense_index": 1}

format: unknown

native_finish_reason: stop

provider: Chutes

currency: USD


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: recommendation
Target surface form: recommendations
Context:
This document is a summary of the European Public Assessment Report (EPAR). It explains how the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) assessed the studies performed, to reach their <t>recommendations</t> on how to use the medicine. If you need more information about your medical condition or your treatment, read the Package Leaflet (also part of the EPAR) or contact your doctor or pharmacist.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=recommendation%1:10:00:: | definition=something (as a course of action) that is recommended as advisable
2. sense_key=recommendation%1:10:02:: | definition=something that recommends (or expresses commendation of) a person or thing as worthy or desirable | synonyms=testimonial, good word
3. sense_key=recommendation%1:07:00:: | definition=any quality or characteristic that gains a person a favorable reception or acceptance or admission | synonyms=passport | examples=her pleasant personality is already a recommendation; his wealth was not a passport into the exclusive circles of society

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "recommendations" in the given context.

Let me analyze the context:
- The document is about a European Public Assessment Report (EPAR)
- It discusses how the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) assessed studies
- They reached "recommendations" on how to use the medicine
- This is about medical/guidance advice on using a medicine

Now let's look at the candidate senses:

1. sense_key=recommendation%1:10:00:: | definition=something (as a course of action) that is recommended as advisable
   - This seems to fit: recommendations on how to use the medicine = advice/course of action recommended as advisable

2. sense_key=recommendation%1:10:02:: | definition=something that recommends (or expresses commendation of) a person or thing as worthy or desirable | synonyms=testimonial, good word
   - This is about praising someone or something, like a testimonial. Doesn't fit the context of medical guidelines.

3. sense_key=recommendation%1:07:00:: | definition=any quality or characteristic that gains a person a favorable reception or acceptance or admission | synonyms=passport | examples=her pleasant personality is already a recommendation; his wealth was not a passport into the exclusive circles of society
   - This is about a quality that makes someone acceptable. The example shows "her pleasant personality is already a recommendation" - meaning the personality itself serves as a credential/passport. This doesn't fit the context of medical advice.

The context clearly refers to official advice or guidelines on how to use medicine - this is a "course of action that is recommended as advisable" - which matches sense 1.

Sense 1 is the standard meaning of recommendation as advice or suggestion for action.
Sense 2 is about testimonials/letters of recommendation.
Sense 3 is about qualities that recommend someone (archaic usage).

The context: "reach their recommendations on how to use the medicine" clearly indicates advice/guidance on a course of action.

Therefore, the best sense is sense 1.

Wait, I need to check the sense indices. The user lists:
1. sense_key=recommendation%1:10:00::
2. sense_key=recommendation%1:10:02::
3. sense_key=recommendation%1:07:00::

So sense_index should be 1.

But let me double-check WordNet to make sure I understand the senses correctly, even though I should rely on the provided definitions.

In WordNet:
- recommendation%1:10:00:: - "something (as a course of action) that is recommended as advisable" - yes, this is the advice meaning.
- recommendation%1:10:02:: - "something that recommends (or expresses commendation of) a person or thing as worthy or desirable" - this is the testimonial meaning.
- recommendation%1:07:00:: - "any quality or characteristic that gains a person a favorable reception or acceptance or admission" - this is the attribute/credential meaning.

The context is clearly about medical advice/guidelines, so sense 1 is correct.

The output should be: {"sense_index": 1}

provider: ModelRun


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: use
Target surface form: use
Context:
This document is a summary of the European Public Assessment Report (EPAR). It explains how the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) assessed the studies performed, to reach their recommendations on how to <t>use</t> the medicine. If you need more information about your medical condition or your treatment, read the Package Leaflet (also part of the EPAR) or contact your doctor or pharmacist.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=use%2:34:01:: | definition=put into service; make work or employ for a particular purpose or for its inherent or natural purpose | synonyms=utilize, utilise, apply, employ | examples=use your head!; we only use Spanish at home
2. sense_key=use%2:34:02:: | definition=take or consume (regularly or habitually) | synonyms=habituate | examples=She uses drugs rarely
3. sense_key=use%2:34:00:: | definition=use up, consume fully | synonyms=expend | examples=The legislature expended its time on school questions
4. sense_key=use%2:41:14:: | definition=seek or achieve an end by using to one's advantage | examples=She uses her influential friends to get jobs; The president's wife used her good connections
5. sense_key=use%2:41:04:: | definition=avail oneself to | synonyms=practice, apply | examples=apply a principle; practice a religion
6. sense_key=use%2:41:03:: | definition=habitually do something (use only in the past tense) | examples=She used to call her mother every week but now she calls only occasionally; I used to get sick when I ate in that dining hall

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation on the word "use" in the given context.

 Context: "This document is a summary of the European Public Assessment Report (EPAR). It explains how the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) assessed the studies performed, to reach their recommendations on how to <t>use</t> the medicine. If you need more information about your medical condition or your treatment, read the Package Leaflet (also part of the EPAR) or contact your doctor or pharmacist."

 The target word is "use" in the phrase "how to use the medicine".

 Let's analyze the candidate senses:

 1. sense_key=use%2:34:01:: | definition=put into service; make work or employ for a particular purpose or for its inherent or natural purpose | synonyms=utilize, utilise, apply, employ | examples=use your head!; we only use Spanish at home
    - This seems to be the general sense of employing something for its intended purpose. "Use the medicine" fits here - putting the medicine into service for its intended purpose (treatment).

 2. sense_key=use%2:34:02:: | definition=take or consume (regularly or habitually) | synonyms=habituate | examples=She uses drugs rarely
    - This is specifically about consuming drugs/substances habitually. While "use the medicine" could involve consumption, the context here is about recommendations on how to employ/administer the medicine, not specifically about habitual drug use. Also, the example "She uses drugs rarely" suggests a specific pattern of consumption, whereas the context is about general instructions for employing the medicine.

 3. sense_key=use%2:34:00:: | definition=use up, consume fully | synonyms=expend | examples=The legislature expended its time on school questions
    - This implies depletion or exhaustion. "Use the medicine" in medical instructions doesn't typically mean "use up" or "consume fully" in the sense of depletion, but rather how to administer or employ it.

 4. sense_key=use%2:41:14:: | definition=seek or achieve an end by using to one's advantage | examples=She uses her influential friends to get jobs; The president's wife used her good connections
    - This is about exploiting or taking advantage of something/someone. Not appropriate for medicine instructions.

 5. sense_key=use%2:41:04:: | definition=avail oneself to | synonyms=practice, apply | examples=apply a principle; practice a religion
    - This is about making use of something available to oneself. Could fit, but sense 1 seems more direct for "how to use the medicine" (how to employ it).

 6. sense_key=use%2:41:03:: | definition=habitually do something (use only in the past tense) | examples=She used to call her mother every week but now she calls only occasionally; I used to get sick when I ate in that dining hall
    - This is specifically the "used to" construction for past habits. The target is "to use" (infinitive), not "used to".

 Comparing sense 1 and sense 2:
 - Sense 1: "put into service; make work or employ for a particular purpose" - This is the general sense of utilizing something for its intended function. When medical professionals give recommendations on "how to use the medicine", they mean how to administer it, employ it for treatment, put it into service.
 - Sense 2: "take or consume (regularly or habitually)" - This is more specific to drug consumption habits. While medicines are consumed, the phrase "how to use the medicine" in EPAR context refers to the proper employment/administration of the medicinal product, not specifically to habitual consumption.

 The context is about recommendations from a medical committee on how to employ the medicine (administration, dosage, etc.). This aligns best with sense 1: putting the medicine into service for its intended purpose.

 Also, looking at the examples for sense 1: "use your head!", "we only use Spanish at home" - these show employing something for a purpose. The medical context is about employing the medicine for therapeutic purposes.

 Sense 2's example "She uses drugs rarely" focuses on the consumption aspect, often with implications of drug use/abuse, whereas the EPAR context is neutral and instructional about proper medical employment.

 Therefore, sense 1 (use%2:34:01::) is the best choice.

 Wait, I need to check the indexing. The user lists:
 1. sense_key=use%2:34:01::
 2. sense_key=use%2:34:02::
 3. sense_key=use%2:34:00::
 4. sense_key=use%2:41:14::
 5. sense_key=use%2:41:04::
 6. sense_key=use%2:41:03::

 So the index for sense 1 is 1.

 But let me double-check if sense 5 (avail oneself to) could be better. "Avail oneself to" with synonyms "practice, apply" - examples are "apply a principle; practice a religion". This is about adopting or following something. "How to use the medicine" could be interpreted as "how to avail oneself of the medicine", but "apply" in the medical sense usually means topical application, whereas "use" is broader. However, sense 1 is the primary transitive sense for employing objects/tools/substances for their purpose.

 In WordNet, sense 1 (use%2:34:01::) is the most common sense and fits the general "employ for purpose" meaning.

 Actually, looking carefully at the context: "recommendations on how to use the medicine" - this is clearly about the proper employment/administration of the medicinal product. This is sense 1.

 The answer should be {"sense_index": 1}.

provider: Novita


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: medicine
Target surface form: medicine
Context:
This document is a summary of the European Public Assessment Report (EPAR). It explains how the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) assessed the studies performed, to reach their recommendations on how to use the <t>medicine</t>. If you need more information about your medical condition or your treatment, read the Package Leaflet (also part of the EPAR) or contact your doctor or pharmacist.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=medicine%1:09:00:: | definition=the branches of medical science that deal with nonsurgical techniques | synonyms=medical specialty
2. sense_key=medicine%1:06:00:: | definition=(medicine) something that treats or prevents or alleviates the symptoms of disease | synonyms=medication, medicament, medicinal drug
3. sense_key=medicine%1:04:00:: | definition=the learned profession that is mastered by graduate training in a medical school and that is devoted to preventing or alleviating or curing diseases and injuries | synonyms=practice of medicine | examples=he studied medicine at Harvard
4. sense_key=medicine%1:04:02:: | definition=punishment for one's actions | synonyms=music | examples=you have to face the music; take your medicine

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation (WSD) on the word "medicine" in the given context.

 Context analysis:
 - The text is about a European Public Assessment Report (EPAR) for medicinal products
 - It mentions "Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use"
 - It talks about how the committee assessed studies to reach recommendations on how to use the "medicine"
 - It mentions "Package Leaflet" and contacting "doctor or pharmacist"
 - The context is clearly about a pharmaceutical product/drug that is used for treatment

 Candidate sense analysis:
 1. sense_key=medicine%1:09:00:: | definition=the branches of medical science that deal with nonsurgical techniques | synonyms=medical specialty
    - This refers to the field of study/practice (e.g., "internal medicine")
    - Not fitting: the context is about a specific product, not a branch of medical science

 2. sense_key=medicine%1:06:00:: | definition=(medicine) something that treats or prevents or alleviates the symptoms of disease | synonyms=medication, medicament, medicinal drug
    - This refers to a substance/drug used for treatment
    - Context: "how to use the medicine" - this fits perfectly with a pharmaceutical product
    - The mention of "Package Leaflet" (patient information leaflet for drugs) confirms this is about a medicinal product
    - This is the most likely sense

 3. sense_key=medicine%1:04:00:: | definition=the learned profession that is mastered by graduate training in a medical school and that is devoted to preventing or alleviating or curing diseases and injuries | synonyms=practice of medicine | examples=he studied medicine at Harvard
    - This refers to the profession or practice of being a doctor
    - Not fitting: the context is not about studying or practicing the profession, but about using a specific product

 4. sense_key=medicine%1:04:02:: | definition=punishment for one's actions | synonyms=music | examples=you have to face the music; take your medicine
    - Figurative sense (idiomatic)
    - Not fitting: the context is literal and medical/pharmaceutical

 The context clearly refers to a medicinal product/drug (something that treats disease), not the field of study, the profession, or a metaphorical punishment.

 Therefore, the correct sense is sense 2 (the one with definition about something that treats disease and synonyms like medication, medicament).

 Wait, let me check the indexing. The user lists:
 1. sense_key=medicine%1:09:00:: ...
 2. sense_key=medicine%1:06:00:: ...
 3. sense_key=medicine%1:04:00:: ...
 4. sense_key=medicine%1:04:02:: ...

 So sense 2 corresponds to the definition about "something that treats or prevents or alleviates the symptoms of disease".

 The JSON should be {"sense_index": 2}.

 But let me double-check the context one more time to make sure I'm not missing something.
 - "how to use the <t>medicine</t>" - this could potentially mean "how to practice medicine" but given the surrounding context of "Committee for Medicinal Products", "Package Leaflet", "doctor or pharmacist", this is clearly referring to a pharmaceutical product.
 - "Medicinal Products" in the committee name strongly suggests "medicine" here means "medicinal drug/product"

 Yes, definitely sense 2.

 Wait, I need to be careful about the output format. The user said "Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}." So I should return {"sense_index": 2}.

provider: DigitalOcean


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: need
Target surface form: need
Context:
This document is a summary of the European Public Assessment Report (EPAR). It explains how the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) assessed the studies performed, to reach their recommendations on how to use the medicine. If you <t>need</t> more information about your medical condition or your treatment, read the Package Leaflet (also part of the EPAR) or contact your doctor or pharmacist. If you want more information on the basis of the CHMP recommendations, read the Scientific Discussion (also part of the EPAR).

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=need%2:42:00:: | definition=require as useful, just, or proper | synonyms=necessitate, ask, postulate, require, take, involve | examples=It takes nerve to do what she did; success usually requires hard work
2. sense_key=need%2:34:00:: | definition=have need of | synonyms=want, require | examples=This piano wants the attention of a competent tuner
3. sense_key=need%2:34:01:: | definition=have or feel a need for | examples=always needing friends and money

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "need" in the given context.

Context: "If you need more information about your medical condition or your treatment, read the Package Leaflet..."

Candidate senses:
1. need%2:42:00:: - require as useful, just, or proper (necessitate, ask, postulate, require, take, involve)
2. need%2:34:00:: - have need of (want, require) - examples: "This piano wants the attention of a competent tuner"
3. need%2:34:01:: - have or feel a need for - examples: "always needing friends and money"

Let me analyze the context. The sentence says "If you need more information..." This is about the patient/reader having a need for more information. It's about lacking something and requiring it.

Sense 1 (need%2:42:00::) seems to be about something necessitating or requiring something else as a matter of logic, justice, or propriety. Examples: "It takes nerve to do what she did", "success usually requires hard work". This is more about objective requirements or entailments.

Sense 2 (need%2:34:00::) is "have need of" - synonyms include want, require. Example: "This piano wants the attention of a competent tuner." This seems to be about lacking something necessary.

Sense 3 (need%2:34:01::) is "have or feel a need for" - example: "always needing friends and money". This seems more subjective, about feeling a need.

In the context "If you need more information...", this is directed at the reader. The reader may require/have need of more information. It's about the reader lacking information and requiring it.

Comparing sense 2 and 3:
- Sense 2: "have need of" - This is more about objective necessity or lacking something essential. The example "This piano wants the attention..." uses "wants" in the sense of "needs" (lacks/requires).
- Sense 3: "have or feel a need for" - This is more subjective/emotional.

In medical documentation, "If you need more information" is a standard phrase meaning "if you require more information" or "if you have need of more information." It's not necessarily about feeling, but about the objective situation where a patient lacks necessary information.

However, looking at the examples:
- Sense 2 example: "This piano wants the attention of a competent tuner" - here "wants" = "needs" = requires. This is about inanimate objects requiring something.
- Sense 3 example: "always needing friends and money" - this is about a person feeling/having a need.

The context "If you need more information..." involves a person (you) who may require information. Both 2 and 3 seem possible.

But let's look more carefully at WordNet distinctions. Usually, need%2:34:00:: vs need%2:34:01::.

need%2:34:00:: - have need of (verb frames: something ----s something)
need%2:34:01:: - have or feel a need for (verb frames: somebody ----s something)

Actually, looking at WordNet:
- need.v.01: require as useful, just, or proper (Let it be required)
- need.v.02: have need of (This piano wants the attention...)
- need.v.03: have or feel a need for (always needing friends and money)

Wait, I need to be careful. Let me think about the exact WordNet senses.

In WordNet 3.0/3.1:
- need.v.01: require as useful, just, or proper. "It takes nerve..." "success requires..."
- need.v.02: have need of. "This piano wants the attention..."
- need.v.03: have or feel a need for. "always needing friends and money"

The context: "If you need more information..." - "you" is a person. The meaning is "if you have need of more information" or "if you require more information."

Sense 2 (have need of) vs Sense 3 (have or feel a need for):
- Sense 2 seems to be used when the subject is inanimate or when it's about objective requirement. The example uses "wants" which is similar to "needs" for inanimate objects.
- Sense 3 seems to be about human subjects feeling a need.

But wait, the example for sense 2 uses "wants" as in "This piano wants attention." That's personification. But the gloss is "have need of."

Actually, looking at typical WSD datasets, "If you need..." often maps to sense 2 or 3 depending on subtle distinctions.

Let me reconsider. The phrase "If you need more information" is offering additional resources if the reader requires them. This is about the reader being in a state of lacking information.

Sense 2: "have need of" - this is very close to "require"
Sense 3: "have or feel a need for" - this emphasizes the subjective feeling

In this medical context, it's more about the practical requirement (you need it to understand your condition) rather than an emotional feeling. But both could fit.

However, looking at the synonyms:
- Sense 2: want, require
- Sense 3: (no synonyms listed in the prompt, but in WordNet it's often just "need")

The prompt says for sense 2: synonyms=want, require
For sense 3: no synonyms listed, just examples.

The context "If you need more information..." - "require" fits well. "Want" in the sense of "need" (British English) also fits. This aligns with sense 2.

But sense 3's example "always needing friends and money" is about a person needing things. The context is also a person needing information.

Let me think about the difference between "have need of" and "have or feel a need for."

"Have need of" is somewhat archaic/formal and means "to require." "Have or feel a need for" is about experiencing the feeling of need.

In the sentence "If you need more information...", it's a conditional offering help. It's saying "if you lack information and require it." This is more about the objective state of requiring something (sense 2) rather than feeling a need (sense 3).

Also, sense 1 is clearly different - it's about situations requiring things, e.g., "It takes nerve..." where the subject is the thing required, not the person needing it. Actually, in "It takes nerve", "takes" = "requires", and the subject "It" is the situation. In "If you need...", the subject "you" is the person who needs. So sense 1 is less likely because sense 1 is about situations/conditions necessitating something, while senses 2 and 3 are about experiencers.

Between 2 and 3:
- Sense 2: "have need of" - the subject is the entity that lacks something (This piano wants/needs attention)
- Sense 3: "have or feel a need for" - the subject experiences the need (always needing friends)

Actually, I think in standard WordNet, sense 2 (need.v.02) is the most common sense for "I need X" where it means "I require X." Sense 3 (need.v.03) is more specific to the emotional/psychological state.

Wait, let me double-check by looking at how these are typically distinguished in SemCor or other corpora.

need.v.02 (have need of): Usually for inanimate subjects or when "need" is synonymous with "require" in a general sense.
need.v.03 (have or feel a need for): Usually for animate subjects with an emotional or psychological need.

But the example for need.v.02 is "This piano wants the attention..." which uses "wants" as a synonym. "Want" here is the archaic/formal "lack/require."

In "If you need more information...", the reader is animate. But the need is informational, not necessarily emotional.

However, looking at the actual WordNet entries:
- need.v.02: have need of; "This piano wants the attention of a competent tuner"
- need.v.03: have or feel a need for; "always needing friends and money"

The key difference might be that sense 2 allows inanimate subjects and is about objective requirements, while sense 3 is specifically for animate subjects feeling the need.

But "you" is animate. So does that push it to sense 3? Not necessarily, because animate subjects can also "have need of" things.

Let me look at the gloss again:
Sense 2: "have need of" - this is a state of lacking something necessary
Sense 3: "have or feel a need for" - this is experiencing the desire/lack

In the context of patient information leaflets, "If you need more information" is a standard formula. It means "If you require more information." The word "require" is listed as a synonym for sense 2.

Also, in many WSD systems, "need" when used as a main verb with a human subject and direct object (I need water) is often sense 2, while sense 3 is more about the internal state.

Actually, I recall that in WordNet:
- need.v.01: require (as in "the situation requires patience")
- need.v.02: need, want (as in "the piano wants tuning") - have need of
- need.v.03: need (as in "I need a hug") - have or feel a need for

But "I need water" could be either 2 or 3. However, "I need more information" is likely sense 2 because it's about lacking/requiring something practical.

Wait, the user says "Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense."

Let me reconsider all three:
1. "require as useful, just, or proper" - This is about logical necessity. "Success requires hard work." The subject is typically an event/situation. "If you need more info" - "you" are not requiring something as useful/just/proper in this schematic sense. This is sense 1.
2. "have need of" - Synonyms: want, require. This fits "If you have need of more information..."
3. "have or feel a need for" - This fits "If you feel a need for more information..."

In the context, it's a practical instruction. "If you need (require) more information..." It's not asking if they emotionally feel a need, but if their situation requires more information. So sense 2 seems best.

But let me check: is there any reason to prefer sense 3? The example "always needing friends and money" is similar to "needing information" - all are things a person might need. However, the gloss "have or feel a need for" emphasizes the subjective experience, while "have need of" emphasizes the objective lack.

In medical contexts, "if you need" is almost always sense 2 (require/have need of).

Also, looking at the synonym lists provided:
Sense 2: want, require
Sense 3: (no synonyms)

The context maps very naturally to "require" (sense 2).

I think the answer is sense 2.

Wait, I should make sure. Let me think about whether "If you need more information" could be sense 1. Sense 1 examples: "It takes nerve to do what she did" (takes = requires), "success usually requires hard work." Here the subject is impersonal. "If you need..." has a personal subject "you." While "you" can be the subject of sense 1? "You require patience" - yes, but that's still sense 1? No, "You require patience" would likely be sense 1 if it means "Your situation requires you to have patience." But "You need more information" is about you lacking it, not about your situation necessitating it.

So sense 2 is the best fit.

Final check: The target is "need" in "If you need more information..."
- Sense 2: have need of; synonyms: want, require
- This matches perfectly.

I'll go with sense_index: 2.

provider: SiliconFlow


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: more
Target surface form: more
Context:
This document is a summary of the European Public Assessment Report (EPAR). It explains how the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) assessed the studies performed, to reach their recommendations on how to use the medicine. If you need <t>more</t> information about your medical condition or your treatment, read the Package Leaflet (also part of the EPAR) or contact your doctor or pharmacist. If you want more information on the basis of the CHMP recommendations, read the Scientific Discussion (also part of the EPAR).

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=more%3:00:01:: | definition=(comparative of `much' used with mass nouns) a quantifier meaning greater in size or amount or extent or degree | synonyms=more than | examples=more land; more support
2. sense_key=more%3:00:02:: | definition=(comparative of `many' used with count nouns) quantifier meaning greater in number | examples=a hall with more seats; we have no more bananas

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "more" in the given context.

 Context analysis:
 The sentence is: "If you need <t>more</t> information about your medical condition or your treatment, read the Package Leaflet..."

 The word "information" is a mass noun (uncountable). You can't say "one information, two informations" in standard English (though some non-native varieties allow it, in standard English it's uncountable).

 Looking at the candidate senses:
 1. sense_key=more%3:00:01:: | definition=(comparative of `much' used with mass nouns) a quantifier meaning greater in size or amount or extent or degree | synonyms=more than | examples=more land; more support
 2. sense_key=more%3:00:02:: | definition=(comparative of `many' used with count nouns) quantifier meaning greater in number | examples=a hall with more seats; we have no more bananas

 Sense 1 is used with mass nouns (much -> more).
 Sense 2 is used with count nouns (many -> more).

 "Information" is a mass noun. Therefore, sense 1 is the correct choice.

 The context asks for "more information" - information is uncountable/mass, so it takes "much" in the positive form, and "more" as the comparative.

 Therefore, the answer should be sense_index: 1.

 Wait, let me double-check the sense keys. The user provided:
 1. sense_key=more%3:00:01::
 2. sense_key=more%3:00:02::

 So the indices are 1 and 2. I need to return {"sense_index": 1}.

 Let me verify:
 - "information" is definitely a mass noun.
 - Sense 1: comparative of 'much' used with mass nouns
 - Sense 2: comparative of 'many' used with count nouns

 Yes, sense 1 is correct.

 The instruction says: "Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}." (This is just an example format, I should use the actual index).

 So: {"sense_index": 1}


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: information
Target surface form: information
Context:
This document is a summary of the European Public Assessment Report (EPAR). It explains how the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) assessed the studies performed, to reach their recommendations on how to use the medicine. If you need more <t>information</t> about your medical condition or your treatment, read the Package Leaflet (also part of the EPAR) or contact your doctor or pharmacist. If you want more information on the basis of the CHMP recommendations, read the Scientific Discussion (also part of the EPAR).

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=information%1:10:00:: | definition=a message received and understood | synonyms=info
2. sense_key=information%1:09:00:: | definition=knowledge acquired through study or experience or instruction
3. sense_key=information%1:10:02:: | definition=formal accusation of a crime
4. sense_key=information%1:14:00:: | definition=a collection of facts from which conclusions may be drawn | synonyms=data | examples=statistical data
5. sense_key=information%1:07:00:: | definition=(communication theory) a numerical measure of the uncertainty of an outcome | synonyms=selective information, entropy | examples=the signal contained thousands of bits of information

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation (WSD) on the word "information" in the given context.

 Let me analyze the context:
 - The text is about a European Public Assessment Report (EPAR) for medicinal products.
 - It mentions that if you need more "information" about your medical condition or treatment, you should read the Package Leaflet or contact your doctor or pharmacist.
 - It also mentions wanting more "information" on the basis of CHMP recommendations.

 Now let's look at the candidate senses:

 1. sense_key=information%1:10:00:: | definition=a message received and understood | synonyms=info
    - This seems like general information, communication.

 2. sense_key=information%1:09:00:: | definition=knowledge acquired through study or experience or instruction
    - This is about knowledge acquisition.

 3. sense_key=information%1:10:02:: | definition=formal accusation of a crime
    - This is a legal term (e.g., "lay an information"), clearly not relevant here.

 4. sense_key=information%1:14:00:: | definition=a collection of facts from which conclusions may be drawn | synonyms=data | examples=statistical data
    - This is about data, facts, statistics.

 5. sense_key=information%1:07:00:: | definition=(communication theory) a numerical measure of the uncertainty of an outcome | synonyms=selective information, entropy | examples=the signal contained thousands of bits of information
    - This is the technical information theory sense (Shannon entropy), clearly not relevant here.

 Now between senses 1, 2, and 4:

 Sense 1 (message received and understood): This is about communication - receiving a message.
 Sense 2 (knowledge acquired...): This is about learning/knowledge.
 Sense 4 (collection of facts...): This is about data/statistics.

 In the context: "If you need more information about your medical condition or your treatment..."
 - This refers to general details, facts, or knowledge about the medical condition.
 - It's asking for more details/data about the condition.
 - It's not specifically about "knowledge acquired through study" (sense 2) in the sense of learning/education, though it's close.
 - It's not just "a message received" (sense 1), though that's also close.

 However, looking at the examples and typical usage:
 - Sense 1: "a message received and understood" - this is quite generic.
 - Sense 2: "knowledge acquired through study or experience or instruction" - this emphasizes the learning aspect.
 - Sense 4: "a collection of facts from which conclusions may be drawn" - this emphasizes factual data.

 In medical contexts, when patients ask for "information" about their condition, they are typically asking for facts, details, data about the condition - which aligns with sense 4 (collection of facts/data).

 But wait, let me reconsider. In common parlance, "information" in the sense of "I need information about X" usually maps to sense 1 or sense 2 in WordNet.

 Let me look more carefully at the distinctions:

 Sense 1: information%1:10:00:: - "a message received and understood" - This is in the noun.communication lexfile (10). It's about the communication act - the message itself.

 Sense 2: information%1:09:00:: - This is in noun.cognition (09). It's about knowledge.

 Sense 4: information%1:14:00:: - This is in noun.group? Wait, 1:14 is noun.group? No, let me check WordNet lexicographer file numbers:
 - 09: noun.cognition
 - 10: noun.communication
 - 14: noun.group? Actually, looking at the sense key format: information%1:14:00::
   - 1 = noun
   - 14 = lexicographer file (noun.group? No, noun.group is usually 14? Wait, let me recall:
   - 09: noun.cognition
   - 10: noun.communication
   - 14: noun.group? Actually, I think 14 might be noun.group, but "data" is usually in noun.communication or noun.cognition...

 Actually, looking at the sense key: information%1:14:00::
 The :14: usually refers to the lexicographer file number. In WordNet:
 - 09 = noun.cognition
 - 10 = noun.communication
 - 14 = noun.group? Or is it noun.quantity?

 Wait, I should look at the definition and synonyms. Sense 4 has synonym "data" and example "statistical data". This is clearly the "data" sense of information - facts and figures.

 In the context: "information about your medical condition" - this is asking for medical details, facts about the condition. This could be sense 4 (facts/data) or sense 2 (knowledge) or sense 1 (message).

 However, in WordNet, sense 4 (information%1:14:00::) is specifically "a collection of facts from which conclusions may be drawn" with synonyms "data". This is the "data" sense.

 Sense 2 is "knowledge acquired through study or experience or instruction" - this is the learning/education sense.

 Sense 1 is "a message received and understood" - this is the communication sense.

 In the phrase "need more information about your medical condition", the patient is looking for factual content, details, data about their condition. This aligns best with sense 4 - facts/data.

 But let me double-check by looking at typical WSD for "information" in similar contexts.

 Actually, looking at the examples provided in the senses:
 - Sense 4 examples: "statistical data"
 - Sense 5 examples: "the signal contained thousands of bits of information"

 The context mentions "Package Leaflet", "Scientific Discussion", "EPAR" - these are documents containing facts and data.

 However, sense 1 is also very common for general "information" requests.

 Let me reconsider the WordNet hierarchy:
 - Sense 1 (noun.communication): communication, content, message, info, information
 - Sense 2 (noun.cognition): cognition, knowledge, information
 - Sense 4 (noun.group? or noun.quantity?): group, collection, data, information

 Actually, looking up WordNet 3.1 or similar:
 - information%1:14:00:: is under noun.group? No, "data" is usually noun.communication.

 Wait, I think I need to be careful. The sense key format is:
 lemma%lexical_identifier:lexfile:head:head_id

 So:
 - 1:10:00 = noun, lexfile 10 (communication), head 00
 - 1:09:00 = noun, lexfile 09 (cognition), head 00
 - 1:14:00 = noun, lexfile 14 (group?), head 00

 Actually, looking at standard WordNet lexicographer files:
 - 09 = noun.cognition
 - 10 = noun.communication
 - 14 = noun.group

 But "data" is in noun.communication in WordNet, I believe. Or is it in noun.cognition?

 Let me think about the actual definitions:

 Sense 4: "a collection of facts from which conclusions may be drawn" - this is the "data" sense. In WordNet, "data" is a separate entry but synonymous with this sense of "information".

 In the context of medical information for patients, they are seeking facts/details about their condition. This is most accurately sense 4.

 However, sense 1 "a message received and understood" is also plausible - the leaflet contains a message.

 But sense 2 "knowledge acquired..." is less likely because the patient isn't necessarily looking to acquire knowledge through study, but rather to obtain facts/data.

 Actually, looking at the distinction between sense 1 and sense 4:
 - Sense 1 is about the communication act - the message that is conveyed.
 - Sense 4 is about the content as facts/data.

 In "need more information", it's ambiguous, but in technical/medical contexts, especially when referring to documents like EPAR, Package Leaflet, Scientific Discussion, these contain factual data (sense 4).

 But wait, looking at the synonyms:
 - Sense 1: info
 - Sense 4: data

 "Info" is more general, "data" is more specific to facts/figures.

 The phrase "information about your medical condition" - is this asking for data (facts) or info (general message)?

 I think sense 1 is the most common general sense. But let me look at the examples in the candidate list again.

 Actually, I notice that sense 4 has the example "statistical data". The context here is not statistical, it's medical condition information.

 Sense 1: "a message received and understood" - when you read a Package Leaflet, you are receiving a message.

 Sense 2: "knowledge acquired..." - when you read the leaflet, you acquire knowledge.

 But sense 4 specifically emphasizes "collection of facts" and "conclusions may be drawn" - this is more analytical, database-like.

 Given that the text mentions "assessed the studies", "Scientific Discussion", there is an element of scientific data, but the specific instance "information about your medical condition" is more about patient information - general medical details.

 I think I need to look at this differently. In WordNet:
 - Sense 1 is the most general sense: "a message received and understood"
 - Sense 2 is the knowledge sense
 - Sense 4 is the data/facts sense

 In the SemCor corpus or similar, "information about X" usually maps to sense 1 or sense 2.

 But let me look at the exact wording: "If you need more information about your medical condition..."

 Compare with:
 - "For more information, call this number" -> sense 1 (communication)
 - "He has a lot of information about the war" -> could be sense 1 or 2
 - "The data contains valuable information" -> sense 4

 Given that the synonyms for sense 4 include "data", and the context is medical/scientific (EPAR, CHMP, studies), but the specific usage is patient-oriented information...

 Actually, looking at the second occurrence: "If you want more information on the basis of the CHMP recommendations..."
 This is asking for the factual basis, the data/reasoning behind the recommendations.

 But both instances seem to refer to general informative content.

 However, sense 1 (message received) seems too specific - it emphasizes the reception and understanding of a message.

 Sense 2 (knowledge acquired) emphasizes the learning process.

 Sense 4 (collection of facts) emphasizes the factual content.

 In patient information leaflets, "information" typically refers to factual content about the medicine - which is sense 4.

 But I'm uncertain. Let me reconsider sense 1 vs sense 2.

 WordNet sense 1: "a message received and understood" - this is hypernym communication, content.
 WordNet sense 2: "knowledge acquired through study or experience or instruction" - hypernym cognition, knowledge.

 When a patient reads a leaflet, they are receiving information (sense 1) and acquiring knowledge (sense 2). But the word "information" in "need more information" is most commonly sense 1 in WordNet.

 Wait, I should check if sense 4 is actually the correct sense for "database" type information.

 Actually, looking at the sense keys provided:
 1. information%1:10:00:: - this is the main sense, "info"
 2. information%1:09:00:: - this is the knowledge sense
 4. information%1:14:00:: - this is the data sense

 In the context of "European Public Assessment Report", "studies performed", "Scientific Discussion", there is a strong implication of factual data, evidence, facts from which conclusions are drawn (by the CHMP).

 The CHMP assesses studies (data) to reach recommendations. If you want more information on the basis of these recommendations, you want the facts/data (sense 4).

 Also, "information about your medical condition" - in a scientific medical context, this refers to medical facts/data.

 However, sense 1 is also very plausible.

 Let me try to find distinguishing features:
 - Sense 4 is often used in technical/computing contexts ("information processing", "information retrieval") and scientific contexts ("statistical information").
 - Sense 1 is general purpose.
 - Sense 2 is educational/learning contexts.

 Given the highly technical/regulatory context (EPAR, CHMP, medicinal products), and the mention of "studies" and "scientific discussion", sense 4 (data/facts) seems most appropriate.

 But I should verify: is sense 4 the "data" sense or is it something else?

 Definition: "a collection of facts from which conclusions may be drawn"
 Synonyms: data
 Examples: statistical data

 Yes, this is clearly the "data" sense.

 In the sentence: "If you want more information on the basis of the CHMP recommendations..."
 This is asking for the factual basis - the data/evidence that led to the recommendations. This fits sense 4 well.

 The first occurrence: "If you need more information about your medical condition..."
 This could be general info (sense 1) or medical facts (sense 4).

 But given that both occurrences are in the same document, and the second one clearly leans toward factual/scientific content, and the document is technical/regulatory, sense 4 is likely the intended sense.

 However, I should consider if sense 1 could be correct. "Information" as a message is very common.

 Actually, looking at WordNet examples for sense 1:
 - "the signal contained thousands of bits of information" -> wait, that's sense 5.

 For sense 1 (information%1:10:00::), examples might include:
 - "he gave us the information"
 - "for your information"

 For sense 2 (information%1:09:00::):
 - "a wealth of information"

 For sense 4 (information%1:14:00::):
 - "statistical data"

 Given the context mentions "studies performed", "assessed", "Scientific Discussion", the word "information" here is being used in the sense of "data" or "facts" that can be analyzed.

 Therefore, I choose sense 4.

 Wait, I need to be careful. The index in the output should correspond to the candidate number.

 The candidates are:
 1. sense_key=information%1:10:00::
 2. sense_key=information%1:09:00::
 3. sense_key=information%1:10:02::
 4. sense_key=information%1:14:00::
 5. sense_key=information%1:07:00::

 So if I choose sense 4 (the data sense), the index is 4.

 But let me double-check: is there any chance it's sense 1?

 Sense 1: "a message received and understood"
 In the context: "read the Package Leaflet... or contact your doctor" - these are sources of messages/information (sense 1).

 But sense 4 also fits: the leaflet contains facts/data.

 However, in common parlance, when we say "I need information about my condition", we usually mean general information (sense 1), not specifically "a collection of facts from which conclusions may be drawn" (sense 4).

 But the presence of "statistical data" as an example for sense 4, and the scientific context...

 Let me reconsider the target word in context once more:
 "If you need more information about your medical condition or your treatment..."

 This is patient information. In WordNet, "patient information" would likely be sense 1 (general communication) or sense 2 (knowledge).

 But "information" in the context of scientific studies and assessment reports might be sense 4.

 Actually, looking at the phrase "information on the basis of the CHMP recommendations" - this refers to the evidence, data, facts that form the basis. This is definitely sense 4.

 Since both instances of "information" in the text likely refer to the same sense, and the second one is clearly about factual basis/data, the first one is likely also sense 4 (facts about the condition).

 Therefore, I will go with sense index 4.

 Final check: could it be sense 2 (knowledge)?
 "Knowledge about your medical condition" - this is plausible, but less likely than "facts/data" in this technical context.

 Could it be sense 1 (message)?
 "Message about your medical condition" - less likely.

 Sense 4 seems best for a regulatory/scientific document context.

 Answer: {"sense_index": 4}


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: medical
Target surface form: medical
Context:
This document is a summary of the European Public Assessment Report (EPAR). It explains how the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) assessed the studies performed, to reach their recommendations on how to use the medicine. If you need more information about your <t>medical</t> condition or your treatment, read the Package Leaflet (also part of the EPAR) or contact your doctor or pharmacist. If you want more information on the basis of the CHMP recommendations, read the Scientific Discussion (also part of the EPAR).

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=medical%3:01:00:: | definition=relating to the study or practice of medicine | examples=the medical profession; a medical student
2. sense_key=medical%3:00:00:: | definition=requiring or amenable to treatment by medicine especially as opposed to surgery | examples=medical treatment; pneumonia is a medical disease
3. sense_key=medical%3:01:02:: | definition=of or belonging to Aesculapius or the healing art | synonyms=aesculapian

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "medical" in the given context.

 Context analysis:
 - The sentence is: "If you need more information about your <t>medical</t> condition or your treatment, read the Package Leaflet..."
 - The context is about a European Public Assessment Report (EPAR) for a medicine.
 - It mentions "medical condition" - this refers to a health condition, illness, or disease state that requires medical attention.
 - The phrase "medical condition" is a common collocation.

 Candidate senses analysis:
 1. sense_key=medical%3:01:00:: | definition=relating to the study or practice of medicine | examples=the medical profession; a medical student
    - This sense relates to the field/profession of medicine.
    - Examples show it's about the profession (medical profession, medical student).
    - While "medical condition" could loosely fit here (relating to medicine), this sense is more about the professional/study aspect.

 2. sense_key=medical%3:00:00:: | definition=requiring or amenable to treatment by medicine especially as opposed to surgery | examples=medical treatment; pneumonia is a medical disease
    - This sense distinguishes medical (pharmaceutical) treatment from surgical treatment.
    - Examples: "medical treatment", "medical disease" (as opposed to surgical).
    - "Medical condition" in the context of patient information about a medicine could fit here, as it refers to conditions treated with medicine (pharmaceuticals) rather than surgery.
    - However, "medical condition" is often used broadly to mean "health condition" or "illness."

 3. sense_key=medical%3:01:02:: | definition=of or belonging to Aesculapius or the healing art | synonyms=aesculapian
    - This is an archaic/technical sense relating to Aesculapius (Greek god of medicine).
    - Synonym "aesculapian" suggests this is not the common usage.
    - "Medical condition" would not use this sense.

 Comparing sense 1 and sense 2:
 - Sense 1: relating to the study or practice of medicine (the field)
 - Sense 2: requiring or amenable to treatment by medicine (as opposed to surgery)

 In the phrase "medical condition":
 - This typically means a health condition, disease, or illness that falls under medical care.
 - In the context of a medicine package leaflet, "medical condition" refers to the disease or health problem being treated.
 - Is this sense 1 or sense 2?

 Looking at WordNet:
 - Sense 1 (medical%3:01:00::) is the general adjective: "relating to the study or practice of medicine"
 - Sense 2 (medical%3:00:00::) is specifically: "requiring or amenable to treatment by medicine especially as opposed to surgery"

 The phrase "medical condition" is most commonly understood as "a condition relating to medicine/health" - which aligns with sense 1 (relating to the practice of medicine). However, sense 2 is specifically about treatment by medicine (drugs) vs surgery.

 In the context: "your medical condition or your treatment"
 - This is referring to the patient's health condition/disease.
 - In pharmaceutical contexts (EPAR, medicine package leaflets), "medical condition" refers to the disease being treated.
 - This is distinct from "medical" in "medical student" (sense 1) or "medical treatment" meaning non-surgical treatment (sense 2).

 Actually, looking carefully at sense 2: "requiring or amenable to treatment by medicine especially as opposed to surgery"
 - This sense is specifically contrasting medical (pharmaceutical) vs surgical treatment.
 - Examples: "medical treatment" (meaning drug therapy), "pneumonia is a medical disease" (treatable with drugs vs surgery).

 But "medical condition" in general usage (and in this context) simply means a health condition, illness, or disease - i.e., a condition that is medical in nature (relating to medicine/health). This aligns with sense 1.

 However, I need to check if "medical condition" is more aligned with sense 1 or sense 2 in WordNet's classification.

 In WordNet:
 - Sense 1: "relating to the study or practice of medicine" - this is the broader sense.
 - Sense 2: "requiring or amenable to treatment by medicine especially as opposed to surgery" - this is the narrower sense contrasting with surgery.

 "Medical condition" typically uses sense 1 - it means a condition related to medicine/health. It doesn't necessarily imply "treatable by drugs as opposed to surgery." A medical condition could be surgical (e.g., "a medical condition requiring surgery" - though this might sound contradictory, people do say this).

 Actually, looking at usage:
 - "Medical condition" = a state of health that requires medical attention; an illness or disease.
 - This is clearly sense 1: relating to the study or practice of medicine.

 Sense 2 is specifically about the type of treatment (medical vs surgical).

 Therefore, "medical condition" in this pharmaceutical document context refers to the patient's health condition/illness, which is "relating to the study or practice of medicine" (sense 1).

 Wait, let me reconsider. The examples for sense 2 include "medical treatment" and "pneumonia is a medical disease". "Medical disease" here likely means a disease treated by internal medicine (drugs) rather than surgery.

 But "medical condition" is broader. However, in the specific context of a medicine leaflet (EPAR), "medical condition" refers to the condition being treated by the medicine. This could potentially align with sense 2 (amenable to treatment by medicine).

 But looking at the definition of sense 1 again: "relating to the study or practice of medicine"
 - A medical condition is a condition relating to medicine.
 - This is the general sense.

 Sense 2 is specifically about the treatment modality.

 I think sense 1 is the correct choice here. "Medical condition" means a condition pertaining to the field of medicine/health.

 Let me verify with the examples:
 - Sense 1 examples: "the medical profession", "a medical student" - these relate to the field/profession.
 - Sense 2 examples: "medical treatment", "pneumonia is a medical disease" - these relate to treatment by drugs.

 "Medical condition" is parallel to "medical profession" and "medical student" in that it describes something belonging to the domain of medicine (sense 1), whereas "medical treatment" in sense 2 describes a specific type of intervention.

 Therefore, the best sense is sense 1.

 Wait, I should double-check the WordNet sense keys. The user provided:
 1. sense_key=medical%3:01:00::
 2. sense_key=medical%3:00:00::
 3. sense_key=medical%3:01:02::

 In WordNet:
 - medical%3:01:00:: is "relating to the study or practice of medicine"
 - medical%3:00:00:: is "requiring or amenable to treatment by medicine especially as opposed to surgery"
 - medical%3:01:02:: is "of or belonging to Aesculapius or the healing art"

 Yes, so sense 1 is the general "pertaining to medicine" sense.

 In the context: "your medical condition"
 This is definitely sense 1. It means your condition relating to medicine/health.

 Final check: Could it be sense 2?
 If it were sense 2, it would mean "your condition that is amenable to treatment by medicine (as opposed to surgery)". While the document is about medicinal products, the phrase "medical condition" itself doesn't carry the contrast with surgery. It simply means "health condition" or "disease."

 Therefore, sense 1 is correct.

 The answer should be: {"sense_index": 1}

provider: DeepInfra


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: condition
Target surface form: condition
Context:
This document is a summary of the European Public Assessment Report (EPAR). It explains how the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) assessed the studies performed, to reach their recommendations on how to use the medicine. If you need more information about your medical <t>condition</t> or your treatment, read the Package Leaflet (also part of the EPAR) or contact your doctor or pharmacist. If you want more information on the basis of the CHMP recommendations, read the Scientific Discussion (also part of the EPAR).

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=condition%1:26:00:: | definition=a state at a particular time | synonyms=status | examples=a condition (or state) of disrepair; the current status of the arms negotiations
2. sense_key=condition%1:10:01:: | definition=an assumption on which rests the validity or effect of something else | synonyms=precondition, stipulation
3. sense_key=condition%1:26:01:: | definition=a mode of being or form of existence of a person or thing | examples=the human condition
4. sense_key=condition%1:09:00:: | definition=information that should be kept in mind when making a decision | synonyms=circumstance, consideration | examples=another consideration is the time it would take
5. sense_key=condition%1:26:02:: | definition=the state of (good) health (especially in the phrases `in condition' or `in shape' or `out of condition' or `out of shape') | synonyms=shape
6. sense_key=condition%1:26:05:: | definition=an illness, disease, or other medical problem | examples=a heart condition; a skin condition
7. sense_key=condition%1:10:02:: | definition=(usually plural) a statement of what is required as part of an agreement | synonyms=term | examples=the contract set out the conditions of the lease; the terms of the treaty were generous
8. sense_key=condition%1:09:01:: | definition=the procedure that is varied in order to estimate a variable's effect by comparison with a control condition | synonyms=experimental condition

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation on the word "condition" in the given context.

 Context analysis:
 - The text is about a European Public Assessment Report (EPAR) for a medicinal product.
 - It mentions "your medical condition or your treatment"
 - The context is clearly medical/health-related.
 - It contrasts "medical condition" with "treatment"
 - It's advising patients to read the Package Leaflet or contact doctor/pharmacist for more information about their medical condition.

 Candidate sense analysis:
 1. sense_key=condition%1:26:00:: - "a state at a particular time" - Too general, not specific to medical context.
 2. sense_key=condition%1:10:01:: - "an assumption on which rests the validity or effect of something else" - This is about preconditions/stipulations, not relevant here.
 3. sense_key=condition%1:26:01:: - "a mode of being or form of existence of a person or thing" - Too philosophical/abstract ("the human condition"), not the medical meaning.
 4. sense_key=condition%1:09:00:: - "information that should be kept in mind when making a decision" - This is about considerations/circumstances in decision-making.
 5. sense_key=condition%1:26:02:: - "the state of (good) health" - This is about physical fitness ("in condition", "out of shape"), not illness.
 6. sense_key=condition%1:26:05:: - "an illness, disease, or other medical problem" - Examples: "a heart condition; a skin condition". This matches "medical condition" perfectly.
 7. sense_key=condition%1:10:02:: - "(usually plural) a statement of what is required as part of an agreement" - Legal/contractual terms.
 8. sense_key=condition%1:09:01:: - "the procedure that is varied in order to estimate a variable's effect" - Scientific experimental context.

 The phrase "medical condition" is a common collocation referring to an illness, disease, or health problem. Sense 6 specifically mentions "an illness, disease, or other medical problem" with examples like "a heart condition" and "a skin condition".

 Therefore, sense 6 (condition%1:26:05::) is the correct choice.

 The user wants the output as: {"sense_index": 6}

provider: StreamLake


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: treatment
Target surface form: treatment
Context:
This document is a summary of the European Public Assessment Report (EPAR). It explains how the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) assessed the studies performed, to reach their recommendations on how to use the medicine. If you need more information about your medical condition or your <t>treatment</t>, read the Package Leaflet (also part of the EPAR) or contact your doctor or pharmacist. If you want more information on the basis of the CHMP recommendations, read the Scientific Discussion (also part of the EPAR).

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=treatment%1:04:00:: | definition=care provided to improve a situation (especially medical procedures or applications that are intended to relieve illness or injury) | synonyms=intervention
2. sense_key=treatment%1:04:01:: | definition=the management of someone or something | synonyms=handling | examples=the handling of prisoners; the treatment of water sewage
3. sense_key=treatment%1:07:00:: | definition=a manner of dealing with something artistically | examples=his treatment of space borrows from Italian architecture
4. sense_key=treatment%1:10:00:: | definition=an extended communication (often interactive) dealing with some particular topic | synonyms=discussion, discourse | examples=the book contains an excellent discussion of modal logic; his treatment of the race question is badly biased

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation on the word "treatment" in the given context.

 Context analysis:
 - The document is about a European Public Assessment Report (EPAR) for medicinal products
 - It discusses how a committee assessed studies to reach recommendations on how to use medicine
 - It mentions "your medical condition or your treatment"
 - It refers to reading the Package Leaflet or contacting doctor/pharmacist for more information
 - The context is clearly medical/healthcare related

 Candidate senses analysis:
 1. sense_key=treatment%1:04:00::
    - definition: care provided to improve a situation (especially medical procedures or applications that are intended to relieve illness or injury)
    - synonyms: intervention
    - This is clearly medical treatment.

 2. sense_key=treatment%1:04:01::
    - definition: the management of someone or something
    - synonyms: handling
    - examples: handling of prisoners, treatment of water sewage
    - This is about management/handling, not specifically medical.

 3. sense_key=treatment%1:07:00::
    - definition: a manner of dealing with something artistically
    - examples: his treatment of space borrows from Italian architecture
    - This is about artistic treatment.

 4. sense_key=treatment%1:10:00::
    - definition: an extended communication (often interactive) dealing with some particular topic
    - synonyms: discussion, discourse
    - examples: treatment of modal logic, treatment of the race question
    - This is about discussing a topic.

 The context is clearly medical: "medical condition", "medicine", "doctor", "pharmacist", "medicinal products".

 Therefore, sense 1 (treatment%1:04:00::) is the correct choice as it specifically refers to medical care/procedures to relieve illness or injury.

 The word "treatment" appears in the phrase "your medical condition or your treatment", which clearly refers to medical treatment.

 I should return: {"sense_index": 1}


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: read
Target surface form: read
Context:
This document is a summary of the European Public Assessment Report (EPAR). It explains how the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) assessed the studies performed, to reach their recommendations on how to use the medicine. If you need more information about your medical condition or your treatment, <t>read</t> the Package Leaflet (also part of the EPAR) or contact your doctor or pharmacist. If you want more information on the basis of the CHMP recommendations, read the Scientific Discussion (also part of the EPAR).

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=read%2:31:00:: | definition=interpret something that is written or printed | examples=read the advertisement; Have you read Salman Rushdie?
2. sense_key=read%2:42:00:: | definition=have or contain a certain wording or form | synonyms=say | examples=The passage reads as follows; What does the law say?
3. sense_key=read%2:31:01:: | definition=look at, interpret, and say out loud something that is written or printed | examples=The King will read the proclamation at noon
4. sense_key=read%2:31:06:: | definition=obtain data from magnetic tapes | synonyms=scan | examples=This dictionary can be read by the computer
5. sense_key=read%2:31:02:: | definition=interpret the significance of, as of palms, tea leaves, intestines, the sky; also of human behavior | examples=She read the sky and predicted rain; I can't read his strange behavior
6. sense_key=read%2:31:09:: | definition=interpret something in a certain way; convey a particular meaning or impression | synonyms=take | examples=I read this address as a satire; How should I take this message?
7. sense_key=read%2:31:05:: | definition=be a student of a certain subject | synonyms=learn, study, take | examples=She is reading for the bar exam
8. sense_key=read%2:32:02:: | definition=indicate a certain reading; of gauges and instruments | synonyms=register, show, record | examples=The thermometer showed thirteen degrees below zero; The gauge read `empty'
9. sense_key=read%2:36:05:: | definition=audition for a stage role by reading parts of a role | examples=He is auditioning for `Julius Caesar' at Stratford this year
10. sense_key=read%2:31:08:: | definition=to hear and understand | examples=I read you loud and clear!
11. sense_key=read%2:31:04:: | definition=make sense of a language | synonyms=understand, interpret, translate | examples=She understands French; Can you read Greek?

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "read" in the given context.

 Context analysis:
 The sentence is: "If you need more information about your medical condition or your treatment, <t>read</t> the Package Leaflet (also part of the EPAR) or contact your doctor or pharmacist."

 The context is about a medical document (EPAR - European Public Assessment Report). The instruction is telling the reader to "read the Package Leaflet" if they need more information. This is a standard instruction in medical documentation telling patients to consult/read the accompanying documentation.

 Looking at the candidate senses:

 1. sense_key=read%2:31:00:: | definition=interpret something that is written or printed | examples=read the advertisement; Have you read Salman Rushdie?
 - This seems to fit. The Package Leaflet is a written/printed document, and the user is being instructed to interpret/consume its content.

 2. sense_key=read%2:42:00:: | definition=have or contain a certain wording or form | synonyms=say | examples=The passage reads as follows; What does the law say?
 - This is about how a text is worded (e.g., "the sign reads 'No Smoking'"). Not applicable here.

 3. sense_key=read%2:31:01:: | definition=look at, interpret, and say out loud something that is written or printed | examples=The King will read the proclamation at noon
 - This involves reading aloud. The context doesn't suggest reading aloud, just reading for information.

 4. sense_key=read%2:31:06:: | definition=obtain data from magnetic tapes | synonyms=scan | examples=This dictionary can be read by the computer
 - Technical/computer reading. Not applicable.

 5. sense_key=read%2:31:02:: | definition=interpret the significance of, as of palms, tea leaves, intestines, the sky; also of human behavior | examples=She read the sky and predicted rain; I can't read his strange behavior
 - This is about interpreting signs/symbols/patterns, not reading text. Not applicable.

 6. sense_key=read%2:31:09:: | definition=interpret something in a certain way; convey a particular meaning or impression | synonyms=take | examples=I read this address as a satire; How should I take this message?
 - This is about interpretation in a specific way (e.g., "I read that as rude"). Not the basic act of reading text.

 7. sense_key=read%2:31:05:: | definition=be a student of a certain subject | synonyms=learn, study, take | examples=She is reading for the bar exam
 - Academic study. Not applicable.

 8. sense_key=read%2:32:02:: | definition=indicate a certain reading; of gauges and instruments | synonyms=register, show, record | examples=The thermometer showed thirteen degrees below zero; The gauge read `empty'
 - Instruments showing values. Not applicable.

 9. sense_key=read%2:36:05:: | definition=audition for a stage role by reading parts of a role | examples=He is auditioning for `Julius Caesar' at Stratford this year
 - Acting audition. Not applicable.

 10. sense_key=read%2:31:08:: | definition=to hear and understand | examples=I read you loud and clear!
 - Radio/communication term. Not applicable.

 11. sense_key=read%2:31:04:: | definition=make sense of a language | synonyms=understand, interpret, translate | examples=She understands French; Can you read Greek?
 - This is about literacy/comprehension of language (can you read Greek?), not the act of reading a specific document.

 Comparing sense 1 and sense 11:
 Sense 1: "interpret something that is written or printed" - examples: "read the advertisement", "Have you read Salman Rushdie?"
 Sense 11: "make sense of a language" - examples: "She understands French", "Can you read Greek?"

 The context is about reading a specific document (Package Leaflet) to get information. This matches sense 1, which is the general sense of reading written/printed material. Sense 11 is more about the ability to read a language (literacy).

 Therefore, sense 1 (read%2:31:00::) is the best fit.

 Wait, let me double-check the WordNet sense keys to make sure I understand the indexing correctly. The user asks for the "sense_index" which appears to be the number before the :: in the sense key? No, looking at the format:
 sense_key=read%2:31:00::
 sense_key=read%2:42:00::
 etc.

 The user says "Choose the single best indexed sense" and "Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}."

 Looking at the candidate senses, they are numbered 1-11. So I should return the number corresponding to the best sense.

 Sense 1 is read%2:31:00::
 Sense 2 is read%2:42:00::
 etc.

 So if I choose sense 1, I return {"sense_index": 1}.

 Let me verify sense 1 vs sense 3:
 Sense 1: interpret something that is written or printed (general reading)
 Sense 3: look at, interpret, and say out loud something that is written or printed (reading aloud)

 The context is clearly not about reading aloud. It's about consuming the information in the Package Leaflet silently.

 Sense 1 vs Sense 11:
 Sense 11 is about understanding a language (Can you read Greek?).
 Sense 1 is about reading specific written content (read the advertisement).

 The instruction "read the Package Leaflet" matches "read the advertisement" from sense 1's examples.

 Therefore, the answer is sense_index: 1.