[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: case
Target surface form: case
Context:
Their appearance and assistance in fundraising for this event undercuts any claims of impartiality, and is unacceptable. Scalia and Thomas have shown little regard for critics who say they too readily mix the business of the court with agenda-driven groups such as the Federalist Society. And Thomas" wife, Ginni, is a high-profile conservative activist. Moreover, conservatives argue that it's Justice Elena Kagan who has an ethical issue, not Scalia and Thomas. Kagan served as solicitor general in the Obama administration when the first legal challenges to the law were brought at the trial court level. Her critics have pushed for Kagan to recuse herself from hearing the <t>case</t>, saying that she was too invested in defending the law then to be impartial now. Kagan has given no indication she will do so.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=case%1:11:00:: | definition=an occurrence of something | synonyms=instance, example | examples=it was a case of bad judgment; another instance occurred yesterday
2. sense_key=case%1:26:00:: | definition=a special set of circumstances | synonyms=event | examples=in that event, the first possibility is excluded; it may rain in which case the picnic will be canceled
3. sense_key=case%1:04:00:: | definition=a comprehensive term for any proceeding in a court of law whereby an individual seeks a legal remedy | synonyms=lawsuit, suit, cause, causa | examples=the family brought suit against the landlord
4. sense_key=case%1:09:00:: | definition=the actual state of things | examples=that was not the case
5. sense_key=case%1:06:00:: | definition=a portable container for carrying several objects | examples=the musicians left their instrument cases backstage
6. sense_key=case%1:18:03:: | definition=a person requiring professional services | examples=a typical case was the suburban housewife described by a marriage counselor
7. sense_key=case%1:18:02:: | definition=a person who is subjected to experimental or other observational procedures; someone who is an object of investigation | synonyms=subject, guinea pig | examples=the subjects for this investigation were selected randomly; the cases that we studied were drawn from two different communities
8. sense_key=case%1:10:02:: | definition=a problem requiring investigation | examples=Perry Mason solved the case of the missing heir
9. sense_key=case%1:10:01:: | definition=a statement of facts and reasons used to support an argument | examples=he stated his case clearly
10. sense_key=case%1:23:00:: | definition=the quantity contained in a case | synonyms=caseful
11. sense_key=case%1:10:00:: | definition=nouns or pronouns or adjectives (often marked by inflection) related in some way to other words in a sentence | synonyms=grammatical case
12. sense_key=case%1:26:02:: | definition=a specific state of mind that is temporary | examples=a case of the jitters
13. sense_key=case%1:18:04:: | definition=a person of a specified kind (usually with many eccentricities) | synonyms=character, eccentric, type | examples=a real character; a strange character
14. sense_key=case%1:10:03:: | definition=a specific size and style of type within a type family | synonyms=font, fount, typeface, face
15. sense_key=case%1:08:00:: | definition=an enveloping structure or covering enclosing an animal or plant organ or part | synonyms=sheath
16. sense_key=case%1:06:06:: | definition=the housing or outer covering of something | synonyms=shell, casing | examples=the clock has a walnut case
17. sense_key=case%1:06:07:: | definition=the enclosing frame around a door or window opening | synonyms=casing | examples=the casings had rotted away and had to be replaced
18. sense_key=case%1:06:03:: | definition=(printing) the receptacle in which a compositor has his type, which is divided into compartments for the different letters, spaces, or numbers | synonyms=compositor's case, typesetter's case | examples=for English, a compositor will ordinarily have two such cases, the upper case containing the capitals and the lower case containing the small letters
19. sense_key=case%1:06:02:: | definition=bed linen consisting of a cover for a pillow | synonyms=pillowcase, slip, pillow slip | examples=the burglar carried his loot in a pillowcase
20. sense_key=case%1:06:01:: | definition=a glass container used to store and display items in a shop or museum or home | synonyms=display case, showcase, vitrine

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "case" in the given context.

 Let me analyze the context:
 - The text is about Supreme Court justices (Scalia, Thomas, Elena Kagan)
 - It mentions legal proceedings: "Kagan served as solicitor general in the Obama administration when the first legal challenges to the law were brought at the trial court level."
 - It mentions: "Her critics have pushed for Kagan to recuse herself from hearing the <t>case</t>"
 - The context is clearly legal/judicial
 - "Hearing the case" is a legal term referring to presiding over a lawsuit or legal proceeding

 Now let's look at the candidate senses:

 1. case%1:11:00:: - an occurrence of something (instance, example) - doesn't fit
 2. case%1:26:00:: - a special set of circumstances (event) - doesn't fit
 3. case%1:04:00:: - a comprehensive term for any proceeding in a court of law whereby an individual seeks a legal remedy (lawsuit, suit, cause, causa) - This fits perfectly! "Hearing the case" refers to a legal proceeding/lawsuit.
 4. case%1:09:00:: - the actual state of things - doesn't fit
 5. case%1:06:00:: - a portable container - doesn't fit
 6. case%1:18:03:: - a person requiring professional services - doesn't fit
 7. case%1:18:02:: - a person who is subjected to experimental procedures - doesn't fit
 8. case%1:10:02:: - a problem requiring investigation - could be confused with detective work, but in legal context, sense 3 is better
 9. case%1:10:01:: - a statement of facts and reasons - doesn't fit
 10. case%1:23:00:: - quantity contained in a case - doesn't fit
 11. case%1:10:00:: - grammatical case - doesn't fit
 12. case%1:26:02:: - a specific state of mind - doesn't fit
 13. case%1:18:04:: - a person of a specified kind - doesn't fit
 14. case%1:10:03:: - type/font - doesn't fit
 15. case%1:08:00:: - enveloping structure - doesn't fit
 16. case%1:06:06:: - housing/outer covering - doesn't fit
 17. case%1:06:07:: - frame around door/window - doesn't fit
 18. case%1:06:03:: - compositor's case - doesn't fit
 19. case%1:06:02:: - pillowcase - doesn't fit
 20. case%1:06:01:: - display case - doesn't fit

 The context is clearly about a legal proceeding. The phrase "hearing the case" is standard legal terminology referring to a judge presiding over a lawsuit. The synonyms listed for sense 3 are "lawsuit, suit, cause, causa" and the example is "the family brought suit against the landlord."

 The context mentions:
 - "first legal challenges to the law were brought at the trial court level"
 - "recuse herself from hearing the case"
 - "defending the law"

 This is definitely sense 3: case%1:04:00:: - a comprehensive term for any proceeding in a court of law whereby an individual seeks a legal remedy.

 The index is 3.

 Wait, I need to check the format. The user wants:
 {"sense_index": 3}

 The sense keys are labeled with numbers 1-20. Sense 3 corresponds to case%1:04:00::.

 So the answer should be:
 {"sense_index": 3}


attempt_kind: initial

status: success

[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: law
Target surface form: law
Context:
Their appearance and assistance in fundraising for this event undercuts any claims of impartiality, and is unacceptable. Scalia and Thomas have shown little regard for critics who say they too readily mix the business of the court with agenda-driven groups such as the Federalist Society. And Thomas" wife, Ginni, is a high-profile conservative activist. Moreover, conservatives argue that it's Justice Elena Kagan who has an ethical issue, not Scalia and Thomas. Kagan served as solicitor general in the Obama administration when the first legal challenges to the law were brought at the trial court level. Her critics have pushed for Kagan to recuse herself from hearing the case, saying that she was too invested in defending the <t>law</t> then to be impartial now. Kagan has given no indication she will do so.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=law%1:14:00:: | definition=the collection of rules imposed by authority | synonyms=jurisprudence | examples=civilization presupposes respect for the law; the great problem for jurisprudence to allow freedom while enforcing order
2. sense_key=law%1:10:00:: | definition=legal document setting forth rules governing a particular kind of activity | examples=there is a law against kidnapping
3. sense_key=law%1:09:00:: | definition=a rule or body of rules of conduct inherent in human nature and essential to or binding upon human society | synonyms=natural law
4. sense_key=law%1:09:01:: | definition=a generalization that describes recurring facts or events in nature | synonyms=law of nature | examples=the laws of thermodynamics
5. sense_key=law%1:09:02:: | definition=the branch of philosophy concerned with the law and the principles that lead courts to make the decisions they do | synonyms=jurisprudence, legal philosophy
6. sense_key=law%1:04:00:: | definition=the learned profession that is mastered by graduate study in a law school and that is responsible for the judicial system | synonyms=practice of law | examples=he studied law at Yale
7. sense_key=law%1:14:01:: | definition=the force of policemen and officers | synonyms=police, police force, constabulary | examples=the law came looking for him

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

finish_reason: stop

role: assistant

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation (WSD) on the word "law" in the given context.

 Let me analyze the context:
 - The text is about Supreme Court justices (Scalia, Thomas, Kagan) and a legal case
 - It mentions "the first legal challenges to the law were brought at the trial court level"
 - It mentions "defending the law"
 - This appears to be referring to the Affordable Care Act (ACA) or similar legislation based on the context of "Obama administration" and "solicitor general"
 - The context is about a specific piece of legislation that was being challenged in court

 Now let's look at the candidate senses:

 1. law%1:14:00:: - "the collection of rules imposed by authority" (jurisprudence) - This is the general concept of law as a system.
 2. law%1:10:00:: - "legal document setting forth rules governing a particular kind of activity" - This refers to a specific statute or piece of legislation.
 3. law%1:09:00:: - "a rule or body of rules of conduct inherent in human nature" (natural law) - This is philosophical/natural law.
 4. law%1:09:01:: - "a generalization that describes recurring facts or events in nature" (law of nature/physics) - Scientific laws.
 5. law%1:09:02:: - "the branch of philosophy concerned with the law" - Legal philosophy.
 6. law%1:04:00:: - "the learned profession" - The practice/field of law as a career.
 7. law%1:14:01:: - "the force of policemen and officers" - The police.

 The context is about "the law" that was being challenged in court and defended by the Solicitor General. This refers to a specific piece of legislation (likely the ACA/Obamacare given the Obama administration context).

 The phrase "challenges to the law" and "defending the law" suggests a specific legal document/statute, not the general concept of law (sense 1), not natural law (sense 3), not scientific law (sense 4), not legal philosophy (sense 5), not the profession (sense 6), and not the police (sense 7).

 Sense 2: "legal document setting forth rules governing a particular kind of activity" with example "there is a law against kidnapping" fits best. This refers to a specific statute or act of legislation.

 Wait, let me reconsider sense 1 vs sense 2.

 Sense 1: "the collection of rules imposed by authority" - This is the legal system as a whole, jurisprudence.
 Sense 2: "legal document setting forth rules governing a particular kind of activity" - This is a specific statute.

 In the text: "the first legal challenges to the law were brought" - this refers to challenging a specific piece of legislation (the ACA). "defending the law" - defending that specific statute.

 This aligns with sense 2. The example "there is a law against kidnapping" shows sense 2 refers to specific statutes.

 However, sometimes "the law" can refer to the general legal system. But here, given "challenges to the law" in the context of the Obama administration's solicitor general defending it, and it being a specific controversial piece of legislation being challenged in court, sense 2 seems most appropriate.

 Actually, looking at WordNet sense keys:
 - law%1:14:00:: is the first sense (noun.group) - "the collection of rules imposed by authority"
 - law%1:10:00:: is the second sense (noun.communication) - "legal document..."

 The index requested should be the position in the list provided (1-7), not the lexicographer file number.

 The candidate senses are numbered 1-7. I need to return the index from that list.

 Sense 1: collection of rules (jurisprudence)
 Sense 2: legal document (statute)
 Sense 3: natural law
 Sense 4: scientific law
 Sense 5: legal philosophy
 Sense 6: profession
 Sense 7: police force

 Given the context mentions "legal challenges to the law" regarding a specific piece of legislation being defended by the Solicitor General, this is sense 2.

 Wait, I should double-check if it could be sense 1. "Respect for the law" is the example for sense 1. But here we have "challenges to the law" - you can challenge a specific law (statute) in court. You don't usually say "challenges to the law" meaning challenges to the legal system as a whole, though you could. But given the Solicitor General defends specific legislation, and the context is about a specific case (likely healthcare law), sense 2 is better.

 Also, the phrase "defending the law" - when the government defends something in court, they defend a specific statute or act.

 Therefore, the answer should be index 2.

 But let me check if there's any ambiguity with sense 1. Sense 1 is "the collection of rules imposed by authority" - this is the abstract concept of law. Sense 2 is a specific instance - a legal document.

 The text says "challenges to the law were brought" - this implies a specific law was being challenged. If it were sense 1, it would be more like "challenges to the rule of law" or something similar.

 Also, "she was too invested in defending the law" - she (Kagan) was Solicitor General, whose job is to defend the government's position, including specific statutes being challenged.

 So yes, sense 2 is correct.

 The user wants the output as {"sense_index": 2}.

format: unknown

native_finish_reason: stop

provider: AtlasCloud

currency: USD


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: indication
Target surface form: indication
Context:
Scalia and Thomas have shown little regard for critics who say they too readily mix the business of the court with agenda-driven groups such as the Federalist Society. And Thomas" wife, Ginni, is a high-profile conservative activist. Moreover, conservatives argue that it's Justice Elena Kagan who has an ethical issue, not Scalia and Thomas. Kagan served as solicitor general in the Obama administration when the first legal challenges to the law were brought at the trial court level. Her critics have pushed for Kagan to recuse herself from hearing the case, saying that she was too invested in defending the law then to be impartial now. Kagan has given no <t>indication</t> she will do so.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=indication%1:10:00:: | definition=something that serves to indicate or suggest | synonyms=indicant | examples=an indication of foul play; indications of strain
2. sense_key=indication%1:10:01:: | definition=the act of indicating or pointing out by name | synonyms=denotation
3. sense_key=indication%1:10:02:: | definition=(medicine) a reason to prescribe a drug or perform a procedure | examples=the presence of bacterial infection was an indication for the use of antibiotics
4. sense_key=indication%1:10:03:: | definition=something (as a course of action) that is indicated as expedient or necessary | examples=there were indications that it was time to leave
5. sense_key=indication%1:09:00:: | definition=a datum about some physical state that is presented to a user by a meter or similar instrument | synonyms=reading, meter reading | examples=he could not believe the meter reading; the barometer gave clear indications of an approaching storm

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "indication" in the given context.

 Context analysis:
 - The sentence is: "Kagan has given no <t>indication</t> she will do so."
 - "Do so" refers to recusing herself from hearing the case.
 - The meaning is that Kagan has not shown any sign, signal, or suggestion that she will recuse herself.
 - It's about her not providing any evidence or suggestion of her intention to recuse herself.

 Candidate senses analysis:

 1. sense_key=indication%1:10:00:: | definition=something that serves to indicate or suggest | synonyms=indicant | examples=an indication of foul play; indications of strain
    - This seems to fit. "No indication she will do so" means no sign or suggestion that she will do so.
    - The examples "an indication of foul play" and "indications of strain" show this is about signs or evidence of something.

 2. sense_key=indication%1:10:01:: | definition=the act of indicating or pointing out by name | synonyms=denotation
    - This is about the act of pointing out or naming something. Doesn't fit the context of giving a sign or signal about future action.

 3. sense_key=indication%1:10:02:: | definition=(medicine) a reason to prescribe a drug or perform a procedure
    - Medical context. Not relevant here.

 4. sense_key=indication%1:10:03:: | definition=something (as a course of action) that is indicated as expedient or necessary | examples=there were indications that it was time to leave
    - This is about something being indicated as necessary or expedient. The example "indications that it was time to leave" suggests advice or recommendation.
    - However, in our context, it's not about something being indicated as expedient, but rather about a sign or evidence of intention.

 5. sense_key=indication%1:09:00:: | definition=a datum about some physical state that is presented to a user by a meter or similar instrument | synonyms=reading, meter reading
    - This is about physical measurements from instruments. Not relevant here.

 Comparing sense 1 and sense 4:
 - Sense 1: "something that serves to indicate or suggest" - this is about a sign, evidence, or suggestion of something.
 - Sense 4: "something (as a course of action) that is indicated as expedient or necessary" - this is about a recommendation or advice that something should be done.

 In the sentence "Kagan has given no indication she will do so", the meaning is that she has not provided any sign, signal, or evidence that she will recuse herself. This aligns with sense 1 (something that serves to indicate or suggest).

 Sense 4 would fit if the sentence were something like "There are indications that she should recuse herself" (meaning it's advisable/necessary), but here it's about her not showing signs of intending to do so.

 Therefore, sense 1 is the best fit.

 Wait, let me double-check the WordNet sense keys. The user provided:
 1. indication%1:10:00::
 2. indication%1:10:01::
 3. indication%1:10:02::
 4. indication%1:10:03::
 5. indication%1:09:00::

 In WordNet, the most common sense of "indication" is indeed "something that serves to indicate or suggest" (sense 1 above).

 The context is about Kagan not giving any sign or suggestion that she will recuse herself. This matches sense 1 perfectly.

 Sense 4 is more about "indication" meaning a recommended course of action (like medical indication for treatment, or general advice), but the example given is "there were indications that it was time to leave" which could be ambiguous. However, looking at the definition carefully: "something (as a course of action) that is indicated as expedient or necessary" - this implies that the indication is pointing to what should be done (expedient/necessary), whereas in our context, the indication would be about what she intends to do or will do, not necessarily what is expedient.

 Actually, looking at the example for sense 4: "there were indications that it was time to leave" - this could mean signs suggesting it was time to leave, which is similar to sense 1. But the definition specifies "indicated as expedient or necessary" which suggests a normative sense (should do) rather than a descriptive sense (will do).

 In our context: "Kagan has given no indication she will do so" - this is about her future action/intention, not about what is expedient or necessary for her to do. It's about evidence/signs of her intention.

 Therefore, sense 1 is correct.

 The answer should be: {"sense_index": 1}

provider: Novita


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: familiarity
Target surface form: familiarity
Context:
The <t>familiarity</t> of the Spanish is higher than that of the Ticos Of the 22 players called in Spain, ten passed 50 international games.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=familiarity%1:09:00:: | definition=personal knowledge or information about someone or something | synonyms=acquaintance, conversance, conversancy
2. sense_key=familiarity%1:07:01:: | definition=usualness by virtue of being familiar or well known
3. sense_key=familiarity%1:07:02:: | definition=close or warm friendship | synonyms=intimacy, closeness | examples=the absence of fences created a mysterious intimacy in which no one knew privacy
4. sense_key=familiarity%1:07:03:: | definition=a casual manner | synonyms=casualness
5. sense_key=familiarity%1:04:00:: | definition=an act of undue intimacy | synonyms=impropriety, indecorum, liberty

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "familiarity" in the given context.

Context: "The <t>familiarity</t> of the Spanish is higher than that of the Ticos Of the 22 players called in Spain, ten passed 50 international games."

Let me analyze the context. It seems to be talking about a soccer/football context. "The Spanish" refers to the Spanish national team, and "the Ticos" refers to the Costa Rican national team (Ticos is a nickname for Costa Ricans). The sentence compares the "familiarity" of the Spanish team versus the Ticos. It mentions that of 22 players called up for Spain, ten have passed 50 international games. This suggests experience or knowledge/information about the players? Or perhaps the players' familiarity with each other?

Wait, let me re-read carefully: "The familiarity of the Spanish is higher than that of the Ticos Of the 22 players called in Spain, ten passed 50 international games."

This seems to be saying that the Spanish team has more familiarity (perhaps among the players, or with the setup) than the Ticos. The supporting fact is that of 22 players called up for Spain, ten have played more than 50 international games. This suggests the Spanish players are more experienced, more known quantities, or perhaps more familiar with each other?

Actually, looking at the candidate senses:
1. personal knowledge or information about someone or something (acquaintance, conversance, conversancy)
2. usualness by virtue of being familiar or well known
3. close or warm friendship (intimacy, closeness)
4. a casual manner (casualness)
5. an act of undue intimacy (impropriety, indecorum, liberty)

In sports journalism, when talking about national teams, "familiarity" often refers to how well the players know each other, how long they've played together, their cohesion. But here the evidence given is "ten passed 50 international games" - this indicates experience.

Wait, "familiarity of the Spanish" - could this mean the Spanish team is more well-known? Or that the players have more familiarity (experience/acquaintance) with international play?

Let me think about sense 1: "personal knowledge or information about someone or something" - this could fit if it means the Spanish players have more knowledge/experience (familiarity) with international competition. But the subject is "the Spanish" as a team, and the comparison is with "the Ticos".

Actually, looking at similar usages in sports writing: "The familiarity of the Spanish team" might refer to the fact that the Spanish players know each other well from playing together at club level (like Barcelona/Real Madrid players). But the context says "ten passed 50 international games" - this points to experience, which is more about being acquainted with the international level.

But wait - "familiarity" with what? The sentence doesn't explicitly say "familiarity with international play". It just says "The familiarity of the Spanish is higher than that of the Ticos".

Sense 2: "usualness by virtue of being familiar or well known" - this would mean the Spanish are more well-known than the Ticos. Given that Spain is a bigger football nation and the players are more famous, this could fit. But the evidence given is about the number of international games played by the players, not about how well-known they are to the public.

Sense 1: "personal knowledge or information about someone or something" - if we interpret this as the Spanish players having more acquaintance/experience (knowledge) of international football because they have more caps. But "familiarity" here is a property of "the Spanish" (the team), not something they possess about something else.

Actually, in this specific text, it seems like it might be translated from Spanish or written by a non-native speaker. "The familiarity of the Spanish" - could "familiarity" here be a translation of "familia" (family) or something else? No, probably not.

Let me reconsider. In football/soccer reporting, especially when comparing national teams, "familiarity" often refers to team cohesion - how familiar the players are with each other. The Spanish team (circa 2010s) was famous for having a core of players from Barcelona and Real Madrid who knew each other very well. The Ticos (Costa Rica) might not have that. But the evidence given is individual caps (international games), which suggests experience rather than team cohesion.

Wait, could "familiarity" here mean "experience"? As in, the Spanish players are more familiar with the international stage? That would align with sense 1 - personal knowledge or information about someone or something (in this case, about international play).

But let me look at sense 2 again: "usualness by virtue of being familiar or well known". This is about being well-known. The Spanish players are more famous/well-known. But the evidence is about caps, not fame.

Hmm, actually, looking at the exact wording: "The familiarity of the Spanish is higher than that of the Ticos Of the 22 players called in Spain, ten passed 50 international games."

I think this might be about the Spanish national team having more "familiarity" in the sense of being a known quantity, or perhaps the writer means "experience" but used "familiarity".

Wait, I should consider if this is about the players' familiarity with each other - sense 3 (close or warm friendship/intimacy/closeness)? No, that seems too strong for a sports team context unless specifically talking about chemistry.

Let me look at the examples for sense 3: "the absence of fences created a mysterious intimacy in which no one knew privacy" - this is about physical/emotional closeness.

Sense 1 synonyms: acquaintance, conversance, conversancy. This is about knowing something through experience. "His familiarity with the subject was evident." If the Spanish players have more caps, they have more acquaintance with international football.

But the structure is "The familiarity of the Spanish" - this is a noun phrase where familiarity is possessed by the Spanish. "The acquaintance of the Spanish" doesn't quite work unless there's an object.

Actually, looking at it again, maybe this is a bad translation or non-native usage where "familiarity" means "experience" or "seniority". In many Romance languages, "familiarity" might not be the right word, but if we have to choose the best WordNet sense...

Let me think about which sense is most commonly used in sports contexts for team cohesion. When sports writers say a team has "familiarity", they often mean the players are familiar with each other - they have played together before. This would be sense 1 (personal knowledge about someone) - they have personal knowledge of each other. Or sense 3 (closeness)?

Actually, WordNet sense 1 is "personal knowledge or information about someone or something". If the Spanish players know each other (have personal knowledge about each other), that fits. The fact that ten have 50+ caps suggests they have been in the national team setup for a long time and thus know each other/the system well.

Sense 2 is "usualness by virtue of being familiar or well known" - this is about the quality of being familiar to an observer. Like "the familiarity of my childhood home". The Spanish team is more familiar (better known) than Costa Rica. But again, the evidence points to player experience, not public recognition.

I think sense 1 is the best fit. The Spanish players have greater personal knowledge/experience (familiarity) of international football / each other, evidenced by their high number of caps.

Wait, I want to double-check. Could it be sense 2? If something is "higher", can usualness be higher? "The usualness of the Spanish is higher" - that doesn't make much sense. "The acquaintance of the Spanish is higher" - also odd grammatically unless there's an implied object.

Actually, looking at the context again, I wonder if "familiarity" is being used to mean "number of familiar faces" or "continuity"? "The familiarity of the Spanish" = the Spanish team has more familiar faces (players who are well-known/regulars). This would align with sense 2 - well known. The evidence: 10 of 22 have 50+ caps, meaning they are established, familiar players.

In sports, "familiarity" can mean continuity - the same players being called up repeatedly. "The team lacks familiarity" means there are many new faces. "The Spanish have more familiarity" means more known/regular players. This fits sense 2 (usualness by virtue of being familiar or well known) or sense 1?

Sense 2 definition: "usualness by virtue of being familiar or well known". This is the state/quality of being familiar to people. If the Spanish squad has more familiar names (well-known players), they have more "familiarity" in this sense.

But sense 1 is about having personal knowledge. The players themselves having knowledge.

Given the evidence "ten passed 50 international games" - this supports that the players are experienced, established, well-known quantities. It suggests the Spanish team is full of familiar (well-known, usual) players.

However, I think the most standard WSD for this would be sense 1 if it means experience/acquaintance with the game, or sense 2 if it means being well-known.

Let me search my internal knowledge for similar WordNet disambiguation examples. "Familiarity" in the context of sports teams and caps...

Actually, I recall that in WordNet, sense 1 (acquaintance, conversance) is the most frequent sense and covers the meaning of "knowledge of something through experience". Sense 2 is less common.

But let's look at the exact sentence structure: "The familiarity of the Spanish is higher than that of the Ticos". This is comparing two teams on some metric. The metric is "familiarity". In football journalism, when comparing two national teams, saying one has more "familiarity" almost always refers to the players knowing each other better from playing together frequently (club teammates or long-time national team colleagues).

For example: "The familiarity of the Spanish midfield is evident" - meaning they know each other's movements well. This is sense 1: personal knowledge about someone.

The evidence given (10 players with 50+ caps) supports that these players have been around a long time, know the system, know each other. This is "personal knowledge or information about someone or something" - where "someone" is their teammates, or "something" is the national team setup.

Sense 3 (intimacy/closeness) is too strong - it's about warm friendship, not professional sports chemistry.

Sense 4 (casual manner) doesn't fit.

Sense 5 (undue intimacy/liberty) doesn't fit.

So it's between 1 and 2.

I think sense 1 is better because:
1. The supporting clause talks about the players' experience (50 international games), which relates to their personal knowledge/acquaintance with international play
2. "Familiarity" as a countable/comparable metric in sports usually refers to team chemistry/experience (sense 1), not public recognition (sense 2)

Wait, actually, looking at the definition of sense 2 again: "usualness by virtue of being familiar or well known". This is an abstract noun referring to the quality of being usual. Can you say "The usualness of the Spanish is higher"? That's strange.

Sense 1: "personal knowledge or information about someone or something". Can you say "The personal knowledge of the Spanish is higher"? Yes, if it means their knowledge/experience level.

I think sense 1 is the intended answer.

But let me reconsider one more time. Is there any chance this is about the Spanish team being more famous? "The familiarity of the Spanish" to the audience? If so, sense 2. But the evidence about 50 international games points to the players' experience, not the audience's recognition. The writer is using the number of caps to justify why the Spanish have more "familiarity" - this strongly suggests that "familiarity" here is being used to mean experience or established relationships.

Therefore, sense 1.

Actually, I want to check one more thing. Could "familiarity" here be a mistranslation or specific usage meaning "family-like quality"? No, that would be sense 3, and the evidence doesn't support it.

I'll go with sense 1.

Wait, I just realized I should look at the exact WordNet sense keys to make sure I have the right index.

The candidates are:
1. sense_key=familiarity%1:09:00:: | definition=personal knowledge or information about someone or something | synonyms=acquaintance, conversance, conversancy
2. sense_key=familiarity%1:07:01:: | definition=usualness by virtue of being familiar or well known
3. sense_key=familiarity%1:07:02:: | definition=close or warm friendship | synonyms=intimacy, closeness
4. sense_key=familiarity%1:07:03:: | definition=a casual manner | synonyms=casualness
5. sense_key=familiarity%1:04:00:: | definition=an act of undue intimacy | synonyms=impropriety, indecorum, liberty

So the indices are 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 as listed. The user wants {"sense_index": N}.

I choose 1.

Let me reconsider once more. Is there any interpretation where sense 2 is clearly better?

"The familiarity of the Spanish is higher than that of the Ticos" - if this is from an article about the 2014 World Cup (Spain vs Costa Rica?), and it's saying Spain is a more familiar team (better known, more famous), then sense 2. But the specific evidence "Of the 22 players called in Spain, ten passed 50 international games" is an argument for experience and continuity, not fame. A team can be famous without having many experienced players. The writer is using the cap count to prove the "familiarity" - this means "familiarity" is being operationalized as experience/continuity.

In sports analytics/journalism, "familiarity" measured by caps would be about how familiar the players are with the national team setup - i.e., their acquaintance with it. That's sense 1.

Yes, sense 1.

provider: SiliconFlow


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: player
Target surface form: players
Context:
The familiarity of the Spanish is higher than that of the Ticos Of the 22 <t>players</t> called in Spain, ten passed 50 international games. On the side of Costa Rica only one of 22 called players reached 50 games.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=player%1:18:01:: | definition=a person who participates in or is skilled at some game | synonyms=participant
2. sense_key=player%1:18:02:: | definition=someone who plays a musical instrument (as a profession) | synonyms=musician, instrumentalist
3. sense_key=player%1:18:00:: | definition=a theatrical performer | synonyms=actor, histrion, thespian, role player
4. sense_key=player%1:18:04:: | definition=a person who pursues a number of different social and sexual partners simultaneously
5. sense_key=player%1:18:03:: | definition=an important participant (as in a business deal) | examples=he was a major player in setting up the corporation

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation on the word "players" in the given context.

Context analysis:
- The text mentions "22 players called in Spain" and "ten passed 50 international games"
- It also mentions "Costa Rica" and "22 called players"
- This is clearly talking about sports - specifically international football/soccer matches (given the mention of Spain, Costa Rica, "international games")
- The word "players" here refers to athletes who participate in sports/games

Candidate sense analysis:
1. sense_key=player%1:18:01:: | definition=a person who participates in or is skilled at some game | synonyms=participant
   - This fits perfectly. Sports players are people who participate in games (sports).

2. sense_key=player%1:18:02:: | definition=someone who plays a musical instrument (as a profession) | synonyms=musician, instrumentalist
   - This is about musicians, not relevant here.

3. sense_key=player%1:18:00:: | definition=a theatrical performer | synonyms=actor, histrion, thespian, role player
   - This is about actors, not relevant here.

4. sense_key=player%1:18:04:: | definition=a person who pursues a number of different social and sexual partners simultaneously
   - This is slang for a womanizer/playboy, not relevant here.

5. sense_key=player%1:18:03:: | definition=an important participant (as in a business deal) | examples=he was a major player in setting up the corporation
   - This is metaphorical usage for business/politics, not sports.

The context clearly indicates sports players (football/soccer given the mention of international games, Spain, Costa Rica). Sense 1 is the correct choice: "a person who participates in or is skilled at some game".

The index requested should be the number after the last colon in the sense key, or based on the ordering provided. Looking at the sense keys:
- player%1:18:01:: (index 01)
- player%1:18:02:: (index 02)
- player%1:18:00:: (index 00)
- player%1:18:04:: (index 04)
- player%1:18:03:: (index 03)

Wait, the user asks for "sense_index". Looking at the format, they want a JSON like {"sense_index": 3}.

But which numbering system? The sense keys use 00, 01, 02, 03, 04. But the list is numbered 1-5.

Looking at the instruction: "Choose the single best indexed sense" and "Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}."

The example shows 3, which corresponds to the third item in the list (theatrical performer).

But I need to determine if they want:
1. The WordNet sense number (00, 01, 02, 03, 04)
2. The position in the candidate list (1, 2, 3, 4, 5)

Given the example {"sense_index": 3}, and looking at candidate 3 being "a theatrical performer", and the example output uses 3, it seems they want the position in the list (1-indexed).

However, looking at WordNet sense keys, the number after the last colon is the lexicographer file number or sense number. But in the example output, they show 3, which would correspond to the third sense listed.

Let me check: if the answer should be sense 1 (the game participant), then the index would be 1.

But wait, looking at the sense keys:
- player%1:18:01:: is listed first (candidate 1)
- player%1:18:02:: is listed second (candidate 2)
- player%1:18:00:: is listed third (candidate 3)
- player%1:18:04:: is listed fourth (candidate 4)
- player%1:18:03:: is listed fifth (candidate 5)

The sense numbers in WordNet are:
- 01 for game player
- 02 for musician
- 00 for actor
- 04 for womanizer
- 03 for business participant

If they want the WordNet sense number, it would be 01 (or 1).
If they want the list position, it would be 1.

But the example shows {"sense_index": 3}, which suggests they might want the list position. However, if I look at the third candidate (actor), that doesn't make sense as an example for this context.

Actually, looking carefully at the instruction: "Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}."

This is just an example format. The number 3 there is just illustrative. I should return the actual index of the correct sense.

Now, is the index the WordNet sense number (00, 01, 02, 03, 04) or the position in the list (1, 2, 3, 4, 5)?

Given that the sense keys end in :: and have numbers like 01, 02, 00, 04, 03, and the instruction mentions "indexed sense", and WordNet uses these numbers to index senses, I believe they want the number from the sense key.

But the example shows 3, not 03 or 00. So likely they want the position in the candidate list (1-indexed).

Let me reconsider. The correct sense is the first one: "a person who participates in or is skilled at some game". This is candidate 1 in the list.

So I should return {"sense_index": 1}.

But wait, looking at the sense key format again: player%1:18:01::
The last number before the :: is 01. Some systems use 0-indexed sense numbers.

However, the example {"sense_index": 3} strongly suggests 1-indexed position in the provided list. If they wanted the WordNet offset or sense number, they would likely show an example with 01 or 1:18:01.

Given the ambiguity, I should look at the context. The user says "Choose the single best indexed sense" and provides a list numbered 1-5. The most natural interpretation is that the "index" refers to the position in the provided list.

Therefore, the answer is 1.

Double-checking: The context is about football/soccer players (Spain vs Costa Rica, international games). This is definitely "a person who participates in or is skilled at some game" - sense 1 in the list.

Final check: Could it be sense 5? "an important participant (as in a business deal)" - no, this is metaphorical and the context is literal sports.
Could it be sense 3? "theatrical performer" - no.
Could it be sense 2? "musician" - no.
Could it be sense 4? "sexual partners" - no.

Definitely sense 1.

So: {"sense_index": 1}

provider: ModelRun


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: game
Target surface form: games
Context:
The familiarity of the Spanish is higher than that of the Ticos Of the 22 players called in Spain, ten passed 50 international <t>games</t>. On the side of Costa Rica only one of 22 called players reached 50 games.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=game%1:04:00:: | definition=a contest with rules to determine a winner | examples=you need four people to play this game
2. sense_key=game%1:04:03:: | definition=a single play of a sport or other contest | examples=the game lasted two hours
3. sense_key=game%1:04:01:: | definition=an amusement or pastime | examples=they played word games; he thought of his painting as a game that filled his empty time
4. sense_key=game%1:05:00:: | definition=animal hunted for food or sport
5. sense_key=game%1:28:00:: | definition=(tennis) a division of play during which one player serves
6. sense_key=game%1:23:00:: | definition=(games) the score at a particular point or the score needed to win | examples=the game is 6 all; he is serving for the game
7. sense_key=game%1:13:00:: | definition=the flesh of wild animals that is used for food
8. sense_key=game%1:09:00:: | definition=a secret scheme to do something (especially something underhand or illegal) | synonyms=plot, secret plan | examples=they concocted a plot to discredit the governor; I saw through his little game from the start
9. sense_key=game%1:06:00:: | definition=the game equipment needed in order to play a particular game | examples=the child received several games for his birthday
10. sense_key=game%1:04:02:: | definition=your occupation or line of work | synonyms=biz | examples=he's in the plumbing game; she's in show biz
11. sense_key=game%1:04:04:: | definition=frivolous or trifling behavior | examples=for actors, memorizing lines is no game; for him, life is all fun and games

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "games" in the given context.

 Context analysis:
 - The text is about soccer/football (Spanish national team vs Costa Rica national team)
 - "Of the 22 players called in Spain, ten passed 50 international games"
 - "On the side of Costa Rica only one of 22 called players reached 50 games"
 - This is talking about international matches/contests in sports
 - "games" here refers to individual matches or contests that players have participated in

 Looking at the candidate senses:

 1. sense_key=game%1:04:00:: | definition=a contest with rules to determine a winner | examples=you need four people to play this game
    - This is a general contest. Could fit, but let's look at others.

 2. sense_key=game%1:04:03:: | definition=a single play of a sport or other contest | examples=the game lasted two hours
    - This refers to a single instance/match of a sport. "International games" in sports context typically refers to individual matches played for the national team. This fits well with "50 international games" meaning 50 matches.

 3. sense_key=game%1:04:01:: | definition=an amusement or pastime | examples=they played word games; he thought of his painting as a game that filled his empty time
    - This is more about recreation/hobby, not professional sports matches.

 4. sense_key=game%1:05:00:: | definition=animal hunted for food or sport
    - Not relevant.

 5. sense_key=game%1:28:00:: | definition=(tennis) a division of play during which one player serves
    - Specific to tennis scoring, not general sports matches.

 6. sense_key=game%1:23:00:: | definition=(games) the score at a particular point or the score needed to win | examples=the game is 6 all; he is serving for the game
    - About scoring, not the matches themselves.

 7. sense_key=game%1:13:00:: | definition=the flesh of wild animals that is used for food
    - Not relevant.

 8. sense_key=game%1:09:00:: | definition=a secret scheme...
    - Not relevant.

 9. sense_key=game%1:06:00:: | definition=the game equipment...
    - Not relevant.

 10. sense_key=game%1:04:02:: | definition=your occupation or line of work...
     - Not relevant.

 11. sense_key=game%1:04:04:: | definition=frivolous or trifling behavior...
     - Not relevant.

 Between sense 1 and sense 2:
 - Sense 1: "a contest with rules to determine a winner" - general
 - Sense 2: "a single play of a sport or other contest" - specific to sports matches

 The context is clearly about sports (international football/soccer matches). "50 international games" means 50 matches played for the national team.

 Sense 2 specifically mentions "a single play of a sport or other contest" and the example "the game lasted two hours" suggests a specific match/instance. This fits "international games" as individual matches.

 However, looking carefully at WordNet senses for "game":
 - game%1:04:00:: is the general "contest" sense
 - game%1:04:03:: is "a single play of a sport or other contest"

 In sports statistics, when we say "He played 50 games", we are counting individual matches/instances of the sport. This aligns with sense 2.

 But wait, looking at the examples:
 - Sense 1: "you need four people to play this game" - refers to the game as a type of contest
 - Sense 2: "the game lasted two hours" - refers to a specific instance

 "50 international games" = 50 specific instances/matches of sport. So sense 2 seems correct.

 Actually, looking at typical WordNet sense distinctions:
 - game%1:04:00:: usually refers to the game as a type of activity (chess is a game, football is a game)
 - game%1:04:03:: refers to a particular match (they won the game yesterday)

 In the context "ten passed 50 international games", this means ten players have participated in 50 international matches each. So it's counting specific instances of matches.

 Therefore, sense 2 (index 2) is the best choice.

 Wait, I need to check the indexing. The user lists:
 1. sense_key=game%1:04:00::
 2. sense_key=game%1:04:03::
 3. sense_key=game%1:04:01::
 ...

 So sense_key=game%1:04:03:: is index 2.

 Let me double-check by looking at the definitions again:
 - "a single play of a sport or other contest" - yes, this is exactly what an "international game" is in this context - a single match between national teams.

 The answer should be {"sense_index": 2}.

provider: Moonshot AI


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: side
Target surface form: side
Context:
The familiarity of the Spanish is higher than that of the Ticos Of the 22 players called in Spain, ten passed 50 international games. On the <t>side</t> of Costa Rica only one of 22 called players reached 50 games. A minor contrast to Costa Rica, comparing the 22 players called by both countries for the friendly game today, at 3:05 pm at the National Stadium in San Jose.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=side%1:15:02:: | definition=a place within a region identified relative to a center or reference location | examples=they always sat on the right side of the church; he never left my side
2. sense_key=side%1:14:00:: | definition=one of two or more contesting groups | examples=the Confederate side was prepared to attack
3. sense_key=side%1:08:00:: | definition=either the left or right half of a body | examples=he had a pain in his side
4. sense_key=side%1:15:00:: | definition=a surface forming part of the outside of an object | synonyms=face | examples=he examined all sides of the crystal; dew dripped from the face of the leaf
5. sense_key=side%1:06:00:: | definition=an extended outer surface of an object | examples=he turned the box over to examine the bottom side; they painted all four sides of the house
6. sense_key=side%1:09:00:: | definition=an aspect of something (as contrasted with some other implied aspect) | examples=he was on the heavy side; he is on the purchasing side of the business
7. sense_key=side%1:15:01:: | definition=a line segment forming part of the perimeter of a plane figure | examples=the hypotenuse of a right triangle is always the longest side
8. sense_key=side%1:14:01:: | definition=a family line of descent | examples=he gets his brains from his father's side
9. sense_key=side%1:13:00:: | definition=a lengthwise dressed half of an animal's carcass used for food | synonyms=side of meat
10. sense_key=side%1:10:00:: | definition=an opinion that is held in opposition to another in an argument or dispute | synonyms=position | examples=there are two sides to every question
11. sense_key=side%1:17:01:: | definition=an elevated geological formation | synonyms=slope, incline | examples=he climbed the steep slope; the house was built on the side of a mountain
12. sense_key=side%1:11:00:: | definition=(sports) the spin given to a ball by striking it on one side or releasing it with a sharp twist | synonyms=English

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "side" in the given context.

 Context analysis:
 - The text is comparing two soccer teams: Spain and Costa Rica (Ticos)
 - "The familiarity of the Spanish is higher than that of the Ticos"
 - "Of the 22 players called in Spain, ten passed 50 international games"
 - "On the side of Costa Rica only one of 22 called players reached 50 games"
 - This is clearly talking about the Costa Rican team/side in a sports context
 - "comparing the 22 players called by both countries for the friendly game today"

 Looking at the candidate senses:

 1. sense_key=side%1:15:02:: - a place within a region identified relative to a center or reference location (e.g., right side of church) - Doesn't fit, not talking about physical location.

 2. sense_key=side%1:14:00:: - one of two or more contesting groups (e.g., Confederate side) - This fits! In sports, we talk about "sides" meaning teams or groups competing against each other. The context mentions "the Spanish" vs "the Ticos" (Costa Rica), and compares statistics "On the side of Costa Rica". This is clearly referring to the Costa Rican team as one of the contesting groups in the match.

 3. sense_key=side%1:08:00:: - either the left or right half of a body - Not relevant.

 4. sense_key=side%1:15:00:: - a surface forming part of the outside of an object - Not relevant.

 5. sense_key=side%1:06:00:: - an extended outer surface of an object - Not relevant.

 6. sense_key=side%1:09:00:: - an aspect of something - Could potentially fit ("on the side of Costa Rica" = regarding Costa Rica), but less likely than sense 2 given the sports context of two teams playing against each other.

 7. sense_key=side%1:15:01:: - a line segment forming part of the perimeter - Not relevant.

 8. sense_key=side%1:14:01:: - a family line of descent - Not relevant.

 9. sense_key=side%1:13:00:: - a lengthwise dressed half of an animal's carcass - Not relevant.

 10. sense_key=side%1:10:00:: - an opinion that is held in opposition to another - Not quite, though "side" can mean position in an argument, here it's about the team itself.

 11. sense_key=side%1:17:01:: - an elevated geological formation - Not relevant.

 12. sense_key=side%1:11:00:: - (sports) the spin given to a ball - Not relevant, though it's sports-related, it's about spin on the ball, not the team.

 The best fit is sense 2: "one of two or more contesting groups". The context is clearly about a soccer match between Spain and Costa Rica, and "On the side of Costa Rica" refers to the Costa Rican team as one of the contesting groups in this sports competition.

 Wait, let me double-check sense 6: "an aspect of something (as contrasted with some other implied aspect)" - examples: "he was on the heavy side", "he is on the purchasing side of the business".

 In the phrase "On the side of Costa Rica", it could mean "regarding Costa Rica" or "from Costa Rica's perspective" or "as for Costa Rica". But given that the text is comparing two teams playing against each other in a friendly game, and mentions "both countries", the "contesting groups" sense seems stronger.

 Actually, looking at the example for sense 2: "the Confederate side was prepared to attack" - this is exactly the usage here. In sports reporting, we frequently say "On the Spanish side..." or "On the side of Costa Rica..." to mean the team.

 Also, the phrase "On the side of Costa Rica" parallels "Of the 22 players called in Spain" - so "side" here is being used to refer to the team/group.

 Therefore, sense index 2 is correct.

 Wait, I need to check the indexing. The user lists:
 1. sense_key=side%1:15:02::
 2. sense_key=side%1:14:00::
 3. sense_key=side%1:08:00::
 ...

 So sense 2 in the list corresponds to sense_key=side%1:14:00::.

 The user asks for the "sense_index" in the JSON. Looking at the example {"sense_index": 3}, this refers to the index in the provided list (1-indexed).

 So I should return {"sense_index": 2}.

 Let me verify once more:
 - Context: Soccer match between Spain and Costa Rica
 - "On the side of Costa Rica only one of 22 called players reached 50 games"
 - This means: On the Costa Rican team, only one player...
 - Sense 2: "one of two or more contesting groups" - yes, this is the team/group sense.
 - Sense 6: "an aspect of something" - this would be more like "on the technical side" or "on the heavy side", not really referring to the team as a group.

 Yes, sense 2 is correct.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: player
Target surface form: players
Context:
The familiarity of the Spanish is higher than that of the Ticos Of the 22 players called in Spain, ten passed 50 international games. On the side of Costa Rica only one of 22 called <t>players</t> reached 50 games. A minor contrast to Costa Rica, comparing the 22 players called by both countries for the friendly game today, at 3:05 pm at the National Stadium in San Jose.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=player%1:18:01:: | definition=a person who participates in or is skilled at some game | synonyms=participant
2. sense_key=player%1:18:02:: | definition=someone who plays a musical instrument (as a profession) | synonyms=musician, instrumentalist
3. sense_key=player%1:18:00:: | definition=a theatrical performer | synonyms=actor, histrion, thespian, role player
4. sense_key=player%1:18:04:: | definition=a person who pursues a number of different social and sexual partners simultaneously
5. sense_key=player%1:18:03:: | definition=an important participant (as in a business deal) | examples=he was a major player in setting up the corporation

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "players" in the given context.

Let me analyze the context:
- The text is about a soccer/football match between Spain and Costa Rica ("the Spanish", "the Ticos", "international games", "friendly game", "National Stadium")
- It mentions "22 players called in Spain" and "ten passed 50 international games"
- It mentions "Costa Rica only one of 22 called players reached 50 games"
- This is clearly about sports - specifically football/soccer players

Now let's look at the candidate senses:
1. sense_key=player%1:18:01:: | definition=a person who participates in or is skilled at some game | synonyms=participant
2. sense_key=player%1:18:02:: | definition=someone who plays a musical instrument (as a profession) | synonyms=musician, instrumentalist
3. sense_key=player%1:18:00:: | definition=a theatrical performer | synonyms=actor, histrion, thespian, role player
4. sense_key=player%1:18:04:: | definition=a person who pursues a number of different social and sexual partners simultaneously
5. sense_key=player%1:18:03:: | definition=an important participant (as in a business deal) | examples=he was a major player in setting up the corporation

The context is clearly about sports - football/soccer players. They are talking about international games, being called up to the national team, etc.

Sense 1: "a person who participates in or is skilled at some game" - This fits perfectly. Sports are games, and these are people participating in the game (football/soccer).

Sense 2: Musical instrument player - not relevant here.

Sense 3: Theatrical performer/actor - not relevant.

Sense 4: Social/sexual partners - not relevant.

Sense 5: Important participant in business - while they are participants, the specific context is about games/sports, not business deals. The example given is about corporate setup.

Therefore, Sense 1 is the correct choice.

The user asks for a JSON object like {"sense_index": 3} - but I need to provide the index of the sense I choose. Looking at the list:
1. player%1:18:01::
2. player%1:18:02::
3. player%1:18:00::
4. player%1:18:04::
5. player%1:18:03::

Wait, I need to be careful about the indexing. The user lists them as:
1. sense_key=player%1:18:01::
2. sense_key=player%1:18:02::
3. sense_key=player%1:18:00::
4. sense_key=player%1:18:04::
5. sense_key=player%1:18:03::

So if I choose the first one (which is the correct one for sports/games), the index is 1.

Let me double-check the WordNet sense keys to make sure I understand the indices correctly. The format is typically:
- player%1:18:00:: = theatrical performer (actor)
- player%1:18:01:: = participant in a game
- player%1:18:02:: = musician
- player%1:18:03:: = important participant (business)
- player%1:18:04:: = person with multiple partners

But the user has listed them in a specific order with indices 1-5. I should go by the order provided:
1. player%1:18:01:: (game participant)
2. player%1:18:02:: (musician)
3. player%1:18:00:: (actor)
4. player%1:18:04:: (sexual/social)
5. player%1:18:03:: (business)

So the correct answer is index 1.

The context mentions "international games", "friendly game", and players being "called in" (called up to the national team). This is definitely about sports players - people who participate in games.

Therefore: {"sense_index": 1}


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: game
Target surface form: games
Context:
The familiarity of the Spanish is higher than that of the Ticos Of the 22 players called in Spain, ten passed 50 international games. On the side of Costa Rica only one of 22 called players reached 50 <t>games</t>. A minor contrast to Costa Rica, comparing the 22 players called by both countries for the friendly game today, at 3:05 pm at the National Stadium in San Jose.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=game%1:04:00:: | definition=a contest with rules to determine a winner | examples=you need four people to play this game
2. sense_key=game%1:04:03:: | definition=a single play of a sport or other contest | examples=the game lasted two hours
3. sense_key=game%1:04:01:: | definition=an amusement or pastime | examples=they played word games; he thought of his painting as a game that filled his empty time
4. sense_key=game%1:05:00:: | definition=animal hunted for food or sport
5. sense_key=game%1:28:00:: | definition=(tennis) a division of play during which one player serves
6. sense_key=game%1:23:00:: | definition=(games) the score at a particular point or the score needed to win | examples=the game is 6 all; he is serving for the game
7. sense_key=game%1:13:00:: | definition=the flesh of wild animals that is used for food
8. sense_key=game%1:09:00:: | definition=a secret scheme to do something (especially something underhand or illegal) | synonyms=plot, secret plan | examples=they concocted a plot to discredit the governor; I saw through his little game from the start
9. sense_key=game%1:06:00:: | definition=the game equipment needed in order to play a particular game | examples=the child received several games for his birthday
10. sense_key=game%1:04:02:: | definition=your occupation or line of work | synonyms=biz | examples=he's in the plumbing game; she's in show biz
11. sense_key=game%1:04:04:: | definition=frivolous or trifling behavior | examples=for actors, memorizing lines is no game; for him, life is all fun and games

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "games" in the given context.

 Context analysis:
 - The text is about international football (soccer) matches between Spain and Costa Rica.
 - "ten passed 50 international games" - referring to players who have played 50 international matches/contests.
 - "reached 50 games" - same meaning, referring to the number of international matches played.
 - "friendly game today" - referring to a specific match being played today.

 Looking at the candidate senses:

 1. sense_key=game%1:04:00:: | definition=a contest with rules to determine a winner | examples=you need four people to play this game
    - This is a general sense of game as a contest. International football matches are contests with rules to determine a winner.

 2. sense_key=game%1:04:03:: | definition=a single play of a sport or other contest | examples=the game lasted two hours
    - This refers to a single instance/play of a sport. The context mentions "50 international games" which means 50 individual matches/contests, and also "friendly game today" referring to a specific match. This seems to fit well.

 3. sense_key=game%1:04:01:: | definition=an amusement or pastime | examples=they played word games; he thought of his painting as a game that filled his empty time
    - This is more about amusement/pastime, not competitive international sports.

 4. sense_key=game%1:05:00:: | definition=animal hunted for food or sport
    - Not relevant here.

 5. sense_key=game%1:28:00:: | definition=(tennis) a division of play during which one player serves
    - Specific to tennis scoring, not relevant for football/soccer.

 6. sense_key=game%1:23:00:: | definition=(games) the score at a particular point or the score needed to win | examples=the game is 6 all; he is serving for the game
    - This is about score in tennis or similar sports. Not relevant here.

 7. sense_key=game%1:13:00:: | definition=the flesh of wild animals that is used for food
    - Not relevant.

 8. sense_key=game%1:09:00:: | definition=a secret scheme...
    - Not relevant.

 9. sense_key=game%1:06:00:: | definition=the game equipment...
    - Not relevant.

 10. sense_key=game%1:04:02:: | definition=your occupation or line of work...
    - Not relevant.

 11. sense_key=game%1:04:04:: | definition=frivolous or trifling behavior...
    - Not relevant.

 Now distinguishing between sense 1 and sense 2:
 - Sense 1: "a contest with rules to determine a winner" - general concept of a game
 - Sense 2: "a single play of a sport or other contest" - specific instance/match

 The context mentions "50 international games" - this refers to 50 individual matches/appearances for the national team. It also mentions "the friendly game today" referring to a specific match.

 Sense 2 ("a single play of a sport or other contest") seems most appropriate because:
 1. It specifically mentions "sport" in the definition
 2. The example "the game lasted two hours" suggests a specific instance of a sporting event
 3. The context is talking about counting individual matches (50 games) and a specific upcoming match (friendly game today)

 However, sense 1 is also plausible as "a contest with rules to determine a winner" - international football matches are certainly contests with rules.

 But looking at the WordNet hierarchy and typical usage:
 - Sense 1 (game%1:04:00::) is the more general sense of "game" as a contest
 - Sense 2 (game%1:04:03::) is more specific to a single play/instance of a sport

 In sports contexts, when we say "he played 50 games", we are referring to 50 individual instances of the sport being played. This aligns with sense 2.

 Also, looking at the example for sense 2: "the game lasted two hours" - this clearly refers to a specific sporting event/match, just like "the friendly game today" in the context.

 The phrase "international games" refers to international matches/contests in football.

 Actually, looking more carefully at WordNet sense distinctions:
 - game%1:04:00:: is the general "contest" sense
 - game%1:04:03:: is "a single play of a sport or other contest"

 In the context of "50 international games", this is counting individual matches. Each game is a single play of the sport (football/soccer).

 Also, "friendly game today" refers to a specific match.

 Therefore, sense 2 (index 2 in the list provided) seems to be the best fit.

 Wait, I need to check the indexing. The user lists:
 1. sense_key=game%1:04:00::
 2. sense_key=game%1:04:03::
 3. sense_key=game%1:04:01::
 ...

 So sense 2 in the list corresponds to game%1:04:03::.

 But let me reconsider. Is there any other sense that could fit?

 Sense 1: "a contest with rules to determine a winner" - This is also very plausible. An international football match is certainly "a contest with rules to determine a winner."

 However, the specificity of "single play of a sport" makes sense 2 better because:
 1. The context emphasizes the number of appearances (50 games)
 2. The context mentions a specific scheduled event ("friendly game today")
 3. The examples for sense 2 ("the game lasted two hours") align with sports reporting about match duration

 Also, in WordNet, sense 1 is often used for the general concept (e.g., "chess is a game", "let's play a game"), while sense 2 is used for specific instances (e.g., "the game was cancelled", "he played in 50 games").

 Given that the context is about counting specific appearances/matches and referring to a specific scheduled match, sense 2 is the best choice.

 Therefore, the answer should be {"sense_index": 2}.

provider: Chutes


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: player
Target surface form: players
Context:
The familiarity of the Spanish is higher than that of the Ticos Of the 22 players called in Spain, ten passed 50 international games. On the side of Costa Rica only one of 22 called players reached 50 games. A minor contrast to Costa Rica, comparing the 22 <t>players</t> called by both countries for the friendly game today, at 3:05 pm at the National Stadium in San Jose. While the Europe and world champions, number one one in the monthly top of FIFA, have a long record of Class A inter selection, the Tricolor has only the defender Michael Umana as the only one who has 50 international games.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=player%1:18:01:: | definition=a person who participates in or is skilled at some game | synonyms=participant
2. sense_key=player%1:18:02:: | definition=someone who plays a musical instrument (as a profession) | synonyms=musician, instrumentalist
3. sense_key=player%1:18:00:: | definition=a theatrical performer | synonyms=actor, histrion, thespian, role player
4. sense_key=player%1:18:04:: | definition=a person who pursues a number of different social and sexual partners simultaneously
5. sense_key=player%1:18:03:: | definition=an important participant (as in a business deal) | examples=he was a major player in setting up the corporation

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "players" in the given context.

 Let me analyze the context:
 - The text is about a football (soccer) match between Spain and Costa Rica
 - It mentions "22 players called in Spain"
 - It mentions "international games" (referring to international football matches)
 - It mentions "friendly game today"
 - It mentions "FIFA" (Fédération Internationale de Football Association)
 - It compares the number of international caps (games played) for players from both teams

 The target word "players" refers to athletes participating in a sports game (specifically football/soccer).

 Now let's look at the candidate senses:

 1. sense_key=player%1:18:01:: | definition=a person who participates in or is skilled at some game | synonyms=participant
    - This fits perfectly. The context is about football players participating in a game.

 2. sense_key=player%1:18:02:: | definition=someone who plays a musical instrument (as a profession) | synonyms=musician, instrumentalist
    - This doesn't fit. The context is about sports, not music.

 3. sense_key=player%1:18:00:: | definition=a theatrical performer | synonyms=actor, histrion, thespian, role player
    - This doesn't fit. The context is about sports, not theater.

 4. sense_key=player%1:18:04:: | definition=a person who pursues a number of different social and sexual partners simultaneously
    - This doesn't fit. The context is about sports.

 5. sense_key=player%1:18:03:: | definition=an important participant (as in a business deal) | examples=he was a major player in setting up the corporation
    - This is about business contexts, not sports games.

 The correct sense is clearly sense 1: "a person who participates in or is skilled at some game"

 The index appears to be 1 based on the sense_key format (player%1:18:01::).

 Wait, let me check the indexing. The user asks for "sense_index" in the JSON. Looking at the candidate senses, they are numbered 1, 2, 3, 4, 5. So I should return the number corresponding to the correct sense.

 Sense 1 is: player%1:18:01:: - a person who participates in or is skilled at some game
 This matches the context of football/soccer players.

 So the answer should be {"sense_index": 1}

provider: Phala


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: game
Target surface form: game
Context:
The familiarity of the Spanish is higher than that of the Ticos Of the 22 players called in Spain, ten passed 50 international games. On the side of Costa Rica only one of 22 called players reached 50 games. A minor contrast to Costa Rica, comparing the 22 players called by both countries for the friendly <t>game</t> today, at 3:05 pm at the National Stadium in San Jose. While the Europe and world champions, number one one in the monthly top of FIFA, have a long record of Class A inter selection, the Tricolor has only the defender Michael Umana as the only one who has 50 international games.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=game%1:04:00:: | definition=a contest with rules to determine a winner | examples=you need four people to play this game
2. sense_key=game%1:04:03:: | definition=a single play of a sport or other contest | examples=the game lasted two hours
3. sense_key=game%1:04:01:: | definition=an amusement or pastime | examples=they played word games; he thought of his painting as a game that filled his empty time
4. sense_key=game%1:05:00:: | definition=animal hunted for food or sport
5. sense_key=game%1:28:00:: | definition=(tennis) a division of play during which one player serves
6. sense_key=game%1:23:00:: | definition=(games) the score at a particular point or the score needed to win | examples=the game is 6 all; he is serving for the game
7. sense_key=game%1:13:00:: | definition=the flesh of wild animals that is used for food
8. sense_key=game%1:09:00:: | definition=a secret scheme to do something (especially something underhand or illegal) | synonyms=plot, secret plan | examples=they concocted a plot to discredit the governor; I saw through his little game from the start
9. sense_key=game%1:06:00:: | definition=the game equipment needed in order to play a particular game | examples=the child received several games for his birthday
10. sense_key=game%1:04:02:: | definition=your occupation or line of work | synonyms=biz | examples=he's in the plumbing game; she's in show biz
11. sense_key=game%1:04:04:: | definition=frivolous or trifling behavior | examples=for actors, memorizing lines is no game; for him, life is all fun and games

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "game" in the given context.

 Context analysis:
 The text is about a football (soccer) match between Spain and Costa Rica. It mentions:
 - "The familiarity of the Spanish is higher than that of the Ticos"
 - "Of the 22 players called in Spain, ten passed 50 international games"
 - "comparing the 22 players called by both countries for the friendly <t>game</t> today"
 - "at 3:05 pm at the National Stadium in San Jose"
 - "the Europe and world champions... have a long record of Class A inter selection"

 The target word "game" appears in the phrase "friendly game today" referring to a soccer match between two national teams.

 Looking at the candidate senses:

 1. sense_key=game%1:04:00:: | definition=a contest with rules to determine a winner | examples=you need four people to play this game
    - This is a general contest/sport definition. Could fit.

 2. sense_key=game%1:04:03:: | definition=a single play of a sport or other contest | examples=the game lasted two hours
    - This refers to a specific instance/match of a sport. The example "the game lasted two hours" suggests a particular match. This fits well with "friendly game today" referring to a specific soccer match.

 3. sense_key=game%1:04:01:: | definition=an amusement or pastime | examples=they played word games; he thought of his painting as a game that filled his empty time
    - This is more about games as activities/hobbies, not specific sporting events.

 4. sense_key=game%1:05:00:: | definition=animal hunted for food or sport
    - Not relevant (wildlife/game animals).

 5. sense_key=game%1:28:00:: | definition=(tennis) a division of play during which one player serves
    - Too specific to tennis scoring, not relevant to soccer.

 6. sense_key=game%1:23:00:: | definition=(games) the score at a particular point or the score needed to win | examples=the game is 6 all; he is serving for the game
    - About score/state of the game, not the match itself.

 7. sense_key=game%1:13:00:: | definition=the flesh of wild animals that is used for food
    - Food meaning, not relevant.

 8. sense_key=game%1:09:00:: | definition=a secret scheme...
    - Not relevant.

 9. sense_key=game%1:06:00:: | definition=the game equipment...
    - Physical objects, not relevant.

 10. sense_key=game%1:04:02:: | definition=your occupation or line of work...
     - Not relevant.

 11. sense_key=game%1:04:04:: | definition=frivolous or trifling behavior...
     - Not relevant.

 Now between sense 1 and sense 2:
 - Sense 1: "a contest with rules to determine a winner" - general concept of a game
 - Sense 2: "a single play of a sport or other contest" - specific instance/match

 The context refers to a specific friendly match today between Spain and Costa Rica at a specific time and place. The phrase "friendly game" refers to a friendly match (a specific sporting event).

 Earlier in the text, it mentions "50 international games" which refers to matches played by players. This usage is consistent with sense 2 (individual matches/contests).

 Sense 2's example "the game lasted two hours" clearly indicates a specific sporting event/match.

 Therefore, sense 2 (game%1:04:03::) is the best fit.

 Wait, let me double-check the indexing. The user lists:
 1. sense_key=game%1:04:00::
 2. sense_key=game%1:04:03::
 3. sense_key=game%1:04:01::
 ...

 So sense_index 2 corresponds to game%1:04:03:: "a single play of a sport or other contest".

 Actually, looking at the list again:
 1. game%1:04:00::
 2. game%1:04:03::
 3. game%1:04:01::

 The indexing is 1-based based on the list provided. So:
 - Index 1: game%1:04:00:: (general contest)
 - Index 2: game%1:04:03:: (single play/match)
 - Index 3: game%1:04:01:: (amusement)

 So the answer should be {"sense_index": 2}.

 Let me verify with WordNet:
 - game%1:04:00:: is usually "a contest with rules to determine a winner"
 - game%1:04:03:: is usually "a single play of a sport or other contest" - yes, this is the specific match sense.
 - game%1:04:01:: is "an amusement or pastime"

 In the context "friendly game today", this is definitely referring to a specific soccer match (a single play of a sport). The word "friendly" modifies it, indicating it's an exhibition match, but it's still a specific instance of a contest.

 Also, the earlier mention of "50 international games" refers to individual matches played by the players.

 So sense_index 2 is correct.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: today
Target surface form: today
Context:
The familiarity of the Spanish is higher than that of the Ticos Of the 22 players called in Spain, ten passed 50 international games. On the side of Costa Rica only one of 22 called players reached 50 games. A minor contrast to Costa Rica, comparing the 22 players called by both countries for the friendly game <t>today</t>, at 3:05 pm at the National Stadium in San Jose. While the Europe and world champions, number one one in the monthly top of FIFA, have a long record of Class A inter selection, the Tricolor has only the defender Michael Umana as the only one who has 50 international games.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=today%1:28:00:: | definition=the present time or age | examples=the world of today; today we have computers
2. sense_key=today%1:28:01:: | definition=the day that includes the present moment (as opposed to yesterday or tomorrow) | examples=Today is beautiful; did you see today's newspaper?

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation (WSD) for the word "today" in the given context.

 Context analysis:
 The text is about a friendly soccer game between Spain and Costa Rica. The sentence mentions: "comparing the 22 players called by both countries for the friendly game <t>today</t>, at 3:05 pm at the National Stadium in San Jose."

 The word "today" here refers to the specific day on which the game is being played, as opposed to yesterday or tomorrow. It's referring to the calendar day that includes the present moment when the game is scheduled.

 Candidate senses:
 1. sense_key=today%1:28:00:: | definition=the present time or age | examples=the world of today; today we have computers
 2. sense_key=today%1:28:01:: | definition=the day that includes the present moment (as opposed to yesterday or tomorrow) | examples=Today is beautiful; did you see today's newspaper?

 Analysis:
 - Sense 1 refers to the present time/age in a broader, more abstract sense (e.g., "the world of today" meaning modern times, contemporary era).
 - Sense 2 refers to the specific calendar day (the day including now, as opposed to yesterday or tomorrow).

 In the context, "today" is used to specify when the friendly game is taking place - it's referring to the specific day, at a specific time (3:05 pm). This matches sense 2, which is about the specific day as opposed to yesterday or tomorrow.

 The examples for sense 2 ("Today is beautiful", "today's newspaper") also align with this usage - referring to the specific day.

 Therefore, the correct sense is sense 2 (index 2).

 I need to return a JSON object: {"sense_index": 2}


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: san_jose
Target surface form: San Jose
Context:
The familiarity of the Spanish is higher than that of the Ticos Of the 22 players called in Spain, ten passed 50 international games. On the side of Costa Rica only one of 22 called players reached 50 games. A minor contrast to Costa Rica, comparing the 22 players called by both countries for the friendly game today, at 3:05 pm at the National Stadium in <t>San Jose</t>. While the Europe and world champions, number one one in the monthly top of FIFA, have a long record of Class A inter selection, the Tricolor has only the defender Michael Umana as the only one who has 50 international games.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=san_jose%1:15:01:: | definition=a city in western California located at the southern end of San Francisco Bay to the south of San Francisco; a center for computer and electronics industries
2. sense_key=san_jose%1:15:00:: | definition=the capital and largest city of Costa Rica | synonyms=capital of Costa Rica

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the target lemma "san_jose" with the surface form "San Jose" in the given context.

 Let me analyze the context:
 - The text mentions "Costa Rica" multiple times
 - It mentions "the Ticos" (which is a nickname for people from Costa Rica)
 - It mentions "the National Stadium in San Jose"
 - It mentions a friendly game between Spain and Costa Rica
 - It mentions "the capital and largest city of Costa Rica" as a synonym for one of the senses

 The two candidate senses are:
 1. San Jose, California (center for computer and electronics industries)
 2. San Jose, Costa Rica (capital and largest city of Costa Rica)

 Given the context is clearly about Costa Rica (mentioning "Costa Rica", "Ticos", "Tricolor", and comparing Spain vs Costa Rica for a football/soccer match), and specifically mentions the National Stadium in San Jose, this must be referring to San Jose, Costa Rica.

 The text explicitly mentions: "comparing the 22 players called by both countries for the friendly game today... at the National Stadium in San Jose"

 San Jose, Costa Rica is the capital of Costa Rica and would be where the National Stadium is located for an international friendly match between Spain and Costa Rica.

 Therefore, the correct sense is sense 2: san_jose%1:15:00:: (the capital and largest city of Costa Rica).

 The user wants me to return a JSON object like {"sense_index": 2} (where the index corresponds to the candidate sense number).

 Wait, looking at the candidate senses:
 1. sense_key=san_jose%1:15:01:: (California)
 2. sense_key=san_jose%1:15:00:: (Costa Rica)

 So the answer should be {"sense_index": 2}.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: number_one
Target surface form: number one
Context:
The familiarity of the Spanish is higher than that of the Ticos Of the 22 players called in Spain, ten passed 50 international games. On the side of Costa Rica only one of 22 called players reached 50 games. A minor contrast to Costa Rica, comparing the 22 players called by both countries for the friendly game today, at 3:05 pm at the National Stadium in San Jose. While the Europe and world champions, <t>number one</t> one in the monthly top of FIFA, have a long record of Class A inter selection, the Tricolor has only the defender Michael Umana as the only one who has 50 international games. That number was reached Friday before the game against Panama (0-2), in Rommel Fernandez.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=number_one%1:18:00:: | definition=a reference to yourself or myself etc.; `take care of number one' means to put your own interests first
2. sense_key=number_one%1:24:00:: | definition=the first or highest in an ordering or series | synonyms=first | examples=He wanted to be the first
3. sense_key=number_one%1:23:00:: | definition=the first element in a countable series | synonyms=first, number 1 | examples=the first of the month

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the target lemma "number_one" with the surface form "number one" in the given context.

Let me analyze the context:
- The text is talking about a soccer/football match between Spain and Costa Rica
- It mentions "the Europe and world champions, <t>number one</t> one in the monthly top of FIFA"
- This refers to Spain being ranked as the top team in the FIFA rankings

Now let's look at the candidate senses:

1. sense_key=number_one%1:18:00:: | definition=a reference to yourself or myself etc.; `take care of number one' means to put your own interests first
   - This is about self-interest, being selfish. Doesn't fit the context about FIFA rankings.

2. sense_key=number_one%1:24:00:: | definition=the first or highest in an ordering or series | synonyms=first | examples=He wanted to be the first
   - This seems to fit. Spain is described as "number one" in the monthly top of FIFA (rankings). This refers to being first/highest in an ordering (the FIFA ranking).

3. sense_key=number_one%1:23:00:: | definition=the first element in a countable series | synonyms=first, number 1 | examples=the first of the month
   - This also seems close, but "first element in a countable series" sounds more like the number 1 itself as a quantity, whereas sense 2 emphasizes "the first or highest in an ordering or series" which fits rankings better.

The context specifically mentions "number one one in the monthly top of FIFA" - clearly referring to their ranking position as #1 in the FIFA world rankings.

Comparing sense 2 and 3:
- Sense 2 (1:24:00) focuses on "the first or highest in an ordering or series" - this fits rankings perfectly.
- Sense 3 (1:23:00) focuses on "the first element in a countable series" - this seems more about the numeral itself or ordinal position in a sequence like "the first of the month".

Given the context is about FIFA rankings (an ordering/series where teams are ranked), sense 2 seems most appropriate. The phrase "number one" here means they are at the top of the rankings, i.e., the first or highest in the ordering.

Wait, let me double-check WordNet sense distinctions. Usually:
- 1:18:00 is a noun referring to oneself (take care of number one)
- 1:24:00 is often "the first or highest in an ordering"
- 1:23:00 might be the integer/ordinal

Actually, looking at the definitions again:
- Sense 2: "the first or highest in an ordering or series" - synonyms: first. Example: "He wanted to be the first"
- Sense 3: "the first element in a countable series" - synonyms: first, number 1. Example: "the first of the month"

Sense 2 seems better because:
1. "Highest in an ordering" specifically captures rankings (like FIFA rankings)
2. The example "He wanted to be the first" aligns with wanting to be number one in rankings
3. FIFA rankings are explicitly an "ordering or series"

However, I should verify whether "number one" in the phrase "number one one" (which seems like a typo or repetition in the text - probably should be just "number one in") refers to the ranking position.

The text says: "the Europe and world champions, number one one in the monthly top of FIFA"
This likely means: "the Europe and world champions, number one in the monthly top of FIFA"

So they're referring to Spain being ranked #1 in the FIFA rankings.

Between sense 2 and 3:
- Sense 2 emphasizes being first/highest in an ordering (ranking)
- Sense 3 emphasizes being the first element

For rankings, sense 2 is definitely the better fit.

The answer should be sense index 2.

Wait, I need to check if the sense indices correspond to the order given:
1. sense_key=number_one%1:18:00:: → index 1
2. sense_key=number_one%1:24:00:: → index 2
3. sense_key=number_one%1:23:00:: → index 3

So I should return {"sense_index": 2}

Let me reconsider if sense 3 could be correct. "the first element in a countable series" - FIFA rankings are a countable series, and Spain is the first element. But "highest in an ordering" (sense 2) captures the competitive ranking aspect better than "first element" which sounds more like a sequence position.

Also, looking at the example for sense 2: "He wanted to be the first" - this is about achieving a position/status, which matches the context of being #1 in FIFA rankings.

The example for sense 3: "the first of the month" - this is about a date/position in time, not a competitive ranking.

Therefore, sense 2 is the best choice.

provider: DigitalOcean