[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: repression
Target surface form: repression
Context:
If I were to ask a sample of American parents, "Do you wish the elementary schools to encourage creativity in your children? "the near-unanimous answer would be, "Yes, of course. "But what do we mean, specifically, by "creativity "? No one can say. In practice, it ends up being equated with a "self-expression "that encourages the youngsters' "self-esteem. "The result is a generation of young people whose ignorance and intellectual incompetence is matched only by their good opinion of themselves. The whole notion of "creativity "in education was (and is) part and parcel of a romantic rebellion against disciplined instruction, which was (and is) regarded as "authoritarian, "a <t>repression</t> and frustration of the latent talents and the wonderful, if as yet undefined, potentialities inherent in the souls of all our children. It is not surprising that parents find this romantic extravagance so attractive.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=repression%1:26:00:: | definition=a state of forcible subjugation | examples=the long repression of Christian sects
2. sense_key=repression%1:22:00:: | definition=(psychiatry) the classical defense mechanism that protects you from impulses or ideas that would cause anxiety by preventing them from becoming conscious
3. sense_key=repression%1:04:00:: | definition=the act of repressing; control by holding down | examples=his goal was the repression of insolence

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "repression" in the given context.

 Let me analyze the context:
 - The text discusses "creativity" in education as part of a "romantic rebellion against disciplined instruction"
 - Disciplined instruction is regarded as "authoritarian"
 - The target word "repression" appears in the phrase: "a repression and frustration of the latent talents and the wonderful, if as yet undefined, potentialities inherent in the souls of all our children"
 - So "repression" here refers to the act of holding down or suppressing the latent talents and potentialities of children
 - It's being used in the context of educational philosophy - viewing disciplined instruction as an act of suppressing children's natural abilities

 Now let's look at the candidate senses:

 1. sense_key=repression%1:26:00:: | definition=a state of forcible subjugation | examples=the long repression of Christian sects
    - This refers to a state of being subjugated, like a condition of oppression
    - The example suggests a prolonged state of subjugation (like Christian sects being repressed)
    - In our context, it's not describing a state but rather an act or process viewed as negative

 2. sense_key=repression%1:22:00:: | definition=(psychiatry) the classical defense mechanism that protects you from impulses or ideas that would cause anxiety by preventing them from becoming conscious
    - This is a technical psychological term (Freudian defense mechanism)
    - The context is about education and social philosophy, not individual psychology or defense mechanisms
    - Doesn't fit the educational/political discourse here

 3. sense_key=repression%1:04:00:: | definition=the act of repressing; control by holding down | examples=his goal was the repression of insolence
    - This refers to the act of suppressing or controlling something
    - The example shows "repression of insolence" - an act of suppressing behavior
    - In our context: "repression of the latent talents... potentialities" - this fits perfectly as an act of suppressing/holding down children's talents
    - The parallel structure with "frustration" (also an act or process of preventing fulfillment) supports this reading

 The context describes disciplined instruction as being regarded as "authoritarian" and as "a repression and frustration of... talents". This is clearly referring to the act of suppressing or holding down these talents (sense 3), not a psychiatric defense mechanism (sense 2) or a state of subjugation (sense 1).

 The phrase "control by holding down" in sense 3 matches the idea that disciplined instruction controls/holds down the natural talents and potentialities of children.

 Therefore, the best sense is sense 3 (repression%1:04:00::).

 Wait, let me double-check the WordNet sense indices. The user lists:
 1. sense_key=repression%1:26:00::
 2. sense_key=repression%1:22:00::
 3. sense_key=repression%1:04:00::

 So sense index 3 corresponds to "the act of repressing; control by holding down".

 Yes, this is correct. The context is talking about the act of repressing (suppressing) children's talents through disciplined instruction, viewing it as authoritarian.

 The answer should be: {"sense_index": 3}

provider: Moonshot AI


attempt_kind: initial

status: success

[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: frustration
Target surface form: frustration
Context:
If I were to ask a sample of American parents, "Do you wish the elementary schools to encourage creativity in your children? "the near-unanimous answer would be, "Yes, of course. "But what do we mean, specifically, by "creativity "? No one can say. In practice, it ends up being equated with a "self-expression "that encourages the youngsters' "self-esteem. "The result is a generation of young people whose ignorance and intellectual incompetence is matched only by their good opinion of themselves. The whole notion of "creativity "in education was (and is) part and parcel of a romantic rebellion against disciplined instruction, which was (and is) regarded as "authoritarian, "a repression and <t>frustration</t> of the latent talents and the wonderful, if as yet undefined, potentialities inherent in the souls of all our children. It is not surprising that parents find this romantic extravagance so attractive.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=frustration%1:12:00:: | definition=the feeling that accompanies an experience of being thwarted in attaining your goals | synonyms=defeat
2. sense_key=frustration%1:04:02:: | definition=an act of hindering someone's plans or efforts | synonyms=thwarting, foiling
3. sense_key=frustration%1:12:01:: | definition=a feeling of annoyance at being hindered or criticized | examples=her constant complaints were the main source of his frustration

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

finish_reason: stop

role: assistant

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation (WSD) for the word "frustration" in the given context. I need to choose between three candidate senses.

 Let me analyze the context:
 - The text discusses how "creativity" in education is part of a romantic rebellion against disciplined instruction
 - Disciplined instruction was/is regarded as "authoritarian"
 - It's described as "a repression and frustration of the latent talents and wonderful potentialities inherent in the souls of all our children"

 The key grammatical structure here is: "a repression and frustration of the latent talents..."
 - "frustration" is coordinated with "repression"
 - Both are modified by "of the latent talents..."
 - This suggests "frustration" is being used as a noun that takes an object (the latent talents)

 Looking at the candidate senses:

 1. sense_key=frustration%1:12:00::
    - definition: the feeling that accompanies an experience of being thwarted in attaining your goals
    - synonyms: defeat
    - This is about a feeling/emotion experienced by someone whose goals are blocked

 2. sense_key=frustration%1:04:02::
    - definition: an act of hindering someone's plans or efforts
    - synonyms: thwarting, foiling
    - This is about the act/action of hindering, not the feeling

 3. sense_key=frustration%1:12:01::
    - definition: a feeling of annoyance at being hindered or criticized
    - examples: her constant complaints were the main source of his frustration
    - This is also a feeling, but specifically annoyance at being hindered/criticized

 In the context: "a repression and frustration of the latent talents"
 - Here, "frustration" is parallel to "repression"
 - "Repression" in this context means the act of repressing/suppressing
 - The phrase means that disciplined instruction frustrates (hinders/prevents the development of) the latent talents
 - So "frustration" here refers to the act of frustrating (hindering), not the feeling of being frustrated

 Wait, let me reconsider. "Frustration" can be:
 - The feeling of being frustrated (sense 1 and 3)
 - The act of frustrating/thwarting (sense 2)

 In the phrase "frustration of the latent talents":
 - This could mean "the frustrating of the latent talents" (the act)
 - Or it could mean "the frustration [felt by] the latent talents" (but talents don't feel)
 - Or it could mean something else...

 Actually, looking closely: "a repression and frustration of the latent talents"
 - "Repression of X" = the act of repressing X
 - "Frustration of X" = the act of frustrating X (hindering X)
 - This parallels sense 2: "an act of hindering someone's plans or efforts"

 But wait, sense 2 says "frustration%1:04:02::" with definition "an act of hindering someone's plans or efforts" and synonyms "thwarting, foiling".

 However, looking at WordNet structure:
 - %1:12:00:: and %1:12:01:: are both nouns (1) referring to feelings/states (12)
 - %1:04:02:: is a noun (1) referring to acts (04)

 In the context, the author is saying that disciplined instruction was regarded as:
 1. "authoritarian"
 2. "a repression and frustration of the latent talents..."

 Here, "frustration" is coordinated with "repression" - both are nominalizations describing what disciplined instruction does to latent talents.
 - "Repression" = the act of repressing
 - "Frustration" = the act of frustrating (hindering/preventing)

 So this should be sense 2: the act of hindering.

 But let me double-check if it could be sense 1 or 3 (the feelings).

 If it were sense 1: "the feeling that accompanies an experience of being thwarted" - this would mean disciplined instruction IS a feeling? No, that doesn't make sense. Or that disciplined instruction creates this feeling? But the syntax is "frustration of the latent talents" - the talents are being frustrated (hindered), not feeling frustrated.

 Actually, looking at the syntax again: "a repression and frustration of the latent talents"
 This is ambiguous. It could mean:
 a) the repression of the talents and the frustration of the talents (where frustration = hindering)
 b) the repression of the talents and [something else]

 But given that talents don't feel emotions, interpretation (a) makes more sense - it's about the act of hindering the development/expression of talents.

 Therefore, sense 2 seems correct: "an act of hindering someone's plans or efforts"

 Wait, I should verify the WordNet senses more carefully. Let me think about what I know about WordNet structure for "frustration":

 Typically:
 - frustration.n.01: the feeling of being frustrated (defeat)
 - frustration.n.02: the act of frustrating (thwarting, foiling)
 - frustration.n.03: a feeling of annoyance (similar to 01 but more specific)

 Actually, looking at the provided keys:
 1. frustration%1:12:00:: - feelings (12 = noun.feeling)
 2. frustration%1:04:02:: - acts (04 = noun.act)
 3. frustration%1:12:01:: - feelings (12 = noun.feeling)

 So sense 2 is the only one that's an act, not a feeling.

 In the context: "regarded as 'authoritarian,' a repression and frustration of the latent talents..."
 - "Authoritarian" is an adjective describing the nature of disciplined instruction
 - "A repression and frustration..." is in apposition to "authoritarian" or describes what it is
 - It characterizes disciplined instruction as being a frustration of talents

 This is using "frustration" to mean the act of frustrating (hindering) the talents.

 Therefore, the answer should be sense index 2.

 But let me reconsider if there's any way this could be sense 1 or 3. Could "frustration" here refer to the feeling experienced by the children? The phrase is "frustration of the latent talents" - this is a noun phrase where "of the latent talents" modifies "frustration". If it were the feeling, it would mean "the frustration belonging to the talents" or "the frustration felt by the talents" - but that doesn't fit well because the text is criticizing the view that disciplined instruction is bad because it causes frustration (feeling) in children.

 Actually, reading the sentence again: "which was (and is) regarded as 'authoritarian,' a repression and frustration of the latent talents and the wonderful, if as yet undefined, potentialities inherent in the souls of all our children."

 The structure is: disciplined instruction [which was...] was regarded as:
 1. authoritarian
 2. a repression of the latent talents...
 3. a frustration of the latent talents...

 Here, "frustration" clearly functions as a noun meaning "the act of frustrating" (hindering/preventing), parallel to "repression" (the act of repressing).

 So yes, sense 2 is definitely the correct answer.

 Final check: sense 2 has synonyms "thwarting, foiling" - these are acts. "Thwarting of the talents" = preventing the talents from developing. This fits perfectly.

 Therefore: {"sense_index": 2}

format: unknown

native_finish_reason: stop

currency: USD


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: latent
Target surface form: latent
Context:
If I were to ask a sample of American parents, "Do you wish the elementary schools to encourage creativity in your children? "the near-unanimous answer would be, "Yes, of course. "But what do we mean, specifically, by "creativity "? No one can say. In practice, it ends up being equated with a "self-expression "that encourages the youngsters' "self-esteem. "The result is a generation of young people whose ignorance and intellectual incompetence is matched only by their good opinion of themselves. The whole notion of "creativity "in education was (and is) part and parcel of a romantic rebellion against disciplined instruction, which was (and is) regarded as "authoritarian, "a repression and frustration of the <t>latent</t> talents and the wonderful, if as yet undefined, potentialities inherent in the souls of all our children. It is not surprising that parents find this romantic extravagance so attractive.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=latent%5:00:00:potential:00 | definition=potentially existing but not presently evident or realized | examples=a latent fingerprint; latent talent
2. sense_key=latent%5:00:00:inactive:02 | definition=(pathology) not presently active | examples=latent infection; latent diabetes

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "latent" in the given context.

Let me analyze the context:
- The passage discusses "creativity" in education as part of a romantic rebellion against disciplined instruction.
- This rebellion was regarded as repression and frustration of the "latent talents" and potentialities inherent in children's souls.
- The phrase is "the latent talents and the wonderful, if as yet undefined, potentialities"

Now let's look at the candidate senses:

1. sense_key=latent%5:00:00:potential:00 | definition=potentially existing but not presently evident or realized | examples=a latent fingerprint; latent talent
2. sense_key=latent%5:00:00:inactive:02 | definition=(pathology) not presently active | examples=latent infection; latent diabetes

The context clearly uses "latent" to describe "talents" that are potentially existing but not yet evident or realized. This matches sense 1 perfectly, especially given the example "latent talent" provided in that sense.

Sense 2 is specifically pathology-related (latent infection, latent diabetes), which doesn't fit the context of educational talents and potentialities.

The context emphasizes that these talents are inherent but not yet developed or evident - "potentialities inherent in the souls of all our children" - which aligns with "potentially existing but not presently evident or realized."

Therefore, the best sense is sense 1.

I need to return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3} but with the correct index, which is 1.

provider: SiliconFlow


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: talent
Target surface form: talents
Context:
If I were to ask a sample of American parents, "Do you wish the elementary schools to encourage creativity in your children? "the near-unanimous answer would be, "Yes, of course. "But what do we mean, specifically, by "creativity "? No one can say. In practice, it ends up being equated with a "self-expression "that encourages the youngsters' "self-esteem. "The result is a generation of young people whose ignorance and intellectual incompetence is matched only by their good opinion of themselves. The whole notion of "creativity "in education was (and is) part and parcel of a romantic rebellion against disciplined instruction, which was (and is) regarded as "authoritarian, "a repression and frustration of the latent <t>talents</t> and the wonderful, if as yet undefined, potentialities inherent in the souls of all our children. It is not surprising that parents find this romantic extravagance so attractive.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=talent%1:09:00:: | definition=natural abilities or qualities | synonyms=endowment, gift, natural endowment
2. sense_key=talent%1:18:00:: | definition=a person who possesses unusual innate ability in some field or activity

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "talents" in the given context. I need to choose between two candidate senses:

1. talent%1:09:00:: - natural abilities or qualities (synonyms: endowment, gift, natural endowment)
2. talent%1:18:00:: - a person who possesses unusual innate ability (this would be referring to a person)

Looking at the context:
"...a repression and frustration of the latent <t>talents</t> and the wonderful, if as yet undefined, potentialities inherent in the souls of all our children."

The word "talents" here is referring to abilities or qualities that children possess, not to people themselves. It's talking about latent (hidden/undeveloped) talents - meaning natural abilities or gifts that children have.

The phrase "latent talents" clearly refers to abilities/qualities, not to people. You can't have "latent people" in this context. The parallel structure with "potentialities" (which also refers to capabilities/abilities) confirms this.

Sense 1 (talent%1:09:00::) refers to natural abilities or qualities.
Sense 2 (talent%1:18:00::) refers to a person (like "she's a talent").

So the correct sense is sense 1 (index 1).

Wait, looking at the instructions, it says "Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}". This suggests I should use the index number of the sense in the candidate list provided.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=talent%1:09:00:: ...
2. sense_key=talent%1:18:00:: ...

So sense 1 is the first one, sense 2 is the second one.

The correct answer is sense 1.

Therefore: {"sense_index": 1}

provider: AtlasCloud


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: yet
Target surface form: yet
Context:
If I were to ask a sample of American parents, "Do you wish the elementary schools to encourage creativity in your children? "the near-unanimous answer would be, "Yes, of course. "But what do we mean, specifically, by "creativity "? No one can say. In practice, it ends up being equated with a "self-expression "that encourages the youngsters' "self-esteem. "The result is a generation of young people whose ignorance and intellectual incompetence is matched only by their good opinion of themselves. The whole notion of "creativity "in education was (and is) part and parcel of a romantic rebellion against disciplined instruction, which was (and is) regarded as "authoritarian, "a repression and frustration of the latent talents and the wonderful, if as <t>yet</t> undefined, potentialities inherent in the souls of all our children. It is not surprising that parents find this romantic extravagance so attractive.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=yet%4:02:02:: | definition=up to the present time | examples=I have yet to see the results; details are yet to be worked out
2. sense_key=yet%4:02:04:: | definition=used in negative statement to describe a situation that has existed up to this point or up to the present time | synonyms=so far, thus far, up to now, hitherto, heretofore, as yet | examples=So far he hasn't called; the sun isn't up yet
3. sense_key=yet%4:02:03:: | definition=to a greater degree or extent; used with comparisons | synonyms=even, still | examples=looked sick and felt even worse; an even (or still) more interesting problem
4. sense_key=yet%4:02:00:: | definition=within an indefinite time or at an unspecified future time | synonyms=in time | examples=he longed for the flowers that were yet to show themselves; sooner or later you will have to face the facts
5. sense_key=yet%4:02:05:: | definition=used after a superlative | synonyms=so far | examples=this is the best so far; the largest drug bust yet
6. sense_key=yet%4:02:06:: | definition=despite anything to the contrary (usually following a concession) | synonyms=however, nevertheless, withal, still, all the same, even so | examples=although I'm a little afraid, however I'd like to try it; while we disliked each other, nevertheless we agreed

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation on the word "yet" in the given context.

 Let me analyze the context:
 "The whole notion of "creativity "in education was (and is) part and parcel of a romantic rebellion against disciplined instruction, which was (and is) regarded as "authoritarian, "a repression and frustration of the latent talents and the wonderful, if as <t>yet</t> undefined, potentialities inherent in the souls of all our children."

 The phrase is "as yet undefined". This is a common collocation.

 Now let's look at the candidate senses:

 1. sense_key=yet%4:02:02:: | definition=up to the present time | examples=I have yet to see the results; details are yet to be worked out
    - This seems to fit "as yet" constructions. "As yet" means "up to the present time" or "so far".

 2. sense_key=yet%4:02:04:: | definition=used in negative statement to describe a situation that has existed up to this point or up to the present time | synonyms=so far, thus far, up to now, hitherto, heretofore, as yet | examples=So far he hasn't called; the sun isn't up yet
    - This explicitly mentions "as yet" in the synonyms! The definition mentions "used in negative statement" but "as yet undefined" is effectively negative (undefined = not defined).

 3. sense_key=yet%4:02:03:: | definition=to a greater degree or extent; used with comparisons | synonyms=even, still | examples=looked sick and felt even worse; an even (or still) more interesting problem
    - This doesn't fit. "As yet undefined" isn't about degree.

 4. sense_key=yet%4:02:00:: | definition=within an indefinite time or at an unspecified future time | synonyms=in time | examples=he longed for the flowers that were yet to show themselves; sooner or later you will have to face the facts
    - This is about future time, but "as yet undefined" refers to the present state (still undefined up to now).

 5. sense_key=yet%4:02:05:: | definition=used after a superlative | synonyms=so far | examples=this is the best so far; the largest drug bust yet
    - Not applicable here.

 6. sense_key=yet%4:02:06:: | definition=despite anything to the contrary (usually following a concession) | synonyms=however, nevertheless, withal, still, all the same, even so | examples=although I'm a little afraid, however I'd like to try it; while we disliked each other, nevertheless we agreed
    - This is the conjunctive use, not applicable here.

 Now between sense 1 and sense 2:

 Sense 1: "up to the present time" - examples: "I have yet to see the results", "details are yet to be worked out"
 Sense 2: "used in negative statement to describe a situation that has existed up to this point or up to the present time" - synonyms include "as yet"

 The phrase "as yet" is explicitly listed as a synonym in sense 2. The phrase in the text is "as yet undefined".

 "Undefined" is a negative state (not defined). So sense 2 seems most appropriate.

 However, let me check if sense 1 could also work. Sense 1 examples: "I have yet to see the results" - this is similar to "as yet undefined" in structure.

 Actually, looking carefully:
 - Sense 1: "yet" as in "I have yet to see" - this is the "still, up to now" sense
 - Sense 2: specifically mentions "as yet" as a synonym and mentions negative statements.

 The phrase "as yet undefined" means "up to now undefined" or "still undefined". This fits sense 2's definition about "up to this point or up to the present time" in negative contexts.

 But wait, sense 1's definition is "up to the present time" and examples include "details are yet to be worked out" which is similar to "undefined" (not defined).

 Let me look at the WordNet sense keys to understand the numbering:
 - yet%4:02:02:: (sense 1 in the list)
 - yet%4:02:04:: (sense 2 in the list)

 Actually, the user has indexed them 1-6 for me. So:
 - Index 1: yet%4:02:02::
 - Index 2: yet%4:02:04::
 - Index 3: yet%4:02:03::
 - Index 4: yet%4:02:00::
 - Index 5: yet%4:02:05::
 - Index 6: yet%4:02:06::

 The phrase "as yet" is a fixed expression meaning "up to the present time". In WordNet, "as yet" is often associated with sense 2 (yet%4:02:04::) which has synonyms including "so far, thus far, up to now, hitherto, heretofore, as yet".

 The context: "the wonderful, if as yet undefined, potentialities"
 This means "the wonderful potentialities, which are as yet undefined" or "which are undefined up to now".

 This is clearly sense 2 (index 2): "used in negative statement to describe a situation that has existed up to this point or up to the present time".

 "Undefined" is a negative state (not defined), and "as yet" reinforces the "up to now" meaning.

 Sense 1 (index 1) is also "up to the present time" but the examples suggest it's used in constructions like "have yet to" or "is yet to be". But "as yet" is specifically listed in sense 2.

 Therefore, the answer should be index 2.

 Wait, let me double-check the exact wording of sense 1 and sense 2 in the prompt:

 1. sense_key=yet%4:02:02:: | definition=up to the present time | examples=I have yet to see the results; details are yet to be worked out
 2. sense_key=yet%4:02:04:: | definition=used in negative statement to describe a situation that has existed up to this point or up to the present time | synonyms=so far, thus far, up to now, hitherto, heretofore, as yet | examples=So far he hasn't called; the sun isn't up yet

 "As yet" is explicitly listed as a synonym in sense 2. The phrase in the text is "as yet undefined". This is a perfect match for sense 2.

 Also, "undefined" is a negative state (not defined), which fits the "used in negative statement" part of sense 2's definition.

 So the answer is definitely sense index 2.

provider: ModelRun


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: potentiality
Target surface form: potentialities
Context:
If I were to ask a sample of American parents, "Do you wish the elementary schools to encourage creativity in your children? "the near-unanimous answer would be, "Yes, of course. "But what do we mean, specifically, by "creativity "? No one can say. In practice, it ends up being equated with a "self-expression "that encourages the youngsters' "self-esteem. "The result is a generation of young people whose ignorance and intellectual incompetence is matched only by their good opinion of themselves. The whole notion of "creativity "in education was (and is) part and parcel of a romantic rebellion against disciplined instruction, which was (and is) regarded as "authoritarian, "a repression and frustration of the latent talents and the wonderful, if as yet undefined, <t>potentialities</t> inherent in the souls of all our children. It is not surprising that parents find this romantic extravagance so attractive.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=potentiality%1:26:00:: | definition=the inherent capacity for coming into being | synonyms=potential, potency
2. sense_key=potentiality%1:09:00:: | definition=an aptitude that may be developed | synonyms=capability, capableness

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "potentialities" in the given context.

Target lemma: potentiality
Target surface form: potentialities
Context: The passage discusses "creativity" in education as part of a romantic rebellion against disciplined instruction. The specific phrase is: "a repression and frustration of the latent talents and the wonderful, if as yet undefined, potentialities inherent in the souls of all our children."

Candidate senses:
1. potentiality%1:26:00:: - the inherent capacity for coming into being | synonyms=potential, potency
2. potentiality%1:09:00:: - an aptitude that may be developed | synonyms=capability, capableness

Let me analyze the context:
- The word is used in the phrase "latent talents and the wonderful, if as yet undefined, potentialities inherent in the souls of all our children"
- "Inherent" is explicitly used in the context: "inherent in the souls"
- The sense 1 definition includes "inherent capacity" and synonyms "potential, potency"
- The sense 2 definition is "an aptitude that may be developed" with synonyms "capability, capableness"

The context emphasizes that these potentialities are "inherent" in the souls of children - this aligns very closely with sense 1's definition "the inherent capacity for coming into being". The word "inherent" appears in the text itself.

Also, the phrase "latent talents and... potentialities" suggests something that exists as a possibility rather than a developed skill. Sense 1 (inherent capacity for coming into being) fits better with the romantic notion of innate, inherent possibilities waiting to be realized, rather than sense 2 which focuses on an aptitude that may be developed (which is more about developable skills).

Wait, let me reconsider. Both could fit. But the key is:
- Sense 1: "inherent capacity for coming into being" - this is about existence, being, becoming real
- Sense 2: "an aptitude that may be developed" - this is about skills/capabilities

In the context, the author is talking about "latent talents" and "potentialities" as things that are "inherent in the souls" of children. The romantic view is that children have these wonderful undefined capacities/possibilities inside them.

The word "inherent" in the context strongly points to sense 1, whose definition explicitly contains "inherent capacity". Also, the phrase "capacity for coming into being" matches the idea of undefined possibilities that could emerge.

Sense 2 focuses on "aptitude" - a natural ability to do something. While related, the context seems more focused on the general capacity/possibility (romantic, undefined) rather than a specific developable aptitude.

Also note the synonyms: sense 1 has "potential, potency" - and the word in the text is "potentialities" (plural of potentiality), which is morphologically related to "potential". The context is talking about the romantic view of children's undefined "potential" in a general sense.

I think sense 1 is the better fit.

The user wants only a JSON object like {"sense_index": 3} but the indices here are 1 and 2. So I should return {"sense_index": 1}.

Wait, let me double-check the exact wording. The candidate senses are numbered 1 and 2. So the index should be 1.

Actually, looking carefully:
1. sense_key=potentiality%1:26:00::
2. sense_key=potentiality%1:09:00::

I need to return {"sense_index": 1}.

Let me make sure I'm not missing anything. The context says "latent talents and the wonderful, if as yet undefined, potentialities inherent in the souls of all our children."

"Latent" means existing but not yet developed or manifest. This aligns with "inherent capacity for coming into being" (sense 1) - something that exists as a possibility but hasn't come into being yet.

Sense 2 "an aptitude that may be developed" - while "latent talents" could be aptitudes, the word "potentialities" here is paired with "inherent" and refers to undefined wonderful things in the soul. The romantic rebellion against disciplined instruction views children as having innate potential/potency that shouldn't be repressed. This is the general philosophical concept of potentiality as possibility/being, not specifically an aptitude.

Also, WordNet sense 1 (potentiality%1:26:00::) is in the noun.person? No, let me think about WordNet lexicographer file names. 1:26:00 - noun.attribute? Actually:
- 1:26 is noun.attribute? Let me recall: 00 noun.Tops, 01 noun.act, ... 26 might be noun.attribute or noun.state? Actually:
  - 1:07 noun.cognition
  - 1:09 noun.cognition? No, 1:09 might be something else.

Wait, the sense keys are:
- potentiality%1:26:00::
- potentiality%1:09:00::

In WordNet:
- 1:26 is noun.attribute? Let me check my internal knowledge. Actually:
  - 1:03 noun.animal
  - 1:05 noun.artifact
  - 1:07 noun.food? No.

Actually, the lexicographer file numbers:
- noun.Tops (00)
- noun.act (01)
- noun.animal (02)
- noun.artifact (03)
- noun.attribute (04)? No, I think:
  - 04 is noun.attribute
  - 07 is noun.cognition
  - 09 is noun.communication? No.

Actually, I don't need to know the exact lexicographer files. The definitions are what matter.

Sense 1: "the inherent capacity for coming into being"
Sense 2: "an aptitude that may be developed"

Given the explicit use of "inherent" in the context and the pairing with "latent" (hidden, present but not visible), sense 1 is clearly the best fit. The text is talking about the romantic notion that children have inherent capacities/possibilities that are being repressed by disciplined instruction.

Therefore, the answer is sense_index 1.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: inherent
Target surface form: inherent
Context:
If I were to ask a sample of American parents, "Do you wish the elementary schools to encourage creativity in your children? "the near-unanimous answer would be, "Yes, of course. "But what do we mean, specifically, by "creativity "? No one can say. In practice, it ends up being equated with a "self-expression "that encourages the youngsters' "self-esteem. "The result is a generation of young people whose ignorance and intellectual incompetence is matched only by their good opinion of themselves. The whole notion of "creativity "in education was (and is) part and parcel of a romantic rebellion against disciplined instruction, which was (and is) regarded as "authoritarian, "a repression and frustration of the latent talents and the wonderful, if as yet undefined, potentialities <t>inherent</t> in the souls of all our children. It is not surprising that parents find this romantic extravagance so attractive.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=inherent%5:00:00:intrinsic:00 | definition=existing as an essential constituent or characteristic | synonyms=built-in, constitutional, inbuilt, integral | examples=the Ptolemaic system with its built-in concept of periodicity; a constitutional inability to tell the truth
2. sense_key=inherent%5:00:00:implicit:00 | definition=in the nature of something though not readily apparent | synonyms=implicit in, underlying | examples=shortcomings inherent in our approach; an underlying meaning

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "inherent" in the given context.

 Let me analyze the context:
 - The text discusses "creativity" in education and how it's part of a romantic rebellion against disciplined instruction
 - The specific phrase is: "the wonderful, if as yet undefined, potentialities inherent in the souls of all our children"
 - This refers to potentialities (latent talents, capabilities) that are intrinsic to or built into the souls/ nature of children

 Now let's look at the candidate senses:

 1. sense_key=inherent%5:00:00:intrinsic:00
    - definition: existing as an essential constituent or characteristic
    - synonyms: built-in, constitutional, inbuilt, integral
    - examples: the Ptolemaic system with its built-in concept of periodicity; a constitutional inability to tell the truth

 2. sense_key=inherent%5:00:00:implicit:00
    - definition: in the nature of something though not readily apparent
    - synonyms: implicit in, underlying
    - examples: shortcomings inherent in our approach; an underlying meaning

 Analysis:
 - The context talks about "potentialities inherent in the souls of all our children"
 - This suggests that these potentialities are intrinsic, built-in, essential characteristics of children
 - Sense 1 emphasizes "existing as an essential constituent or characteristic" - this fits well with the idea that these wonderful potentialities are essential parts of children's souls/nature
 - Sense 2 emphasizes "in the nature of something though not readily apparent" - while potentialities might not be readily apparent (they are latent), the focus here seems to be more on them being intrinsic/essential rather than hidden or underlying

 However, looking closely at the phrase "latent talents and the wonderful, if as yet undefined, potentialities inherent in the souls of all our children":
 - "Latent" means existing but not yet developed or manifest
 - "As yet undefined" suggests they are not readily apparent
 - This might suggest sense 2 (implicit, underlying)

 But wait, looking at the examples for sense 1: "constitutional inability to tell the truth" - this suggests something built into one's nature/constitution.
 And for sense 2: "shortcomings inherent in our approach" - this suggests something implicit in or underlying the approach.

 The phrase "inherent in the souls" suggests these potentialities are intrinsic to, or essential constituents of, the souls of children. This aligns with sense 1 (intrinsic, built-in, constitutional).

 Also, looking at the broader context: the romantic view is that children have these wonderful potentialities naturally built into them (intrinsic), as opposed to being imposed from outside through "authoritarian" disciplined instruction.

 Sense 1 seems to be the better fit because:
 1. It emphasizes essential characteristics/constituents
 2. The synonyms "built-in", "constitutional", "inbuilt" fit well with the romantic notion that these talents are naturally part of children's souls
 3. While the potentialities are "latent" and "undefined", the word "inherent" here is modifying what kind of potentialities they are - they are intrinsic to the children, not external

 Actually, looking more carefully at WordNet distinctions:
 - Sense 1 (intrinsic): existing as an essential constituent or characteristic
 - Sense 2 (implicit): in the nature of something though not readily apparent

 The key difference is that sense 1 focuses on being an essential part/constituent, while sense 2 focuses on being present but not obvious.

 In the phrase "potentialities inherent in the souls", the meaning is that these potentialities are part of the essential nature of the souls - they are intrinsic characteristics. This is sense 1.

 The "latent" and "undefined" describe the state of the potentialities, but "inherent" describes their relationship to the souls - they belong to the souls essentially.

 Therefore, sense 1 is the correct choice.

 Wait, I need to check the sense indices. The user provided:
 1. sense_key=inherent%5:00:00:intrinsic:00
 2. sense_key=inherent%5:00:00:implicit:00

 So sense_index should be 1.

 Let me double-check by looking at typical WordNet entries for "inherent":
 In WordNet 3.0 or 3.1, "inherent" typically has:
 - Sense 1: existing as an essential constituent or characteristic; intrinsic (similar to 'built-in', 'constitutional')
 - Sense 2: in the nature of something though not readily apparent; implicit in, underlying

 Yes, that matches.

 In the context: "the wonderful, if as yet undefined, potentialities inherent in the souls of all our children"

 This is saying that these potentialities are intrinsic to the souls of children - they are part of their essential nature. This is clearly sense 1.

 The fact that they are "latent" and "undefined" might make one think of sense 2 (not readily apparent), but "inherent" here is not being used to mean "hidden" or "underlying" in the sense of being implied but not stated. Rather, it's being used to mean that these qualities are naturally part of the children's being.

 Therefore: {"sense_index": 1}

provider: Chutes


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: soul
Target surface form: souls
Context:
If I were to ask a sample of American parents, "Do you wish the elementary schools to encourage creativity in your children? "the near-unanimous answer would be, "Yes, of course. "But what do we mean, specifically, by "creativity "? No one can say. In practice, it ends up being equated with a "self-expression "that encourages the youngsters' "self-esteem. "The result is a generation of young people whose ignorance and intellectual incompetence is matched only by their good opinion of themselves. The whole notion of "creativity "in education was (and is) part and parcel of a romantic rebellion against disciplined instruction, which was (and is) regarded as "authoritarian, "a repression and frustration of the latent talents and the wonderful, if as yet undefined, potentialities inherent in the <t>souls</t> of all our children. It is not surprising that parents find this romantic extravagance so attractive.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=soul%1:18:00:: | definition=the immaterial part of a person; the actuating cause of an individual life | synonyms=psyche
2. sense_key=soul%1:03:00:: | definition=a human being | synonyms=person, individual, someone, somebody, mortal | examples=there was too much for one person to do
3. sense_key=soul%1:12:00:: | definition=deep feeling or emotion | synonyms=soulfulness
4. sense_key=soul%1:04:00:: | definition=the human embodiment of something | examples=the soul of honor
5. sense_key=soul%1:10:00:: | definition=a secular form of gospel that was a major Black musical genre in the 1960s and 1970s | examples=soul was politically significant during the Civil Rights movement

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the target word "souls" in the given context.

Let me analyze the context:
- The passage discusses "creativity" in education as part of a romantic rebellion against disciplined instruction.
- It mentions "latent talents and the wonderful, if as yet undefined, potentialities inherent in the souls of all our children."
- The phrase "inherent in the souls of all our children" suggests something immaterial, spiritual, or essential within each child.
- The context is about romantic notions of human potential and inherent qualities.

Now let's look at the candidate senses:

1. sense_key=soul%1:18:00:: | definition=the immaterial part of a person; the actuating cause of an individual life | synonyms=psyche
   - This refers to the spiritual/immaterial essence of a person. "Inherent in the souls of all our children" fits well with the idea of an immaterial part containing potentialities and latent talents.

2. sense_key=soul%1:03:00:: | definition=a human being | synonyms=person, individual, someone, somebody, mortal
   - This would mean "all our children" are souls = people. But the phrase says "inherent in the souls of all our children" - this suggests the souls belong to the children, not that the souls are the children themselves. Also, "latent talents... inherent in the souls" suggests the soul is a container/location of these qualities, not the person itself.

3. sense_key=soul%1:12:00:: | definition=deep feeling or emotion | synonyms=soulfulness
   - Doesn't fit. We're not talking about deep feelings inherent in emotions.

4. sense_key=soul%1:04:00:: | definition=the human embodiment of something | examples=the soul of honor
   - This is usually used in phrases like "the soul of discretion" meaning the embodiment. But here it's "souls of all our children" plural, and talking about inherent potentialities. Doesn't fit the "embodiment" pattern.

5. sense_key=soul%1:10:00:: | definition=music genre
   - Clearly irrelevant.

The best fit is sense 1: the immaterial part of a person. The context is romantic, talking about latent talents and undefined potentialities inherent in the spiritual/immaterial essence (soul) of children. This aligns with the romantic rebellion mentioned, which often emphasizes the inner spirit/soul of the child versus authoritarian discipline.

The phrase "inherent in the souls" strongly points to the immaterial part/essence rather than just "people."

So the answer should be sense_index: 1.

Wait, let me double-check the numbering. The user lists:
1. sense_key=soul%1:18:00::
2. sense_key=soul%1:03:00::
3. sense_key=soul%1:12:00::
4. sense_key=soul%1:04:00::
5. sense_key=soul%1:10:00::

So sense 1 is the immaterial part.

Yes, {"sense_index": 1}.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: child
Target surface form: children
Context:
If I were to ask a sample of American parents, "Do you wish the elementary schools to encourage creativity in your children? "the near-unanimous answer would be, "Yes, of course. "But what do we mean, specifically, by "creativity "? No one can say. In practice, it ends up being equated with a "self-expression "that encourages the youngsters' "self-esteem. "The result is a generation of young people whose ignorance and intellectual incompetence is matched only by their good opinion of themselves. The whole notion of "creativity "in education was (and is) part and parcel of a romantic rebellion against disciplined instruction, which was (and is) regarded as "authoritarian, "a repression and frustration of the latent talents and the wonderful, if as yet undefined, potentialities inherent in the souls of all our <t>children</t>. It is not surprising that parents find this romantic extravagance so attractive.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=child%1:18:00:: | definition=a young person of either sex | synonyms=kid, youngster, minor, shaver, nipper, small fry | examples=she writes books for children; they're just kids
2. sense_key=child%1:18:01:: | definition=a human offspring (son or daughter) of any age | synonyms=kid | examples=they had three children; they were able to send their kids to college
3. sense_key=child%1:18:06:: | definition=an immature childish person | synonyms=baby | examples=he remained a child in practical matters as long as he lived; stop being a baby!
4. sense_key=child%1:18:07:: | definition=a member of a clan or tribe | examples=the children of Israel

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "children" (target lemma: child) in the given context.

 Let me analyze the context:
 - The text discusses American parents and elementary schools
 - It mentions "your children" in the context of education and creativity
 - It talks about "youngsters" and "a generation of young people"
 - The phrase "inherent in the souls of all our children" refers to the offspring of parents
 - The context is about parents and their offspring/kids

 Now let's look at the candidate senses:

 1. sense_key=child%1:18:00:: | definition=a young person of either sex | synonyms=kid, youngster, minor, shaver, nipper, small fry | examples=she writes books for children; they're just kids
    - This refers to young people in general, not necessarily the offspring of specific parents.

 2. sense_key=child%1:18:01:: | definition=a human offspring (son or daughter) of any age | synonyms=kid | examples=they had three children; they were able to send their kids to college
    - This refers to offspring/sons and daughters of parents.

 3. sense_key=child%1:18:06:: | definition=an immature childish person | synonyms=baby | examples=he remained a child in practical matters as long as he lived; stop being a baby!
    - This is metaphorical, referring to someone who behaves childishly.

 4. sense_key=child%1:18:07:: | definition=a member of a clan or tribe | examples=the children of Israel
    - This is a biblical or tribal usage.

 Analysis of the context:
 - The text mentions "American parents" and "your children" - this strongly suggests the relationship of offspring to parents.
 - The phrase "all our children" in the context of parents and education suggests biological or adopted offspring.
 - While the children are young (elementary school age), the specific context emphasizes the parent-offspring relationship.

 Comparing sense 1 vs sense 2:
 - Sense 1 focuses on age (young person)
 - Sense 2 focuses on relationship (offspring)

 The context emphasizes "parents" and "your children" - this is clearly about the offspring relationship. The examples for sense 2 include "they had three children" and "send their kids to college" which matches the parental context here.

 The text is talking about parents wishing schools to encourage creativity in their offspring (children).

 Therefore, sense 2 (child%1:18:01::) is the best fit.

 Wait, let me double-check. The text says "inherent in the souls of all our children" - "our" here refers to the parents/parenting generation. This confirms it's about offspring.

 Also, earlier it mentions "youngsters" which might suggest sense 1, but the specific phrase "your children" asked to parents clearly indicates the offspring sense.

 So the answer should be sense index 2.

 Wait, I need to check the indexing. The user lists:
 1. sense_key=child%1:18:00::
 2. sense_key=child%1:18:01::
 3. sense_key=child%1:18:06::
 4. sense_key=child%1:18:07::

 So sense 2 is child%1:18:01:: which is "a human offspring (son or daughter) of any age".

 Yes, this is correct. The context is clearly about parents and their offspring.

 Actually, looking more carefully at the text: "inherent in the souls of all our children" - this is referring to the children of the parents being discussed. It's about the offspring relationship.

 Also, the mention of "elementary schools" and "youngsters" might make one think of sense 1 (young person), but the defining characteristic here is the relationship to parents, not just the age.

 The question asks: "Do you wish the elementary schools to encourage creativity in your children?"
 This is asking parents about their offspring. So sense 2 is definitely correct.

 Final check: sense 4 (children of Israel) is clearly wrong. Sense 3 (immature person) is wrong. It's between 1 and 2. The presence of "parents" and "your" makes it sense 2.

 The answer is {"sense_index": 2}.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: parent
Target surface form: parents
Context:
But what do we mean, specifically, by "creativity "? No one can say. In practice, it ends up being equated with a "self-expression "that encourages the youngsters' "self-esteem. "The result is a generation of young people whose ignorance and intellectual incompetence is matched only by their good opinion of themselves. The whole notion of "creativity "in education was (and is) part and parcel of a romantic rebellion against disciplined instruction, which was (and is) regarded as "authoritarian, "a repression and frustration of the latent talents and the wonderful, if as yet undefined, potentialities inherent in the souls of all our children. It is not surprising that <t>parents</t> find this romantic extravagance so attractive. Fortunately, these same parents do want their children to get a decent education as traditionally understood, and they have enough common sense to know what that demands.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=parent%1:18:00:: | definition=a father or mother; one who begets or one who gives birth to or nurtures and raises a child; a relative who plays the role of guardian
2. sense_key=parent%1:03:00:: | definition=an organism (plant or animal) from which younger ones are obtained

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "parents" in the given context.

 Target lemma: parent
 Target surface form: parents
 Context: A paragraph discussing "creativity" in education, romantic rebellion against disciplined instruction, and how parents find this attractive but also want traditional education for their children.

 Candidate senses:
 1. sense_key=parent%1:18:00:: | definition=a father or mother; one who begets or one who gives birth to or nurtures and raises a child; a relative who plays the role of guardian
 2. sense_key=parent%1:03:00:: | definition=an organism (plant or animal) from which younger ones are obtained

 Analysis:
 - The context is about education, children, and families.
 - The text mentions "youngsters", "children", "generation of young people"
 - It talks about "parents" finding romantic extravagance attractive and wanting their children to get a decent education
 - This is clearly referring to human parents (fathers and mothers), not biological organisms in a genetic sense
 - Sense 1 refers to human parents (father or mother)
 - Sense 2 refers to organisms (plants or animals) - this is the biological/genetic sense

 The context is clearly about human parents raising children and caring about their education. Therefore, sense 1 is the correct choice.

 The user wants the output as a JSON object: {"sense_index": 1}

 Wait, looking at the candidate senses:
 1. sense_key=parent%1:18:00::
 2. sense_key=parent%1:03:00::

 So the index would be 1 for the first sense.

 Let me double-check:
 - "parents" in the text refers to the mothers and fathers of the "youngsters" and "children" mentioned
 - They are described as finding educational philosophies attractive and wanting their children to get a decent education
 - This is definitely the human social role sense, not the biological organism sense

 Therefore: {"sense_index": 1}


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: find
Target surface form: find
Context:
But what do we mean, specifically, by "creativity "? No one can say. In practice, it ends up being equated with a "self-expression "that encourages the youngsters' "self-esteem. "The result is a generation of young people whose ignorance and intellectual incompetence is matched only by their good opinion of themselves. The whole notion of "creativity "in education was (and is) part and parcel of a romantic rebellion against disciplined instruction, which was (and is) regarded as "authoritarian, "a repression and frustration of the latent talents and the wonderful, if as yet undefined, potentialities inherent in the souls of all our children. It is not surprising that parents <t>find</t> this romantic extravagance so attractive. Fortunately, these same parents do want their children to get a decent education as traditionally understood, and they have enough common sense to know what that demands.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=find%2:40:02:: | definition=come upon, as if by accident; meet with | synonyms=happen, chance, bump, encounter | examples=We find this idea in Plato; I happened upon the most wonderful bakery not very far from here
2. sense_key=find%2:39:02:: | definition=discover or determine the existence, presence, or fact of | synonyms=detect, observe, discover, notice | examples=She detected high levels of lead in her drinking water; We found traces of lead in the paint
3. sense_key=find%2:40:00:: | definition=come upon after searching; find the location of something that was missed or lost | synonyms=regain | examples=Did you find your glasses?; I cannot find my gloves!
4. sense_key=find%2:32:00:: | definition=establish after a calculation, investigation, experiment, survey, or study | synonyms=determine, find out, ascertain | examples=find the product of two numbers; The physicist who found the elusive particle won the Nobel Prize
5. sense_key=find%2:31:10:: | definition=come to believe on the basis of emotion, intuitions, or indefinite grounds | synonyms=feel | examples=I feel that he doesn't like me; I find him to be obnoxious
6. sense_key=find%2:39:01:: | definition=perceive or be contemporaneous with | synonyms=witness, see | examples=We found Republicans winning the offices; You'll see a lot of cheating in this school
7. sense_key=find%2:40:01:: | definition=get something or somebody for a specific purpose | synonyms=line up, get hold, come up | examples=I found this gadget that will serve as a bottle opener; I got hold of these tools to fix our plumbing
8. sense_key=find%2:36:00:: | definition=make a discovery, make a new finding | synonyms=discover | examples=Roentgen discovered X-rays; Physicists believe they found a new elementary particle
9. sense_key=find%2:31:09:: | definition=make a discovery | synonyms=discover | examples=She found that he had lied to her; The story is false, so far as I can discover
10. sense_key=find%2:40:03:: | definition=obtain through effort or management | examples=She found the time and energy to take care of her aging parents; We found the money to send our sons to college
11. sense_key=find%2:32:01:: | definition=decide on and make a declaration about | synonyms=rule | examples=find someone guilty
12. sense_key=find%2:30:00:: | definition=receive a specified treatment (abstract) | synonyms=receive, get, obtain, incur | examples=These aspects of civilization do not find expression or receive an interpretation; His movie received a good review
13. sense_key=find%2:39:05:: | definition=perceive oneself to be in a certain condition or place | examples=I found myself in a difficult situation; When he woke up, he found himself in a hospital room
14. sense_key=find%2:40:15:: | definition=get or find back; recover the use of | synonyms=recover, retrieve, regain | examples=She regained control of herself; She found her voice and replied quickly
15. sense_key=find%2:38:10:: | definition=succeed in reaching; arrive at | examples=The arrow found its mark
16. sense_key=find%2:30:13:: | definition=accept and make use of one's personality, abilities, and situation | synonyms=find oneself | examples=My son went to Berkeley to find himself

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation (WSD) on the word "find" in the given context.

 Context analysis:
 The sentence is: "It is not surprising that parents <t>find</t> this romantic extravagance so attractive."

 The context discusses:
 - "Creativity" in education being equated with self-expression and self-esteem
 - This being part of a romantic rebellion against disciplined instruction
 - Parents finding this romantic extravagance attractive
 - Parents still wanting traditional education for their children

 The meaning here is that parents come to believe or perceive this romantic extravagance as attractive. It's about their perception or judgment of something.

 Looking at the candidate senses:

 1. find%2:40:02:: - come upon, as if by accident; meet with (happen, chance, bump, encounter)
    - This is about physically encountering or discovering by accident. Doesn't fit.

 2. find%2:39:02:: - discover or determine the existence, presence, or fact of (detect, observe, discover, notice)
    - This is about discovering facts or detecting things. Not quite right for finding something attractive.

 3. find%2:40:00:: - come upon after searching; find the location of something that was missed or lost
    - Physical searching. Not applicable.

 4. find%2:32:00:: - establish after a calculation, investigation, experiment, survey, or study
    - Scientific or systematic discovery. Not applicable.

 5. find%2:31:10:: - come to believe on the basis of emotion, intuitions, or indefinite grounds (feel)
    - Examples: "I feel that he doesn't like me; I find him to be obnoxious"
    - This fits well! "find this romantic extravagance so attractive" - this is about perceiving/judging something to be attractive based on feelings/intuition.

 6. find%2:39:01:: - perceive or be contemporaneous with (witness, see)
    - Examples: "We found Republicans winning the offices"
    - This is about witnessing events. Not quite right.

 7. find%2:40:01:: - get something or somebody for a specific purpose
    - About obtaining things. Not applicable.

 8. find%2:36:00:: - make a discovery, make a new finding
    - Scientific discovery. Not applicable.

 9. find%2:31:09:: - make a discovery
    - Similar to above. Not applicable.

 10. find%2:40:03:: - obtain through effort or management
     - About obtaining resources. Not applicable.

 11. find%2:32:01:: - decide on and make a declaration about
     - Legal or formal declarations. Not applicable.

 12. find%2:30:00:: - receive a specified treatment (abstract)
     - Examples: "do not find expression"
     - Not applicable.

 13. find%2:39:05:: - perceive oneself to be in a certain condition or place
     - Reflexive: "find myself in a difficult situation"
     - Not applicable here (not reflexive).

 14. find%2:40:15:: - get or find back; recover the use of
     - About recovering lost items. Not applicable.

 15. find%2:38:10:: - succeed in reaching; arrive at
     - Physical arrival. Not applicable.

 16. find%2:30:13:: - accept and make use of one's personality, abilities, and situation
     - "Find oneself" - identity. Not applicable.

 The best fit is sense 5: find%2:31:10:: - "come to believe on the basis of emotion, intuitions, or indefinite grounds" with synonym "feel".

 The structure "find X attractive" is a classic example of this sense - it means to perceive or judge X to be attractive. This is about forming an opinion or belief about something's quality.

 Wait, let me double-check sense 5 vs sense 6.

 Sense 6: find%2:39:01:: - perceive or be contemporaneous with (witness, see)
 Example: "We found Republicans winning the offices"

 Sense 5: find%2:31:10:: - come to believe on the basis of emotion, intuitions, or indefinite grounds (feel)
 Example: "I find him to be obnoxious"

 The sentence "parents find this romantic extravagance so attractive" matches the pattern of sense 5: Subject finds Object to be [adjective/adjective phrase]. This is about judging or perceiving something to have a certain quality (attractiveness).

 Actually, looking at WordNet structure, sense 5 (find%2:31:10::) is the one for "find" when used with adjective complements like "find attractive", "find obnoxious", etc.

 Let me verify the index. The user lists them as:
 5. sense_key=find%2:31:10::

 Yes, that's index 5.

 But wait, I should check if there's any other sense that might fit.

 Sense 2: discover or determine the existence... - could "find attractive" mean they discover it is attractive? No, that's not the meaning. The meaning is that they consider it attractive or perceive it as attractive.

 Sense 5 is definitely the best fit. The gloss "come to believe on the basis of emotion, intuitions, or indefinite grounds" and the synonym "feel" match the context where parents emotionally/intuitively judge this educational philosophy as attractive.

 The answer should be {"sense_index": 5}.

provider: DeepInfra


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: romantic
Target surface form: romantic
Context:
But what do we mean, specifically, by "creativity "? No one can say. In practice, it ends up being equated with a "self-expression "that encourages the youngsters' "self-esteem. "The result is a generation of young people whose ignorance and intellectual incompetence is matched only by their good opinion of themselves. The whole notion of "creativity "in education was (and is) part and parcel of a romantic rebellion against disciplined instruction, which was (and is) regarded as "authoritarian, "a repression and frustration of the latent talents and the wonderful, if as yet undefined, potentialities inherent in the souls of all our children. It is not surprising that parents find this <t>romantic</t> extravagance so attractive. Fortunately, these same parents do want their children to get a decent education as traditionally understood, and they have enough common sense to know what that demands.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=romantic%3:01:00:: | definition=belonging to or characteristic of Romanticism or the Romantic Movement in the arts | synonyms=romanticist, romanticistic | examples=romantic poetry
2. sense_key=romantic%5:00:01:loving:00 | definition=expressive of or exciting sexual love or romance | synonyms=amatory, amorous | examples=her amatory affairs; amorous glances
3. sense_key=romantic%5:00:00:impractical:00 | definition=not sensible about practical matters; idealistic and unrealistic | synonyms=quixotic, wild-eyed | examples=as quixotic as a restoration of medieval knighthood; a romantic disregard for money

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "romantic" in the given context.

Let me analyze the context:
The passage discusses "creativity" in education and describes it as "part and parcel of a romantic rebellion against disciplined instruction." It mentions this rebellion was regarded as against "authoritarian" methods, and describes it as involving "latent talents" and "wonderful, if as yet undefined, potentialities inherent in the souls of all our children." Later it refers to "this romantic extravagance."

Now let's look at the candidate senses:

1. sense_key=romantic%3:01:00:: | definition=belonging to or characteristic of Romanticism or the Romantic Movement in the arts | synonyms=romanticist, romanticistic | examples=romantic poetry

This refers to the artistic/literary movement (Romanticism). The context mentions a "romantic rebellion" but is it referring to the Romantic Movement specifically? The text talks about a rebellion against disciplined instruction in education, emphasizing self-expression, self-esteem, and the inherent potential in children's souls. This sounds like it could be related to Romanticism as an intellectual/artistic movement, but let's check the others.

2. sense_key=romantic%5:00:01:loving:00 | definition=expressive of or exciting sexual love or romance | synonyms=amatory, amorous | examples=her amatory affairs; amorous glances

This is clearly about love/sexual romance. The context is about education, creativity, and rebellion against discipline. Nothing about love or sexual relationships. So this is out.

3. sense_key=romantic%5:00:00:impractical:00 | definition=not sensible about practical matters; idealistic and unrealistic | synonyms=quixotic, wild-eyed | examples=as quixotic as a restoration of medieval knighthood; a romantic disregard for money

This sense means impractical, idealistic, unrealistic. The context describes the notion of creativity in education as leading to "ignorance and intellectual incompetence" matched with high self-esteem. It calls it "romantic extravagance" that parents find attractive. The description suggests it's unrealistic, impractical, focusing on undefined potentialities rather than disciplined instruction. The phrase "wonderful, if as yet undefined, potentialities" suggests idealism/unrealism.

However, looking at sense 1 again: The Romantic Movement in the arts and philosophy emphasized emotion, individualism, and the glorification of the past and nature. The text describes a rebellion against "disciplined instruction" and "authoritarian" methods, focusing on "self-expression," "latent talents," and "potentialities inherent in the souls of all our children." This sounds very much like Romantic ideology - the emphasis on the individual, emotion, natural goodness/potential of children (Rousseau-esque ideas), rebellion against strict rationalism and authority.

But wait, the text says "this romantic extravagance" and describes it as attractive to parents but leading to ignorance. Is this referring to Romanticism the movement, or just being romantic in the sense of idealistic/unrealistic?

Let me look at the specific phrase: "The whole notion of 'creativity' in education was (and is) part and parcel of a romantic rebellion against disciplined instruction..."

The phrase "romantic rebellion" could mean:
1. A rebellion characteristic of Romanticism (the artistic/intellectual movement)
2. An idealistic/impractical rebellion (sense 3)

But then it says "It is not surprising that parents find this romantic extravagance so attractive."

"Romantic extravagance" suggests excess, lack of practicality. But also, the description of focusing on undefined potentialities in children's souls is very much in line with Romantic educational philosophy (like Rousseau's Emile).

However, looking at the gloss for sense 1: "belonging to or characteristic of Romanticism or the Romantic Movement in the arts". The context is about education, not specifically arts. But Romanticism as a broader movement influenced education.

Looking at sense 3: "not sensible about practical matters; idealistic and unrealistic". The text criticizes the notion as leading to ignorance and incompetence, calling it an "extravagance" (which suggests excess, lack of practicality). The parents like it because it's attractive (idealistic), but the author implies it's not practical.

But there's a subtle distinction. Is the text referring to the Romantic Movement (capital R Romanticism) or just being romantic (lowercase, meaning idealistic)?

The phrase "romantic rebellion" without capitalization could go either way. However, the description of "latent talents and the wonderful, if as yet undefined, potentialities inherent in the souls of all our children" is classic Romantic ideology - the belief in innate goodness, natural development, rejection of rigid structure.

But sense 3's examples include "a romantic disregard for money" - which fits the pattern of being impractical about practical matters.

Let me reconsider the context more carefully. The author is critical of this approach. They describe it as resulting in "ignorance and intellectual incompetence." They call it "romantic extravagance." The tone suggests they view it as unrealistic, impractical, quixotic - trying to achieve an idealistic vision that doesn't work in reality.

However, sense 1 specifically mentions "Romantic Movement in the arts." The context is about education policy/pedagogy, not arts specifically. While Romanticism influenced education, the gloss specifically mentions "arts."

Sense 3 is more general: "not sensible about practical matters; idealistic and unrealistic."

Given that:
1. The text criticizes the approach as impractical (leading to incompetence)
2. It calls it an "extravagance" (suggesting excess, lack of practicality)
3. It contrasts with "disciplined instruction" and "common sense"
4. The description of undefined potentialities suggests unrealistic idealism

Sense 3 seems like a strong candidate.

But let me check if sense 1 could fit better. The Romantic Movement was indeed a rebellion against Enlightenment rationalism and authority. It emphasized emotion, nature, and the individual. The description of rebellion against "authoritarian" instruction and focus on "self-expression" aligns with Romanticism. However, WordNet's sense 1 is specifically about the arts (Romantic poetry), while this is about education.

Actually, looking at WordNet, sense 1 (romantic%3:01:00::) is the adjective relating to Romanticism. But Romanticism is broader than just arts - it includes philosophy and other areas. However, the gloss specifically mentions "Romantic Movement in the arts."

Sense 3 (romantic%5:00:00:impractical:00) is the sense meaning quixotic, impractical.

Given the context emphasizes the impracticality and unrealistic nature (ignorance and incompetence result, it's an extravagance), and contrasts with "common sense," sense 3 seems most appropriate.

But I need to be careful. The phrase "romantic rebellion" could be interpreted as "a rebellion of the type associated with Romanticism" or "an idealistic rebellion."

Let me look at the target word occurrence: "It is not surprising that parents find this <t>romantic</t> extravagance so attractive."

The word "romantic" here modifies "extravagance." An "extravagance" can be romantic in the sense of idealistic/unrealistic (sense 3) or related to Romanticism (sense 1).

Given the criticism of the educational approach as producing incompetence, and the contrast with "common sense" and "decent education as traditionally understood," the author is clearly portraying this as impractical and unrealistic.

Therefore, sense 3 is the best fit.

Wait, I should double-check if there's any possibility of sense 2. No, definitely not about sexual love.

So it's between 1 and 3.

Argument for 1: The passage describes a specific historical/intellectual movement - the "creativity" movement in education is described as a "romantic rebellion" against discipline. This aligns with the Romantic Movement's values.

Argument for 3: The passage emphasizes the impracticality and unrealistic nature of the approach, which leads to negative outcomes (ignorance). The word "extravagance" and the contrast with "common sense" support the "impractical" meaning.

Given that the text explicitly links this to negative practical consequences (incompetence) and contrasts it with common sense, and given that sense 1 is specifically tied to the arts (which is not the primary context here), sense 3 is the better choice.

Final check: In WordNet, "romantic" as "impractical" (sense 3) is a very common usage. "A romantic scheme" = unrealistic. The text's use of "extravagance" (excessive, unrealistic spending/behavior) fits well with this sense.

I choose sense 3.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: so
Target surface form: so
Context:
But what do we mean, specifically, by "creativity "? No one can say. In practice, it ends up being equated with a "self-expression "that encourages the youngsters' "self-esteem. "The result is a generation of young people whose ignorance and intellectual incompetence is matched only by their good opinion of themselves. The whole notion of "creativity "in education was (and is) part and parcel of a romantic rebellion against disciplined instruction, which was (and is) regarded as "authoritarian, "a repression and frustration of the latent talents and the wonderful, if as yet undefined, potentialities inherent in the souls of all our children. It is not surprising that parents find this romantic extravagance <t>so</t> attractive. Fortunately, these same parents do want their children to get a decent education as traditionally understood, and they have enough common sense to know what that demands.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=so%4:02:02:: | definition=to a very great extent or degree | examples=the idea is so obvious; never been so happy
2. sense_key=so%4:02:06:: | definition=in a manner that facilitates | examples=he observed the snakes so he could describe their behavior; he stooped down so he could pick up his hat
3. sense_key=so%4:02:05:: | definition=in such a condition or manner, especially as expressed or implied | examples=They're happy and I hope they will remain so; so live your life that old age will bring no regrets
4. sense_key=so%4:02:07:: | definition=to a certain unspecified extent or degree | examples=I can only go so far with this student; can do only so much in a day
5. sense_key=so%4:02:08:: | definition=in the same way; also | examples=I was offended and so was he; worked hard and so did she
6. sense_key=so%4:02:04:: | definition=in the way indicated; ; ; (`thusly' is a nonstandard variant) | synonyms=thus, thusly | examples=hold the brush so; set up the pieces thus
7. sense_key=so%4:02:03:: | definition=(usually followed by `that') to an extent or degree as expressed | examples=he was so tired he could hardly stand; so dirty that it smells
8. sense_key=so%4:02:09:: | definition=subsequently or soon afterward (often used as sentence connectors) | synonyms=then, and so, and then | examples=then he left; go left first, then right
9. sense_key=so%4:02:10:: | definition=(used to introduce a logical conclusion) from that fact or reason or as a result | synonyms=therefore, hence, thence, thus | examples=therefore X must be true; the eggs were fresh and hence satisfactory
10. sense_key=so%4:02:00:: | definition=in truth (often tends to intensify) | synonyms=indeed | examples=they said the car would break down and indeed it did; it is very cold indeed

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "so" in the given context.

 Context analysis:
 The sentence is: "It is not surprising that parents find this romantic extravagance <t>so</t> attractive."

 The word "so" here modifies "attractive" - it's an intensifier meaning "to a very great extent or degree" or "very".

 Let's look at the candidate senses:

 1. sense_key=so%4:02:02:: | definition=to a very great extent or degree | examples=the idea is so obvious; never been so happy
    - This looks like a strong candidate. "so attractive" = attractive to a very great extent/degree.

 2. sense_key=so%4:02:06:: | definition=in a manner that facilitates | examples=he observed the snakes so he could describe their behavior
    - This is the "so that" (in order to) sense. Not applicable here.

 3. sense_key=so%4:02:05:: | definition=in such a condition or manner, especially as expressed or implied | examples=They're happy and I hope they will remain so
    - This is the pro-form usage (referring back to a previous state). Not applicable.

 4. sense_key=so%4:02:07:: | definition=to a certain unspecified extent or degree | examples=I can only go so far with this student
    - This is the "so far" / limited extent sense. Not applicable.

 5. sense_key=so%4:02:08:: | definition=in the same way; also | examples=I was offended and so was he
    - This is the "also" sense. Not applicable.

 6. sense_key=so%4:02:04:: | definition=in the way indicated | synonyms=thus, thusly | examples=hold the brush so
    - This is the manner/demonstrative sense. Not applicable.

 7. sense_key=so%4:02:03:: | definition=(usually followed by `that') to an extent or degree as expressed | examples=he was so tired he could hardly stand
    - This is the "so...that" correlative construction. While the sentence has "so attractive", it doesn't have a "that" clause following it (the "that" in "It is not surprising that..." is a complementizer, not part of the so...that construction). However, looking closely: "parents find this romantic extravagance so attractive" - there's no result clause introduced by "that" immediately following. The "that" after "surprising" is part of the main clause structure.

    Wait, let me reconsider. The structure is:
    "It is not surprising [that parents find this romantic extravagance so attractive]"

    Inside the subordinate clause: "parents find this romantic extravagance so attractive"
    This is "find [object] [complement]" structure. "so attractive" is the object complement describing the extravagance.

    Is this sense 1 or sense 7?
    Sense 1: "to a very great extent or degree" - general intensifier
    Sense 7: "(usually followed by `that') to an extent or degree as expressed" - specifically the correlative "so...that" construction

    The example for sense 7: "he was so tired he could hardly stand" (note: "that" is optional in the result clause but implied)
    The example for sense 1: "the idea is so obvious; never been so happy"

    In the target sentence, "so attractive" is not followed by a result clause. It's just describing the degree of attractiveness. Therefore, sense 1 is more appropriate.

    However, I should check if there's any implicit "that" meaning. The sentence continues: "Fortunately, these same parents..." - there's no result clause like "*so attractive that they embrace it completely*". So it's not the correlative construction.

    Therefore, sense 1 (so%4:02:02::) is the best fit.

 8. sense_key=so%4:02:09:: | definition=subsequently or soon afterward | synonyms=then
    - Temporal sense. Not applicable.

 9. sense_key=so%4:02:10:: | definition=(used to introduce a logical conclusion) | synonyms=therefore
    - Conjunctive sense. Not applicable.

 10. sense_key=so%4:02:00:: | definition=in truth (often tends to intensify) | synonyms=indeed
     - This is the "indeed" sense, but "so attractive" doesn't mean "indeed attractive" in this context. This sense is more for "So, it is true" or "He did so do it" (emphatic).

 Comparing sense 1 and sense 7 again:
 Sense 1: "to a very great extent or degree" - examples: "the idea is so obvious", "never been so happy"
 Sense 7: "(usually followed by `that') to an extent or degree as expressed" - examples: "he was so tired he could hardly stand"

 The key difference is that sense 7 specifically requires/implies a "that" clause expressing the result or extent. In "parents find this romantic extravagance so attractive", there is no following result clause. It's simply an intensifier modifying "attractive".

 Therefore, the correct sense is 1 (index 1).

 Wait, I need to check the indexing. The user lists:
 1. sense_key=so%4:02:02::
 2. sense_key=so%4:02:06::
 3. sense_key=so%4:02:05::
 4. sense_key=so%4:02:07::
 5. sense_key=so%4:02:08::
 6. sense_key=so%4:02:04::
 7. sense_key=so%4:02:03::
 8. sense_key=so%4:02:09::
 9. sense_key=so%4:02:10::
 10. sense_key=so%4:02:00::

 So sense 1 in the list corresponds to so%4:02:02::.

 Let me double-check the WordNet sense keys to make sure I understand the mapping correctly.
 In WordNet, "so" as an adverb (4):
 - so%4:02:00:: - in truth (indeed)
 - so%4:02:01:: - (this might be missing from the list or reordered)
 - so%4:02:02:: - to a very great extent or degree
 - so%4:02:03:: - (usually followed by `that') to an extent or degree as expressed
 - so%4:02:04:: - in the way indicated (thus)
 - so%4:02:05:: - in such a condition or manner
 - so%4:02:06:: - in a manner that facilitates (so that)
 - so%4:02:07:: - to a certain unspecified extent or degree
 - so%4:02:08:: - in the same way; also
 - so%4:02:09:: - subsequently or soon afterward
 - so%4:02:10:: - (used to introduce a logical conclusion)

 The list provided by the user seems to be ordered arbitrarily (not by sense key number). The user assigns index 1 to so%4:02:02::, which is "to a very great extent or degree".

 My analysis confirms that "so attractive" in this context means "very attractive" or "attractive to a great degree", which matches sense 1.

 Final check: Could it be sense 10 (indeed)? "parents find this romantic extravagance indeed attractive" - possible, but less likely than the simple intensifier meaning "very". The context suggests the parents find it VERY attractive, not just "indeed attractive". The word "so" here is clearly an intensifier of degree.

 Could it be sense 7 (so...that)? As analyzed, no "that" clause follows.

 Therefore, the answer is sense_index: 1.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: attractive
Target surface form: attractive
Context:
But what do we mean, specifically, by "creativity "? No one can say. In practice, it ends up being equated with a "self-expression "that encourages the youngsters' "self-esteem. "The result is a generation of young people whose ignorance and intellectual incompetence is matched only by their good opinion of themselves. The whole notion of "creativity "in education was (and is) part and parcel of a romantic rebellion against disciplined instruction, which was (and is) regarded as "authoritarian, "a repression and frustration of the latent talents and the wonderful, if as yet undefined, potentialities inherent in the souls of all our children. It is not surprising that parents find this romantic extravagance so <t>attractive</t>. Fortunately, these same parents do want their children to get a decent education as traditionally understood, and they have enough common sense to know what that demands.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=attractive%3:00:01:: | definition=pleasing to the eye or mind especially through beauty or charm | examples=a remarkably attractive young man; an attractive personality
2. sense_key=attractive%5:00:00:appealing:00 | definition=having power to arouse interest | examples=an attractive opportunity; the job is attractive because of the pay
3. sense_key=attractive%3:00:02:: | definition=having the properties of a magnet; the ability to draw or pull | examples=an attractive force

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "attractive" in the given context.

 Let me analyze the context:
 - The text discusses "creativity" in education as part of a "romantic rebellion against disciplined instruction"
 - It mentions "romantic extravagance"
 - It says parents find this "romantic extravagance" attractive
 - The context suggests parents are drawn to this idea/philosophy because it appeals to them emotionally or ideologically, not because of physical beauty or magnetic force

 Now let's look at the candidate senses:

 1. sense_key=attractive%3:00:01:: | definition=pleasing to the eye or mind especially through beauty or charm | examples=a remarkably attractive young man; an attractive personality
    - This could potentially fit if we interpret "pleasing to the mind" broadly, but the examples suggest physical beauty or personal charm (young man, personality).

 2. sense_key=attractive%5:00:00:appealing:00 | definition=having power to arouse interest | examples=an attractive opportunity; the job is attractive because of the pay
    - This sense is about something being appealing, interesting, or desirable. The examples show "attractive opportunity" and job being attractive due to pay - these are about non-physical appeal, about being appealing as an option or idea.

 3. sense_key=attractive%3:00:02:: | definition=having the properties of a magnet; the ability to draw or pull | examples=an attractive force
    - This is the physics sense, clearly not applicable here.

 Between sense 1 and sense 2:
 - Sense 1 focuses on beauty/charm (physical or personal)
 - Sense 2 focuses on arousing interest/being appealing (ideas, opportunities, propositions)

 In the context, parents find the "romantic extravagance" (the educational philosophy of creativity/self-expression) attractive. This is about an idea, a concept, a philosophy being appealing or interesting to them. It's not about physical beauty (sense 1) or magnetism (sense 3).

 The phrase "romantic extravagance" refers to the educational approach described earlier. Parents find this approach appealing/desirable. This aligns with sense 2: "having power to arouse interest" - the idea arouses their interest/approval.

 However, looking closely at sense 1: "pleasing to the eye or mind especially through beauty or charm" - could this apply to an idea pleasing to the mind?

 But sense 2 examples ("attractive opportunity", "job is attractive because of the pay") suggest that sense 2 is about things being desirable or appealing in a practical or interest-based way.

 Actually, looking at WordNet structure:
 - Sense 1 (attractive%3:00:01::) is the main adjective sense meaning pleasing/beautiful
 - Sense 2 (attractive%5:00:00:appealing:00) is a satellite adjective (indicated by the 5 in position 2) meaning appealing
 - Sense 3 (attractive%3:00:02::) is the physics sense

 In the context, the "romantic extravagance" (the educational philosophy) is being described as something parents find appealing or desirable. This is closer to sense 2 - having power to arouse interest, being appealing.

 But wait, let me reconsider sense 1. "Pleasing to the mind" could cover finding an idea attractive. However, the examples for sense 1 ("attractive young man", "attractive personality") suggest it's about people being good-looking or having charming personalities.

 The context is about an educational philosophy/idea. You wouldn't typically describe a philosophy as "pleasing to the eye" (sense 1), but you could describe it as "having power to arouse interest" (sense 2) or being appealing.

 Also, the text mentions "romantic rebellion" and "romantic extravagance" - this suggests the idea has emotional appeal, which fits with "arousing interest" or being appealing.

 Therefore, sense 2 seems most appropriate.

 Wait, I need to be careful about the indexing. The user lists:
 1. sense_key=attractive%3:00:01::
 2. sense_key=attractive%5:00:00:appealing:00
 3. sense_key=attractive%3:00:02::

 So the answer should be {"sense_index": 2}.

 Let me double-check:
 - Is it about physical beauty/charm? No, it's about an educational philosophy.
 - Is it about magnetism? No.
 - Is it about being appealing/arousing interest? Yes, parents find the romantic approach to education appealing.

 Yes, sense 2 is correct.