[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: interview
Target surface form: interviews
Context:
Over 100 participants from the main interest groups attended and debated issues such as the role of key actors including public authorities, social partners, voluntary and community organisations as well as service users. There were relatively few cases reported of attempts to involve users in service planning but their involvement in service provision was found to be more common. Note was also taken of the variety of different roles played by public welfare The Foundation organised, together with the European Commission, the Spanish Ministry of Social Affairs and the Galician regional government, a European conference on social exclusion: a major challenge for public welfare services. The Foundation recently published a comparative study as part of the EPOC project which assesses the extent to which direct participation can humanise work while increasing profitability. The study is based on 195 personal <t>interviews</t> with senior officials of the social partners as representatives of national level peak organisations in fifteen European countries. As important industrial sectors, the metal industry and the banking sector were also included.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=interview%1:10:01:: | definition=the questioning of a person (or a conversation in which information is elicited); often conducted by journalists | examples=my interviews with teenagers revealed a weakening of religious bonds
2. sense_key=interview%1:10:00:: | definition=a conference (usually with someone important) | synonyms=consultation, audience | examples=he had a consultation with the judge; he requested an audience with the king

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "interviews" in the given context.

 Let me analyze the context:
 - The text is about a study based on "195 personal interviews with senior officials of the social partners"
 - These interviews are conducted with senior officials as representatives of national level peak organisations
 - It's part of a comparative study assessing direct participation in work
 - The interviews are described as "personal interviews"

 Now let's look at the candidate senses:

 1. sense_key=interview%1:10:01::
    - definition: the questioning of a person (or a conversation in which information is elicited); often conducted by journalists
    - examples: my interviews with teenagers revealed a weakening of religious bonds

 2. sense_key=interview%1:10:00::
    - definition: a conference (usually with someone important)
    - synonyms: consultation, audience
    - examples: he had a consultation with the judge; he requested an audience with the king

 Analysis:
 - The context describes "personal interviews" conducted as part of a research study (comparative study, EPOC project)
 - The purpose is to gather information from senior officials
 - This fits sense 1: "the questioning of a person (or a conversation in which information is elicited)"
 - While sense 2 mentions "conference" and "consultation/audience", the context emphasizes data collection for a study, not necessarily a formal meeting with someone important in the sense of an audience with a king or judge
 - The example for sense 1 ("my interviews with teenagers revealed...") matches the research context here ("The study is based on 195 personal interviews...")

 Sense 1 is about eliciting information through questioning/conversation, which fits research interviews.
 Sense 2 is more about formal meetings with important people (audience with king, consultation with judge).

 The context clearly describes research methodology - conducting interviews to gather data for a study. This aligns with sense 1.

 Therefore, the best sense is sense_index: 1.


attempt_kind: initial

status: success

[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: senior
Target surface form: senior
Context:
Over 100 participants from the main interest groups attended and debated issues such as the role of key actors including public authorities, social partners, voluntary and community organisations as well as service users. There were relatively few cases reported of attempts to involve users in service planning but their involvement in service provision was found to be more common. Note was also taken of the variety of different roles played by public welfare The Foundation organised, together with the European Commission, the Spanish Ministry of Social Affairs and the Galician regional government, a European conference on social exclusion: a major challenge for public welfare services. The Foundation recently published a comparative study as part of the EPOC project which assesses the extent to which direct participation can humanise work while increasing profitability. The study is based on 195 personal interviews with <t>senior</t> officials of the social partners as representatives of national level peak organisations in fifteen European countries. As important industrial sectors, the metal industry and the banking sector were also included.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=senior%3:00:00:: | definition=older; higher in rank; longer in length of tenure or service | examples=senior officer
2. sense_key=senior%5:00:00:last:00 | definition=used of the fourth and final year in United States high school or college | synonyms=fourth-year | examples=the senior prom
3. sense_key=senior%5:00:00:old:02 | definition=advanced in years; (`aged' is pronounced as two syllables) | synonyms=aged, elderly, older | examples=aged members of the society; elderly residents could remember the construction of the first skyscraper

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

finish_reason: stop

role: assistant

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "senior" in the given context.

 Let me analyze the context:
 - The study is based on 195 personal interviews with <t>senior</t> officials of the social partners as representatives of national level peak organisations in fifteen European countries.
 - The officials are described as being from "national level peak organisations"
 - They are "officials of the social partners"

 Now let's look at the candidate senses:

 1. sense_key=senior%3:00:00:: | definition=older; higher in rank; longer in length of tenure or service | examples=senior officer
    - This sense refers to rank/position in an organization (higher in rank, longer tenure)
    - Example: "senior officer" fits well with "senior officials"

 2. sense_key=senior%5:00:00:last:00 | definition=used of the fourth and final year in United States high school or college | synonyms=fourth-year | examples=the senior prom
    - This is about educational years (senior year)
    - Doesn't fit the context of "officials of the social partners"

 3. sense_key=senior%5:00:00:old:02 | definition=advanced in years; (`aged' is pronounced as two syllables) | synonyms=aged, elderly, older | examples=aged members of the society; elderly residents could remember the construction of the first skyscraper
    - This refers to age (elderly people)
    - While "senior" can mean elderly, in the phrase "senior officials", it typically means higher-ranking, not necessarily old in age

 Analysis:
 The phrase "senior officials" is a common collocation where "senior" means higher in rank or position within an organization, not necessarily older in age (though there may be correlation). The context mentions "national level peak organisations" which suggests these are high-ranking officials.

 Sense 1 matches perfectly: "higher in rank; longer in length of tenure or service" with the example "senior officer" being very similar to "senior officials".

 Sense 3 is about being elderly/advanced in years, which is not the primary meaning when referring to officials in an organizational hierarchy.

 Therefore, the best sense is index 1.

 Wait, let me double-check the sense keys format. The user provided:
 1. sense_key=senior%3:00:00::
 2. sense_key=senior%5:00:00:last:00
 3. sense_key=senior%5:00:00:old:02

 So the indices are 1, 2, 3.

 My choice is index 1.

 Let me verify once more:
 - "senior officials" = high-ranking officials
 - Sense 1: "higher in rank; longer in length of tenure or service" - matches
 - Sense 3: "advanced in years" - could apply to people, but "senior officials" specifically refers to their position, not their age
 - The context is about organizational structure (national level peak organisations), which supports the rank interpretation

 Yes, definitely sense 1.

format: unknown

native_finish_reason: stop

provider: StreamLake

currency: USD


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: official
Target surface form: officials
Context:
Over 100 participants from the main interest groups attended and debated issues such as the role of key actors including public authorities, social partners, voluntary and community organisations as well as service users. There were relatively few cases reported of attempts to involve users in service planning but their involvement in service provision was found to be more common. Note was also taken of the variety of different roles played by public welfare The Foundation organised, together with the European Commission, the Spanish Ministry of Social Affairs and the Galician regional government, a European conference on social exclusion: a major challenge for public welfare services. The Foundation recently published a comparative study as part of the EPOC project which assesses the extent to which direct participation can humanise work while increasing profitability. The study is based on 195 personal interviews with senior <t>officials</t> of the social partners as representatives of national level peak organisations in fifteen European countries. As important industrial sectors, the metal industry and the banking sector were also included.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=official%1:18:01:: | definition=a worker who holds or is invested with an office | synonyms=functionary
2. sense_key=official%1:18:00:: | definition=someone who administers the rules of a game or sport | examples=the golfer asked for an official who could give him a ruling

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation (WSD) for the word "officials" in the given context.

 Target lemma: official
 Target surface form: officials
 Context analysis:
 The sentence containing the target word is: "The study is based on 195 personal interviews with senior <t>officials</t> of the social partners as representatives of national level peak organisations in fifteen European countries."

 Looking at the context:
 - The officials are "senior"
 - They are "of the social partners" (social partners refers to employer associations and trade unions)
 - They are "representatives of national level peak organisations"
 - They are from "fifteen European countries"
 - The study is about direct participation in work, social exclusion, public welfare services

 Candidate senses:
 1. sense_key=official%1:18:01:: | definition=a worker who holds or is invested with an office | synonyms=functionary
 2. sense_key=official%1:18:00:: | definition=someone who administers the rules of a game or sport | examples=the golfer asked for an official who could give him a ruling

 Analysis:
 - Sense 2 refers to sports officials (umpires, referees, etc.), which clearly doesn't fit the context of social partners, national level peak organisations, and industrial sectors like metal industry and banking.
 - Sense 1 refers to a worker who holds or is invested with an office (a functionary). This fits perfectly with "senior officials" of organizations like social partners (trade unions, employer associations), who would hold offices or positions in these organizations.

 The context is about a study involving interviews with senior representatives/functionaries of social partner organizations across Europe. These are bureaucratic or organizational officials, not sports officials.

 Therefore, sense 1 (official%1:18:01::) is the correct choice.

 The user wants the output as: {"sense_index": 1}

 Wait, I need to check the indexing. The user lists:
 1. sense_key=official%1:18:01::
 2. sense_key=official%1:18:00::

 So sense 1 corresponds to the first one listed (the functionary/office holder), and sense 2 corresponds to the second one listed (sports official).

 Therefore, the answer should be {"sense_index": 1}.

 Let me double-check the WordNet senses to make sure I understand correctly:
 - official%1:18:01:: usually refers to a person who holds an office or position (functionary)
 - official%1:18:00:: usually refers to a sports official (umpire, referee)

 Yes, in WordNet 3.0/3.1:
 - official.n.01: someone who administers the rules of a game or sport
 - official.n.02: a worker who holds or is invested with an office

 Wait, the sense keys provided are:
 1. official%1:18:01::
 2. official%1:18:00::

 In WordNet, the last two digits before the :: are the lex_id. Usually:
 - official%1:18:00:: is the first sense (most common)
 - official%1:18:01:: is the second sense

 But the user has labeled them as:
 1. sense_key=official%1:18:01:: | definition=a worker who holds or is invested with an office | synonyms=functionary
 2. sense_key=official%1:18:00:: | definition=someone who administers the rules of a game or sport | examples=the golfer asked for an official who could give him a ruling

 So the user has indexed them as:
 Index 1: official%1:18:01:: (office holder/functionary)
 Index 2: official%1:18:00:: (sports official)

 Given the context about "senior officials of the social partners as representatives of national level peak organisations", this clearly refers to office holders, functionaries, representatives in organizations - not sports officials.

 Therefore, the correct index is 1.

 Output format: {"sense_index": 1}

provider: Moonshot AI


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: social
Target surface form: social
Context:
Over 100 participants from the main interest groups attended and debated issues such as the role of key actors including public authorities, social partners, voluntary and community organisations as well as service users. There were relatively few cases reported of attempts to involve users in service planning but their involvement in service provision was found to be more common. Note was also taken of the variety of different roles played by public welfare The Foundation organised, together with the European Commission, the Spanish Ministry of Social Affairs and the Galician regional government, a European conference on social exclusion: a major challenge for public welfare services. The Foundation recently published a comparative study as part of the EPOC project which assesses the extent to which direct participation can humanise work while increasing profitability. The study is based on 195 personal interviews with senior officials of the <t>social</t> partners as representatives of national level peak organisations in fifteen European countries. As important industrial sectors, the metal industry and the banking sector were also included.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=social%3:01:00:: | definition=relating to human society and its members | synonyms=societal | examples=social institutions; societal evolution
2. sense_key=social%3:00:00:: | definition=living together or enjoying life in communities or organized groups | examples=a human being is a social animal; mature social behavior
3. sense_key=social%3:01:02:: | definition=relating to or belonging to or characteristic of high society | examples=made fun of her being so social and high-toned; a social gossip colum
4. sense_key=social%5:00:00:sociable:00 | definition=composed of sociable people or formed for the purpose of sociability | examples=a purely social club; the church has a large social hall
5. sense_key=social%5:00:00:gregarious:00 | definition=tending to move or live together in groups or colonies of the same kind | examples=ants are social insects
6. sense_key=social%5:00:00:friendly:01 | definition=marked by friendly companionship with others | examples=a social cup of coffee

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "social" in the given context.

 Let me analyze the context:
 - The text is about a conference on social exclusion, public welfare services, and involvement of various actors
 - The specific sentence containing the target "social" is: "The study is based on 195 personal interviews with senior officials of the <t>social</t> partners as representatives of national level peak organisations in fifteen European countries."

 The phrase is "social partners". In EU and labor relations contexts, "social partners" refers to employer organizations and trade unions - the key actors in industrial relations and social dialogue. They represent civil society and are involved in policy-making regarding labor market and social policy.

 Now let's look at the candidate senses:

 1. sense_key=social%3:01:00:: | definition=relating to human society and its members | synonyms=societal | examples=social institutions; societal evolution
    - This is the broad, general meaning related to society. "Social partners" could fit here as partners in/of society, relating to social institutions.

 2. sense_key=social%3:00:00:: | definition=living together or enjoying life in communities or organized groups | examples=a human being is a social animal; mature social behavior
    - This seems to be about the behavioral tendency of living socially, being gregarious. Doesn't fit "social partners" in this context.

 3. sense_key=social%3:01:02:: | definition=relating to or belonging to or characteristic of high society | examples=made fun of her being so social and high-toned; a social gossip colum
    - This is about high society, aristocratic. Not relevant here.

 4. sense_key=social%5:00:00:sociable:00 | definition=composed of sociable people or formed for the purpose of sociability | examples=a purely social club; the church has a large social hall
    - This is about being sociable/chatty, recreational social activities. The examples mention social clubs. Not the meaning here.

 5. sense_key=social%5:00:00:gregarious:00 | definition=tending to move or live together in groups or colonies of the same kind | examples=ants are social insects
    - Biological/behavioral sense of living in groups. Not relevant for "social partners" in a labor relations context.

 6. sense_key=social%5:00:00:friendly:01 | definition=marked by friendly companionship with others | examples=a social cup of coffee
    - Friendly, companionable. Not the right meaning.

 So between senses 1 and possibly others, sense 1 seems most likely: "relating to human society and its members" (synonyms: societal).

 "Social partners" in EU terminology refers to the two sides of industry (employers and trade unions) who participate in social dialogue. This is about "relating to human society and its members" - the societal level, social institutions, etc.

 Wait, let me reconsider. Is there any other sense that might fit?

 Actually, looking at sense 1: "relating to human society and its members" - this is the general, broad sense that covers things like "social policy", "social welfare", "social partners", "social affairs".

 The context mentions:
 - "Spanish Ministry of Social Affairs"
 - "social exclusion"
 - "public welfare services"
 - "social partners"

 This is clearly using "social" in the sense of "relating to human society and its members" - the societal sense.

 Sense 1 matches this best. The other senses are either about behavior (gregariousness, friendliness), high society, or biological grouping.

 Therefore, the answer should be index 1.

 Wait, I need to double-check the sense keys. The user provided:
 1. sense_key=social%3:01:00::
 2. sense_key=social%3:00:00::
 3. sense_key=social%3:01:02::
 4. sense_key=social%5:00:00:sociable:00
 5. sense_key=social%5:00:00:gregarious:00
 6. sense_key=social%5:00:00:friendly:01

 So the index numbers are 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6.

 The target is "social partners" meaning the representative organizations in industrial relations (employers and unions). This is definitely sense 1: relating to human society and its members.

 Let me confirm by looking at the examples for sense 1: "social institutions; societal evolution" - yes, "social partners" would be an institution/organization type relating to society.

 Sense 2 is about living together/behavioral: "a human being is a social animal" - not the right meaning.

 So the answer is {"sense_index": 1}.

provider: DigitalOcean


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: representative
Target surface form: representatives
Context:
Over 100 participants from the main interest groups attended and debated issues such as the role of key actors including public authorities, social partners, voluntary and community organisations as well as service users. There were relatively few cases reported of attempts to involve users in service planning but their involvement in service provision was found to be more common. Note was also taken of the variety of different roles played by public welfare The Foundation organised, together with the European Commission, the Spanish Ministry of Social Affairs and the Galician regional government, a European conference on social exclusion: a major challenge for public welfare services. The Foundation recently published a comparative study as part of the EPOC project which assesses the extent to which direct participation can humanise work while increasing profitability. The study is based on 195 personal interviews with senior officials of the social partners as <t>representatives</t> of national level peak organisations in fifteen European countries. As important industrial sectors, the metal industry and the banking sector were also included.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=representative%1:18:00:: | definition=a person who represents others
2. sense_key=representative%1:18:02:: | definition=an advocate who represents someone else's policy or purpose | synonyms=spokesperson, interpreter, voice | examples=the meeting was attended by spokespersons for all the major organs of government
3. sense_key=representative%1:18:01:: | definition=a member of the United States House of Representatives | synonyms=congressman, congresswoman
4. sense_key=representative%1:09:00:: | definition=an item of information that is typical of a class or group | synonyms=example, illustration, instance | examples=this patient provides a typical example of the syndrome; there is an example on page 10

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation on the word "representatives" in the given context.

 Let me analyze the context:
 - The text discusses a study based on 195 personal interviews with senior officials of the social partners
 - These officials are described as "representatives of national level peak organisations in fifteen European countries"
 - They represent organizations (social partners/peak organisations) at the national level

 Now let's look at the candidate senses:

 1. sense_key=representative%1:18:00:: | definition=a person who represents others
    - This is a general sense of someone who represents others/organizations

 2. sense_key=representative%1:18:02:: | definition=an advocate who represents someone else's policy or purpose | synonyms=spokesperson, interpreter, voice | examples=the meeting was attended by spokespersons for all the major organs of government
    - This seems to be about advocating or speaking for someone else's policy
    - Synonyms include spokesperson, interpreter, voice

 3. sense_key=representative%1:18:01:: | definition=a member of the United States House of Representatives | synonyms=congressman, congresswoman
    - This is specifically about US political representatives (Congress)
    - The context is about European countries, not US Congress, so this is unlikely

 4. sense_key=representative%1:09:00:: | definition=an item of information that is typical of a class or group | synonyms=example, illustration, instance
    - This is an abstract sense (like a representative sample), not a person
    - The context clearly refers to people (senior officials), so this is wrong

 Now between sense 1 and sense 2:
 - Sense 1: "a person who represents others" - general agentive sense
 - Sense 2: "an advocate who represents someone else's policy or purpose" - more specific to advocacy/spokesperson

 The context mentions "senior officials of the social partners as representatives of national level peak organisations". These are people who represent organizations (social partners/peak organisations).

 Looking at the gloss for sense 2: "an advocate who represents someone else's policy or purpose" - this seems to fit well with representing an organization's policy/purpose. The synonyms (spokesperson, interpreter, voice) also fit.

 However, sense 1 is "a person who represents others" - which is more general.

 The key distinction seems to be:
 - Sense 1 is the general "agent" sense - someone who acts on behalf of others
 - Sense 2 is the "spokesperson/advocate" sense - someone who speaks for/advocates for someone else's policy

 In the context, these are senior officials representing peak organizations (like trade unions, employer organizations, etc. - "social partners" is EU terminology for labor market organizations). They are acting as representatives of these organizations.

 The phrase "as representatives of national level peak organisations" suggests they are acting in the capacity of representing those organizations - acting on their behalf.

 But let's look more carefully at WordNet's actual distinctions. In WordNet:
 - representative%1:18:00 is the general sense: "a person who represents others"
 - representative%1:18:02 is: "an advocate who represents someone else's policy or purpose" with synonyms spokesperson, interpreter, voice

 The context mentions "senior officials of the social partners" - these are officials who represent the organizations. The question is whether they are "advocates" for the policy (sense 2) or just general representatives (sense 1).

 Actually, looking at the example for sense 2: "the meeting was attended by spokespersons for all the major organs of government" - this suggests sense 2 is about speaking/representing the views of an entity.

 But in the given context, these representatives are being interviewed for a study about participation in industrial relations. They represent their organizations (peak organizations/social partners).

 Sense 1 seems to be the hypernym - a person who represents others.
 Sense 2 seems to be a specific type - an advocate/spokesperson.

 However, looking at the actual WordNet hierarchy:
 - representative (person) -> representative%1:18:00 (general)
 - representative -> spokesperson%1:18:00 (which is synonymous with representative%1:18:02?)

 Wait, let me reconsider. The sense keys provided are:
 1. representative%1:18:00:: - a person who represents others
 2. representative%1:18:02:: - an advocate who represents someone else's policy or purpose
 3. representative%1:18:01:: - US House member
 4. representative%1:09:00:: - example/instance (abstract)

 In the context: "senior officials of the social partners as representatives of national level peak organisations"

 These officials represent the organizations. They act on their behalf. This could fit either sense 1 or 2.

 But sense 2 specifically mentions "advocate" and has synonyms like "spokesperson, interpreter, voice". The context doesn't necessarily emphasize the "advocacy" or "speaking" aspect, though it could be implied.

 However, looking at the phrase "as representatives of" - this is the general sense of representing others.

 But let me check if there's a distinction in WordNet between these two person senses. Usually:
 - Sense 0 (00): agent, general representative
 - Sense 2 (02): spokesperson, voice

 In many WSD tasks for "representative" when referring to people representing organizations in a general sense (like union representatives, employee representatives), sense 1 (the general person sense) is often the correct choice unless it's specifically about being a spokesperson or US congressperson.

 But wait, looking at the gloss for sense 2 again: "an advocate who represents someone else's policy or purpose". In industrial relations contexts, representatives of social partners (trade unions, employer associations) are indeed advocates for their constituents' policies.

 However, the key might be in the phrase "as representatives of national level peak organisations". This indicates they are acting in the capacity of representing those organizations - which is the general sense.

 But let me look at the example provided for sense 2: "the meeting was attended by spokespersons for all the major organs of government". This suggests that sense 2 is about being a spokesperson for an organization.

 In the context, are these people spokespersons? They are "senior officials" being interviewed. They represent their organizations in the study. This could be sense 2.

 However, I need to be careful. In WordNet, sense 1 (representative%1:18:00) is usually the default for "a person who represents a group". Sense 2 is more specific to being a voice/spokesperson.

 Actually, looking at typical WordNet sense distributions:
 - representative%1:18:00: "a person who represents others" - this includes delegates, agents, etc.
 - representative%1:18:02: "an advocate who represents someone else's policy or purpose" - this is synonymous with spokesperson

 In the given context, the word is used to describe senior officials who represent peak organizations. These are likely delegates or officials acting on behalf of their organizations. This fits sense 1.

 But let me reconsider sense 2. The definition says "an advocate who represents someone else's policy or purpose". In labor relations, union representatives are advocates. But the text doesn't emphasize the advocacy aspect, just that they represent the organizations.

 Also, looking at the synonyms for sense 2: spokesperson, interpreter, voice. The text doesn't suggest these officials are necessarily spokespersons (public voices) of the organizations, just that they represent them (perhaps as delegates or officials).

 Therefore, sense 1 seems more appropriate: "a person who represents others".

 Wait, but I should check if there's any other clue. The text mentions "social partners" which in EU terminology refers to trade unions and employer associations. Their representatives could be either general representatives or spokespersons.

 But looking at the structure: "senior officials of the social partners as representatives of national level peak organisations" - this is defining who was interviewed: senior officials who act as representatives of these organizations.

 In WordNet, sense 1 is the hypernym that covers anyone who represents others. Sense 2 is a hyponym covering spokespersons/advocates.

 Without specific evidence that they are spokespersons (advocates for policy), sense 1 is safer.

 However, looking at the provided candidate senses again, I notice that sense 2 has the example: "the meeting was attended by spokespersons for all the major organs of government". This is similar to the context where representatives of organizations are attending/participating.

 But the key difference is:
 - Sense 1: general representation (delegation, acting on behalf)
 - Sense 2: advocacy, speaking for (spokesperson)

 The context mentions they were interviewed for a study. As representatives of their organizations, they provide information about their organizations' positions. This makes them spokespersons in a broad sense, but technically they are just representatives.

 Actually, looking carefully at WordNet's structure:
 - representative%1:18:00 is the general agent sense
 - representative%1:18:02 = spokesperson%1:18:00

 In the context of "representatives of national level peak organisations", these are people who represent the organizations. In industrial relations, these are typically called "representatives" in the general sense (sense 1), not specifically spokespersons (sense 2).

 Moreover, if sense 2 were intended, the synonyms "spokesperson, interpreter, voice" would be relevant, but the text doesn't suggest these people are necessarily the public voice or interpreters - just that they represent the organizations in this study.

 Therefore, I believe sense 1 (representative%1:18:00::) is the correct choice.

 Wait, I need to double-check. The user asks for the "single best indexed sense".

 Let me reconsider sense 2. The definition is "an advocate who represents someone else's policy or purpose". The key word is "advocate". Are these officials advocates? In the context of social partners (unions/employers) in industrial relations, yes, they advocate for their members' interests. But the text doesn't emphasize this advocacy role explicitly.

 Also, note that sense 1 has no synonyms listed in the candidate description, while sense 2 has specific synonyms. This might suggest sense 1 is the general default.

 But actually, looking at the WordNet database structure (which I should simulate):
 - representative.n.01: a person who represents others
 - representative.n.02: an advocate who represents someone else's policy or purpose (spokesperson)
 - representative.n.03: a member of the United States House of Representatives

 So the indices 00, 01, 02 in the sense keys correspond to these (with 00 being n.01, 01 being n.03, 02 being n.02? No, that doesn't match).

 Actually, the sense keys are:
 - representative%1:18:00:: -> this is usually the first sense (index 1 in 1-based, or 0 in 0-based)
 - representative%1:18:02:: -> this is the third sense (index 3 in 1-based, or 2 in 0-based)
 - representative%1:18:01:: -> this is the second sense (index 2 in 1-based, or 1 in 0-based)

 Wait, the numbers after the second colon are the lexicographer file numbers or sense numbers? In WordNet sense keys, the format is:
 lemma%pos:lex_filenum:lex_id:head_word:head_id

 But here the user shows:
 1. sense_key=representative%1:18:00::
 2. sense_key=representative%1:18:02::
 3. sense_key=representative%1:18:01::
 4. sense_key=representative%1:09:00::

 The numbers 00, 02, 01, 00 are the lex_id (lexicographer ids), which usually indicate the sense order within the lex file. But they can be out of order.

 However, the user labels them as:
 1. sense_key=... (first one listed)
 2. sense_key=... (second one listed)
 3. sense_key=... (third one listed)
 4. sense_key=... (fourth one listed)

 And asks me to return {"sense_index": 3} meaning the third one in the list (1-indexed).

 So I need to choose which of the four listed senses is correct.

 Sense 3 is: "a member of the United States House of Representatives" - clearly wrong because the context is about European countries, not US Congress.

 Sense 4 is: abstract "example" - clearly wrong because these are people (senior officials).

 So it's between Sense 1 and Sense 2.

 Sense 1: "a person who represents others" (general)
 Sense 2: "an advocate who represents someone else's policy or purpose" (specific: spokesperson)

 Context: "senior officials of the social partners as representatives of national level peak organisations"

 These are officials who represent organizations. In standard English, this is the general sense (sense 1). They are representatives of the organizations - they act on their behalf.

 While they might also be advocates, the general sense of "representative" as "a person who represents others" is the most accurate here. The specific sense of "spokesperson/advocate" (sense 2) is too narrow unless specified that they are speaking for the policy.

 Also, note that sense 2 has synonyms "spokesperson, interpreter, voice". If the text meant spokesperson, it might have used that word. But it uses "representatives" in the general sense of delegates or agents of the organizations.

 Therefore, sense 1 is the best choice.

 So the answer should be: {"sense_index": 1}

 Wait, I want to double-check by looking at the actual WordNet entries to make sure I understand the senses correctly.

 In WordNet 3.1 or similar:
 - representative, n.
   1. a person who represents others
   2. spokesperson, interpreter, representative, voice - an advocate who represents someone else's policy or purpose
   3. congressman, congresswoman, representative - a member of the United States House of Representatives
   4. example, illustration, instance, representative - an item of information that is typical of a class or group

 So the mapping is:
 - sense_key ending in 00: sense 1 (person who represents others)
 - sense_key ending in 02: sense 2 (spokesperson)
 - sense_key ending in 01: sense 3 (US congressperson)
 - sense_key ending in 00 (different lex file 09): sense 4 (example)

 So yes:
 1. representative%1:18:00:: = sense 1: a person who represents others
 2. representative%1:18:02:: = sense 2: spokesperson/advocate
 3. representative%1:18:01:: = sense 3: US House member
 4. representative%1:09:00:: = sense 4: example

 Given the context describes European officials representing peak organizations (social partners), sense 1 is correct.

 Final check: Could it be sense 2? These are "senior officials" representing their organizations' positions in interviews. They are speaking for the organizations, so they could be considered spokespersons. However, "representative" in the context of labor relations and "social partners" typically refers to the general concept of employee representatives or union representatives, not specifically spokespersons. The general sense is broader and more appropriate.

 Also, if sense 2 were intended, the gloss mentions "advocate", which has a specific connotation of public support/pleading, which isn't clearly present here.

 Therefore, I choose sense 1.

provider: DeepInfra


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: national
Target surface form: national
Context:
Over 100 participants from the main interest groups attended and debated issues such as the role of key actors including public authorities, social partners, voluntary and community organisations as well as service users. There were relatively few cases reported of attempts to involve users in service planning but their involvement in service provision was found to be more common. Note was also taken of the variety of different roles played by public welfare The Foundation organised, together with the European Commission, the Spanish Ministry of Social Affairs and the Galician regional government, a European conference on social exclusion: a major challenge for public welfare services. The Foundation recently published a comparative study as part of the EPOC project which assesses the extent to which direct participation can humanise work while increasing profitability. The study is based on 195 personal interviews with senior officials of the social partners as representatives of <t>national</t> level peak organisations in fifteen European countries. As important industrial sectors, the metal industry and the banking sector were also included.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=national%3:01:00:: | definition=of or relating to or belonging to a nation or country | examples=national hero; national anthem
2. sense_key=national%3:00:00:: | definition=limited to or in the interests of a particular nation | examples=national interests; isolationism is a strictly national policy
3. sense_key=national%3:00:01:: | definition=concerned with or applicable to or belonging to an entire nation or country | examples=the national government; national elections
4. sense_key=national%5:00:00:public:00 | definition=owned or maintained for the public by the national government | examples=national parks
5. sense_key=national%5:00:00:domestic:00 | definition=inside the country | synonyms=home, interior, internal | examples=the British Home Office has broader responsibilities than the United States Department of the Interior; the nation's internal politics
6. sense_key=national%3:01:02:: | definition=characteristic of or peculiar to the people of a nation | examples=a national trait
7. sense_key=national%3:01:01:: | definition=of or relating to nationality | examples=national origin

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "national" in the given context.

 Context analysis:
 - The sentence is: "The study is based on 195 personal interviews with senior officials of the social partners as representatives of <t>national</t> level peak organisations in fifteen European countries."
 - The phrase is "national level peak organisations"
 - This refers to organisations that operate at the country-wide level (as opposed to regional or local level)
 - The context mentions "fifteen European countries" and discusses "public welfare", "social partners", "European Commission", etc.
 - The organisations are "peak organisations" (likely umbrella organizations) at the "national level"

 Looking at the candidate senses:

 1. sense_key=national%3:01:00:: | definition=of or relating to or belonging to a nation or country | examples=national hero; national anthem
    - This is a general relational adjective. While "national level" relates to a nation, this sense is broader.

 2. sense_key=national%3:00:00:: | definition=limited to or in the interests of a particular nation | examples=national interests; isolationism is a strictly national policy
    - This implies exclusivity or limitation to one nation's interests. The context doesn't suggest the organisations are limited to national interests in an exclusionary way, but rather that they operate at the national level.

 3. sense_key=national%3:00:01:: | definition=concerned with or applicable to or belonging to an entire nation or country | examples=the national government; national elections
    - This fits well. "National level" means pertaining to the entire country (as opposed to regional/local). The examples "national government" and "national elections" both refer to things that cover the whole nation.
    - "National level peak organisations" would mean organisations that operate at the level of the entire nation (country-wide).

 4. sense_key=national%5:00:00:public:00 | definition=owned or maintained for the public by the national government | examples=national parks
    - This refers to ownership by the national government. The context mentions "social partners" which typically refers to trade unions and employer organisations, not necessarily government-owned entities.

 5. sense_key=national%5:00:00:domestic:00 | definition=inside the country | synonyms=home, interior, internal | examples=the British Home Office has broader responsibilities than the United States Department of the Interior; the nation's internal politics
    - This contrasts with international/external. While "national level" could contrast with international, the specific phrase "national level" usually contrasts with sub-national (regional, local) levels in this context.

 6. sense_key=national%3:01:02:: | definition=characteristic of or peculiar to the people of a nation | examples=a national trait
    - This refers to distinctive characteristics of a people. Not relevant here.

 7. sense_key=national%3:01:01:: | definition=of or relating to nationality | examples=national origin
    - This refers to nationality as a legal status or ethnic origin. Not relevant.

 The best fit is sense 3: "concerned with or applicable to or belonging to an entire nation or country"
 - "National level" means the level of the entire nation (as opposed to regional or local)
 - The examples "national government" and "national elections" parallel "national level organisations" - all refer to scope covering the whole country.

 Sense 1 is too general. Sense 3 specifically captures the "entire nation" aspect which contrasts with regional/local levels mentioned elsewhere in the text (the text mentions "Galician regional government" earlier, establishing a contrast between national and regional levels).

 Therefore, the answer should be sense_index 3.

provider: Chutes


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: level
Target surface form: level
Context:
Over 100 participants from the main interest groups attended and debated issues such as the role of key actors including public authorities, social partners, voluntary and community organisations as well as service users. There were relatively few cases reported of attempts to involve users in service planning but their involvement in service provision was found to be more common. Note was also taken of the variety of different roles played by public welfare The Foundation organised, together with the European Commission, the Spanish Ministry of Social Affairs and the Galician regional government, a European conference on social exclusion: a major challenge for public welfare services. The Foundation recently published a comparative study as part of the EPOC project which assesses the extent to which direct participation can humanise work while increasing profitability. The study is based on 195 personal interviews with senior officials of the social partners as representatives of national <t>level</t> peak organisations in fifteen European countries. As important industrial sectors, the metal industry and the banking sector were also included.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=level%1:07:00:: | definition=a position on a scale of intensity or amount or quality | synonyms=degree, grade | examples=a moderate grade of intelligence; a high level of care is required
2. sense_key=level%1:26:01:: | definition=a relative position or degree of value in a graded group | synonyms=grade, tier | examples=lumber of the highest grade
3. sense_key=level%1:26:00:: | definition=a specific identifiable position in a continuum or series or especially in a process | synonyms=degree, stage, point | examples=a remarkable degree of frankness; at what stage are the social sciences?
4. sense_key=level%1:07:01:: | definition=height above ground | examples=the water reached ankle level; the pictures were at the same level
5. sense_key=level%1:06:00:: | definition=indicator that establishes the horizontal when a bubble is centered in a tube of liquid | synonyms=spirit level
6. sense_key=level%1:06:03:: | definition=a flat surface at right angles to a plumb line | synonyms=horizontal surface | examples=park the car on the level
7. sense_key=level%1:09:00:: | definition=an abstract place usually conceived as having depth | synonyms=layer, stratum | examples=a good actor communicates on several levels; a simile has at least two layers of meaning
8. sense_key=level%1:06:01:: | definition=a structure consisting of a room or set of rooms at a single position along a vertical scale | synonyms=floor, storey, story | examples=what level is the office on?

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "level" in the given context.

 Context analysis:
 The sentence is: "The study is based on 195 personal interviews with senior officials of the social partners as representatives of national <t>level</t> peak organisations in fifteen European countries."

 Key context clues:
 - "national level" - referring to a position in a hierarchy or scale
 - "peak organisations" - referring to top-level organizations
 - The context is about social partners, public welfare, European countries
 - It's about the "level" at which these organizations operate (national vs presumably local, regional, or international)

 Candidate sense analysis:

 1. sense_key=level%1:07:00:: | definition=a position on a scale of intensity or amount or quality | synonyms=degree, grade | examples=a moderate grade of intelligence; a high level of care is required
 - This refers to intensity/amount/quality. "National level" here doesn't refer to intensity or amount, but rather a position in a hierarchy or administrative structure.

 2. sense_key=level%1:26:01:: | definition=a relative position or degree of value in a graded group | synonyms=grade, tier | examples=lumber of the highest grade
 - This refers to value/grade. "National level" isn't about value grading.

 3. sense_key=level%1:26:00:: | definition=a specific identifiable position in a continuum or series or especially in a process | synonyms=degree, stage, point | examples=a remarkable degree of frankness; at what stage are the social sciences?
 - This refers to a position in a continuum/series/process. "National level" fits here as a position in a hierarchy (local, regional, national, international).

 4. sense_key=level%1:07:01:: | definition=height above ground | examples=the water reached ankle level; the pictures were at the same level
 - Physical height. Not applicable.

 5. sense_key=level%1:06:00:: | definition=indicator that establishes the horizontal when a bubble is centered in a tube of liquid | synonyms=spirit level
 - The tool. Not applicable.

 6. sense_key=level%1:06:03:: | definition=a flat surface at right angles to a plumb line | synonyms=horizontal surface | examples=park the car on the level
 - Physical flatness. Not applicable.

 7. sense_key=level%1:09:00:: | definition=an abstract place usually conceived as having depth | synonyms=layer, stratum | examples=a good actor communicates on several levels; a simile has at least two layers of meaning
 - Abstract layers/depths. While "national level" could be seen as an abstract layer, this sense is more about depth of meaning or communication levels. The context here is about organizational hierarchy/administrative levels.

 8. sense_key=level%1:06:01:: | definition=a structure consisting of a room or set of rooms at a single position along a vertical scale | synonyms=floor, storey, story | examples=what level is the office on?
 - Physical building floors. Not applicable.

 Comparing sense 1 and sense 3:
 Sense 1: position on a scale of intensity or amount or quality
 Sense 3: specific identifiable position in a continuum or series or especially in a process

 "National level" refers to a position in a hierarchy (local, regional, national, international). This is a continuum or series of administrative levels. It's not about intensity or amount (sense 1), nor about value (sense 2), nor about abstract depth (sense 7).

 Sense 3 seems best: "a specific identifiable position in a continuum or series or especially in a process" - national level is a specific position in the series/continuum of administrative levels (local, regional, national, etc.).

 Wait, let me reconsider sense 1 vs sense 3 more carefully.

 Sense 1 (level%1:07:00::): "a position on a scale of intensity or amount or quality"
 - Examples: "a moderate grade of intelligence", "a high level of care"
 - This is about degrees of intensity, amount, or quality.

 Sense 3 (level%1:26:00::): "a specific identifiable position in a continuum or series or especially in a process"
 - Examples: "a remarkable degree of frankness", "at what stage are the social sciences?"
 - Synonyms: degree, stage, point

 In the phrase "national level", we're talking about the level of government/organization - i.e., national as opposed to local or regional. This is a position in a hierarchy or series.

 Actually, looking at WordNet more carefully:
 - Sense 1 (1:07:00) is under noun.artifact? No, 1:07 is noun.attribute.
 - Sense 3 (1:26:00) is under noun.state? No, 1:26 is noun.state.

 Wait, WordNet sense keys:
 - %1:07:00:: = noun.attribute
 - %1:26:00:: = noun.state
 - %1:26:01:: = noun.state (different lex id)

 Actually, looking at standard WordNet:
 - level%1:07:00:: - a position on a scale of intensity or amount or quality (e.g., "a high level of care")
 - level%1:26:00:: - a specific identifiable position in a continuum or series or especially in a process (e.g., "at what stage are the social sciences?")
 - level%1:26:01:: - a relative position or degree of value in a graded group (e.g., "lumber of the highest grade")

 "National level" fits best with sense 3: a position in a continuum/series (the series being: local, regional, national, international).

 However, I should check if there's any other interpretation. Could it be sense 7 (abstract place conceived as having depth)?
 "level%1:09:00:: - an abstract place usually conceived as having depth"
 Examples: "a good actor communicates on several levels", "a simile has at least two layers of meaning"
 This is about levels of meaning, interpretation, or analysis. Not administrative levels.

 So sense 3 is the best fit.

 But wait, is "national level" referring to "national degree/grade" (sense 1)? No, that would be like "a high level of nationalism". Here "national" modifies "level", indicating the level is "national" in scope.

 Actually, looking at the phrase "national level peak organisations" - this means peak organizations at the national level (as opposed to local or European level).

 This is definitely sense 3: a specific identifiable position in a continuum or series.

 Let me double-check sense 1 vs sense 3 distinctions.
 Sense 1 examples: "a moderate grade of intelligence", "a high level of care", "a high level of unemployment"
 These are about quantities or intensities.

 Sense 3 examples: "at what stage are the social sciences?", "a remarkable degree of frankness"
 These are about steps in a process or positions in a series.

 "National level" is clearly a position in the series: local < regional < national < international.

 Therefore, sense 3 (level%1:26:00::) is correct.

 The index would be 3.

 Wait, I need to make sure about the indexing. The user lists:
 1. sense_key=level%1:07:00::
 2. sense_key=level%1:26:01::
 3. sense_key=level%1:26:00::
 4. sense_key=level%1:07:01::
 5. sense_key=level%1:06:00::
 6. sense_key=level%1:06:03::
 7. sense_key=level%1:09:00::
 8. sense_key=level%1:06:01::

 So sense 3 corresponds to level%1:26:00::.

 Yes, that's the one I want.

 Final check: Could it be sense 2 (level%1:26:01:: - a relative position or degree of value in a graded group)?
 Examples: "lumber of the highest grade"
 This is about grading quality. "National level" isn't about quality grading.

 So definitely sense 3.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: organisation
Target surface form: organisations
Context:
Over 100 participants from the main interest groups attended and debated issues such as the role of key actors including public authorities, social partners, voluntary and community organisations as well as service users. There were relatively few cases reported of attempts to involve users in service planning but their involvement in service provision was found to be more common. Note was also taken of the variety of different roles played by public welfare The Foundation organised, together with the European Commission, the Spanish Ministry of Social Affairs and the Galician regional government, a European conference on social exclusion: a major challenge for public welfare services. The Foundation recently published a comparative study as part of the EPOC project which assesses the extent to which direct participation can humanise work while increasing profitability. The study is based on 195 personal interviews with senior officials of the social partners as representatives of national level peak <t>organisations</t> in fifteen European countries. As important industrial sectors, the metal industry and the banking sector were also included.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=organisation%1:14:01:: | definition=the persons (or committees or departments etc.) who make up a body for the purpose of administering something | synonyms=administration, governance, governing body, establishment, brass, organization | examples=he claims that the present administration is corrupt; the governance of an association is responsible to its members
2. sense_key=organisation%1:14:00:: | definition=a group of people who work together | synonyms=organization
3. sense_key=organisation%1:09:00:: | definition=an organized structure for arranging or classifying | synonyms=arrangement, organization, system | examples=he changed the arrangement of the topics; the facts were familiar but it was in the organization of them that he was original
4. sense_key=organisation%1:07:00:: | definition=an ordered manner; orderliness by virtue of being methodical and well organized | synonyms=organization, system | examples=his compulsive organization was not an endearing quality; we can't do it unless we establish some system around here
5. sense_key=organisation%1:04:00:: | definition=the act of organizing a business or an activity related to a business | synonyms=organization | examples=he was brought in to supervise the organization of a new department
6. sense_key=organisation%1:04:01:: | definition=the activity or result of distributing or disposing persons or things properly or methodically | synonyms=organization | examples=his organization of the work force was very efficient
7. sense_key=organisation%1:04:02:: | definition=the act of forming or establishing something | synonyms=constitution, establishment, formation, organization | examples=the constitution of a PTA group last year; it was the establishment of his reputation

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation (WSD) on the word "organisations" (target lemma: organisation) in the given context.

 Let me analyze the context:

 The sentence containing the target word is:
 "The study is based on 195 personal interviews with senior officials of the social partners as representatives of national level peak <t>organisations</t> in fifteen European countries."

 Key context clues:
 - "senior officials" - suggests people in charge
 - "social partners" - refers to organizations representing employers and workers
 - "representatives of national level peak organisations" - these are top-level groups/entities
 - "in fifteen European countries" - suggests these are organized bodies or groups

 Now let's look at the candidate senses:

 1. sense_key=organisation%1:14:01::
    - Definition: the persons (or committees or departments etc.) who make up a body for the purpose of administering something
    - Synonyms: administration, governance, governing body, establishment, brass, organization
    - Examples mention administration, governance of an association

 2. sense_key=organisation%1:14:00::
    - Definition: a group of people who work together
    - Synonyms: organization
    - This is a more general sense of a group/organization

 3. sense_key=organisation%1:09:00::
    - Definition: an organized structure for arranging or classifying
    - Synonyms: arrangement, organization, system
    - This is about structure/arrangement, not the entity itself

 4. sense_key=organisation%1:07:00::
    - Definition: an ordered manner; orderliness by virtue of being methodical and well organized
    - Synonyms: organization, system
    - This is about the quality of being organized, not a specific entity

 5. sense_key=organisation%1:04:00::
    - Definition: the act of organizing a business or an activity related to a business
    - Synonyms: organization
    - This is the act/process of organizing

 6. sense_key=organisation%1:04:01::
    - Definition: the activity or result of distributing or disposing persons or things properly or methodically
    - Synonyms: organization
    - Also about the act/activity of organizing

 7. sense_key=organisation%1:04:02::
    - Definition: the act of forming or establishing something
    - Synonyms: constitution, establishment, formation, organization
    - About the act of forming/establishing

 Analysis:
 The target "organisations" refers to "national level peak organisations" that have "senior officials" and act as "representatives" of "social partners" (which typically refers to employer organizations and trade unions in EU social dialogue contexts).

 "Peak organisations" (or peak associations) refers to the highest level representative bodies/organizations in a sector or country.

 The context suggests these are formal groups or bodies that represent interests (like trade unions, employer associations).

 Comparing sense 1 and sense 2:
 - Sense 1 focuses on "the persons (or committees or departments etc.) who make up a body for the purpose of administering something" - this emphasizes the administrative/governing aspect.
 - Sense 2 is simply "a group of people who work together" - more general.

 However, looking at the specific context: "social partners as representatives of national level peak organisations" - this refers to organizations like trade unions, employer associations, etc. These are groups of people who work together (sense 2), but sense 1 might also fit because they are bodies for administering something (representing interests).

 But let's look more carefully at sense 1: "the persons (or committees or departments etc.) who make up a body for the purpose of administering something" - this seems to refer to the leadership/administrative part of an organization (the "brass", "administration").

 Sense 2: "a group of people who work together" - this is the broader sense of an organization as an entity.

 In the phrase "peak organisations", these are clearly referring to the entities themselves (like the national trade union confederation, national employer association), not just their administrative committees.

 Also, earlier in the text: "voluntary and community organisations" - this suggests the general sense of organizations as groups.

 However, looking at the specific sentence: "senior officials of the social partners as representatives of national level peak organisations" - the organisations are being represented by officials. The organisations themselves are the entities that the officials belong to or represent.

 Actually, looking at WordNet sense 1:14:01 vs 1:14:00:
 - 1:14:01 is specifically about the administrative body (the people who administer)
 - 1:14:00 is about a group of people who work together

 But wait, looking at the synonyms for sense 1: "administration, governance, governing body, establishment, brass" - these refer to the leadership/management, not the entire organization.

 For sense 2: just "organization" - this is the general sense.

 In the context of "peak organisations" in the context of European social dialogue, these refer to peak associations - the highest level representative organizations (like ETUC, BusinessEurope, etc., or their national equivalents). These are organizations in the sense of groups of people working together.

 However, looking at the example for sense 1: "he claims that the present administration is corrupt; the governance of an association is responsible to its members" - this suggests the governing/administrative part.

 The text says "senior officials... as representatives of... organisations" - the officials represent the organizations. The organizations are the entities being represented.

 I think sense 2 (a group of people who work together) is the best fit, or possibly sense 1 if we interpret "peak organisations" as the governing bodies. But "peak organisations" typically means the top-level organizations (entities), not just their administrative committees.

 Let me reconsider sense 1. The definition says "the persons (or committees or departments etc.) who make up a body for the purpose of administering something". This is metonymic - the administration stands for the whole, or it refers specifically to the administration.

 But in common usage, "organisation" in the context of "voluntary and community organisations" and "peak organisations" refers to the entities/groups themselves.

 Wait, looking at the context again: "social partners as representatives of national level peak organisations". Social partners are typically organizations (trade unions and employer associations). So the organisations are the social partners themselves, or the entities they represent.

 Actually, "social partners" is a term used in EU policy to refer to the representative organizations of workers and employers. So "national level peak organisations" are these representative bodies.

 Between sense 1 and sense 2:
 - Sense 2 is the hypernym: a group of people who work together
 - Sense 1 is more specific: the administrative/governing body

 Which is more appropriate? In the context of industrial relations and European social policy, "peak organisations" refers to the highest-level representative organizations (like national confederations of trade unions). These are organizations in the general sense (sense 2), not specifically their administrative apparatus (sense 1).

 Moreover, sense 1's synonyms (brass, administration, establishment) suggest the leadership elite, whereas "peak organisations" refers to the organizations as wholes (though at the peak of their respective sectors).

 However, I should check if there's any nuance I'm missing. The phrase "national level peak organisations" is a technical term in European industrial relations referring to the highest-level employer and employee organizations in a country.

 Given that earlier in the text we see "voluntary and community organisations" (which are clearly groups/entities, not just their administrative parts), and the current target is parallel to that, sense 2 seems correct.

 But let me double-check the WordNet senses. In WordNet:
 - Organisation (group) - 1:14:00 - a group of people who work together
 - Organisation (administration) - 1:14:01 - the persons who make up a governing body

 In the sentence: "senior officials of the social partners as representatives of national level peak organisations"

 If the organisations were the administrative bodies (sense 1), then "senior officials" would be part of those bodies, or the bodies would be the officials. But "representatives of organisations" suggests the organisations are the entities being represented.

 Actually, looking carefully: "senior officials of the social partners as representatives of national level peak organisations". This could mean:
 - Senior officials (who are) representatives of organisations
 - Or: senior officials of the social partners, [who are acting] as representatives of organisations

 But "social partners" are themselves organisations. So "senior officials of the social partners" = senior officials of these organisations. Then "as representatives of national level peak organisations" - this might mean they represent these peak organisations, or they are representatives from these organisations.

 Given the context of "EPOC project" and "social partners as representatives", these are likely representatives from peak organisations.

 I think sense 2 is the safest choice: "a group of people who work together" - this covers trade unions, employer associations, etc.

 However, looking at the gloss for sense 1 again: "the persons (or committees or departments etc.) who make up a body for the purpose of administering something". This could fit "peak organisations" if we consider them as the administrative bodies of their respective sectors. But this seems stretched.

 Let me look at the examples provided for sense 1: "he claims that the present administration is corrupt; the governance of an association is responsible to its members". These clearly refer to the leadership/administrative part.

 The examples for sense 2 are not provided, but the definition is simple: "a group of people who work together".

 Given that the context mentions "voluntary and community organisations" earlier (which are clearly groups/entities), and "peak organisations" is parallel to that, I choose sense 2.

 Wait, I need to check if sense 1 could be correct. In some contexts, "organisation" can mean the administrative apparatus. But "peak organisations" in EU English almost always refers to the peak associations themselves (the entities), not just their boards.

 Therefore, sense_index: 2.

 But let me reconsider one more time. The text mentions "senior officials... as representatives...". If the organisations were just groups (sense 2), that's fine. If they were administrations (sense 1), that's also possible. But sense 1 is more specific to the governing/administrative function.

 Actually, looking at the WordNet hierarchy, sense 1:14:01 is a hyponym of sense 1:14:00? No, in WordNet, these are distinct senses under the same noun.group lexicographer file (1:14).

 Sense 1:14:00 - organization, organisation (a group of people who work together)
 Sense 1:14:01 - administration, governance, governing body, establishment, brass, organization, organisation (the persons who make up a body for the purpose of administering something)

 Note that "organization" is listed as a synonym for both, which can be confusing.

 But the key difference:
 - Sense 1:14:00: the group as a whole
 - Sense 1:14:01: specifically the administrative/decision-making part of the group

 In "peak organisations", we are referring to the entities (like the national trade union confederation), not specifically their executive committees. So sense 2 (1:14:00) is correct.

 Final check: Could it be any other sense?
 - Sense 3 (arrangement/structure): No, these are clearly entities with officials.
 - Sense 4 (orderliness): No, that's an abstract quality.
 - Sense 5, 6, 7 (acts of organizing): No, these are nouns referring to the process, but "peak organisations" refers to the entities themselves (the result of organizing, not the act).

 So it's between 1 and 2. I choose 2.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: country
Target surface form: countries
Context:
Over 100 participants from the main interest groups attended and debated issues such as the role of key actors including public authorities, social partners, voluntary and community organisations as well as service users. There were relatively few cases reported of attempts to involve users in service planning but their involvement in service provision was found to be more common. Note was also taken of the variety of different roles played by public welfare The Foundation organised, together with the European Commission, the Spanish Ministry of Social Affairs and the Galician regional government, a European conference on social exclusion: a major challenge for public welfare services. The Foundation recently published a comparative study as part of the EPOC project which assesses the extent to which direct participation can humanise work while increasing profitability. The study is based on 195 personal interviews with senior officials of the social partners as representatives of national level peak organisations in fifteen European <t>countries</t>. As important industrial sectors, the metal industry and the banking sector were also included.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=country%1:14:00:: | definition=a politically organized body of people under a single government | synonyms=state, nation, land, commonwealth, res publica, body politic | examples=the state has elected a new president; African nations
2. sense_key=country%1:15:00:: | definition=the territory occupied by a nation | synonyms=state, land | examples=he returned to the land of his birth; he visited several European countries
3. sense_key=country%1:14:01:: | definition=the people who live in a nation or country | synonyms=nation, land | examples=a statement that sums up the nation's mood; the news was announced to the nation
4. sense_key=country%1:15:01:: | definition=an area outside of cities and towns | synonyms=rural area | examples=his poetry celebrated the slower pace of life in the country
5. sense_key=country%1:15:02:: | definition=a particular geographical region of indefinite boundary (usually serving some special purpose or distinguished by its people or culture or geography) | synonyms=area | examples=it was a mountainous area; Bible country

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "countries" in the given context.

Let me analyze the context:
- The text discusses a European conference on social exclusion
- It mentions a comparative study based on interviews with senior officials in fifteen European <t>countries</t>
- The context involves "national level peak organisations" and "European countries"
- It's talking about political/geographical entities (nations/states)

Now let's look at the candidate senses:

1. sense_key=country%1:14:00:: | definition=a politically organized body of people under a single government | synonyms=state, nation, land, commonwealth, res publica, body politic | examples=the state has elected a new president; African nations
   - This refers to the political entity/government aspect.

2. sense_key=country%1:15:00:: | definition=the territory occupied by a nation | synonyms=state, land | examples=he returned to the land of his birth; he visited several European countries
   - This refers to the geographical territory.
   - Example specifically mentions "European countries" which matches our context.

3. sense_key=country%1:14:01:: | definition=the people who live in a nation or country | synonyms=nation, land | examples=a statement that sums up the nation's mood; the news was announced to the nation
   - This refers to the people/citizens.

4. sense_key=country%1:15:01:: | definition=an area outside of cities and towns | synonyms=rural area | examples=his poetry celebrated the slower pace of life in the country
   - This is the rural vs urban sense (countryside). Not relevant here.

5. sense_key=country%1:15:02:: | definition=a particular geographical region of indefinite boundary (usually serving some special purpose or distinguished by its people or culture or geography) | synonyms=area | examples=it was a mountainous area; Bible country
   - This is a more general region sense.

In the context: "fifteen European countries" - this is referring to European nations/states as territorial/political entities.

Between sense 1 and sense 2:
- Sense 1: politically organized body of people (the political entity/government)
- Sense 2: the territory occupied by a nation (the land/territory)

The example for sense 2 specifically mentions "he visited several European countries" which is very close to our context "fifteen European countries".

Also, looking at the context: "national level peak organisations in fifteen European countries" - this refers to organizations operating within the territory of these nations, or the nations themselves as entities.

In WordNet, sense 1 (country%1:14:00::) is the "nation" sense - the political entity.
Sense 2 (country%1:15:00::) is the "territory/land" sense.

However, looking at the examples:
- Sense 1 examples: "the state has elected a new president; African nations"
- Sense 2 examples: "he returned to the land of his birth; he visited several European countries"

The phrase "European countries" appears in the example for sense 2, which strongly suggests that's the correct sense here.

Also, in the context, we're talking about "fifteen European countries" - this is referring to the geographical/political entities as territories where these organizations exist.

Sense 1 focuses on the "politically organized body of people under a single government" - emphasizing the governance aspect.
Sense 2 focuses on "the territory occupied by a nation" - emphasizing the geographical area.

When we say "fifteen European countries", we're typically referring to the territorial/political entities themselves, which aligns with sense 2.

Wait, let me reconsider the WordNet hierarchy. In WordNet:
- 1:14 refers to noun.group (groups of people/organizations)
- 1:15 refers to noun.location (spatial/physical locations)

Sense 1 (1:14:00) is the political entity (nation-state as a group).
Sense 2 (1:15:00) is the territory (the land itself).

In the context "senior officials of the social partners as representatives of national level peak organisations in fifteen European countries", the word "countries" refers to the nations as political entities where these organizations are located.

However, the example "he visited several European countries" under sense 2 suggests that when we talk about visiting or being in European countries, we use sense 2.

But actually, looking carefully at WordNet definitions:
- Sense 1: "a politically organized body of people under a single government" - this is the abstract political entity
- Sense 2: "the territory occupied by a nation" - this is the physical land

In common parlance, when we say "fifteen European countries", we could mean either, but the presence of "European" suggests the geographical/political units.

Let me look at the examples again:
- Sense 1: "the state has elected a new president; African nations" - focuses on the political act
- Sense 2: "he returned to the land of his birth; he visited several European countries" - focuses on the place/location

The context mentions "in fifteen European countries" - this is locative, suggesting sense 2 (the territory/location).

Also, the phrase "European countries" is explicitly in the examples for sense 2.

Therefore, sense 2 seems to be the best fit.

But wait, I should check if sense 1 could also fit. "African nations" is the example for sense 1, which is similar to "European countries". However, "nations" in the example for sense 1 emphasizes the people/political organization, while "countries" in sense 2 example emphasizes the territories.

Actually, looking at the synsets more carefully:
- Sense 1 synonyms: state, nation, land, commonwealth, res publica, body politic
- Sense 2 synonyms: state, land

Sense 1 is more about the political entity (the state), while sense 2 is more about the geographical area.

In the context: "national level peak organisations in fifteen European countries" - this refers to organizations operating at the national level within these countries. The countries are being used as geographical/political containers for the organizations.

Given that the example for sense 2 explicitly mentions "European countries", and the context is about a study conducted across fifteen European nations (as territories where interviews took place), sense 2 (country%1:15:00::) seems correct.

However, I need to be careful. In many WSD tasks, "country" referring to a nation-state is often sense 1. But the explicit example matching is compelling.

Let me reconsider the context more carefully. The text mentions:
- "fifteen European countries"
- "national level peak organisations" (organizations at the national level)
- The study involves interviews across these countries

This is talking about the countries as geopolitical entities.

Actually, looking at WordNet sense numbering:
- country%1:14:00:: is the first sense (most common)
- country%1:15:00:: is the second sense

In standard WSD datasets like SemCor, "country" usually maps to sense 1 when referring to nations like "European countries", "African countries", etc.

But the example for sense 2 explicitly says "he visited several European countries". This is a strong indicator.

Let me think about the distinction:
- Sense 1: The political entity (the government, the state as an institution)
- Sense 2: The territory (the land mass)

When we say "in fifteen European countries", we usually mean within the territories of fifteen European nations. This aligns with sense 2.

But when we say "the country elected a new president", that's sense 1 (the political body).

Given the context mentions "in fifteen European countries" (locative), and the example for sense 2 mentions "European countries", I will go with sense 2.

Wait, looking at the candidate list again:
1. sense_key=country%1:14:00::
2. sense_key=country%1:15:00::
3. sense_key=country%1:14:01::
4. sense_key=country%1:15:01::
5. sense_key=country%1:15:02::

The index numbers are 1, 2, 3, 4, 5.

So if I choose sense 2, I return {"sense_index": 2}.

But I need to be absolutely sure. Let me reconsider if it could be sense 1.

Sense 1: "a politically organized body of people under a single government"
Sense 2: "the territory occupied by a nation"

The phrase "fifteen European countries" is ambiguous between these two, but typically in WordNet:
- Sense 1 is the "nation" sense (group of people)
- Sense 2 is the "land" sense (territory)

However, looking at the actual WordNet data (from my knowledge), sense 1 examples include "the country has elected a new president" while sense 2 includes "he visited several European countries".

Given the exact match with the example in sense 2, and the locative usage "in fifteen European countries", sense 2 is the correct choice.

Actually, looking at the provided examples again:
- Sense 1: "the state has elected a new president; African nations"
- Sense 2: "he returned to the land of his birth; he visited several European countries"

The context: "in fifteen European countries" - this is about location/territory where the interviews took place. This aligns perfectly with sense 2.

Therefore, the answer is sense_index 2.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: important
Target surface form: important
Context:
There were relatively few cases reported of attempts to involve users in service planning but their involvement in service provision was found to be more common. Note was also taken of the variety of different roles played by public welfare The Foundation organised, together with the European Commission, the Spanish Ministry of Social Affairs and the Galician regional government, a European conference on social exclusion: a major challenge for public welfare services. The Foundation recently published a comparative study as part of the EPOC project which assesses the extent to which direct participation can humanise work while increasing profitability. The study is based on 195 personal interviews with senior officials of the social partners as representatives of national level peak organisations in fifteen European countries. As <t>important</t> industrial sectors, the metal industry and the banking sector were also included. Key speakers at the social exclusion conference were (left to right) Cristina Louro, Employment, Industrial Relations and Social Affairs Directorate, European Commission Fernando Gomes, a high degree of Committee of the Regions Barbara Weiler, Member of the European Parliament José Maria Gil-Robles, Vice-President, European Parliament and John Carroll, Economic and Social Committee.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=important%3:00:00:: | definition=of great significance or value | synonyms=of import | examples=important people; the important questions of the day
2. sense_key=important%3:00:04:: | definition=important in effect or meaning | synonyms=significant | examples=a significant change in tax laws; a significant change in the Constitution
3. sense_key=important%3:00:02:: | definition=of extreme importance; vital to the resolution of a crisis | synonyms=crucial | examples=a crucial moment in his career; a crucial election
4. sense_key=important%5:00:00:influential:00 | definition=having authority or ascendancy or influence | synonyms=authoritative | examples=an important official; the captain's authoritative manner
5. sense_key=important%5:00:00:immodest:02 | definition=having or suggesting a consciousness of high position | examples=recited the decree with an important air; took long important strides in the direction of his office

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "important" in the given context.

 Let me analyze the context:
 - The text discusses a study about social exclusion, public welfare services, and industrial sectors.
 - The specific sentence is: "As <t>important</t> industrial sectors, the metal industry and the banking sector were also included."
 - Here, "important" is modifying "industrial sectors" - meaning the metal industry and banking sector are being described as important sectors.

 Now let's look at the candidate senses:

 1. sense_key=important%3:00:00:: | definition=of great significance or value | synonyms=of import | examples=important people; the important questions of the day
    - This seems like the general sense of "important" - having great significance or value.
    - The example "important people" suggests this can apply to sectors/entities that are significant.

 2. sense_key=important%3:00:04:: | definition=important in effect or meaning | synonyms=significant | examples=a significant change in tax laws; a significant change in the Constitution
    - This seems to focus on "effect or meaning" - more about the impact or implication.
    - The examples suggest changes or things that have meaningful impact.

 3. sense_key=important%3:00:02:: | definition=of extreme importance; vital to the resolution of a crisis | synonyms=crucial | examples=a crucial moment in his career; a crucial election
    - This is stronger - "extreme importance", "vital", "crucial".
    - The examples suggest critical moments or decisions.

 4. sense_key=important%5:00:00:influential:00 | definition=having authority or ascendancy or influence | synonyms=authoritative | examples=an important official; the captain's authoritative manner
    - This is about having authority or influence.
    - The example "an important official" suggests someone with power/authority.

 5. sense_key=important%5:00:00:immodest:02 | definition=having or suggesting a consciousness of high position | examples=recited the decree with an important air; took long important strides in the direction of his office
    - This is about demeanor, acting self-important or pompous.

 Now, in the context: "As important industrial sectors, the metal industry and the banking sector were also included."

 The metal industry and banking sector are being described as significant, valuable sectors worth including in the study. They are sectors of great significance or value to the economy or the study.

 This doesn't seem to be about:
 - Being crucial/vital to a crisis (sense 3) - there's no crisis mentioned
 - Having authority or influence (sense 4) - sectors don't have authority in the sense of personal influence
 - Being immodest/pompous (sense 5) - clearly not applicable to industrial sectors
 - Being important in effect or meaning (sense 2) - this seems more about implications or meaningfulness rather than significance/value

 Sense 1 "of great significance or value" fits best. The metal industry and banking sector are significant/valuable sectors of the economy. They are "important" in the general sense of being significant or valuable enough to be included in the study.

 Sense 2 focuses on "effect or meaning" which seems slightly different - more about being meaningful or having implications. But "important industrial sectors" is more about their economic significance or value.

 Actually, looking more carefully at WordNet distinctions:
 - Sense 1 (important%3:00:00::) is the general sense: "of great significance or value"
 - Sense 2 (important%3:00:04::) is "important in effect or meaning" - this might be for things like "a significant difference" vs "an important difference"? Actually, looking at the examples: "a significant change" - this seems to be about things that are meaningful or consequential.

 But for "important industrial sectors", we're talking about sectors that are significant in size, economic impact, or value to the study. This aligns with sense 1.

 Wait, let me reconsider sense 2. The definition is "important in effect or meaning" with synonym "significant". The examples are about changes in laws and constitution. This seems to emphasize the consequential nature - having important effects or meanings.

 Sense 1 is broader: "of great significance or value".

 In the phrase "important industrial sectors", we mean sectors that are major, significant, valuable - this is sense 1.

 However, I should check if there's any distinction I'm missing. In WordNet:
 - important, of import (vs unimportant)
 - significant (vs insignificant) - this might be sense 2
 - crucial (vs non-crucial) - sense 3

 Actually, looking at standard WordNet entries for "important":
 - Sense 1: of great significance or value
 - Sense 2: significant, important (important in effect or meaning)
 - Sense 3: crucial, important (of extreme importance; vital to the resolution of a crisis)
 - Sense 4: authoritative, important, significant (having authority or ascendancy or influence)
 - Sense 5: immodest, important (having or suggesting a consciousness of high position)

 In the context "important industrial sectors", the meaning is that these sectors are significant or major sectors of the economy. This aligns with sense 1: "of great significance or value".

 Sense 2 might apply to things like "important distinctions" or "important differences" where the focus is on the meaning or effect. But for sectors, it's about their value/significance.

 Therefore, the best sense is sense 1.

 Wait, I need to be careful. The user asks for the "single best indexed sense" and to return {"sense_index": 1} (or whatever number).

 Let me double-check by looking at the examples:
 - Sense 1 examples: "important people; the important questions of the day" - these are things of value/significance
 - Sense 2 examples: "a significant change in tax laws; a significant change in the Constitution" - these are things with important effects/implications

 "Industrial sectors" are more like "important people" - they are entities of significance/value, not necessarily things defined by their effect or meaning (though they have effects).

 Also, sense 1 has synonym "of import" which fits well with "important industrial sectors" meaning sectors of import (significance).

 So I choose sense 1.

 But wait, I should check if sense 4 could apply: "having authority or ascendancy or influence". Could industrial sectors be described as having influence? Yes, but the phrase "important industrial sectors" typically means major/significant sectors, not necessarily influential ones (though they are related). The example for sense 4 is "an important official" which is about a person with authority. Sectors don't have authority in the same way.

 Sense 1 is definitely the best fit.

 One final check: is there any reason to choose sense 2? If the text meant that these sectors were important for the study's results or conclusions (i.e., their inclusion has important effects on the findings), then sense 2 might work. But the natural reading is simply that these are significant/major sectors of the economy that were included because of their importance (size, relevance, etc.).

 Therefore: {"sense_index": 1}

provider: ModelRun