[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: wait
Target surface form: waited
Context:
"Yes, yes ", he muttered impatiently. "Of course it looked like an accident. I always work it that way -- and always at a time when the customer has an alibi. Let me prove it, Phil. I think I can manage one more favor for you ". He <t>waited</t> eagerly. Haney swished the liquor in the bottom of his glass.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=wait%2:42:00:: | definition=stay in one place and anticipate or expect something | examples=I had to wait on line for an hour to get the tickets
2. sense_key=wait%2:42:01:: | definition=wait before acting | synonyms=hold off, hold back | examples=the scientists held off announcing their results until they repeated the experiment
3. sense_key=wait%2:31:00:: | definition=look forward to the probable occurrence of | synonyms=expect, look, await | examples=We were expecting a visit from our relatives; She is looking to a promotion
4. sense_key=wait%2:41:00:: | definition=serve as a waiter or waitress in a restaurant | synonyms=waitress | examples=I'm waiting on tables at Maxim's

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "waited" in the given context.

 Let me analyze the context:
 - "Yes, yes ", he muttered impatiently. "Of course it looked like an accident. I always work it that way -- and always at a time when the customer has an alibi. Let me prove it, Phil. I think I can manage one more favor for you ". He <t>waited</t> eagerly. Haney swished the liquor in the bottom of his glass.

 The character is speaking, then says he can manage one more favor, and then "He waited eagerly." This suggests he is waiting for a response or reaction from Phil (or Haney, depending on who is speaking to whom - actually looking at the dialogue, it seems the speaker is offering to prove something and do a favor, then waits eagerly for a response).

 Now let's look at the candidate senses:

 1. sense_key=wait%2:42:00:: | definition=stay in one place and anticipate or expect something | examples=I had to wait on line for an hour to get the tickets
    - This is about staying in place and expecting something. The character is staying in place (implied) and expecting a response.

 2. sense_key=wait%2:42:01:: | definition=wait before acting | synonyms=hold off, hold back | examples=the scientists held off announcing their results until they repeated the experiment
    - This is about delaying action. The context doesn't suggest he's delaying action; rather he's waiting for a reaction/response after offering to do something.

 3. sense_key=wait%2:31:00:: | definition=look forward to the probable occurrence of | synonyms=expect, look, await | examples=We were expecting a visit from our relatives; She is looking to a promotion
    - This is about expecting something to happen. "await" is a good synonym here. He is awaiting a response.

 4. sense_key=wait%2:41:00:: | definition=serve as a waiter or waitress in a restaurant | synonyms=waitress | examples=I'm waiting on tables at Maxim's
    - This is clearly not the meaning here. He's not serving tables.

 Now between sense 1 and sense 3:
 - Sense 1 (wait%2:42:00::): "stay in one place and anticipate or expect something" - this is the general sense of waiting, like waiting in line.
 - Sense 3 (wait%2:31:00::): "look forward to the probable occurrence of" - this is more about expecting/awaiting an event, with synonyms like expect, look, await.

 The context: "He waited eagerly." After offering to do a favor/prove something, he is waiting for the other person's response or reaction.

 Looking at the examples:
 - Sense 1 example: "I had to wait on line for an hour to get the tickets" - this is physical waiting in a location.
 - Sense 3 examples: "We were expecting a visit from our relatives; She is looking to a promotion" - this is about expecting something to happen.

 In the context, he is waiting for a response, which is more like anticipating an occurrence (the other person speaking or reacting) rather than just staying in a place. However, "wait" in the sense of waiting for a response could fit both.

 But looking carefully at the glosses:
 - Sense 1: "stay in one place and anticipate or expect something" - emphasizes the physical aspect of staying.
 - Sense 3: "look forward to the probable occurrence of" - emphasizes the mental state of expectation.

 In the sentence "He waited eagerly", the word "eagerly" suggests an emotional state of anticipation, which aligns well with sense 3 (looking forward to...). Also, the structure "wait for something" often aligns with sense 3 when it's about awaiting an event/response.

 However, I need to check the specific WordNet senses. In WordNet:
 - wait%2:42:00:: is the "stay in one place" sense (e.g., wait in line)
 - wait%2:31:00:: is the "expect" sense (e.g., await)

 The context suggests he is awaiting a reply or reaction from Phil/Haney. This is the "await" sense - looking forward to the probable occurrence of (the other person speaking).

 But let me reconsider. The phrase "He waited eagerly" in dialogue context usually means he paused, staying in place, expecting a response. This could be sense 1.

 However, looking at the distinction:
 - Sense 1 is about remaining in a state/place (intransitive)
 - Sense 3 is about transitive waiting (wait for something) or having an expectation

 Actually, looking at the WordNet entries:
 - wait%2:42:00:: (verb.stative) - stay in one place and anticipate or expect something; "I had to wait on line for an hour to get the tickets"
 - wait%2:31:00:: (verb.cognition) - look forward to the probable occurrence of; "We were expecting a visit from our relatives"

 The key difference is the syntactic frame and the semantic focus. Sense 3 is about expecting/awaiting a specific event, while sense 1 is about the act of remaining somewhere in anticipation.

 In the context, is there an object implied? "He waited eagerly [for a response]". The response is implied. This suggests sense 3 might be appropriate because it's about awaiting an occurrence.

 But actually, looking at typical WSD for "wait" in similar contexts:
 - "He waited for an answer" - usually sense 1 or sense 3 depending on the specific annotation guidelines.
 - But sense 3 specifically has synonyms "expect, look, await" and the gloss mentions "look forward to the probable occurrence of".

 The word "eagerly" strongly suggests the "look forward to" aspect of sense 3, rather than just the neutral "stay in one place" of sense 1.

 Also, sense 2 is about holding off/delaying, which doesn't fit.
 Sense 4 is about serving, which doesn't fit.

 So it's between 1 and 3.

 Let me look at the examples again:
 - Sense 1: "I had to wait on line for an hour to get the tickets" - this is about enduring a delay, staying in a queue.
 - Sense 3: "We were expecting a visit from our relatives; She is looking to a promotion" - this is about anticipation of future events.

 In the story context, the character has just offered to do something ("I think I can manage one more favor for you"), and then "He waited eagerly." He is waiting to see what the other person will say - he is anticipating the response. This fits sense 3 better because it's about anticipating an occurrence (the reply), not just staying in a physical location.

 However, I should check if there's a possibility that sense 1 is correct. In many dictionaries, "wait" when used without an explicit object but with an implied "for something" can be either sense depending on whether the emphasis is on the physical staying or the mental expectation.

 But given the adverb "eagerly" which modifies the mental/emotional state, and the context of offering a favor and wanting to see the reaction, sense 3 (expect/await) seems more appropriate.

 Wait, I need to be careful. In WordNet, sense 3 (wait%2:31:00::) is actually the "await" sense, which is often used transitively or with "for". But "wait" can be used intransitively with an implied object.

 Actually, looking at the verb frames:
 - Sense 1 (wait%2:42:00::): Somebody ----s, Somebody ----s PP (e.g., wait on line)
 - Sense 3 (wait%2:31:00::): Somebody ----s something, Somebody ----s somebody, Somebody ----s PP (e.g., await something)

 But "He waited eagerly" doesn't have an explicit object, though one is implied.

 Let me reconsider the context more carefully. The speaker says "Let me prove it, Phil. I think I can manage one more favor for you." Then "He waited eagerly." This is a dramatic pause, waiting for Phil's reaction. This is the "stay in place and anticipate" sense - he's pausing, not leaving, waiting for the response.

 But "eagerly" pushes toward the expectation sense.

 Actually, looking at standard WordNet disambiguation examples:
 - "I wait for the day when..." - this would likely be sense 3 (await/expect)
 - "I wait at the bus stop" - this would be sense 1

 Here, he is waiting for a response. The response is an event. So sense 3.

 But I'm second-guessing because sense 1 is the most common general sense of "wait". However, the presence of "eagerly" and the context of anticipating a reaction strongly points to sense 3.

 Let me check if there's any other clue. The previous sentence is about doing a favor. Then he waits eagerly. Haney swishes liquor. So he's waiting to see what Haney/Phil does or says.

 I think sense 3 is the best fit: "look forward to the probable occurrence of" - he is looking forward to seeing the reaction/getting the go-ahead.

 Actually, looking at the synonyms for sense 3: expect, look, await. "He awaited eagerly" would be a very similar sentence.

 For sense 1, the example is waiting in line - a more passive, physical waiting.

 Therefore, I choose sense 3.

 Wait, I should double-check sense 2: "wait before acting" - this is like "hold off". He's not holding off on anything; he's waiting for the other person.

 So final decision: sense 3.

 But let me reconsider one more time. Is it possible that sense 1 is correct because he's physically staying in the conversation/place waiting for a reply?

 In WordNet, the distinction between sense 1 and sense 3 is often tricky. Let me think about the hypernyms:
 - Sense 1 (wait%2:42:00::) - hypernym: be (stative)
 - Sense 3 (wait%2:31:00::) - hypernym: expect (cognition)

 Given that "eagerly" describes a cognitive/emotional state (eagerness), and the context is about anticipating a response (a cognitive expectation), sense 3 is better.

 Also, the word "waited" here is synonymous with "awaited" in this context.

 So I'll go with sense 3.

provider: Phala


attempt_kind: initial

status: success

[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: liquor
Target surface form: liquor
Context:
"Of course it looked like an accident. I always work it that way -- and always at a time when the customer has an alibi. Let me prove it, Phil. I think I can manage one more favor for you ". He waited eagerly. Haney swished the <t>liquor</t> in the bottom of his glass.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=liquor%1:13:00:: | definition=an alcoholic beverage that is distilled rather than fermented | synonyms=spirits, booze, hard drink, hard liquor, John Barleycorn, strong drink
2. sense_key=liquor%1:27:00:: | definition=a liquid substance that is a solution (or emulsion or suspension) used or obtained in an industrial process | examples=waste liquors
3. sense_key=liquor%1:13:01:: | definition=the liquid in which vegetables or meat have be cooked | synonyms=pot liquor, pot likker

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

finish_reason: stop

role: assistant

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "liquor" in the given context.

Context analysis:
- The passage involves characters drinking ("Haney swished the liquor in the bottom of his glass")
- This clearly indicates an alcoholic beverage context
- The mention of "glass" and drinking context strongly suggests alcoholic liquor

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=liquor%1:13:00:: - alcoholic beverage that is distilled rather than fermented (spirits, booze, hard drink, etc.)
2. sense_key=liquor%1:27:00:: - industrial liquid solution (waste liquors)
3. sense_key=liquor%1:13:01:: - cooking liquid from vegetables/meat (pot liquor)

Analysis:
- Sense 1 fits perfectly: "swished the liquor in the bottom of his glass" - this describes someone drinking spirits/alcohol from a glass
- Sense 2 (industrial) doesn't fit the context of drinking from a glass in a social setting
- Sense 3 (cooking liquid/pot liquor) doesn't fit either - you wouldn't typically "swish" cooking broth in a glass in this context, and the setting appears to be a drinking/social scenario with mentions of "customer" and favors

The context clearly involves drinking alcohol. The phrase "swished the liquor in the bottom of his glass" is a classic description of someone drinking spirits.

Therefore, the correct sense is index 1 (liquor%1:13:00::).

I need to return: {"sense_index": 1}

format: unknown

native_finish_reason: stop

provider: Moonshot AI

currency: USD


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: bottom
Target surface form: bottom
Context:
"Of course it looked like an accident. I always work it that way -- and always at a time when the customer has an alibi. Let me prove it, Phil. I think I can manage one more favor for you ". He waited eagerly. Haney swished the liquor in the <t>bottom</t> of his glass.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=bottom%1:15:00:: | definition=the lower side of anything | synonyms=underside, undersurface
2. sense_key=bottom%1:15:01:: | definition=the lowest part of anything | examples=they started at the bottom of the hill
3. sense_key=bottom%1:08:00:: | definition=the fleshy part of the human body that you sit on | synonyms=buttocks, nates, arse, butt, backside, bum | examples=he deserves a good kick in the butt; are you going to sit on your fanny and do nothing?
4. sense_key=bottom%1:28:00:: | definition=the second half of an inning; while the home team is at bat | synonyms=bottom of the inning
5. sense_key=bottom%1:17:00:: | definition=a depression forming the ground under a body of water | synonyms=bed | examples=he searched for treasure on the ocean bed
6. sense_key=bottom%1:17:01:: | definition=low-lying alluvial land near a river | synonyms=bottomland
7. sense_key=bottom%1:06:00:: | definition=a cargo ship | synonyms=freighter, merchantman, merchant ship | examples=they did much of their overseas trade in foreign bottoms

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "bottom" in the given context.

Context: "He waited eagerly. Haney swished the liquor in the <t>bottom</t> of his glass."

Let me analyze the candidate senses:

1. sense_key=bottom%1:15:00:: | definition=the lower side of anything | synonyms=underside, undersurface
   - This refers to the underside/undersurface of something. In the context of a glass, the "bottom" could be the lower part, but "underside" implies the external bottom surface, not the internal lower part where liquid sits.

2. sense_key=bottom%1:15:01:: | definition=the lowest part of anything | examples=they started at the bottom of the hill
   - This is the lowest part of something. In a glass, the bottom would be the lowest part where the liquid rests. This seems very plausible - "the bottom of his glass" means the lowest interior part of the glass where the remaining liquor sits.

3. sense_key=bottom%1:08:00:: | definition=the fleshy part of the human body that you sit on
   - This is clearly about buttocks/anatomy. Not relevant to a glass.

4. sense_key=bottom%1:28:00:: | definition=the second half of an inning
   - Baseball term. Not relevant.

5. sense_key=bottom%1:17:00:: | definition=a depression forming the ground under a body of water
   - This is like "ocean bottom" or "river bottom" - the ground under water. While a glass contains liquid, "the bottom of his glass" refers to the glass itself, not the ground under a body of water.

6. sense_key=bottom%1:17:01:: | definition=low-lying alluvial land near a river
   - Geographic term (bottomland). Not relevant.

7. sense_key=bottom%1:06:00:: | definition=a cargo ship
   - Nautical term for a ship. Not relevant.

Now comparing sense 1 and sense 2:

Sense 1: "the lower side of anything" - This focuses on the underside, the surface facing downward. For a glass, the underside would be the exterior bottom surface that sits on the table.

Sense 2: "the lowest part of anything" - This focuses on the lowest portion or section of an object. For a glass, this would be the interior lower part where liquid collects.

In the sentence: "Haney swished the liquor in the bottom of his glass."

When you swish liquor in a glass, you're moving it around in the lowest interior part of the glass. You're not swishing it on the underside (external bottom) of the glass.

So sense 2 (the lowest part of anything) is the correct choice.

Wait, let me double-check the WordNet senses. Sometimes "bottom" can mean:

- The lowest part (interior)
- The underside (exterior lower surface)

In "bottom of the glass" when referring to liquid, it's definitely the interior lowest part, not the exterior underside.

Example comparison:
- "The bottom of the glass was dirty" (exterior underside - sense 1)
- "There was sediment at the bottom of the glass" (interior lowest part - sense 2)

In this case: "swished the liquor in the bottom of his glass" - clearly referring to the interior lowest part where the liquid is.

Therefore, sense 2 is correct.

Actually, looking at the indices:
1. sense_key=bottom%1:15:00:: (underside, undersurface)
2. sense_key=bottom%1:15:01:: (lowest part)

So the answer should be index 2.

Wait, I need to be careful about the format. The user wants {"sense_index": 2}.

Let me verify once more. Is there any chance it's sense 1? "The lower side of anything" - if we think of a glass, the "lower side" could be interpreted as the bottom interior, but the synonyms "underside, undersurface" strongly suggest the external surface facing down. You wouldn't call the interior bottom of a glass the "underside" - that's specifically the external surface.

Sense 2: "the lowest part of anything" with example "they started at the bottom of the hill" - this clearly refers to the lowest portion/section of an object or terrain. This fits "bottom of his glass" perfectly.

Therefore, the answer is sense_index 2.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: glass
Target surface form: glass
Context:
"Of course it looked like an accident. I always work it that way -- and always at a time when the customer has an alibi. Let me prove it, Phil. I think I can manage one more favor for you ". He waited eagerly. Haney swished the liquor in the bottom of his <t>glass</t>.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=glass%1:27:00:: | definition=a brittle transparent solid with irregular atomic structure
2. sense_key=glass%1:06:00:: | definition=a container for holding liquids while drinking | synonyms=drinking glass
3. sense_key=glass%1:23:00:: | definition=the quantity a glass will hold | synonyms=glassful
4. sense_key=glass%1:06:03:: | definition=a small refracting telescope | synonyms=field glass, spyglass
5. sense_key=glass%1:06:01:: | definition=an amphetamine derivative (trade name Methedrine) used in the form of a crystalline hydrochloride; used as a stimulant to the nervous system and as an appetite suppressant | synonyms=methamphetamine, methamphetamine hydrochloride, Methedrine, meth, deoxyephedrine, chalk
6. sense_key=glass%1:06:02:: | definition=a mirror; usually a ladies' dressing mirror | synonyms=looking glass
7. sense_key=glass%1:06:04:: | definition=glassware collectively | examples=She collected old glass

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "glass" in the given context.

 Context: "Haney swished the liquor in the bottom of his <t>glass</t>."

 Key clues:
 - "swished the liquor" - implies a liquid is being moved around
 - "in the bottom of his glass" - implies a container
 - "liquor" - alcoholic beverage, typically drunk from a container

 Candidate senses analysis:
 1. glass%1:27:00:: - "a brittle transparent solid with irregular atomic structure" - This is the material/substance itself. While the container is made of this material, in this context "his glass" refers to the container, not the material.
 2. glass%1:06:00:: - "a container for holding liquids while drinking" - synonyms: drinking glass. This fits perfectly. Haney is swishing liquor in a drinking vessel.
 3. glass%1:23:00:: - "the quantity a glass will hold" - synonyms: glassful. This refers to the amount/volume. While "a glass" can mean a quantity, "his glass" with "swished the liquor in the bottom" strongly suggests the physical container, not just the quantity. You swish liquid in a container, not in a quantity.
 4. glass%1:06:03:: - "a small refracting telescope" - synonyms: field glass, spyglass. Doesn't fit the context of liquor.
 5. glass%1:06:01:: - drug reference (methamphetamine). Doesn't fit.
 6. glass%1:06:02:: - "a mirror" - doesn't fit with liquor being swished in it.
 7. glass%1:06:04:: - "glassware collectively" - refers to a collection/category, not a specific item being held by someone.

 The best fit is sense 2: "a container for holding liquids while drinking" (drinking glass).

 The context describes someone swishing liquor in the bottom of "his glass" - this is clearly referring to a drinking vessel/container.

 So the answer should be: {"sense_index": 2}

provider: ModelRun


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: rout
Target surface form: rout
Context:
Tuesday's <t>rout</t> of a GOP congressional hopeful in a Mississippi district that hasn't backed a Democratic presidential candidate since Adlai Stevenson is another reminder that, at least at the federal level, political "ticket splitting "has been on the rise over the past half century. In only one presidential election year prior to 1948 did more than 20% of the nation's congressional districts choose a different party's candidate for the White House than for the House of Representatives.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=rout%1:14:00:: | definition=a disorderly crowd of people | synonyms=mob, rabble
2. sense_key=rout%1:11:00:: | definition=an overwhelming defeat

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation (WSD) for the target word "rout" in the given context.

 Context analysis:
 - "Tuesday's rout of a GOP congressional hopeful in a Mississippi district..."
 - This is describing an election result where a GOP (Republican) candidate lost to a Democrat in a district that usually votes Republican.
 - The context suggests a defeat or loss in an election.
 - "Overwhelming defeat" fits well with the political context of an election.
 - The other sense "disorderly crowd of people" doesn't fit here - we're not talking about a mob or rabble, but rather an electoral defeat.

 Candidate senses:
 1. rout%1:14:00:: - disorderly crowd (mob, rabble) - doesn't fit
 2. rout%1:11:00:: - overwhelming defeat - fits perfectly with the electoral context

 The context describes a political defeat where a GOP candidate lost badly ("hasn't backed a Democratic presidential candidate since Adlai Stevenson" implies this was an unusual/upset defeat).

 Therefore, sense 2 is the correct choice.

 I need to return only a JSON object: {"sense_index": 2}

provider: AtlasCloud


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: back
Target surface form: backed
Context:
Tuesday's rout of a GOP congressional hopeful in a Mississippi district that hasn't <t>backed</t> a Democratic presidential candidate since Adlai Stevenson is another reminder that, at least at the federal level, political "ticket splitting "has been on the rise over the past half century. In only one presidential election year prior to 1948 did more than 20% of the nation's congressional districts choose a different party's candidate for the White House than for the House of Representatives.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=back%2:41:00:: | definition=be behind; approve of | synonyms=endorse, indorse, plump for, plunk for, support | examples=He plumped for the Labor Party; I backed Kennedy in 1960
2. sense_key=back%2:38:00:: | definition=travel backward | examples=back into the driveway; The car backed up and hit the tree
3. sense_key=back%2:41:01:: | definition=give support or one's approval to | synonyms=second, endorse, indorse | examples=I'll second that motion; I can't back this plan
4. sense_key=back%2:38:01:: | definition=cause to travel backward | examples=back the car into the parking spot
5. sense_key=back%2:40:00:: | definition=support financial backing for | examples=back this enterprise
6. sense_key=back%2:42:00:: | definition=be in back of | examples=My garage backs their yard
7. sense_key=back%2:33:00:: | definition=place a bet on | synonyms=bet on, gage, stake, game, punt | examples=Which horse are you backing?; I'm betting on the new horse
8. sense_key=back%2:30:03:: | definition=shift to a counterclockwise direction | examples=the wind backed
9. sense_key=back%2:30:00:: | definition=establish as valid or genuine | synonyms=back up | examples=Can you back up your claims?
10. sense_key=back%2:30:01:: | definition=strengthen by providing with a back or backing

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "backed" in the given context.

 Context analysis:
 - "Tuesday's rout of a GOP congressional hopeful in a Mississippi district that hasn't <t>backed</t> a Democratic presidential candidate since Adlai Stevenson..."
 - The sentence is talking about a congressional district that hasn't supported/voted for a Democratic presidential candidate since Adlai Stevenson.
 - The context is political - about voting patterns and supporting candidates.

 Looking at the candidate senses:

 1. sense_key=back%2:41:00:: | definition=be behind; approve of | synonyms=endorse, indorse, plump for, plunk for, support | examples=He plumped for the Labor Party; I backed Kennedy in 1960
    - This looks very relevant. The example "I backed Kennedy in 1960" is almost exactly parallel to the context (backing a presidential candidate).
    - Definition: be behind; approve of
    - Synonyms include endorse, support

 2. sense_key=back%2:38:00:: | definition=travel backward
    - Not relevant. No physical movement backward.

 3. sense_key=back%2:41:01:: | definition=give support or one's approval to | synonyms=second, endorse, indorse | examples=I'll second that motion; I can't back this plan
    - This is also about support/approval, but the examples suggest more formal procedural support (seconding a motion) rather than electoral support.
    - However, both senses 1 and 3 are close.

 4. sense_key=back%2:38:01:: | definition=cause to travel backward
    - Not relevant.

 5. sense_key=back%2:40:00:: | definition=support financial backing for
    - Not about financial support, but electoral support.

 6. sense_key=back%2:42:00:: | definition=be in back of
    - Spatial relation, not relevant.

 7. sense_key=back%2:33:00:: | definition=place a bet on
    - Gambling context, not relevant.

 8. sense_key=back%2:30:03:: | definition=shift to a counterclockwise direction
    - Weather/wind context, not relevant.

 9. sense_key=back%2:30:00:: | definition=establish as valid or genuine
    - Not relevant.

 10. sense_key=back%2:30:01:: | definition=strengthen by providing with a back or backing
    - Physical backing, not relevant.

 Now comparing sense 1 and sense 3:
 - Sense 1: "be behind; approve of" - examples include "I backed Kennedy in 1960" which is directly about supporting a political candidate.
 - Sense 3: "give support or one's approval to" - examples include "I'll second that motion" which is more about formal procedural support.

 The context is about a district supporting/voting for a presidential candidate. The example in sense 1 ("I backed Kennedy in 1960") matches perfectly with "backed a Democratic presidential candidate".

 Therefore, sense 1 is the best choice.

 Wait, let me double-check the sense keys and indices. The user lists them as:
 1. sense_key=back%2:41:00::
 2. sense_key=back%2:38:00::
 3. sense_key=back%2:41:01::
 4. sense_key=back%2:38:01::
 5. sense_key=back%2:40:00::
 6. sense_key=back%2:42:00::
 7. sense_key=back%2:33:00::
 8. sense_key=back%2:30:03::
 9. sense_key=back%2:30:00::
 10. sense_key=back%2:30:01::

 So sense 1 is index 1.

 But let me verify if there's any subtle distinction between sense 1 and sense 3 that would make sense 3 better.

 Sense 1: "be behind; approve of" - this seems to be about general support or endorsement, particularly in political contexts (based on the Kennedy example).
 Sense 3: "give support or one's approval to" - this seems very similar, but the examples suggest it's about seconding motions or backing plans.

 Actually, looking at WordNet structure (though I should rely on what's given):
 - back%2:41:00:: is usually the sense "endorse, indorse, plump for, plunk for, support" - to support actively or vote for.
 - back%2:41:01:: is usually "second, endorse, indorse" - to give support or one's approval to.

 The distinction might be subtle, but the example "I backed Kennedy in 1960" in sense 1 makes it the clear winner for a context about backing a presidential candidate.

 Also, sense 1 includes "plump for" and "plunk for" which are voting-related idioms, while sense 3 includes "second" which is parliamentary procedure.

 Therefore, sense_index: 1 is the correct answer.

provider: Chutes


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: democratic
Target surface form: Democratic
Context:
Tuesday's rout of a GOP congressional hopeful in a Mississippi district that hasn't backed a <t>Democratic</t> presidential candidate since Adlai Stevenson is another reminder that, at least at the federal level, political "ticket splitting "has been on the rise over the past half century. In only one presidential election year prior to 1948 did more than 20% of the nation's congressional districts choose a different party's candidate for the White House than for the House of Representatives.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=democratic%3:00:00:: | definition=characterized by or advocating or based upon the principles of democracy or social equality; ; ; - George du Maurier | examples=democratic government; a democratic country
2. sense_key=democratic%3:01:00:: | definition=belong to or relating to the Democratic Party | examples=Democratic senator
3. sense_key=democratic%5:00:00:common:01 | definition=representing or appealing to or adapted for the benefit of the people at large | synonyms=popular | examples=democratic art forms; a democratic or popular movement

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "Democratic" in the given context.

Context analysis:
- "Tuesday's rout of a GOP congressional hopeful in a Mississippi district that hasn't backed a <t>Democratic</t> presidential candidate since Adlai Stevenson..."
- This is talking about a "Democratic presidential candidate" - specifically referring to the Democratic Party.
- The contrast is between GOP (Republican Party) and Democratic (Democratic Party).
- "hasn't backed a Democratic presidential candidate since Adlai Stevenson" - Adlai Stevenson was a Democratic Party presidential nominee.
- Later mentions: "different party's candidate for the White House than for the House of Representatives" - this confirms we're talking about political parties.

Candidate senses:
1. democratic%3:00:00:: - characterized by or advocating or based upon the principles of democracy or social equality (general political philosophy)
2. democratic%3:01:00:: - belong to or relating to the Democratic Party (specific US political party)
3. democratic%5:00:00:common:01 - representing or appealing to or adapted for the benefit of the people at large; popular

The context clearly refers to the Democratic Party (capitalized "Democratic" in "Democratic presidential candidate", contrasted with GOP, talking about ticket splitting between parties). This matches sense 2 exactly: "belong to or relating to the Democratic Party" with example "Democratic senator".

Sense 1 would be lowercase typically and refer to democratic principles in general.
Sense 3 refers to "popular" or "for the benefit of people at large" - doesn't fit the political party context.

Therefore, the best sense is index 2.

I need to return only a JSON object: {"sense_index": 2}

provider: SiliconFlow


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: presidential
Target surface form: presidential
Context:
Tuesday's rout of a GOP congressional hopeful in a Mississippi district that hasn't backed a Democratic <t>presidential</t> candidate since Adlai Stevenson is another reminder that, at least at the federal level, political "ticket splitting "has been on the rise over the past half century. In only one presidential election year prior to 1948 did more than 20% of the nation's congressional districts choose a different party's candidate for the White House than for the House of Representatives.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=presidential%3:01:00:: | definition=relating to a president or presidency | examples=presidential aides; presidential veto
2. sense_key=presidential%3:00:00:: | definition=befitting a president | examples=criticized the candidate for not looking presidential

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "presidential" in the given context.

 Context analysis:
 The sentence is: "Tuesday's rout of a GOP congressional hopeful in a Mississippi district that hasn't backed a Democratic <t>presidential</t> candidate since Adlai Stevenson is another reminder that, at least at the federal level, political 'ticket splitting' has been on the rise over the past half century."

 The phrase is "presidential candidate" - referring to a candidate for the office of president (specifically, the US presidency).

 Candidate senses:
 1. sense_key=presidential%3:01:00:: | definition=relating to a president or presidency | examples=presidential aides; presidential veto
 2. sense_key=presidential%3:00:00:: | definition=befitting a president | examples=criticized the candidate for not looking presidential

 Analysis:
 - Sense 1: "relating to a president or presidency" - This describes things associated with the office of president. "Presidential candidate" fits here because it refers to a candidate for the presidency (relating to the presidency).
 - Sense 2: "befitting a president" - This describes demeanor, appearance, or behavior that is appropriate for a president (e.g., "looking presidential", "acting presidential").

 In the context "Democratic presidential candidate", we are talking about a candidate running for the office of president. This is about the relationship to the presidency/office, not about whether the candidate looks or acts presidential.

 Therefore, sense 1 is the correct choice: "relating to a president or presidency".

 The examples for sense 1 include "presidential aides" and "presidential veto" - both relate to the office/institution of the presidency. "Presidential candidate" similarly relates to the office being sought.

 The examples for sense 2 is about appearance/demeanor ("not looking presidential"), which doesn't match our context.

 So the answer should be sense_index: 1.

 Wait, I need to check the format. The user wants:
 {"sense_index": 3}

 But the senses are numbered 1 and 2 in the candidate list. So I should return {"sense_index": 1}.

 Let me double-check:
 - "presidential candidate" = candidate for president = relating to the presidency (sense 1)
 - "looking presidential" = looking like/befitting a president (sense 2)

 Yes, definitely sense 1.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: candidate
Target surface form: candidate
Context:
Tuesday's rout of a GOP congressional hopeful in a Mississippi district that hasn't backed a Democratic presidential <t>candidate</t> since Adlai Stevenson is another reminder that, at least at the federal level, political "ticket splitting "has been on the rise over the past half century. In only one presidential election year prior to 1948 did more than 20% of the nation's congressional districts choose a different party's candidate for the White House than for the House of Representatives.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=candidate%1:18:01:: | definition=a politician who is running for public office | synonyms=campaigner, nominee
2. sense_key=candidate%1:18:00:: | definition=someone who is considered for something (for an office or prize or honor etc.) | synonyms=prospect

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "candidate" in the given context.

Context analysis:
- "Tuesday's rout of a GOP congressional hopeful in a Mississippi district that hasn't backed a Democratic presidential <t>candidate</t> since Adlai Stevenson..."
- This refers to a presidential candidate - someone running for public office (President).
- "In only one presidential election year prior to 1948 did more than 20% of the nation's congressional districts choose a different party's candidate for the White House than for the House of Representatives."
- Here it refers to candidates for the White House (President) and House of Representatives.

Sense 1: "a politician who is running for public office" | synonyms=campaigner, nominee
Sense 2: "someone who is considered for something (for an office or prize or honor etc.)" | synonyms=prospect

The context is clearly about political elections - presidential candidates and candidates for the House of Representatives. These are politicians running for public office.

Sense 1 fits best because:
1. The context is explicitly political - "Democratic presidential candidate", "candidate for the White House", "candidate for the House of Representatives"
2. These are people actively running for public office, not just being considered for something
3. Synonyms like "campaigner" and "nominee" fit the political election context better than "prospect"

Sense 2 is more general - could be a candidate for a job, award, etc. While technically a presidential candidate is "considered for office," the specific political context of running for public office makes Sense 1 the better fit.

The instructions say:
- Choose single best indexed sense
- Do not answer with WordNet sense key
- Return only JSON object like {"sense_index": 3}

Wait, the senses are numbered 1 and 2 in the prompt. So the index should be 1 or 2.

Sense 1 is candidate%1:18:01::
Sense 2 is candidate%1:18:00::

The best sense is 1.

I need to return exactly: {"sense_index": 1}


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: reminder
Target surface form: reminder
Context:
Tuesday's rout of a GOP congressional hopeful in a Mississippi district that hasn't backed a Democratic presidential candidate since Adlai Stevenson is another <t>reminder</t> that, at least at the federal level, political "ticket splitting "has been on the rise over the past half century. In only one presidential election year prior to 1948 did more than 20% of the nation's congressional districts choose a different party's candidate for the White House than for the House of Representatives.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=reminder%1:10:00:: | definition=a message that helps you remember something | examples=he ignored his wife's reminders
2. sense_key=reminder%1:09:00:: | definition=an experience that causes you to remember something
3. sense_key=reminder%1:18:00:: | definition=someone who gives a warning so that a mistake can be avoided | synonyms=admonisher, monitor

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation (WSD) on the word "reminder" in the given context.

Let me analyze the context:
"Tuesday's rout of a GOP congressional hopeful in a Mississippi district that hasn't backed a Democratic presidential candidate since Adlai Stevenson is another <t>reminder</t> that, at least at the federal level, political 'ticket splitting' has been on the rise over the past half century."

The sentence is saying that this political event (the rout/election result) serves as a reminder of the fact that ticket splitting has been increasing.

Now let's look at the candidate senses:

1. sense_key=reminder%1:10:00:: | definition=a message that helps you remember something | examples=he ignored his wife's reminders
   - This seems to be about a physical message or communication (like a note, email, etc.)
   - The example "he ignored his wife's reminders" suggests verbal or written reminders
   - In our context, it's not a message being sent, but an event/circumstance

2. sense_key=reminder%1:09:00:: | definition=an experience that causes you to remember something
   - This is about an experience or event that triggers memory
   - The political event (the rout) is an experience/occurrence that causes people to remember/recognize the trend of ticket splitting
   - This fits well: the election result is an experience/event that reminds people of the historical trend

3. sense_key=reminder%1:18:00:: | definition=someone who gives a warning so that a mistake can be avoided | synonyms=admonisher, monitor
   - This refers to a person who reminds others
   - The context is about an event (the rout), not a person
   - So this doesn't fit

Between sense 1 and sense 2:
- Sense 1 is about a message (communication artifact)
- Sense 2 is about an experience (event/occurrence)

The context describes "Tuesday's rout" (an election result/event) serving as a reminder. This is clearly an experience/event, not a message in the sense of a communication sent to someone.

Therefore, sense 2 (reminder%1:09:00::) is the best fit.

Wait, let me double-check the WordNet hierarchy:
- 1:10 usually refers to communication/artifact
- 1:09 usually refers to cognition/psychological feature
- 1:18 usually refers to person

Actually, looking at standard WordNet lexicographer file names:
- noun.communication (10)
- noun.cognition (09)
- noun.person (18)

So:
- Sense 1: a message (communication)
- Sense 2: an experience (cognition/psychological)
- Sense 3: someone who gives warning (person)

The context: "Tuesday's rout... is another reminder that..."
This is using an event (the rout) as something that brings to mind/reminds of a fact. This is clearly sense 2 - an experience that causes you to remember something.

The answer should be {"sense_index": 2}.

provider: StreamLake


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: federal
Target surface form: federal
Context:
Tuesday's rout of a GOP congressional hopeful in a Mississippi district that hasn't backed a Democratic presidential candidate since Adlai Stevenson is another reminder that, at least at the <t>federal</t> level, political "ticket splitting "has been on the rise over the past half century. In only one presidential election year prior to 1948 did more than 20% of the nation's congressional districts choose a different party's candidate for the White House than for the House of Representatives.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=federal%5:00:00:national:01 | definition=national; especially in reference to the government of the United States as distinct from that of its member units | examples=the Federal Bureau of Investigation; federal courts
2. sense_key=federal%3:01:02:: | definition=of or relating to the central government of a federation | examples=a federal district is one set aside as the seat of the national government
3. sense_key=federal%5:00:00:northern:02 | definition=being of or having to do with the northern United States and those loyal to the Union during the American Civil War | synonyms=Union | examples=Union soldiers; Federal forces
4. sense_key=federal%3:00:00:: | definition=characterized by or constituting a form of government in which power is divided between one central and several regional authorities | examples=a federal system like that of the United States; federal governments often evolved out of confederations

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation (WSD) for the word "federal" in the given context.

 Let me analyze the context:
 - The sentence talks about "federal level" in contrast to other levels (implied state/local)
 - It mentions "GOP congressional hopeful", "Mississippi district", "Democratic presidential candidate"
 - It discusses "ticket splitting" between presidential elections and House of Representatives elections
 - The phrase "at least at the federal level" suggests the national government level as opposed to state/local levels

 Now let's look at the candidate senses:

 1. sense_key=federal%5:00:00:national:01
    - Definition: national; especially in reference to the government of the United States as distinct from that of its member units
    - Examples: the Federal Bureau of Investigation; federal courts
    - This seems to fit well. The context is talking about the federal (national) level vs. state/local levels or districts.

 2. sense_key=federal%3:01:02::
    - Definition: of or relating to the central government of a federation
    - Examples: a federal district is one set aside as the seat of the national government
    - This is similar to sense 1 but more general (any federation, not specifically US). However, the context specifically mentions US political entities (GOP, Mississippi, Democratic presidential candidate, House of Representatives).

 3. sense_key=federal%5:00:00:northern:02
    - Definition: being of or having to do with the northern United States and those loyal to the Union during the American Civil War
    - Synonyms: Union
    - Examples: Union soldiers; Federal forces
    - This is clearly wrong for the context. The text is not talking about the Civil War era.

 4. sense_key=federal%3:00:00::
    - Definition: characterized by or constituting a form of government in which power is divided between one central and several regional authorities
    - Examples: a federal system like that of the United States; federal governments often evolved out of confederations
    - This describes the system of government itself (the federal structure), not the level of government. The context says "at the federal level", which refers to the national government level, not the abstract concept of federalism.

 Comparing sense 1 and sense 2:
 - Sense 1 is marked as "national; especially in reference to the government of the United States" - this fits perfectly because the context is clearly about US politics (Mississippi, GOP, Democratic, House of Representatives).
 - Sense 2 is more general "of or relating to the central government of a federation" - could apply to any federal system.
 - However, looking at the sense keys and WordNet structure:
   - Sense 1: federal%5:00:00:national:01 - this is an adjective satellite (5) meaning national
   - Sense 2: federal%3:01:02:: - this is an adjective (3) relating to central government
   - Sense 4: federal%3:00:00:: - this is the adjective pertaining to the system of federalism

 Actually, looking more carefully at the context: "at the federal level" - this is referring to the national level of government as distinct from state/local levels.

 Sense 1 ("national; especially in reference to the government of the United States as distinct from that of its member units") seems to be the best fit because:
 1. It specifically mentions "United States" and "distinct from its member units" (states)
 2. The context contrasts federal level with districts/states (Mississippi district)
 3. It deals with US politics specifically

 Sense 2 is broader and applies to any federation.

 Sense 4 is about the form/structure of government (federal vs unitary), not specifically the level.

 Wait, I need to look at the exact wording again. The phrase "at the federal level" typically means at the national government level.

 Sense 1 examples: "the Federal Bureau of Investigation; federal courts" - these are national-level institutions.
 Sense 2 examples: "a federal district is one set aside as the seat of the national government" - also national level.

 But Sense 1 explicitly mentions "United States" and "distinct from that of its member units", which matches the context perfectly where they're discussing US districts vs federal elections.

 Actually, looking at typical WordNet sense distinctions:
 - Sense 4 (3:00:00) is the "relational" adjective for federalism/system
 - Sense 2 (3:01:02) is "of or relating to the central government of a federation"
 - Sense 1 (5:00:00:national:01) is "national; especially... United States"

 In the phrase "at the federal level", "federal" is functioning as an attributive adjective modifying "level", meaning the national level.

 Sense 1 seems best because:
 1. The context is specifically about the US (Mississippi, GOP, Democratic parties are US-specific)
 2. It contrasts the federal level with local districts
 3. "National; especially in reference to the government of the United States as distinct from that of its member units" - this captures the distinction between federal US government and state governments (member units)

 Sense 2 is also plausible but more generic. However, given the US-specific context, Sense 1 is better.

 Wait, I should check if there's any subtle difference. Sense 1 is marked as 5:00:00 which means it's an adjective satellite (similar to 'national'). Sense 2 is 3:01:02 which is a relational adjective.

 Actually, looking at the examples for sense 2: "a federal district is one set aside as the seat of the national government" - this is defining what makes something "federal" in the context of a federation.

 But in the sentence "at the federal level", we're talking about the level of the federal government, i.e., the national level.

 I think Sense 1 is the correct choice.

 Let me double-check Sense 4: "characterized by or constituting a form of government in which power is divided..." - this would be used in phrases like "federal system", "federal government" (describing the type), but "federal level" refers to the level at which the national government operates.

 Sense 1: "federal courts" - courts of the national government
 Sense 1: "the Federal Bureau of Investigation" - national agency

 Yes, "at the federal level" = at the national level (US government level). This is Sense 1.

 Final check: The text mentions "ticket splitting" between presidential and House elections, both of which are federal elections (as opposed to state or local). This confirms it's about the national/federal level of US government.

 Answer: {"sense_index": 1}

provider: DigitalOcean


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: level
Target surface form: level
Context:
Tuesday's rout of a GOP congressional hopeful in a Mississippi district that hasn't backed a Democratic presidential candidate since Adlai Stevenson is another reminder that, at least at the federal <t>level</t>, political "ticket splitting "has been on the rise over the past half century. In only one presidential election year prior to 1948 did more than 20% of the nation's congressional districts choose a different party's candidate for the White House than for the House of Representatives.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=level%1:07:00:: | definition=a position on a scale of intensity or amount or quality | synonyms=degree, grade | examples=a moderate grade of intelligence; a high level of care is required
2. sense_key=level%1:26:01:: | definition=a relative position or degree of value in a graded group | synonyms=grade, tier | examples=lumber of the highest grade
3. sense_key=level%1:26:00:: | definition=a specific identifiable position in a continuum or series or especially in a process | synonyms=degree, stage, point | examples=a remarkable degree of frankness; at what stage are the social sciences?
4. sense_key=level%1:07:01:: | definition=height above ground | examples=the water reached ankle level; the pictures were at the same level
5. sense_key=level%1:06:00:: | definition=indicator that establishes the horizontal when a bubble is centered in a tube of liquid | synonyms=spirit level
6. sense_key=level%1:06:03:: | definition=a flat surface at right angles to a plumb line | synonyms=horizontal surface | examples=park the car on the level
7. sense_key=level%1:09:00:: | definition=an abstract place usually conceived as having depth | synonyms=layer, stratum | examples=a good actor communicates on several levels; a simile has at least two layers of meaning
8. sense_key=level%1:06:01:: | definition=a structure consisting of a room or set of rooms at a single position along a vertical scale | synonyms=floor, storey, story | examples=what level is the office on?

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "level" in the given context.

 Context analysis:
 "Tuesday's rout of a GOP congressional hopeful in a Mississippi district that hasn't backed a Democratic presidential candidate since Adlai Stevenson is another reminder that, at least at the federal <t>level</t>, political 'ticket splitting' has been on the rise over the past half century."

 The phrase "federal level" refers to the federal tier or stratum of government. It's talking about the position within a hierarchy or system of government (federal vs state vs local).

 Looking at the candidate senses:

 1. sense_key=level%1:07:00:: - position on a scale of intensity/amount/quality (degree, grade). Examples: "moderate grade of intelligence", "high level of care". This seems to be about measurements or degrees of quality/intensity.

 2. sense_key=level%1:26:01:: - relative position or degree of value in a graded group (grade, tier). Examples: "lumber of the highest grade". This is about ranking within a graded group.

 3. sense_key=level%1:26:00:: - specific identifiable position in a continuum or series or process (degree, stage, point). Examples: "at what stage are the social sciences?" This is about steps in a process or continuum.

 4. sense_key=level%1:07:01:: - height above ground. Physical height.

 5. sense_key=level%1:06:00:: - spirit level (tool).

 6. sense_key=level%1:06:03:: - flat surface at right angles to plumb line (horizontal surface).

 7. sense_key=level%1:09:00:: - abstract place usually conceived as having depth (layer, stratum). Examples: "a good actor communicates on several levels", "a simile has at least two layers of meaning". This refers to layers or strata of meaning, organization, or structure.

 8. sense_key=level%1:06:01:: - floor/story of a building.

 Now, "federal level" - this is referring to the tier or stratum of government. It's an abstract classification of governmental organization.

 Sense 7 seems closest: "an abstract place usually conceived as having depth" with synonyms "layer, stratum". The example "a good actor communicates on several levels" suggests different layers or strata of communication/analysis. Similarly, "federal level" refers to the federal stratum or layer of government.

 However, sense 1 is also possible: "a position on a scale of intensity or amount or quality". But "federal" isn't really a position on a scale of intensity. It's a category or tier.

 Sense 2: "a relative position or degree of value in a graded group". This could work - federal is a position in the graded group of government levels (local, state, federal).

 Sense 3: "a specific identifiable position in a continuum or series". This could also work - federal is a stage in the hierarchy.

 But sense 7 with "layer, stratum" seems most appropriate for "federal level" when talking about tiers of government. The phrase "at the federal level" means at the federal stratum or layer.

 Let me reconsider sense 1 vs sense 7.

 Sense 1: "a position on a scale of intensity or amount or quality" - this is about degrees/extent. "High level of care", "moderate grade of intelligence". This is quantitative.

 Sense 7: "an abstract place usually conceived as having depth" - this is about layers/strata. "Communicates on several levels" means different layers of meaning or understanding.

 "Federal level" is definitely about layers/tiers of government structure, not about intensity or amount.

 Between sense 2 (grade, tier) and sense 7 (layer, stratum):

 Sense 2: "a relative position or degree of value in a graded group" - this is about ranking/grading. Lumber grades, military ranks, etc.

 Sense 7: "an abstract place usually conceived as having depth" - this is about layers or strata in an abstract sense.

 "Federal level" is often synonymous with "federal tier" or "federal stratum".

 Actually, looking at WordNet conventions, sense 1 (level%1:07:00::) is the most common sense for "level" when used in phrases like "at the national level", "at the local level". But let me check the definitions carefully.

 Wait, looking at the examples for sense 7: "a good actor communicates on several levels" - this is metaphorical layers. "a simile has at least two layers of meaning" - also metaphorical.

 For sense 1: "a high level of care" - this is degree/amount.

 For sense 2: "lumber of the highest grade" - this is ranking within a group.

 For sense 3: "at what stage" - this is temporal or procedural steps.

 In the context "federal level", this is referring to the tier or layer of government. It's an administrative or jurisdictional stratum.

 I think sense 7 (layer, stratum) or sense 2 (grade, tier) could both work, but sense 7 seems more abstract and appropriate for "federal level" as a layer of governance.

 However, looking at standard WSD for "level", phrases like "at the national level" or "at the federal level" often map to sense 1 or sense 7 depending on the specific WordNet version. But given these specific glosses:

 Sense 7: "an abstract place usually conceived as having depth" - "federal level" is an abstract place/stratum of government.

 Sense 2: "a relative position or degree of value in a graded group" - this emphasizes "value" or grading, which doesn't fit as well. Government levels aren't necessarily about value grading.

 Sense 1 is about scales of intensity/amount.

 So sense 7 seems best.

 But wait, looking at sense 1 again: "a position on a scale of intensity or amount or quality". Is "federal" a position on a scale? Not really a scale of intensity.

 Looking at sense 3: "a specific identifiable position in a continuum or series". Government levels (local, state, federal) form a continuum or series. This could work.

 However, the phrase "at the federal level" is very commonly used to mean "in the federal tier/stratum".

 In WordNet 3.0/3.1, the sense for "level" meaning "layer, stratum" is indeed sense 7 here (level%1:09:00::). The sense key ending in 00:: for noun.09 usually indicates the first sense in that lexicographer file (noun.cognition or noun.group? 1:09 is noun.group I think, or noun.cognition? Actually 1:09 is noun.group? No, WordNet lexicographer file numbers: 03 = noun.animal, 05 = noun.artifact, 06 = noun.attribute, 07 = noun.body, 09 = noun.cognition? Let me check... actually 1:09 is noun.communication? No, the second number is the lexicographer file number. 09 is noun.communication? No, I think 09 is noun.cognition. Wait, standard WordNet lexicographer files:
 00 = adj.all
 01 = adj.pert
 02 = adv.all
 03 = noun.Tops (unique beginners)
 04 = noun.act
 05 = noun.animal
 06 = noun.artifact
 07 = noun.attribute
 08 = noun.body
 09 = noun.cognition
 10 = noun.communication
 11 = noun.competition
 etc.

 So level%1:09:00:: is noun.cognition - "an abstract place usually conceived as having depth". This fits "federal level" as an abstract conceptual layer.

 level%1:26:00:: would be noun.event? No, 26 is noun.state? Actually, the file numbers go higher. Let me recall:
 15 = noun.location
 17 = noun.object
 18 = noun.person
 19 = noun.phenomenon
 20 = noun.plant
 23 = noun.shape
 24 = noun.state
 25 = noun.substance
 26 = noun.time? No...

 Actually, looking at the sense keys provided:
 - level%1:07:00:: (noun.attribute)
 - level%1:26:01:: (what is 26? noun.time? No, I think 26 might be noun.state or something else)
 - level%1:26:00::
 - level%1:07:01::
 - level%1:06:00:: (noun.artifact)
 - level%1:06:03:: (noun.artifact)
 - level%1:09:00:: (noun.cognition)
 - level%1:06:01:: (noun.artifact)

 Actually, looking at standard WordNet 3.0:
 - level%1:06:00:: = spirit level (tool)
 - level%1:06:01:: = floor/story
 - level%1:06:02:: = horizontal surface (but here it's 03)
 - level%1:07:00:: = degree/grade (position on scale)
 - level%1:07:01:: = height
 - level%1:09:00:: = layer/stratum (abstract)
 - level%1:26:00:: = stage/point (in process) - this is likely noun.state or noun.time? Actually 26 is noun.time.
 - level%1:26:01:: = grade/tier (relative position) - this might be noun.state or noun.rank?

 Wait, tier is usually noun.group or noun.state?

 Let me think about the context again. "at the federal level" - this means regarding the federal government, in the federal domain, at the federal tier.

 In many WSD datasets, "at the ... level" phrases often map to sense 1 (degree, extent) or sense 7 (layer). But given that "federal" refers to a specific governmental stratum, and the text discusses "ticket splitting" at different scopes (federal vs presumably state/local), sense 7 (layer, stratum) seems most appropriate.

 However, sense 2 (grade, tier) with synonyms "grade, tier" also fits well. "Federal tier" makes sense.

 But sense 2's definition mentions "degree of value", which is not relevant here. Government levels don't have a value ranking necessarily.

 Sense 7's definition mentions "abstract place usually conceived as having depth". This fits well with the metaphor of levels of government having "depth" or being layers.

 Also, the example for sense 7: "a good actor communicates on several levels" is parallel to "at the federal level" - both refer to domains or layers of activity/analysis.

 Therefore, I choose sense 7 (index 7).

 Wait, I need to check the indexing. The user lists:
 1. sense_key=...
 2. sense_key=...
 3. sense_key=...
 4. sense_key=...
 5. sense_key=...
 6. sense_key=...
 7. sense_key=...
 8. sense_key=...

 So sense 7 is the one with sense_key=level%1:09:00::.

 Let me double-check if sense 1 could be correct. "At the federal level" could mean "to the federal degree" or "in terms of federal scope"? But "level" in sense 1 is about intensity/amount/quality. "Federal" is not an intensity.

 Sense 3: "position in a continuum or series". Government levels are a series (local, state, federal). But "federal level" emphasizes the stratum/layer, not the sequential position in a process.

 I think 7 is the best choice.

 Actually, looking at common WSD practice, "at the national level" is often tagged as sense 1 in some annotations, but looking at these specific glosses, sense 1 is clearly about magnitude/intensity ("moderate grade of intelligence", "high level of care"). "Federal" is not a magnitude.

 So I'll go with 7.

provider: Novita


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: political
Target surface form: political
Context:
Tuesday's rout of a GOP congressional hopeful in a Mississippi district that hasn't backed a Democratic presidential candidate since Adlai Stevenson is another reminder that, at least at the federal level, <t>political</t> "ticket splitting "has been on the rise over the past half century. In only one presidential election year prior to 1948 did more than 20% of the nation's congressional districts choose a different party's candidate for the White House than for the House of Representatives.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=political%3:00:00:: | definition=involving or characteristic of politics or parties or politicians; - Daniel Goleman | examples=calling a meeting is a political act in itself; political pressure
2. sense_key=political%3:01:01:: | definition=of or relating to your views about social relationships involving authority or power | examples=political opinions
3. sense_key=political%3:01:02:: | definition=of or relating to the profession of governing | examples=political career

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "political" in the given context.

 Context analysis:
 The sentence is about "political 'ticket splitting'" - referring to voters choosing candidates from different parties for different offices (e.g., voting for a Democratic president but Republican congressperson, or vice versa).

 The phrase "political ticket splitting" refers to a phenomenon in electoral politics where voters split their tickets between different parties.

 Let's look at the candidate senses:

 1. sense_key=political%3:00:00:: | definition=involving or characteristic of politics or parties or politicians; examples=calling a meeting is a political act in itself; political pressure
    - This seems to be the general adjective meaning "relating to politics"
    - "political ticket splitting" would involve politics/parties

 2. sense_key=political%3:01:01:: | definition=of or relating to your views about social relationships involving authority or power | examples=political opinions
    - This seems more about personal political views/opinions regarding authority/power structures
    - "political opinions" is the example

 3. sense_key=political%3:01:02:: | definition=of or relating to the profession of governing | examples=political career
    - This is about the profession/career of governing
    - "political career" is the example

 Analysis:
 "Ticket splitting" is an electoral behavior phenomenon. The phrase "political ticket splitting" means ticket splitting that occurs in the political realm - i.e., involving political parties and elections.

 Sense 1 is the broad sense covering "involving or characteristic of politics or parties or politicians." This fits best because:
 - Ticket splitting involves political parties (GOP, Democratic)
 - It's characteristic of politics/electoral behavior
 - It's not specifically about personal views on authority (sense 2)
 - It's not specifically about the profession of governing as a career (sense 3)

 Sense 1 is the general relational adjective meaning "pertaining to politics."

 The context discusses:
 - GOP congressional hopeful
 - Democratic presidential candidate
 - Federal level
 - Congressional districts
 - Presidential election
 - Different party's candidate

 This is clearly about political parties and the political system.

 Sense 1 examples include "political pressure" - which is similar to "political ticket splitting" in that both describe phenomena in the political sphere.

 Sense 2 focuses on views about social relationships involving authority - this is more ideological/personal belief oriented.

 Sense 3 focuses on the profession of governing - this would be like "political science" or "political career" or someone being a "political animal" in the sense of working in politics professionally.

 "Ticket splitting" is a behavior of voters in elections involving parties, so Sense 1 is the best fit.

 Wait, let me double-check the WordNet sense distinctions. In WordNet:
 - political%3:00:00:: is usually the general "pertaining to politics" sense
 - political%3:01:01:: might be more specific to political theory/ideology?
 - political%3:01:02:: is about the profession

 Actually, looking at standard WordNet 3.0 or 3.1:
 - political, politic (adj) - involving or characteristic of politics or parties or politicians; "calling a meeting is a political act in itself"; "political pressure"; "a political machine"; "political office"; "political policy"
 - political (adj) - of or relating to your views about social relationships involving authority or power; "political opinions"
 - political (adj) - of or relating to the profession of governing; "political career"

 The context is about "ticket splitting" which is an electoral phenomenon involving political parties. This is clearly covered by sense 1: "involving or characteristic of politics or parties or politicians."

 Sense 2 would be if it were "political views" or "political ideology" regarding authority.
 Sense 3 would be if it were about someone having a "political career" as a politician.

 Therefore, sense 1 is correct.

 The answer should be: {"sense_index": 1}


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: past
Target surface form: past
Context:
Tuesday's rout of a GOP congressional hopeful in a Mississippi district that hasn't backed a Democratic presidential candidate since Adlai Stevenson is another reminder that, at least at the federal level, political "ticket splitting "has been on the rise over the <t>past</t> half century. In only one presidential election year prior to 1948 did more than 20% of the nation's congressional districts choose a different party's candidate for the White House than for the House of Representatives.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=past%3:00:00:: | definition=earlier than the present time; no longer current | examples=time past; his youth is past
2. sense_key=past%5:00:00:outgoing:00 | definition=of a person who has held and relinquished a position or office | synonyms=preceding, retiring | examples=a retiring member of the board

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "past" in the given context.

Context analysis:
- The sentence is: "Tuesday's rout... is another reminder that... political 'ticket splitting' has been on the rise over the past half century."
- The phrase is "the past half century"
- This refers to the previous 50 years, earlier than the present time, no longer current (in the sense of being completed/behind us)

Candidate senses:
1. past%3:00:00:: - definition: earlier than the present time; no longer current; examples: "time past", "his youth is past"
2. past%5:00:00:outgoing:00 - definition: of a person who has held and relinquished a position or office; synonyms: preceding, retiring; examples: "a retiring member of the board"

Analysis:
- Sense 1 fits perfectly: "the past half century" means the previous 50 years, which is earlier than the present time.
- Sense 2 is about people who have held office and left (outgoing/retiring), which doesn't apply to time periods like "half century".

The target word "past" is modifying "half century" to indicate a time period that has elapsed or is behind us in time.

Therefore, sense 1 is the correct choice.

The user wants the output as: {"sense_index": 1}


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: presidential
Target surface form: presidential
Context:
Tuesday's rout of a GOP congressional hopeful in a Mississippi district that hasn't backed a Democratic presidential candidate since Adlai Stevenson is another reminder that, at least at the federal level, political "ticket splitting "has been on the rise over the past half century. In only one <t>presidential</t> election year prior to 1948 did more than 20% of the nation's congressional districts choose a different party's candidate for the White House than for the House of Representatives. Now that percentage routinely equals a third and twice has been above 40%.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=presidential%3:01:00:: | definition=relating to a president or presidency | examples=presidential aides; presidential veto
2. sense_key=presidential%3:00:00:: | definition=befitting a president | examples=criticized the candidate for not looking presidential

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "presidential" in the given context.

Let me analyze the context:
- The sentence is about "presidential election year"
- It's discussing how congressional districts choose candidates for the White House (presidential elections) vs House of Representatives
- The phrase is "presidential election year" - referring to elections for president

Now let's look at the candidate senses:

1. sense_key=presidential%3:01:00:: | definition=relating to a president or presidency | examples=presidential aides; presidential veto
   - This sense refers to things related to the office of president, the presidency as an institution, or things belonging to/associated with a president.
   - Examples: "presidential aides" (aides of the president), "presidential veto" (veto by the president)
   - "Presidential election" would fit here - an election for president, relating to the presidency

2. sense_key=presidential%3:00:00:: | definition=befitting a president | examples=criticized the candidate for not looking presidential
   - This sense refers to demeanor, appearance, or behavior that is appropriate for a president.
   - Examples: "looking presidential" (appearing dignified/appropriate for the office)
   - This is about the quality/characteristics of being presidential in manner or appearance.

In the context: "presidential election year"
- This refers to an election year for the office of president
- It's about the election relating to the presidency/president
- It's not about looking/acting "presidential" (befitting a president)

Therefore, sense 1 is the correct choice: "relating to a president or presidency"

The phrase "presidential election" clearly means an election for president - relating to the president/presidency, not an election that looks dignified or befitting a president.

So the answer should be: {"sense_index": 1}


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: election
Target surface form: election
Context:
Tuesday's rout of a GOP congressional hopeful in a Mississippi district that hasn't backed a Democratic presidential candidate since Adlai Stevenson is another reminder that, at least at the federal level, political "ticket splitting "has been on the rise over the past half century. In only one presidential <t>election</t> year prior to 1948 did more than 20% of the nation's congressional districts choose a different party's candidate for the White House than for the House of Representatives. Now that percentage routinely equals a third and twice has been above 40%.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=election%1:04:01:: | definition=a vote to select the winner of a position or political office | examples=the results of the election will be announced tonight
2. sense_key=election%1:04:00:: | definition=the act of selecting someone or something; the exercise of deliberate choice | examples=her election of medicine as a profession
3. sense_key=election%1:26:00:: | definition=the status or fact of being elected | examples=they celebrated his election
4. sense_key=election%1:09:00:: | definition=the predestination of some individuals as objects of divine mercy (especially as conceived by Calvinists)

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation on the word "election" in the given context. Let me analyze the context and the candidate senses.

Context analysis:
- The text is discussing political elections, specifically presidential election years.
- It mentions "presidential <t>election</t> year" - this refers to the event or process of voting to select a president.
- It mentions "congressional districts choose a different party's candidate" - again referring to voting/selection.
- It's discussing historical voting patterns and ticket splitting.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=election%1:04:01:: | definition=a vote to select the winner of a position or political office | examples=the results of the election will be announced tonight
2. sense_key=election%1:04:00:: | definition=the act of selecting someone or something; the exercise of deliberate choice | examples=her election of medicine as a profession
3. sense_key=election%1:26:00:: | definition=the status or fact of being elected | examples=they celebrated his election
4. sense_key=election%1:09:00:: | definition=the predestination of some individuals as objects of divine mercy (especially as conceived by Calvinists)

Analysis:
- Sense 1 fits perfectly: "a vote to select the winner of a position or political office" - specifically referring to a presidential election year, which is an event where voting occurs to select political office holders.
- Sense 2 is more general "act of selecting" - the example shows "election of medicine as a profession" which is a personal choice, not a political voting event.
- Sense 3 refers to the status of being elected (e.g., celebrating one's election to office), not the event itself.
- Sense 4 is theological/religious, clearly not applicable.

The phrase "presidential election year" clearly refers to the voting event to select the president (political office), which matches Sense 1.

I should choose index 1.

Wait, let me double-check the indexing. The user said "Candidate senses" and listed them as 1, 2, 3, 4. So "sense_index" should be the number in that list.

Sense 1: election%1:04:01:: - the vote/event to select winner of political office
Sense 2: election%1:04:00:: - general act of selecting
Sense 3: election%1:26:00:: - status of being elected
Sense 4: election%1:09:00:: - theological predestination

Yes, sense 1 is correct.

The context is clearly about political elections, specifically presidential elections (voting years). The example for sense 1 ("the results of the election will be announced tonight") also fits political contexts.

So the answer should be {"sense_index": 1}.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: year
Target surface form: year
Context:
Tuesday's rout of a GOP congressional hopeful in a Mississippi district that hasn't backed a Democratic presidential candidate since Adlai Stevenson is another reminder that, at least at the federal level, political "ticket splitting "has been on the rise over the past half century. In only one presidential election <t>year</t> prior to 1948 did more than 20% of the nation's congressional districts choose a different party's candidate for the White House than for the House of Representatives. Now that percentage routinely equals a third and twice has been above 40%.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=year%1:28:01:: | definition=a period of time containing 365 (or 366) days | synonyms=twelvemonth, yr | examples=she is 4 years old; in the year 1920
2. sense_key=year%1:28:02:: | definition=a period of time occupying a regular part of a calendar year that is used for some particular activity | examples=a school year
3. sense_key=year%1:28:00:: | definition=the period of time that it takes for a planet (as, e.g., Earth or Mars) to make a complete revolution around the sun | examples=a Martian year takes 687 of our days
4. sense_key=year%1:14:00:: | definition=a body of students who graduate together | synonyms=class | examples=the class of '97; she was in my year at Hoehandle High

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "year" in the given context.

 Context analysis:
 The sentence is: "In only one presidential election <t>year</t> prior to 1948 did more than 20% of the nation's congressional districts choose a different party's candidate for the White House than for the House of Representatives."

 The context is about presidential elections and the years in which they occur. The phrase "presidential election year" refers to a specific calendar year (like 1948, or other years) when a presidential election takes place.

 Looking at the candidate senses:

 1. sense_key=year%1:28:01:: | definition=a period of time containing 365 (or 366) days | synonyms=twelvemonth, yr | examples=she is 4 years old; in the year 1920
    - This is the general sense of a calendar year (365/366 days).
    - The example "in the year 1920" fits well with "presidential election year" referring to a specific calendar year.
    - "Presidential election year" typically means the calendar year in which the presidential election occurs (e.g., 2020, 2016, etc.).

 2. sense_key=year%1:28:02:: | definition=a period of time occupying a regular part of a calendar year that is used for some particular activity | examples=a school year
    - This refers to specific activity-based years like school year, fiscal year, etc.
    - While "election year" could be construed this way, it typically refers to the calendar year, not an arbitrary 12-month period designated for elections.

 3. sense_key=year%1:28:00:: | definition=the period of time that it takes for a planet (as, e.g., Earth or Mars) to make a complete revolution around the sun | examples=a Martian year takes 687 of our days
    - This is the astronomical sense (orbital period).
    - Not relevant here, as we're talking about presidential elections in specific calendar years.

 4. sense_key=year%1:14:00:: | definition=a body of students who graduate together | synonyms=class | examples=the class of '97; she was in my year at Hoehandle High
    - This is the "class" sense (e.g., "she was in my year at school").
    - Not relevant to presidential elections.

 The context is clearly referring to calendar years (like 1948) when presidential elections occur. The phrase "presidential election year" refers to the calendar year in which the election is held.

 Sense 1 (year%1:28:01::) is the best fit because:
 - It refers to a period of 365/366 days (calendar year)
 - The example "in the year 1920" parallels "presidential election year" (e.g., "in the presidential election year of 1948")
 - It's the general time unit sense used for dating events

 Sense 2 might seem plausible if thinking of "election year" as a specific activity period, but "presidential election year" specifically refers to the calendar year (e.g., 2024 is a presidential election year). It's not a separate fiscal or academic year; it's the standard calendar year.

 Therefore, sense index 1 is the correct choice.

 Wait, let me double-check the indexing. The user lists:
 1. sense_key=year%1:28:01::
 2. sense_key=year%1:28:02::
 3. sense_key=year%1:28:00::
 4. sense_key=year%1:14:00::

 So index 1 corresponds to year%1:28:01:: (365/366 days).
 Index 2 corresponds to year%1:28:02:: (activity period).
 Index 3 corresponds to year%1:28:00:: (orbital period).
 Index 4 corresponds to year%1:14:00:: (class).

 Yes, sense 1 is correct.

 The context: "In only one presidential election year prior to 1948..."
 This refers to specific calendar years (like 1944, 1940, etc.) when presidential elections occurred. So it's definitely sense 1.

 Output format: {"sense_index": 1}