[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: authority
Target surface form: authorities
Context:
The Foundation has recently been involved in organising a conference which dealt with this critical challenge. Over 100 participants from the main interest groups attended and debated issues such as the role of key actors including public <t>authorities</t>, social partners, voluntary and community organisations as well as service users. There were relatively few cases reported of attempts to involve users in service planning but their involvement in service provision was found to be more common.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=authority%1:07:00:: | definition=the power or right to give orders or make decisions | synonyms=authorization, authorisation, potency, dominance, say-so | examples=he has the authority to issue warrants; deputies are given authorization to make arrests
2. sense_key=authority%1:18:01:: | definition=(usually plural) persons who exercise (administrative) control over others | examples=the authorities have issued a curfew
3. sense_key=authority%1:18:00:: | definition=an expert whose views are taken as definitive | examples=he is an authority on corporate law
4. sense_key=authority%1:09:00:: | definition=freedom from doubt; belief in yourself and your abilities | synonyms=assurance, self-assurance, confidence, self-confidence, sureness | examples=his assurance in his superiority did not make him popular; after that failure he lost his confidence
5. sense_key=authority%1:14:00:: | definition=an administrative unit of government | synonyms=agency, federal agency, government agency, bureau, office | examples=the Central Intelligence Agency; the Census Bureau
6. sense_key=authority%1:07:02:: | definition=official permission or approval | synonyms=authorization, authorisation, sanction | examples=authority for the program was renewed several times
7. sense_key=authority%1:10:00:: | definition=an authoritative written work | examples=this book is the final authority on the life of Milton

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "authorities" in the given context.

 Context analysis:
 - The sentence mentions "public authorities" alongside other actors like "social partners, voluntary and community organisations as well as service users"
 - It's talking about key actors in a conference dealing with some critical challenge
 - The phrase "public authorities" typically refers to government bodies or officials who exercise administrative control
 - The word is in plural form "authorities"

 Candidate sense analysis:
 1. authority%1:07:00:: - "the power or right to give orders or make decisions" - This refers to the abstract concept of power, not the people. The context mentions "public authorities" as actors/participants, not the abstract concept of power.

 2. authority%1:18:01:: - "(usually plural) persons who exercise (administrative) control over others" - This fits perfectly. The context mentions "public authorities" as key actors alongside other groups. The example "the authorities have issued a curfew" shows this sense refers to people (usually government officials) who exercise control.

 3. authority%1:18:00:: - "an expert whose views are taken as definitive" - This refers to an expert, but "public authorities" in this context doesn't mean experts, it means government/administrative bodies.

 4. authority%1:09:00:: - "freedom from doubt; belief in yourself and your abilities" - This is about confidence/self-assurance, clearly not relevant here.

 5. authority%1:14:00:: - "an administrative unit of government" - This could be close, referring to agencies. However, the context lists "public authorities" alongside "social partners, voluntary and community organisations, service users" - these are all groups of people/actors, not just abstract units. Also, the plural "authorities" fits better with sense 2 (persons) than sense 5 (units). But wait, sense 5 examples include "agency", "bureau" which can be plural. However, in the phrase "public authorities", when referring to government bodies, sense 2 is more about the people who exercise control, while sense 5 is about the organizational units.

 Let me reconsider sense 2 vs sense 5:
 - Sense 2: persons who exercise (administrative) control over others
 - Sense 5: an administrative unit of government

 The context says "key actors including public authorities, social partners, voluntary and community organisations as well as service users". All of these are groups/entities that can be considered actors. "Public authorities" here likely means government bodies or officials.

 However, looking at the WordNet distinction:
 - Sense 2 is specifically marked as "usually plural" and refers to "persons"
 - Sense 5 refers to "an administrative unit" (singular)

 In common usage, "public authorities" often refers to government bodies/agencies (sense 5) or the officials who run them (sense 2).

 But looking at the examples:
 - Sense 2 example: "the authorities have issued a curfew" - here "authorities" refers to the people in charge (police/government officials)
 - Sense 5 examples: "the Central Intelligence Agency; the Census Bureau" - these are specific organizations

 In the context: "public authorities" are listed as "key actors" along with "social partners, voluntary and community organisations". These are all collective nouns referring to groups of people or organizations.

 However, the phrase "public authorities" is very commonly used to mean government agencies or bodies (sense 5), but also commonly used to mean the officials who exercise control (sense 2).

 Let me look more carefully at the glosses:
 - Sense 2: "persons who exercise (administrative) control over others"
 - Sense 5: "an administrative unit of government"

 The context mentions "attempts to involve users in service planning" and "service provision". This suggests a context of governance and public administration where "public authorities" would be the government bodies responsible for services.

 But wait, the crucial clue is the word "actors". It says "key actors including public authorities". Actors are typically people or entities that act. Both senses could fit, but sense 2 specifically mentions "persons" while sense 5 mentions "unit".

 Also, note that sense 2 is explicitly marked as "usually plural", which matches our target form "authorities".

 In the context of European Union or UK English (given words like "organising" with s), "public authorities" typically refers to bodies like local councils, government departments, etc.

 However, looking at the exact wording in the context: "public authorities, social partners, voluntary and community organisations". These are all types of organizations/groups. "Social partners" typically refers to employer and employee organizations. "Voluntary and community organisations" are clearly organizations. So "public authorities" likely refers to governmental organizations/bodies, which would be sense 5.

 But sense 2 is "persons who exercise control". In many contexts, "the authorities" means the police or government officials (people).

 Let me check if there's a way to distinguish between sense 2 and 5 more clearly.

 Sense 2 examples: "the authorities have issued a curfew" - here, authorities are the people who can issue curfews (police, government)
 Sense 5 examples: "the Central Intelligence Agency; the Census Bureau" - these are specific named agencies

 In the context "public authorities", it's being used as a general category alongside other stakeholder groups. In public policy discourse, "public authorities" usually refers to government bodies/agencies (sense 5).

 However, looking at the WordNet hierarchy:
 - Sense 2 is under noun.person (1:18)
 - Sense 5 is under noun.group (1:14)

 The context groups "public authorities" with "social partners" (groups), "voluntary and community organisations" (groups), and "service users" (people). So it's mixing groups and people.

 But "public authorities" in the plural often maps to sense 2 in WordNet. Let me reconsider the examples given in the sense definitions.

 Actually, looking carefully at sense 2: "(usually plural) persons who exercise (administrative) control over others"
 And sense 5: "an administrative unit of government"

 In the phrase "public authorities", if we mean the police or local council officials, that's sense 2. If we mean the agencies themselves (like "the Environmental Protection Agency"), that's sense 5.

 In the given context, "public authorities" is contrasted with "service users" and grouped with "social partners" and "voluntary and community organisations". This suggests a stakeholder analysis where "public authorities" means government bodies/institutions.

 However, I need to check which sense is the best fit according to standard WSD practice.

 In many WSD datasets, "authorities" when referring to government bodies in a general sense often maps to sense 2 (persons who exercise control) when it emphasizes the decision-makers, or sense 5 (administrative unit) when it emphasizes the organizations.

 But looking at the specific context: "the role of key actors including public authorities". The word "actors" suggests agencies or bodies that play a role, which could fit sense 5. But "actors" can also mean people.

 The phrase "public authorities" is extremely ambiguous between these two senses. However, sense 2 is specifically noted as "usually plural", which is a strong indicator. Also, the example for sense 2 "the authorities have issued a curfew" is very similar to how "public authorities" would act in this context (making decisions about service planning).

 Let me look at sense 5 again. The synonyms are "agency, federal agency, government agency, bureau, office". These are specific types of organizations. "Public authorities" is a broader term that could encompass all of these.

 Actually, in British English (which this appears to be, given "organising"), "public authority" is a technical term referring to bodies exercising public functions, which could include local authorities, government departments, etc.

 Between sense 2 and 5:
 - If the focus is on the people making decisions: sense 2
 - If the focus is on the organizations: sense 5

 The context mentions "attempts to involve users in service planning". Service planning is done by organizations (authorities), not just individual persons. But it's done by people within those organizations.

 I think the key is that sense 2 explicitly mentions "(usually plural)" in its definition, which is a strong signal that this is the sense intended for the plural form "authorities" when referring to governing bodies. Sense 5 is singular "an administrative unit" and while it can be pluralized, the explicit marking of sense 2 for plural usage is significant.

 Also, looking at the other items in the list: "social partners" (plural), "voluntary and community organisations" (plural), "service users" (plural). These are all groups of people. "Public authorities" as "persons who exercise control" (sense 2) fits this parallelism better than "administrative units" (sense 5), though both could work.

 However, "voluntary and community organisations" are clearly organizations (sense 5-like), while "service users" are clearly people (sense 2-like). So the list mixes both.

 I think I should go with sense 2: authority%1:18:01:: - (usually plural) persons who exercise (administrative) control over others.

 Reasoning:
 1. The form is plural "authorities"
 2. The definition explicitly mentions "usually plural"
 3. In the context of governance and service planning, "public authorities" typically refers to the officials or bodies in charge (the people who exercise control)
 4. The example "the authorities have issued a curfew" is semantically similar to authorities being involved in service planning

 Wait, I should double-check if there's any other sense that could fit.

 Sense 1: power/right - "public authority" could mean the authority of the public, but that's not what "public authorities" means. "Public authorities" means authorities that are public (i.e., government).

 Sense 3: expert - no, that's not it.

 Sense 6: official permission - no.

 Sense 7: written work - no.

 So it's between 2 and 5.

 Let me reconsider the distinction. In WordNet:
 - 1:18:01 is a hyponym of 1:18:00 (expert)?? No, let me check the hierarchy mentally.
 - Actually, 1:18 refers to "person, individual, someone..."
 - 1:14 refers to "group, grouping"

 So sense 2 is definitely about people, sense 5 is about groups/units.

 In the context: "key actors". An actor can be a person or an organization. But "public authorities" in plural usually refers to the people in charge (the government officials) when used in the sense of decision-makers.

 However, in EU/UK public policy English, "public authority" is often used to mean "public body" or "government agency".

 Given the instruction to choose the single best indexed sense, and given that sense 2 is explicitly marked for plural usage and fits the pattern of "the authorities" meaning those in power who make administrative decisions, I will go with sense 2.

 Actually, looking at the example for sense 2 again: "the authorities have issued a curfew". This shows authorities as the subject of an action (issuing a curfew). In the context, authorities are actors who would be involved in service planning. This matches.

 The example for sense 5: "the Central Intelligence Agency; the Census Bureau" - these are specific named entities. The context doesn't name specific agencies but refers to "public authorities" as a category of actors, which aligns better with the general "persons who exercise control" (sense 2) than specific administrative units (sense 5), though both are close.

 I think sense 2 is the better choice.

 Final check: The target is "authorities" (plural). Sense 2 is the only one that explicitly mentions "usually plural" in its definition. This is a strong indicator that this is the intended sense for plural usages.

 Therefore: {"sense_index": 2}

provider: StreamLake


attempt_kind: initial

status: success

[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: social
Target surface form: social
Context:
The Foundation has recently been involved in organising a conference which dealt with this critical challenge. Over 100 participants from the main interest groups attended and debated issues such as the role of key actors including public authorities, <t>social</t> partners, voluntary and community organisations as well as service users. There were relatively few cases reported of attempts to involve users in service planning but their involvement in service provision was found to be more common.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=social%3:01:00:: | definition=relating to human society and its members | synonyms=societal | examples=social institutions; societal evolution
2. sense_key=social%3:00:00:: | definition=living together or enjoying life in communities or organized groups | examples=a human being is a social animal; mature social behavior
3. sense_key=social%3:01:02:: | definition=relating to or belonging to or characteristic of high society | examples=made fun of her being so social and high-toned; a social gossip colum
4. sense_key=social%5:00:00:sociable:00 | definition=composed of sociable people or formed for the purpose of sociability | examples=a purely social club; the church has a large social hall
5. sense_key=social%5:00:00:gregarious:00 | definition=tending to move or live together in groups or colonies of the same kind | examples=ants are social insects
6. sense_key=social%5:00:00:friendly:01 | definition=marked by friendly companionship with others | examples=a social cup of coffee

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

finish_reason: stop

role: assistant

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation (WSD) for the word "social" in the given context. Let me analyze the context carefully.

Context analysis:
- The sentence discusses a conference about critical challenges
- It mentions "public authorities, social partners, voluntary and community organisations as well as service users"
- The phrase "social partners" is a specific term often used in EU/employment contexts referring to employer organizations and trade unions
- The context is about societal/institutional organization rather than individual sociability or friendliness

Candidate sense analysis:

1. sense_key=social%3:01:00:: | definition=relating to human society and its members | synonyms=societal | examples=social institutions; societal evolution
   - This seems broad and relates to society in general
   - "Social partners" is a term used in the context of labor relations and societal organization
   - This fits well with "relating to human society and its members"

2. sense_key=social%3:00:00:: | definition=living together or enjoying life in communities or organized groups | examples=a human being is a social animal; mature social behavior
   - This seems more about the nature of being social/living in groups (biological/anthropological sense)
   - Doesn't fit "social partners" in this institutional context

3. sense_key=social%3:01:02:: | definition=relating to or belonging to or characteristic of high society | examples=made fun of her being so social and high-toned; a social gossip colum
   - This is about high society, elite social circles
   - Definitely doesn't fit the context of labor/employment partners

4. sense_key=social%5:00:00:sociable:00 | definition=composed of sociable people or formed for the purpose of sociability | examples=a purely social club; the church has a large social hall
   - This is about clubs/gatherings for socializing
   - "Social partners" doesn't mean partners for socializing here

5. sense_key=social%5:00:00:gregarious:00 | definition=tending to move or live together in groups or colonies of the same kind | examples=ants are social insects
   - Biological sense (like social insects)
   - Not applicable here

6. sense_key=social%5:00:00:friendly:01 | definition=marked by friendly companionship with others | examples=a social cup of coffee
   - This is about friendly interaction
   - Not the meaning here

The phrase "social partners" is a technical term in European Union and labor relations contexts, referring to employer associations and trade unions. This fits best with sense 1: "relating to human society and its members" (synonyms=societal).

Sense 1 covers institutional/societal aspects: "social institutions; societal evolution" - and "social partners" are key actors in societal/institutional structures dealing with labor and social policy.

The context mentions "public authorities, social partners, voluntary and community organisations" - these are all types of societal actors/institutions, not groups defined by being friendly, gregarious, or high-society.

Therefore, the best sense is sense 1 (index 1).

Wait, let me double-check the sense indexing. The user lists:
1. sense_key=social%3:01:00::
2. sense_key=social%3:00:00::
3. sense_key=social%3:01:02::
4. sense_key=social%5:00:00:sociable:00
5. sense_key=social%5:00:00:gregarious:00
6. sense_key=social%5:00:00:friendly:01

So sense 1 is the correct index.

Actually, looking at WordNet, "social" has these adjective senses:
- relating to human society and its members (pertaining to society)
- living together or enjoying life in communities...
- relating to high society
- composed of sociable people...
- (of animals) tending to move or live together...
- marked by friendly companionship...

The context "social partners" refers to partners in society - specifically in the socio-economic sense. This is definitely sense 1.

One might argue about sense 4 (composed of sociable people...), but "social partners" in EU/ILO terminology refers to the institutional role in society, not to partners who are sociable.

Therefore: {"sense_index": 1}

format: unknown

native_finish_reason: stop

provider: AtlasCloud

currency: USD


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: voluntary
Target surface form: voluntary
Context:
The Foundation has recently been involved in organising a conference which dealt with this critical challenge. Over 100 participants from the main interest groups attended and debated issues such as the role of key actors including public authorities, social partners, <t>voluntary</t> and community organisations as well as service users. There were relatively few cases reported of attempts to involve users in service planning but their involvement in service provision was found to be more common.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=voluntary%3:00:01:: | definition=of your own free will or design; done by choice; not forced or compelled | examples=man is a voluntary agent; participation was voluntary
2. sense_key=voluntary%3:00:02:: | definition=controlled by individual volition | examples=voluntary motions; voluntary muscles

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "voluntary" in the given context.

 Context analysis:
 - The sentence mentions "voluntary and community organisations"
 - This is referring to organizations that are voluntary in nature (non-profit, charitable, done by choice)
 - The context is about a conference dealing with critical challenges, involving public authorities, social partners, voluntary and community organisations, and service users.

 Candidate senses:
 1. voluntary%3:00:01:: - "of your own free will or design; done by choice; not forced or compelled" - examples: "man is a voluntary agent; participation was voluntary"
 2. voluntary%3:00:02:: - "controlled by individual volition" - examples: "voluntary motions; voluntary muscles"

 Analysis:
 - Sense 1 refers to something done by choice, not forced. When we say "voluntary organisations", we mean organizations that are formed by voluntary action, non-compulsory, typically non-profit or charitable organizations where participation is voluntary.
 - Sense 2 refers to physiological control (voluntary muscles vs involuntary muscles), which is clearly not the context here.

 The phrase "voluntary and community organisations" is a common collocation referring to the third sector, non-profit sector, or civil society organizations. These are "voluntary" in the sense that they involve voluntary participation, are not state-mandated, and rely on voluntary effort.

 This aligns with sense 1: "of your own free will or design; done by choice; not forced or compelled"

 The examples for sense 1 include "participation was voluntary" which is semantically related to "voluntary organisations" (organisations based on voluntary participation).

 Therefore, the correct sense is index 1.

 Wait, I need to check the exact format. The user wants:
 {"sense_index": 3}

 But the candidate senses are numbered 1 and 2. So I should return:
 {"sense_index": 1}

 Let me double-check:
 - Sense 1: voluntary%3:00:01:: - voluntary (adjective) - willing, done by choice
 - Sense 2: voluntary%3:00:02:: - voluntary (adjective) - controlled by will (physiological)

 "Voluntary organisations" definitely uses sense 1. These are organizations that operate on a voluntary basis (non-compulsory, relying on volunteers or voluntary participation).

 Yes, sense 1 is correct.

provider: Phala


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: community
Target surface form: community
Context:
The Foundation has recently been involved in organising a conference which dealt with this critical challenge. Over 100 participants from the main interest groups attended and debated issues such as the role of key actors including public authorities, social partners, voluntary and <t>community</t> organisations as well as service users. There were relatively few cases reported of attempts to involve users in service planning but their involvement in service provision was found to be more common.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=community%1:14:00:: | definition=a group of people living in a particular local area | examples=the team is drawn from all parts of the community
2. sense_key=community%1:21:00:: | definition=common ownership | examples=they shared a community of possessions
3. sense_key=community%1:14:04:: | definition=a group of nations having common interests | examples=they hoped to join the NATO community
4. sense_key=community%1:26:00:: | definition=agreement as to goals | synonyms=community of interests | examples=the preachers and the bootleggers found they had a community of interests
5. sense_key=community%1:15:00:: | definition=a district where people live; occupied primarily by private residences | synonyms=residential district, residential area
6. sense_key=community%1:14:02:: | definition=(ecology) a group of interdependent organisms inhabiting the same region and interacting with each other | synonyms=biotic community

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "community" in the given context.

 Let me analyze the context:
 - The sentence mentions "voluntary and community organisations"
 - It's talking about interest groups, public authorities, social partners, and service users
 - The context is about organizing a conference with participants from various interest groups
 - The phrase "voluntary and community organisations" suggests organizations that are community-based or serve the community

 Now let's look at the candidate senses:

 1. sense_key=community%1:14:00:: | definition=a group of people living in a particular local area | examples=the team is drawn from all parts of the community
    - This refers to a local group of people, like a neighborhood or town.

 2. sense_key=community%1:21:00:: | definition=common ownership | examples=they shared a community of possessions
    - This is about shared ownership, not relevant here.

 3. sense_key=community%1:14:04:: | definition=a group of nations having common interests | examples=they hoped to join the NATO community
    - This is about international groups/nations, not relevant here.

 4. sense_key=community%1:26:00:: | definition=agreement as to goals | synonyms=community of interests | examples=the preachers and the bootleggers found they had a community of interests
    - This is about shared interests/goals, not organizations.

 5. sense_key=community%1:15:00:: | definition=a district where people live; occupied primarily by private residences | synonyms=residential district, residential area
    - This is a physical location/residential area.

 6. sense_key=community%1:14:02:: | definition=(ecology) a group of interdependent organisms inhabiting the same region and interacting with each other | synonyms=biotic community
    - This is ecological, not relevant.

 Wait, I need to look more carefully. The phrase is "voluntary and community organisations".

 In the context of social policy and civil society, "community organisations" typically refers to organizations that serve or represent a community of people - often non-profit groups, local associations, etc.

 Looking at sense 1: "a group of people living in a particular local area" - this could work for "community organisations" meaning organizations of/for the local community.

 But let me check if there's a better fit. Actually, looking at the WordNet senses, sense 1 seems to be the most general sense of a group of people in a local area.

 However, "community organisations" in this context likely refers to organizations that are part of or serve the community (in the sense of a group of people).

 Let me reconsider the options. The context mentions:
 - public authorities
 - social partners
 - voluntary and community organisations
 - service users

 This is a typical categorization in social policy/EU contexts where "community organisations" refers to non-profit, civil society organizations that operate at the local community level.

 Sense 1 (community%1:14:00::) "a group of people living in a particular local area" seems closest, as "community organisations" would be organizations of or for such a group.

 But wait, is there a sense that means "community" as in "the community sector"? Let me look again.

 Actually, looking at the examples for sense 1: "the team is drawn from all parts of the community" - this suggests the community as a group of people.

 In the phrase "voluntary and community organisations", "community" is modifying "organisations" and refers to organizations that are community-based or serve the community.

 Sense 1 seems to be the best fit among the given options. The other senses are:
 - 2: common ownership (not relevant)
 - 3: nations (not relevant)
 - 4: agreement as to goals (not relevant)
 - 5: residential district (physical place, not the social group)
 - 6: ecological (not relevant)

 So sense 1 (index 1) appears to be the correct choice.

 Wait, I should double-check the indexing. The user asks for the "sense_index" which corresponds to the numbered list provided (1-6).

 The target is "community organisations" - organizations that belong to or serve the community (group of people).

 Sense 1: a group of people living in a particular local area
 Sense 5: a district where people live (physical location)

 "Community organisations" refers to organizations of the people (sense 1), not organizations of the physical district (sense 5).

 Therefore, sense_index: 1.

 But let me reconsider if there's any ambiguity. Could it be sense 4 (community of interests)? The example shows "community of interests" as a phrase meaning shared goals. But "community organisations" doesn't mean "organizations with shared interests" in this context. It means organizations that are part of the voluntary/community sector - i.e., non-profits, NGOs, local associations.

 In British/European English usage, "community organisations" typically refers to organizations that serve or represent local communities (groups of people).

 So yes, sense 1 is correct.

 Actually, looking at the WordNet entry more carefully, sense 1 is "a group of people living in a particular local area" - this is the social group sense.

 Sense 5 is the geographical sense.

 The phrase "voluntary and community organisations" is a standard collocation in British English referring to the third sector - voluntary organizations and community groups (where community groups are groups of local people).

 So the answer should be sense_index: 1.

provider: DeepInfra


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: organisation
Target surface form: organisations
Context:
The Foundation has recently been involved in organising a conference which dealt with this critical challenge. Over 100 participants from the main interest groups attended and debated issues such as the role of key actors including public authorities, social partners, voluntary and community <t>organisations</t> as well as service users. There were relatively few cases reported of attempts to involve users in service planning but their involvement in service provision was found to be more common.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=organisation%1:14:01:: | definition=the persons (or committees or departments etc.) who make up a body for the purpose of administering something | synonyms=administration, governance, governing body, establishment, brass, organization | examples=he claims that the present administration is corrupt; the governance of an association is responsible to its members
2. sense_key=organisation%1:14:00:: | definition=a group of people who work together | synonyms=organization
3. sense_key=organisation%1:09:00:: | definition=an organized structure for arranging or classifying | synonyms=arrangement, organization, system | examples=he changed the arrangement of the topics; the facts were familiar but it was in the organization of them that he was original
4. sense_key=organisation%1:07:00:: | definition=an ordered manner; orderliness by virtue of being methodical and well organized | synonyms=organization, system | examples=his compulsive organization was not an endearing quality; we can't do it unless we establish some system around here
5. sense_key=organisation%1:04:00:: | definition=the act of organizing a business or an activity related to a business | synonyms=organization | examples=he was brought in to supervise the organization of a new department
6. sense_key=organisation%1:04:01:: | definition=the activity or result of distributing or disposing persons or things properly or methodically | synonyms=organization | examples=his organization of the work force was very efficient
7. sense_key=organisation%1:04:02:: | definition=the act of forming or establishing something | synonyms=constitution, establishment, formation, organization | examples=the constitution of a PTA group last year; it was the establishment of his reputation

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "organisations" (lemma: organisation) in the given context.

 Let me analyze the context:
 - The sentence mentions "voluntary and community organisations"
 - These are listed alongside "public authorities", "social partners", and "service users"
 - The context is about participants/actors in a conference dealing with service planning and provision
 - These organisations are described as "key actors" along with other groups

 Now let's look at the candidate senses:

 1. sense_key=organisation%1:14:01:: - "the persons (or committees or departments etc.) who make up a body for the purpose of administering something"
    - Synonyms: administration, governance, governing body, establishment, brass, organization
    - This seems to refer to the administrative body of something, like the management.

 2. sense_key=organisation%1:14:00:: - "a group of people who work together"
    - Synonyms: organization
    - This is a general sense of a group/entity of people working together.

 3. sense_key=organisation%1:09:00:: - "an organized structure for arranging or classifying"
    - This is about abstract structure/systems, not groups of people.

 4. sense_key=organisation%1:07:00:: - "an ordered manner; orderliness..."
    - This is about the quality of being organized, not a group.

 5. sense_key=organisation%1:04:00:: - "the act of organizing a business..."
    - This is the act/process, not the entity.

 6. sense_key=organisation%1:04:01:: - "the activity or result of distributing..."
    - Also an act/activity.

 7. sense_key=organisation%1:04:02:: - "the act of forming or establishing something"
    - Also an act/activity of formation.

 In the context, "voluntary and community organisations" refers to entities/groups that are actors in society - like NGOs, community groups, etc. These are groups of people who work together for a common purpose.

 Comparing sense 1 and sense 2:
 - Sense 1 focuses on administrative bodies (the people who administer something)
 - Sense 2 is the general "group of people who work together"

 "Voluntary and community organisations" refers to organizations like charities, NGOs, community groups - these are groups of people working together. They are not specifically administrative bodies (sense 1), though they might have administration.

 Sense 1 seems more specific to the governing/administrative aspect (like "the administration" of a company), while sense 2 is the general term for any organized group of people.

 In the context: "public authorities, social partners, voluntary and community organisations as well as service users" - this is listing different types of stakeholders/actors. "Voluntary and community organisations" are clearly referring to organizational entities (like NGOs, charities, community groups), not the act of organizing, not the quality of being organized, and not just the administrative branch.

 Sense 2: "a group of people who work together" fits best. These are community groups - groups of people working together for community purposes.

 Sense 1 could be tempting because it mentions "committees" and "departments", but it specifically mentions "for the purpose of administering something" which is too specific. Community organisations aren't necessarily just administrative bodies - they are groups that work together on various activities.

 Also, looking at the examples for sense 1: "he claims that the present administration is corrupt; the governance of an association is responsible to its members" - this emphasizes the governing aspect.

 For sense 2, while the definition is brief ("a group of people who work together"), this is the standard sense for referring to entities like "non-profit organisations", "community organisations", etc.

 The context lists "voluntary and community organisations" as actors alongside public authorities and social partners. These are organizational entities.

 Therefore, sense 2 (organisation%1:14:00::) is the best fit.

 Wait, let me double-check the WordNet sense keys. The format is:
 organisation%1:14:00::
 organisation%1:14:01::

 In WordNet:
 - 1:14:00 is usually the first sense (most common) for nouns
 - 1:14:01 is the second sense

 But looking at the definitions provided:
 - Sense 1 (01): administration/governance
 - Sense 2 (00): group of people who work together

 Actually, looking carefully at the sense keys:
 1. organisation%1:14:01::
 2. organisation%1:14:00::

 The number after the last colon is the lexicographer file number or sense number. Usually 00 is the first sense, 01 is the second, etc. But here they seem to be labeled as 01 and 00.

 Wait, in WordNet sense keys, the format is:
 lemma%lexical_file:lexical_id

 Actually, the format shown is:
 sense_key=organisation%1:14:01::

 This looks like:
 - 1 = noun (part of speech)
 - 14 = lexicographer file (noun.group?)
 - 01 = sense number

 But then there's also 00.

 Actually, looking at standard WordNet:
 - organisation.n.01 might be one sense
 - organisation.n.02 might be another

 But here the user has provided specific sense keys. I need to choose the index (1-7) that corresponds to the best sense.

 The options are numbered 1-7 in the list. I need to return the index number (1-7).

 So:
 - Index 1: administration/governance sense
 - Index 2: group of people who work together
 - Index 3: organized structure for arranging/classifying
 - Index 4: ordered manner/orderliness
 - Index 5: act of organizing a business
 - Index 6: activity of distributing
 - Index 7: act of forming/establishing

 The context clearly refers to "voluntary and community organisations" as entities/groups, not as acts or abstract structures. So it's between 1 and 2.

 "Voluntary and community organisations" refers to organizations like charities, NGOs, clubs - these are groups of people who work together. They are not specifically the administrative branch of something (sense 1).

 Therefore, index 2 is correct.

 Let me verify with the examples and synonyms:
 - Sense 2 synonyms: organization
 - Sense 2 definition: a group of people who work together

 This matches "community organisations" - community groups are groups of people working together.

 Sense 1 would be more like "the organisation of the company" meaning the management/leadership.

 So the answer should be {"sense_index": 2}.

provider: Novita


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: service
Target surface form: service
Context:
The Foundation has recently been involved in organising a conference which dealt with this critical challenge. Over 100 participants from the main interest groups attended and debated issues such as the role of key actors including public authorities, social partners, voluntary and community organisations as well as <t>service</t> users. There were relatively few cases reported of attempts to involve users in service planning but their involvement in service provision was found to be more common.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=service%1:04:08:: | definition=work done by one person or group that benefits another | examples=budget separately for goods and services
2. sense_key=service%1:04:00:: | definition=an act of help or assistance | examples=he did them a service
3. sense_key=service%1:04:01:: | definition=the act of public worship following prescribed rules | synonyms=religious service, divine service | examples=the Sunday service
4. sense_key=service%1:14:05:: | definition=a company or agency that performs a public service; subject to government regulation
5. sense_key=service%1:04:07:: | definition=employment in or work for another | examples=he retired after 30 years of service
6. sense_key=service%1:14:00:: | definition=a force that is a branch of the armed forces | synonyms=military service, armed service
7. sense_key=service%1:18:00:: | definition=Canadian writer (born in England) who wrote about life in the Yukon Territory (1874-1958) | synonyms=Robert William Service
8. sense_key=service%1:07:00:: | definition=a means of serving | synonyms=avail, help | examples=of no avail; there's no help for it
9. sense_key=service%1:06:00:: | definition=tableware consisting of a complete set of articles (silver or dishware) for use at table | synonyms=table service
10. sense_key=service%1:04:03:: | definition=the act of mating by male animals | synonyms=servicing | examples=the bull was worth good money in servicing fees
11. sense_key=service%1:04:09:: | definition=(law) the acts performed by an English feudal tenant for the benefit of his lord which formed the consideration for the property granted to him
12. sense_key=service%1:04:02:: | definition=(sports) a stroke that puts the ball in play | synonyms=serve | examples=his powerful serves won the game
13. sense_key=service%1:04:04:: | definition=the act of delivering a writ or summons upon someone | synonyms=serving, service of process | examples=he accepted service of the subpoena
14. sense_key=service%1:04:05:: | definition=periodic maintenance on a car or machine | synonyms=overhaul, inspection and repair | examples=it was time for an overhaul on the tractor
15. sense_key=service%1:04:06:: | definition=the performance of duties by a waiter or servant | examples=that restaurant has excellent service

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "service" in the given context.

 Context analysis:
 - The text is about a conference dealing with involving users in service planning and service provision
 - It mentions "service users" and their involvement in "service planning" and "service provision"
 - This is about social services, public services, or community services
 - The context involves public authorities, social partners, voluntary and community organisations, and service users

 Looking at the candidate senses:

 1. sense_key=service%1:04:08:: | definition=work done by one person or group that benefits another | examples=budget separately for goods and services
    - This is a general sense of service as work done for others. Could fit.

 2. sense_key=service%1:04:00:: | definition=an act of help or assistance | examples=he did them a service
    - This is more about a specific act of helping, not the ongoing provision of services.

 3. sense_key=service%1:04:01:: | definition=the act of public worship following prescribed rules | synonyms=religious service, divine service
    - Religious context, doesn't fit here.

 4. sense_key=service%1:14:05:: | definition=a company or agency that performs a public service; subject to government regulation
    - This refers to the organization itself (a service), not the activity or provision. The context talks about "service users" and "service provision" which suggests the activity/work, not the organization.

 5. sense_key=service%1:04:07:: | definition=employment in or work for another | examples=he retired after 30 years of service
    - Usually refers to employment tenure or domestic service. Doesn't fit the context of social/community services.

 6. sense_key=service%1:14:00:: | definition=a force that is a branch of the armed forces
    - Military context, doesn't fit.

 7. sense_key=service%1:18:00:: | definition=Canadian writer...
    - Person, doesn't fit.

 8. sense_key=service%1:07:00:: | definition=a means of serving | synonyms=avail, help
    - Abstract sense, doesn't fit well here.

 9. sense_key=service%1:06:00:: | definition=tableware...
    - Physical objects, doesn't fit.

 10. sense_key=service%1:04:03:: | definition=the act of mating by male animals
     - Biological, doesn't fit.

 11. sense_key=service%1:04:09:: | definition=(law) the acts performed by an English feudal tenant...
     - Historical/legal specific, doesn't fit.

 12. sense_key=service%1:04:02:: | definition=(sports) a stroke that puts the ball in play
     - Sports, doesn't fit.

 13. sense_key=service%1:04:04:: | definition=the act of delivering a writ or summons upon someone
     - Legal process, doesn't fit.

 14. sense_key=service%1:04:05:: | definition=periodic maintenance on a car or machine
     - Maintenance/repair, doesn't fit.

 15. sense_key=service%1:04:06:: | definition=the performance of duties by a waiter or servant
     - Restaurant/hospitality service, doesn't fit.

 Now, looking more carefully at sense 1: "work done by one person or group that benefits another" - this is a very general sense that covers services provided by organizations to users.

 However, looking at the WordNet structure, sense 1:04:08 is likely the general sense of "service" as in goods and services, utility services, etc.

 But wait, let me reconsider. The context mentions "service users" - this is a technical term in social policy and healthcare referring to people who use social services, health services, etc.

 The phrase "service planning" and "service provision" suggests the organized delivery of services to the public.

 Looking at sense 1 again: "work done by one person or group that benefits another" - this is broad and fits.

 But is there a better fit? Let me check if there's a sense specifically about public/social services...

 Sense 4: "a company or agency that performs a public service; subject to government regulation" - this is the organization, not the activity.

 Actually, looking at the WordNet hierarchy, sense 1:04:08 (service%1:04:08::) is defined as "work done by one person or group that benefits another" with example "budget separately for goods and services". This fits the economic/general sense of services as opposed to goods.

 But in the context of "service users" and "service provision" in the social/ voluntary sector, this is referring to the general concept of services delivered to users.

 However, I should check if there's a sense that specifically covers "service" as in "social service" or "public service"...

 Actually, looking at the list again, sense 1:04:00 is "an act of help or assistance" - this is too specific (a single act).

 Sense 1:04:08 is the most general sense covering the work/activity provided to benefit others.

 But let me double-check the WordNet sense numbering. The user provided the sense keys with indices.

 sense_key=service%1:04:08:: corresponds to the 1st sense in the list provided (index 1)
 sense_key=service%1:04:00:: corresponds to the 2nd sense in the list (index 2)
 sense_key=service%1:04:01:: corresponds to the 3rd sense (index 3)
 ...

 Wait, the user says "Candidate senses" and lists them 1-15. The indices in the JSON should refer to this numbering (1-15), not the WordNet lexicographer file numbers.

 So:
 1. sense_key=service%1:04:08:: -> index 1
 2. sense_key=service%1:04:00:: -> index 2
 ...

 The context: "service users", "service planning", "service provision"

 This is talking about the provision of services (work done to benefit others) to users.

 Index 1: "work done by one person or group that benefits another" - fits perfectly with "service provision" and "service users" (those who receive the work/benefit).

 Index 2: "an act of help or assistance" - too specific, usually refers to a favor or specific helpful act, not the ongoing provision of organized services.

 Index 4 refers to the organization, not the activity.

 Therefore, the best sense is index 1.

 Wait, let me reconsider. In WordNet, is there a distinction between "service" as a countable noun (an act) vs uncountable (the general concept)?

 Sense 1 (service%1:04:08::) is the general concept: "work done by one person or group that benefits another"
 Sense 2 (service%1:04:00::) is "an act of help or assistance"

 In the context of "service users" (a compound noun common in UK social policy), "service" refers to the organized provision of assistance/care, which aligns with sense 1.

 Also, the example for sense 1 "budget separately for goods and services" fits the economic context of service provision planning.

 So I choose index 1.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: user
Target surface form: users
Context:
The Foundation has recently been involved in organising a conference which dealt with this critical challenge. Over 100 participants from the main interest groups attended and debated issues such as the role of key actors including public authorities, social partners, voluntary and community organisations as well as service <t>users</t>. There were relatively few cases reported of attempts to involve users in service planning but their involvement in service provision was found to be more common.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=user%1:18:00:: | definition=a person who makes use of a thing; someone who uses or employs something
2. sense_key=user%1:18:01:: | definition=a person who uses something or someone selfishly or unethically | synonyms=exploiter
3. sense_key=user%1:18:02:: | definition=a person who takes drugs | synonyms=drug user, substance abuser

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "users" in the given context.

 Context analysis:
 - The text is about a conference organized by "The Foundation"
 - Participants included public authorities, social partners, voluntary/community organizations, and "service users"
 - The text mentions "attempts to involve users in service planning" and "their involvement in service provision"
 - This is clearly talking about people who use services (service users)

 Candidate senses:
 1. user%1:18:00:: - a person who makes use of a thing; someone who uses or employs something
 2. user%1:18:01:: - a person who uses something or someone selfishly or unethically (synonyms: exploiter)
 3. user%1:18:02:: - a person who takes drugs (synonyms: drug user, substance abuser)

 Analysis:
 - Sense 2 (exploiter) doesn't fit - there's no connotation of selfish or unethical use in the context of service provision and planning.
 - Sense 3 (drug user) doesn't fit - the context is about services, conferences, public authorities, etc., not drug use.
 - Sense 1 is the general sense of someone who makes use of something. In this context, "service users" refers to people who use services - this fits perfectly with sense 1: "a person who makes use of a thing; someone who uses or employs something" (where the "thing" would be services).

 The phrase "service users" is a common collocation referring to people who utilize services, which aligns with the general definition in sense 1.

 Therefore, the correct sense is sense 1 (index 1).

 I need to return: {"sense_index": 1}


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: case
Target surface form: cases
Context:
The Foundation has recently been involved in organising a conference which dealt with this critical challenge. Over 100 participants from the main interest groups attended and debated issues such as the role of key actors including public authorities, social partners, voluntary and community organisations as well as service users. There were relatively few <t>cases</t> reported of attempts to involve users in service planning but their involvement in service provision was found to be more common. Note was also taken of the variety of different roles played by public welfare

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=case%1:11:00:: | definition=an occurrence of something | synonyms=instance, example | examples=it was a case of bad judgment; another instance occurred yesterday
2. sense_key=case%1:26:00:: | definition=a special set of circumstances | synonyms=event | examples=in that event, the first possibility is excluded; it may rain in which case the picnic will be canceled
3. sense_key=case%1:04:00:: | definition=a comprehensive term for any proceeding in a court of law whereby an individual seeks a legal remedy | synonyms=lawsuit, suit, cause, causa | examples=the family brought suit against the landlord
4. sense_key=case%1:09:00:: | definition=the actual state of things | examples=that was not the case
5. sense_key=case%1:06:00:: | definition=a portable container for carrying several objects | examples=the musicians left their instrument cases backstage
6. sense_key=case%1:18:03:: | definition=a person requiring professional services | examples=a typical case was the suburban housewife described by a marriage counselor
7. sense_key=case%1:18:02:: | definition=a person who is subjected to experimental or other observational procedures; someone who is an object of investigation | synonyms=subject, guinea pig | examples=the subjects for this investigation were selected randomly; the cases that we studied were drawn from two different communities
8. sense_key=case%1:10:02:: | definition=a problem requiring investigation | examples=Perry Mason solved the case of the missing heir
9. sense_key=case%1:10:01:: | definition=a statement of facts and reasons used to support an argument | examples=he stated his case clearly
10. sense_key=case%1:23:00:: | definition=the quantity contained in a case | synonyms=caseful
11. sense_key=case%1:10:00:: | definition=nouns or pronouns or adjectives (often marked by inflection) related in some way to other words in a sentence | synonyms=grammatical case
12. sense_key=case%1:26:02:: | definition=a specific state of mind that is temporary | examples=a case of the jitters
13. sense_key=case%1:18:04:: | definition=a person of a specified kind (usually with many eccentricities) | synonyms=character, eccentric, type | examples=a real character; a strange character
14. sense_key=case%1:10:03:: | definition=a specific size and style of type within a type family | synonyms=font, fount, typeface, face
15. sense_key=case%1:08:00:: | definition=an enveloping structure or covering enclosing an animal or plant organ or part | synonyms=sheath
16. sense_key=case%1:06:06:: | definition=the housing or outer covering of something | synonyms=shell, casing | examples=the clock has a walnut case
17. sense_key=case%1:06:07:: | definition=the enclosing frame around a door or window opening | synonyms=casing | examples=the casings had rotted away and had to be replaced
18. sense_key=case%1:06:03:: | definition=(printing) the receptacle in which a compositor has his type, which is divided into compartments for the different letters, spaces, or numbers | synonyms=compositor's case, typesetter's case | examples=for English, a compositor will ordinarily have two such cases, the upper case containing the capitals and the lower case containing the small letters
19. sense_key=case%1:06:02:: | definition=bed linen consisting of a cover for a pillow | synonyms=pillowcase, slip, pillow slip | examples=the burglar carried his loot in a pillowcase
20. sense_key=case%1:06:01:: | definition=a glass container used to store and display items in a shop or museum or home | synonyms=display case, showcase, vitrine

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the target word "cases" in the given context.

Context analysis:
- The Foundation organized a conference about involving users in service planning and provision.
- "There were relatively few cases reported of attempts to involve users in service planning but their involvement in service provision was found to be more common."
- Here, "cases" refers to instances or occurrences of attempts to involve users.

Looking at the candidate senses:
1. sense_key=case%1:11:00:: | definition=an occurrence of something | synonyms=instance, example | examples=it was a case of bad judgment; another instance occurred yesterday
2. sense_key=case%1:26:00:: | definition=a special set of circumstances | synonyms=event | examples=in that event, the first possibility is excluded; it may rain in which case the picnic will be canceled
3. Legal proceeding - doesn't fit
4. Actual state of things - doesn't fit ("that was not the case")
5. Portable container - doesn't fit
6. Person requiring professional services - could be related to social services, but here it's about "attempts to involve users", not people being cases
7. Person subjected to experimental/observational procedures - doesn't fit
8. Problem requiring investigation - doesn't fit
9. Statement of facts and reasons - doesn't fit
10. Quantity - doesn't fit
11. Grammatical case - doesn't fit
12. Specific state of mind - doesn't fit
13. Person of specified kind - doesn't fit
14. Typeface - doesn't fit
15. Enveloping structure - doesn't fit
16. Housing/outer covering - doesn't fit
17. Frame around door/window - doesn't fit
18. Printing receptacle - doesn't fit
19. Pillowcase - doesn't fit
20. Display case - doesn't fit

Between sense 1 and sense 2:
- Sense 1: "an occurrence of something" - synonyms: instance, example. Examples: "it was a case of bad judgment; another instance occurred yesterday"
- Sense 2: "a special set of circumstances" - synonyms: event. Examples: "in that event, the first possibility is excluded; it may rain in which case the picnic will be canceled"

In the context: "few cases reported of attempts to involve users" - this means few instances/occurrences were reported. This aligns perfectly with sense 1: "an occurrence of something".

Sense 2 is more about a set of circumstances or a situation (like "in that case"), which doesn't fit as well here. The phrase "cases of attempts" means instances or examples of attempts.

Also sense 6 could be tempting in a social services context (a person requiring professional services), but the text says "cases ... of attempts", not "cases" referring to people. If it said "there were relatively few cases" referring to service users as clients, maybe, but here it's "cases ... of attempts to involve users".

So the best sense is sense 1.

Wait, let me double-check sense 6: "a person requiring professional services" - examples: "a typical case was the suburban housewife described by a marriage counselor". In social work contexts, "cases" often refers to individual clients or service users. However, the syntax here is "cases reported of attempts to involve users" - the "of attempts" makes it clearly about occurrences/instances of attempts, not people. If it were sense 6, it would likely read "few cases were reported" where "cases" directly refers to people, or "few cases of users". But it's "cases of attempts".

Sense 1 is definitely the best fit.

The user wants JSON output exactly like {"sense_index": 3}. So I should return {"sense_index": 1}.

provider: SiliconFlow


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: report
Target surface form: reported
Context:
The Foundation has recently been involved in organising a conference which dealt with this critical challenge. Over 100 participants from the main interest groups attended and debated issues such as the role of key actors including public authorities, social partners, voluntary and community organisations as well as service users. There were relatively few cases <t>reported</t> of attempts to involve users in service planning but their involvement in service provision was found to be more common. Note was also taken of the variety of different roles played by public welfare

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=report%2:32:00:: | definition=to give an account or representation of in words | synonyms=describe, account | examples=Discreet Italian police described it in a manner typically continental
2. sense_key=report%2:32:04:: | definition=announce as the result of an investigation or experience or finding | examples=Dozens of incidents of wife beatings are reported daily in this city; The team reported significant advances in their research
3. sense_key=report%2:32:03:: | definition=announce one's presence | examples=I report to work every day at 9 o'clock
4. sense_key=report%2:32:01:: | definition=make known to the authorities | examples=One student reported the other to the principal
5. sense_key=report%2:32:13:: | definition=be responsible for reporting the details of, as in journalism | synonyms=cover | examples=Snow reported on China in the 1950's; The cub reporter covered New York City
6. sense_key=report%2:32:02:: | definition=complain about; make a charge against | examples=I reported her to the supervisor

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation on the word "reported" in the given context. I need to choose the best sense from the 6 candidate senses provided.

 Let me analyze the context:
 "There were relatively few cases reported of attempts to involve users in service planning but their involvement in service provision was found to be more common."

 The sentence is talking about cases (instances/situations) that were "reported" - meaning they were made known, documented, or communicated. The context is about a conference where participants discussed issues, and specifically mentions that few cases were reported of attempts to involve users in service planning.

 Now let's look at the candidate senses:

 1. sense_key=report%2:32:00:: | definition=to give an account or representation of in words | synonyms=describe, account
    - This is a general sense of describing or giving an account. While close, it seems more active in terms of describing something in detail.

 2. sense_key=report%2:32:04:: | definition=announce as the result of an investigation or experience or finding | examples=Dozens of incidents of wife beatings are reported daily in this city; The team reported significant advances in their research
    - This sense involves announcing findings or incidents. The example "Dozens of incidents of wife beatings are reported daily" is very similar to "few cases reported" in the target sentence. This seems like a strong candidate.

 3. sense_key=report%2:32:03:: | definition=announce one's presence | examples=I report to work every day at 9 o'clock
    - This is about reporting for duty or announcing one's presence. Doesn't fit the context of "cases reported."

 4. sense_key=report%2:32:01:: | definition=make known to the authorities | examples=One student reported the other to the principal
    - This is about reporting someone to authorities. The context doesn't mention authorities, and "cases" aren't being reported to authorities in this context - it's about documenting/announcing findings from a conference/investigation.

 5. sense_key=report%2:32:13:: | definition=be responsible for reporting the details of, as in journalism | synonyms=cover | examples=Snow reported on China in the 1950's
    - This is about journalism or covering news. The context isn't about journalism.

 6. sense_key=report%2:32:02:: | definition=complain about; make a charge against | examples=I reported her to the supervisor
    - This is similar to sense 4 - making a complaint or charge. Doesn't fit.

 Comparing sense 1 and sense 2:
 Sense 1 is "to give an account or representation of in words" - this is more general.
 Sense 2 is "announce as the result of an investigation or experience or finding" - this specifically mentions announcing incidents/findings.

 The context mentions "cases reported" in the context of a conference that dealt with a critical challenge, where participants debated issues. The "cases" are instances or examples that were documented or communicated as findings. The example in sense 2 "Dozens of incidents of wife beatings are reported daily" parallels "few cases reported" very closely.

 Also, the structure "cases reported" suggests passive usage where cases are being announced/documented as findings or incidents, which aligns with sense 2.

 Sense 1 could work but is more general. Sense 2 specifically captures the meaning of documenting/announcing incidents or findings, which fits the context of discussing cases at a conference based on investigation or experience.

 Therefore, sense 2 (index 2) seems to be the best choice.

 Wait, let me double-check the indexing. The user lists:
 1. sense_key=report%2:32:00::
 2. sense_key=report%2:32:04::
 3. sense_key=report%2:32:03::
 4. sense_key=report%2:32:01::
 5. sense_key=report%2:32:13::
 6. sense_key=report%2:32:02::

 So sense_key=report%2:32:04:: is index 2.

 Actually, looking at the WordNet sense keys:
 - report%2:32:00:: is the first sense (index 1)
 - report%2:32:04:: is the second sense (index 2)
 - report%2:32:03:: is the third sense (index 3)
 - report%2:32:01:: is the fourth sense (index 4)
 - report%2:32:13:: is the fifth sense (index 5)
 - report%2:32:02:: is the sixth sense (index 6)

 So I should return {"sense_index": 2}.

 But let me reconsider if sense 1 could be better. Sense 1 is "to give an account or representation of in words" with synonyms describe, account. The example is "Discreet Italian police described it in a manner typically continental."

 In the target sentence: "There were relatively few cases reported of attempts to involve users..."

 This could mean "few cases were described/documented" or "few cases were announced as findings."

 However, the context suggests these are findings from the conference/discussion - instances that were brought up or documented as part of the investigation or discussion of the topic. The example in sense 2 specifically mentions "incidents... are reported" which is structurally identical to "cases... reported."

 Also, looking at the definition of sense 2: "announce as the result of an investigation or experience or finding" - this fits well because the conference dealt with investigating the critical challenge, and the cases are findings from that investigation or from the experiences discussed.

 Sense 1 is more about describing something in words, which is close but sense 2 is more specific to the context of documenting incidents/findings.

 I think sense 2 is the correct choice.

 One more check: could it be sense 4? "make known to the authorities" - no, there's no indication of authorities.
 Sense 6? "complain about" - no, it's not about complaining.
 Sense 3? "announce one's presence" - definitely not.
 Sense 5? Journalism - no.

 So it's between 1 and 2. Given the parallel with "incidents... reported" in the example for sense 2, and the context of findings from a conference/investigation, sense 2 is best.

 The answer should be {"sense_index": 2}.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: attempt
Target surface form: attempts
Context:
The Foundation has recently been involved in organising a conference which dealt with this critical challenge. Over 100 participants from the main interest groups attended and debated issues such as the role of key actors including public authorities, social partners, voluntary and community organisations as well as service users. There were relatively few cases reported of <t>attempts</t> to involve users in service planning but their involvement in service provision was found to be more common. Note was also taken of the variety of different roles played by public welfare

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=attempt%1:04:00:: | definition=earnest and conscientious activity intended to do or accomplish something | synonyms=effort, endeavor, endeavour, try | examples=made an effort to cover all the reading material; wished him luck in his endeavor
2. sense_key=attempt%1:04:02:: | definition=the act of attacking | synonyms=attack | examples=attacks on women increased last year; they made an attempt on his life

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "attempts" in the given context.

 Context analysis:
 - The sentence is: "There were relatively few cases reported of <t>attempts</t> to involve users in service planning but their involvement in service provision was found to be more common."
 - The context is about a conference organized by a Foundation dealing with involving users (service users) in service planning and provision.
 - The word "attempts" here refers to efforts or endeavors to involve users in service planning.

 Candidate senses:
 1. sense_key=attempt%1:04:00:: | definition=earnest and conscientious activity intended to do or accomplish something | synonyms=effort, endeavor, endeavour, try | examples=made an effort to cover all the reading material; wished him luck in his endeavor
 2. sense_key=attempt%1:04:02:: | definition=the act of attacking | synonyms=attack | examples=attacks on women increased last year; they made an attempt on his life

 Analysis:
 - Sense 1 fits the context: "attempts to involve users" means efforts or endeavors to involve them. This is about making an effort to accomplish something (involving users in planning).
 - Sense 2 is about attacking (e.g., "attempt on his life"), which clearly doesn't fit the context of involving users in service planning.

 Therefore, the correct sense is sense 1 (attempt%1:04:00::).

 The user wants the output as: {"sense_index": 1}

 Wait, I need to check the indexing. The user lists:
 1. sense_key=attempt%1:04:00::
 2. sense_key=attempt%1:04:02::

 So sense_index should be 1.

 Let me double-check:
 - "attempts to involve users" = efforts to involve users
 - This matches definition 1: "earnest and conscientious activity intended to do or accomplish something"
 - Synonyms: effort, endeavor, endeavour, try
 - This makes sense in the context of social services and user involvement.

 Definition 2 is about attacking: "the act of attacking" - this is clearly wrong here.

 So the answer is sense_index: 1.

provider: Chutes


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: involve
Target surface form: involve
Context:
The Foundation has recently been involved in organising a conference which dealt with this critical challenge. Over 100 participants from the main interest groups attended and debated issues such as the role of key actors including public authorities, social partners, voluntary and community organisations as well as service users. There were relatively few cases reported of attempts to <t>involve</t> users in service planning but their involvement in service provision was found to be more common. Note was also taken of the variety of different roles played by public welfare

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=involve%2:42:01:: | definition=connect closely and often incriminatingly | synonyms=affect, regard | examples=This new ruling affects your business
2. sense_key=involve%2:42:04:: | definition=engage as a participant | examples=Don't involve me in your family affairs!
3. sense_key=involve%2:42:00:: | definition=have as a necessary feature | synonyms=imply | examples=This decision involves many changes
4. sense_key=involve%2:42:07:: | definition=require as useful, just, or proper | synonyms=necessitate, ask, postulate, need, require, take | examples=It takes nerve to do what she did; success usually requires hard work
5. sense_key=involve%2:42:02:: | definition=contain as a part | examples=Dinner at Joe's always involves at least six courses
6. sense_key=involve%2:31:00:: | definition=occupy or engage the interest of | examples=His story completely involved me during the entire afternoon
7. sense_key=involve%2:30:00:: | definition=make complex or intricate or complicated | examples=The situation was rather involved

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "involve" in the given context.

Context analysis:
"There were relatively few cases reported of attempts to <t>involve</t> users in service planning but their involvement in service provision was found to be more common."

The sentence is talking about attempts to include/engage users in service planning. The structure is "attempts to involve users in service planning" - meaning to engage them as participants, to include them, to get them to take part.

Let's look at the candidate senses:

1. involve%2:42:01:: - connect closely and often incriminatingly (affect, regard). Example: "This new ruling affects your business". This doesn't fit. Not about incriminating or affecting in that sense.

2. involve%2:42:04:: - engage as a participant. Example: "Don't involve me in your family affairs!" This seems very close. The context is about engaging users as participants in service planning.

3. involve%2:42:00:: - have as a necessary feature (imply). Example: "This decision involves many changes". This is about entailment/necessary consequence. Not fitting here.

4. involve%2:42:07:: - require as useful, just, or proper (necessitate, need, require). Example: "success usually requires hard work". Not quite. It's not saying service planning requires users, but rather attempts to engage/include them.

5. involve%2:42:02:: - contain as a part. Example: "Dinner at Joe's always involves at least six courses". This is about containing/including as a component. Could be close, but "involve users" as containing them as part of planning? Maybe, but "engage as a participant" seems better because users are being brought in to participate in planning.

6. involve%2:31:00:: - occupy or engage the interest of. Example: "His story completely involved me during the entire afternoon". This is about captivating interest. Not fitting.

7. involve%2:30:00:: - make complex or intricate. Not fitting.

Between sense 2 and 5:
Sense 2: "engage as a participant" - Example: "Don't involve me in your family affairs!"
Sense 5: "contain as a part" - Example: "Dinner at Joe's always involves at least six courses"

In the context: "attempts to involve users in service planning". This means getting users to participate in service planning. The phrase "involve X in Y" where X is a person and Y is an activity strongly suggests sense 2 (engage as a participant). The example "Don't involve me in your family affairs!" matches the syntactic pattern perfectly: involve [person] in [activity/affairs].

Also, the surrounding text mentions "involvement in service provision" - again, participation.

Therefore, sense 2 (index 2) is the best fit.

Wait, let me double-check the indexing. The user lists:
1. sense_key=involve%2:42:01::
2. sense_key=involve%2:42:04::
3. sense_key=involve%2:42:00::
4. sense_key=involve%2:42:07::
5. sense_key=involve%2:42:02::
6. sense_key=involve%2:31:00::
7. sense_key=involve%2:30:00::

So sense 2 is index 2.

The user asks: Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

So I should return {"sense_index": 2}.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: user
Target surface form: users
Context:
The Foundation has recently been involved in organising a conference which dealt with this critical challenge. Over 100 participants from the main interest groups attended and debated issues such as the role of key actors including public authorities, social partners, voluntary and community organisations as well as service users. There were relatively few cases reported of attempts to involve <t>users</t> in service planning but their involvement in service provision was found to be more common. Note was also taken of the variety of different roles played by public welfare

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=user%1:18:00:: | definition=a person who makes use of a thing; someone who uses or employs something
2. sense_key=user%1:18:01:: | definition=a person who uses something or someone selfishly or unethically | synonyms=exploiter
3. sense_key=user%1:18:02:: | definition=a person who takes drugs | synonyms=drug user, substance abuser

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "users" in the given context.

 Target lemma: user
 Target surface form: users
 Context analysis:
 - The text is about a conference organized by "The Foundation"
 - It mentions "service users" earlier in the text: "public authorities, social partners, voluntary and community organisations as well as service users"
 - Later it mentions: "attempts to involve <t>users</t> in service planning"
 - The context is about service provision, service planning, public welfare
 - The users are being involved in service planning and service provision
 - This is clearly referring to people who use services (service users)

 Candidate senses:
 1. user%1:18:00:: - a person who makes use of a thing; someone who uses or employs something
 2. user%1:18:01:: - a person who uses something or someone selfishly or unethically (synonyms: exploiter)
 3. user%1:18:02:: - a person who takes drugs (synonyms: drug user, substance abuser)

 Analysis:
 - Sense 2 (exploiter) doesn't fit - there's no connotation of selfish or unethical use in the context of service planning and welfare services.
 - Sense 3 (drug user) doesn't fit - the context is about public welfare services, service provision, and service planning, not drug use.
 - Sense 1 is the general sense of someone who makes use of a thing or service. In this context, "users" refers to "service users" - people who use the services being discussed (public welfare services).

 The phrase "service users" is a common collocation in social policy and public administration contexts, referring to people who use public services. This maps to sense 1 - a person who makes use of a thing (in this case, services).

 Therefore, the correct sense is sense 1 (index 1).

 Wait, I need to check the indexing. The user lists:
 1. sense_key=user%1:18:00::
 2. sense_key=user%1:18:01::
 3. sense_key=user%1:18:02::

 So sense_index should be 1.

 Let me double-check:
 - The context mentions "service users" explicitly earlier
 - Then refers to "users" as shorthand for service users
 - These are people who use services
 - Sense 1: "a person who makes use of a thing; someone who uses or employs something" - this fits perfectly
 - Sense 2 is about exploitation - doesn't fit
 - Sense 3 is about drugs - doesn't fit

 So the answer is {"sense_index": 1}


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: service
Target surface form: service
Context:
The Foundation has recently been involved in organising a conference which dealt with this critical challenge. Over 100 participants from the main interest groups attended and debated issues such as the role of key actors including public authorities, social partners, voluntary and community organisations as well as service users. There were relatively few cases reported of attempts to involve users in <t>service</t> planning but their involvement in service provision was found to be more common. Note was also taken of the variety of different roles played by public welfare

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=service%1:04:08:: | definition=work done by one person or group that benefits another | examples=budget separately for goods and services
2. sense_key=service%1:04:00:: | definition=an act of help or assistance | examples=he did them a service
3. sense_key=service%1:04:01:: | definition=the act of public worship following prescribed rules | synonyms=religious service, divine service | examples=the Sunday service
4. sense_key=service%1:14:05:: | definition=a company or agency that performs a public service; subject to government regulation
5. sense_key=service%1:04:07:: | definition=employment in or work for another | examples=he retired after 30 years of service
6. sense_key=service%1:14:00:: | definition=a force that is a branch of the armed forces | synonyms=military service, armed service
7. sense_key=service%1:18:00:: | definition=Canadian writer (born in England) who wrote about life in the Yukon Territory (1874-1958) | synonyms=Robert William Service
8. sense_key=service%1:07:00:: | definition=a means of serving | synonyms=avail, help | examples=of no avail; there's no help for it
9. sense_key=service%1:06:00:: | definition=tableware consisting of a complete set of articles (silver or dishware) for use at table | synonyms=table service
10. sense_key=service%1:04:03:: | definition=the act of mating by male animals | synonyms=servicing | examples=the bull was worth good money in servicing fees
11. sense_key=service%1:04:09:: | definition=(law) the acts performed by an English feudal tenant for the benefit of his lord which formed the consideration for the property granted to him
12. sense_key=service%1:04:02:: | definition=(sports) a stroke that puts the ball in play | synonyms=serve | examples=his powerful serves won the game
13. sense_key=service%1:04:04:: | definition=the act of delivering a writ or summons upon someone | synonyms=serving, service of process | examples=he accepted service of the subpoena
14. sense_key=service%1:04:05:: | definition=periodic maintenance on a car or machine | synonyms=overhaul, inspection and repair | examples=it was time for an overhaul on the tractor
15. sense_key=service%1:04:06:: | definition=the performance of duties by a waiter or servant | examples=that restaurant has excellent service

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "service" in the given context.

 Let me analyze the context:
 - The text is about a conference organized by a Foundation dealing with critical challenges.
 - Participants include public authorities, social partners, voluntary and community organisations, and service users.
 - The sentence mentions: "There were relatively few cases reported of attempts to involve users in service planning but their involvement in service provision was found to be more common."
 - Later mentions "public welfare"

 The specific target is "service planning" - it's about planning of services, and contrasts with "service provision".

 Now let's look at the candidate senses:

 1. service%1:04:08:: - work done by one person or group that benefits another; examples: "budget separately for goods and services"
 2. service%1:04:00:: - an act of help or assistance; examples: "he did them a service"
 3. service%1:04:01:: - the act of public worship following prescribed rules
 4. service%1:14:05:: - a company or agency that performs a public service; subject to government regulation
 5. service%1:04:07:: - employment in or work for another; examples: "he retired after 30 years of service"
 6. service%1:14:00:: - a force that is a branch of the armed forces
 7. service%1:18:00:: - Canadian writer (Robert William Service)
 8. service%1:07:00:: - a means of serving; synonyms: avail, help
 9. service%1:06:00:: - tableware consisting of a complete set of articles
 10. service%1:04:03:: - the act of mating by male animals
 11. service%1:04:09:: - (law) the acts performed by an English feudal tenant for the benefit of his lord
 12. service%1:04:02:: - (sports) a stroke that puts the ball in play
 13. service%1:04:04:: - the act of delivering a writ or summons upon someone
 14. service%1:04:05:: - periodic maintenance on a car or machine
 15. service%1:04:06:: - the performance of duties by a waiter or servant

 The context is about "service planning" and "service provision" in the context of public welfare, voluntary organizations, and community organisations. This is referring to services as in public services, social services, or services provided by organizations to users/beneficiaries.

 Looking at sense 1: "work done by one person or group that benefits another" with example "budget separately for goods and services" - this seems to fit the general concept of services in an economic/administrative context.

 Looking at sense 4: "a company or agency that performs a public service; subject to government regulation" - this refers to the organization itself, not the activity or output. The context mentions "service users" and "service planning" which suggests the activity or work being provided, not the organization.

 Looking at sense 1 again - "work done by one person or group that benefits another" - this aligns with "service provision" and "service planning" in the context of public welfare and voluntary sector. The example "goods and services" is very common in economic and administrative contexts.

 Sense 4 would be about the entity (like "the postal service"), but here "service" is being used as a mass noun or abstract concept in "service planning" (planning of services) and "service provision" (providing services).

 Sense 1 is the most general economic/administrative sense of service as work done for the benefit of others, which fits the context of public welfare, voluntary organizations, and involving users in planning.

 Actually, looking more carefully at the WordNet sense keys:
 - service%1:04:08:: is "work done by one person or group that benefits another"
 - service%1:04:00:: is "an act of help or assistance"

 The context mentions "service users" which is a term used in health and social care to refer to people who use services (like social services, healthcare services). This aligns with sense 1 - the services being works done by organizations (voluntary, community, public authorities) that benefit the users.

 Sense 4 is about the company/agency itself, which doesn't fit because you wouldn't say "users in [company] planning" - you might say "user involvement in service planning" where service refers to the work/activity being provided.

 Therefore, sense 1 (service%1:04:08::) seems correct.

 Wait, let me reconsider sense 4. "a company or agency that performs a public service" - could "service" in "service planning" mean the planning of the service organization? But "service provision" strongly suggests the provision of the service activity, not the provision of the company.

 Also, "service users" typically means users of services (the work/assistance provided), not users of companies.

 So sense 1 is the best fit.

 But let me double-check other possibilities:
 - Sense 8: "a means of serving" - synonyms avail, help. Not quite right.
 - Sense 2: "an act of help or assistance" - this is close, but sense 1 is broader and includes systematic work done by organizations.
 - Sense 14: "periodic maintenance" - no, that's mechanical service.
 - Sense 15: "performance of duties by a waiter" - no, that's hospitality.

 The context is about welfare services, community services - these are covered by sense 1.

 The index for sense 1 in the list is 1 (the first one).

 Wait, the user asks for the sense_index based on the list provided. The list is numbered 1-15. So I need to return the number from that list.

 Sense 1 in the list is: service%1:04:08:: definition=work done by one person or group that benefits another

 This seems correct.

 Actually, looking at the gloss for sense 4 again: "a company or agency that performs a public service; subject to government regulation" - this is the "service" as in "the civil service" or "the postal service" - referring to the organization.

 But in the context "service planning" and "service provision", and "service users", these are distinct concepts:
 - Service users = people who use the services
 - Service planning = planning the delivery of services
 - Service provision = providing the services

 This maps to sense 1: "work done by one person or group that benefits another"

 Therefore, the answer should be sense_index: 1

 But wait, I should verify the WordNet sense ordering. In WordNet, service has multiple senses. The sense_key service%1:04:08:: corresponds to the sense "work done by one person or group that benefits another".

 In the candidate list:
 1. sense_key=service%1:04:08::
 2. sense_key=service%1:04:00::
 3. sense_key=service%1:04:01::
 ...

 So the list index 1 corresponds to sense_key service%1:04:08::.

 Yes, I should return {"sense_index": 1}.

provider: DigitalOcean