[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: organization
Target surface form: organization
Context:
As we all know, a few minutes before the end of the game (that their team had already won), both players deliberately wasted time which made the referee show the second yellow card to both of them. This way, and since Real Madrid will finish as leader of its group, both players will fulfil the prescribed sanction during the next game of league, against Auxerre, and will be able to get rid of the cards the following phase. Finally, the committee of discipline of the UEFA has sanctioned with two games the trainer of the team, Jose Mourinho, and with different economic amounts the implied players. The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of football. It is so extended that it part of the ethos, of the unwritten rules, but followed nonetheless by this sport. Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid <t>organization</t> (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician. Anyway, the debate deals with if that type of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport, that is to say, if with these actions fraud is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful actions with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=organization%1:14:00:: | definition=a group of people who work together | synonyms=organisation
2. sense_key=organization%1:09:00:: | definition=an organized structure for arranging or classifying | synonyms=arrangement, organisation, system | examples=he changed the arrangement of the topics; the facts were familiar but it was in the organization of them that he was original
3. sense_key=organization%1:14:01:: | definition=the persons (or committees or departments etc.) who make up a body for the purpose of administering something | synonyms=administration, governance, governing body, establishment, brass, organisation | examples=he claims that the present administration is corrupt; the governance of an association is responsible to its members
4. sense_key=organization%1:04:00:: | definition=the act of organizing a business or an activity related to a business | synonyms=organisation | examples=he was brought in to supervise the organization of a new department
5. sense_key=organization%1:07:00:: | definition=an ordered manner; orderliness by virtue of being methodical and well organized | synonyms=organisation, system | examples=his compulsive organization was not an endearing quality; we can't do it unless we establish some system around here
6. sense_key=organization%1:04:01:: | definition=the activity or result of distributing or disposing persons or things properly or methodically | synonyms=organisation | examples=his organization of the work force was very efficient
7. sense_key=organization%1:04:02:: | definition=the act of forming or establishing something | synonyms=constitution, establishment, formation, organisation | examples=the constitution of a PTA group last year; it was the establishment of his reputation

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation (WSD) for the target word "organization" in the given context.

 Let me analyze the context:
 - The text is about a football/soccer incident involving Real Madrid
 - The specific phrase is: "team of the Real Madrid <t>organization</t>"
 - It's discussing the entity Real Madrid as an organization/institution
 - The context mentions: "that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor", "fined its players", "committee of discipline of the UEFA"

 Now let me look at the candidate senses:

 1. sense_key=organization%1:14:00:: | definition=a group of people who work together | synonyms=organisation
    - This is a general group of people working together.

 2. sense_key=organization%1:09:00:: | definition=an organized structure for arranging or classifying | synonyms=arrangement, organisation, system
    - This is about structure/arrangement, not the entity itself.

 3. sense_key=organization%1:14:01:: | definition=the persons (or committees or departments etc.) who make up a body for the purpose of administering something | synonyms=administration, governance, governing body, establishment, brass, organisation | examples=he claims that the present administration is corrupt; the governance of an association is responsible to its members
    - This refers to the governing body, administration, the people who make up the body for administering something.

 4. sense_key=organization%1:04:00:: | definition=the act of organizing a business or an activity related to a business | synonyms=organisation
    - This is the act/process of organizing.

 5. sense_key=organization%1:07:00:: | definition=an ordered manner; orderliness by virtue of being methodical and well organized | synonyms=organisation, system
    - This is about the quality of being organized.

 6. sense_key=organization%1:04:01:: | definition=the activity or result of distributing or disposing persons or things properly or methodically | synonyms=organisation
    - Another act/process sense.

 7. sense_key=organization%1:04:02:: | definition=the act of forming or establishing something | synonyms=constitution, establishment, formation, organisation
    - Another act/process sense about forming/establishing.

 Now, looking at the context "Real Madrid organization":
 - Real Madrid is a football club, which is an institution/entity.
 - The text refers to it as having a hymn, fining players, being part of the debate about noble behavior.
 - The phrase "team of the Real Madrid organization" suggests Real Madrid is being referred to as an entity, an institution, or a body that administers/administrates the team.

 Let's compare sense 1 and sense 3:
 - Sense 1: "a group of people who work together" - very general
 - Sense 3: "the persons (or committees or departments etc.) who make up a body for the purpose of administering something" - more specific to administrative bodies, governance, establishment.

 The context mentions:
 - "committee of discipline of the UEFA"
 - "team of the Real Madrid organization"
 - Real Madrid is described as having a hymn and fining players (administrative actions)

 However, "Real Madrid organization" could also be interpreted as the club as a whole (the group of people working together).

 But looking closely at sense 3: "the persons (or committees or departments etc.) who make up a body for the purpose of administering something" - this seems to refer specifically to the governing/administrative part.

 However, in common parlance, "Real Madrid organization" refers to the club/institution as a whole entity - the group of people (players, staff, management) working together as a unit.

 Let me reconsider sense 1 vs sense 3.

 Sense 1: organization%1:14:00:: - "a group of people who work together"
 Sense 3: organization%1:14:01:: - "the persons (or committees or departments etc.) who make up a body for the purpose of administering something"

 The context: "team of the Real Madrid organization" - this suggests the organization is the overarching entity that contains the team. Real Madrid is a sports organization/club.

 In WordNet:
 - Sense 1 (14:00) is usually the general "organization" as an entity (like a company, club, etc.)
 - Sense 3 (14:01) is more specific to administrative bodies, governance.

 But looking at the glosses and examples:
 - Sense 1 examples: None provided, but typically this would be "the United Nations is an international organization"
 - Sense 3 examples: "he claims that the present administration is corrupt", "the governance of an association"

 The text mentions: "the committee of discipline of the UEFA has sanctioned... the trainer..." and discusses the "Real Madrid organization" in the context of it having values (nobility, honor) and fining players.

 Actually, looking at the specific phrase "team of the Real Madrid organization" - this is slightly odd phrasing. It seems to treat Real Madrid as the organization, and the team is part of it. Or it could mean the organization as the administrative body separate from the team.

 But given the context about UEFA committee, discipline, fining players, and the club's hymn and values - this seems to refer to Real Madrid as an institution/entity.

 Let me check the Princeton WordNet hierarchy:
 - organization%1:14:00:: is usually the first sense - the generic group/entity sense.
 - organization%1:14:01:: is the administrative body sense.

 In many WSD tasks, "organization" referring to a company, club, or institution typically maps to sense 1 (14:00) - the general group of people working together.

 However, let's look at the specific context clues:
 - "team of the Real Madrid organization" - this suggests the organization is distinct from the team, likely the club structure/administration.
 - But it also says "that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor" - hymns are typically of clubs/institutions, not just administrative bodies.
 - "has fined its players" - administrative action.

 Actually, looking at sense 3 again: "the persons (or committees or departments etc.) who make up a body for the purpose of administering something"

 If "Real Madrid organization" refers to the club as an administrative body (the establishment that runs the football team), then sense 3 might fit.

 But sense 1 "a group of people who work together" is broader and covers sports clubs.

 Let me check the examples for sense 3 again: "he claims that the present administration is corrupt", "the governance of an association"

 The context mentions "committee of discipline", "trainer", "players", "hymn", "fined its players".

 Actually, looking at the phrase structure: "team of the Real Madrid organization" - this is parallel to saying "the IBM organization" or "the Microsoft organization" - referring to the company/entity as a whole.

 I think sense 1 is the best fit: "a group of people who work together" - Real Madrid is a group of people (players, coaches, staff) working together as a football club.

 But let me reconsider if sense 3 could be better. Sense 3 emphasizes "administering something". While Real Madrid does administration, the context emphasizes the culture/ethos ("part of the ethos", "unwritten rules", "its hymn presumes of nobility"), which applies to the club as a whole institution, not just the administrative committee.

 However, the text specifically contrasts the "team" with the "organization" in the phrase "team of the Real Madrid organization", and mentions the organization fining players (which an administrative body does).

 Wait, looking carefully: "carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization" - this might mean the team belonging to the Real Madrid organization.

 In English, "organization" can mean:
 1. The entity/institution itself (sense 1)
 2. The administrative body (sense 3)

 Given the mention of "committee of discipline", "fined its players", and the contrast with "team", sense 3 (the administrative body) might be intended here.

 But actually, looking at typical usage, when we say "Real Madrid organization", we usually mean the club as a whole (sense 1), not specifically the board of directors (sense 3).

 Let me look at the WordNet definitions more carefully.

 Sense 1 (14:00): a group of people who work together
 - This is a social group.

 Sense 3 (14:01): the persons (or committees or departments etc.) who make up a body for the purpose of administering something
 - This is specifically about administration/governance.

 The context says: "team of the Real Madrid organization"
 This suggests the organization owns/houses the team.

 And: "that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor" - organizations (clubs) have hymns/anthems.
 "has fined its players" - organizations (clubs) fine players.

 This seems to be referring to the club as an institution.

 Between sense 1 and sense 3:
 - Sense 1 is the general sense of an organized group/entity.
 - Sense 3 is specific to administrative bodies.

 Real Madrid is a football club, which is an organization in the general sense (sense 1). It is also an administrative body (sense 3), but the general sense is usually the default for sports clubs unless specified otherwise (like "the organization of the club" referring to management).

 However, looking at the specific phrasing "team of the Real Madrid organization", this is slightly unusual. Normally we'd say "Real Madrid organization" or "Real Madrid Football Club". The addition of "team of the" suggests we're distinguishing the team from the larger organizational structure.

 But the text also mentions "committee of discipline of the UEFA" - UEFA is an organization too.

 Actually, looking at the full sentence: "the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization"

 This is slightly garbled English (probably translated), but it seems to mean the provocation was carried out by the team of the Real Madrid organization.

 I think sense 1 is the safest choice: Real Madrid as a group of people who work together (the club).

 But let me check if there's any reason to prefer sense 3. The mention of fining players and committees suggests administrative functions, but the hymn and ethos suggest the cultural institution.

 Actually, looking at the WordNet examples for sense 3: "he claims that the present administration is corrupt; the governance of an association is responsible to its members"

 "Association" is mentioned - football clubs are often called associations (e.g., "the American Football Association"). Real Madrid is a "club", which is a type of organization.

 I think both could be argued, but sense 1 is the hypernym/higher-level sense that includes sports clubs.

 However, looking at the specific sense indices:
 1. organization%1:14:00:: - group of people who work together
 3. organization%1:14:01:: - persons who make up a body for the purpose of administering something

 Given that the text contrasts the team with the organization (implied by "team of the...organization"), and mentions administrative actions (fining), sense 3 might be intended.

 But wait - "team of the Real Madrid organization" could just mean the team belonging to/constituting the Real Madrid organization.

 Let me look for similar examples in WordNet training data or standard disambiguation.

 In standard WSD:
 - "the Red Cross is a humanitarian organization" -> sense 1 (14:00)
 - "the organization of the company" -> sense 4 or 6 (act of organizing)
 - "he joined the organization" -> sense 1 (the group)

 "Real Madrid organization" is similar to "Red Cross organization" - referring to the entity itself.

 Therefore, sense 1 seems correct.

 But I'm uneasy about the specific phrasing "team of the Real Madrid organization". If the author wanted to say Real Madrid, they would just say "Real Madrid". The fact that they say "the Real Madrid organization" suggests they are emphasizing the organizational/institutional aspect.

 However, looking at sense 1 vs sense 3 again:
 - Sense 1: a group of people who work together (岩)
 - Sense 3: the persons... who make up a body for the purpose of administering something (管理機構)

 In the context: "the committee of discipline of the UEFA has sanctioned... the trainer... and... the implied players. The provocation... is not a new practice... It is so extended that it part of the ethos... team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous acts)..."

 The parenthetical "that has fined its players" strongly suggests the administrative/governing aspect is being emphasized. The organization (administrative body) fines the players.

 Also, "team of the..." suggests the organization is distinct from the team - i.e., the management vs the players.

 Therefore, sense 3 (organization%1:14:01::) - the administrative body - might be the correct choice.

 Let me verify with the synonyms for sense 3: administration, governance, governing body, establishment, brass, organisation.

 In the text:
 - "committee of discipline" (synonym: governing body?)
 - "fined its players" (administrative action)

 The text treats the organization as an entity that can fine players, which is an administrative/governing function.

 While sense 1 could also work (the club as a whole fines players), sense 3 is more specific to the administrative aspect which seems to be highlighted here.

 However, looking at the gloss for sense 1 again: "a group of people who work together" - this is very broad and includes the administrative body.

 But sense 3 is more specific: "the persons (or committees or departments etc.) who make up a body for the purpose of administering something"

 Given that:
 1. The text mentions "committee of discipline" in the same context
 2. The organization is described as fining players (administrative act)
 3. The phrase "team of the..." suggests a part-whole relationship where the organization is the administrative structure

 I think sense 3 is the best fit.

 Wait, but "Real Madrid organization" is commonly understood as the entire club, not just the board. And the hymn belongs to the club as a whole, not just the administrative committee.

 Also, WordNet sense 3 examples focus on "administration", "governance" - the people doing the governing.

 But in "Real Madrid organization", we refer to the institution.

 Let me reconsider sense 1: "a group of people who work together"

 Real Madrid is definitely a group of people who work together.

 But is it specifically the "persons who make up a body for the purpose of administering something"?

 The fine is issued by the disciplinary committee or the club management, which is part of the organization in sense 3.

 Actually, looking at the sentence structure again: "carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization"

 This is ambiguous. It could mean:
 a) Carried out by [the team of the Real Madrid organization] - i.e., the players of Real Madrid
 b) Carried out by team of [the Real Madrid organization] - awkward phrasing

 Given the context about wasting time and yellow cards, it was the players who did it. So "team" here means the players/squad. And this team belongs to the Real Madrid organization.

 So the organization is the club/institution that owns/employs the team.

 In this case, is it sense 1 or sense 3?

 A football club is both:
 - A group of people working together (sense 1)
 - An administrative body (sense 3)

 But typically, in WordNet:
 - sense 14:00 is for organizations as social units (companies, clubs, associations)
 - sense 14:01 is specifically for administrative bodies, governments, managements

 The mention of "committee" and "fining" pushes toward sense 14:01.

 However, the mention of "hymn" and "ethos" pushes toward sense 14:00 (the cultural entity).

 I think I need to decide. Given that the text explicitly mentions administrative actions (fining) and committees, and the organization is presented as distinct from the team (players), sense 3 is likely the intended sense.

 But I'm still concerned that sense 1 is the default for "X organization" where X is a proper noun referring to a club.

 Let me check if there are any other clues.

 The text also mentions: "the committee of discipline of the UEFA"

 UEFA is the Union of European Football Associations - an organization (sense 1 or 3).

 But UEFA is specifically an association of associations (football associations).

 Real Madrid is a "club", which is a type of organization.

 In WordNet, "club" is a separate synset, but "organization" is the hypernym.

 Actually, looking at the indices:
 1. 14:00 - group of people who work together
 2. 09:00 - structure for arranging
 3. 14:01 - persons who make up a body for administering
 4. 04:00 - act of organizing
 5. 07:00 - ordered manner
 6. 04:01 - activity of distributing
 7. 04:02 - act of forming

 Given that this is about the entity Real Madrid, and not the act of organizing or a manner of being organized, we can eliminate 2, 4, 5, 6, 7.

 It's between 1 and 3.

 Sense 1: organization%1:14:00::
 Sense 3: organization%1:14:01::

 The difference is subtle. Sense 3 is specifically about the administering body.

 In the sentence: "team of the Real Madrid organization"

 If I substitute sense 3: "team of the Real Madrid administration/governing body"
 If I substitute sense 1: "team of the Real Madrid group/club"

 Both work, but sense 1 is more natural for referring to the club as a whole.

 However, the parenthetical "that has fined its players" - who fines players? The club management/administration. So sense 3 fits well here.

 Also, if it were sense 1, would we say "team of the Real Madrid group of people who work together"? That's redundant.

 But "team of the Real Madrid governing body" makes sense - the team belongs to the administrative structure.

 Actually, looking at it again, "Real Madrid organization" is a way of referring to the club to sound more formal or to emphasize the institutional aspect.

 I will go with sense 1 (index 1) as the primary sense for referring to an organized entity like a football club, but I acknowledge sense 3 is a strong candidate.

 Wait, I need to check the exact wording of the instructions. "Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}."

 The sense index refers to the numbered list provided:
 1. sense_key=organization%1:14:00::
 2. sense_key=organization%1:09:00::
 3. sense_key=organization%1:14:01::
 4. sense_key=organization%1:04:00::
 5. sense_key=organization%1:07:00::
 6. sense_key=organization%1:04:01::
 7. sense_key=organization%1:04:02::

 So if I choose sense 1:14:00, the index is 1.
 If I choose sense 1:14:01, the index is 3.

 Given the strong emphasis on administrative functions (fining players, committee of discipline, hymn mentioning nobility and honor as institutional values), and the distinction between the team (players) and the organization (the club structure), I believe sense 3 (the administrative body sense) is the best choice.

 Final check: Does "Real Madrid organization" refer to the governing body or the club as a whole?

 In common parlance, it refers to the club. But in this specific context with the administrative details, sense 3 fits better.

 However, looking at WordNet sense 1:14:00 examples elsewhere (not provided here but from knowledge), it includes "a voluntary organization", "a charitable organization", etc. Real Madrid is this type of organization.

 Sense 1:14:01 is more like "the administration", "the brass", "the establishment" - the people in charge.

 The text says the organization "fined its players" - this is what the management does.

 But it also says the organization has a hymn - this is what the club has.

 A club has a hymn. A governing body (sense 3) might not be said to have a hymn, but rather the institution has it.

 Therefore, despite the administrative references, sense 1 is probably correct because the hymn and ethos are attributes of the entire club/organization, not just the administrative committee.

 I'll go with index 1.


attempt_kind: initial

status: success

[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: nobility
Target surface form: nobility
Context:
As we all know, a few minutes before the end of the game (that their team had already won), both players deliberately wasted time which made the referee show the second yellow card to both of them. This way, and since Real Madrid will finish as leader of its group, both players will fulfil the prescribed sanction during the next game of league, against Auxerre, and will be able to get rid of the cards the following phase. Finally, the committee of discipline of the UEFA has sanctioned with two games the trainer of the team, Jose Mourinho, and with different economic amounts the implied players. The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of football. It is so extended that it part of the ethos, of the unwritten rules, but followed nonetheless by this sport. Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of <t>nobility</t> and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician. Anyway, the debate deals with if that type of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport, that is to say, if with these actions fraud is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful actions with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=nobility%1:14:00:: | definition=a privileged class holding hereditary titles | synonyms=aristocracy
2. sense_key=nobility%1:07:00:: | definition=the quality of elevation of mind and exaltation of character or ideals or conduct | synonyms=nobleness, magnanimousness, grandeur
3. sense_key=nobility%1:26:00:: | definition=the state of being of noble birth | synonyms=noblesse

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

finish_reason: stop

role: assistant

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation (WSD) on the word "nobility" in the given context.

Let me analyze the context:
The sentence is: "that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor"

The context is about Real Madrid's hymn (anthem/song) which claims/presumes to have "nobility and honor". This is referring to the moral qualities or characteristics of the team/organization, not to a class of people (aristocracy) or the state of being born noble.

Let me look at the candidate senses:

1. sense_key=nobility%1:14:00:: | definition=a privileged class holding hereditary titles | synonyms=aristocracy
   - This refers to the social class of nobles/aristocrats.
   - In the context, Real Madrid is not claiming to BE a privileged class of people holding hereditary titles. While they might be prestigious, "nobility" here is paired with "honor", suggesting moral qualities.

2. sense_key=nobility%1:07:00:: | definition=the quality of elevation of mind and exaltation of character or ideals or conduct | synonyms=nobleness, magnanimousness, grandeur
   - This refers to the quality of being noble in character - magnanimity, high moral ideals, honorable conduct.
   - The context mentions "nobility and honor" together. This fits perfectly. Real Madrid's hymn presumably celebrates their high moral character and honorable conduct.
   - This makes sense in the context of criticizing their behavior (getting yellow cards deliberately) which contradicts these noble principles.

3. sense_key=nobility%1:26:00:: | definition=the state of being of noble birth | synonyms=noblesse
   - This refers to noble birth or extraction.
   - While Real Madrid is a prestigious club, the pairing with "honor" and the contrast with their actual behavior (which is being criticized as lacking in sportsmanship) suggests this is about moral qualities, not birth status.

The phrase "presumes of nobility and honor" is talking about the club's self-image or values - they claim to have high moral standards (nobility of character) and honor. This contrasts with the cynical behavior described (deliberately getting yellow cards).

Therefore, sense 2 is the best fit: "the quality of elevation of mind and exaltation of character or ideals or conduct".

Actually, looking at WordNet structure:
- nobility%1:14:00:: is the social class (aristocracy)
- nobility%1:07:00:: is the quality of being noble (moral excellence)
- nobility%1:26:00:: is the state of being of noble birth (noblesse)

The context clearly indicates moral excellence/character, not social class or birth status.

So the answer should be sense_index: 2.

Wait, I need to check the exact format. The user wants:
{"sense_index": 3} (for example)

So I should return:
{"sense_index": 2}

But let me double-check. The context says: "that in its hymn presumes of <t>nobility</t> and honor"

Real Madrid's hymn presumably claims the team has "nobility and honor". This is about the team's character and ideals, not about being aristocrats or being born noble. The contrast is between their claimed high moral standing (nobility) and their actual behavior (cynical time-wasting to manipulate sanctions).

Therefore, sense 2 (quality of elevation of mind...) is correct.

One more check: Could sense 1 (aristocracy) work? Real Madrid is sometimes called "los blancos" and has a regal history, but "presumes of nobility and honor" in the context of criticizing their sportsmanship definitely points to the moral sense, not the social class sense.

Could sense 3 (noble birth) work? No, a football club doesn't have noble birth in the hereditary sense.

So yes, definitely sense 2.

format: unknown

native_finish_reason: stop

provider: DigitalOcean

currency: USD


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: honor
Target surface form: honor
Context:
As we all know, a few minutes before the end of the game (that their team had already won), both players deliberately wasted time which made the referee show the second yellow card to both of them. This way, and since Real Madrid will finish as leader of its group, both players will fulfil the prescribed sanction during the next game of league, against Auxerre, and will be able to get rid of the cards the following phase. Finally, the committee of discipline of the UEFA has sanctioned with two games the trainer of the team, Jose Mourinho, and with different economic amounts the implied players. The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of football. It is so extended that it part of the ethos, of the unwritten rules, but followed nonetheless by this sport. Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and <t>honor</t>, and that has fined its players for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician. Anyway, the debate deals with if that type of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport, that is to say, if with these actions fraud is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful actions with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=honor%1:10:00:: | definition=a tangible symbol signifying approval or distinction | synonyms=award, accolade, honour, laurels | examples=an award for bravery
2. sense_key=honor%1:26:00:: | definition=the state of being honored | synonyms=honour, laurels
3. sense_key=honor%1:07:00:: | definition=the quality of being honorable and having a good name | synonyms=honour | examples=a man of honor
4. sense_key=honor%1:07:01:: | definition=a woman's virtue or chastity | synonyms=honour, purity, pureness

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "honor" in the given context.

 Let me analyze the context:
 - The text is about Real Madrid football club
 - It mentions that in their hymn (anthem), they "presume of nobility and honor"
 - The context is about values, principles, and moral character of the organization
 - It's contrasting their claimed values (nobility and honor) with their actual behavior (getting yellow cards on purpose)

 Now let's look at the candidate senses:

 1. sense_key=honor%1:10:00:: - "a tangible symbol signifying approval or distinction" (award, accolade)
    - This refers to physical awards or prizes. The context is talking about values in a hymn, not tangible awards.

 2. sense_key=honor%1:26:00:: - "the state of being honored"
    - This refers to the state of being respected or honored by others. While close, the context seems to focus more on the quality/character trait itself rather than the state of being honored.

 3. sense_key=honor%1:07:00:: - "the quality of being honorable and having a good name" (examples: "a man of honor")
    - This fits well. The hymn claims nobility and honor as qualities/virtues of the organization. It's about having a good reputation and being honorable. The phrase "man of honor" example aligns with the idea of an organization claiming to have honor as a character trait.

 4. sense_key=honor%1:07:01:: - "a woman's virtue or chastity"
    - This is specifically about female chastity, which is clearly not relevant to a football club's hymn.

 The best fit is sense 3: "the quality of being honorable and having a good name". The context discusses Real Madrid's hymn claiming nobility and honor - these are moral qualities and character traits, not tangible awards (sense 1), not the state of being honored (sense 2), and certainly not about female chastity (sense 4).

 The phrase "presumes of nobility and honor" suggests they claim to possess these virtues/qualities. This aligns with sense 3's definition of "the quality of being honorable and having a good name" and the example "a man of honor."

 Therefore, the answer should be {"sense_index": 3}.

provider: DeepInfra


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: player
Target surface form: players
Context:
As we all know, a few minutes before the end of the game (that their team had already won), both players deliberately wasted time which made the referee show the second yellow card to both of them. This way, and since Real Madrid will finish as leader of its group, both players will fulfil the prescribed sanction during the next game of league, against Auxerre, and will be able to get rid of the cards the following phase. Finally, the committee of discipline of the UEFA has sanctioned with two games the trainer of the team, Jose Mourinho, and with different economic amounts the implied players. The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of football. It is so extended that it part of the ethos, of the unwritten rules, but followed nonetheless by this sport. Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its <t>players</t> for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician. Anyway, the debate deals with if that type of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport, that is to say, if with these actions fraud is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful actions with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=player%1:18:01:: | definition=a person who participates in or is skilled at some game | synonyms=participant
2. sense_key=player%1:18:02:: | definition=someone who plays a musical instrument (as a profession) | synonyms=musician, instrumentalist
3. sense_key=player%1:18:00:: | definition=a theatrical performer | synonyms=actor, histrion, thespian, role player
4. sense_key=player%1:18:04:: | definition=a person who pursues a number of different social and sexual partners simultaneously
5. sense_key=player%1:18:03:: | definition=an important participant (as in a business deal) | examples=he was a major player in setting up the corporation

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the target word "players" (lemma: player) in the given context.

Let me analyze the context:
- The text is about football (soccer) - mentions "game", "team", "referee", "yellow card", "Real Madrid", "UEFA", "discipline committee"
- The specific sentence: "The committee of discipline of the UEFA has sanctioned with two games the trainer of the team, Jose Mourinho, and with different economic amounts the implied players."
- Later: "Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its <t>players</t> for analogous acts)"

So the context is clearly about sports, specifically football/soccer players. They are people participating in the game/sport.

Now let's look at the candidate senses:

1. sense_key=player%1:18:01:: | definition=a person who participates in or is skilled at some game | synonyms=participant
   - This fits perfectly. Football players participate in the game of football (soccer).

2. sense_key=player%1:18:02:: | definition=someone who plays a musical instrument (as a profession) | synonyms=musician, instrumentalist
   - Not relevant. Context is football, not music.

3. sense_key=player%1:18:00:: | definition=a theatrical performer | synonyms=actor, histrion, thespian, role player
   - Not relevant. While the text mentions "dramatization" and "histrionic" in reference to Mourinho, the target word "players" refers to the athletes being fined, not actors.

4. sense_key=player%1:18:04:: | definition=a person who pursues a number of different social and sexual partners simultaneously
   - Not relevant. This is slang for a womanizer/playboy, not relevant to sports context.

5. sense_key=player%1:18:03:: | definition=an important participant (as in a business deal) | examples=he was a major player in setting up the corporation
   - This is metaphorical usage for business contexts. While the text mentions "participant" in the sense of business/legal language ("important participant"), the specific word "players" here refers to the athletes on the football team, not business participants.

The context clearly talks about football players - athletes participating in the sport. Sense 1 is the correct choice.

Wait, let me double-check the sense indexing. The user lists:
1. sense_key=player%1:18:01::
2. sense_key=player%1:18:02::
3. sense_key=player%1:18:00::
4. sense_key=player%1:18:04::
5. sense_key=player%1:18:03::

The indices seem to be:
- Index 1: game participant (sports)
- Index 2: musician
- Index 3: actor/theatrical performer
- Index 4: womanizer
- Index 5: business participant

Actually, looking at the WordNet sense keys:
- player%1:18:00:: is the first sense (actor)
- player%1:18:01:: is the second sense (game participant)
- player%1:18:02:: is the third sense (musician)
- player%1:18:03:: is the fourth sense (business participant)
- player%1:18:04:: is the fifth sense (womanizer)

But the user has numbered them 1-5 in the list. So:
- Candidate 1 corresponds to player%1:18:01:: (game participant)
- Candidate 2 corresponds to player%1:18:02:: (musician)
- Candidate 3 corresponds to player%1:18:00:: (actor)
- Candidate 4 corresponds to player%1:18:04:: (womanizer)
- Candidate 5 corresponds to player%1:18:03:: (business participant)

Given the context about football, the correct sense is the game participant, which is candidate 1.

The target surface form is "players" which appears in "its players" referring to Real Madrid's football players.

Therefore, the answer should be {"sense_index": 1}.

provider: Moonshot AI


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: act
Target surface form: acts
Context:
As we all know, a few minutes before the end of the game (that their team had already won), both players deliberately wasted time which made the referee show the second yellow card to both of them. This way, and since Real Madrid will finish as leader of its group, both players will fulfil the prescribed sanction during the next game of league, against Auxerre, and will be able to get rid of the cards the following phase. Finally, the committee of discipline of the UEFA has sanctioned with two games the trainer of the team, Jose Mourinho, and with different economic amounts the implied players. The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of football. It is so extended that it part of the ethos, of the unwritten rules, but followed nonetheless by this sport. Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous <t>acts</t>) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician. Anyway, the debate deals with if that type of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport, that is to say, if with these actions fraud is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful actions with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=act%1:10:01:: | definition=a legal document codifying the result of deliberations of a committee or society or legislative body | synonyms=enactment
2. sense_key=act%1:03:00:: | definition=something that people do or cause to happen | synonyms=deed, human action, human activity
3. sense_key=act%1:10:00:: | definition=a subdivision of a play or opera or ballet
4. sense_key=act%1:10:02:: | definition=a short theatrical performance that is part of a longer program | synonyms=routine, number, turn, bit | examples=he did his act three times every evening; she had a catchy little routine
5. sense_key=act%1:10:03:: | definition=a manifestation of insincerity | examples=he put on quite an act for her benefit

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation (WSD) on the word "acts" in the given context.

 Target lemma: act
 Target surface form: acts
 Context analysis:
 The context is about football (soccer), specifically about Real Madrid players deliberately wasting time to get yellow cards so they can serve their suspension in a less important match. The relevant sentence is: "that has fined its players for analogous <t>acts</t>"

 The sentence says: "that has fined its players for analogous acts" - referring to the Real Madrid organization fining its players for similar actions/behaviors.

 Candidate senses:
 1. act%1:10:01:: - a legal document codifying the result of deliberations... (enactment)
 2. act%1:03:00:: - something that people do or cause to happen (deed, human action, human activity)
 3. act%1:10:00:: - a subdivision of a play or opera or ballet
 4. act%1:10:02:: - a short theatrical performance... (routine, number, turn, bit)
 5. act%1:10:03:: - a manifestation of insincerity

 Analysis:
 - The context is about players being fined for "analogous acts" - meaning analogous actions or behaviors.
 - "Acts" here refers to things that people do (deliberately wasting time, provoking yellow cards).
 - Sense 2 (act%1:03:00::) defines it as "something that people do or cause to happen" with synonyms "deed, human action, human activity".
 - This fits perfectly with the context of players committing certain actions/behaviors that warrant fines.
 - Sense 1 is about legal documents, which doesn't fit.
 - Sense 3 is about subdivisions of plays/operas, doesn't fit.
 - Sense 4 is about theatrical performances, doesn't fit (though there's mention of "dramatization" elsewhere in the text, the specific target word "acts" refers to the players' actions, not theatrical acts).
 - Sense 5 is about insincerity, which doesn't fit here.

 Therefore, the correct sense is sense 2 (index 2 in the list, which corresponds to act%1:03:00::).

 Wait, let me check the indexing. The user asks for {"sense_index": N} where N corresponds to the numbered list.

 The list is:
 1. sense_key=act%1:10:01::
 2. sense_key=act%1:03:00::
 3. sense_key=act%1:10:00::
 4. sense_key=act%1:10:02::
 5. sense_key=act%1:10:03::

 So sense 2 is the correct one.

 Let me double-check the context: "fined its players for analogous acts"
 - Are these legal acts (statutes)? No.
 - Are these theatrical acts? No, though there is mention of "dramatization" by Mourinho, the "acts" here refer to the actions of the players (wasting time, provoking cards).
 - Is it a manifestation of insincerity? No, that's a different meaning.

 The definition for sense 2: "something that people do or cause to happen" - this matches perfectly. The players did something (wasted time), and the club fined them for these actions/deeds.

 So the answer should be {"sense_index": 2}.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: history
Target surface form: history
Context:
As we all know, a few minutes before the end of the game (that their team had already won), both players deliberately wasted time which made the referee show the second yellow card to both of them. This way, and since Real Madrid will finish as leader of its group, both players will fulfil the prescribed sanction during the next game of league, against Auxerre, and will be able to get rid of the cards the following phase. Finally, the committee of discipline of the UEFA has sanctioned with two games the trainer of the team, Jose Mourinho, and with different economic amounts the implied players. The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of football. It is so extended that it part of the ethos, of the unwritten rules, but followed nonetheless by this sport. Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded <t>history</t> of histrionic and provoking technician. Anyway, the debate deals with if that type of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport, that is to say, if with these actions fraud is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful actions with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=history%1:28:00:: | definition=the aggregate of past events | examples=a critical time in the school's history
2. sense_key=history%1:10:00:: | definition=a record or narrative description of past events | synonyms=account, chronicle, story | examples=a history of France; he gave an inaccurate account of the plot to kill the president
3. sense_key=history%1:09:00:: | definition=the discipline that records and interprets past events involving human beings | examples=he teaches Medieval history; history takes the long view
4. sense_key=history%1:28:02:: | definition=the continuum of events occurring in succession leading from the past to the present and even into the future | examples=all of human history
5. sense_key=history%1:09:01:: | definition=all that is remembered of the past as preserved in writing; a body of knowledge | examples=the dawn of recorded history; from the beginning of history

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "history" in the given context.

 Let me analyze the context:
 - The text is about football/soccer, specifically about Jose Mourinho and his behavior
 - The specific phrase is: "who adds one more to his expanded <t>history</t> of histrionic and provoking technician"
 - This refers to Mourinho's pattern or record of being a histrionic and provoking technician/manager

 Now let's look at the candidate senses:

 1. sense_key=history%1:28:00:: | definition=the aggregate of past events | examples=a critical time in the school's history
    - This refers to past events in general, like "the history of Rome" or "a critical time in the school's history"
    - Not quite right for referring to someone's personal record of behavior

 2. sense_key=history%1:10:00:: | definition=a record or narrative description of past events | synonyms=account, chronicle, story | examples=a history of France; he gave an inaccurate account of the plot to kill the president
    - This refers to a written record or narrative
    - The context mentions "his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician" - this seems to refer to a record or account of his past behavior
    - Synonyms include "account, chronicle, story" - "account" fits well here ("his account of histrionic behavior")

 3. sense_key=history%1:09:00:: | definition=the discipline that records and interprets past events involving human beings | examples=he teaches Medieval history; history takes the long view
    - This is the academic field/study of history
    - Not applicable here

 4. sense_key=history%1:28:02:: | definition=the continuum of events occurring in succession leading from the past to the present and even into the future | examples=all of human history
    - This is about the flow of time/events
    - Too broad/abstract for this context

 5. sense_key=history%1:09:01:: | definition=all that is remembered of the past as preserved in writing; a body of knowledge | examples=the dawn of recorded history; from the beginning of history
    - This is about recorded knowledge of the past
    - Not quite right for a personal track record

 The phrase "his expanded history of..." suggests a record or account of past instances. This matches sense 2: "a record or narrative description of past events" with synonyms "account, chronicle, story".

 In this context, "history" means his track record or the accumulated account of his past behavior as a histrionic and provoking technician. This aligns with sense 2.

 Wait, let me reconsider sense 1: "the aggregate of past events" - could this fit? "His aggregate of past events of being histrionic..." - possible, but less likely than the "record/account" meaning.

 Actually, looking at the phrase "adds one more to his expanded history" - this suggests he is adding another incident to his record/reputation. This is similar to saying "he has a history of violence" - meaning a record or pattern of past behavior.

 In WordNet, "history" in the sense of "a record or narrative description of past events" (sense 2) seems to be the best fit when referring to someone's personal history or track record as a narrative of their past actions.

 However, I should check if there's a sense that specifically covers "a person's past record of behavior". Looking at the examples:
 - Sense 2 examples: "a history of France", "he gave an inaccurate account of the plot"
 - Sense 1 examples: "a critical time in the school's history"

 The phrase "his history of..." where it means his track record or pattern of past behavior is a common usage. In WordNet, this is typically covered by sense 2 (the narrative/record sense) or sometimes considered a separate usage.

 But looking carefully at the definitions:
 - Sense 1: "the aggregate of past events" - this is the events themselves
 - Sense 2: "a record or narrative description of past events" - this is the account of the events

 When we say "he has a history of violence", we mean there is a record or pattern of violent behavior in his past. This aligns with sense 2.

 Also, the synonym "account" in sense 2 fits well: "his account of histrionic behavior" (though "account" might not be perfect, it's closer than the other options).

 Actually, looking at common WSD datasets, "history" in the context of "a history of [behavior]" usually maps to sense 2.

 Let me double-check by looking at the specific phrase: "his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician"

 This means: his track record / the accumulated instances / the narrative of his past behavior showing he is a histrionic and provoking technician.

 This is definitely sense 2: a record or narrative description of past events.

 Therefore, the answer should be sense_index: 2.

provider: Phala


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: debate
Target surface form: debate
Context:
This way, and since Real Madrid will finish as leader of its group, both players will fulfil the prescribed sanction during the next game of league, against Auxerre, and will be able to get rid of the cards the following phase. Finally, the committee of discipline of the UEFA has sanctioned with two games the trainer of the team, Jose Mourinho, and with different economic amounts the implied players. The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of football. It is so extended that it part of the ethos, of the unwritten rules, but followed nonetheless by this sport. Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician. Anyway, the <t>debate</t> deals with if that type of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport, that is to say, if with these actions fraud is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful actions with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense. The matter examines the type of damage that is brought to the sporting spirit.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=debate%1:10:01:: | definition=a discussion in which reasons are advanced for and against some proposition or proposal | synonyms=argument, argumentation | examples=the argument over foreign aid goes on and on
2. sense_key=debate%1:10:00:: | definition=the formal presentation of a stated proposition and the opposition to it (usually followed by a vote) | synonyms=disputation, public debate

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "debate" in the given context.

 Let me analyze the context:
 - The text discusses a controversy in football (soccer) regarding Real Madrid players receiving yellow cards intentionally to serve suspensions strategically.
 - The specific sentence containing the target word: "Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact..."
 - Later: "Anyway, the <t>debate</t> deals with if that type of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport..."

 Now let's look at the candidate senses:

 1. sense_key=debate%1:10:01:: | definition=a discussion in which reasons are advanced for and against some proposition or proposal | synonyms=argument, argumentation | examples=the argument over foreign aid goes on and on

 2. sense_key=debate%1:10:00:: | definition=the formal presentation of a stated proposition and the opposition to it (usually followed by a vote) | synonyms=disputation, public debate

 Analysis:
 - Sense 1 refers to a general discussion/argument where reasons are advanced for and against something. This fits contexts like "the debate over climate change" or "political debate."
 - Sense 2 refers to a formal presentation, usually in a structured setting like a debate competition or parliamentary procedure, often followed by a vote.

 In the given context:
 - The text is talking about a controversy/dispute regarding sports ethics.
 - It mentions "the debate arisen in the related case" and "the debate deals with if that type of behavior..."
 - This is clearly referring to an ongoing discussion/argument about whether certain behavior contradicts sporting principles.
 - It's not referring to a formal debate competition with a proposition and opposition sides in a structured format followed by a vote.
 - It's referring to the general discussion/controversy surrounding the issue.

 Therefore, Sense 1 (debate%1:10:01::) is the correct choice. This is the "discussion" sense rather than the "formal disputation" sense.

 The synonyms for Sense 1 are "argument, argumentation" - which fits the context of people arguing about the ethics of the situation.
 The example "the argument over foreign aid goes on and on" is similar to the context where there's an ongoing argument/debate about the football incident.

 Sense 2 would be used for contexts like "the debate between the two candidates" or "a parliamentary debate" where there's a formal structure.

 So the answer should be: {"sense_index": 1}

provider: StreamLake


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: type
Target surface form: type
Context:
This way, and since Real Madrid will finish as leader of its group, both players will fulfil the prescribed sanction during the next game of league, against Auxerre, and will be able to get rid of the cards the following phase. Finally, the committee of discipline of the UEFA has sanctioned with two games the trainer of the team, Jose Mourinho, and with different economic amounts the implied players. The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of football. It is so extended that it part of the ethos, of the unwritten rules, but followed nonetheless by this sport. Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician. Anyway, the debate deals with if that <t>type</t> of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport, that is to say, if with these actions fraud is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful actions with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense. The matter examines the type of damage that is brought to the sporting spirit.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=type%1:09:00:: | definition=a subdivision of a particular kind of thing | examples=what type of sculpture do you prefer?
2. sense_key=type%1:18:00:: | definition=a person of a specified kind (usually with many eccentricities) | synonyms=character, eccentric, case | examples=a real character; a strange character
3. sense_key=type%1:14:01:: | definition=(biology) the taxonomic group whose characteristics are used to define the next higher taxon
4. sense_key=type%1:10:01:: | definition=printed characters | examples=small type is hard to read
5. sense_key=type%1:10:00:: | definition=all of the tokens of the same symbol | examples=the word `element' contains five different types of character
6. sense_key=type%1:06:00:: | definition=a small metal block bearing a raised character on one end; produces a printed character when inked and pressed on paper | examples=he dropped a case of type, so they made him pick them up

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "type" in the given context.

Let me analyze the context:
"Anyway, the debate deals with if that <t>type</t> of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport..."

The phrase is "that type of behavior". Here, "type" is being used to refer to a particular kind or category of behavior.

Let me look at the candidate senses:

1. sense_key=type%1:09:00:: | definition=a subdivision of a particular kind of thing | examples=what type of sculpture do you prefer?
2. sense_key=type%1:18:00:: | definition=a person of a specified kind (usually with many eccentricities) | synonyms=character, eccentric, case | examples=a real character; a strange character
3. sense_key=type%1:14:01:: | definition=(biology) the taxonomic group whose characteristics are used to define the next higher taxon
4. sense_key=type%1:10:01:: | definition=printed characters | examples=small type is hard to read
5. sense_key=type%1:10:00:: | definition=all of the tokens of the same symbol | examples=the word `element' contains five different types of character
6. sense_key=type%1:06:00:: | definition=a small metal block bearing a raised character on one end; produces a printed character when inked and pressed on paper | examples=he dropped a case of type, so they made him pick them up

The context is "that type of behavior". This clearly means "that kind of behavior" or "that category of behavior".

Sense 1: "a subdivision of a particular kind of thing" - this fits perfectly. "What type of sculpture do you prefer?" is analogous to "that type of behavior".

Sense 2 is about a person (character, eccentric).
Sense 3 is biology-specific.
Senses 4, 5, 6 are about printing/typography.

So the correct sense is sense 1 (index 1).

Wait, let me double-check the indexing. The user lists them as:
1. sense_key=type%1:09:00::
2. sense_key=type%1:18:00::
3. sense_key=type%1:14:01::
4. sense_key=type%1:10:01::
5. sense_key=type%1:10:00::
6. sense_key=type%1:06:00::

So I should return {"sense_index": 1}.

Let me verify: "that type of behavior" - yes, this is asking about a kind/category of behavior. Sense 1 is the general "kind/sort" meaning. The example "what type of sculpture do you prefer?" matches the syntactic pattern "type of [noun]".

The answer should be JSON exactly like {"sense_index": 3} but with 1 instead of 3.

provider: SiliconFlow


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: behavior
Target surface form: behavior
Context:
This way, and since Real Madrid will finish as leader of its group, both players will fulfil the prescribed sanction during the next game of league, against Auxerre, and will be able to get rid of the cards the following phase. Finally, the committee of discipline of the UEFA has sanctioned with two games the trainer of the team, Jose Mourinho, and with different economic amounts the implied players. The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of football. It is so extended that it part of the ethos, of the unwritten rules, but followed nonetheless by this sport. Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician. Anyway, the debate deals with if that type of <t>behavior</t> not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport, that is to say, if with these actions fraud is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful actions with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense. The matter examines the type of damage that is brought to the sporting spirit.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=behavior%1:04:00:: | definition=manner of acting or controlling yourself | synonyms=behaviour, conduct, doings
2. sense_key=behavior%1:26:00:: | definition=the action or reaction of something (as a machine or substance) under specified circumstances | synonyms=behaviour | examples=the behavior of small particles can be studied in experiments
3. sense_key=behavior%1:07:00:: | definition=(behavioral attributes) the way a person behaves toward other people | synonyms=demeanor, demeanour, behaviour, conduct, deportment
4. sense_key=behavior%1:04:01:: | definition=(psychology) the aggregate of the responses or reactions or movements made by an organism in any situation | synonyms=behaviour

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "behavior" in the given context. I need to choose the best sense from the 4 candidate senses provided.

 Let me analyze the context:
 - The text discusses football (soccer) players getting yellow cards intentionally to serve suspensions during less important matches
 - It mentions this is part of the "ethos" and "unwritten rules" of football
 - It questions whether this type of "behavior" contradicts the principles of the sport
 - It asks if this constitutes fraud despite being technically respectful of regulations
 - The debate is about whether this type of conduct/behavior violates sporting spirit

 Now let's look at the candidate senses:

 1. sense_key=behavior%1:04:00:: | definition=manner of acting or controlling yourself | synonyms=behaviour, conduct, doings
    - This is a general sense referring to how one acts or conducts oneself.

 2. sense_key=behavior%1:26:00:: | definition=the action or reaction of something (as a machine or substance) under specified circumstances | synonyms=behaviour | examples=the behavior of small particles can be studied in experiments
    - This is for non-human entities (machines, substances, particles). The context is about human players and their actions, so this is out.

 3. sense_key=behavior%1:07:00:: | definition=(behavioral attributes) the way a person behaves toward other people | synonyms=demeanor, demeanour, behaviour, conduct, deportment
    - This focuses on how a person behaves toward others, emphasizing social conduct and demeanor.

 4. sense_key=behavior%1:04:01:: | definition=(psychology) the aggregate of the responses or reactions or movements made by an organism in any situation | synonyms=behaviour
    - This is a technical/psychological sense about organisms' responses.

 The context is discussing the actions of football players and a coach - specifically the practice of intentionally getting yellow cards (provocation of a yellow card). This is about their conduct/actions in the sport.

 The phrase is "that type of behavior" referring to the intentional card-getting practice.

 Sense 1 (manner of acting or controlling yourself) vs Sense 3 (the way a person behaves toward other people):

 Sense 1 seems broader - general manner of acting.
 Sense 3 seems more focused on interpersonal/social behavior (demeanor toward others).

 However, looking at the context, the debate is about whether this type of conduct/action violates sporting principles. The word is referring to the general actions/conduct of the players (getting cards intentionally).

 But let me look more carefully at the specific wording in the context:
 "the debate deals with if that type of <t>behavior</t> not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport"

 This is referring to the practice of intentionally getting yellow cards - it's a type of conduct or way of acting.

 Sense 1: "manner of acting or controlling yourself" - this fits well. It's about how the players are acting/conducting themselves.

 Sense 3: "the way a person behaves toward other people" - while this involves other people (opponents, referees), the focus seems to be more on the general conduct/actions rather than specifically interpersonal demeanor.

 Actually, looking at WordNet hierarchies:
 - Sense 1 (behavior%1:04:00::) is under noun.act (acts or actions)
 - Sense 3 (behavior%1:07:00::) is under noun.attribute (attributes of people)

 The context is discussing an action (getting a yellow card intentionally) and whether that type of action/conduct is acceptable. It's referring to the act itself, not the attribute/demeanor of the person.

 Also, looking at the synonyms:
 - Sense 1: behaviour, conduct, doings
 - Sense 3: demeanor, demeanour, behaviour, conduct, deportment

 "Doings" in sense 1 suggests actions/activities, which fits the context of "that type of behavior" referring to the deliberate card-getting.

 However, sense 3 might also fit because it includes "conduct" and is about how people behave.

 But the key distinction is that sense 1 is about the manner of acting (action-focused), while sense 3 is about behavioral attributes/demeanor (attribute-focused).

 The text says "that type of behavior" referring to the deliberate provocation of yellow cards. This is a specific action pattern - a way of acting. It's not primarily about their demeanor or how they carry themselves socially (deportment), but about their tactical actions in the game.

 Sense 1 seems most appropriate: "manner of acting or controlling yourself"

 Wait, let me reconsider sense 3. The definition says "the way a person behaves toward other people". In football, getting a yellow card involves interaction with the referee and opponents. But the context emphasizes that this is a "practice" and part of the "ethos" - it's a strategic behavior.

 Actually, looking at typical WSD for "behavior":
 - When referring to general human actions/conduct in a context of ethics/rules, sense 1 is usually the right choice.
 - Sense 3 is more about one's demeanor or comportment (how polite, professional, etc. one appears).

 The context mentions "dramatization orchestrated by Mourinho" and "histrionic and provoking technician" - this could relate to demeanor. But the specific phrase is "that type of behavior" referring back to "The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances".

 "Provocation of a yellow card" is an action, a doing.

 Therefore, sense 1 (manner of acting or controlling yourself, synonyms: conduct, doings) is the best fit.

 Let me double-check by elimination:
 - Sense 2: For machines/substances - eliminate.
 - Sense 4: Technical psychology term for organisms - too technical/scientific for this sports ethics context - eliminate.
 - Between 1 and 3:
   - Sense 1 is [noun.act] - action
   - Sense 3 is [noun.attribute] - attribute

 The question is whether this behavior is fraudulent/contradicts sporting principles. This is about the nature of the action itself, not the interpersonal demeanor.

 I choose sense 1.

 Wait, I need to be careful. The sense keys show:
 1. behavior%1:04:00::
 3. behavior%1:07:00::

 The numbers after %1 indicate the lexicographer file (noun.act vs noun.attribute).

 But looking at the actual definitions again:
 Sense 1: "manner of acting or controlling yourself"
 Sense 3: "(behavioral attributes) the way a person behaves toward other people"

 In the context: "that type of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation"

 This is clearly referring to the manner of acting (getting yellow cards intentionally).

 Also, the phrase "conduct" appears in both, but "doings" in sense 1 aligns with "actions" being discussed.

 I think sense 1 is correct.

 However, I should verify if there's any subtlety I'm missing. The text mentions "dramatization" and "histrionic" which could suggest demeanor (sense 3), but the antecedent of "that type of behavior" is clearly "The provocation of a yellow card" which is an action/practice.

 Therefore: {"sense_index": 1}

provider: AtlasCloud


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: principle
Target surface form: principles
Context:
This way, and since Real Madrid will finish as leader of its group, both players will fulfil the prescribed sanction during the next game of league, against Auxerre, and will be able to get rid of the cards the following phase. Finally, the committee of discipline of the UEFA has sanctioned with two games the trainer of the team, Jose Mourinho, and with different economic amounts the implied players. The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of football. It is so extended that it part of the ethos, of the unwritten rules, but followed nonetheless by this sport. Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician. Anyway, the debate deals with if that type of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the <t>principles</t> of the sport, that is to say, if with these actions fraud is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful actions with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense. The matter examines the type of damage that is brought to the sporting spirit.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=principle%1:09:03:: | definition=a basic generalization that is accepted as true and that can be used as a basis for reasoning or conduct | synonyms=rule | examples=their principles of composition characterized all their works
2. sense_key=principle%1:09:01:: | definition=a rule or standard especially of good behavior | examples=a man of principle; he will not violate his principles
3. sense_key=principle%1:09:00:: | definition=a basic truth or law or assumption | examples=the principles of democracy
4. sense_key=principle%1:09:04:: | definition=a rule or law concerning a natural phenomenon or the function of a complex system | synonyms=rule | examples=the principle of the conservation of mass; the principle of jet propulsion
5. sense_key=principle%1:10:00:: | definition=rule of personal conduct | synonyms=precept
6. sense_key=principle%1:09:02:: | definition=(law) an explanation of the fundamental reasons (especially an explanation of the working of some device in terms of laws of nature) | synonyms=rationale | examples=the rationale for capital punishment; the principles of internal-combustion engines

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "principles" in the given context.

 Let me analyze the context:
 - The text discusses football (soccer) and specifically about players getting yellow cards intentionally to serve suspensions in less important matches.
 - It mentions that this behavior is part of the "ethos" and "unwritten rules" of the sport.
 - The key sentence is: "the debate deals with if that type of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the <t>principles</t> of the sport, that is to say, if with these actions fraud is committed"
 - It's asking whether this behavior contradicts the fundamental values, ethics, or standards of the sport.

 Now let's look at the candidate senses:

 1. principle%1:09:03:: - a basic generalization that is accepted as true and that can be used as a basis for reasoning or conduct (synonyms: rule)
    - This is quite general. Could fit but let's see others.

 2. principle%1:09:01:: - a rule or standard especially of good behavior
    - Examples: "a man of principle; he will not violate his principles"
    - This seems very relevant. The context is about whether the behavior contradicts the standards of good behavior/sportsmanship in football.

 3. principle%1:09:00:: - a basic truth or law or assumption
    - Examples: "the principles of democracy"
    - This is more about fundamental truths or laws, like scientific or political principles.

 4. principle%1:09:04:: - a rule or law concerning a natural phenomenon or the function of a complex system
    - Examples: "the principle of the conservation of mass"
    - This is scientific/physical principles. Not relevant here.

 5. principle%1:10:00:: - rule of personal conduct (synonyms: precept)
    - This is about personal conduct rules. The context is about the sport's principles, not necessarily personal conduct rules, though related.

 6. principle%1:09:02:: - (law) an explanation of the fundamental reasons...
    - Legal/technical explanation sense. Not relevant.

 The context is about whether the behavior contradicts the "principles of the sport" - meaning the ethical standards, moral rules, or standards of good behavior expected in sports.

 Sense 2 ("a rule or standard especially of good behavior") fits best because:
 - The context discusses whether the behavior is fraudulent or against the spirit of the sport
 - It mentions "ethos" and "unwritten rules"
 - It's about good behavior/sportsmanship (not violating the principles)
 - The examples "a man of principle; he will not violate his principles" align with the idea of not violating the ethical standards of the sport

 Sense 1 is too general (basic generalization).
 Sense 3 is about basic truths/laws (like democracy), not quite about behavioral standards.
 Sense 5 is about personal conduct rules, but "principles of the sport" suggests broader ethical standards of the game itself, not just personal precepts.

 Actually, looking closely at sense 2 vs sense 5:
 - Sense 2: "a rule or standard especially of good behavior" - examples mention "a man of principle" (moral integrity)
 - Sense 5: "rule of personal conduct" - synonym precept

 The phrase "principles of the sport" refers to the ethical standards or moral rules of the sport as an institution/activity. This aligns with sense 2 - standards of good behavior.

 Also, the context contrasts the specific regulation (written rules) with the principles (unwritten standards of good behavior/ethics).

 So sense 2 (index 2) seems best.

 Wait, let me check the indexing. The user lists:
 1. sense_key=principle%1:09:03::
 2. sense_key=principle%1:09:01::
 3. sense_key=principle%1:09:00::
 4. sense_key=principle%1:09:04::
 5. sense_key=principle%1:10:00::
 6. sense_key=principle%1:09:02::

 So sense 2 in the list is principle%1:09:01:: (a rule or standard especially of good behavior).

 But I need to be careful. Let me reconsider sense 1 vs sense 2.

 Sense 1: "a basic generalization that is accepted as true and that can be used as a basis for reasoning or conduct" - synonyms: rule
 Sense 2: "a rule or standard especially of good behavior"

 The context mentions "ethos" and "unwritten rules" and asks if the behavior contradicts the principles of the sport. It's about the spirit and ethical foundation of the sport.

 "Principles of the sport" in sports ethics contexts usually refers to the fundamental ethical standards - fair play, sportsmanship, etc. This is definitely sense 2.

 Sense 3 "basic truth or law" could be argued, but the examples ("principles of democracy") suggest more structural/fundamental truths rather than ethical standards.

 The phrase "contradicts the principles of the sport" implies violating ethical standards or moral rules, not violating a basic truth or scientific law.

 Therefore, sense 2 (index 2) is the best choice.

 Wait, I should double-check if sense 5 could fit. "Rule of personal conduct" - but the principles here are attributed to "the sport" itself, not personal conduct rules. It's about what the sport stands for, its ethos.

 So yes, sense 2.

 The output should be JSON: {"sense_index": 2}

provider: Chutes


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: action
Target surface form: actions
Context:
This way, and since Real Madrid will finish as leader of its group, both players will fulfil the prescribed sanction during the next game of league, against Auxerre, and will be able to get rid of the cards the following phase. Finally, the committee of discipline of the UEFA has sanctioned with two games the trainer of the team, Jose Mourinho, and with different economic amounts the implied players. The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of football. It is so extended that it part of the ethos, of the unwritten rules, but followed nonetheless by this sport. Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician. Anyway, the debate deals with if that type of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport, that is to say, if with these <t>actions</t> fraud is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful actions with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense. The matter examines the type of damage that is brought to the sporting spirit.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=action%1:04:02:: | definition=something done (usually as opposed to something said) | examples=there were stories of murders and other unnatural actions
2. sense_key=action%1:26:00:: | definition=the state of being active | synonyms=activity, activeness | examples=his sphere of activity; he is out of action
3. sense_key=action%1:04:03:: | definition=a military engagement | synonyms=military action | examples=he saw action in Korea
4. sense_key=action%1:22:00:: | definition=a process existing in or produced by nature (rather than by the intent of human beings) | synonyms=natural process, natural action, activity | examples=the action of natural forces; volcanic activity
5. sense_key=action%1:10:00:: | definition=the series of events that form a plot | examples=his novels always have a lot of action
6. sense_key=action%1:07:00:: | definition=the trait of being active and energetic and forceful | examples=a man of action
7. sense_key=action%1:06:00:: | definition=the operating part that transmits power to a mechanism | synonyms=action mechanism | examples=the piano had a very stiff action
8. sense_key=action%1:04:01:: | definition=a judicial proceeding brought by one party against another; one party prosecutes another for a wrong done or for protection of a right or for prevention of a wrong | synonyms=legal action, action at law
9. sense_key=action%1:04:04:: | definition=an act by a government body or supranational organization | examples=recent federal action undermined the segregationist position; the United Nations must have the power to propose and organize action without being hobbled by irrelevant issues
10. sense_key=action%1:04:00:: | definition=the most important or interesting work or activity in a specific area or field | examples=the action is no longer in technology stocks but in municipal bonds; gawkers always try to get as close to the action as possible

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "actions" in the given context.

Let me analyze the context carefully:

The text is discussing football (soccer) players getting yellow cards intentionally to serve suspensions during less important matches. It mentions:
- "the provocation of a yellow card"
- "that type of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation"
- "with these <t>actions</t> fraud is committed"
- "they are respectful actions with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense"

So "actions" here refers to the specific things done by the players (getting yellow cards intentionally, dramatization, etc.) - these are deeds or things done by people.

Let me look at the candidate senses:

1. sense_key=action%1:04:02:: | definition=something done (usually as opposed to something said) | examples=there were stories of murders and other unnatural actions
   - This seems very relevant. The context is talking about specific things the players did (provoking yellow cards, dramatization). These are "things done" as opposed to things said.

2. sense_key=action%1:26:00:: | definition=the state of being active | synonyms=activity, activeness | examples=his sphere of activity; he is out of action
   - This is about a state of being active, not specific deeds. Doesn't fit.

3. sense_key=action%1:04:03:: | definition=a military engagement | synonyms=military action | examples=he saw action in Korea
   - Not military context. No.

4. sense_key=action%1:22:00:: | definition=a process existing in or produced by nature (rather than by the intent of human beings) | synonyms=natural process, natural action, activity | examples=the action of natural forces; volcanic activity
   - Not natural processes. These are human intentional acts. No.

5. sense_key=action%1:10:00:: | definition=the series of events that form a plot | examples=his novels always have a lot of action
   - Not about a narrative plot. No.

6. sense_key=action%1:07:00:: | definition=the trait of being active and energetic and forceful | examples=a man of action
   - Not about a personal trait. No.

7. sense_key=action%1:06:00:: | definition=the operating part that transmits power to a mechanism | synonyms=action mechanism | examples=the piano had a very stiff action
   - Not a mechanical part. No.

8. sense_key=action%1:04:01:: | definition=a judicial proceeding brought by one party against another; one party prosecutes another for a wrong done or for protection of a right or for prevention of a wrong | synonyms=legal action, action at law
   - Not a lawsuit. No.

9. sense_key=action%1:04:04:: | definition=an act by a government body or supranational organization | examples=recent federal action undermined the segregationist position; the United Nations must have the power to propose and organize action without being hobbled by irrelevant issues
   - Not by a government body. The actions are by football players and a coach. No.

10. sense_key=action%1:04:00:: | definition=the most important or interesting work or activity in a specific area or field | examples=the action is no longer in technology stocks but in municipal bonds; gawkers always try to get as close to the action as possible
    - Not about where the important activity is. No.

So sense 1 is clearly the best fit: "something done (usually as opposed to something said)" - referring to the deeds/behavior of the players and coach.

Wait, let me double-check the sense numbering. The user lists them 1-10. Sense 1 is action%1:04:02:: "something done (usually as opposed to something said)".

The context: "with these actions fraud is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful actions with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense."

Yes, these are specific acts/deeds performed by the players. Sense 1 is correct.

I need to return only a JSON object: {"sense_index": 1}


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: fraud
Target surface form: fraud
Context:
This way, and since Real Madrid will finish as leader of its group, both players will fulfil the prescribed sanction during the next game of league, against Auxerre, and will be able to get rid of the cards the following phase. Finally, the committee of discipline of the UEFA has sanctioned with two games the trainer of the team, Jose Mourinho, and with different economic amounts the implied players. The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of football. It is so extended that it part of the ethos, of the unwritten rules, but followed nonetheless by this sport. Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician. Anyway, the debate deals with if that type of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport, that is to say, if with these actions <t>fraud</t> is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful actions with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense. The matter examines the type of damage that is brought to the sporting spirit.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=fraud%1:04:00:: | definition=intentional deception resulting in injury to another person
2. sense_key=fraud%1:18:00:: | definition=a person who makes deceitful pretenses | synonyms=imposter, impostor, pretender, fake, faker, sham
3. sense_key=fraud%1:04:01:: | definition=something intended to deceive; deliberate trickery intended to gain an advantage | synonyms=fraudulence, dupery, hoax, humbug, put-on

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation (WSD) for the word "fraud" in the given context.

 First, let's analyze the context:
 - The text discusses football (soccer) players getting yellow cards intentionally to serve suspensions in less important matches
 - This is described as a "frequent practice" that is part of the "ethos" and "unwritten rules"
 - The debate is whether this behavior constitutes "fraud" - specifically whether it contradicts the principles of the sport even if it doesn't violate specific regulations
 - The question is: "if with these actions fraud is committed"
 - These actions are described as "respectful actions with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense"
 - The key elements: intentional deception? Injury to another? Deceitful pretense? Deliberate trickery to gain advantage?

 Now let's look at the candidate senses:

 1. sense_key=fraud%1:04:00::
    - definition=intentional deception resulting in injury to another person
    - This requires injury to another person. In the context, are they injuring another person? The text talks about violating sporting spirit, not necessarily injuring another person. The "injury" here seems to be legal/financial harm in the WordNet sense, but in sports context, it's not clear there's injury to another person.

 2. sense_key=fraud%1:18:00::
    - definition=a person who makes deceitful pretenses
    - synonyms=imposter, impostor, pretender, fake, faker, sham
    - This refers to a person, not an act. The context uses "fraud" as an act/behavior ("fraud is committed"), not to describe a person. So this is unlikely.

 3. sense_key=fraud%1:04:01::
    - definition=something intended to deceive; deliberate trickery intended to gain an advantage
    - synonyms=fraudulence, dupery, hoax, humbug, put-on
    - This fits well: deliberate trickery intended to gain an advantage. The players are tricking the system/regulations to gain an advantage (serving suspension in a less important match). It's deception intended to gain an advantage.

 Comparing sense 1 and sense 3:
 - Sense 1 emphasizes "injury to another person"
 - Sense 3 emphasizes "deliberate trickery intended to gain an advantage"

 In the context, the debate is about whether the actions violate sporting principles/spirit. The actions are respectful of regulations but elude their sense/purpose. The players are trying to gain an advantage (by manipulating when they serve suspension) through deception (getting carded on purpose but pretending it wasn't intentional).

 However, is there "injury to another person" in sense 1? The text mentions "the type of damage that is brought to the sporting spirit" - this is damage to the spirit of the sport, not necessarily injury to another person. The WordNet gloss for sense 1 specifically mentions "injury to another person" which usually means legal or financial harm to a victim.

 In sports contexts, when we talk about "fraud" in the sense of breaking rules to gain advantage, it's often sense 3 (trickery to gain advantage) rather than sense 1 (deception causing injury).

 Also, look at the phrase "fraud is committed" - this suggests an act or deed, not a person (ruling out sense 2).

 Between sense 1 and 3:
 The text says: "if with these actions fraud is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful actions with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense."

 This suggests deceptive practice to gain advantage (avoiding suspension in important matches), not necessarily causing injury to another person. The "damage" mentioned is to the "sporting spirit," not to another individual.

 Therefore, sense 3 seems most appropriate: "deliberate trickery intended to gain an advantage."

 Wait, let me double-check the WordNet senses. In WordNet:
 - fraud%1:04:00:: is usually the first sense: intentional deception resulting in injury to another person (legal fraud)
 - fraud%1:04:01:: is the second sense: something intended to deceive; deliberate trickery intended to gain an advantage

 The context is about sports ethics. The question is whether intentionally getting a yellow card to manipulate suspension timing constitutes fraud. This is about trickery/gaming the system for advantage, not about injuring another person.

 Therefore, the answer should be sense index 3.

 Wait, the user asks for the "indexed sense" but says "Do not answer with a WordNet sense key." and "Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}."

 Looking at the candidate senses:
 1. sense_key=fraud%1:04:00::
 2. sense_key=fraud%1:18:00::
 3. sense_key=fraud%1:04:01::

 The index appears to be the number (1, 2, or 3).

 So I should return {"sense_index": 3}.

 Let me verify once more:
 - Context: Players intentionally getting yellow cards to serve bans in less important games. Is this fraud?
 - It's deception/trickery to gain advantage (avoiding ban in important game) = sense 3
 - It's not a person = not sense 2
 - It doesn't necessarily result in injury to another person (the opponent isn't really injured legally/financially; the sport/spirit is damaged but that's not "another person") = not sense 1

 Yes, sense 3 is correct.