[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: become
Target surface form: become
Context:
Parents should be involved with their children's education at home, not in school. They should see to it that their kids do not play truant; they should make certain that the children spend enough time doing homework; they should scrutinize the report card. If parents are dissatisfied with a school, they should have the option of switching to another. -- "Community involvement "is an even worse idea. Here, the experience of New York City is decisive. Locally elected school boards, especially in our larger cities, <t>become</t> the prey of ambitious, generally corrupt, and invariably demagogic local politicians or would-be politicians. New York is in the process of trying to disengage itself from a 20-year-old commitment to this system of school governance, even as Chicago and other cities are moving to institute it.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=become%2:30:00:: | definition=enter or assume a certain state or condition | synonyms=go, get | examples=He became annoyed when he heard the bad news; It must be getting more serious
2. sense_key=become%2:42:01:: | definition=undergo a change or development | synonyms=turn | examples=The water turned into ice; Her former friend became her worst enemy
3. sense_key=become%2:42:00:: | definition=come into existence | examples=What becomes has duration
4. sense_key=become%2:42:03:: | definition=enhance the appearance of | synonyms=suit | examples=Mourning becomes Electra; This behavior doesn't suit you!

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "become" in the given context.

 Let me analyze the context:
 - The sentence is: "Locally elected school boards, especially in our larger cities, become the prey of ambitious, generally corrupt, and invariably demagogic local politicians or would-be politicians."
 - The meaning here is that school boards enter into or assume the state of being "the prey" of corrupt politicians.
 - They are transitioning into a state where they are preyed upon by politicians.

 Now let's look at the candidate senses:

 1. sense_key=become%2:30:00:: | definition=enter or assume a certain state or condition | synonyms=go, get | examples=He became annoyed when he heard the bad news; It must be getting more serious
    - This fits well. The school boards are entering/assuming the state of being "prey" to politicians.
    - "Become the prey" = enter the state of being prey.

 2. sense_key=become%2:42:01:: | definition=undergo a change or development | synonyms=turn | examples=The water turned into ice; Her former friend became her worst enemy
    - This involves a transformation or change from one thing to another.
    - While there is a change, the structure "become the prey" is more about entering a state rather than transforming into something else.
    - However, "Her former friend became her worst enemy" shows a change in relationship/status, which is somewhat similar.
    - But "become the prey" is more about assuming a condition/state.

 3. sense_key=become%2:42:00:: | definition=come into existence
    - This doesn't fit. The school boards already exist; they are not coming into existence as prey.

 4. sense_key=become%2:42:03:: | definition=enhance the appearance of | synonyms=suit
    - This is clearly wrong. "Become" here doesn't mean "suit" or look good on.

 Between sense 1 and sense 2:
 - Sense 1: "enter or assume a certain state or condition" - focuses on entering a state.
 - Sense 2: "undergo a change or development" - focuses on transformation/turning into something.

 In the sentence "Locally elected school boards... become the prey of...", the school boards are entering the condition/state of being prey. They are assuming the role/state of being prey to politicians.

 The example for sense 1: "He became annoyed" - entering a state of annoyance.
 The example for sense 2: "Her former friend became her worst enemy" - transformation from friend to enemy.

 "Become the prey" is more like entering a state/condition (sense 1) rather than undergoing a developmental change (sense 2). The school boards remain school boards, but they enter the state of being prey.

 Also, looking at the gloss for sense 1: "enter or assume a certain state or condition" - this matches "become the prey" (assume the condition of being prey).

 Therefore, sense 1 (index 1) is the best choice.

 Wait, let me double-check the sense keys and indices:
 - The user lists them as 1, 2, 3, 4.
 - Sense 1: become%2:30:00::
 - Sense 2: become%2:42:01::
 - Sense 3: become%2:42:00::
 - Sense 4: become%2:42:03::

 So the answer should be {"sense_index": 1}.

 Actually, looking more carefully at sense 2: "undergo a change or development" with example "The water turned into ice" - this is a material transformation. "Her former friend became her worst enemy" is also a categorical shift.

 But "become the prey" - are the school boards transforming into prey, or are they entering a state where they are preyed upon? It's more about entering a state or condition.

 Also, in WordNet, sense 1 (become%2:30:00::) is typically the most common sense of "become" meaning "to come to be" or "enter into a state".

 Let me verify with the examples:
 - Sense 1 examples: "He became annoyed", "It must be getting more serious" - these are states/conditions.
 - Sense 2 examples: "The water turned into ice", "Her former friend became her worst enemy" - these are changes of identity/category.

 "Become the prey" - while "prey" is a noun, here it's describing a condition/state (of being exploited), not a transformation into the physical entity of prey. So sense 1 is better.

 Final decision: sense_index 1.

provider: Chutes


attempt_kind: initial

status: success

[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: ambitious
Target surface form: ambitious
Context:
Parents should be involved with their children's education at home, not in school. They should see to it that their kids do not play truant; they should make certain that the children spend enough time doing homework; they should scrutinize the report card. If parents are dissatisfied with a school, they should have the option of switching to another. -- "Community involvement "is an even worse idea. Here, the experience of New York City is decisive. Locally elected school boards, especially in our larger cities, become the prey of <t>ambitious</t>, generally corrupt, and invariably demagogic local politicians or would-be politicians. New York is in the process of trying to disengage itself from a 20-year-old commitment to this system of school governance, even as Chicago and other cities are moving to institute it.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=ambitious%3:00:00:: | definition=having a strong desire for success or achievement
2. sense_key=ambitious%5:00:00:difficult:00 | definition=requiring full use of your abilities or resources | synonyms=challenging | examples=ambitious schedule; performed the most challenging task without a mistake

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

finish_reason: stop

role: assistant

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "ambitious" in the given context.

Let me analyze the context:
The passage is criticizing "community involvement" in schools, specifically locally elected school boards. It says these boards become "the prey of ambitious, generally corrupt, and invariably demagogic local politicians or would-be politicians."

Here, "ambitious" is used to describe politicians. It's paired with "corrupt" and "demagogic" - all negative traits. The sense seems to be about having a strong desire for success, achievement, power, or advancement - particularly in a political career.

Now let's look at the candidate senses:

1. sense_key=ambitious%3:00:00:: | definition=having a strong desire for success or achievement
   - This fits describing people (politicians) who have a strong desire for success/achievement/power. In WordNet, this is likely the main adjective sense describing a person.

2. sense_key=ambitious%5:00:00:difficult:00 | definition=requiring full use of your abilities or resources | synonyms=challenging | examples=ambitious schedule; performed the most challenging task without a mistake
   - This sense describes tasks, schedules, projects, etc. - things that are demanding or challenging. The example given is "ambitious schedule."
   - In the context, "ambitious" modifies "local politicians" (people), not tasks or projects.

Therefore, sense 1 is clearly the correct choice. The word describes people with a strong desire for success/achievement (in this case, political success).

The user wants only a JSON object like {"sense_index": 3} but with the correct index. Since sense 1 is the correct one, I should return {"sense_index": 1}.

Wait, let me double-check the indexing. The candidate senses are numbered 1 and 2. So the answer should be {"sense_index": 1}.

The user said "Do not answer with a WordNet sense key." and "Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}."

So I just need to return the JSON with index 1.

format: unknown

native_finish_reason: stop

provider: SiliconFlow

currency: USD


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: generally
Target surface form: generally
Context:
Parents should be involved with their children's education at home, not in school. They should see to it that their kids do not play truant; they should make certain that the children spend enough time doing homework; they should scrutinize the report card. If parents are dissatisfied with a school, they should have the option of switching to another. -- "Community involvement "is an even worse idea. Here, the experience of New York City is decisive. Locally elected school boards, especially in our larger cities, become the prey of ambitious, <t>generally</t> corrupt, and invariably demagogic local politicians or would-be politicians. New York is in the process of trying to disengage itself from a 20-year-old commitment to this system of school governance, even as Chicago and other cities are moving to institute it.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=generally%4:02:02:: | definition=usually; as a rule | synonyms=by and large, more often than not, mostly | examples=by and large it doesn't rain much here
2. sense_key=generally%4:02:01:: | definition=without distinction of one from others | synonyms=in general, in the main | examples=he is interested in snakes in general
3. sense_key=generally%4:02:00:: | definition=without regard to specific details or exceptions | synonyms=broadly, loosely, broadly speaking | examples=he interprets the law broadly

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "generally" in the given context.

Let me analyze the context:
"Locally elected school boards, especially in our larger cities, become the prey of ambitious, <t>generally</t> corrupt, and invariably demagogic local politicians or would-be politicians."

The structure is: "ambitious, generally corrupt, and invariably demagogic"

Here, "generally" is modifying "corrupt" and is parallel to "invariably" modifying "demagogic".

Let me look at the candidate senses:

1. sense_key=generally%4:02:02:: | definition=usually; as a rule | synonyms=by and large, more often than not, mostly | examples=by and large it doesn't rain much here
- This means "usually" or "for the most part". In the context, "generally corrupt" would mean "usually corrupt" or "mostly corrupt" - this fits well. It suggests that these politicians are for the most part corrupt.

2. sense_key=generally%4:02:01:: | definition=without distinction of one from others | synonyms=in general, in the main | examples=he is interested in snakes in general
- This is about speaking generally, not specifically. "Generally corrupt" in this sense would mean something like "corrupt in general" (as opposed to specific instances), but the parallel structure with "invariably demagogic" suggests a frequency/intensity adverb rather than a generalization over cases.

3. sense_key=generally%4:02:00:: | definition=without regard to specific details or exceptions | synonyms=broadly, loosely, broadly speaking | examples=he interprets the law broadly
- This is about broad interpretation or speaking broadly. "Generally corrupt" doesn't fit this sense well. You can't really be "broadly corrupt" in the same way you interpret law broadly.

Wait, let me reconsider. The phrase is "ambitious, generally corrupt, and invariably demagogic".

"Generally" here seems to mean "in most cases" or "usually" - sense 1. The author is saying that locally elected school boards become prey to politicians who are ambitious, usually corrupt, and invariably demagogic. This is making a generalization about the character of these politicians.

Sense 1: "usually; as a rule" - "generally corrupt" = usually corrupt, as a rule corrupt. This fits.

Sense 2: "without distinction of one from others" - this is more like "in general" as opposed to "in particular". But "generally corrupt" doesn't quite mean "corrupt in general" in this context.

Sense 3: "without regard to specific details or exceptions" - broadly speaking. This doesn't fit.

Actually, let me think more carefully about sense 2. The gloss is "without distinction of one from others" and synonyms are "in general, in the main". This is the sense used when talking about something as a whole or in a general manner. But in "generally corrupt", we're saying they are corrupt in general/usually.

But looking at the examples:
Sense 1 example: "by and large it doesn't rain much here" - frequency.
Sense 2 example: "he is interested in snakes in general" - general topic, not specific instances.
Sense 3 example: "he interprets the law broadly" - broad vs. narrow.

In "generally corrupt", it's functioning as an adverb modifying the adjective "corrupt", indicating that corruption is the usual or common characteristic. This aligns with sense 1 (usually; as a rule).

The parallel with "invariably" (which means always/unavoidably) also supports a frequency/quantification reading. "Generally" (usually) corrupt and "invariably" (always) demagogic.

So sense 1 seems best.

Wait, I need to be careful about the sense numbering. The user lists:
1. sense_key=generally%4:02:02::
2. sense_key=generally%4:02:01::
3. sense_key=generally%4:02:00::

The user wants me to return {"sense_index": N} where N is the index in the candidate list (1, 2, or 3).

So if I choose sense 1 (usually; as a rule), I return {"sense_index": 1}.

Let me double-check. Could it be sense 2? "without distinction of one from others" - this would mean that the politicians are corrupt without distinguishing one from another, i.e., they are all corrupt in general. But the adverb placement between "ambitious" and "corrupt" and the pairing with "invariably" strongly suggests the "usually" meaning.

Also, in WordNet, generally%4:02:02:: is the "usually" sense (most frequent), generally%4:02:01:: is the "in general" sense, and generally%4:02:00:: is the "broadly" sense.

Given the context of describing politicians as typically having these negative qualities, "usually" or "as a rule" is the intended meaning.

Therefore: {"sense_index": 1}


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: corrupt
Target surface form: corrupt
Context:
Parents should be involved with their children's education at home, not in school. They should see to it that their kids do not play truant; they should make certain that the children spend enough time doing homework; they should scrutinize the report card. If parents are dissatisfied with a school, they should have the option of switching to another. -- "Community involvement "is an even worse idea. Here, the experience of New York City is decisive. Locally elected school boards, especially in our larger cities, become the prey of ambitious, generally <t>corrupt</t>, and invariably demagogic local politicians or would-be politicians. New York is in the process of trying to disengage itself from a 20-year-old commitment to this system of school governance, even as Chicago and other cities are moving to institute it.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=corrupt%3:00:00:: | definition=lacking in integrity | examples=humanity they knew to be corrupt...from the day of Adam's creation; a corrupt and incompetent city government
2. sense_key=corrupt%3:00:04:: | definition=not straight; dishonest or immoral or evasive | synonyms=crooked
3. sense_key=corrupt%5:00:00:imperfect:00 | definition=containing errors or alterations | synonyms=corrupted | examples=a corrupt text; spoke a corrupted version of the language
4. sense_key=corrupt%5:00:00:stale:00 | definition=touched by rot or decay | synonyms=tainted | examples=tainted bacon; `corrupt' is archaic

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation (WSD) for the word "corrupt" in the given context. I need to choose the best sense from the four candidate senses provided.

 Let me analyze the context:
 The text is discussing "Community involvement" in schools, specifically mentioning New York City's experience with locally elected school boards. It says these boards "become the prey of ambitious, generally corrupt, and invariably demagogic local politicians or would-be politicians."

 So the context is about politicians who are dishonest, lacking integrity, and involved in wrongdoing related to their political positions.

 Now let's look at the candidate senses:

 1. sense_key=corrupt%3:00:00:: | definition=lacking in integrity | examples=humanity they knew to be corrupt...from the day of Adam's creation; a corrupt and incompetent city government
    - This fits well. The example mentions "a corrupt and incompetent city government" which is very similar to the context about local politicians and school boards in cities.

 2. sense_key=corrupt%3:00:04:: | definition=not straight; dishonest or immoral or evasive | synonyms=crooked
    - This also seems relevant. "Dishonest or immoral" fits politicians. "Crooked" is a synonym often used for corrupt politicians.

 3. sense_key=corrupt%5:00:00:imperfect:00 | definition=containing errors or alterations | synonyms=corrupted | examples=a corrupt text; spoke a corrupted version of the language
    - This is about texts, language, data - not about people's moral character. Doesn't fit.

 4. sense_key=corrupt%5:00:00:stale:00 | definition=touched by rot or decay | synonyms=tainted | examples=tainted bacon; `corrupt' is archaic
    - This is about physical decay (like food). Doesn't fit the context of politicians.

 Now I need to decide between sense 1 and sense 2.

 Sense 1: "lacking in integrity" - this is a broad moral characterization.
 Sense 2: "not straight; dishonest or immoral or evasive" with synonym "crooked" - this also fits but might emphasize dishonesty more specifically.

 Looking at the examples for sense 1: "a corrupt and incompetent city government" - this is almost exactly the context we have (local politicians/city governance).

 Looking at the WordNet sense keys:
 - corrupt%3:00:00:: is the first adjective sense (usually the most common)
 - corrupt%3:00:04:: is another adjective sense

 In WordNet, sense 1 (corrupt%3:00:00::) is the sense meaning "lacking in integrity; dishonest" - it's the general sense for morally corrupt.
 Sense 2 (corrupt%3:00:04::) is defined as "not straight; dishonest or immoral or evasive" with synonym "crooked" - this might be more specific to being crooked/criminal in behavior.

 Actually, looking more carefully:
 - Sense 1: "lacking in integrity" - this is the general sense for people who are corrupt (morally depraved, dishonest)
 - Sense 2: "not straight; dishonest or immoral or evasive" - this seems very similar but specifically lists "crooked" as a synonym

 In many WSD datasets, "corrupt" when referring to politicians usually maps to the "lacking in integrity" sense (sense 1). The example "a corrupt and incompetent city government" is a perfect match for the context about local politicians in city governance.

 However, I should check if there's a distinction. Sense 2 might be more about being "crooked" in the sense of criminal behavior, while sense 1 is broader "lacking integrity."

 But actually, looking at the definitions again:
 Sense 1: "lacking in integrity" - examples include "humanity they knew to be corrupt" and "a corrupt and incompetent city government"
 Sense 2: "not straight; dishonest or immoral or evasive" - synonym "crooked"

 The context mentions "ambitious, generally corrupt, and invariably demagogic local politicians" - this describes politicians who lack integrity and are dishonest.

 The key difference might be that sense 1 is the attributive/adjectival sense for people/governments lacking integrity, while sense 2 might be more specific.

 Actually, looking at WordNet structure:
 - corrupt%3:00:00:: corresponds to adjective sense 1: "lacking in integrity"
 - corrupt%3:00:04:: corresponds to adjective sense 2: "not straight; dishonest or immoral or evasive"

 In standard WordNet, the first sense (3:00:00) is usually the default for morally corrupt when describing people. The second sense (3:00:04) is often considered similar but might have nuances.

 Wait, I should look at the indices provided in the question. The user lists them as:
 1. sense_key=corrupt%3:00:00::
 2. sense_key=corrupt%3:00:04::
 3. sense_key=corrupt%5:00:00:imperfect:00
 4. sense_key=corrupt%5:00:00:stale:00

 So I need to return {"sense_index": 1} or {"sense_index": 2}, etc.

 Given the example in sense 1 explicitly mentions "a corrupt and incompetent city government", and the context is about local politicians and city school governance, sense 1 is the best match.

 The context is about political corruption - politicians who are dishonest and lack integrity in their official capacities. This aligns perfectly with sense 1's example of "corrupt...city government."

 Sense 2 with "crooked" might also work, but sense 1 is more directly supported by the parallel example of city government corruption.

 Therefore, the answer should be sense_index: 1.

provider: StreamLake


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: local
Target surface form: local
Context:
Parents should be involved with their children's education at home, not in school. They should see to it that their kids do not play truant; they should make certain that the children spend enough time doing homework; they should scrutinize the report card. If parents are dissatisfied with a school, they should have the option of switching to another. -- "Community involvement "is an even worse idea. Here, the experience of New York City is decisive. Locally elected school boards, especially in our larger cities, become the prey of ambitious, generally corrupt, and invariably demagogic <t>local</t> politicians or would-be politicians. New York is in the process of trying to disengage itself from a 20-year-old commitment to this system of school governance, even as Chicago and other cities are moving to institute it.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=local%3:00:01:: | definition=relating to or applicable to or concerned with the administration of a city or town or district rather than a larger area | examples=local taxes; local authorities
2. sense_key=local%3:01:01:: | definition=of or belonging to or characteristic of a particular locality or neighborhood | examples=local customs; local schools
3. sense_key=local%3:00:02:: | definition=affecting only a restricted part or area of the body | examples=local anesthesia

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "local" in the given context.

 Let me analyze the context:
 - The text discusses "Community involvement" in schools
 - It mentions "Locally elected school boards"
 - It talks about "local politicians or would-be politicians"
 - The context is about governance at the city/town level (New York City, Chicago, larger cities)
 - The politicians are described as ambitious, corrupt, demagogic, and associated with locally elected school boards

 Now let's look at the candidate senses:

 1. sense_key=local%3:00:01:: | definition=relating to or applicable to or concerned with the administration of a city or town or district rather than a larger area | examples=local taxes; local authorities
    - This seems to fit well. The text is talking about politicians at the city/town level (local politicians), school boards that are locally elected, and governance at the municipal level.

 2. sense_key=local%3:01:01:: | definition=of or belonging to or characteristic of a particular locality or neighborhood | examples=local customs; local schools
    - This is more about characteristics of a specific neighborhood or area (like local customs, local schools). While "local schools" appears in the example, the specific usage here is about "local politicians" in the context of city administration and governance.

 3. sense_key=local%3:00:02:: | definition=affecting only a restricted part or area of the body | examples=local anesthesia
    - This is clearly medical and doesn't fit the context at all.

 Comparing sense 1 and sense 2:
 - Sense 1 focuses on administration/governance at the city/town/district level (local taxes, local authorities)
 - Sense 2 focuses on characteristics of a particular locality/neighborhood (local customs, local schools)

 In the context, "local politicians" refers to politicians operating at the municipal/city level (as opposed to state or federal). The text mentions "Locally elected school boards" and discusses governance systems in cities like New York and Chicago. This aligns with sense 1, which deals with administration of a city or town.

 While "local schools" might suggest sense 2, the specific phrase "local politicians" in the context of elected school boards and city governance points to sense 1 (relating to administration of a city or town).

 The key distinction is:
 - Sense 1: administrative/political jurisdiction (local government, local authorities, local taxes)
 - Sense 2: geographic/neighborhood characteristics (local customs, local color)

 Here, "local politicians" means politicians at the municipal/city level of government, which is sense 1.

 Therefore, the best answer is sense_index: 1.

provider: ModelRun


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: politician
Target surface form: politicians
Context:
Parents should be involved with their children's education at home, not in school. They should see to it that their kids do not play truant; they should make certain that the children spend enough time doing homework; they should scrutinize the report card. If parents are dissatisfied with a school, they should have the option of switching to another. -- "Community involvement "is an even worse idea. Here, the experience of New York City is decisive. Locally elected school boards, especially in our larger cities, become the prey of ambitious, generally corrupt, and invariably demagogic local <t>politicians</t> or would-be politicians. New York is in the process of trying to disengage itself from a 20-year-old commitment to this system of school governance, even as Chicago and other cities are moving to institute it.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=politician%1:18:01:: | definition=a leader engaged in civil administration
2. sense_key=politician%1:18:00:: | definition=a person active in party politics | synonyms=politico, pol, political leader
3. sense_key=politician%1:18:02:: | definition=a schemer who tries to gain advantage in an organization in sly or underhanded ways

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation on the word "politicians" in the given context.

 Let me analyze the context:
 - The text discusses school boards and community involvement in education
 - It mentions "Locally elected school boards... become the prey of ambitious, generally corrupt, and invariably demagogic local politicians or would-be politicians"
 - The tone is negative, describing these people as "ambitious," "corrupt," and "demagogic"
 - They're described as preying on school boards
 - The context suggests these are people involved in party politics or seeking power/influence

 Now let's look at the candidate senses:

 1. sense_key=politician%1:18:01:: | definition=a leader engaged in civil administration
    - This seems to refer to someone actually holding office or administering civil affairs
    - The context mentions "would-be politicians" which suggests people aspiring to be politicians, not necessarily current civil administrators

 2. sense_key=politician%1:18:00:: | definition=a person active in party politics | synonyms=politico, pol, political leader
    - This refers to someone active in party politics
    - The context mentions "locally elected school boards" becoming prey to these people
    - "Demagogic" suggests appealing to the masses for political gain
    - "Ambitious" and "corrupt" suggest political maneuvering
    - "Would-be politicians" fits well with "person active in party politics" (aspiring or active)
    - The synonyms include "politico" and "pol" which fit the context of local political figures

 3. sense_key=politician%1:18:02:: | definition=a schemer who tries to gain advantage in an organization in sly or underhanded ways
    - This is more about scheming within an organization
    - While the text mentions corruption, the primary focus seems to be on political figures (demagogic, ambitious) rather than just schemers
    - The phrase "local politicians or would-be politicians" suggests the standard meaning of political figures, not just schemers

 Let me reconsider:
 - The text describes them as "demagogic" - this is a political term referring to leaders who seek support by appealing to popular desires and prejudices
 - "Locally elected school boards" suggests these are people involved in the political process
 - "Ambitious" and "corrupt" are common descriptors for politicians in the political sense
 - The mention of "would-be politicians" alongside "politicians" suggests the standard definition of people seeking or holding political office

 Sense 2 (a person active in party politics) seems most appropriate because:
 1. The context is about elected school boards and local governance
 2. The description "demagogic" is specifically political
 3. "Would-be politicians" fits the definition of people active in or seeking to be active in party politics
 4. The synonyms (politico, pol, political leader) fit the context of local political figures

 Sense 1 (civil administration) is too narrow and doesn't capture the "would-be" aspect or the negative political connotations as well.

 Sense 3 (schemer) is too specific to the negative aspect and doesn't capture the primary meaning of being political figures. While they are described negatively, the word "politicians" here refers to their role in the political system, not just their scheming nature.

 Actually, looking more carefully at the context: "ambitious, generally corrupt, and invariably demagogic local politicians or would-be politicians"

 The description emphasizes their political nature (demagogic) and ambition for power. This aligns with sense 2 - people active in party politics.

 However, I should consider if sense 3 might fit better because of the strong negative connotations ("corrupt," "prey," "demagogic"). But "demagogic" is specifically a political term, not just a scheming term. And the phrase "would-be politicians" clearly indicates these are people who want to be or are political figures, not just schemers in an organization.

 The context is about governance and elected boards, which is the domain of party politics.

 I think sense 2 is the best fit.

 Wait, let me double-check the WordNet definitions to make sure I'm interpreting them correctly.

 Sense 1: "a leader engaged in civil administration" - This is someone actually administering civil affairs.
 Sense 2: "a person active in party politics" - This is broader, includes people active in political parties and campaigns.
 Sense 3: "a schemer who tries to gain advantage in an organization in sly or underhanded ways" - This is the derogatory sense.

 The text says they become "the prey of ambitious, generally corrupt, and invariably demagogic local politicians"

 While there are negative connotations, the primary meaning is still referring to actual political figures or aspiring political figures, not just schemers. The word "demagogic" specifically refers to a political leader who seeks support by appealing to popular desires and prejudices rather than by using rational argument.

 Also, the phrase "or would-be politicians" suggests the category is political figures/aspiring political figures.

 Therefore, sense 2 is the correct choice.

 But let me reconsider sense 3 one more time. Is it possible that the context is using "politicians" primarily to mean schemers who manipulate the school system for their own advantage?

 The text mentions "Locally elected school boards... become the prey of..." - this suggests the politicians are exploiting the school boards for political gain. This could fit sense 3 (schemers), but it also fits sense 2 (people active in party politics) who are using the school boards as a stepping stone or for patronage.

 However, the key is that "demagogic" is a political term. You wouldn't typically call a mere schemer "demagogic" - demagoguery is specifically about political leadership and appealing to the masses.

 Also, the mention of "New York is in the process of trying to disengage itself from a 20-year-old commitment to this system of school governance" - this is about the political system of elected school boards being controlled by political figures.

 I think sense 2 is definitely the right answer.

 Final check: The user wants a JSON object like {"sense_index": 3} where the number corresponds to the index in the candidate list (1, 2, or 3).

 So I should return {"sense_index": 2}.

provider: Novita


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: politician
Target surface form: politicians
Context:
Parents should be involved with their children's education at home, not in school. They should see to it that their kids do not play truant; they should make certain that the children spend enough time doing homework; they should scrutinize the report card. If parents are dissatisfied with a school, they should have the option of switching to another. -- "Community involvement "is an even worse idea. Here, the experience of New York City is decisive. Locally elected school boards, especially in our larger cities, become the prey of ambitious, generally corrupt, and invariably demagogic local politicians or would-be <t>politicians</t>. New York is in the process of trying to disengage itself from a 20-year-old commitment to this system of school governance, even as Chicago and other cities are moving to institute it.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=politician%1:18:01:: | definition=a leader engaged in civil administration
2. sense_key=politician%1:18:00:: | definition=a person active in party politics | synonyms=politico, pol, political leader
3. sense_key=politician%1:18:02:: | definition=a schemer who tries to gain advantage in an organization in sly or underhanded ways

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation (WSD) on the word "politicians" in the given context. I need to choose between three candidate senses:

1. politician%1:18:01:: - a leader engaged in civil administration
2. politician%1:18:00:: - a person active in party politics (synonyms: politico, pol, political leader)
3. politician%1:18:02:: - a schemer who tries to gain advantage in an organization in sly or underhanded ways

Let me analyze the context:

The passage discusses "Community involvement" in schools and mentions "Locally elected school boards" becoming "the prey of ambitious, generally corrupt, and invariably demagogic local politicians or would-be politicians."

Key contextual clues:
- "ambitious" - suggests seeking power/position
- "generally corrupt" - suggests negative connotation, unethical behavior
- "invariably demagogic" - suggests manipulative, appealing to emotions/prejudices rather than reason
- "prey" - suggests they exploit the school boards for their own gain
- The contrast between "politicians" and "would-be politicians" suggests people seeking political power/position

Now let's evaluate the senses:

Sense 1: "a leader engaged in civil administration" - This is a neutral/positive definition about administration. The context emphasizes corruption and demagoguery, not just administration.

Sense 2: "a person active in party politics" - This is also relatively neutral, describing someone involved in politics. While the context involves elected officials, the modifiers "corrupt" and "demagogic" suggest something more specific than just being active in politics.

Sense 3: "a schemer who tries to gain advantage in an organization in sly or underhanded ways" - This fits well with "corrupt," "demagogic," and the idea that they make the school boards their "prey." The context emphasizes their negative, scheming nature - they exploit the school boards for political gain in underhanded ways.

However, looking at the WordNet structure, sense 2 (politician%1:18:00::) is usually the general sense of someone in politics, while sense 3 is a specific derogatory sense.

But wait, let me reconsider. The phrase "ambitious, generally corrupt, and invariably demagogic local politicians" - this describes actual politicians (elected officials or those seeking office), not just schemers in general. The word "demagogic" specifically relates to political leadership.

Actually, looking carefully at the context: "Locally elected school boards... become the prey of ambitious, generally corrupt, and invariably demagogic local politicians or would-be politicians."

These are people who are either currently politicians or aspiring to be politicians (would-be politicians). The description emphasizes their political nature (demagogic) and corruption.

Sense 2: "a person active in party politics" - this seems to fit best because:
1. They are described as "local politicians" and "would-be politicians"
2. They are associated with "locally elected school boards"
3. The term "demagogic" is specifically political
4. While they are described negatively, the core meaning is still "person active in party politics" - the negative descriptors are contextual modifiers

Sense 3 emphasizes "schemer" and "sly or underhanded ways" - while the context mentions corruption, the primary identity here is political figures, not just schemers. The phrase "would-be politicians" strongly suggests sense 2 (people wanting to be active in party politics/political leaders).

Also, looking at the synonyms for sense 2: politico, pol, political leader - these fit the context of local elected officials and those aspiring to such positions.

Sense 1 is too specific to civil administration and lacks the party politics connotation.

Therefore, sense 2 (index 2) seems most appropriate: "a person active in party politics."

Wait, I need to check the sense keys again:
1. politician%1:18:01:: - a leader engaged in civil administration
2. politician%1:18:00:: - a person active in party politics
3. politician%1:18:02:: - a schemer...

In WordNet, usually the most common sense is index 00. The context describes people who are politically active/elected, making sense 2 the best fit, even though they are described negatively. The negative description doesn't automatically mean sense 3, because sense 3 is specifically about scheming within an organization (like a company), whereas these are political figures exploiting school boards for political gain.

Actually, looking at the definition of sense 3 again: "a schemer who tries to gain advantage in an organization in sly or underhanded ways" - this could apply to politicians scheming within the school board organization.

But the phrase "would-be politicians" strongly indicates people who want to become political figures (sense 2), not just schemers in general.

Also, "demagogic" is a political term, fitting sense 2 better.

I think sense 2 is the correct choice.

But let me double-check by looking at typical WordNet examples if I knew them. Sense 2 typically covers the general meaning of someone in politics, which can be used negatively or positively. Sense 3 is more specific to the derogatory "mere politician" as schemer.

Given the context mentions "elected school boards" and "local politicians," this is clearly referring to political figures, not just generic schemers. Even though they are described as corrupt, they are still politicians in the standard sense (sense 2).

Therefore: {"sense_index": 2}

provider: AtlasCloud


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: process
Target surface form: process
Context:
They should see to it that their kids do not play truant; they should make certain that the children spend enough time doing homework; they should scrutinize the report card. If parents are dissatisfied with a school, they should have the option of switching to another. -- "Community involvement "is an even worse idea. Here, the experience of New York City is decisive. Locally elected school boards, especially in our larger cities, become the prey of ambitious, generally corrupt, and invariably demagogic local politicians or would-be politicians. New York is in the <t>process</t> of trying to disengage itself from a 20-year-old commitment to this system of school governance, even as Chicago and other cities are moving to institute it. -- In most states, increasing expenditures on education, in our current circumstances, will probably make things worse, not better.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=process%1:04:00:: | definition=a particular course of action intended to achieve a result | synonyms=procedure | examples=the procedure of obtaining a driver's license; it was a process of trial and error
2. sense_key=process%1:09:00:: | definition=(psychology) the performance of some composite cognitive activity; an operation that affects mental contents | synonyms=cognitive process, mental process, operation, cognitive operation | examples=the process of thinking; the cognitive operation of remembering
3. sense_key=process%1:10:00:: | definition=a writ issued by authority of law; usually compels the defendant's attendance in a civil suit; failure to appear results in a default judgment against the defendant | synonyms=summons
4. sense_key=process%1:09:01:: | definition=a mental process that you are not directly aware of | synonyms=unconscious process | examples=the process of denial
5. sense_key=process%1:08:00:: | definition=a natural prolongation or projection from a part of an organism either animal or plant | synonyms=outgrowth, appendage | examples=a bony process
6. sense_key=process%1:03:00:: | definition=a sustained phenomenon or one marked by gradual changes through a series of states | synonyms=physical process | examples=events now in process; the process of calcification begins later for boys than for girls

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation (WSD) for the target word "process" in the given context.

 Context analysis:
 The sentence is: "New York is in the <t>process</t> of trying to disengage itself from a 20-year-old commitment to this system of school governance..."

 The phrase "in the process of" is an idiom meaning "in the course of" or "in the middle of doing something." It refers to a series of actions or changes taking place over time.

 Looking at the candidate senses:

 1. process%1:04:00:: - "a particular course of action intended to achieve a result" (procedure)
    - Examples: "the procedure of obtaining a driver's license; it was a process of trial and error"
    - This refers to a specific procedure or method.

 2. process%1:09:00:: - psychological/cognitive process
    - Not relevant here, as this is about a city/government action, not mental activity.

 3. process%1:10:00:: - legal writ/summons
    - Definitely not relevant.

 4. process%1:09:01:: - unconscious mental process
    - Not relevant.

 5. process%1:08:00:: - biological outgrowth/appendage
    - Not relevant (anatomical meaning).

 6. process%1:03:00:: - "a sustained phenomenon or one marked by gradual changes through a series of states" (physical process)
    - Examples: "events now in process; the process of calcification begins later for boys than for girls"
    - Synonyms: physical process

 Now, comparing sense 1 and sense 6:

 Sense 1 focuses on a "course of action intended to achieve a result" - more like a procedure or method.
 Sense 6 focuses on a "sustained phenomenon" with "gradual changes through a series of states" - more like an ongoing series of events or developments.

 The phrase "in the process of" typically maps to sense 6 (or similar senses in other dictionaries) referring to a series of progressive changes or actions taking place over time.

 However, looking closely at WordNet:
 - Sense 1 (process%1:04:00::) is under noun.artifact? No, let me check the lexicographer files... Actually, looking at the sense key format:
   - %1:04:00 - noun.act (acts or actions)
   - %1:09:00 - noun.cognition
   - %1:10:00 - noun.communication
   - %1:09:01 - noun.cognition
   - %1:08:00 - noun.body
   - %1:03:00 - noun.event? No, %1:03 is noun.event? Wait, WordNet lexicographer file numbers:
     - 03: noun.event (phenomenon, process)
     - 04: noun.act
     - 09: noun.cognition
     - 10: noun.communication
     - 08: noun.body

 Actually, let me verify WordNet lexicographer file numbers:
 - 00: adj.all
 - 01: noun.Tops (entity, etc.)
 - 02: noun.group
 - 03: noun.event (event, act, phenomenon)
 - 04: noun.act
 - 05: noun.animal
 - 06: noun.artifact
 - 07: noun.attribute
 - 08: noun.body
 - 09: noun.cognition
 - 10: noun.communication
 - 11: noun.possession
 - 12: noun.quantity
 - 13: noun.relation
 - 14: noun.shape
 - 15: noun.state
 - 16: noun.substance
 - 17: noun.time
 - 18: verb.body
 ...etc.

 So:
 - process%1:04:00:: = noun.act (a particular course of action intended to achieve a result)
 - process%1:03:00:: = noun.event (a sustained phenomenon or one marked by gradual changes through a series of states)

 The context "in the process of trying to disengage" suggests an ongoing series of actions or gradual change. New York is undergoing a transition, a series of states leading from one condition to another.

 The idiom "in the process of" strongly aligns with sense 6 (noun.event - sustained phenomenon with gradual changes), not sense 1 (noun.act - a particular course of action/method).

 However, I should verify with the examples:
 - Sense 1 examples: "the procedure of obtaining a driver's license; it was a process of trial and error" - these are about methods/procedures.
 - Sense 6 examples: "events now in process; the process of calcification" - these are about ongoing phenomena/gradual changes.

 "New York is in the process of trying to disengage..." - this is about being in the middle of an ongoing transition/series of actions. This fits sense 6 better.

 But wait, "process" in "in the process of" is often considered sense 1 in some treatments? Let me reconsider.

 Actually, looking at WordNet's actual data (from my internal knowledge):
 - Sense 1: "a particular course of action intended to achieve a result" - often used for "due process", "democratic process", etc.
 - Sense 6: "a sustained phenomenon or one marked by gradual changes through a series of states" - often used for natural processes, biological processes, or ongoing developments.

 The phrase "in the process of" is ambiguous between:
 1. Being in the middle of performing a specific procedure (sense 1)
 2. Being in the middle of an ongoing development/transition (sense 6)

 However, "disengaging from a 20-year-old commitment" is a complex, gradual transition rather than a specific "course of action intended to achieve a result" in the procedural sense. It's more like an ongoing phenomenon.

 Also, sense 6 specifically has the example "events now in process" which is very close to "in the process of".

 But I need to be careful. In WordNet, sense 6 (process%1:03:00::) is the "physical process" sense - natural phenomena. Is disengaging from a commitment a "physical process"? It's a social/political process.

 However, WordNet's sense 6 definition says "a sustained phenomenon or one marked by gradual changes through a series of states" - this can apply to social processes too, even though the synset includes "physical process" as a synonym. The example "the process of calcification" is biological, but the definition is broad enough for social processes.

 Sense 1 is more about a procedure or method - "the process of obtaining a license" implies the steps you take. "The process of trying to disengage" could be interpreted as the steps/procedures being taken, but "in the process of" as an idiom typically selects for the ongoing, gradual change meaning.

 Let me check if there's any other sense... No, the list is complete.

 Actually, looking at standard WSD for "in the process of":
 - It usually maps to sense 6 (the event/phenomenon sense) in WordNet.

 For example, "in the process of change" = sense 6.
 "in the process of disengaging" = similar to change, an ongoing phenomenon.

 Therefore, the best choice is sense 6.

 Wait, I need to double-check the indexing. The user lists:
 1. sense_key=process%1:04:00::
 2. sense_key=process%1:09:00::
 3. sense_key=process%1:10:00::
 4. sense_key=process%1:09:01::
 5. sense_key=process%1:08:00::
 6. sense_key=process%1:03:00::

 So sense_index 6 corresponds to process%1:03:00::.

 Therefore, the answer should be {"sense_index": 6}.

 But let me reconsider sense 1 vs sense 6 one more time to be absolutely sure.

 Sense 1: "a particular course of action intended to achieve a result"
 - Synonyms: procedure
 - Examples: "the procedure of obtaining a driver's license; it was a process of trial and error"
 - This is about a method, a planned sequence of steps to achieve a goal.

 Sense 6: "a sustained phenomenon or one marked by gradual changes through a series of states"
 - Synonyms: physical process
 - Examples: "events now in process; the process of calcification begins later for boys than for girls"
 - This is about something happening over time, undergoing change.

 The context: "New York is in the process of trying to disengage itself from a 20-year-old commitment..."
 This describes a city undergoing a transition, moving from one state to another. It's a sustained phenomenon with gradual changes. It's not referring to a specific procedure or method like "due process" or "the application process." It's using the "in the process of" idiom meaning "in the course of" or "in the middle of."

 Therefore, sense 6 is correct.

 Final check: Could it be sense 1? If we interpret "process" as "the procedure of disengaging", it could fit, but "in the process of" strongly collocates with sense 6 (ongoing phenomenon). Also, sense 6 is the only one with the example "events now in process" which parallels "New York is in the process..."

 The answer is 6.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: try
Target surface form: trying
Context:
They should see to it that their kids do not play truant; they should make certain that the children spend enough time doing homework; they should scrutinize the report card. If parents are dissatisfied with a school, they should have the option of switching to another. -- "Community involvement "is an even worse idea. Here, the experience of New York City is decisive. Locally elected school boards, especially in our larger cities, become the prey of ambitious, generally corrupt, and invariably demagogic local politicians or would-be politicians. New York is in the process of <t>trying</t> to disengage itself from a 20-year-old commitment to this system of school governance, even as Chicago and other cities are moving to institute it. -- In most states, increasing expenditures on education, in our current circumstances, will probably make things worse, not better.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=try%2:41:00:: | definition=make an effort or attempt | synonyms=seek, attempt, essay, assay | examples=He tried to shake off his fears; The infant had essayed a few wobbly steps
2. sense_key=try%2:41:01:: | definition=put to the test, as for its quality, or give experimental use to | synonyms=test, prove, try out, examine, essay | examples=This approach has been tried with good results; Test this recipe
3. sense_key=try%2:41:06:: | definition=put on trial or hear a case and sit as the judge at the trial of | synonyms=judge, adjudicate | examples=The football star was tried for the murder of his wife; The judge tried both father and son in separate trials
4. sense_key=try%2:34:00:: | definition=take a sample of | synonyms=sample, try out, taste | examples=Try these new crackers; Sample the regional dishes
5. sense_key=try%2:41:05:: | definition=examine or hear (evidence or a case) by judicial process | synonyms=hear | examples=The jury had heard all the evidence; The case will be tried in California
6. sense_key=try%2:37:01:: | definition=give pain or trouble to | examples=I've been sorely tried by these students
7. sense_key=try%2:37:00:: | definition=test the limits of | synonyms=strain, stress | examples=You are trying my patience!
8. sense_key=try%2:30:00:: | definition=melt (fat or lard) in order to separate out impurities | synonyms=render | examples=try the yak butter; render fat in a casserole
9. sense_key=try%2:29:00:: | definition=put on a garment in order to see whether it fits and looks nice | synonyms=try on | examples=Try on this sweater to see how it looks

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation on the word "trying" in the given context. I need to choose the best sense from the 9 candidate senses provided.

First, let's look at the context:
"New York is in the process of <t>trying</t> to disengage itself from a 20-year-old commitment to this system of school governance..."

The sentence is about New York attempting or making an effort to disengage from a system of school governance.

Now let's look at the candidate senses:

1. sense_key=try%2:41:00:: | definition=make an effort or attempt | synonyms=seek, attempt, essay, assay | examples=He tried to shake off his fears; The infant had essayed a few wobbly steps

This looks like a strong candidate. "Trying to disengage" means making an effort or attempt to disengage.

2. sense_key=try%2:41:01:: | definition=put to the test, as for its quality, or give experimental use to | synonyms=test, prove, try out, examine, essay | examples=This approach has been tried with good results; Test this recipe

This is about testing something, like trying a new method. But here New York is not testing disengagement in the sense of an experiment - they are attempting to do it.

3. sense_key=try%2:41:06:: | definition=put on trial or hear a case and sit as the judge at the trial of | synonyms=judge, adjudicate | examples=The football star was tried for the murder...

This is legal context, not applicable here.

4. sense_key=try%2:34:00:: | definition=take a sample of | synonyms=sample, try out, taste | examples=Try these new crackers...

This is about sampling food/products. Not applicable.

5. sense_key=try%2:41:05:: | definition=examine or hear (evidence or a case) by judicial process | synonyms=hear | examples=The jury had heard all the evidence...

Legal context again, not applicable.

6. sense_key=try%2:37:01:: | definition=give pain or trouble to | examples=I've been sorely tried by these students

This would be like "these students are trying my patience" but in a different construction. Not applicable here.

7. sense_key=try%2:37:00:: | definition=test the limits of | synonyms=strain, stress | examples=You are trying my patience!

This is about straining or stressing. Not applicable.

8. sense_key=try%2:30:00:: | definition=melt (fat or lard) in order to separate out impurities | synonyms=render | examples=try the yak butter...

Cooking term, not applicable.

9. sense_key=try%2:29:00:: | definition=put on a garment in order to see whether it fits and looks nice | synonyms=try on | examples=Try on this sweater...

Clothing context, not applicable.

So the best fit is clearly sense 1: "make an effort or attempt" (try%2:41:00::).

The context shows New York making an effort to disengage from a system. The construction "trying to [verb]" almost always corresponds to sense 1 (attempting to do something).

Therefore, the answer should be {"sense_index": 1}.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: system
Target surface form: system
Context:
They should see to it that their kids do not play truant; they should make certain that the children spend enough time doing homework; they should scrutinize the report card. If parents are dissatisfied with a school, they should have the option of switching to another. -- "Community involvement "is an even worse idea. Here, the experience of New York City is decisive. Locally elected school boards, especially in our larger cities, become the prey of ambitious, generally corrupt, and invariably demagogic local politicians or would-be politicians. New York is in the process of trying to disengage itself from a 20-year-old commitment to this <t>system</t> of school governance, even as Chicago and other cities are moving to institute it. -- In most states, increasing expenditures on education, in our current circumstances, will probably make things worse, not better.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=system%1:06:00:: | definition=instrumentality that combines interrelated interacting artifacts designed to work as a coherent entity | examples=he bought a new stereo system; the system consists of a motor and a small computer
2. sense_key=system%1:14:00:: | definition=a group of independent but interrelated elements comprising a unified whole | synonyms=scheme | examples=a vast system of production and distribution and consumption keep the country going
3. sense_key=system%1:27:00:: | definition=(physical chemistry) a sample of matter in which substances in different phases are in equilibrium | examples=in a static system oil cannot be replaced by water on a surface; a system generating hydrogen peroxide
4. sense_key=system%1:09:00:: | definition=a complex of methods or rules governing behavior | synonyms=system of rules | examples=they have to operate under a system they oppose; that language has a complex system for indicating gender
5. sense_key=system%1:09:02:: | definition=an organized structure for arranging or classifying | synonyms=arrangement, organization, organisation | examples=he changed the arrangement of the topics; the facts were familiar but it was in the organization of them that he was original
6. sense_key=system%1:08:00:: | definition=a group of physiologically or anatomically related organs or parts | examples=the body has a system of organs for digestion
7. sense_key=system%1:09:01:: | definition=a procedure or process for obtaining an objective | examples=they had to devise a system that did not depend on cooperation
8. sense_key=system%1:08:01:: | definition=the living body considered as made up of interdependent components forming a unified whole | examples=exercise helped him get the alcohol out of his system
9. sense_key=system%1:07:00:: | definition=an ordered manner; orderliness by virtue of being methodical and well organized | synonyms=organization, organisation | examples=his compulsive organization was not an endearing quality; we can't do it unless we establish some system around here

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "system" in the given context.

 Let me analyze the context:
 - The text discusses school governance, specifically mentioning "New York City" and "locally elected school boards"
 - It mentions "a 20-year-old commitment to this system of school governance"
 - The context is about a method or structure of organizing school governance/administration
 - It contrasts with "Community involvement" and discusses how school boards become prey to politicians
 - It mentions Chicago and other cities moving to "institute it" (referring to this system)

 Now let's look at the candidate senses:

 1. sense_key=system%1:06:00:: - This refers to physical artifacts/machinery (stereo system, motor and computer). Not applicable here - we're talking about governance, not physical objects.

 2. sense_key=system%1:14:00:: - "a group of independent but interrelated elements comprising a unified whole" - synonyms include "scheme". Examples mention production/distribution/consumption. This could potentially fit, but let's look at others.

 3. sense_key=system%1:27:00:: - Physical chemistry definition. Not relevant to school governance.

 4. sense_key=system%1:09:00:: - "a complex of methods or rules governing behavior" - synonyms "system of rules". Examples: "they have to operate under a system they oppose", "that language has a complex system for indicating gender". This seems promising - school governance involves methods/rules for how schools are run.

 5. sense_key=system%1:09:02:: - "an organized structure for arranging or classifying" - synonyms arrangement, organization. Examples about arranging topics. This is more about classification/ordering rather than governance methods.

 6. sense_key=system%1:08:00:: - Anatomical/physiological systems (digestive system, etc.). Not relevant.

 7. sense_key=system%1:09:01:: - "a procedure or process for obtaining an objective" - examples about devising a system. This is close but seems more focused on procedures for specific objectives rather than overarching governance structures.

 8. sense_key=system%1:08:01:: - The living body considered as a whole. Not relevant.

 9. sense_key=system%1:07:00:: - "an ordered manner; orderliness by virtue of being methodical and well organized" - this is about the quality of being organized, not the organizational structure itself.

 Now, comparing sense 4 and sense 2:
 - Sense 4: "a complex of methods or rules governing behavior" - specifically mentions governing behavior, and the example "they have to operate under a system they oppose" fits well with the context of being committed to a system of school governance that people might want to disengage from.
 - Sense 2: "a group of independent but interrelated elements comprising a unified whole" - this is more general, could apply to any complex organization.

 The context specifically mentions "system of school governance" - governance implies rules, methods, and ways of governing. Sense 4 specifically mentions "methods or rules governing behavior" and has the synonym "system of rules".

 Also, the text mentions "Locally elected school boards... become the prey of... politicians" - this describes a governance structure with rules and methods.

 Sense 4 (system%1:09:00::) seems the best fit.

 Wait, let me double-check sense 2. The example for sense 2 is "a vast system of production and distribution and consumption keep the country going" - this is about an economic system. The school governance context is similar - it's a system of governance.

 But sense 4 specifically mentions "governing behavior" in its definition: "a complex of methods or rules governing behavior". Given that the context is explicitly about "school governance", sense 4 seems more precise.

 Also, looking at the WordNet sense keys:
 - system%1:09:00:: is the "system of rules" sense
 - system%1:14:00:: is the "scheme" sense (group of elements)

 In the context: "New York is in the process of trying to disengage itself from a 20-year-old commitment to this system of school governance"

 This refers to the method/structure of governance - the rules and methods by which schools are governed (locally elected school boards, etc.).

 I believe sense 4 (index 4) is the correct choice.

 Wait, I need to check the indexing. The user lists:
 1. sense_key=system%1:06:00::
 2. sense_key=system%1:14:00::
 3. sense_key=system%1:27:00::
 4. sense_key=system%1:09:00::
 5. sense_key=system%1:09:02::
 6. sense_key=system%1:08:00::
 7. sense_key=system%1:09:01::
 8. sense_key=system%1:08:01::
 9. sense_key=system%1:07:00::

 So sense 4 corresponds to system%1:09:00:: - "a complex of methods or rules governing behavior".

 Yes, this is the correct sense. The context is about a governance system - a set of methods and rules for how schools are governed (specifically mentioning locally elected school boards).

 Actually, looking more carefully at sense 2: "a group of independent but interrelated elements comprising a unified whole" with synonym "scheme". This could also fit "system of school governance" as a scheme/arrangement of governance.

 But sense 4 is more specific about "methods or rules governing behavior" which captures the essence of "governance" better. Governance is about rules and methods of governing.

 Also, the example for sense 4: "they have to operate under a system they oppose" parallels the context where New York is trying to disengage from a system (implying they oppose it or it's problematic).

 I think sense 4 is definitely the best choice.

 Let me verify by looking at sense 7: "a procedure or process for obtaining an objective". This is too narrow - it's about a specific procedure, not an overarching governance structure.

 Sense 9 is about the quality of being organized ("orderliness"), not the structure itself.

 So yes, sense 4.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: school
Target surface form: school
Context:
They should see to it that their kids do not play truant; they should make certain that the children spend enough time doing homework; they should scrutinize the report card. If parents are dissatisfied with a school, they should have the option of switching to another. -- "Community involvement "is an even worse idea. Here, the experience of New York City is decisive. Locally elected school boards, especially in our larger cities, become the prey of ambitious, generally corrupt, and invariably demagogic local politicians or would-be politicians. New York is in the process of trying to disengage itself from a 20-year-old commitment to this system of <t>school</t> governance, even as Chicago and other cities are moving to institute it. -- In most states, increasing expenditures on education, in our current circumstances, will probably make things worse, not better.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=school%1:14:00:: | definition=an educational institution | examples=the school was founded in 1900
2. sense_key=school%1:06:00:: | definition=a building where young people receive education | synonyms=schoolhouse | examples=the school was built in 1932; he walked to school every morning
3. sense_key=school%1:09:00:: | definition=the process of being formally educated at a school | synonyms=schooling | examples=what will you do when you finish school?
4. sense_key=school%1:14:02:: | definition=a body of creative artists or writers or thinkers linked by a similar style or by similar teachers | examples=the Venetian school of painting
5. sense_key=school%1:28:00:: | definition=the period of instruction in a school; the time period when school is in session | synonyms=schooltime, school day | examples=stay after school; he didn't miss a single day of school
6. sense_key=school%1:14:03:: | definition=an educational institution's faculty and students | examples=the school keeps parents informed; the whole school turned out for the game
7. sense_key=school%1:14:01:: | definition=a large group of fish | synonyms=shoal | examples=a school of small glittering fish swam by

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation (WSD) for the word "school" in the given context.

 Let me analyze the context carefully:

 The target word "school" appears in this sentence:
 "New York is in the process of trying to disengage itself from a 20-year-old commitment to this system of <t>school</t> governance, even as Chicago and other cities are moving to institute it."

 The surrounding context discusses:
 - Parents being dissatisfied with a school and switching to another
 - Locally elected school boards
 - "this system of school governance"
 - New York trying to disengage from this system
 - Chicago and other cities moving to institute it

 Now let's look at the candidate senses:

 1. sense_key=school%1:14:00:: | definition=an educational institution | examples=the school was founded in 1900
    - This refers to the institution itself. Could fit, but let's check others.

 2. sense_key=school%1:06:00:: | definition=a building where young people receive education | synonyms=schoolhouse | examples=the school was built in 1932; he walked to school every morning
    - This is the physical building. The context is talking about "school governance" and "system of school governance", which suggests an organizational/institutional level rather than just a physical building.

 3. sense_key=school%1:09:00:: | definition=the process of being formally educated at a school | synonyms=schooling | examples=what will you do when you finish school?
    - This refers to the process/education itself. "System of school governance" doesn't fit well with "the process of being formally educated."

 4. sense_key=school%1:14:02:: | definition=a body of creative artists or writers or thinkers linked by a similar style or by similar teachers | examples=the Venetian school of painting
    - This is about artistic schools. Not relevant here.

 5. sense_key=school%1:28:00:: | definition=the period of instruction in a school; the time period when school is in session | synonyms=schooltime, school day | examples=stay after school; he didn't miss a single day of school
    - This refers to time/period. "System of school governance" doesn't fit with a time period.

 6. sense_key=school%1:14:03:: | definition=an educational institution's faculty and students | examples=the school keeps parents informed; the whole school turned out for the game
    - This refers to the people (faculty and students). "System of school governance" could involve the people, but the context is talking about "school boards" and governance systems, which suggests the institutional level.

 7. sense_key=school%1:14:01:: | definition=a large group of fish | synonyms=shoal | examples=a school of small glittering fish swam by
    - Fish. Not relevant.

 Now, looking at the specific phrase: "system of school governance"

 This is referring to how schools are governed. The context mentions:
 - "Locally elected school boards"
 - "this system of school governance"
 - New York trying to disengage from it
 - Chicago moving to institute it

 This is talking about the governance of educational institutions. The word "school" here refers to the educational institution (sense 1), not the building (sense 2), not the process (sense 3), not the people (sense 6).

 However, let me reconsider. The phrase is "school governance" - this could mean:
 1. Governance of schools (the institutions)
 2. Governance within schools

 But given the context about "locally elected school boards" and cities instituting or disengaging from systems, this is clearly about the governance of educational institutions.

 Sense 1: "an educational institution" - this is the general sense of school as an organization/institution.
 Sense 6: "an educational institution's faculty and students" - this is metonymic, referring to the people.

 In the phrase "school governance", we're talking about how the educational institution is governed. This aligns with sense 1.

 But wait, looking at the earlier sentence: "If parents are dissatisfied with a school, they should have the option of switching to another." Here "a school" could be sense 1 (institution) or sense 2 (building) or sense 6 (people). But given the context of switching to another, and the later discussion of governance, sense 1 (educational institution) seems most appropriate.

 Actually, looking more carefully at the target occurrence:
 "this system of <t>school</t> governance"

 This is a compound noun phrase. "School governance" means the governance of schools. The word "school" here modifies "governance" and refers to the type of institution being governed.

 Sense 1 (an educational institution) is the best fit because:
 - It refers to the institution as an entity
 - The governance system applies to these institutions
 - The context discusses school boards which govern educational institutions
 - The contrast between New York and Chicago is about how cities manage their educational institutions

 Sense 2 (building) is too concrete/physical.
 Sense 3 (process) doesn't fit with "governance" - you don't govern a process in this way.
 Sense 6 (faculty and students) is possible but less likely than the institution itself.

 Therefore, the best sense is sense 1: school%1:14:00:: (an educational institution).

 Wait, I need to check the WordNet sense keys carefully. The user provided:

 1. sense_key=school%1:14:00:: | definition=an educational institution
 2. sense_key=school%1:06:00:: | definition=a building...
 3. sense_key=school%1:09:00:: | definition=the process...
 4. sense_key=school%1:14:02:: | definition=a body of creative artists...
 5. sense_key=school%1:28:00:: | definition=the period of instruction...
 6. sense_key=school%1:14:03:: | definition=an educational institution's faculty and students
 7. sense_key=school%1:14:01:: | definition=a large group of fish

 So sense 1 is the educational institution sense.

 But let me double-check: could it be sense 6 (faculty and students)?
 "System of school governance" - if "school" refers to the faculty and students, then it would be governance of the faculty and students. But school boards govern the institution, which includes the faculty and students, but also the buildings, curriculum, etc. The institution sense is broader and more appropriate.

 Also, looking at the examples for sense 1: "the school was founded in 1900" - this treats school as an organization/institution.

 The examples for sense 6: "the school keeps parents informed; the whole school turned out for the game" - these treat school as a collective of people.

 In the context of "school governance" and "school boards", we're talking about the institutional level.

 Therefore, sense_index: 1.

 Actually, looking at the WordNet lexicographer file numbers:
 - %1:14:00:: - noun.group (educational institution)
 - %1:06:00:: - noun.artifact (building)
 - %1:09:00:: - noun.cognition (process)
 - %1:14:02:: - noun.group (artistic school)
 - %1:28:00:: - noun.time (period)
 - %1:14:03:: - noun.group (faculty and students)
 - %1:14:01:: - noun.group (fish)

 Yes, sense 1 is the main institutional sense.

 One final check: The phrase is "system of school governance". This is referring to the governance structure for schools (educational institutions). The context mentions "Locally elected school boards" which are boards that govern schools (institutions).

 I am confident the answer is sense 1.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: governance
Target surface form: governance
Context:
They should see to it that their kids do not play truant; they should make certain that the children spend enough time doing homework; they should scrutinize the report card. If parents are dissatisfied with a school, they should have the option of switching to another. -- "Community involvement "is an even worse idea. Here, the experience of New York City is decisive. Locally elected school boards, especially in our larger cities, become the prey of ambitious, generally corrupt, and invariably demagogic local politicians or would-be politicians. New York is in the process of trying to disengage itself from a 20-year-old commitment to this system of school <t>governance</t>, even as Chicago and other cities are moving to institute it. -- In most states, increasing expenditures on education, in our current circumstances, will probably make things worse, not better.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=governance%1:14:00:: | definition=the persons (or committees or departments etc.) who make up a body for the purpose of administering something | synonyms=administration, governing body, establishment, brass, organization, organisation | examples=he claims that the present administration is corrupt; the governance of an association is responsible to its members
2. sense_key=governance%1:04:00:: | definition=the act of governing; exercising authority | synonyms=government, governing, government activity, administration | examples=regulations for the governing of state prisons; he had considerable experience of government

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation (WSD) on the word "governance" in the given context.

 Let me analyze the context:
 - The text discusses school governance in New York City
 - It mentions "Locally elected school boards" becoming prey to politicians
 - It mentions "this system of school governance"
 - New York is trying to disengage from a 20-year-old commitment to this system
 - Chicago and other cities are moving to institute it

 Now let's look at the two candidate senses:

 Sense 1 (governance%1:14:00::):
 - Definition: the persons (or committees or departments etc.) who make up a body for the purpose of administering something
 - Synonyms: administration, governing body, establishment, brass, organization, organisation
 - Examples: "he claims that the present administration is corrupt"; "the governance of an association is responsible to its members"
 - This sense refers to the people/entities who govern (the governing body itself)

 Sense 2 (governance%1:04:00::):
 - Definition: the act of governing; exercising authority
 - Synonyms: government, governing, government activity, administration
 - Examples: "regulations for the governing of state prisons"; "he had considerable experience of government"
 - This sense refers to the activity/process of governing

 In the context:
 - The phrase is "system of school governance"
 - The text discusses "Locally elected school boards" as being part of this system
 - It mentions New York trying to disengage from this system while Chicago institutes it
 - The focus seems to be on the structure/system of who administers the schools (the school boards, the body/organization), rather than the abstract act of governing

 However, looking more carefully:
 - "system of school governance" could refer to either the system of people (sense 1) or the system of activities/processes (sense 2)
 - But the context emphasizes "Locally elected school boards" - these are the actual bodies/people making up the administration
 - The text says these boards become prey to politicians, suggesting the issue is with the governing bodies themselves (the people/committees)

 Wait, let me reconsider. The phrase "school governance" in the context of "system of school governance" and comparing New York and Chicago...

 Actually, looking at the examples:
 - Sense 1 example: "the governance of an association is responsible to its members" - here governance = the body of people
 - Sense 2 example: "regulations for the governing of state prisons" - here governing = the activity

 In the sentence: "New York is in the process of trying to disengage itself from a 20-year-old commitment to this system of school governance"

 If it's sense 1 (the persons/committees), then "system of school governance" = system of school governing bodies/administrations
 If it's sense 2 (the act), then "system of school governance" = system of school governing/administration (the process)

 But the context mentions "Locally elected school boards" specifically as what becomes prey to politicians. These school boards ARE the governance (in sense 1). The text is criticizing the system where locally elected boards run the schools.

 Also, looking at the contrast: New York is moving away from this system while Chicago is moving toward it. This suggests a structural/organizational difference in who manages the schools.

 However, "governance" is often used to mean "the act or manner of governing" in modern usage. But let's look at the WordNet distinction carefully.

 Sense 1 is specifically about the people ("the persons... who make up a body")
 Sense 2 is about the activity ("the act of governing")

 In the phrase "school governance", if we mean the boards/committees that govern schools, that's sense 1.
 If we mean the act of governing schools, that's sense 2.

 The context mentions "Locally elected school boards" as the problematic element. These boards are the governance (sense 1). The system being discussed is one where local boards govern the schools (decentralized governance).

 But wait, the text says "Locally elected school boards... become the prey..." and then refers to "this system of school governance". The "this" refers back to the system involving locally elected school boards. So "governance" here seems to refer to the system of having local boards (the governing bodies).

 However, "governance" can be tricky. Let me look at the examples again.

 Sense 1: "the governance of an association is responsible to its members" - here governance = the governing body
 Sense 2: "he had considerable experience of government" - here government = the activity/art of governing

 In the context: "system of school governance" - this is ambiguous, but given that they're talking about switching from one system to another (New York disengaging, Chicago instituting), and the system involves "Locally elected school boards", it seems to refer to the structural arrangement - who governs (the local boards vs. perhaps central authority).

 Actually, looking at the broader context about community involvement and local control vs. central control, "governance" here likely refers to the mechanism/structure of administration (the bodies), not the abstract act.

 But I need to be careful. In many educational contexts, "school governance" refers to the system by which schools are governed (the act/process), but it can also refer to the governing bodies.

 Let me look at the specific sentence again: "New York is in the process of trying to disengage itself from a 20-year-old commitment to this system of school governance"

 If I substitute sense 1: "system of school [governing body/administration]" - this makes sense as a system of local boards.
 If I substitute sense 2: "system of school [act of governing]" - this also makes sense.

 But the key clue is earlier: "Locally elected school boards... become the prey..." - these boards are the governance in sense 1. The system is one where these boards exist.

 Also, sense 1's synonyms include "administration" and "establishment" and "organization" - these fit well with "school governance" meaning the administrative bodies of schools.

 Sense 2's synonyms include "government activity" - which emphasizes the activity aspect.

 Given that the text criticizes the "Locally elected school boards" specifically, and refers to the "system" that includes these boards, I believe sense 1 is the correct choice. The governance = the bodies (boards) that administer the schools.

 Wait, but I should check if there's any other clue. The text mentions "Community involvement" as an idea, and then discusses local school boards. This is about who has control - the community (through local boards) vs. perhaps professional administrators or central authorities.

 In this case, "governance" refers to the locus of authority - the governing bodies.

 I think sense 1 is correct.

 But let me double-check by considering if sense 2 could be better. If it were sense 2, the focus would be on the act of governing, the exercise of authority. The text does mention "exercising authority" implicitly, but the concrete reference is to "school boards" which are entities/organizations.

 Also, looking at the WordNet examples for sense 1: "he claims that the present administration is corrupt" - the context mentions "generally corrupt" politicians, which aligns with the corruption aspect mentioned in sense 1's example.

 Therefore, I choose sense 1.

 Wait, I need to check the sense_index format. The user wants {"sense_index": 3} format, but the senses are numbered 1 and 2 in the candidate list. So I should return {"sense_index": 1}.

 Actually, looking at the instructions: "Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}."

 The candidate senses are labeled 1 and 2. So I should return the index 1 or 2.

 Sense 1 is governance%1:14:00::
 Sense 2 is governance%1:04:00::

 I believe the answer is sense 1.

 Final check: The definition of sense 1 mentions "persons (or committees or departments etc.)" - school boards are committees/departments. The definition of sense 2 mentions "the act of governing" - while related, the specific mention of "school boards" as the problematic element in the context points to sense 1, where the governance is the body itself.

 Yes, sense 1.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: other
Target surface form: other
Context:
They should see to it that their kids do not play truant; they should make certain that the children spend enough time doing homework; they should scrutinize the report card. If parents are dissatisfied with a school, they should have the option of switching to another. -- "Community involvement "is an even worse idea. Here, the experience of New York City is decisive. Locally elected school boards, especially in our larger cities, become the prey of ambitious, generally corrupt, and invariably demagogic local politicians or would-be politicians. New York is in the process of trying to disengage itself from a 20-year-old commitment to this system of school governance, even as Chicago and <t>other</t> cities are moving to institute it. -- In most states, increasing expenditures on education, in our current circumstances, will probably make things worse, not better.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=other%3:00:00:: | definition=not the same one or ones already mentioned or implied; - the White Queen | examples=today isn't any other day; the construction of highways and other public works
2. sense_key=other%5:00:00:past:00 | definition=recently past | examples=the other evening
3. sense_key=other%5:00:02:past:00 | definition=belonging to the distant past | synonyms=early, former | examples=the early inhabitants of Europe; former generations
4. sense_key=other%5:00:00:strange:00 | definition=very unusual; different in character or quality from the normal or expected; - Lance Morrow | examples=a strange, other dimension...where his powers seemed to fail

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "other" in the given context.

Let me analyze the context:
- The sentence is: "New York is in the process of trying to disengage itself from a 20-year-old commitment to this system of school governance, even as Chicago and <t>other</t> cities are moving to institute it."
- The target word "other" is modifying "cities"
- It's referring to cities other than New York (and Chicago)
- It's used to indicate additional or different cities besides the ones mentioned (New York, and potentially Chicago)

Now let's look at the candidate senses:

1. sense_key=other%3:00:00:: | definition=not the same one or ones already mentioned or implied; - the White Queen | examples=today isn't any other day; the construction of highways and other public works
   - This seems to fit. "Other cities" means cities not the same as the ones already mentioned (New York, and Chicago is mentioned as distinct from New York but grouped with "other cities").
   - The example "the construction of highways and other public works" shows "other" being used to refer to additional items of the same type.

2. sense_key=other%5:00:00:past:00 | definition=recently past | examples=the other evening
   - This refers to time, like "the other day". Doesn't fit here.

3. sense_key=other%5:00:02:past:00 | definition=belonging to the distant past | synonyms=early, former | examples=the early inhabitants of Europe; former generations
   - This refers to distant past. Doesn't fit.

4. sense_key=other%5:00:00:strange:00 | definition=very unusual; different in character or quality from the normal or expected; - Lance Morrow | examples=a strange, other dimension...where his powers seemed to fail
   - This means "strange" or "unusual". Doesn't fit the context of "other cities" which just means additional/different cities.

Sense 1 is clearly the correct choice. The phrase "Chicago and other cities" means Chicago plus additional cities that are not the same as New York (which was mentioned earlier). This is the standard adjectival use of "other" to mean "not the same one or ones already mentioned or implied."

The context is comparing New York's action (disengaging from a system) with Chicago and additional cities (which are instituting it). So "other" refers to cities besides New York and besides Chicago (or potentially grouping Chicago with other cities besides New York).

Actually, looking more carefully: "Chicago and other cities" - this means Chicago plus additional cities. So "other" is modifying "cities" to mean cities different from New York (which is the subject of the first clause).

Yes, sense 1 is definitely correct.

The user wants the output as: {"sense_index": 1}

Wait, I need to check the indexing. The user lists:
1. sense_key=...
2. sense_key=...
3. sense_key=...
4. sense_key=...

So the index is 1, 2, 3, or 4.

Sense 1 is the correct one.

provider: DeepInfra