[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: fact
Target surface form: fact
Context:
However, the paradoxical thing about the action of the players of Real Madrid is that it did not comply to what we normally characterize as legal fraud, because the violation of the rules was not made secretly as to try to avoid the sanction, but their action was most evident and thus they received punishment from the referee. They waited for and accepted the sanction with no complaints. Another question is what type of advantage the violators obtained in the actions deliberately carried out. Here it seems necessary to state that it isn't a disadvantageous situation for rival nor is an obtained benefit in the same game, because evidently the result of the action supposes leaving their own team with less players. And neither is it a useful strategy for the next game, because the club will not be able to count on those players. The advantage, obviously, consists in the <t>fact</t> that the players will begin the following phase of the Championship without cards that could threaten their participation in a future game. But it is about a long term advantage, with a certain degree of indetermination, because the team can be eliminated first of change, and in addition with this action the players fulfil a sanction game and go to the second cycle of cards, in which the suspension by card accumulation takes place with one less than in the first cycle.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=fact%1:09:01:: | definition=a piece of information about circumstances that exist or events that have occurred | examples=first you must collect all the facts of the case
2. sense_key=fact%1:10:01:: | definition=a statement or assertion of verified information about something that is the case or has happened | examples=he supported his argument with an impressive array of facts
3. sense_key=fact%1:26:01:: | definition=an event known to have happened or something known to have existed | examples=your fears have no basis in fact; how much of the story is fact and how much fiction is hard to tell
4. sense_key=fact%1:09:02:: | definition=a concept whose truth can be proved | examples=scientific hypotheses are not facts

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation (WSD) on the word "fact" in a specific context. Let me analyze the context and the candidate senses.

 Context analysis:
 The sentence is: "The advantage, obviously, consists in the <t>fact</t> that the players will begin the following phase of the Championship without cards that could threaten their participation in a future game."

 Here, "fact" refers to the circumstance or situation that the players will begin the next phase without cards. It's referring to an existing state of affairs or a piece of information about circumstances that exist.

 Candidate senses:

 1. fact%1:09:01:: | definition=a piece of information about circumstances that exist or events that have occurred | examples=first you must collect all the facts of the case
 - This seems to fit. The "fact that..." construction often introduces a piece of information about circumstances that exist.

 2. fact%1:10:01:: | definition=a statement or assertion of verified information about something that is the case or has happened | examples=he supported his argument with an impressive array of facts
 - This emphasizes the statement or assertion aspect. The context here isn't about making an assertion or statement, but rather about the actual circumstance itself.

 3. fact%1:26:01:: | definition=an event known to have happened or something known to have existed | examples=your fears have no basis in fact; how much of the story is fact and how much fiction is hard to tell
 - This refers to actual events or things that exist as opposed to fiction. The context here isn't contrasting fact vs. fiction, but rather stating what the advantage consists of - i.e., the circumstance that...

 4. fact%1:09:02:: | definition=a concept whose truth can be proved | examples=scientific hypotheses are not facts
 - This refers to provable truths, often in scientific or logical contexts. The context here isn't about provable truths or scientific facts.

 Now, looking more closely at sense 1 vs sense 3:

 Sense 1 (fact%1:09:01): "a piece of information about circumstances that exist or events that have occurred"
 - Focuses on information/data

 Sense 3 (fact%1:26:01): "an event known to have happened or something known to have existed"
 - Focuses on the actual event/thing itself

 The construction "consists in the fact that..." is tricky. Let me look at the examples:

 For sense 1: "first you must collect all the facts of the case" - here facts are pieces of information.

 For sense 3: "your fears have no basis in fact" - here "fact" refers to actual reality/events.

 In the phrase "consists in the fact that...", we're saying the advantage consists in the circumstance/state of affairs that...

 Actually, looking at WordNet more carefully:
 - Sense 1:09:01 is under noun.artifact? No, 1:09 is "cognition" (psychological features)
 - Sense 1:26:01 is under noun.relation? No, 1:26 is "state" (a state of affairs)

 Wait, let me check the WordNet hierarchies:
 - 1:09:01 - usually "fact" as cognition/information (piece of information)
 - 1:26:01 - usually "fact" as a state of affairs (event known to have happened)

 In the sentence "The advantage consists in the fact that...", the word "fact" is introducing a clause that describes the content of the advantage. The advantage consists in the circumstance/state that the players will begin without cards.

 This seems closer to sense 1:26:01 (an event known to have happened or something known to have existed)? Or sense 1:09:01 (a piece of information)?

 Let me think about the usage. When we say "the fact that X", we are often treating the proposition X as a fact - as something that is the case.

 In "the fact that the players will begin... without cards", this is referring to the state of affairs itself.

 But looking at the examples:
 Sense 1 example: "first you must collect all the facts of the case" - plural facts as information
 Sense 3 example: "your fears have no basis in fact" - singular fact as reality/truth

 The phrase "basis in fact" uses "fact" as a mass noun or abstract concept referring to reality.

 But "the fact that..." construction is tricky. Let me see...

 Actually, looking at WordNet structure:
 - fact%1:09:01 :: a piece of information about circumstances that exist or events that have occurred
 - fact%1:10:01 :: a statement or assertion of verified information...
 - fact%1:26:01 :: an event known to have happened or something known to have existed

 In "the fact that...", it's often used to refer to the circumstance or situation. This aligns with 1:26:01 "an event known to have happened or something known to have existed" or "circumstances that exist".

 But 1:09:01 says "circumstances that exist or events that have occurred" - this is very similar.

 The distinction:
 1:09:01 emphasizes "a piece of information" - so it's about the information content.
 1:26:01 emphasizes "an event" or "something" - the actual thing itself.

 In the context: "The advantage consists in the fact that..."

 This is talking about the advantage consisting in some circumstance/state. The "fact" here is the actual state of affairs (that players will begin without cards), not merely a piece of information.

 However, looking at common usage, "the fact that" is extremely common and could be mapped to different senses.

 Let me look at the examples again carefully:

 Sense 1: "first you must collect all the facts of the case" - gathering data/information.
 Sense 2: "he supported his argument with an impressive array of facts" - using statements/evidence.
 Sense 3: "your fears have no basis in fact" - basis in reality/truth.
 Sense 4: "scientific hypotheses are not facts" - established truths/propositions.

 The context: "The advantage, obviously, consists in the <t>fact</t> that the players will begin the following phase..."

 This is saying the advantage is contained in/constituted by the circumstance that players will start without cards.

 I think sense 1 (1:09:01) or sense 3 (1:26:01) are the main contenders.

 Sense 3 definition: "an event known to have happened or something known to have existed"
 - The players beginning the next phase without cards is an event/circumstance known to exist (or will exist).

 Sense 1 definition: "a piece of information about circumstances that exist"
 - This would be the information that they will begin without cards.

 But "consists in the fact" suggests we're talking about the content - what the fact is about.

 Actually, looking at similar examples in WordNet or usage patterns:

 "The fact that he left early was a problem" - here "fact" refers to the circumstance/event that he left early.

 This maps to sense 3: an event known to have happened.

 But wait, in the given text, the players haven't actually begun the next phase yet. The text says "will begin". So it's a future event, or a circumstance that will exist.

 "The advantage consists in the fact that..." - this is talking about what the advantage is. The advantage is that they will have no cards.

 Actually, I think sense 1 is best: "a piece of information about circumstances that exist or events that have occurred"

 But "will begin" is future... though the text presents it as a determining factor.

 Let me reconsider sense 3 vs sense 1.

 Sense 3: "an event known to have happened or something known to have existed"
 - This is about actual events/things in reality.

 Sense 1: "a piece of information about circumstances that exist or events that have occurred"
 - This is about information concerning those things.

 In the phrase "the fact that the players will begin...", we are nominalizing the proposition. The "fact" is the circumstance itself.

 However, looking at the WordNet examples, sense 3 includes "your fears have no basis in fact" which uses "fact" as an abstract mass noun (reality).

 Sense 1 uses "facts" as countable pieces of information.

 In "the fact that...", "fact" is countable singular.

 I think the intended sense is 1:09:01 - "a piece of information about circumstances..." because:
 1. It's used with "that" clause
 2. It refers to the informational content of what is the case
 3. It fits the pattern of "consists in the fact that" as indicating what the advantage consists in - i.e., this piece of information/circumstance.

 But actually, looking at the fine distinctions in WordNet:

 sense 1.09.01: cognition, knowledge -- (psychological result of perception and learning and reasoning; "a piece of information about circumstances...")
 sense 3.26.01: state -- (the way something is with respect to its main attributes; "an event known to have happened...")

 Wait, 1:26 in WordNet is the "state" file ( noun.state ), which includes "the way something is..."

 Actually, let me check: in WordNet 3.0 or 3.1,
 - 1:09 is noun.cognition
 - 1:26 is noun.state

 Sense 1:09:01: fact (cognition) - a piece of information about circumstances that exist or events that have occurred
 Sense 3:26:01: fact (state) - an event known to have happened or something known to have existed

 In the context, "the fact that the players will begin..." - is this a cognition (piece of information) or a state (an event/situation)?

 The advantage consists in the situation/circumstance that they will begin without cards. This seems more like a state (noun.state) - the state of affairs where they begin without cards.

 However, the phrase "the fact that" is extremely ambiguous between these.

 But looking at the instruction: "WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together."

 The examples for sense 3: "your fears have no basis in fact"
 This contrasts fact with fiction/basis.

 Examples for sense 1: "first you must collect all the facts of the case"
 This is about gathering information.

 In our text: "The advantage... consists in the fact that..." - this is stating what the advantage is. The advantage is constituted by this circumstance.

 This is closer to sense 3: the actual event/circumstance known to exist (or will exist).

 But the phrase "fact that" is very commonly associated with sense 1 in many WSD systems... I'm not entirely sure.

 Let me look at sense 2: "a statement or assertion" - this is clearly distinct, referring to linguistic entities (statements).

 Sense 4: "a concept whose truth can be proved" - mathematical/scientific facts.

 So it's between 1 and 3.

 The phrase "the fact that" often introduces a clause describing a situation. In philosophical terms, this is often called a "fact" as in a state of affairs.

 WordNet sense 3 is "an event known to have happened or something known to have existed".
 The text describes something that will happen (begin the following phase without cards).

 Actually, "something known to have existed" could cover circumstances that will exist.

 But let me look at the specific wording of sense 1 again: "a piece of information about circumstances that exist or events that have occurred"

 If I say "the fact that he is tall", is that a piece of information or a circumstance?

 It's both, but in WSD, we need to choose.

 I think the key is in the verb phrase "consists in the fact".

 "Consists in" means "is constituted by" or "has as its essence".

 "The advantage consists in the fact that..." = "The advantage is that..."

 This is identifying the advantage with the circumstance.

 This suggests sense 3 (the event/circumstance itself) rather than sense 1 (information about the circumstance).

 However, "fact" in sense 3 is often used in phrases like "in fact", "as a matter of fact", "basis in fact" - referring to reality/truth.

 "The fact that" construction is actually more commonly associated with sense 1 in WordNet classification, I believe.

 But let me check if there's a pattern. The user says "Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense."

 I need to make a decision.

 Looking at the content: The text discusses rules, violations, advantages, strategies. It's analyzing a situation.

 "The advantage... consists in the fact that..."

 This is a very standard construction. Let me see if I can find similar examples in WSD corpora or WordNet.

 Actually, looking at the fine-grained senses:

 Sense 1:09:01 is usually the default sense for "fact" when it means "a piece of information".

 Sense 3:26:01 is used for "fact" as in "fact vs. fiction" or "historical fact".

 In "the fact that...", it's introducing a proposition that is being treated as true/real.

 I think Sense 1 is correct because:
 - It refers to "circumstances that exist"
 - The phrase "the fact that [circumstance]" fits the gloss "a piece of information about circumstances"
 - The surrounding text is informational/analytical.

 Wait, but "circumstances that exist" in sense 1 refers to the object of the information, not the information itself.

 The gloss for sense 1: "a piece of information about [circumstances that exist]"
 The gloss for sense 3: "[an event known to have happened]"

 In "the fact that players will begin...", we are talking about the event (them beginning without cards), not a piece of information about it.

 But "fact" here is the subject of "consists". The advantage consists in the fact.

 If I substitute sense 3: "The advantage consists in the event known to have happened that..."
 If I substitute sense 1: "The advantage consists in the piece of information about circumstances that..."

 Hmm.

 Actually, looking at WordNet more carefully, sense 1:09:01 is often the sense used for "fact" in "the fact that" constructions in SemCor and other tagged corpora.

 But sense 3:26:01 is used for "in fact" and "fact" as opposed to fiction.

 Let me reconsider sense 3's example: "how much of the story is fact and how much fiction is hard to tell"
 Here "fact" is uncountable or plural, referring to true events vs. made up events.

 In our case, it's "the fact" (singular, countable definite).

 Countable singular "fact" usually maps to sense 1 or 2.

 Sense 2 is "a statement or assertion".

 So between 1 and 2.

 "The advantage consists in the statement that..." doesn't fit well.
 "The advantage consists in the piece of information that..." fits better.

 So sense 1.

 But let me double-check: could it be sense 3?

 "The advantage consists in the event that..." - this could work, but "event" might be too specific. It's a circumstance/state.

 Sense 3 says "an event known to have happened or something known to have existed"
 "Something known to have existed" is very broad.

 I think I'm overthinking this.

 In standard WSD for WordNet:
 - fact%1:09:01 is the most common sense for "fact"
 - It covers "the fact that" constructions
 - Sense 3 is for phrases like "accomplished fact", "in fact", "matter of fact", distinguishing from fiction.

 Therefore, sense 1:09:01 is the best choice.

 Answer: {"sense_index": 1}


attempt_kind: initial

status: success

[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: player
Target surface form: players
Context:
However, the paradoxical thing about the action of the players of Real Madrid is that it did not comply to what we normally characterize as legal fraud, because the violation of the rules was not made secretly as to try to avoid the sanction, but their action was most evident and thus they received punishment from the referee. They waited for and accepted the sanction with no complaints. Another question is what type of advantage the violators obtained in the actions deliberately carried out. Here it seems necessary to state that it isn't a disadvantageous situation for rival nor is an obtained benefit in the same game, because evidently the result of the action supposes leaving their own team with less players. And neither is it a useful strategy for the next game, because the club will not be able to count on those players. The advantage, obviously, consists in the fact that the <t>players</t> will begin the following phase of the Championship without cards that could threaten their participation in a future game. But it is about a long term advantage, with a certain degree of indetermination, because the team can be eliminated first of change, and in addition with this action the players fulfil a sanction game and go to the second cycle of cards, in which the suspension by card accumulation takes place with one less than in the first cycle.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=player%1:18:01:: | definition=a person who participates in or is skilled at some game | synonyms=participant
2. sense_key=player%1:18:02:: | definition=someone who plays a musical instrument (as a profession) | synonyms=musician, instrumentalist
3. sense_key=player%1:18:00:: | definition=a theatrical performer | synonyms=actor, histrion, thespian, role player
4. sense_key=player%1:18:04:: | definition=a person who pursues a number of different social and sexual partners simultaneously
5. sense_key=player%1:18:03:: | definition=an important participant (as in a business deal) | examples=he was a major player in setting up the corporation

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

finish_reason: stop

role: assistant

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "players" in the given context.

 Let me analyze the context:
 - The text is talking about "players of Real Madrid"
 - It mentions actions in a game/sport context (violation of rules, referee, punishment, cards, Championship)
 - It discusses sanctions, cards (yellow/red cards presumably), suspension, and participation in games
 - Real Madrid is a famous football (soccer) club
 - The context involves sports, games, team participation

 Now let's look at the candidate senses:

 1. sense_key=player%1:18:01:: | definition=a person who participates in or is skilled at some game | synonyms=participant
    - This fits sports/games participants. "Game" here can mean sports match.

 2. sense_key=player%1:18:02:: | definition=someone who plays a musical instrument (as a profession) | synonyms=musician, instrumentalist
    - This is about musicians. Not relevant here.

 3. sense_key=player%1:18:00:: | definition=a theatrical performer | synonyms=actor, histrion, thespian, role player
    - This is about actors. Not relevant.

 4. sense_key=player%1:18:04:: | definition=a person who pursues a number of different social and sexual partners simultaneously
    - This is slang for someone who dates multiple people. Not relevant.

 5. sense_key=player%1:18:03:: | definition=an important participant (as in a business deal) | examples=he was a major player in setting up the corporation
    - This is metaphorical, about business or important participants in deals. While "participant" is close, the context is clearly about sports/athletes, not business.

 The context clearly refers to athletes/footballers participating in a sports championship (Real Madrid, referee, cards, sanctions, games).

 Sense 1 is "a person who participates in or is skilled at some game" - this is the general sense for game/sport participants.

 Wait, let me check the WordNet sense keys to make sure I understand the indices correctly:
 - player%1:18:01:: - this is the first sense in the file (index 1)
 - player%1:18:02:: - second sense (musician)
 - player%1:18:00:: - wait, this looks like index 0? Or is it the third one?
 - player%1:18:04:: - fourth
 - player%1:18:03:: - third?

 Actually, looking at the format:
 - player%1:18:01:: - this typically means lexicographer file 18 (noun.person), and 01 is the sense number?
 - But in WordNet, the sense keys usually end with :: and the number before that indicates the sense number.

 Wait, the user lists them as:
 1. sense_key=player%1:18:01::
 2. sense_key=player%1:18:02::
 3. sense_key=player%1:18:00::
 4. sense_key=player%1:18:04::
 5. sense_key=player%1:18:03::

 This is confusing. Usually WordNet sense keys have the format: word%pos:lexfile:lexid:: or similar. The number before the last :: is often the lex_id or sense number.

 But the user has labeled them 1, 2, 3, 4, 5. So I should return the index (1, 2, 3, 4, or 5) corresponding to the best sense.

 Let me map:
 - Index 1: person who participates in or is skilled at some game (sports/games player)
 - Index 2: musician
 - Index 3: theatrical performer (actor)
 - Index 4: person with multiple sexual partners
 - Index 5: important participant (business)

 The context is clearly about football/soccer players (Real Madrid, championship, referee, cards, sanctions). So sense 1 is the correct one.

 Wait, I need to be careful. The user asks for "sense_index". Looking at the example: {"sense_index": 3}

 So I need to return the number of the candidate in the list (1, 2, 3, 4, or 5).

 The context is about sports - specifically football/soccer given "Real Madrid", "referee", "cards", "Championship", "sanction game".

 Therefore, sense 1 is correct: "a person who participates in or is skilled at some game"

 But wait, is there any ambiguity with sense 5 "an important participant"? The text says "major player" in the example, but here it's talking about the actual athletes. The phrase "players of Real Madrid" clearly refers to the team members who play the sport.

 Also, looking at the specific sentence: "the paradoxical thing about the action of the players of Real Madrid" - this is definitely the athletes.

 So the answer should be sense_index: 1.

 But let me double-check the WordNet senses to make sure I understand the definitions correctly.

 In WordNet 3.0 or 3.1:
 - player, participant (noun) - a person who participates in or is skilled at some game
 - player, musician (noun) - someone who plays a musical instrument
 - player, actor, histrion, thespian, role player (noun) - a theatrical performer
 - player (noun) - a person who pursues a number of different social and sexual partners simultaneously
 - player (noun) - an important participant (as in a business deal)

 Yes, so sense 1 is the sports/games participant.

 The context mentions:
 - "players of Real Madrid" (famous football club)
 - "violation of the rules"
 - "referee"
 - "sanction"
 - "cards" (yellow/red cards in football)
 - "Championship"
 - "suspension by card accumulation"
 - "participation in a future game"

 This is unambiguously sports context.

 Therefore, the answer is sense_index 1.

 Wait, I should check if "player" in the sense of "game player" (like chess player, football player) is indeed sense 1. Yes.

 One final check: could it be sense 5? "an important participant"? The text mentions "major player" in the definition example, but the context here is not metaphorical business usage. It's literal sports usage. The players are literally playing a game (football).

 So definitely sense 1.

 The output should be: {"sense_index": 1}

format: unknown

native_finish_reason: stop

provider: AtlasCloud

currency: USD


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: phase
Target surface form: phase
Context:
However, the paradoxical thing about the action of the players of Real Madrid is that it did not comply to what we normally characterize as legal fraud, because the violation of the rules was not made secretly as to try to avoid the sanction, but their action was most evident and thus they received punishment from the referee. They waited for and accepted the sanction with no complaints. Another question is what type of advantage the violators obtained in the actions deliberately carried out. Here it seems necessary to state that it isn't a disadvantageous situation for rival nor is an obtained benefit in the same game, because evidently the result of the action supposes leaving their own team with less players. And neither is it a useful strategy for the next game, because the club will not be able to count on those players. The advantage, obviously, consists in the fact that the players will begin the following <t>phase</t> of the Championship without cards that could threaten their participation in a future game. But it is about a long term advantage, with a certain degree of indetermination, because the team can be eliminated first of change, and in addition with this action the players fulfil a sanction game and go to the second cycle of cards, in which the suspension by card accumulation takes place with one less than in the first cycle.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=phase%1:28:00:: | definition=any distinct time period in a sequence of events | synonyms=stage | examples=we are in a transitional stage in which many former ideas must be revised or rejected
2. sense_key=phase%1:26:00:: | definition=(physical chemistry) a distinct state of matter in a system; matter that is identical in chemical composition and physical state and separated from other material by the phase boundary | synonyms=form | examples=the reaction occurs in the liquid phase of the system
3. sense_key=phase%1:28:01:: | definition=a particular point in the time of a cycle; measured from some arbitrary zero and expressed as an angle | synonyms=phase angle
4. sense_key=phase%1:07:00:: | definition=(astronomy) the particular appearance of a body's state of illumination (especially one of the recurring shapes of the part of Earth's moon that is illuminated by the sun) | examples=the full phase of the moon

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "phase" in the given context.

 Let me analyze the context:
 - The text is about soccer/football (Real Madrid, players, referee, cards, Championship)
 - It discusses players deliberately getting yellow cards (or similar sanctions) so they can start the next "phase" of the Championship without cards
 - The phrase is: "the players will begin the following <t>phase</t> of the Championship"
 - This refers to a distinct time period or stage in the sequence of the Championship (tournament)

 Now let's look at the candidate senses:

 1. sense_key=phase%1:28:00:: | definition=any distinct time period in a sequence of events | synonyms=stage | examples=we are in a transitional stage in which many former ideas must be revised or rejected
    - This fits well. The Championship has different phases/stages (group stage, knockout stage, etc., or simply different time periods). "Following phase" suggests a sequence of events/time periods.

 2. sense_key=phase%1:26:00:: | definition=(physical chemistry) a distinct state of matter in a system...
    - This is about chemistry (solid, liquid, gas). Not relevant to a sports championship.

 3. sense_key=phase%1:28:01:: | definition=a particular point in the time of a cycle; measured from some arbitrary zero and expressed as an angle
    - This is about phase angles in waves/cycles, often physics or mathematics. Not relevant to championship stages.

 4. sense_key=phase%1:07:00:: | definition=(astronomy) the particular appearance of a body's state of illumination...
    - This is about moon phases. Not relevant.

 So clearly sense 1 is the correct one. The context refers to a "phase of the Championship" meaning a distinct time period or stage in the sequence of the tournament/events.

 The synonym "stage" fits perfectly here (e.g., "next stage of the Championship").

 Therefore, the answer should be {"sense_index": 1}.

provider: Phala


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: championship
Target surface form: Championship
Context:
However, the paradoxical thing about the action of the players of Real Madrid is that it did not comply to what we normally characterize as legal fraud, because the violation of the rules was not made secretly as to try to avoid the sanction, but their action was most evident and thus they received punishment from the referee. They waited for and accepted the sanction with no complaints. Another question is what type of advantage the violators obtained in the actions deliberately carried out. Here it seems necessary to state that it isn't a disadvantageous situation for rival nor is an obtained benefit in the same game, because evidently the result of the action supposes leaving their own team with less players. And neither is it a useful strategy for the next game, because the club will not be able to count on those players. The advantage, obviously, consists in the fact that the players will begin the following phase of the <t>Championship</t> without cards that could threaten their participation in a future game. But it is about a long term advantage, with a certain degree of indetermination, because the team can be eliminated first of change, and in addition with this action the players fulfil a sanction game and go to the second cycle of cards, in which the suspension by card accumulation takes place with one less than in the first cycle.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=championship%1:26:00:: | definition=the status of being a champion | synonyms=title | examples=he held the title for two years
2. sense_key=championship%1:11:00:: | definition=a competition at which a champion is chosen
3. sense_key=championship%1:04:00:: | definition=the act of providing approval and support | synonyms=backing, backup, patronage | examples=his vigorous backing of the conservatives got him in trouble with progressives

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "championship" in the given context.

 Let me analyze the context:
 - The text is discussing Real Madrid players and their actions in a game
 - It mentions "the following phase of the Championship"
 - It talks about players beginning this phase without cards
 - It mentions being eliminated, suspension by card accumulation, etc.
 - This is clearly about a sports competition/tournament

 Now let's look at the candidate senses:

 1. sense_key=championship%1:26:00:: | definition=the status of being a champion | synonyms=title | examples=he held the title for two years
    - This refers to the status/title of being a champion, not the competition itself.

 2. sense_key=championship%1:11:00:: | definition=a competition at which a champion is chosen
    - This refers to the actual competition or tournament where a champion is determined.

 3. sense_key=championship%1:04:00:: | definition=the act of providing approval and support | synonyms=backing, backup, patronage | examples=his vigorous backing of the conservatives got him in trouble with progressives
    - This is clearly unrelated to the sports context.

 In the context, "Championship" refers to a tournament or competition (specifically what seems to be a football/soccer tournament with phases, elimination, cards, etc.). The phrase "following phase of the Championship" indicates it's talking about stages of a competition, not the status of being a champion.

 Therefore, sense 2 is the correct choice: "a competition at which a champion is chosen"

 Wait, let me double-check the WordNet sense indices. The user provided:
 1. championship%1:26:00:: (status of being a champion)
 2. championship%1:11:00:: (competition at which a champion is chosen)
 3. championship%1:04:00:: (act of providing approval and support)

 The context is clearly about a sports tournament/competition (specifically seems to be referring to a football championship like UEFA Champions League or similar, given the mention of Real Madrid, phases, elimination, cards, etc.).

 So the correct sense is index 2.

 The user wants the output as: {"sense_index": 2}

provider: Chutes


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: participation
Target surface form: participation
Context:
However, the paradoxical thing about the action of the players of Real Madrid is that it did not comply to what we normally characterize as legal fraud, because the violation of the rules was not made secretly as to try to avoid the sanction, but their action was most evident and thus they received punishment from the referee. They waited for and accepted the sanction with no complaints. Another question is what type of advantage the violators obtained in the actions deliberately carried out. Here it seems necessary to state that it isn't a disadvantageous situation for rival nor is an obtained benefit in the same game, because evidently the result of the action supposes leaving their own team with less players. And neither is it a useful strategy for the next game, because the club will not be able to count on those players. The advantage, obviously, consists in the fact that the players will begin the following phase of the Championship without cards that could threaten their <t>participation</t> in a future game. But it is about a long term advantage, with a certain degree of indetermination, because the team can be eliminated first of change, and in addition with this action the players fulfil a sanction game and go to the second cycle of cards, in which the suspension by card accumulation takes place with one less than in the first cycle.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=participation%1:04:00:: | definition=the act of sharing in the activities of a group | synonyms=engagement, involvement, involution | examples=the teacher tried to increase his students' engagement in class activities
2. sense_key=participation%1:26:00:: | definition=the condition of sharing in common with others (as fellows or partners etc.) | synonyms=involvement

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "participation" in the given context.

 Let me analyze the context:
 - The text is about soccer/football players from Real Madrid
 - It discusses sanctions, cards (yellow/red cards), and player suspensions
 - The specific sentence: "The advantage, obviously, consists in the fact that the players will begin the following phase of the Championship without cards that could threaten their participation in a future game."
 - So "participation" here refers to the players being able to play/take part in a future game
 - It's about the act of taking part in the game, not about sharing something in common with others

 Now let's look at the candidate senses:

 1. sense_key=participation%1:04:00:: | definition=the act of sharing in the activities of a group | synonyms=engagement, involvement, involution | examples=the teacher tried to increase his students' engagement in class activities
    - This seems to be about the act of taking part in activities
    - In the context, players' participation in a future game = the act of taking part in the game
    - This fits well

 2. sense_key=participation%1:26:00:: | definition=the condition of sharing in common with others (as fellows or partners etc.) | synonyms=involvement
    - This is about the condition/state of sharing in common with others
    - The context is about players being able to play in a game, not about sharing something in common with others
    - This doesn't fit as well

 The context is clearly about the act of taking part in a game (playing in it), not about a condition of sharing. The players want to avoid cards so they can participate (take part) in future games.

 Therefore, sense 1 is the correct choice.

 Wait, let me double-check the WordNet senses. In WordNet:
 - participation%1:04:00:: is usually the act of participating (the act of sharing in the activities of a group)
 - participation%1:26:00:: is usually the state of being a participant (the condition of sharing in common with others)

 In the sentence: "cards that could threaten their participation in a future game"
 - This means cards that could prevent them from playing/participating in a future game
 - It's about the act of taking part in the game
 - Or possibly the state of being a participant?

 Actually, looking more carefully:
 - "threaten their participation" = threaten their ability to take part
 - This could be interpreted as threatening their involvement/act of participating (sense 1)
 - Or threatening their status as participants (sense 2)?

 But sense 2 is defined as "the condition of sharing in common with others (as fellows or partners etc.)" - this seems more about being part of a group in a general sense, like being a partner or fellow.

 In sports contexts, "participation" usually refers to the act of playing/taking part in the game, which aligns with sense 1 (the act of sharing in the activities of a group).

 Also, looking at the synonyms:
 - Sense 1: engagement, involvement, involution
 - Sense 2: involvement

 The example for sense 1 mentions "engagement in class activities" which parallels "participation in a future game" - both are about engaging in an activity.

 Therefore, sense 1 is definitely the correct choice.

 The user wants the output as: {"sense_index": 1}


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: game
Target surface form: game
Context:
However, the paradoxical thing about the action of the players of Real Madrid is that it did not comply to what we normally characterize as legal fraud, because the violation of the rules was not made secretly as to try to avoid the sanction, but their action was most evident and thus they received punishment from the referee. They waited for and accepted the sanction with no complaints. Another question is what type of advantage the violators obtained in the actions deliberately carried out. Here it seems necessary to state that it isn't a disadvantageous situation for rival nor is an obtained benefit in the same game, because evidently the result of the action supposes leaving their own team with less players. And neither is it a useful strategy for the next game, because the club will not be able to count on those players. The advantage, obviously, consists in the fact that the players will begin the following phase of the Championship without cards that could threaten their participation in a future <t>game</t>. But it is about a long term advantage, with a certain degree of indetermination, because the team can be eliminated first of change, and in addition with this action the players fulfil a sanction game and go to the second cycle of cards, in which the suspension by card accumulation takes place with one less than in the first cycle.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=game%1:04:00:: | definition=a contest with rules to determine a winner | examples=you need four people to play this game
2. sense_key=game%1:04:03:: | definition=a single play of a sport or other contest | examples=the game lasted two hours
3. sense_key=game%1:04:01:: | definition=an amusement or pastime | examples=they played word games; he thought of his painting as a game that filled his empty time
4. sense_key=game%1:05:00:: | definition=animal hunted for food or sport
5. sense_key=game%1:28:00:: | definition=(tennis) a division of play during which one player serves
6. sense_key=game%1:23:00:: | definition=(games) the score at a particular point or the score needed to win | examples=the game is 6 all; he is serving for the game
7. sense_key=game%1:13:00:: | definition=the flesh of wild animals that is used for food
8. sense_key=game%1:09:00:: | definition=a secret scheme to do something (especially something underhand or illegal) | synonyms=plot, secret plan | examples=they concocted a plot to discredit the governor; I saw through his little game from the start
9. sense_key=game%1:06:00:: | definition=the game equipment needed in order to play a particular game | examples=the child received several games for his birthday
10. sense_key=game%1:04:02:: | definition=your occupation or line of work | synonyms=biz | examples=he's in the plumbing game; she's in show biz
11. sense_key=game%1:04:04:: | definition=frivolous or trifling behavior | examples=for actors, memorizing lines is no game; for him, life is all fun and games

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "game" in the given context.

 Let me analyze the context:
 - The text is discussing soccer/football (Real Madrid, players, referee, cards, Championship)
 - The specific sentence is: "The advantage, obviously, consists in the fact that the players will begin the following phase of the Championship without cards that could threaten their participation in a future <t>game</t>."
 - It's talking about players avoiding cards so they can participate in a future "game" (match/contest)
 - Earlier mentions: "the same game", "the next game", "sanction game"

 Looking at the candidate senses:
 1. game%1:04:00:: - a contest with rules to determine a winner (general contest)
 2. game%1:04:03:: - a single play of a sport or other contest (specific instance/match)
 3. game%1:04:01:: - an amusement or pastime
 4. game%1:05:00:: - animal hunted for food or sport
 5. game%1:28:00:: - (tennis) a division of play during which one player serves
 6. game%1:23:00:: - (games) the score at a particular point or the score needed to win
 7. game%1:13:00:: - the flesh of wild animals
 8. game%1:09:00:: - a secret scheme (plot)
 9. game%1:06:00:: - the game equipment
 10. game%1:04:02:: - your occupation or line of work
 11. game%1:04:04:: - frivolous or trifling behavior

 The context is clearly about sports (soccer/football). The word "game" here refers to a specific match or contest in the future - "participation in a future game".

 Comparing sense 1 and sense 2:
 - Sense 1: "a contest with rules to determine a winner" - this is the general concept of a game
 - Sense 2: "a single play of a sport or other contest" - this refers to a specific instance/match

 In the phrase "participation in a future game", we're talking about a specific upcoming match/event, not the general concept of games. The text mentions "the same game", "the next game", and "a future game" - these all refer to specific matches/contests.

 Sense 2 (game%1:04:03::) seems most appropriate because:
 - It refers to a single play/instance of a sport
 - The context is about soccer matches
 - "a future game" means a future match
 - The examples include "the game lasted two hours" which fits the sports context

 Sense 1 is more general (the concept of a game as a contest), but here we're talking about specific scheduled matches.

 Sense 5 is specific to tennis (division of play during which one player serves), which doesn't fit here (soccer context).

 Therefore, the best sense is sense_key=game%1:04:03:: which corresponds to index 2.

 Wait, let me double-check the indexing. The user lists:
 1. sense_key=game%1:04:00::
 2. sense_key=game%1:04:03::
 3. sense_key=game%1:04:01::
 ...

 So index 2 corresponds to game%1:04:03:: - "a single play of a sport or other contest".

 Yes, this fits best. The context is about Real Madrid players and soccer matches. "Participation in a future game" means participating in a future match/contest.

 Actually, looking more carefully at the context:
 - "the same game" - refers to the current match
 - "the next game" - refers to the next match
 - "a future game" - refers to a future match

 These are all specific instances of the sport being played, not the general concept of "game" as an activity.

 So sense 2 (index 2) is correct.

 But let me reconsider sense 1 vs sense 2.
 Sense 1: "a contest with rules to determine a winner" - examples: "you need four people to play this game"
 Sense 2: "a single play of a sport or other contest" - examples: "the game lasted two hours"

 In the context: "participation in a future game" - this is talking about a specific scheduled match. The example "the game lasted two hours" suggests a specific event/match. This aligns with "a future game" meaning a future match.

 Also, earlier in the text: "neither is it a useful strategy for the next game" - "the next game" refers to the next match.

 So yes, sense 2 (index 2) is the best choice.

 The answer should be: {"sense_index": 2}

provider: DeepInfra


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: term
Target surface form: term
Context:
They waited for and accepted the sanction with no complaints. Another question is what type of advantage the violators obtained in the actions deliberately carried out. Here it seems necessary to state that it isn't a disadvantageous situation for rival nor is an obtained benefit in the same game, because evidently the result of the action supposes leaving their own team with less players. And neither is it a useful strategy for the next game, because the club will not be able to count on those players. The advantage, obviously, consists in the fact that the players will begin the following phase of the Championship without cards that could threaten their participation in a future game. But it is about a long <t>term</t> advantage, with a certain degree of indetermination, because the team can be eliminated first of change, and in addition with this action the players fulfil a sanction game and go to the second cycle of cards, in which the suspension by card accumulation takes place with one less than in the first cycle. So that, by passing rounds, it is not so clear that it is an advantage.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=term%1:10:00:: | definition=a word or expression used for some particular thing | examples=he learned many medical terms
2. sense_key=term%1:28:00:: | definition=a limited period of time | examples=a prison term; he left school before the end of term
3. sense_key=term%1:10:02:: | definition=(usually plural) a statement of what is required as part of an agreement | synonyms=condition | examples=the contract set out the conditions of the lease; the terms of the treaty were generous
4. sense_key=term%1:09:00:: | definition=any distinct quantity contained in a polynomial | examples=the general term of an algebraic equation of the n-th degree
5. sense_key=term%1:10:01:: | definition=one of the substantive phrases in a logical proposition | examples=the major term of a syllogism must occur twice
6. sense_key=term%1:28:01:: | definition=the end of gestation or point at which birth is imminent | synonyms=full term | examples=a healthy baby born at full term
7. sense_key=term%1:06:00:: | definition=(architecture) a statue or a human bust or an animal carved out of the top of a square pillar; originally used as a boundary marker in ancient Rome | synonyms=terminus, terminal figure

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation on the word "term" in the given context.

 Let me analyze the context:
 - The text is about sports sanctions, specifically about players getting cards/suspensions in a championship
 - Key phrase: "But it is about a long <t>term</t> advantage"
 - The context discusses whether getting a sanction is advantageous in the long run vs short term
 - "long term advantage" is a common collocation meaning an advantage that manifests over a long period of time

 Now let's look at the candidate senses:

 1. term%1:10:00:: - "a word or expression used for some particular thing" (like medical terms)
    - This doesn't fit. "long word advantage" doesn't make sense.

 2. term%1:28:00:: - "a limited period of time" (examples: prison term, end of term)
    - This fits "long term" as in a long period of time. "Long-term advantage" means an advantage over a long duration.

 3. term%1:10:02:: - "(usually plural) a statement of what is required as part of an agreement"
    - This is about contractual terms/conditions. Doesn't fit here.

 4. term%1:09:00:: - mathematical term in a polynomial
    - Not relevant.

 5. term%1:10:01:: - logical proposition term
    - Not relevant.

 6. term%1:28:01:: - "the end of gestation or point at which birth is imminent" (full term)
    - This is specifically about pregnancy/gestation. Doesn't fit a sports context.

 7. term%1:06:00:: - architecture/statue
    - Not relevant.

 The phrase "long term" clearly refers to a long period of time. Sense 2 (term%1:28:00::) is defined as "a limited period of time" with examples like "a prison term; he left school before the end of term".

 The phrase "long term" is an idiomatic expression meaning "over a long period of time" or "in the distant future", which aligns with sense 2 (a limited period of time).

 Wait, let me double-check. The context says: "But it is about a long term advantage, with a certain degree of indetermination..."

 Yes, this is clearly referring to the time duration aspect. The advantage is not immediate but rather over a longer period of time (the next phase of the Championship, future games).

 So the correct sense is index 2 (sense_key=term%1:28:00::).

 But let me verify the indexing. The user lists:
 1. sense_key=term%1:10:00::
 2. sense_key=term%1:28:00::
 3. sense_key=term%1:10:02::
 4. sense_key=term%1:09:00::
 5. sense_key=term%1:10:01::
 6. sense_key=term%1:28:01::
 7. sense_key=term%1:06:00::

 So sense 2 is the one with definition "a limited period of time".

 Actually, looking closely at the context: "long term advantage" - this could potentially be interpreted as "long-term" as an adjective, but here it's used as a noun phrase "a long term advantage" where "term" is the noun being modified by "long".

 Yes, "term" here means a period of time. The advantage extends over a long period of time.

 Therefore, the answer should be {"sense_index": 2}.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: advantage
Target surface form: advantage
Context:
They waited for and accepted the sanction with no complaints. Another question is what type of advantage the violators obtained in the actions deliberately carried out. Here it seems necessary to state that it isn't a disadvantageous situation for rival nor is an obtained benefit in the same game, because evidently the result of the action supposes leaving their own team with less players. And neither is it a useful strategy for the next game, because the club will not be able to count on those players. The advantage, obviously, consists in the fact that the players will begin the following phase of the Championship without cards that could threaten their participation in a future game. But it is about a long term <t>advantage</t>, with a certain degree of indetermination, because the team can be eliminated first of change, and in addition with this action the players fulfil a sanction game and go to the second cycle of cards, in which the suspension by card accumulation takes place with one less than in the first cycle. So that, by passing rounds, it is not so clear that it is an advantage.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=advantage%1:07:00:: | definition=the quality of having a superior or more favorable position | synonyms=vantage | examples=the experience gave him the advantage over me
2. sense_key=advantage%1:23:00:: | definition=(tennis) first point scored after deuce
3. sense_key=advantage%1:07:01:: | definition=benefit resulting from some event or action | synonyms=reward | examples=it turned out to my advantage; reaping the rewards of generosity

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "advantage" in a specific context. Let me analyze the context carefully.

The context is about sports (football/soccer), specifically discussing sanctions, cards, and strategic decisions. The text discusses whether getting a sanction (yellow/red card) provides an "advantage" to the violators.

Key parts of the context:
- "what type of advantage the violators obtained"
- "it isn't a disadvantageous situation for rival nor is an obtained benefit in the same game"
- "The advantage, obviously, consists in the fact that the players will begin the following phase of the Championship without cards"
- "But it is about a long term advantage"
- "by passing rounds, it is not so clear that it is an advantage"

Now looking at the candidate senses:

1. sense_key=advantage%1:07:00:: | definition=the quality of having a superior or more favorable position | synonyms=vantage | examples=the experience gave him the advantage over me
   - This seems to be about a general superior position or vantage point.

2. sense_key=advantage%1:23:00:: | definition=(tennis) first point scored after deuce
   - This is very specific to tennis scoring. The context is about football/soccer (Championship, cards, players, teams), not tennis. So this is definitely wrong.

3. sense_key=advantage%1:07:01:: | definition=benefit resulting from some event or action | synonyms=reward | examples=it turned out to my advantage; reaping the rewards of generosity
   - This is about a benefit or reward from an action.

Analyzing the context:
The text is discussing whether the deliberate action of getting sanctioned (cards) results in a benefit for the team. Specifically, it mentions "the advantage... consists in the fact that the players will begin the following phase... without cards" and "it is about a long term advantage."

This fits sense 3: "benefit resulting from some event or action" - the benefit being starting the next phase without cards, resulting from the action of deliberately getting sanctioned now.

Sense 1 (vantage/superior position) is more about being in a better position generally, while sense 3 is specifically about a benefit accruing from an action. The text explicitly frames this as a potential "benefit" (contrasted with "disadvantageous situation"), and discusses it as a strategic "reward" for the action taken.

Also, the examples for sense 3 include "it turned out to my advantage" which fits the context of evaluating whether something is advantageous or not.

Therefore, sense 3 (index 3) is the correct choice.

Wait, I need to check the indexing. The user asks for {"sense_index": 3} corresponding to the third sense listed (advantage%1:07:01::).

Let me double-check:
- Sense 1: advantage%1:07:00:: (the quality of having a superior or more favorable position)
- Sense 2: advantage%1:23:00:: (tennis)
- Sense 3: advantage%1:07:01:: (benefit resulting from some event or action)

Yes, the target is sense 3.

The context discusses whether the action provides a "benefit" (synonym in sense 3) or "reward" (also synonym in sense 3). It talks about "obtained benefit" in the text. This confirms sense 3.

Sense 1 is more about the state of being ahead or having the upper hand (like in a competition), whereas here it's specifically about the beneficial outcome of a specific action (getting carded/sanctioned now to avoid cards later).

So the answer is {"sense_index": 3}.

provider: Novita


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: degree
Target surface form: degree
Context:
They waited for and accepted the sanction with no complaints. Another question is what type of advantage the violators obtained in the actions deliberately carried out. Here it seems necessary to state that it isn't a disadvantageous situation for rival nor is an obtained benefit in the same game, because evidently the result of the action supposes leaving their own team with less players. And neither is it a useful strategy for the next game, because the club will not be able to count on those players. The advantage, obviously, consists in the fact that the players will begin the following phase of the Championship without cards that could threaten their participation in a future game. But it is about a long term advantage, with a certain <t>degree</t> of indetermination, because the team can be eliminated first of change, and in addition with this action the players fulfil a sanction game and go to the second cycle of cards, in which the suspension by card accumulation takes place with one less than in the first cycle. So that, by passing rounds, it is not so clear that it is an advantage.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=degree%1:07:00:: | definition=a position on a scale of intensity or amount or quality | synonyms=grade, level | examples=a moderate grade of intelligence; a high level of care is required
2. sense_key=degree%1:26:01:: | definition=a specific identifiable position in a continuum or series or especially in a process | synonyms=level, stage, point | examples=a remarkable degree of frankness; at what stage are the social sciences?
3. sense_key=degree%1:10:00:: | definition=an award conferred by a college or university signifying that the recipient has satisfactorily completed a course of study | synonyms=academic degree | examples=he earned his degree at Princeton summa cum laude
4. sense_key=degree%1:23:00:: | definition=a measure for arcs and angles | synonyms=arcdegree | examples=there are 360 degrees in a circle
5. sense_key=degree%1:09:00:: | definition=the highest power of a term or variable
6. sense_key=degree%1:23:03:: | definition=a unit of temperature on a specified scale | examples=the game was played in spite of the 40-degree temperature
7. sense_key=degree%1:07:01:: | definition=the seriousness of something (e.g., a burn or crime) | examples=murder in the second degree; a second degree burn

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "degree" in the given context.

 Let me analyze the context:
 - The text is discussing a sports sanction situation (likely soccer/football given the mention of cards, players, teams, championships)
 - The specific phrase is: "But it is about a long term advantage, with a certain <t>degree</t> of indetermination..."
 - The meaning here is about the extent or level of indetermination/uncertainty
 - It's talking about a "certain degree of indetermination" meaning a certain level, amount, or extent of uncertainty

 Now let's look at the candidate senses:

 1. sense_key=degree%1:07:00:: | definition=a position on a scale of intensity or amount or quality | synonyms=grade, level | examples=a moderate grade of intelligence; a high level of care is required
    - This seems to fit. "A certain degree of indetermination" means a certain level or amount on a scale of indetermination.

 2. sense_key=degree%1:26:01:: | definition=a specific identifiable position in a continuum or series or especially in a process | synonyms=level, stage, point | examples=a remarkable degree of frankness; at what stage are the social sciences?
    - This also could fit, but seems more about stages in a process or series. The example "a remarkable degree of frankness" is similar to the usage here (a remarkable degree of indetermination), but let me check the nuances.
    - Actually, looking at the examples, "a remarkable degree of frankness" is very similar to "a certain degree of indetermination". But sense 1 also has examples like "a moderate grade of intelligence" which is similar.

 Let me compare sense 1 and sense 2 more carefully:

 Sense 1: "a position on a scale of intensity or amount or quality" - synonyms: grade, level
 Sense 2: "a specific identifiable position in a continuum or series or especially in a process" - synonyms: level, stage, point

 The phrase "a certain degree of indetermination" is talking about the extent or amount of indetermination. Indetermination is a quality/state, and we're talking about how much of it exists.

 Sense 1 seems to focus on "scale of intensity or amount or quality" - this fits well with "degree of indetermination" (amount/level of uncertainty).

 Sense 2 seems to focus on "position in a continuum or series or process" - this might fit less well because we're not talking about a stage in a process, but rather the extent/amount of a quality (indetermination).

 However, looking at the example for sense 2: "a remarkable degree of frankness" - this is very similar to our phrase "a certain degree of indetermination". Both are talking about the extent of a quality (frankness/indetermination).

 But wait, sense 1 has "a moderate grade of intelligence" - also similar.

 Let me check WordNet definitions more carefully. In WordNet:
 - degree%1:07:00:: is the first sense, usually the most common one, referring to a position on a scale.
 - degree%1:26:01:: is often used for "stage" or "point" in a process.

 Actually, looking at the examples:
 - Sense 1 examples: "a moderate grade of intelligence; a high level of care is required"
 - Sense 2 examples: "a remarkable degree of frankness; at what stage are the social sciences?"

 The phrase "a certain degree of indetermination" patterns with "a remarkable degree of frankness" (both are [adjective] + degree + of + [abstract noun]). This suggests sense 2 might be the match.

 But wait, "a moderate grade of intelligence" in sense 1 is also similar.

 Let me think about the distinction. Sense 1 (degree%1:07:00::) is often used for measurable scales (temperature, intensity, amount). Sense 2 (degree%1:26:01::) is often used for stages or levels in a progression, or extent of abstract qualities.

 Actually, looking at standard WordNet:
 - degree%1:07:00:: usually corresponds to "level, grade" - a position on a scale
 - degree%1:26:01:: usually corresponds to "level, stage, point" - a specific identifiable position in a continuum

 In the phrase "degree of indetermination", we're talking about the extent or amount of indetermination. This is typically sense 1 (the basic sense of degree as a level on a scale).

 But let me look at the specific WordNet sense keys provided:
 - sense_key=degree%1:07:00:: - this is the "grade, level" sense
 - sense_key=degree%1:26:01:: - this is the "level, stage, point" sense

 The difference is subtle. Sense 1:07:00 is under noun.artifact? No, 1:07 is noun.attribute in WordNet 3.0/3.1. Let me check:
 - 1:07 is noun.attribute
 - 1:26 is noun.state? No, 1:26 is noun.state in some versions, but let me check WordNet structure.

 Actually, in WordNet:
 - 1:07:00 is noun.attribute - "a position on a scale of intensity or amount or quality"
 - 1:26:01 is noun.state - "a specific identifiable position in a continuum or series or especially in a process"

 Wait, looking at the definition for 1:26:01: "a specific identifiable position in a continuum or series or especially in a process" - this sounds like "stage" or "phase".

 But the example "a remarkable degree of frankness" suggests this sense can be used with abstract qualities.

 However, "a certain degree of indetermination" where indetermination means uncertainty/unpredictability - this is talking about the extent or level of uncertainty. This is most commonly sense 1:07:00.

 Let me check the other senses to be sure:
 3. Academic degree - clearly not relevant
 4. Arcdegree (geometry) - not relevant
 5. Math term (highest power) - not relevant
 6. Temperature - not relevant (though related to sense 1, it's specific to temperature)
 7. Severity (burns, crimes) - not relevant

 So it's between 1 and 2.

 The phrase "with a certain degree of indetermination" means "with a certain amount/level of uncertainty". This is the standard usage of "degree" as a level on a scale (sense 1).

 Sense 2 is more about stages in a process or specific points in a continuum (like "the degree of progress" or "to a high degree" in the sense of extent, but wait...).

 Actually, looking at WordNet examples for sense 2 (degree%1:26:01::):
 - "a remarkable degree of frankness"
 - "at what stage are the social sciences?"

 The first example is exactly parallel to our construction: "[adj] degree of [abstract noun]".

 But sense 1 has:
 - "a moderate grade of intelligence"
 - "a high level of care is required"

 These are also similar.

 The distinction in WordNet is:
 - Sense 1 (1:07:00): focuses on "scale of intensity or amount or quality" - this is the general sense of extent/amount
 - Sense 2 (1:26:01): focuses on "position in a continuum or series or process" - this is about stages or points in a progression

 "Indetermination" is not a process or series; it's a quality or state. The phrase is talking about how much indetermination exists - the amount or level. This fits sense 1 better.

 However, many WSD systems might map "degree of X" where X is an abstract noun to sense 2 because of the "frankness" example. But looking carefully, sense 1 is the more general "amount/level" sense.

 Wait, I should check the actual WordNet sense keys to be sure about the numbering.

 In WordNet 3.1:
 - degree%1:07:00:: - a position on a scale of intensity or amount or quality; "a moderate grade of intelligence"; "a high level of care is required"
 - degree%1:26:01:: - a specific identifiable position in a continuum or series or especially in a process; "a remarkable degree of frankness"; "at what stage are the social sciences?"

 The key difference is that sense 1 uses "grade" and "level" as synonyms and talks about scales of intensity/amount/quality. Sense 2 uses "level", "stage", "point" and talks about continua/series/processes.

 "Indetermination" is a quality/state. We're talking about the amount of it. This is sense 1.

 But there's ambiguity because "degree" in "degree of frankness" (sense 2 example) and "degree of indetermination" seem similar.

 However, looking at the gloss for sense 2: "a specific identifiable position in a continuum or series or especially in a process". Is "indetermination" a continuum? Not really. We're not talking about a position in a series of indeterminations, but rather the extent/amount of the property of indetermination.

 Therefore, sense 1 is the correct choice.

 Wait, let me reconsider. In many lexical databases, "degree" in "to a degree" or "a degree of" when referring to extent is often sense 2 in some classifications, but in WordNet specifically:

 Sense 1: "a position on a scale of intensity or amount or quality"
 - Examples: moderate grade of intelligence, high level of care

 Sense 2: "a specific identifiable position in a continuum or series or especially in a process"
 - Examples: remarkable degree of frankness, stage of social sciences

 The example "a remarkable degree of frankness" is very similar to "a certain degree of indetermination". Both refer to the extent of an abstract quality.

 But "frankness" could be seen as a continuum (from total secrecy to total openness), and "indetermination" (uncertainty) is also a continuum (from certain to uncertain).

 However, sense 1 is explicitly about "amount or quality" which seems to fit "indetermination" (an amount of uncertainty).

 Let me look at the synonyms again:
 Sense 1: grade, level
 Sense 2: level, stage, point

 Both have "level". But sense 1 has "grade" (like grade of intelligence), sense 2 has "stage" and "point" (like stages of a process).

 The context is: "with a certain degree of indetermination" - modifying "indetermination" which is a noun referring to uncertainty/unpredictability.

 If I substitute synonyms:
 - "with a certain level of indetermination" - works for both
 - "with a certain grade of indetermination" - sounds a bit odd, but possible
 - "with a certain stage of indetermination" - doesn't work well (indetermination isn't a process with stages)
 - "with a certain point of indetermination" - doesn't work well

 So sense 1 seems better because "stage" and "point" (synonyms of sense 2) don't fit well with "indetermination".

 Also, the definition of sense 2 emphasizes "continuum or series or especially in a process". The text is not talking about a process of indetermination, but the amount of uncertainty.

 Therefore, sense 1 (degree%1:07:00::) is the best choice.

 Actually, looking at the index numbers in the candidate list:
 1. sense_key=degree%1:07:00::
 2. sense_key=degree%1:26:01::
 ...

 So the answer should be {"sense_index": 1}.

 But wait, I want to double-check. Could it be sense 7? "the seriousness of something" - no, that's for burns and crimes (first degree murder, etc.).

 Could it be sense 6? Temperature? No.

 So definitely between 1 and 2.

 One more check: in the sentence "with a certain degree of indetermination", could "degree" mean "stage"?
 - "with a certain stage of indetermination" - this would imply indetermination has stages, like early indetermination, late indetermination. That doesn't fit the context.
 - "with a certain level of indetermination" - this fits perfectly, meaning some amount of uncertainty.

 Since sense 1 is the "level/grade on a scale" sense and sense 2 is the "stage/point in a process" sense, and "level" fits but "stage" doesn't, sense 1 is correct.

 Final answer: sense_index 1.

provider: ModelRun


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: team
Target surface form: team
Context:
They waited for and accepted the sanction with no complaints. Another question is what type of advantage the violators obtained in the actions deliberately carried out. Here it seems necessary to state that it isn't a disadvantageous situation for rival nor is an obtained benefit in the same game, because evidently the result of the action supposes leaving their own team with less players. And neither is it a useful strategy for the next game, because the club will not be able to count on those players. The advantage, obviously, consists in the fact that the players will begin the following phase of the Championship without cards that could threaten their participation in a future game. But it is about a long term advantage, with a certain degree of indetermination, because the <t>team</t> can be eliminated first of change, and in addition with this action the players fulfil a sanction game and go to the second cycle of cards, in which the suspension by card accumulation takes place with one less than in the first cycle. So that, by passing rounds, it is not so clear that it is an advantage.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=team%1:14:00:: | definition=a cooperative unit (especially in sports) | synonyms=squad
2. sense_key=team%1:14:01:: | definition=two or more draft animals that work together to pull something

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "team" in the given context.

 Let me analyze the context:
 - The text is discussing sports, specifically a Championship
 - It mentions "their own team with less players"
 - It mentions "the club will not be able to count on those players"
 - It mentions "the team can be eliminated first of change" (likely meaning eliminated early/changed)
 - It discusses players, cards, sanctions, games, and championships

 The candidate senses are:
 1. team%1:14:00:: - a cooperative unit (especially in sports) | synonyms=squad
 2. team%1:14:01:: - two or more draft animals that work together to pull something

 Clearly, sense 1 is the correct one. The context is about a sports team (specifically what appears to be a soccer/football team given the mention of cards, sanctions, players, and championships).

 Sense 2 refers to draft animals (like horses or oxen pulling a plow or wagon), which is completely irrelevant to this sports context.

 The word "team" in the context refers to a sports team that participates in a Championship, has players, can be eliminated, etc.

 Therefore, the answer should be sense_index: 1.

 Wait, I need to check the format. The user wants:
 {"sense_index": 1}

 But looking at the candidate senses, they are numbered 1 and 2. So I should return the index 1.

 Let me double-check the context to make sure I'm not missing anything:
 - "leaving their own team with less players" - sports team
 - "the team can be eliminated first of change" - eliminated from the tournament/championship
 - "players will begin the following phase of the Championship" - definitely sports

 Yes, sense 1 is correct.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: change
Target surface form: change
Context:
They waited for and accepted the sanction with no complaints. Another question is what type of advantage the violators obtained in the actions deliberately carried out. Here it seems necessary to state that it isn't a disadvantageous situation for rival nor is an obtained benefit in the same game, because evidently the result of the action supposes leaving their own team with less players. And neither is it a useful strategy for the next game, because the club will not be able to count on those players. The advantage, obviously, consists in the fact that the players will begin the following phase of the Championship without cards that could threaten their participation in a future game. But it is about a long term advantage, with a certain degree of indetermination, because the team can be eliminated first of <t>change</t>, and in addition with this action the players fulfil a sanction game and go to the second cycle of cards, in which the suspension by card accumulation takes place with one less than in the first cycle. So that, by passing rounds, it is not so clear that it is an advantage.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=change%1:11:00:: | definition=an event that occurs when something passes from one state or phase to another | synonyms=alteration, modification | examples=the change was intended to increase sales; this storm is certainly a change for the worse
2. sense_key=change%1:24:00:: | definition=a relational difference between states; especially between states before and after some event | examples=he attributed the change to their marriage
3. sense_key=change%1:04:00:: | definition=the action of changing something | examples=the change of government had no impact on the economy; his change on abortion cost him the election
4. sense_key=change%1:19:00:: | definition=the result of alteration or modification | examples=there were marked changes in the lining of the lungs; there had been no change in the mountains
5. sense_key=change%1:21:02:: | definition=the balance of money received when the amount you tender is greater than the amount due | examples=I paid with a twenty and pocketed the change
6. sense_key=change%1:06:01:: | definition=a thing that is different | examples=he inspected several changes before selecting one
7. sense_key=change%1:06:00:: | definition=a different or fresh set of clothes | examples=she brought a change in her overnight bag
8. sense_key=change%1:21:01:: | definition=coins of small denomination regarded collectively | examples=he had a pocketful of change
9. sense_key=change%1:21:03:: | definition=money received in return for its equivalent in a larger denomination or a different currency | examples=he got change for a twenty and used it to pay the taxi driver
10. sense_key=change%1:07:00:: | definition=a difference that is usually pleasant | synonyms=variety | examples=he goes to France for variety; it is a refreshing change to meet a woman mechanic

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation on the word "change" in the given context.

First, let me analyze the context carefully:

The text is about sports, specifically about a Championship (soccer/football likely). The key phrase is: "the team can be eliminated first of change"

Looking at the surrounding context:
- It discusses players, sanctions, cards (likely yellow/red cards in football)
- It mentions "the following phase of the Championship"
- It mentions "passing rounds"
- The phrase "first of change" seems to mean "first round" or something similar? Actually, looking more carefully...

Wait, "first of change" - this seems like it might be a translation or specific terminology. Let me look at the phrase: "the team can be eliminated first of change"

Actually, looking at the structure: "the team can be eliminated first of <t>change</t>"

This seems odd. Let me reconsider. Could it be "first round of change"? Or "first phase of change"?

Wait, reading the sentence again: "But it is about a long term advantage, with a certain degree of indetermination, because the team can be eliminated first of change, and in addition with this action the players fulfil a sanction game and go to the second cycle of cards..."

Hmm. "first of change" - this might mean "at the first opportunity" or "in the first instance"? Or could it be referring to a "round" or "phase"?

Actually, looking at the candidates:

1. change%1:11:00:: - an event that occurs when something passes from one state or phase to another (alteration, modification)
2. change%1:24:00:: - a relational difference between states
3. change%1:04:00:: - the action of changing something
4. change%1:19:00:: - the result of alteration or modification
5. change%1:21:02:: - the balance of money received (coins/change)
6. change%1:06:01:: - a thing that is different
7. change%1:06:00:: - a different or fresh set of clothes
8. change%1:21:01:: - coins of small denomination
9. change%1:21:03:: - money received in return for equivalent in larger denomination
10. change%1:07:00:: - a difference that is usually pleasant (variety)

Given the context about a Championship, rounds, phases, and elimination... "first of change" likely refers to a phase or round. But none of the senses explicitly mention "round" or "phase" as a noun meaning.

Wait, looking at sense 1: "an event that occurs when something passes from one state or phase to another" - examples: "the change was intended to increase sales; this storm is certainly a change for the worse"

Sense 4: "the result of alteration or modification" - examples mention "changes in the lining of the lungs"

Sense 2: "a relational difference between states"

But the phrase "first of change" is ambiguous. However, looking at the context about "the following phase of the Championship" and "passing rounds", and the phrase "eliminated first of change"...

Actually, could "change" here mean "round" in the sense of a game or match? No, that's not in WordNet.

Let me reconsider the phrase. Could it be "first of change" = "first change" = "first substitution"? In sports like soccer, "change" can mean substitution.

But looking at the WordNet senses, sense 1 mentions "phase". The text mentions "phase of the Championship".

The phrase "eliminated first of change" might mean "eliminated at the first change/opportunity" or "eliminated in the first round of changes"?

Wait, looking at the Spanish or translation context... This might be translated from Spanish. In Spanish, "cambio" can mean substitution, change, or exchange.

But let's look at the candidates again. Which sense fits "first of change" in a tournament context?

Sense 1: "phase to another" - could be about phases of the championship
Sense 4: "result of alteration"
Sense 6: "a thing that is different" - "several changes before selecting one"

Actually, looking at sense 6: "a thing that is different" - examples: "he inspected several changes before selecting one"

But in the context: "the team can be eliminated first of change" - this suggests "change" is a point in time or an event.

Wait, could "change" here mean "round" as in "heat" or "turn"? No.

Let me look at the phrase again carefully: "the team can be eliminated first of change"

Could it be a typo or OCR error for "first round"? No, I must work with what's there.

Actually, looking at sports terminology, "change" can mean the exchange of ends or substitution, but "eliminated first of change" doesn't fit.

Let me reconsider sense 1: "an event that occurs when something passes from one state or phase to another"

The text mentions "phase of the Championship". If "change" refers to a phase transition or a new phase/round...

"eliminated first of change" could mean eliminated at the first phase transition? Or in the first round of the championship?

But wait, looking at the phrase structure: "first of change" - this is unusual English. Could it be "first off changed"? No.

Maybe it's "first of change" meaning "the first change" as in "the first substitution"? In some sports contexts, teams make changes (substitutions).

But looking at the definition: "the team can be eliminated first of change" - if "change" means "variety" or "alteration", it doesn't make sense.

Let me look at sense 10: "a difference that is usually pleasant" - "variety" - "it is a refreshing change to meet a woman mechanic"

Sense 6: "a thing that is different" - "he inspected several changes before selecting one"

Actually, sense 6 might fit if we interpret "first of change" as "the first change" (the first option/different thing). But "eliminated first of change" is still awkward.

Wait, I think I need to reconsider the text. Maybe "change" here refers to a "round" in the sense of a change of play? No.

Let me look at the money senses (5, 8, 9) - clearly not relevant.

Clothing sense (7) - not relevant.

So it's between:
- Event of passing from one state to another (1)
- Relational difference (2)
- Action of changing (3)
- Result of alteration (4)
- Thing that is different (6)
- Pleasant difference (10)

Given the context about "phase of the Championship", "passing rounds", and "eliminated", the most likely meaning is related to a phase or round of the competition.

But none of the senses mean "round" directly.

However, sense 1 mentions "phase" in the definition: "passes from one state or phase to another"

And the text says: "begin the following phase of the Championship"

So "change" could be referring to the transition between phases, or the new phase itself.

"eliminated first of change" - could mean eliminated in the first phase/round of the change (i.e., the next phase).

Or it could be referring to "the first change" meaning the first substitution or the first... something.

But given the WordNet options, and the mention of "phase" both in the definition and the text, sense 1 seems the most plausible: "an event that occurs when something passes from one state or phase to another"

The phrase would mean: the team can be eliminated at the first change (i.e., the first transition/phase shift).

Alternatively, sense 4 "the result of alteration or modification" - but "first of change" is odd for this.

Sense 6: "a thing that is different" - "first of change" could mean "first among changes" or "first change", but "eliminated" suggests a temporal event.

Actually, looking at the examples for sense 1: "the change was intended to increase sales; this storm is certainly a change for the worse"

So "change" as an event or occurrence.

In the context: "the team can be eliminated first of change" - likely meaning at the first opportunity/transition, or perhaps it's poorly phrased English for "at the first round" or "in the first instance".

But given the definitions, sense 1 is the only one that mentions "phase" which aligns with the text's mention of "phase of the Championship".

Also, the text discusses states: "leaving their own team with less players", "go to the second cycle of cards" - these are state changes.

So I will go with sense 1.

Wait, let me double-check sense 3: "the action of changing something" - examples: "the change of government", "his change on abortion"

"first of change" would be odd for this.

Sense 2: "a relational difference between states" - this is abstract.

Sense 1 seems best: the event of passing from one state/phase to another (e.g., from one round to the next, or from one phase of the championship to the next).

Therefore: {"sense_index": 1}

provider: DigitalOcean


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: action
Target surface form: action
Context:
They waited for and accepted the sanction with no complaints. Another question is what type of advantage the violators obtained in the actions deliberately carried out. Here it seems necessary to state that it isn't a disadvantageous situation for rival nor is an obtained benefit in the same game, because evidently the result of the action supposes leaving their own team with less players. And neither is it a useful strategy for the next game, because the club will not be able to count on those players. The advantage, obviously, consists in the fact that the players will begin the following phase of the Championship without cards that could threaten their participation in a future game. But it is about a long term advantage, with a certain degree of indetermination, because the team can be eliminated first of change, and in addition with this <t>action</t> the players fulfil a sanction game and go to the second cycle of cards, in which the suspension by card accumulation takes place with one less than in the first cycle. So that, by passing rounds, it is not so clear that it is an advantage.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=action%1:04:02:: | definition=something done (usually as opposed to something said) | examples=there were stories of murders and other unnatural actions
2. sense_key=action%1:26:00:: | definition=the state of being active | synonyms=activity, activeness | examples=his sphere of activity; he is out of action
3. sense_key=action%1:04:03:: | definition=a military engagement | synonyms=military action | examples=he saw action in Korea
4. sense_key=action%1:22:00:: | definition=a process existing in or produced by nature (rather than by the intent of human beings) | synonyms=natural process, natural action, activity | examples=the action of natural forces; volcanic activity
5. sense_key=action%1:10:00:: | definition=the series of events that form a plot | examples=his novels always have a lot of action
6. sense_key=action%1:07:00:: | definition=the trait of being active and energetic and forceful | examples=a man of action
7. sense_key=action%1:06:00:: | definition=the operating part that transmits power to a mechanism | synonyms=action mechanism | examples=the piano had a very stiff action
8. sense_key=action%1:04:01:: | definition=a judicial proceeding brought by one party against another; one party prosecutes another for a wrong done or for protection of a right or for prevention of a wrong | synonyms=legal action, action at law
9. sense_key=action%1:04:04:: | definition=an act by a government body or supranational organization | examples=recent federal action undermined the segregationist position; the United Nations must have the power to propose and organize action without being hobbled by irrelevant issues
10. sense_key=action%1:04:00:: | definition=the most important or interesting work or activity in a specific area or field | examples=the action is no longer in technology stocks but in municipal bonds; gawkers always try to get as close to the action as possible

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "action" in the given context.

 Let me analyze the context:
 - The text discusses sports sanctions, specifically about players getting cards in a championship
 - It mentions "the result of the action supposes leaving their own team with less players"
 - It talks about "this action" referring to a deliberate act carried out by violators
 - The context is about a specific thing done by players (likely deliberately getting yellow/red cards to serve a suspension in a less important game)

 Looking at the candidate senses:

 1. sense_key=action%1:04:02:: - "something done (usually as opposed to something said)" - examples include "there were stories of murders and other unnatural actions"
    - This seems like a general "deed" or "act" sense. The context refers to a specific thing done by players (deliberately carrying out actions to get cards/sanctions).

 2. sense_key=action%1:26:00:: - "the state of being active" - synonyms: activity, activeness
    - This is about a state, not a specific deed. Doesn't fit.

 3. sense_key=action%1:04:03:: - "a military engagement"
    - Not military context.

 4. sense_key=action%1:22:00:: - "a process existing in or produced by nature"
    - Not a natural process, it's a deliberate human act.

 5. sense_key=action%1:10:00:: - "the series of events that form a plot"
    - Not about a story/plot.

 6. sense_key=action%1:07:00:: - "the trait of being active and energetic and forceful"
    - Not about a personality trait.

 7. sense_key=action%1:06:00:: - "the operating part that transmits power to a mechanism"
    - Not about machinery.

 8. sense_key=action%1:04:01:: - "a judicial proceeding..."
    - Not a legal case.

 9. sense_key=action%1:04:04:: - "an act by a government body or supranational organization"
    - Not a government act.

 10. sense_key=action%1:04:00:: - "the most important or interesting work or activity in a specific area or field"
     - Not about where the excitement is.

 The context describes a specific thing done by players - deliberately carrying out actions to obtain an advantage (getting cards to serve suspensions). This refers to specific deeds or things done.

 Sense 1 (action%1:04:02::) is defined as "something done (usually as opposed to something said)" with examples like "there were stories of murders and other unnatural actions". This fits best because:
 - The text refers to "actions deliberately carried out"
 - It refers to "this action" as a specific thing done by the players
 - It's about a deed/act committed by the players

 Wait, let me double-check the WordNet sense numbering. The user provided sense keys with indices. Let me map them:

 1. action%1:04:02::
 2. action%1:26:00::
 3. action%1:04:03::
 4. action%1:22:00::
 5. action%1:10:00::
 6. action%1:07:00::
 7. action%1:06:00::
 8. action%1:04:01::
 9. action%1:04:04::
 10. action%1:04:00::

 The target word appears in: "with this <t>action</t> the players fulfil a sanction game"

 This refers to the specific act/deed of getting the cards/sanction. It's "something done" by the players.

 Sense 1 (action%1:04:02::) is the general sense of "something done" - a deed or act.

 Let me verify if any other sense could fit better. Sense 9 is about government acts. Sense 8 is legal proceedings. Sense 3 is military.

 The context is about sports violations/sanctions. The "action" refers to the deliberate act of violating rules to get cards. This is a general "something done" sense.

 Therefore, the best sense is index 1.

 Wait, I need to be careful. In WordNet, the sense keys encode the synset offset. But the user has provided numbered candidates 1-10. I need to return the index number (1-10) of the best sense.

 So if sense 1 (action%1:04:02::) is the best, I return {"sense_index": 1}.

 Let me re-read carefully to make sure:
 - "the actions deliberately carried out" - refers to things done
 - "the result of the action" - result of the thing done
 - "with this action" - with this thing done

 Yes, it's the general "deed/act" sense.

 Sense 1: "something done (usually as opposed to something said)" - this matches perfectly.

 The other senses are too specific (military, legal, government, natural process, etc.) or refer to states/traits.

 So the answer is index 1.