[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: have
Target surface form: have
Context:
Alimta should only be given under the supervision of a doctor who is qualified in the use of anticancer chemotherapy. The recommended dose of Alimta is 500 mg per square metre of body surface area (calculated using the patient s height and weight). It is given once every three weeks as an intravenous infusion lasting 10 minutes. To reduce side effects, patients should take a corticosteroid and folic acid (a type of vitamin), and receive injections of vitamin B12 during treatment with Alimta. When Alimta is given with cisplatin, an anti-emetic medicine (to prevent vomiting) and fluids (to prevent dehydration) should also be given before or after the cisplatin dose. Treatment should be delayed or discontinued, or the dose reduced, in patients whose blood counts are abnormal or who <t>have</t> certain other side effects. Alimta is not recommended for use in patients with moderate or severe kidney problems.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=have%2:40:00:: | definition=have or possess, either in a concrete or an abstract sense | synonyms=have got, hold | examples=She has $1,000 in the bank; He has got two beautiful daughters
2. sense_key=have%2:42:00:: | definition=have as a feature | synonyms=feature | examples=This restaurant features the most famous chefs in France
3. sense_key=have%2:39:06:: | definition=go through (mental or physical states or experiences) | synonyms=experience, receive, get | examples=get an idea; experience vertigo
4. sense_key=have%2:40:04:: | definition=have ownership or possession of | synonyms=own, possess | examples=He owns three houses in Florida; How many cars does she have?
5. sense_key=have%2:30:00:: | definition=cause to move; cause to be in a certain position or condition | synonyms=get, let | examples=He got his squad on the ball; This let me in for a big surprise
6. sense_key=have%2:34:00:: | definition=serve oneself to, or consume regularly | synonyms=consume, ingest, take in, take | examples=Have another bowl of chicken soup!; I don't take sugar in my coffee
7. sense_key=have%2:41:00:: | definition=have a personal or business relationship with someone | examples=have a postdoc; have an assistant
8. sense_key=have%2:36:00:: | definition=organize or be responsible for | synonyms=hold, throw, make, give | examples=hold a reception; have, throw, or make a party
9. sense_key=have%2:40:01:: | definition=have left | examples=I have two years left; I don't have any money left
10. sense_key=have%2:42:12:: | definition=be confronted with | examples=What do we have here?; Now we have a fine mess
11. sense_key=have%2:30:01:: | definition=undergo | synonyms=experience | examples=The stocks had a fast run-up
12. sense_key=have%2:29:02:: | definition=suffer from; be ill with | examples=She has arthritis
13. sense_key=have%2:32:00:: | definition=cause to do; cause to act in a specified manner | synonyms=induce, stimulate, cause, get, make | examples=The ads induced me to buy a VCR; My children finally got me to buy a computer
14. sense_key=have%2:40:05:: | definition=receive willingly something given or offered | synonyms=accept, take | examples=The only girl who would have him was the miller's daughter; I won't have this dog in my house!
15. sense_key=have%2:40:03:: | definition=get something; come into possession of | synonyms=receive | examples=receive payment; receive a gift
16. sense_key=have%2:29:05:: | definition=undergo (as of injuries and illnesses) | synonyms=suffer, sustain, get | examples=She suffered a fracture in the accident; He had an insulin shock after eating three candy bars
17. sense_key=have%2:40:02:: | definition=achieve a point or goal | synonyms=get, make | examples=Nicklaus had a 70; The Brazilian team got 4 goals
18. sense_key=have%2:29:00:: | definition=cause to be born | synonyms=give birth, deliver, bear, birth | examples=My wife had twins yesterday!
19. sense_key=have%2:35:00:: | definition=have sex with; archaic use | synonyms=take | examples=He had taken this woman when she was most vulnerable

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "have" in the given context.

 Context analysis:
 The sentence is: "Treatment should be delayed or discontinued, or the dose reduced, in patients whose blood counts are abnormal or who <t>have</t> certain other side effects."

 The target word "have" is used in the context of patients experiencing or suffering from side effects.

 Looking at the candidate senses:

 1. have%2:40:00:: - possess (concrete or abstract) - "She has $1,000", "He has got two daughters" - Not quite right, as "have side effects" is more about experiencing than possessing.

 2. have%2:42:00:: - have as a feature - "This restaurant features..." - Not appropriate.

 3. have%2:39:06:: - go through (mental or physical states or experiences) - "get an idea", "experience vertigo" - This could work, as side effects are physical states/experiences.

 4. have%2:40:04:: - have ownership or possession of - "He owns three houses" - Not about ownership.

 5. have%2:30:00:: - cause to move/position - Not relevant.

 6. have%2:34:00:: - consume - "Have another bowl" - Not relevant.

 7. have%2:41:00:: - relationship - Not relevant.

 8. have%2:36:00:: - organize/responsible for - Not relevant.

 9. have%2:40:01:: - have left - Not relevant.

 10. have%2:42:12:: - be confronted with - "What do we have here?" - Possible, but less specific than medical experience.

 11. have%2:30:01:: - undergo - "The stocks had a fast run-up" - This could work for side effects.

 12. have%2:29:02:: - suffer from; be ill with - "She has arthritis" - This is very close! Side effects are similar to illness/suffering.

 13. have%2:32:00:: - cause to do - Not relevant.

 14. have%2:40:05:: - receive willingly - Not relevant.

 15. have%2:40:03:: - get something/come into possession - Not relevant.

 16. have%2:29:05:: - undergo (as of injuries and illnesses) - "She suffered a fracture", "He had an insulin shock" - This is very strong! Side effects are similar to injuries/illnesses.

 17. have%2:40:02:: - achieve a point - Not relevant.

 18. have%2:29:00:: - cause to be born - Not relevant.

 19. have%2:35:00:: - have sex with - Not relevant.

 Now comparing the strongest candidates:
 - Sense 3: go through (mental or physical states or experiences) - synonyms: experience, receive, get
 - Sense 11: undergo - synonyms: experience
 - Sense 12: suffer from; be ill with - examples: "She has arthritis"
 - Sense 16: undergo (as of injuries and illnesses) - synonyms: suffer, sustain, get - examples: "He had an insulin shock"

 The context is medical: "patients... have certain other side effects"

 Side effects are adverse reactions to medication, similar to injuries or illnesses.

 Sense 16 specifically mentions "undergo (as of injuries and illnesses)" and gives the example "He had an insulin shock after eating three candy bars" - an insulin shock is a medical side effect/adverse reaction.

 Sense 12 is "suffer from; be ill with" - "She has arthritis". While side effects are medical, "have side effects" is slightly different from "have arthritis". Arthritis is a disease/condition one has, while side effects are experiences one undergoes.

 However, looking at the examples for sense 16: "She suffered a fracture in the accident; He had an insulin shock after eating three candy bars" - this fits perfectly with "have side effects".

 Sense 3 is more general: "go through (mental or physical states or experiences)" - examples include "get an idea; experience vertigo". Vertigo is a physical state, but sense 16 is more specific to injuries and illnesses.

 Sense 11: "undergo" - "The stocks had a fast run-up" - this seems more about events/processes rather than medical conditions.

 Sense 16 (have%2:29:05::) seems the best fit because:
 1. It's specifically about injuries and illnesses
 2. Side effects are medical adverse events, similar to the example "insulin shock"
 3. The synonym "suffer" fits well with side effects (patients suffer side effects)

 Wait, let me double-check sense 12 vs 16.

 Sense 12: have%2:29:02:: | definition=suffer from; be ill with | examples=She has arthritis
 Sense 16: have%2:29:05:: | definition=undergo (as of injuries and illnesses) | synonyms=suffer, sustain, get | examples=She suffered a fracture in the accident; He had an insulin shock after eating three candy bars

 "Have side effects" - side effects are not exactly illnesses (like arthritis), but they are adverse medical events. The example "He had an insulin shock" is very close to having a side effect.

 Also, "suffer from" (sense 12) vs "undergo" (sense 16). You can "have side effects" without necessarily "suffering from" them in the sense of having a chronic illness, though side effects do cause suffering.

 But actually, looking at common usage, "have side effects" is very similar to "have symptoms". In medical contexts, "have" often maps to sense 16 when referring to adverse events.

 Let me reconsider sense 3: "go through (mental or physical states or experiences)". Side effects are physical states/experiences. But sense 16 is more specific.

 Actually, looking at WordNet structure:
 - Sense 16 is specifically about injuries and illnesses
 - Sense 12 is about being ill with a disease
 - Sense 3 is more general experience

 "Side effects" are not exactly injuries or illnesses, but they are adverse medical events. However, in the context of chemotherapy (the text mentions Alimta, anticancer chemotherapy), side effects are definitely medical adverse events.

 The example in sense 16: "He had an insulin shock after eating three candy bars" - an insulin shock is a metabolic/medical event, very similar to a side effect.

 Also, the synonym "sustain" in sense 16 fits: "sustain side effects" is a valid collocation.

 But wait, looking at the index numbers... The user wants the "sense_index". Looking at the list:

 1. sense_key=have%2:40:00::
 2. sense_key=have%2:42:00::
 3. sense_key=have%2:39:06::
 4. sense_key=have%2:40:04::
 5. sense_key=have%2:30:00::
 6. sense_key=have%2:34:00::
 7. sense_key=have%2:41:00::
 8. sense_key=have%2:36:00::
 9. sense_key=have%2:40:01::
 10. sense_key=have%2:42:12::
 11. sense_key=have%2:30:01::
 12. sense_key=have%2:29:02::
 13. sense_key=have%2:32:00::
 14. sense_key=have%2:40:05::
 15. sense_key=have%2:40:03::
 16. sense_key=have%2:29:05::
 17. sense_key=have%2:40:02::
 18. sense_key=have%2:29:00::
 19. sense_key=have%2:35:00::

 So sense 16 is index 16.

 But let me verify if there's a better match.

 Could it be sense 3? "go through (mental or physical states or experiences)" - examples: "get an idea; experience vertigo". Vertigo is a side effect-like symptom.

 Could it be sense 12? "suffer from; be ill with" - "She has arthritis".

 In medical texts, "have" + [medical condition] usually maps to sense 12 or 16 depending on whether it's a disease or an injury/event.

 Side effects are typically considered events or states that one experiences or undergoes, rather than diseases one possesses.

 Actually, looking at the distinction:
 - Sense 12: chronic conditions (arthritis)
 - Sense 16: acute events/injuries (fracture, insulin shock)

 Side effects can be acute or chronic, but in the context of chemotherapy, they are often acute events that occur during treatment.

 However, "have side effects" is a very common phrase. Let me think about how WordNet distinguishes these.

 Actually, looking at the gloss for sense 16 again: "undergo (as of injuries and illnesses)" - this covers both injuries (acute) and illnesses (could be acute or chronic).

 But sense 12 is specifically "suffer from; be ill with".

 I think sense 16 is the best fit because:
 1. The example "He had an insulin shock" is almost exactly parallel to "have side effects" (both are adverse physiological reactions)
 2. The synonyms include "sustain" and "suffer" which collocate with side effects
 3. Side effects are things that happen to you (undergo) rather than things you possess, though "have" is used for both

 Wait, I should also consider sense 3 carefully. "go through (mental or physical states or experiences)". Is having a side effect "going through a physical state"? Yes. But sense 16 is more specific to the medical domain.

 In WSD tasks, more specific senses are preferred when the context fits.

 Therefore, I choose index 16.

 But let me double-check if there's any other sense I missed.

 Sense 10: "be confronted with" - "What do we have here?" - This is more about encountering or discovering, not really about experiencing medical symptoms.

 Sense 11: "undergo" - but the example is "The stocks had a fast run-up" - this is about events/processes in general, not specifically medical.

 So yes, sense 16 is the best choice.

 Final check: The context is about patients having side effects from chemotherapy. This is a medical context involving adverse reactions. Sense 16 is defined as "undergo (as of injuries and illnesses)" with examples including medical shocks. This is the best match.

 The answer should be: {"sense_index": 16}


attempt_kind: initial

status: success

[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: certain
Target surface form: certain
Context:
Alimta should only be given under the supervision of a doctor who is qualified in the use of anticancer chemotherapy. The recommended dose of Alimta is 500 mg per square metre of body surface area (calculated using the patient s height and weight). It is given once every three weeks as an intravenous infusion lasting 10 minutes. To reduce side effects, patients should take a corticosteroid and folic acid (a type of vitamin), and receive injections of vitamin B12 during treatment with Alimta. When Alimta is given with cisplatin, an anti-emetic medicine (to prevent vomiting) and fluids (to prevent dehydration) should also be given before or after the cisplatin dose. Treatment should be delayed or discontinued, or the dose reduced, in patients whose blood counts are abnormal or who have <t>certain</t> other side effects. Alimta is not recommended for use in patients with moderate or severe kidney problems.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=certain%5:00:00:definite:00 | definition=definite but not specified or identified | examples=set aside a certain sum each week; to a certain degree
2. sense_key=certain%3:00:02:: | definition=having or feeling no doubt or uncertainty; confident and assured | synonyms=sure | examples=felt certain of success; was sure (or certain) she had seen it
3. sense_key=certain%3:00:01:: | definition=established beyond doubt or question; definitely known | examples=what is certain is that every effect must have a cause; it is certain that they were on the bus
4. sense_key=certain%3:00:03:: | definition=certain to occur; destined or inevitable; ; ; - Benjamin Franklin | synonyms=sure | examples=he was certain to fail; his fate is certain
5. sense_key=certain%3:00:05:: | definition=established irrevocably | synonyms=sealed | examples=his fate is sealed
6. sense_key=certain%5:00:00:reliable:00 | definition=reliable in operation or effect | synonyms=sure | examples=a quick and certain remedy; a sure way to distinguish the two
7. sense_key=certain%5:00:00:careful:00 | definition=exercising or taking care great enough to bring assurance | synonyms=sure | examples=be certain to disconnect the iron when you are through; be sure to lock the doors

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

finish_reason: stop

role: assistant

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "certain" in the given context.

 Context analysis:
 The sentence is: "Treatment should be delayed or discontinued, or the dose reduced, in patients whose blood counts are abnormal or who have <t>certain</t> other side effects."

 The word "certain" here modifies "other side effects". It means "specific" or "particular" side effects - not all side effects, but some specific ones that are definite but not necessarily named in this text.

 Looking at the candidate senses:

 1. sense_key=certain%5:00:00:definite:00 | definition=definite but not specified or identified | examples=set aside a certain sum each week; to a certain degree
    - This seems to fit. "Certain other side effects" means some definite but unspecified side effects. The examples "set aside a certain sum each week" and "to a certain degree" show this usage where "certain" means "some particular" or "specific but not named".

 2. sense_key=certain%3:00:02:: | definition=having or feeling no doubt or uncertainty; confident and assured | synonyms=sure | examples=felt certain of success; was sure (or certain) she had seen it
    - This is about being confident. Doesn't fit here - the side effects aren't feeling confident.

 3. sense_key=certain%3:00:01:: | definition=established beyond doubt or question; definitely known | examples=what is certain is that every effect must have a cause; it is certain that they were on the bus
    - This is about something being definitely true or known. While side effects might be definitely known, the phrase "certain other side effects" is more about "some specific" side effects rather than asserting their certainty/truth.

 4. sense_key=certain%3:00:03:: | definition=certain to occur; destined or inevitable | synonyms=sure | examples=he was certain to fail; his fate is certain
    - This is about inevitability. Not the right meaning here.

 5. sense_key=certain%3:00:05:: | definition=established irrevocably | synonyms=sealed | examples=his fate is sealed
    - This is about being sealed/fixed. Not applicable.

 6. sense_key=certain%5:00:00:reliable:00 | definition=reliable in operation or effect | synonyms=sure | examples=a quick and certain remedy; a sure way to distinguish the two
    - This is about reliability. Not the meaning here.

 7. sense_key=certain%5:00:00:careful:00 | definition=exercising or taking care great enough to bring assurance | synonyms=sure | examples=be certain to disconnect the iron when you are through; be sure to lock the doors
    - This is about being careful/sure to do something. Not applicable.

 So sense 1 is the best fit: "definite but not specified or identified" - meaning particular but unspecified side effects.

 Wait, let me double-check the WordNet sense keys. The first one is certain%5:00:00:definite:00. In WordNet, adjectives are often categorized with %5 for attributive adjectives. The definition "definite but not specified or identified" matches the usage "certain other side effects" = "some specific/other particular side effects".

 Yes, this is the correct sense. The phrase means "some particular other side effects" - definite that they exist but not specified which ones in this context.

 So the answer should be sense_index: 1.

format: unknown

native_finish_reason: stop

provider: Chutes

currency: USD


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: other
Target surface form: other
Context:
Alimta should only be given under the supervision of a doctor who is qualified in the use of anticancer chemotherapy. The recommended dose of Alimta is 500 mg per square metre of body surface area (calculated using the patient s height and weight). It is given once every three weeks as an intravenous infusion lasting 10 minutes. To reduce side effects, patients should take a corticosteroid and folic acid (a type of vitamin), and receive injections of vitamin B12 during treatment with Alimta. When Alimta is given with cisplatin, an anti-emetic medicine (to prevent vomiting) and fluids (to prevent dehydration) should also be given before or after the cisplatin dose. Treatment should be delayed or discontinued, or the dose reduced, in patients whose blood counts are abnormal or who have certain <t>other</t> side effects. Alimta is not recommended for use in patients with moderate or severe kidney problems.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=other%3:00:00:: | definition=not the same one or ones already mentioned or implied; - the White Queen | examples=today isn't any other day; the construction of highways and other public works
2. sense_key=other%5:00:00:past:00 | definition=recently past | examples=the other evening
3. sense_key=other%5:00:02:past:00 | definition=belonging to the distant past | synonyms=early, former | examples=the early inhabitants of Europe; former generations
4. sense_key=other%5:00:00:strange:00 | definition=very unusual; different in character or quality from the normal or expected; - Lance Morrow | examples=a strange, other dimension...where his powers seemed to fail

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "other" in the given context.

 Context analysis:
 The sentence is: "Treatment should be delayed or discontinued, or the dose reduced, in patients whose blood counts are abnormal or who have certain <t>other</t> side effects."

 The word "other" here is modifying "side effects". It's referring to side effects that are different from or additional to the ones already mentioned (blood counts being abnormal, or perhaps other side effects mentioned earlier in the text like those reduced by corticosteroids, folic acid, etc.).

 Looking at the candidate senses:

 1. sense_key=other%3:00:00:: | definition=not the same one or ones already mentioned or implied; - the White Queen | examples=today isn't any other day; the construction of highways and other public works
    - This seems to fit. It means "additional" or "different from those already mentioned". In the context, "certain other side effects" means side effects different from/ in addition to the abnormal blood counts already mentioned.

 2. sense_key=other%5:00:00:past:00 | definition=recently past | examples=the other evening
    - This refers to time (e.g., "the other day"). Doesn't fit here.

 3. sense_key=other%5:00:02:past:00 | definition=belonging to the distant past | synonyms=early, former | examples=the early inhabitants of Europe; former generations
    - This refers to past time/former. Doesn't fit.

 4. sense_key=other%5:00:00:strange:00 | definition=very unusual; different in character or quality from the normal or expected; - Lance Morrow | examples=a strange, other dimension...where his powers seemed to fail
    - This means "strange" or "unusual" in a metaphysical sense. While "side effects" could be unusual, the phrase "certain other side effects" clearly means "certain additional/different side effects", not "certain strange side effects".

 Therefore, sense 1 is the correct choice. It corresponds to the standard adjectival sense of "other" meaning "not the same one or ones already mentioned or implied" - i.e., additional or different ones.

 The context mentions abnormal blood counts as one issue, and "certain other side effects" as another category of issues that would require treatment modification.

 So the answer should be: {"sense_index": 1}

provider: ModelRun


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: side_effect
Target surface form: side effects
Context:
Alimta should only be given under the supervision of a doctor who is qualified in the use of anticancer chemotherapy. The recommended dose of Alimta is 500 mg per square metre of body surface area (calculated using the patient s height and weight). It is given once every three weeks as an intravenous infusion lasting 10 minutes. To reduce side effects, patients should take a corticosteroid and folic acid (a type of vitamin), and receive injections of vitamin B12 during treatment with Alimta. When Alimta is given with cisplatin, an anti-emetic medicine (to prevent vomiting) and fluids (to prevent dehydration) should also be given before or after the cisplatin dose. Treatment should be delayed or discontinued, or the dose reduced, in patients whose blood counts are abnormal or who have certain other <t>side effects</t>. Alimta is not recommended for use in patients with moderate or severe kidney problems.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=side_effect%1:26:00:: | definition=a secondary and usually adverse effect of a drug or therapy | examples=severe headaches are one of the side effects of the drug
2. sense_key=side_effect%1:19:00:: | definition=any adverse and unwanted secondary effect | synonyms=fallout | examples=a strategy to contain the fallout from the accounting scandal

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the target lemma "side_effect" with the surface form "side effects" in the given context.

 Let me analyze the context:
 - The text is about a drug called Alimta (anticancer chemotherapy)
 - It mentions "To reduce side effects, patients should take a corticosteroid and folic acid..."
 - It mentions "Treatment should be delayed or discontinued, or the dose reduced, in patients whose blood counts are abnormal or who have certain other side effects."
 - The context is clearly medical/pharmaceutical - discussing a drug treatment, its administration, and adverse reactions to it.

 Now let's look at the candidate senses:

 1. sense_key=side_effect%1:26:00:: | definition=a secondary and usually adverse effect of a drug or therapy | examples=severe headaches are one of the side effects of the drug
    - This is specifically about drugs or therapy
    - The example mentions "drug"
    - This fits perfectly with the context about Alimta (a drug) and its adverse effects

 2. sense_key=side_effect%1:19:00:: | definition=any adverse and unwanted secondary effect | synonyms=fallout | examples=a strategy to contain the fallout from the accounting scandal
    - This is more general - "any" adverse secondary effect
    - The synonym is "fallout"
    - The example is about an accounting scandal (not medical)
    - This seems to be the broader sense that can apply to non-medical contexts (like fallout from a scandal)

 The context is specifically about a drug (Alimta) and its medical treatment. The text mentions:
 - "anticancer chemotherapy"
 - "dose"
 - "intravenous infusion"
 - "corticosteroid"
 - "folic acid"
 - "vitamin B12"
 - "blood counts"

 This is clearly a medical/pharmaceutical context. Therefore, sense 1 (specific to drugs or therapy) is the best fit, not sense 2 (general adverse effect).

 The target phrase "side effects" appears in:
 1. "To reduce side effects, patients should take..." - referring to effects of Alimta (the drug)
 2. "who have certain other side effects" - referring to effects of the drug treatment

 Both instances clearly refer to adverse effects of the drug/therapy.

 Therefore, the correct sense is sense 1 (side_effect%1:26:00::).

 The user wants the output as: {"sense_index": 1}

 Wait, let me double-check the sense indices. The user lists:
 1. sense_key=side_effect%1:26:00::
 2. sense_key=side_effect%1:19:00::

 So sense_index should be 1.

 Actually, looking carefully at the WordNet sense keys:
 - side_effect%1:26:00:: - this is the medical/pharmaceutical sense (noun.artifact or noun.cognition? Actually 1:26 would be noun.phenomenon or similar? Let me think about WordNet lexicographer file numbers...)
 - Actually, in WordNet:
   - 1:26 usually refers to noun.phenomenon or similar categories
   - But regardless, the definition clearly states "of a drug or therapy"

 - side_effect%1:19:00:: - 1:19 is usually noun.phenomenon? Wait, let me recall:
   - 1:04 = noun.animal
   - 1:17 = noun.phenomenon
   - 1:26 = noun.state? No...

 Actually, the lexicographer file numbers (second number in the sense key):
 - 19 = noun.phenomenon
 - 26 = noun.state? Or noun.attribute?

 Wait, looking at the definitions:
 - Sense 1: "a secondary and usually adverse effect of a drug or therapy" - this is clearly the medical sense
 - Sense 2: "any adverse and unwanted secondary effect" with synonym "fallout" - this is the general sense

 In WordNet 3.0 or 3.1:
 - side_effect%1:26:00:: is likely the medical sense (noun.state or similar)
 - side_effect%1:19:00:: is likely the general sense (noun.phenomenon)

 But regardless of the lexicographer file numbers, the definitions make it clear:
 - Sense 1 is specifically about drugs/therapy
 - Sense 2 is general (with "fallout" as synonym)

 The context is clearly about a drug (Alimta), so Sense 1 is correct.

 The user wants: {"sense_index": 1}


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: use
Target surface form: use
Context:
The recommended dose of Alimta is 500 mg per square metre of body surface area (calculated using the patient s height and weight). It is given once every three weeks as an intravenous infusion lasting 10 minutes. To reduce side effects, patients should take a corticosteroid and folic acid (a type of vitamin), and receive injections of vitamin B12 during treatment with Alimta. When Alimta is given with cisplatin, an anti-emetic medicine (to prevent vomiting) and fluids (to prevent dehydration) should also be given before or after the cisplatin dose. Treatment should be delayed or discontinued, or the dose reduced, in patients whose blood counts are abnormal or who have certain other side effects. Alimta is not recommended for <t>use</t> in patients with moderate or severe kidney problems. For more information, see the Summary of Product Characteristics (also part of the EPAR).

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=use%1:04:00:: | definition=the act of using | synonyms=usage, utilization, utilisation, employment, exercise | examples=he warned against the use of narcotic drugs; skilled in the utilization of computers
2. sense_key=use%1:07:00:: | definition=what something is used for | synonyms=function, purpose, role | examples=the function of an auger is to bore holes; ballet is beautiful but what use is it?
3. sense_key=use%1:07:02:: | definition=a particular service | examples=he put his knowledge to good use; patrons have their uses
4. sense_key=use%1:22:00:: | definition=(economics) the utilization of economic goods to satisfy needs or in manufacturing | synonyms=consumption, economic consumption, usance, use of goods and services | examples=the consumption of energy has increased steadily
5. sense_key=use%1:04:01:: | definition=(psychology) an automatic pattern of behavior in reaction to a specific situation; may be inherited or acquired through frequent repetition | synonyms=habit | examples=owls have nocturnal habits; she had a habit twirling the ends of her hair
6. sense_key=use%1:04:02:: | definition=exerting shrewd or devious influence especially for one's own advantage | synonyms=manipulation | examples=his manipulation of his friends was scandalous
7. sense_key=use%1:07:03:: | definition=(law) the exercise of the legal right to enjoy the benefits of owning property | synonyms=enjoyment | examples=we were given the use of his boat

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the target word "use" in the given context. Let me analyze the context carefully.

The sentence containing the target word is: "Alimta is not recommended for <t>use</t> in patients with moderate or severe kidney problems."

Looking at the context:
- This is a medical/pharmaceutical text about a drug called Alimta
- It's discussing dosage, administration, and contraindications
- The specific sentence says Alimta is not recommended for "use" in patients with certain kidney problems

Now let me examine the candidate senses:

1. sense_key=use%1:04:00:: | definition=the act of using | synonyms=usage, utilization, utilisation, employment, exercise | examples=he warned against the use of narcotic drugs; skilled in the utilization of computers

2. sense_key=use%1:07:00:: | definition=what something is used for | synonyms=function, purpose, role | examples=the function of an auger is to bore holes; ballet is beautiful but what use is it?

3. sense_key=use%1:07:02:: | definition=a particular service | examples=he put his knowledge to good use; patrons have their uses

4. sense_key=use%1:22:00:: | definition=(economics) the utilization of economic goods to satisfy needs or in manufacturing | synonyms=consumption, economic consumption, usance, use of goods and services | examples=the consumption of energy has increased steadily

5. sense_key=use%1:04:01:: | definition=(psychology) an automatic pattern of behavior in reaction to a specific situation; may be inherited or acquired through frequent repetition | synonyms=habit | examples=owls have nocturnal habits; she had a habit twirling the ends of her hair

6. sense_key=use%1:04:02:: | definition=exerting shrewd or devious influence especially for one's own advantage | synonyms=manipulation | examples=his manipulation of his friends was scandalous

7. sense_key=use%1:07:03:: | definition=(law) the exercise of the legal right to enjoy the benefits of owning property | synonyms=enjoyment | examples=we were given the use of his boat

Analyzing the specific usage: "Alimta is not recommended for use in patients with moderate or severe kidney problems."

Here, "use" refers to the act of using the drug (Alimta). It's about the employment or utilization of the medication in certain patients.

Looking at sense 1: "the act of using" - this fits perfectly. The sentence is saying that the drug should not be used (employed/utilized) in patients with kidney problems.

Sense 2 is about "what something is used for" (function/purpose) - but here we're not talking about what Alimta is used for (treating cancer), but rather whether it should be used at all in certain patients.

Sense 3 is "a particular service" - this doesn't fit well here.

Sense 4 is economic consumption - not relevant here.

Sense 5 is psychology/habit - not relevant.

Sense 6 is manipulation - not relevant.

Sense 7 is legal enjoyment of property - not relevant.

The example for sense 1 includes "he warned against the use of narcotic drugs" which is very similar to our context "not recommended for use in patients..." - both are warnings about using substances/medications.

Therefore, the best sense is sense 1 (use%1:04:00::).

Wait, I need to check the indexing. The user lists them as:
1. sense_key=use%1:04:00::
2. sense_key=use%1:07:00::
3. sense_key=use%1:07:02::
4. sense_key=use%1:22:00::
5. sense_key=use%1:04:01::
6. sense_key=use%1:04:02::
7. sense_key=use%1:07:03::

So sense 1 is the first one in the list.

Actually, looking carefully at the sentence: "Alimta is not recommended for <t>use</t> in patients..."

This is saying that the drug is not recommended to be used (employed/utilized) in these patients. This matches sense 1: "the act of using".

The phrase "for use in" is a common collocation indicating "for the act of using in" or "to be used in".

Yes, sense 1 is definitely the correct choice.

But wait, let me double-check sense 3: "a particular service". Could "for use" mean "for service"? Like "patrons have their uses"? No, that doesn't fit. The structure "recommended for use in patients" clearly indicates the act of administering/using the drug.

Sense 2: "what something is used for" - if it were "the use of Alimta is to treat cancer", that would be sense 2. But here it's about whether it should be used at all in certain populations.

So the answer is index 1.

Wait, I should verify the WordNet sense numbering. The format is use%1:04:00::, which means:
- use: lemma
- 1: noun (part of speech)
- 04: lexicographer file (noun.act)
- 00: sense number

But the user is asking for the "sense_index" which corresponds to the numbered list provided (1-7).

So I should return {"sense_index": 1}.

Let me reconsider if there's any ambiguity. Could it be sense 2?

Sense 2 examples: "the function of an auger is to bore holes; ballet is beautiful but what use is it?"

The second example "what use is it?" is about the purpose/value. But our context is "recommended for use" which is about the act of using.

Also, sense 1 example: "he warned against the use of narcotic drugs" - this is extremely parallel to "not recommended for use in patients".

Therefore, I'm confident the answer is 1.

provider: StreamLake


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: patient
Target surface form: patients
Context:
The recommended dose of Alimta is 500 mg per square metre of body surface area (calculated using the patient s height and weight). It is given once every three weeks as an intravenous infusion lasting 10 minutes. To reduce side effects, patients should take a corticosteroid and folic acid (a type of vitamin), and receive injections of vitamin B12 during treatment with Alimta. When Alimta is given with cisplatin, an anti-emetic medicine (to prevent vomiting) and fluids (to prevent dehydration) should also be given before or after the cisplatin dose. Treatment should be delayed or discontinued, or the dose reduced, in patients whose blood counts are abnormal or who have certain other side effects. Alimta is not recommended for use in <t>patients</t> with moderate or severe kidney problems. For more information, see the Summary of Product Characteristics (also part of the EPAR).

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=patient%1:18:00:: | definition=a person who requires medical care | examples=the number of emergency patients has grown rapidly
2. sense_key=patient%1:10:00:: | definition=the semantic role of an entity that is not the agent but is directly involved in or affected by the happening denoted by the verb in the clause | synonyms=affected role, patient role

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "patients" in the given context. The target lemma is "patient" and the surface form is "patients".

Looking at the context:
- This is a medical/pharmaceutical text about the drug Alimta
- It discusses dosing recommendations based on body surface area calculated using "the patient's height and weight"
- It mentions "patients should take a corticosteroid"
- It mentions "patients whose blood counts are abnormal"
- The specific target instance is: "Alimta is not recommended for use in <t>patients</t> with moderate or severe kidney problems."

Candidate senses:
1. patient%1:18:00:: - "a person who requires medical care" - examples mention "emergency patients"
2. patient%1:10:00:: - "the semantic role of an entity that is not the agent but is directly involved in or affected by the happening denoted by the verb in the clause" - this is a grammatical/linguistic sense (patient role in linguistics)

Analysis:
- The context is clearly medical - talking about a drug, treatment, kidney problems, blood counts, etc.
- The word "patients" here refers to people receiving medical treatment or care
- Sense 1 fits perfectly: "a person who requires medical care" or more broadly, a person receiving medical treatment
- Sense 2 is a technical linguistic term about semantic roles (like "the patient received the ball" where "patient" is the grammatical role, not a medical patient)

The context makes it clear these are medical patients - people with kidney problems who would be taking the drug Alimta.

Therefore, sense 1 (patient%1:18:00::) is the correct choice.

The user wants the output as: {"sense_index": 1}


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: moderate
Target surface form: moderate
Context:
The recommended dose of Alimta is 500 mg per square metre of body surface area (calculated using the patient s height and weight). It is given once every three weeks as an intravenous infusion lasting 10 minutes. To reduce side effects, patients should take a corticosteroid and folic acid (a type of vitamin), and receive injections of vitamin B12 during treatment with Alimta. When Alimta is given with cisplatin, an anti-emetic medicine (to prevent vomiting) and fluids (to prevent dehydration) should also be given before or after the cisplatin dose. Treatment should be delayed or discontinued, or the dose reduced, in patients whose blood counts are abnormal or who have certain other side effects. Alimta is not recommended for use in patients with <t>moderate</t> or severe kidney problems. For more information, see the Summary of Product Characteristics (also part of the EPAR).

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=moderate%3:00:00:: | definition=being within reasonable or average limits; not excessive or extreme | examples=moderate prices; a moderate income
2. sense_key=moderate%5:00:00:mild:00 | definition=not extreme | synonyms=temperate | examples=a moderate penalty; temperate in his response to criticism
3. sense_key=moderate%5:00:00:temperate:00 | definition=marked by avoidance of extravagance or extremes | synonyms=restrained | examples=moderate in his demands; restrained in his response

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "moderate" in the given context.

Context analysis:
- The text is about medical dosing of a drug called Alimta
- The specific sentence is: "Alimta is not recommended for use in patients with <t>moderate</t> or severe kidney problems."
- Here, "moderate" is modifying "kidney problems" (or "kidney" understood as kidney function/disease)
- It's being used in contrast with "severe" - so it's describing the severity level of kidney problems
- The sense should indicate something between mild and severe - i.e., not extreme, reasonable/ average limits

Looking at the candidate senses:

1. sense_key=moderate%3:00:00:: | definition=being within reasonable or average limits; not excessive or extreme | examples=moderate prices; a moderate income
   - This is the adjective sense (3:00:00 indicates adjective satellite or similar)
   - "Being within reasonable or average limits" fits well with medical severity grading (moderate = middle range, not extreme)
   - Examples show it describing degree/intensity (prices, income)

2. sense_key=moderate%5:00:00:mild:00 | definition=not extreme | synonyms=temperate | examples=a moderate penalty; temperate in his response to criticism
   - This seems to be a satellite adjective linked to "mild"
   - "Not extreme" fits, but the examples suggest more about behavior/response (temperate in response)
   - In medical context, we usually say "moderate" to mean middle severity, not necessarily linked to "mild"

3. sense_key=moderate%5:00:00:temperate:00 | definition=marked by avoidance of extravagance or extremes | synonyms=restrained | examples=moderate in his demands; restrained in his response
   - This seems to describe a person's behavior or character (avoidance of extravagance)
   - Examples: "moderate in his demands" - this is about self-restraint
   - Doesn't fit describing kidney problems severity

Between sense 1 and 2:
- Sense 1 (%3:00:00::) is the core adjective sense meaning "within reasonable limits, not excessive"
- Sense 2 (%5:00:00:mild:00) links to "mild" - but in medical severity, "moderate" is actually worse than "mild", so linking to mild might be confusing, though WordNet structure might have it this way
- Actually, looking at the examples: "a moderate penalty" - this could work for severity
- But "temperate in his response" suggests more about behavior/temperament

Wait, looking at WordNet structure:
- moderate%3:00:00:: is likely the main adjective sense (moderate as in not extreme in amount/intensity)
- moderate%5:00:00:mild:00 - the 5 indicates adjective satellite, and it's similar to mild
- moderate%5:00:00:temperate:00 - similar to temperate

In the context of "moderate kidney problems", we're talking about severity/degree of illness. This is about the intensity or seriousness being neither mild nor severe, but in the middle - "within reasonable or average limits" compared to the extreme of severe.

Sense 1 ("being within reasonable or average limits; not excessive or extreme") is the most appropriate for describing the severity of a medical condition. "Moderate kidney problems" means the problems are of medium severity - not excessive, within average limits for such problems.

Sense 2 focuses on "not extreme" but with synonym "temperate" which usually applies to climate or behavior (temperate response), not typically to disease severity in this way.

Sense 3 is clearly about behavior/character (restrained, avoidance of extravagance).

Therefore, sense 1 is the best fit.

The user asks for a JSON object like {"sense_index": 3} - but I should use the number corresponding to the sense. The senses are numbered 1, 2, 3 in the list. So I should return {"sense_index": 1}.

Wait, let me double-check the sense keys:
1. moderate%3:00:00::
2. moderate%5:00:00:mild:00
3. moderate%5:00:00:temperate:00

In WordNet:
- moderate%3:00:00:: is "moderate, sensible" - being within reasonable limits
- moderate%5:00:00:mild:: would be similar to mild (but the key shows mild:00)
- Actually, looking at standard WordNet:
  - moderate (adj) - being within reasonable or average limits; not excessive or extreme
  - moderate (adj) - not extreme; "a moderate penalty"
  - moderate (adj) - marked by avoidance of extravagance or extremes; "moderate in his demands"

Wait, actually in standard WordNet 3.0:
- Sense 1: moderate%3:00:00:: - being within reasonable or average limits; not excessive or extreme ("moderate prices", "a moderate income")
- Sense 2: moderate%5:00:00:mild:00 - not extreme ("a moderate penalty", "temperate in his response to criticism")
- Sense 3: moderate%5:00:00:temperate:00 - marked by avoidance of extravagance or extremes ("moderate in his demands", "restrained in his response")

For medical severity:
- "Moderate kidney problems" - this is describing the degree/severity as being neither mild nor severe. This aligns with sense 1 (within reasonable limits, not excessive) or sense 2 (not extreme).

But "moderate" in medical grading (mild, moderate, severe) specifically means medium severity - which is "within reasonable or average limits" when considering the range of the condition.

However, sense 2 has the example "a moderate penalty" which is similar to severity grading. But the synonym "temperate" makes it seem more like climate or temperament.

Actually, looking carefully:
- Sense 1: "being within reasonable or average limits" - this fits the medical context of severity levels
- Sense 2: "not extreme" with synonym "temperate" - temperate usually means mild/moderate in terms of climate or self-control
- Sense 3: "marked by avoidance of extravagance" - clearly about behavior/character

In medical contexts describing disease severity, "moderate" means of medium severity, intermediate between mild and severe. This maps best to sense 1: being within reasonable or average limits; not excessive or extreme.

Also, note that sense 1 is the first/primary sense of the adjective "moderate".

The answer should be {"sense_index": 1}.

provider: Moonshot AI


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: severe
Target surface form: severe
Context:
The recommended dose of Alimta is 500 mg per square metre of body surface area (calculated using the patient s height and weight). It is given once every three weeks as an intravenous infusion lasting 10 minutes. To reduce side effects, patients should take a corticosteroid and folic acid (a type of vitamin), and receive injections of vitamin B12 during treatment with Alimta. When Alimta is given with cisplatin, an anti-emetic medicine (to prevent vomiting) and fluids (to prevent dehydration) should also be given before or after the cisplatin dose. Treatment should be delayed or discontinued, or the dose reduced, in patients whose blood counts are abnormal or who have certain other side effects. Alimta is not recommended for use in patients with moderate or <t>severe</t> kidney problems. For more information, see the Summary of Product Characteristics (also part of the EPAR).

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=severe%5:00:00:intense:00 | definition=intensely or extremely bad or unpleasant in degree or quality | synonyms=terrible, wicked | examples=severe pain; a severe case of flu
2. sense_key=severe%5:00:00:strong:00 | definition=very strong or vigorous | synonyms=hard, knockout | examples=strong winds; a hard left to the chin
3. sense_key=severe%5:00:00:plain:01 | definition=severely simple | synonyms=austere, stark, stern | examples=a stark interior
4. sense_key=severe%5:00:02:nonindulgent:00 | definition=unsparing and uncompromising in discipline or judgment; - H.G.Wells | synonyms=spartan | examples=a parent severe to the pitch of hostility; a hefty six-footer with a rather severe mien
5. sense_key=severe%5:00:00:critical:03 | definition=causing fear or anxiety by threatening great harm | synonyms=dangerous, grave, grievous, serious, life-threatening | examples=a dangerous operation; a grave situation
6. sense_key=severe%5:00:01:bad:00 | definition=very bad in degree or extent | examples=a severe worldwide depression; the house suffered severe damage

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation (WSD) for the word "severe" in the given context. Let me analyze the context and the candidate senses.

Context analysis:
The text is about a medical drug (Alimta) and its dosage recommendations. The specific sentence is: "Alimta is not recommended for use in patients with moderate or <t>severe</t> kidney problems."

So "severe" here modifies "kidney problems" (medical condition). It's describing the degree or extent of the kidney problems.

Let me look at the candidate senses:

1. sense_key=severe%5:00:00:intense:00 | definition=intensely or extremely bad or unpleasant in degree or quality | synonyms=terrible, wicked | examples=severe pain; a severe case of flu
   - This relates to intensity/degree of something bad. "Severe pain", "severe case of flu" - these are about degree/extent of medical conditions.
   - "Severe kidney problems" fits here - it's about the degree of the medical problem.

2. sense_key=severe%5:00:00:strong:00 | definition=very strong or vigorous | synonyms=hard, knockout | examples=strong winds; a hard left to the chin
   - This is about physical strength or force. Not applicable to kidney problems.

3. sense_key=severe%5:00:00:plain:01 | definition=severely simple | synonyms=austere, stark, stern | examples=a stark interior
   - This is about simplicity/austerity in appearance/style. Not applicable.

4. sense_key=severe%5:00:02:nonindulgent:00 | definition=unsparing and uncompromising in discipline or judgment; - H.G.Wells | synonyms=spartan | examples=a parent severe to the pitch of hostility; a hefty six-footer with a rather severe mien
   - This is about strictness in behavior/judgment (like a severe teacher). Not applicable to medical conditions.

5. sense_key=severe%5:00:00:critical:03 | definition=causing fear or anxiety by threatening great harm | synonyms=dangerous, grave, grievous, serious, life-threatening | examples=a dangerous operation; a grave situation
   - This is about threatening great harm/danger. "Severe" here could potentially fit, but looking at the examples "dangerous operation", "grave situation" - these are more about immediate danger/life-threatening situations.
   - However, "severe kidney problems" in medical contexts often means serious/advanced stage, but let's check if this is distinct from sense 1.

6. sense_key=severe%5:00:01:bad:00 | definition=very bad in degree or extent | examples=a severe worldwide depression; the house suffered severe damage
   - This is about something being very bad in degree or extent. Examples: severe depression, severe damage.
   - "Severe kidney problems" - kidney problems are "bad" (undesirable condition), and "severe" indicates the degree/extent is very bad.

Now I need to distinguish between sense 1 and sense 6, as both seem plausible.

Sense 1: "intensely or extremely bad or unpleasant in degree or quality" - focuses on intensity/quality of something bad/unpleasant.
Sense 6: "very bad in degree or extent" - focuses on degree/extent of something bad.

Looking at the examples:
Sense 1 examples: severe pain, severe case of flu
Sense 6 examples: severe worldwide depression, severe damage

"Severe kidney problems" seems closer to "severe case of flu" (sense 1) or "severe damage" (sense 6)?

Actually, looking carefully at WordNet structure:
- Sense 1 is under the "intense" cluster (intensely or extremely bad)
- Sense 6 is under the "bad" cluster (very bad in degree or extent)

In medical contexts, when we say "severe kidney problems", we usually mean the problems are of great degree/extent - they are very bad. This aligns with sense 6.

But wait, let me reconsider sense 1. "Severe pain" is about the intensity of the pain. "Severe case of flu" is about the intensity/seriousness of the case.

Sense 5 (critical/grave) could also be a contender, but "severe" in "severe kidney problems" is more about the stage/degree of the disease rather than necessarily causing immediate fear/anxiety (though it implies seriousness).

Actually, looking at standard WSD for "severe" in medical contexts:
- "Severe" describing a medical condition usually maps to sense 1 (intensely bad) or sense 6 (very bad in degree).

But looking at the specific definitions:
Sense 1: "intensely or extremely bad or unpleasant in degree or quality"
Sense 6: "very bad in degree or extent"

The key difference might be:
- Sense 1 emphasizes the intensity/unpleasantness (subjective experience)
- Sense 6 emphasizes the extent/degree of the bad condition (objective assessment)

However, looking at the WordNet hierarchy and typical mappings:
- Sense 1 (severe%5:00:00:intense:00) is often used for "severe pain", "severe weather"
- Sense 6 (severe%5:00:01:bad:00) is used for "severe damage", "severe depression"

In the context "severe kidney problems", this is a medical condition describing the state/degree of organ dysfunction. This aligns with sense 6, as kidney problems are "bad" and severe indicates they are very bad in degree.

But I should check if there's a distinction between "severe" as "serious/grave" (sense 5) vs "severe" as "intense/bad" (sense 1 or 6).

Sense 5 synonyms: dangerous, grave, grievous, serious, life-threatening
Sense 1 synonyms: terrible, wicked
Sense 6 synonyms: (none listed, but examples show severe depression, severe damage)

In medical texts, "severe" often alternates with "serious" or "grave", but in WordNet, "severe" sense 5 specifically means "causing fear or anxiety by threatening great harm" - this is more about the immediate threat perception.

However, "severe kidney problems" in the context of drug contraindications typically means advanced-stage kidney disease, i.e., kidney problems that are very bad in extent/degree.

Let me look at the examples again:
Sense 1: severe pain; a severe case of flu
Sense 6: a severe worldwide depression; the house suffered severe damage

"A severe case of flu" is very similar to "severe kidney problems" - both are medical conditions described as severe.

"A severe case of flu" suggests sense 1 might be the right choice.

But "severe damage" suggests sense 6.

Wait, I need to be careful about WordNet sense numbering. Let me think about the actual WordNet senses of "severe":

In WordNet 3.0 or similar:
1. severe (intensely or extremely bad) - severe pain, severe case of flu
2. severe (very strong) - severe storms?
3. severe (plain/simple) - severe architecture
4. severe (strict) - severe teacher
5. severe (critical/grave) - severe illness?
6. severe (very bad in degree) - severe damage

Actually, looking at the provided sense keys:
- sense_key=severe%5:00:00:intense:00 (sense 1 in the list)
- sense_key=severe%5:00:01:bad:00 (sense 6 in the list)

The lexname (5th element) for sense 1 is "intense", for sense 6 is "bad".

In medical terminology, "severe" when describing a disease or organ dysfunction usually maps to the sense meaning "very bad in degree or extent" (sense 6) or "intensely bad" (sense 1).

But looking at the specific context: "moderate or severe kidney problems" - this is a gradation: moderate vs severe. This suggests a scale of severity/badness.

Sense 6 explicitly mentions "degree or extent": "very bad in degree or extent"
Sense 1 mentions "degree or quality": "intensely or extremely bad or unpleasant in degree or quality"

Both mention "degree".

However, sense 1 focuses on "unpleasant" - kidney problems are not necessarily described as unpleasant in the subjective sense here, but as a medical condition that is bad.

Also, looking at the synonyms:
Sense 1: terrible, wicked
Sense 6: (no synonyms listed, but the definition stands)

"Terrible" and "wicked" are somewhat informal or emphatic. "Severe kidney problems" is a technical medical description.

Sense 5 synonyms: dangerous, grave, grievous, serious, life-threatening - these are very appropriate for medical contexts.

But is "severe kidney problems" life-threatening or grave? It could be, but the text is distinguishing "moderate or severe" - this is a standard medical classification (mild, moderate, severe).

In medical classification, "severe" typically maps to WordNet sense 6 (very bad in degree or extent) or sense 1 (intensely bad).

Let me reconsider sense 5: "causing fear or anxiety by threatening great harm"
Is a "severe kidney problem" defined as causing fear by threatening great harm? Or is it simply a case where the kidney function is very impaired?

In the context of drug contraindications, "severe kidney problems" means significantly impaired renal function, not necessarily immediately life-threatening in the sense of causing fear, but rather "very bad" in terms of organ function.

Between sense 1 and sense 6:
Sense 1 examples: severe pain (subjective experience), severe case of flu (medical condition)
Sense 6 examples: severe worldwide depression (economic condition), severe damage (physical damage)

"Severe kidney problems" is a medical condition, similar to "severe case of flu", which points to sense 1.

But "severe damage" is also similar to organ damage...

Actually, looking at the WordNet entries more carefully:
Sense 1: "intensely or extremely bad or unpleasant in degree or quality" - adjective.all
Sense 6: "very bad in degree or extent" - also adjective.all

The distinction is subtle. However, sense 1 is linked to the concept of "intense" while sense 6 is linked to "bad".

In many WSD datasets, "severe" describing diseases or medical conditions is often mapped to sense 1 (the "intense/terrible" sense).

But let me look at the "moderate or severe" construction. This is describing the stage or degree of the kidney problems.

Sense 6 definition: "very bad in degree or extent" - this fits perfectly with describing the degree of kidney problems.

Sense 1 definition: "intensely or extremely bad... in degree" - also fits.

However, sense 1 emphasizes "unpleasant" - kidney problems are medical conditions, not necessarily described by their unpleasantness in this technical context.

Sense 6 is more neutral and objective: "very bad in degree or extent".

Also, looking at sense 5: this would mean the kidney problems are life-threatening or grave. While severe kidney problems can be grave, the pairing with "moderate" suggests a spectrum of severity/badness, not necessarily a spectrum of life-threateningness.

I think sense 6 is the best fit: "very bad in degree or extent".

Wait, I should verify if there's any reason to choose sense 5. The synonyms for sense 5 include "serious", "grave", and "grievous" - all of which could describe kidney problems. However, the definition specifies "causing fear or anxiety by threatening great harm" - this is about the emotional response or immediate threat. "Severe kidney problems" in a drug label is a classification of renal impairment (e.g., creatinine clearance levels), not necessarily emphasizing the fear/anxiety aspect.

Therefore, sense 6 seems most appropriate.

But let me double-check by considering if "severe case of flu" (sense 1 example) is more similar to "severe kidney problems". A "case of flu" is a medical condition instance, just like "kidney problems". So sense 1 has strong support too.

However, "severe" + "problems" might pattern more like "severe damage" (sense 6) than "severe pain" (sense 1). "Problems" and "damage" are both nouns indicating bad states/conditions, while "pain" is a sensation, and "case" is an instance.

Actually, looking at typical WordNet sense distinctions:
- Sense 1 (severe%5:00:00:intense:00): often used for weather, pain, experiences
- Sense 6 (severe%5:00:01:bad:00): often used for economic conditions, damage, consequences

Kidney problems are a physical medical condition. Between the two, sense 6 seems slightly better because it's about the state being very bad, whereas sense 1 emphasizes the intensity and unpleasantness.

But I recall that in many lexical semantic resources, "severe illness" or "severe disease" is often mapped to the "intense" sense or the "bad" sense depending on the fine-grained distinction.

Given the instruction to not hedge and choose the single best indexed sense, I need to make a decision.

Looking at the candidates again:
1. intense/extremely bad - severe pain, severe case of flu
6. very bad in degree - severe depression, severe damage

"Severe kidney problems" in the context of contraindications refers to the extent of renal impairment. This is objective assessment of how bad the condition is. This aligns with sense 6.

Also, sense 1 examples include "severe case of flu" which is a count noun phrase, while "kidney problems" is a mass/plural noun phrase. But that's weak evidence.

I think sense 6 is the most accurate.

Wait, looking at the sense keys provided:
sense_key=severe%5:00:00:intense:00 (index 1)
sense_key=severe%5:00:01:bad:00 (index 6)

The %5:00:01:bad vs %5:00:00:intense distinction is key.

In WordNet, "severe" sense 1 (bad) is: "very bad in degree or extent"
"sese" sense 2 (intense) is: "intensely or extremely bad or unpleasant in degree or quality"

Actually, looking at standard WordNet 3.1:
severe
1. (of something bad or undesirable) very great; intense --- severe pain, severe case of flu
2. ... (other senses)

But the user lists sense 1 as "intense" and sense 6 as "bad".

Given that "kidney problems" are undesirable/bad, and "severe" indicates the degree is very bad, sense 6 fits well.

However, sense 1 also mentions "extremely bad... in degree".

The difference might be that sense 1 requires the noun to be something that can be "intense" or experienced as intense/unpleasant (like pain, flu), while sense 6 is for general bad things (like depression, damage).

Kidney problems are not typically described as "intense" but as "bad" or "serious". Therefore, sense 6 is better.

Final check: Could it be sense 5 (critical/grave/serious)?
Definition: "causing fear or anxiety by threatening great harm"
While severe kidney problems are serious, the text contrasts "moderate" with "severe". "Moderate" kidney problems don't cause fear/anxiety by threatening great harm (or less so), while "severe" ones do. This could fit.

But "moderate or severe" is a standard medical classification (e.g., CTCAE grades), where severe means Grade 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening. "Life-threatening" would be Grade 4. So "severe" is distinct from "life-threatening" in medical terminology.

Therefore, sense 5 (which includes life-threatening in its synonyms) might be too strong.

Between sense 1 and sense 6, I choose sense 6.

Actually, looking at the examples one more time:
Sense 1: severe pain; a severe case of flu
Sense 6: a severe worldwide depression; the house suffered severe damage

"A severe case of flu" is extremely similar to "severe kidney problems" - both are medical conditions.

"A severe worldwide depression" is economic.
"Severe damage" is physical injury to objects.

While kidney problems are physical/medical, they are more like "flu" (medical condition) than "damage" (injury to object).

Therefore, sense 1 might be better because the example "severe case of flu" establishes that this sense applies to medical conditions.

But "depression" in sense 6 examples could be medical depression or economic. If it's medical depression, then sense 6 also applies to medical conditions.

Given the ambiguity, and that both are valid, I need to choose the one that best fits the specific nuance.

"Alimta is not recommended for use in patients with moderate or severe kidney problems."

This is about the severity/grade of the renal impairment. In medical terms, this describes the extent of the problem.

Sense 6: "very bad in degree or extent" - explicitly mentions extent.
Sense 1: "extremely bad... in degree or quality" - mentions degree, but also quality and unpleasantness.

Sense 6 seems more objective and appropriate for describing the objective state of organ function.

I will go with sense 6.

Wait, looking at the sense indices in the candidate list:
1. sense_key=severe%5:00:00:intense:00
2. sense_key=severe%5:00:00:strong:00
3. sense_key=severe%5:00:00:plain:01
4. sense_key=severe%5:00:02:nonindulgent:00
5. sense_key=severe%5:00:00:critical:03
6. sense_key=severe%5:00:01:bad:00

So index 6 is the one with "bad" in the sense key.

Final decision: {"sense_index": 6}


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: problem
Target surface form: problems
Context:
The recommended dose of Alimta is 500 mg per square metre of body surface area (calculated using the patient s height and weight). It is given once every three weeks as an intravenous infusion lasting 10 minutes. To reduce side effects, patients should take a corticosteroid and folic acid (a type of vitamin), and receive injections of vitamin B12 during treatment with Alimta. When Alimta is given with cisplatin, an anti-emetic medicine (to prevent vomiting) and fluids (to prevent dehydration) should also be given before or after the cisplatin dose. Treatment should be delayed or discontinued, or the dose reduced, in patients whose blood counts are abnormal or who have certain other side effects. Alimta is not recommended for use in patients with moderate or severe kidney <t>problems</t>. For more information, see the Summary of Product Characteristics (also part of the EPAR).

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=problem%1:26:00:: | definition=a state of difficulty that needs to be resolved | synonyms=job | examples=she and her husband are having problems; it is always a job to contact him
2. sense_key=problem%1:10:00:: | definition=a question raised for consideration or solution | examples=our homework consisted of ten problems to solve
3. sense_key=problem%1:09:00:: | definition=a source of difficulty | synonyms=trouble | examples=one trouble after another delayed the job; what's the problem?

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation (WSD) on the word "problems" in the given context. The target lemma is "problem" and the surface form is "problems" (plural).

 Context analysis:
 The sentence is: "Alimta is not recommended for use in patients with moderate or severe kidney <t>problems</t>."

 This is talking about medical conditions - specifically kidney issues/conditions that would make the drug unsuitable. The "problems" here refer to medical difficulties or troubles with the kidneys.

 Candidate sense analysis:

 1. sense_key=problem%1:26:00:: | definition=a state of difficulty that needs to be resolved | synonyms=job | examples=she and her husband are having problems; it is always a job to contact him
    - This sense refers to a state of difficulty. The example "she and her husband are having problems" suggests personal/relationship difficulties.
    - In medical context, "kidney problems" could fit here as a state of difficulty with the kidneys.

 2. sense_key=problem%1:10:00:: | definition=a question raised for consideration or solution | examples=our homework consisted of ten problems to solve
    - This is the mathematical/logical problem sense (like homework problems).
    - "Kidney problems" clearly doesn't mean questions to be solved in this context. So this is out.

 3. sense_key=problem%1:09:00:: | definition=a source of difficulty | synonyms=trouble | examples=one trouble after another delayed the job; what's the problem?
    - This sense refers to a source of difficulty, with synonym "trouble".
    - "Kidney problems" could mean kidney trouble - something that is causing difficulty.
    - The example "what's the problem?" aligns with asking what the trouble/source of difficulty is.

 Now comparing sense 1 and sense 3:

 Sense 1 (problem%1:26:00::): "a state of difficulty that needs to be resolved"
 - Focuses on the state/condition of being in difficulty
 - Example: "having problems" (experiencing a state of difficulty)

 Sense 3 (problem%1:09:00::): "a source of difficulty"
 - Focuses on the thing that causes difficulty
 - Synonym: trouble
 - Example: "one trouble after another"

 In the phrase "kidney problems", we are referring to medical conditions or troubles with the kidneys. This is more about the kidneys being a source of difficulty (trouble) or being in a state of difficulty.

 However, looking at WordNet's organization:
 - Sense 1 (problem%1:26:00::) is under noun.state (26)
 - Sense 3 (problem%1:09:00::) is under noun.cognition (09) or noun.communication? Wait, let me check the lexicographer files.

 Actually, looking at the sense keys:
 - problem%1:26:00:: -> 26 is noun.state
 - problem%1:10:00:: -> 10 is noun.communication
 - problem%1:09:00:: -> 09 is noun.cognition? No, 09 is usually noun.cognition, but let me verify WordNet lexicographer file numbers:
   - 09 = noun.cognition
   - 10 = noun.communication
   - 26 = noun.state

 Actually, looking at standard WordNet 3.0 or 3.1 lexicographer file indices:
 - 1:03 = noun.animal
 - 1:05 = noun.artifact
 - 1:09 = noun.attribute? No, let me think.

 Actually, the numbers in sense keys like %1:26:00:: refer to:
 - 1 = noun
 - 26 = the lexicographer file number
 - 00 = the sense number within that file

 Standard WordNet lexicographer file numbers:
 - 03 = noun.animal
 - 06 = noun.body
 - 09 = noun.cognition
 - 10 = noun.communication
 - 26 = noun.state
 - 28 = noun.substance

 So:
 - problem%1:26:00:: = noun.state: a state of difficulty that needs to be resolved
 - problem%1:10:00:: = noun.communication: a question raised for consideration or solution
 - problem%1:09:00:: = noun.cognition: a source of difficulty

 Wait, that doesn't seem right. "A source of difficulty" doesn't sound like a cognition. Let me reconsider.

 Actually, looking at WordNet data:
 - problem%1:26:00:: is indeed "a state of difficulty that needs to be resolved" (noun.state)
 - problem%1:10:00:: is "a question raised for consideration or solution" (noun.communication)
 - problem%1:09:00:: is "a source of difficulty" - this might be noun.cognition or perhaps the lexicographer file is different.

 Actually, checking WordNet 3.1:
 - problem%1:09:00:: is under noun.cognition and means "a source of difficulty"
 - problem%1:26:00:: is under noun.state and means "a state of difficulty that needs to be resolved"

 In medical contexts like "kidney problems", "heart problems", "liver problems", this usually refers to medical conditions - states of difficulty or troubles.

 Between sense 1 (state of difficulty) and sense 3 (source of difficulty):

 "Kidney problems" can be interpreted both ways:
 1. The kidneys are in a state of difficulty (state)
 2. The kidneys are a source of difficulty (source)

 However, looking at the examples:
 - Sense 1 example: "she and her husband are having problems" - this is about people experiencing difficulties (marital problems)
 - Sense 3 example: "one trouble after another delayed the job" - this is about things causing difficulty, and "what's the problem?"

 In medical terminology, when we say "kidney problems", we typically mean medical conditions affecting the kidneys (renal impairment, disease, etc.). This is closer to "trouble" (synonym of sense 3) or a "state of difficulty" (sense 1).

 But looking at the gloss for sense 3: "a source of difficulty" with synonym "trouble". In the context "patients with moderate or severe kidney problems", the problems are medical conditions - they are sources of difficulty for the patient's health, or they are troubles.

 However, sense 1 "a state of difficulty that needs to be resolved" also fits well because medical conditions are states.

 But let's look at the specific examples given:
 - Sense 1: "she and her husband are having problems" - this is similar to "patients having kidney problems"
 - Sense 3: "one trouble after another delayed the job" - this is about obstacles/sources of problems

 Actually, "having kidney problems" parallels "having problems" in the sense 1 example. But "kidney problems" as a noun phrase is the object of "with" - "patients with kidney problems".

 In WordNet, "heart problems" and similar medical usage typically maps to sense 3 (source of difficulty/trouble) or sense 1 (state).

 Let me think about the distinction:
 - Sense 1 (problem%1:26:00::): "a state of difficulty that needs to be resolved" - this is the "trouble" sense as in "we're in trouble" or "having problems"
 - Sense 3 (problem%1:09:00::): "a source of difficulty" - this is the "trouble" sense as in "the car is giving me trouble"

 For organs: "kidney problems" = the kidneys are malfunctioning (source of difficulty to the body/patient) OR the kidneys are in a state of difficulty.

 But medically, we usually say "renal problems" to mean renal impairment or disease - these are conditions (states).

 However, looking at WordNet's actual usage distinctions:
 - Sense 1 usually covers personal/social difficulties ("marital problems", "financial problems")
 - Sense 3 usually covers specific things that are problematic ("engine trouble", "what's the problem?")

 In "kidney problems", this is analogous to "engine trouble" - a specific organ/system is not functioning properly. This would map to sense 3.

 Also, the synonym for sense 3 is "trouble", and we commonly say "kidney trouble" to mean the same thing as "kidney problems".

 The synonym for sense 1 is "job" (British usage: "it's a real job to get there"), which is less relevant.

 Therefore, sense 3 (problem%1:09:00::) seems most appropriate.

 Wait, let me reconsider the sense indices provided:
 1. sense_key=problem%1:26:00::
 2. sense_key=problem%1:10:00::
 3. sense_key=problem%1:09:00::

 So:
 - Index 1 = problem%1:26:00:: (state of difficulty)
 - Index 2 = problem%1:10:00:: (question/homework problem)
 - Index 3 = problem%1:09:00:: (source of difficulty)

 Given the context of medical conditions affecting kidneys, and the parallel with "trouble" (as in "kidney trouble"), sense 3 is the best fit.

 Decision: sense_index: 3

 Double-checking: Could it be sense 1?
 "A state of difficulty that needs to be resolved" - kidney disease is indeed a state of difficulty. But the examples for sense 1 focus on people having problems (relationships, etc.), while sense 3 focuses on the problems themselves as sources of difficulty.

 In "patients with kidney problems", the problems are attributes/conditions of the kidneys that cause difficulty. This aligns with "source of difficulty".

 Also, in WordNet, sense 3 (source of difficulty) is often used for mechanical/physical issues ("what's the problem with the engine?"), while sense 1 is used for personal predicaments.

 Therefore, I choose index 3.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: more
Target surface form: more
Context:
It is given once every three weeks as an intravenous infusion lasting 10 minutes. To reduce side effects, patients should take a corticosteroid and folic acid (a type of vitamin), and receive injections of vitamin B12 during treatment with Alimta. When Alimta is given with cisplatin, an anti-emetic medicine (to prevent vomiting) and fluids (to prevent dehydration) should also be given before or after the cisplatin dose. Treatment should be delayed or discontinued, or the dose reduced, in patients whose blood counts are abnormal or who have certain other side effects. Alimta is not recommended for use in patients with moderate or severe kidney problems. For <t>more</t> information, see the Summary of Product Characteristics (also part of the EPAR). How does Alimta work?

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=more%3:00:01:: | definition=(comparative of `much' used with mass nouns) a quantifier meaning greater in size or amount or extent or degree | synonyms=more than | examples=more land; more support
2. sense_key=more%3:00:02:: | definition=(comparative of `many' used with count nouns) quantifier meaning greater in number | examples=a hall with more seats; we have no more bananas

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to disambiguate the word "more" in the given context. Let me analyze the context carefully.

The context is a medical text about a drug called Alimta. The sentence containing the target word is: "For <t>more</t> information, see the Summary of Product Characteristics (also part of the EPAR)."

The phrase "For more information" is a very common fixed expression meaning "for additional information" or "further information."

Now let me look at the candidate senses provided:

1. sense_key=more%3:00:01:: | definition=(comparative of `much' used with mass nouns) a quantifier meaning greater in size or amount or extent or degree | synonyms=more than | examples=more land; more support
2. sense_key=more%3:00:02:: | definition=(comparative of `many' used with count nouns) quantifier meaning greater in number | examples=a hall with more seats; we have no more bananas

Wait, there are only 2 senses provided, but the user asks me to return a JSON with "sense_index" which suggests there might be more senses. However, looking at the instructions, I see: "Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}."

But looking at the candidate senses, I only see sense keys 1 and 2 (more%3:00:01:: and more%3:00:02::). However, in WordNet, there are actually more senses of "more".

Let me think about the actual sense here. "For more information" - here "more" is functioning as a determiner/adjective meaning "additional" or "further".

Looking at WordNet for "more":
- Sense 1: (comparative of `much' used with mass nouns) a quantifier meaning greater in size or amount or extent or degree
- Sense 2: (comparative of `many' used with count nouns) quantifier meaning greater in number

But "information" is a mass noun (uncountable). So sense 1 would apply if we were comparing quantities of information (e.g., "more information than we had before").

However, in the phrase "for more information", "more" means "additional" or "further", which is essentially the comparative form used with mass nouns to indicate a greater amount.

Wait, looking at the provided senses:
- Sense 1: comparative of 'much' used with mass nouns
- Sense 2: comparative of 'many' used with count nouns

"Information" is a mass noun (uncountable), so sense 1 would be the correct one.

But wait, the user says "Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}" - this is an example format, but it says "3" which suggests there might be a third sense, or it's just an example of the format.

Let me reconsider. In "For more information", "more" is modifying "information" (mass noun), so it should be sense 1.

But I need to be careful. The schematic glosses might not capture the exact nuance, but given that "information" is a mass noun, and sense 1 is for mass nouns while sense 2 is for count nouns, sense 1 is clearly the right choice.

Sense 1: (comparative of `much' used with mass nouns)
Sense 2: (comparative of `many' used with count nouns)

"Information" is uncountable/mass, so sense 1.

But wait, looking at the example format {"sense_index": 3}, this might be indicating that I should use the index number from the candidate list (1 or 2), but the example shows 3... Actually, looking carefully at the instructions:

"Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}."

This is likely just showing the format. I should return {"sense_index": 1} if I choose the first sense, or {"sense_index": 2} if I choose the second.

However, looking at the phrase "For more information", this is a standard phrase where "more" means "additional". In WordNet, there might be separate senses for "additional" versus "greater in amount", but looking at the provided candidates, only comparative senses are listed.

Sense 1 covers "greater in size or amount or extent or degree" for mass nouns.
Sense 2 covers "greater in number" for count nouns.

"Information" is definitely a mass noun, and "more information" means a greater amount of information (or additional information), so it should be sense 1.

But let me reconsider if there's any trick here. The phrase "for more information" is often lexicalized, but the underlying semantics still fit sense 1 - it's the comparative of much (since information is uncountable).

Therefore, the answer should be sense_index 1.

Wait, I should double-check WordNet to see if there's a specific sense for "more" as in "additional" that might be different from the comparative quantifier senses.

In WordNet 3.0/3.1, "more" as an adjective has:
- Sense 1: (comparative of `much' used with mass nouns) a quantifier meaning greater in size or amount or extent or degree; "more land"; "more support"
- Sense 2: (comparative of `many' used with count nouns) quantifier meaning greater in number; "a hall with more seats"; "we have no more bananas"

And as an adverb there are also senses like "to a greater degree or extent".

But in the phrase "for more information", "more" is functioning as an adjective/determiner modifying "information", which is a mass noun, so sense 1.

Actually, looking carefully at the instruction example: {"sense_index": 3} - this might mean that the indexing starts from 1, and I should put the number of the sense I choose. So if I choose sense 1, I put {"sense_index": 1}.

But I want to make sure I'm not missing something. Is there any possibility that "more" in "for more information" is considered sense 2? No, because information is not countable (you don't say *"informations" in English). It's definitely a mass noun context.

Therefore, sense 1 is correct.

One final check: could "more" here be functioning as something else? "For [additional] information" - yes, comparative adjective functioning as determiner. "More" = comparative of "much". "Much information" vs "More information". Yes.

So the answer is sense_index 1.

Actually, looking at the example provided in the instructions: "Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}" - the number 3 might be arbitrary just to show the format, or it might indicate that the senses are numbered 1, 2, 3... and I should pick the corresponding number.

Given the candidates listed as 1 and 2, and I choose 1, I will return {"sense_index": 1}.

But wait, looking at the sense keys:
1. sense_key=more%3:00:01::
2. sense_key=more%3:00:02::

In WordNet, the lexical file 00 is for adjectives. The first sense is 01, second is 02.

So yes, sense 1 is the one for mass nouns.

Final answer: {"sense_index": 1}

provider: DigitalOcean