[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: justice
Target surface form: justices
Context:
The dinner was held at a Washington hotel hours after the court's conference over the case. In attendance was, among others, Mitch McConnell, the Senate's top Republican and an avowed opponent of the healthcare law. The featured guests at the dinner? Scalia and Thomas. It's nothing new: The two justices have been attending Federalist Society events for years. And it's nothing that runs afoul of ethics rules. In fact, justices are exempt from the Code of Conduct that governs the actions of lower federal <t>justices</t>. If they were, they arguably fell under code's Canon 4C, which states, "A judge may attend fund-raising events of law-related and other organizations although the judge may not be a speaker, a guest of honor, or featured on the program of such an event."

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=justice%1:07:00:: | definition=the quality of being just or fair | synonyms=justness
2. sense_key=justice%1:04:00:: | definition=judgment involved in the determination of rights and the assignment of rewards and punishments
3. sense_key=justice%1:18:00:: | definition=a public official authorized to decide questions brought before a court of justice | synonyms=judge, jurist
4. sense_key=justice%1:14:00:: | definition=the United States federal department responsible for enforcing federal laws (including the enforcement of all civil rights legislation); created in 1870 | synonyms=Department of Justice, Justice Department, DoJ

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the target word "justices" (plural of justice) in the given context.

 Let me analyze the context:
 - The text is discussing Supreme Court justices (Scalia and Thomas are mentioned)
 - It mentions "the court's conference over the case"
 - It mentions "lower federal justices"
 - It discusses ethics rules and the Code of Conduct that governs judges
 - The target word "justices" appears in the phrase "lower federal justices"

 Now let's look at the candidate senses:

 1. justice%1:07:00:: - "the quality of being just or fair" (synonyms: justness)
    - This is an abstract concept/quality, not a person. The context is talking about people (Scalia, Thomas, federal justices), so this doesn't fit.

 2. justice%1:04:00:: - "judgment involved in the determination of rights and the assignment of rewards and punishments"
    - This refers to the concept/act of judgment or the administration of justice, not the people who perform it. The context is about specific people attending events.

 3. justice%1:18:00:: - "a public official authorized to decide questions brought before a court of justice" (synonyms: judge, jurist)
    - This refers to a person who is a judge. The context mentions Scalia and Thomas (who were Supreme Court Justices) and "lower federal justices" - clearly referring to judges/justices as people. This fits perfectly.

 4. sense_key=justice%1:14:00:: - "the United States federal department responsible for enforcing federal laws..."
    - This refers to the Department of Justice (the organization/executive department), not individual judges. The context is clearly about individual judges (Scalia, Thomas, etc.), not the Department of Justice.

 The context is clearly referring to judges/justices as people - specifically federal judges. The phrase "lower federal justices" refers to judges in lower federal courts, as opposed to Supreme Court justices (Scalia and Thomas).

 Therefore, the correct sense is #3: "a public official authorized to decide questions brought before a court of justice"

 The answer should be: {"sense_index": 3}

provider: Moonshot AI


attempt_kind: initial

status: success

[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: code
Target surface form: code
Context:
In attendance was, among others, Mitch McConnell, the Senate's top Republican and an avowed opponent of the healthcare law. The featured guests at the dinner? Scalia and Thomas. It's nothing new: The two justices have been attending Federalist Society events for years. And it's nothing that runs afoul of ethics rules. In fact, justices are exempt from the Code of Conduct that governs the actions of lower federal justices. If they were, they arguably fell under <t>code</t>'s Canon 4C, which states, "A judge may attend fund-raising events of law-related and other organizations although the judge may not be a speaker, a guest of honor, or featured on the program of such an event." Nevertheless, the sheer proximity of Scalia and Thomas to two of the law firms in the case, as well as to a company with a massive financial interest, was enough to alarm ethics-in-government activists.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=code%1:10:01:: | definition=a set of rules or principles or laws (especially written ones) | synonyms=codification
2. sense_key=code%1:10:00:: | definition=a coding system used for transmitting messages requiring brevity or secrecy
3. sense_key=code%1:10:02:: | definition=(computer science) the symbolic arrangement of data or instructions in a computer program or the set of such instructions | synonyms=computer code

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

finish_reason: stop

role: assistant

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation (WSD) for the target word "code" in the given context.

Let me analyze the context:
- The text is discussing Supreme Court justices (Scalia and Thomas) and ethics rules.
- It mentions "justices are exempt from the Code of Conduct that governs the actions of lower federal justices"
- Then it says: "If they were, they arguably fell under <t>code</t>'s Canon 4C..."
- The "Code" being referred to is clearly the "Code of Conduct" mentioned earlier.
- Canon 4C is a specific provision within this Code.

Now let me look at the candidate senses:

1. sense_key=code%1:10:01:: | definition=a set of rules or principles or laws (especially written ones) | synonyms=codification
   - This fits perfectly. The "Code of Conduct" is a set of rules/principles/laws governing judicial behavior. "Codification" is a synonym, and this is essentially a codified set of rules.

2. sense_key=code%1:10:00:: | definition=a coding system used for transmitting messages requiring brevity or secrecy
   - This refers to things like Morse code, secret codes, etc. Doesn't fit the context of judicial ethics rules.

3. sense_key=code%1:10:02:: | definition=(computer science) the symbolic arrangement of data or instructions in a computer program or the set of such instructions | synonyms=computer code
   - This refers to programming code. Clearly not relevant to the context of judicial conduct and ethics rules.

The context is clearly referring to a "Code of Conduct" which is a set of rules or principles. Therefore, sense 1 is the correct choice.

The target surface form is "code" (lowercase in the tagged context, but referring back to "Code of Conduct" mentioned earlier).

The sentence "If they were, they arguably fell under <t>code</t>'s Canon 4C" means "If they were [exempt], they arguably fell under [the] code's Canon 4C" - referring to the Code of Conduct's Canon 4C.

So the sense is definitely sense 1: a set of rules or principles or laws (especially written ones).

I need to return only a JSON object: {"sense_index": 1}

format: unknown

native_finish_reason: stop

provider: StreamLake

currency: USD


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: judge
Target surface form: judge
Context:
In attendance was, among others, Mitch McConnell, the Senate's top Republican and an avowed opponent of the healthcare law. The featured guests at the dinner? Scalia and Thomas. It's nothing new: The two justices have been attending Federalist Society events for years. And it's nothing that runs afoul of ethics rules. In fact, justices are exempt from the Code of Conduct that governs the actions of lower federal justices. If they were, they arguably fell under code's Canon 4C, which states, "A <t>judge</t> may attend fund-raising events of law-related and other organizations although the judge may not be a speaker, a guest of honor, or featured on the program of such an event." Nevertheless, the sheer proximity of Scalia and Thomas to two of the law firms in the case, as well as to a company with a massive financial interest, was enough to alarm ethics-in-government activists.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=judge%1:18:00:: | definition=a public official authorized to decide questions brought before a court of justice | synonyms=justice, jurist
2. sense_key=judge%1:18:01:: | definition=an authority who is able to estimate worth or quality | synonyms=evaluator

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "judge" in the given context.

 Let me analyze the context:
 - The text is discussing Supreme Court justices (Scalia and Thomas)
 - It mentions "lower federal justices"
 - It quotes Canon 4C: "A judge may attend fund-raising events..."
 - The context is about judicial ethics, court justices, and legal proceedings
 - It mentions "two of the law firms in the case"

 Now let's look at the candidate senses:

 1. sense_key=judge%1:18:00:: | definition=a public official authorized to decide questions brought before a court of justice | synonyms=justice, jurist
    - This refers to a judicial officer, someone who presides over court cases
    - Synonyms include "justice" and "jurist"
    - The context mentions "justices" multiple times (Scalia and Thomas are Supreme Court justices)
    - The quote mentions "A judge may attend..." referring to judicial conduct rules

 2. sense_key=judge%1:18:01:: | definition=an authority who is able to estimate worth or quality | synonyms=evaluator
    - This refers to someone who evaluates or assesses quality (like a critic, connoisseur, etc.)
    - Not related to legal proceedings

 The context clearly involves legal judges/justices. The text discusses:
 - Supreme Court justices (Scalia and Thomas)
 - Federal judges
 - The Code of Conduct for judges
 - Canon 4C which governs judicial behavior at events
 - Law firms and cases

 The word "judge" in the quote "A judge may attend fund-raising events..." refers to a judicial officer, a public official who decides questions in court. This matches sense 1.

 Sense 2 would be for contexts like "He is a good judge of character" or "She judged the wine competition" - referring to evaluation/assessment, not legal adjudication.

 Therefore, the correct sense is sense 1 (index 1).

 The user wants the output as: {"sense_index": 1}

provider: DeepInfra


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: event
Target surface form: events
Context:
In attendance was, among others, Mitch McConnell, the Senate's top Republican and an avowed opponent of the healthcare law. The featured guests at the dinner? Scalia and Thomas. It's nothing new: The two justices have been attending Federalist Society events for years. And it's nothing that runs afoul of ethics rules. In fact, justices are exempt from the Code of Conduct that governs the actions of lower federal justices. If they were, they arguably fell under code's Canon 4C, which states, "A judge may attend fund-raising <t>events</t> of law-related and other organizations although the judge may not be a speaker, a guest of honor, or featured on the program of such an event." Nevertheless, the sheer proximity of Scalia and Thomas to two of the law firms in the case, as well as to a company with a massive financial interest, was enough to alarm ethics-in-government activists.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=event%1:03:00:: | definition=something that happens at a given place and time
2. sense_key=event%1:26:00:: | definition=a special set of circumstances | synonyms=case | examples=in that event, the first possibility is excluded; it may rain in which case the picnic will be canceled
3. sense_key=event%1:19:00:: | definition=a phenomenon located at a single point in space-time; the fundamental observational entity in relativity theory
4. sense_key=event%1:19:01:: | definition=a phenomenon that follows and is caused by some previous phenomenon | synonyms=consequence, effect, outcome, result, issue, upshot | examples=the magnetic effect was greater when the rod was lengthwise; his decision had depressing consequences for business

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "events" in the given context.

Target lemma: event
Target surface form: events
Context: The text discusses Federalist Society events and fund-raising events attended by judges/justices.

Let me analyze the candidate senses:

1. sense_key=event%1:03:00:: | definition=something that happens at a given place and time
   - This is the general sense of an occurrence or happening.
   - In the context: "Federalist Society events" and "fund-raising events" - these are gatherings, occurrences, things that happen at specific places and times.

2. sense_key=event%1:26:00:: | definition=a special set of circumstances | synonyms=case | examples=in that event, the first possibility is excluded; it may rain in which case the picnic will be canceled
   - This is the "in that event" sense - referring to a hypothetical situation or circumstance.
   - The context doesn't use "event" in this conditional sense.

3. sense_key=event%1:19:00:: | definition=a phenomenon located at a single point in space-time; the fundamental observational entity in relativity theory
   - This is the physics/relativity theory sense.
   - The context is about social gatherings, not physics.

4. sense_key=event%1:19:01:: | definition=a phenomenon that follows and is caused by some previous phenomenon | synonyms=consequence, effect, outcome, result, issue, upshot
   - This is the "result/consequence" sense.
   - The context is not talking about consequences or results.

Looking at the context:
- "The two justices have been attending Federalist Society events for years."
- "A judge may attend fund-raising events of law-related and other organizations..."

These are clearly referring to organized gatherings, occasions, things that happen at given places and times. This matches sense 1: "something that happens at a given place and time."

Sense 1 is the most general and common sense for "event" when referring to social gatherings, meetings, functions, etc.

Sense 2 would be used in phrases like "in the event that..."
Sense 3 is physics-specific.
Sense 4 is about consequences/results.

Therefore, the correct sense is sense 1 (sense_key=event%1:03:00::).

The user wants me to return a JSON object like {"sense_index": 3}, where the number corresponds to the index of the sense in the list provided (1-indexed).

So I should return: {"sense_index": 1}

provider: ModelRun


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: organization
Target surface form: organizations
Context:
In attendance was, among others, Mitch McConnell, the Senate's top Republican and an avowed opponent of the healthcare law. The featured guests at the dinner? Scalia and Thomas. It's nothing new: The two justices have been attending Federalist Society events for years. And it's nothing that runs afoul of ethics rules. In fact, justices are exempt from the Code of Conduct that governs the actions of lower federal justices. If they were, they arguably fell under code's Canon 4C, which states, "A judge may attend fund-raising events of law-related and other <t>organizations</t> although the judge may not be a speaker, a guest of honor, or featured on the program of such an event." Nevertheless, the sheer proximity of Scalia and Thomas to two of the law firms in the case, as well as to a company with a massive financial interest, was enough to alarm ethics-in-government activists.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=organization%1:14:00:: | definition=a group of people who work together | synonyms=organisation
2. sense_key=organization%1:09:00:: | definition=an organized structure for arranging or classifying | synonyms=arrangement, organisation, system | examples=he changed the arrangement of the topics; the facts were familiar but it was in the organization of them that he was original
3. sense_key=organization%1:14:01:: | definition=the persons (or committees or departments etc.) who make up a body for the purpose of administering something | synonyms=administration, governance, governing body, establishment, brass, organisation | examples=he claims that the present administration is corrupt; the governance of an association is responsible to its members
4. sense_key=organization%1:04:00:: | definition=the act of organizing a business or an activity related to a business | synonyms=organisation | examples=he was brought in to supervise the organization of a new department
5. sense_key=organization%1:07:00:: | definition=an ordered manner; orderliness by virtue of being methodical and well organized | synonyms=organisation, system | examples=his compulsive organization was not an endearing quality; we can't do it unless we establish some system around here
6. sense_key=organization%1:04:01:: | definition=the activity or result of distributing or disposing persons or things properly or methodically | synonyms=organisation | examples=his organization of the work force was very efficient
7. sense_key=organization%1:04:02:: | definition=the act of forming or establishing something | synonyms=constitution, establishment, formation, organisation | examples=the constitution of a PTA group last year; it was the establishment of his reputation

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "organizations" in the given context.

 Let me analyze the context:
 - The sentence is: "A judge may attend fund-raising events of law-related and other <t>organizations</t> although the judge may not be a speaker, a guest of honor, or featured on the program of such an event."
 - This is referring to groups of people (law-related organizations, other organizations) that hold fund-raising events.
 - The context is about judges attending events held by these groups.

 Now let's look at the candidate senses:

 1. sense_key=organization%1:14:00:: | definition=a group of people who work together | synonyms=organisation
    - This fits well. Organizations here are groups of people (like the Federalist Society mentioned earlier in the text, or law firms, or other groups).

 2. sense_key=organization%1:09:00:: | definition=an organized structure for arranging or classifying | synonyms=arrangement, organisation, system
    - This refers to the abstract concept of organization/arrangement, not a specific group. Doesn't fit.

 3. sense_key=organization%1:14:01:: | definition=the persons (or committees or departments etc.) who make up a body for the purpose of administering something | synonyms=administration, governance, governing body, establishment, brass, organisation
    - This is more specific to administrative bodies or governing bodies. While organizations can be governing bodies, sense 1 is more general and fits "law-related and other organizations" better. Sense 3 seems more focused on the administrative/governing aspect specifically.

 4. sense_key=organization%1:04:00:: | definition=the act of organizing a business or an activity related to a business | synonyms=organisation
    - This is the act/process, not the entity. The context refers to entities that hold events.

 5. sense_key=organization%1:07:00:: | definition=an ordered manner; orderliness by virtue of being methodical and well organized | synonyms=organisation, system
    - This is about the quality of being organized, not a group.

 6. sense_key=organization%1:04:01:: | definition=the activity or result of distributing or disposing persons or things properly or methodically | synonyms=organisation
    - Again, this is about the activity/process, not the entity.

 7. sense_key=organization%1:04:02:: | definition=the act of forming or establishing something | synonyms=constitution, establishment, formation, organisation
    - This is about the act of forming/establishing, not the established group.

 So the choice is between sense 1 and sense 3.

 Sense 1: "a group of people who work together" - This is a general definition of an organization as an entity.
 Sense 3: "the persons (or committees or departments etc.) who make up a body for the purpose of administering something" - This is more specific to administrative/governing bodies.

 In the context, "law-related and other organizations" refers to various types of groups - could be non-profits, professional associations, etc. The Federalist Society mentioned earlier is an example of such an organization. These are groups of people who work together (sense 1), not necessarily administrative bodies in the sense of sense 3.

 Sense 3 examples mention "administration", "governance", "governing body" - which suggests it's about the leadership/administrative part of something, whereas sense 1 is the general "group of people who work together."

 The phrase "law-related and other organizations" is referring to entities like the Federalist Society, law firms (though firms are mentioned separately), or other groups that hold fund-raising events. These are best described as "groups of people who work together" (sense 1) rather than specifically administrative bodies (sense 3).

 Therefore, sense 1 is the best fit.

 Wait, let me double-check the WordNet sense keys. The format is:
 organization%1:14:00::
 organization%1:14:01::

 In WordNet:
 - %1:14:00:: is usually the first sense of the noun (group of people)
 - %1:14:01:: is the second sense (administrative body)

 Actually, looking at standard WordNet:
 - organization (n) sense 1: a group of people who work together
 - organization (n) sense 2: an organized structure for arranging or classifying
 - organization (n) sense 3: the persons (or committees or departments etc.) who make up a body for the purpose of administering something

 But the sense keys provided show:
 1. organization%1:14:00:: - group of people who work together
 2. organization%1:09:00:: - organized structure for arranging or classifying
 3. organization%1:14:01:: - persons who make up a body for administering something

 So index 1 is the general "group" sense, and index 3 is the "administrative body" sense.

 In the context: "fund-raising events of law-related and other organizations"

 This clearly refers to groups/entities like the Federalist Society (mentioned earlier in the text), which are groups of people who work together. It's not specifically referring to the administrative/governing subset of such groups, but the groups themselves.

 Therefore, sense_index should be 1.

 But let me reconsider sense 3. Could "law-related organizations" refer to the administrative bodies? The examples for sense 3 include "he claims that the present administration is corrupt" and "the governance of an association." This seems to focus on the governing/administrative aspect.

 However, "organizations" in the context of attending fund-raising events refers to the entities themselves (like the Federalist Society, or the American Bar Association, etc.), not specifically their administrative committees.

 Also, looking at the broader context: The text mentions "Federalist Society events" and "two of the law firms in the case" - these are organizations in the sense of groups of people who work together.

 So I maintain that sense 1 is correct.

 Wait, I should check if there's any trick here. The word is "organizations" plural. All senses can be pluralized, but senses 4, 6, and 7 (the act/activity senses) are less likely to be used in plural when referring to events of multiple organizations. Actually, senses 4, 6, and 7 are uncountable or refer to acts, so "organizations" plural strongly suggests senses 1, 2, or 3.

 Between 1 and 3, sense 1 is the hypernym/general sense, while sense 3 is hyponym/specific (administrative bodies). Since the text mentions "law-related and other organizations" - the "other" suggests a broad category, which fits the general sense 1 better.

 Final decision: sense_index 1.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: judge
Target surface form: judge
Context:
In attendance was, among others, Mitch McConnell, the Senate's top Republican and an avowed opponent of the healthcare law. The featured guests at the dinner? Scalia and Thomas. It's nothing new: The two justices have been attending Federalist Society events for years. And it's nothing that runs afoul of ethics rules. In fact, justices are exempt from the Code of Conduct that governs the actions of lower federal justices. If they were, they arguably fell under code's Canon 4C, which states, "A judge may attend fund-raising events of law-related and other organizations although the <t>judge</t> may not be a speaker, a guest of honor, or featured on the program of such an event." Nevertheless, the sheer proximity of Scalia and Thomas to two of the law firms in the case, as well as to a company with a massive financial interest, was enough to alarm ethics-in-government activists.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=judge%1:18:00:: | definition=a public official authorized to decide questions brought before a court of justice | synonyms=justice, jurist
2. sense_key=judge%1:18:01:: | definition=an authority who is able to estimate worth or quality | synonyms=evaluator

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation (WSD) on the word "judge" in the given context.

Let me analyze the context:
- The text discusses justices (like Scalia and Thomas) who are Supreme Court justices
- It mentions "lower federal justices"
- It quotes Canon 4C: "A judge may attend fund-raising events..."
- This is talking about judicial ethics rules
- The context is clearly about judicial officials who preside over courts

Now let's look at the candidate senses:

1. sense_key=judge%1:18:00:: | definition=a public official authorized to decide questions brought before a court of justice | synonyms=justice, jurist
   - This refers to a judicial officer, someone who presides over court cases
   - The context is about Supreme Court justices and federal judges
   - The quote mentions ethics rules for judges
   - "justice" is listed as a synonym, and the text mentions "justices" multiple times

2. sense_key=judge%1:18:01:: | definition=an authority who is able to estimate worth or quality | synonyms=evaluator
   - This refers to someone who evaluates or assesses quality (like a judge at a competition, or someone who forms opinions)
   - Not specifically a judicial official

The context clearly points to sense 1. The text discusses federal judges, Supreme Court justices, legal ethics codes (Canon 4C), and court-related matters. The word "judge" in the quoted code refers to a judicial official, the same as "justice" mentioned elsewhere in the text.

The quote specifically says "A judge may attend..." in the context of the Code of Conduct for federal judges. This is clearly referring to a public official authorized to decide questions brought before a court of justice.

Therefore, the correct sense is index 1.

Wait, I need to check if the indices are 1-based or 0-based. The user presents:
1. sense_key=...
2. sense_key=...

So these are indexed as 1 and 2. I should return {"sense_index": 1}.

But let me double-check. The user says "Choose the single best indexed sense" and "Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}". The example shows 3, but my indices are 1 and 2. I should use the actual index from the list (1 or 2).

Actually, looking carefully at the instructions, the example {"sense_index": 3} is just an example format. I should return the index of the sense I choose. Since the first sense is labeled "1." and the second is "2.", I should return 1 for the first sense.

Let me verify once more:
- Context: Legal/judicial setting, discussing federal judges and Supreme Court justices
- Quote from Canon 4C about what "A judge" may or may not do regarding fundraising events
- This is clearly a public official who decides questions in court (sense 1)
- Not an evaluator of quality in general (sense 2)

Yes, sense 1 is correct.

provider: DigitalOcean


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: speaker
Target surface form: speaker
Context:
In attendance was, among others, Mitch McConnell, the Senate's top Republican and an avowed opponent of the healthcare law. The featured guests at the dinner? Scalia and Thomas. It's nothing new: The two justices have been attending Federalist Society events for years. And it's nothing that runs afoul of ethics rules. In fact, justices are exempt from the Code of Conduct that governs the actions of lower federal justices. If they were, they arguably fell under code's Canon 4C, which states, "A judge may attend fund-raising events of law-related and other organizations although the judge may not be a <t>speaker</t>, a guest of honor, or featured on the program of such an event." Nevertheless, the sheer proximity of Scalia and Thomas to two of the law firms in the case, as well as to a company with a massive financial interest, was enough to alarm ethics-in-government activists.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=speaker%1:18:00:: | definition=someone who expresses in language; someone who talks (especially someone who delivers a public speech or someone especially garrulous) | synonyms=talker, utterer, verbalizer, verbaliser | examples=the speaker at commencement; an utterer of useful maxims
2. sense_key=speaker%1:06:00:: | definition=electro-acoustic transducer that converts electrical signals into sounds loud enough to be heard at a distance | synonyms=loudspeaker, speaker unit, loudspeaker system, speaker system
3. sense_key=speaker%1:18:01:: | definition=the presiding officer of a deliberative assembly | examples=the leader of the majority party is the Speaker of the House of Representatives

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation (WSD) on the word "speaker" in the given context.

Let me analyze the context:
- The text is about judges attending fund-raising events
- It mentions Canon 4C which states: "A judge may attend fund-raising events of law-related and other organizations although the judge may not be a speaker, a guest of honor, or featured on the program of such an event."
- Here, "speaker" refers to someone who delivers a speech or talks at the event
- The context is about public speaking at events, not about electronic devices (sense 2) or the presiding officer of a legislative assembly (sense 3)

Looking at the candidate senses:
1. sense_key=speaker%1:18:00:: - someone who expresses in language; someone who talks (especially someone who delivers a public speech or someone especially garrulous). Examples: "the speaker at commencement; an utterer of useful maxims"
2. sense_key=speaker%1:06:00:: - electro-acoustic transducer (electronic device) - clearly not this one
3. sense_key=speaker%1:18:01:: - the presiding officer of a deliberative assembly (like Speaker of the House) - not this one because the context is about being a speaker at a fundraising event, not holding the office of Speaker

The context clearly refers to someone who delivers a speech at an event ("fund-raising events... the judge may not be a speaker..."). This matches sense 1, which mentions "someone who delivers a public speech" and gives the example "the speaker at commencement."

Sense 3 is specifically about the presiding officer (like "Speaker of the House"), which is a specific political office, not the general role of speaking at an event.

Therefore, the correct sense is index 1.

Wait, let me double-check the sense indices. The user lists them as:
1. sense_key=speaker%1:18:00::
2. sense_key=speaker%1:06:00::
3. sense_key=speaker%1:18:01::

So sense 1 is the one about someone who expresses in language/delivers public speeches.
Sense 3 is the presiding officer.

The context: "the judge may not be a speaker, a guest of honor, or featured on the program of such an event"

This is clearly referring to someone who speaks at the event (gives a speech), not the Speaker of the House (which would be capitalized usually anyway, but more importantly, the context is about fundraising events of law-related organizations, not legislative assemblies).

So the answer should be sense_index: 1.

But wait, I need to be careful. In legal/government contexts, could "speaker" refer to sense 3? The text mentions Senate, Republicans, justices, etc. But the specific quote is about Canon 4C regarding fundraising events. The canon is saying a judge can't be a speaker (as in, give a speech) at such events.

Also, looking at the synonyms for sense 1: talker, utterer, verbalizer, verbaliser. And the examples include "the speaker at commencement."

Yes, this is definitely sense 1.

The output should be: {"sense_index": 1}


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: program
Target surface form: program
Context:
In attendance was, among others, Mitch McConnell, the Senate's top Republican and an avowed opponent of the healthcare law. The featured guests at the dinner? Scalia and Thomas. It's nothing new: The two justices have been attending Federalist Society events for years. And it's nothing that runs afoul of ethics rules. In fact, justices are exempt from the Code of Conduct that governs the actions of lower federal justices. If they were, they arguably fell under code's Canon 4C, which states, "A judge may attend fund-raising events of law-related and other organizations although the judge may not be a speaker, a guest of honor, or featured on the <t>program</t> of such an event." Nevertheless, the sheer proximity of Scalia and Thomas to two of the law firms in the case, as well as to a company with a massive financial interest, was enough to alarm ethics-in-government activists.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=program%1:09:00:: | definition=a series of steps to be carried out or goals to be accomplished | synonyms=plan, programme | examples=they drew up a six-step plan; they discussed plans for a new bond issue
2. sense_key=program%1:09:01:: | definition=a system of projects or services intended to meet a public need | synonyms=programme | examples=he proposed an elaborate program of public works; working mothers rely on the day care program
3. sense_key=program%1:10:01:: | definition=a radio or television show | synonyms=broadcast, programme | examples=did you see his program last night?
4. sense_key=program%1:10:04:: | definition=a document stating the aims and principles of a political party | synonyms=platform, political platform, political program | examples=their candidate simply ignored the party platform; they won the election even though they offered no positive program
5. sense_key=program%1:10:00:: | definition=an announcement of the events that will occur as part of a theatrical or sporting event | synonyms=programme | examples=you can't tell the players without a program
6. sense_key=program%1:10:05:: | definition=an integrated course of academic studies | synonyms=course of study, programme, curriculum, syllabus | examples=he was admitted to a new program at the university
7. sense_key=program%1:10:02:: | definition=(computer science) a sequence of instructions that a computer can interpret and execute | synonyms=programme, computer program, computer programme | examples=the program required several hundred lines of code
8. sense_key=program%1:04:00:: | definition=a performance (or series of performances) at a public presentation | synonyms=programme | examples=the program lasted more than two hours

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation on the word "program" in the given context.

 Context analysis:
 - The sentence is about ethics rules for judges attending fund-raising events
 - The specific quote: "A judge may attend fund-raising events of law-related and other organizations although the judge may not be a speaker, a guest of honor, or featured on the <t>program</t> of such an event."
 - This is referring to a printed document or listing for an event (like a dinner or fund-raiser) that lists speakers, guests of honor, featured participants, etc.

 Looking at the candidate senses:

 1. sense_key=program%1:09:00:: - "a series of steps to be carried out or goals to be accomplished" (plan, programme)
    - This is about plans/goals, not a printed document for an event.

 2. sense_key=program%1:09:01:: - "a system of projects or services intended to meet a public need"
    - This is about public service programs, not event documentation.

 3. sense_key=program%1:10:01:: - "a radio or television show"
    - Not a broadcast.

 4. sense_key=program%1:10:04:: - "a document stating the aims and principles of a political party"
    - This is specifically about political platforms, not event programs.

 5. sense_key=program%1:10:00:: - "an announcement of the events that will occur as part of a theatrical or sporting event"
    - Synonyms: programme
    - Examples: "you can't tell the players without a program"
    - This fits! A program at a fund-raising event would list the events, speakers, guests of honor, etc.

 6. sense_key=program%1:10:05:: - "an integrated course of academic studies"
    - Academic context, not relevant.

 7. sense_key=program%1:10:02:: - "(computer science) a sequence of instructions..."
    - Computer context, not relevant.

 8. sense_key=program%1:04:00:: - "a performance (or series of performances) at a public presentation"
    - This refers to the performance itself, not the printed document listing participants.

 The context specifically mentions being "featured on the program of such an event" where the event is a fund-raising event. This refers to being listed/printed in the event program/document that announces what will occur and who is participating.

 Sense 5 (program%1:10:00::) is the best fit: "an announcement of the events that will occur as part of a theatrical or sporting event" - though the gloss mentions theatrical or sporting, it extends to any event where there's a printed program listing participants. The example "you can't tell the players without a program" supports this being a printed document handed out at events.

 Actually, looking more carefully at sense 8: "a performance (or series of performances) at a public presentation" - this is the performance itself.

 Sense 5 is definitely the right one. The context is about being featured (listed/named) on the printed document (program) for the event.

 Wait, let me double-check the sense indices. The user lists them as:
 1. sense_key=program%1:09:00::
 2. sense_key=program%1:09:01::
 3. sense_key=program%1:10:01::
 4. sense_key=program%1:10:04::
 5. sense_key=program%1:10:00::
 6. sense_key=program%1:10:05::
 7. sense_key=program%1:10:02::
 8. sense_key=program%1:04:00::

 So sense 5 corresponds to program%1:10:00:: which is "an announcement of the events that will occur as part of a theatrical or sporting event".

 This is the correct sense. Even though the event is a fund-raising dinner (not explicitly theatrical or sporting), the concept of a "program" as a printed document listing the events and participants is exactly what is meant here. The gloss is schematic as noted, and the example "you can't tell the players without a program" confirms this is the printed material distributed at events.

 Therefore, the answer should be {"sense_index": 5}.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: event
Target surface form: event
Context:
In attendance was, among others, Mitch McConnell, the Senate's top Republican and an avowed opponent of the healthcare law. The featured guests at the dinner? Scalia and Thomas. It's nothing new: The two justices have been attending Federalist Society events for years. And it's nothing that runs afoul of ethics rules. In fact, justices are exempt from the Code of Conduct that governs the actions of lower federal justices. If they were, they arguably fell under code's Canon 4C, which states, "A judge may attend fund-raising events of law-related and other organizations although the judge may not be a speaker, a guest of honor, or featured on the program of such an <t>event</t>." Nevertheless, the sheer proximity of Scalia and Thomas to two of the law firms in the case, as well as to a company with a massive financial interest, was enough to alarm ethics-in-government activists.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=event%1:03:00:: | definition=something that happens at a given place and time
2. sense_key=event%1:26:00:: | definition=a special set of circumstances | synonyms=case | examples=in that event, the first possibility is excluded; it may rain in which case the picnic will be canceled
3. sense_key=event%1:19:00:: | definition=a phenomenon located at a single point in space-time; the fundamental observational entity in relativity theory
4. sense_key=event%1:19:01:: | definition=a phenomenon that follows and is caused by some previous phenomenon | synonyms=consequence, effect, outcome, result, issue, upshot | examples=the magnetic effect was greater when the rod was lengthwise; his decision had depressing consequences for business

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "event" in the given context.

Let me analyze the context:
- The text is about Supreme Court justices Scalia and Thomas attending Federalist Society events.
- The specific sentence containing the target word is: "A judge may attend fund-raising events of law-related and other organizations although the judge may not be a speaker, a guest of honor, or featured on the program of such an <t>event</t>."

The word "event" here refers to a gathering, occasion, or happening - specifically a fund-raising event or a social/programmatic gathering.

Now let's look at the candidate senses:

1. sense_key=event%1:03:00:: | definition=something that happens at a given place and time
   - This is the general sense of an occurrence or happening. It could fit, as a fund-raising event is something that happens at a given place and time.

2. sense_key=event%1:26:00:: | definition=a special set of circumstances | synonyms=case | examples=in that event, the first possibility is excluded; it may rain in which case the picnic will be canceled
   - This is the "in that event" sense - referring to a hypothetical situation or circumstance. The example shows "in that event" meaning "in that case". This doesn't fit the context of a physical gathering/fund-raiser.

3. sense_key=event%1:19:00:: | definition=a phenomenon located at a single point in space-time; the fundamental observational entity in relativity theory
   - This is the physics/relativity sense. Not relevant here.

4. sense_key=event%1:19:01:: | definition=a phenomenon that follows and is caused by some previous phenomenon | synonyms=consequence, effect, outcome, result, issue, upshot
   - This is the "result/outcome" sense. Not relevant here.

So it's between sense 1 and sense 2. Sense 2 is clearly about a hypothetical case or circumstance ("in that event"). The context is talking about actual fund-raising gatherings - physical events that people attend.

Sense 1 ("something that happens at a given place and time") is the general sense that covers gatherings, occasions, happenings, etc. This is the correct sense for "fund-raising events" and "such an event" referring back to those fund-raising gatherings.

Wait, let me double-check WordNet sense distinctions. In WordNet, "event" has several senses:
- The general "something that happens" sense (this would cover parties, meetings, gatherings)
- The "case/circumstance" sense (in that event)
- The physics sense
- The consequence sense

Actually, looking more carefully at WordNet:
event%1:03:00:: is likely the general "occurrence" sense - something that happens.
event%1:26:00:: is the "case" sense - "in the event that..."

In the context: "fund-raising events" and "such an event" clearly refers to a gathering/occurrence, not a hypothetical case.

Therefore, sense 1 is the correct choice.

Wait, I should verify the sense keys. The format event%1:03:00:: suggests:
- event: lemma
- %1:03:00: lexicographer file 03 (nouns of event/occurrence?), probably
- Actually, WordNet lexicographer file numbers:
  - 03 is usually "noun.event" or similar? Let me think.
  - Actually, the format is lemma%pos:lex_filenum:sense_num
  - So 1:03:00 would be noun, file 03, sense 00.

But regardless of the file number, the definitions provided are:
1. something that happens at a given place and time
2. a special set of circumstances (synonyms=case)
3. physics sense
4. consequence sense

The context is clearly sense 1. A fund-raising event is something that happens at a given place and time.

So the answer should be {"sense_index": 1}.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: proximity
Target surface form: proximity
Context:
The featured guests at the dinner? Scalia and Thomas. It's nothing new: The two justices have been attending Federalist Society events for years. And it's nothing that runs afoul of ethics rules. In fact, justices are exempt from the Code of Conduct that governs the actions of lower federal justices. If they were, they arguably fell under code's Canon 4C, which states, "A judge may attend fund-raising events of law-related and other organizations although the judge may not be a speaker, a guest of honor, or featured on the program of such an event." Nevertheless, the sheer <t>proximity</t> of Scalia and Thomas to two of the law firms in the case, as well as to a company with a massive financial interest, was enough to alarm ethics-in-government activists. "This stunning breach of ethics and indifference to the code belies claims by several justices that the court abides by the same rules that apply to all other federal judges," said Bob Edgar, the president of Common Cause.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=proximity%1:07:00:: | definition=the property of being close together | synonyms=propinquity
2. sense_key=proximity%1:15:00:: | definition=the region close around a person or thing
3. sense_key=proximity%1:09:00:: | definition=a Gestalt principle of organization holding that (other things being equal) objects or events that are near to one another (in space or time) are perceived as belonging together as a unit | synonyms=law of proximity

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation (WSD) on the word "proximity" in the given context.

 Let me analyze the context:
 - The text discusses Supreme Court Justices Scalia and Thomas attending a dinner with law firms and a company that had financial interests in cases before the court.
 - The specific sentence: "Nevertheless, the sheer <t>proximity</t> of Scalia and Thomas to two of the law firms in the case, as well as to a company with a massive financial interest, was enough to alarm ethics-in-government activists."
 - Here, "proximity" refers to the closeness/closeness in relationship or physical closeness between the justices and the law firms/company.

 Now let's look at the candidate senses:

 1. sense_key=proximity%1:07:00:: | definition=the property of being close together | synonyms=propinquity
    - This seems to be about the state or quality of being near/close together. "Propinquity" means nearness in place, time, or relationship.
    - In the context, it refers to the closeness/association between the justices and the law firms.

 2. sense_key=proximity%1:15:00:: | definition=the region close around a person or thing
    - This would refer to a physical area or vicinity (like "in the proximity of the building").
    - The context doesn't emphasize a physical region/area around them, but rather their closeness/association to the firms.

 3. sense_key=proximity%1:09:00:: | definition=a Gestalt principle of organization holding that (other things being equal) objects or events that are near to one another (in space or time) are perceived as belonging together as a unit | synonyms=law of proximity
    - This is a technical term from psychology/Gestalt theory.
    - The context is about ethics and judicial conduct, not psychological perception principles.

 Analysis:
 - Sense 1 (1:07:00) refers to the property or state of being close together - this fits the abstract concept of being near/close to something (in this case, close association with law firms).
 - Sense 2 (1:15:00) refers to a physical region/area - this doesn't fit as well because the text is talking about their closeness to the firms (relationship-wise or event-wise), not a physical region surrounding them.
 - Sense 3 (1:09:00) is the Gestalt principle - clearly wrong for this context.

 The word "proximity" here means closeness/nearness in terms of association or physical presence at the event with these firms. The phrase "proximity of Scalia and Thomas to two of the law firms" indicates the state of being close to/associated with them.

 Sense 1 (proximity%1:07:00::) with synonym "propinquity" is the best fit. Propinquity specifically can mean "nearness of blood; kinship" or "nearness in place or time," and in this context, it refers to the closeness/association between the justices and the interested parties.

 Actually, looking more carefully:
 - Sense 1: "the property of being close together" - this is an abstract noun referring to the quality/state of closeness.
 - Sense 2: "the region close around a person or thing" - this refers to a location/place.

 In the sentence, "the sheer proximity of Scalia and Thomas to two of the law firms" - this is talking about the fact that they were close to/associated with these firms (attending the same event, being near them). It's not talking about a region (sense 2), nor is it talking about a psychological principle (sense 3).

 Therefore, sense 1 is correct.

 Wait, let me double-check the WordNet sense indices. The user lists:
 1. sense_key=proximity%1:07:00::
 2. sense_key=proximity%1:15:00::
 3. sense_key=proximity%1:09:00::

 So I need to return {"sense_index": 1}.

 Let me verify:
 - proximity%1:07:00:: is the attribute/quality sense (noun.attribute)
 - proximity%1:15:00:: is the location/region sense (noun.location)
 - proximity%1:09:00:: is the cognition/psychological sense (noun.cognition)

 Yes, sense 1 is correct. The context discusses the quality/state of being close to/associated with the law firms, not a physical region.

 Final check: The sentence says "proximity of Scalia and Thomas to two of the law firms" - this is clearly about the relationship/closeness between the justices and the firms, which is the property of being close together (sense 1), not a region around them (sense 2).

 Answer: {"sense_index": 1}


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: case
Target surface form: case
Context:
The featured guests at the dinner? Scalia and Thomas. It's nothing new: The two justices have been attending Federalist Society events for years. And it's nothing that runs afoul of ethics rules. In fact, justices are exempt from the Code of Conduct that governs the actions of lower federal justices. If they were, they arguably fell under code's Canon 4C, which states, "A judge may attend fund-raising events of law-related and other organizations although the judge may not be a speaker, a guest of honor, or featured on the program of such an event." Nevertheless, the sheer proximity of Scalia and Thomas to two of the law firms in the <t>case</t>, as well as to a company with a massive financial interest, was enough to alarm ethics-in-government activists. "This stunning breach of ethics and indifference to the code belies claims by several justices that the court abides by the same rules that apply to all other federal judges," said Bob Edgar, the president of Common Cause.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=case%1:11:00:: | definition=an occurrence of something | synonyms=instance, example | examples=it was a case of bad judgment; another instance occurred yesterday
2. sense_key=case%1:26:00:: | definition=a special set of circumstances | synonyms=event | examples=in that event, the first possibility is excluded; it may rain in which case the picnic will be canceled
3. sense_key=case%1:04:00:: | definition=a comprehensive term for any proceeding in a court of law whereby an individual seeks a legal remedy | synonyms=lawsuit, suit, cause, causa | examples=the family brought suit against the landlord
4. sense_key=case%1:09:00:: | definition=the actual state of things | examples=that was not the case
5. sense_key=case%1:06:00:: | definition=a portable container for carrying several objects | examples=the musicians left their instrument cases backstage
6. sense_key=case%1:18:03:: | definition=a person requiring professional services | examples=a typical case was the suburban housewife described by a marriage counselor
7. sense_key=case%1:18:02:: | definition=a person who is subjected to experimental or other observational procedures; someone who is an object of investigation | synonyms=subject, guinea pig | examples=the subjects for this investigation were selected randomly; the cases that we studied were drawn from two different communities
8. sense_key=case%1:10:02:: | definition=a problem requiring investigation | examples=Perry Mason solved the case of the missing heir
9. sense_key=case%1:10:01:: | definition=a statement of facts and reasons used to support an argument | examples=he stated his case clearly
10. sense_key=case%1:23:00:: | definition=the quantity contained in a case | synonyms=caseful
11. sense_key=case%1:10:00:: | definition=nouns or pronouns or adjectives (often marked by inflection) related in some way to other words in a sentence | synonyms=grammatical case
12. sense_key=case%1:26:02:: | definition=a specific state of mind that is temporary | examples=a case of the jitters
13. sense_key=case%1:18:04:: | definition=a person of a specified kind (usually with many eccentricities) | synonyms=character, eccentric, type | examples=a real character; a strange character
14. sense_key=case%1:10:03:: | definition=a specific size and style of type within a type family | synonyms=font, fount, typeface, face
15. sense_key=case%1:08:00:: | definition=an enveloping structure or covering enclosing an animal or plant organ or part | synonyms=sheath
16. sense_key=case%1:06:06:: | definition=the housing or outer covering of something | synonyms=shell, casing | examples=the clock has a walnut case
17. sense_key=case%1:06:07:: | definition=the enclosing frame around a door or window opening | synonyms=casing | examples=the casings had rotted away and had to be replaced
18. sense_key=case%1:06:03:: | definition=(printing) the receptacle in which a compositor has his type, which is divided into compartments for the different letters, spaces, or numbers | synonyms=compositor's case, typesetter's case | examples=for English, a compositor will ordinarily have two such cases, the upper case containing the capitals and the lower case containing the small letters
19. sense_key=case%1:06:02:: | definition=bed linen consisting of a cover for a pillow | synonyms=pillowcase, slip, pillow slip | examples=the burglar carried his loot in a pillowcase
20. sense_key=case%1:06:01:: | definition=a glass container used to store and display items in a shop or museum or home | synonyms=display case, showcase, vitrine

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "case" in the given context.

Let me analyze the context:
- The text is about Supreme Court justices Scalia and Thomas attending Federalist Society events.
- It mentions "the sheer proximity of Scalia and Thomas to two of the law firms in the <t>case</t>"
- This is clearly referring to a legal proceeding or lawsuit.
- The context involves law firms, justices, ethics, and legal matters.

Looking at the candidate senses:
1. case%1:11:00:: - an occurrence of something (instance, example)
2. case%1:26:00:: - a special set of circumstances (event)
3. case%1:04:00:: - a comprehensive term for any proceeding in a court of law whereby an individual seeks a legal remedy (lawsuit, suit, cause, causa) - examples: "the family brought suit against the landlord"
4. case%1:09:00:: - the actual state of things
5. case%1:06:00:: - portable container
6. case%1:18:03:: - person requiring professional services
7. case%1:18:02:: - person subjected to experimental procedures
8. case%1:10:02:: - problem requiring investigation (Perry Mason solved the case...)
9. case%1:10:01:: - statement of facts and reasons
10. case%1:23:00:: - quantity contained in a case
11. case%1:10:00:: - grammatical case
12. case%1:26:02:: - specific state of mind
13. case%1:18:04:: - person of specified kind
14. case%1:10:03:: - typeface
15. case%1:08:00:: - enveloping structure
16. case%1:06:06:: - housing/outer covering
17. case%1:06:07:: - frame around door/window
18. case%1:06:03:: - compositor's case
19. case%1:06:02:: - pillowcase
20. case%1:06:01:: - display case

The context mentions "law firms in the case" - this strongly suggests a legal proceeding. The text discusses justices, ethics rules, and law firms involved in litigation.

Sense 3 (case%1:04:00::) is defined as "a comprehensive term for any proceeding in a court of law whereby an individual seeks a legal remedy" with synonyms lawsuit, suit, cause, causa. This fits perfectly with "law firms in the case" - meaning law firms involved in the lawsuit/legal proceeding.

Sense 8 (case%1:10:02::) is "a problem requiring investigation" like Perry Mason solving a case. While this is sometimes used for legal matters, in the context of "law firms in the case" and judicial ethics regarding a legal proceeding before the court, sense 3 is much more appropriate. When we say "law firms in the case," we mean law firms representing parties in a lawsuit or legal action.

Therefore, the best sense is index 3.

Wait, let me double-check the indexing. The user lists them as:
1. sense_key=case%1:11:00::
2. sense_key=case%1:26:00::
3. sense_key=case%1:04:00::
...

So index 3 corresponds to case%1:04:00::.

Yes, the answer should be {"sense_index": 3}.

provider: SiliconFlow


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: company
Target surface form: company
Context:
The featured guests at the dinner? Scalia and Thomas. It's nothing new: The two justices have been attending Federalist Society events for years. And it's nothing that runs afoul of ethics rules. In fact, justices are exempt from the Code of Conduct that governs the actions of lower federal justices. If they were, they arguably fell under code's Canon 4C, which states, "A judge may attend fund-raising events of law-related and other organizations although the judge may not be a speaker, a guest of honor, or featured on the program of such an event." Nevertheless, the sheer proximity of Scalia and Thomas to two of the law firms in the case, as well as to a <t>company</t> with a massive financial interest, was enough to alarm ethics-in-government activists. "This stunning breach of ethics and indifference to the code belies claims by several justices that the court abides by the same rules that apply to all other federal judges," said Bob Edgar, the president of Common Cause.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=company%1:14:01:: | definition=an institution created to conduct business | examples=he only invests in large well-established companies; he started the company in his garage
2. sense_key=company%1:14:03:: | definition=small military unit; usually two or three platoons
3. sense_key=company%1:26:00:: | definition=the state of being with someone | synonyms=companionship, fellowship, society | examples=he missed their company; he enjoyed the society of his friends
4. sense_key=company%1:14:02:: | definition=organization of performers and associated personnel (especially theatrical) | synonyms=troupe | examples=the traveling company all stayed at the same hotel
5. sense_key=company%1:18:00:: | definition=a social or business visitor | synonyms=caller | examples=the room was a mess because he hadn't expected company
6. sense_key=company%1:14:00:: | definition=a social gathering of guests or companions | examples=the house was filled with company when I arrived
7. sense_key=company%1:14:06:: | definition=a band of people associated temporarily in some activity | synonyms=party | examples=they organized a party to search for food; the company of cooks walked into the kitchen
8. sense_key=company%1:14:04:: | definition=crew of a ship including the officers; the whole force or personnel of a ship | synonyms=ship's company
9. sense_key=company%1:14:05:: | definition=a unit of firefighters including their equipment | examples=a hook-and-ladder company

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "company" in the given context.

 Let me analyze the context:
 - The text is about Supreme Court justices Scalia and Thomas attending events
 - It mentions "two of the law firms in the case, as well as to a company with a massive financial interest"
 - This is referring to a business entity that has financial interests in a legal case
 - The context is about ethics, law firms, and business entities with financial stakes

 Now let's look at the candidate senses:

 1. sense_key=company%1:14:01:: | definition=an institution created to conduct business | examples=he only invests in large well-established companies; he started the company in his garage
 - This fits perfectly. It's a business institution/entity. The context mentions "a company with a massive financial interest" which clearly refers to a business corporation.

 2. sense_key=company%1:14:03:: | definition=small military unit; usually two or three platoons
 - Military context, not relevant here.

 3. sense_key=company%1:26:00:: | definition=the state of being with someone | synonyms=companionship, fellowship, society | examples=he missed their company; he enjoyed the society of his friends
 - This is about companionship/being together, not a business entity.

 4. sense_key=company%1:14:02:: | definition=organization of performers and associated personnel (especially theatrical) | synonyms=troupe | examples=the traveling company all stayed at the same hotel
 - Theater group, not relevant.

 5. sense_key=company%1:18:00:: | definition=a social or business visitor | synonyms=caller | examples=the room was a mess because he hadn't expected company
 - Guest/visitor, not relevant.

 6. sense_key=company%1:14:00:: | definition=a social gathering of guests or companions | examples=the house was filled with company when I arrived
 - Social gathering, not relevant.

 7. sense_key=company%1:14:06:: | definition=a band of people associated temporarily in some activity | synonyms=party | examples=they organized a party to search for food; the company of cooks walked into the kitchen
 - Temporary group, not relevant.

 8. sense_key=company%1:14:04:: | definition=crew of a ship including the officers; the whole force or personnel of a ship | synonyms=ship's company
 - Ship crew, not relevant.

 9. sense_key=company%1:14:05:: | definition=a unit of firefighters including their equipment | examples=a hook-and-ladder company
 - Firefighters, not relevant.

 The context clearly refers to a business entity with financial interests in a legal case. This matches sense 1: "an institution created to conduct business".

 The phrase "a company with a massive financial interest" clearly indicates a business corporation/enterprise.

 Therefore, the correct sense index is 1.

 Wait, let me double-check the sense keys and indices. The user lists them as:
 1. sense_key=company%1:14:01::
 2. sense_key=company%1:14:03::
 3. sense_key=company%1:26:00::
 4. sense_key=company%1:14:02::
 5. sense_key=company%1:18:00::
 6. sense_key=company%1:14:00::
 7. sense_key=company%1:14:06::
 8. sense_key=company%1:14:04::
 9. sense_key=company%1:14:05::

 So index 1 corresponds to the business institution sense.

 Actually, looking at WordNet, company%1:14:01:: is indeed the business sense.

 The context: "two of the law firms in the case, as well as to a company with a massive financial interest"
 - Law firms are business entities
 - The company is also a business entity with financial interests
 - This is clearly the commercial business sense

 So the answer should be {"sense_index": 1}


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: interest
Target surface form: interest
Context:
The featured guests at the dinner? Scalia and Thomas. It's nothing new: The two justices have been attending Federalist Society events for years. And it's nothing that runs afoul of ethics rules. In fact, justices are exempt from the Code of Conduct that governs the actions of lower federal justices. If they were, they arguably fell under code's Canon 4C, which states, "A judge may attend fund-raising events of law-related and other organizations although the judge may not be a speaker, a guest of honor, or featured on the program of such an event." Nevertheless, the sheer proximity of Scalia and Thomas to two of the law firms in the case, as well as to a company with a massive financial <t>interest</t>, was enough to alarm ethics-in-government activists. "This stunning breach of ethics and indifference to the code belies claims by several justices that the court abides by the same rules that apply to all other federal judges," said Bob Edgar, the president of Common Cause.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=interest%1:09:00:: | definition=a sense of concern with and curiosity about someone or something | synonyms=involvement | examples=an interest in music
2. sense_key=interest%1:07:01:: | definition=a reason for wanting something done | synonyms=sake | examples=for your sake; died for the sake of his country
3. sense_key=interest%1:07:02:: | definition=the power of attracting or holding one's attention (because it is unusual or exciting etc.) | synonyms=interestingness | examples=they said nothing of great interest; primary colors can add interest to a room
4. sense_key=interest%1:21:00:: | definition=a fixed charge for borrowing money; usually a percentage of the amount borrowed | examples=how much interest do you pay on your mortgage?
5. sense_key=interest%1:21:03:: | definition=(law) a right or legal share of something; a financial involvement with something | synonyms=stake | examples=they have interests all over the world; a stake in the company's future
6. sense_key=interest%1:14:00:: | definition=(usually plural) a social group whose members control some field of activity and who have common aims | synonyms=interest group | examples=the iron interests stepped up production
7. sense_key=interest%1:04:01:: | definition=a diversion that occupies one's time and thoughts (usually pleasantly) | synonyms=pastime, pursuit | examples=sailing is her favorite pastime; his main pastime is gambling

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation on the word "interest" in the given context.

 Let me analyze the context:
 - The text is about Supreme Court justices Scalia and Thomas attending Federalist Society events
 - It mentions their proximity to law firms and "a company with a massive financial <t>interest</t>"
 - The context is about ethics, financial involvement, and legal cases

 Now let me look at the candidate senses:

 1. interest%1:09:00:: - a sense of concern with and curiosity about someone or something (e.g., an interest in music)
    - This is about curiosity/hobby, not financial.

 2. interest%1:07:01:: - a reason for wanting something done (e.g., for your sake)
    - This doesn't fit the financial context.

 3. interest%1:07:02:: - the power of attracting or holding one's attention
    - This is about being interesting, not financial stake.

 4. interest%1:21:00:: - a fixed charge for borrowing money (e.g., mortgage interest)
    - This is about interest rates/loan charges, not ownership stake.

 5. interest%1:21:03:: - (law) a right or legal share of something; a financial involvement with something (synonyms: stake)
    - Examples: "they have interests all over the world; a stake in the company's future"
    - This fits perfectly! The context mentions "a company with a massive financial interest" - meaning a financial stake/ownership share in the company.

 6. interest%1:14:00:: - (usually plural) a social group whose members control some field of activity (interest group)
    - This refers to groups like "the iron interests", not individual financial stakes.

 7. interest%1:04:01:: - a diversion that occupies one's time (pastime)
    - This is about hobbies.

 The context clearly indicates a financial/legal meaning: "a company with a massive financial interest". This refers to having a financial stake or legal share in the company. This matches sense 5: "(law) a right or legal share of something; a financial involvement with something" with synonym "stake".

 The key phrase is "financial interest" which in legal/business contexts means a financial stake or ownership share.

 So the answer should be sense index 5.

provider: AtlasCloud


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: breach
Target surface form: breach
Context:
It's nothing new: The two justices have been attending Federalist Society events for years. And it's nothing that runs afoul of ethics rules. In fact, justices are exempt from the Code of Conduct that governs the actions of lower federal justices. If they were, they arguably fell under code's Canon 4C, which states, "A judge may attend fund-raising events of law-related and other organizations although the judge may not be a speaker, a guest of honor, or featured on the program of such an event." Nevertheless, the sheer proximity of Scalia and Thomas to two of the law firms in the case, as well as to a company with a massive financial interest, was enough to alarm ethics-in-government activists. "This stunning <t>breach</t> of ethics and indifference to the code belies claims by several justices that the court abides by the same rules that apply to all other federal judges," said Bob Edgar, the president of Common Cause. "The justices were wining and dining at a black-tie fundraiser with attorneys who have pending cases before the court."

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=breach%1:04:01:: | definition=a failure to perform some promised act or obligation
2. sense_key=breach%1:17:00:: | definition=an opening (especially a gap in a dike or fortification)
3. sense_key=breach%1:11:00:: | definition=a personal or social separation (as between opposing factions) | synonyms=rupture, break, severance, rift, falling out | examples=they hoped to avoid a break in relations

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation (WSD) on the word "breach" in the given context.

 Context analysis:
 - The text discusses Supreme Court justices attending events with law firms that have pending cases before the court.
 - Bob Edgar (Common Cause president) calls this a "stunning breach of ethics and indifference to the code"
 - The context is about violating ethical standards/rules.
 - The phrase is "breach of ethics" - this is a common collocation meaning a violation or failure to follow ethical standards.

 Candidate sense analysis:

 1. sense_key=breach%1:04:01:: | definition=a failure to perform some promised act or obligation
    - This seems to fit. A "breach of ethics" means failing to follow ethical obligations/rules.
    - WordNet sense 1:04:01 is likely the "breach" as in "breach of contract" - failing to perform an obligation.

 2. sense_key=breach%1:17:00:: | definition=an opening (especially a gap in a dike or fortification)
    - This is the physical meaning - a gap or opening.
    - Doesn't fit the context of ethics violations.

 3. sense_key=breach%1:11:00:: | definition=a personal or social separation (as between opposing factions) | synonyms=rupture, break, severance, rift, falling out | examples=they hoped to avoid a break in relations
    - This is about a rupture in relations between people/groups.
    - While there is tension here, "breach of ethics" specifically refers to violating ethical standards, not a separation between people.
    - The phrase "breach of ethics" is standardly used to mean violation of ethical duties (sense 1), not a social separation.

 Looking at the context: "This stunning breach of ethics and indifference to the code..."
 - This clearly refers to a violation of ethical obligations/rules.
 - Sense 1 (failure to perform some promised act or obligation) fits best because ethics codes impose obligations on judges, and failing to follow them is a breach of that obligation.

 Sense 3 might be tempting if one thinks of "breach" as a break in relations, but "breach of ethics" is an established phrase meaning violation of ethical standards, which aligns with sense 1 (failure to perform an obligation).

 The index requested should be the number from the candidate list (1, 2, or 3).

 Sense 1 is the correct choice.

 Wait, let me double-check the WordNet sense keys to make sure I understand the numbering:
 - The user lists them as 1, 2, 3.
 - I should return {"sense_index": 1}

 Let me verify:
 - Sense 1: breach%1:04:01:: - failure to perform promised act/obligation (this is the "breach of contract" sense)
 - Sense 2: breach%1:17:00:: - opening/gap (physical)
 - Sense 3: breach%1:11:00:: - personal/social separation

 "Breach of ethics" = violation of ethical duty = sense 1.

 Yes, definitely sense 1.

provider: Novita


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: indifference
Target surface form: indifference
Context:
It's nothing new: The two justices have been attending Federalist Society events for years. And it's nothing that runs afoul of ethics rules. In fact, justices are exempt from the Code of Conduct that governs the actions of lower federal justices. If they were, they arguably fell under code's Canon 4C, which states, "A judge may attend fund-raising events of law-related and other organizations although the judge may not be a speaker, a guest of honor, or featured on the program of such an event." Nevertheless, the sheer proximity of Scalia and Thomas to two of the law firms in the case, as well as to a company with a massive financial interest, was enough to alarm ethics-in-government activists. "This stunning breach of ethics and <t>indifference</t> to the code belies claims by several justices that the court abides by the same rules that apply to all other federal judges," said Bob Edgar, the president of Common Cause. "The justices were wining and dining at a black-tie fundraiser with attorneys who have pending cases before the court."

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=indifference%1:12:00:: | definition=unbiased impartial unconcern
2. sense_key=indifference%1:12:01:: | definition=apathy demonstrated by an absence of emotional reactions | synonyms=emotionlessness, impassivity, impassiveness, phlegm, stolidity, unemotionality
3. sense_key=indifference%1:07:00:: | definition=the trait of lacking enthusiasm for or interest in things generally | synonyms=apathy, numbness, spiritlessness
4. sense_key=indifference%1:07:01:: | definition=the trait of remaining calm and seeming not to care; a casual lack of concern | synonyms=nonchalance, unconcern

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "indifference" in the given context.

 Let me analyze the context:
 - The text discusses Supreme Court justices (Scalia and Thomas) attending Federalist Society events
 - There's concern about ethics because they were at a fundraiser with attorneys who have pending cases before the court
 - The quote says: "This stunning breach of ethics and indifference to the code belies claims by several justices that the court abides by the same rules..."

 The key phrase is "indifference to the code" - meaning they don't care about or are unconcerned with the code of conduct/ethics rules.

 Now let's look at the candidate senses:

 1. sense_key=indifference%1:12:00:: | definition=unbiased impartial unconcern
    - This seems to be about impartiality/unbiasedness, like a judge should be indifferent (neutral) between parties. But here the context is about ignoring rules, not being impartial between parties.

 2. sense_key=indifference%1:12:01:: | definition=apathy demonstrated by an absence of emotional reactions | synonyms=emotionlessness, impassivity, impassiveness, phlegm, stolidity, unemotionality
    - This is about lack of emotion, being stoic. The context isn't about emotional reactions but about not caring about rules.

 3. sense_key=indifference%1:07:00:: | definition=the trait of lacking enthusiasm for or interest in things generally | synonyms=apathy, numbness, spiritlessness
    - This is a general apathy or lack of interest in things generally. While close, the context is more specific - it's about a specific lack of concern regarding the code of conduct.

 4. sense_key=indifference%1:07:01:: | definition=the trait of remaining calm and seeming not to care; a casual lack of concern | synonyms=nonchalance, unconcern
    - This fits best. "Indifference to the code" means a lack of concern about the code, unconcern about following the rules. The synonyms "nonchalance" and "unconcern" fit perfectly with the idea of justices not caring about ethical guidelines.

 Wait, let me reconsider sense 1. "Unbiased impartial unconcern" - could this mean unconcern in the sense of not being biased? But the phrase is "indifference to the code" - they're not being indifferent (impartial) between parties; they're showing disregard for the rules.

 Actually, looking at WordNet structure:
 - sense 1 (indifference%1:12:00::) is likely the "impartiality" sense - like "indifference to the outcome"
 - sense 4 (indifference%1:07:01::) is about "nonchalance, unconcern" - like "indifference to danger" or "indifference to the rules"

 The context is clearly about not caring about the code of conduct/ethics rules. This is a "lack of concern" rather than "impartiality" or "lack of emotion."

 So sense 4 seems best: "the trait of remaining calm and seeming not to care; a casual lack of concern" with synonyms nonchalance, unconcern.

 But let me double-check the sense indices. The user lists them as:
 1. sense_key=indifference%1:12:00::
 2. sense_key=indifference%1:12:01::
 3. sense_key=indifference%1:07:00::
 4. sense_key=indifference%1:07:01::

 So I need to return the index number (1, 2, 3, or 4).

 The context: "indifference to the code" - this means disregard for, lack of concern for the code.

 Sense 4: "the trait of remaining calm and seeming not to care; a casual lack of concern" - this matches "indifference to the code" perfectly.

 Sense 3 is "lacking enthusiasm for or interest in things generally" - this is more general apathy.

 Sense 4 is specifically about "seeming not to care; a casual lack of concern" which fits the criticism that the justices don't care about ethical rules.

 Therefore, the answer should be sense_index: 4.

 Wait, I should verify the WordNet senses to make sure I'm interpreting correctly.

 In WordNet 3.0/3.1:
 - indifference.n.01: unbiased impartial unconcern (the state of being indifferent)
 - indifference.n.02: emotionlessness, impassivity, impassiveness, phlegm, stolidity, unemotionality (apathy demonstrated by an absence of emotional reactions)
 - indifference.n.03: apathy, numbness, spiritlessness (the trait of lacking enthusiasm for or interest in things generally)
 - indifference.n.04: nonchalance, unconcern (the trait of remaining calm and seeming not to care; a casual lack of concern)

 Yes, so:
 - 1 is impartiality/neutrality
 - 2 is lack of emotion
 - 3 is general apathy/numbness
 - 4 is casual lack of concern/nonchalance

 The context "indifference to the code" clearly means lack of concern for the code, disregard for the rules. This is sense 4 (nonchalance, unconcern).

 The quote criticizes the justices for not caring about the code of conduct. This is a "casual lack of concern" or "unconcern."

 So the answer is 4.

provider: Phala


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: code
Target surface form: code
Context:
It's nothing new: The two justices have been attending Federalist Society events for years. And it's nothing that runs afoul of ethics rules. In fact, justices are exempt from the Code of Conduct that governs the actions of lower federal justices. If they were, they arguably fell under code's Canon 4C, which states, "A judge may attend fund-raising events of law-related and other organizations although the judge may not be a speaker, a guest of honor, or featured on the program of such an event." Nevertheless, the sheer proximity of Scalia and Thomas to two of the law firms in the case, as well as to a company with a massive financial interest, was enough to alarm ethics-in-government activists. "This stunning breach of ethics and indifference to the <t>code</t> belies claims by several justices that the court abides by the same rules that apply to all other federal judges," said Bob Edgar, the president of Common Cause. "The justices were wining and dining at a black-tie fundraiser with attorneys who have pending cases before the court."

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=code%1:10:01:: | definition=a set of rules or principles or laws (especially written ones) | synonyms=codification
2. sense_key=code%1:10:00:: | definition=a coding system used for transmitting messages requiring brevity or secrecy
3. sense_key=code%1:10:02:: | definition=(computer science) the symbolic arrangement of data or instructions in a computer program or the set of such instructions | synonyms=computer code

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "code" in the given context.

 Let me analyze the context:
 - The text discusses Supreme Court justices and ethics rules
 - It mentions "Code of Conduct" (capitalized)
 - It mentions "code's Canon 4C"
 - The target word "code" appears in: "This stunning breach of ethics and indifference to the <t>code</t> belies claims..."
 - The context is clearly about a set of rules or principles governing judicial conduct

 Now let's look at the candidate senses:
 1. sense_key=code%1:10:01:: | definition=a set of rules or principles or laws (especially written ones) | synonyms=codification
 2. sense_key=code%1:10:00:: | definition=a coding system used for transmitting messages requiring brevity or secrecy
 3. sense_key=code%1:10:02:: | definition=(computer science) the symbolic arrangement of data or instructions in a computer program or the set of such instructions | synonyms=computer code

 Analysis:
 - Sense 1 refers to a set of rules, principles, or laws - this fits perfectly with "Code of Conduct" and "Canon 4C" (which is a specific rule within a code)
 - Sense 2 refers to coding systems for messages (like Morse code, secret codes) - this doesn't fit the context of judicial ethics
 - Sense 3 refers to computer code - clearly not relevant to this legal/judicial context

 The context is about judicial ethics, rules of conduct for judges, and specifically mentions "Code of Conduct" and "Canon 4C". This is clearly referring to a formal set of written rules or laws governing behavior.

 Therefore, sense 1 is the correct choice.

 The user wants the output as: {"sense_index": 1}


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: claim
Target surface form: claims
Context:
It's nothing new: The two justices have been attending Federalist Society events for years. And it's nothing that runs afoul of ethics rules. In fact, justices are exempt from the Code of Conduct that governs the actions of lower federal justices. If they were, they arguably fell under code's Canon 4C, which states, "A judge may attend fund-raising events of law-related and other organizations although the judge may not be a speaker, a guest of honor, or featured on the program of such an event." Nevertheless, the sheer proximity of Scalia and Thomas to two of the law firms in the case, as well as to a company with a massive financial interest, was enough to alarm ethics-in-government activists. "This stunning breach of ethics and indifference to the code belies <t>claims</t> by several justices that the court abides by the same rules that apply to all other federal judges," said Bob Edgar, the president of Common Cause. "The justices were wining and dining at a black-tie fundraiser with attorneys who have pending cases before the court."

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=claim%1:10:00:: | definition=an assertion of a right (as to money or property) | examples=his claim asked for damages
2. sense_key=claim%1:10:02:: | definition=an assertion that something is true or factual | examples=his claim that he was innocent; evidence contradicted the government's claims
3. sense_key=claim%1:04:00:: | definition=demand for something as rightful or due | examples=they struck in support of their claim for a shorter work day
4. sense_key=claim%1:07:02:: | definition=an informal right to something | synonyms=title | examples=his claim on her attentions; his title to fame
5. sense_key=claim%1:07:01:: | definition=an established or recognized right | synonyms=title | examples=a strong legal claim to the property; he had no documents confirming his title to his father's estate
6. sense_key=claim%1:10:01:: | definition=a demand especially in the phrase | synonyms=call | examples=the call of duty

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "claims" in the given context.

 First, let me analyze the context:
 - The sentence is: "This stunning breach of ethics and indifference to the code belies <t>claims</t> by several justices that the court abides by the same rules that apply to all other federal judges"
 - Bob Edgar is criticizing justices Scalia and Thomas for attending a fundraiser with attorneys who have pending cases
 - He says this "belies claims by several justices" - meaning it contradicts or shows to be false the statements/declarations made by the justices
 - The claims are that "the court abides by the same rules that apply to all other federal judges"
 - So the "claims" here are assertions that something is true (that the court follows the same rules)

 Now let's look at the candidate senses:

 1. claim%1:10:00:: - "an assertion of a right (as to money or property)" - examples: "his claim asked for damages"
    - This is about asserting a right to money/property. Not applicable here.

 2. claim%1:10:02:: - "an assertion that something is true or factual" - examples: "his claim that he was innocent; evidence contradicted the government's claims"
    - This fits perfectly. The justices are asserting that something is true (that they abide by the same rules). The context is about assertions of fact/truth.

 3. claim%1:04:00:: - "demand for something as rightful or due" - examples: "they struck in support of their claim for a shorter work day"
    - This is about demanding something, like workers demanding rights. Not applicable.

 4. claim%1:07:02:: - "an informal right to something" - synonyms=title - examples: "his claim on her attentions; his title to fame"
    - This is about having a right to something, not applicable.

 5. claim%1:07:01:: - "an established or recognized right" - synonyms=title - examples: "a strong legal claim to the property"
    - Again about legal rights to property, not applicable.

 6. claim%1:10:01:: - "a demand especially in the phrase" - synonyms=call - examples: "the call of duty"
    - This seems to be about "the call of duty" type usage, not applicable.

 So sense 2 (claim%1:10:02::) is the best fit: "an assertion that something is true or factual"

 The context shows that the justices made assertions (claims) that the court abides by the same rules, and this behavior contradicts those assertions.

 The index for this sense in the candidate list is 2 (second item in the list).

 Wait, let me double-check the indexing. The user lists:
 1. sense_key=claim%1:10:00::
 2. sense_key=claim%1:10:02::
 3. sense_key=claim%1:04:00::
 4. sense_key=claim%1:07:02::
 5. sense_key=claim%1:07:01::
 6. sense_key=claim%1:10:01::

 So sense 2 is claim%1:10:02:: which is "an assertion that something is true or factual".

 Yes, that's correct. The context is about assertions/statements that something is true (that the court follows ethics rules), which are belied (contradicted) by their actions.

 The answer should be {"sense_index": 2}