[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: times
Target surface form: times()
Context:
It can be used to define a container. Mainly useful for working with piecewise. Now you could ask me, why should the user mind about MathML? That s easy. With this, we can operate with functions like cos(), sin(), any other trigonometric functions, sum () or product (). It does not matter what kind it is. We can use plus(), <t>times()</t> and everything which has its operator. kalgebra's console is useful as a calculator.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=times%1:28:01:: | definition=a more or less definite period of time now or previously present | examples=it was a sign of the times
2. sense_key=times%1:04:00:: | definition=an arithmetic operation that is the inverse of division; the product of two numbers is computed | synonyms=multiplication | examples=the multiplication of four by three gives twelve; four times three equals twelve
3. sense_key=time%1:11:00:: | definition=an instance or single occasion for some event | synonyms=time, clip | examples=this time he succeeded; he called four times
4. sense_key=time%1:28:05:: | definition=a period of time considered as a resource under your control and sufficient to accomplish something | synonyms=time | examples=take time to smell the roses; I didn't have time to finish
5. sense_key=time%1:28:00:: | definition=an indefinite period (usually marked by specific attributes or activities) | synonyms=time | examples=he waited a long time; the time of year for planting
6. sense_key=time%1:28:06:: | definition=a suitable moment | synonyms=time | examples=it is time to go
7. sense_key=time%1:03:00:: | definition=the continuum of experience in which events pass from the future through the present to the past | synonyms=time
8. sense_key=time%1:11:01:: | definition=a person's experience on a particular occasion | synonyms=time | examples=he had a time holding back the tears; they had a good time together
9. sense_key=clock_time%1:28:00:: | definition=a reading of a point in time as given by a clock | synonyms=clock time, time | examples=do you know what time it is?; the time is 10 o'clock
10. sense_key=fourth_dimension%1:28:00:: | definition=the fourth coordinate that is required (along with three spatial dimensions) to specify a physical event | synonyms=fourth dimension, time
11. sense_key=meter%1:07:00:: | definition=rhythm as given by division into parts of equal duration | synonyms=meter, metre, time
12. sense_key=prison_term%1:28:00:: | definition=the period of time a prisoner is imprisoned | synonyms=prison term, sentence, time | examples=he served a prison term of 15 months; his sentence was 5 to 10 years

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the target word "times" in the given context.

 Context analysis:
 - The text is about MathML, mathematical functions, and operations
 - It mentions: "We can use plus(), times() and everything which has its operator"
 - It mentions arithmetic operations: "sum() or product()"
 - It mentions trigonometric functions: "cos(), sin()"
 - It mentions "kalgebra's console is useful as a calculator"
 - The target form is "times()" which suggests a function call

 Looking at the candidate senses:

 1. sense_key=times%1:28:01:: - "a more or less definite period of time" - This is about temporal periods, not mathematical operations.

 2. sense_key=times%1:04:00:: - "an arithmetic operation that is the inverse of division; the product of two numbers is computed" - Synonyms: multiplication. Examples: "the multiplication of four by three gives twelve; four times three equals twelve". This matches perfectly with the context of mathematical operations, calculator functions, and being paired with "plus()" (addition).

 3. sense_key=time%1:11:00:: - "an instance or single occasion for some event" - This is about occurrences/occasions, not math.

 4. sense_key=time%1:28:05:: - "a period of time considered as a resource" - Temporal meaning.

 5. sense_key=time%1:28:00:: - "an indefinite period" - Temporal meaning.

 6. sense_key=time%1:28:06:: - "a suitable moment" - Temporal meaning.

 7. sense_key=time%1:03:00:: - "the continuum of experience" - Temporal/philosophical meaning.

 8. sense_key=time%1:11:01:: - "a person's experience on a particular occasion" - Temporal/experiential.

 9. sense_key=clock_time%1:28:00:: - "a reading of a point in time as given by a clock" - Temporal.

 10. sense_key=fourth_dimension%1:28:00:: - Physics concept of time as fourth dimension.

 11. sense_key=meter%1:07:00:: - Rhythm/meter in music/poetry.

 12. sense_key=prison_term%1:28:00:: - Prison sentence duration.

 The context clearly indicates a mathematical operation. The word "times" is used alongside "plus()" and other mathematical functions like "cos()", "sin()", "sum()", "product()". The text mentions "kalgebra's console is useful as a calculator."

 Sense 2 is the only one that refers to the arithmetic operation of multiplication. The example given for sense 2 even uses "four times three equals twelve" which shows "times" being used as a multiplication operator.

 Therefore, the correct sense is index 2.

 Wait, I need to check the indexing. The user lists them as:
 1. sense_key=times%1:28:01::
 2. sense_key=times%1:04:00::
 3. sense_key=time%1:11:00::
 ...

 So index 2 corresponds to sense_key=times%1:04:00::.

 The user asks for a JSON object like {"sense_index": 3}. So I should return {"sense_index": 2}.

 Let me double-check:
 - The target is "times()" - clearly a function representing multiplication
 - Context: "We can use plus(), times() and everything which has its operator"
 - This is clearly the arithmetic operation sense
 - Sense 2 definition: "an arithmetic operation that is the inverse of division; the product of two numbers is computed"
 - Synonyms: multiplication
 - Examples: "four times three equals twelve"

 Yes, sense 2 is correct.


attempt_kind: initial

status: success

[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: have
Target surface form: has
Context:
It can be used to define a container. Mainly useful for working with piecewise. Now you could ask me, why should the user mind about MathML? That s easy. With this, we can operate with functions like cos(), sin(), any other trigonometric functions, sum () or product (). It does not matter what kind it is. We can use plus(), times() and everything which <t>has</t> its operator. kalgebra's console is useful as a calculator.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=have%2:40:00:: | definition=have or possess, either in a concrete or an abstract sense | synonyms=have got, hold | examples=She has $1,000 in the bank; He has got two beautiful daughters
2. sense_key=have%2:42:00:: | definition=have as a feature | synonyms=feature | examples=This restaurant features the most famous chefs in France
3. sense_key=have%2:39:06:: | definition=go through (mental or physical states or experiences) | synonyms=experience, receive, get | examples=get an idea; experience vertigo
4. sense_key=have%2:40:04:: | definition=have ownership or possession of | synonyms=own, possess | examples=He owns three houses in Florida; How many cars does she have?
5. sense_key=have%2:30:00:: | definition=cause to move; cause to be in a certain position or condition | synonyms=get, let | examples=He got his squad on the ball; This let me in for a big surprise
6. sense_key=have%2:34:00:: | definition=serve oneself to, or consume regularly | synonyms=consume, ingest, take in, take | examples=Have another bowl of chicken soup!; I don't take sugar in my coffee
7. sense_key=have%2:41:00:: | definition=have a personal or business relationship with someone | examples=have a postdoc; have an assistant
8. sense_key=have%2:36:00:: | definition=organize or be responsible for | synonyms=hold, throw, make, give | examples=hold a reception; have, throw, or make a party
9. sense_key=have%2:40:01:: | definition=have left | examples=I have two years left; I don't have any money left
10. sense_key=have%2:42:12:: | definition=be confronted with | examples=What do we have here?; Now we have a fine mess
11. sense_key=have%2:30:01:: | definition=undergo | synonyms=experience | examples=The stocks had a fast run-up
12. sense_key=have%2:29:02:: | definition=suffer from; be ill with | examples=She has arthritis
13. sense_key=have%2:32:00:: | definition=cause to do; cause to act in a specified manner | synonyms=induce, stimulate, cause, get, make | examples=The ads induced me to buy a VCR; My children finally got me to buy a computer
14. sense_key=have%2:40:05:: | definition=receive willingly something given or offered | synonyms=accept, take | examples=The only girl who would have him was the miller's daughter; I won't have this dog in my house!
15. sense_key=have%2:40:03:: | definition=get something; come into possession of | synonyms=receive | examples=receive payment; receive a gift
16. sense_key=have%2:29:05:: | definition=undergo (as of injuries and illnesses) | synonyms=suffer, sustain, get | examples=She suffered a fracture in the accident; He had an insulin shock after eating three candy bars
17. sense_key=have%2:40:02:: | definition=achieve a point or goal | synonyms=get, make | examples=Nicklaus had a 70; The Brazilian team got 4 goals
18. sense_key=have%2:29:00:: | definition=cause to be born | synonyms=give birth, deliver, bear, birth | examples=My wife had twins yesterday!
19. sense_key=have%2:35:00:: | definition=have sex with; archaic use | synonyms=take | examples=He had taken this woman when she was most vulnerable

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

finish_reason: stop

role: assistant

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation (WSD) on the word "has" in the given context. The target lemma is "have" and the surface form is "has".

 Context analysis:
 The sentence is: "We can use plus(), times() and everything which <t>has</t> its operator."

 The context is about programming/mathematical software (kalgebra, MathML, functions like cos(), sin(), sum(), product(), plus(), times()). The sentence is saying that we can use various functions and operations, and everything that "has" its operator.

 The meaning here is about possession or possession of a feature/attribute. The subject is "everything" (referring to functions/operations), and the object is "its operator". So functions/operators that possess or have an associated operator.

 Looking at the candidate senses:

 1. sense_key=have%2:40:00:: | definition=have or possess, either in a concrete or an abstract sense | synonyms=have got, hold | examples=She has $1,000 in the bank; He has got two beautiful daughters
 - This is a general sense of possession, both concrete and abstract.

 2. sense_key=have%2:42:00:: | definition=have as a feature | synonyms=feature | examples=This restaurant features the most famous chefs in France
 - This is about having as a feature or characteristic.

 4. sense_key=have%2:40:04:: | definition=have ownership or possession of | synonyms=own, possess | examples=He owns three houses in Florida; How many cars does she have?
 - This is about ownership.

 The context is about mathematical functions or operations having operators. This is not about ownership in the legal sense, but about possessing a feature or attribute (the operator).

 However, sense 1 (have%2:40:00::) is the general "have or possess" sense which covers both concrete and abstract possession. Sense 2 is specifically about having as a feature.

 Let me look more carefully at the distinction between sense 1 and sense 2.

 Sense 1: "have or possess, either in a concrete or an abstract sense" - examples: "She has $1,000 in the bank", "He has got two beautiful daughters"
 Sense 2: "have as a feature" - examples: "This restaurant features the most famous chefs in France", "The house has a long porch"

 Actually, looking at the examples for sense 2, it seems to be about characteristics or features of things.

 In the context "everything which has its operator", we're talking about functions/operations that possess an operator. This could be seen as:
 - Having as a feature (sense 2)
 - Having/possessing in an abstract sense (sense 1)

 But sense 2 (have%2:42:00::) is specifically glossed as "have as a feature" with synonym "feature". The example "This restaurant features..." suggests it's about characteristics.

 However, in the programming context, saying a function "has" an operator might mean it is associated with or possesses that operator.

 Let me check if there's a better fit. Sense 4 is about ownership (own, possess), which is too strong for functions having operators.

 Sense 1 is the general possession sense. Sense 2 is specifically about features.

 In WordNet, sense 2 (have%2:42:00::) is typically used for "have" meaning "have as a feature, show" - like "The house has five bedrooms" or "This sweater has a hole in it".

 In the sentence "everything which has its operator", it's saying that these functions possess their own operators. This is abstract possession.

 But wait, looking at the examples for sense 1: "She has $1,000", "He has got two daughters" - these are about possession/ownership in a broad sense.

 For sense 2: "This restaurant features..." - this is about characteristics.

 The relationship between a function and its operator is not exactly ownership, nor is it exactly a feature in the sense of a characteristic. It's more like "possess" or "be equipped with".

 Actually, looking at WordNet structure:
 - have%2:40:00:: is the first sense, usually the most general possession sense.
 - have%2:42:00:: is the "have as a feature" sense.

 In many WSD tasks, "have" when talking about objects having attributes or parts often maps to sense 2 (have as a feature). But "have" when talking about possession of items maps to sense 1 or 4.

 However, "operator" here is not exactly a feature like "color" or "size", but something the function possesses or is associated with.

 Let me reconsider the context. The text is about MathML and mathematical functions. It mentions "plus()", "times()" and everything which "has" its operator. This likely means functions that have corresponding operators (like +, *, etc.).

 This is similar to saying "The phone has a camera" - which would be sense 2 (have as a feature).

 But it could also be sense 1 (general possession).

 Let me look at the distinction between sense 1 and sense 4:
 - Sense 1: have or possess (concrete or abstract) - synonyms: have got, hold
 - Sense 4: have ownership or possession of - synonyms: own, possess

 Sense 4 is more specific to ownership, while sense 1 is broader possession.

 Between sense 1 and sense 2:
 - Sense 2 is specifically about features/characteristics.

 In the sentence "everything which has its operator", the word "its" suggests that the operator belongs to the function. This is possessive.

 However, looking at the examples:
 - Sense 1 examples: "She has $1,000", "He has got two daughters"
 - Sense 2 examples: "This restaurant features the most famous chefs"

 The structure "everything which has its operator" is relative clause. The antecedent is "everything" referring to functions like plus(), times(), etc.

 Actually, looking at the broader context: "We can use plus(), times() and everything which has its operator."

 This suggests that plus(), times() are examples of things that have operators. In programming/mathematical notation, plus() is a function that has the operator +, times() has the operator *, etc.

 So "have" here means "be associated with" or "possess".

 I think sense 2 (have as a feature) or sense 1 (have/possess) could work, but sense 2 seems more appropriate for inanimate objects having features/attributes.

 But wait, looking at the WordNet entry for have%2:42:00::, it's defined as "have as a feature" and the synonym is "feature". This is used when something is characterized by something.

 However, sense 1 is the most general sense.

 Let me check if there's any other sense that might fit better.

 Sense 7: have a personal or business relationship - no.
 Sense 8: organize or be responsible for - no.
 Sense 14: receive willingly - no.
 Sense 15: get something; come into possession - no.

 So it's between 1, 2, and 4.

 Sense 4 (ownership) is too strong.
 Sense 2 (feature) is possible but might be too specific for "having an operator".
 Sense 1 (general possession) seems the safest bet.

 But let me think about the specific WordNet sense distinctions. In WordNet 3.0 or similar:
 - Sense 1 (have%2:40:00::): have, have got, hold - "have or possess, either in a concrete or an abstract sense"
 - Sense 2 (have%2:42:00::): have, feature - "have as a feature"

 The example for sense 2 in WordNet is often something like "This dress has a long train" or "The car has four wheels" - parts or characteristics.

 An operator is not exactly a part of the function, nor is it exactly a characteristic like color. It's more like an associated entity.

 However, in many lexical resources, "have" when used with inanimate subjects and objects often falls under sense 2 if it's about characteristics, or sense 1 if it's about possession.

 But looking at the provided examples for sense 1: "She has $1,000", "He has got two daughters" - these are about human possession.
 For sense 2: "This restaurant features..." - this is about inanimate subjects.

 The subject here is "everything" (referring to functions), which is inanimate/abstract.

 However, the key distinction is that sense 2 is specifically glossed with "feature" as a synonym, suggesting it's about characteristics or attributes.

 Is an operator a feature of a function? In a mathematical sense, yes. Functions have associated operators.

 But I think sense 1 is broader and covers abstract possession, which would include "having an operator".

 Actually, looking carefully at the candidate list:
 1. have%2:40:00:: - have or possess, either in a concrete or an abstract sense
 2. have%2:42:00:: - have as a feature

 In standard WordNet, "have" for "possess" (abstract or concrete) is sense 1. "Have" for "feature" is sense 2.

 The sentence "everything which has its operator" - the operator is possessed by the function.

 I think sense 1 is the correct choice because:
 1. It's the most general sense of possession
 2. While sense 2 is about features, an operator is more like a possessed item than a feature (though it's arguable)
 3. The examples for sense 1 include abstract possession ("He has got two beautiful daughters" - abstract in the sense of relationships, though daughters are concrete)

 Wait, daughters are concrete. $1,000 is concrete.

 But sense 1 explicitly says "either in a concrete or an abstract sense".

 Sense 4 is specifically about ownership (own, possess).

 So for "functions having operators", sense 1 seems best.

 But let me reconsider sense 2. If I say "The function has an operator", is that like "The house has a porch" (feature) or like "She has a car" (possession)?

 In programming contexts, when we say a function "has" an operator, we usually mean it is associated with or uses that operator. This is closer to possession than to being a characteristic/feature.

 Actually, looking at the WordNet examples provided in the prompt:
 Sense 2 example: "This restaurant features the most famous chefs in France"
 This is clearly about characteristics/features.

 Sense 1 examples: "She has $1,000 in the bank", "He has got two beautiful daughters"
 These are about possession.

 "Everything which has its operator" - the operator belongs to the thing, so it's possession.

 Therefore, sense 1 (have%2:40:00::) is the best choice.

 Wait, I should double-check if there's any other sense that could be better.

 Sense 5: cause to move - no.
 Sense 6: consume - no.
 Sense 7: relationship - no.
 Sense 8: organize - no.
 Sense 9: have left - no.
 Sense 10: be confronted with - no.
 Sense 11: undergo - no.
 Sense 12: suffer from - no.
 Sense 13: cause to do - no.
 Sense 14: receive willingly - no.
 Sense 15: get something - no.
 Sense 16: undergo (injuries) - no.
 Sense 17: achieve a point - no.
 Sense 18: give birth - no.
 Sense 19: have sex with - no.

 So it's definitely between 1, 2, and 4.

 Between 1 and 4: 4 is specifically about ownership (synonyms: own, possess). The example "He owns three houses" suggests legal ownership. Functions don't "own" operators in that sense. They just "have" them.

 Between 1 and 2: 1 is general possession, 2 is having as a feature.

 I think the answer is sense 1.

 But I want to make sure about the indexing. The user asks for the "single best indexed sense" and to return {"sense_index": 3} format.

 The senses are numbered 1-19 in the list. So I should return the number from that list.

 Sense 1 is index 1.
 Sense 2 is index 2.
 etc.

 So if I choose sense 1, I return {"sense_index": 1}.

 Let me reconsider if sense 2 could be better. In some WSD datasets, "have" when used with inanimate subjects taking objects that are components/parts might be sense 2.

 But "operator" is not exactly a part of the function in the physical sense. It's an associated symbol or operation.

 Actually, looking at the context again: "We can use plus(), times() and everything which has its operator."

 This is saying we can use these functions, and everything that possesses its operator. This implies that some things might not have operators, but these functions do.

 This is clearly possession.

 I'll go with sense 1.

 Wait, I should check if sense 2 might be intended for this kind of usage. The gloss "have as a feature" and synonym "feature" suggests that if something "has" something as one of its characteristics, it's sense 2.

 For example: "The word 'run' has many meanings" - would this be sense 1 or 2? Probably sense 1 (abstract possession).

 "The house has three bedrooms" - this is often sense 2 in WordNet (part/whole or characteristic).

 But "The function has an operator" - is the operator a feature/characteristic? Or is it a possessed item?

 I think it's safer to go with sense 1 as it's the broader, more general sense that covers abstract possession.

 Final decision: sense_index 1.

format: unknown

native_finish_reason: stop

provider: DeepInfra

currency: USD


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: operator
Target surface form: operator
Context:
It can be used to define a container. Mainly useful for working with piecewise. Now you could ask me, why should the user mind about MathML? That s easy. With this, we can operate with functions like cos(), sin(), any other trigonometric functions, sum () or product (). It does not matter what kind it is. We can use plus(), times() and everything which has its <t>operator</t>. kalgebra's console is useful as a calculator.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=operator%1:24:00:: | definition=(mathematics) a symbol or function representing a mathematical operation
2. sense_key=operator%1:18:00:: | definition=an agent that operates some apparatus or machine | synonyms=manipulator | examples=the operator of the switchboard
3. sense_key=operator%1:18:01:: | definition=someone who owns or operates a business | examples=who is the operator of this franchise?
4. sense_key=operator%1:18:02:: | definition=a shrewd or unscrupulous person who knows how to circumvent difficulties | synonyms=hustler, wheeler dealer
5. sense_key=operator%1:18:03:: | definition=a speculator who trades aggressively on stock or commodity markets

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "operator" in the given context.

 Let me analyze the context:
 - The text is talking about MathML, mathematical functions (cos(), sin(), trigonometric functions), sum(), product(), plus(), times()
 - It mentions "everything which has its <operator>"
 - This is clearly in a mathematical/computational context
 - The word is used in the context of mathematical operations and symbols

 Now let's look at the candidate senses:

 1. sense_key=operator%1:24:00:: | definition=(mathematics) a symbol or function representing a mathematical operation
    - This fits perfectly with the context about MathML, mathematical functions, plus(), times(), etc.
    - The context mentions "operate with functions" and "everything which has its <operator>"
    - This is clearly about mathematical operators

 2. sense_key=operator%1:18:00:: | definition=an agent that operates some apparatus or machine | synonyms=manipulator | examples=the operator of the switchboard
    - This is about a person operating equipment
    - Not relevant to the mathematical context

 3. sense_key=operator%1:18:01:: | definition=someone who owns or operates a business | examples=who is the operator of this franchise?
    - Business context
    - Not relevant

 4. sense_key=operator%1:18:02:: | definition=a shrewd or unscrupulous person who knows how to circumvent difficulties | synonyms=hustler, wheeler dealer
    - Slang meaning about a person
    - Not relevant

 5. sense_key=operator%1:18:03:: | definition=a speculator who trades aggressively on stock or commodity markets
    - Financial trading context
    - Not relevant

 The context is clearly mathematical, discussing MathML, trigonometric functions, and mathematical operations like plus() and times(). The word "operator" here refers to mathematical symbols or functions representing operations.

 Therefore, sense 1 is the correct choice.

 The user wants the output as: {"sense_index": 1}

provider: Phala


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: useful
Target surface form: useful
Context:
Mainly useful for working with piecewise. Now you could ask me, why should the user mind about MathML? That s easy. With this, we can operate with functions like cos(), sin(), any other trigonometric functions, sum () or product (). It does not matter what kind it is. We can use plus(), times() and everything which has its operator. kalgebra's console is <t>useful</t> as a calculator. There you have a list of the declared variables.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=useful%3:00:00:: | definition=being of use or service | synonyms=utile | examples=the girl felt motherly and useful; a useful job
2. sense_key=useful%5:00:00:functional:00 | definition=having a useful function | synonyms=utilitarian | examples=utilitarian steel tables

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "useful" in the given context.

 Context analysis:
 - The text is about a software (kalgebra's console) being useful as a calculator
 - It mentions working with piecewise functions, MathML, trigonometric functions, etc.
 - The specific sentence is: "kalgebra's console is <t>useful</t> as a calculator."

 Candidate senses:
 1. sense_key=useful%3:00:00:: | definition=being of use or service | synonyms=utile | examples=the girl felt motherly and useful; a useful job
 2. sense_key=useful%5:00:00:functional:00 | definition=having a useful function | synonyms=utilitarian | examples=utilitarian steel tables

 Let me analyze the differences:
 - Sense 1 (useful%3:00:00::): This is the general sense of "being of use or service" - the most common usage. Synonyms: utile.
 - Sense 2 (useful%5:00:00:functional:00): This seems to be a satellite adjective sense related to "functional" - "having a useful function". Synonyms: utilitarian.

 Looking at the context: "kalgebra's console is useful as a calculator."
 - This means the console is of use/service as a calculator
 - It's not specifically about having a "useful function" in the sense of being utilitarian/designed for utility
 - It's the general sense of being helpful, beneficial, serving a purpose

 The examples for sense 1 include "a useful job" which is similar to "useful as a calculator" - both describe something being of service/help in a particular capacity.

 Sense 2 seems more about the design/functional nature (utilitarian), like "utilitarian steel tables" - focused on practicality and function rather than aesthetics, or designed to be useful.

 In this context, "useful as a calculator" means it serves the purpose of a calculator well, it is of service as a calculator. This aligns with sense 1.

 Also, looking at WordNet structure:
 - useful%3:00:00:: is the main adjective sense (adj.all)
 - useful%5:00:00:functional:00 is a satellite of functional (adj.pert or similar?)

 Actually, looking at the sense keys:
 - 3:00:00 indicates it's in the adjective.all file (3), first section (00), first sense (00)
 - 5:00:00:functional:00 indicates it's a satellite adjective (5), and it's related to functional

 The context "useful as a calculator" fits better with the general "being of use or service" (sense 1) rather than the specific "having a useful function" which implies a design characteristic (utilitarian).

 Therefore, the best sense is sense 1.

 Wait, I need to check the indexing. The user lists:
 1. sense_key=useful%3:00:00:: ...
 2. sense_key=useful%5:00:00:functional:00 ...

 So sense_index should be 1.

 Let me double-check:
 - "kalgebra's console is useful as a calculator" - this is saying the console is helpful/serviceable as a calculator.
 - Sense 1: "being of use or service" - matches perfectly.
 - Sense 2: "having a useful function" / utilitarian - this would imply the console is designed purely for utility, which isn't exactly what the sentence conveys. The sentence is saying it serves well as a calculator, not that it has a utilitarian design.

 Also, looking at the examples:
 - Sense 1: "the girl felt motherly and useful; a useful job"
 - Sense 2: "utilitarian steel tables"

 "Useful as a calculator" is more like "a useful job" than "utilitarian steel tables".

 So the answer is sense 1.

provider: Chutes


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: there
Target surface form: There
Context:
Now you could ask me, why should the user mind about MathML? That s easy. With this, we can operate with functions like cos(), sin(), any other trigonometric functions, sum () or product (). It does not matter what kind it is. We can use plus(), times() and everything which has its operator. kalgebra's console is useful as a calculator. <t>There</t> you have a list of the declared variables. By double clicking on them you will see a dialog that lets you change their values (just a way to trick the log).

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=there%4:02:00:: | definition=in or at that place | synonyms=at that place, in that location | examples=they have lived there for years; it's not there
2. sense_key=there%4:02:02:: | definition=in that matter | synonyms=in that respect, on that point | examples=I agree with you there
3. sense_key=there%4:02:01:: | definition=to or toward that place; away from the speaker | synonyms=thither | examples=go there around noon!

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "there" in the given context.

Context analysis:
The sentence is: "There you have a list of the declared variables."

Looking at the context:
- The text is discussing kalgebra's console
- The previous sentence mentions: "kalgebra's console is useful as a calculator."
- The current sentence: "There you have a list of the declared variables."
- The following sentence: "By double clicking on them you will see a dialog that lets you change their values..."

The word "There" is being used to point to a specific location (kalgebra's console) where something exists (a list of declared variables). It's indicating existence or presence in that place/location.

Now let's look at the candidate senses:

1. sense_key=there%4:02:00:: | definition=in or at that place | synonyms=at that place, in that location | examples=they have lived there for years; it's not there
   - This refers to physical or logical location. "in or at that place"
   - Example: "they have lived there for years" - refers to a place
   - In our context: "There you have a list..." - pointing to the console as a place where the list exists.

2. sense_key=there%4:02:02:: | definition=in that matter | synonyms=in that respect, on that point | examples=I agree with you there
   - This is abstract, referring to a matter or point being discussed.
   - Example: "I agree with you there" - means "on that point"
   - Doesn't fit our context. We're not talking about "in that matter/respect"

3. sense_key=there%4:02:01:: | definition=to or toward that place; away from the speaker | synonyms=thither | examples=go there around noon!
   - This indicates direction/movement toward a place.
   - Example: "go there" - implies movement
   - Our sentence is not about moving toward a place, but about something existing in a place.

The usage "There you have..." is an idiomatic expression meaning "in that place you will find" or "present in that location is". This matches sense 1: "in or at that place".

The phrase "There you have..." is pointing to the console (kalgebra's console mentioned in the previous sentence) as the location where the list exists.

Therefore, sense 1 is the correct choice.

Wait, let me double-check. Is "There you have..." possibly sense 2? No, sense 2 is about "in that matter/respect" like "I agree with you there".

Is it sense 3? "to or toward that place"? No, because we're not saying "go there" or moving toward there. We're saying that in that location (the console), there exists a list.

Actually, looking more carefully at the sentence structure: "There you have a list of the declared variables."

This could be interpreted as:
1. "In that place (the console), you have/find a list..." - locative/existential
2. "There" as in "There you go" - but that's different

But given the candidates, sense 1 "in or at that place" fits best. The word "there" is referring back to "kalgebra's console" mentioned in the previous sentence. The console is the place where the list of declared variables exists.

So the answer should be sense_index: 1.

Let me verify the sense keys format. The user said:
1. sense_key=there%4:02:00::
2. sense_key=there%4:02:02::
3. sense_key=there%4:02:01::

So index 1 is there%4:02:00::, index 2 is there%4:02:02::, index 3 is there%4:02:01::.

The answer should be {"sense_index": 1}.

Wait, I should make sure about the WordNet sense ordering. Sometimes WordNet senses are ordered by frequency. Let me think about the specific definitions again.

Sense 1: "in or at that place" - locative, static
Sense 2: "in that matter" - abstract
Sense 3: "to or toward that place" - directional, movement

The context: "kalgebra's console is useful as a calculator. There you have a list of the declared variables."

"there" refers to "kalgebra's console". It's saying that in/at that console, you have a list. This is clearly locative - indicating the place where something is. So sense 1.

Yes, I'm confident. The answer is 1.

provider: ModelRun


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: have
Target surface form: have
Context:
Now you could ask me, why should the user mind about MathML? That s easy. With this, we can operate with functions like cos(), sin(), any other trigonometric functions, sum () or product (). It does not matter what kind it is. We can use plus(), times() and everything which has its operator. kalgebra's console is useful as a calculator. There you <t>have</t> a list of the declared variables. By double clicking on them you will see a dialog that lets you change their values (just a way to trick the log).

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=have%2:40:00:: | definition=have or possess, either in a concrete or an abstract sense | synonyms=have got, hold | examples=She has $1,000 in the bank; He has got two beautiful daughters
2. sense_key=have%2:42:00:: | definition=have as a feature | synonyms=feature | examples=This restaurant features the most famous chefs in France
3. sense_key=have%2:39:06:: | definition=go through (mental or physical states or experiences) | synonyms=experience, receive, get | examples=get an idea; experience vertigo
4. sense_key=have%2:40:04:: | definition=have ownership or possession of | synonyms=own, possess | examples=He owns three houses in Florida; How many cars does she have?
5. sense_key=have%2:30:00:: | definition=cause to move; cause to be in a certain position or condition | synonyms=get, let | examples=He got his squad on the ball; This let me in for a big surprise
6. sense_key=have%2:34:00:: | definition=serve oneself to, or consume regularly | synonyms=consume, ingest, take in, take | examples=Have another bowl of chicken soup!; I don't take sugar in my coffee
7. sense_key=have%2:41:00:: | definition=have a personal or business relationship with someone | examples=have a postdoc; have an assistant
8. sense_key=have%2:36:00:: | definition=organize or be responsible for | synonyms=hold, throw, make, give | examples=hold a reception; have, throw, or make a party
9. sense_key=have%2:40:01:: | definition=have left | examples=I have two years left; I don't have any money left
10. sense_key=have%2:42:12:: | definition=be confronted with | examples=What do we have here?; Now we have a fine mess
11. sense_key=have%2:30:01:: | definition=undergo | synonyms=experience | examples=The stocks had a fast run-up
12. sense_key=have%2:29:02:: | definition=suffer from; be ill with | examples=She has arthritis
13. sense_key=have%2:32:00:: | definition=cause to do; cause to act in a specified manner | synonyms=induce, stimulate, cause, get, make | examples=The ads induced me to buy a VCR; My children finally got me to buy a computer
14. sense_key=have%2:40:05:: | definition=receive willingly something given or offered | synonyms=accept, take | examples=The only girl who would have him was the miller's daughter; I won't have this dog in my house!
15. sense_key=have%2:40:03:: | definition=get something; come into possession of | synonyms=receive | examples=receive payment; receive a gift
16. sense_key=have%2:29:05:: | definition=undergo (as of injuries and illnesses) | synonyms=suffer, sustain, get | examples=She suffered a fracture in the accident; He had an insulin shock after eating three candy bars
17. sense_key=have%2:40:02:: | definition=achieve a point or goal | synonyms=get, make | examples=Nicklaus had a 70; The Brazilian team got 4 goals
18. sense_key=have%2:29:00:: | definition=cause to be born | synonyms=give birth, deliver, bear, birth | examples=My wife had twins yesterday!
19. sense_key=have%2:35:00:: | definition=have sex with; archaic use | synonyms=take | examples=He had taken this woman when she was most vulnerable

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation (WSD) on the word "have" in the given context.

 Context analysis:
 The sentence is: "There you <t>have</t> a list of the declared variables."

 The context is about a calculator/console application (kalgebra). The user is explaining that in the console, there is a list of declared variables available. The phrase "There you have..." is an idiomatic expression meaning "there you can find" or "there exists/possesses" in the sense of "you have available" or "you possess".

 Looking at the candidate senses:

 1. sense_key=have%2:40:00:: | definition=have or possess, either in a concrete or an abstract sense | synonyms=have got, hold | examples=She has $1,000 in the bank; He has got two beautiful daughters
    - This is a general possession sense. "There you have a list" could fit here as "you possess/hold a list".

 2. sense_key=have%2:42:00:: | definition=have as a feature | synonyms=feature | examples=This restaurant features the most famous chefs in France
    - This is about featuring something. The console features a list? Maybe, but "there you have" is more about the user possessing/seeing the list.

 3. sense_key=have%2:39:06:: | definition=go through (mental or physical states or experiences) | synonyms=experience, receive, get | examples=get an idea; experience vertigo
    - Not relevant.

 4. sense_key=have%2:40:04:: | definition=have ownership or possession of | synonyms=own, possess | examples=He owns three houses in Florida; How many cars does she have?
    - This is stronger ownership. The user doesn't own the list in the sense of property, but has access to it.

 5. sense_key=have%2:30:00:: | definition=cause to move; cause to be in a certain position or condition | synonyms=get, let | examples=He got his squad on the ball; This let me in for a big surprise
    - Not relevant.

 6. sense_key=have%2:34:00:: | definition=serve oneself to, or consume regularly | synonyms=consume, ingest, take in, take | examples=Have another bowl of chicken soup!; I don't take sugar in my coffee
    - Not relevant.

 7. sense_key=have%2:41:00:: | definition=have a personal or business relationship with someone | examples=have a postdoc; have an assistant
    - Not relevant.

 8. sense_key=have%2:36:00:: | definition=organize or be responsible for | synonyms=hold, throw, make, give | examples=hold a reception; have, throw, or make a party
    - Not relevant.

 9. sense_key=have%2:40:01:: | definition=have left | examples=I have two years left; I don't have any money left
    - Not relevant.

 10. sense_key=have%2:42:12:: | definition=be confronted with | examples=What do we have here?; Now we have a fine mess
     - This is close. "There you have..." could be similar to "What do we have here?" but the context is more about availability/possession than confrontation.

 11. sense_key=have%2:30:01:: | definition=undergo | synonyms=experience | examples=The stocks had a fast run-up
     - Not relevant.

 12. sense_key=have%2:29:02:: | definition=suffer from; be ill with | examples=She has arthritis
     - Not relevant.

 13. sense_key=have%2:32:00:: | definition=cause to do; cause to act in a specified manner | synonyms=induce, stimulate, cause, get, make | examples=The ads induced me to buy a VCR; My children finally got me to buy a computer
     - Not relevant.

 14. sense_key=have%2:40:05:: | definition=receive willingly something given or offered | synonyms=accept, take | examples=The only girl who would have him was the miller's daughter; I won't have this dog in my house!
     - Not relevant.

 15. sense_key=have%2:40:03:: | definition=get something; come into possession of | synonyms=receive | examples=receive payment; receive a gift
     - Not quite. It's not about receiving.

 16. sense_key=have%2:29:05:: | definition=undergo (as of injuries and illnesses) | synonyms=suffer, sustain, get | examples=She suffered a fracture in the accident; He had an insulin shock after eating three candy bars
     - Not relevant.

 17. sense_key=have%2:40:02:: | definition=achieve a point or goal | synonyms=get, make | examples=Nicklaus had a 70; The Brazilian team got 4 goals
     - Not relevant.

 18. sense_key=have%2:29:00:: | definition=cause to be born | synonyms=give birth, deliver, bear, birth | examples=My wife had twins yesterday!
     - Not relevant.

 19. sense_key=have%2:35:00:: | definition=have sex with; archaic use | synonyms=take | examples=He had taken this woman when she was most vulnerable
     - Not relevant.

 The most likely candidates are sense 1 or sense 4 (possession), or possibly sense 10 (be confronted with).

 Let's look closely at sense 1: "have or possess, either in a concrete or an abstract sense" - examples: "She has $1,000 in the bank", "He has got two beautiful daughters". This is general possession.

 Sense 4: "have ownership or possession of" - examples: "He owns three houses", "How many cars does she have?". This seems more about ownership.

 In the sentence "There you have a list of the declared variables", the meaning is that the user possesses/has access to a list. It's not about ownership (sense 4), but about having something available/accessible (sense 1).

 However, sense 10 "be confronted with" has examples "What do we have here?" and "Now we have a fine mess". The phrase "There you have..." is often used to present something, similar to "There you go" or "Here you have". But in this specific context, it's describing the console's feature: "There you have a list..." meaning "In that place, you possess/have a list".

 Actually, looking at the context again: "kalgebra's console is useful as a calculator. There you have a list of the declared variables."

 This is describing the console. The console contains/possesses a list. Or the user has a list there.

 Sense 1 (have%2:40:00::) is the most general possession sense. It covers "have got" and "hold". "There you have..." fits this pattern of possession.

 Sense 10 (have%2:42:12::) "be confronted with" - the examples suggest a more situational encounter. "There you have a list" doesn't imply confrontation.

 Sense 2 (have%2:42:00::) "have as a feature" - could the console "have" a list as a feature? Yes, but the syntax "There you have..." suggests the subject "you" has the list, not the console. Wait, let me check: "There you have a list..."

 Actually, "There you have..." is an idiomatic expression. It can mean:
 1. There you possess (you have there)
 2. There you are presented with (be confronted with)

 But looking at the flow: "kalgebra's console is useful as a calculator. There you have a list of the declared variables."

 This seems to mean: "In the console, you have (possess/are provided with) a list..."

 Between sense 1 and sense 4:
 - Sense 1 is more general possession (concrete or abstract)
 - Sense 4 is specifically ownership

 The user doesn't own the list, they just have access to it, or the list is available to them. So sense 1 is better than sense 4.

 But wait, is there a sense about "there is" or existential? No, that's not in the list.

 Let me reconsider sense 10: "be confronted with". The example "What do we have here?" is similar to presenting something. "There you have a list" could be interpreted as "There you are presented with a list" or "There you encounter a list".

 However, sense 1 seems more standard for "you have a list". The subject "you" possesses the list (in the context of the interface).

 Actually, looking at WordNet sense 1: "have or possess, either in a concrete or an abstract sense" - this is the most common sense for "have" when indicating possession.

 The sentence structure "There you have X" is a presentational construction. In WordNet, sense 10 "be confronted with" might capture the presentational "what do we have here", but "there you have" is more about the addressee possessing something.

 Let me check if there's a sense for "to cause to be" or similar. No, that's not in the list.

 Actually, looking at the examples for sense 1: "She has $1,000 in the bank" - this is similar to "You have a list there". It's about possessing/having something.

 I think sense 1 is the best fit.

 Wait, I should check sense 2 again: "have as a feature". The console has a list as a feature. But the sentence says "There you have...", not "The console has...". The subject is "you", not "the console". So it's about the user having the list, not the console featuring it.

 Therefore, sense 1 (general possession) is the correct choice.

 But let me double-check sense 10. "be confronted with" - examples: "What do we have here?", "Now we have a fine mess". These are exclamatory. The target sentence is declarative and descriptive. "There you have a list..." is simply stating that a list is available to the user. It's not confrontational.

 So sense 1 is best.

 Index: 1

 Wait, I need to make sure about the indexing. The user lists them as:
 1. sense_key=have%2:40:00::
 2. sense_key=have%2:42:00::
 ...
 10. sense_key=have%2:42:12::

 So the index is the number before the sense key.

 Therefore, the answer should be {"sense_index": 1}.

 But let me reconsider one more time. Is it possible that "have" here means "there you can see/obtain" which might be sense 15 "get something; come into possession of"? No, that's about receiving.

 Is it sense 14 "receive willingly"? No.

 Is it sense 3 "experience"? No.

 I think sense 1 is definitely the best. The phrase "There you have..." means "You possess there..." or "You have available there...".

 Final check: The context is technical documentation about software. "There you have a list" = "A list is available to you there" = possession/availability.

 Sense 1: "have or possess, either in a concrete or an abstract sense" - fits perfectly.

 Answer: {"sense_index": 1}

provider: Novita


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: list
Target surface form: list
Context:
Now you could ask me, why should the user mind about MathML? That s easy. With this, we can operate with functions like cos(), sin(), any other trigonometric functions, sum () or product (). It does not matter what kind it is. We can use plus(), times() and everything which has its operator. kalgebra's console is useful as a calculator. There you have a <t>list</t> of the declared variables. By double clicking on them you will see a dialog that lets you change their values (just a way to trick the log).

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=list%1:10:00:: | definition=a database containing an ordered array of items (names or topics) | synonyms=listing
2. sense_key=list%1:07:00:: | definition=the property possessed by a line or surface that departs from the vertical | synonyms=tilt, inclination, lean, leaning | examples=the tower had a pronounced tilt; the ship developed a list to starboard

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation (WSD) for the word "list" in the given context.

 Context analysis:
 - The text is about MathML, mathematical functions, and kalgebra's console.
 - The specific sentence is: "There you have a <t>list</t> of the declared variables."
 - This refers to a collection or ordered array of declared variables in a calculator/console interface.
 - The variables are displayed in a way that you can double-click on them to change values.

 Candidate senses:
 1. sense_key=list%1:10:00:: - definition: a database containing an ordered array of items (names or topics) | synonyms=listing
    - This fits the context of having a collection/ordered array of declared variables.

 2. sense_key=list%1:07:00:: - definition: the property possessed by a line or surface that departs from the vertical | synonyms=tilt, inclination, lean, leaning
    - This refers to a physical tilting or leaning (like a ship listing).
    - This does not fit the context of computer variables.

 The context clearly refers to a computer science/data structure meaning - an ordered collection of items (variables). This matches sense 1 (the database/ordered array sense), not sense 2 (the physical tilt).

 Therefore, the correct sense is index 1.

 I need to return: {"sense_index": 1}


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: variable
Target surface form: variables
Context:
Now you could ask me, why should the user mind about MathML? That s easy. With this, we can operate with functions like cos(), sin(), any other trigonometric functions, sum () or product (). It does not matter what kind it is. We can use plus(), times() and everything which has its operator. kalgebra's console is useful as a calculator. There you have a list of the declared <t>variables</t>. By double clicking on them you will see a dialog that lets you change their values (just a way to trick the log).

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=variable%1:17:00:: | definition=something that is likely to vary; something that is subject to variation | examples=the weather is one variable to be considered
2. sense_key=variable%1:09:00:: | definition=a quantity that can assume any of a set of values | synonyms=variable quantity
3. sense_key=variable%1:17:01:: | definition=a star that varies noticeably in brightness | synonyms=variable star
4. sense_key=variable%1:10:00:: | definition=a symbol (like x or y) that is used in mathematical or logical expressions to represent a variable quantity

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "variables" in the given context.

Context analysis:
- The text is about MathML, mathematical functions (cos(), sin(), trigonometric functions, sum(), product(), plus(), times()), and using kalgebra's console as a calculator.
- It mentions "a list of the declared variables" and "By double clicking on them you will see a dialog that lets you change their values"
- This is clearly a mathematical/programming context where variables are symbols that represent values that can be changed.

Candidate senses:
1. variable%1:17:00:: - something likely to vary (general)
2. variable%1:09:00:: - a quantity that can assume any of a set of values (variable quantity)
3. variable%1:17:01:: - variable star (astronomy)
4. variable%1:10:00:: - a symbol (like x or y) used in mathematical or logical expressions to represent a variable quantity

The context specifically mentions MathML, mathematical functions, calculator console, declared variables, and changing their values. In mathematical expressions, variables are symbols like x or y. However, sense 2 is "variable quantity" - a quantity that can assume values. Sense 4 is specifically about the symbol used in mathematical/logical expressions.

The text says "list of the declared variables" and "change their values". In programming/math software like kalgebra, variables are symbols that hold values. The mention of "symbol (like x or y)" in sense 4 fits well. But sense 2 is about the quantity itself.

Let me look more carefully. The context mentions MathML, functions, operators, calculator. "You have a list of the declared variables. By double clicking on them you will see a dialog that lets you change their values."

In computer algebra systems / calculators, variables are symbols that represent quantities. The WordNet sense 4 specifically mentions "a symbol (like x or y) that is used in mathematical or logical expressions to represent a variable quantity". This seems to match the context of declared variables in a mathematical calculator environment.

Sense 2 "a quantity that can assume any of a set of values" is more abstract. But when you have a "list of declared variables" in a calculator console, you're looking at symbols/names that represent values.

However, in many WSD tasks for math contexts, sense 2 might be considered. But let's look at the examples and glosses again.

Sense 4: "a symbol (like x or y) that is used in mathematical or logical expressions to represent a variable quantity"
Sense 2: "a quantity that can assume any of a set of values" | synonyms=variable quantity

The context: "declared variables" in a calculator console where you can change their values. This is very much like symbols in a mathematical expression. KAlgebra is a mathematical calculator/application. In such applications, you declare variables (like x, y, n) and assign them values.

Actually, looking at the distinction: sense 2 is the quantity itself (the variable quantity), while sense 4 is the symbol representing it. In programming and math software, when we say "list of declared variables", we usually mean the symbols/names. But WordNet sense 4 specifically says "a symbol (like x or y)...".

Wait, the context says "change their values". A symbol itself doesn't have a value in the abstract, but in a computational context, a variable (symbol) is bound to a value.

Let me reconsider. In the context of "kalgebra's console", "declared variables", and mathematical functions, the most appropriate sense is likely sense 4 (the mathematical symbol) or sense 2 (the mathematical quantity).

But looking at typical WordNet disambiguation for "variable" in math contexts:
- If it's talking about "x and y are variables", sense 4 is often the right choice because x and y are symbols.
- If it's talking about "the variable in the experiment", sense 1 might apply.
- Sense 2 is "variable quantity" which is a quantity.

The phrase "declared variables" strongly suggests named entities in a computational/mathematical system. In KAlgebra (a KDE calculator), variables are identifiers/symbols.

Also, the mention of MathML and operators suggests formal mathematical expressions where variables are symbols.

I think sense 4 is the best fit. But let me double-check if sense 2 could be better. "Variable quantity" is a quantity. But you don't really "declare" a quantity in a list; you declare a symbol. You change the value associated with the symbol.

Therefore, sense 4 seems most appropriate.

Wait, I should check if there's any reason to prefer sense 2. In mathematics education, "variable" often refers to the quantity that varies. But in computer algebra systems, it's the symbol.

The instruction says: "WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense."

Examples for sense 1: "the weather is one variable to be considered" - general factor.
Examples for sense 4: none provided, but gloss says "like x or y".

Given the specific mention of mathematical functions and a calculator console, and the fact that you double-click on them to change values (interacting with named entities), sense 4 is the strongest match.

Actually, looking at the target surface form "variables" (plural), and "list of the declared variables" - in programming contexts, these are definitely symbols.

I'll go with sense 4.

Wait, I need to be careful. Let me re-read the context once more:
"Now you could ask me, why should the user mind about MathML? That s easy. With this, we can operate with functions like cos(), sin(), any other trigonometric functions, sum () or product (). It does not matter what kind it is. We can use plus(), times() and everything which has its operator. kalgebra's console is useful as a calculator. There you have a list of the declared <t>variables</t>. By double clicking on them you will see a dialog that lets you change their values (just a way to trick the log)."

This is definitely describing a computer algebra system / calculator. Variables are entities that hold values. In WordNet, sense 4 captures the mathematical/logical symbol sense. I think this is correct.

One more check: Is there any chance sense 2 is better? "a quantity that can assume any of a set of values". In a calculator, a variable does hold a quantity, but the interface shows you a list of declared variables (names). The act of declaring and changing values maps better to symbols that represent variable quantities.

Also, in WordNet, sense 4 is under noun.communication (1:10), which is a symbol, while sense 2 is under noun.cognition (1:09), a quantity. Since these are declared in a console and manipulated via UI (double clicking), the symbol interpretation fits better.

Final decision: sense_index 4.

provider: SiliconFlow


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: see
Target surface form: see
Context:
That s easy. With this, we can operate with functions like cos(), sin(), any other trigonometric functions, sum () or product (). It does not matter what kind it is. We can use plus(), times() and everything which has its operator. kalgebra's console is useful as a calculator. There you have a list of the declared variables. By double clicking on them you will <t>see</t> a dialog that lets you change their values (just a way to trick the log). Every time you enter an expression, the " ans " variable value will be changed to the last result.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=see%2:39:00:: | definition=perceive by sight or have the power to perceive by sight | examples=You have to be a good observer to see all the details; Can you see the bird in that tree?
2. sense_key=see%2:31:01:: | definition=perceive (an idea or situation) mentally | synonyms=understand, realize, realise | examples=Now I see!; I just can't see your point
3. sense_key=see%2:39:02:: | definition=perceive or be contemporaneous with | synonyms=witness, find | examples=We found Republicans winning the offices; You'll see a lot of cheating in this school
4. sense_key=see%2:36:00:: | definition=imagine; conceive of; see in one's mind | synonyms=visualize, visualise, envision, project, fancy, figure | examples=I can't see him on horseback!; I can see what will happen
5. sense_key=see%2:31:00:: | definition=deem to be | synonyms=consider, reckon, view, regard | examples=She views this quite differently from me; I consider her to be shallow
6. sense_key=see%2:31:02:: | definition=get to know or become aware of, usually accidentally | synonyms=learn, hear, get word, get wind, pick up, find out | examples=I learned that she has two grown-up children; I see that you have been promoted
7. sense_key=see%2:39:03:: | definition=see or watch | synonyms=watch, view, catch, take in | examples=view a show on television; This program will be seen all over the world
8. sense_key=see%2:38:00:: | definition=come together | synonyms=meet, run into, encounter, run across, come across | examples=I'll probably see you at the meeting; How nice to see you again!
9. sense_key=see%2:32:00:: | definition=find out, learn, or determine with certainty, usually by making an inquiry or other effort | synonyms=determine, check, find out, ascertain, watch, learn | examples=I want to see whether she speaks French; See whether it works
10. sense_key=see%2:31:03:: | definition=be careful or certain to do something; make certain of something | synonyms=check, insure, see to it, ensure, control, ascertain | examples=He verified that the valves were closed; See that the curtains are closed
11. sense_key=see%2:41:11:: | definition=go to see for professional or business reasons | examples=You should see a lawyer; We had to see a psychiatrist
12. sense_key=see%2:41:12:: | definition=go to see for a social visit | examples=I went to see my friend Mary the other day
13. sense_key=see%2:41:10:: | definition=go to see a place, as for entertainment | synonyms=visit | examples=We went to see the Eiffel Tower in the morning
14. sense_key=see%2:41:14:: | definition=take charge of or deal with | synonyms=attend, take care, look | examples=Could you see about lunch?; I must attend to this matter
15. sense_key=see%2:35:09:: | definition=receive as a specified guest | examples=the doctor will see you now; The minister doesn't see anybody before noon
16. sense_key=see%2:41:00:: | definition=date regularly; have a steady relationship with | synonyms=go steady, go out, date | examples=Did you know that she is seeing an older man?; He is dating his former wife again!
17. sense_key=see%2:39:05:: | definition=see and understand, have a good eye | examples=The artist must first learn to see
18. sense_key=see%2:31:08:: | definition=deliberate or decide | examples=See whether you can come tomorrow; let's see--which movie should we see tonight?
19. sense_key=see%2:39:11:: | definition=observe as if with an eye | examples=The camera saw the burglary and recorded it
20. sense_key=see%2:39:13:: | definition=observe, check out, and look over carefully or inspect | synonyms=examine | examples=The customs agent examined the baggage; I must see your passport before you can enter the country
21. sense_key=see%2:39:12:: | definition=go or live through | synonyms=experience, go through | examples=We had many trials to go through; he saw action in Viet Nam
22. sense_key=see%2:38:03:: | definition=accompany or escort | synonyms=escort | examples=I'll see you to the door
23. sense_key=see%2:33:00:: | definition=match or meet | examples=I saw the bet of one of my fellow players
24. sense_key=see%2:31:13:: | definition=make sense of; assign a meaning to | synonyms=interpret, construe | examples=What message do you see in this letter?; How do you interpret his behavior?

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the target word "see" in the given context.

Context analysis:
"By double clicking on them you will <t>see</t> a dialog that lets you change their values (just a way to trick the log)."

The sentence describes a user interface interaction: double clicking on declared variables in kalgebra's console will cause a dialog to appear/be displayed. The user will visually perceive a dialog box.

Let's look at the candidate senses:

1. see%2:39:00:: - perceive by sight or have the power to perceive by sight. Examples: "You have to be a good observer to see all the details; Can you see the bird in that tree?" This is basic visual perception. In the context, double clicking causes a dialog to appear that you can look at. This seems plausible.

2. see%2:31:01:: - perceive mentally (understand, realize). "Now I see!" Not fitting here.

3. see%2:39:02:: - perceive or be contemporaneous with (witness, find). "You'll see a lot of cheating" - more about witnessing events. Not quite right for a dialog appearing.

4. see%2:36:00:: - imagine, visualize. Not fitting.

5. see%2:31:00:: - deem to be (consider, view). Not fitting.

6. see%2:31:02:: - get to know/become aware (learn, hear). "I see that you have been promoted." This is about learning information. While seeing a dialog might inform you, the immediate meaning is visual.

7. see%2:39:03:: - see or watch (watch, view, catch, take in). "view a show on television; This program will be seen all over the world." This is about viewing something, often intentionally watching or broadcasting. The dialog appearing after double-clicking is more about it becoming visible to you.

8. see%2:38:00:: - come together (meet). Not fitting.

9. see%2:32:00:: - find out/learn/determine with certainty. "I want to see whether she speaks French." Not fitting.

10. see%2:31:03:: - be careful/certain (see to it). Not fitting.

11. see%2:41:11:: - go to see for professional reasons. Not fitting.

12. see%2:41:12:: - go to see for social visit. Not fitting.

13. see%2:41:10:: - go to see a place for entertainment. Not fitting.

14. see%2:41:14:: - take charge of/deal with. Not fitting.

15. see%2:35:09:: - receive as a specified guest. Not fitting.

16. see%2:41:00:: - date regularly. Not fitting.

17. see%2:39:05:: - see and understand, have a good eye. Not fitting.

18. see%2:31:08:: - deliberate or decide. Not fitting.

19. see%2:39:11:: - observe as if with an eye. "The camera saw the burglary..." Not fitting.

20. see%2:39:13:: - observe, check out, inspect (examine). "I must see your passport..." Not fitting.

21. see%2:39:12:: - go or live through (experience). Not fitting.

22. see%2:38:03:: - accompany or escort. Not fitting.

23. see%2:33:00:: - match or meet (bet). Not fitting.

24. see%2:31:13:: - make sense of; assign meaning to (interpret). Not fitting.

So it's between sense 1 and sense 7, possibly sense 6.

Sense 1: perceive by sight. "By double clicking on them you will see a dialog..." This is the most direct. You double click and a dialog becomes visible, which you perceive by sight.

Sense 7: see or watch. This often implies active viewing or broadcasting. "This program will be seen all over the world." The dialog isn't being watched like a show; it's simply displayed.

Sense 6: "I see that you have been promoted" - this is about becoming aware. But the context is specifically about a dialog box appearing on screen as a result of double-clicking. The primary meaning is visual perception.

Sense 1 seems the best fit. The action of double-clicking causes a dialog to become visible, and the user perceives it by sight.

Wait, let me reconsider sense 7: "see or watch" with synonyms watch, view, catch, take in. Example: "view a show on television; This program will be seen all over the world." In computing contexts, "you will see a dialog" is very common. Is this sense 1 or 7?

Sense 1 definition: "perceive by sight or have the power to perceive by sight". Examples: "You have to be a good observer to see all the details; Can you see the bird in that tree?" This is about the physical ability/capacity or act of visual perception.

Sense 7 definition: "see or watch". Examples: "view a show on television; This program will be seen all over the world". This seems more about the content being displayed/viewed.

In the sentence: "By double clicking on them you will see a dialog that lets you change their values". This is similar to "you will see a window pop up". I think sense 1 is the most fundamental visual perception sense. However, sense 7 might capture the "view" aspect better.

Let me look at WordNet more carefully. In WordNet, "see" has many senses. Sense 1 (perceive by sight) vs sense 7 (watch, view). The distinction:
- Sense 1: "perceive by sight or have the power to perceive by sight" - this is the basic stative or inchoative visual perception.
- Sense 7: "see or watch" - this is more active viewing, deliberate looking.

When a dialog appears after double-clicking, you perceive it visually. It's not really "watching" or "viewing" a show. It's more basic: the dialog becomes visible and you see it.

Also consider sense 6: "get to know or become aware of, usually accidentally" - "I see that you have been promoted". Could "see a dialog" mean "encounter/become aware of a dialog"? In UI contexts, "you will see" often means "you will encounter/be presented with". But the direct object is "a dialog", and the most natural reading is visual.

I think sense 1 is the best choice. The user will visually perceive a dialog box.

Wait, I should check if there's a sense like "perceive (something) visually because it is displayed/presented". That's essentially sense 1.

Let me double-check the exact wording of sense 1: "perceive by sight or have the power to perceive by sight". The examples are about observing details and seeing a bird. This fits "see a dialog".

Sense 7: "see or watch" with examples about television programs. A dialog box isn't typically "watched".

Therefore, sense_index: 1.

But let me reconsider sense 6: "get to know or become aware of, usually accidentally" with example "I see that you have been promoted". The structure there is "see that-clause". Here we have "see a dialog". So sense 6 is less likely because it typically takes a that-clause or fact, not a physical object (though possible, e.g., "I see a problem" can mean understand/aware).

Actually, "I see a problem" could be sense 1 (visually see) or sense 24 (interpret) or sense 2 (understand mentally). But for a dialog box in a UI, it's clearly physical/visual.

So I'll go with sense 1.

Wait, I want to be careful. In many WSD datasets, "see" in contexts like "you will see X" where X is a UI element is often labeled as sense 1 (perceive by sight). Let me think if there's any other sense that could be better.

Sense 20: "observe, check out, and look over carefully or inspect" - no, there's no careful inspection implied.

Sense 3: "perceive or be contemporaneous with" (witness) - "You'll see a lot of cheating" - witnessing events over time. Not a dialog.

Sense 1 is definitely the best fit.

Final check: The target is "see", context is about double-clicking variables in kalgebra's console and a dialog appearing. The user perceives this dialog visually. Sense 1: perceive by sight.

Answer: {"sense_index": 1}


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: let
Target surface form: lets
Context:
That s easy. With this, we can operate with functions like cos(), sin(), any other trigonometric functions, sum () or product (). It does not matter what kind it is. We can use plus(), times() and everything which has its operator. kalgebra's console is useful as a calculator. There you have a list of the declared variables. By double clicking on them you will see a dialog that <t>lets</t> you change their values (just a way to trick the log). Every time you enter an expression, the " ans " variable value will be changed to the last result.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=let%2:41:00:: | definition=make it possible through a specific action or lack of action for something to happen | synonyms=allow, permit | examples=This permits the water to rush in; This sealed door won't allow the water come into the basement
2. sense_key=let%2:32:00:: | definition=actively cause something to happen | examples=I let it be known that I was not interested
3. sense_key=let%2:32:02:: | definition=consent to, give permission | synonyms=permit, allow, countenance | examples=She permitted her son to visit her estranged husband; I won't let the police search her basement
4. sense_key=let%2:30:01:: | definition=cause to move; cause to be in a certain position or condition | synonyms=get, have | examples=He got his squad on the ball; This let me in for a big surprise
5. sense_key=let%2:30:00:: | definition=leave unchanged | examples=let it be
6. sense_key=let%2:40:00:: | definition=grant use or occupation of under a term of contract | synonyms=lease, rent | examples=I am leasing my country estate to some foreigners

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to perform fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "lets" (lemma "let") in the given context.

 Context analysis:
 - The sentence is: "By double clicking on them you will see a dialog that <t>lets</t> you change their values (just a way to trick the log)."
 - The context is about a software application (kalgebra's console) where double-clicking on declared variables opens a dialog.
 - This dialog enables/allows the user to change the values of the variables.

 Candidate sense analysis:

 1. sense_key=let%2:41:00:: | definition=make it possible through a specific action or lack of action for something to happen | synonyms=allow, permit | examples=This permits the water to rush in; This sealed door won't allow the water come into the basement
    - This sense is about making something possible or enabling something to happen.
    - In the context: "a dialog that lets you change their values" - the dialog makes it possible for the user to change values.
    - This seems like a strong candidate. The dialog enables/allows the action of changing values.

 2. sense_key=let%2:32:00:: | definition=actively cause something to happen | examples=I let it be known that I was not interested
    - This is about actively causing something to become known or happen.
    - The dialog doesn't actively cause the user to change values; it enables the user to do so.
    - Doesn't fit as well.

 3. sense_key=let%2:32:02:: | definition=consent to, give permission | synonyms=permit, allow, countenance | examples=She permitted her son to visit her estranged husband; I won't let the police search her basement
    - This is about giving permission or consent.
    - The dialog isn't giving permission in the sense of authority; it's enabling functionality.
    - While semantically related, sense 1 is better for inanimate objects (like software dialogs) that enable actions rather than give permission.

 4. sense_key=let%2:30:01:: | definition=cause to move; cause to be in a certain position or condition | synonyms=get, have | examples=He got his squad on the ball; This let me in for a big surprise
    - This sense is about causing movement or positioning.
    - "let me in for a big surprise" - idiomatic usage.
    - Doesn't fit: the dialog doesn't cause the user to move or be in a position.

 5. sense_key=let%2:30:00:: | definition=leave unchanged | examples=let it be
    - This is the "let it be" sense - allowing something to remain as is.
    - Opposite of what's happening here (changing values).

 6. sense_key=let%2:40:00:: | definition=grant use or occupation of under a term of contract | synonyms=lease, rent
    - This is the "lease/rent" sense of let.
    - Completely wrong context.

 Now comparing sense 1 and sense 3:
 - Sense 1 (let%2:41:00::): "make it possible through a specific action or lack of action for something to happen" - focuses on enabling/possibility.
 - Sense 3 (let%2:32:02::): "consent to, give permission" - focuses on permission/authorization.

 In software contexts where a dialog "lets" you do something, it's almost always about enabling or making it possible (sense 1), not about giving permission in the interpersonal sense (sense 3).

 Sense 1 examples: "This permits the water to rush in" - similar to "the dialog permits/lets you change values" - enabling the flow/action.

 Sense 3 examples: "She permitted her son to visit" - interpersonal permission.

 Also note the WordNet lexicographer file:
 - let%2:41:00:: - verb.prergn (likely "verb.permissive" or similar frame)
 - let%2:32:02:: - verb.communication?

 Actually looking at sense keys:
 - %2:41:xx usually refers to verbs of perception/communication? No, let me check WordNet frames.
 - Actually, in WordNet 3.0/3.1:
   - let%2:41:00:: is under verb.perception? No...
   - The second number is the lexicographer file number.
   - 41 is usually "verb.contact" or similar? Wait.

 Actually, standard WordNet lexicographer file numbers:
 - 00 is usually the first file...
 - But I should rely on the glosses and examples.

 The key distinction:
 Sense 1: "make it possible through a specific action or lack of action for something to happen" - this is the "allow/permit" sense where the subject enables the object to do something.
 Sense 3: "consent to, give permission" - this is also "permit/allow" but emphasizes the social/contractual permission.

 In the context: "a dialog that lets you change their values"
 - The dialog is an inanimate object/interface element.
 - It allows/enables the action.
 - It doesn't "consent" in the human sense.

 Therefore, sense 1 is the best fit.

 Wait, let me double-check the sense indices provided:
 1. sense_key=let%2:41:00::
 2. sense_key=let%2:32:00::
 3. sense_key=let%2:32:02::
 4. sense_key=let%2:30:01::
 5. sense_key=let%2:30:00::
 6. sense_key=let%2:40:00::

 The user asks for "sense_index" which corresponds to the number in the list (1-6).

 So I should return {"sense_index": 1}.

 But wait, let me reconsider sense 3 vs sense 1 carefully.

 Sense 1: "make it possible through a specific action or lack of action for something to happen"
 Examples: "This permits the water to rush in; This sealed door won't allow the water come into the basement"
 - These are about physical possibility/enabling.

 Sense 3: "consent to, give permission"
 Examples: "She permitted her son to visit her estranged husband; I won't let the police search her basement"
 - These are about social permission.

 In computational contexts, when we say "the dialog lets you change values", we mean it makes it possible/enables you to do it (sense 1), not that it gives you permission (sense 3).

 Also, looking at the synonyms:
 Sense 1: allow, permit
 Sense 3: permit, allow, countenance

 Both have "allow" and "permit" as synonyms, but the definitions differ subtly.

 Actually, looking at standard WordNet entries for "let":
 - Sense 1 (let.v.01): "make it possible through a specific action or lack of action for something to happen" - 'This permits the water to rush in'
 - Sense 2 (let.v.02): "actively cause something to happen" - 'I let it be known'
 - Sense 3 (let.v.03): "consent to, give permission" - 'She permitted her son to visit...'
 - Sense 4 (let.v.04): "cause to move; cause to be in a certain position or condition" - 'He got his squad...'
 - Sense 5 (let.v.05): "leave unchanged" - 'let it be'
 - Sense 6 (let.v.06): "grant use or occupation of under a term of contract" - 'I am leasing...'

 So the indices 1-6 in the candidate list correspond to these WordNet senses.

 The context "a dialog that lets you change their values" clearly aligns with sense 1: making it possible for you to change values.

 Final check: Is there any chance it could be sense 4? "cause to move; cause to be in a certain position or condition"
 "This let me in for a big surprise" - this is an idiomatic usage.
 "get" as in "I got him to leave" (causative).
 But "lets you change" - the dialog isn't causing you to change the values; it's allowing you to change them. You are the agent changing the values.

 So sense 1 is correct.

 The answer should be: {"sense_index": 1}

provider: DigitalOcean


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: change
Target surface form: change
Context:
That s easy. With this, we can operate with functions like cos(), sin(), any other trigonometric functions, sum () or product (). It does not matter what kind it is. We can use plus(), times() and everything which has its operator. kalgebra's console is useful as a calculator. There you have a list of the declared variables. By double clicking on them you will see a dialog that lets you <t>change</t> their values (just a way to trick the log). Every time you enter an expression, the " ans " variable value will be changed to the last result.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=change%2:30:01:: | definition=cause to change; make different; cause a transformation | synonyms=alter, modify | examples=The advent of the automobile may have altered the growth pattern of the city; The discussion has changed my thinking about the issue
2. sense_key=change%2:30:00:: | definition=undergo a change; become different in essence; losing one's or its original nature | examples=She changed completely as she grew older; The weather changed last night
3. sense_key=change%2:30:02:: | definition=become different in some particular way, without permanently losing one's or its former characteristics or essence | synonyms=alter, vary | examples=her mood changes in accordance with the weather; The supermarket's selection of vegetables varies according to the season
4. sense_key=change%2:30:05:: | definition=lay aside, abandon, or leave for another | synonyms=switch, shift | examples=switch to a different brand of beer; She switched psychiatrists
5. sense_key=change%2:30:03:: | definition=change clothes; put on different clothes | examples=Change before you go to the opera
6. sense_key=change%2:30:04:: | definition=exchange or replace with another, usually of the same kind or category | synonyms=exchange, commute, convert | examples=Could you convert my dollars into pounds?; He changed his name
7. sense_key=change%2:40:00:: | definition=give to, and receive from, one another | synonyms=exchange, interchange | examples=Would you change places with me?; We have been exchanging letters for a year
8. sense_key=change%2:38:00:: | definition=change from one vehicle or transportation line to another | synonyms=transfer | examples=She changed in Chicago on her way to the East coast
9. sense_key=change%2:30:08:: | definition=become deeper in tone | synonyms=deepen | examples=His voice began to change when he was 12 years old; Her voice deepened when she whispered the password
10. sense_key=change%2:30:06:: | definition=remove or replace the coverings of | examples=Father had to learn how to change the baby; After each guest we changed the bed linens

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
 The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "change" in the given context.

Context analysis:
The text is about a calculator/console application (kalgebra). The specific sentence is: "By double clicking on them you will see a dialog that lets you change their values (just a way to trick the log)."

The phrase "change their values" means to modify or alter the values of variables. This is about causing a change to something (the values), not about undergoing a change oneself (like sense 2), not about switching brands (sense 4), not about changing clothes (sense 5), not about exchanging currency (sense 6 or 7), not about transportation (sense 8), not about voice deepening (sense 9), and not about changing bed linens (sense 10).

Looking at the candidates:
1. change%2:30:01:: - cause to change; make different; cause a transformation (synonyms: alter, modify)
2. change%2:30:00:: - undergo a change (intransitive)
3. change%2:30:02:: - become different in some particular way (intransitive)
4. change%2:30:05:: - lay aside, abandon, or leave for another (switch, shift)
5. change%2:30:03:: - change clothes
6. change%2:30:04:: - exchange or replace with another (exchange, commute, convert)
7. change%2:40:00:: - give to, and receive from, one another (interchange)
8. change%2:38:00:: - change from one vehicle to another (transfer)
9. change%2:30:08:: - become deeper in tone (deepen)
10. change%2:30:06:: - remove or replace the coverings of

The context "lets you change their values" implies the user is causing the values to be different - they are modifying or altering them. This fits sense 1: "cause to change; make different; cause a transformation" with synonyms "alter, modify".

Sense 6 is about exchanging or replacing with another of the same kind (like changing money), but here we're modifying variable values to specific new values, not necessarily exchanging them.

Sense 1 is the best fit because:
- It's transitive (you change [the values])
- It means to cause transformation/make different
- Synonyms alter and modify fit perfectly with modifying variable values

The JSON output should be: {"sense_index": 1}


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: value
Target surface form: values
Context:
That s easy. With this, we can operate with functions like cos(), sin(), any other trigonometric functions, sum () or product (). It does not matter what kind it is. We can use plus(), times() and everything which has its operator. kalgebra's console is useful as a calculator. There you have a list of the declared variables. By double clicking on them you will see a dialog that lets you change their <t>values</t> (just a way to trick the log). Every time you enter an expression, the " ans " variable value will be changed to the last result.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=value%1:09:00:: | definition=a numerical quantity measured or assigned or computed | examples=the value assigned was 16 milliseconds
2. sense_key=value%1:07:00:: | definition=the quality (positive or negative) that renders something desirable or valuable | examples=the Shakespearean Shylock is of dubious value in the modern world
3. sense_key=value%1:21:00:: | definition=the amount (of money or goods or services) that is considered to be a fair equivalent for something else | synonyms=economic value | examples=he tried to estimate the value of the produce at normal prices
4. sense_key=value%1:07:01:: | definition=relative darkness or lightness of a color; -Joe Hing Lowe | examples=I establish the colors and principal values by organizing the painting into three values--dark, medium...and light
5. sense_key=value%1:28:00:: | definition=(music) the relative duration of a musical note | synonyms=time value, note value
6. sense_key=value%1:09:01:: | definition=an ideal accepted by some individual or group | examples=he has old-fashioned values

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "values" in the given context.

Let me analyze the context:
- The text is about a mathematical software (kalgebra's console)
- It mentions declared variables, double clicking on them to see a dialog that lets you change their "values"
- It mentions "ans" variable value being changed to the last result
- This is clearly a computing/mathematical context where "values" refers to the numerical or data content assigned to variables

Now let's look at the candidate senses:

1. sense_key=value%1:09:00:: | definition=a numerical quantity measured or assigned or computed | examples=the value assigned was 16 milliseconds
   - This fits well. In computing/programming, variables have values that are numerical quantities or data assigned to them. The example mentions "the value assigned was 16 milliseconds" which aligns with assigning values to variables.

2. sense_key=value%1:07:00:: | definition=the quality (positive or negative) that renders something desirable or valuable | examples=the Shakespearean Shylock is of dubious value in the modern world
   - This is about worth/importance, not about variable contents. Doesn't fit.

3. sense_key=value%1:21:00:: | definition=the amount (of money or goods or services) that is considered to be a fair equivalent for something else | synonyms=economic value | examples=he tried to estimate the value of the produce at normal prices
   - This is about monetary/economic value. Doesn't fit the computing context.

4. sense_key=value%1:07:01:: | definition=relative darkness or lightness of a color; -Joe Hing Lowe | examples=I establish the colors and principal values by organizing the painting into three values--dark, medium...and light
   - This is about art/color values. Doesn't fit.

5. sense_key=value%1:28:00:: | definition=(music) the relative duration of a musical note | synonyms=time value, note value
   - This is about music. Doesn't fit.

6. sense_key=value%1:09:01:: | definition=an ideal accepted by some individual or group | examples=he has old-fashioned values
   - This is about moral/ethical values. Doesn't fit.

The context is clearly about computer programming/mathematics where variables have values assigned to them. The definition in sense 1 "a numerical quantity measured or assigned or computed" fits perfectly because:
- It mentions variables being declared
- You can change their values
- The "ans" variable value changes to the last result
- This is about assigning computed or numerical quantities to variables

Sense 1 is the correct choice.

provider: StreamLake