[User]
Which numbered sense of "dose" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: Treatment should be delayed or discontinued, or the <t>dose</t> reduced, in patients whose blood counts are abnormal or who have certain other side effects.

Senses:
1. definition=a measured portion of medicine taken at any one time
2. definition=the quantity of an active agent (substance or radiation) taken in or absorbed at any one time
3. definition=a communicable infection transmitted by sexual intercourse or genital contact
4. definition=street name for lysergic acid diethylamide

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the Request:** The user wants to identify the correct sense of the word "dose" as used in a specific sentence. The output must be *only* the number of the correct sense.

2.  **Analyze the Sentence:** "Treatment should be delayed or discontinued, or the <t>dose</t> reduced, in patients whose blood counts are abnormal or who have certain other side effects."
    *   Context: Medical treatment context.
    *   Grammar: "the <t>dose</t> reduced" implies "the amount of medication given" should be lowered.
    *   Key indicators: "Treatment," "patients," "blood counts," "side effects." This points towards a medical administration context.

3.  **Analyze the Senses:**
    *   *Sense 1:* "a measured portion of medicine taken at any one time."
        *   This fits well. It refers to medicine and a portion taken. In the sentence, reducing the "dose" means lowering the specific amount of medicine given to the patient.
    *   *Sense 2:* "the quantity of an active agent (substance or radiation) taken in or absorbed at any one time."
        *   This also seems plausible, as "medicine" is an active agent. However, Sense 1 is more specific to "medicine," while Sense 2 is broader (includes radiation, other substances). Let's look closer. Is "medicine" the primary driver here? Yes. Usually, dictionaries distinguish between the general administration of a drug (Sense 1) and the scientific/physical quantity of an active agent (Sense 2), though they are very close.
        *   Let's compare 1 and 2. Sense 1 is "a measured portion of medicine". Sense 2 is "quantity of an active agent". In clinical practice ("Treatment... delayed... dose reduced"), doctors adjust the *portion of medicine* prescribed. Sense 1 captures the clinical application. Sense 2 is often used in toxicology or physics contexts (e.g., "radiation dose" or "absorbed dose"). While a drug is an active agent, the phrase "the dose reduced" in a standard treatment context usually refers to the defined portion of the medicine (pill size, volume of liquid).
        *   Let's check typical dictionary distinctions (like WordNet, from which these definitions likely originate).
            *   WordNet 3.0:
                *   1: a measured portion of medicine taken at any one time
                *   2: the quantity of an active agent (substance or radiation) taken in or absorbed at any one time
            *   Usage examples for Sense 1: "He took a dose of medicine."
            *   Usage examples for Sense 2: "The absorbed dose."
        *   In the sentence provided: "the dose reduced" implies the prescribed amount of the therapeutic agent. Both fit, but Sense 1 is the standard definition for the administration of medicine in a clinical setting. Sense 2 is often broader (covering radiation, which isn't strictly "medicine" in the traditional sense, or specific scientific quantification).
        *   However, let's look at the nuances. Is the distinction based on "medicine" vs "active agent"? Yes. The sentence mentions "Treatment" and "patients." This implies medical intervention. Sense 1 specifies "medicine." Sense 2 specifies "substance or radiation."
        *   If the patient is taking a pill, it is a "measured portion of medicine." If they are receiving radiation therapy, it would be Sense 2. The sentence doesn't specify the *type* of treatment (chemotherapy involves drugs, radiotherapy involves radiation). However, "blood counts" are commonly affected by chemotherapy (drugs). If it were radiation, "side effects" and "blood counts" also apply, but "dose reduced" regarding "medicine" is the most frequent colocation for Sense 1.
        *   Usually, when these specific WordNet-style definitions are presented in NLP tasks, Sense 1 is the "prototypical" medical sense for drugs/medicine, and Sense 2 is for radiation or toxicology.
        *   Let's look at the phrase "the dose reduced." This usually refers to the amount of the drug. Is the drug considered "medicine" or just an "active agent"? It is medicine. Therefore, Sense 1 is the best fit.

    *   *Sense 3:* "a communicable infection transmitted by sexual intercourse or genital contact" (slang).
        *   Incorrect. Context is medical treatment, not a disease itself (though "dose" can be slang for venereal disease, the context "dose reduced" makes this grammatically impossible—you don't reduce a venereal disease in that way).

    *   *Sense 4:* "street name for lysergic acid diethylamide" (slang).
        *   Incorrect. Context is clinical treatment ("blood counts," "side effects"), not street drug usage.

4.  **Differentiating Sense 1 and Sense 2 (The tricky part):**
    *   Sentence: "Treatment should be delayed... or the dose reduced..."
    *   Definition 1: "measured portion of medicine".
    *   Definition 2: "quantity of an active agent (substance or radiation)".
    *   Distinction: Definition 1 is specific to *medicine*. Definition 2 includes *radiation* and generally focuses on the *active agent* aspect.
    *   In standard WordNet datasets (which this looks like), Sense 1 is the primary, most common sense for "dose" regarding medication. Sense 2 is often used for things like "radiation dose" or scientific descriptions of absorption.
    *   Example for Sense 2: "The lethal dose was 50mg." "Radiation dose."
    *   Example for Sense 1: "Take your daily dose." "The doctor reduced the dose."
    *   Since the sentence refers to "Treatment" involving "patients" with "blood counts" (likely chemo or similar drug therapy), and implies the administration of a therapeutic substance, Sense 1 is the intended target for the standard concept of a prescribed amount of medication. While chemotherapeutic agents are "active agents," they are given as "medicine." Sense 1 is the most direct fit for standard medical prescriptions.

    *   Let's double-check if there's any reason to choose 2 over 1.
        *   If the treatment were radiation therapy, Sense 2 would be correct.
        *   If the treatment is chemotherapy (implied by "blood counts" and "delayed or discontinued"), it involves chemical substances.
        *   Are chemical substances "medicine"? Yes.
        *   Is Sense 1 the default for drugs? Yes.
        *   Is Sense 2 the default for radiation? Yes.
        *   Without specific mention of radiation, Sense 1 is the primary sense for a therapeutic dose of a drug.

    *   Therefore, Sense 1 is the correct choice.

5.  **Final Selection:** Sense 1.

6.  **Formatting Output:** Return only the number.
    *   Output: 2 (Wait, let me re-evaluate Sense 1 vs Sense 2 carefully one last time. I want to be absolutely sure.)

    *   Let's look at the WordNet hierarchy or usage notes if I can recall them.
    *   WordNet 3.0:
        *   S: (n) dose (a measured portion of medicine taken at any one time)
        *   S: (n) dose, dosage (the quantity of an active agent (substance or radiation) taken in or absorbed at any one time)
    *   Wait, WordNet often lists the "quantity of active agent" as a separate sense or sometimes synonymous.
    *   Let's look at the specific wording "measured portion of medicine". This implies a discrete unit (a pill, a spoonful).
    *   "Quantity of an active agent" implies a concentration or amount of the *stuff itself*, often measured in mg or Gy (gray).
    *   When a doctor reduces the "dose" of chemotherapy, they are reducing the quantity of the active agent (e.g., from 100mg/m2 to 75mg/m2).
    *   However, in general dictionary mapping exercises (like SemCor or WSD tasks), "dose" in the context of taking/administering medicine is almost always mapped to Sense 1. Sense 2 is reserved for contexts like "radiation dose" or specific toxicological contexts ("lethal dose 50").
    *   The phrase "the dose reduced" is standard medical terminology regarding medication. Most lexicographers would classify the general administration of a drug under "portion of medicine" (Sense 1) rather than the broader "quantity of active agent" (Sense 2), unless the text specifically discusses the physics or pharmacokinetics of the agent itself.
    *   Standard usage: "He missed a dose of antibiotics." -> Sense 1.
    *   Standard usage: "The radiation dose was high." -> Sense 2.
    *   The sentence here is clinical management ("Treatment... delayed... dose reduced"). It concerns the administration of the treatment.
    *   If I have to choose the *best* fit:
        *   Sense 1 is the most common sense for therapeutic drugs.
        *   Sense 2 is technically accurate but usually reserved for non-medicine contexts (radiation) or scientific quantification.
        *   Dictionaries often use "dose" and "dosage" interchangeably in definition 2, but "dosage" usually refers to the regimen. Here "dose" is the singular instance amount.
        *   I will stick with Sense 1 because the context implies the administration of a medicinal treatment rather than a physics/absorption context.

    *   Let's reconsider if the "blood counts" implies chemotherapy. Chemo drugs are medicines.
    *   Therefore: Sense 1.

    *   Wait, let me check if "substance" in Sense 2 makes it the catch-all.
    *   If I take a dose of aspirin, is it Sense 1 or 2?
    *   WordNet: Sense 1. "a measured portion of medicine".
    *   If I measure the "absorbed dose", it is Sense 2.
    *   If I talk about "street dose" (LSD), it's Sense 4.
    *   If I talk about a "dose of clap", it's Sense 3.
    *   The sentence uses "dose" in the sense of the amount administered to the patient. This aligns with Sense 1.

    *   Let's double check the definitions provided in the prompt.
    *   1: definition=a measured portion of medicine taken at any one time
    *   2: definition=the quantity of an active agent (substance or radiation) taken in or absorbed at any one time
    *   If the sentence is about chemotherapy, the "active agent" definition (2) is scientifically precise, but "measured portion of medicine" (1) is the lexical standard for "giving/taking a dose".
    *   Let's try to find a reason why 2 might be better.
        *   "Substance or radiation". Chemotherapy is a substance.
        *   But "medicine" is also a substance.
        *   Sense 1 is the specific hyponym of Sense 2 in many ontologies (Medicine is a type of active agent).
        *   In WSD (Word Sense Disambiguation), we usually pick the most specific sense that fits.
        *   Is "medicine" the correct hypernym for the treatment? "Treatment" is broad. But "dose reduced" usually refers to the drug. Drugs are medicines.
        *   Therefore Sense 1 is more specific than Sense 2.
        *   Specificity rule applies: Pick the most specific sense.
        *   Sense 1 ("medicine") is a specific type of Sense 2 ("active agent").
        *   Unless the context is radiation, Sense 1 is preferred.

    *   Conclusion: Sense 1.

    *   Wait, looking at typical WordNet entries for 'dose':
        *   1. dose -- (a measured portion of medicine taken at any one time; "the dose is too small")
        *   2. dose, dosage -- (the quantity of an active agent (substance or radiation) taken in or absorbed at any one time)
    *   Example sentence: "Treatment... dose reduced."
    *   This fits the example "the dose is too small" (Sense 1).
    *   Therefore, 1 is the answer.


attempt_kind: initial

status: success

[User]
Which numbered sense of "reduce" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: Treatment should be delayed or discontinued, or the dose <t>reduced</t>, in patients whose blood counts are abnormal or who have certain other side effects.

Senses:
1. definition=cut down on; make a reduction in | examples=reduce your daily fat intake
2. definition=make less complex | examples=reduce a problem to a single question
3. definition=bring to humbler or weaker state or condition | examples=He reduced the population to slavery
4. definition=simplify the form of a mathematical equation of expression by substituting one term for another
5. definition=lower in grade or rank or force somebody into an undignified situation | examples=She reduced her niece to a servant
6. definition=be the essential element | examples=The proposal boils down to a compromise
7. definition=reduce in size; reduce physically | examples=Hot water will shrink the sweater
8. definition=lessen and make more modest | examples=reduce one's standard of living
9. definition=make smaller | examples=reduce an image
10. definition=to remove oxygen from a compound, or cause to react with hydrogen or form a hydride, or to undergo an increase in the number of electrons
11. definition=narrow or limit | examples=reduce the influx of foreigners
12. definition=put down by force or intimidation | examples=The government quashes any attempt of an uprising
13. definition=undergo meiosis | examples=The cells reduce
14. definition=reposition (a broken bone after surgery) back to its normal site
15. definition=destress and thus weaken a sound when pronouncing it
16. definition=reduce in scope while retaining essential elements | examples=The manuscript must be shortened
17. definition=be cooked until very little liquid is left | examples=The sauce should reduce to one cup
18. definition=cook until very little liquid is left | examples=The cook reduced the sauce by boiling it for a long time
19. definition=lessen the strength or flavor of a solution or mixture | examples=cut bourbon
20. definition=take off weight

finish_reason: stop

role: assistant

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the sentence:** "Treatment should be delayed or discontinued, or the dose <t>reduced</t>, in patients whose blood counts are abnormal or who have certain other side effects."
    *   **Context:** Medical context. Specifically, discussing treatment dosage for patients with side effects.
    *   **Subject:** The dose (of medication).
    *   **Action:** Reduced.
    *   **Meaning:** To make the amount (dose) smaller or lower to avoid side effects.

2.  **Analyze the senses:**
    *   Sense 1: "cut down on; make a reduction in" (e.g., reduce fat intake). This fits the idea of lowering the amount of something.
    *   Sense 2: "make less complex" (e.g., reduce a problem). Not applicable.
    *   Sense 3: "bring to humbler or weaker state" (e.g., slavery). Not applicable.
    *   Sense 4: "simplify... mathematical equation". Not applicable.
    *   Sense 5: "lower in grade or rank". Not applicable.
    *   Sense 6: "be the essential element". Not applicable.
    *   Sense 7: "reduce in size; reduce physically" (e.g., shrink a sweater). Physically changing size/dimensions. A dose isn't exactly physically shrinking like a sweater, though the quantity is smaller.
    *   Sense 8: "lessen and make more modest" (e.g., standard of living). Abstract/lifestyle context.
    *   Sense 9: "make smaller" (e.g., reduce an image). Usually refers to dimensions/scale.
    *   Sense 10: Chemistry definition (remove oxygen). Not applicable.
    *   Sense 11: "narrow or limit" (e.g., influx of foreigners). Close, but usually implies restricting flow/entry.
    *   Sense 12: "put down by force". Not applicable.
    *   Sense 13: Biology/meiosis. Not applicable.
    *   Sense 14: Medical (reposition bone). Specific surgical context, not dosage.
    *   Sense 15: Linguistics (destress). Not applicable.
    *   Sense 16: "reduce in scope while retaining essential elements" (e.g., shorten manuscript). Usually refers to editing text or scope.
    *   Sense 17: Cooking (be cooked). Not applicable.
    *   Sense 18: Cooking (cook). Not applicable.
    *   Sense 19: "lessen the strength... of a solution" (e.g., cut bourbon). This is related to dilution.
    *   Sense 20: "take off weight". Not applicable.

3.  **Compare the best candidates:**
    *   *Sense 1:* "cut down on; make a reduction in". Examples: "reduce your daily fat intake". This matches the context of "reducing a dose" (lowering the quantity/amount administered). A dose is an amount/intake.
    *   *Sense 7:* "reduce in size; reduce physically". Examples: "Hot water will shrink the sweater". This usually implies physical dimensions (height, width, volume of a solid object). While a dose is a physical substance, the concept of "reducing a dose" is about lowering the quantity administered, which aligns better with "make a reduction in" or "cut down on".
    *   *Sense 19:* "lessen the strength... of a solution". While a drug might be a solution, "reducing the dose" usually means taking *less of it* (e.g., 1 pill instead of 2), not necessarily diluting the concentration of the liquid itself (though that can happen, "reduced dose" usually refers to quantity).

    *   *Refining Sense 1:* The example "reduce your daily fat intake" is semantically very close to "reduce the dose". Both involve lowering the quantity of something consumed/administered.

    Let's look at the definition again.
    Sense 1: "cut down on; make a reduction in".
    Sentence: "...the dose reduced..."
    Does this mean "make a reduction in the dose"? Yes.
    Does this mean "cut down on the dose"? Yes.

    Let's check if any other sense is a specific medical sense that overrides this. Sense 14 is medical but for bones. Sense 10 is chemical. Sense 19 is chemistry/cooking mixing.

    Therefore, Sense 1 is the general sense of lowering an amount/quantity.

4.  **Final Decision:** Sense 1 captures the meaning of decreasing the quantity of the dose.

    Sentence: Treatment should be delayed or discontinued, or the dose <t>reduced</t>...
    -> The dose should be made smaller/lower in amount.
    Sense 1 definition: "cut down on; make a reduction in".
    Sense 1 example: "reduce your daily fat intake".

    This is the best fit.

    Answer: 1

format: unknown

native_finish_reason: stop

provider: Together

currency: USD


[User]
Which numbered sense of "patient" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: Treatment should be delayed or discontinued, or the dose reduced, in <t>patients</t> whose blood counts are abnormal or who have certain other side effects.

Senses:
1. definition=a person who requires medical care | examples=the number of emergency patients has grown rapidly
2. definition=the semantic role of an entity that is not the agent but is directly involved in or affected by the happening denoted by the verb in the clause

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the Request:**
    *   Target word: "patient" (marked with `<t>patients</t>`).
    *   Context sentence: "Treatment should be delayed or discontinued, or the dose reduced, in <t>patients</t> whose blood counts are abnormal or who have certain other side effects."
    *   Provided senses:
        1.  definition=a person who requires medical care | examples=the number of emergency patients has grown rapidly
        2.  definition=the semantic role of an entity that is not the agent but is directly involved in or affected by the happening denoted by the verb in the clause
    *   Task: Return only the number of the correct sense.

2.  **Analyze the Sentence Context:**
    *   The sentence discusses medical treatment, blood counts, side effects, and dosage.
    *   The word "patients" refers to people receiving medical care (treatment).
    *   Specifically, it refers to individuals with abnormal blood counts or side effects, necessitating a change in their treatment.

3.  **Evaluate the Senses:**
    *   **Sense 1:** "a person who requires medical care".
        *   Does the context fit? Yes. The sentence describes people receiving treatment, having blood counts checked, and experiencing side effects. These are classic attributes of a medical patient.
    *   **Sense 2:** "the semantic role of an entity that is not the agent but is directly involved in or affected by the happening denoted by the verb in the clause".
        *   This is a linguistic/grammatical definition (the "patient" role in a sentence, often contrasted with "agent").
        *   Example: In "The rock fell," the rock is the patient (theme). In "John hit the ball," the ball is the patient.
        *   Does the context fit? No. The word "patients" in the sentence is not referring to the grammatical role. It refers to the actual human beings in a hospital or clinical setting. It is a noun representing a person, not a meta-linguistic concept.

4.  **Conclusion:**
    *   Sense 1 is the correct meaning in this context.

5.  **Final Output Formulation:**
    *   The user requested "only the number".
    *   The number is 1.

provider: StreamLake


[User]
Which numbered sense of "blood_count" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: Treatment should be delayed or discontinued, or the dose reduced, in patients whose <t>blood counts</t> are abnormal or who have certain other side effects.

Senses:
1. definition=the number of red and white corpuscles in a blood sample
2. definition=the act of estimating the number of red and white corpuscles in a blood sample

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the Request:** The user wants to identify the correct sense of the phrase "blood_count" from a given list of two senses, based on a specific sentence context. The output must be *only* the number of the correct sense.

2.  **Analyze the Sentence:**
    *   Sentence: "Treatment should be delayed or discontinued, or the dose reduced, in patients whose <t>blood counts</t> are abnormal or who have certain other side effects."
    *   Context: The sentence talks about patients having "abnormal" blood counts. This implies a measurement or a result of a test. It refers to the state of the blood (the numbers of cells), not the action of counting them. If the counts (the numbers) are low or high, treatment is affected.

3.  **Analyze the Senses:**
    *   Sense 1: "definition=the number of red and white corpuscles in a blood sample".
        *   This refers to the *result* or the *value*. A patient can have a high, low, or abnormal "number". This fits the context of being "abnormal".
    *   Sense 2: "definition=the act of estimating the number of red and white corpuscles in a blood sample".
        *   This refers to the *procedure* or the *action* of counting. One would not usually say a patient's "act of estimating" is abnormal. One would say the *result* of the count is abnormal.

4.  **Compare Sentence Context to Senses:**
    *   "patients whose blood counts are abnormal" -> The word "abnormal" describes the level or status of the numbers (the corpuscles). It describes a physiological state or a test result value.
    *   Sense 1 is a noun referring to the data/value.
    *   Sense 2 is a noun referring to an action/process.
    *   In medical contexts, when discussing side effects and delaying treatment, doctors look at the *results* of the blood test (the numbers). If the numbers (Sense 1) are off, they act. They do not look at the "act of counting" (Sense 2).

5.  **Conclusion:** Sense 1 is the correct match.

6.  **Final Output Formulation:** The user requested "Return only the number of the correct sense."

    *   Correct number: 1

7.  **Final Check:** Does "blood counts" in the sentence refer to the numbers? Yes. "Counts are abnormal" = "Numbers are abnormal". Does it refer to the act? No. "The act of counting is abnormal" makes no sense.

    Therefore, Sense 1.

provider: Baidu


[User]
Which numbered sense of "abnormal" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: Treatment should be delayed or discontinued, or the dose reduced, in patients whose blood counts are <t>abnormal</t> or who have certain other side effects.

Senses:
1. definition=not normal; not typical or usual or regular or conforming to a norm | examples=abnormal powers of concentration
2. definition=departing from the normal in e.g. intelligence and development | examples=they were heartbroken when they learned their child was abnormal
3. definition=much greater than the normal | examples=abnormal profits

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the Request:**
    *   Target word: "abnormal" (enclosed in `<t></t>`).
    *   Sentence context: "Treatment should be delayed or discontinued, or the dose reduced, in patients whose blood counts are <t>abnormal</t> or who have certain other side effects."
    *   Goal: Identify the correct sense number from the provided list.
    *   Output constraint: Return *only* the number.

2.  **Analyze the Context:**
    *   Subject: Patients' "blood counts".
    *   Condition: The blood counts are "abnormal".
    *   Implication: Treatment needs to be adjusted (delayed, discontinued, dose reduced).
    *   Meaning in context: Blood counts usually have a standard "normal" range (e.g., white blood cell count, red blood cell count, platelets). If they fall outside this range (too high or too low), it indicates a medical issue or side effect. The word is used to mean "not within the normal/healthy range".

3.  **Analyze the Senses:**
    *   *Sense 1:* "not normal; not typical or usual or regular or conforming to a norm". Examples: "abnormal powers of concentration". This is a broad definition covering anything that deviates from a standard or norm. Blood counts have a specific medical norm/range. Deviating from this fits the definition of "not conforming to a norm".
    *   *Sense 2:* "departing from the normal in e.g. intelligence and development". Examples: "they were heartbroken when they learned their child was abnormal". This sense is specific to human development, intelligence, or behavior (often pejorative or clinical in a psychological/developmental context). Blood counts are biological metrics, not intelligence or developmental characteristics.
    *   *Sense 3:* "much greater than the normal". Examples: "abnormal profits". This implies an excess or surplus. While blood counts *can* be abnormally high, they can also be abnormally low. The context of medical side effects usually implies counts dropping (myelosuppression) or sometimes rising, but "abnormal" in this medical context covers *both* directions of deviation. Sense 3 restricts it to "much greater," which is too narrow and potentially inaccurate for a general medical warning about blood counts (which usually refers to low counts in chemotherapy contexts, though high counts can also be abnormal). Furthermore, Sense 1 covers the general deviation, whereas Sense 3 is specific to magnitude in a positive/excess direction.

4.  **Compare Context to Senses:**
    *   Context: Blood counts deviating from the healthy range.
    *   Sense 1: General deviation from a norm. Fits perfectly. Blood counts have a norm; being abnormal means not conforming to that norm.
    *   Sense 2: Specific to intelligence/development. Does not fit.
    *   Sense 3: Specific to being "much greater". Does not fit the general medical usage of "abnormal" (which includes being lower) and is too specific.

5.  **Conclusion:** Sense 1 is the correct fit.

6.  **Final Output Generation:** The user requested *only* the number.
    *   Correct number: 1.

provider: Parasail


[User]
Which numbered sense of "have" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: Treatment should be delayed or discontinued, or the dose reduced, in patients whose blood counts are abnormal or who <t>have</t> certain other side effects.

Senses:
1. definition=have or possess, either in a concrete or an abstract sense | examples=She has $1,000 in the bank
2. definition=have as a feature | examples=This restaurant features the most famous chefs in France
3. definition=go through (mental or physical states or experiences) | examples=get an idea
4. definition=have ownership or possession of | examples=He owns three houses in Florida
5. definition=cause to move; cause to be in a certain position or condition | examples=He got his squad on the ball
6. definition=serve oneself to, or consume regularly | examples=Have another bowl of chicken soup!
7. definition=have a personal or business relationship with someone | examples=have a postdoc
8. definition=organize or be responsible for | examples=hold a reception
9. definition=have left | examples=I have two years left
10. definition=be confronted with | examples=What do we have here?
11. definition=undergo | examples=The stocks had a fast run-up
12. definition=suffer from; be ill with | examples=She has arthritis
13. definition=cause to do; cause to act in a specified manner | examples=The ads induced me to buy a VCR
14. definition=receive willingly something given or offered | examples=The only girl who would have him was the miller's daughter
15. definition=get something; come into possession of | examples=receive payment
16. definition=undergo (as of injuries and illnesses) | examples=She suffered a fracture in the accident
17. definition=achieve a point or goal | examples=Nicklaus had a 70
18. definition=cause to be born | examples=My wife had twins yesterday!
19. definition=have sex with; archaic use | examples=He had taken this woman when she was most vulnerable

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the context:** The sentence is "Treatment should be delayed or discontinued, or the dose reduced, in patients whose blood counts are abnormal or who <t>have</t> certain other side effects."
    *   Subject: patients (specifically "who", referring to patients).
    *   Verb: have.
    *   Object: certain other side effects.

2.  **Analyze the meaning:** The sentence discusses medical scenarios. Patients are experiencing side effects. "Having side effects" means experiencing or suffering from them. It is a medical condition or a consequence of treatment.

3.  **Evaluate the senses:**

    *   1: *have or possess...* - Side effects aren't really "possessed" like money or objects. You don't own them.
    *   2: *have as a feature* - Patients don't "feature" side effects in the way a restaurant features a chef. A patient might "have" symptoms as a feature of their condition, but usually, "side effects" are experienced events/states, not inherent features of the person.
    *   3: *go through (mental or physical states or experiences)* - This is close. Having side effects is going through an experience/state.
    *   4: *have ownership or possession of* - Similar to 1. You don't own side effects.
    *   5: *cause to move...* - No.
    *   6: *serve oneself to, or consume...* - No.
    *   7: *have a personal or business relationship...* - No.
    *   8: *organize or be responsible for...* - No.
    *   9: *have left* - No.
    *   10: *be confronted with* - A bit too specific to the "what do we have here?" or "you have a problem" context.
    *   11: *undergo* - "The stocks had a fast run-up". This is for processes/events. Having side effects fits the "undergo" definition broadly.
    *   12: *suffer from; be ill with* - Examples: "She has arthritis", "He has a cold". Side effects are a form of illness or adverse medical condition. Patients "have" side effects in the same way they "have" a disease or symptoms.
    *   13: *cause to do...* - No.
    *   14: *receive willingly...* - No.
    *   15: *get something; come into possession of* - No.
    *   16: *undergo (as of injuries and illnesses)* - Example: "She suffered a fracture in the accident". Side effects are similar to injuries or illnesses caused by treatment.
    *   17: *achieve a point or goal* - No.
    *   18: *cause to be born* - No.
    *   19: *have sex with* - No.

4.  **Compare the most likely candidates:**

    *   Sense 12: "suffer from; be ill with". Example: "She has arthritis".
    *   Sense 16: "undergo (as of injuries and illnesses)". Example: "She suffered a fracture in the accident".

    The phrase is "have certain other side effects".
    Side effects are unwanted reactions to a drug/treatment. They are medical conditions/symptoms.
    "To have side effects" usually means to experience or suffer from them.

    Let's look closely at Sense 12 vs 16.
    Sense 12 usually implies a state of being (chronic or current state): "She has arthritis". "He has a headache".
    Sense 16 usually implies an event of undergoing something traumatic or specific: "She suffered a fracture". "He had a heart attack".

    "Side effects" can be plural and countable events (like "he had side effects") or a state ("he has side effects").
    In the sentence: "...patients... who <t>have</t> certain other side effects."
    This sounds very similar to "She has arthritis" (Sense 12). It describes the patient's medical status.
    However, Sense 16 specifically mentions "injuries and illnesses". Side effects fit squarely into the category of "illnesses" or medical complications resulting from treatment.
    Often, dictionaries define "have" in medical contexts as "suffer from" or "experience".

    Let's check the examples again.
    Sense 12: "She has arthritis". (State/Condition)
    Sense 16: "She suffered a fracture in the accident". (Event/Injury occurrence)

    "Side effects" are often discussed as conditions patients experience. "Patients having side effects" is synonymous with "patients suffering from side effects".
    Sense 12 fits very well: "suffer from; be ill with".
    Sense 16 fits very well: "undergo (as of injuries and illnesses)".

    Let's look at standard WordNet or dictionary mappings for this specific usage.
    WordNet 3.0:
    Sense 12 (WordNet numbering might differ from the provided list, I must stick to the provided list).
    Let's map the provided definitions to standard meanings.

    Sense 12 in the prompt: "suffer from; be ill with".
    Sense 16 in the prompt: "undergo (as of injuries and illnesses)".

    Is "side effects" a state (like arthritis) or an event (like a fracture)?
    Side effects can be nausea (state/event), rash (state), etc.
    "Have side effects" is usually distinct from "have a fracture".
    You "get" side effects (start to experience them) and you "have" them (possess the condition).
    "Have arthritis" (Sense 12) -> State.
    "Have a fracture" (Sense 16) -> Event/Injury.
    "Have side effects" -> Often refers to the presence of adverse conditions.
    "Do you have side effects?" (State). "He has severe side effects."

    Let's look at Sense 3: "go through (mental or physical states or experiences)". Example: "get an idea", "have a feeling".
    "Having side effects" involves experiencing them.

    However, Sense 12 ("suffer from; be ill with") is the standard definition for "have" + [medical condition]. Side effects function as temporary medical conditions in this context. The example "She has arthritis" aligns well with "Patients... have side effects".

    Let's look at Sense 16. Example: "She suffered a fracture".
    If the sentence said "patients who *suffered* certain other side effects", Sense 16 would be strong. But the verb is "have". "Patients who *have* side effects."
    Usually, "have a fracture" implies the state of the bone being broken (which aligns with Sense 12/state), but the definition provided for 16 is "undergo (as of injuries and illnesses)" which leans towards the event.
    "Side effects" are generally "suffered from" (Sense 12). When a doctor asks "Do you have any side effects?", they are asking about the state of the patient.

    Let's compare 12 and 16 again.
    12: suffer from; be ill with.
    16: undergo (as of injuries and illnesses).

    In the sentence, the patients currently *have* the side effects.
    "Who have certain other side effects."
    If I say "I have a cold", that is Sense 12.
    If I say "I had a heart attack", that is Sense 16 (event).
    "Side effects" can be processes/events (diarrhea episodes) or states (rash).
    But generally, the construction "to have [symptom/condition]" maps to the "suffer from/be ill with" definition.

    Let's look at Sense 11: "undergo". Example: "The stocks had a fast run-up".
    This is usually for processes.
    Sense 16 is specifically for injuries/illnesses.
    Sense 12 is "suffer from; be ill with".
    Sense 16 is "undergo (as of injuries and illnesses)".

    Distinction:
    "She has arthritis" (Sense 12) - Focus on the state of having the disease.
    "She suffered a fracture" (Sense 16) - Focus on the occurrence of the injury.

    In the sentence: "...patients ... who <t>have</t> certain other side effects."
    This describes the patients' current medical condition regarding the treatment.
    "Suffer from" is the most natural synonym here. "Patients who suffer from certain other side effects."
    "Undergo" sounds slightly less natural in the present tense simple aspect for side effects ("Patients who undergo side effects" vs "Patients who have side effects"). "Undergo" usually implies a specific procedure or an event (undergo surgery, undergo a transformation).

    Therefore, Sense 12 ("suffer from; be ill with") is the best fit. It captures the medical condition aspect. Side effects are medical conditions/illnesses induced by the treatment.

    Let's verify Sense 12's examples vs the sentence.
    Sense 12 Ex: "She has arthritis".
    Sentence: "Patients... have side effects".
    Structural match: Subject (Person) + have + [Medical Condition/Symptom].
    Semantic match: Arthritis is a condition. Side effects are conditions (symptoms, reactions).
    Definition match: "suffer from". Patients suffer from side effects.

    Let's verify Sense 16's examples vs the sentence.
    Sense 16 Ex: "She suffered a fracture in the accident".
    Sentence: "Patients... have side effects".
    "Have" is present tense. "Suffered" in the example is past tense implying the event.
    "Undergo" in Sense 16 definition suggests an event.
    While side effects can be events, the phrasing "have side effects" treats them as a condition being experienced (state), fitting Sense 12 better.

    Let's check Sense 3 again. "go through (mental or physical states or experiences)".
    Example: "get an idea". This sense often collocates with "get" or refers to "having a feeling".
    "Have a side effect" is more specific than just an experience; it is a medical adversity.
    Sense 12 specifically covers "be ill with".
    Sense 16 specifically covers "injuries and illnesses".
    Since 12 and 16 are more specific to the medical domain than 3, one of them should be the answer.
    Between 12 and 16:
    "She has arthritis" (State) -> 12.
    "She suffered a fracture" (Event/Injury) -> 16.
    Side effects are typically discussed as conditions (states) in the present tense ("Do you have side effects?"). If it were "He had a severe reaction last night", it might lean towards 16 (event). But the sentence is about patients currently presenting with side effects (condition).
    Therefore, Sense 12 is the most appropriate.

    Let's double check if Sense 2 (feature) applies. "Patients... have certain other side effects".
    Could it mean "Patients feature side effects"? No, that implies the side effects are a characteristic feature. Side effects are adverse events, not inherent features of the patient.

    Let's check Sense 1 (possess). "Patients possess side effects". No, you don't own them.

    So it's definitely between 12 and 16.
    The key is "suffer from" vs "undergo".
    "Undergo" (16) usually collocates with nouns like "surgery", "test", "metamorphosis", or in the provided example "suffered a fracture" (an event).
    "Suffer from" (12) collocates with diseases and symptoms like "arthritis", "headache", "cancer".
    Side effects are symptoms/conditions. "Nausea is a side effect." "I have nausea."
    The sentence says "patients who have... side effects".
    This maps to "patients who suffer from side effects".
    This aligns perfectly with Sense 12.

    Final decision: Sense 12.

provider: AtlasCloud


[User]
Which numbered sense of "certain" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: Treatment should be delayed or discontinued, or the dose reduced, in patients whose blood counts are abnormal or who have <t>certain</t> other side effects.

Senses:
1. definition=definite but not specified or identified | examples=set aside a certain sum each week
2. definition=having or feeling no doubt or uncertainty; confident and assured | examples=felt certain of success
3. definition=established beyond doubt or question; definitely known | examples=what is certain is that every effect must have a cause
4. definition=certain to occur; destined or inevitable; ; ; - Benjamin Franklin | examples=he was certain to fail
5. definition=established irrevocably | examples=his fate is sealed
6. definition=reliable in operation or effect | examples=a quick and certain remedy
7. definition=exercising or taking care great enough to bring assurance | examples=be certain to disconnect the iron when you are through

reasoning_content:
The sentence is: "Treatment should be delayed or discontinued, or the dose reduced, in patients whose blood counts are abnormal or who have <t>certain</t> other side effects."
The word "certain" in this context means "definite but not specified or identified". It refers to some specific but unnamed side effects.
Let's check the senses:
1. definition=definite but not specified or identified | examples=set aside a certain sum each week -> matches "a certain person", "certain side effects" (meaning some particular but unspecified side effects).
2. definition=having or feeling no doubt or uncertainty; confident and assured
3. definition=established beyond doubt or question; definitely known
4. definition=certain to occur; destined or inevitable
5. definition=established irrevocably
6. definition=reliable in operation or effect
7. definition=exercising or taking care great enough to bring assurance

Sense 1 fits perfectly. "certain other side effects" means "some specific but unspecified other side effects".
Therefore, the correct sense number is 1.

provider: SiliconFlow


[User]
Which numbered sense of "other" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: Treatment should be delayed or discontinued, or the dose reduced, in patients whose blood counts are abnormal or who have certain <t>other</t> side effects.

Senses:
1. definition=not the same one or ones already mentioned or implied; - the White Queen | examples=today isn't any other day
2. definition=recently past | examples=the other evening
3. definition=belonging to the distant past | examples=the early inhabitants of Europe
4. definition=very unusual; different in character or quality from the normal or expected; - Lance Morrow | examples=a strange, other dimension...where his powers seemed to fail

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the Request:**
    *   Target word: "other" (marked with `<t></t>`).
    *   Sentence context: "Treatment should be delayed or discontinued, or the dose reduced, in patients whose blood counts are abnormal or who have certain <t>other</t> side effects."
    *   Task: Identify the correct sense number from the provided list.
    *   Output constraint: Return *only* the number.

2.  **Analyze the Sentence:**
    *   The sentence is discussing medical treatment protocols.
    *   It mentions "blood counts are abnormal" as one condition.
    *   It then mentions "certain <t>other</t> side effects".
    *   The structure implies a distinction or addition to the previously mentioned condition (abnormal blood counts). "Side effects" is a category that includes "abnormal blood counts" (or blood-related issues), and "other" introduces additional/side effects *different* from the one just mentioned.

3.  **Analyze the Senses:**
    *   **Sense 1:** "not the same one or ones already mentioned or implied".
        *   Example: "today isn't any other day".
        *   Contextual fit: The sentence mentions abnormal blood counts. Then it mentions "other side effects". These are side effects *different* from the abnormal blood counts already mentioned. This fits perfectly. It distinguishes the new set of side effects from the one previously referenced.
    *   **Sense 2:** "recently past".
        *   Example: "the other evening".
        *   Contextual fit: Does "other" mean "recently past" in "other side effects"? No. It's not referring to time.
    *   **Sense 3:** "belonging to the distant past".
        *   Example: "the early inhabitants of Europe" (Wait, this example doesn't even seem to use the word "other" explicitly, but the definition implies archaic usage like "other times"). Regardless, in the target sentence, it doesn't refer to the distant past.
    *   **Sense 4:** "very unusual; different in character or quality from the normal or expected".
        *   Example: "a strange, other dimension".
        *   Contextual fit: While side effects are undesirable, "other" here is not used to mean "strange" or "supernatural" or "unworldly". It is used simply to enumerate additional distinct instances.

4.  **Compare and Conclude:**
    *   Sense 1 captures the core function of "other" here: different/distinct/additional from the one(s) already mentioned (abnormal blood counts).
    *   Senses 2, 3, and 4 are temporal or qualitative descriptions that do not fit the enumerative/contrastive usage in the medical sentence.

5.  **Final Output Generation:**
    *   The correct sense is 1.


[User]
Which numbered sense of "side_effect" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: Treatment should be delayed or discontinued, or the dose reduced, in patients whose blood counts are abnormal or who have certain other <t>side effects</t>.

Senses:
1. definition=a secondary and usually adverse effect of a drug or therapy | examples=severe headaches are one of the side effects of the drug
2. definition=any adverse and unwanted secondary effect | examples=a strategy to contain the fallout from the accounting scandal

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the Request:**
    *   Target word: "side_effect" (marked with <t></t>).
    *   Context sentence: "Treatment should be delayed or discontinued, or the dose reduced, in patients whose blood counts are abnormal or who have certain other <t>side effects</t>."
    *   Provided senses:
        *   Sense 1: definition=a secondary and usually adverse effect of a drug or therapy | examples=severe headaches are one of the side effects of the drug
        *   Sense 2: definition=any adverse and unwanted secondary effect | examples=a strategy to contain the fallout from the accounting scandal
    *   Task: Return only the number of the correct sense.

2.  **Analyze the Context:**
    *   The sentence talks about "Treatment", "drug", "dose reduced", "patients", "blood counts".
    *   The phrase is "who have certain other side effects".
    *   The context is clearly medical/clinical. It refers to the consequences of medical treatment on a patient.

3.  **Analyze the Senses:**
    *   **Sense 1:** Specific to "a drug or therapy". The definition includes "secondary and usually adverse effect". The example mentions "side effects of the drug". This fits the medical context perfectly.
    *   **Sense 2:** A broader definition: "any adverse and unwanted secondary effect". The example is about "fallout from the accounting scandal" (a non-medical context). While the definition is similar, the scope is general.

4.  **Compare Context to Senses:**
    *   The context mentions "Treatment" and "dose". This is strictly a medical context regarding drugs/therapy.
    *   Sense 1 specifically mentions "drug or therapy" in the definition.
    *   Sense 2 is a general definition applicable to anything (scandals, policies, etc.).
    *   Usually, in word sense disambiguation tasks, the more specific definition that matches the domain (medical) is preferred if the definitions are hierarchical or distinct in scope.
    *   However, looking closely at the definitions:
        *   Sense 1: "secondary and usually adverse effect of a drug or therapy" -> Matches "Treatment", "dose".
        *   Sense 2: "any adverse and unwanted secondary effect" -> Broad.
    *   The sentence is discussing medical treatment. Therefore, Sense 1 is the precise sense intended. Sense 2 is a hypernym or a metaphorical extension often found in general usage (like "side effect of the recession"). Since the sentence is literal and medical, Sense 1 is the correct choice.

5.  **Formulate Output:**
    *   The correct sense is 1.
    *   Constraint: "Return only the number of the correct sense."

6.  **Final Check:**
    *   Sentence: Medical context.
    *   Sense 1: Medical definition.
    *   Sense 2: General definition (example is business/scandal).
    *   Match: Sense 1.

7.  **Construct Final Response:** "1".


[User]
Which numbered sense of "use" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: Alimta is not recommended for <t>use</t> in patients with moderate or severe kidney problems.

Senses:
1. definition=the act of using | examples=he warned against the use of narcotic drugs
2. definition=what something is used for | examples=the function of an auger is to bore holes
3. definition=a particular service | examples=he put his knowledge to good use
4. definition=(economics) the utilization of economic goods to satisfy needs or in manufacturing | examples=the consumption of energy has increased steadily
5. definition=(psychology) an automatic pattern of behavior in reaction to a specific situation; may be inherited or acquired through frequent repetition | examples=owls have nocturnal habits
6. definition=exerting shrewd or devious influence especially for one's own advantage | examples=his manipulation of his friends was scandalous
7. definition=(law) the exercise of the legal right to enjoy the benefits of owning property | examples=we were given the use of his boat

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the input sentence:** "Alimta is not recommended for <t>use</t> in patients with moderate or severe kidney problems."
    *   Context: Medical/Pharmacological.
    *   Word: "use".
    *   Phrase: "use in patients". This refers to the administration or application of the drug (Alimta) for treatment.

2.  **Analyze the senses provided:**

    *   **Sense 1:** definition=the act of using | examples=he warned against the use of narcotic drugs.
        *   Definition matches? "The act of using" fits well. The sentence talks about the act of administering the drug to patients.
        *   Example matches? "he warned against the use of narcotic drugs" is extremely similar to "not recommended for use in patients". Both are about the administration/consumption of medication.
        *   Fit: High.

    *   **Sense 2:** definition=what something is used for | examples=the function of an auger is to bore holes.
        *   Definition matches? This refers to purpose or function (utility). While the drug has a purpose (treating cancer), the sentence structure "recommended for use" refers to the act of employing the drug, not defining its function itself. You wouldn't say "Alimta is not recommended for its purpose/function." You say "Alimta is not recommended for the act of using it."
        *   Fit: Low.

    *   **Sense 3:** definition=a particular service | examples=he put his knowledge to good use.
        *   Definition matches? This usually refers to utility or benefit derived from something abstract like knowledge or a skill.
        *   Fit: Low.

    *   **Sense 4:** definition=(economics) the utilization of economic goods to satisfy needs or in manufacturing | examples=the consumption of energy has increased steadily.
        *   Definition matches? This is specific to economics. While taking a drug involves consumption, the domain of the sentence is medical/pharmaceutical, not macro-economics or manufacturing.
        *   Fit: Low.

    *   **Sense 5:** definition=(psychology) an automatic pattern of behavior... | examples=owls have nocturnal habits.
        *   Definition matches? This defines "habit" or a psychological behavior pattern. Not relevant to administering a drug.
        *   Fit: None.

    *   **Sense 6:** definition=exerting shrewd or devious influence especially for one's own advantage | examples=his manipulation of his friends was scandalous.
        *   Definition matches? This refers to manipulation or exploitation.
        *   Fit: None.

    *   **Sense 7:** definition=(law) the exercise of the legal right to enjoy the benefits of owning property | examples=we were given the use of his boat.
        *   Definition matches? This is a legal term regarding property rights.
        *   Fit: None.

3.  **Compare the best fit (Sense 1) with the sentence:**
    *   Sentence: "Alimta is not recommended for [the act of using] in patients..."
    *   Sense 1: "the act of using". Example: "use of narcotic drugs".
    *   The sentence is discussing the administration or application of a medical treatment. This aligns perfectly with the general definition of "the act of using". The example provided in Sense 1 ("use of narcotic drugs") is semantically very close to the target sentence ("use ... in patients").

4.  **Final Conclusion:** Sense 1 is the correct answer. It describes the act of employing a drug.

5.  **Format Output:** Return only the number.

provider: Friendli


[User]
Which numbered sense of "patient" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: Alimta is not recommended for use in <t>patients</t> with moderate or severe kidney problems.

Senses:
1. definition=a person who requires medical care | examples=the number of emergency patients has grown rapidly
2. definition=the semantic role of an entity that is not the agent but is directly involved in or affected by the happening denoted by the verb in the clause

reasoning_content:
The sentence is: "Alimta is not recommended for use in <t>patients</t> with moderate or severe kidney problems."
The word in question is "patients".
In the context of the sentence, "patients" refers to people receiving medical care (specifically those with kidney problems taking the drug Alimta).
Sense 1: definition=a person who requires medical care. This fits perfectly.
Sense 2: definition=the semantic role of an entity that is not the agent but is directly involved in or affected by the happening denoted by the verb in the clause. This is the grammatical/linguistic sense of "patient", which does not fit the context.

Therefore, the correct sense is 1.


[User]
Which numbered sense of "moderate" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: Alimta is not recommended for use in patients with <t>moderate</t> or severe kidney problems.

Senses:
1. definition=being within reasonable or average limits; not excessive or extreme | examples=moderate prices
2. definition=not extreme | examples=a moderate penalty
3. definition=marked by avoidance of extravagance or extremes | examples=moderate in his demands

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the Request:**
    *   Target word: "moderate" (used as an adjective in the specific context).
    *   Context sentence: "Alimta is not recommended for use in patients with <t>moderate</t> or severe kidney problems."
    *   Provided senses:
        1.  definition=being within reasonable or average limits; not excessive or extreme | examples=moderate prices
        2.  definition=not extreme | examples=a moderate penalty
        3.  definition=marked by avoidance of extravagance or extremes | examples=moderate in his demands
    *   Constraint: Return *only* the number of the correct sense.

2.  **Analyze the Context:**
    *   The sentence is about medical conditions: "moderate or severe kidney problems."
    *   Medical severity scales usually range from mild -> moderate -> severe.
    *   Here, "moderate" describes the intensity or degree of the kidney problems. It means "medium" or "intermediate" between mild and severe.

3.  **Analyze the Senses:**
    *   **Sense 1:** "being within reasonable or average limits; not excessive or extreme".
        *   Does this fit? A "moderate" medical problem is indeed within limits (between mild and severe). It is not "excessive" in the sense of being the worst case (severe), but it's definitely a problem. The "average limits" part is a bit vague, but "not excessive or extreme" aligns well with the medical scale. In medical contexts, "moderate" means "neither mild nor severe."
    *   **Sense 2:** "not extreme".
        *   This is similar to Sense 1 but simpler. Does it fit? Yes, moderate kidney problems are not extreme (which would be severe).
    *   **Sense 3:** "marked by avoidance of extravagance or extremes".
        *   Does this fit? This usually applies to behavior or personality (e.g., "he is a moderate drinker," "she is moderate in her views"). It implies a conscious choice or a trait of character/style. Kidney problems are not "marked by avoidance of extravagance." They are biological states, not behavioral traits. So, Sense 3 is incorrect.

4.  **Compare Sense 1 and Sense 2:**
    *   Sense 1: "being within reasonable or average limits; not excessive or extreme".
    *   Sense 2: "not extreme".
    *   These are very similar. Let's look closely at the definitions and examples provided in standard dictionaries (like WordNet, from which these often derive).
    *   *WordNet 3.1 check (Mental Sandbox):*
        *   Adj 1: being within reasonable or average limits; not excessive or extreme (e.g., moderate prices).
        *   Adj 2: not extreme (e.g., a moderate penalty).
        *   (Wait, let me double-check the WordNet mappings for "moderate" usage in medical contexts).
    *   Often, Sense 1 is the primary definition for "moderate" meaning "average" or "medium" amount/intensity. "Moderate prices" = average/reasonable prices. "Moderate kidney problems" = medium intensity problems.
    *   Sense 2 says "not extreme". While a moderate problem is not extreme, Sense 1 ("within reasonable... limits") captures the positive existence of the condition (it exists, it's in the middle). Sense 2 ("not extreme") is often used for things like penalties or temperatures where the "middle" nature is defined by the negation of the extreme.
    *   However, in WSD (Word Sense Disambiguation) datasets (like Senseval or SemEval), the specific definitions matter.
    *   Let's look at the structure. Sense 1 mentions "average limits". A moderate medical condition is literally in the middle range.
    *   Let's check if Sense 2 is reserved for contexts where "not extreme" is the primary description rather than "medium/middling".
    *   Actually, Sense 1 is usually the "catch-all" for "average/middle degree".
    *   Let's look at the example for Sense 1: "moderate prices". This refers to a level on a scale (price).
    *   Let's look at the example for Sense 2: "a moderate penalty". This also refers to a level on a scale.
    *   Why are they separated?
        *   Sense 1: "within reasonable or average limits". This suggests a normative standard or a "normal" range, though "moderate" problems aren't "normal" (healthy), they are average *among problems*.
        *   Sense 2: "not extreme".
    *   Let's consider standard WSD annotations.
        *   Sentence: "moderate or severe kidney problems".
        *   Here "moderate" stands in contrast to "severe".
        *   In medical grading: Mild < Moderate < Severe.
        *   "Moderate" here means "of medium severity".
        *   Sense 1 definition: "being within reasonable or average limits".
        *   Sense 2 definition: "not extreme".
    *   "Not extreme" is technically true, but "medium" (implied by "average limits" or just the general meaning of the word in this context) is the specific location on the scale.
    *   Usually, Sense 1 is the definition for "average" or "medium" intensity.
    *   Let's try to differentiate Sense 1 and Sense 2 based on the provided text.
    *   Sense 1 implies a specific position ("within limits").
    *   Sense 2 implies a negation ("not extreme").
    *   However, looking at WordNet (source of these definitions), Sense 1 is "being within reasonable or average limits; not excessive or extreme". Sense 2 is just "not extreme". In many WSD systems, Sense 1 covers intensity/degree contexts.
    *   Example comparison:
        *   "moderate prices" (Sense 1) -> Prices that are average/reasonable.
        *   "moderate penalty" (Sense 2) -> A penalty that isn't harsh.
    *   Is "moderate kidney problems" more like "moderate prices" or "moderate penalty"? Both are about degree.
    *   Let's look for a reason to pick one over the other.
    *   In WordNet 3.0/3.1:
        *   S: (adj) moderate (being within reasonable or average limits; not excessive or extreme) "moderate prices"; "a moderate income"; "a moderate fine"; "moderate demands"; "a moderate estimate"
        *   Wait, usually, WordNet groups these. Let's re-read the provided senses carefully.
    *   The provided prompt lists them as separate senses.
        1. definition=being within reasonable or average limits; not excessive or extreme | examples=moderate prices
        2. definition=not extreme | examples=a moderate penalty
    *   This separation suggests Sense 1 is for things that are "average/reasonable/medium" and Sense 2 is strictly "not extreme".
    *   "Moderate kidney problems": Is it "not extreme"? Yes. Is it "average limits"? In the context of "kidney problems", it is the middle step.
    *   Sense 1 seems to capture the "middle" nature ("average limits"). Sense 2 seems to focus on the lack of extremity. In medical triage, "moderate" is a distinct category, not just "not severe". It is the intermediate state. Therefore, Sense 1 (being within average limits / the middle) fits better than just "not extreme" (which could arguably include mild, though usually moderate is defined as between mild and severe).
    *   Actually, looking at standard dictionary definitions for medical usage: "moderate" means "of medium quantity or amount".
    *   Sense 1 mentions "average limits". "Average" is the keyword here. Moderate is the "average" severity of a specific condition (if you look at the distribution, or conceptually the middle).
    *   Let's verify Sense 3 again. "marked by avoidance of extravagance or extremes" (e.g. moderate in his demands). This is behavioral. Kidney problems are not behavioral. Sense 3 is out.

    *   Decision between 1 and 2:
        *   Sense 1 defines it as being *within* limits.
        *   Sense 2 defines it as *not* extreme.
        *   While "moderate" implies "not extreme", it specifically implies a "middle" state.
        *   Sense 1's "average limits" aligns with "middle state".
        *   Therefore, Sense 1 is the best fit among the choices.

    *   Let's double check typical WSD data (e.g., SemCor/Senseval).
    *   In SemCor, "moderate" (adj) often maps to the sense "being within reasonable or average limits..."
    *   Example: "moderate breeze" -> Sense 1.
    *   Example: "moderate capability" -> Sense 1.
    *   Example: "moderate prices" -> Sense 1.
    *   The second sense "not extreme" in the prompt seems to be a specific subset or a simplification. But usually, the "medium/average" sense is Sense 1.
    *   In the sentence "moderate or severe kidney problems", "moderate" is used to grade the intensity. It is the middle point.
    *   Sense 1 ("average limits") fits the grading logic.

    *   Conclusion: Sense 1.

provider: DeepInfra


[User]
Which numbered sense of "severe" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: Alimta is not recommended for use in patients with moderate or <t>severe</t> kidney problems.

Senses:
1. definition=intensely or extremely bad or unpleasant in degree or quality | examples=severe pain
2. definition=very strong or vigorous | examples=strong winds
3. definition=severely simple | examples=a stark interior
4. definition=unsparing and uncompromising in discipline or judgment; - H.G.Wells | examples=a parent severe to the pitch of hostility
5. definition=causing fear or anxiety by threatening great harm | examples=a dangerous operation
6. definition=very bad in degree or extent | examples=a severe worldwide depression

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the Request:**
    *   Target word: "severe" (marked with <t></t>).
    *   Context sentence: "Alimta is not recommended for use in patients with moderate or <t>severe</t> kidney problems."
    *   Goal: Identify the correct sense number from the provided list.
    *   Constraint: Return *only* the number.

2.  **Analyze the Sentence Context:**
    *   The sentence is discussing medical conditions (kidney problems).
    *   The structure is "moderate or severe".
    *   This context refers to the intensity, seriousness, or stage of a medical condition.
    *   "Severe" here acts as a gradable adjective describing the state of health. It's not describing weather, discipline, style, or a threatening mood. It describes how *bad* the condition is.

3.  **Analyze the Senses:**

    *   *Sense 1:* definition=intensely or extremely bad or unpleasant in degree or quality | examples=severe pain.
        *   "Severe pain" is very close to "severe kidney problems". Pain is a symptom/condition. Kidney problems are a condition. "Intensely or extremely bad" fits perfectly.

    *   *Sense 2:* definition=very strong or vigorous | examples=strong winds.
        *   This usually applies to physical forces (weather). Kidney problems aren't "vigorous" in this sense.

    *   *Sense 3:* definition=severely simple | examples=a stark interior.
        *   This refers to style/aesthetics (like "severe lines"). Not applicable to a medical condition.

    *   *Sense 4:* definition=unsparing and uncompromising in discipline or judgment | examples=a parent severe to the pitch of hostility.
        *   This refers to personality or behavior. Not applicable.

    *   *Sense 5:* definition=causing fear or anxiety by threatening great harm | examples=a dangerous operation.
        *   While a severe condition is dangerous, the word "severe" in this specific medical context usually refers to the *degree* or *intensity* of the illness itself, not just the "fear" it causes. However, let's look at Sense 6 before deciding.

    *   *Sense 6:* definition=very bad in degree or extent | examples=a severe worldwide depression.
        *   This refers to "very bad in degree or extent". This is also very close.
        *   Let's compare Sense 1 and Sense 6.
        *   Sense 1: "intensely or extremely bad or unpleasant in degree or quality". Example: "severe pain".
        *   Sense 6: "very bad in degree or extent". Example: "a severe worldwide depression".
        *   In medical contexts (like grading kidney failure), "severe" is often contrasted with "mild" and "moderate". It indicates a high degree of impairment.
        *   Sense 1 includes "unpleasant... quality". Kidney problems are definitely unpleasant/bad.
        *   Sense 6 focuses on "degree or extent".
        *   Let's look closer at the examples provided in the source data (WordNet usually). Sense 1 usually maps to "intense/extreme". "Severe pain" fits Sense 1. "Severe kidney problems" is similar to "severe pain" (a condition/symptom).
        *   Sense 6 examples often involve macro-level events (depression) or sometimes injury (severe injury). But actually, in WordNet, "severe" often breaks down into:
            *   Intense/extreme (pain, weather).
            *   Stern/strict (discipline).
            *   Plain/unadorned.
        *   Let's look at the specific definitions again.
        *   Sense 1: "intensely or extremely bad or unpleasant in degree or quality".
        *   Sense 6: "very bad in degree or extent".
        *   There is a subtle overlap. However, standard WordNet sense inventories often group medical conditions under the definition akin to Sense 1 ("intensely or extremely bad...").
        *   Let's check common WordNet mappings (from memory/general knowledge of NLP datasets like SemCor).
        *   "Severe pain", "severe illness", "severe injury" usually fall under the definition "intensely or extremely bad or unpleasant in degree or quality".
        *   "Severe depression" (economic or psychological) often falls under "very bad in degree or extent" or Sense 1 depending on the version.
        *   However, let's look at the specific phrasing: "moderate or severe".
        *   "Moderate" acts as a counterpoint. Mild -> Moderate -> Severe.
        *   This describes the *intensity* or *quality* of the condition.
        *   Sense 1 mentions "unpleasant in degree". Kidney problems are unpleasant/bad.
        *   Sense 6 says "very bad in degree or extent".
        *   Which is a better fit?
        *   Actually, Sense 1 is the standard definition for "severe" when applied to physical suffering, pain, or medical conditions in many dictionaries.
        *   Let's look at the examples again.
        *   Sense 1: "severe pain".
        *   Sense 6: "a severe worldwide depression".
        *   Kidney problems are closer to "pain" (physical condition) than "depression" (economic state) in terms of the semantic domain (medical vs economic), though "severe depression" (mental health) is medical.
        *   However, usually, Sense 1 is the primary sense for "severe" meaning "intense" or "extreme".
        *   Let's check if there's a distinction regarding "bad" vs "unpleasant". Kidney problems are "bad" conditions.
        *   Let's try to find a discriminator.
        *   Sense 1 focuses on "unpleasant in degree or quality".
        *   Sense 6 focuses on "very bad in degree or extent".
        *   A kidney problem is a "bad" thing. Is it "unpleasant"? Yes.
        *   But "severe kidney problems" (medical classification) is usually considered a high degree of the problem.
        *   Let's check the nuances of WordNet 3.0 (which this list likely comes from).
        *   WordNet 3.0 Senses for "severe":
            *   1: causing fear or anxiety by threatening great harm (a dangerous operation). -> This is Sense 5 in the prompt. (Prompt sense 5).
            *   2: very strong or vigorous (strong winds). -> Sense 2 in prompt.
            *   3: severely simple (a stark interior). -> Sense 3 in prompt.
            *   4: unsparing and uncompromising... (a severe parent). -> Sense 4 in prompt.
            *   5: intensely or extremely bad or unpleasant... (severe pain). -> Sense 1 in prompt.
            *   6: very bad in degree or extent (severe worldwide depression). -> Sense 6 in prompt.
        *   *Correction*: The order in the prompt is shuffled compared to standard WordNet, but I will stick to the prompt's numbering.
        *   Comparing Prompt Sense 1 vs Prompt Sense 6.
        *   Prompt Sense 1: "intensely or extremely bad or unpleasant in degree or quality". Example: severe pain.
        *   Prompt Sense 6: "very bad in degree or extent". Example: severe worldwide depression.
        *   Medical conditions (illnesses, injuries, symptoms) are standard examples for the sense meaning "intense" or "serious". "Severe pain" (Sense 1) is conceptually identical to "Severe kidney problems" (a serious medical condition).
        *   Sense 6 ("very bad in degree or extent") in WordNet examples often cites "a severe shortage", "a severe infection", "a severe loss".
        *   Wait, WordNet 3.0 actually maps "severe pain" and "severe illness" often to the definition "intensely or extremely bad or unpleasant in degree or quality".
        *   However, let's look at Sense 6 again: "very bad in degree or extent".
        *   Let's check the overlap.
        *   If I look at SemCor annotations or sense disambiguation papers:
            *   "Severe pain" -> Sense 1 (Intense).
            *   "Severe weather" -> Sense 2.
            *   "Severe depression" (economic) -> Sense 6.
        *   Is "kidney problems" closer to "pain" or "depression"? It's closer to "pain" (medical symptom/condition).
        *   "Severe" in medical contexts (severe asthma, severe kidney failure) refers to the intensity of the pathology.
        *   Sense 1 specifies "unpleasant in degree or quality". A disease is an unpleasant quality/state.
        *   Sense 6 specifies "very bad in degree or extent".
        *   There is a strong case for Sense 1. Medical symptoms (like pain) are prototypical examples for Sense 1. Economic situations are prototypical for Sense 6.
        *   Let's re-read Sense 1 carefully: "intensely or extremely bad or unpleasant in degree or quality".
        *   Let's re-read Sense 6 carefully: "very bad in degree or extent".
        *   Usually, Sense 1 (Intense/Extreme) covers medical symptoms and subjective suffering. Sense 6 covers the magnitude of negative events/situations.
        *   However, "kidney problems" is a condition. Is it a quality (Sense 1) or a situation/event (Sense 6)?
        *   Let's look at WordNet 3.1 or 3.0 specific examples for Sense 1 vs 6 (using standard numbering).
        *   Standard WN Sense 1: "severely simple" (Sense 3 here).
        *   Standard WN Sense 2: "very bad in degree or extent" (Sense 6 here). Examples: "a severe shortage", "a severe infection".
        *   Standard WN Sense 3: "intensely or extremely bad or unpleasant in degree or quality" (Sense 1 here). Examples: "severe pain".
        *   *Wait*, if Sense 6 (prompt) says "a severe worldwide depression", and standard WordNet puts "severe infection" under "very bad in degree or extent", then "severe kidney problems" might be Sense 6.
        *   Let's verify the mapping of examples to definitions.
        *   Definition: "very bad in degree or extent". Examples: "a severe worldwide depression", "a severe shortage".
        *   Definition: "intensely or extremely bad or unpleasant in degree or quality". Examples: "severe pain".
        *   "Kidney problems" is a state/condition. Is it "pain" (subjective sensation) or a general "bad thing" (condition)?
        *   "Severe" in "severe kidney problems" means the condition is advanced/serious.
        *   Often, medical illnesses are grouped with "pain" under "intense/bad quality" (Sense 1).
        *   Let's look at the "unpleasant" vs "bad" distinction. Pain is unpleasant. Depression (economic) is bad (not necessarily "unpleasant" in the sensory way).
        *   Kidney problems cause unpleasantness but are structurally a "problem" (bad state).
        *   However, "severe pain" is the example for Sense 1. "Severe" modifies "pain" (intensity). "Severe" modifies "kidney problems" (intensity/seriousness).
        *   The parallel between "severe pain" (Sense 1) and "severe kidney problems" is strong. Both describe the intensity of a medical negative.
        *   Conversely, Sense 6 examples are often macro-level abstractions (depression, shortage).
        *   Therefore, Sense 1 seems the most appropriate fit for a medical condition in a patient, aligning with the example "severe pain".

    *   Let's double check Sense 5: "causing fear or anxiety...". Example: "a dangerous operation".
        *   The sentence mentions "Alimta... not recommended...". This implies danger/risk.
        *   However, "severe" in "severe kidney problems" describes the *kidney problems*, not the drug Alimta directly (though the problems cause the danger).
        *   If the sentence were "Alimta is a severe drug," Sense 5 might apply (dangerous/threatening).
        *   But "severe kidney problems" refers to the *state* of the kidneys. The kidneys are failing. The state is intense/extreme.
        *   So it's not Sense 5.

    *   Back to Sense 1 vs Sense 6.
    *   Sense 1: Intensely or extremely bad/unpleasant.
    *   Sense 6: Very bad in degree/extent.
    *   Let's assume the source is WordNet.
    *   WordNet definition for "severe" (adj):
        *   1. severely simple... (Sense 3 here)
        *   2. very bad in degree or extent... (Sense 6 here). Examples: "a severe worldwide depression"; "a severe shortage".
        *   3. intensely or extremely bad or unpleasant in degree or quality... (Sense 1 here). Examples: "severe pain"; "a severe illness".
    *   Notice the example in the standard WordNet for Sense 3 (Sense 1 in this list): "a severe illness".
    *   "Kidney problems" is an illness/condition.
    *   Therefore, the correct sense is Sense 1 (based on the example "severe pain" and "severe illness" aligning with the definition "intensely or extremely bad...").

    *   Let's check Sense 6 (Standard WN Sense 2) again. Does it ever cover illness?
    *   Sometimes definitions overlap.
    *   But "severe illness" is explicitly linked to the "intense/unpleasant" definition in standard WordNet files.
    *   Sense 1 definition: "intensely or extremely bad or unpleasant in degree or quality".
    *   Example: "severe pain".
    *   "Kidney problems" acts like "illness" or "pain".
    *   Therefore, Sense 1 is the correct choice.

4.  **Final Verification:**
    *   Sentence: "...moderate or severe kidney problems."
    *   Sense 1: "intensely or extremely bad or unpleasant...". Example: "severe pain".
    *   Is "severe kidney problems" an instance of this? Yes. It means the problems are intense/serious/extreme. It is a medical context. The examples for this sense usually include medical symptoms/conditions.
    *   Sense 6: "very bad in degree or extent". Example: "a severe worldwide depression".
    *   This usually applies to non-medical abstract nouns (depression, shortage, drought).
    *   Conclusion: Sense 1 is the intended answer.

    *   Let's check if Sense 5 ("dangerous") applies.
    *   Definition: "causing fear or anxiety...".
    *   While severe kidney problems are dangerous, the adjective "severe" is grading the *intensity* of the problem, not describing its attribute of being "fearsome" directly. "Severe" implies "extreme" here, not just "dangerous". A mild problem could be dangerous (e.g., a mild allergic reaction can be dangerous if untreated, but "severe" defines the stage/grade). Medical staging (Mild/Moderate/Severe) corresponds to intensity/badness (Sense 1).

    *   Result: 1.


[User]
Which numbered sense of "problem" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: Alimta is not recommended for use in patients with moderate or severe kidney <t>problems</t>.

Senses:
1. definition=a state of difficulty that needs to be resolved | examples=she and her husband are having problems
2. definition=a question raised for consideration or solution | examples=our homework consisted of ten problems to solve
3. definition=a source of difficulty | examples=one trouble after another delayed the job

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the Request:**
    *   Target word: "problem" (marked as `<t>problems</t>` in the sentence).
    *   Sentence context: "Alimta is not recommended for use in patients with moderate or severe kidney <t>problems</t>."
    *   Task: Identify the correct sense from the provided numbered list.
    *   Constraint: Return *only* the number.

2.  **Analyze the Sentence Context:**
    *   Subject: "Alimta" (a drug).
    *   Context: Medical advice/contraindications.
    *   Phrase: "kidney problems".
    *   Meaning in context: "Problems" here refers to medical conditions, dysfunctions, or diseases affecting the kidneys. It implies a state where the kidneys are not working correctly, causing health issues. This is a state of difficulty or dysfunction (physiological).

3.  **Analyze the Senses:**
    *   **Sense 1:** definition="a state of difficulty that needs to be resolved" | examples="she and her husband are having problems".
        *   *Analysis:* This sense covers general difficulties or states of affairs that are problematic. Medical conditions fit here because a health issue is a state of difficulty (the body isn't working right) that usually needs medical attention/resolution. The example provided ("having problems") is about relationships/life, but the definition is broad enough to cover physical ailments or dysfunctions. Kidney failure/disease is a "state of difficulty" regarding health.
    *   **Sense 2:** definition="a question raised for consideration or solution" | examples="our homework consisted of ten problems to solve".
        *   *Analysis:* This refers to academic questions, puzzles, or math problems. Kidney issues are not questions to be solved on paper; they are conditions. This doesn't fit.
    *   **Sense 3:** definition="a source of difficulty" | examples="one trouble after another delayed the job".
        *   *Analysis:* This usually refers to an external factor causing trouble (e.g., "money is a problem," "the weather was a problem"). While a kidney problem *is* a source of difficulty for the patient, Sense 1 usually captures the *state* of the organ itself better. Let's look closer at the distinction between 1 and 3.
        *   Sense 1 is a "state of difficulty". Sense 3 is a "source of difficulty".
        *   "Kidney problems" describes the *condition* or *state* of the kidneys. The kidneys are in a state of difficulty. It doesn't describe an external agent causing difficulty (though the condition causes difficulty for the patient). In WordNet style definitions (which this list resembles), "health problem" usually falls under the "state" definition (often WordNet synset 1: a state of difficulty that needs to be resolved).
        *   Let's compare examples. Sense 1 example: "she and her husband are having problems" (state of the relationship). Sense 3 example: "one trouble after another delayed the job" (events/things acting as sources of trouble).
        *   "Kidney problems" is the condition itself. It is a state of ill health. Therefore, Sense 1 is the primary fit. Sense 3 is often used for distinct events or things causing a blockage (e.g., "poverty is a problem"). Medical "problems" are states of the body.

4.  **Final Verification:**
    *   Sentence: "kidney problems".
    *   Is it a question? No (Sense 2 out).
    *   Is it a source of difficulty (like a specific obstacle) or a state of difficulty (a condition)? Medical conditions are states of difficulty (the body is in a difficult state). The definition "a state of difficulty that needs to be resolved" applies perfectly. The "resolution" is treatment/cure.
    *   Sense 1 fits best.

5.  **Construct the Output:**
    *   The user requested *only* the number.
    *   Number: 1.


[User]
Which numbered sense of "more" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: For <t>more</t> information, see the Summary of Product Characteristics (also part of the EPAR).

Senses:
1. definition=(comparative of `much' used with mass nouns) a quantifier meaning greater in size or amount or extent or degree | examples=more land
2. definition=(comparative of `many' used with count nouns) quantifier meaning greater in number | examples=a hall with more seats

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the Request:** The user wants to identify the correct sense of the word "more" (marked with tags) in a specific sentence, choosing from two provided senses. The output should be *only* the number of the correct sense.

2.  **Analyze the Sentence:** "For <t>more</t> information, see the Summary of Product Characteristics (also part of the EPAR)."
    *   Context: The phrase is "more information".
    *   Noun being modified: "information".
    *   Nature of the noun: Is "information" a mass noun or a count noun?
        *   "Information" is generally treated as an uncountable noun (mass noun) in standard English (you can't say "an information" or "two informations").
        *   Meaning in context: It implies a greater quantity or amount of information, or additional information.

3.  **Analyze Sense 1:**
    *   Definition: "(comparative of `much' used with mass nouns) a quantifier meaning greater in size or amount or extent or degree".
    *   Examples: "more land".
    *   Fit: "Information" is a mass noun. The usage fits "greater in amount" (additional information). This looks correct.

4.  **Analyze Sense 2:**
    *   Definition: "(comparative of `many' used with count nouns) quantifier meaning greater in number".
    *   Examples: "a hall with more seats".
    *   Fit: "Seats" are countable. "Information" is not countable in this context (it's not "more types of information" in the sense of distinct countable items usually, but rather an amount of data). While one *could* argue about countability in specific philosophical contexts, standard usage aligns "more information" with "more water," "more time," or "more land" (mass nouns).

5.  **Compare and Conclude:**
    *   Sense 1 deals with mass nouns (amount/extent). "Information" is a mass noun.
    *   Sense 2 deals with count nouns (number). "Information" is not a count noun here.
    *   Therefore, Sense 1 is the correct choice.

6.  **Format Output:** The user requested "Return only the number of the correct sense."

7.  **Final Output Generation:** 1.


[User]
Which numbered sense of "information" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: For more <t>information</t>, see the Summary of Product Characteristics (also part of the EPAR).

Senses:
1. definition=a message received and understood
2. definition=knowledge acquired through study or experience or instruction
3. definition=formal accusation of a crime
4. definition=a collection of facts from which conclusions may be drawn | examples=statistical data
5. definition=(communication theory) a numerical measure of the uncertainty of an outcome | examples=the signal contained thousands of bits of information

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the context:** The sentence is "For more <t>information</t>, see the Summary of Product Characteristics (also part of the EPAR)."
    *   This sentence is typically found in medical or regulatory documents (EPAR stands for European Public Assessment Report).
    *   The phrase "For more information, see..." invites the reader to consult a document for further details, facts, or instructions about a product (likely a medicine).
    *   The word "information" here refers to the content that provides details or knowledge about the product.

2.  **Analyze the senses:**
    *   **Sense 1:** "a message received and understood". This is a general definition of information as communication. While technically the document contains messages, this definition focuses on the act of receiving/understanding a specific message rather than the body of knowledge/details being referred to in this context. It's a bit too specific to the act of communication in a signal/transmission sense or a specific piece of news.
    *   **Sense 2:** "knowledge acquired through study or experience or instruction". This fits well. The "Summary of Product Characteristics" contains knowledge and instructions about the product. The reader is being directed to acquire more knowledge.
    *   **Sense 3:** "formal accusation of a crime". This is a legal term (an "information" filed by a prosecutor). This is clearly incorrect in this context.
    *   **Sense 4:** "a collection of facts from which conclusions may be drawn | examples=statistical data". This refers to data or raw material for analysis. While the Summary of Product Characteristics contains facts, the phrase "For more information" usually refers to descriptive content or explanatory knowledge, not necessarily just a dataset for the user to draw conclusions from (though there is overlap). However, let's look closer at Sense 1 vs Sense 2 vs Sense 4.
        *   Sense 1 implies a singular message.
        *   Sense 4 implies data/statistics.
        *   Sense 2 implies general knowledge/instruction.
    *   **Sense 5:** "(communication theory) a numerical measure of the uncertainty of an outcome". This is a technical definition from Information Theory (Shannon entropy, bits). Clearly incorrect.

3.  **Compare Sense 1, Sense 2, and Sense 4.**
    *   Context: "For more information, see the Summary..."
    *   In standard WordNet or similar lexical databases, "information" often breaks down into these categories.
    *   Sense 1 ("message received and understood") is often used for things like "That was a useful piece of information."
    *   Sense 2 ("knowledge acquired through study...") is often used for the abstract concept of knowledge or the content of a document/education. "I need more information about this topic" usually maps to knowledge/instruction.
    *   Sense 4 ("collection of facts... statistical data") is usually specific to data points.

    Let's look at how WordNet specifically structures these (which seems to be the source of these definitions).
    *   WordNet 3.0:
        *   1: a message received and understood.
        *   2: knowledge acquired through study or experience or instruction.
        *   3: formal accusation of a crime.
        *   4: a collection of facts from which conclusions may be drawn.
        *   5: (communication theory) a numerical measure...

    In the sentence "For more information, see the Summary of Product Characteristics," the "information" is the content of the document. Is it a message? Is it knowledge? Is it data?
    Usually, when a document offers "more information," it offers knowledge or instruction about the subject matter.
    Sense 2 is the most standard definition for "information" when referring to the content of a reference document or text intended to instruct or inform a user. Sense 1 is often more specific to a discrete unit of communication (a news item, a signal). Sense 4 is specific to data.

    Let's test Sense 1: "For more [messages received and understood], see..." - slightly awkward.
    Let's test Sense 2: "For more [knowledge acquired through study or instruction], see..." - This fits well. The Summary of Product Characteristics is a source of knowledge/instruction.
    Let's test Sense 4: "For more [collections of facts/statistical data], see..." - While the document has facts, the word "information" here encompasses the whole descriptive text, not just statistical data.

    However, looking at common NLP tagging tasks (like SemCor/WordNet disambiguation), "information" in the phrase "for more information" is often tagged with Sense 1 or Sense 2.
    Let's look at the nuance.
    Sense 1: "a message received and understood". Example: "The information was received."
    Sense 2: "knowledge acquired through study...". Example: "He has a vast amount of information on that subject."

    The sentence "For more information..." is a standard directive. It implies "To acquire more knowledge on this subject...".
    Therefore, Sense 2 seems the strongest fit.

    Let's re-evaluate Sense 1. If I tell you a fact, that is a piece of information (Sense 1). If I write a manual, it contains information (Sense 2).
    The "Summary of Product Characteristics" is a document intended to provide knowledge. The user reads it to gain knowledge.
    Sense 2 definition: "knowledge acquired through study or experience or instruction".
    The text itself isn't the "acquired knowledge" (which resides in the head), but it is the *source* of information which is defined as knowledge in this sense. In WordNet, the synset for Sense 2 often covers the "content of instruction" aspect.
    Actually, Sense 1 ("a message...") is the most frequent sense in WordNet for general text. But Sense 2 is the definition for the abstract "body of knowledge".

    Let's check a similar example from WordNet annotations.
    "I need more information." -> usually Sense 2 (knowledge).
    "The phone call was just a piece of information." -> Sense 1.
    "Statistical information." -> Sense 4.

    The sentence "For more information, see..." directs the reader to a body of text to gain knowledge. This aligns best with Sense 2.
    Let's double check Sense 1. Does the document contain "messages"? Yes, technically. But "information" as "knowledge" is the intended meaning in "for more information".
    Definition 1 focuses on the "message" aspect.
    Definition 2 focuses on the "knowledge" aspect.
    The Summary of Product Characteristics is a source of knowledge.

    Let's consider the source of the definitions provided in the prompt. They look exactly like WordNet definitions.
    WordNet 3.1:
    S: (n) information, info (a message received and understood)
    S: (n) information (knowledge acquired through study or experience or instruction)
    S: (n) information (formal accusation of a crime)
    S: (n) data, information (a collection of facts from which conclusions may be drawn) "statistical data"
    S: (n) information (communication theory) a numerical measure of the uncertainty of outcome ...

    The phrase "For more information" is idiomatic.
    "For more [knowledge/content], see..."
    If I look at how disambiguation systems handle "For more information":
    Often, Sense 1 is used as a catch-all for "content communicated".
    However, Sense 2 is specific to knowledge/instruction.
    The document is a "Summary of Product Characteristics". This is instructional and educational for the reader (doctor/patient).
    Sense 2 is the definition of "knowledge".
    Is the "information" in the document "knowledge"? Yes.
    Is it a "message"? It is composed of messages, but the semantic intent of "information" here is "what you can know".

    Let's differentiate.
    Sense 1 implies a discrete communication event or unit.
    Sense 2 implies a domain of understanding or material to be learned.
    "For more information" -> "To learn more about this" -> "To acquire more knowledge".
    This points to Sense 2.

    Let's check Sense 4 again. "Collection of facts... statistical data".
    The SPC (Summary of Product Characteristics) includes clinical data, posology, etc. It is a collection of facts.
    However, the prompt phrase "For more information" is a general reference to the text. It's not specifically highlighting the statistical nature. It's highlighting the explanatory nature.
    Between 2 and 4, 2 is broader ("knowledge").
    Between 1 and 2, 2 fits the "reference material" context better (instruction/experience). Sense 1 is often "a piece of information".

    Let's look at an example of Sense 1 usage: "They were helpful, but the information they gave us wasn't what we needed." (Specific messages).
    Example of Sense 2 usage: "He is a man of vast information." (Knowledge). "This book is a source of information."
    The sentence "For more information, see..." fits the pattern "This document is a source of information." -> Sense 2.

    Therefore, Sense 2 is the correct choice.