[User]
Which numbered sense of "provocation" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: The <t>provocation</t> of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of football.

Senses:
1. definition=unfriendly behavior that causes anger or resentment
2. definition=something that incites or provokes; a means of arousing or stirring to action
3. definition=needed encouragement | examples=the result was a provocation of vigorous investigation

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the user's request:** The user wants to know which numbered sense of the word "provocation" is used in a specific sentence. I need to output *only* the number of the correct sense.

2.  **Analyze the sentence:**
    *   Sentence: "The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of football."
    *   Context: This is about football (soccer). A yellow card is a penalty given by a referee.
    *   Key phrase: "The provocation of a yellow card". This phrasing is slightly awkward or ambiguous depending on how one reads "provocation".
        *   Reading A: Did the player do something that *provoked* the referee into giving the card? (The action that caused the card).
        *   Reading B: Is the yellow card itself the "provocation" (the stimulus)?
        *   Reading C: Is the yellow card the result of provocation?

    Let's look closer at the structure: "The provocation of a yellow card..."
    In football contexts, we usually talk about "dissent" or "fouls" provoking a card. Or, sometimes, a player dives (feigns injury) to provoke a card for the opponent.
    However, looking at the specific phrasing "The provocation of a yellow card", it sounds like the yellow card is the *result* or the *event* being discussed.
    Wait, let's re-read carefully. "The provocation of a yellow card... is not a new practice."
    This suggests that the *act of showing/giving* a yellow card (or perhaps the act that leads to it) is the subject.
    Actually, usually, one speaks of "The provocation *of* a response".
    If the referee gives a yellow card, is it a "provocation"?
    Sense 1: "unfriendly behavior that causes anger or resentment". A referee giving a card often causes anger in the player. Is the sentence saying "The unfriendly act of giving a yellow card causes anger"? No, that doesn't fit the "not a new practice" context well.
    Sense 2: "something that incites or provokes; a means of arousing or stirring to action". Does a yellow card incite action? Maybe. Does the act leading to the yellow card incite the yellow card? Yes.
    Sense 3: "needed encouragement". Doesn't fit at all. A yellow card isn't "needed encouragement" in a standard context.

    Let's reconsider the semantics of the sentence source or style.
    This sentence seems to imply that the yellow card is the *response* to a provocation, OR that the yellow card itself is the provocation.
    Let's try to find the intended meaning in standard usage.
    "The provocation of a yellow card" -> The act that causes a yellow card to be given.
    Is "a yellow card" the object of the preposition "of" indicating the result?
    "The provocation of laughter" -> The thing that causes laughter.
    "The provocation of a yellow card" -> The thing that causes a yellow card.
    If this is the meaning, then "provocation" refers to the *stimulus*.
    Stimulus = Sense 2 ("something that incites or provokes").
    Let's check Sense 1 again. "Unfriendly behavior that causes anger". If a player acts unfriendly, does that cause a yellow card? Yes. But does the word "provocation" in this sentence refer to the player's anger? No, the phrase is "provocation *of* a yellow card". It refers to the cause of the card.

    Let's look at the definitions again.
    1. "unfriendly behavior that causes anger or resentment". Example: "He reacted to the provocation." (The insult was the provocation).
    2. "something that incites or provokes; a means of arousing or stirring to action". This is the broad definition of a stimulus causing a reaction.
    3. "needed encouragement". Irrelevant.

    Sentence analysis:
    "The provocation of a yellow card" = The inciting factor or the cause leading to the issuance of a yellow card.
    Or, conversely, is the yellow card the "provocation" (Sense 1)? "The yellow card was a provocation to the player." (The card caused anger).
    But the sentence says "The provocation of a yellow card... is frequent."
    If the yellow card is the provocation (Sense 1), the sentence would read "The yellow card was a provocation."
    The structure "The provocation of X" usually means "The cause of X" or "The act of provoking X".
    If X = Yellow Card.
    Provoking a yellow card = causing a yellow card to happen.
    Therefore, the "provocation" is the thing that incites/causes the card.
    This aligns perfectly with Sense 2: "something that incites or provokes". The foul or behavior is the provocation that incites the yellow card.

    Let's check if Sense 1 fits differently.
    Could it be "The [unfriendly behavior that causes anger] of a yellow card"? No, that makes no sense grammatically.
    Could it be "The [act of provoking] a yellow card"? Yes.
    The act of provoking falls under Sense 2 ("something that incites... a means of arousing").

    Let's consider the possibility that the sentence is poorly constructed or from a specific corpus (like a learner corpus).
    "The provocation of a yellow card" -> The act of getting a yellow card? No, you don't want to provoke a yellow card usually.
    Maybe the context is a player diving? A player feigns injury to provoke a yellow card for an opponent.
    In that case, the dive is the provocation. It is the "something that incites" the yellow card.
    This fits Sense 2.

    Is there any interpretation where Sense 1 applies?
    Sense 1 defines "provocation" as the behavior itself (the unfriendly act).
    If the sentence meant "The act of being unfriendly that results in a yellow card", it fits loosely, but Sense 2 is the general "cause/incitement" definition.
    Sense 1 is specific to causing *anger or resentment*.
    Sense 2 is causing *action* (stirring to action). A referee giving a card is an action. A player diving to get an opponent a card is inciting action.
    Sense 2 is the best fit for "something that incites [an outcome]".

    Let's try a substitution test.
    Sentence: "The [cause/incitement] of a yellow card... is not a new practice."
    "The [unfriendly behavior causing anger] of a yellow card..." -> Unlikely. The yellow card is not the victim of the unfriendly behavior.
    The yellow card is the *result* of the provocation.
    Sense 2: "something that incites... a means of arousing... to action".
    The yellow card is the "action" (or result of action) taken by the referee.
    The "provocation" is the thing that caused it.
    This is Sense 2.

    Let's double check Sense 3. "Needed encouragement". No.

    Let's double check Sense 1 vs 2 nuances.
    Sense 1 is specific to *interpersonal conflict* (causing anger/resentment).
    Sense 2 is the *causal agent* definition (incites/provokes).
    In "The provocation of a yellow card", the yellow card is an official sanction, not a feeling of anger or resentment.
    While the player might feel anger (Sense 1), the "provocation" described here is the cause of the *card*, not the cause of *anger* (unless the card caused anger, but the grammar "provocation OF a yellow card" implies the card is the outcome, not the recipient of the feeling).
    (e.g., "Provocation of laughter" -> Laughter is the outcome. "Provocation of a fight" -> Fight is the outcome).
    Therefore, "Provocation of a yellow card" -> Yellow card is the outcome.
    The word "provocation" here refers to the cause/stimulus.
    Sense 2: "something that incites or provokes".

    Conclusion: Sense 2 is the correct answer.

    Let's verify the phrasing again. "The provocation of a yellow card".
    Does it mean "The act of showing a yellow card"?
    If so, is the yellow card the "provocation"?
    If the referee shows the card, is the *card* the provocation (Sense 1 - causing anger)?
    Sentence: "The provocation of a yellow card... is frequent."
    If "provocation" = "showing the card".
    Does showing the card cause anger? Yes. Is it "unfriendly behavior"? It's a penalty.
    But the phrasing "The provocation of a yellow card" is very unnatural if it means "The showing of a yellow card". We would say "The issuance of a yellow card" or "The showing of a yellow card".
    We say "The provocation of X" when X is the *result* of the provocation.
    Example: "The provocation of a reaction."
    So, the "provocation" is the thing that *caused* the yellow card.
    The "thing that causes" = "something that incites or provokes".
    This maps to Sense 2.

    Final check.
    Input sentence: The <t>provocation</t> of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of football.
    This sentence likely refers to situations where a player does something (dives, feigns, argues) specifically to get a card drawn (either for themselves, oddly, or for an opponent).
    Most likely context: Simulation/diving to get an opponent a yellow card.
    The simulation is the "provocation". It is the "means of arousing... to action" (the action being the referee giving the card).
    This is Sense 2.

    If I chose Sense 1: "unfriendly behavior that causes anger".
    A dive is arguably unfriendly/sportsmanlike. But the *defining* feature here is that it causes the card (an action/result), not primarily that it causes anger (though it might). Sense 2 covers the causation of the event (the card). Sense 1 restricts the result to "anger or resentment". A yellow card is a formal penalty, not just an emotion.
    Therefore, Sense 2 is the broader, more applicable definition for causing an event/outcome.

    Result: 2.


attempt_kind: initial

status: success

[User]
Which numbered sense of "circumstance" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: The provocation of a yellow card in similar <t>circumstances</t> as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of football.

Senses:
1. definition=a condition that accompanies or influences some event or activity
2. definition=the set of facts or circumstances that surround a situation or event | examples=the historical context
3. definition=information that should be kept in mind when making a decision | examples=another consideration is the time it would take
4. definition=formal ceremony about important occasions | examples=pomp and circumstance

finish_reason: stop

role: assistant

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the user's request:** The user wants to identify the specific numbered sense of the word "circumstance" used in a given sentence. I need to return *only* the number.

2.  **Analyze the sentence:**
    *   Sentence: "The provocation of a yellow card in similar <t>circumstances</t> as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of football."
    *   Context: The sentence talks about a specific event (provocation of a yellow card) happening in a specific context or situation ("similar <t>circumstances</t> as this one"). It refers to the conditions surrounding the event on the football pitch.

3.  **Analyze the senses provided:**

    *   **Sense 1:** "definition=a condition that accompanies or influences some event or activity".
        *   Does this fit? Yes. The yellow card event is happening within a set of conditions or context. The phrase "similar circumstances" implies a similar set of conditions accompanying the event.

    *   **Sense 2:** "definition=the set of facts or circumstances that surround a situation or event | examples=the historical context".
        *   Does this fit? This definition looks very similar to Sense 1. Often, dictionaries distinguish between "a condition" (singular/specific factor) and "the set of facts" (the overall context). Let's look closer. Sense 2 often maps to "context" or "background". The example "the historical context" suggests a broader scope. Sense 1 focuses on "a condition". In the sentence, "in similar circumstances", it usually refers to the general situation or the specific conditions prevailing at the time. Let's look at common dictionary distinctions (like WordNet).
        *   *WordNet distinction:*
            *   Sense 1 (circumstance): "a condition that accompanies or influences some event or activity".
            *   Sense 2 (context, circumstance): "the set of facts or circumstances that surround a situation or event".
        *   Usage in sentence: "in similar circumstances". This usually means "in similar situations" or "under similar conditions".
        *   Let's compare Sense 1 and Sense 2 again.
            *   Sense 1 is about a *condition* that influences an event.
            *   Sense 2 is about the *set of facts* surrounding an event.
            *   "In similar circumstances" is a fixed phrase where "circumstances" (plural) refers to the situation or state of affairs. This aligns well with Sense 1 (often pluralized in usage like "under the circumstances"). Sense 2 often leans towards the abstract concept of "context" (e.g., "the political circumstance"). However, the definitions provided in the prompt are specific. Let's look at the nuances.
            *   Definition 1: "a condition that accompanies...". Plural "circumstances" usually means the aggregate of such conditions.
            *   Definition 2: "the set of facts... that surround...". This is also the aggregate of conditions.
            *   This is a tricky distinction often found in WordNet. Let's check the source (likely WordNet 3.0 or similar).
            *   WordNet 3.0:
                *   1. circumstance: a condition that accompanies or influences some event or activity.
                *   2. context, circumstance: the set of facts or circumstances that surround a situation or event; "the historical context".
            *   In the phrase "in similar circumstances", we are talking about the conditions of the game/event.
            *   Let's look at the example for Sense 2: "the historical context". This implies a macro view.
            *   Let's look at Sense 1. It's the most general definition for "circumstance" in the singular or plural when referring to the facts of a case.
            *   "Under the circumstances" or "in similar circumstances" typically maps to Sense 1 in many WSD (Word Sense Disambiguation) tasks. Why? Because Sense 2 often has the synonym "context" and implies the *background* information rather than the immediate conditions influencing the specific activity.
            *   Let's re-read Sense 1: "a condition that accompanies or influences some event or activity". The yellow card is the event. The "circumstances" are the conditions accompanying it (e.g., the score, the time, the behavior of players). This fits perfectly.

    *   **Sense 3:** "definition=information that should be kept in mind when making a decision | examples=another consideration is the time it would take".
        *   Does this fit? No. This usually maps to "consideration". While the referee makes a decision, "in similar circumstances" describes the *situation*, not just the "information to keep in mind" as an abstract input. This sense usually appears in sentences like "Circumstances permitting, we will go." or "Take every circumstance into account." The sentence here is descriptive of the event's setting, not the decision-making process of the referee explicitly.

    *   **Sense 4:** "definition=formal ceremony about important occasions | examples=pomp and circumstance".
        *   Does this fit? No. This is a specific idiom ("pomp and circumstance") or refers to formal rituals. Football matches are not "formal ceremonies" in this specific sense (though they have rules).

4.  **Refining the choice between Sense 1 and Sense 2:**
    *   Sense 1 focuses on "condition(s) accompanying an event".
    *   Sense 2 focuses on "set of facts surrounding a situation" (synonym: context).
    *   The phrase "in similar circumstances" effectively means "in similar situations" or "under similar conditions".
    *   In many WSD datasets (like SemCor or Senseval), "circumstances" used in the phrase "under/in ... circumstances" is tagged as Sense 1. The logic is that it refers to the specific conditions affecting the event.
    *   Sense 2 (Context) is often used when talking about the broader environment, e.g., "The circumstances of the poem's writing."
    *   The sentence says: "The provocation... in similar circumstances...". The event is the provocation/yellow card. The circumstances are the immediate conditions of the game. This aligns best with Sense 1.

    *   Let's double-check the definition of Sense 1 vs Sense 2 in standard WordNet hierarchies.
        *   WN S1: Hypernym: factor, element. (It's a contributing factor).
        *   WN S2: Hypernym: information. (It's the background info).
    *   Wait, let me check the actual hypernyms in WordNet 3.1 just to be sure about the logic often used in these tests.
        *   S1 (circumstance): attribute, dimension, property (a characteristic property).
        *   S2 (context, circumstance): knowledge, information (the set of facts...).
    *   In the sentence "in similar circumstances", is "circumstances" referring to the *attributes* of the situation (Sense 1) or the *knowledge/information* about the situation (Sense 2)?
    *   Actually, looking at common annotation practices for these specific definitions:
        *   Definition 1 is the standard definition for "state of affairs" or "conditions". "Under the circumstances" is the classic example for Sense 1 in many dictionaries.
        *   Definition 2 is often synonymous with "context".
    *   Therefore, Sense 1 is the standard choice for "in similar circumstances" describing the conditions of an event.

5.  **Final Decision:**
    *   Sense 1 fits best. "Circumstances" here means the conditions accompanying the event (the yellow card).
    *   Sense 4 is clearly wrong (pomp).
    *   Sense 3 is clearly wrong (consideration).
    *   Sense 2 is a strong distractor, but "similar circumstances" generally maps to the "conditions" definition (Sense 1) rather than the "context/information" definition (Sense 2).

    Let's check if the prompt definitions match WordNet exactly.
    *   Sense 1: "a condition that accompanies or influences some event or activity" -> WordNet 3.0 wn-noun-1.
    *   Sense 2: "the set of facts or circumstances that surround a situation or event" -> WordNet 3.0 wn-noun-2 (synset context--1).
    *   Example "the historical context" is Sense 2.
    *   Example "in similar circumstances" is usually Sense 1 because it refers to the prevailing conditions.
    *   Therefore, the answer is 1.

    One more check: Does the sentence imply "context"?
    "The provocation... in similar circumstances...". The provocation happens *in* the conditions. It doesn't happen *in* the context (it happens *in the context of* something). The preposition "in" + "circumstances" usually collocates with Sense 1 (conditions). Sense 2 is usually "the circumstances of [event]".
    Usage:
    - "In these circumstances" -> Sense 1.
    - "The circumstances of the crime" -> Sense 2 (potentially, or Sense 1 depending on granularity).
    - "Historical context" -> Sense 2.

    The sentence uses "in similar circumstances". This matches Sense 1 perfectly.

    Return only the number.

format: unknown

native_finish_reason: stop

provider: Friendli

currency: USD


[User]
Which numbered sense of "practice" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new <t>practice</t>, but rather frequent in the world of football.

Senses:
1. definition=a customary way of operation or behavior | examples=it is their practice to give annual raises
2. definition=systematic training by multiple repetitions | examples=practice makes perfect
3. definition=translating an idea into action | examples=a hard theory to put into practice
4. definition=the exercise of a profession | examples=the practice of the law
5. definition=knowledge of how something is usually done | examples=it is not the local practice to wear shorts to dinner

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the context:** The sentence is: "The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new <t>practice</t>, but rather frequent in the world of football."

2.  **Analyze the target word:** The word is "practice". In this context, it refers to a specific type of behavior or action (provoking a yellow card) that happens often or is habitual in football.

3.  **Analyze the senses provided:**
    *   Sense 1: "a customary way of operation or behavior" (examples: it is their practice to give annual raises). This refers to a habit, a tradition, or a usual way of doing things.
    *   Sense 2: "systematic training by multiple repetitions" (examples: practice makes perfect). This refers to rehearsal or training.
    *   Sense 3: "translating an idea into action" (examples: a hard theory to put into practice). This refers to the application of a concept.
    *   Sense 4: "the exercise of a profession" (examples: the practice of the law). This refers to a professional business or career.
    *   Sense 5: "knowledge of how something is usually done" (examples: it is not the local practice to wear shorts to dinner). This refers to the *knowledge* or *know-how* of a custom. Note: Sense 1 is about the *behavior* itself, Sense 5 is about the *knowledge* of the behavior. Let's look closely at the sentence. "The provocation... is not a new practice". Is it referring to the knowledge of it, or the behavior itself? It's referring to the behavior/action itself.

4.  **Compare context to senses:**
    *   Does it mean training? No. (Eliminate 2).
    *   Does it mean applying a theory? No. (Eliminate 3).
    *   Does it mean a professional career? No. (Eliminate 4).
    *   Does it mean a customary behavior? Yes. Provoking a card is a behavior/action. It is described as "frequent" (customary/habitual) in football.
    *   Does it mean knowledge of how it is done? The sentence says "The provocation... is not a new [practice]". This structure equates the provocation (an action/event) with the practice. It fits better as a "customary way of operation or behavior" (Sense 1) rather than the "knowledge" (Sense 5). While Sense 5 is close (customs), Sense 1 is defined as the "way of operation or behavior" itself. Provoking a card is an action/behavior.

    Let's re-evaluate Sense 5 vs Sense 1.
    Sense 1: "customary way of operation or behavior". Synonyms: habit, custom, routine.
    Sense 5: "knowledge of how something is usually done". Synonyms: know-how, acquaintance.
    Example in text: "Provocation... is not a new practice".
    Is provocation a "knowledge"? No, it's an action.
    Is provocation a "customary behavior"? Yes.
    Therefore, Sense 1 is the correct choice.

5.  **Final Check:**
    Sentence: The provocation... is not a new [behavior/custom], but rather frequent...
    Sense 1: customary way of operation or behavior.
    This fits perfectly.

6.  **Return only the number.**
    The number is 1.

provider: DeepInfra


[User]
Which numbered sense of "world" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the <t>world</t> of football.

Senses:
1. definition=everything that exists anywhere | examples=they study the evolution of the universe
2. definition=people in general; especially a distinctive group of people with some shared interest | examples=the Western world
3. definition=all of your experiences that determine how things appear to you | examples=his world was shattered
4. definition=the 3rd planet from the sun; the planet we live on | examples=the Earth moves around the sun
5. definition=people in general considered as a whole | examples=he is a hero in the eyes of the public
6. definition=a part of the earth that can be considered separately | examples=the outdoor world
7. definition=the concerns of this life as distinguished from heaven and the afterlife | examples=they consider the church to be independent of the world
8. definition=all of the living human inhabitants of the earth | examples=all the world loves a lover

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the Request:** The user wants to identify the correct sense of the word "world" (marked with `<t></t>`) in a specific sentence, based on a provided list of 8 senses. The output must be *only* the number of the correct sense.

2.  **Analyze the Sentence:**
    *   Sentence: "The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the <t>world</t> of football."
    *   Context: The phrase is "world of football". The sentence discusses practices (diving/faking injury to get a card) within the specific domain or community of football (soccer).

3.  **Analyze the Senses:**
    *   *Sense 1:* "everything that exists anywhere" (Universe/Cosmos). Does "world of football" mean the universe? No.
    *   *Sense 2:* "people in general; especially a distinctive group of people with some shared interest". Example: "the Western world", "the art world". Does "world of football" fit this? Yes. It refers to the community of people involved in football (players, fans, coaches, etc.) who share that interest.
    *   *Sense 3:* "all of your experiences that determine how things appear to you" (Subjective reality). Does "world of football" mean someone's internal experience? No.
    *   *Sense 4:* "the 3rd planet from the sun; the planet we live on". Does "world of football" mean the planet? No, though football happens on Earth, the phrase implies a specific sphere of activity, not the physical planet itself.
    *   *Sense 5:* "people in general considered as a whole" (The public/mankind). While it involves people, "world of football" is a subset of people, not humanity as a whole. Sense 2 is more specific and accurate for a domain like "football".
    *   *Sense 6:* "a part of the earth that can be considered separately" (e.g., "the outdoor world"). This usually refers to physical environments or spheres of activity/nature. While "world of football" is a sphere of activity, Sense 2 ("distinctive group of people with some shared interest") captures the *social* aspect of "football" better than just a geographical or environmental separation.
    *   *Sense 7:* "the concerns of this life as distinguished from heaven and the afterlife". Not relevant here.
    *   *Sense 8:* "all of the living human inhabitants of the earth". Similar to Sense 5, too broad.

4.  **Compare Sense 2 and Sense 6:**
    *   Sense 2 mentions "a distinctive group of people with some shared interest". "The world of football" is idiomatic for the community and institutions surrounding the sport.
    *   Sense 6 mentions "a part of the earth that can be considered separately". The example is "the outdoor world".
    *   Looking at the phrasing "world of [subject/noun]", it often refers to a specific domain or sphere of interest involving people. The definition of Sense 2 explicitly mentions "distinctive group of people with some shared interest". Football is a shared interest. The "world of football" refers to the people and culture within that interest.

5.  **Final Verification:**
    *   Sentence phrase: "world of football".
    *   Meaning: The community/sphere of professional football.
    *   Match: Sense 2 ("people in general; especially a distinctive group of people with some shared interest").

6.  **Construct Output:** The user requested *only* the number.
    *   The number is 2.

provider: AtlasCloud


[User]
Which numbered sense of "football" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of <t>football</t>.

Senses:
1. definition=any of various games played with a ball (round or oval) in which two teams try to kick or carry or propel the ball into each other's goal
2. definition=the inflated oblong ball used in playing American football

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the Request:**
    *   Target word: "football".
    *   Context sentence: "The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of <t>football</t>."
    *   Provided senses:
        1.  definition=any of various games played with a ball (round or oval) in which two teams try to kick or carry or propel the ball into each other's goal.
        2.  definition=the inflated oblong ball used in playing American football.
    *   Goal: Return *only* the number of the correct sense.

2.  **Analyze the Context Sentence:**
    *   Key phrase: "provocation of a yellow card".
    *   What sport uses "yellow cards" as a penalty?
        *   Soccer (Association Football) uses yellow cards.
        *   Rugby uses cards (yellow/red), but usually refers to it as "rugby" or "rugby union/league".
        *   American football does *not* use yellow cards for penalties (they use flags, signals, and announcements).
    *   Key phrase: "world of football".
    *   Interpretation: This refers to the sport as an institution, culture, or activity, not a physical object (the ball).

3.  **Evaluate Sense 1:**
    *   Definition: "any of various games played with a ball... in which two teams try to kick or carry or propel the ball into each other's goal".
    *   Does it fit? Yes. The sentence refers to the sport/activity/industry. The mention of a "yellow card" strongly points to Association Football (soccer), which falls under the general category of "various games played with a ball... into each other's goal". This definition covers the sport itself, not the object.

4.  **Evaluate Sense 2:**
    *   Definition: "the inflated oblong ball used in playing American football".
    *   Does it fit? No. The sentence talks about "the world of football". You don't say "the world of [a physical ball]". You say "the world of [a sport/activity]". Also, the context of "yellow cards" rules out American football (the sport), and the definition refers to the *object*, not the sport.

5.  **Conclusion:**
    *   Sense 1 refers to the game/sport.
    *   Sense 2 refers to the specific ball used in American football.
    *   The sentence refers to the sport/context where rules (yellow cards) apply.
    *   Therefore, Sense 1 is the correct match.

6.  **Final Output Formatting:**
    *   The user requested "Return only the number".
    *   Result: 1.

provider: Together


[User]
Which numbered sense of "rule" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: It is so extended that it part of the ethos, of the unwritten <t>rules</t>, but followed nonetheless by this sport.

Senses:
1. definition=a principle or condition that customarily governs behavior | examples=it was his rule to take a walk before breakfast
2. definition=something regarded as a normative example | examples=the convention of not naming the main character
3. definition=prescribed guide for conduct or action
4. definition=(linguistics) a rule describing (or prescribing) a linguistic practice
5. definition=a basic generalization that is accepted as true and that can be used as a basis for reasoning or conduct | examples=their principles of composition characterized all their works
6. definition=the duration of a monarch's or government's power | examples=during the rule of Elizabeth
7. definition=dominance or power through legal authority | examples=France held undisputed dominion over vast areas of Africa
8. definition=directions that define the way a game or sport is to be conducted | examples=he knew the rules of chess
9. definition=any one of a systematic body of regulations defining the way of life of members of a religious order | examples=the rule of St. Dominic
10. definition=a rule or law concerning a natural phenomenon or the function of a complex system | examples=the principle of the conservation of mass
11. definition=(mathematics) a standard procedure for solving a class of mathematical problems | examples=he determined the upper bound with Descartes' rule of signs
12. definition=measuring stick consisting of a strip of wood or metal or plastic with a straight edge that is used for drawing straight lines and measuring lengths

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the input sentence:** "It is so extended that it part of the ethos, of the unwritten <t>rules</t>, but followed nonetheless by this sport."
    *   Key phrase: "unwritten rules".
    *   Context: Part of the ethos, followed nonetheless by this sport.
    *   The sentence talks about behavior or conduct within a sport that isn't written down formally but is part of the culture (ethos).

2.  **Analyze the senses provided:**
    *   Sense 1: "a principle or condition that customarily governs behavior" (Example: walking before breakfast). This fits "unwritten rules" well. It's about custom and behavior.
    *   Sense 2: "something regarded as a normative example" (Example: convention of not naming the main character). This is close, but usually refers to a specific precedent or pattern rather than a governing principle.
    *   Sense 3: "prescribed guide for conduct or action". Usually implies a formal prescription, but can be general. However, the text specifies "unwritten", implying custom rather than prescription.
    *   Sense 8: "directions that define the way a game or sport is to be conducted" (Example: rules of chess). The context mentions "this sport". This is a strong contender. However, "rules of a game" usually implies the official rulebook. The sentence explicitly says "unwritten rules". In sports, "unwritten rules" are distinct from the official rules (like the rulebook). Unwritten rules govern behavior (like not running up the score, or specific etiquette), which aligns well with Sense 1 (customarily governs behavior). Let's compare Sense 1 and Sense 8.
        *   Sense 8 focuses on the official mechanics of the game (like chess rules). "Unwritten rules" are usually behavioral norms *within* the sport, not the technical laws of the game itself.
        *   Sense 1 focuses on "customarily governs behavior". Unwritten rules are by definition customary.

3.  **Refine the choice:**
    *   The phrase "unwritten rules" refers to codes of conduct or behavioral expectations that are not formalized in a rulebook.
    *   Sense 1: "principle or condition that customarily governs behavior". This captures the essence of an "unwritten rule" – it is a custom, it governs behavior. It fits the example "it was his rule to take a walk".
    *   Sense 8: "directions that define the way a game or sport is to be conducted". If the sentence said "He broke the rules and got a penalty," it would be Sense 8. But "unwritten rules" are social norms/customs within the sport, not the defining regulations of the sport itself (you can't win a game by following unwritten rules, you just earn respect).
    *   Sense 1 is the broader, more accurate definition for "unwritten rules" in a cultural or behavioral context.

4.  **Final Verification:**
    *   Sentence: "unwritten rules ... followed ... by this sport."
    *   Sense 1 Definition: "a principle or condition that customarily governs behavior".
    *   "Unwritten rules" are exactly principles that customarily govern behavior, rather than official laws of the game (Sense 8) or mathematical procedures (Sense 11).
    *   The WordNet definition for Sense 1 is usually "a principle or condition that customarily governs behavior". This matches perfectly.

5.  **Output format:** Return only the number.

    *   Selected Sense: 1.

    Let's double check Sense 2 ("something regarded as a normative example"). This is usually about patterns or models. "Unwritten rules" are active governing principles of behavior. Sense 1 is better.

    Let's double check Sense 3 ("prescribed guide"). "Unwritten" contradicts "prescribed" in the sense of official direction, though not necessarily informal direction. But Sense 1 ("customarily") captures the "unwritten" aspect better.

    Therefore, Sense 1 is the correct choice.


[User]
Which numbered sense of "part" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: <t>Part</t> of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician.

Senses:
1. definition=something determined in relation to something that includes it | examples=he wanted to feel a part of something bigger than himself
2. definition=something less than the whole of a human artifact | examples=the rear part of the house
3. definition=a portion of a natural object | examples=they analyzed the river into three parts
4. definition=that which concerns a person with regard to a particular role or situation | examples=it requires vigilance on our part
5. definition=the extended spatial location of something | examples=the farming regions of France
6. definition=the actions and activities assigned to or required or expected of a person or group | examples=the function of a teacher
7. definition=an actor's portrayal of someone in a play | examples=she played the part of Desdemona
8. definition=assets belonging to or due to or contributed by an individual person or group | examples=he wanted his share in cash
9. definition=one of the portions into which something is regarded as divided and which together constitute a whole | examples=the written part of the exam
10. definition=a line of scalp that can be seen when sections of hair are combed in opposite directions | examples=his part was right in the middle
11. definition=the melody carried by a particular voice or instrument in polyphonic music | examples=he tried to sing the tenor part
12. definition=the part played by a person in bringing about a result | examples=I am proud of my contribution in advancing the project

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the Request:** The user wants me to identify the correct sense of the word "part" (enclosed in `<t></t>`) from a provided list of 12 senses, based on a specific sentence. I need to return *only* the number.

2.  **Analyze the Sentence:**
    *   Sentence: "<t>Part</t> of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization..."
    *   Context: The phrase is "Part of the debate".
    *   Meaning: "Part" here refers to a segment, a portion, or some fraction of the total debate. It is not the whole debate, but a piece of it.

3.  **Analyze the Senses:**

    *   *Sense 1:* "something determined in relation to something that includes it" (e.g., "a part of something bigger"). This is a very general definition, often overlapping with others. "Part of the debate" fits the relation logic (part to whole), but let's see if there is a more specific sense.

    *   *Sense 2:* "something less than the whole of a human artifact" (e.g., "the rear part of the house"). A debate isn't exactly a physical artifact like a house. It's an abstract concept/event. "House" is physical; "debate" is abstract.

    *   *Sense 3:* "a portion of a natural object" (e.g., "river"). A debate is not a natural object.

    *   *Sense 4:* "that which concerns a person with regard to a particular role or situation" (e.g., "on our part"). The sentence structure is "Part of the debate", not "on the part of [someone]". Incorrect.

    *   *Sense 5:* "the extended spatial location of something" (e.g., "regions of France"). This usually refers to spatial regions. A debate has a temporal and conceptual extent, but this sense usually implies physical geography or space. Not the best fit.

    *   *Sense 6:* "the actions and activities assigned to or required or expected of a person or group" (e.g., "function of a teacher"). This is "role" or "function". "Part of the debate" doesn't mean the function of the debate. Incorrect.

    *   *Sense 7:* "an actor's portrayal of someone in a play". Incorrect.

    *   *Sense 8:* "assets belonging to or due to or contributed by an individual person or group" (e.g., "share"). This implies financial or material possession. A debate isn't an asset owned in that way. Incorrect.

    *   *Sense 9:* "one of the portions into which something is regarded as divided and which together constitute a whole" (e.g., "the written part of the exam").
        *   Let's compare Sense 1 and Sense 9.
        *   Sense 1 is very broad/abstract: "something determined in relation to something that includes it".
        *   Sense 9 is specific to division/portion constituting a whole. "Part of the debate" implies that the debate is the whole, and this specific issue is a portion of it.
        *   Let's look at the example for Sense 9: "the written part of the exam". An exam is an event/activity. A debate is an event/activity. This seems very close.
        *   Let's look at Sense 1's example: "he wanted to feel a part of something bigger". This often implies membership or belonging to a group/abstract concept.
        *   Let's look at Sense 2's example: "rear part of the house". Physical object.
        *   Let's look at Sense 3's example: "parts of a river". Natural object.

    *   *Re-evaluating Sense 1 vs 9:*
        *   WordNet (which is likely the source of these definitions) usually categorizes "part" under specific synsets.
        *   Sense 9 definition: "one of the portions into which something is regarded as divided and which together constitute a whole". This fits "Part of the debate" perfectly. A debate can be divided into topics or arguments. This portion constitutes a part of the whole debate.
        *   Sense 1 definition: "something determined in relation to something that includes it". This is often "part and parcel" or "part of a group".
        *   Usually, when talking about a fraction of a non-physical entity (like a debate, an exam, a journey), Sense 9 is the standard mapping in WordNet (often `part.n.01` or `part.n.02` depending on version, but here Sense 9 corresponds to the "portion/division" meaning).
        *   Let's check the example for Sense 1 again: "he wanted to feel a part of something bigger than himself". This is about inclusion/belonging.
        *   Let's check the example for Sense 9 again: "the written part of the exam". This is about a constitutive portion of an entity.
        *   "Part of the debate" is a constitutive portion of the debate event. Therefore, Sense 9 is the best fit.

    *   Let's check Sense 2 again: "human artifact". A debate could be considered a human artifact (created by humans), but Sense 2 usually implies physical components (like parts of a car, house, machine).
    *   Let's check Sense 5: "extended spatial location". Not spatial.

    *   *Decision:* Sense 9 captures the "portion of a whole" aspect best for an abstract entity like a debate.

    *   *Let's double check against standard WordNet hierarchies.*
        *   Sense 1 usually maps to "part, portion, component part, constituent, component" -> definition: "something determined in relation to something that includes it". (WordNet 3.0: part#n#1). Example: "the animal constituent of plankton". This is about constitution.
        *   Sense 9 usually maps to "part, portion, division" -> definition: "one of the portions into which something is regarded as divided and which together constitute a whole". (WordNet 3.0: part#n#3?). Actually, let's look closer at the definitions provided in the prompt.
        *   Prompt Sense 1: "something determined in relation to something that includes it". This is the broad "relation" sense.
        *   Prompt Sense 9: "one of the portions into which something is regarded as divided and which together constitute a whole".
        *   "Part of the debate" refers to a segment. "The debate" is the whole. This instance is a "portion".
        *   Often, Sense 1 is the general relation, Sense 9 is the specific "division" or "section".
        *   Consider the phrase "part of the problem", "part of the reason", "part of the debate". These usually fall under the "portion/division" sense.
        *   Let's look at the examples again.
        *   Sense 9 example: "the written part of the exam". An exam is an event/process. A debate is an event/process.
        *   Sense 1 example: "he wanted to feel a part of something bigger". This is "belonging".
        *   Therefore, Sense 9 is the better match.

    *   *Wait, let me check Sense 1 in WordNet contexts.* In WordNet 3.0:
        *   S: (n) part, portion, component part, constituent, component (something determined in relation to something that includes it) "he wanted to feel a part of something bigger than himself"; "I read a portion of the manuscript"; "the smaller component is hard to reach"; "the animal constituent of plankton"
        *   S: (n) part, portion (something less than the whole of a human artifact) "the rear part of the house"; "glue the two parts together"
        *   S: (n) part, piece (a portion of a natural object) "they analyzed the river into three parts"; "five parts of x to one part of y" -> (This matches prompt Sense 3 roughly)
        *   S: (n) part (that which concerns a person with regard to a particular role or situation) "it requires vigilance on our part"
        *   S: (n) region, part (the extended spatial location of something) "the farming regions of France"
        *   S: (n) function, office, part, role (the actions and activities assigned to or required or expected of a person or group) "the function of a teacher"
        *   S: (n) character, role, theatrical role, part, persona (an actor's portrayal of someone in a play)
        *   S: (n) share, portion, part, percentage (assets belonging to or due to or contributed by an individual person or group)
        *   S: (n) part, section, division (one of the portions into which something is regarded as divided and which together constitute a whole) "the written part of the exam"; "the finance section of the company"; "the BBC's engineering division"

    *   Okay, let's map the prompt senses to WordNet senses:
        *   Prompt 1 = WordNet 1. (General relation/inclusion).
        *   Prompt 2 = WordNet 2. (Human artifact).
        *   Prompt 3 = WordNet 3? (Natural object).
        *   Prompt 4 = WordNet 4. (Role/situation).
        *   Prompt 5 = WordNet 5. (Spatial location).
        *   Prompt 6 = WordNet 6. (Function/Role).
        *   Prompt 7 = WordNet 7. (Actor).
        *   Prompt 8 = WordNet 8. (Share/Assets).
        *   Prompt 9 = WordNet 9. (Division/Section).

    *   *The specific instance:* "Part of the debate".
    *   Is "debate" a human artifact? Yes, in a way. But usually, artifacts in Sense 2 refer to physical objects (house, machine).
    *   Is "debate" an abstract whole? Yes.
    *   Does it fit Sense 9 (Division)? "One of the portions into which something is regarded as divided". The debate is divided into parts/topics. One of them is the part mentioned.
    *   Does it fit Sense 1 (General)? "Something determined in relation to something that includes it". This is almost always true for any "part of X". It is the hypernym of Sense 2, 3, and 9.
    *   Which is the *specific* sense used?
        *   Sense 1 is a hypernym. In WSD (Word Sense Disambiguation) tasks, one usually picks the most specific sense that fits.
        *   Sense 9 specifies "portions into which something is regarded as divided".
        *   Let's look at the example in Sense 9: "the written part of the exam". An exam is an event/activity.
        *   "Part of the debate" refers to a segment of the event/activity.
        *   This aligns perfectly with Sense 9.
        *   Sense 1 is often used for "membership" (part of a group) or "constituents" (parts of a mixture). While "part of the debate" *is* a constituent, Sense 9 provides the specific nuance of "division" or "section" of a larger entity (abstract or physical), which matches "exam" and "debate".

    *   Let's double check Sense 2. "Something less than the whole of a human artifact". A debate is not an artifact in the sense of a physical object. So Sense 2 is out.
    *   So it's between Sense 1 (General relation) and Sense 9 (Division/Portion).
    *   In WordNet, `part#n#1` (Prompt Sense 1) covers "component part", "constituent".
    *   `part#n#9` (Prompt Sense 9) covers "section", "division".
    *   "Part of the debate" implies a specific segment or topic within the debate. "The finance section of the company" is an example for Sense 9. "The written part of the exam" is an example for Sense 9.
    *   "Part of the debate" is structurally and semantically identical to "Part of the exam".
    *   Therefore, Sense 9 is the correct answer.

    *   Let's quickly check the other definitions just to be absolutely sure.
    *   Sense 4: "on our part". No.
    *   Sense 5: "regions of France". No.
    *   Sense 6: "role of a teacher". No.
    *   Sense 12: "part played by a person... contribution". The sentence mentions "part of the debate", not someone's part/contribution *in* the debate. Although the sentence discusses Mourinho's actions, the specific word "<t>Part</t>" refers to the debate itself.
    *   Wait, look at the sentence: "<t>Part</t> of the debate... is caused by..."
    *   It means "Some portion of the debate".
    *   This is definitely Sense 9.

    *   Let's refine the reasoning.
    *   The phrase is "Part of the debate".
    *   Meaning: A segment or portion of the total discussion.
    *   Sense 9 definition: "one of the portions into which something is regarded as divided and which together constitute a whole".
    *   Example for 9: "the written part of the exam".
    *   Analogy: Exam -> Debate (Abstract/Event). Written part -> Part mentioned in text (segment).
    *   Fit: Excellent.

    *   Sense 1 definition: "something determined in relation to something that includes it".
    *   Example for 1: "he wanted to feel a part of something bigger".
    *   Fit: This sense is too broad and often implies inclusion in a collective/group or a component in a composition sense. Sense 9 captures the "segment/division" aspect of an event/activity better.

    *   Therefore, the answer is 9.

provider: Parasail


[User]
Which numbered sense of "debate" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: Part of the <t>debate</t> arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician.

Senses:
1. definition=a discussion in which reasons are advanced for and against some proposition or proposal | examples=the argument over foreign aid goes on and on
2. definition=the formal presentation of a stated proposition and the opposition to it (usually followed by a vote)

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the Request:**
    *   Target word: "debate" (marked with <t></t>).
    *   Context sentence: "Part of the <t>debate</t> arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization..."
    *   Provided senses:
        *   1: definition=a discussion in which reasons are advanced for and against some proposition or proposal | examples=the argument over foreign aid goes on and on
        *   2: definition=the formal presentation of a stated proposition and the opposition to it (usually followed by a vote)
    *   Task: Return *only* the number of the correct sense.

2.  **Analyze the Context:**
    *   The sentence refers to a "debate arisen in the related case".
    *   The context involves a controversy surrounding Real Madrid, fines for players, and Mourinho's dramatization/histrionics.
    *   It talks about a situation where there is disagreement, argumentation, and public discourse regarding the actions of the team and the manager.
    *   It doesn't mention a formal parliamentary procedure, a specific scheduled event with a moderator, or a vote taking place afterward.

3.  **Analyze Sense 1:**
    *   Definition: "a discussion in which reasons are advanced for and against some proposition or proposal".
    *   Example: "the argument over foreign aid goes on and on".
    *   Fit: The context describes a controversy or argument arising from a case. People are discussing/arguing about the actions of Real Madrid and Mourinho. This fits the general idea of a debate as a discussion or argument about a topic.

4.  **Analyze Sense 2:**
    *   Definition: "the formal presentation of a stated proposition and the opposition to it (usually followed by a vote)".
    *   Example: (implied context would be a legislative body or debate club).
    *   Fit: The sentence describes a public controversy, not a formal scheduled debate with a vote. There is no mention of a formal procedure or a vote.

5.  **Compare and Conclude:**
    *   Sense 1 refers to a general argument or discussion (a controversy).
    *   Sense 2 refers to a specific formal event.
    *   The "debate" in the sentence is about the controversy ("arisen in the related case"), making Sense 1 the correct choice.

6.  **Final Output Formulation:**
    *   The user requested *only* the number.
    *   The number is 1.

provider: Amazon Bedrock


[User]
Which numbered sense of "case" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: Part of the debate arisen in the related <t>case</t> is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician.

Senses:
1. definition=an occurrence of something | examples=it was a case of bad judgment
2. definition=a special set of circumstances | examples=in that event, the first possibility is excluded
3. definition=a comprehensive term for any proceeding in a court of law whereby an individual seeks a legal remedy | examples=the family brought suit against the landlord
4. definition=the actual state of things | examples=that was not the case
5. definition=a portable container for carrying several objects | examples=the musicians left their instrument cases backstage
6. definition=a person requiring professional services | examples=a typical case was the suburban housewife described by a marriage counselor
7. definition=a person who is subjected to experimental or other observational procedures; someone who is an object of investigation | examples=the subjects for this investigation were selected randomly
8. definition=a problem requiring investigation | examples=Perry Mason solved the case of the missing heir
9. definition=a statement of facts and reasons used to support an argument | examples=he stated his case clearly
10. definition=the quantity contained in a case
11. definition=nouns or pronouns or adjectives (often marked by inflection) related in some way to other words in a sentence
12. definition=a specific state of mind that is temporary | examples=a case of the jitters
13. definition=a person of a specified kind (usually with many eccentricities) | examples=a real character
14. definition=a specific size and style of type within a type family
15. definition=an enveloping structure or covering enclosing an animal or plant organ or part
16. definition=the housing or outer covering of something | examples=the clock has a walnut case
17. definition=the enclosing frame around a door or window opening | examples=the casings had rotted away and had to be replaced
18. definition=(printing) the receptacle in which a compositor has his type, which is divided into compartments for the different letters, spaces, or numbers | examples=for English, a compositor will ordinarily have two such cases, the upper case containing the capitals and the lower case containing the small letters
19. definition=bed linen consisting of a cover for a pillow | examples=the burglar carried his loot in a pillowcase
20. definition=a glass container used to store and display items in a shop or museum or home

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the input sentence:** "Part of the debate arisen in the related <t>case</t> is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization..."

2.  **Contextual clues:**
    *   The sentence mentions "Real Madrid organization", "fined its players", "Mourinho" (a famous football manager), "histrionic and provoking technician".
    *   The phrase "debate arisen in the related <t>case</t>" suggests a specific event or situation that is being discussed or investigated.
    *   The context mentions fines, organizations, and debates. This sounds like a legal matter or a controversial incident involving a famous football club.

3.  **Evaluate the senses provided:**

    *   *Sense 1: an occurrence of something (e.g., it was a case of bad judgment).* This is a general occurrence. While a legal case is an occurrence, "related case" usually implies something more specific than just an instance of something happening.
    *   *Sense 2: a special set of circumstances (e.g., in that event...).* This is similar to "situation". Again, "related case" usually refers to a specific entity (a lawsuit or investigation) rather than just "circumstances".
    *   *Sense 3: a comprehensive term for any proceeding in a court of law whereby an individual seeks a legal remedy (e.g., the family brought suit against the landlord).* This fits well. Legal cases involving sports teams, fines, and "debate" often end up in court or formal arbitration. The mention of "fined its players" and "Mourinho" acting out suggests a controversy that likely has legal or disciplinary proceedings. The phrase "related case" is standard terminology for connecting one lawsuit or legal proceeding to another.
    *   *Sense 4: the actual state of things (e.g., that was not the case).* This refers to truth/reality. "In the related case" doesn't fit grammatically or semantically here.
    *   *Sense 5: a portable container.* No.
    *   *Sense 6: a person requiring professional services.* No.
    *   *Sense 7: a person subjected to experimental procedures.* No.
    *   *Sense 8: a problem requiring investigation (e.g., Perry Mason solved the case of the missing heir).* This is often used for detective stories or police investigations. However, the structure "related case" strongly favors the legal definition (Sense 3) or a specific instance of an event (Sense 1). Sense 8 is usually "the case of X" or "solving a case". "The related case" sounds more formal/juridical. Let's look closer at the context. It seems to be talking about a controversy involving Real Madrid. Is it a police investigation or a legal proceeding? Often, high-profile football controversies (like "Mourinho's dramatization") involve disciplinary hearings or lawsuits. Sense 3 is the standard definition for "case" in a legal/administrative context ("related case"). Sense 8 is usually used for the *investigation* itself, but Sense 3 encompasses the entire *proceeding*. Given the formal tone and "related case", Sense 3 is the strongest candidate.
    *   *Sense 9: a statement of facts and reasons used to support an argument.* No, this is "making a case".
    *   *Senses 10-20:* Definitions involving quantity, grammar, type size, biology, housing, printing, bed linen, glass containers. None of these fit the context of a debate within a specific situation involving a sports organization.

4.  **Refining the choice between Sense 1, Sense 2, Sense 3, and Sense 8:**
    *   *Sense 1/2:* "An occurrence" or "special set of circumstances". If I say "In the case of the fire, run," that's Sense 2. If I say "It was a case of mistaken identity," that's Sense 1. "In the related case" implies a countable entity—a specific file or matter. This points to 3 or 8.
    *   *Sense 8:* "A problem requiring investigation." This implies a mystery or a police matter. While Mourinho's behavior might be dramatic, the context of "debate" and "Real Madrid organization" sounds like a disciplinary or legal context.
    *   *Sense 3:* "A proceeding in a court of law." Or broadly, a legal action. In news reporting (which this sentence resembles), a "case" is almost always a lawsuit or a formal disciplinary hearing. The phrase "related case" is a standard legal collocate referring to a different lawsuit or hearing. The sentence discusses the "debate arisen in the related <t>case</t>". Legal cases generate debates (arguments between lawyers/judges/public).

    *   Let's check the specific example text provided in the prompt to see if it matches a known news article. The text mentions "Real Madrid", "Mourinho", and a "debate arisen in the related case". This looks like a translation or a snippet from a news report about a legal dispute or disciplinary hearing involving Jose Mourinho (perhaps regarding refereeing controversies or tapping up players).
    *   In legal and news contexts, "the related case" refers to a specific lawsuit or proceeding.
    *   Therefore, Sense 3 is the best fit.

5.  **Final Confirmation:**
    *   Sentence part: "...debate arisen in the related <t>case</t>..."
    *   Definition: "a comprehensive term for any proceeding in a court of law whereby an individual seeks a legal remedy".
    *   Does it fit? Yes. It refers to a specific legal proceeding or file.
    *   Comparison with Sense 8: Sense 8 is usually "detect a case" or "solve a case". While Sense 8 is close, "the related case" is standard legal terminology (Sense 3). The context of an organization fining players and a "debate" arising fits the legal/proceeding definition perfectly.

6.  **Construct Output:** The user wants only the number.
    The number is 3.


[User]
Which numbered sense of "fact" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the <t>fact</t> that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician.

Senses:
1. definition=a piece of information about circumstances that exist or events that have occurred | examples=first you must collect all the facts of the case
2. definition=a statement or assertion of verified information about something that is the case or has happened | examples=he supported his argument with an impressive array of facts
3. definition=an event known to have happened or something known to have existed | examples=your fears have no basis in fact
4. definition=a concept whose truth can be proved | examples=scientific hypotheses are not facts

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the user's request**: The user wants to identify the specific sense of the word "fact" (marked with <t></t>) in a given sentence. I need to choose from four provided senses and return *only* the number.

2.  **Analyze the sentence**:
    *   Sentence: "Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the <t>fact</t> that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization..."
    *   Context: The sentence discusses a debate caused by a specific event or action ("fact that has been carried out"). The phrasing "fact that has been carried out" suggests an action or occurrence. However, looking closer at the syntax: "...caused by the <t>fact</t> that has been carried out..."
    *   Wait, let me re-read the specific phrase: "the <t>fact</t> that has been carried out". This is slightly awkward English (likely translated), but let's look at what "fact" refers to here.
    *   It refers to an event or action done by the Real Madrid team.
    *   Let's look at the options.

3.  **Analyze the Senses**:
    *   **Sense 1**: definition=a piece of information about circumstances that exist or events that have occurred | examples=first you must collect all the facts of the case. (Focus: piece of information regarding circumstances/events).
    *   **Sense 2**: definition=a statement or assertion of verified information about something that is the case or has happened | examples=he supported his argument with an impressive array of facts. (Focus: a statement/assertion presented as truth).
    *   **Sense 3**: definition=an event known to have happened or something known to have existed | examples=your fears have no basis in fact. (Focus: the actual event/reality itself).
    *   **Sense 4**: definition=a concept whose truth can be proved | examples=scientific hypotheses are not facts. (Focus: provable concept).

4.  **Match Sentence to Senses**:
    *   The sentence says "the fact that has been carried out".
    *   "Carried out" implies an action or an event.
    *   Sense 1 suggests "information about... events". Can you "carry out" a piece of information? No, you carry out an action/event.
    *   Sense 2 suggests a "statement". Can you "carry out" a statement? No.
    *   Sense 3 suggests "an event known to have happened". Can you "carry out" an event? Yes. An event or action is something that can be carried out.
    *   Sense 4 suggests a "concept". Can you "carry out" a concept? Not usually in this context.

    *   Let's reconsider the syntax. "caused by the fact that has been carried out". This is grammatically slightly odd. Usually, "the fact that..." introduces a clause (e.g., "the fact that he left"). Here, the relative clause is "that has been carried out". The "that" refers to the "fact".
    *   So, the "fact" is the thing that was carried out. What gets carried out? An act, an event, an operation.
    *   Therefore, "fact" here is synonymous with the "event" or the "deed" or the "act" itself.
    *   Sense 3: "an event known to have happened".
    *   Let's double-check Sense 1. "a piece of information about... events". If "fact" meant information, the sentence would mean "caused by the piece of information that has been carried out". Information isn't carried out.
    *   Let's double-check Sense 3 again. If "fact" means "event", the sentence means "caused by the event that has been carried out". This makes semantic sense.

    *   Let's look at the example for Sense 3: "your fears have no basis in fact". Here "fact" means reality/actuality.
    *   Is there a better fit?
    *   Let's look at the source of the sentence if possible (mentally). This looks like a translation from Spanish (Real Madrid, Mourinho context). In Spanish, "hecho" means both "fact" and "event/act/deed".
    *   The phrase "el hecho que ha sido llevado a cabo" -> "the deed/act that has been carried out".
    *   Translated to English as "fact", it retains the meaning of an actual occurrence or event.
    *   Sense 3 defines "fact" as "an event known to have happened". This fits the "act/deed" meaning required by the verb "carried out".

5.  **Refining the decision**:
    *   The verb phrase "carried out" is the key selector.
    *   Only an action or event can be "carried out".
    *   Sense 3 is the only definition that equates "fact" to "an event". (Sense 1 is information *about* an event. Sense 2 is a statement *about* an event. Sense 4 is a concept).

    *   Therefore, Sense 3 is the correct match.

6.  **Final check**:
    *   Sentence: ...caused by the [event/deed] that has been carried out...
    *   Definition 3: an event known to have happened...
    *   Match: Yes.

7.  **Output generation**: Return only the number.
    *   Number: 3.

provider: Chutes


[User]
Which numbered sense of "team" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by <t>team</t> of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician.

Senses:
1. definition=a cooperative unit (especially in sports)
2. definition=two or more draft animals that work together to pull something

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the Request:**
    *   Target word: "team" (marked with <t></t>).
    *   Context sentence: "...has been carried out by <t>team</t> of the Real Madrid organization..."
    *   Provided senses:
        1.  definition=a cooperative unit (especially in sports)
        2.  definition=two or more draft animals that work together to pull something
    *   Constraint: Return *only* the number of the correct sense.

2.  **Analyze the Context:**
    *   The sentence mentions "Real Madrid organization". Real Madrid is a famous football (soccer) club.
    *   The sentence mentions "players" later on ("has fined its players").
    *   The sentence mentions "Mourinho" (a famous football manager) as a "technician" (coach/manager).
    *   The phrase is "team of the Real Madrid organization".

3.  **Evaluate Sense 1:**
    *   Definition: "a cooperative unit (especially in sports)".
    *   Fit: Real Madrid is a sports organization. The group of players representing them is called a "team". Mourinho is the coach of that team. The context is explicitly about sports (football). This fits perfectly.

4.  **Evaluate Sense 2:**
    *   Definition: "two or more draft animals that work together to pull something".
    *   Fit: Real Madrid is not a group of animals. Mourinho is not coaching oxen or horses. This definition is metaphorical or literal regarding animals, which does not fit the context of a professional football club.

5.  **Conclusion:** Sense 1 is the correct match.

6.  **Formulate Output:** The user requested "only the number".
    *   The number is 1.

provider: Novita


[User]
Which numbered sense of "organization" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid <t>organization</t> (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician.

Senses:
1. definition=a group of people who work together
2. definition=an organized structure for arranging or classifying | examples=he changed the arrangement of the topics
3. definition=the persons (or committees or departments etc.) who make up a body for the purpose of administering something | examples=he claims that the present administration is corrupt
4. definition=the act of organizing a business or an activity related to a business | examples=he was brought in to supervise the organization of a new department
5. definition=an ordered manner; orderliness by virtue of being methodical and well organized | examples=his compulsive organization was not an endearing quality
6. definition=the activity or result of distributing or disposing persons or things properly or methodically | examples=his organization of the work force was very efficient
7. definition=the act of forming or establishing something | examples=the constitution of a PTA group last year

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the user's request:**
    *   Task: Identify the correct sense of the word "organization" in a given sentence.
    *   Input Sentence: "Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid <t>organization</t> (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho..."
    *   Input Senses: A list of 7 definitions/examples.
    *   Constraint: Return *only* the number of the correct sense.

2.  **Analyze the context of the target word:**
    *   Word: "organization" (specifically "Real Madrid <t>organization</t>").
    *   Context: The sentence refers to "Real Madrid", a famous football (soccer) club. It mentions "team", "hymn", "players", "technician" (manager/coach).
    *   Meaning in context: The word refers to the entity, the club itself, the body of people (management, staff, players) that constitutes Real Madrid. It is being referred to as an entity that can fine players and presume nobility.

3.  **Evaluate the senses:**

    *   *Sense 1: definition=a group of people who work together.*
        *   Does it fit? Yes. Real Madrid is a football club, which is a group of people working together (players, staff, management). The phrase "team of the Real Madrid organization" implies the entity/group. This seems like a strong candidate.

    *   *Sense 2: definition=an organized structure for arranging or classifying.*
        *   Does it fit? No. This refers to a system or method of classification (like a taxonomy). Real Madrid is not a classification system.

    *   *Sense 3: definition=the persons (or committees or departments etc.) who make up a body for the purpose of administering something.*
        *   Does it fit? This refers to the administration or governance body of an entity (e.g., "the university administration"). While Real Madrid has an administration, the context "team of the Real Madrid organization" usually refers to the whole entity/institution, not just the administrative staff. However, Sense 1 ("group of people who work together") is often a broader, more general definition for an organization like a club or company in WordNet-style hierarchies. Let's compare Sense 1 and Sense 3 carefully.
        *   Sense 1 is "organization" (the business/institution).
        *   Sense 3 is "administration" or "governance".
        *   In the sentence, "team of the Real Madrid organization" refers to the club as a whole entity. The club fined its players. This is an action by the institution. Often, dictionaries (like WordNet) define "organization" (Sense 1) as "a group of people who work together".
        *   Let's look at Sense 3's example: "he claims that the present administration is corrupt". This equates "organization" with "administration".
        *   Let's look at Sense 1's example (usually implicit or generic). If I say "The Red Cross is a large organization," that fits Sense 1.
        *   Real Madrid is an organization (a club). Is it Sense 1 or 3?
        *   Usually, WordNet (which this list resembles) defines Sense 1 as "an organized structure for arranging or classifying" (Wait, let me check standard WordNet orders or the specific list provided).
        *   *Correction:* The list provided in the prompt is the specific source of truth.
        *   Prompt Sense 1: "a group of people who work together".
        *   Prompt Sense 3: "the persons (or committees or departments etc.) who make up a body for the purpose of administering something".
        *   Real Madrid is a club (a group of people working together). It is an entity. Does it fit Sense 3? Usually, Sense 3 is "administration" or "governance". If the sentence meant "The Real Madrid board," Sense 3 would be better. But "Real Madrid organization" usually refers to the club itself as a collective entity.
        *   Therefore, Sense 1 feels like the best fit for "club/entity".

    *   *Sense 4: definition=the act of organizing a business or an activity related to a business.*
        *   Does it fit? No. This is an action/process. "Real Madrid organization" is a noun phrase referring to an entity.

    *   *Sense 5: definition=an ordered manner; orderliness by virtue of being methodical and well organized.*
        *   Does it fit? No. This is an abstract quality (state of being organized).

    *   *Sense 6: definition=the activity or result of distributing or disposing persons or things properly or methodically.*
        *   Does it fit? No. This is an activity or result of arranging.

    *   *Sense 7: definition=the act of forming or establishing something.*
        *   Does it fit? No. This is the act of creation ("constitution").

4.  **Narrowing down between Sense 1 and Sense 3:**

    *   Sense 1: "a group of people who work together".
    *   Sense 3: "the persons (or committees or departments etc.) who make up a body for the purpose of administering something".
    *   Context: "Real Madrid organization".
    *   Real Madrid is a sports club. It is an organization in the sense of a business, association, or club.
    *   In standard WordNet (which this list looks like a variation of), Sense 1 is usually the "organized structure" definition, and Sense 3 is the "group of people" definition. *However*, the prompt provides a specific ordering that I must follow.
    *   Let's re-read the definitions provided in the prompt strictly.
    *   Sense 1: "a group of people who work together".
    *   Sense 3: "the persons... who make up a body for the purpose of administering something".
    *   Real Madrid (the organization) is the club. It consists of players, coaches, doctors, management, etc. They work together to play football and run the business.
    *   Does Sense 3 fit? That usually implies the bureaucratic side (the administration). The sentence says the "organization... has fined its players". While the administration does the fining, referring to the "Real Madrid organization" usually identifies the club as the collective entity (Sense 1) rather than specifically the governing body (Sense 3).
    *   Consider the phrase "team of the Real Madrid organization". This implies the organization is the umbrella entity. The team is a part of it.
    *   Therefore, "organization" = the club/entity = a group of people who work together.

    *   Let's check if the provided definitions map to a specific dataset (like WordNet).
        *   WordNet 3.0/3.1 Senses for "organization":
            *   1: organization, organisation -- (an organized structure for arranging or classifying "he changed the arrangement of the topics") -> Matches Prompt Sense 2.
            *   2: organization, organisation -- (the activity or result of distributing or disposing persons or things properly or methodically "his organization of the work force was very efficient") -> Matches Prompt Sense 6.
            *   3: arrangement, organization, organisation, system -- (an organized structure for arranging or classifying "he changed the arrangement of the topics" ... wait, duplicate?). Let's look at the standard WordNet order again or SemCor.
            *   Often, "group of people" is the main sense intended for things like "World Health Organization" or "terrorist organization".
        *   Let's ignore external WordNet mapping and stick *strictly* to the text provided in the prompt.
        *   Prompt Sense 1: "a group of people who work together".
        *   Prompt Sense 3: "the persons... who make up a body for the purpose of administering something".
        *   Target: "Real Madrid organization".
        *   Is Real Madrid an organization (Sense 1)? Yes, it's a group of people working together.
        *   Is Real Madrid an organization (Sense 3)? This definition often maps to "administration". While the administration is part of Real Madrid, calling the whole club "the organization" usually invokes the broader "group of people/institution" meaning (Sense 1).
        *   Furthermore, Sense 3's example "he claims that the present administration is corrupt" suggests a synonymy between organization and administration.
        *   Sense 1 fits "The Red Cross organization" or "Real Madrid organization" better as a general term for the institution.

    *   Let's double check the "team of the Real Madrid organization" phrasing.
        *   The sentence says: "...carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization..."
        *   Actually, the phrasing is slightly odd ("team of the organization"). Usually, you say "team of the club".
        *   If "organization" refers to the administrative body (Sense 3), does the "team" (players) belong to the "administration"? Yes, technically.
        *   But if "organization" refers to the collective group (Sense 1), the "team" is a subset of that group.
        *   Sense 1 ("a group of people who work together") is the most standard definition for a corporate entity or club in a general context.
        *   Sense 3 ("administering something") is more specific to governance.
        *   The sentence mentions the organization fined players. This is an administrative act, but the entity performing it is the club (Sense 1). You would say "The organization fined him," referring to the group/institution.
        *   Most word sense disambiguation tasks involving "organization" referring to a named entity (like a company, club, or NGO) default to the "group of people" sense (often Sense 1 or 3 in WordNet depending on version, but here clearly Sense 1 is the general "group of people").
        *   Sense 3 specifically mentions "administering". While correct for the function, Sense 1 is the definition of the entity itself.
        *   Let's compare Sense 1 and 3 again based on the text provided.
        *   Sense 1: definition=a group of people who work together. (Simple, entity-based).
        *   Sense 3: definition=the persons... who make up a body for the purpose of administering something. (Function-based, synonymous with administration).
        *   Real Madrid is an entity. It is primarily defined as a club/group.
        *   I will select Sense 1. It is the most direct fit for "Real Madrid" as a collective noun for the club.

5.  **Final Verification:**
    *   Sentence: "...team of the Real Madrid <t>organization</t>..."
    *   Is Real Madrid a structure for arranging? No (Sense 2).
    *   Is it the act of organizing? No (Sense 4).
    *   Is it orderliness? No (Sense 5).
    *   Is it an activity? No (Sense 6).
    *   Is it the act of forming? No (Sense 7).
    *   Choice is between 1 and 3.
    *   Sense 1: Group of people working together. (Fits Real Madrid perfectly).
    *   Sense 3: Body for administering. (Fits the management, but "Real Madrid organization" usually implies the whole club).
    *   Standard usage: "The UN is an organization." -> Group of people. "I joined the organization." -> Group of people.
    *   Therefore, Sense 1 is the correct choice.

6.  **Formatting Output:**
    *   Constraint: Return only the number.
    *   Result: 1.


[User]
Which numbered sense of "nobility" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of <t>nobility</t> and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician.

Senses:
1. definition=a privileged class holding hereditary titles
2. definition=the quality of elevation of mind and exaltation of character or ideals or conduct
3. definition=the state of being of noble birth

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the Request:** The user wants to identify the correct sense of the word "nobility" as used in a specific sentence. The output should be *only* the number of the correct sense.

2.  **Analyze the Sentence:**
    *   Context: Real Madrid organization.
    *   Phrase: "...in its hymn presumes of <t>nobility</t> and honor..."
    *   Meaning: The hymn (an anthem or song) boasts or claims "nobility" and "honor".
    *   Context clues: Real Madrid is a football club. Football clubs aren't people with "noble birth" (Sense 3) nor a "privileged class holding hereditary titles" (Sense 1) in a literal, legal sense within their anthem. However, anthems often speak about abstract qualities like bravery, spirit, honor, and high moral character.
    *   Contrast: The sentence contrasts this claimed "nobility" with the "histrionic and provoking" behavior of the technician (Mourinho) and fines for players. This implies a moral or behavioral expectation, not a genealogical one.

3.  **Analyze the Senses:**
    *   Sense 1: "a privileged class holding hereditary titles" (e.g., The nobility of France). This refers to a group of people (aristocrats).
    *   Sense 2: "the quality of elevation of mind and exaltation of character or ideals or conduct" (e.g., The nobility of his sacrifice). This refers to an abstract quality of high moral character or grandeur.
    *   Sense 3: "the state of being of noble birth" (e.g., His nobility was questioned). This refers to an individual's status or lineage.

4.  **Match Sentence to Senses:**
    *   Does the hymn presume (boast of) being a "privileged class" (Sense 1)? No, it's a sports club.
    *   Does the hymn presume (boast of) the "state of being of noble birth" (Sense 3)? No, the club isn't a person born noble.
    *   Does the hymn presume (boast of) "quality of elevation of mind... character or ideals" (Sense 2)? Yes. The hymn celebrates the spirit, high ideals, and honor of the club. This fits the context of sports anthems which usually extol virtues like greatness, honor, and "noble" sporting behavior.

5.  **Verify:**
    *   "Nobility and honor" are often paired as abstract virtues.
    *   The Real Madrid anthem (Himno del Real Madrid) lyrics roughly translate to "History, legend, glory..." etc. While I don't need to know the exact lyrics, the phrase "presumes of nobility and honor" strongly implies a moral claim.
    *   The irony in the sentence relies on the contrast between high moral standing (Sense 2) and bad behavior (histrionics/provocation). If the anthem was about being aristocrats (Sense 1), the irony wouldn't make sense regarding the behavior of the coach.

6.  **Final Conclusion:** The correct sense is number 2.

7.  **Format Output:** Return only the number.

    Result: 2


[User]
Which numbered sense of "honor" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and <t>honor</t>, and that has fined its players for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician.

Senses:
1. definition=a tangible symbol signifying approval or distinction | examples=an award for bravery
2. definition=the state of being honored
3. definition=the quality of being honorable and having a good name | examples=a man of honor
4. definition=a woman's virtue or chastity

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the Request:**
    *   Target sentence: "Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and <t>honor</t>, and that has fined its players for analogous acts)..."
    *   Task: Identify the correct numbered sense of "honor" from the provided list.
    *   Constraint: Return only the number.

2.  **Analyze the Context:**
    *   The sentence discusses Real Madrid, a football club.
    *   The phrase is: "...in its hymn presumes of nobility and <t>honor</t>..."
    *   Context clue: "hymn" (anthem). Real Madrid's anthem (himno) famously includes the phrase "...vestida de blancos, de pureza y de nobleza, nacen tus banderas..." or similar sentiments regarding nobility, honor, and purity.
    *   Meaning: The club claims or presumes to possess these abstract qualities: nobility (high moral character) and honor (high moral character, reputation, integrity).
    *   The word "honor" here refers to a personal/organizational quality of integrity, good reputation, and high moral standards, not a physical award, not the state of being honored (ceremonially), and certainly not a woman's chastity.

3.  **Evaluate the Senses:**
    *   Sense 1: "a tangible symbol signifying approval or distinction" (e.g., an award).
        *   Does "presumes of nobility and honor" mean the hymn boasts about a trophy or medal? No. It boasts about a quality.
    *   Sense 2: "the state of being honored".
        *   This usually refers to the experience of receiving honor (e.g., "It is an honor to be here"). While related, the context here is about what the club *is* or claims to be (a quality), not the state of receiving accolades.
    *   Sense 3: "the quality of being honorable and having a good name" (e.g., a man of honor).
        *   This fits perfectly. Real Madrid's anthem boasts about the club's noble nature and integrity (honor). It is an abstract quality or reputation.
    *   Sense 4: "a woman's virtue or chastity".
        *   This is specific to women and archaic in this context. Not applicable to a football club.

4.  **Select the Best Fit:**
    *   Sense 3 aligns with the meaning of "honor" as a moral quality or reputation ("good name") associated with the club.

5.  **Final Output Formulation:**
    *   The request asks for *only* the number.
    *   The number is 3.

6.  **Double Check:**
    *   Sentence: "...presumes of nobility and honor..."
    *   Translation/Interpretation: The club boasts about its nobility and its integrity/reputation.
    *   Sense 3 definition: "the quality of being honorable and having a good name".
    *   Match confirmed.

    *   Why not Sense 2? "State of being honored" implies a passive reception of honor (like "great honor was bestowed upon him"). Here, it's an intrinsic quality the club claims to have. "Nobility and honor" are qualities possessed, like "courage and honor". Sense 3 is the definition of the quality itself.

    *   Result: 3.

provider: StreamLake


[User]
Which numbered sense of "player" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its <t>players</t> for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician.

Senses:
1. definition=a person who participates in or is skilled at some game
2. definition=someone who plays a musical instrument (as a profession)
3. definition=a theatrical performer
4. definition=a person who pursues a number of different social and sexual partners simultaneously
5. definition=an important participant (as in a business deal) | examples=he was a major player in setting up the corporation

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the User's Request:**
    *   Target word: "player" (marked as `<t>players</t>` in the sentence).
    *   Sentence: "Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its **players** for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho..."
    *   Task: Identify the correct sense number from the provided list.
    *   Constraint: Return *only* the number.

2.  **Analyze the Context of the Sentence:**
    *   The sentence mentions "Real Madrid organization". Real Madrid is a famous football (soccer) club.
    *   It mentions "team of the Real Madrid organization".
    *   It mentions "Mourinho" (José Mourinho, a famous football manager).
    *   The word "players" refers to members of the team who were fined for "analogous acts" (likely referring to unsportsmanlike conduct or simulation, given the context of "histrionic and provoking technician").
    *   Clearly, these "players" are athletes participating in a sport (football).

3.  **Evaluate the Provided Senses:**
    *   Sense 1: "definition=a person who participates in or is skilled at some game". This fits perfectly. Football is a game, and these are participants.
    *   Sense 2: "definition=someone who plays a musical instrument (as a profession)". Incorrect. Real Madrid is a sports team, not an orchestra (in this context).
    *   Sense 3: "definition=a theatrical performer". Incorrect. While "dramatization" and "histrionic" are mentioned, the "players" themselves are athletes, not actors by profession, though they might be accused of acting (diving) on the field. The primary definition fits the role within the organization.
    *   Sense 4: "definition=a person who pursues a number of different social and sexual partners simultaneously". Incorrect. This is the slang "playboy" or "player" definition.
    *   Sense 5: "definition=an important participant (as in a business deal)". Incorrect. This usually refers to business or political contexts (e.g., "a major player in the industry"). While athletes are important to the club, the context is specifically about the game/team, not a business transaction negotiation context (though it is a business, the role is defined by the game).

4.  **Confirm the Best Match:**
    *   Sense 1 describes athletes/sports team members. The context is Real Madrid (sports team). The match is exact.

5.  **Formulate the Output:**
    *   The user requested "only the number".
    *   The correct number is 1.

6.  **Final Check:**
    *   Sentence mentions Real Madrid and Mourinho -> Sports.
    *   Word is "players" -> Athletes.
    *   Definition 1 -> Participant in a game.
    *   Result -> 1.


[User]
Which numbered sense of "act" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous <t>acts</t>) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician.

Senses:
1. definition=a legal document codifying the result of deliberations of a committee or society or legislative body
2. definition=something that people do or cause to happen
3. definition=a subdivision of a play or opera or ballet
4. definition=a short theatrical performance that is part of a longer program | examples=he did his act three times every evening
5. definition=a manifestation of insincerity | examples=he put on quite an act for her benefit

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the Request:**
    *   Target word: "act" (specifically the plural form "<t>acts</t>" in the sentence).
    *   Sentence: "...Real Madrid organization... has fined its players for analogous <t>acts</t>..."
    *   Task: Identify the correct sense number from the provided list.
    *   Constraint: Return *only* the number.

2.  **Analyze the Context:**
    *   The sentence discusses Real Madrid fining its players.
    *   The phrase is "analogous acts".
    *   What kind of things does a sports team fine players for? Misconduct, bad behavior, specific actions on or off the field.
    *   In this context, "acts" refers to deeds, behaviors, or actions performed by the players. They did something wrong (an action), so they were fined.

3.  **Evaluate the Senses:**
    *   *Sense 1:* "a legal document codifying the result of deliberations..." (e.g., The Stamp Act).
        *   Does it fit? No. The players weren't fined for "analogous legal documents".
    *   *Sense 2:* "something that people do or cause to happen".
        *   Does it fit? Yes. The players performed certain actions/behaviors (acts). Fines are consequences for actions/behaviors. This aligns perfectly with "deeds" or "actions".
    *   *Sense 3:* "a subdivision of a play or opera or ballet".
        *   Does it fit? No. The players weren't fined for acts of a play.
    *   *Sense 4:* "a short theatrical performance that is part of a longer program".
        *   Does it fit? No. Not a performance context here (even though Mourinho is accused of "dramatization", the "acts" for which players were fined refers to their conduct/behavior, not a scheduled performance piece).
    *   *Sense 5:* "a manifestation of insincerity" (e.g., "he put on quite an act").
        *   Does it fit? No. While "dramatization" is mentioned later regarding Mourinho, the "acts" referred to here are the specific behaviors or incidents committed by players that warranted a fine. While one *could* argue a player is putting on an act, the word is plural "acts" and follows "analogous" (meaning similar deeds), fitting the general definition of actions/deeds better than the specific idiomatic "putting on an act".

4.  **Confirm the Best Match:**
    *   The phrase "analogous acts" refers to similar actions or behaviors.
    *   Definition 2 covers "something that people do".
    *   This is the standard, general definition of the word "act" meaning a deed or action.

5.  **Final Output Formulation:**
    *   The correct sense is 2.
    *   The user requested "only the number".

6.  **Final Check:**
    *   Sentence: "...fined its players for analogous [actions/behaviors]..."
    *   Definition 2: "something that people do..."
    *   Match: Perfect.

    Result: 2.

provider: Baidu