[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: type
Target surface form: type
Context:
This way, and since Real Madrid will finish as leader of its group, both players will fulfil the prescribed sanction during the next game of league, against Auxerre, and will be able to get rid of the cards the following phase. Finally, the committee of discipline of the UEFA has sanctioned with two games the trainer of the team, Jose Mourinho, and with different economic amounts the implied players. The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of football. It is so extended that it part of the ethos, of the unwritten rules, but followed nonetheless by this sport. Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician. Anyway, the debate deals with if that <t>type</t> of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport, that is to say, if with these actions fraud is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful actions with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense. The matter examines the type of damage that is brought to the sporting spirit.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=type%1:09:00:: | definition=a subdivision of a particular kind of thing | examples=what type of sculpture do you prefer?
2. sense_key=type%1:18:00:: | definition=a person of a specified kind (usually with many eccentricities) | synonyms=character, eccentric, case | examples=a real character; a strange character
3. sense_key=type%1:14:01:: | definition=(biology) the taxonomic group whose characteristics are used to define the next higher taxon
4. sense_key=type%1:10:01:: | definition=printed characters | examples=small type is hard to read
5. sense_key=type%1:10:00:: | definition=all of the tokens of the same symbol | examples=the word `element' contains five different types of character
6. sense_key=type%1:06:00:: | definition=a small metal block bearing a raised character on one end; produces a printed character when inked and pressed on paper | examples=he dropped a case of type, so they made him pick them up

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

raw_output:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the target word and context:**
    *   Target lemma: `type`
    *   Context sentence: "Anyway, the debate deals with if that *type* of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport..."
    *   Context meaning: The word "type" is used here to refer to a category, sort, or class of behavior. It acts as a classifier for "behavior" (that specific behavior of getting yellow cards on purpose).

2.  **Analyze the candidate senses:**

    *   *Sense 1:* `type%1:09:00::` | Definition: "a subdivision of a particular kind of thing" | Example: "what type of sculpture do you prefer?"
        *   Analysis: This sense refers to a category, sort, variety, or class of something. "That type of behavior" fits perfectly with "a subdivision of a particular kind of thing" (specifically, a subdivision of behavior). This is the most common, general usage of the word.

    *   *Sense 2:* `type%1:18:00::` | Definition: "a person of a specified kind (usually with many eccentricities)" | Synonyms: character, eccentric, case | Example: "a real character"
        *   Analysis: This refers to a person. The context refers to "behavior," not a person.

    *   *Sense 3:* `type%1:14:01::` | Definition: "(biology) the taxonomic group whose characteristics are used to define the next higher taxon"
        *   Analysis: This is a specific biological/scientific technical definition. The context is about sports/soccer, not biology.

    *   *Sense 4:* `type%1:10:01::` | Definition: "printed characters" | Example: "small type is hard to read"
        *   Analysis: This refers to typography or printing. Not relevant here.

    *   *Sense 5:* `type%1:10:00::` | Definition: "all of the tokens of the same symbol" | Example: "the word `element' contains five different types of character"
        *   Analysis: This is a logic/linguistics/computer science technical definition regarding types vs tokens. Not the general usage in the text.

    *   *Sense 6:* `type%1:06:00::` | Definition: "a small metal block bearing a raised character on one end..."
        *   Analysis: This refers to the physical object used in printing presses. Not relevant.

3.  **Select the best sense:**
    *   Sense 1 matches the usage "type of [noun]" to denote a category or variety.
    *   The phrase "that type of behavior" equates to "that kind of behavior" or "that category of behavior".
    *   This aligns with Sense 1's definition "a subdivision of a particular kind of thing".

4.  **Formulate the output:**
    *   The instruction requires a JSON object with the index.
    *   Sense 1 is the correct one.
    *   JSON format: `{"sense_index": 1}`.


attempt_kind: initial

status: success

[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: behavior
Target surface form: behavior
Context:
This way, and since Real Madrid will finish as leader of its group, both players will fulfil the prescribed sanction during the next game of league, against Auxerre, and will be able to get rid of the cards the following phase. Finally, the committee of discipline of the UEFA has sanctioned with two games the trainer of the team, Jose Mourinho, and with different economic amounts the implied players. The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of football. It is so extended that it part of the ethos, of the unwritten rules, but followed nonetheless by this sport. Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician. Anyway, the debate deals with if that type of <t>behavior</t> not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport, that is to say, if with these actions fraud is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful actions with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense. The matter examines the type of damage that is brought to the sporting spirit.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=behavior%1:04:00:: | definition=manner of acting or controlling yourself | synonyms=behaviour, conduct, doings
2. sense_key=behavior%1:26:00:: | definition=the action or reaction of something (as a machine or substance) under specified circumstances | synonyms=behaviour | examples=the behavior of small particles can be studied in experiments
3. sense_key=behavior%1:07:00:: | definition=(behavioral attributes) the way a person behaves toward other people | synonyms=demeanor, demeanour, behaviour, conduct, deportment
4. sense_key=behavior%1:04:01:: | definition=(psychology) the aggregate of the responses or reactions or movements made by an organism in any situation | synonyms=behaviour

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

finish_reason: stop

role: assistant

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the target lemma and context:**
    *   **Lemma:** `behavior` (noun).
    *   **Context:** The text discusses football (soccer), specifically Real Madrid, players getting yellow cards intentionally to clear their record for the next phase, and the debate around whether this is ethical or against the "sporting spirit" even if technically legal.
    *   **Sentence:** "Anyway, the debate deals with if that type of <t>behavior</t> not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport..."
    *   **Meaning in context:** The "behavior" refers to the actions of the players and the coach (faking provocations, getting intentional yellow cards, dramatization). It's about their conduct, actions, and how they act in a specific situation.

2.  **Analyze the candidate senses:**

    *   **Sense 1:** `behavior%1:04:00::`
        *   *Definition:* manner of acting or controlling yourself.
        *   *Synonyms:* behaviour, conduct, doings.
        *   *Analysis:* This refers to general conduct, how one acts. The context discusses a specific type of action (provoking a yellow card, dramatization). It fits the idea of "conduct" or "acting". The phrase "that type of behavior" usually refers to a pattern of acting or specific actions taken.

    *   **Sense 2:** `behavior%1:26:00::`
        *   *Definition:* the action or reaction of something (as a machine or substance) under specified circumstances.
        *   *Examples:* "the behavior of small particles..."
        *   *Analysis:* This is scientific/physical behavior. The context is human behavior in sports. Incorrect.

    *   **Sense 3:** `behavior%1:07:00::`
        *   *Definition:* (behavioral attributes) the way a person behaves toward other people.
        *   *Synonyms:* demeanor, demeanour, behaviour, conduct, deportment.
        *   *Analysis:* This focuses on *interpersonal* behavior or bearing/demeanor. While the football players are interacting with others (referees, opponents), the text discusses the act of "getting a card" or "orchestrating dramatization" as a strategic move, not necessarily just their general demeanor or how they treat people socially. It's broader than just interpersonal relations; it's about the action itself within the rules of the game. However, "conduct" (Sense 1) seems to cover the specific actions better than "demeanor" (Sense 3). Sense 3 is often used for "his behavior towards her was rude". Here, it's "that type of behavior" referring to the specific act of simulation/provocation.

    *   **Sense 4:** `behavior%1:04:01::`
        *   *Definition:* (psychology) the aggregate of the responses or reactions or movements made by an organism in any situation.
        *   *Synonyms:* behaviour.
        *   *Analysis:* This is a technical psychological definition. The context is sports journalism/analysis, not a clinical psychological assessment of an organism.

3.  **Compare Sense 1 and Sense 3:**
    *   Sense 1: "manner of acting or controlling yourself". Synonyms: conduct. Example: "that type of behavior" fits well here. The text talks about the "provocation of a yellow card" as a "practice". This is a manner of acting.
    *   Sense 3: "the way a person behaves toward other people". Synonyms: demeanor. The text is about a specific strategy (simulation, provocation) within a game, not necessarily the general manner of treating others, though it affects others. The phrase "that type of behavior" usually aligns with the general sense of conduct/actions (Sense 1) rather than the interpersonal demeanor sense (Sense 3).
    *   WordNet often distinguishes between general conduct (Sense 1) and interpersonal demeanor (Sense 3). The context discusses "acts", "practice", "actions". These map closely to "conduct" and "manner of acting". Sense 1 seems the most appropriate for "that type of behavior" referring to rule-bending tactics.

4.  **Select the best sense:**
    *   Sense 1 covers "manner of acting". The context describes a specific action/practice (getting a card intentionally).
    *   Sense 3 is too specific to interpersonal relations/demeanor.
    *   Sense 2 is physical/inanimate.
    *   Sense 4 is psychological/scientific.

    Therefore, Sense 1 is the best fit.

5.  **Format the output:**
    *   JSON object: `{"sense_index": 1}`.

format: unknown

native_finish_reason: stop

provider: AtlasCloud

currency: USD


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: principle
Target surface form: principles
Context:
This way, and since Real Madrid will finish as leader of its group, both players will fulfil the prescribed sanction during the next game of league, against Auxerre, and will be able to get rid of the cards the following phase. Finally, the committee of discipline of the UEFA has sanctioned with two games the trainer of the team, Jose Mourinho, and with different economic amounts the implied players. The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of football. It is so extended that it part of the ethos, of the unwritten rules, but followed nonetheless by this sport. Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician. Anyway, the debate deals with if that type of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the <t>principles</t> of the sport, that is to say, if with these actions fraud is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful actions with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense. The matter examines the type of damage that is brought to the sporting spirit.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=principle%1:09:03:: | definition=a basic generalization that is accepted as true and that can be used as a basis for reasoning or conduct | synonyms=rule | examples=their principles of composition characterized all their works
2. sense_key=principle%1:09:01:: | definition=a rule or standard especially of good behavior | examples=a man of principle; he will not violate his principles
3. sense_key=principle%1:09:00:: | definition=a basic truth or law or assumption | examples=the principles of democracy
4. sense_key=principle%1:09:04:: | definition=a rule or law concerning a natural phenomenon or the function of a complex system | synonyms=rule | examples=the principle of the conservation of mass; the principle of jet propulsion
5. sense_key=principle%1:10:00:: | definition=rule of personal conduct | synonyms=precept
6. sense_key=principle%1:09:02:: | definition=(law) an explanation of the fundamental reasons (especially an explanation of the working of some device in terms of laws of nature) | synonyms=rationale | examples=the rationale for capital punishment; the principles of internal-combustion engines

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The target word is "principles" in the context: "if that type of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport"

Let me analyze the context:
- The text discusses whether certain behaviors in football (like intentionally getting yellow cards) contradict the "principles of the sport"
- It's talking about sporting spirit, unwritten rules, ethics, and whether something that follows the literal regulation but goes against the "sense" or "spirit" of the sport is acceptable
- The phrase "principles of the sport" refers to the fundamental values, ethical standards, or core beliefs that govern sporting behavior

Let me examine each candidate sense:

1. **sense_key=principle%1:09:03::** - "a basic generalization that is accepted as true and that can be used as a basis for reasoning or conduct" - This is about general principles used for reasoning. The example is about principles of composition. This is quite general.

2. **sense_key=principle%1:09:01::** - "a rule or standard especially of good behavior" - Examples: "a man of principle; he will not violate his principles" - This is about moral/ethical principles, standards of good behavior.

3. **sense_key=principle%1:09:00::** - "a basic truth or law or assumption" - Example: "the principles of democracy" - This is more about fundamental truths or laws, like foundational principles.

4. **sense_key=principle%1:09:04::** - "a rule or law concerning a natural phenomenon or the function of a complex system" - Examples about conservation of mass, jet propulsion - This is scientific/mechanical principles. Not applicable here.

5. **sense_key=principle%1:10:00::** - "rule of personal conduct" - synonym: precept - This is about personal moral rules.

6. **sense_key=principle%1:09:02::** - "(law) an explanation of the fundamental reasons" - About rationale for things like capital punishment or how engines work. Not applicable here.

The context is about "principles of the sport" - the ethical standards and values that should govern sporting behavior. The text talks about:
- "sporting spirit"
- "ethos"
- "unwritten rules"
- "nobility and honor"
- Whether behavior contradicts the values of the sport

This is about ethical standards of good behavior in the context of sports. The closest matches are:

Sense 2: "a rule or standard especially of good behavior" - This fits well. The principles of the sport would be the standards of good sporting behavior.

Sense 3: "a basic truth or law or assumption" - "principles of democracy" example - This is more about foundational principles of a system. Could work for "principles of the sport" but seems more about structural/constitutional principles.

Sense 1: "a basic generalization that is accepted as true" - Too general/abstract.

Sense 5: "rule of personal conduct" - This is specifically about personal conduct, not collective/sporting principles.

I think Sense 2 is the best fit. "The principles of the sport" refers to standards of good behavior in sports - fairness, honesty, sporting spirit, etc. The context is clearly about whether certain behavior violates the ethical standards/principles that should govern sports.

Sense 3 could also work if we think of "principles of the sport" as the fundamental truths/laws that the sport is based on. But the context emphasizes "sporting spirit," "ethos," "honor," and ethical behavior, which aligns more with Sense 2's focus on "standards of good behavior."

Let me reconsider: The phrase "principles of the sport" in the context of discussing whether provoking yellow cards contradicts the sporting spirit is about the moral/ethical standards of the sport. Sense 2 explicitly mentions "a rule or standard especially of good behavior."

I'll go with sense2.

provider: Together


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: action
Target surface form: actions
Context:
This way, and since Real Madrid will finish as leader of its group, both players will fulfil the prescribed sanction during the next game of league, against Auxerre, and will be able to get rid of the cards the following phase. Finally, the committee of discipline of the UEFA has sanctioned with two games the trainer of the team, Jose Mourinho, and with different economic amounts the implied players. The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of football. It is so extended that it part of the ethos, of the unwritten rules, but followed nonetheless by this sport. Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician. Anyway, the debate deals with if that type of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport, that is to say, if with these <t>actions</t> fraud is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful actions with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense. The matter examines the type of damage that is brought to the sporting spirit.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=action%1:04:02:: | definition=something done (usually as opposed to something said) | examples=there were stories of murders and other unnatural actions
2. sense_key=action%1:26:00:: | definition=the state of being active | synonyms=activity, activeness | examples=his sphere of activity; he is out of action
3. sense_key=action%1:04:03:: | definition=a military engagement | synonyms=military action | examples=he saw action in Korea
4. sense_key=action%1:22:00:: | definition=a process existing in or produced by nature (rather than by the intent of human beings) | synonyms=natural process, natural action, activity | examples=the action of natural forces; volcanic activity
5. sense_key=action%1:10:00:: | definition=the series of events that form a plot | examples=his novels always have a lot of action
6. sense_key=action%1:07:00:: | definition=the trait of being active and energetic and forceful | examples=a man of action
7. sense_key=action%1:06:00:: | definition=the operating part that transmits power to a mechanism | synonyms=action mechanism | examples=the piano had a very stiff action
8. sense_key=action%1:04:01:: | definition=a judicial proceeding brought by one party against another; one party prosecutes another for a wrong done or for protection of a right or for prevention of a wrong | synonyms=legal action, action at law
9. sense_key=action%1:04:04:: | definition=an act by a government body or supranational organization | examples=recent federal action undermined the segregationist position; the United Nations must have the power to propose and organize action without being hobbled by irrelevant issues
10. sense_key=action%1:04:00:: | definition=the most important or interesting work or activity in a specific area or field | examples=the action is no longer in technology stocks but in municipal bonds; gawkers always try to get as close to the action as possible

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the target word and context:**
    *   Target lemma: `action`
    *   Target surface form: `actions`
    *   Context sentence: "...if with these <t>actions</t> fraud is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful actions with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense."
    *   Broader context: The text discusses a football (soccer) controversy involving Real Madrid players, Jose Mourinho, and deliberate yellow cards. The "actions" refer to the specific behaviors of the players (provoking yellow cards) to serve suspensions at a convenient time.

2.  **Analyze the candidate senses:**

    *   **Sense 1:** `action%1:04:02::` | Definition: something done (usually as opposed to something said) | Examples: there were stories of murders and other unnatural actions.
        *   *Evaluation:* This is the most general sense of "action" referring to a deed, act, or behavior. The context discusses specific behaviors (getting yellow cards on purpose). The players' "actions" are "something done". This fits well.

    *   **Sense 2:** `action%1:26:00::` | Definition: the state of being active | Synonyms: activity, activeness | Examples: his sphere of activity; he is out of action.
        *   *Evaluation:* This refers to a state or quality, not specific countable events. The target word is plural ("actions"). "States of being active" doesn't fit the plural countable usage here. "With these activities" doesn't fit the nuance of specific acts of misconduct as well as "deeds" or "acts".

    *   **Sense 3:** `action%1:04:03::` | Definition: a military engagement | Synonyms: military action.
        *   *Evaluation:* The context is sports, not war. Incorrect.

    *   **Sense 4:** `action%1:22:00::` | Definition: a process existing in or produced by nature... | Synonyms: natural process...
        *   *Evaluation:* The actions described are deliberate human behaviors (provocation), not natural processes. Incorrect.

    *   **Sense 5:** `action%1:10:00::` | Definition: the series of events that form a plot.
        *   *Evaluation:* This is a literary/narrative sense. The text is a news report/analysis, not a description of a novel's plot. Incorrect.

    *   **Sense 6:** `action%1:07:00::` | Definition: the trait of being active and energetic and forceful.
        *   *Evaluation:* This is a trait/attribute. The context uses the plural countable noun "actions" referring to specific events (getting yellow cards). Incorrect.

    *   **Sense 7:** `action%1:06:00::` | Definition: the operating part that transmits power to a mechanism.
        *   *Evaluation:* Mechanical sense. Incorrect.

    *   **Sense 8:** `action%1:04:01::` | Definition: a judicial proceeding...
        *   *Evaluation:* While there is a "committee of discipline" and "sanctions", the word "actions" in the target sentence ("with these actions fraud is committed") refers to the players' behavior (the act of getting the card), not a lawsuit or legal proceeding. Incorrect.

    *   **Sense 9:** `action%1:04:04::` | Definition: an act by a government body or supranational organization.
        *   *Evaluation:* The subject of the "actions" in the target sentence is implied to be the players/Mourinho (the agents of the fraud/behavior), not the governing body. The governing body acts later (sanctions). The "actions" discussed are the fouls/time-wasting to get cards. Incorrect.

    *   **Sense 10:** `action%1:04:00::` | Definition: the most important or interesting work or activity in a specific area or field.
        *   *Evaluation:* This is idiomatic (e.g., "where the action is"). The context doesn't support this meaning. Incorrect.

3.  **Refine the choice:**
    *   The text discusses specific deeds: "The provocation of a yellow card... is not a new practice", "analogous acts", "behavior", "these actions".
    *   Sense 1 defines "action" as "something done".
    *   Synonyms for Sense 1 often include "deed", "act".
    *   The plural "actions" refers to the specific instances of provoking yellow cards.
    *   This aligns perfectly with Sense 1: "something done (usually as opposed to something said)".
    *   Although the examples for Sense 1 in the prompt ("murders and other unnatural actions") are dramatic, the definition "something done" is the broad hypernym that encompasses the specific behaviors (acts/deeds) mentioned in the text.

4.  **Final Conclusion:** Sense 1 is the correct choice. It represents the general sense of "action" as a deed or act performed by an agent.

5.  **Format Output:** JSON object `{"sense_index": 1}`.

provider: Baidu


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: fraud
Target surface form: fraud
Context:
This way, and since Real Madrid will finish as leader of its group, both players will fulfil the prescribed sanction during the next game of league, against Auxerre, and will be able to get rid of the cards the following phase. Finally, the committee of discipline of the UEFA has sanctioned with two games the trainer of the team, Jose Mourinho, and with different economic amounts the implied players. The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of football. It is so extended that it part of the ethos, of the unwritten rules, but followed nonetheless by this sport. Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician. Anyway, the debate deals with if that type of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport, that is to say, if with these actions <t>fraud</t> is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful actions with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense. The matter examines the type of damage that is brought to the sporting spirit.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=fraud%1:04:00:: | definition=intentional deception resulting in injury to another person
2. sense_key=fraud%1:18:00:: | definition=a person who makes deceitful pretenses | synonyms=imposter, impostor, pretender, fake, faker, sham
3. sense_key=fraud%1:04:01:: | definition=something intended to deceive; deliberate trickery intended to gain an advantage | synonyms=fraudulence, dupery, hoax, humbug, put-on

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

raw_output:
```json
{"sense_index": 3}
```

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 3}
```

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the context:**
    *   **Sentence:** "...if with these actions <t>fraud</t> is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful actions with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense."
    *   **Contextual clues:** The text discusses football players (specifically Real Madrid players and Mourinho) intentionally getting yellow cards to clear their record for a later phase of the tournament. This is described as "provocation," "dramatization," and actions that elude the "sense" of the regulation even if they respect the letter of it.
    *   **Target usage:** "fraud is committed". The word "fraud" here refers to an act or an abstract concept of deception, not a person. One does not "commit" a person. One "commits" an act, a crime, or a fraud (the abstract concept).
    *   **Comparison with senses:**
        *   Sense 1: "intentional deception resulting in injury to another person". The players are intentionally deceiving (simulating/arranging a card). Does it result in injury? Not physical injury, perhaps injury to the sporting spirit (mentioned later in the text: "damage that is brought to the sporting spirit"). This is an abstract concept of fraud.
        *   Sense 2: "a person who makes deceitful pretenses". Synonyms: imposter, fake. Can you "commit" a person? No. You cannot say "a fraud is committed" meaning "an imposter is committed". This sense is ruled out.
        *   Sense 3: "something intended to deceive; deliberate trickery intended to gain an advantage". Synonyms: fraudulence, dupery, hoax, humbug, put-on.
    *   **Distinguishing Sense 1 vs. Sense 3:**
        *   Sense 1 often implies a specific legal or moral wrong involving injury to a person (fraud in a legal sense).
        *   Sense 3 focuses on "deliberate trickery intended to gain an advantage". The players are engaging in trickery (faking/simulating the foul/card situation) to gain an advantage (clearing the cards for the next round). The text asks if this constitutes "fraud". It is treated as an act of deception/trickery.
        *   The phrase "fraud is committed" is the key collocation.
        *   Let's look at the definitions again.
            *   Sense 1: "intentional deception resulting in injury to another person".
            *   Sense 3: "something intended to deceive; deliberate trickery intended to gain an advantage".
        *   The context describes a tactical maneuver ("trickery", "provocation") to gain an advantage (players available for the next phase, cards cleared). The "injury" aspect of Sense 1 (injury to a person) is less prominent than the "trickery to gain advantage" aspect of Sense 3. The text says "damage that is brought to the sporting spirit", which fits the outcome of deception, but the core act is the trickery/manipulation of the rules.
        *   Sense 3 synonyms: "dupery, hoax, humbug". The act is a hoax or trickery.
        *   Usually, "commit fraud" collocates strongly with Sense 1 or Sense 3. In WordNet 3.0/3.1:
            *   `fraud%1:04:00::` (Sense 1 in list): intentional deception resulting in injury to another person.
            *   `fraud%1:04:01::` (Sense 3 in list): something intended to deceive; deliberate trickery intended to gain an advantage.
        *   Is the act described a "fraud" (the act) or "fraud" (the crime)? The text asks if "fraud is committed". The act is clearly deliberate trickery to gain an advantage. While it might "injure" the opponent or the spirit, the primary motivation and definition of the act in sports contexts (gamesmanship) is trickery for advantage.
        *   Let's consider the "injury" clause in Sense 1. While "injury to another person" can be abstract (financial loss), in sports, it's often harder to pin down specific injury compared to the clear "trickery for advantage".
        *   However, Sense 1 is often the generic "fraud" (the act of defrauding). Sense 3 is "something intended to deceive" (a hoax, a put-on).
        *   Let's look at the text again: "...if with these actions fraud is committed". This usage treats fraud as an abstract noun denoting the act of defrauding.
        *   WordNet structure: The noun "fraud" usually has the hierarchy:
            1.  fraud (act) -> deception -> act. (This maps to Sense 3 here: "something intended to deceive").
            2.  fraud (act) -> crime -> wrong. (This maps to Sense 1 here: "intentional deception resulting in injury...").
        *   Wait, let's check standard mappings.
            *   Sense 1 (injury): Often refers to the legal concept or the specific act of defrauding someone.
            *   Sense 3 (trickery): Often refers to the method (a hoax, a sham).
        *   Context: "if with these actions fraud is committed". This sounds legalistic or semi-legalistic. "Commit fraud" is a legal collocate.
        *   If I commit fraud, I deceive you to injure you (take your money).
        *   In this sports context, they are deceiving the referee/UEFA to gain an advantage. Does it injure a person? It injures the "sporting spirit". Is the "sporting spirit" a person? No.
        *   Therefore, Sense 3 ("something intended to deceive; deliberate trickery intended to gain an advantage") fits the "gain an advantage" part perfectly, and "something intended to deceive" fits the act of simulation. The "injury to another person" constraint of Sense 1 is difficult to satisfy literally here (injury to spirit).
        *   Also, Sense 3 synonyms include "hoax, humbug". The text calls it "provocation" and "dramatization". This aligns well with "trickery".
        *   The phrase "fraud to the sport" or similar usually maps to the "trickery/cheating" sense rather than the specific legal injury sense.
        *   Let's re-read Sense 1 definition: "intentional deception resulting in injury to another person".
        *   Let's re-read Sense 3 definition: "something intended to deceive; deliberate trickery intended to gain an advantage".
        *   The text explicitly mentions: "gain an advantage" (implied by clearing cards for the next phase). The text mentions "elude its sense" (deceive the regulation).
        *   The phrase "commit fraud" is standard. Which sense does it take? Usually the act sense.
        *   If we assume Sense 1 is the 'crime' and Sense 3 is the 'deception/trick', the act described is unsportsmanlike conduct (trickery), not necessarily a crime against a specific person causing injury. The "advantage" is the key.
        *   Therefore, Sense 3 seems better because it highlights the "trickery intended to gain an advantage" which matches the "tactical yellow card" scenario perfectly, whereas Sense 1 requires "injury to another person", which is stretched metaphorically here (injury to spirit vs injury to person).

    *   Decision: Sense 3.
    *   Reasoning recap:
        *   Sense 2 is a person (ruled out by "fraud is committed").
        *   Sense 1 requires "injury to another person". The context discusses "damage to the sporting spirit", not a person. While "injury" can be abstract, the specific framing of "trickery intended to gain an advantage" in Sense 3 is a direct match for the tactical yellow card scenario (simulation for advantage).
        *   Sense 3 ("deliberate trickery intended to gain an advantage") captures the essence of the sports tactic described.

2.  **Formatting output:**
    *   JSON object: {"sense_index": 3}

provider: Chutes


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: action
Target surface form: actions
Context:
This way, and since Real Madrid will finish as leader of its group, both players will fulfil the prescribed sanction during the next game of league, against Auxerre, and will be able to get rid of the cards the following phase. Finally, the committee of discipline of the UEFA has sanctioned with two games the trainer of the team, Jose Mourinho, and with different economic amounts the implied players. The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of football. It is so extended that it part of the ethos, of the unwritten rules, but followed nonetheless by this sport. Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician. Anyway, the debate deals with if that type of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport, that is to say, if with these actions fraud is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful <t>actions</t> with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense. The matter examines the type of damage that is brought to the sporting spirit.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=action%1:04:02:: | definition=something done (usually as opposed to something said) | examples=there were stories of murders and other unnatural actions
2. sense_key=action%1:26:00:: | definition=the state of being active | synonyms=activity, activeness | examples=his sphere of activity; he is out of action
3. sense_key=action%1:04:03:: | definition=a military engagement | synonyms=military action | examples=he saw action in Korea
4. sense_key=action%1:22:00:: | definition=a process existing in or produced by nature (rather than by the intent of human beings) | synonyms=natural process, natural action, activity | examples=the action of natural forces; volcanic activity
5. sense_key=action%1:10:00:: | definition=the series of events that form a plot | examples=his novels always have a lot of action
6. sense_key=action%1:07:00:: | definition=the trait of being active and energetic and forceful | examples=a man of action
7. sense_key=action%1:06:00:: | definition=the operating part that transmits power to a mechanism | synonyms=action mechanism | examples=the piano had a very stiff action
8. sense_key=action%1:04:01:: | definition=a judicial proceeding brought by one party against another; one party prosecutes another for a wrong done or for protection of a right or for prevention of a wrong | synonyms=legal action, action at law
9. sense_key=action%1:04:04:: | definition=an act by a government body or supranational organization | examples=recent federal action undermined the segregationist position; the United Nations must have the power to propose and organize action without being hobbled by irrelevant issues
10. sense_key=action%1:04:00:: | definition=the most important or interesting work or activity in a specific area or field | examples=the action is no longer in technology stocks but in municipal bonds; gawkers always try to get as close to the action as possible

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

reasoning_content:
The target word is "actions" in the context: "Anyway, the debate deals with if that type of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport, that is to say, if with these actions fraud is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful <t>actions</t> with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense."

Here, "actions" refers to something done (provoking a yellow card, orchestrating dramatization). It means "something done (usually as opposed to something said)".
Let's check the senses:
1. action%1:04:02:: - something done (usually as opposed to something said) - examples: there were stories of murders and other unnatural actions
2. action%1:26:00:: - the state of being active
3. action%1:04:03:: - a military engagement
4. action%1:22:00:: - a process existing in or produced by nature
5. action%1:10:00:: - the series of events that form a plot
6. action%1:07:00:: - the trait of being active and energetic and forceful
7. action%1:06:00:: - the operating part that transmits power
8. action%1:04:01:: - a judicial proceeding
9. action%1:04:04:: - an act by a government body or supranational organization
10. action%1:04:00:: - the most important or interesting work or activity in a specific area or field

Sense 1 fits perfectly: "something done". The context mentions "these actions", referring to the provocation of a yellow card and the dramatization orchestrated by Mourinho, which are things done by people.

So the sense index is 1.

provider: SiliconFlow


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: regulation
Target surface form: regulation
Context:
This way, and since Real Madrid will finish as leader of its group, both players will fulfil the prescribed sanction during the next game of league, against Auxerre, and will be able to get rid of the cards the following phase. Finally, the committee of discipline of the UEFA has sanctioned with two games the trainer of the team, Jose Mourinho, and with different economic amounts the implied players. The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of football. It is so extended that it part of the ethos, of the unwritten rules, but followed nonetheless by this sport. Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician. Anyway, the debate deals with if that type of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport, that is to say, if with these actions fraud is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful actions with the sport <t>regulation</t>, but they seem to elude its sense. The matter examines the type of damage that is brought to the sporting spirit.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=regulation%1:10:00:: | definition=an authoritative rule | synonyms=ordinance
2. sense_key=regulation%1:09:00:: | definition=a principle or condition that customarily governs behavior | synonyms=rule | examples=it was his rule to take a walk before breakfast; short haircuts were the regulation
3. sense_key=regulation%1:26:00:: | definition=the state of being controlled or governed
4. sense_key=regulation%1:22:00:: | definition=(embryology) the ability of an early embryo to continue normal development after its structure has been somehow damaged or altered
5. sense_key=regulation%1:04:01:: | definition=the act of bringing to uniformity; making regular | synonyms=regularization, regularisation
6. sense_key=regulation%1:04:00:: | definition=the act of controlling or directing according to rule | synonyms=regulating | examples=fiscal regulations are in the hands of politicians

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

raw_output: `{"sense_index": 1}`

content: `{"sense_index": 1}`

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the Request:**
    *   **Target lemma:** regulation
    *   **Target surface form:** regulation
    *   **Context:** A text discussing football (soccer), specifically Real Madrid, UEFA sanctions, yellow cards, and "unwritten rules". The sentence containing the target is: "Anyway, the debate deals with if that type of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport..."
    *   **Task:** Select the single best indexed sense from the provided list.
    *   **Constraints:** Output a JSON object `{"sense_index": X}`. Do not hedge.

2.  **Analyze the Context:**
    *   The sentence: "...behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport..."
    *   The meaning here refers to a set of official rules or laws governing the sport (UEFA regulations, disciplinary rules).
    *   The text contrasts "unwritten rules" (ethos) with "the regulation" (official written code).
    *   The "committee of discipline" imposes sanctions based on these rules.

3.  **Analyze the Candidate Senses:**

    *   **Sense 1:** `regulation%1:10:00::` | definition="an authoritative rule" | synonyms="ordinance".
        *   *Analysis:* This fits well. The context refers to a specific rule or body of rules established by an authority (UEFA). It's an authoritative rule prohibiting or permitting specific behaviors.

    *   **Sense:** `regulation ("customarily governs"). The example "short haircuts were the regulation" implies a standard or norm. While it can mean a rule, Sense 1 is more specific to an "authoritative rule," which fits the legalistic/sports governance context better than the "habit/custom" nuance often associated with this sense (especially given the examples). However, WordNet distinctions between "rule" and "regulation" can be subtle. Let's look closer. In the text, it says "not prohibited specifically by the regulation". This suggests a specific codified rule or set of rules. Sense 1 ("authoritative rule") captures the legislative nature of sports regulations better than Sense 2 (which includes customs/habits).

    *   **Sense 3:** ` or code), not a state of control.

    *   **Sense 4:** `regulation%1:22:00::` | definition="(embryology) the ability of an early embryo..."
        *   *Analysis:* Irrelevant. Not biological.

    *   **Sense 5:** `regulation%1:04:01::` | definition="the act of bringing to uniformity; making regular" | synonyms="regularization".
        *   *Analysis:* This refers to the *process* of making something regular/uniform. The context refers to a document or a set of prohibitions, not the act of standardization.

    *   **Sense 6:** `regulation%1:04:00::` | definition="the act of controlling or directing according to rule" | synonyms="regulating".
        *   *Analysis:* Similar to Sense 5, this refers to the *act* of controlling. The target in the sentence "by the regulation" is the instrument/means (the rule itself), not the action of regulating.

4.  **Disambiguation between Sense 1 and Sense 2:**
    *   Sense 1: "an authoritative rule". Synonym: ordinance. This implies a formal rule enacted by an authority (like UEFA).
    *   Sense 2: "a principle or condition that customarily governs behavior". Synonym: rule. Examples: "it was his rule to take a walk".
    *   The text contrasts the "unwritten rules" (ethos) with "the regulation". The "regulation" here is the written, authoritative code of the sport (UEFA rules).
    *   Therefore, Sense 1 is the correct choice. It captures the authority and the specific codified nature (the "unwritten rules" or ethos).

5.  **Final Selection:** Sense 1.

6.  **Formatting Output:** JSON object `{"sense_index": 1}`.

provider: Amazon Bedrock


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: matter
Target surface form: matter
Context:
Finally, the committee of discipline of the UEFA has sanctioned with two games the trainer of the team, Jose Mourinho, and with different economic amounts the implied players. The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of football. It is so extended that it part of the ethos, of the unwritten rules, but followed nonetheless by this sport. Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician. Anyway, the debate deals with if that type of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport, that is to say, if with these actions fraud is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful actions with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense. The <t>matter</t> examines the type of damage that is brought to the sporting spirit. One of the advantages that include the sport spirit is the physical integrity of the opposite players, aspect that with these actions wasn't put into danger, that is to say, there was no violent game.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=matter%1:09:01:: | definition=a vaguely specified concern | synonyms=affair, thing | examples=several matters to attend to; it is none of your affair
2. sense_key=matter%1:09:00:: | definition=some situation or event that is thought about | synonyms=topic, subject, issue | examples=he kept drifting off the topic; he had been thinking about the subject for several years
3. sense_key=matter%1:03:00:: | definition=that which has mass and occupies space | examples=physicists study both the nature of matter and the forces which govern it
4. sense_key=matter%1:09:02:: | definition=a problem | examples=is anything the matter?
5. sense_key=matter%1:07:00:: | definition=(used with negation) having consequence | examples=they were friends and it was no matter who won the games
6. sense_key=matter%1:10:00:: | definition=written works (especially in books or magazines) | examples=he always took some reading matter with him on the plane

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the target word and context**:
    *   Target lemma: `matter`
    *   Target surface form: `matter`
    *   Context sentence: "The <t>matter</t> examines the type of damage that is brought to the sporting spirit."
    *   Wider context: The text discusses a controversy involving Jose Mourinho, Real Madrid, UEFA sanctions, and the ethics of provoking yellow cards (unsporting behavior). It mentions a "debate" about whether these actions contradict the principles of the sport. The sentence in question refers to "The matter" as something that examines the damage to the sporting spirit.

2.  **Analyze the candidate senses**:

    *   **Sense 1 (matter%1:09:01::)**: "a vaguely specified concern". Synonyms: affair, thing. Examples: "several matters to attend to".
        *   *Fit*: Could fit. "The matter" refers to the specific issue/incident being discussed (the provocation of the yellow card). It's a concern or a situation.

    *   **Sense 2 (matter%1:09:00::)**: "some situation or event that is thought about". Synonyms: topic, subject, issue. Examples: "he kept drifting off the topic".
        *   *Fit*: This seems stronger. The context is about a "debate" and analyzing the implications of the event. "The matter" here is synonymous with "the issue" or "the subject of discussion". The sentence says "The matter examines...". Usually, abstract concepts or subjects of discourse "examine" things (metaphorically) or are the subject of examination. However, reading the sentence strictly: "The matter examines the type of damage..." usually implies the subject matter itself is the focus. Let's check the specific usage here. In legal or formal contexts, "The matter" often refers to the case or the issue at hand.
        *   Comparison with Sense 1: Sense 1 is "vaguely specified concern". Sense 2 is "situation or event that is thought about" (topic/subject). The text talks about a "debate arisen in the related case". "The matter" refers to the subject of this debate/case.

    *   **Sense 3 (matter%1:03:00::)**: "that which has mass and occupies space".
        *   *Fit*: Incorrect. This is physics.

    *   **Sense 4 (matter%1:09:02::)**: "a problem". Examples: "is anything the matter?".
        *   *Fit*: Usually used with questions like "what's the matter?" or "nothing's the matter". Here, "The matter examines..." doesn't fit the "problem/difficulty" nuance as well as Sense 1 or 2.

    *   **Sense 5 (matter%1:07:00::)**: "(used with negation) having consequence".
        *   *Fit*: Incorrect context (not negated importance).

    *   **Sense 6 (matter%1:10:00::)**: "written works (especially in books or magazines)".
        *   *Fit*: Incorrect.

3.  **Refine the choice between Sense 1 and Sense 2**:

    *   Context: "The matter examines the type of damage..." This is a slightly awkward translation (likely from Spanish "El asunto" or similar). It effectively means "The subject [of this discussion] examines..."
    *   Sense 1 definition: "a vaguely specified concern". Synonyms: affair, thing.
    *   Sense 2 definition: "some situation or event that is thought about". Synonyms: topic, subject, issue.

    Let's look at the examples for Sense 2: "he kept drifting off the topic". This aligns with the "debate" mentioned in the previous sentences. The text is an analysis of a situation.
    Let's look at the examples for Sense 1: "several matters to attend to". This implies tasks or business.

    The phrase "The matter" here refers to the controversial incident (the provocation of the yellow card) and the subsequent debate. It functions as "The issue" or "The subject".
    Sense 2 synonyms: `topic, subject, issue`.
    Sense 1 synonyms: `affair, thing`.

    "The issue examines..." or "The subject examines..." fits the semantic role of the noun in the sentence better than "The affair examines...". While "The affair" is possible, Sense 2 captures the cognitive/discursive aspect ("thought about", "topic") which aligns with the surrounding text about "debate", "case", "principles", "ethos".

    WordNet 3.0/3.1 distinctions:
    *   1:09:00 (topic/subject/issue): often refers to the content of a discussion or text.
    *   1:09:01 (affair/thing): often refers to a specific situation of concern or business.

    In this specific sentence: "The matter examines..." The entity doing the examining (metonymically or metaphorically) is the subject of discussion.
    Is it a "vaguely specified concern"? It's actually quite specific (the Mourinho incident).
    Is it a "situation or event that is thought about"? Yes, it's the subject of the debate.

    Let's check standard WSD behavior for "the matter" in contexts like "We need to discuss the matter". Usually, that maps to Sense 1 (affair/concern).
    However, here it is "The matter examines...". This construction suggests "The subject matter".
    Let's look at Sense 2's definition again: "some situation or event that is thought about".
    The text says "Part of the **debate** arisen in the related case..." followed by "The **matter** examines...". There is a strong link to the *topic* of discussion.
    Sense 2 synonyms include `topic`. Sense 1 synonyms are `affair, thing`.
    In this text, "matter" is effectively interchangeable with "issue" or "subject". "The issue examines the type of damage..."
    Therefore, Sense 2 seems the best fit.

    Let's double-check Sense 1. "A vaguely specified concern". Is the Mourinho sanction a "vaguely specified concern"? It's a specific event. Sense 1 is often used for "a matter of importance" or "a matter to attend to" (tasks).
    Sense 2 covers "topic", "subject", "issue". This matches the context of a debate and analysis of rules/ethos perfectly.

    Decision: Sense 2.

provider: StreamLake


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: type
Target surface form: type
Context:
Finally, the committee of discipline of the UEFA has sanctioned with two games the trainer of the team, Jose Mourinho, and with different economic amounts the implied players. The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of football. It is so extended that it part of the ethos, of the unwritten rules, but followed nonetheless by this sport. Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician. Anyway, the debate deals with if that type of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport, that is to say, if with these actions fraud is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful actions with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense. The matter examines the <t>type</t> of damage that is brought to the sporting spirit. One of the advantages that include the sport spirit is the physical integrity of the opposite players, aspect that with these actions wasn't put into danger, that is to say, there was no violent game.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=type%1:09:00:: | definition=a subdivision of a particular kind of thing | examples=what type of sculpture do you prefer?
2. sense_key=type%1:18:00:: | definition=a person of a specified kind (usually with many eccentricities) | synonyms=character, eccentric, case | examples=a real character; a strange character
3. sense_key=type%1:14:01:: | definition=(biology) the taxonomic group whose characteristics are used to define the next higher taxon
4. sense_key=type%1:10:01:: | definition=printed characters | examples=small type is hard to read
5. sense_key=type%1:10:00:: | definition=all of the tokens of the same symbol | examples=the word `element' contains five different types of character
6. sense_key=type%1:06:00:: | definition=a small metal block bearing a raised character on one end; produces a printed character when inked and pressed on paper | examples=he dropped a case of type, so they made him pick them up

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The target word is "type" in the sentence: "The matter examines the type of damage that is brought to the sporting spirit."

Let me analyze the context:
- The text is discussing a disciplinary case in football (soccer)
- It's talking about provoking yellow cards intentionally
- The sentence where "type" appears is: "The matter examines the type of damage that is brought to the sporting spirit."
- This means it's examining what kind or category of damage is being done

Let me look at the candidate senses:

1. sense_key=type%1:09:00:: | definition=a subdivision of a particular kind of thing | examples=what type of sculpture do you prefer?
- This refers to a category, kind, or variety of something
- Example: "what type of sculpture" - asking about the kind/category

2. sense_key=type%1:18:00:: | definition=a person of a specified kind (usually with many eccentricities) | synonyms=character, eccentric, case | examples=a real character; a strange character
- This is about a person being eccentric or a "character"
- Not relevant here

3. sense_key=type%1:14:01:: | definition=(biology) the taxonomic group whose characteristics are used to define the next higher taxon
- This is a biological taxonomy sense
- Not relevant here

4. sense_key=type%1:10:01:: | definition=printed characters | examples=small type is hard to read
- This is about typography/printing
- Not relevant

5. sense_key=type%1:10:00:: | definition=all of the tokens of the same symbol | examples=the word `element' contains five different types of character
- This is about symbols/characters in text
- Not relevant

6. sense_key=type%1:06:00:: | definition=a small metal block bearing a raised character on one end; produces a printed character when inked and pressed on paper
- This is about physical printing type/blocks
- Not relevant

The context "the type of damage" clearly refers to what kind or category of damage - this matches sense 1: "a subdivision of a particular kind of thing."

The phrase "type of damage" is asking about the kind/category/classification of damage, which fits perfectly with sense 1.

The answer should be sense_index 1.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: damage
Target surface form: damage
Context:
Finally, the committee of discipline of the UEFA has sanctioned with two games the trainer of the team, Jose Mourinho, and with different economic amounts the implied players. The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of football. It is so extended that it part of the ethos, of the unwritten rules, but followed nonetheless by this sport. Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician. Anyway, the debate deals with if that type of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport, that is to say, if with these actions fraud is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful actions with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense. The matter examines the type of <t>damage</t> that is brought to the sporting spirit. One of the advantages that include the sport spirit is the physical integrity of the opposite players, aspect that with these actions wasn't put into danger, that is to say, there was no violent game.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=damage%1:11:00:: | definition=the occurrence of a change for the worse | synonyms=harm, impairment
2. sense_key=damage%1:11:01:: | definition=loss of military equipment | synonyms=equipment casualty
3. sense_key=damage%1:04:00:: | definition=the act of damaging something or someone | synonyms=harm, hurt, scathe
4. sense_key=damage%1:21:00:: | definition=the amount of money needed to purchase something | synonyms=price, terms | examples=the price of gasoline; he got his new car on excellent terms
5. sense_key=damage%1:04:01:: | definition=any harm or injury resulting from a violation of a legal right | synonyms=wrong, legal injury

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
Let me analyze the context carefully to determine the correct sense of "damage" in this sentence.

The sentence is: "The matter examines the type of damage that is brought to the sporting spirit."

The context discusses:
- A disciplinary action against a football coach and players
- The provocation of a yellow card in football
- Debate about whether certain behaviors contradict the principles of the sport
- Whether actions that are technically legal but perhaps against the spirit of the sport constitute "fraud"
- The impact on the "sporting spirit"

Let's analyze each candidate sense:

1. sense_key=damage%1:11:00:: | definition=the occurrence of a change for the worse | synonyms=harm, impairment
   - This refers to a general change for the worse

2. sense_key=damage%1:11:01:: | definition=loss of military equipment | synonyms=equipment casualty
   - This is specific to military context, which doesn't fit here

3. sense_key=damage%1:04:00:: | definition=the act of damaging something or someone | synonyms=harm, hurt, scathe
   - This refers to the act of causing damage

4. sense_key=damage%1:04:01:: | definition=the amount of money needed to purchase something | synonyms=price, terms | examples=the price of gasoline; he got his new car on excellent terms
   - This is about monetary cost, which doesn't fit the context

5. sense_key=damage%1:04:01:: | definition=any harm or injury resulting from a violation of a legal right | synonyms=wrong, legal injury
   - This has a legal connotation

In the context, "damage" is used in the phrase "the type of damage that is brought to the sporting spirit." The text is discussing the harm or injury to the principles or spirit of sport, not a literal physical damage or monetary damage.

The most appropriate sense appears to be:
1. sense_key=damage%1:11:00:: | definition=the occurrence of a change for the worse | synonyms=harm, impairment

This is because the context is talking about a negative change or harm to the sporting spirit - an abstract concept. The damage here refers to the deterioration or harm caused to the ethos and principles of fair play in sports by the described actions.

Sense 3 (the act of damaging something) is close, but sense 1 (the occurrence of a change for the worse) better captures the notion of the result or effect on the sporting spirit, rather than the act itself.

Sense 5 has a legal connotation which could potentially apply since the text discusses rules and regulations, but it seems too specific to violations of legal rights, while the text is discussing sporting principles and ethics.

Therefore, sense 1 (the occurrence of a change for the worse) is the most appropriate in this context.

Actually, let me reconsider. The text is discussing "the type of damage that is brought to the sporting spirit." This suggests an action or result that harms the sporting spirit. Let me look more carefully at the difference between sense 1 and sense 3:

Sense 1: "the occurrence of a change for the worse" - This refers to the result or state of being damaged
Sense 3: "the act of damaging something or someone" - This refers to the action of causing damage

In the context, the phrase "damage that is brought to the sporting spirit" could be interpreted as either:
1. The harm or deterioration that occurs to the sporting spirit (result)
2. The act of causing harm to the sporting spirit (action)

I think sense 1 is still more appropriate because the text is examining what kind of harm or deterioration is happening to the sporting spirit as a result of these actions, rather than focusing on the act itself. The context is asking "what type of damage" occurs, which is asking about the nature of the harm, not the act of causing it.

Actually, let me look at the synonyms for more guidance:

Sense 1: synonyms=harm, impairment
Sense 3: synonyms=harm, hurt, scathe

Both have "harm" as a synonym, but sense 1 includes "impairment" which fits well with the idea of damaging an abstract concept like "sporting spirit." Sense 3 includes "hurt" and "scathe" which have a more physical connotation.

So I believe sense 1 (the occurrence of a change for the worse) is the most appropriate for this context.

I'll double check sense 5 again:
Sense 5: definition=any harm or injury resulting from a violation of a legal right | synonyms=wrong, legal injury

This sense has a specific legal connotation related to violations of legal rights. While the text does discuss rules and regulations, it's talking about the "unwritten rules" and "sporting spirit" rather than formal legal rights. The context is more about ethics and principles in sports rather than legal violations.

Therefore, I conclude that sense 1 (the occurrence of a change for the worse) is the most appropriate sense for "damage" in this context.

I'll double check sense 4 again:
Sense 4: definition=the amount of money needed to purchase something | synonyms=price, terms | examples=the price of gasoline; he got his new car on excellent terms

This is clearly about monetary cost or price, which doesn't fit the context at all. The context is discussing damage to sporting spirit, not monetary considerations.

I'll also double check sense 2 again:
Sense 2: definition=loss of military equipment | synonyms=equipment casualty

This is specifically about military equipment loss, which has no relevance to the context about sports ethics.

My final conclusion is that sense 1 (the occurrence of a change for the worse) is the most appropriate sense for "damage" in this context.

Actually, I'm now thinking about how "damage" is used in the sentence: "The matter examines the type of damage that is brought to the sporting spirit."

This is asking about what kind of harm or negative change occurs to the sporting spirit. The phrase "type of damage" suggests we're looking at the nature or quality of the harm, not the act itself. This reinforces my selection of sense 1.

However, I'm still a bit torn between sense 1 and sense 3. Let me consider one more time:

Sense 1: "the occurrence of a change for the worse" - Focuses on the result or state
Sense 3: "the act of damaging something or someone" - Focuses on the action

In the phrase "damage that is brought to," there's a sense of action (bringing), but the focus is on what type of damage (result) occurs. The text is examining what kind of negative impact these actions have on the sporting spirit, not the act of causing that impact.

Therefore, I still believe sense 1 is the most appropriate.

Actually, I want to reconsider sense 5 again: "any harm or injury resulting from a violation of a legal right."

The context mentions "The matter examines the type of damage that is brought to the sporting spirit." While this isn't about formal legal rights, it is discussing violations of sporting principles and unwritten rules. The text explicitly mentions "fraud" and discusses whether actions that follow the letter of the regulation but violate its spirit constitute wrongdoing.

However, sense 5 specifically refers to "violation of a legal right" which seems too formal and specific for this context about sporting ethics and unwritten rules. The sporting context doesn't clearly involve legal rights in the formal sense that sense 5 implies.

Therefore, I maintain that sense 1 is the most appropriate.

Let me try a different approach. What if we replace "damage" with each of the synonyms and see which fits best?

1. "The matter examines the type of harm/impairment that is brought to the sporting spirit."
   - This sounds natural and captures the idea of deterioration to the sporting spirit

3. "The matter examines the type of harm/hurt/scathe that is brought to the sporting spirit."
   - "Harm" works, but "hurt" and "scathe" sound awkward with "sporting spirit"

5. "The matter examines the type of wrong/legal injury that is brought to the sporting spirit."
   - This sounds less natural, as "legal injury" is too formal for this context about sports ethics

This exercise reinforces that sense 1 (with synonyms "harm" and "impairment") fits best with the context.

Therefore, I conclude that sense 1 (the occurrence of a change for the worse) is the most appropriate sense for "damage" in this context.

Final answer: {"sense_index": 1}

provider: Novita


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: advantage
Target surface form: advantages
Context:
The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of football. It is so extended that it part of the ethos, of the unwritten rules, but followed nonetheless by this sport. Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician. Anyway, the debate deals with if that type of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport, that is to say, if with these actions fraud is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful actions with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense. The matter examines the type of damage that is brought to the sporting spirit. One of the <t>advantages</t> that include the sport spirit is the physical integrity of the opposite players, aspect that with these actions wasn't put into danger, that is to say, there was no violent game. Another of these advantages to which it is alluded to with the fare-play is to avoid that the team of the lawbreaker players takes advantage unjustly of the opposite team, which did not happen either.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=advantage%1:07:00:: | definition=the quality of having a superior or more favorable position | synonyms=vantage | examples=the experience gave him the advantage over me
2. sense_key=advantage%1:23:00:: | definition=(tennis) first point scored after deuce
3. sense_key=advantage%1:07:01:: | definition=benefit resulting from some event or action | synonyms=reward | examples=it turned out to my advantage; reaping the rewards of generosity

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 3}
```

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "advantages" in a specific context.

**1. Analyze the context:**
The text discusses "fair play" (written as "fare-play" here) in football (soccer). It talks about a player getting a yellow card intentionally, unsportsmanlike behavior, and the "sporting spirit".
The target sentence is: "One of the <t>advantages</t> that include the sport spirit is the physical integrity of the opposite players..."
And later: "Another of these advantages to which it is alluded to with the fare-play is to avoid that the team of the lawbreaker players takes advantage unjustly of the opposite team..."

The word "advantages" here refers to things that are protected or upheld by the sporting spirit/fair play. Specifically, "physical integrity of the opposite players" is listed as one of these "advantages". The second one mentioned is "to avoid that the team of the lawbreaker players takes advantage unjustly of the opposite team".

Wait, let's look at the phrasing again. "One of the advantages that include the sport spirit..." This phrasing is slightly awkward/non-native English, but the meaning seems to be "One of the values/benefits/principles encompassed by the sport spirit..."
The text says "One of the advantages that include the sport spirit is the physical integrity of the opposite players". This suggests "advantages" here acts like "benefits" or "positive aspects" or "things of value" inherent in fair play.
However, later it says "to avoid that the team of the lawbreaker players takes advantage unjustly...". This second usage refers to gaining an upper hand (sense 1).
But the target is the first instance: "One of the <t>advantages</t> that include the sport spirit is the physical integrity..."

Let's re-read carefully. "One of the advantages that include the sport spirit is the physical integrity of the opposite players..."
Is "advantage" meaning "superior position" here? No. "Physical integrity" is not a superior position.
Is it "benefit resulting from some event or action"? The sporting spirit provides the benefit/protection of physical integrity.
Is it the tennis score? No.

Let's look at the candidate senses:
1. `advantage%1:07:00::`: the quality of having a superior or more favorable position. Synonyms: vantage. Example: the experience gave him the advantage over me.
2. `advantage%1:23:00::`: (tennis) first point scored after deuce.
3. `advantage%1:07:01::`: benefit resulting from some event or action. Synonyms: reward. Examples: it turned out to my advantage; reaping the rewards of generosity.

The context discusses "fair play" and the "sporting spirit". The text argues about what constitutes damage to the sporting spirit.
"Physical integrity of the opposite players" is described as one of the "advantages".
Does "physical integrity" fit the definition of "benefit resulting from some event or action"? Yes, fair play results in the benefit of physical integrity.
Does it fit "superior or more favorable position"? Not really. It's a state of being safe, a positive thing, a benefit.

The text is discussing ethics in sports. Fair play brings certain benefits/advantages (values upheld). One such benefit is that players don't get hurt.
Sense 3 seems to fit best: "benefit resulting from some event or action" (the event/action being adherence to sporting spirit/fair play).
The synonym "reward" fits somewhat conceptually (the reward of fair play is safety), though "benefit" is the key word in the definition.
The context mentions "benefit" implicitly: the "sporting spirit" ensures these positive things.

Let's check Sense 1 again. "Superior or more favorable position".
Context: "One of the advantages that include the sport spirit is the physical integrity..."
Could "advantage" here mean a strategic upper hand? No, physical integrity isn't a strategic upper hand in this context; it's a protected right or a positive outcome of following the rules.
However, often "advantage" in sports is strictly about winning or positional superiority (Sense 1).
But here, the author lists "physical integrity" as an "advantage" included in the sport spirit.
If I say "One of the advantages of living in the city is public transport", I am using Sense 3 (benefit).
If I say "He had the advantage in the game", I am using Sense 1.

The sentence structure "One of the advantages that include the sport spirit is..." parallels "One of the advantages of doing X is Y".
Therefore, the meaning is "benefit" or "positive aspect".
Sense 3: "benefit resulting from some event or action". The event/action is the sport spirit/fair play. The benefit is physical integrity.

Let's verify if there's any nuance of Sense 1.
If a team "takes advantage" (mentioned later in the text: "takes advantage unjustly"), that is Sense 1 (positional superiority).
But the target is the plural noun "One of the <t>advantages</t>...".
"One of the benefits..."
This aligns perfectly with Sense 3.

The tennis sense (2) is obviously wrong.

So it's between 1 and 3.
Sense 1 implies competition relative to others (superior position).
Sense 3 implies a general benefit or positive outcome.
Is "physical integrity" a "superior position"? No.
Is it a "benefit"? Yes.
Therefore, Sense 3 is the correct choice.

Let's double check the provided examples for Sense 3: "it turned out to my advantage".
Example: "reaping the rewards of generosity".
In the text: "One of the advantages [benefits] ... is the physical integrity".
Matches Sense 3.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: integrity
Target surface form: integrity
Context:
The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of football. It is so extended that it part of the ethos, of the unwritten rules, but followed nonetheless by this sport. Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician. Anyway, the debate deals with if that type of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport, that is to say, if with these actions fraud is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful actions with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense. The matter examines the type of damage that is brought to the sporting spirit. One of the advantages that include the sport spirit is the physical <t>integrity</t> of the opposite players, aspect that with these actions wasn't put into danger, that is to say, there was no violent game. Another of these advantages to which it is alluded to with the fare-play is to avoid that the team of the lawbreaker players takes advantage unjustly of the opposite team, which did not happen either.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=integrity%1:26:00:: | definition=an undivided or unbroken completeness or totality with nothing wanting | synonyms=unity, wholeness | examples=the integrity of the nervous system is required for normal development; he took measures to insure the territorial unity of Croatia
2. sense_key=integrity%1:07:00:: | definition=moral soundness | examples=he expects to find in us the common honesty and integrity of men of business; they admired his scrupulous professional integrity

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the Target Lemma and Context:**
    *   **Target Lemma:** integrity
    *   **Context:** The text discusses a football (soccer) player receiving a yellow card on purpose (simulation/tactical foul) and the ethical debate surrounding it. It mentions Real Madrid, Mourinho, and "sporting spirit".
    *   **Specific Sentence:** "One of the advantages that include the sport spirit is the physical <t>integrity</t> of the opposite players, aspect that with these actions wasn't put into danger, that is to say, there was no violent game."
    *   **Key phrase:** "physical integrity of the opposite players".
    *   **Clarification:** The text says this specific action did not endanger physical integrity because there was no violent play.

2.  **Analyze the Candidate Senses:**
    *   **Sense 1:** `integrity%1:26:00::`
        *   Definition: "an undivided or unbroken completeness or totality with nothing wanting"
        *   Synonyms: unity, wholeness
        *   Examples: "the integrity of the nervous system", "territorial unity of Croatia".
        *   Analysis: This sense refers to the state of being whole, complete, or intact. In medical or biological contexts, "physical integrity" refers to the body being whole and uninjured.
    *   **Sense 2:** `integrity%1:07:00::`
        *   Definition: "moral soundness"
        *   Examples: "common honesty and integrity", "scrupulous professional integrity".
        *   Analysis: This sense refers to character, honesty, and moral uprightness.

3.  **Disambiguation:**
    *   The sentence explicitly mentions "physical integrity".
    *   The text contrasts the potential violation of rules/ethics (moral integrity of the sport/game) with the physical safety of the players.
    *   "Physical integrity" clearly aligns with Sense 1 (wholeness of the body, not being broken/injured). It refers to the players' bodies remaining intact and uninjured.
    *   The broader context discusses "sporting spirit" and "fair play", which relates to the *moral* concept (Sense 2), but the *specific instance* of the target word "integrity" is modified by the adjective "physical".
    *   Therefore, the target word refers to the wholeness/completeness of the physical body, not moral character.

4.  **Conclusion:**
    *   Sense 1 (wholeness/completeness) fits "physical integrity".
    *   Sense 2 (moral soundness) fits the general discussion of the "sporting spirit" but *not* the specific usage "physical integrity".

5.  **Formatting:**
    *   The user wants a JSON object `{"sense_index": X}`.
    *   The senses are numbered 1 and 2 in the prompt.
    *   Sense 1 is the correct choice.

    *Self-Correction/Verification:* Does "physical integrity" mean moral soundness? No. It means the state of the body being intact. Does Sense 1 cover "physical integrity"? Yes, it covers "undivided or unbroken completeness".

    Final choice: Sense 1.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: player
Target surface form: players
Context:
The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of football. It is so extended that it part of the ethos, of the unwritten rules, but followed nonetheless by this sport. Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician. Anyway, the debate deals with if that type of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport, that is to say, if with these actions fraud is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful actions with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense. The matter examines the type of damage that is brought to the sporting spirit. One of the advantages that include the sport spirit is the physical integrity of the opposite <t>players</t>, aspect that with these actions wasn't put into danger, that is to say, there was no violent game. Another of these advantages to which it is alluded to with the fare-play is to avoid that the team of the lawbreaker players takes advantage unjustly of the opposite team, which did not happen either.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=player%1:18:01:: | definition=a person who participates in or is skilled at some game | synonyms=participant
2. sense_key=player%1:18:02:: | definition=someone who plays a musical instrument (as a profession) | synonyms=musician, instrumentalist
3. sense_key=player%1:18:00:: | definition=a theatrical performer | synonyms=actor, histrion, thespian, role player
4. sense_key=player%1:18:04:: | definition=a person who pursues a number of different social and sexual partners simultaneously
5. sense_key=player%1:18:03:: | definition=an important participant (as in a business deal) | examples=he was a major player in setting up the corporation

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the Context:**
    *   The text discusses "football" (soccer).
    *   It mentions "yellow card", "Real Madrid", "Mourinho", "sporting spirit", "fair-play", "team".
    *   The specific sentence containing the target "players" is: "One of the advantages that include the sport spirit is the physical integrity of the opposite <t>players</t>..."
    *   Another mention: "...team of the lawbreaker players..."
    *   The context clearly refers to athletes participating in a sports game (football).

2.  **Analyze the Candidate Senses:**
    *   **Sense 1:** "a person who participates in or is skilled at some game" | Synonyms: participant. This fits perfectly. Football is a game/sport.
    *   **Sense 2:** "someone who plays a musical instrument". Incorrect context.
    *   **Sense 3:** "a theatrical performer". Incorrect context (though Mourinho is described as "histrionic", the "players" are the athletes, not actors on a stage in the literal sense).
    *   **Sense 4:** "a person who pursues a number of different social and sexual partners". Incorrect context.
    *   **Sense 5:** "an important participant (as in a business deal)". Incorrect context.

3.  **Select the Best Sense:**
    *   The target word refers to the football athletes.
    *   Sense 1 covers participants in a game.
    *   Therefore, Sense 1 is the correct choice.

4.  **Format the Output:**
    *   The user requested a JSON object: `{"sense_index": 1}`.
    *   The instructions say "Do not answer with a WordNet sense key."
    *   The instructions say "Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}."

    Wait, the example in the prompt says `{"sense_index": 3}`. I need to map the correct sense to the index number.
    Sense 1 corresponds to index 1.

    Double check index mapping:
    1 -> player%1:18:01:: (person who participates in a game) -> Matches.
    2 -> player%1:18:02:: (musician)
    3 -> player%1:18:00:: (actor)
    4 -> player%1:18:04:: (sexual/social player)
    5 -> player%1:18:03:: (business participant)

    The correct sense is the one labeled "1" in the list provided.

    Result: `{"sense_index": 1}`