[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: explain
Target surface form: explains
Context:
This document is a summary of the European Public Assessment Report (EPAR). It <t>explains</t> how the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) assessed the studies performed, to reach their recommendations on how to use the medicine. If you need more information about your medical condition or your treatment, read the Package Leaflet (also part of the EPAR) or contact your doctor or pharmacist.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=explain%2:32:00:: | definition=make plain and comprehensible | synonyms=explicate | examples=He explained the laws of physics to his students
2. sense_key=explain%2:32:01:: | definition=define | examples=The committee explained their plan for fund-raising to the Dean
3. sense_key=explain%2:32:02:: | definition=serve as a reason or cause or justification of | synonyms=excuse | examples=Your need to sleep late does not excuse your late arrival at work; Her recent divorce may explain her reluctance to date again

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The target word is "explains" in the context: "It explains how the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) assessed the studies performed, to reach their recommendations on how to use the medicine."

Let me analyze each sense:

1. sense_index=1 | definition=make plain and comprehensible | synonyms=explicate | examples=He explained the laws of physics to his students
- This sense is about making something clear and understandable to someone.

2. sense_index=2 | definition=define | examples=The committee explained their plan for fund-raising to the Dean
- This is about defining or laying out something.

3. sense_index=3 | definition=serve as a reason or cause or justification of | synonyms=excuse | examples=Your need to sleep late does not excuse your late arrival at work; Her recent divorce may explain her reluctance to date again
- This is about providing reasons or justifications for something.

In the context, the document "explains how the Committee... assessed the studies performed, to reach their recommendations." The document is making clear/describing the process by which the committee did their assessment. It's clarifying and making plain how something was done.

This fits sense 1 best - "make plain and comprehensible." The document is providing information to help readers understand the process.

Sense 3 doesn't fit because this isn't about justification or providing reasons for something - it's about describing a process.

Sense 2 is about defining something, which isn't quite right either - the document isn't defining terms, it's describing/clarifying a process.

The best answer is sense_index=1.

provider: DeepInfra


attempt_kind: initial

status: success

[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: committee
Target surface form: Committee
Context:
This document is a summary of the European Public Assessment Report (EPAR). It explains how the <t>Committee</t> for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) assessed the studies performed, to reach their recommendations on how to use the medicine. If you need more information about your medical condition or your treatment, read the Package Leaflet (also part of the EPAR) or contact your doctor or pharmacist.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=committee%1:14:00:: | definition=a special group delegated to consider some matter;  - Milton Berle | synonyms=commission | examples=a committee is a group that keeps minutes and loses hours
2. sense_key=committee%1:14:01:: | definition=a self-constituted organization to promote something | synonyms=citizens committee

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

finish_reason: stop

role: assistant

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the Target Lemma and Context:**
    *   Target lemma: *committee*.
    *   Target surface form: *Committee*.
    *   Context: "This document is a summary of the European Public Assessment Report (EPAR). It explains how the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) assessed the studies performed, to reach their recommendations on how to use the medicine..."
    *   Key details: The committee (CHMP) is part of a regulatory framework (European Public Assessment Report). They "assessed studies" and "reach their recommendations." This implies a formal, official body established to perform a specific function (evaluation/recommendation) within a larger organization (European Medicines Agency implicitly).

2.  **Analyze Candidate Senses:**
    *   **Sense 1:** `committee%1:14:00::`
        *   Definition: "a special group delegated to consider some matter".
        *   Synonyms: *commission*.
        *   Examples: "a committee is a group that keeps minutes and loses hours" (a joke quote by Milton Berle).
        *   Analysis: This sense describes a formal group delegated to perform a task or consider a matter. The CHMP fits this description perfectly. It is a special group (specialists) delegated (by the EMA/EU) to consider matters (medicinal products assessment).
    *   **Sense 2:** `committee%1:14:01::`
        *   Definition: "a self-constituted organization to promote something".
        *   Synonyms: *citizens committee*.
        *   Analysis: This sense implies a grassroots or self-organized group, usually formed by citizens to advocate or promote a cause. The CHMP is an official regulatory body, not a "self-constituted" citizens' group. It is formally constituted by the European Union framework.

3.  **Compare Senses to Context:**
    *   The CHMP (Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use) is a formal scientific advisory body. It is not self-constituted; it is legally established.
    *   It is a group "delegated to consider some matter" (the safety/efficacy of medicines).
    *   Sense 1 aligns with the standard definition of a working committee or commission within an organizational or governmental structure.
    *   Sense 2 aligns with grassroots advocacy groups (e.g., a local neighborhood watch committee formed by residents).

4.  **Select Best Sense:**
    *   Sense 1 is the correct fit. The CHMP is a delegated group considering medicinal products.

5.  **Format Output:**
    *   The user wants a JSON object: `{"sense_index": X}`.
    *   Sense 1 corresponds to index 1.

    *Self-Correction/Verification:*
    *   Context: "Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use".
    *   Is it self-constituted? No, it's part of the EMEA/EMA.
    *   Is it a special group delegated to consider some matter? Yes.
    *   Synonym "commission" fits well here (often used for official regulatory bodies).
    *   Therefore, Sense 1 is correct.

    *Output construction:* `{"sense_index": 1}`

format: unknown

native_finish_reason: stop

provider: AtlasCloud

currency: USD


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: product
Target surface form: Products
Context:
This document is a summary of the European Public Assessment Report (EPAR). It explains how the Committee for Medicinal <t>Products</t> for Human Use (CHMP) assessed the studies performed, to reach their recommendations on how to use the medicine. If you need more information about your medical condition or your treatment, read the Package Leaflet (also part of the EPAR) or contact your doctor or pharmacist.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=product%1:06:01:: | definition=commodities offered for sale | synonyms=merchandise, ware | examples=good business depends on having good merchandise; that store offers a variety of products
2. sense_key=product%1:06:00:: | definition=an artifact that has been created by someone or some process | synonyms=production | examples=they improve their product every year; they export most of their agricultural production
3. sense_key=product%1:09:00:: | definition=a quantity obtained by multiplication | synonyms=mathematical product | examples=the product of 2 and 3 is 6
4. sense_key=product%1:27:00:: | definition=a chemical substance formed as a result of a chemical reaction | examples=a product of lime and nitric acid
5. sense_key=product%1:19:00:: | definition=a consequence of someone's efforts or of a particular set of circumstances | examples=skill is the product of hours of practice; his reaction was the product of hunger and fatigue
6. sense_key=product%1:14:00:: | definition=the set of elements common to two or more sets | synonyms=intersection, Cartesian product | examples=the set of red hats is the intersection of the set of hats and the set of red things

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

raw_output:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the Target**: The target word is "Products" (plural of product). The context is "Medicinal Products for Human Use".

2.  **Analyze the Context**: The sentence is "It explains how the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) assessed the studies performed..."
    *   Context domain: Medicine, pharmaceuticals, regulation.
    *   Specific phrase: "Medicinal Products".
    *   Meaning: Pharmaceutical drugs, medicines, preparations created for medical use.

3.  **Analyze the Candidate Senses**:

    *   *Sense 1 (commodities offered for sale)*: Synonyms: merchandise, ware. Examples: store offers a variety of products. This is a general commercial sense. While medicines are commodities, "Medicinal Products" refers more specifically to the *type* of thing created rather than just its status as goods for sale. However, in regulatory contexts, they are often legally defined as products put on the market. But let's check other senses to see if there's a better fit regarding the "created" aspect or specific chemical nature.

    *   *Sense 2 (an artifact that has been created by someone or some process)*: Synonyms: production. Examples: agricultural production. This refers to the output of a creation process. Medicines are definitely artifacts created by a process (manufacturing, synthesis). This is a broader definition than Sense 1 (which focuses on sale). "Medicinal products" are distinct types of creations/artifacts.

    *   *Sense 3 (mathematical product)*: Quantity obtained by multiplication. Irrelevant.

    *   *Sense 4 (a chemical substance formed as a result of a chemical reaction)*: Examples: product of lime and nitric acid. This refers to a reaction product (like product vs reactant in chemistry). While medicines are chemicals, the phrase "Medicinal Products" usually refers to the finished dosage form (tablets, solutions) or the commercial preparation, not just the output of a specific reaction in a test tube. It *could* be argued they are chemical substances, but "Medicinal Product" is a regulatory term for the pharmaceutical preparation.

    *   *Sense 5 (consequence of efforts)*: Abstract meaning (skill is the product...). Irrelevant.

    *   *Sense 6 (set intersection)*: Mathematical. Irrelevant.

4.  **Compare Sense 1 and Sense 2**:
    *   Sense 1 emphasizes "offered for sale" (commodities). The EPAR (European Public Assessment Report) is a regulatory document for authorizing medicines for the market. Once authorized, they are products in the market sense.
    *   Sense 2 emphasizes "an artifact that has been created".
    *   WordNet sense distinctions often differ between "wares/commodities" (Sense 1) and "productions/artifacts" (Sense 2).
    *   "Medicinal product" is the standard regulatory term for a medicine. Is it Sense 1 or Sense 2?
    *   In WordNet, Sense 1 ("commodities offered for sale") is often the default for "product" in a business context.
    *   However, Sense 2 ("an artifact that has been created...") is often used for specific types of outputs.
    *   Let's look at the specific phrase "Medicinal Products".
        *   In the pharmaceutical industry, a "product" is the specific drug formulation.
        *   Sense 1 examples: "good business depends on having good merchandise", "store offers a variety of products". This fits the commercial aspect.
        *   Sense 2 examples: "they improve their product every year", "agricultural production". This fits the manufacturing/creation aspect.
    *   Context: The CHMP assesses studies to recommend how to use the *medicine*. The "product" here is the medicine itself as an entity that has been manufactured and is being regulated.
    *   Usually, when referring to specific categories of goods (like "agricultural products", "dairy products", "medicinal products"), Sense 1 is the strong candidate because they are commodities/items of trade. Sense 2 is often the act of producing or the specific output instance.
    *   Let's check WordNet hierarchies if possible (mentally). Sense 1 is under `commodity, good`. Sense 2 is under `artifact, artefact`.
    *   Medicines are certainly commodities in this context (assessed for the market). But are they "merchandise"?
    *   "Medicinal products" acts as a terminological phrase.
    *   Let's compare:
        *   Sense 1: "commodities offered for sale". A regulatory committee deals with the authorization for sale.
        *   Sense 2: "artifact created by process".
    *   In standard WSD datasets (like SemCor), Sense 1 is the default for "product" referring to commercial goods. "Medicinal products" are a class of commercial goods.
    *   Example: "The company sells various products." (Sense 1). "This new product is the result of years of research." (Sense 2? or 1?).
    *   WordNet Sense 1 for "product" is defined as "commodities offered for sale".
    *   WordNet Sense 2 for "product" is defined as "an artifact that has been created...".
    *   Often, the distinction is subtle. If the focus is on the *selling* or the *presence in a store*, it's Sense 1. If the focus is on the *making* or the *quality of the output*, it's Sense 2.
    *   Context: "Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use". This implies the *items* being regulated. They are items of trade/commerce.
    *   However, many WSD systems map "dairy products", "agricultural products" to Sense 1 (commodities).
    *   Let's reconsider Sense 4 ("chemical substance..."). While medicines are chemicals, "Medicinal Products" usually implies the formulation (pills, etc.), which is an artifact/commodity. Sense 4 is usually strictly for chemical reaction outputs (e.g., "the product of this reaction is water").
    *   Choice is between 1 and 2.
    *   Sense 1 synonyms: merchandise, ware.
    *   Sense 2 synonyms: production.
    *   Is a medicine "merchandise"? Yes.
    *   Is a medicine an "artifact"? Yes.
    *   Which is primary?
    *   In the phrase "Committee for Medicinal Products", "Products" refers to the class of goods available for medical use.
    *   The definition of Sense 1 "commodities offered for sale" fits the regulatory context perfectly (regulating what can be sold). Sense 2 focuses on the creation process. The CHMP focuses on the safety/efficacy for market authorization (sale).
    *   Therefore, Sense 1 is the better fit because the context is a report (EPAR) assessing the suitability of these items for the market (commodities).

    *   Let's double check Sense 2 examples: "they improve their product every year". This implies a specific brand or output quality.
    *   Sense 1 examples: "that store offers a variety of products". This implies categories of goods. "Medicinal Products" is a category of goods.

    *   Conclusion: Sense 1 is the standard sense for "goods/items of a specific type".

    *   Wait, let me pause. Some annotators might prefer Sense 2 because it is the super-sense (artifact) and Sense 1 (commodity) implies it is *currently* for sale. A "Medicinal Product" under assessment might not be for sale yet (it's being assessed). However, the concept of "product" in "Medicinal Product" is a regulatory classification of the item. Is it an artifact or a commodity?
    *   If I create a medicine in a lab but haven't sold it, is it a Sense 1? No.
    *   The CHMP assesses it *before* it is put on the market.
    *   Sense 1: "offered for sale".
    *   Sense 2: "created by someone or some process".
    *   During assessment, it is a result of a process (Sense 2). Once authorized, it becomes a commodity (Sense 1).
    *   However, the phrase "Medicinal Product" is a terminological fixed phrase.
    *   Let's look at the definition of "Medicinal Product" in EU law: "Any substance or combination of substances presented as having properties for treating or preventing disease..."
    *   WordNet Sense 2 is "an artifact that has been created...". This seems safer because it doesn't require the "for sale" condition, though approval leads to sale.
    *   BUT, usually, distinct categories like "consumer products", "software products", "medicinal products" are mapped to Sense 1 in most corpora (SemCor, etc.) because they are viewed as items of commerce/industry.
    *   Let's look at Sense 1 again: "commodities offered for sale". The CHMP decides if it *can* be offered for sale.
    *   Let's look at Sense 2: "an artifact...".
    *   Let's look at the synonyms again.
        *   Sense 1: merchandise, ware.
        *   Sense 2: production.
    *   "Medicinal productions"? No.
    *   "Medicinal wares"? No.
    *   But the word is "Product".
    *   Let's try to find similar instances in WSD literature.
    *   "The company released a new product." -> usually Sense 1 (commercial item).
    *   "The specific product of this gene is a protein." -> Sense 4 or 5.
    *   "Agricultural products." -> Sense 1 (goods).
    *   "Gross Domestic Product." -> Sense 1 (value of goods/services).
    *   The regulatory term "Medicinal Products" aligns with the concept of "Pharmaceutical goods". Even if in the process of assessment, the entity is defined as a "product" in the commercial regulatory sense.
    *   I will stick with Sense 1 because "Medicinal Products" functions as a category of goods/commodities within the market framework, which is what the EPAR regulates.

    *   Let me reconsider Sense 2. If I write a document, it's a product of my work (Sense 5 or 2?). If I build a table, it's a product (Sense 2) or furniture (Sense 1?).
    *   WordNet sense 1 is the "merchandise" sense.
    *   WordNet sense 2 is the "creation" sense.
    *   Is "Medicinal Products" referring to merchandise?
    *   The CHMP (Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use) is about the authorization of medicines for the market.
    *   The term "product" here is the standard term for a pharmaceutical preparation intended for the market.
    *   I believe Sense 1 captures the "commercial good" aspect better than Sense 2, even if the assessment happens before the sale. The intent is sale/use.
    *   Furthermore, Sense 1 has the hypernym `commodity`. Sense 2 has the hypernym `artifact`. All commodities are artifacts, but in WSD, we pick the most specific sense. If it's a commercial item, Sense 1 is more specific than Sense 2.
    *   Is it a commercial item? Yes, the EPAR is for a medicine intended for the European market.
    *   Therefore, Sense 1.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: human
Target surface form: Human
Context:
This document is a summary of the European Public Assessment Report (EPAR). It explains how the Committee for Medicinal Products for <t>Human</t> Use (CHMP) assessed the studies performed, to reach their recommendations on how to use the medicine. If you need more information about your medical condition or your treatment, read the Package Leaflet (also part of the EPAR) or contact your doctor or pharmacist.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=human%3:01:00:: | definition=characteristic of humanity | examples=human nature
2. sense_key=human%3:01:01:: | definition=relating to a person | examples=the experiment was conducted on 6 monkeys and 2 human subjects
3. sense_key=human%3:00:00:: | definition=having human form or attributes as opposed to those of animals or divine beings | examples=human beings; the human body

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the Target Lemma and Context**:
    *   **Lemma**: "human" (adjective, based on the surface form "Human" modifying "Use").
    *   **Context**: "...Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP)..."
    *   **Syntactic role**: Adjective modifying "Use" (noun phrase).

2.  **Analyze the Candidate Senses**:
    *   **Sense 1**: `human%3:01:00::`
        *   Definition: characteristic of humanity
        *   Examples: human nature
        *   Analysis: This refers to qualities inherent to humans (emotions, fallibility, etc.). "Human Use" isn't about the characteristic nature of humanity (like kindness or cruelty), but rather *who* uses it.

    *   **Sense 2**: `human%3:01:01::`
        *   Definition: relating to a person
        *   Examples: the experiment was conducted on 6 monkeys and 2 human subjects
        *   Analysis: This sense distinguishes humans from animals or other entities in a specific context (like experiments). "Human subjects" vs "monkey subjects". In the phrase "Human Use", it implies use *by* humans (people). It relates to the person/entity doing the using. This seems close, but let's check Sense 3.

    *   **Sense 3**: `human%3:00:00::`
        *   Definition: having human form or attributes as opposed to those of animals or divine beings
        *   Examples: human beings; the human body
        *   Analysis: This is the general adjectival sense distinguishing humans from animals or gods. The phrase "Human Use" implies use by *human beings* (the biological entity) as opposed to veterinary use (animal use).

3.  **Compare Senses 2 and 3 in Context**:
    *   The context is a medical document (EPAR). The distinction in pharmacology is almost always between "Human Use" (medicine for people) and "Veterinary Use" (medicine for animals).
    *   Sense 2 ("relating to a person") is often used in contexts where a specific contrast is drawn within a specific scenario (like an experiment comparing monkeys and humans). The example "human subjects" fits this.
    *   Sense 3 ("having human form or attributes... opposed to animals") covers the biological distinction. "Human use" designates the intended beneficiary of the medicinal product as the species *Homo sapiens*, distinct from animals.
    *   Let's look at the ontology mapping.
        *   Sense 1 (characteristic of humanity) -> "Human frailty" / "Human nature".
        *   Sense 2 (relating to a person) -> "Human error", "Human factor"? Or is that Sense 1? The example "human subjects" suggests a specific classification of subjects in a study.
        *   Sense 3 (opposed to animals/divine) -> "Human body", "Human being".
    *   "Medicinal Products for Human Use": This is a regulatory classification. It distinguishes drugs for people from drugs for animals.
    *   Is "Human" here "relating to a person" (Sense 2) or "belonging to the species/biological category" (Sense 3)?
    *   In WordNet (approximate mappings), the distinction between the "adjective satellite" senses (01:00 and 01:01) and the "adjective" head (00:00) can be subtle.
    *   Sense 3 (00:00) is usually the core biological distinction. "Human body" is Sense 3. "Human being" is Sense 3.
    *   "Human Use" is effectively "Use by Human Beings". Since "Human Beings" falls under Sense 3 (based on the example provided for Sense 3), the adjectival modification "Human Use" likely falls under Sense 3 as well.
    *   Sense 2 ("relating to a person") has the example "human subjects". This is very similar to "Human Use" in that it distinguishes from animals in a medical context. However, Sense 3's definition "having human form or attributes as opposed to those of animals" captures the fundamental categorical distinction required by the regulatory phrase "Human Use" (vs Veterinary Use).
    *   Let's check WordNet hierarchy. Usually, `adj.all` (00) is the head. `adj.pert` (01) relates to the noun.
    *   Noun "Human" usually refers to the biological entity.
    *   Adjective Sense 3 (`human%3:00:00::`) maps to "human" (noun) concepts (biological). Definition: "having human form or attributes as opposed to those of animals or divine beings".
    *   Adjective Sense 2 (`human%3:01:01::`) maps to definition "relating to a person".
    *   The phrase "Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use" is a fixed regulatory term. It means medicine for *people*. The core distinction is Human vs. Animal.
    *   Sense 3 explicitly mentions "opposed to those of animals". This fits the "Human vs Veterinary" distinction perfectly.
    *   Sense 2's example "human subjects" is extremely close contextually. However, Sense 3 includes "human beings" and "human body". "Human Use" is use by "human beings". Therefore, Sense 3 is the broader, more fundamental sense that encompasses the category distinction necessary here.

    *   Let's re-evaluate Sense 2. "Relating to a person". "Human subjects". This is often a `pert` sense (pertaining to the noun).
    *   Let's re-evaluate Sense 3. "Having human form...". This is the attributive sense.
    *   In "Human Use", is "Human" describing the quality of the use (Use by a person - Sense 2)? Or describing the nature of the user (Use by a human being - Sense 3)?
    *   Standard WordSenseDisambiguation on "human use": The underlying concept is the species. "Medicinal products for [Human] Use". If it were Sense 1, it would mean "Use that is characteristic of humanity" (doesn't make sense). If it were Sense 2, it relates to a person. If it were Sense 3, it opposes animals.
    *   Regulatory context strictly contrasts Human vs Animal.
    *   Sense 3 definition: "...as opposed to those of animals..." matches the regulatory context perfectly (Human vs Veterinary medicine).
    *   Sense 2 definition: "relating to a person" is a bit weaker/less specific about the biological species contrast, though "person" implies human.
    *   The example for Sense 3 ("human beings") is the head noun. "Human Use" = Use for "human beings".
    *   The example for Sense 2 ("human subjects") is specific to experiment populations.
    *   "Human Use" is a general category. Sense 3 is the head adjective sense.

    *   Decision: Sense 3. The definition explicitly mentions the contrast with animals ("opposed to those of animals"), which is the exact semantic function of "Human" in the regulatory phrase "Human Use" (as opposed to Veterinary Use).

    *   Double check Sense 2. "Relating to a person". A person *is* a human being. But Sense 3's definition provides the *differentia* that is relevant to the context (animals). Also, "Human Use" parallels "Human body" (Sense 3 example).

    *   Let's check the sense keys provided.
        *   Sense 3: `human%3:00:00::` (The head adjective).
        *   Sense 2: `human%3:01:01::` (A satellite or derived sense).
    *   Usually, if a word carries the core definition of the noun it modifies, the head sense (Sense 3 here) is preferred over the "relating to" sense, unless it's a distinct abstract relation (like "human resources" might be Sense 2? Or even Sense 1?). But "Human Use" = Use for humans (noun). "Human body" = Body of a human (noun). Sense 3 covers this.

    *   Therefore, Sense 3 is thebest fit.

provider: Together


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: use
Target surface form: Use
Context:
This document is a summary of the European Public Assessment Report (EPAR). It explains how the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human <t>Use</t> (CHMP) assessed the studies performed, to reach their recommendations on how to use the medicine. If you need more information about your medical condition or your treatment, read the Package Leaflet (also part of the EPAR) or contact your doctor or pharmacist.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=use%1:04:00:: | definition=the act of using | synonyms=usage, utilization, utilisation, employment, exercise | examples=he warned against the use of narcotic drugs; skilled in the utilization of computers
2. sense_key=use%1:07:00:: | definition=what something is used for | synonyms=function, purpose, role | examples=the function of an auger is to bore holes; ballet is beautiful but what use is it?
3. sense_key=use%1:07:02:: | definition=a particular service | examples=he put his knowledge to good use; patrons have their uses
4. sense_key=use%1:22:00:: | definition=(economics) the utilization of economic goods to satisfy needs or in manufacturing | synonyms=consumption, economic consumption, usance, use of goods and services | examples=the consumption of energy has increased steadily
5. sense_key=use%1:04:01:: | definition=(psychology) an automatic pattern of behavior in reaction to a specific situation; may be inherited or acquired through frequent repetition | synonyms=habit | examples=owls have nocturnal habits; she had a habit twirling the ends of her hair
6. sense_key=use%1:04:02:: | definition=exerting shrewd or devious influence especially for one's own advantage | synonyms=manipulation | examples=his manipulation of his friends was scandalous
7. sense_key=use%1:07:03:: | definition=(law) the exercise of the legal right to enjoy the benefits of owning property | synonyms=enjoyment | examples=we were given the use of his boat

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation (WSD) for the word "Use" in a specific context.
The target lemma is "use".
The target surface form is "Use" (capitalized).
The context is: "This document is a summary of the European Public Assessment Report (EPAR). It explains how the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human <t>Use</t> (CHMP) assessed the studies performed, to reach their recommendations on how to use the medicine. ..."

Let's analyze the context phrase: "Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use".
The phrase "Human Use" refers to the purpose or function for which medicinal products are intended. It signifies the intended application of the products for humans.
It's part of a proper noun phrase (name of a committee), but the word "Use" here refers to the *purpose* or the *function* or *what it is used for*.

Let's look at the candidate senses:

1. sense_key=use%1:04:00:: | definition=the act of using | synonyms=usage, utilization, utilisation, employment, exercise | examples=he warned against the use of narcotic drugs; skilled in the utilization of computers
   - "The act of using". While there is an act involved, "Human Use" usually refers to the intended purpose/function rather than just the act itself. "For Human Use" suggests "for the purpose of being used by humans".

2. sense_key=use%1:07:00:: | definition=what something is used for | synonyms=function, purpose, role | examples=the function of an auger is to bore holes; ballet is beautiful but what use is it?
   - "What something is used for". "Medicinal Products for Human Use" -> Medicinal products intended for the purpose/function of being applied to humans. This fits very well. It aligns with the definition "what something is used for" and synonyms "purpose".

3. sense_key=use%1:07:02:: | definition=a particular service | examples=he put his knowledge to good use; patrons have their uses
   - "A particular service". Not really fitting the regulatory context of "Human Use".

4. sense_key=use%1:22:00:: | definition=(economics) the utilization of economic goods... | synonyms=consumption...
   - This is specific to economics. While medicine involves economics, "Human Use" in a regulatory context is broader than "consumption" in an economic sense.

5. sense_key=use%1:04:01:: | definition=(psychology) an automatic pattern of behavior...
   - Clearly irrelevant.

6. sense_key=use%1:04:02:: | definition=exerting shrewd or devious influence...
   - Clearly irrelevant.

7. sense_key=use%1:07:03:: | definition=(law) the exercise of the legal right...
   - Legal context, but refers to property rights (usufruct). Not the standard meaning in a medical regulatory context.

Comparison between sense 1 and sense 2.
Sense 1: "the act of using".
Sense 2: "what something is used for" / "purpose".

In the phrase "for Human Use", it modifies "Medicinal Products".
"Products for the act of using"? Or "Products for the purpose of being used"?
In regulatory language (EU EMA context), "Human Use" delineates the intended scope or purpose. The medicine is *for* the use (purpose/application) of humans.
Sense 2 ("what something is used for") captures the notion of intended function/purpose better than just the "act".
If I say "This is for outdoor use", I mean "the purpose of this is outdoor application".
If I say "The use of drugs is dangerous", I mean "the act".
Here, "for Human Use" parallels "for outdoor use". It defines the purpose/function.

Therefore, sense 2 is the best fit.

Let's double check the examples for sense 2. "ballet is beautiful but what use is it?" -> Meaning "what is its function/purpose".
"the function of an auger is to bore holes".
"Medicinal Products for Human Use" -> Medicinal products whose function/purpose is application to humans.

This seems robust.

Let's check sense 1 again. "he warned against the use of narcotic drugs". Here "use" is the act.
In the text: "...recommendations on how to use the medicine." -> Here "use" is a verb.
The target is "Committee for Medicinal Products for Human <t>Use</t>".
Context: "Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use".
Does "Use" mean the act or the purpose?
Usually, "for [Adjective] use" means "for [Adjective] purpose".
e.g. "for external use", "for office use", "for personal use".
These all map to sense 2: what something is used for / purpose.

So, sense index 2 is the correct answer.

JSON format required: {"sense_index": 2}.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: assess
Target surface form: assessed
Context:
This document is a summary of the European Public Assessment Report (EPAR). It explains how the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) <t>assessed</t> the studies performed, to reach their recommendations on how to use the medicine. If you need more information about your medical condition or your treatment, read the Package Leaflet (also part of the EPAR) or contact your doctor or pharmacist.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=assess%2:31:00:: | definition=evaluate or estimate the nature, quality, ability, extent, or significance of | synonyms=measure, evaluate, valuate, appraise, value | examples=I will have the family jewels appraised by a professional; access all the factors when taking a risk
2. sense_key=assess%2:40:01:: | definition=charge (a person or a property) with a payment, such as a tax or a fine
3. sense_key=assess%2:40:00:: | definition=set or determine the amount of (a payment such as a fine) | synonyms=tax
4. sense_key=assess%2:31:01:: | definition=estimate the value of (property) for taxation | examples=Our house hasn't been assessed in years

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the Target Lemma and Context:**
    *   Target lemma: "assess" (past tense: "assessed").
    *   Context: "It explains how the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) assessed the studies performed, to reach their recommendations..."
    *   Key semantic details: The subject is a committee (CHMP). The object is "the studies performed". The purpose is to reach recommendations on how to use the medicine. This implies a process of evaluation, analysis, and judgment of data/scientific studies.

2.  **Analyze the Candidate Senses:**

    *   **Sense 1:**
        *   Definition: "evaluate or estimate the nature, quality, ability, extent, or significance of"
        *   Synonyms: measure, evaluate, valuate, appraise, value.
        *   Examples: "access all the factors when taking a risk" (Note: the example in WordNet actually says "access", but it often means "assess" or is a typo in some datasets, but the definition is clearly about evaluation). The definition fits the idea of looking at scientific studies to determine their quality or significance.
        *   Fit: This seems very strong. The committee is evaluating studies.

    *   **Sense 2:**
        *   Definition: "charge (a person or a property) with a payment, such as a tax or a fine"
        *   Fit: No financial charge or tax is involved here. This is not relevant.

    *   **Sense 3:**
        *   Definition: "set or determine the amount of (a payment such as a fine)"
        *   Synonyms: tax.
        *   Fit: No payment amount is being set. Not relevant.

    *   **Sense 4:**
        *   Definition: "estimate the value of (property) for taxation"
        *   Examples: "Our house hasn't been assessed in years"
        *   Fit: This is specific to property tax valuation. The context is about medical studies, not property tax.

3.  **Compare and Select:**
    *   Sense 1 is about general evaluation (studies, nature, quality).
    *   Senses 2, 3, and 4 are financial/fiscal meanings (taxes, fines, property value for tax).
    *   The context clearly refers to a scientific/regulatory evaluation of medical studies. Therefore, Sense 1 is the correct choice.

4.  **Format Output:**
    *   The user wants a JSON object `{"sense_index": X}`.
    *   Sense 1 corresponds to index 1 (based on the list numbering provided).

5.  **Final check:**
    *   Does "assessed the studies" mean "evaluated the studies"? Yes.
    *   Does it match definition 1? Yes ("evaluate... the nature, quality...").
    *   Do the other definitions match? No.

    Result: Index 1.

provider: Baidu


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: study
Target surface form: studies
Context:
This document is a summary of the European Public Assessment Report (EPAR). It explains how the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) assessed the <t>studies</t> performed, to reach their recommendations on how to use the medicine. If you need more information about your medical condition or your treatment, read the Package Leaflet (also part of the EPAR) or contact your doctor or pharmacist.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=study%1:04:00:: | definition=a detailed critical inspection | synonyms=survey
2. sense_key=study%1:09:03:: | definition=applying the mind to learning and understanding a subject (especially by reading) | synonyms=work | examples=mastering a second language requires a lot of work; no schools offer graduate study in interior design
3. sense_key=study%1:10:00:: | definition=a written document describing the findings of some individual or group | synonyms=report, written report | examples=this accords with the recent study by Hill and Dale
4. sense_key=study%1:09:04:: | definition=a state of deep mental absorption | examples=she is in a deep study
5. sense_key=study%1:06:00:: | definition=a room used for reading and writing and studying | examples=he knocked lightly on the closed door of the study
6. sense_key=study%1:09:02:: | definition=a branch of knowledge | synonyms=discipline, subject, subject area, subject field, field, field of study | examples=in what discipline is his doctorate?; teachers should be well trained in their subject
7. sense_key=study%1:06:01:: | definition=preliminary drawing for later elaboration | synonyms=sketch | examples=he made several studies before starting to paint
8. sense_key=study%1:09:01:: | definition=attentive consideration and meditation | synonyms=cogitation | examples=after much cogitation he rejected the offer
9. sense_key=study%1:18:00:: | definition=someone who memorizes quickly and easily (as the lines for a part in a play) | examples=he is a quick study
10. sense_key=study%1:10:01:: | definition=a composition intended to develop one aspect of the performer's technique | examples=a study in spiccato bowing

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the target lemma and form:** The lemma is "study", and the surface form is "studies". It's a plural noun in this context ("...assessed the studies performed...").

2.  **Analyze the context:**
    *   Source: European Public Assessment Report (EPAR).
    *   Context sentence: "It explains how the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) assessed the studies performed, to reach their recommendations on how to use the medicine."
    *   Key phrase: "assessed the studies performed".
    *   Domain: Pharmaceutical/Medical regulatory context.
    *   Meaning: Scientific investigations, clinical trials, or research projects conducted to evaluate the medicine.

3.  **Evaluate candidate senses:**

    *   **Sense 1 (study%1:04:00::):** "a detailed critical inspection". Synonyms: "survey".
        *   Context fit: This refers to the act of inspecting or surveying. While clinical studies involve inspection, the text says the committee "assessed the studies". "Studies" here refers to the specific research projects/trials conducted, rather than just the abstract act of inspection. However, "study" in a medical context often means a research study (clinical study). Let's check other senses. Usually, this sense (1:04:00) maps to `act.n.02` or similar in other ontologies, referring to the *process* of studying. But here, "studies" are objects that can be "performed" and "assessed".

    *   **Sense 2 (study%1:09:03::):** "applying the mind to learning and understanding a subject...".
        *   Context fit: This is academic study/learning. Not fitting for pharmaceutical trials.

    *   **Sense 3 (study%1:10:00::):** "a written document describing the findings of some individual or group". Synonyms: "report, written report".
        *   Context fit: A clinical study results in a report. The context mentions "This document is a summary...". However, the phrase "assessed the studies performed" implies the *execution* of the research/trials, not just the reading of the paper. But wait, looking at WordNet sense definitions strictly.
        *   Sense 1 is "detailed critical inspection".
        *   Sense 3 is "a written document".
        *   In medical contexts, "studies" usually refers to the *research projects* themselves. Does WordNet have a specific "research project" sense?
        *   Let's look at the hierarchy/definition again.
        *   Sense 1 (1:04:00): "a detailed critical inspection". If I say "clinical study", is it an inspection? Yes. Is it the *process*? Yes. But usually, that falls under "research".
        *   Let's look at Sense 1's synonyms: "survey".
        *   Let's look at Sense 3's examples: "this accords with the recent study by Hill and Dale". This refers to the work/research presented, often as a document.
        *   Let's re-read the context: "assessed the studies performed". One performs a study (conducts research). One assesses the results/process.
        *   If I look at how WordNet defines "study" regarding research:
            *   Sense 1 (1:04:00) - Inspection.
            *   Sense 3 (1:10:00) - Document.
        *   There is a gap here in WordNet's specific definitions compared to specialized dictionaries (which would have "piece of research"). WordNet 3.x doesn't have a perfect "research project" sense distinct from "inspection" or "document".
        *   However, let's look at the usage. "The studies performed".
        *   Sense 3 example: "this accords with the recent study by Hill and Dale". This is very close to "recent clinical studies".
        *   Sense 1 definition: "detailed critical inspection".
        *   If the committee assesses the studies, are they assessing the document describing the findings (Sense 3)? Or the inspection itself (Sense 1)?
        *   Usually, in this genre (regulatory documents), "studies" refers to the data package/clinical trials.
        *   Comparing Sense 1 and Sense 3.
            *   Sense 1 is defined as an "inspection" (process). Synonyms: survey. "A study of traffic patterns".
            *   Sense 3 is defined as a "written document" (communication). Synonyms: report. "A study published in the Lancet".
        *   Context: "assessed the studies performed". You perform a study (Sense 1/process). You write a report (Sense 3). The phrase "studies performed" leans heavily toward the *process* or the *investigation* itself, not just the paper.
        *   Let's check other senses to be sure.
        *   Sense 4: mental absorption. No.
        *   Sense 5: room. No.
        *   Sense 6: branch of knowledge. No.
        *   Sense 7: preliminary drawing. No.
        *   Sense 8: meditation. No.
        *   Sense 9: person. No.
        *   Sense 10: music. No.

    *   **Decision between Sense 1 and Sense 3.**
        *   Sense 1 (1:04:00): "detailed critical inspection".
        *   Sense 3 (1:10:00): "written document".
        *   In the medical domain, a "study" is a "research study".
        *   Sense 1 corresponds to `act` (the doing). "To perform a study" -> to carry out an inspection/investigation.
        *   Sense 3 corresponds to `communication` (the result).
        *   Context: "assessed the studies performed".
        *   If we say "perform a study", we are talking about the investigation. Sense 1.
        *   If we say "read the study", we are talking about the document. Sense 3.
        *   Here, the studies are "performed". You perform the investigation, you don't "perform" the document. Therefore, Sense 1 fits the predicate "perform" better.
        *   Let's check WordNet mapping for "clinical study" or similar. Often mapped to Sense 1.
        *   Also, Sense 3 synonyms "report, written report". While a study produces a report, the study *performed* is the investigation.
        *   However, Sense 1's definition "detailed critical inspection" feels slightly weak for "clinical trial". But in WordNet's coarse granularity, "investigation" (implied by inspection) is Sense 1.
        *   Let's look at the example for Sense 1 (none provided in prompt, but typically "a study of traffic conditions").
        *   Let's look at the example for Sense 3: "this accords with the recent study by Hill and Dale". This usage is extremely common for "scientific study".
        *   Is there a chance Sense 3 covers the research work itself? "Written document describing the findings". If I say "the study was flawed", I might mean the methodology (Sense 1) or the paper (Sense 3).
        *   If the text says "assessed the studies performed", it refers to the *work done* (the trials). The committee looks at the results of the *work*.
        *   Sense 1 (Inspection/Investigation) is the "doing".
        *   Sense 3 (Report) is the "artifact".
        *   In "studies performed", the word "performed" modifies "studies". One performs an action/investigation. One does not perform a document.
        *   Therefore, Sense 1 is the correct sense for "investigation/research project".

    *   **Refining the choice:**
        *   WordNet Sense 1:04:00 is under the "act" hierarchy.
        *   WordNet Sense 1:10:00 is under the "communication" hierarchy.
        *   "Studies performed" -> Act of investigating.
        *   Therefore, Sense 1 is the best fit.

    *   Let's double check Sense 2 just in case. "applying the mind to learning". No, that's student study.
    *   Let's double check Sense 6. "branch of knowledge". No, "medical studies" could mean the field, but "studies performed" refers to specific instances.

    *   **Conclusion:** Sense 1 describes the investigation itself (detailed critical inspection), which aligns with clinical studies/trials being performed. Sense 3 describes the report, which is the outcome, but "performed" links to the activity.

    *   Wait, I need to be careful. Sometimes Sense 3 is used for "scientific study" as a count noun. "A study shows X". Is that Sense 1 or 3 in WordNet?
    *   "A study shows X" -> The document (Sense 3) contains the findings.
    *   "We conducted a study" -> The investigation (Sense 1).
    *   Context: "assessed the studies performed".
    *   "Performed" collocates strongly with the investigation (Sense 1). You conduct/perform an inspection/investigation.
    *   The CHMP assesses the *trials* (the investigations). They might read the reports, but the object of "performed" is the investigation.
    *   Thus, Sense 1 is the logical choice.

    *   Let's check the synonyms for Sense 1: "survey". A survey is something you perform.
    *   Let's check the synonyms for Sense 3: "report". You write a report, you don't perform it.
    *   This distinction confirms Sense 1.

4.  **Final verification:**
    *   Target: studies (plural noun).
    *   Context: pharmaceutical trials.
    *   Candidate: Sense 1 (investigation/inspection).
    *   Candidate: Sense 3 (report).
    *   Predicate: "performed".
    *   Selection: You perform an investigation (Sense 1). You do not perform a report. (You prepare/write a report).
    *   Choice: Sense 1.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: perform
Target surface form: performed
Context:
This document is a summary of the European Public Assessment Report (EPAR). It explains how the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) assessed the studies <t>performed</t>, to reach their recommendations on how to use the medicine. If you need more information about your medical condition or your treatment, read the Package Leaflet (also part of the EPAR) or contact your doctor or pharmacist.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=perform%2:36:00:: | definition=carry out or perform an action | synonyms=execute, do | examples=John did the painting, the weeding, and he cleaned out the gutters; the skater executed a triple pirouette
2. sense_key=perform%2:41:02:: | definition=perform a function | examples=Who will perform the wedding?
3. sense_key=perform%2:36:01:: | definition=give a performance (of something) | examples=Horowitz is performing at Carnegie Hall tonight; We performed a popular Gilbert and Sullivan opera
4. sense_key=perform%2:41:00:: | definition=get (something) done | synonyms=do | examples=I did my job

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the target lemma:** "perform" (verb). Target surface form: "performed".
2.  **Analyze the context:**
    *   Sentence: "It explains how the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) assessed the studies <t>performed</t>, to reach their recommendations on how to use the medicine."
    *   Contextual meaning: Studies were carried out, executed, or conducted. The subject implies scientists or researchers doing the studies. The object is "studies".
    *   Semantics: This is about doing work, carrying out an action (a study), not giving a performance (artistic) or performing a specific social function (like a wedding).
3.  **Evaluate Candidate Senses:**
    *   **Sense 1:** `perform%2:36:00::` | Definition: "carry out or perform an action" | Synonyms: execute, do | Examples: "John did the painting...", "the skater executed a triple pirouette".
        *   *Fit:* The definition "carry out or perform an action" fits perfectly with conducting studies. "Studies performed" is a common collocation meaning studies conducted/carried out. The examples show general actions.
    *   **Sense 2:** `perform%2:41:02::` | Definition: "perform a function" | Examples: "Who will perform the wedding?"
        *   *Fit:* This usually refers to a specific role, ceremony, or duty (like a wedding or a specific office function). While a study is a task, this sense is often more idiomatically restricted to specific "functions" like ceremonies or roles. The "studies performed" fits "carry out an action" better than "perform a function" in the ceremonial sense.
    *   **Sense 3:** `perform%2:36:01::` | Definition: "give a performance (of something)" | Examples: "Horowitz is performing...", "We performed a popular Gilbert and Sullivan opera".
        *   *Fit:* This is clearly artistic/musical performance. Not applicable to scientific studies.
    *   **Sense 4:** `perform%2:41:00::` | Definition: "get (something) done" | Synonyms: do | Examples: "I did my job".
        *   *Fit:* This is close to Sense 1 but often implies completion or accomplishment. Sense 1 ("carry out or perform an action") is the most direct mapping to the execution of studies (clinical trials). "Assessed the studies performed" focuses on the action of doing the study. Sense 1 includes "execute", which is the standard collocate for studies (execute a study, carry out a study).
4.  **Compare Sense 1 and Sense 4:**
    *   Sense 1 is "carry out or perform an action". Synonyms: execute, do.
    *   Sense 4 is "get (something) done". Synonyms: do.
    *   "Studies performed" maps to "studies conducted" or "studies carried out". This aligns strongly with Sense 1's definition "carry out or perform an action". Sense 4's definition "get (something) done" has a nuance of accomplishment/finishing. While studies are finished, the phrase "studies performed" usually emphasizes the undertaking of the research process itself.
    *   WordNet often distinguishes between general action (do/execute) and accomplishment. Sense 1 is the most generic "do/execute" sense. "The studies performed" is equivalent to "the studies executed/carried out". Sense 1 is the standard default for "carry out" in a non-artistic, non-ceremonial context.
5.  **Final Selection:** Sense 1 is the best fit. It denotes the general execution of an action (studies).


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: reach
Target surface form: reach
Context:
This document is a summary of the European Public Assessment Report (EPAR). It explains how the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) assessed the studies performed, to <t>reach</t> their recommendations on how to use the medicine. If you need more information about your medical condition or your treatment, read the Package Leaflet (also part of the EPAR) or contact your doctor or pharmacist.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=reach%2:38:01:: | definition=reach a destination, either real or abstract | synonyms=make, attain, hit, arrive at, gain | examples=We hit Detroit by noon; The water reached the doorstep
2. sense_key=reach%2:38:00:: | definition=reach a point in time, or a certain state or level | synonyms=hit, attain | examples=The thermometer hit 100 degrees; This car can reach a speed of 140 miles per hour
3. sense_key=reach%2:35:00:: | definition=move forward or upward in order to touch; also in a metaphorical sense | synonyms=reach out | examples=Government reaches out to the people
4. sense_key=reach%2:32:00:: | definition=be in or establish communication with | synonyms=get through, get hold of, contact | examples=Our advertisements reach millions; He never contacted his children after he emigrated to Australia
5. sense_key=reach%2:41:00:: | definition=to gain with effort | synonyms=achieve, accomplish, attain | examples=she achieved her goal despite setbacks
6. sense_key=reach%2:42:00:: | definition=to extend as far as | synonyms=extend to, touch | examples=The sunlight reached the wall; Can he reach?
7. sense_key=reach%2:38:06:: | definition=reach a goal, e.g., | synonyms=make, get to, progress to | examples=make the first team; We made it!
8. sense_key=reach%2:40:00:: | definition=place into the hands or custody of | synonyms=pass, hand, pass on, turn over, give | examples=hand me the spoon, please; Turn the files over to me, please
9. sense_key=reach%2:33:00:: | definition=to exert much effort or energy | synonyms=strive, strain | examples=straining our ears to hear

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the target word and context:**
    *   Target lemma: `reach`
    *   Target surface form: `reach`
    *   Context: "...to <t>reach</t> their recommendations on how to use the medicine."
    *   The sentence describes the Committee (CHMP) assessing studies *in order to* produce or arrive at recommendations.

2.  **Analyze the candidate senses:**

    *   **Sense 1:** `reach%2:38:01::` | Definition: reach a destination, either real or abstract. | Synonyms: make, attain, hit, arrive at, gain. | Examples: "We hit Detroit by noon", "The water reached the doorstep".
        *   *Analysis:* This is about arriving at a physical location or an abstract destination. Recommendations are abstract, but the sense implies arriving *at* something. It's a strong candidate, but let's look for something more specific to decisions/results.

    *   **Sense 2:** `reach%2:38:00::` | Definition: reach a point in time, or a certain state or level. | Synonyms: hit, attain. | Examples: "The thermometer hit 100 degrees", "This car can reach a speed of 140 miles per hour".
        *   *Analysis:* This is about levels, speeds, temperatures, or times. "Recommendations" are not a state or level in this context. Incorrect.

    *   **Sense 3:** `reach%2:35:00::` | Definition: move forward or upward in order to touch; also in a metaphorical sense. | Synonyms: reach out. | Examples: "Government reaches out to the people".
        *   *Analysis:* This is about physical reaching or "reaching out" to contact/help. Incorrect.

    *   **Sense 4:** `reach%2:32:00::` | Definition: be in or establish communication with. | Synonyms: get through, get hold of, contact. | Examples: "Our advertisements reach millions".
        *   *Analysis:* This is about communication range or contacting people. Incorrect.

    *   **Sense 5:** `reach%2:41:00::` | Definition: to gain with effort. | Synonyms: achieve, accomplish, attain. | Examples: "she achieved her goal despite setbacks".
        *   *Analysis:* This sense focuses on the effort/result aspect. "Reach their recommendations" implies a process of deliberation leading to a result. Synonyms like "achieve" or "accomplish" fit well with "recommendations" (as a goal/outcome of the committee's work).

    *   **Sense 6:** `reach%2:42:00::` | Definition: to extend as far as. | Synonyms: extend to, touch. | Examples: "The sunlight reached the wall".
        *   *Analysis:* Physical extension. Incorrect.

    *   **Sense 7:** `reach%2:38:06::` | Definition: reach a goal, e.g. | Synonyms: make, get to, progress to. | Examples: "make the first team", "We made it!".
        *   *Analysis:* This is very similar to Sense 5. It involves reaching a goal. Recommendations are the goal of the assessment process.

    *   **Sense 8:** `reach%2:40:00::` | Definition: place into the hands or custody of. | Synonyms: pass, hand, pass on, turn over, give. | Examples: "hand me the spoon".
        *   *Analysis:* Physical transfer. Incorrect.

    *   **Sense 9:** `reach%2:33:00::` | Definition: to exert much effort or energy. | Synonyms: strive, strain. | Examples: "straining our ears to hear".
        *   *Analysis:* Focusing on the effort part. Incorrect.

3.  **Disambiguating between Sense 1, Sense 5, and Sense 7:**

    *   Context: "assessed the studies performed, to **reach** their recommendations".
    *   Sense 1 (arrive at): You can "arrive at a recommendation". This is a very common collocation. The definition says "reach a destination... abstract". A decision/recommendation is an abstract destination.
    *   Sense 5 (gain with effort): Synonyms are achieve/accomplish. "Achieve their recommendations" sounds slightly odd. You achieve a goal or an objective. You *reach* or *arrive at* a decision/recommendation.
    *   Sense 7 (reach a goal): Synonyms make, get to. "Make their recommendations" works, but usually, you "make a recommendation". Here the target is "reach". "Reach a goal" fits the structure of a committee working toward a result.

    Let's look closely at the WordNet hierarchy (implied by the sense keys).
    *   `reach%2:38:01::` (Sense 1) is often the general "arrive at" sense. Examples: "The water reached the doorstep". Abstract usage: "reached a conclusion/decision".
    *   `reach%2:41:00::` (Sense 5) emphasizes the "effort" and "achievement" aspect ("gain with effort").
    *   `reach%2:38:06::` (Sense 7) is "reach a goal". The examples are "make the first team", "We made it!".

    Let's look at the specific phrase "reach recommendations".
    Does one "arrive at" recommendations? Yes.
    Does one "achieve" recommendations? Not typically. One achieves a *result* or *consensus*.
    Does one "reach a goal" (Sense 7)? The recommendation isn't the goal per se; the recommendation is the *output*. The goal is the assessment.

    Let's reconsider Sense 1 ("arrive at").
    Example synonyms: "make, attain, hit, arrive at, gain".
    "Arrive at their recommendations" is a very standard English phrase.
    The definition "reach a destination, either real or abstract" fits "recommendations" as an abstract destination in the reasoning process.

    Let's compare Sense 1 and Sense 5 again.
    Sense 5: "to gain with effort". Synonyms: "achieve, accomplish, attain".
    "They attained their recommendations" -> slightly awkward.
    "They arrived at their recommendations" -> Natural.
    "They reached their recommendations" -> The meaning maps most closely to "arrive at" (Sense 1) in this context. The committee went through a process (journey) and arrived at the recommendations (destination).

    However, there is another angle. "Reach a decision" or "Reach a conclusion" is usually mapped to the "arrive at" sense in most dictionaries (often grouped with arriving at a destination abstractly).
    Sense 5 is usually "reach an agreement" or "reach a compromise" (where effort is highlighted to gain a result), but WordNet sometimes splits these fine hairs.
    Let's check the synonyms for Sense 1 again: "make, attain, hit, arrive at, gain".
    Let's check the synonyms for Sense 5 again: "achieve, accomplish, attain".

    The sentence is: "to reach their recommendations".
    "Reach a decision/recommendation/conclusion" is standard idiom for Sense 1 (arrive at).
    Sense 5 ("gain with effort") is usually for things like "reach safety" or "reach the top" (though that can be spatial too) or "reach a state".
    Actually, looking at standard WSD datasets (like SemCor), "reach a decision" is often tagged with the "arrive at" sense (Sense 1).
    Sense 1's definition "reach a destination, either real or abstract" allows for abstract destinations like conclusions, decisions, and recommendations.

    Let's look at Sense 7: "reach a goal". Examples "make the first team". This seems more about status or succeeding in a specific outcome. Recommendations are a result of a process.

    Let's look at Sense 5 again. "to gain with effort". While the committee puts in effort, "reach recommendations" isn't about "gaining" the recommendations as a possession or status, but concluding the deliberation.

    Therefore, Sense 1 ("reach a destination... abstract") is the best fit. "Arrive at" is the closest synonym that fits the collocation "reach/arrive at recommendations".

    Let's double check Sense 2: "reach a point in time, or a certain state or level".
    Is a recommendation a "state or level"? No, it's a determination.

    So the contest is primarily between Sense 1 and Sense 5.
    Context: "...to reach their recommendations..."
    Replacement test:
    "...to **arrive at** their recommendations..." (Sense 1 synonym) -> Works perfectly.
    "...to **achieve** their recommendations..." (Sense 5 synonym) -> Clunky. You achieve a goal, you don't achieve a recommendation.
    "...to **make** their recommendations..." (Sense 1 synonym) -> Works, but "make a recommendation" is the phrase, "reach" implies the end of the deliberation journey.
    "...to **attain** their recommendations..." (Sense 1/5 synonym) -> Clunky.

    Sense 1 is the standard sense for "reach a conclusion/decision/verdict/recommendation". It treats the abstract outcome as a destination.

    Final check on Sense 7. "reach a goal". Is a recommendation a goal? The goal is "to determine usage". The recommendation is the outcome. Sense 1 covers the outcome as a destination.

    Selection: Sense 1.

provider: DigitalOcean


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: recommendation
Target surface form: recommendations
Context:
This document is a summary of the European Public Assessment Report (EPAR). It explains how the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) assessed the studies performed, to reach their <t>recommendations</t> on how to use the medicine. If you need more information about your medical condition or your treatment, read the Package Leaflet (also part of the EPAR) or contact your doctor or pharmacist.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=recommendation%1:10:00:: | definition=something (as a course of action) that is recommended as advisable
2. sense_key=recommendation%1:10:02:: | definition=something that recommends (or expresses commendation of) a person or thing as worthy or desirable | synonyms=testimonial, good word
3. sense_key=recommendation%1:07:00:: | definition=any quality or characteristic that gains a person a favorable reception or acceptance or admission | synonyms=passport | examples=her pleasant personality is already a recommendation; his wealth was not a passport into the exclusive circles of society

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the Target Word and Context:**
    *   Target lemma: "recommendation"
    *   Target surface form: "recommendations"
    *   Context: "This document is a summary of the European Public Assessment Report (EPAR). It explains how the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) assessed the studies performed, to reach their **recommendations** on how to use the medicine."
    *   Key phrase: "recommendations on how to use the medicine".

2.  **Analyze the Candidate Senses:**

    *   **Sense 1:** `recommendation%1:10:00::`
        *   Definition: "something (as a course of action) that is recommended as advisable"
        *   Focus: Advice, a course of action, suggestions on what to do.
        *   Fit with context: The CHMP is providing advice/guidelines on "how to use the medicine". This fits perfectly. The committee is advising a course of action (usage instructions).

    *   **Sense 2:** `recommendation%1:10:02::`
        *   Definition: "something that recommends (or expresses commendation of) a person or thing as worthy or desirable"
        *   Synonyms: testimonial, good word.
        *   Focus: Praise, endorsement of worthiness (like a letter of recommendation).
        *   Fit with context: The CHMP is not praising the medicine or giving a "testimonial". They are regulating/guiding usage. The context mentions "how to use the medicine", not "this medicine is great".

    *   **Sense 3:** `recommendation%1:07:00::`
        *   Definition: "any quality or characteristic that gains a person a favorable reception or acceptance or admission"
        *   Synonyms: passport.
        *   Examples: "her pleasant personality is already a recommendation".
        *   Focus: An inherent quality that makes someone/something acceptable.
        *   Fit with context: This is clearly not relevant. The CHMP's "recommendations" are external statements/actions, not inherent qualities.

3.  **Compare and Select:**
    *   Sense 1 matches the context of "recommendations on how to use the medicine". These are actionable guidelines (courses of action).
    *   Sense 2 implies praise/commendation (testimonial). The context is regulatory/medical advice, not praise.
    *   Sense 3 implies a characteristic/quality. The context refers to a document/report outcome.

    Therefore, Sense 1 is the correct choice.

4.  **Format the Output:**
    *   The user requested a specific JSON format: `{"sense_index": X}`.
    *   The chosen index is 1.

provider: Parasail


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: use
Target surface form: use
Context:
This document is a summary of the European Public Assessment Report (EPAR). It explains how the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) assessed the studies performed, to reach their recommendations on how to <t>use</t> the medicine. If you need more information about your medical condition or your treatment, read the Package Leaflet (also part of the EPAR) or contact your doctor or pharmacist.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=use%2:34:01:: | definition=put into service; make work or employ for a particular purpose or for its inherent or natural purpose | synonyms=utilize, utilise, apply, employ | examples=use your head!; we only use Spanish at home
2. sense_key=use%2:34:02:: | definition=take or consume (regularly or habitually) | synonyms=habituate | examples=She uses drugs rarely
3. sense_key=use%2:34:00:: | definition=use up, consume fully | synonyms=expend | examples=The legislature expended its time on school questions
4. sense_key=use%2:41:14:: | definition=seek or achieve an end by using to one's advantage | examples=She uses her influential friends to get jobs; The president's wife used her good connections
5. sense_key=use%2:41:04:: | definition=avail oneself to | synonyms=practice, apply | examples=apply a principle; practice a religion
6. sense_key=use%2:41:03:: | definition=habitually do something (use only in the past tense) | examples=She used to call her mother every week but now she calls only occasionally; I used to get sick when I ate in that dining hall

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation (WSD) for the target word "use" in the provided context.

**Context:**
"This document is a summary of the European Public Assessment Report (EPAR). It explains how the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) assessed the studies performed, to reach their recommendations on how to **use** the medicine. If you need more information about your medical condition or your treatment, read the Package Leaflet (also part of the EPAR) or contact your doctor or pharmacist."

**Target:** "use" (verb)

**Analysis of the Context:**
The sentence discusses recommendations on "how to use the medicine".
The context is about medical treatment. Patients or healthcare providers employ the medicine for its intended purpose (treating a condition). It implies application, employment, or putting the medicine into service for a specific function (healing/treating).

**Evaluating Candidate Senses:**

1.  **Sense 1:** `use%2:34:01::` -> "put into service; make work or employ for a particular purpose or for its inherent or natural purpose". Synonyms: utilize, apply, employ. Examples: "use your head!", "we only use Spanish at home".
    *   *Match:* This fits perfectly. Taking medicine involves putting it into service or employing it for its natural purpose (treatment). "Apply the medicine" or "employ the medicine" works well here.

2.  **Sense 2:** `use%2:34:02::` -> "take or consume (regularly or habitually)". Synonyms: habituate. Examples: "She uses drugs rarely".
    *   *Match:* This refers to habitual consumption, often associated with substances (often illicit or addictive, but can be medication). However, the context here is about "recommendations on how to use the medicine", which implies the proper method of administration or application, not just the habit of taking it. While "taking medicine" is related, Sense 1 covers the functional aspect of "putting it into service" (administration), which is the primary focus of "how to use". Sense 2 is more about the frequency/habit ("She uses drugs"). The phrase "how to use" strongly suggests the *method* or *act* of employment (Sense 1), not the habit.

3.  **Sense 3:** `use%2:34:00::` -> "use up, consume fully". Synonyms: expend.
    *   *Match:* This is about depletion. The context is not about using *up* the medicine, but administering it.

4.  **Sense 4:** `use%2:41:14::` -> "seek or achieve an end by using to one's advantage". Examples: "She uses her influential friends".
    *   *Match:* This is about exploiting people or resources for gain. Not relevant to medicine administration.

5.  **Sense 5:** `use%2:41:04::` -> "avail oneself to". Synonyms: practice, apply. Examples: "apply a principle".
    *   *Match:* This is about abstract application (principles, religion). Not the physical application/administration of an object like medicine.

6.  **Sense 6:** `use%2:41:03::` -> "habitually do something (use only in the past tense)".
    *   *Match:* This is "used to". The text says "to use", so this is grammatically impossible.

**Decision:**
Sense 1 is the most appropriate. It covers the general sense of employing an object (medicine) for its purpose. The phrase "how to use the medicine" aligns with the definition "put into service; make work or employ for a particular purpose".

**Refining the choice:**
Sense 2 is a distractor because it involves drugs/medicine in the example ("She uses drugs rarely"). However, Sense 2 focuses on the *habit* or *regular consumption*. Sense 1 focuses on *employing* something for a purpose. The context is an instruction manual (EPAR summary) explaining the correct way to administer the drug (method, dosage, etc.). This is the act of employment/application. Therefore, Sense 1 is superior.

Sense 1 definition: "put into service; make work or employ for a particular purpose or for its inherent or natural purpose". Medicine is used for its inherent purpose (healing).

Final check of Sense 1 vs Sense 2.
Context: "recommendations on how to use the medicine".
Does "use" here mean "how to consume it habitually" (Sense 2)? Or "how to apply/employ it" (Sense 1)?
Instructions on "how to use" a tool or product almost always fall under Sense 1 (application/employment).
Sense 2 usually appears in contexts discussing addiction or regular intake (e.g., "He uses cocaine").
Sense 1 encompasses the act of taking it for the intended purpose.

Conclusion: Sense 1.

provider: Friendli


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: medicine
Target surface form: medicine
Context:
This document is a summary of the European Public Assessment Report (EPAR). It explains how the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) assessed the studies performed, to reach their recommendations on how to use the <t>medicine</t>. If you need more information about your medical condition or your treatment, read the Package Leaflet (also part of the EPAR) or contact your doctor or pharmacist.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=medicine%1:09:00:: | definition=the branches of medical science that deal with nonsurgical techniques | synonyms=medical specialty
2. sense_key=medicine%1:06:00:: | definition=(medicine) something that treats or prevents or alleviates the symptoms of disease | synonyms=medication, medicament, medicinal drug
3. sense_key=medicine%1:04:00:: | definition=the learned profession that is mastered by graduate training in a medical school and that is devoted to preventing or alleviating or curing diseases and injuries | synonyms=practice of medicine | examples=he studied medicine at Harvard
4. sense_key=medicine%1:04:02:: | definition=punishment for one's actions | synonyms=music | examples=you have to face the music; take your medicine

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the Context**: The sentence is "It explains how the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) assessed the studies performed, to reach their recommendations on how to use the <t>medicine</t>."
    *   Key phrases: "Committee for Medicinal Products", "assessed the studies", "how to use", "Package Leaflet", "contact your doctor or pharmacist".
    *   The target word "medicine" refers to a physical substance or product used for treatment. The context talks about usage instructions, package leaflets, and pharmacists—all pointing towards a pharmaceutical product/drug.

2.  **Analyze the Candidate Senses**:
    *   **Sense 1**: "the branches of medical science that deal with nonsurgical techniques" (synonyms: medical specialty).
        *   *Fit*: No. The text is not talking about a field of study (like internal medicine vs surgery).
    *   **Sense 2**: "something that treats or prevents or alleviates the symptoms of disease" (synonyms: medication, medicament, medicinal drug).
        *   *Fit*: Yes. This matches the concept of a pharmaceutical product being assessed by a committee and having usage instructions.
    *   **Sense 3**: "the learned profession that is mastered by graduate training..." (synonyms: practice of medicine).
        *   *Fit*: No. The text is not referring to the profession of being a doctor (e.g., "practicing medicine").
    *   **Sense 4**: "punishment for one's actions" (synonyms: music).
        *   *Fit*: No. This is an idiomatic usage not relevant here.

3.  **Select the Best Sense**: Sense 2 fits perfectly. The text discusses a specific medicinal product being assessed for human use.

4.  **Format the Output**: The user requested a JSON object format: `{"sense_index": X}`. Since I selected Sense 2, the output should be `{"sense_index": 2}`.

5.  **Final Check**:
    *   Does "how to use the medicine" refer to a branch of science? No.
    *   Does it refer to the profession? No.
    *   Does it refer to punishment? No.
    *   Does it refer to a substance/drug? Yes.
    *   Index: 2.

provider: StreamLake


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: need
Target surface form: need
Context:
This document is a summary of the European Public Assessment Report (EPAR). It explains how the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) assessed the studies performed, to reach their recommendations on how to use the medicine. If you <t>need</t> more information about your medical condition or your treatment, read the Package Leaflet (also part of the EPAR) or contact your doctor or pharmacist. If you want more information on the basis of the CHMP recommendations, read the Scientific Discussion (also part of the EPAR).

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=need%2:42:00:: | definition=require as useful, just, or proper | synonyms=necessitate, ask, postulate, require, take, involve | examples=It takes nerve to do what she did; success usually requires hard work
2. sense_key=need%2:34:00:: | definition=have need of | synonyms=want, require | examples=This piano wants the attention of a competent tuner
3. sense_key=need%2:34:01:: | definition=have or feel a need for | examples=always needing friends and money

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the Target Lemma and Context:**
    *   **Lemma:** need
    *   **Surface Form:** need
    *   **Context Sentence:** "If you <t>need</t> more information about your medical condition or your treatment, read the Package Leaflet..."
    *   **Context Meaning:** The user has a requirement for something (information). It is conditional ("If you need..."). It implies a necessity or requirement to achieve a specific goal (understanding one's condition/treatment). It's not an emotional feeling or a state of poverty/longing; it's a practical requirement.

2.  **Analyze the Candidate Senses:**

    *   **Sense 1:**
        *   *Sense Key:* need%2:42:00::
        *   *Definition:* require as useful, just, or proper
        *   *Synonyms:* necessitate, ask, postulate, require, take, involve
        *   *Examples:* "It takes nerve to do what she did"; "success usually requires hard work".
        *   *Analysis:* This sense focuses on the objective requirement of a situation or action. It often involves an impersonal subject ("It takes nerve") or an abstract subject ("success usually requires"). However, it can apply to people ("I need a car"). The core aspect is the necessity/requirement. The context "If you need more information" fits the idea of requirement. The synonyms "require" and "necessitate" fit well. The definition "require as useful, just, or proper" aligns with obtaining medical information.

    *   **Sense 2:**
        *   *Sense Key:* need%2:34:00::
        *   *Definition:* have need of
        *   *Synonyms:* want, require
        *   *Examples:* "This piano wants the attention of a competent tuner".
        *   *Analysis:* This sense is often very similar to Sense 1 in WordNet (sometimes distinctions in WordNet are subtle or overlapping). The example "This piano wants the attention..." suggests a lack or a practical requirement for maintenance. The definition "have need of" is almost circular. The synonym "want" here is used in the sense of "lack" or "need" (like "the house wants paint"), not necessarily desire. Let's look at the lexical domain or syntactic frame if possible. Sense 1 (2:42) is often associated with "requirement". Sense 2 (2:34) is often "possession" or "lack". However, "If you need more information" is a standard usage. Is it "have need of"? Yes. Is it "require"? Yes.

    *   **Sense 3:**
        *   *Sense Key:* need%2:34:01::
        *   *Definition:* have or feel a need for
        *   *Examples:* "always needing friends and money".
        *   *Analysis:* The example implies a psychological state or a chronic condition of lacking/longing ("always needing"). The definition mentions "feel a need for". In the context "If you need more information," the speaker isn't talking about an emotional feeling or a persistent state of longing. It is a specific situational requirement. This sense seems less appropriate than 1 or 2.

3.  **Distinguishing between Sense 1 and Sense 2:**
    *   This is the tricky part in WordNet. Let's look at the definitions and examples closely.
    *   Sense 1 (2:42:00): "require as useful, just, or proper". Examples: "It takes nerve", "success usually requires hard work". These examples often involve abstract subjects or actions requiring things. But it also applies to human subjects. The key is the *necessity* aspect relative to a goal.
    *   Sense 2 (2:34:00): "have need of". Example: "This piano wants the attention...". The synonym "want" here is crucial. "Want" in the sense of "need/lack". "This piano wants attention" = "This piano needs attention".
    *   Let's look at the syntax. "If you need more information". Subject = "you". Object = "information". Verb = "need".
    *   In many WSD systems, Sense 1 is the dominant sense for the verb "need" when used transitively to express necessity.
    *   Let's check the synonyms again.
        *   Sense 1 synonyms: necessitate, ask, postulate, require, take, involve. These often suggest that the subject (or situation) imposes a requirement. Even if the subject is "you", "You require information" (you need it to function).
        *   Sense 2 synonyms: want, require. "You want information" (in the sense of need).
    *   WordNet hierarchy:
        *   Sense 1 (2:42) falls under 'require'. It implies a logical or practical necessity.
        *   Sense 2 (2:34) falls under 'want' (in the sense of lack/need).
    *   Let's evaluate the nuances.
        *   "If you need more information" is equivalent to "If you require more information".
        *   Sense 1 definition: "require as useful, just, or proper". This fits the context of medical information perfectly. It is proper and useful to have that information.
        *   Sense 2 definition: "have need of". This is generic.
        *   Usually, Sense 1 is the most common sense for the verb "need" in contexts like "I need a car", "I need water", "You need information". It captures the objective necessity.
        *   Sense 2's example ("This piano wants...") suggests a slightly different nuance, perhaps more stative or relating to a deficiency/lack ("want"). While "need" and "want" (lack) overlap, Sense 1 is the standard definition for the transitive verb meaning "require".
        *   Let's check the definition of Sense 1 again: "require as useful, just, or proper". "You require information [as it is useful for your health]". This seems the most precise fit.
        *   Let's check the definition of Sense 2 again: "have need of". This is the definition.
        *   Sense 3 is definitely out (emotional/chronic feeling).

    *   Comparison with WordNet usage:
        *   Sense 1 is usually the "default" sense for the verb "need" meaning "require". The synonyms "require", "necessitate" are strong matches. The example "success usually requires hard work" shows the pattern of logical necessity. "If you need more information" fits this pattern of logical/situational necessity.
        *   Sense 2 is often mapped to "want" (in the sense of need). The example "This piano wants..." uses "wants". If the target was "want" used as "need", it would be Sense 2. Since the target is "need", and the meaning is "require", Sense 1 is generally the preferred mapping in WSD tasks for the core meaning of "require".
        *   Looking at the semantic relations: Sense 1 is hypernym of Sense 2 in some structures, or vice versa? No, they are often sisters or distinct senses.
        *   However, let's look at the specific phrasing "If you need...".
        *   Is it a lack? (Sense 2). You lack information? No, you might have some, but you need *more*. It's a requirement for a goal.
        *   Sense 1 ("require") captures the "goal-oriented necessity".
        *   Therefore, Sense 1 is the best fit.

    *   Let's double check Sense 2 vs Sense 1 in WordNet 3.0/3.1.
        *   need%2:42:00:: -> definitions often cite "require".
        *   need%2:34:00:: -> definitions often cite "have need of".
        *   If I look at the examples for Sense 1 ("success usually requires..."), it focuses on the necessity relationship.
        *   If I look at the examples for Sense 2 ("This piano wants..."), it focuses on the state of the object requiring something.
        *   "If you need information" -> The situation requires you to have information. It aligns with Sense 1.

    *   Let's consider Sense 1 vs Sense 3.
        *   Sense 3 is "have or feel a need for". Example: "always needing friends". This is emotional or craving. Context is not emotional. So Sense 3 is out.

    *   Final check: Sense 1 vs Sense 2.
        *   Sense 1 is defined as "require as useful, just, or proper".
        *   Sense 2 is defined as "have need of".
        *   "If you require more information" works.
        *   "If you have need of more information" works (archaic but valid meaning).
        *   WordNet often distinguishes between the act/situation of requiring (Sense 1) and the state of needing (Sense 2).
        *   However, "If you need..." is a conditional clause.
        *   Usually, the "require" sense (Sense 1) is the primary sense taught and tagged for standard transitive usage of "need".
        *   Let's look at the synonyms provided in the prompt for Sense 1: "necessitate, ask, postulate, require, take, involve". These imply a strong, often logical or situational necessity.
        *   The context "If you need more information" implies that having the information is necessary (required) to understand the medical condition. It fits the "require" synonym perfectly.
        *   Sense 2 synonym: "want". "If you want more information" (in the sense of need). It works, but "require" (Sense 1) is a more precise definition of the specific utility (medical necessity) than "want" (which can imply lack or desire). The example for Sense 2 "piano wants attention" is about maintenance/deficiency. The context here is about acquiring additional knowledge for a purpose.
        *   Sense 1 seems the intended correct answer for the standard "necessitate/require" usage.

    *   Let's refine the reasoning.
        *   Sense 3: Emotional/craving. No.
        *   Sense 2: "have need of". Closely related to "want" (deficiency). The example "piano wants attention" suggests a thing needing something.
        *   Sense 1: "require as useful, just, or proper". Example "success requires hard work". The context "you need information" is about necessity for a purpose. "It is proper/useful/necessary for you to have information". This aligns with Sense 1.
        *   Furthermore, Sense 1 is generally the first sense (most frequent) in WordNet for the verb "need". In standard WSD without strong evidence to the contrary, the most frequent sense (MFS) is often the correct baseline. The context doesn't provide enough constraint to push it away from the core meaning of "require".
        *   The prompt asks to use the gloss. "Require as useful, just, or proper". Is it proper to read the leaflet? Yes. Is it useful? Yes. Does it necessitate it? Yes.
        *   Sense 2 gloss "have need of" is less descriptive.

    *   Decision: Sense 1.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: more
Target surface form: more
Context:
This document is a summary of the European Public Assessment Report (EPAR). It explains how the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) assessed the studies performed, to reach their recommendations on how to use the medicine. If you need <t>more</t> information about your medical condition or your treatment, read the Package Leaflet (also part of the EPAR) or contact your doctor or pharmacist. If you want more information on the basis of the CHMP recommendations, read the Scientific Discussion (also part of the EPAR).

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=more%3:00:01:: | definition=(comparative of `much' used with mass nouns) a quantifier meaning greater in size or amount or extent or degree | synonyms=more than | examples=more land; more support
2. sense_key=more%3:00:02:: | definition=(comparative of `many' used with count nouns) quantifier meaning greater in number | examples=a hall with more seats; we have no more bananas

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
Let me analyze the context to determine which sense of "more" is being used.

The sentence is: "If you need more information about your medical condition or your treatment, read the Package Leaflet (also part of the EPAR) or contact your doctor or pharmacist."

The key is to determine whether "information" is a count noun or a mass noun.

"Information" is a mass noun - we don't typically say "one information, two informations." It's a substance-like concept that we measure in amount rather than count. We say "much information" not "many informations."

Let's look at the two senses:

1. sense_key=more%3:00:01:: | definition=(comparative of `much' used with mass nouns) a quantifier meaning greater in size or amount or extent or degree | synonyms=more than | examples=more land; more support

2. sense_key=more%3:00:02:: | definition=(comparative of `many' used with count nouns) quantifier meaning greater in number | examples=a hall with more seats; we have no more bananas

Since "information" is a mass noun, the correct sense would be sense 1, which is used with mass nouns and indicates greater in size or amount or extent or degree.

Let's double-check:
- "more land" - land is a mass noun
- "more support" - support is a mass noun
- "more information" - information is a mass noun

Yes, sense 1 is the correct choice for this context.