[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: filing
Target surface form: filing
Context:
"The daily crush of media tweets, cameras and reporters outside the courthouse," the lawyers wrote, "was unlike anything ever seen here in New Haven and maybe statewide." Their focus on the Twitter coverage is controversial. In interviews, some journalists said the claim that instant news was more incendiary than reports delivered more slowly was a Luddite view that would make poor court policy governing coverage of future trials. But some lawyers said appeals courts were often attracted to arguments that social and technological changes required adaptation by the courts. Mr. Hayes's lawyers are pressing that claim. In their <t>filing</t>, they referred to the Supreme Court's 1966 decision overturning Dr. Sheppard's conviction because of the trial coverage and made it clear they would claim that the new media required new rules. "This case," they wrote, "represents the Sheppard v. Maxwell of the 21st century."

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=filing%1:10:00:: | definition=the entering of a legal document into the public record | examples=he filed a complaint; he filed his tax return
2. sense_key=filing%1:17:00:: | definition=a fragment rubbed off by the use of a file
3. sense_key=filing%1:04:01:: | definition=the act of using a file (as in shaping or smoothing an object)
4. sense_key=filing%1:04:00:: | definition=preservation and methodical arrangement as of documents and papers etc. | examples=I have some filing to do

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the Target Word**: The target word is "filing" (noun).
2.  **Analyze the Context**:
    *   The context discusses lawyers, a courthouse, Mr. Hayes's lawyers, appeals courts, and a legal case involving Dr. Sheppard.
    *   The specific sentence is: "In their **filing**, they referred to the Supreme Court's 1966 decision overturning Dr. Sheppard's conviction..."
    *   The phrase "In their filing" refers to a document submitted by lawyers to a court.
    *   It mentions referring to a decision and making claims. This is a formal legal action involving documentation.
3.  **Evaluate the Candidate Senses**:
    *   *Sense 1 (filing%1:10:00::)*: Definition: "the entering of a legal document into the public record". Examples: "he filed a complaint", "he filed his tax return".
        *   Analysis: This sense relates to legal documents and the act of entering them into the record. In context, "In their filing" acts as a metonymy for the document itself or the specific instance of submitting the legal document (the motion/brief). The context is clearly legal (lawyers, courthouse, Supreme Court decision). This fits the legal domain perfectly.
    *   *Sense 2 (filing%1:17:00::)*: Definition: "a fragment rubbed off by the use of a file".
        *   Analysis: This is a physical shaving of metal/wood. The context is about legal proceedings, not carpentry or metalwork. Incorrect.
    *   *Sense 3 (filing%1:04:01::)*: Definition: "the act of using a file (as in shaping or smoothing an object)".
        *   Analysis: This refers to the action of smoothing something. Again, wrong domain. Incorrect.
    *   *Sense 4 (filing%1:04:00::)*: Definition: "preservation and methodical arrangement as of documents and papers etc.". Examples: "I have some filing to do".
        *   Analysis: This refers to office organization (putting papers in folders). While lawyers do this, the context "In their filing, they referred to..." implies a specific legal submission (a brief or motion), not the act of organizing papers in a cabinet. It refers to the content of the submission, not the storage system.
4.  **Select the Best Sense**:
    *   Sense 1 captures the legal nature of the submission. Even though the gloss emphasizes the *act* of entering, the usage "In their filing" usually refers to the document submitted (the result of the act of filing) or the instance of the act. In WordNet, sense 1 covers "he filed a complaint" -> "filing a complaint". The context "In their filing" refers to the legal document submitted to the court. This aligns closest with Sense 1 compared to the others (metal shavings, smoothing objects, or organizing papers in a drawer).
    *   The gloss for Sense 1 says "the entering of a legal document...". In usage, "a filing" often counts as the document itself (metonymy). The legal context makes this the only viable option among the four.

    Let's double-check Sense 4. Is "filing" used as "the document"? Sense 4 is "preservation and methodical arrangement". That's the administrative task. Sense 1 is "the entering of a legal document". In legal English, a "filing" is a document submitted to the court. Sense 1 is the intended legal sense.

    Therefore, Sense 1 is the correct choice.

5.  **Format Output**: Return JSON {"sense_index": 1}.


attempt_kind: initial

status: success

[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: supreme_court
Target surface form: Supreme Court
Context:
"The daily crush of media tweets, cameras and reporters outside the courthouse," the lawyers wrote, "was unlike anything ever seen here in New Haven and maybe statewide." Their focus on the Twitter coverage is controversial. In interviews, some journalists said the claim that instant news was more incendiary than reports delivered more slowly was a Luddite view that would make poor court policy governing coverage of future trials. But some lawyers said appeals courts were often attracted to arguments that social and technological changes required adaptation by the courts. Mr. Hayes's lawyers are pressing that claim. In their filing, they referred to the <t>Supreme Court</t>'s 1966 decision overturning Dr. Sheppard's conviction because of the trial coverage and made it clear they would claim that the new media required new rules. "This case," they wrote, "represents the Sheppard v. Maxwell of the 21st century."

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=supreme_court%1:14:00:: | definition=the highest federal court in the United States; has final appellate jurisdiction and has jurisdiction over all other courts in the nation | synonyms=Supreme Court of the United States, United States Supreme Court
2. sense_key=supreme_court%1:14:01:: | definition=the highest court in most states of the United States | synonyms=state supreme court, high court

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

raw_output:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

finish_reason: stop

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

role: assistant

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the target lemma and surface form:**
    *   Target lemma: `supreme_court`
    *   Target surface form: `Supreme Court`

2.  **Analyze the context:**
    *   The text discusses a legal case in New Haven (Connecticut context implied).
    *   Lawyers are filing something regarding media coverage (tweets, cameras) affecting a trial.
    *   The crucial sentence: "In their filing, they referred to the <t>Supreme Court</t>'s 1966 decision overturning Dr. Sheppard's conviction..."
    *   Historical Fact Check: The Sheppard v. Maxwell case.
    *   Sheppard v. Maxwell (1966) was a decision by the *Supreme Court of the United States* (the federal Supreme Court). It established precedent regarding the impact of pre-trial publicity on the right to a fair trial.
    *   The lawyers are citing a famous federal case to argue for a change in policy for a current case.
    *   The text also mentions "appeals courts" generally, but the specific citation "1966 decision overturning Dr. Sheppard's conviction" points definitively to the federal entity.

3.  **Analyze the candidate senses:**
    *   **Sense 1:** "the highest federal court in the United States; has final appellate jurisdiction..." (Synonyms: Supreme Court of the United States, United States Supreme Court).
    *   **Sense 2:** "the highest court in most states of the United States" (Synonyms: state supreme court, high court).

4.  **Evaluate the fit:**
    *   The context explicitly mentions the "1966 decision overturning Dr. Sheppard's conviction".
    *   Sheppard v. Maxwell was decided by the US Supreme Court (federal).
    *   Therefore, the reference is to the highest federal court, not a state supreme court (even though the case might be happening in a state context like New Haven, CT, the precedent cited is federal).
    *   Sense 1 is the correct fit.

5.  **Formulate the output:**
    *   The instruction asks to return a JSON object `{"sense_index": X}`.
    *   Do not return the sense key.
    *   Sense 1 corresponds to index 1.

    Wait, let me double check the indexing in the prompt.
    Candidate senses are numbered 1 and 2.
    1. `supreme_court%1:14:00::` -> Federal Supreme Court.
    2. `supreme_court%1:14:01::` -> State Supreme Court.

    The context refers to the 1966 Sheppard decision. This is a US Supreme Court case.
    Therefore, Sense 1 is correct.

    JSON: `{"sense_index": 1}`

format: unknown

native_finish_reason: stop

provider: Friendli

currency: USD


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: decision
Target surface form: decision
Context:
"The daily crush of media tweets, cameras and reporters outside the courthouse," the lawyers wrote, "was unlike anything ever seen here in New Haven and maybe statewide." Their focus on the Twitter coverage is controversial. In interviews, some journalists said the claim that instant news was more incendiary than reports delivered more slowly was a Luddite view that would make poor court policy governing coverage of future trials. But some lawyers said appeals courts were often attracted to arguments that social and technological changes required adaptation by the courts. Mr. Hayes's lawyers are pressing that claim. In their filing, they referred to the Supreme Court's 1966 <t>decision</t> overturning Dr. Sheppard's conviction because of the trial coverage and made it clear they would claim that the new media required new rules. "This case," they wrote, "represents the Sheppard v. Maxwell of the 21st century."

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=decision%1:04:00:: | definition=the act of making up your mind about something | synonyms=determination, conclusion | examples=the burden of decision was his; he drew his conclusions quickly
2. sense_key=decision%1:09:00:: | definition=a position or opinion or judgment reached after consideration | synonyms=determination, conclusion | examples=a decision unfavorable to the opposition; his conclusion took the evidence into account
3. sense_key=decision%1:11:02:: | definition=(boxing) a victory won on points when no knockout has occurred | examples=had little trouble in taking a unanimous decision over his opponent
4. sense_key=decision%1:11:01:: | definition=the outcome of a game or contest | examples=the team dropped three decisions in a row
5. sense_key=decision%1:07:00:: | definition=the trait of resoluteness as evidenced by firmness of character or purpose | synonyms=decisiveness | examples=a man of unusual decisiveness

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
I need to determine which WordNet sense of "decision" best fits the context.

Let me analyze the context:
"In their filing, they referred to the Supreme Court's 1966 decision overturning Dr. Sheppard's conviction because of the trial coverage..."

The "decision" here refers to a ruling made by the Supreme Court. This is a formal legal ruling/judgment after consideration of a case.

Let me look at the candidate senses:

1. sense_key=decision%1:04:00:: | definition=the act of making up your mind about something | synonyms=determination, conclusion | examples="the burden of decision was his; he drew his conclusions quickly"
   - This refers to the act/ process of deciding, not the formal outcome or ruling.

2. sense_key=decision%1:09:00:: | definition=a position or opinion or judgment reached after consideration | synonyms=determination, conclusion | examples="a decision unfavorable to the opposition; his conclusion took the evidence into account"
   - This refers to a judgment/position reached after consideration. A Supreme Court decision is a judgment/ruling reached after consideration of the case. This fits well.

3. sense_key=decision%1:11:02:: | definition=(boxing) a victory won on points when no knockout has occurred
   - This is a sports/boxing-specific sense. Not relevant here.

4. sense_key=decision%1:11:01:: | definition=the outcome of a game or contest
   - This refers to sports outcomes. Not relevant here.

5. sense_key=decision%1:07:00:: | definition=the trait of resoluteness as evidenced by firmness of character or purpose | synonyms=decisiveness
   - This refers to a personality trait. Not relevant here.

The context is about a Supreme Court decision - a formal legal ruling/judgment. This is a "judgment reached after consideration" by the court, which matches sense 2 (index 2).

Sense 1 is about the act/process of deciding, while sense 2 is about the judgment/position/ruling that results from that consideration. A Supreme Court decision is the ruling itself, not the act of making the ruling.

So the answer is sense index 2.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: conviction
Target surface form: conviction
Context:
"The daily crush of media tweets, cameras and reporters outside the courthouse," the lawyers wrote, "was unlike anything ever seen here in New Haven and maybe statewide." Their focus on the Twitter coverage is controversial. In interviews, some journalists said the claim that instant news was more incendiary than reports delivered more slowly was a Luddite view that would make poor court policy governing coverage of future trials. But some lawyers said appeals courts were often attracted to arguments that social and technological changes required adaptation by the courts. Mr. Hayes's lawyers are pressing that claim. In their filing, they referred to the Supreme Court's 1966 decision overturning Dr. Sheppard's <t>conviction</t> because of the trial coverage and made it clear they would claim that the new media required new rules. "This case," they wrote, "represents the Sheppard v. Maxwell of the 21st century."

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=conviction%1:09:00:: | definition=an unshakable belief in something without need for proof or evidence | synonyms=strong belief, article of faith
2. sense_key=conviction%1:04:00:: | definition=(criminal law) a final judgment of guilty in a criminal case and the punishment that is imposed | synonyms=judgment of conviction, condemnation, sentence | examples=the conviction came as no surprise

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the Target:** The target lemma is "conviction" (noun). The specific surface form is "conviction". The context is a legal setting discussing the overturning of a previous judgment due to media coverage.

2.  **Analyze the Context:**
    *   "The daily crush of media tweets..." (context setting: high-profile trial).
    *   "Mr. Hayes's lawyers are pressing that claim."
    *   "In their filing, they referred to the Supreme Court's 1966 decision overturning Dr. Sheppard's <t>conviction</t>..."
    *   "...because of the trial coverage..."
    *   "...overturning Dr. Sheppard's..." implies a legal decision or verdict.

3.  **Analyze the Candidate Senses:**
    *   **Sense 1:** "an unshakable belief in something without need for proof or evidence". Synonyms: strong belief, article of faith.
        *   Does this fit? Can you "overturn" a belief? You can change a belief, but "overturning a conviction" in a legal context almost exclusively refers to a legal verdict. While one could theoretically overturn an opinion in a debate, the phrase "Supreme Court's 1966 decision overturning Dr. Sheppard's..." clearly places this in the realm of jurisprudence.
    *   **Sense 2:** "(criminal law) a final judgment of guilty in a criminal case and the punishment that is imposed". Synonyms: judgment of conviction, condemnation, sentence. Examples: "the conviction came as no surprise".
        *   Does this fit? The Supreme Court overturning a legal judgment fits perfectly. Dr. Sheppard was a famous case (Sheppard v. Maxwell) involving a murder trial where the verdict was overturned due to prejudicial publicity. The context explicitly mentions "criminal law" concepts: "courthouse", "reporters", "trial coverage", "Supreme Court", "appeals courts". "Overturning a conviction" is standard legal terminology for nullifying a guilty verdict.

4.  **Compare and Decide:**
    *   The phrase "overturning Dr. Sheppard's [conviction]" is the key.
    *   Sense 2 refers to a legal judgment of guilty.
    *   Sense 1 refers to a strong personal belief.
    *   The Supreme Court overturns legal rulings, not personal beliefs (unless one stretches the metaphor, but legal texts are literal).
    *   Therefore, Sense 2 is the correct choice.

5.  **Format Output:** The user wants a JSON object with the sense index.
    *   Sense 1 -> index 1
    *   Sense 2 -> index 2

    Result: {"sense_index": 2}

provider: Baidu


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: trial
Target surface form: trial
Context:
"The daily crush of media tweets, cameras and reporters outside the courthouse," the lawyers wrote, "was unlike anything ever seen here in New Haven and maybe statewide." Their focus on the Twitter coverage is controversial. In interviews, some journalists said the claim that instant news was more incendiary than reports delivered more slowly was a Luddite view that would make poor court policy governing coverage of future trials. But some lawyers said appeals courts were often attracted to arguments that social and technological changes required adaptation by the courts. Mr. Hayes's lawyers are pressing that claim. In their filing, they referred to the Supreme Court's 1966 decision overturning Dr. Sheppard's conviction because of the <t>trial</t> coverage and made it clear they would claim that the new media required new rules. "This case," they wrote, "represents the Sheppard v. Maxwell of the 21st century."

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=trial%1:04:00:: | definition=the act of testing something | synonyms=test, run | examples=in the experimental trials the amount of carbon was measured separately; he called each flip of the coin a new trial
2. sense_key=trial%1:09:00:: | definition=trying something to find out about it | synonyms=trial run, test, tryout | examples=a sample for ten days free trial; a trial of progesterone failed to relieve the pain
3. sense_key=trial%1:04:03:: | definition=the act of undergoing testing | synonyms=test | examples=he survived the great test of battle; candidates must compete in a trial of skill
4. sense_key=trial%1:04:02:: | definition=(law) the determination of a person's innocence or guilt by due process of law | examples=he had a fair trial and the jury found him guilty; most of these complaints are settled before they go to trial
5. sense_key=trial%1:11:01:: | definition=(sports) a preliminary competition to determine qualifications | examples=the trials for the semifinals began yesterday
6. sense_key=trial%1:11:00:: | definition=an annoying or frustrating or catastrophic event | synonyms=tribulation, visitation | examples=his mother-in-law's visits were a great trial for him; life is full of tribulations

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the context**: The text talks about "lawyers," "courthouse," "court policy," "Mr. Hayes's lawyers," "Supreme Court's 1966 decision," "overturning Dr. Sheppard's conviction," "innocence or guilt," and "future trials." The specific sentence mentions "coverage of future trials" and "the trial coverage." The entire context revolves around legal proceedings.

2.  **Analyze the candidate senses**:
    *   Sense 1: "the act of testing something" (e.g., scientific experiment). Not fitting the legal context.
    *   Sense 2: "trying something to find out about it" (e.g., trial period for software). Not fitting the legal context.
    *   Sense 3: "the act of undergoing testing" (e.g., trial of skill/battle). Not fitting the legal context.
    *   Sense 4: "(law) the determination of a person's innocence or guilt by due process of law" (e.g., fair trial). This perfectly matches the context of a courthouse, lawyers, convictions, and the Supreme Court.
    *   Sense 5: "(sports) a preliminary competition." Not relevant.
    *   Sense 6: "an annoying or frustrating or catastrophic event." Not relevant.

3.  **Select the best sense**: The context is explicitly about legal proceedings (the Sheppard case, overturning convictions, courthouse). Therefore, the legal definition of "trial" is the correct one. This corresponds to Sense 4.

4.  **Format the output**: The user requested a JSON object: `{"sense_index": 4}`.

provider: AtlasCloud


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: coverage
Target surface form: coverage
Context:
"The daily crush of media tweets, cameras and reporters outside the courthouse," the lawyers wrote, "was unlike anything ever seen here in New Haven and maybe statewide." Their focus on the Twitter coverage is controversial. In interviews, some journalists said the claim that instant news was more incendiary than reports delivered more slowly was a Luddite view that would make poor court policy governing coverage of future trials. But some lawyers said appeals courts were often attracted to arguments that social and technological changes required adaptation by the courts. Mr. Hayes's lawyers are pressing that claim. In their filing, they referred to the Supreme Court's 1966 decision overturning Dr. Sheppard's conviction because of the trial <t>coverage</t> and made it clear they would claim that the new media required new rules. "This case," they wrote, "represents the Sheppard v. Maxwell of the 21st century."

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=coverage%1:21:00:: | definition=the total amount and type of insurance carried | synonyms=insurance coverage
2. sense_key=coverage%1:07:00:: | definition=the extent to which something is covered | examples=the dictionary's coverage of standard English is excellent
3. sense_key=coverage%1:10:00:: | definition=the news as presented by reporters for newspapers or radio or television | synonyms=reporting, reportage | examples=they accused the paper of biased coverage of race relations

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the Target Lemma and Context:**
    *   Target Lemma: `coverage`
    *   Context Summary: The text discusses a legal case (Mr. Hayes) and the media environment surrounding the trial (tweets, cameras, reporters). It mentions "Twitter coverage," "reports delivered more slowly," "court policy governing coverage of future trials," and "trial coverage." It compares the situation to the Sheppard v. Maxwell case, which was about media influence on a trial.
    *   Key phrases indicating sense: "media tweets," "reporters," "news," "biased coverage" (mentioned in the candidate example, but conceptually similar here), "newspapers or radio or television" (implied by the nature of the coverage).

2.  **Analyze the Candidate Senses:**

    *   **Sense 1:** `coverage%1:21:00::`
        *   Definition: "the total amount and type of insurance carried"
        *   Synonyms: "insurance coverage"
        *   Fit: This context is about a legal trial and media, not insurance. This sense is incorrect.

    *   **Sense 2:** `coverage%1:07:00::`
        *   Definition: "the extent to which something is covered"
        *   Example: "the dictionary's coverage of standard English is excellent"
        *   Fit: This sense refers to scope or inclusiveness (e.g., how many words are in a dictionary, or how much area a blanket covers). While the text discusses the *intensity* of the media ("daily crush"), the primary meaning here is the act of reporting/news presentation, not the extent of a range or area. "Trial coverage" refers to the reporting *of* the trial, not the percentage of the trial that was observed.

    *   **Sense 3:** `coverage%1:10:00::`
        *   Definition: "the news as presented by reporters for newspapers or radio or television"
        *   Synonyms: "reporting, reportage"
        *   Example: "they accused the paper of biased coverage of race relations"
        *   Fit: The context is explicitly about media (tweets, cameras, reporters), news, and how the trial is being reported. Phrases like "Twitter coverage," "trial coverage," and the reference to the Supreme Court decision regarding media influence align perfectly with "the news as presented by reporters." The synonyms "reporting" and "reportage" match the activity described (tweets, reports delivered).

3.  **Select the Best Sense:**
    *   Sense 3 is clearly the correct choice. The text is about journalistic coverage of a trial.

4.  **Format Output:**
    *   The user wants a JSON object: `{"sense_index": 3}`.

provider: Novita


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: rule
Target surface form: rules
Context:
"The daily crush of media tweets, cameras and reporters outside the courthouse," the lawyers wrote, "was unlike anything ever seen here in New Haven and maybe statewide." Their focus on the Twitter coverage is controversial. In interviews, some journalists said the claim that instant news was more incendiary than reports delivered more slowly was a Luddite view that would make poor court policy governing coverage of future trials. But some lawyers said appeals courts were often attracted to arguments that social and technological changes required adaptation by the courts. Mr. Hayes's lawyers are pressing that claim. In their filing, they referred to the Supreme Court's 1966 decision overturning Dr. Sheppard's conviction because of the trial coverage and made it clear they would claim that the new media required new <t>rules</t>. "This case," they wrote, "represents the Sheppard v. Maxwell of the 21st century."

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=rule%1:09:00:: | definition=a principle or condition that customarily governs behavior | synonyms=regulation | examples=it was his rule to take a walk before breakfast; short haircuts were the regulation
2. sense_key=rule%1:09:01:: | definition=something regarded as a normative example | synonyms=convention, normal, pattern, formula | examples=the convention of not naming the main character; violence is the rule not the exception
3. sense_key=rule%1:10:00:: | definition=prescribed guide for conduct or action | synonyms=prescript
4. sense_key=rule%1:10:01:: | definition=(linguistics) a rule describing (or prescribing) a linguistic practice | synonyms=linguistic rule
5. sense_key=rule%1:09:03:: | definition=a basic generalization that is accepted as true and that can be used as a basis for reasoning or conduct | synonyms=principle | examples=their principles of composition characterized all their works
6. sense_key=rule%1:28:00:: | definition=the duration of a monarch's or government's power | examples=during the rule of Elizabeth
7. sense_key=rule%1:26:00:: | definition=dominance or power through legal authority | synonyms=dominion | examples=France held undisputed dominion over vast areas of Africa; the rule of Caesar
8. sense_key=rule%1:10:02:: | definition=directions that define the way a game or sport is to be conducted | examples=he knew the rules of chess
9. sense_key=rule%1:10:03:: | definition=any one of a systematic body of regulations defining the way of life of members of a religious order | examples=the rule of St. Dominic
10. sense_key=rule%1:09:02:: | definition=a rule or law concerning a natural phenomenon or the function of a complex system | synonyms=principle | examples=the principle of the conservation of mass; the principle of jet propulsion
11. sense_key=rule%1:09:04:: | definition=(mathematics) a standard procedure for solving a class of mathematical problems | synonyms=formula | examples=he determined the upper bound with Descartes' rule of signs; he gave us a general formula for attacking polynomials
12. sense_key=rule%1:06:00:: | definition=measuring stick consisting of a strip of wood or metal or plastic with a straight edge that is used for drawing straight lines and measuring lengths | synonyms=ruler

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the Context:**
    *   Sentence: "In their filing, they referred to the Supreme Court's 1966 decision overturning Dr. Sheppard's conviction because of the trial coverage and made it clear they would claim that the new media required new <t>rules</t>."
    *   Surrounding text: The text discusses lawyers arguing about media coverage (tweets, cameras, reporters) outside a courthouse. They are comparing the current situation to a past Supreme Court case (Sheppard v. Maxwell). They argue that "new media required new rules."
    *   Meaning in context: The "rules" here refer to regulations or guidelines established by a legal authority (the court) to govern conduct (media coverage of trials). It's about setting boundaries for behavior in a legal/procedural setting.

2.  **Analyze the Candidate Senses:**

    *   **Sense 1:** `rule%1:09:00::` | definition=a principle or condition that customarily governs behavior | synonyms=regulation | examples=it was his rule to take a walk before breakfast; short haircuts were the regulation.
        *   *Analysis:* This refers to a custom or habit ("it was his rule to take a walk"). It can also mean a general regulation. The synonym "regulation" fits well. The definition "customarily governs behavior" implies habit or established custom. While close, is it "customary" or "prescribed"?

    *   **Sense 2:** `rule%1:09:01::` | definition=something regarded as a normative example | synonyms=convention, normal, pattern, formula | examples=the convention of not naming the main character...
        *   *Analysis:* This is about norms and conventions, not explicit regulations set by a court.

    *   **Sense 3:** `rule%1:10:00::` | definition=prescribed guide for conduct or action | synonyms=prescript.
        *   *Analysis:* This fits the legal context very well. Courts "prescribe" rules. It is a guide for conduct (how media should behave/cover trials). "Prescribed guide for conduct or action" matches "court policy governing coverage" mentioned in the text perfectly.

    *   **Sense 4:** `rule%1:10:01::` | definition=(linguistics) a rule describing (or prescribing) a linguistic practice...
        *   *Analysis:* Incorrect domain (linguistics).

    *   **Sense 5:** `rule%1:09:03::` | definition=a basic generalization that is accepted as true... | synonyms=principle | examples=their principles of composition...
        *   *Analysis:* This is about fundamental truths or principles, not specific legal regulations.

    *   **Senses 6 & 7:** Duration of power or dominance.
        *   *Analysis:* Incorrect meaning.

    *   **Sense 8:** `rule%1:10:02::` | definition=directions that define the way a game or sport is be conducted...
        *   *Analysis:* Wrong domain (games/sports).

    *   **Sense 9:** Religious order rules.
        *   *Analysis:* Wrong domain.

    *   **Sense 10:** Scientific rule.
        *   *Analysis:* Wrong domain.

    *   **Sense 11:** Mathematical rule.
        *   *Analysis:* Wrong domain.

    *   **Sense 12:** Measuring stick (ruler).
        *   *Analysis:* Wrong part of speech/meaning.

3.  **Compare Sense 1 and Sense 3:**
    *   Sense 1 ("a principle or condition that customarily governs behavior") often implies custom or general regulation. Example: "short haircuts were the regulation."
    *   Sense 3 ("prescribed guide for conduct or action") emphasizes the *prescriptive* nature of the rule.
    *   In the context of a court decision (Sheppard v. Maxwell) and "court policy governing coverage," the lawyers are arguing for specific *procedures* or *regulations* to be put in place by the court to handle the new media landscape. The text mentions "court policy governing coverage." "Policy" acts as a guide for conduct/action.
    *   Sense 1 is often used for "house rules" or habitual behavior.
    *   Sense 3 is the standard WordNet sense for rules made by authorities (like laws, court orders, or explicit guidelines) rather than just social customs or habits. The synonym "prescript" (authoritative direction or instruction) aligns well with a court setting.
    *   Looking at the definitions again:
        *   Sense 1: "customarily governs behavior" -> implies tradition/habit.
        *   Sense 3: "prescribed guide for conduct or action" -> implies specific instructions laid down.
    *   The lawyers want the court to *create* new rules to manage the situation. This fits the "prescribed" aspect of Sense 3 better than the "customary" aspect of Sense 1. However, Sense 1's synonym is "regulation". Let's look closer.
    *   WordNet 3.1 distinctions:
        *   1:09:00 (regulation) - "it was his rule to take a walk..." (habitual).
        *   1:10:00 (prescript) - "prescribed guide for conduct or action".
    *   Context: "new media required new rules." These aren't customary habits yet; they are proposed regulations/guidelines for action.
    *   Let's check the examples for Sense 1: "it was his rule to take a walk". This leans towards personal habit. "short haircuts were the regulation" leans towards a general rule.
    *   Sense 3 definition: "prescribed guide for conduct or action". This is very broad and fits legal rules, administrative rules, etc.
    *   The text explicitly mentions "court policy governing coverage". Policy/Prescript/Sense 3 seems the best fit for formal, authoritative regulations established by an institution.

    *   Let's verify if Sense 1 is better. Sometimes Sense 1 is the catch-all for "regulation". But the "customarily" part of the gloss is a distractor for this specific context. Courts don't "customarily" set rules in the sense of tradition; they *prescribe* them.
    *   Sense 3 is the correct fit for *rules of court* or specific directives.

    Let's refine the choice between 1 and 3.
    - Sense 1 (regulation) is defined as "a principle or condition that customarily governs behavior". The key word "customarily" makes it sound like established tradition ("house rules").
    - Sense 3 (prescript) is defined as "prescribed guide for conduct or action". This fits the legal context where rules are *prescribed* by an authority (the court) to govern specific conduct (media coverage).

    Therefore, Sense 3 is the precise match for legal or procedural rules established by an authority.

4.  **Final Selection:** Sense 3.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: case
Target surface form: case
Context:
Their focus on the Twitter coverage is controversial. In interviews, some journalists said the claim that instant news was more incendiary than reports delivered more slowly was a Luddite view that would make poor court policy governing coverage of future trials. But some lawyers said appeals courts were often attracted to arguments that social and technological changes required adaptation by the courts. Mr. Hayes's lawyers are pressing that claim. In their filing, they referred to the Supreme Court's 1966 decision overturning Dr. Sheppard's conviction because of the trial coverage and made it clear they would claim that the new media required new rules. "This <t>case</t>," they wrote, "represents the Sheppard v. Maxwell of the 21st century."

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=case%1:11:00:: | definition=an occurrence of something | synonyms=instance, example | examples=it was a case of bad judgment; another instance occurred yesterday
2. sense_key=case%1:26:00:: | definition=a special set of circumstances | synonyms=event | examples=in that event, the first possibility is excluded; it may rain in which case the picnic will be canceled
3. sense_key=case%1:04:00:: | definition=a comprehensive term for any proceeding in a court of law whereby an individual seeks a legal remedy | synonyms=lawsuit, suit, cause, causa | examples=the family brought suit against the landlord
4. sense_key=case%1:09:00:: | definition=the actual state of things | examples=that was not the case
5. sense_key=case%1:06:00:: | definition=a portable container for carrying several objects | examples=the musicians left their instrument cases backstage
6. sense_key=case%1:18:03:: | definition=a person requiring professional services | examples=a typical case was the suburban housewife described by a marriage counselor
7. sense_key=case%1:18:02:: | definition=a person who is subjected to experimental or other observational procedures; someone who is an object of investigation | synonyms=subject, guinea pig | examples=the subjects for this investigation were selected randomly; the cases that we studied were drawn from two different communities
8. sense_key=case%1:10:02:: | definition=a problem requiring investigation | examples=Perry Mason solved the case of the missing heir
9. sense_key=case%1:10:01:: | definition=a statement of facts and reasons used to support an argument | examples=he stated his case clearly
10. sense_key=case%1:23:00:: | definition=the quantity contained in a case | synonyms=caseful
11. sense_key=case%1:10:00:: | definition=nouns or pronouns or adjectives (often marked by inflection) related in some way to other words in a sentence | synonyms=grammatical case
12. sense_key=case%1:26:02:: | definition=a specific state of mind that is temporary | examples=a case of the jitters
13. sense_key=case%1:18:04:: | definition=a person of a specified kind (usually with many eccentricities) | synonyms=character, eccentric, type | examples=a real character; a strange character
14. sense_key=case%1:10:03:: | definition=a specific size and style of type within a type family | synonyms=font, fount, typeface, face
15. sense_key=case%1:08:00:: | definition=an enveloping structure or covering enclosing an animal or plant organ or part | synonyms=sheath
16. sense_key=case%1:06:06:: | definition=the housing or outer covering of something | synonyms=shell, casing | examples=the clock has a walnut case
17. sense_key=case%1:06:07:: | definition=the enclosing frame around a door or window opening | synonyms=casing | examples=the casings had rotted away and had to be replaced
18. sense_key=case%1:06:03:: | definition=(printing) the receptacle in which a compositor has his type, which is divided into compartments for the different letters, spaces, or numbers | synonyms=compositor's case, typesetter's case | examples=for English, a compositor will ordinarily have two such cases, the upper case containing the capitals and the lower case containing the small letters
19. sense_key=case%1:06:02:: | definition=bed linen consisting of a cover for a pillow | synonyms=pillowcase, slip, pillow slip | examples=the burglar carried his loot in a pillowcase
20. sense_key=case%1:06:01:: | definition=a glass container used to store and display items in a shop or museum or home | synonyms=display case, showcase, vitrine

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the Target Word and Context:**
    *   Target Lemma: `case`
    *   Target Surface Form: `case`
    *   Context Sentence: "This **case**," they wrote, "represents the Sheppard v. Maxwell of the 21st century."
    *   Broader Context: The text discusses "court policy," "future trials," "appeals courts," "Mr. Hayes's lawyers," "Supreme Court... decision," "overturning Dr. Sheppard's conviction." The specific sentence is a quote from lawyers filing a legal document.

2.  **Analyze the Candidate Senses:**

    *   1: "an occurrence of something" (instance, example). Not fitting. This is a specific legal proceeding.
    *   2: "a special set of circumstances" (event). Not fitting. This refers to a legal matter, not just an event like rain.
    *   3: "a comprehensive term for any proceeding in a court of law whereby an individual seeks a legal remedy" (lawsuit, suit, cause, causa). This looks very promising. "Sheppard v. Maxwell" is a famous Supreme Court case (lawsuit/legal proceeding). The quote compares the current situation ("This case") to the Sheppard case.
    *   4: "the actual state of things". Not fitting.
    *   5: "a portable container". Not fitting.
    *   6: "a person requiring professional services". Not fitting.
    *   7: "a person who is subjected to experimental... procedures". Not fitting.
    *   8: "a problem requiring investigation". While a legal case involves investigation, sense 3 is much more specific to the context of courts, trials, and lawyers mentioned in the text. However, sometimes "case" in legal contexts is mapped to "problem requiring investigation" (like Perry Mason examples). Let's compare Sense 3 and Sense 8.
        *   Sense 3 examples: "the family brought suit against the landlord".
        *   Sense 8 examples: "Perry Mason solved the case of the missing heir".
    *   9: "a statement of facts and reasons used to support an argument". Lawyers make a "case," but here "This case" refers to the entity/affair itself, the legal proceeding, not just the argument.
    *   10: "quantity contained in a case". No.
    *   11: "grammatical case". No.
    *   12: "a specific state of mind". No.
    *   13: "a person of a specified kind". No.
    *   14: "a specific size and style of type". No.
    *   15: "an enveloping structure". No.
    *   16: "the housing or outer covering". No.
    *   17: "the enclosing frame". No.
    *   18: "the receptacle in which a compositor has his type". No.
    *   19: "bed linen". No.
    *   20: "a glass container". No.

3.  **Disambiguate between Sense 3 and Sense 8 (and potentially Sense 1):**

    *   The context is heavily legal: "court policy," "trials," "appeals courts," "lawyers," "Supreme Court," "conviction."
    *   The sentence refers to "Sheppard v. Maxwell". This is the name of a specific Supreme Court decision/lawsuit.
    *   "This case" refers to the specific legal proceeding involving Mr. Hayes.
    *   Sense 3 definition: "a comprehensive term for any proceeding in a court of law whereby an individual seeks a legal remedy". Synonyms include "lawsuit", "suit". This matches perfectly. Mr. Hayes's lawyers are pressing a claim in a legal proceeding.
    *   Sense 8 definition: "a problem requiring investigation". Example: "Perry Mason solved the case...". In mystery novels, "the case" is often the problem to be solved. In legal contexts, it can overlap. However, the explicit mention of "proceeding in a court of law" in Sense 3's definition aligns better with "future trials", "appeals courts", and the Supreme Court decision.
    *   Sense 1 is too general ("occurrence of something").

    *   Let's look closer at Sense 3 vs Sense 8 in WordNet.
    *   Sense 3 (`case%1:04:00::`) is under the hierarchy of `act` (via `legal proceeding` -> `proceeding`).
    *   Sense 8 (`case%1:10:02::`) is under the hierarchy of `problem`.

    *   "This case" refers to the legal entity/lawsuit that Mr. Hayes is involved in. It is being compared to *Sheppard v. Maxwell*, which is a famous legal case (proceeding). Therefore, it is a legal proceeding, not just an abstract problem.
    *   The definition for Sense 3: "a comprehensive term for any proceeding in a court of law..." is the most precise definition for "case" in the context of "appeals courts", "trials", "Supreme Court decision".

4.  **Final Selection:** Sense 3.

    *   Target: "This **case**..."
    *   Context: Legal proceeding involving Mr. Hayes, compared to Sheppard v. Maxwell.
    *   Sense 3: "proceeding in a court of law".

    This is the correct sense.

provider: StreamLake


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: century
Target surface form: century
Context:
Their focus on the Twitter coverage is controversial. In interviews, some journalists said the claim that instant news was more incendiary than reports delivered more slowly was a Luddite view that would make poor court policy governing coverage of future trials. But some lawyers said appeals courts were often attracted to arguments that social and technological changes required adaptation by the courts. Mr. Hayes's lawyers are pressing that claim. In their filing, they referred to the Supreme Court's 1966 decision overturning Dr. Sheppard's conviction because of the trial coverage and made it clear they would claim that the new media required new rules. "This case," they wrote, "represents the Sheppard v. Maxwell of the 21st <t>century</t>."

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=century%1:28:00:: | definition=a period of 100 years
2. sense_key=century%1:23:00:: | definition=ten 10s | synonyms=hundred, 100, C, one C

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the target word and context:**
    *   Target lemma: "century"
    *   Target surface form: "century"
    *   Context snippet: "This case represents the Sheppard v. Maxwell of the 21st century."
    *   Full context analysis: The text discusses legal arguments regarding media coverage (Twitter vs. traditional) and how courts adapt to technological changes. The specific sentence mentions the "21st century" in comparison to a 1966 Supreme Court decision (which happened in the 20th century).

2.  **Analyze the candidate senses:**
    *   Sense 1: `century%1:28:00::` | Definition: "a period of 100 years"
    *   Sense 2: `century%1:23:00::` | Definition: "ten 10s" | Synonyms: hundred, 100, C, one C. (This is the numerical value sense).

3.  **Disambiguate:**
    *   The phrase "21st century" refers to the specific period of 100 years following the 20th century (specifically the years 2001-2100).
    *   Does it refer to the number 100 (as in a cricket score or a count)? No.
    *   Does it refer to a period of time? Yes.
    *   The context contrasts the current era (21st century) with the era of the Sheppard v. Maxwell case (1966). This fits the definition of "a period of 100 years".

4.  **Match to indexed senses:**
    *   Sense 1 corresponds to "a period of 100 years".
    *   Sense 2 corresponds to the number 100.

5.  **Conclusion:**
    *   The phrase "21st century" clearly denotes a time period.
    *   Sense 1 is the correct choice.

6.  **Format the output:**
    *   JSON format required: `{"sense_index": 1}`

provider: Chutes


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: fraud
Target surface form: fraud
Context:
Sport and <t>fraud</t> law Tricks such as those of Alonso and Ramos before the Ajax demonstrate wittiness but not the will to get remove of a sanction.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=fraud%1:04:00:: | definition=intentional deception resulting in injury to another person
2. sense_key=fraud%1:18:00:: | definition=a person who makes deceitful pretenses | synonyms=imposter, impostor, pretender, fake, faker, sham
3. sense_key=fraud%1:04:01:: | definition=something intended to deceive; deliberate trickery intended to gain an advantage | synonyms=fraudulence, dupery, hoax, humbug, put-on

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

raw_output:
```json
{"sense_index": 3}
```

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 3}
```

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the Request:**
    *   Target lemma: `fraud`
    *   Context: "Sport and <t>fraud</t> law Tricks such as those of Alonso and Ramos before the Ajax demonstrate wittiness but not the will to get remove of a sanction."
    *   Candidate senses:
        1.  `fraud%1:04:00::` (intentional deception resulting in injury...)
        2.  `fraud%1:18:00::` (a person who makes deceitful pretenses...)
        3.  `fraud%1:04:01::` (something intended to deceive; deliberate trickery...)
    *   Constraint: Choose single best indexed sense. No hedging. Return JSON `{"sense_index": X}`.

2.  **Analyze the Context:**
    *   Sentence: "Sport and fraud law..."
    *   The phrase "Sport and fraud law" suggests a legal category or a domain of regulation. Just like "Contract law" or "Criminal law", "fraud law" refers to the body of laws regarding fraud.
    *   However, the sentence continues: "Tricks such as those of Alonso and Ramos before the Ajax demonstrate wittiness but not the will to get remove of a sanction."
    *   This context refers to a specific incident in football (soccer) where players (Xabi Alonso, Sergio Ramos) deliberately got yellow cards to reset their yellow card count before a knockout stage (likely Champions League vs Ajax). This is often termed "tactical fouling" or getting a "tactical yellow card". Some commentators equated this to "fraud" or unsportsmanlike conduct.
    *   Let's look at the candidates.

3.  **Evaluate Candidate Senses:**

    *   **Sense 1: `fraud%1:04:00::` (intentional deception resulting in injury to another person)**
        *   This is the legal definition of fraud (wrongful or criminal deception intended to result in financial or personal gain).
        *   "Fraud law" usually refers to this concept (legal statutes against fraud).
        *   However, does "fraud law" in "Sport and fraud law" refer to the legal crime of fraud? Or is it a misinterpretation of the phrase structure?
        *   Let's re-read the source context carefully. The text seems to be a translation or a slightly non-native English phrasing.
        *   "Sport and fraud law" -> Is it a list? "Sport [law] and fraud law"? Or is "fraud" modifying "law"?
        *   The specific incident mentioned (Alonso/Ramos tricks) involves deliberate deception to gain an advantage (wiping the slate clean for the next round).
        *   Is it a "person" (Sense 2)? No, it's a concept/action.
        *   Is it "something intended to deceive" (Sense 3)? Yes, the "tricks" were intended to deceive the referee or the system.
        *   Let's compare Sense 1 and Sense 3.
        *   Sense 1 emphasizes "injury to another person" (often financial/legal).
        *   Sense 3 emphasizes "something intended to deceive; deliberate trickery intended to gain an advantage". Synonyms: fraudulence, dupery, hoax, humbug.
        *   The context talks about "Tricks". The context describes the actions as "wittiness".
        *   In sports, "fraud" is often used loosely to describe "trickery" or "unsportsmanlike deception" rather than the criminal legal definition (Sense 1), though "fraud law" implies a body of regulations.
        *   However, look at the phrasing: "Sport and fraud law". This sounds like a specific domain title. In many civil law countries, "Sport Law" and "Fraud Law" are distinct. But "Sport and fraud law" appears to be a specific topic or article title regarding the intersection or the comparison of tricks vs laws.
        *   Actually, looking at the specific example: Alonso and Ramos getting yellow cards on purpose. This is a deliberate trick to gain an advantage (clean record for knockouts). This fits "deliberate trickery intended to gain an advantage" (Sense 3).
        *   But the target word is specifically in the phrase "Sport and fraud law". Here, "fraud" is acting as a noun adjunct modifying "law", or it's a compound subject "Sport and fraud" modifying "law"? No, usually "fraud law" refers to the laws concerning *fraud* (Sense 1 - the crime).
        *   However, the sentence following says: "Tricks... demonstrate wittiness but not the will to get remove of a sanction." This implies the "fraud" being discussed is the "trick" itself, or the comparison to the legal concept.
        *   Let's look closer at Sense 3. Sense 3 synonyms are "hoax, humbug". The definition is "something intended to deceive". The action of Ramos/Alonso was a "trick" (fraud).
        *   If the sentence meant "Laws regarding fraud", it uses Sense 1 (the abstract concept of criminal deception).
        *   If the sentence is using "fraud" to label the specific action (The trick itself), it uses Sense 3. "That goal was a fraud!" "The yellow card was a fraud!"
        *   Context: "Sport and fraud law". This looks like a section header or topic.
        *   The sentence continues: "Tricks such as those... demonstrate...".
        *   Is "fraud" here referring to the *crime* (Sense 1) or the *act of deception/trickery* (Sense 3)?
        *   Sense 3 includes synonyms like "dupery" and "hoax". "Something intended to deceive".
        *   In sports commentary, these actions are often called "fraud" in the sense of "trickery" or "deceit" (Sense 3), rather than the crime of fraud (Sense 1), although they are often discussed in relation to rules/laws.
        *   However, if the phrase is "fraud law", it refers to the law regarding the *concept* of fraud.
        *   Let's check the definitions again.
        *   Sense 1: Intentional deception resulting in injury. (The legal/crime concept).
        *   Sense 3: Something intended to deceive; deliberate trickery. (The act/trick itself).
        *   If the text says "Sport and fraud law", it is grouping "Sport law" and "Fraud law". "Fraud law" defines the legal boundaries of "fraud" (Sense 1).
        *   *Correction*: The source text might be "Sport and fraud: Law tricks..." or something similar, but based on the provided text "Sport and fraud law", it seems to be discussing the legal aspect.
        *   Let's reconsider the specific incident. The incident is about *deception* to gain an advantage.
        *   Sense 3 definition: "something intended to deceive; deliberate trickery intended to gain an advantage". The synonyms "humbug, put-on" fit the "wittiness/trick" aspect of the Alonso/Ramos incident (a "put-on" or a "fake" foul).
        *   Sense 1 definition: "intentional deception resulting in injury to another person". While true in a broad sense, "injury" usually implies legal damages in this sense (the criminal fraud sense). The context mentions "not the will to get remove of a sanction", implying they *wanted* the sanction (yellow card) but for a deceptive purpose.
        *   Crucially, WordNet Sense 3 is often the "act of deceiving" or "trickery" sense, whereas Sense 1 is the "crime" sense. The context discusses "Tricks".
        *   Let's look at the collocation. "Sport and fraud law". This could be "Sport [law] and fraud law". If so, fraud is the domain of the law. Laws regulate *intentional deception resulting in injury* (Sense 1).
        *   However, the immediate discourse following ("Tricks such as those...") describes the act.
        *   Let's assume the text is not standard native English ("get remove of a sanction" is odd).
        *   If the author equates the "tricks" to "fraud", they are calling the tricks "fraud". "These tricks are fraud."
        *   If "fraud" = "tricks" (deliberate trickery intended to gain an advantage), then Sense 3 is the perfect fit.
        *   If "fraud" = "legal concept of deception", Sense 1 fits better for "fraud law".
        *   Let's look at the provided sentence again. "Sport and fraud law". Is it a list: "Sport" and "Fraud law"? Or "Sport and fraud" law? It's ambiguous.
        *   But look at the continuation: "Tricks such as those of Alonso and Ramos... demonstrate wittiness...".
        *   The text is comparing/analyzing the tricks.
        *   Common usage in this specific discourse (football tactical fouls): The act is considered a form of "fraud" (deception) on the game.
        *   Which sense captures "deliberate trickery intended to gain an advantage"? Sense 3.
        *   Which sense captures "intentional deception resulting in injury"? Sense 1.
        *   The "advantage" (Sense 3) is key here. They gained a competitive advantage (wiped slate). "Injury" (Sense 1) is harder to prove in a sports context unless we force the legal interpretation. The text seems to be discussing the *nature* of the act ("Tricks... wittiness"), aligning with "trickery" (Sense 3) rather than the strict legal "injury" definition (Sense 1).
        *   Furthermore, Sense 3 is defined as "something intended to deceive". The acts of Alonso and Ramos were specific "things" (actions) intended to deceive the referee.
        *   Therefore, Sense 3 seems more applicable to the specific description of the tricks as fraud.
        *   However, is the target word `fraud` functioning as the noun in the phrase "fraud law"?
        *   In "fraud law", "fraud" acts as a classifier. It refers to the *concept* of fraud. The legal concept is usually Sense 1.
        *   Let's check if there is a specific sense for "fraud" as "trickery".
        *   WordNet 3.1:
            *   fraud (n) 1: intentional deception... (Sense 1:04:00)
            *   fraud (n) 2: a person who... (Sense 1:18:00)
            *   fraud (n) 3: something intended to deceive... (Sense 1:04:01)
        *   In "fraud law", does it mean "Law against trickery"? Or "Law against deceptive injury"?
        *   Usually, "fraud law" deals with the crime (Sense 1).
        *   BUT, let's look at the sentence flow. "Sport and fraud law Tricks such as those..."
        *   Could it be: "Sport and fraud [in] law"? Or "Sport and fraud: Law tricks..."?
        *   Or is the target simply the word "fraud" in the phrase "fraud law"?
        *   If I interpret the context as "Sport and fraud law", and the topic is the "tricks" of Alonso/Ramos, the text is likely using "fraud" to describe the *tricks*.
        *   "Sport and fraud law" -> This might be a translation of "Sports law and fraud".
        *   Let's assume the prompt asks for the sense of the word *as used*. If the phrase is "fraud law", it means laws about fraud.
        *   However, Sense 3 "deliberate trickery" fits the description of the Alonso/Ramos action perfectly ("Tricks... gain an advantage").
        *   Sense 1 fits the legal domain name better.
        *   Let's look at the definition details. Sense 1: "injury to another person". Sense 3: "gain an advantage".
        *   In sports, tactical fouls are "intended to gain an advantage". They are "something intended to deceive". This matches Sense 3 perfectly.
        *   While "fraud law" implies a legal framework (Sense 1), the context immediately discusses "Tricks" which are "wittiness".
        *   If the sentence were "This is a case of fraud," Sense 3 fits better for a trick/hoax.
        *   If the sentence were "He was convicted of fraud," Sense 1 fits better.
        *   Here, "fraud" is in the phrase "fraud law". But the surrounding text describes the *actions* as tricks/wittiness. It's an article discussing whether these tricks constitute fraud. The author calls them "Tricks".
        *   Let's search for the specific text "Sport and fraud law Tricks such as those of Alonso and Ramos".
        *   It appears to be a translated excerpt (likely from Spanish or German given the players and syntax). The original likely discusses "El fraude en el deporte" or similar.
        *   In this context, "fraud" is being used to label the specific deceptive acts (the tricks).
        *   "Tricks... demonstrate... not the will to get remove of a sanction."
        *   The "fraud" refers to the specific act of deception (the trick).
        *   Definition 3: "something intended to deceive; deliberate trickery intended to gain an advantage".
        *   Synonyms: dupery, humbug.
        *   This fits the description of the "tricks" perfectly.
        *   Definition 1 requires "injury to another person". While one *could* argue the opponent is injured, the primary goal in sports "fraud" (diving, tactical cards) is to gain an advantage (Sense 3's definition). Sense 3 specifically mentions "gain an advantage", which matches the tactical nature of the foul.
        *   Therefore, Sense 3 is the stronger semantic fit for the description of the "tricks" in this context.

    *   **Decision:** Sense 3 covers "deliberate trickery intended to gain an advantage". The context is about "Tricks" in sport used to gain an advantage (tactical yellow cards). Sense 1 is more specific to criminal law requiring "injury" (often financial). Sense 3's "gain an advantage" aligns with the "tactical" nature of the described event.

    *   **Final check:**
        *   Target: fraud.
        *   Sense 1: Crime.
        *   Sense 3: Trickery/Deception for advantage.
        *   Context: Tricks to get a yellow card (advantage).
        *   Does the phrase "fraud law" force Sense 1? If the text were strictly "fraud law" in a legal textbook, yes. But here it's "Sport and fraud law" followed by a discussion of "Tricks". It is discussing the *concept* of fraud/trickery in sports. The "law" part might be modifying both, or "Sport and fraud" might be the topic. Even if it is "fraud law", does that law define fraud as Sense 1 or Sense 3? Laws against fraud usually define it as deception for gain (Sense 3/1 overlap), but WordNet distinguishes them by "injury" (Sense 1) vs "something intended to deceive" (Sense 3).
        *   The "Tricks" mentioned are definitely "something intended to deceive" (Sense 3). They are not necessarily "injurious" in the legal sense (Sense 1), but they are "trickery intended to gain an advantage".
        *   Therefore, Sense 3 is the intended sense for the description of the events.

    *   **Refinement:** Let's reconsider Sense 1. Is it possible Sense 1 is the hypernym?
        *   Sense 1: intentional deception resulting in injury.
        *   Sense 3: something intended to deceive.
        *   Sense 3 is more general regarding the act (doesn't strictly require "injury" in the same way, or at least emphasizes the trickery). The context emphasizes the *trick* and the *advantage*.
        *   Most WSD systems would map "fraud" in "tactical foul/fraud" contexts to the "trickery/deception" sense if available, rather than the strict legal crime sense, especially when synonyms include "humbug" or "hoax" (Sense 3). The text calls them "Tricks".
        *   I will go with Sense 3.

    *   **Wait, let me double check the "Sport and fraud law" phrase.**
        *   If it's a title "Sport and Fraud Law", it refers to the body of law.
        *   Body of law = Laws against Fraud (Sense 1).
        *   However, the text explains: "Tricks... demonstrate wittiness...". It's discussing the nature of the act.
        *   Is the target word referring to the law, or the act? "Sport and fraud law" -> "Law of Sport and Law of Fraud"? Or "Law of Sport and Fraud"?
        *   If the target is in the phrase "fraud law", the sense of "fraud" is the concept being regulated.
        *   Is the concept being regulated the "crime" (Sense 1) or the "trickery" (Sense 3)? In law, fraud is a crime (Sense 1).
        *   But in "Sport law", "fraud" is often "match-fixing" or "doping" (crime) OR it is "simulation" (trickery).
        *   Alonso/Ramos actions were "simulation" or "tactical fouling". This is not usually a crime, but it is "deception/trickery".
        *   Calling it "fraud" in a loose sense fits Sense 3 ("deliberate trickery").
        *   Calling it "fraud" in a strict legal sense (fraud law) might be an analogy.
        *   The sentence contrasts the "tricks" with the "will to get remove of a sanction".
        *   Given the "Tricks" description and the "gain an advantage" (Sense 3 definition), Sense 3 is the best fit for the *content* of the sentence. Even if it appears in the phrase "fraud law", the concept of fraud being invoked is the deceptive trickery for advantage.

    *   **Alternative view:**
        *   Sense 1: "intentional deception resulting in injury..."
        *   Sense 3: "something intended to deceive... intended to gain an advantage".
        *   The context: "intended to gain an advantage" (tactical yellow).
        *   The context does not focus on "injury".
        *   Therefore Sense 3 is better.

    *   **Final selection:** Sense 3.

provider: Together


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: law
Target surface form: law
Context:
Sport and fraud <t>law</t> Tricks such as those of Alonso and Ramos before the Ajax demonstrate wittiness but not the will to get remove of a sanction.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=law%1:14:00:: | definition=the collection of rules imposed by authority | synonyms=jurisprudence | examples=civilization presupposes respect for the law; the great problem for jurisprudence to allow freedom while enforcing order
2. sense_key=law%1:10:00:: | definition=legal document setting forth rules governing a particular kind of activity | examples=there is a law against kidnapping
3. sense_key=law%1:09:00:: | definition=a rule or body of rules of conduct inherent in human nature and essential to or binding upon human society | synonyms=natural law
4. sense_key=law%1:09:01:: | definition=a generalization that describes recurring facts or events in nature | synonyms=law of nature | examples=the laws of thermodynamics
5. sense_key=law%1:09:02:: | definition=the branch of philosophy concerned with the law and the principles that lead courts to make the decisions they do | synonyms=jurisprudence, legal philosophy
6. sense_key=law%1:04:00:: | definition=the learned profession that is mastered by graduate study in a law school and that is responsible for the judicial system | synonyms=practice of law | examples=he studied law at Yale
7. sense_key=law%1:14:01:: | definition=the force of policemen and officers | synonyms=police, police force, constabulary | examples=the law came looking for him

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the Target Lemma and Context:**
    *   Target lemma: "law"
    *   Context: "Sport and fraud <t>law</t> Tricks such as those of Alonso and Ramos before the Ajax demonstrate wittiness but not the will to get remove of a sanction."
    *   Analysis of the sentence: The sentence seems to be discussing a specific incident in sports (likely football/soccer) involving players Alonso and Ramos (Real Madrid players) against Ajax. The phrase "Sport and fraud law" looks like a title or a heading, or perhaps a slightly awkward translation or fragment of a sentence. The content discusses "Tricks... demonstrate wittiness but not the will to get remove of a sanction." "Sanction" implies a penalty imposed by a governing body.

2.  **Examine Candidate Senses:**
    *   **Sense 1 (law%1:14:00::):** "the collection of rules imposed by authority" | synonyms=jurisprudence | examples=civilization presupposes respect for the law. (General system of rules).
    *   **Sense 2 (law%1:10:00::):** "legal document setting forth rules governing a particular kind of activity" | examples=there is a law against kidnapping. (Specific statute/document).
    *   **Sense 3 (law%1:09:00::):** "a rule or body of rules of conduct inherent in human nature..." (Natural law - philosophical).
    *   **Sense 4 (law%1:09:01::):** "a generalization that describes recurring facts or events in nature" (Scientific law).
    *   **Sense 5 (law%1:09:02::):** "the branch of philosophy concerned with the law..." (Jurisprudence/Legal philosophy).
    *   **Sense 6 (law%1:04:00::):** "the learned profession..." (Law as a career/field of study).
    *   **Sense 7 (law%1:14:01::):** "the force of policemen and officers" (The police).

3.  **Evaluate Contextual Fit:**
    *   The phrase is "Sport and fraud <t>law</t>".
    *   Is it a specific legal document? "fraud law" often refers to a body of statutes regarding fraud. In a sports context, there might not be a specific "document" called the "fraud law" in the same way there is a "law against kidnapping", but it refers to the set of regulations governing fraud (often match-fixing or doping fraud).
    *   Is it the general collection of rules? (Sense 1). "Sport and fraud law" usually refers to the *body of law* or regulations dealing with these topics.
    *   Is it a profession? No.
    *   Is it the police? No.
    *   Is it natural law? No.
    *   Is it scientific law? No.

    *   Let's look closely at the distinction between Sense 1 and Sense 2.
        *   Sense 1: "collection of rules imposed by authority". This is usually uncountable ("the law").
        *   Sense 2: "legal document setting forth rules...". This is usually countable ("a law").
    *   The context says "fraud law". In English compounds like "fraud law", "tax law", "contract law", the word "law" usually refers to the *body of rules* or the system of regulations (Sense 1). It acts as a mass noun concept. If it were Sense 2 (a specific statute), it might be "the Fraud Law" (capitalized) or "a law regarding fraud". "Fraud law" (singular, no article, modifying a compound) strongly suggests a field or body of regulations (Sense 1).
    *   Furthermore, the context talks about a "sanction". Sanctions are penalties applied based on rules/regulations. The text is discussing the application of rules (or tricks to circumvent them) in sports.
    *   However, looking at WordNet definitions specifically:
        *   Sense 1: "the collection of rules imposed by authority". Examples: "civilization presupposes respect for the law". This fits "fraud law" as a category of rules.
        *   Sense 2: "legal document setting forth rules...". Example: "there is a law against kidnapping". This implies a specific act/legislative text.
    *   "Sport and fraud law" seems to refer to the body of regulations regarding fraud in sports. This aligns best with Sense 1 (collection of rules).

    *   Let's consider the source of the text (Alonso/Ramos vs Ajax). This refers to a Champions League match where Real Madrid players got yellow cards on purpose to reset their suspension status for the next round (tactical fouls/yellow cards). This is often discussed under "rules", "regulations", or "law" of the game (UEFA rules).
    *   The phrase "fraud law" in a general sense often refers to statutory law. But in a sports context, it refers to the rules governing the sport.
    *   Which WordNet sense captures "the rules of the game" or "the body of rules regarding fraud"?
    *   Sense 1 definition: "the collection of rules imposed by authority". The authority here is the governing body (UEFA/FIFA). This fits well.
    *   Sense 2 definition: "legal document". UEFA regulations are documents, but they aren't usually called "a law" in the statutory sense. "Fraud law" as a compound usually denotes the *field* of law (Sense 1 - jurisprudence/collection of rules).

    *   Let's check Sense 6: "the learned profession". "He studies law". Not applicable here.
    *   Let's check Sense 7: "police". Not applicable.

    *   Comparison:
        *   Sense 1: Collection of rules.
        *   Sense 2: A specific legal document/act.
    *   "Fraud law" denotes a *category* of legal rules, not a single document (though it comprises documents). One says "Tax law is complex" (Sense 1). One says "Congress passed a new tax law" (Sense 2).
    *   The context "Sport and fraud law" resembles "Tax law" or "Criminal law". This usage corresponds to the body of rules (Sense 1). The definition "collection of rules imposed by authority" matches this usage perfectly.

    *   Wait, let's check the specific phrasing "Sport and fraud law". It looks like a headline. Headlines often drop articles. "Fraud law" usually refers to the body of laws regarding fraud.
    *   Decision: Sense 1 is the best fit. It refers to the system/collection of rules rather than a specific isolated statute (which might be Sense 2, though Sense 2 often implies a countable noun usage "a law").

    *   Let's double check Sense 5: "branch of philosophy...". No.
    *   Let's double check Sense 3: "inherent in human nature...". No.

    *   Therefore, Sense 1 is the correct choice. It covers the "collection of rules" aspect found in compounds like "contract law", "tort law", and "fraud law".

    *   Is it Sense 2? If the text meant "A specific law about fraud", it would likely be phrased "The fraud law" or "A fraud law". "Fraud law" as a mass noun concept fits Sense 1.
    *   Let's look at the example for Sense 1: "civilization presupposes respect for the law". (Mass noun usage).
    *   Example for Sense 2: "there is a law against kidnapping". (Count usage).
    *   In "Sport and fraud law", "law" is used in a mass noun way (referring to the field/body of regulations).

    *   Conclusion: Sense 1.

    *   Wait, is there a chance it refers to "The Law" as the police (Sense 7)? "Sport and fraud police"? Unlikely context. The discussion is about "tricks" and "sanctions" (rules), not the police force investigating.

    *   Final check:
    *   Target: law.
    *   Context: "Sport and fraud law..."
    *   Meaning: The set of regulations/rules regarding fraud.
    *   Sense 1 definition: "the collection of rules imposed by authority".
    *   This matches perfectly.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: trick
Target surface form: Tricks
Context:
Sport and fraud law <t>Tricks</t> such as those of Alonso and Ramos before the Ajax demonstrate wittiness but not the will to get remove of a sanction. The expulsion presumably forged by two players of Real Madrid (Xabi Alonso and Sergio Ramos) in the game played on the 23rd of November against Ajax in European Champions League has caused rivers of ink to be written about if such behavior is or is not unsportsmanlike and if, both players should be sanctioned by UEFA.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=trick%1:04:05:: | definition=a cunning or deceitful action or device | synonyms=fast one | examples=he played a trick on me; he pulled a fast one and got away with it
2. sense_key=trick%1:28:00:: | definition=a period of work or duty
3. sense_key=trick%1:04:04:: | definition=an attempt to get you to do something foolish or imprudent | examples=that offer was a dirty trick
4. sense_key=trick%1:04:00:: | definition=a ludicrous or grotesque act done for fun and amusement | synonyms=antic, joke, prank, caper, put-on
5. sense_key=trick%1:04:02:: | definition=an illusory feat; considered magical by naive observers | synonyms=magic trick, conjuring trick, magic, legerdemain, conjuration, thaumaturgy
6. sense_key=trick%1:18:00:: | definition=a prostitute's customer | synonyms=whoremaster, whoremonger, john
7. sense_key=trick%1:04:01:: | definition=(card games) in a single round, the sequence of cards played by all the players; the high card is the winner

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the context:**
    *   The sentence is: "Sport and fraud law Tricks such as those of Alonso and Ramos before the Ajax demonstrate wittiness but not the will to get remove of a sanction."
    *   The specific situation described is football players (Alonso and Ramos) getting deliberate red cards (expulsion) to manipulate the timing of a suspension so they are free for later matches (knockout stages).
    *   This is described as "fraud law" and behavior that might be "unsportsmanlike."
    *   Key phrases: "cunning," "deceitful," "wittiness," "forged," "sanction."

2.  **Analyze the candidate senses:**
    *   **Sense 1:** `a cunning or deceitful action or device`. Synonyms: `fast one`. Examples: "he played a trick on me". This fits the idea of manipulating the rules or a system to gain an advantage in a sly way. The context mentions "fraud law" and "wittiness" used to avoid sanctions improperly.
    *   **Sense 2:** `a period of work or duty`. Irrelevant.
    *   **Sense 3:** `an attempt to get you to do something foolish or imprudent`. Example: "that offer was a dirty trick". While the players did something questionable, the "trick" here is the action they performed (time-wasting/faking to get a card) to deceive the referee/UEFA system, not necessarily an attempt to make someone else do something foolish (though they deceive the referee). Sense 1 is broader and fits "cunning action".
    *   **Sense 4:** `a ludicrous or grotesque act done for fun and amusement`. Synonyms: `prank, joke`. Context: "fraud law," "unsportsmanlike," "sanction." This wasn't for fun/amusement in the sense of a party prank; it was a calculated strategic move. It wasn't "just for fun."
    *   **Sense 5:** `an illusory feat; considered magical`. Irrelevant.
    *   **Sense 6:** `a prostitute's customer`. Irrelevant.
    *   **Sense 7:** `(card games) in a single round...`. Irrelevant (football context).

3.  **Evaluate Sense 1 vs Sense 3 vs Sense 4:**
    *   Sense 4 (Prank/Joke) is incorrect because the intent wasn't amusement; it was a calculated, strategic move to reset a suspension timer. It was "witty" (clever) but "fraudulent" in the eyes of the law/sport.
    *   Sense 3 (Foolish/imprudent) usually implies trapping someone. Here, the "trick" refers to the specific deceitful actions (diving, time-wasting) used to solicit a yellow/red card deliberately.
    *   Sense 1 (Cunning or deceitful action or device) is the strongest fit. The players used a "device" (fouling/delaying) to trick the system. The definition "cunning or deceitful action" aligns perfectly with "fraud" and "forged" mentioned in the text. The example "he pulled a fast one" aligns with getting away with a clever manipulation.

4.  **Conclusion:** Sense 1 is the correct sense. It refers to a cunning maneuver to gain an advantage.

5.  **Format Output:** JSON object `{"sense_index": 1}`.

provider: Parasail


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: will
Target surface form: will
Context:
Sport and fraud law Tricks such as those of Alonso and Ramos before the Ajax demonstrate wittiness but not the <t>will</t> to get remove of a sanction. The expulsion presumably forged by two players of Real Madrid (Xabi Alonso and Sergio Ramos) in the game played on the 23rd of November against Ajax in European Champions League has caused rivers of ink to be written about if such behavior is or is not unsportsmanlike and if, both players should be sanctioned by UEFA.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=will%1:09:00:: | definition=the capability of conscious choice and decision and intention; - George Meredith | synonyms=volition | examples=the exercise of their volition we construe as revolt
2. sense_key=will%1:09:01:: | definition=a fixed and persistent intent or purpose | examples=where there's a will there's a way
3. sense_key=will%1:10:00:: | definition=a legal document declaring a person's wishes regarding the disposal of their property when they die | synonyms=testament

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

raw_output:
```json
{"sense_index": 2}
```

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 2}
```

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the Request:**
    *   Task: Fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation (WSD).
    *   Target lemma: `will`.
    *   Target surface form: `will`.
    *   Context: A sentence discussing soccer players (Alonso and Ramos) getting deliberate red cards to clear their record before playoffs. The sentence says their tricks demonstrate "wittiness but not the *will* to get remove of a sanction."
    *   Candidate senses:
        1.  `will%1:09:00::` (volition, capability of conscious choice).
        2.  `will%1:09:01::` (fixed and persistent intent/purpose - "where there's a will...").
        3.  `will%1:10:00::` (legal document/testament).
    *   Output format: JSON `{"sense_index": X}`.

2.  **Analyze the Context:**
    *   The sentence is: "Sport and fraud law Tricks such as those of Alonso and Ramos before the Ajax demonstrate wittiness but not the will to get remove of a sanction."
    *   The phrase "the will to get remove of a sanction" (somewhat broken English, likely translated) refers to the players' determination or intention to avoid punishment or to manipulate the system to clear their record (getting "remove of a sanction" usually implies avoiding a suspension in a crucial future game).
    *   Actually, looking closely at the phrasing "not the will to get remove of a sanction", it implies they *lacked* the determination or intent to avoid punishment (or perhaps they *did* have the specific intent to take the punishment now to be free later, but the sentence structure suggests a critique of their lack of sporting will/integrity).
    *   Let's re-read carefully: "...demonstrate wittiness but not the will to get remove of a sanction." This phrasing is clunky. It might mean they showed cleverness (wittiness) but lacked the determination to actually avoid the sanction (maybe meaning they accepted it deliberately?). Or, more likely in the context of "fraud law", it means they lacked the moral "will" or integrity to avoid cheating. Let's stick to the core meaning of "will" here. It refers to intent, determination, or purpose.

3.  **Evaluate Candidate Senses:**

    *   **Sense 1 (`will%1:09:00::`):** Definition: "the capability of conscious choice and decision and intention". Synonym: "volition". Example: "the exercise of their volition...".
        *   *Fit:* This refers to the faculty of making choices. While the players are exercising choice, the phrase "the will to [verb phrase]" usually refers to *determination* or *purpose*, not just the abstract capability of choice.

    *   **Sense 2 (`will%1:09:01::`):** Definition: "a fixed and persistent intent or purpose". Example: "where there's a will there's a way".
        *   *Fit:* This refers to strong determination or a specific intent to achieve something. The phrase "the will to get remove of a sanction" parallels the idiom "the will to win" or "the will to survive". It implies a strong drive or fixed purpose. In the context, the author is saying they showed cleverness but not the "determination/purpose" to get rid of the sanction (or perhaps the moral will).
        *   However, let's look at the semantics again. The context says they demonstrated wittiness *but not* the will to get remove of a sanction.
        *   Wait, the context implies they *deliberately* got sanctioned. So they *wanted* the sanction to clear their records. The sentence might be poorly written (likely translated from Spanish: "demostrar ingenio pero no la voluntad de librarse de una sanción").
        *   The usage "the will to [do X]" is the key pattern here. "Will to live", "Will to power", "Will to win".
        *   This pattern matches Sense 2 much better than Sense 1. Sense 1 is about the *faculty* of will (volition). Sense 2 is about the *content* or *strength* of that will (determination/intent). When people say "He has the will to do it," they mean determination/purpose (Sense 2), not the neurological capacity for volition (Sense 1).

    *   **Sense 3 (`will%1:10:00::`):** Definition: "a legal document...".
        *   *Fit:* Completely irrelevant. They are not writing a last testament on the soccer field.

4.  **Compare Sense 1 and Sense 2:**
    *   Sense 1 is "volition" (abstract capability). Example: "free will".
    *   Sense 2 is "determination/purpose". Example: "willpower" (roughly), "where there's a will".
    *   Context phrase: "not the will to get remove of a sanction".
    *   If we substitute synonyms: "not the *determination* to get remove of a sanction" vs "not the *volition* to get remove of a sanction".
    *   "Determination" (Sense 2) fits the collocation "the will to [verb]" naturally.
    *   "Volition" (Sense 1) is usually used in contexts like "of his own volition". We rarely say "He had the volition to do it" to mean he was determined; we say "He had the volition" to mean he made the choice.
    *   The sentence is discussing a behavioral trait (determination/intent vs cleverness). "Wittiness" contrasts with "Will/Determination" here.
    *   Therefore, Sense 2 is the correct choice.

5.  **Final Selection:**
    *   Sense 1: Capability of choice (Volition).
    *   Sense 2: Fixed/persistent intent (Determination).
    *   Sense 3: Legal document.
    *   The phrase "the will to..." indicates a strong intent or determination. This matches Sense 2.

6.  **Construct Output:**
    *   JSON format: `{"sense_index": 2}`.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: expulsion
Target surface form: expulsion
Context:
Sport and fraud law Tricks such as those of Alonso and Ramos before the Ajax demonstrate wittiness but not the will to get remove of a sanction. The <t>expulsion</t> presumably forged by two players of Real Madrid (Xabi Alonso and Sergio Ramos) in the game played on the 23rd of November against Ajax in European Champions League has caused rivers of ink to be written about if such behavior is or is not unsportsmanlike and if, both players should be sanctioned by UEFA. As we all know, a few minutes before the end of the game (that their team had already won), both players deliberately wasted time which made the referee show the second yellow card to both of them.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=expulsion%1:04:01:: | definition=the act of forcing out someone or something | synonyms=ejection, exclusion, riddance | examples=the ejection of troublemakers by the police; the child's expulsion from school
2. sense_key=expulsion%1:04:02:: | definition=squeezing out by applying pressure | synonyms=extrusion | examples=an unexpected extrusion of toothpaste from the bottom of the tube; the expulsion of pus from the pimple
3. sense_key=expulsion%1:04:00:: | definition=the act of expelling or projecting or ejecting | synonyms=projection, ejection, forcing out

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the Target Lemma and Context:**
    *   **Lemma:** expulsion
    *   **Context:** The text discusses a football (soccer) match between Real Madrid and Ajax. Two players (Alonso and Ramos) deliberately got a second yellow card to get sent off (expelled from the game) so they could serve a suspension in a meaningless match and be "clean" for the knockout stages. The text mentions "sanction", "second yellow card", "forcing out" (implicitly via the red card resulting from the second yellow).
    *   **Key phrase:** "The expulsion presumably forged by two players...". This refers to them getting sent off the pitch by the referee.

2.  **Analyze the Candidate Senses:**
    *   **Sense 1:** `expulsion%1:04:01::`
        *   **Definition:** the act of forcing out someone or something
        *   **Synonyms:** ejection, exclusion, riddance
        *   **Examples:** "the ejection of troublemakers by the police"; "the child's expulsion from school"
        *   **Fit:** This sense involves removing a person from a place or institution (school, stadium, etc.). In sports, a "sending off" is an ejection/expulsion of a player from the game.

    *   **Sense 2:** `expulsion%2:29:00::` (Wait, the prompt says `expulsion%1:04:02::`)
        *   **Definition:** squeezing out by applying pressure
        *   **Synonyms:** extrusion
        *   **Examples:** toothpaste, pus.
        *   **Fit:** This is physical/physiological. Not relevant to a football match context.

    *   **Sense 3:** `expulsion%1:04:00::`
        *   **Definition:** the act of expelling or projecting or ejecting
        *   **Synonyms:** projection, ejection, forcing out
        *   **Fit:** This seems broader. It lists "projection" as a synonym. Sense 1 is more specific to "forcing out someone". Sense 3 is often used for things like air, or projectiles, though "ejection" fits people too.
        *   Let's look closer at Sense 1 vs Sense 3 in WordNet.
        *   Sense 1 (`%1:04:01::`) specifically mentions "someone or something" but the examples focus on people (troublemakers, child from school). "Riddance" is a synonym here.
        *   Sense 3 (`%1:04:00::`) includes "projecting".
        *   In the context of sports, a red card results in an "expulsion" or "sending off". This is an ejection of a person.
        *   Sense 1's examples ("troublemakers by the police", "child's expulsion from school") are metaphorically very close to a player being sent off. It's a disciplinary removal.
        *   Sense 3 is often the "parent" hypernym in some hierarchies or a more physical/general sense. However, looking at standard WSD practices for "expulsion" in sports:
            *   Sense 1 (School/Troublemakers) aligns perfectly with the disciplinary aspect of a sports ejection.
            *   Sense 3 includes "projection".
        *   Let's check the synset structure usually found in WordNet.
            *   104010830-n "expulsion, ejection, riddance" -> "the act of forcing out someone or something" (Sense 1 in prompt). Examples: "the child's expulsion from school".
            *   104009762-n "expulsion, projection, ejection, forcing out" -> "the act of expelling or projecting or ejecting".
        *   Usually, the specific sense regarding the removal of a person from a location/organization is Sense 1 (`1:04:01`). The context is explicitly about players being removed from the game via a sanction (yellow/red card).
        *   Sense 1 examples: "ejection of troublemakers", "expulsion from school".
        *   Context: Players ejected from the game.
        *   This fits Sense 1 much better than Sense 3 (which includes projection) or Sense 2 (squeezing).

3.  **Decision:**
    *   The context describes a disciplinary action where players are removed from the game.
    *   Sense 1 covers "forcing out someone" with examples like "troublemakers" and "school expulsion". This matches the semantic field of a sports ejection.
    *   Sense 2 is irrelevant (toothpaste/pus).
    *   Sense 3 is broader/physical ("projection"). While "ejection" is a synonym, Sense 1 captures the "removal of a person" aspect better.

4.  **Formatting:**
    *   The user wants `{"sense_index": X}`.
    *   The chosen sense corresponds to index 1.

    Let's double check the indices.
    Candidate 1: sense_key=expulsion%1:04:01:: ... examples: ejection of troublemakers ...
    Candidate 2: sense_key=expulsion%1:04:02:: ... examples: extrusion of toothpaste ...
    Candidate 3: sense_key=expulsion%1:04:00:: ... synonyms: projection ...

    Context: "The expulsion presumably forged by two players... referee show the second yellow card".
    This is an ejection of a person from the field of play. Sense 1 is the correct choice.

    Output: {"sense_index": 1}