[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: actually
Target surface form: actually
Context:
kalgebra is a mathematical calculator based on content markup MathML language. Nowadays it is capable to make simple MathML operations (arithmetic and logical) and to representate 2D and 3D graphs. It is <t>actually</t> not necessary to know MathML to use kalgebra. kalgebra is a MathML based graph calculator.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=actually%4:02:01:: | definition=in actual fact | synonyms=really | examples=to be nominally but not actually independent; no one actually saw the shark
2. sense_key=actually%4:02:00:: | definition=used to imply that one would expect the fact to be the opposite of that stated; surprisingly | synonyms=in reality | examples=you may actually be doing the right thing by walking out; she actually spoke Latin
3. sense_key=actually%4:02:03:: | definition=at the present moment | examples=the transmission screen shows the picture that is actually on the air
4. sense_key=actually%4:02:02:: | definition=as a sentence modifier to add slight emphasis | examples=actually, we all help clear up after a meal; actually, I haven't seen the film

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 2}
```

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the word "actually" in a specific sentence context.

**Context Analysis:**
Sentence: "It is <t>actually</t> not necessary to know MathML to use kalgebra."
The phrase "actually not necessary" suggests a contrast or a correction of a potential assumption. The user might assume that because it's based on MathML, they need to know MathML. The word "actually" here introduces a fact that might be surprising or contrary to expectation.

**Candidate Sense Analysis:**

1.  **Sense 1 (actually%4:02:01::):**
    *   Definition: "in actual fact"
    *   Synonyms: "really"
    *   Examples: "to be nominally but not actually independent", "no one actually saw the shark"
    *   Fit: This sense emphasizes reality vs. appearance. "It is really not necessary." It fits reasonably well, but let's see if others fit better.

2.  **Sense 2 (actually%4:02:00::):**
    *   Definition: "used to imply that one would expect the fact to be the opposite of that stated; surprisingly"
    *   Synonyms: "in reality"
    *   Examples: "you may actually be doing the right thing by walking out", "she actually spoke Latin"
    *   Fit: The context is: "It is actually not necessary to know MathML to use kalgebra." One might expect that because it is a "MathML based graph calculator," knowing MathML *is* necessary. "Actually" counters this expectation. This aligns perfectly with the definition "expect the fact to be the opposite."

3.  **Sense 3 (actually%4:02:03::):**
    *   Definition: "at the present moment"
    *   Examples: "the transmission screen shows the picture that is actually on the air"
    *   Fit: This is clearly not about time/temporal aspect. Incorrect.

4.  **Sense 4 (actually%4:02:02::):**
    *   Definition: "as a sentence modifier to add slight emphasis"
    *   Examples: "actually, we all help clear up after a meal", "actually, I haven't seen the film"
    *   Fit: This is often used at the start of a sentence or clause as a discourse marker. In the context "It is actually not necessary", it modifies the predicate, but Sense 2's definition regarding "expect the fact to be the opposite" captures the specific pragmatic function better than just "slight emphasis". The contrastive function described in Sense 2 is the core meaning here.

**Comparing Sense 1 and Sense 2:**
Sense 1 is "in actual fact" / "really".
Sense 2 is "contrary to expectation" / "surprisingly".

In the sentence "It is actually not necessary...", the function of "actually" is to correct a potential misconception (that one needs to know MathML).
"You might think you need to know MathML, but actually/surprisingly, it is not necessary."
Sense 2's definition ("used to imply that one would expect the fact to be the opposite of that stated") is the precise definition for this usage. It signals a counter-expectation.

Let's check Sense 1 again. "In actual fact". "It is in actual fact not necessary." While true, Sense 2 highlights the pragmatic function of correcting the assumption inherent in the context (tool based on MathML -> assumes need to know MathML).

Sense 2 is the standard WSD mapping for this specific contrastive usage where the speaker is correcting a likely assumption.

Let's double check the indexing.
Sense 1: actually%4:02:01::
Sense 2: actually%4:02:00::
Sense 3: actually%4:02:03::
Sense 4: actually%4:02:02::

The JSON needs the `sense_index`.
Sense 1 -> index 1
Sense 2 -> index 2
Sense 3 -> index 3
Sense 4 -> index 4

If I choose Sense 2, the output is `{"sense_index": 2}`.

Let's review Sense 4 again: "as a sentence modifier to add slight emphasis". Often "actually" is used just to soften a statement or add emphasis without strong contrast (e.g., "I actually think it's a good idea"). However, here there is a strong logical contrast: "MathML based calculator" vs "not necessary to know MathML". This fits Sense 2 (surprisingly/contrary to expectation) much better than just general emphasis (Sense 4) or mere reality assertion (Sense 1).

Therefore, Sense 2 is the best fit.

Wait, let me look at the sense keys provided to ensure I match the index.
1. actually%4:02:01:: (in actual fact)
2. actually%4:02:00:: (contrary to expectation)
3. actually%4:02:03:: (present moment)
4. actually%4:02:02:: (emphasis)

Yes, the order in the prompt is 1, 2, 3, 4.
I am selecting the second option.

Context: "It is [actually] not necessary to know MathML..."
Context clue: "MathML based graph calculator".
Implication: Usually tools based on X require knowledge of X.
Reality: Not necessary.
Function of 'actually': Pointing out this discrepancy between implication and reality.
Sense 2 definition: "used to imply that one would expect the fact to be the opposite of that stated".
This is a perfect match.

Final decision: Sense 2.


attempt_kind: initial

status: success

[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: necessary
Target surface form: necessary
Context:
kalgebra is a mathematical calculator based on content markup MathML language. Nowadays it is capable to make simple MathML operations (arithmetic and logical) and to representate 2D and 3D graphs. It is actually not <t>necessary</t> to know MathML to use kalgebra. kalgebra is a MathML based graph calculator.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=necessary%3:00:00:: | definition=absolutely essential
2. sense_key=necessary%5:00:00:inevitable:00 | definition=unavoidably determined by prior circumstances | examples=the necessary consequences of one's actions

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

finish_reason: stop

role: assistant

reasoning_content:
The target word is "necessary" in the context: "It is actually not necessary to know MathML to use kalgebra."

Let me analyze the two candidate senses:

1. **sense_key=necessary%3:00:00::** - definition: "absolutely essential"
2. **sense_key=necessary%5:00:00:inevitable:00** - definition: "unavoidably determined by prior circumstances" - examples: "the necessary consequences of one's actions"

In the sentence, the meaning is that knowing MathML is not required/essential to use kalgebra. The word "necessary" here means "required" or "essential" - you don't need to know MathML to use the application.

Sense 1 (absolutely essential) fits this context. The sentence is saying that knowing MathML is not essential for using kalgebra.

Sense 2 is about something that is inevitably determined by prior circumstances, like "necessary consequences" - this is a more philosophical/logical sense of necessity, not what's being expressed here.

So sense 1 is the correct choice: "absolutely essential" - meaning it's not essential/required to know MathML.

The answer should be: {"sense_index": 1}

format: unknown

native_finish_reason: stop

provider: StreamLake

currency: USD


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: know
Target surface form: know
Context:
kalgebra is a mathematical calculator based on content markup MathML language. Nowadays it is capable to make simple MathML operations (arithmetic and logical) and to representate 2D and 3D graphs. It is actually not necessary to <t>know</t> MathML to use kalgebra. kalgebra is a MathML based graph calculator.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=know%2:31:01:: | definition=be cognizant or aware of a fact or a specific piece of information; possess knowledge or information about | synonyms=cognize, cognise | examples=I know that the President lied to the people; I want to know who is winning the game!
2. sense_key=know%2:31:03:: | definition=know how to do or perform something | examples=She knows how to knit; Does your husband know how to cook?
3. sense_key=know%2:31:02:: | definition=be aware of the truth of something; have a belief or faith in something; regard as true beyond any doubt | examples=I know that I left the key on the table; Galileo knew that the earth moves around the sun
4. sense_key=know%2:31:00:: | definition=be familiar or acquainted with a person or an object | examples=She doesn't know this composer; Do you know my sister?
5. sense_key=know%2:31:04:: | definition=have firsthand knowledge of states, situations, emotions, or sensations | synonyms=experience, live | examples=I know the feeling!; have you ever known hunger?
6. sense_key=know%2:31:06:: | definition=accept (someone) to be what is claimed or accept his power and authority | synonyms=acknowledge, recognize, recognise | examples=The Crown Prince was acknowledged as the true heir to the throne; We do not recognize your gods
7. sense_key=know%2:31:15:: | definition=have fixed in the mind | examples=I know Latin; This student knows her irregular verbs
8. sense_key=know%2:35:00:: | definition=have sexual intercourse with | synonyms=sleep together, roll in the hay, love, make out, make love, sleep with | examples=This student sleeps with everyone in her dorm; Adam knew Eve
9. sense_key=know%2:31:11:: | definition=know the nature or character of | examples=we all knew her as a big show-off
10. sense_key=know%2:31:12:: | definition=be able to distinguish, recognize as being different | examples=The child knows right from wrong
11. sense_key=know%2:31:14:: | definition=perceive as familiar | examples=I know this voice!

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
Let me analyze the context and determine the best sense for "know" in this sentence:

Context: "It is actually not necessary to know MathML to use kalgebra."

The context is talking about using a mathematical calculator (kalgebra) that is based on MathML language. The sentence says that it's not necessary to "know" MathML to use the calculator.

Let me examine each candidate sense:

1. sense_key=know%2:31:01:: | "be cognizant or aware of a fact or a specific piece of information; possess knowledge or information about"
   - This could potentially fit, as it's about possessing knowledge about MathML.

2. sense_key=know%2:31:03:: | "know how to do or perform something"
   - This doesn't fit as well because we're not talking about knowing how to do MathML as a skill.

3. sense_key=know%2:31:02:: | "be aware of the truth of something; have a belief or faith in something"
   - This doesn't fit well because we're not talking about beliefs or truth.

4. sense_key=know%2:31:00:: | "be familiar or acquainted with a person or an object"
   - This could fit somewhat, as knowing MathML could mean being familiar with it.

5. sense_key=know%2:31:04:: | "have firsthand knowledge of states, situations, emotions, or sensations"
   - This doesn't fit well because MathML isn't a state, situation, emotion, or sensation.

6. sense_key=know%2:31:06:: | "accept (someone) to be what is claimed or accept his power and authority"
   - This doesn't fit at all.

7. sense_key=know%2:31:15:: | "have fixed in the mind"
   - This could fit, as knowing MathML could mean having knowledge of MathML fixed in one's mind.

8. sense_key=know%2:35:00:: | "have sexual intercourse with"
   - This clearly doesn't fit.

9. sense_key=know%2:31:11:: | "know the nature or character of"
   - This doesn't fit well because we're not talking about knowing the nature or character of MathML as a person.

10. sense_key=know%2:31:12:: | "be able to distinguish, recognize as being different"
   - This doesn't fit.

11. sense_key=know%2:31:14:: | "perceive as familiar"
   - This doesn't fit well.

The best fits seem to be senses 1, 4, and 7. Let me refine my analysis:

Sense 1: "be cognizant or aware of a fact or a specific piece of information; possess knowledge or information about"
   - This seems most appropriate because the context is saying that you don't need to possess knowledge about MathML to use the calculator.

Sense 4: "be familiar or acquainted with a person or an object"
   - This doesn't fit as well because MathML isn't a person, and "object" here seems to refer more to physical objects than abstract knowledge domains.

Sense 7: "have fixed in the mind"
   - This could also fit, but the examples given ("I know Latin; This student knows her irregular verbs") suggest this sense is more about having specific facts or skills fixed in mind rather than general knowledge of a subject.

Based on this analysis, I believe sense 1 is the best fit for the target word in context. The sentence is saying that it's not necessary to possess knowledge about MathML to use the calculator.

Actually, let me look a bit more closely at sense 7, since the examples "I know Latin" is similar to "know MathML" - both are knowledge of a language/format/system.

Sense 7: "have fixed in the mind"
   - Examples: "I know Latin; This student knows her irregular verbs"
   - This does seem relevant to knowing a language or format like MathML.

Now I'm torn between senses 1 and 7. Let me think about what "knowing MathML" means in the context. It likely means understanding the syntax, semantics, and structure of MathML - a markup language. This is similar to knowing Latin or any other language, which would be captured by sense 7. However, it could also be understood as having general knowledge about MathML, which would be covered by sense 1.

Given that MathML is a language/format and the examples for sense 7 specifically mention knowing languages, I believe sense 7 is actually the best fit. The context is saying that you don't need to have MathML syntax and semantics fixed in your mind to use the calculator.

Let me revisit the senses one more time:

Sense 1: "be cognizant or aware of a fact or a specific piece of information; possess knowledge or information about"
   - This is about knowing facts or information. MathML is more of a language/format.

Sense 7: "have fixed in the mind"
   - Examples: "I know Latin; This student knows her irregular verbs"
   - This is about knowing a language or set of rules/skills, which fits with "knowing MathML."

I believe sense 7 is the best fit because knowing MathML is similar to knowing a language (like Latin), which is illustrated in the example for sense 7.

Actually, let me look at the context once more to be sure:

"It is actually not necessary to know MathML to use kalgebra."

This is saying that you don't need to know the MathML language to use the calculator. You don't need to understand the syntax, semantics, and structure of MathML. This aligns well with sense 7 ("have fixed in the mind") and its example of knowing Latin.

Therefore, I believe sense 7 is the best fit for the target word in context.

Wait, let me look at the index numbering again:

1. sense_key=know%2:31:01:: | definition=be cognizant or aware of a fact or a specific piece of information...
2. sense_key=know%2:31:03:: | definition=know how to do or perform something
3. sense_key=know%2:31:02:: | definition=be aware of the truth of something...
4. sense_key=know%2:31:00:: | definition=be familiar or acquainted with a person or an object
5. sense_key=know%2:31:04:: | definition=have firsthand knowledge of states, situations, emotions, or sensations
6. sense_key=know%2:31:06:: | definition=accept (someone) to be what is claimed...
7. sense_key=know%2:31:15:: | definition=have fixed in the mind
8. sense_key=know%2:35:00:: | definition=have sexual intercourse with
9. sense_key=know%2:31:11:: | definition=know the nature or character of
10. sense_key=know%2:31:12:: | definition=be able to distinguish, recognize as being different
11. sense_key=know%2:31:14:: | definition=perceive as familiar

I was focusing on the sense definitions and examples rather than the indices. So sense 7 corresponds to "have fixed in the mind". I believe this is the best fit for the target word in context.

Actually, let me reconsider my reasoning again by analyzing the context more carefully:

"It is actually not necessary to know MathML to use kalgebra."

This sentence is saying that you don't need to know MathML in order to use the calculator kalgebra. MathML is a markup language for mathematics. To "know MathML" here means to understand the syntax and semantics of this markup language, similar to knowing a programming language or a foreign language.

Sense 1: "be cognizant or aware of a fact or a specific piece of information; possess knowledge or information about"
   - This is about knowing facts or pieces of information. Knowing a language is more than just knowing facts.

Sense 7: "have fixed in the mind"
   - Examples: "I know Latin; This student knows her irregular verbs"
   - This is about having knowledge of a language or system fixed in mind. The example "I know Latin" is particularly relevant, as it refers to knowing a language, similar to knowing MathML.

Based on this analysis, I believe sense 7 is the best fit because:
1. "Knowing MathML" is similar to "knowing Latin" (a language).
2. The example "I know Latin" in sense 7 is analogous to "know MathML" in the context.
3. Sense 7 is about having knowledge of a language/system fixed in mind, which aligns with the context of not needing to know MathML to use the calculator.

Therefore, I believe sense 7 (index 7) is the best fit for the target word in context.

Actually, I should double-check my reasoning about sense 1. Let me look at the examples for sense 1:

Examples: "I know that the President lied to the people; I want to know who is winning the game!"

These examples are about knowing specific facts or pieces of information, not about knowing a language or system. This confirms that sense 1 is not the best fit for "know MathML".

On the other hand, the examples for sense 7 are:
Examples: "I know Latin; This student knows her irregular verbs"

These examples are about knowing a language or a set of rules/skills, which aligns with "knowing MathML" in the context.

Therefore, I maintain that sense 7 (index 7) is the best fit for the target word in context.

My final answer is {"sense_index": 7}.

provider: Friendli


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: use
Target surface form: use
Context:
kalgebra is a mathematical calculator based on content markup MathML language. Nowadays it is capable to make simple MathML operations (arithmetic and logical) and to representate 2D and 3D graphs. It is actually not necessary to know MathML to <t>use</t> kalgebra. kalgebra is a MathML based graph calculator.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=use%2:34:01:: | definition=put into service; make work or employ for a particular purpose or for its inherent or natural purpose | synonyms=utilize, utilise, apply, employ | examples=use your head!; we only use Spanish at home
2. sense_key=use%2:34:02:: | definition=take or consume (regularly or habitually) | synonyms=habituate | examples=She uses drugs rarely
3. sense_key=use%2:34:00:: | definition=use up, consume fully | synonyms=expend | examples=The legislature expended its time on school questions
4. sense_key=use%2:41:14:: | definition=seek or achieve an end by using to one's advantage | examples=She uses her influential friends to get jobs; The president's wife used her good connections
5. sense_key=use%2:41:04:: | definition=avail oneself to | synonyms=practice, apply | examples=apply a principle; practice a religion
6. sense_key=use%2:41:03:: | definition=habitually do something (use only in the past tense) | examples=She used to call her mother every week but now she calls only occasionally; I used to get sick when I ate in that dining hall

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the Context:**
    *   Sentence: "It is actually not necessary to know MathML to use kalgebra."
    *   Subject/Agent: The user (implied "to [for someone to] use kalgebra").
    *   Object: "kalgebra" (a software application, a mathematical calculator).
    *   Meaning: The user interacts with or operates the software. The software is a tool employed for a specific purpose (math calculations/graphs).

2.  **Analyze the Candidate Senses:**

    *   *Sense 1:* `use%2:34:01::` -> "put into service; make work or employ for a particular purpose or for its inherent or natural purpose". Synonyms: utilize, apply, employ. Examples: "use your head!", "we only use Spanish at home".
        *   Analysis: This sense fits well. "Kalgebra" is a tool. The user puts it into service to solve math problems. The definition "employ for a particular purpose" aligns with using software.

    *   *Sense 2:* `use%2:34:02::` -> "take or consume (regularly or habitually)". Synonyms: habituate. Examples: "She uses drugs rarely".
        *   Analysis: This usually refers to consuming substances (drugs, alcohol) or habitual actions. While one might use software habitually, the core meaning here isn't about consumption or addiction, but operation. It's not the best fit.

    *   *Sense 3:* `use%2:34:00::` -> "use up, consume fully". Synonyms: expend. Examples: "The legislature expended its time on school questions".
        *   Analysis: This implies depletion of resources. Using software does not deplete it (it's not a consumable resource like fuel or time in this specific context). Incorrect.

    *   *Sense 4:* `use%2:41:14::` -> "seek or achieve an end by using to one's advantage". Examples: "She uses her influential friends to get jobs".
        *   Analysis: This implies exploitation or instrumentalization of people/situations for gain. This doesn't fit "use kalgebra" (an inanimate tool).

    *   *Sense 5:* `use%2:41:04::` -> "avail oneself to". Synonyms: practice, apply. Examples: "apply a principle".
        *   Analysis: This is often abstract. "Apply a principle", "practice a religion". While "use" can mean this, the context is operating a specific software tool.

    *   *Sense 6:* `use%2:41:03::` -> "habitually do something (use only in the past tense)".
        *   Analysis: This refers to the auxiliary construction "used to". The target form is "use" (present infinitive), and the context is not about past habits. Incorrect.

3.  **Comparison and Selection:**
    *   Sense 1 covers the standard meaning of employing a tool or object for its intended function.
    *   Kalgebra is a tool.
    *   "It is ... not necessary to know MathML to *employ/utilize* kalgebra."
    *   Sense 1 is the clear winner.

4.  **Format the Output:**
    *   The instruction asks for a JSON object `{"sense_index": X}`.
    *   The list is 1-indexed based on the candidate senses provided.
    *   Sense 1 corresponds to index 1.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: now
Target surface form: now
Context:
kalgebra is a mathematical calculator based on content markup MathML language. Nowadays it is capable to make simple MathML operations (arithmetic and logical) and to representate 2D and 3D graphs. It is actually not necessary to know MathML to use kalgebra. kalgebra is a MathML based graph calculator. Although it was initially MathML oriented it can <t>now</t> be used by everyone with little mathematical knowledge. Here's a screenshot of kalgebra main window

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=now%4:02:05:: | definition=in the historical present; at this point in the narration of a series of past events | examples=President Kennedy now calls in the National Guard; Washington now decides to cross the Delaware
2. sense_key=now%4:02:00:: | definition=in these times; - Nancy Mitford | synonyms=nowadays, today | examples=it is solely by their language that the upper classes nowadays are distinguished; we now rarely see horse-drawn vehicles on city streets
3. sense_key=now%4:02:02:: | definition=used to preface a command or reproof or request | examples=now hear this!; now pay attention
4. sense_key=now%4:02:04:: | definition=at the present moment | synonyms=at present | examples=goods now on sale; the now-aging dictator
5. sense_key=now%4:02:01:: | definition=without delay or hesitation; with no time intervening | synonyms=immediately, instantly, straightaway, straight off, directly, right away | examples=he answered immediately; found an answer straightaway
6. sense_key=now%4:02:07:: | definition=(prefatory or transitional) indicates a change of subject or activity | examples=Now the next problem is...
7. sense_key=now%4:02:06:: | definition=in the immediate past | examples=told me just now

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the context:**
    *   Sentence: "Although it was initially MathML oriented it can **now** be used by everyone with little mathematical knowledge."
    *   Key aspects:
        *   "Initially" vs "now": This contrast highlights a change in state over time.
        *   "It can *now* be used": This refers to the current capability or state of affairs compared to the past ("initially").
        *   It's describing the current status of software (kalgebra).
        *   The previous sentence says "Nowadays it is capable to...".
        *   The meaning is "at the present time" or "currently".

2.  **Analyze the candidate senses:**

    *   **Sense 1:** "in the historical present; at this point in the narration of a series of past events" (e.g., "President Kennedy now calls in the National Guard").
        *   *Evaluation:* This is for narrative storytelling (historical present). The context is a technical description of software, not a narrative of past events. Incorrect.

    *   **Sense 2:** "in these times; - Nancy Mitford" (Synonyms: nowadays, today). (e.g., "we now rarely see horse-drawn vehicles...").
        *   *Evaluation:* This fits very well. It refers to the general current era or state of affairs. The sentence contrasts the initial state with the current state ("in these times"). The previous sentence even uses the word "Nowadays".

    *   **Sense 3:** "used to preface a command or reproof or request" (e.g., "now hear this!").
        *   *Evaluation:* This is an imperative/discourse marker usage. The target word is inside a declarative statement about capability. Incorrect.

    *   **Sense 4:** "at the present moment" (Synonyms: at present). (e.g., "goods now on sale").
        *   *Evaluation:* This is very close to Sense 2. The distinction between "at the present moment" and "in these times" is subtle.
        *   Let's look at the example: "goods now on sale".
        *   Let's look at the context: "it can now be used by everyone".
        *   Is it referring to a specific moment (moment of utterance) or the current era/state? The context implies a shift from the past to the current general state of affairs (similar to "nowadays").
        *   However, WordNet Sense 4 ("at the present moment") often implies a more immediate temporality or specific instances (like "the now-aging dictator").
        *   WordNet Sense 2 ("in these times") explicitly lists "nowadays" as a synonym. The previous sentence uses "Nowadays". The contrast "initially... now" suggests a change in the general condition/era of the software's existence, fitting "in these times" or "nowadays" better than a split-second "present moment".
        *   Let's compare Sense 2 and Sense 4 examples.
            *   Sense 2: "we now rarely see horse-drawn vehicles" -> General current state/era.
            *   Sense 4: "goods now on sale" -> Current status.
        *   The sentence "Although it was initially... it can now be used..." describes a change in the general capability of the software in the current time period. It aligns closely with "nowadays". The text even starts the paragraph with "Nowadays it is capable...". The target sentence elaborates on this current state.
        *   Therefore, Sense 2 ("in these times", synonymous with "nowadays") is the strongest fit because it captures the "current era vs past era" contrast better than Sense 4 (which is often used for immediate states or continuous present). The synonym "nowadays" provided in Sense 2 is the deciding factor, as the context describes the evolution of software capabilities over time.

    *   **Sense 5:** "without delay or hesitation; with no time intervening" (Synonyms: immediately, instantly).
        *   *Evaluation:* The sentence isn't saying the software can be used *immediately/without delay*. It's saying it is currently *able* to be used. Incorrect.

    *   **Sense 6:** "(prefatory or transitional) indicates a change of subject or activity" (e.g., "Now the next problem is...").
        *   *Evaluation:* The word is not used as a transition to a new topic here; it modifies the verb phrase "can be used". Incorrect.

    *   **Sense 7:** "in the immediate past" (e.g., "told me just now").
        *   *Evaluation:* The context is not referring to the immediate past. Incorrect.

3.  **Final Decision:**
    The context contrasts the initial state with the current general state. The text explicitly uses "Nowadays" in the previous sentence. Sense 2 has the definition "in these times" and the synonym "nowadays". This matches the function of the target word "now" in "it can now be used".

    Choice: Sense 2.

provider: Baidu


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: use
Target surface form: used
Context:
kalgebra is a mathematical calculator based on content markup MathML language. Nowadays it is capable to make simple MathML operations (arithmetic and logical) and to representate 2D and 3D graphs. It is actually not necessary to know MathML to use kalgebra. kalgebra is a MathML based graph calculator. Although it was initially MathML oriented it can now be <t>used</t> by everyone with little mathematical knowledge. Here's a screenshot of kalgebra main window

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=use%2:34:01:: | definition=put into service; make work or employ for a particular purpose or for its inherent or natural purpose | synonyms=utilize, utilise, apply, employ | examples=use your head!; we only use Spanish at home
2. sense_key=use%2:34:02:: | definition=take or consume (regularly or habitually) | synonyms=habituate | examples=She uses drugs rarely
3. sense_key=use%2:34:00:: | definition=use up, consume fully | synonyms=expend | examples=The legislature expended its time on school questions
4. sense_key=use%2:41:14:: | definition=seek or achieve an end by using to one's advantage | examples=She uses her influential friends to get jobs; The president's wife used her good connections
5. sense_key=use%2:41:04:: | definition=avail oneself to | synonyms=practice, apply | examples=apply a principle; practice a religion
6. sense_key=use%2:41:03:: | definition=habitually do something (use only in the past tense) | examples=She used to call her mother every week but now she calls only occasionally; I used to get sick when I ate in that dining hall

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The context is about a software called "kalgebra" which is a mathematical calculator. The sentence says "Although it was initially MathML oriented it can now be used by everyone with little mathematical knowledge."

Let me analyze the candidate senses:

1. sense_key=use%2:34:01:: - "put into service; make work or employ for a particular purpose or for its inherent or natural purpose" - This is about employing something for a purpose. Examples: "use your head!", "we only use Spanish at home". This seems like a general sense of using something (a tool, a language, etc.) for a purpose.

2. sense_key=use%2:34:02:: - "take or consume (regularly or habitually)" - This is about consuming something regularly, like drugs. Example: "She uses drugs rarely". Not relevant here.

3. sense_key=use%2:34:00:: - "use up, consume fully" - This is about depleting resources. Example: "The legislature expended its time on school questions". Not relevant here.

4. sense_key=use%2:41:14:: - "seek or achieve an end by using to one's advantage" - This is about leveraging something/someone for personal gain. Examples: "She uses her influential friends to get jobs". Not relevant here.

5. sense_key=use%2:41:04:: - "avail oneself to" - Examples: "apply a principle", "practice a religion". This is about following or applying abstract concepts. Not quite right.

6. sense_key=use%2:41:03:: - "habitually do something (use only in the past tense)" - Examples: "She used to call her mother every week". This is about past habits. This is for "used to" constructions. Not relevant here.

The context is about a software tool being used by people. The sentence says the software "can now be used by everyone" - meaning people can employ/utilize this tool for their purposes (mathematical calculations).

Sense 1 fits best: "put into service; make work or employ for a particular purpose or for its inherent or natural purpose" - the software is being employed/used by people for mathematical purposes. The synonyms "utilize, utilise, apply, employ" match this context well.

So the answer is sense_index: 1

provider: Together


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: little
Target surface form: little
Context:
kalgebra is a mathematical calculator based on content markup MathML language. Nowadays it is capable to make simple MathML operations (arithmetic and logical) and to representate 2D and 3D graphs. It is actually not necessary to know MathML to use kalgebra. kalgebra is a MathML based graph calculator. Although it was initially MathML oriented it can now be used by everyone with <t>little</t> mathematical knowledge. Here's a screenshot of kalgebra main window

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=little%3:00:01:: | definition=limited or below average in number or quantity or magnitude or extent | synonyms=small | examples=a little dining room; a little house
2. sense_key=little%3:00:03:: | definition=(quantifier used with mass nouns) small in quantity or degree; not much or almost none or (with `a') at least some | synonyms=slight | examples=little rain fell in May; gave it little thought
3. sense_key=little%5:00:00:young:00 | definition=(of children and animals) young, immature | synonyms=small | examples=what a big little boy you are; small children
4. sense_key=little%5:00:00:unimportant:00 | definition=(informal) small and of little importance | synonyms=fiddling, footling, lilliputian, niggling, piddling, piffling | examples=a fiddling sum of money; a footling gesture
5. sense_key=little%5:00:00:soft:04 | definition=(of a voice) faint | synonyms=small | examples=a little voice; a still small voice
6. sense_key=little%3:00:00:: | definition=low in stature; not tall | synonyms=short | examples=he was short and stocky; short in stature
7. sense_key=little%5:00:00:lowercase:00 | definition=lowercase | synonyms=minuscule, small | examples=little a; small a
8. sense_key=little%5:00:00:emotional:00 | definition=small in a way that arouses feelings (of tenderness or its opposite depending on the context) | examples=a nice little job; bless your little heart

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the target word and context:**
    *   Target lemma: *little*
    *   Target surface form: *little*
    *   Context sentence: "Although it was initially MathML oriented it can now be used by everyone with <t>little</t> mathematical knowledge."
    *   Contextual meaning: The word "little" modifies "mathematical knowledge". The sentence states that people do not need much knowledge to use the software. It implies a small quantity or degree of abstract knowledge.

2.  **Analyze the candidate senses:**

    *   **Sense 1:** "limited or below average in number or quantity or magnitude or extent" (synonyms: small).
        *   *Analysis:* This usually refers to physical objects (a little dining room). While it mentions quantity, it's often about physical size or countable things.

    *   **Sense 2:** "(quantifier used with mass nouns) small in quantity or degree; not much or almost none or (with `a') at least some" (synonyms: slight).
        *   *Analysis:* This definition explicitly mentions "quantifier used with mass nouns". "Knowledge" is a mass noun (uncountable). The definition "small in quantity or degree" fits perfectly with "mathematical knowledge". The examples "little rain fell in May" (mass noun) and "gave it little thought" (mass noun/abstract concept) align well with "little mathematical knowledge".

    *   **Sense 3:** "(of children and animals) young, immature".
        *   *Analysis:* "Knowledge" is not a child or animal. Incorrect.

    *   **Sense 4:** "(informal) small and of little importance".
        *   *Analysis:* This refers to triviality or lack of importance. While having little knowledge might imply it's not a "heavy" requirement, the primary meaning here is about the *amount* of knowledge required, not the unimportance of the knowledge itself in a derogatory sense. Sense 2 captures the quantifier aspect better.

    *   **Sense 5:** "(of a voice) faint".
        *   *Analysis:* Does not refer to a voice. Incorrect.

    *   **Sense 6:** "low in stature; not tall".
        *   *Analysis:* Refers to physical height. Incorrect.

    *   **Sense 7:** "lowercase".
        *   *Analysis:* Refers to letters. Incorrect.

    *   **Sense 8:** "small in a way that arouses feelings".
        *   *Analysis:* Emotional connotation. "Mathematical knowledge" is neutral here. Incorrect.

3.  **Compare Sense 1 and Sense 2:**
    *   Sense 1 is general ("below average in number or quantity").
    *   Sense 2 is specific to mass nouns ("quantifier used with mass nouns").
    *   "Knowledge" is a mass noun.
    *   The examples for Sense 2 ("little rain", "little thought") are mass nouns.
    *   The example for Sense 1 ("a little dining room") is a count noun.
    *   Therefore, Sense 2 is the specific and correct choice for modifying an uncountable noun like "knowledge".

4.  **Final decision:** Sense 2 is the best fit.

5.  **Formatting:** Return JSON object `{"sense_index": 2}`.

provider: AtlasCloud


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: mathematical
Target surface form: mathematical
Context:
kalgebra is a mathematical calculator based on content markup MathML language. Nowadays it is capable to make simple MathML operations (arithmetic and logical) and to representate 2D and 3D graphs. It is actually not necessary to know MathML to use kalgebra. kalgebra is a MathML based graph calculator. Although it was initially MathML oriented it can now be used by everyone with little <t>mathematical</t> knowledge. Here's a screenshot of kalgebra main window

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=mathematical%3:01:00:: | definition=of or pertaining to or of the nature of mathematics | examples=a mathematical textbook; slide rules and other mathematical instruments
2. sense_key=mathematical%3:00:00:: | definition=relating to or having ability to think in or work with numbers | synonyms=numerical | examples=tests for rating numerical aptitude; a mathematical whiz
3. sense_key=mathematical%5:00:00:unquestionable:00 | definition=beyond question | examples=a mathematical certainty
4. sense_key=mathematical%5:00:00:possible:00 | definition=statistically possible though highly improbable | examples=have a mathematical chance of making the playoffs
5. sense_key=mathematical%5:00:00:exact:00 | definition=characterized by the exactness or precision of mathematics | examples=mathematical precision

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the Context:**
    *   Sentence: "Although it was initially MathML oriented it can now be used by everyone with little <t>mathematical</t> knowledge."
    *   Key phrase: "mathematical knowledge".
    *   The context discusses "kalgebra", a calculator tool based on MathML (Mathematical Markup Language).
    *   It mentions that originally it was MathML oriented, but now it's accessible to people with "little mathematical knowledge".
    *   This implies knowledge related to the field of mathematics (equations, graphs, numbers, logic), rather than a specific ability to calculate numbers mentally (sense 2), certainty (sense 3), statistical improbability (sense 4), or exactness (sense 5).

2.  **Analyze the Candidate Senses:**
    *   **Sense 1:** `mathematical%3:01:00::` | Definition: "of or pertaining to or of the nature of mathematics" | Examples: "a mathematical textbook", "mathematical instruments". This is the general adjectival sense relating to the discipline of mathematics. "Mathematical knowledge" fits this perfectly (knowledge regarding the discipline).
    *   **Sense 2:** `mathematical%3:00:00::` | Definition: "relating to or having ability to think in or work with numbers" | Synonyms: "numerical". Examples: "mathematical whiz". While mathematical knowledge involves numbers, this sense seems to focus more on *aptitude* or the *numerical aspect* specifically, often interchangeable with "numerical" (as seen in the synonyms). "Little numerical knowledge" is possible, but "little mathematical knowledge" usually refers to the broader subject matter (algebra, geometry, etc.), which aligns better with Sense 1. Sense 2 is often used for "mathematical aptitude" or specific numerical contexts.
    *   **Sense 3:** `mathematical%5:00:00:unquestionable:00::` | Definition: "beyond question" | Examples: "a mathematical certainty". This is a metaphorical usage. The context is literal, referring to the subject matter.
    *   **Sense 4:** `mathematical%5:00:00:possible:00::` | Definition: "statistically possible though highly improbable". This is specific to sports odds or probability contexts. Not relevant here.
    *   **Sense 5:** `mathematical%5:00:00:exact:00::` | Definition: "characterized by the exactness or precision of mathematics". Examples: "mathematical precision". This refers to the *quality* of being precise. "Little mathematical knowledge" doesn't mean "little precise knowledge"; it means little knowledge of math.

3.  **Compare Sense 1 and Sense 2:**
    *   Sense 1 is the general definition "of or pertaining to mathematics".
    *   Sense 2 is "relating to... ability to think in or work with numbers" with synonym "numerical".
    *   In the phrase "mathematical knowledge", the word refers to the subject matter (mathematics). One can have mathematical knowledge about geometry, set theory, or logic, which are mathematical (Sense 1) but not strictly "numerical" (Sense 2's synonym).
    *   The context talks about MathML, graphs, and operations. This is the domain of mathematics.
    *   Sense 1 is the superordinate term for "pertaining to mathematics". Sense 2 seems to be a specific subset or usage often aligned with "numerical".
    *   The phrase "mathematical knowledge" refers to knowledge *of mathematics*. This maps directly to Sense 1 ("of or pertaining to... mathematics").
    *   Sense 2 ("mathematical whiz") focuses on the *ability* or *aptitude*. While related, "mathematical knowledge" is about the *content* of the field. Sense 1 covers "textbook" and "instruments", which are objects/concepts related to the field. Knowledge is a concept related to the field.

    Let's check the mappings in WordNet usually.
    Adjective satellites often branch off.
    Sense 1: `mathematical` (pertaining to mathematics).
    Sense 2: `mathematical` (syn: numerical).

    "Mathematical knowledge" -> Knowledge about mathematics.
    Is this Sense 1 or Sense 2?
    Sense 1's examples are "mathematical textbook", "mathematical instruments".
    Sense 2's examples are "tests for rating numerical aptitude", "a mathematical whiz".

    The context implies the user doesn't need deep knowledge of the subject (Mathematics/MathML) to use the calculator.
    Therefore, the adjective modifies "knowledge" to mean "knowledge of mathematics".
    This is "of or pertaining to mathematics" (Sense 1).

    Does it fit Sense 2? "Little ability to work with numbers knowledge"? Awkward phrasing. "Little numerical knowledge"? Maybe, but mathematics is broader than numbers (geometry, logic). The tool does graphs and logical operations. Thus, Sense 1 is more appropriate because it encompasses the whole field, not just numbers.

4.  **Final Decision:**
    The target word "mathematical" modifies "knowledge". The knowledge is about the subject of mathematics. This matches the definition "of or pertaining to or of the nature of mathematics".
    Index: 1.

provider: DeepInfra


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: here
Target surface form: Here
Context:
kalgebra is a mathematical calculator based on content markup MathML language. Nowadays it is capable to make simple MathML operations (arithmetic and logical) and to representate 2D and 3D graphs. It is actually not necessary to know MathML to use kalgebra. kalgebra is a MathML based graph calculator. Although it was initially MathML oriented it can now be used by everyone with little mathematical knowledge. <t>Here</t>'s a screenshot of kalgebra main window kalgebra main window

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=here%4:02:00:: | definition=in or at this place; where the speaker or writer is | examples=I work here; turn here
2. sense_key=here%4:02:02:: | definition=in this circumstance or respect or on this point or detail | examples=what do we have here?; here I must disagree
3. sense_key=here%4:02:01:: | definition=to this place (especially toward the speaker) | synonyms=hither | examples=come here, please
4. sense_key=here%4:02:04:: | definition=at this time; now | examples=we'll adjourn here for lunch and discuss the remaining issues this afternoon

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the Request:**
    *   **Target lemma:** here
    *   **Target surface form:** Here
    *   **Context:** A description of "kalgebra", a mathematical calculator. Specifically, the sentence is "Here's a screenshot of kalgebra main window..."
    *   **Candidate senses:** Four WordNet-style senses.
    *   **Constraints:** Choose the single best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Return *only* a JSON object `{"sense_index": X}`.

2.  **Analyze the Context:**
    *   The sentence containing the target word is: "<t>Here</t>'s a screenshot of kalgebra main window kalgebra main window".
    *   Grammar: "Here's" = "Here is". This is an existential or presentational construction.
    *   Meaning: The speaker/writer is presenting an object (a screenshot) that is present in the text/context right now.

3.  **Analyze the Candidate Senses:**

    *   **Sense 1:** "in or at this place; where the speaker or writer is" (examples: "I work here", "turn here").
        *   *Fit:* Does it mean "at this place"? Not really physically. It's introducing something that follows. "Here" often functions deictically to point to the immediate context or the location of the utterance. In written text, "Here is a screenshot" implies "In this location (the text/document you are reading) is a screenshot." This is a strong contender, but let's check the others. "Place" can be abstract (the text).

    *   **Sense 2:** "in this circumstance or respect or on this point or detail" (examples: "what do we have here?", "here I must disagree").
        *   *Fit:* Is the screenshot a circumstance or a point of detail? Not really. "Here's a screenshot" isn't about a point of argument or a circumstance in the same way "Here I must disagree" is. "What do we have here?" often refers to a situation or a physical discovery. Sense 2 is usually metaphorical or abstract regarding a topic/argument.

    *   **Sense 3:** "to this place (especially toward the speaker)" (synonyms: hither) (examples: "come here, please").
        *   *Fit:* This is motion-oriented. "Here's a screenshot" is not an invitation to move toward the speaker. It is a static presentation. Incorrect.

    *   **Sense 4:** "at this time; now" (examples: "we'll adjourn here for lunch...").
        *   *Fit:* Does it mean "now"? "Now's a screenshot"? No. Incorrect.

4.  **Re-evaluating Sense 1 vs. Sense 2 (and potentially others):**

    *   WordNet definitions for "here" (r) can be tricky with presentational sentences like "Here is X".
    *   Sense 1 definition: "in or at this place". In a text, "this place" is the location in the document. "Here is the photo" means "In this spot (in the book/webpage), the photo is located."
    *   Sense 2 definition: "in this circumstance". "Here's a screenshot" could arguably be seen as "In this situation/context" (the context of the article), but usually, Sense 2 is for abstract points ("Here, the author makes a mistake").
    *   Let's look at standard WSD practices for "Here is/are".
        *   "Here is the book." -> Location in space or text. Matches Sense 1 (place).
        *   "Here, I disagree." -> Point in argument. Matches Sense 2.
    *   The context is a technical description followed by an image. The word "Here" points to the immediate textual location. The screenshot is being placed *in this place* (the document).
    *   Therefore, Sense 1 ("in or at this place") is the standard interpretation for "Here" in presentational structures like "Here is [Object]". Even though the "place" is the document, it fits the schema of Sense 1 better than Sense 2 (topic/respect) or Sense 3 (motion) or Sense 4 (time).

5.  **Final Selection:**
    *   Sense 1 captures the spatial/textual location.
    *   The phrase "Here's a screenshot" effectively means "At this place (in this text), there exists a screenshot."
    *   Sense 1 is the correct choice.

6.  **Formatting Output:**
    *   JSON format: `{"sense_index": 1}`.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: main
Target surface form: main
Context:
kalgebra is a mathematical calculator based on content markup MathML language. Nowadays it is capable to make simple MathML operations (arithmetic and logical) and to representate 2D and 3D graphs. It is actually not necessary to know MathML to use kalgebra. kalgebra is a MathML based graph calculator. Although it was initially MathML oriented it can now be used by everyone with little mathematical knowledge. Here's a screenshot of kalgebra <t>main</t> window kalgebra main window

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=main%5:00:00:important:00 | definition=most important element | synonyms=chief, primary, principal, master | examples=the chief aim of living; the main doors were of solid glass
2. sense_key=main%3:00:02:: | definition=(of a clause) capable of standing syntactically alone as a complete sentence | synonyms=independent | examples=the main (or independent) clause in a complex sentence has at least a subject and a verb
3. sense_key=main%5:00:00:intense:00 | definition=of force; of the greatest possible intensity | examples=by main strength

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the Request:**
    *   Target lemma: `main`
    *   Target surface form: `main`
    *   Context: A description of software called "kalgebra". The specific phrase is "Here's a screenshot of kalgebra main window".
    *   Task: Fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation (WSD).
    *   Constraints: Choose the single best indexed sense (1, 2, or 3). Output only JSON `{"sense_index": X}`. Do not hedge.

2.  **Analyze the Context:**
    *   Sentence: "Here's a screenshot of kalgebra main window kalgebra main window".
    *   Usage: The word `main` is modifying "window".
    *   Meaning in context: "Main window" refers to the primary, most important, or central window of the application. It is the default view or the principal interface users interact with when opening the app.

3.  **Analyze the Candidate Senses:**

    *   **Sense 1:**
        *   Definition: "most important element"
        *   Synonyms: chief, primary, principal, master
        *   Examples: "the chief aim of living", "the main doors were of solid glass"
        *   Fit: Does "most important element" fit "main window"? Yes. Is "main window" the primary/principal window? Yes. This matches the synonym "main" used in "main doors".

    *   **Sense 2:**
        *   Definition: "(of a clause) capable of standing syntactically alone as a complete sentence"
        *   Synonyms: independent
        *   Examples: "the main (or independent) clause..."
        *   Fit: This is a grammatical/linguistic term. The context is about a GUI window, not grammar. Incorrect.

    *   **Sense 3:**
        *   Definition: "of force; of the greatest possible intensity"
        *   Examples: "by main strength"
        *   Fit: This usually relates to physical force or effort (e.g., "main force"). "Main window" has nothing to do with physical intensity. Incorrect.

4.  **Select the Best Sense:**
    *   Sense 1 is the standard adjectival meaning of "main" denoting importance or primacy. "Main window" is a standard colocation in computing, meaning the *primary* window of an application.
    *   Sense 1 synonyms (primary, principal) align perfectly with the function of a "main window".

5.  **Final Formatting:**
    *   The user wants a JSON object: `{"sense_index": 1}`.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: window
Target surface form: window
Context:
kalgebra is a mathematical calculator based on content markup MathML language. Nowadays it is capable to make simple MathML operations (arithmetic and logical) and to representate 2D and 3D graphs. It is actually not necessary to know MathML to use kalgebra. kalgebra is a MathML based graph calculator. Although it was initially MathML oriented it can now be used by everyone with little mathematical knowledge. Here's a screenshot of kalgebra main <t>window</t> kalgebra main window

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=window%1:06:00:: | definition=a framework of wood or metal that contains a glass windowpane and is built into a wall or roof to admit light or air
2. sense_key=window%1:06:01:: | definition=a transparent opening in a vehicle that allow vision out of the sides or back; usually is capable of being opened
3. sense_key=window%1:06:02:: | definition=a transparent panel (as of an envelope) inserted in an otherwise opaque material
4. sense_key=window%1:17:00:: | definition=an opening that resembles a window in appearance or function | examples=he could see them through a window in the trees
5. sense_key=window%1:28:00:: | definition=the time period that is considered best for starting or finishing something | examples=the expanded window will give us time to catch the thieves; they had a window of less than an hour when an attack would have succeeded
6. sense_key=window%1:06:04:: | definition=a pane of glass in a window | synonyms=windowpane | examples=the ball shattered the window
7. sense_key=window%1:06:05:: | definition=an opening in a wall or screen that admits light and air and through which customers can be served | examples=he stuck his head in the window
8. sense_key=window%1:06:03:: | definition=(computer science) a rectangular part of a computer screen that contains a display different from the rest of the screen

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the target lemma and surface form**: The word is "window" (noun), appearing as "window".
2.  **Analyze the context**: The text describes "kalgebra", a "mathematical calculator" software. It talks about graphs, screenshots, and "kalgebra main window". This is clearly a Graphical User Interface (GUI) context.
3.  **Evaluate the candidate senses**:
    *   Sense 1: "framework of wood or metal... built into a wall" - Physical architectural window. Incorrect.
    *   Sense 2: "transparent opening in a vehicle" - Car window. Incorrect.
    *   Sense 3: "transparent panel (as of an envelope)" - Envelope window. Incorrect.
    *   Sense 4: "an opening that resembles a window... in the trees" - Metaphorical/physical opening. Incorrect.
    *   Sense 5: "time period... best for starting or finishing" - Metaphorical time window. Incorrect.
    *   Sense 6: "pane of glass" - Physical glass. Incorrect.
    *   Sense 7: "opening in a wall... customers can be served" - Service window/counter. Incorrect.
    *   Sense 8: "(computer science) a rectangular part of a computer screen..." - This matches the context of software (kalgebra) and screenshots perfectly.

4.  **Select the best sense**: Sense 8 is the standard definition for a GUI window.

5.  **Format the output**: The user requests a JSON object like `{"sense_index": X}` where X is the index number.
    *   Sense 1 corresponds to index 1.
    *   Sense 2 corresponds to index 2.
    *   ...
    *   Sense 8 corresponds to index 8.

    Wait, let me check the list numbering provided in the prompt.
    The prompt lists:
    1. sense_key=window%1:06:00:: ...
    2. sense_key=window%1:06:01:: ...
    3. sense_key=window%1:06:02:: ...
    4. sense_key=window%1:17:00:: ...
    5. sense_key=window%1:28:00:: ...
    6. sense_key=window%1:06:04:: ...
    7. sense_key=window%1:06:05:: ...
    8. sense_key=window%1:06:03:: ...

    The target sense is sense 8 (computer science window).

    However, usually, in these datasets, the index corresponds to the position in the provided list. Let me verify the sense index requested. "Choose the single best indexed sense." usually implies I should output the number associated with the correct definition in the list provided.
    The correct definition is item 8.

    Let's double-check the definitions.
    Item 8: "(computer science) a rectangular part of a computer screen that contains a display different from the rest of the screen".

    Context: "kalgebra main window". This refers to the main GUI window of the application.

    Therefore, the sense_index is 8.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: main
Target surface form: main
Context:
Nowadays it is capable to make simple MathML operations (arithmetic and logical) and to representate 2D and 3D graphs. It is actually not necessary to know MathML to use kalgebra. kalgebra is a MathML based graph calculator. Although it was initially MathML oriented it can now be used by everyone with little mathematical knowledge. Here's a screenshot of kalgebra main window kalgebra <t>main</t> window kalgebra main window consists in a Console tab, a 2D Graph tab, a 3D Graph tab and a Dictionary tab.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=main%5:00:00:important:00 | definition=most important element | synonyms=chief, primary, principal, master | examples=the chief aim of living; the main doors were of solid glass
2. sense_key=main%3:00:02:: | definition=(of a clause) capable of standing syntactically alone as a complete sentence | synonyms=independent | examples=the main (or independent) clause in a complex sentence has at least a subject and a verb
3. sense_key=main%5:00:00:intense:00 | definition=of force; of the greatest possible intensity | examples=by main strength

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the target word:** The target lemma is "main". The surface form is "main".
2.  **Analyze the context:** The sentence is "Here's a screenshot of kalgebra main window kalgebra main window kalgebra main window consists in a Console tab..." The target word appears in the phrase "main window". It modifies "window". It refers to the primary, most important window of the application "kalgebra".
3.  **Analyze the candidate senses:**
    *   **Sense 1:** `main%5:00:00:important:00`
        *   Definition: "most important element"
        *   Synonyms: chief, primary, principal, master
        *   Examples: "the chief aim of living"; "the main doors were of solid glass"
        *   Fit: This sense describes something that is the primary or most important part of something. A "main window" is the primary interface of a software application. The example "main doors" is semantically very similar to "main window" (both physical or virtual structures/entry points).
    *   **Sense 2:** `main%3:00:02::`
        *   Definition: "(of a clause) capable of standing syntactically alone as a complete sentence"
        *   Synonyms: independent
        *   Examples: "the main (or independent) clause in a complex sentence has at least a subject and a verb"
        *   Fit: This is a linguistic/grammatical definition. The context is about a software interface, not grammar. "Main window" is not a clause. This fits poorly.
    *   **Sense 3:** `main%5:00:00:intense:00`
        *   Definition: "of force; of the greatest possible intensity"
        *   Examples: "by main strength"
        *   Fit: This sense relates to physical force or intensity. The context refers to a user interface element. This fits poorly.
4.  **Select the best sense:** Sense 1 is the clear winner. It denotes the "most important" or "primary" aspect of something. The "main window" is the primary window of the application. The example "main doors" aligns well with "main window".
5.  **Format output:** The user wants a JSON object `{"sense_index": X}`. Since Sense 1 is the best choice, the index is 1.

provider: DigitalOcean


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: window
Target surface form: window
Context:
Nowadays it is capable to make simple MathML operations (arithmetic and logical) and to representate 2D and 3D graphs. It is actually not necessary to know MathML to use kalgebra. kalgebra is a MathML based graph calculator. Although it was initially MathML oriented it can now be used by everyone with little mathematical knowledge. Here's a screenshot of kalgebra main window kalgebra main <t>window</t> kalgebra main window consists in a Console tab, a 2D Graph tab, a 3D Graph tab and a Dictionary tab.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=window%1:06:00:: | definition=a framework of wood or metal that contains a glass windowpane and is built into a wall or roof to admit light or air
2. sense_key=window%1:06:01:: | definition=a transparent opening in a vehicle that allow vision out of the sides or back; usually is capable of being opened
3. sense_key=window%1:06:02:: | definition=a transparent panel (as of an envelope) inserted in an otherwise opaque material
4. sense_key=window%1:17:00:: | definition=an opening that resembles a window in appearance or function | examples=he could see them through a window in the trees
5. sense_key=window%1:28:00:: | definition=the time period that is considered best for starting or finishing something | examples=the expanded window will give us time to catch the thieves; they had a window of less than an hour when an attack would have succeeded
6. sense_key=window%1:06:04:: | definition=a pane of glass in a window | synonyms=windowpane | examples=the ball shattered the window
7. sense_key=window%1:06:05:: | definition=an opening in a wall or screen that admits light and air and through which customers can be served | examples=he stuck his head in the window
8. sense_key=window%1:06:03:: | definition=(computer science) a rectangular part of a computer screen that contains a display different from the rest of the screen

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the Target Lemma:** The target word is "window" (noun).
2.  **Analyze the Context:**
    *   The text describes "kalgebra", a software application (a "MathML based graph calculator").
    *   It mentions a "screenshot of kalgebra main window".
    *   It describes the "kalgebra main window" as consisting of tabs ("Console tab, a 2D Graph tab, a 3D Graph tab and a Dictionary tab").
    *   This is clearly referring to a graphical user interface (GUI) element on a computer screen.
3.  **Evaluate Candidate Senses:**
    *   Sense 1: "framework of wood or metal... built into a wall or roof" (Physical window in a building). Incorrect.
    *   Sense 2: "transparent opening in a vehicle" (Car window). Incorrect.
    *   Sense 3: "transparent panel... in an envelope". Incorrect.
    *   Sense 4: "opening that resembles a window... in the trees". Metaphorical/Physical opening. Incorrect.
    *   Sense 5: "time period... for starting or finishing something" (Time window). Incorrect.
    *   Sense 6: "pane of glass" (windowpane). Incorrect.
    *   Sense 7: "opening in a wall... customers can be served" (Service window/ticket window). Incorrect.
    *   Sense 8: "(computer science) a rectangular part of a computer screen that contains a display different from the rest of the screen". This matches the context perfectly. The text talks about a software application ("kalgebra") and its interface ("main window") containing tabs.
4.  **Determine the Index:** Sense 8 corresponds to index 8 in the provided list (counting from 1 based on the prompt format usually, but let's check the list numbering in the prompt).
    *   Candidate list:
        1. window%1:06:00:: (Building window)
        2. window%1:06:01:: (Vehicle window)
        3. window%1:06:02:: (Envelope window)
        4. window%1:17:00:: (Resembling a window)
        5. window%1:28:00:: (Time window)
        6. window%1:06:04:: (Windowpane)
        7. window%1:06:05:: (Service window)
        8. window%1:06:03:: (Computer science window)
    *   The target sense is the last one listed: "(computer science) a rectangular part of a computer screen..."
    *   This is item number 8 in the list provided.
5.  **Final Output Generation:** Format as JSON {"sense_index": 8}.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: main
Target surface form: main
Context:
It is actually not necessary to know MathML to use kalgebra. kalgebra is a MathML based graph calculator. Although it was initially MathML oriented it can now be used by everyone with little mathematical knowledge. Here's a screenshot of kalgebra main window kalgebra main window kalgebra <t>main</t> window consists in a Console tab, a 2D Graph tab, a 3D Graph tab and a Dictionary tab. Below these tabs you will find an input field to type your functions or do your calculations.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=main%5:00:00:important:00 | definition=most important element | synonyms=chief, primary, principal, master | examples=the chief aim of living; the main doors were of solid glass
2. sense_key=main%3:00:02:: | definition=(of a clause) capable of standing syntactically alone as a complete sentence | synonyms=independent | examples=the main (or independent) clause in a complex sentence has at least a subject and a verb
3. sense_key=main%5:00:00:intense:00 | definition=of force; of the greatest possible intensity | examples=by main strength

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
Let me analyze the context to determine the best sense for the word "main" in this sentence.

Context: "Here's a screenshot of kalgebra main window kalgebra main window kalgebra main window consists in a Console tab, a 2D Graph tab, a 3D Graph tab and a Dictionary tab."

The target word is "main" used in phrases like "main window" - referring to the primary/principal window of the kalgebra application.

Let me examine the senses:

1. sense_key=main%5:00:00:important:00 | definition=most important element | synonyms=chief, primary, principal, master | examples=the chief aim of living; the main doors were of solid glass

This sense refers to "most important element" with synonyms like chief, primary, principal, master. The examples show usage like "main doors" which is similar to "main window" - referring to the primary/primary interface.

2. sense_key=main%3:00:02:: | definition=(of a clause) capable of standing syntactically alone as a complete sentence | synonyms=independent | examples=the main (or independent) clause in a complex sentence has at least a subject and a verb

This is a linguistic/grammatical sense about clauses - clearly not applicable here.

3. sense_key=main%5:00:00:intense:00 | definition=of force; of the greatest possible intensity | examples=by main strength

This sense is about force/intensity - not applicable here.

The context uses "main window" to refer to the primary/principal window of the kalgebra application. This aligns with sense 1, which has examples like "main doors" and refers to the "most important element" with synonyms like "primary" and "principal."

Sense 1 is clearly the correct choice here. The "main window" is the primary interface element of the application.

{"sense_index": 1}


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: window
Target surface form: window
Context:
It is actually not necessary to know MathML to use kalgebra. kalgebra is a MathML based graph calculator. Although it was initially MathML oriented it can now be used by everyone with little mathematical knowledge. Here's a screenshot of kalgebra main window kalgebra main window kalgebra main <t>window</t> consists in a Console tab, a 2D Graph tab, a 3D Graph tab and a Dictionary tab. Below these tabs you will find an input field to type your functions or do your calculations.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=window%1:06:00:: | definition=a framework of wood or metal that contains a glass windowpane and is built into a wall or roof to admit light or air
2. sense_key=window%1:06:01:: | definition=a transparent opening in a vehicle that allow vision out of the sides or back; usually is capable of being opened
3. sense_key=window%1:06:02:: | definition=a transparent panel (as of an envelope) inserted in an otherwise opaque material
4. sense_key=window%1:17:00:: | definition=an opening that resembles a window in appearance or function | examples=he could see them through a window in the trees
5. sense_key=window%1:28:00:: | definition=the time period that is considered best for starting or finishing something | examples=the expanded window will give us time to catch the thieves; they had a window of less than an hour when an attack would have succeeded
6. sense_key=window%1:06:04:: | definition=a pane of glass in a window | synonyms=windowpane | examples=the ball shattered the window
7. sense_key=window%1:06:05:: | definition=an opening in a wall or screen that admits light and air and through which customers can be served | examples=he stuck his head in the window
8. sense_key=window%1:06:03:: | definition=(computer science) a rectangular part of a computer screen that contains a display different from the rest of the screen

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the Context:** The sentence is "Here's a screenshot of kalgebra main window kalgebra main window kalgebra main window consists in a Console tab...". The word "kalgebra" refers to a software application (a graph calculator). The "window" refers to the graphical user interface (GUI) element on a computer screen where the application runs. It mentions tabs (Console, 2D Graph, 3D Graph, Dictionary) and an input field. This is clearly a computer science context.

2.  **Analyze the Candidate Senses:**
    *   Sense 1: Framework of wood/metal in a wall (physical architectural window). -> Incorrect.
    *   Sense 2: Transparent opening in a vehicle. -> Incorrect.
    *   Sense 3: Transparent panel in an envelope. -> Incorrect.
    *   Sense 4: Opening resembling a window (e.g., in trees). -> Incorrect.
    *   Sense 5: Time period (window of opportunity). -> Incorrect.
    *   Sense 6: Pane of glass (windowpane). -> Incorrect.
    *   Sense 7: Opening for serving customers (e.g., ticket window). -> Incorrect.
    *   Sense 8: (computer science) a rectangular part of a computer screen that contains a display different from the rest of the screen. -> Correct. This matches the context of a software application's GUI window perfectly.

3.  **Determine the Index:** Sense 8 is the last one listed.
    *   Sense 1: window%1:06:00::
    *   Sense 2: window%1:06:01::
    *   Sense 3: window%1:06:02::
    *   Sense 4: window%1:17:00::
    *   Sense 5: window%1:28:00::
    *   Sense 6: window%1:06:04::
    *   Sense 7: window%1:06:05::
    *   Sense 8: window%1:06:03::

    Wait, let me re-read the list order provided in the prompt to ensure the index is correct based on the order given.
    1. sense_key=window%1:06:00:: (Physical window)
    2. sense_key=window%1:06:01:: (Vehicle window)
    3. sense_key=window%1:06:02:: (Envelope window)
    4. sense_key=window%1:17:00:: (Opening in trees)
    5. sense_key=window%1:28:00:: (Time period)
    6. sense_key=window%1:06:04:: (Pane of glass)
    7. sense_key=window%1:06:05:: (Service window)
    8. sense_key=window%1:06:03:: (Computer science window)

    The target sense is the one related to computer science.
    The prompt asks to return the index relative to the candidate senses list provided.
    Therefore, the sense index is 8.

4.  **Format the Output:** JSON object `{"sense_index": 8}`.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: consist
Target surface form: consists
Context:
It is actually not necessary to know MathML to use kalgebra. kalgebra is a MathML based graph calculator. Although it was initially MathML oriented it can now be used by everyone with little mathematical knowledge. Here's a screenshot of kalgebra main window kalgebra main window kalgebra main window <t>consists</t> in a Console tab, a 2D Graph tab, a 3D Graph tab and a Dictionary tab. Below these tabs you will find an input field to type your functions or do your calculations.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=consist%2:42:00:: | definition=originate (in) | synonyms=dwell, lie, lie in | examples=The problems dwell in the social injustices in this country
2. sense_key=consist%2:42:04:: | definition=have its essential character; be comprised or contained in; be embodied in | examples=The payment consists in food; What does love consist in?
3. sense_key=consist%2:42:02:: | definition=be consistent in form, tenor, or character; be congruous | examples=Desires are to be satisfied only so far as consists with an approved end
4. sense_key=consist%2:42:01:: | definition=be composed of | synonyms=comprise | examples=The land he conquered comprised several provinces; What does this dish consist of?

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The user wants me to perform Word Sense Disambiguation for the target lemma "consist" (specifically the form "consists") in a given context.

**Context Analysis:**
The sentence is: "kalgebra main window consists in a Console tab, a 2D Graph tab, a 3D Graph tab and a Dictionary tab."
Actually, looking at the text provided: "...kalgebra main window <t>consists</t> in a Console tab..."
Wait, looking closely at the preposition.
Text: "Here's a screenshot of kalgebra main window kalgebra main window kalgebra main window <t>consists</t> in a Console tab, a 2D Graph tab, a 3D Graph tab and a Dictionary tab."

There is a slight oddity in the text provided: "consists in". Usually, when meaning "be composed of", we use "consist of". Let's check the senses provided.

**Candidate Senses Analysis:**

*   **Sense 1:** `originate (in)`
    *   Synonyms: dwell, lie, lie in
    *   Example: The problems dwell in the social injustices...
    *   Does the window "originate in" the tabs? No. The tabs are parts of the window.

*   **Sense 2:** `have its essential character; be comprised or contained in; be embodied in`
    *   Example: The payment consists in food; What does love consist in?
    *   This sense usually uses "consist in" (preposition). It often refers to abstract concepts (payment, love, happiness).
    *   However, the definition mentions "be comprised... in".
    *   Let's look at the specific context again. "The window consists in a Console tab...".
    *   The meaning here is composition/parts. The window *is made up of* these tabs.
    *   Is "consist in" idiomatic for physical composition? Usually, we say "consist of" for composition.
    *   However, the text explicitly says "consists **in**".
    *   Let's check Sense 4.

*   **Sense 3:** `be consistent in form, tenor, or character; be congruous`
    *   Example: Desires are to be satisfied only so far as consists with an approved end
    *   This doesn't fit. This is about consistency/congruency.

*   **Sense 4:** `be composed of`
    *   Synonyms: comprise
    *   Examples: The land he conquered comprised several provinces; What does this dish consist of?
    *   Definition: "be composed of".
    *   This fits the meaning perfectly (The window is composed of tabs).
    *   The issue is the preposition. The text says "consists **in**". Sense 4 examples say "consist **of**".
    *   However, Sense 2 says "have its essential character; be comprised or contained in; be embodied in".
    *   Let's look at WordNet definitions carefully.
    *   WordNet 3.1:
        *   consist%2:42:00:: (dwell, lie, lie in) -> "originate (in)"
        *   consist%2:42:04:: -> "have its essential character; be comprised or contained in; be embodied in". Example: "The payment consists in food".
        *   consist%2:42:01:: (comprise) -> "be composed of". Example: "What does this dish consist of?"

    *   Let's look at the context again. "kalgebra main window consists in a Console tab..."
    *   Ideally, it should be "consists of".
    *   If the text uses "consists in", does it mean "is embodied in" (Sense 2)? "The window is embodied in a tab"? That sounds backwards. A tab is a part of the window.
    *   Perhaps the text in the context has a typo/usage error (writing "in" instead of "of").
    *   Or perhaps the text is using the specific sense 2 which allows "in".
    *   Definition 2: "be comprised or contained in".
        *   If A consists in B, B contains A? No, usually "A consists in B" means B is the essence of A.
        *   Example: "Happiness consists in activity." (Happiness is found in activity).
        *   Example: "The payment consists in food." (The payment takes the form of food).
    *   Let's check the reverse. "The Console tab consists in the window." -> The essence of the tab is the window? No.
    *   "The window consists in the tabs." -> The essence of the window is the tabs?
    *   The intended meaning is clearly **composition**. The window has these components.
    *   The standard sense for composition is Sense 4 ("be composed of").
    *   The standard sense for "consist in" is Sense 2 (essence/embodiment) or Sense 1 (originate).

    *   Let's look at the source of the text. "kalgebra main window consists in a Console tab..."
    *   This looks like a technical documentation snippet.
    *   If I assume the text is correct and uses "consists in" grammatically:
        *   "The window consists in a Console tab..." -> The essence of the window is found in the Console tab? Or the window is comprised in the tab?
        *   This makes little sense physically.
    *   If I assume the text is a slightly ungrammatical usage of "consist" for composition (using "in" instead of "of"):
        *   Then the intended meaning corresponds to Sense 4.
    *   However, linguists often map "consist in" to Sense 2.
    *   Let's evaluate Sense 2's definition again: "be comprised or contained in".
    *   If X consists in Y, X is comprised in Y? Or X is comprised of Y?
    *   "The payment consists in food" -> The payment is food.
    *   "The window consists in a Console tab..." -> The window is the Console tab?
    *   The list continues: "...a 2D Graph tab, a 3D Graph tab and a Dictionary tab."
    *   So the window consists in [A, B, C, D].
    *   This is a list of parts.
    *   Sense 4 is "be composed of". The examples list parts: "several provinces".
    *   Sense 2 examples: "food" (singular mass), "love" (abstract).

    *   Key distinction:
        *   Sense 2 is abstract essence. "Happiness consists in virtue."
        *   Sense 4 is physical composition/parts. "The team consists of 5 players."
        *   The context lists GUI elements (parts of the interface).
        *   The meaning is clearly composition (Sense 4 meaning).
        *   The preposition is "in".
        *   Is there a sense of "consist" that uses "in" for composition?
        *   Historically, "consist in" meant "exist in, have essence in". "Consist of" is for composition.
        *   However, the provided Sense 2 definition includes "be comprised ... in".
        *   Let's look at the mapping provided by the user.
        *   Sense 4: `be composed of`. Note the preposition "of" in the example.
        *   Sense 2: `have its essential character; be comprised or contained in`. Note the preposition "in" in the example. Note the definition "be comprised ... in".
    *   If the text uses "in", strictly speaking, it aligns with Sense 2's syntactic frame, but the semantics (list of parts) align with Sense 4.
    *   BUT, Sense 2 definition says "be comprised ... in".
    *   Wait. "Comprise" can be used as "X comprises Y" (Y is part of X) or "Y is comprised of X" (Y is part of X) - wait, that's "composed".
    *   Standard usage: "The whole comprises the parts." "The parts compose the whole." "The whole is composed of the parts."
    *   WordNet Sense 2 definition: "be comprised ... in".
    *   If "The window consists in the tabs", and Sense 2 says "be comprised ... in".
    *   Does Sense 2 mean composition?
        *   Example: "The payment consists in food."
        *   This sounds like "The payment takes the form of food."
        *   Example: "What does love consist in?"
        *   This is asking for the essence/definition.
    *   Context: "The window consists in a Console tab..."
    *   This lists components. The meaning is composition.
    *   If I choose Sense 4, I ignore the preposition "in" (which is a strong syntactic cue for Sense 1 or 2) in favor of the semantic meaning (composition).
    *   If I choose Sense 2, I respect the preposition "in" and the definition "be comprised ... in", but the semantics of listing GUI tabs is borderline for "essential character" vs "physical composition".
    *   However, Sense 2's definition explicitly includes "be comprised ... in". This phrasing ("be comprised") links it to composition. "Comprise" means "to be made up of".
    *   If Sense 2 says "be comprised ... in", it suggests that "consist in" can mean composition.
    *   Let's check if "be comprised in" is an archaic or specific sense of composition.
    *   In older English, "consist in" was used for composition. But modern English uses "consist of".
    *   WordNet separates them.
        *   Sense 2 is usually "consist in" (Essence).
        *   Sense 4 is usually "consist of" (Composition).
    *   The text provided says: "kalgebra main window **consists in**..."
    *   It lists parts.
    *   If the author made a mistake and meant "consists of", the correct sense *conceptually* is Sense 4. WSD usually annotates the intended meaning, but if the lemma+preposition forms a distinct construction from another sense, we must be careful.
    *   However, look at Sense 2's definition again: "be comprised or contained in".
    *   "Comprise" is the keyword for composition.
    *   If the definition of Sense 2 includes "be comprised", it covers composition. And it allows the preposition "in".
    *   Therefore, Sense 2 covers the usage "consist in" where the meaning is composition.
    *   Sense 4 specifically uses "consist of".
    *   Let's check the WordNet hierarchy/definitions for this specific instance.
    *   WordNet 3.0:
        *   1. dwell, consist, lie, lie in -- (originate (in); "The problems dwell in the social injustices in this country")
        *   2. consist -- (have its essential character; be comprised or contained in; be embodied in; "The payment consists in food"; "What does love consist in?")
        *   3. consist -- (be consistent in form, tenor, or character; be congruous)
        *   4. consist, comprise -- (be composed of; "The land he conquered comprised several provinces"; "What does this dish consist of?")

    *   The target text uses "consists **in**".
    *   Sense 2 definition explicitly handles "consist in" (via examples and definition "contained in").
    *   Sense 2 definition includes "be comprised". "Comprise" implies composition.
    *   So, Sense 2 ("consist in") covers "composition" when the preposition is "in".
    *   Sense 4 ("consist of") covers "composition" when the preposition is "of".
    *   Since the text uses "in", the correct sense is Sense 2. The definition "be comprised ... in" justifies mapping the composition meaning onto the "in" construction.

    *   Alternative view: The text is erroneous ("consist in" used for "consist of"). Even so, in WSD tasks, we often tag the sense that fits the *usage* (syntactic + semantic). The usage "consist in" aligns with Sense 2. The semantic of "be comprised" (part of Sense 2) aligns with the context of listing parts.
    *   If I were to choose Sense 4, I would be correcting the text to "consists of".
    *   If I choose Sense 2, I am saying "consist in" (Sense 2) can mean composition. The definition supports this ("be comprised"). The "essential character" part of Sense 2 applies well to abstract concepts, but listing the components of a software window (what it consists of/in) could be argued as defining its essential make-up.
    *   Let's check synonyms for Sense 2: None listed in the prompt's sense block? Wait, prompt says "synonyms=dwell, lie, lie in" for Sense 1. Synonyms for Sense 4 are "comprise".
    *   Sense 2 Synonyms: None provided in the prompt snippet (it just lists definition and examples).
    *   Prompt Sense 2: `sense_key=consist%2:42:04:: | definition=have its essential character; be comprised or contained in; be embodied in | examples=The payment consists in food; What does love consist in?`
    *   Prompt Sense 4: `sense_key=consist%2:42:01:: | definition=be composed of | synonyms=comprise | examples=The land he conquered comprised several provinces; What does this dish consist of?`

    *   Comparison:
        *   Sense 4 is the standard sense for "The window consists of tabs".
        *   Sense 2 is the standard sense for "Happiness consists in activity".
        *   The text has "consists in".
        *   If "consists in" is used for a list of components, is it Sense 2 or Sense 4?
        *   Linguistically, "consist in" for composition is rare/archaic or erroneous. "Consist of" is standard for composition.
        *   However, WordNet Sense 2 includes "be comprised ... in".
        *   If a user writes "consist in [list of parts]", they are using the form of Sense 2 but the meaning of Sense 4.
        *   Does Sense 2 *really* cover composition?
        *   Example: "The payment consists in food." -> Payment is food. Composition? Or Essence? It's a transfer of goods. It's effectively composition (the payment is made of food).
        *   If Sense 2 covers "be comprised", it covers composition with the preposition "in".
        *   Thus, selecting Sense 2 is the correct linguistic choice for the form "consist in" even if the meaning is compositional, because Sense 2 is defined as "be comprised ... in".

    *   Let's verify if "be comprised in" is a standard definition for Sense 2.
    *   Yes, WordNet Sense 2 includes "be comprised".
    *   Therefore, Sense 2 is the correct answer. It captures the syntax ("in") and the semantic aspect of "being comprised" (composition) defined within that sense.

    *   Let's double check Sense 1. "Originate (in)". "The problems dwell in the social injustices". "The window originates in a Console tab". No.
    *   Let's double check Sense 3. "Consistent". No.

    *   Choice between Sense 2 and Sense 4.
    *   Sense 4 requires "of".
    *   Sense 2 requires "in".
    *   Context has "in".
    *   Context meaning: Composition (window made of tabs).
    *   Sense 2 definition: "have its essential character; be comprised or contained in".
    *   Does "window consists in tabs" fit "be comprised ... in"? Yes.
    *   Does it fit "have essential character"? A window's essence is its tabs? Yes, structurally.
    *   Does it fit "be embodied in"? The window is embodied in the tabs? Yes.
    *   So Sense 2 fits the syntax and the definition scope provided by WordNet.

    *   Conclusion: Sense 2.
    *   Wait, let's look at the JSON format. {"sense_index": 2}.

    Let me re-read carefully.
    Sense 2 definition: "have its essential character; be comprised or contained in; be embodied in"
    Sense 4 definition: "be composed of"
    Context: "window consists in a Console tab..."

    If I treat this as a strict WSD task on the provided text:
    The text uses "consists in".
    WordNet maps "consist in" -> Sense 2.
    WordNet maps "consist of" -> Sense 4.
    Even though the meaning is compositional, the usage "consist in" falls under Sense 2's definition of "be comprised ... in".

    If I have to choose the *best* indexed sense.
    Sense 4 is for "consist of".
    Sense 2 is for "consist in".
    The text has "consist in".
    Therefore, Sense 2.

    Is there any reason to think Sense 1 is better?
    "Originate (in)". The window originates in the tabs? No.

    So it's definitely Sense 2.