[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: subject
Target surface form: subject
Context:
Is immigration a burden or an opportunity for the economy? Immigration policy under Nicolas Sarkozy was criticised from various aspects a congestion of police, legal and administrative services subjected to a policy of numbers and the compatibility of that policy with the self-proclaimed status of the country as the country of French human rights. More recently, it is administrative harassment of foreign students, which is topical, with the minister of the interior ("Libération" on 23 May) declaring that France "does not need foreign talent, bricklayers and waiters." But it is only rarely analyzed from the economic viewpoint. There is a lot of consensus between the Left and the Right on this <t>subject</t>. On the Right, the tone was set by Jacques Chirac, who declared in 1976 that "900,000 unemployed would not become a problem in a country with 2 million of foreign workers," and on the Left by Michel Rocard explaining in 1990 that France "can not accommodate all the world's misery."

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=subject%1:10:00:: | definition=the subject matter of a conversation or discussion | synonyms=topic, theme | examples=he didn't want to discuss that subject; it was a very sensitive topic
2. sense_key=subject%1:06:00:: | definition=something (a person or object or scene) selected by an artist or photographer for graphic representation | synonyms=content, depicted object | examples=a moving picture of a train is more dramatic than a still picture of the same subject
3. sense_key=subject%1:09:00:: | definition=a branch of knowledge | synonyms=discipline, subject area, subject field, field, field of study, study | examples=in what discipline is his doctorate?; teachers should be well trained in their subject
4. sense_key=subject%1:09:01:: | definition=some situation or event that is thought about | synonyms=topic, issue, matter | examples=he kept drifting off the topic; he had been thinking about the subject for several years
5. sense_key=subject%1:10:01:: | definition=(grammar) one of the two main constituents of a sentence; the grammatical constituent about which something is predicated
6. sense_key=subject%1:18:01:: | definition=a person who is subjected to experimental or other observational procedures; someone who is an object of investigation | synonyms=case, guinea pig | examples=the subjects for this investigation were selected randomly; the cases that we studied were drawn from two different communities
7. sense_key=subject%1:18:00:: | definition=a person who owes allegiance to that nation | synonyms=national | examples=a monarch has a duty to his subjects
8. sense_key=subject%1:10:02:: | definition=(logic) the first term of a proposition

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

[Assistant] sense_index": 1}

[User] Your previous answer was invalid. Choose one candidate index between 1 and 8. Return only valid JSON exactly like {"sense_index": 1}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the Target Lemma and Surface Form**: The target lemma is "subject" and the surface form is "subject".
2.  **Analyze the Context**:
    *   The sentence is: "There is a lot of consensus between the Left and the Right on this <t>subject</t>."
    *   The broader context discusses immigration policy, its economic impact, political stances (Left vs. Right), and specific quotes from politicians (Chirac, Rocard).
    *   The word "subject" here refers to the topic of discussion, specifically "immigration" and its economic/political implications.
3.  **Evaluate Candidate Senses**:
    *   Sense 1: "the subject matter of a conversation or discussion". Synonyms: topic, theme. Examples: "he didn't want to discuss that subject". This fits perfectly. The text is discussing a political issue (immigration), which is a topic of conversation/debate.
    *   Sense 2: "something selected by an artist...". This is about art/photography. Not relevant.
    *   Sense 3: "a branch of knowledge". Synonyms: discipline, subject area. This usually refers to school subjects (Math, Science) or academic fields. While immigration could be a subject of study, the context here is about a specific political issue being discussed/debated, not an academic discipline per se. Sense 1 is a better fit for "topic of discussion".
    *   Sense 4: "some situation or event that is thought about". Synonyms: topic, issue, matter. This is very close to Sense 1. Let's distinguish. Sense 1 emphasizes "conversation or discussion". Sense 4 emphasizes "situation or event thought about". The context says "consensus... on this subject". This implies a topic of political debate/discussion. Sense 1's examples ("discuss that subject") align slightly better with the political discourse context than Sense 4's examples ("thinking about the subject"), though they are often conflated. However, WordNet often distinguishes "topic of conversation" (Sense 1) from "matter/issue one thinks about" (Sense 4). Immigration is an "issue" or "matter" here, but the frame "consensus ... on this subject" strongly implies a topic of debate/conversation. Let's look at the synonyms for Sense 4: "topic, issue, matter". Sense 1 synonyms: "topic, theme". "Immigration" is definitely an issue. But usually, when people say "on this subject", they refer to Sense 1 (topic of discussion). Let's check the definition of Sense 1 again vs Sense 4. Sense 1: "subject matter of a conversation or discussion". The text discusses political stances and consensus regarding immigration. It is a matter of public discourse. Sense 4 (often mapped to "topic" or "matter" in other dictionaries) is very broad. Sense 1 is specific to discourse. Given the context of political analysis and consensus (which implies dialogue or positioning), Sense 1 is strong. However, Sense 4 is also a strong contender because immigration is a "situation or event". Let's look at the examples provided in the prompt for Sense 1: "he didn't want to discuss that subject". Sense 4: "he had been thinking about the subject". In the text, there is a consensus *on* the subject (agreement regarding the topic). This leans towards Sense 1 (discussion topic). Sense 4 is often used for the content of a thought process or a problem to be solved. Immigration is a problem/issue. But "on this subject" usually introduces the *topic* of the sentence/discourse.
    *   Let's re-evaluate Sense 1 vs Sense 4.
        *   Sense 1: topic of conversation.
        *   Sense 4: situation/event thought about (issue).
        *   Immigration is indeed an "issue". The text says "immigration policy... was criticised... rarely analyzed... consensus... on this subject".
        *   Sense 4's synonyms are "topic, issue, matter".
        *   Sense 1's synonyms are "topic, theme".
        *   Often, Sense 4 is used for "subject" in phrases like "subject of the sentence" (which is Sense 5 here) or philosophical subjects. Wait, Sense 4 definition in WordNet 3.0/3.1 usually maps to `topic` or `matter`. In WordNet, `topic` (noun) has senses. `subject` (Sense 1) is `topic`. `subject` (Sense 4) is often `subject matter` or `matter`.
        *   Let's look at the WordNet hierarchy structure usually found in standard versions.
        *   Sense 1 (WN 3.0: 1:09:00 or 1:10:00 depending on version mapping): "the subject matter of a conversation or discussion".
        *   Sense 4 (WN 3.0: 1:09:01 usually "issue, matter, topic"): "some situation or event that is thought about".
        *   In this specific context, "There is a lot of consensus... on this subject". The subject is the *topic* of the consensus/agreement. Consensus implies a discussion or a position taken on an issue. Sense 4's definition "situation or event that is thought about" fits "issue". Sense 1's definition "subject matter of a conversation or discussion" fits "topic".
        *   Usually, "topic" is the most direct synonym for "subject" in this context. Sense 1 has synonym "topic". Sense 4 has synonym "topic".
        *   However, Sense 1 is the primary sense for "topic of discourse". Sense 4 is often broader ("the subject of the inquiry").
        *   Let's look at the examples again.
        *   Sense 1: "he didn't want to discuss that subject".
        *   Sense 4: "he kept drifting off the topic" (wait, the example for sense 4 says "drifting off the topic"?? No, the prompt text for Sense 4 example is "he kept drifting off the topic; he had been thinking about the subject for several years").
        *   Actually, in WordNet, Sense 1 is usually the "topic/theme" sense. Sense 4 is the "issue/matter" sense.
        *   Immigration is a political issue. It is the "subject matter of a conversation" (Sense 1) and a "situation... thought about" (Sense 4).
        *   Which is better? The phrase "on this subject" collocates highly with Sense 1 (topic of conversation). The previous sentences describe a debate/critique ("criticised", "analyzed", "consensus"). These are discursive actions. Therefore, Sense 1 is the most precise fit for a subject of discourse.
    *   Sense 5: Grammatical subject. Incorrect.
    *   Sense 6: Experimental subject. Incorrect.
    *   Sense 7: Political subject (citizen). Incorrect.
    *   Sense 8: Logic subject. Incorrect.

    **Decision between Sense 1 and Sense 4**:
    Sense 1 focuses on "conversation or discussion".
    Sense 4 focuses on "situation or event that is thought about".
    The context is political commentary: "Immigration policy... was criticised... analyzed... consensus". This is a public discussion. The word "subject" refers to the topic of this discussion (immigration).
    While it is an "issue" (Sense 4), the specific usage "consensus on this subject" links directly to the notion of a topic of agreement/discussion.
    WordNet often distinguishes these. Sense 1 is usually the top-ranked sense for "topic".
    Let's verify the Sense Key mapping in the prompt.
    Sense 1: `subject%1:10:00::` (topic, theme).
    Sense 4: `subject%1:09:01::` (topic, issue, matter). Note: In some WordNet versions, the order is swapped, but let's stick to the prompt's definitions.
    Sense 4 definition "some situation or event that is thought about" sounds like "subject matter" of a thought/problem. Sense 1 "subject matter of a conversation or discussion" fits the political discourse context better. "Consensus" is a result of discussion/positions.
    I will choose Sense 1 because the text explicitly frames the "subject" as something "criticised", "analyzed", and having "consensus" regarding it—activities constituting discussion and conversation.

    Therefore, the correct index is 1.

provider: Friendli


attempt_kind: initial

status: success

[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: right
Target surface form: Right
Context:
Is immigration a burden or an opportunity for the economy? Immigration policy under Nicolas Sarkozy was criticised from various aspects a congestion of police, legal and administrative services subjected to a policy of numbers and the compatibility of that policy with the self-proclaimed status of the country as the country of French human rights. More recently, it is administrative harassment of foreign students, which is topical, with the minister of the interior ("Libération" on 23 May) declaring that France "does not need foreign talent, bricklayers and waiters." But it is only rarely analyzed from the economic viewpoint. There is a lot of consensus between the Left and the Right on this subject. On the <t>Right</t>, the tone was set by Jacques Chirac, who declared in 1976 that "900,000 unemployed would not become a problem in a country with 2 million of foreign workers," and on the Left by Michel Rocard explaining in 1990 that France "can not accommodate all the world's misery." The only difference, the degree of generosity

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=right%1:07:00:: | definition=an abstract idea of that which is due to a person or governmental body by law or tradition or nature; ; - Eleanor Roosevelt | examples=they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights; Certain rights can never be granted to the government but must be kept in the hands of the people
2. sense_key=right%1:15:00:: | definition=location near or direction toward the right side; i.e. the side to the south when a person or object faces east | examples=he stood on the right
3. sense_key=right%1:06:00:: | definition=the piece of ground in the outfield on the catcher's right | synonyms=right field
4. sense_key=right%1:14:00:: | definition=those who support political or social or economic conservatism; those who believe that things are better left unchanged | synonyms=right wing
5. sense_key=right%1:08:00:: | definition=the hand that is on the right side of the body | synonyms=right hand | examples=he writes with his right hand but pitches with his left; hit him with quick rights to the body
6. sense_key=right%1:04:00:: | definition=a turn toward the side of the body that is on the south when the person is facing east | examples=take a right at the corner
7. sense_key=right%1:07:01:: | definition=anything in accord with principles of justice | synonyms=rightfulness | examples=he feels he is in the right; the rightfulness of his claim
8. sense_key=right%1:21:00:: | definition=(frequently plural) the interest possessed by law or custom in some intangible thing | examples=mineral rights; film rights

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

finish_reason: stop

role: assistant

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the Target Lemma and Form**: The target lemma is "right", and the surface form in the text is "Right" (capitalized). The context discusses politics, specifically immigration policy, and contrasts "the Left and the Right".

2.  **Analyze the Context**:
    *   Sentence: "There is a lot of consensus between the Left and the Right on this subject."
    *   Sentence: "On the Right, the tone was set by Jacques Chirac..."
    *   The context explicitly contrasts "Left" and "Right" as political factions or ideologies.
    *   Jacques Chirac is mentioned as setting the tone for the "Right". Jacques Chirac was a French conservative politician.
    *   Michel Rocard is mentioned regarding the "Left".
    *   The discussion involves economic viewpoints, political consensus, and immigration policy.

3.  **Evaluate Candidate Senses**:
    *   *Sense 1 (abstract idea of due)*: Relates to legal or moral rights. Not fitting for a political faction.
    *   *Sense 2 (location/direction)*: Spatial orientation. Not fitting for a political group.
    *   *Sense 3 (baseball position)*: Specific to baseball. Not relevant.
    *   *Sense 4 (political conservatives)*: Definition: "those who support political or social or economic conservatism; those who believe that things are better left unchanged". Synonyms: "right wing".
        *   This matches the context perfectly. The text discusses the political "Right" (conservatives) represented by Jacques Chirac, contrasted with the "Left".
    *   *Sense 5 (right hand)*: Anatomical. Not relevant.
    *   *Sense 6 (turn)*: Spatial direction. Not relevant.
    *   *Sense 7 (justice)*: Moral correctness. Not relevant.
    *   *Sense 8 (interest in intangible)*: Legal ownership (e.g., mineral rights). Not relevant.

4.  **Select the Best Sense**: Sense 4 is the definition of the political "Right". The context clearly refers to the political spectrum.

5.  **Format the Output**: The user wants a JSON object `{"sense_index": X}`. The index corresponding to the chosen sense (sense_key=right%1:14:00::) is 4.

format: unknown

native_finish_reason: stop

provider: StreamLake

currency: USD


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: tone
Target surface form: tone
Context:
Is immigration a burden or an opportunity for the economy? Immigration policy under Nicolas Sarkozy was criticised from various aspects a congestion of police, legal and administrative services subjected to a policy of numbers and the compatibility of that policy with the self-proclaimed status of the country as the country of French human rights. More recently, it is administrative harassment of foreign students, which is topical, with the minister of the interior ("Libération" on 23 May) declaring that France "does not need foreign talent, bricklayers and waiters." But it is only rarely analyzed from the economic viewpoint. There is a lot of consensus between the Left and the Right on this subject. On the Right, the <t>tone</t> was set by Jacques Chirac, who declared in 1976 that "900,000 unemployed would not become a problem in a country with 2 million of foreign workers," and on the Left by Michel Rocard explaining in 1990 that France "can not accommodate all the world's misery." The only difference, the degree of generosity

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=tone%1:10:01:: | definition=the quality of a person's voice | synonyms=tone of voice | examples=he began in a conversational tone; he spoke in a nervous tone of voice
2. sense_key=tone%1:07:02:: | definition=(linguistics) a pitch or change in pitch of the voice that serves to distinguish words in tonal languages | examples=the Beijing dialect uses four tones
3. sense_key=tone%1:07:01:: | definition=(music) the distinctive property of a complex sound (a voice or noise or musical sound) | synonyms=timbre, timber, quality | examples=the timbre of her soprano was rich and lovely; the muffled tones of the broken bell summoned them to meet
4. sense_key=tone%1:26:01:: | definition=the general atmosphere of a place or situation and the effect that it has on people | synonyms=spirit, feel, feeling, flavor, flavour, look | examples=the feel of the city excited him; a clergyman improved the tone of the meeting
5. sense_key=tone%1:07:00:: | definition=a quality of a given color that differs slightly from another color | synonyms=shade, tint, tincture | examples=after several trials he mixed the shade of pink that she wanted
6. sense_key=tone%1:10:02:: | definition=a notation representing the pitch and duration of a musical sound | synonyms=note, musical note | examples=the singer held the note too long
7. sense_key=tone%1:09:00:: | definition=a steady sound without overtones | synonyms=pure tone | examples=they tested his hearing with pure tones of different frequencies
8. sense_key=tone%1:26:02:: | definition=the elastic tension of living muscles, arteries, etc. that facilitate response to stimuli | synonyms=tonicity, tonus | examples=the doctor tested my tonicity
9. sense_key=tone%1:10:00:: | definition=a musical interval of two semitones | synonyms=whole tone, step, whole step
10. sense_key=tone%1:07:03:: | definition=the quality of something (an act or a piece of writing) that reveals the attitudes and presuppositions of the author | examples=the general tone of articles appearing in the newspapers is that the government should withdraw; from the tone of her behavior I gathered that I had outstayed my welcome

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the Context:** The sentence is "On the Right, the tone was set by Jacques Chirac, who declared in 1976 that '900,000 unemployed would not become a problem in a country with 2 million of foreign workers,' and on the Left by Michel Rocard explaining in 1990 that France 'can not accommodate all the world's misery.'"
    *   The phrase is "the tone was set by [Person]".
    *   The context discusses political discourse (immigration policy, Left vs. Right).
    *   The "tone" refers to the prevailing attitude, stance, or characteristic manner of expression regarding the topic (immigration) established by political leaders.
    *   It's metaphorical. It's not a literal sound (music, voice quality), nor a color, nor muscle tension.
    *   It refers to the "quality of a piece of writing/speech" or the "attitude/presuppositions" revealed by the author/speaker.

2.  **Evaluate Candidate Senses:**

    *   *Sense 1 (quality of voice):* Too literal. Chirac didn't just speak in a specific vocal quality; he established a political stance/approach.
    *   *Sense 2 (linguistics pitch):* Irrelevant.
    *   *Sense 3 (music timbre):* Irrelevant.
    *   *Sense 4 (general atmosphere):* "The general atmosphere of a place or situation and the effect that it has on people." Example: "a clergyman improved the tone of the meeting". This is close. The "tone of the debate/discussion" fits here often. However, the context emphasizes the *attitude* behind the statements made by the leaders.
    *   *Sense 5 (color):* Irrelevant.
    *   *Sense 6 (musical note):* Irrelevant.
    *   *Sense 7 (steady sound):* Irrelevant.
    *   *Sense 8 (muscle tension):* Irrelevant.
    *   *Sense 9 (musical interval):* Irrelevant.
    *   *Sense 10 (quality of writing revealing attitude):* "the quality of something (an act or a piece of writing) that reveals the attitudes and presuppositions of the author". Examples: "the general tone of articles appearing in the newspapers is that the government should withdraw"; "from the tone of her behavior I gathered that I had outstayed my welcome".

3.  **Compare Sense 4 vs Sense 10:**
    *   Sense 4 is "atmosphere". "The tone of the meeting." This is often the "mood" or "feeling" of the environment.
    *   Sense 10 is "attitude/stance revealed by an act/writing". "The tone of articles."
    *   The sentence says: "On the Right, the **tone** was set by Jacques Chirac... who declared..."
    *   This implies that Chirac's declaration established the *attitude*, *stance*, or *rhetorical approach* for the Right regarding immigration.
    *   The text quotes a specific declaration. The "tone" is the quality of the political discourse/argumentation.
    *   Sense 10 explicitly mentions "quality of something (an act or a piece of writing) that reveals the attitudes...".
    *   In political contexts, "setting the tone" usually refers to establishing the rhetorical stance or the nature of the discourse (e.g., aggressive, conciliatory, exclusionary). This aligns perfectly with Sense 10's definition of revealing attitudes and presuppositions.
    *   Sense 4 (atmosphere/place) is slightly different, usually describing a physical situation or a vague mood. Here, we are talking about political *rhetoric* and *opinions*. "The tone was set by Jacques Chirac" means the *attitudinal framework* of the argument was set by him.
    *   Let's check the example for Sense 10: "the general tone of articles appearing in the newspapers is that the government should withdraw". This is about the message/stance conveyed. Chirac's quote conveys a specific stance (immigrants as labor units, not a problem if managed).
    *   Therefore, Sense 10 is the best fit. It captures the nuance of political rhetoric and the "attitude" of the speaker/actor.

4.  **Final Selection:** Sense 10. The context is about the political attitude or stance regarding immigration established by the leaders' statements. This fits the definition "the quality of something (an act or a piece of writing) that reveals the attitudes and presuppositions of the author".


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: problem
Target surface form: problem
Context:
Is immigration a burden or an opportunity for the economy? Immigration policy under Nicolas Sarkozy was criticised from various aspects a congestion of police, legal and administrative services subjected to a policy of numbers and the compatibility of that policy with the self-proclaimed status of the country as the country of French human rights. More recently, it is administrative harassment of foreign students, which is topical, with the minister of the interior ("Libération" on 23 May) declaring that France "does not need foreign talent, bricklayers and waiters." But it is only rarely analyzed from the economic viewpoint. There is a lot of consensus between the Left and the Right on this subject. On the Right, the tone was set by Jacques Chirac, who declared in 1976 that "900,000 unemployed would not become a <t>problem</t> in a country with 2 million of foreign workers," and on the Left by Michel Rocard explaining in 1990 that France "can not accommodate all the world's misery." The only difference, the degree of generosity

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=problem%1:26:00:: | definition=a state of difficulty that needs to be resolved | synonyms=job | examples=she and her husband are having problems; it is always a job to contact him
2. sense_key=problem%1:10:00:: | definition=a question raised for consideration or solution | examples=our homework consisted of ten problems to solve
3. sense_key=problem%1:09:00:: | definition=a source of difficulty | synonyms=trouble | examples=one trouble after another delayed the job; what's the problem?

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the target word and context:**
    *   Target lemma: "problem"
    *   Context sentence: "...900,000 unemployed would not become a problem in a country with 2 million of foreign workers..."
    *   Broader context: The text discusses immigration, economic burden vs. opportunity, unemployment, and political stances.
    *   Specific usage: Jacques Chirac is arguing that 900,000 unemployed people would not constitute a "problem" (a burden/issue) if there were 2 million foreign workers (presumably implying that the foreign workers take jobs or fill gaps, though the quote logic is actually saying the unemployed wouldn't be an issue because the foreign workers are doing the jobs, or perhaps implying a demographic balance). Actually, let's look closer at the quote: "900,000 unemployed would not become a problem...". Here, "problem" refers to a source of difficulty, a burden, or a troublesome situation for the country/society.

2.  **Analyze the candidate senses:**

    *   **Sense 1:** `problem%1:26:00::` | definition="a state of difficulty that needs to be resolved" | synonyms=["job"] | examples=["she and her husband are having problems", "it is always a job to contact him"].
        *   *Analysis:* This sense often refers to interpersonal issues or a specific task/difficulty to be overcome. The synonym "job" in the examples (it is always a job to contact him) suggests a specific difficult task. The "husband/wife problems" example suggests relationship difficulties. While the context involves a difficulty, this definition feels slightly more specific to the state of difficulty itself rather than the entity causing it.

    *   **Sense 2:** `problem%1:10:00::` | definition="a question raised for consideration or solution" | examples=["our homework consisted of ten problems to solve"].
        *   *Analysis:* This is the academic/mathematical sense. Not applicable here. The context is sociopolitical.

    *   **Sense 3:** `problem%1:09:00::` | definition="a source of difficulty" | synonyms=["trouble"] | examples=["one trouble after another delayed the job", "what's the problem?"].
        *   *Analysis:* This definition fits perfectly. "900,000 unemployed would not become a *source of difficulty*..." or "would not become *trouble*". The sentence discusses whether unemployment constitutes a burden or an issue for the country. The synonym "trouble" aligns well with the general societal issue described (unemployment being a burden/trouble).

3.  **Compare Sense 1 vs. Sense 3:**
    *   Sense 1 ("state of difficulty") vs Sense 3 ("source of difficulty").
    *   In the sentence, "900,000 unemployed" are the *entity*. They would not become a [target]. They would not become a *source of difficulty*.
    *   The phrasing "become a problem" often collocates with Sense 3. For instance, "He is not a problem" means he is not a source of difficulty/trouble. "The leak is a problem" = source of difficulty.
    *   Sense 1 is often used like "we have a problem" (the state we are in) or specific interpersonal/functional hurdles. Sense 3 captures the aspect of being a "burden" or "trouble", which fits the earlier context mentioning "Is immigration a burden...".
    *   In WordNet, the distinction between 1:26:00 and 1:09:00 can be subtle.
    *   1:26:00 (Sense 1) usually implies a specific difficulty needing resolution (often personal/interpersonal).
    *   1:09:00 (Sense 3) focuses on the *source* or *cause* of the trouble. The unemployed people are viewed as the *source* of the difficulty/burden in the quote.
    *   Let's look at the synonyms again. Sense 3 has "trouble". "They would not become a trouble" fits.
    *   Let's check examples for Sense 1. "She and her husband are having problems" - state of difficulty.
    *   Let's check examples for Sense 3. "One trouble after another delayed the job" - source of difficulty.
    *   The sentence "900,000 unemployed would not become a problem" essentially means "900,000 unemployed would not be a source of trouble/difficulty".
    *   Sense 3 is the standard sense for "something/someone causing trouble".

4.  **Conclusion:** Sense 3 is the best fit. It captures the meaning of "burden" or "source of difficulty" which is the core of the sociopolitical argument being made.

5.  **Format Output:** JSON object `{"sense_index": 3}`.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: country
Target surface form: country
Context:
Is immigration a burden or an opportunity for the economy? Immigration policy under Nicolas Sarkozy was criticised from various aspects a congestion of police, legal and administrative services subjected to a policy of numbers and the compatibility of that policy with the self-proclaimed status of the country as the country of French human rights. More recently, it is administrative harassment of foreign students, which is topical, with the minister of the interior ("Libération" on 23 May) declaring that France "does not need foreign talent, bricklayers and waiters." But it is only rarely analyzed from the economic viewpoint. There is a lot of consensus between the Left and the Right on this subject. On the Right, the tone was set by Jacques Chirac, who declared in 1976 that "900,000 unemployed would not become a problem in a <t>country</t> with 2 million of foreign workers," and on the Left by Michel Rocard explaining in 1990 that France "can not accommodate all the world's misery." The only difference, the degree of generosity

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=country%1:14:00:: | definition=a politically organized body of people under a single government | synonyms=state, nation, land, commonwealth, res publica, body politic | examples=the state has elected a new president; African nations
2. sense_key=country%1:15:00:: | definition=the territory occupied by a nation | synonyms=state, land | examples=he returned to the land of his birth; he visited several European countries
3. sense_key=country%1:14:01:: | definition=the people who live in a nation or country | synonyms=nation, land | examples=a statement that sums up the nation's mood; the news was announced to the nation
4. sense_key=country%1:15:01:: | definition=an area outside of cities and towns | synonyms=rural area | examples=his poetry celebrated the slower pace of life in the country
5. sense_key=country%1:15:02:: | definition=a particular geographical region of indefinite boundary (usually serving some special purpose or distinguished by its people or culture or geography) | synonyms=area | examples=it was a mountainous area; Bible country

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the target word:** The target word is "country" (lemma: country).
2.  **Analyze the context:**
    *   The sentence is: "...Jacques Chirac, who declared in 1976 that '900,000 unemployed would not become a problem in a <t>country</t> with 2 million of foreign workers,'..."
    *   The broader context discusses immigration policy, the economy, foreign workers, and political figures (Sarkozy, Chirac, Rocard).
    *   The phrase "in a country with 2 million of foreign workers" refers to a geopolitical entity where people live, laws apply, and economies function.
3.  **Analyze the candidate senses:**
    *   *Sense 1 (country%1:14:00::):* "a politically organized body of people under a single government". Synonyms: state, nation, land, commonwealth. Examples: "the state has elected a new president". This focuses on the political organization/government aspect.
    *   *Sense 2 (country%1:15:00::):* "the territory occupied by a nation". Synonyms: state, land. Examples: "he visited several European countries". This focuses on the geographical/territorial aspect.
    *   *Sense 3 (country%1:14:01::):* "the people who live in a nation or country". Synonyms: nation, land. Examples: "sums up the nation's mood". This focuses on the population/people aspect.
    *   *Sense 4 (country%1:15:01::):* "an area outside of cities and towns". Synonyms: rural area. This is clearly not the meaning here (not "countryside").
    *   *Sense 5 (country%1:15:02::):* "a particular geographical region of indefinite boundary". Examples: "Bible country". This refers to a region/area, not a sovereign state.
4.  **Disambiguate:**
    *   The context talks about unemployed people and foreign workers *in* the country. It mentions a count of 900,000 unemployed and 2 million foreign workers.
    *   Is it Sense 1 (political entity)? Yes, France is a political entity. The quote discusses a problem within the state's jurisdiction.
    *   Is it Sense 2 (territory)? A territory doesn't have "unemployed" people in the administrative sense; the population within the territory does. However, Sense 2 is often used for "visiting a country".
    *   Is it Sense 3 (the people)? The sentence says "in a country with 2 million foreign workers". While "country" here implies the collective body, the phrasing "in a country" strongly suggests the geopolitical entity or the state rather than just the people themselves (where one might say "among the people"). However, Sense 1's definition "politically organized body of people" fits very well with the context of government policy and unemployment statistics. Sense 3 defines it as "the people who live in a nation", but usually, usage like "in a country" refers to the entity defined in Sense 1 or the territory defined in Sense 2.
    *   Let's look closely at Sense 1 vs Sense 2 vs Sense 3.
    *   Sense 1 definition: "a politically organized body of people under a single government".
    *   Sense 3 definition: "the people who live in a nation or country".
    *   The quote refers to the entity France. Jacques Chirac is speaking about the state/nation.
    *   Usually, general references to a nation-state (like "France", "a country like Germany") map to Sense 1 in many WordNet disambiguation tasks because it captures the political/sovereign nature which encompasses the territory, the people, and the government.
    *   Let's check the example for Sense 1: "African nations". Let's check the example for Sense 3: "sums up the nation's mood".
    *   The phrase "in a country" usually refers to the political entity. Unemployment is a statistic of the people, but the "country" is the container entity.
    *   Comparing Sense 1 and Sense 2: Sense 1 emphasizes the political organization. Sense 2 emphasizes the territory. Sense 1 is generally the default for "country" when referring to a sovereign state (like France) in a political/economic context.
    *   Comparing Sense 1 and Sense 3: Sense 3 is specifically "the people". One says "the whole country was shocked" (metonymy for the people, Sense 3). One says "the country has a GDP of X" (Sense 1/2). Here, "900,000 unemployed ... in a country". It refers to the geopolitical entity. Sense 1 is the standard definition for a nation-state.
    *   Let's check WordNet hierarchy (hypernyms).
        *   Sense 1 (state, nation, land...) -> administrative unit -> unit -> object.
        *   Sense 2 (state, land...) -> district, territory -> region -> location.
        *   Sense 3 (nation, land...) -> people -> group -> abstraction.
    *   The sentence discusses "unemployed", "foreign workers", "problem". This is a socio-economic statement about the state. While it involves people, the entity "country" is the political unit.
    *   However, looking at Sense 1 again: "politically organized body of people". This definition actually explicitly mentions "people".
    *   Most Word Sense Disambiguation (WSD) systems tag "country" referring to a nation like France as Sense 1 (the 'state/nation' sense).
    *   Sense 3 is often reserved for metonymic usage where "country" replaces "the population" directly, e.g., "The country is tired of the war."
    *   In "in a country with 2 million foreign workers", it refers to the sovereign state. Sense 1 is the best fit.
    *   Let's reconsider Sense 1 vs Sense 2.
        *   If I say "I traveled to France", I am visiting the territory (Sense 2) or the entity (Sense 1). WordNet often distinguishes these. Sense 1 is "body of people/government". Sense 2 is "territory".
        *   However, in "in a country with...", the "country" acts as the container for the economy and the population. This usually leans towards Sense 1 (the organized entity) in WSD datasets like SemCor/ONTONOTES, although distinctions can be subtle.
        *   Let's look at the examples provided in the prompt.
            *   Sense 1: "the state has elected a new president". (Political entity).
            *   Sense 2: "he returned to the land of his birth". (Territory/Place).
            *   Sense 3: "sums up the nation's mood". (People).
        *   The quote is about economic policy and unemployment within the jurisdiction. This feels closest to the "politically organized body of people" (Sense 1). It's not just the dirt (Sense 2), and it's not just the mood of the populace (Sense 3), though it involves the populace. The entity "country" here is the agent or the container of the political/economic situation. Sense 1 is the most robust definition for a sovereign state in a political context.

    *   Let's verify index numbering.
        *   1: country%1:14:00:: (politically organized body...)
        *   2: country%1:15:00:: (territory...)
        *   3: country%1:14:01:: (people...)
        *   4: country%1:15:01:: (rural area...)
        *   5: country%1:15:02:: (region...)

    *   Decision: The target refers to France as a political entity dealing with unemployment. Sense 1 is the definition of a nation-state.

    *   Alternative view: Could it be Sense 3? "The people who live in a nation". "Unemployed" are people. But the syntax "in a country" denotes the spatial/political entity, not the people directly (which would be "among the country"). The preposition "in" selects for the entity/territory. Sense 1 includes the concept of the body of people organized under a government, which fits the demographic/political context perfectly.

    *   Therefore, index 1 is the correct choice.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: worker
Target surface form: workers
Context:
Is immigration a burden or an opportunity for the economy? Immigration policy under Nicolas Sarkozy was criticised from various aspects a congestion of police, legal and administrative services subjected to a policy of numbers and the compatibility of that policy with the self-proclaimed status of the country as the country of French human rights. More recently, it is administrative harassment of foreign students, which is topical, with the minister of the interior ("Libération" on 23 May) declaring that France "does not need foreign talent, bricklayers and waiters." But it is only rarely analyzed from the economic viewpoint. There is a lot of consensus between the Left and the Right on this subject. On the Right, the tone was set by Jacques Chirac, who declared in 1976 that "900,000 unemployed would not become a problem in a country with 2 million of foreign <t>workers</t>," and on the Left by Michel Rocard explaining in 1990 that France "can not accommodate all the world's misery." The only difference, the degree of generosity

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=worker%1:18:00:: | definition=a person who works at a specific occupation | examples=he is a good worker
2. sense_key=worker%1:18:01:: | definition=a member of the working class (not necessarily employed) | synonyms=proletarian, prole | examples=workers of the world--unite!
3. sense_key=worker%1:05:01:: | definition=sterile member of a colony of social insects that forages for food and cares for the larvae
4. sense_key=worker%1:18:02:: | definition=a person who acts and gets things done | synonyms=actor, doer | examples=he's a principal actor in this affair; when you want something done get a doer

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

raw_output:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the target word:** The target lemma is "worker" and the surface form is "workers". It appears in the phrase "foreign workers" within the context of immigration policy, unemployment, and the economy in France.

2.  **Analyze the context:**
    *   The text discusses immigration policy and its economic impact.
    *   It mentions "900,000 unemployed" versus "2 million of foreign workers".
    *   It mentions specific job types earlier ("bricklayers and waiters").
    *   The phrase "foreign workers" refers to people who come to a country to work, specifically in the labor market.
    *   The context contrasts them with the unemployed and discusses the economy.

3.  **Analyze the candidate senses:**
    *   **Sense 1 (worker%1:18:00::):** Definition: "a person who works at a specific occupation". Example: "he is a good worker". This fits the general meaning of someone employed in the labor market. The context implies these people are part of the workforce (contrasted with the unemployed).
    *   **Sense 2 (worker%1:18:01::):** Definition: "a member of the working class (not necessarily employed)". Synonyms: proletarian, prole. Example: "workers of the world--unite!". This sense refers to social class rather than employment status or the act of working. While immigrants often belong to the working class, the context here ("2 million of foreign workers") specifically contrasts them with "unemployed" and discusses economic needs (bricklayers, waiters), implying active participation in the labor market/occupation rather than just class status. However, WordNet sense 1 is usually the default for "person doing a job".
    *   **Sense 3 (worker%1:05:01::):** Definition: "sterile member of a colony of social insects...". This is biological. Clearly incorrect for human immigrants.
    *   **Sense 4 (worker%1:18:02::):** Definition: "a person who acts and gets things done". Synonyms: actor, doer. Example: "get a doer". This refers to a personality trait or a role in a specific event ("principal actor in this affair"). It doesn't fit the socio-economic context of "foreign workers" in the labor force.

4.  **Evaluate Sense 1 vs. Sense 2:**
    *   Sense 1 emphasizes "specific occupation" and working. The context mentions "bricklayers and waiters" (specific occupations) and contrasts the number of workers with the number of unemployed. The phrase "foreign workers" is a standard collocation for migrant laborers.
    *   Sense 2 emphasizes class ("proletarian"). The text is political (Left vs. Right), but the specific quote "900,000 unemployed... 2 million foreign workers" relies on the economic definition of a worker (someone holding a job) to make the numerical contrast valid regarding the labor market. The "unemployed" are often part of the "working class" (Sense 2), so contrasting "unemployed" with "workers" (Sense 2) would be a category error in strict WordNet terms (since an unemployed person is still a proletarian/worker in the class sense). Therefore, the contrast requires the definition of "worker" as someone currently employed or working at an occupation. Thus, Sense 1 is the precise fit.

5.  **Conclusion:** Sense 1 is the best fit. It denotes individuals employed in the economy, fitting the contrast with the unemployed and the context of immigration for labor.

6.  **Formulate Output:**
    *   Target: workers
    *   Context fits Sense 1.
    *   JSON format: {"sense_index": 1}


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: left
Target surface form: Left
Context:
Is immigration a burden or an opportunity for the economy? Immigration policy under Nicolas Sarkozy was criticised from various aspects a congestion of police, legal and administrative services subjected to a policy of numbers and the compatibility of that policy with the self-proclaimed status of the country as the country of French human rights. More recently, it is administrative harassment of foreign students, which is topical, with the minister of the interior ("Libération" on 23 May) declaring that France "does not need foreign talent, bricklayers and waiters." But it is only rarely analyzed from the economic viewpoint. There is a lot of consensus between the Left and the Right on this subject. On the Right, the tone was set by Jacques Chirac, who declared in 1976 that "900,000 unemployed would not become a problem in a country with 2 million of foreign workers," and on the <t>Left</t> by Michel Rocard explaining in 1990 that France "can not accommodate all the world's misery." The only difference, the degree of generosity

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=left%1:15:00:: | definition=location near or direction toward the left side; i.e. the side to the north when a person or object faces east | examples=she stood on the left
2. sense_key=left%1:14:00:: | definition=those who support varying degrees of social or political or economic change designed to promote the public welfare | synonyms=left wing
3. sense_key=left%1:08:00:: | definition=the hand that is on the left side of the body | synonyms=left hand | examples=jab with your left
4. sense_key=left%1:06:00:: | definition=the piece of ground in the outfield on the catcher's left | synonyms=left field | examples=the batter flied out to left
5. sense_key=left%1:04:00:: | definition=a turn toward the side of the body that is on the north when the person is facing east | examples=take a left at the corner

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the Target**: The target word is "Left" (capitalized in the context snippet, but the lemma is "left"). The context is a political text discussing immigration policy in France, mentioning Nicolas Sarkozy, the "Right" (Jacques Chirac), and the "Left" (Michel Rocard).

2.  **Analyze the Context**: The sentence containing the target is: "There is a lot of consensus between the Left and the Right on this subject."
    *   Later, it says: "On the Right, the tone was set by Jacques Chirac... and on the Left by Michel Rocard..."
    *   The text contrasts "Left" and "Right".
    *   These terms refer to political factions or ideological groups.
    *   Michel Rocard is identified with the Socialist Party (Parti socialiste) in France, which is a center-left party.

3.  **Analyze the Candidate Senses**:
    *   *Sense 1*: "location near or direction toward the left side..." - Physical direction/location. Incorrect.
    *   *Sense 2*: "those who support varying degrees of social or political or economic change designed to promote the public welfare" - Synonyms: "left wing". This defines a political group/ideology. Matches the context of "the Left" vs "the Right" in politics.
    *   *Sense 3*: "the hand that is on the left side of the body" - Body part. Incorrect.
    *   *Sense 4*: "the piece of ground in the outfield on the catcher's left" - Baseball terminology. Incorrect.
    *   *Sense 5*: "a turn toward the side of the body..." - Physical movement/direction. Incorrect.

4.  **Select the Best Sense**: The context is clearly political. "The Left" refers to the political group. Sense 2 defines exactly this: "those who support varying degrees of social or political or economic change...".

5.  **Format the Output**: The instructions require a JSON object with the key "sense_index".
    *   Sense 1 is index 1.
    *   Sense 2 is index 2.
    *   Sense 3 is index 3.
    *   Sense 4 is index 4.
    *   Sense 5 is index 5.

    The correct sense is Sense 2.

    JSON output: `{"sense_index": 2}`.

provider: Novita


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: france
Target surface form: France
Context:
Is immigration a burden or an opportunity for the economy? Immigration policy under Nicolas Sarkozy was criticised from various aspects a congestion of police, legal and administrative services subjected to a policy of numbers and the compatibility of that policy with the self-proclaimed status of the country as the country of French human rights. More recently, it is administrative harassment of foreign students, which is topical, with the minister of the interior ("Libération" on 23 May) declaring that France "does not need foreign talent, bricklayers and waiters." But it is only rarely analyzed from the economic viewpoint. There is a lot of consensus between the Left and the Right on this subject. On the Right, the tone was set by Jacques Chirac, who declared in 1976 that "900,000 unemployed would not become a problem in a country with 2 million of foreign workers," and on the Left by Michel Rocard explaining in 1990 that <t>France</t> "can not accommodate all the world's misery." The only difference, the degree of generosity

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=france%1:15:00:: | definition=a republic in western Europe; the largest country wholly in Europe | synonyms=French Republic
2. sense_key=france%1:18:00:: | definition=French writer of sophisticated novels and short stories (1844-1924) | synonyms=Anatole France, Jacques Anatole Francois Thibault

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the target word:** The target lemma is "france", and the surface form is "France".
2.  **Analyze the context:**
    *   The text discusses immigration policy in France.
    *   It mentions Nicolas Sarkozy (former President of France), the minister of the interior, Jacques Chirac (former President), and Michel Rocard (former Prime Minister).
    *   The specific sentence containing the target is: "...on the Left by Michel Rocard explaining in 1990 that France 'can not accommodate all the world's misery.'"
    *   The text refers to a geographical/political entity where policies are made, economies function, and politicians operate.
3.  **Analyze the candidate senses:**
    *   Sense 1: "a republic in western Europe; the largest country wholly in Europe" (Synonyms: French Republic). This is the geopolitical entity.
    *   Sense 2: "French writer of sophisticated novels and short stories (1844-1924)" (Synonyms: Anatole France, Jacques Anatole Francois Thibault). This is a person.
4.  **Disambiguate:**
    *   The context talks about immigration, economy, Nicolas Sarkozy, Jacques Chirac, Michel Rocard, and the country's ability to accommodate misery.
    *   Michel Rocard was a French politician (Prime Minister). He was speaking about the country.
    *   "France" in this context refers to the nation/state, not the author Anatole France.
    *   Therefore, Sense 1 is the correct choice.
5.  **Format the output:** The user wants a JSON object with the key "sense_index". Since the list is 1-indexed in the prompt's presentation (Candidate senses: 1. ..., 2. ...), and the sense keys usually follow a specific format, I need to map the choice to the index provided in the list.
    *   The list starts with "1. sense_key=france%1:15:00:: ...".
    *   My choice is the first definition (the republic/country).
    *   So the index is 1.

Let's double-check the JSON format required: `{"sense_index": 1}`.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: misery
Target surface form: misery
Context:
Is immigration a burden or an opportunity for the economy? Immigration policy under Nicolas Sarkozy was criticised from various aspects a congestion of police, legal and administrative services subjected to a policy of numbers and the compatibility of that policy with the self-proclaimed status of the country as the country of French human rights. More recently, it is administrative harassment of foreign students, which is topical, with the minister of the interior ("Libération" on 23 May) declaring that France "does not need foreign talent, bricklayers and waiters." But it is only rarely analyzed from the economic viewpoint. There is a lot of consensus between the Left and the Right on this subject. On the Right, the tone was set by Jacques Chirac, who declared in 1976 that "900,000 unemployed would not become a problem in a country with 2 million of foreign workers," and on the Left by Michel Rocard explaining in 1990 that France "can not accommodate all the world's <t>misery</t>." The only difference, the degree of generosity

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=misery%1:26:00:: | definition=a state of ill-being due to affliction or misfortune | synonyms=wretchedness, miserableness | examples=the misery and wretchedness of those slums is intolerable
2. sense_key=misery%1:12:00:: | definition=a feeling of intense unhappiness | examples=she was exhausted by her misery and grief

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The target word is "misery" in the context of Michel Rocard explaining that France "can not accommodate all the world's misery."

Let's analyze the two candidate senses:

1. sense_key=misery%1:26:00:: | definition=a state of ill-being due to affliction or misfortune | synonyms=wretchedness, miserableness | examples=the misery and wretchedness of those slums is intolerable

2. sense_key=misery%1:12:00:: | definition=a feeling of intense unhappiness | examples=she was exhausted by her misery and grief

In the context, "the world's misery" refers to the suffering, poverty, and hardship of people around the world - not just their feelings of unhappiness, but the actual state of affliction and misfortune they are in. This is about people in poor conditions who might want to immigrate to France.

Sense 1 refers to "a state of ill-being due to affliction or misfortune" - this captures the external condition of suffering, poverty, and hardship that immigrants might be escaping from. The example about slums being intolerable also relates to physical conditions of poverty and hardship.

Sense 2 refers to "a feeling of intense unhappiness" - this is more about the internal emotional state of being unhappy.

When Rocard says France "can not accommodate all the world's misery," he's referring to the people suffering from poverty, war, and other external hardships - not just their feelings of unhappiness. The misery here is the state of affliction and misfortune that exists in the world.

Sense 1 is the better fit for this context.

provider: SiliconFlow


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: difference
Target surface form: difference
Context:
Immigration policy under Nicolas Sarkozy was criticised from various aspects a congestion of police, legal and administrative services subjected to a policy of numbers and the compatibility of that policy with the self-proclaimed status of the country as the country of French human rights. More recently, it is administrative harassment of foreign students, which is topical, with the minister of the interior ("Libération" on 23 May) declaring that France "does not need foreign talent, bricklayers and waiters." But it is only rarely analyzed from the economic viewpoint. There is a lot of consensus between the Left and the Right on this subject. On the Right, the tone was set by Jacques Chirac, who declared in 1976 that "900,000 unemployed would not become a problem in a country with 2 million of foreign workers," and on the Left by Michel Rocard explaining in 1990 that France "can not accommodate all the world's misery." The only <t>difference</t>, the degree of generosity In 2005, the fear of invasion of the national territory by hordes of Polish plumbers was felt both on the Left and on the Right.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=difference%1:07:00:: | definition=the quality of being unlike or dissimilar | examples=there are many differences between jazz and rock
2. sense_key=difference%1:11:00:: | definition=a variation that deviates from the standard or norm | synonyms=deviation, divergence, departure | examples=the deviation from the mean
3. sense_key=difference%1:10:00:: | definition=a disagreement or argument about something important | synonyms=dispute, difference of opinion, conflict | examples=he had a dispute with his wife; there were irreconcilable differences
4. sense_key=difference%1:24:00:: | definition=a significant change | examples=the difference in her is amazing; his support made a real difference
5. sense_key=difference%1:23:00:: | definition=the number that remains after subtraction; the number that when added to the subtrahend gives the minuend | synonyms=remainder

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The target word is "difference" in the context: "The only difference, the degree of generosity"

The context is talking about the consensus between the Left and the Right on immigration policy. Jacques Chirac (Right) said "900,000 unemployed would not become a problem in a country with 2 million of foreign workers" and Michel Rocard (Left) said France "can not accommodate all the world's misery."

The sentence "The only difference, the degree of generosity" means that both sides agree on restricting immigration, they just differ in how generous they are. The "difference" here refers to a quality of being unlike or dissimilar - specifically, the Left and Right differ only in the degree of generosity.

Let me look at the candidate senses:

1. the quality of being unlike or dissimilar - "there are many differences between jazz and rock"
2. a variation that deviates from the standard or norm
3. a disagreement or argument about something important
4. a significant change
5. the number that remains after subtraction

The context is saying that the only difference between the Left and Right is the degree of generosity. This is about the quality of being unlike or dissimilar - the Left and Right are different in their degree of generosity.

Sense 1 fits best: "the quality of being unlike or dissimilar". The difference here is a distinguishing characteristic - the degree of generosity is what makes them unlike each other.

Sense 2 is about deviation from a norm/standard, which doesn't fit.
Sense 3 is about a disagreement or argument, which doesn't fit because the context is about consensus, not disagreement.
Sense 4 is about a significant change, which doesn't fit.
Sense 5 is mathematical, which doesn't fit.

The answer is sense index 1.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: degree
Target surface form: degree
Context:
Immigration policy under Nicolas Sarkozy was criticised from various aspects a congestion of police, legal and administrative services subjected to a policy of numbers and the compatibility of that policy with the self-proclaimed status of the country as the country of French human rights. More recently, it is administrative harassment of foreign students, which is topical, with the minister of the interior ("Libération" on 23 May) declaring that France "does not need foreign talent, bricklayers and waiters." But it is only rarely analyzed from the economic viewpoint. There is a lot of consensus between the Left and the Right on this subject. On the Right, the tone was set by Jacques Chirac, who declared in 1976 that "900,000 unemployed would not become a problem in a country with 2 million of foreign workers," and on the Left by Michel Rocard explaining in 1990 that France "can not accommodate all the world's misery." The only difference, the <t>degree</t> of generosity In 2005, the fear of invasion of the national territory by hordes of Polish plumbers was felt both on the Left and on the Right.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=degree%1:07:00:: | definition=a position on a scale of intensity or amount or quality | synonyms=grade, level | examples=a moderate grade of intelligence; a high level of care is required
2. sense_key=degree%1:26:01:: | definition=a specific identifiable position in a continuum or series or especially in a process | synonyms=level, stage, point | examples=a remarkable degree of frankness; at what stage are the social sciences?
3. sense_key=degree%1:10:00:: | definition=an award conferred by a college or university signifying that the recipient has satisfactorily completed a course of study | synonyms=academic degree | examples=he earned his degree at Princeton summa cum laude
4. sense_key=degree%1:23:00:: | definition=a measure for arcs and angles | synonyms=arcdegree | examples=there are 360 degrees in a circle
5. sense_key=degree%1:09:00:: | definition=the highest power of a term or variable
6. sense_key=degree%1:23:03:: | definition=a unit of temperature on a specified scale | examples=the game was played in spite of the 40-degree temperature
7. sense_key=degree%1:07:01:: | definition=the seriousness of something (e.g., a burn or crime) | examples=murder in the second degree; a second degree burn

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the target word:** The target lemma is "degree" (noun). The context phrase is "The only difference, the degree of generosity".

2.  **Analyze the context:**
    *   The text discusses immigration policy in France.
    *   It mentions criticism from various aspects.
    *   It notes consensus between the Left and the Right on the subject (immigration/control).
    *   Quotes are provided from Chirac (Right) and Rocard (Left), both expressing similar sentiments about limits/controls (economy vs. misery).
    *   The sentence in question: "The only difference, the degree of generosity"
    *   Meaning: The Left and Right agree on the principle of restriction, but they might differ in *how much* generosity they show (or the extent/intensity of it). "Generosity" here refers to the policy's leniency or openness.

3.  **Evaluate the candidate senses:**

    *   **Sense 1 (degree%1:07:00::):** Definition: "a position on a scale of intensity or amount or quality". Synonyms: grade, level. Examples: "a moderate grade of intelligence", "a high level of care is required".
        *   *Analysis:* "The degree of generosity" fits this perfectly. Generosity is a quality/amount. The Left and Right differ on the scale/amount of generosity. This sense covers general magnitude or extent.

    *   **Sense 2 (degree%1:26:01::):** Definition: "a specific identifiable position in a continuum or series or especially in a process". Synonyms: level, stage, point. Examples: "a remarkable degree of frankness", "at what stage are the social sciences?".
        *   *Analysis:* While "a remarkable degree of frankness" is structurally similar ("degree of [abstract noun]"), Sense 1 seems slightly more focused on the *amount* or *intensity* (how generous), whereas Sense 2 often implies a stage in a process. However, the distinction between Sense 1 and Sense 2 in WordNet for abstract nouns like "frankness" vs "generosity" is subtle. Let's look closer at Sense 2's definition: "position in a continuum or series or especially in a process". Generosity isn't really a process. It's an attribute. Sense 1 (intensity/amount/quality) is the standard definition for "degree" when used to quantify an abstract noun (degree of difficulty, degree of success, degree of generosity).

    *   **Sense 3 (degree%1:10:00::):** Definition: "an award conferred by a college or university...". Synonyms: academic degree.
        *   *Analysis:* Irrelevant. Context is about politics/policy, not education.

    *   **Sense 4 (degree%1:23:00::):** Definition: "a measure for arcs and angles".
        *   *Analysis:* Irrelevant. Geometry context.

    *   **Sense 5 (degree%1:09:00::):** Definition: "the highest power of a term or variable".
        *   *Analysis:* Irrelevant. Math/Logic context.

    *   **Sense 6 (degree%1:23:03::):** Definition: "a unit of temperature on a specified scale".
        *   *Analysis:* Irrelevant. Physics context.

    *   **Sense 7 (degree%1:07:01::):** Definition: "the seriousness of something (e.g., a burn or crime)".
        *   *Analysis:* Irrelevant. Legal/Medical context.

4.  **Refine choice between Sense 1 and Sense 2:**
    *   Sense 1: "a position on a scale of intensity or amount or quality".
    *   Sense 2: "a specific identifiable position in a continuum or series or especially in a process".
    *   Context: "The only difference, the degree of generosity". The Left and Right differ on the *extent* or *amount* of generosity.
    *   Example comparison:
        *   Sense 1: "a high level of care". (Amount/intensity of an attribute).
        *   Sense 2: "at what stage are the social sciences?" (Position in a process).
    *   "Generosity" is an attribute/quality. We are measuring the intensity/amount of that quality. Sense 1 is the standard definition for "to what extent" or "how much".
    *   Sense 2 example "a remarkable degree of frankness" creates a bit of overlap, but usually, when measuring an abstract quality like generosity, kindness, difficulty, success, Sense 1 (intensity/amount) is the primary definition used in WSD tasks unless there is a clear "stage/step" connotation (e.g., degrees of separation).
    *   In "degree of generosity", it refers to the *amount* of generosity. Therefore, Sense 1 is the best fit.

5.  **Final Selection:** Sense 1.

6.  **Format Output:** JSON object `{"sense_index": 1}`.

provider: DeepInfra


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: generosity
Target surface form: generosity
Context:
Immigration policy under Nicolas Sarkozy was criticised from various aspects a congestion of police, legal and administrative services subjected to a policy of numbers and the compatibility of that policy with the self-proclaimed status of the country as the country of French human rights. More recently, it is administrative harassment of foreign students, which is topical, with the minister of the interior ("Libération" on 23 May) declaring that France "does not need foreign talent, bricklayers and waiters." But it is only rarely analyzed from the economic viewpoint. There is a lot of consensus between the Left and the Right on this subject. On the Right, the tone was set by Jacques Chirac, who declared in 1976 that "900,000 unemployed would not become a problem in a country with 2 million of foreign workers," and on the Left by Michel Rocard explaining in 1990 that France "can not accommodate all the world's misery." The only difference, the degree of <t>generosity</t> In 2005, the fear of invasion of the national territory by hordes of Polish plumbers was felt both on the Left and on the Right.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=generosity%1:07:00:: | definition=the trait of being willing to give your money or time | synonyms=generousness
2. sense_key=generosity%1:04:00:: | definition=acting generously | synonyms=unselfishness

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the Request:**
    *   **Task:** Fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation (WSD).
    *   **Target lemma:** generosity.
    *   **Context:** A text discussing French immigration policy under Nicolas Sarkozy and predecessors (Chirac, Rocard). It mentions Left and Right political consensus on restricting immigration ("France cannot accommodate all the world's misery"). The specific sentence is "The only difference, the degree of generosity".
    *   **Candidate Senses:**
        1.  `generosity%1:07:00::` - Definition: the trait of being willing to give your money or time. Synonyms: generousness.
        2.  `generosity%1:04:00::` - Definition: acting generously. Synonyms: unselfishness.
    *   **Constraints:** Return only a JSON object `{"sense_index": X}`. No hedging. Choose the single best sense.

2.  **Analyze the Context:**
    *   The text contrasts the Left and Right political wings in France regarding immigration.
    *   It notes a consensus: both sides agree that France cannot take in everyone (limiting immigration).
    *   The sentence in question: "The only difference, the degree of generosity."
    *   What does "generosity" refer to here? It refers to the *willingness to accept immigrants* or the *leniency/openness of the immigration policy*.
    *   Is it referring to a specific act of giving (sense 2)? Or is it referring to a general trait, stance, or disposition of the state/policy (sense 1)?

3.  **Evaluate Sense 1 (`generosity%1:07:00::`):**
    *   Definition: "the trait of being willing to give your money or time".
    *   Analysis: The text discusses "the degree of generosity". This implies a scale of a trait or quality. The political stance (Left vs. Right) is being characterized by a trait: how willing are they to "give" (in this case, give entry/resources/citizenship) to foreigners.
    *   "Trait" fits well with political dispositions or the character of a policy regime. "The degree of [trait]" makes sense. A country or a policy is described as having the *trait* of generosity (or lack thereof).

4.  **Evaluate Sense 2 (`generosity%1:04:00::`):**
    *   Definition: "acting generously".
    *   Synonym: unselfishness.
    *   Analysis: This sense focuses on the *act* or the *action* itself. "The degree of [acting generously]" sounds awkward. "The degree of unselfishness" fits grammatically but refers more to the behavior.
    *   Usually, when discussing a policy stance or a comparison of political positions ("degree of..."), we are referring to an abstract quality or a trait (Sense 1) rather than the specific act of unselfishness (Sense 2). The text is analyzing the *nature* of the policy (a trait of the system), not a specific instance of unselfish behavior.

5.  **Compare and Refine:**
    *   The phrase "degree of X" strongly suggests X is a measurable quality or trait.
    *   Sense 1 defines "generosity" as a "trait". This aligns perfectly with "degree of generosity". It is the *trait* of being willing to give (resources, access, rights).
    *   Sense 2 defines it as "acting generously" (an activity/manner of action). While one could argue policy is action, "trait" captures the enduring quality attributed to the political sides. The contrast is between the *dispositions* of the Left and Right.
    *   Sense 1 is the abstract noun describing the quality. Sense 2 is often used for the activity. In WSD, distinguishing between the trait (abstract quality) and the act (instance) is common.
    *   "The trait of being willing to give..." -> The Left might have a higher *trait* of generosity (willingness to give entry) than the Right.
    *   Therefore, Sense 1 is the better fit.

6.  **Final Selection:**
    *   Sense 1 (index 1).
    *   The definition "the trait of being willing to give..." captures the essence of the political stance described. The "degree" modifier quantifies this trait.

7.  **Format Output:**
    *   JSON object: `{"sense_index": 1}`.

provider: Together


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: fear
Target surface form: fear
Context:
More recently, it is administrative harassment of foreign students, which is topical, with the minister of the interior ("Libération" on 23 May) declaring that France "does not need foreign talent, bricklayers and waiters." But it is only rarely analyzed from the economic viewpoint. There is a lot of consensus between the Left and the Right on this subject. On the Right, the tone was set by Jacques Chirac, who declared in 1976 that "900,000 unemployed would not become a problem in a country with 2 million of foreign workers," and on the Left by Michel Rocard explaining in 1990 that France "can not accommodate all the world's misery." The only difference, the degree of generosity In 2005, the <t>fear</t> of invasion of the national territory by hordes of Polish plumbers was felt both on the Left and on the Right. Both sides see immigrants as a burden on the French economy and on French society.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=fear%1:12:00:: | definition=an emotion experienced in anticipation of some specific pain or danger (usually accompanied by a desire to flee or fight) | synonyms=fearfulness, fright
2. sense_key=fear%1:12:01:: | definition=an anxious feeling | synonyms=concern, care | examples=care had aged him; they hushed it up out of fear of public reaction
3. sense_key=fear%1:12:02:: | definition=a feeling of profound respect for someone or something | synonyms=reverence, awe, veneration | examples=the fear of God; the Chinese reverence for the dead

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

raw_output:
```json
{"sense_index": 2}
```

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 2}
```

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the Target Word and Context**:
    *   **Target**: "fear" (noun).
    *   **Context Sentence**: "In 2005, the <t>fear</t> of invasion of the national territory by hordes of Polish plumbers was felt both on the Left and on the Right."
    *   **Broader Context**: The text discusses political discourse in France regarding immigration. It mentions "administrative harassment," foreign workers, economic burdens, and political consensus. Specifically, the target sentence refers to the "fear of invasion" linked to the Polish plumber trope during the debate on the European Services Directive.

2.  **Analyze the Candidate Senses**:

    *   **Sense 1**:
        *   Definition: "an emotion experienced in anticipation of some specific pain or danger (usually accompanied by a desire to flee or fight)".
        *   Synonyms: fearfulness, fright.
        *   Analysis: This sense refers to the visceral, primal emotion of being afraid of immediate danger or pain. While there is a "danger" perceived (invasion), the context is political and sociological. "Fear of invasion" usually implies a specific apprehension or dread about a future event, but let's look at the other senses.

    *   **Sense 2**:
        *   Definition: "an anxious feeling".
        *   Synonyms: concern, care.
        *   Examples: "care had aged him", "they hushed it up out of fear of public reaction".
        *   Analysis: This sense captures a state of anxiety or worry about a potential outcome. The example "fear of public reaction" is structurally similar to "fear of invasion." In political contexts, "fear" often manifests as anxiety or concern about consequences (economic burden, cultural change) rather than a "fight or flight" immediate panic response. The phrase "fear of invasion" here acts as a political rallying cry or a state of public anxiety.

    *   **Sense 3**:
        *   Definition: "a feeling of profound respect for someone or something".
        *   Synonyms: reverence, awe, veneration.
        *   Examples: "the fear of God".
        *   Analysis: This sense is clearly irrelevant to the context of xenophobia or protectionism regarding Polish plumbers.

3.  **Compare Sense 1 and Sense 2**:
    *   Sense 1 (fear/fright) implies a direct emotional response to a threat. Is the "fear of invasion" a primal fright? Or an anxious concern?
    *   Sense 2 (anxious feeling/concern) aligns well with the synonym "concern" and the example "fear of public reaction."
    *   Let's look at the phrase "fear of invasion". Is it an emotion of anticipated pain/danger (Sense 1)? Yes, invasion implies danger. However, in WordNet usage, Sense 1 often leans towards the physical/visceral emotion (fearfulness, fright). Sense 2 encompasses the more cognitive aspect of anxiety or worry about a specific issue.
    *   Let's check the examples provided in WordNet for Sense 2: "they hushed it up out of fear of public reaction." This usage matches the political/social nature of the target sentence. The politicians and public are worried/concerned/anxious about the invasion.
    *   Let's check the synonyms for Sense 1: "fearfulness, fright". "Fright" is a sudden scare. The "fear of invasion" is a lingering, social anxiety.
    *   Let's check the synonyms for Sense 2: "concern, care". This fits the political discourse better (concern about the economy, concern about immigration).

    *   **Decision**: Sense 1 is often reserved for the raw emotion (e.g., "he was struck with fear"). Sense 2 covers "anxious feeling" or concern. In the sentence "the fear of invasion," it describes a collective anxiety or worry within the political sphere. This aligns with Sense 2's definition of "an anxious feeling" and its synonym "concern."

    *   *Self-Correction/Refinement*: Sometimes WordNet distinctions are tricky.
        *   Sense 1: "anticipation of some specific pain or danger". "Invasion" is a danger. But is it just "fearfulness"? No, it's a specific political stance.
        *   Sense 2: "an anxious feeling". Synonyms: concern. The context talks about consensus, political discourse, and viewing immigrants as a burden. This suggests "concern" or "anxiety" rather than a panic response.
        *   Let's look at the examples again. Sense 2 example: "out of fear of public reaction". This is very close to "fear of invasion". Both are abstract future events that subjects are anxious about.
        *   Sense 1 examples aren't provided here, but the definition mentions "desire to flee or fight". While the political rhetoric might invoke defense, the *fear* itself is described as a sentiment felt "both on the Left and on the Right," suggesting a shared anxiety or concern.

    *   Therefore, Sense 2 is the better fit for an abstract, sociopolitical "anxious feeling" or "concern."

4.  **Final Conclusion**: The context describes a political climate of anxiety regarding immigration. The "fear" is a collective worry or concern about a hypothetical event (invasion by Polish plumbers). This matches Sense 2 ("an anxious feeling", synonyms "concern, care").

    *   Sense 1 is too visceral/physical (fright).
    *   Sense 3 is wrong meaning (reverence).
    *   Sense 2 fits "anxious feeling" and "concern".

    Index: 2.

provider: Baidu


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: invasion
Target surface form: invasion
Context:
More recently, it is administrative harassment of foreign students, which is topical, with the minister of the interior ("Libération" on 23 May) declaring that France "does not need foreign talent, bricklayers and waiters." But it is only rarely analyzed from the economic viewpoint. There is a lot of consensus between the Left and the Right on this subject. On the Right, the tone was set by Jacques Chirac, who declared in 1976 that "900,000 unemployed would not become a problem in a country with 2 million of foreign workers," and on the Left by Michel Rocard explaining in 1990 that France "can not accommodate all the world's misery." The only difference, the degree of generosity In 2005, the fear of <t>invasion</t> of the national territory by hordes of Polish plumbers was felt both on the Left and on the Right. Both sides see immigrants as a burden on the French economy and on French society.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=invasion%1:04:00:: | definition=the act of invading; the act of an army that invades for conquest or plunder
2. sense_key=invasion%1:11:00:: | definition=any entry into an area not previously occupied | synonyms=encroachment, intrusion | examples=an invasion of tourists; an invasion of locusts
3. sense_key=invasion%1:11:01:: | definition=(pathology) the spread of pathogenic microorganisms or malignant cells to new sites in the body | examples=the tumor's invasion of surrounding structures

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the Target Word:** The target word is "invasion". It's a noun.

2.  **Analyze the Context:**
    *   Sentence: "In 2005, the fear of invasion of the national territory by hordes of Polish plumbers was felt both on the Left and on the Right."
    *   Broader context: The text discusses immigration policy in France, political rhetoric about foreign workers (Polish plumbers), and economic burden.
    *   Key phrases: "fear of invasion", "national territory", "hordes of Polish plumbers".
    *   Meaning: The text describes a metaphorical or rhetorical "invasion" where a large number of people (immigrants/workers) are entering or threatening to enter the country. It's not a literal military invasion (though the rhetoric borrows military terminology like "national territory"). It's also not a medical/pathological invasion.

3.  **Analyze the Candidate Senses:**

    *   **Sense 1 (`invasion%1:04:00::`):**
        *   Definition: "the act of invading; the act of an army that invades for conquest or plunder".
        *   Focus: Military context, armies, conquest.
        *   Match: Does "hordes of Polish plumbers" constitute an army invading for conquest? No. While the rhetoric uses "national territory" and "invasion", the actual event described is the movement of workers. Sense 1 is too specific to military action.

    *   **Sense 2 (`invasion%1:11:00::`):**
        *   Definition: "any entry into an area not previously occupied".
        *   Synonyms: "encroachment, intrusion".
        *   Examples: "an invasion of tourists; an invasion of locusts".
        *   Focus: General entry of a group or mass into an area.
        *   Match: The context speaks of a "fear of invasion ... by hordes of Polish plumbers". This fits the metaphorical or generalized sense of a mass entry, similar to "invasion of tourists" or "invasion of locusts". It captures the "entry into an area" aspect (national territory) without requiring military intent. The example "invasion of tourists" is very close semantically to "invasion of foreign workers".

    *   **Sense 3 (`invasion%1:11:01::`):**
        *   Definition: "(pathology) the spread of pathogenic microorganisms or malignant cells to new sites in the body".
        *   Focus: Medical/biological context.
        *   Match: The context is sociopolitical, not medical.

4.  **Compare and Select:**
    *   Sense 1 is strictly military. While the text uses military-like rhetoric ("territory"), the entity performing the action is "hordes of Polish plumbers" (workers), not an army.
    *   Sense 3 is medical. Incorrect.
    *   Sense 2 covers "any entry into an area not previously occupied" and explicitly lists examples like "invasion of tourists". The "Polish plumbers" scenario is exactly this kind of mass entry/metaphorical invasion.

    The text uses "invasion" to describe the influx of people (foreign workers) into the country. This aligns perfectly with Sense 2's definition of entry into an area and its examples of non-military groups entering a space.

5.  **Final Conclusion:** Sense 2 is the best fit. It covers the metaphorical/mass entry sense used in political discourse regarding immigration.

6.  **Format Output:** JSON object `{"sense_index": 2}`.

provider: Venice


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: territory
Target surface form: territory
Context:
More recently, it is administrative harassment of foreign students, which is topical, with the minister of the interior ("Libération" on 23 May) declaring that France "does not need foreign talent, bricklayers and waiters." But it is only rarely analyzed from the economic viewpoint. There is a lot of consensus between the Left and the Right on this subject. On the Right, the tone was set by Jacques Chirac, who declared in 1976 that "900,000 unemployed would not become a problem in a country with 2 million of foreign workers," and on the Left by Michel Rocard explaining in 1990 that France "can not accommodate all the world's misery." The only difference, the degree of generosity In 2005, the fear of invasion of the national <t>territory</t> by hordes of Polish plumbers was felt both on the Left and on the Right. Both sides see immigrants as a burden on the French economy and on French society.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=territory%1:15:00:: | definition=a region marked off for administrative or other purposes | synonyms=district, territorial dominion, dominion
2. sense_key=territory%1:09:00:: | definition=an area of knowledge or interest | examples=his questions covered a lot of territory
3. sense_key=territory%1:15:01:: | definition=the geographical area under the jurisdiction of a sovereign state | synonyms=soil | examples=American troops were stationed on Japanese soil

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the target word and context**:
    *   Target lemma: territory
    *   Context snippet: "In 2005, the fear of invasion of the national <t>territory</t> by hordes of Polish plumbers was felt both on the Left and on the Right."
    *   Keywords/phrases: "national territory", "invasion", "France" (implied by context of Jacques Chirac, Michel Rocard, Polish plumbers debate).

2.  **Analyze the candidate senses**:
    *   **Sense 1**: `territory%1:15:00::` | definition=a region marked off for administrative or other purposes | synonyms=district, territorial dominion, dominion. This usually refers to a specific subdivision (like a "US Territory" or a sales territory) or a defined area within a country.
    *   **Sense 2**: `territory%1:09:00::` | definition=an area of knowledge or interest | examples=his questions covered a lot of territory. This is metaphorical/abstract. Clearly not applicable to a physical invasion by Polish plumbers.
    *   **Sense 3**: `territory%1:15:01::` | definition=the geographical area under the jurisdiction of a sovereign state | synonyms=soil | examples=American troops were stationed on Japanese soil. This refers to the land belonging to a nation-state.

3.  **Match context to senses**:
    *   The context speaks of the "national territory" of France.
    *   It speaks of an "invasion". Invasions happen across borders of sovereign states.
    *   The phrase "national territory" strongly aligns with the definition of Sense 3 ("geographical area under the jurisdiction of a sovereign state").
    *   Sense 1 is possible but less precise. "National territory" is a standard collocation referring to the entirety of a country's land, synonymous with "soil" (listed in Sense 3 synonyms). Sense 1 suggests a subdivision or a region marked off *within* a system, whereas Sense 3 captures the concept of the nation-state's domain.
    *   The synonym "soil" in Sense 3 fits perfectly with the idea of invasion (being on French soil).

4.  **Select the best sense**:
    *   Sense 3 is the best fit. It captures the political/geographical entity of the nation of France.

5.  **Format the output**:
    *   The user wants a JSON object `{"sense_index": X}`.
    *   Sense 3 corresponds to index 3.

    Let's double-check indices.
    1. territory%1:15:00:: (district)
    2. territory%1:09:00:: (area of knowledge)
    3. territory%1:15:01:: (sovereign state area)

    The text mentions "national territory". This is the land belonging to the sovereign state (France). Therefore, Sense 3.

provider: DigitalOcean