[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: part
Target surface form: Part
Context:
As we all know, a few minutes before the end of the game (that their team had already won), both players deliberately wasted time which made the referee show the second yellow card to both of them. This way, and since Real Madrid will finish as leader of its group, both players will fulfil the prescribed sanction during the next game of league, against Auxerre, and will be able to get rid of the cards the following phase. Finally, the committee of discipline of the UEFA has sanctioned with two games the trainer of the team, Jose Mourinho, and with different economic amounts the implied players. The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of football. It is so extended that it part of the ethos, of the unwritten rules, but followed nonetheless by this sport. <t>Part</t> of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician. Anyway, the debate deals with if that type of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport, that is to say, if with these actions fraud is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful actions with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=part%1:24:00:: | definition=something determined in relation to something that includes it | synonyms=portion, component part, component, constituent | examples=he wanted to feel a part of something bigger than himself; I read a portion of the manuscript
2. sense_key=part%1:06:00:: | definition=something less than the whole of a human artifact | synonyms=portion | examples=the rear part of the house; glue the two parts together
3. sense_key=part%1:17:00:: | definition=a portion of a natural object | synonyms=piece | examples=they analyzed the river into three parts; he needed a piece of granite
4. sense_key=part%1:09:02:: | definition=that which concerns a person with regard to a particular role or situation | examples=it requires vigilance on our part; they resisted every effort on his part
5. sense_key=part%1:15:00:: | definition=the extended spatial location of something | synonyms=region | examples=the farming regions of France; religions in all parts of the world
6. sense_key=part%1:04:01:: | definition=the actions and activities assigned to or required or expected of a person or group | synonyms=function, office, role | examples=the function of a teacher; the government must do its part
7. sense_key=part%1:09:01:: | definition=an actor's portrayal of someone in a play | synonyms=character, role, theatrical role, persona | examples=she played the part of Desdemona
8. sense_key=part%1:21:00:: | definition=assets belonging to or due to or contributed by an individual person or group | synonyms=share, portion, percentage | examples=he wanted his share in cash
9. sense_key=part%1:09:00:: | definition=one of the portions into which something is regarded as divided and which together constitute a whole | synonyms=section, division | examples=the written part of the exam; the finance section of the company
10. sense_key=part%1:08:01:: | definition=a line of scalp that can be seen when sections of hair are combed in opposite directions | synonyms=parting | examples=his part was right in the middle
11. sense_key=part%1:10:00:: | definition=the melody carried by a particular voice or instrument in polyphonic music | synonyms=voice | examples=he tried to sing the tenor part
12. sense_key=part%1:04:03:: | definition=the part played by a person in bringing about a result | synonyms=contribution, share | examples=I am proud of my contribution in advancing the project; they all did their share of the work

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The target word is "Part" in the context: "Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization..."

The sentence is: "Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization..."

Here "Part" is used in the phrase "Part of the debate" - meaning a portion or section of the debate. The debate is an abstract concept/discussion, and we're talking about a portion of it.

Let me examine the candidates:

1. sense_key=part%1:24:00:: | definition=something determined in relation to something that includes it | synonyms=portion, component part, component, constituent | examples=he wanted to feel a part of something bigger than himself; I read a portion of the manuscript

2. sense_key=part%1:06:00:: | definition=something less than the whole of a human artifact | synonyms=portion | examples=the rear part of the house; glue the two parts together

3. sense_key=part%1:17:00:: | definition=a portion of a natural object | synonyms=piece | examples=they analyzed the river into three parts; he needed a piece of granite

4. sense_key=part%1:09:02:: | definition=that which concerns a person with regard to a particular role or situation | examples=it requires vigilance on our part; they resisted every effort on his part

5. sense_key=part%1:15:00:: | definition=the extended spatial location of something | synonyms=region | examples=the farming regions of France; religions in all parts of the world

6. sense_key=part%1:04:01:: | definition=the actions and activities assigned to or required or expected of a person or group | synonyms=function, office, role | examples=the function of a teacher; the government must do its part

7. sense_key=part%1:09:01:: | definition=an actor's portrayal of someone in a play | synonyms=character, role, theatrical role, persona | examples=she played the part of Desdemona

8. sense_key=part%1:21:00:: | definition=assets belonging to or due to or contributed by an individual person or group | synonyms=share, portion, percentage | examples=he wanted his share in cash

9. sense_key=part%1:09:00:: | definition=one of the portions into which something is regarded as divided and which together constitute a whole | synonyms=section, division | examples=the written part of the exam; the finance section of the company

10. sense_key=part%1:08:01:: | definition=a line of scalp that can be seen when sections of hair are combed in opposite directions | synonyms=parting | examples=his part was right in the middle

11. sense_key=part%1:10:00:: | definition=the melody carried by a particular voice or instrument in polyphonic music | synonyms=voice | examples=he tried to sing the tenor part

12. sense_key=part%1:04:03:: | definition=the part played by a person in bringing about a result | synonyms=contribution, share | examples=I am proud of my contribution in advancing the project; they all did their share of the work

The context is "Part of the debate" - we're talking about a portion/section of an abstract discussion (the debate).

Sense 9 seems most appropriate: "one of the portions into which something is regarded as divided and which together constitute a whole" with synonyms "section, division" and example "the written part of the exam; the finance section of the company"

Sense 1 could also apply: "something determined in relation to something that includes it" with synonyms "portion, component part, component, constituent" and example "I read a portion of the manuscript"

Sense 1 is more general - "something determined in relation to something that includes it". This is very schematic.

Sense 9 is more specific - "one of the portions into which something is regarded as divided and which together constitute a whole" - this emphasizes division and constituting a whole together.

"Part of the debate" suggests we're talking about a portion of a larger whole (the entire debate). The debate can be thought of as divided into different aspects or portions, and we're discussing one part of it.

Looking at the examples:
- Sense 1: "I read a portion of the manuscript" - similar abstract content
- Sense 9: "the written part of the exam" - also similar

I think sense 9 fits better because it emphasizes the portion as part of a whole that is divided, which matches "Part of the debate" well. The debate is a whole discussion that can be divided into parts, and we're referring to one part.

However, looking more carefully at sense 1: "something determined in relation to something that includes it" - this is actually quite general and could fit many uses of "part of". The example "I read a portion of the manuscript" is very similar to "Part of the debate".

Let me reconsider. In WordNet hierarchies:
- Sense 1 (part%1:24:00::) has synset {part, portion, component_part, component, constituent} - this is a very general sense for "part" meaning a portion or component of something larger.

- Sense 9 (part%1:09:00::) has synset {part, section, division} - this emphasizes the division aspect.

In the phrase "Part of the debate," we're saying that a portion of the debate (a section or division of it) is caused by certain facts. This aligns with sense 9 which emphasizes portions into which something is divided.

However, sense 1 with "portion" as a synonym and "I read a portion of the manuscript" as an example is also very close.

Let me look at the WordNet hierarchy more carefully:
- Sense 1 (part%1:24:00::) - "something determined in relation to something that includes it" - this is under the "relation" noun hierarchy
- Sense 9 (part%1:09:00::) - "one of the portions into which something is regarded as divided and which together constitute a whole" - this is about division/segment

The phrase "Part of the debate" suggests we're viewing the debate as having constituent parts, and we're identifying one of those parts. This is closer to sense 9's definition which emphasizes division into portions that constitute a whole.

But wait, let me reconsider sense 1 more carefully. "Something determined in relation to something that includes it" - this is actually very general and could cover any "part of X" construction. The example "he wanted to feel a part of something bigger than himself" shows this sense being used for abstract belonging.

Actually, looking at typical WordNet sense ordering, sense 1 is often the most common/general sense. For "part", sense 1 meaning "something determined in relation to something that includes it" with synonyms "portion, component part, component, constituent" is the most general sense of part = portion.

In "Part of the debate", we're using "part" to mean "portion" - a segment or fraction of the overall debate. This aligns with sense 1's synonym "portion" and the example "I read a portion of the manuscript."

Sense 9 emphasizes "one of the portions into which something is regarded as divided" - this has more of a sense of explicit division. "Part of the debate" doesn't necessarily imply the debate was formally divided; we're just saying some portion of it was caused by certain factors.

I think sense 1 is the better fit. It's the general sense of "part" meaning "portion" - which is exactly how it's used in "Part of the debate."

Let me double-check by considering: would "portion" substitute well?
"Portion of the debate" - yes, this works.
"Section of the debate" - also works, but "portion" feels more natural for the abstract concept of a debate.

So sense 1 seems most appropriate.

Actually, I need to be more careful. Let me re-read sense 9: "one of the portions into which something is regarded as divided and which together constitute a whole"

A debate can be thought of as having different parts or aspects. "Part of the debate" refers to one aspect or portion of the overall debate. This does fit sense 9's definition of being one of the portions into which something is divided.

But sense 1's "something determined in relation to something that includes it" is more general and encompasses this use as well.

The key difference:
- Sense 1: Very general - any part in relation to a whole
- Sense 9: More specific - one of the portions into which something is divided, emphasizing the division aspect

In "Part of the debate arisen in the related case", we're talking about one portion or aspect of the debate. The debate isn't necessarily formally divided into parts; rather, we're just referring to a portion of it.

I think sense 1 is the more appropriate choice here because:
1. "Part of the debate" uses "part" in the most general sense of "portion"
2. The synonym "portion" in sense 1 is a perfect match
3. The example "I read a portion of the manuscript" is analogous - both refer to a portion of an abstract whole

Sense 9 would be more appropriate if we were talking about formally divided sections, like "the written part of the exam" where the exam has distinct, defined parts.

The debate is more fluid and abstract, so sense 1 is better.

Final answer: sense_index: 1


attempt_kind: initial

status: success

[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: debate
Target surface form: debate
Context:
As we all know, a few minutes before the end of the game (that their team had already won), both players deliberately wasted time which made the referee show the second yellow card to both of them. This way, and since Real Madrid will finish as leader of its group, both players will fulfil the prescribed sanction during the next game of league, against Auxerre, and will be able to get rid of the cards the following phase. Finally, the committee of discipline of the UEFA has sanctioned with two games the trainer of the team, Jose Mourinho, and with different economic amounts the implied players. The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of football. It is so extended that it part of the ethos, of the unwritten rules, but followed nonetheless by this sport. Part of the <t>debate</t> arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician. Anyway, the debate deals with if that type of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport, that is to say, if with these actions fraud is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful actions with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=debate%1:10:01:: | definition=a discussion in which reasons are advanced for and against some proposition or proposal | synonyms=argument, argumentation | examples=the argument over foreign aid goes on and on
2. sense_key=debate%1:10:00:: | definition=the formal presentation of a stated proposition and the opposition to it (usually followed by a vote) | synonyms=disputation, public debate

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

finish_reason: stop

role: assistant

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the target word:** The target lemma is "debate". The context shows the word used in a sentence: "Part of the <t>debate</t> arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that..." and "Anyway, the debate deals with if that type of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport..."

2.  **Analyze the context:**
    *   The topic is football (soccer).
    *   Players deliberately got yellow cards to clear their record for the next phase (tactical fouling/wasting time).
    *   Real Madrid and Mourinho are involved.
    *   There is a controversy about whether this behavior (legal by the letter of the law but against the spirit) is ethical.
    *   People are discussing this issue. The text mentions "Part of the debate arisen in the related case..." and "the debate deals with if that type of behavior... contradicts the principles of the sport".
    *   This implies an ongoing discussion, controversy, or argument in the public sphere or among commentators, not a formal, timed event with a vote.

3.  **Analyze Candidate Sense 1:**
    *   *sense_key:* debate%1:10:01::
    *   *definition:* a discussion in which reasons are advanced for and against some proposition or proposal
    *   *synonyms:* argument, argumentation
    *   *examples:* the argument over foreign aid goes on and on
    *   *Fit:* This fits well. The context describes an "arisen" discussion regarding a controversial act. Reasons are being advanced (it's against the spirit vs. it's legal). It's an ongoing public discourse. The synonym "argument" fits the tone of the text ("The provocation... is not a new practice... Part of the debate... caused by the fact..."). The example "argument over foreign aid" parallels the "debate over tactical yellow cards".

4.  **Analyze Candidate Sense 2:**
    *   *sense_key:* debate%1:10:00::
    *   *definition:* the formal presentation of a stated proposition and the opposition to it (usually followed by a vote)
    *   *synonyms:* disputation, public debate
    *   *Fit:* This refers to a formal debate (like a political debate or a high school debate round). While it's a "public" issue, there is no indication of a formal setting with regulated turns, a moderator, or a concluding vote. It refers to the general controversy and discussion among fans, officials, and media.

5.  **Compare and Decide:**
    *   Sense 1 is about a general discussion/argument about a topic.
    *   Sense 2 is about a specific formal event.
    *   The context describes a controversy arising from a specific incident in a football match. It talks about the "ethos" and "unwritten rules." This is a matter of public discussion/argumentation (Sense 1), not a scheduled formal debate event (Sense 2).
    *   Therefore, Sense 1 is the correct choice.

6.  **Format Output:**
    *   JSON object: {"sense_index": 1}

format: unknown

native_finish_reason: stop

provider: Parasail

currency: USD


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: case
Target surface form: case
Context:
As we all know, a few minutes before the end of the game (that their team had already won), both players deliberately wasted time which made the referee show the second yellow card to both of them. This way, and since Real Madrid will finish as leader of its group, both players will fulfil the prescribed sanction during the next game of league, against Auxerre, and will be able to get rid of the cards the following phase. Finally, the committee of discipline of the UEFA has sanctioned with two games the trainer of the team, Jose Mourinho, and with different economic amounts the implied players. The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of football. It is so extended that it part of the ethos, of the unwritten rules, but followed nonetheless by this sport. Part of the debate arisen in the related <t>case</t> is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician. Anyway, the debate deals with if that type of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport, that is to say, if with these actions fraud is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful actions with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=case%1:11:00:: | definition=an occurrence of something | synonyms=instance, example | examples=it was a case of bad judgment; another instance occurred yesterday
2. sense_key=case%1:26:00:: | definition=a special set of circumstances | synonyms=event | examples=in that event, the first possibility is excluded; it may rain in which case the picnic will be canceled
3. sense_key=case%1:04:00:: | definition=a comprehensive term for any proceeding in a court of law whereby an individual seeks a legal remedy | synonyms=lawsuit, suit, cause, causa | examples=the family brought suit against the landlord
4. sense_key=case%1:09:00:: | definition=the actual state of things | examples=that was not the case
5. sense_key=case%1:06:00:: | definition=a portable container for carrying several objects | examples=the musicians left their instrument cases backstage
6. sense_key=case%1:18:03:: | definition=a person requiring professional services | examples=a typical case was the suburban housewife described by a marriage counselor
7. sense_key=case%1:18:02:: | definition=a person who is subjected to experimental or other observational procedures; someone who is an object of investigation | synonyms=subject, guinea pig | examples=the subjects for this investigation were selected randomly; the cases that we studied were drawn from two different communities
8. sense_key=case%1:10:02:: | definition=a problem requiring investigation | examples=Perry Mason solved the case of the missing heir
9. sense_key=case%1:10:01:: | definition=a statement of facts and reasons used to support an argument | examples=he stated his case clearly
10. sense_key=case%1:23:00:: | definition=the quantity contained in a case | synonyms=caseful
11. sense_key=case%1:10:00:: | definition=nouns or pronouns or adjectives (often marked by inflection) related in some way to other words in a sentence | synonyms=grammatical case
12. sense_key=case%1:26:02:: | definition=a specific state of mind that is temporary | examples=a case of the jitters
13. sense_key=case%1:18:04:: | definition=a person of a specified kind (usually with many eccentricities) | synonyms=character, eccentric, type | examples=a real character; a strange character
14. sense_key=case%1:10:03:: | definition=a specific size and style of type within a type family | synonyms=font, fount, typeface, face
15. sense_key=case%1:08:00:: | definition=an enveloping structure or covering enclosing an animal or plant organ or part | synonyms=sheath
16. sense_key=case%1:06:06:: | definition=the housing or outer covering of something | synonyms=shell, casing | examples=the clock has a walnut case
17. sense_key=case%1:06:07:: | definition=the enclosing frame around a door or window opening | synonyms=casing | examples=the casings had rotted away and had to be replaced
18. sense_key=case%1:06:03:: | definition=(printing) the receptacle in which a compositor has his type, which is divided into compartments for the different letters, spaces, or numbers | synonyms=compositor's case, typesetter's case | examples=for English, a compositor will ordinarily have two such cases, the upper case containing the capitals and the lower case containing the small letters
19. sense_key=case%1:06:02:: | definition=bed linen consisting of a cover for a pillow | synonyms=pillowcase, slip, pillow slip | examples=the burglar carried his loot in a pillowcase
20. sense_key=case%1:06:01:: | definition=a glass container used to store and display items in a shop or museum or home | synonyms=display case, showcase, vitrine

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
1. alyze the target word and context:**
    *   Target lemma: `case`
    *   Context sentence: "Part of the debate arisen in the related <t>case</t> is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization..."
    *   Broader context: The text describes an incident where Real Madrid players deliberately got yellow cards to serve a suspension in a meaningless game, clearing their record for the next phase. There is a disciplinary committee sanction. There is a debate about ethics.
    *   The word "case" here refers to this specific incident/scandal involving::`): "an occurrence of something". Synonyms: instance, example.
        *   Analysis: This is a strong contender. The "related case" refers to the occurrence of the yellow card. The context implies a specific event with circumstances being discussed/investigated.

    *   Sense 2 (`case%1:26:00::`): "a special set of circumstances". Synonyms: event.
        *   Analysis: "In that event...", "it may rain in which case...". The examples here function more as conditional or referential markers for situations. While the incident *is* a set of circumstances, the usage "the related case" suggests a specific instance or matter under discussion, almost like a "case study" or a specific "matter" being debated.

    *   Sense 3 (`case%1:04:00::`): "a comprehensive court. However, the text says "The provocation... is not a new practice... Part of the debate arisen in the related case...". It refers to the incident itself as a "case" in the public debate sense, not necessarily a formal legal proceeding number. It's a "case" in the sense of a specific subject of discussion/controversy.

    *   Sense 4 (`case%1:09:00::`): "the actual state of things".
        *   Analysis: "That was not the case". This is usually a predicate use. Here, "the related case" is a noun phrase acting as an object of a preposition. Doesn't fit.

    *   Sense 5-20: (Containers, Grammar, Medical, Printing, etc.)
        *   Sense 6: Portable container. No.
        *   Sense 7: Medical/Investigation subject. No.
        *   Sense 8 (`case%1:10:02::`): "a problem requiring investigation". Example: "Perry Mason solved the case...".
        *   Analysis: This fits well. There is a controversy, a debate, and a disciplinary investigation. The "related case" refers to this matter that people are discussing and investigating (the committee sanctioned them). It is treated as a matter of public interest or investigation.

    *   Let's reconsider Sense 1 vs Sense 8 vs Sense 2.
        *   Context: "Part of the debate arisen in the related case..."
        *   Is it an instance/occurrence (Sense 1)? "This case of bad judgment". Yes, it could be. "The related instance".
        *   Is it a problem requiring investigation (Sense 8)? The discipline committee did investigate. There is a debate. This often happens in "cases" (like the 'case' of the yellow cards).
        *   Is it a legal proceeding (Sense 3)? Not really a court of law, but a disciplinary body. Often sports "cases" are mapped to legal senses in some contexts, but here it's more about the public debate and the specific incident.

    *   Let's look at Sense 2 again: "a special set of circumstances". Synonym: "event". Example: "in which case". This sense usually functions to refer to a hypothetical or previously mentioned situation/condition. "In the related case" doesn't quite fit the "special set of circumstances" definition as well as "instance/example" or "matter/investigation".

    *   Let's look at Sense 8 again: "a problem requiring investigation". The example is "Perry Mason solved the case". The "related case" here is the matter involving Real Madrid. It is being debated. It was investigated by the committee.
    *   However, often "case" in journalism like this just means "instance" or "occurrence" (Sense 1). "This is a case of deliberate time-wasting."
    *   Let's check the definition of Sense 1 again: "an occurrence of something". Synonyms: instance, example.
    *   Let's check the definition of Sense 8 again: "a problem requiring investigation".
    *   The phrase "related case" suggests a specific incident.incident/occurrence]..." works. "Part of the debate arisen in the related [problem requiring investigation]..." works slightly less naturally as a direct substitution for "incident", but "case" is often used for "the matter at hand".

    *   Let's look) are often mapped to Sense 8 ("problem requiring investigation") or Sense 1 ("occurrence").
    *   Let's look at the context "Part of the debate arisen in the related case". This sounds like "the related matter".
    *   Sense 8's example "Perry Mason solved the case of the missing heir" aligns with the "investigation/discipline" aspect mentioned (UEFA committee, sanctions).
    *   However, is it "requiring investigation"? The investigation (sanctions) has already happened or is happening. The text discusses the *debate* arising from it.
    *   Compare with Sense 1: "It was a case of bad judgment". "Another instance occurred yesterday".
    *   If the sentence was "This is a case of bad sportsmanship", it would be Sense 1.
    *   But here: "the related case". This refers to the specific case" (like "the O.J. Simpson case") are Sense 8 (problem/investigation) or Sense 1 (occurrence).
    *   Let's check the mapping for "case" in similar contexts.
        *   "The case of the broken window" -> Sense 8 (investigation) or Sense 1 (instance).
        *   "In case of fire" -> Sense 2.
        *   "The court case" -> Sense 3.
    *   Here we have a sports scandal. There is a committee (quasi-legal).
    *   However, the text says "Part of the debate arisen in the related case". It treats the event as a topic.
    *   Is it Sense 1? "An occurrence". "The related occurrence". Fits well.
    *   Is it Sense 8? "A problem requiring investigation". "The related problem requiring investigation". Fits less well as a noun phrase.
    *   Is it Sense 3? "A proceeding in a court". "The related proceeding". Plausible given the disciplinary committee context. But the "case" is usually the *matter* before the court, not the court process itself, though the word covers both.
    *   However, the text highlights the debate about ethics, not just the legal process.
    *   Sense 1 is the most general and often covers specific incidents referred to as "cases".
    *   Let's look at Sense 2 again. "A special set of circumstances". This is usually for conditional phrases. "In this case..." "In case of rain...". Not a noun referring to an event like "The related case".

    *   Let's look at Sense 8 again. "A problem requiring investigation". The definition is restrictive ("requiring investigation"). While there was an investigation, is it *defined* by it here? Or just as an event/incident?
    *   Sense 1: "An occurrence of something". This encompasses the event.
    *   But wait, is there a sense for "matter" or "situation" being discussed?
    *   Sense 2 is "a special set of circumstances".
    *   Let's consider the example "it was a case of bad judgment". That is Sense 1.
    *   Let's consider "The related case". If I substitute "instance", "Part of the debate arisen in the related instance..." makes sense.
    *   If I substitute "lawsuit" (Sense 3), "Part of the debate arisen in the related lawsuit..." It's not a lawsuit, but a disciplinary matter.
    *   If I substitute "investigation" (Sense 8), "Part of the debate arisen in the related investigation..." It's plausible.
    *   However, usually, "case" meaning "specific incident" (especially one discussed or controversial) maps to Sense 1 (occurrence) or sometimes Sense 8 if the investigative aspect is dominant.
    *   Let's look at Sense 1's examples again: "it was a case of bad judgment", "another instance occurred yesterday".
    *   Let's look at Sense 8's examples: "Perry Mason solved the case...".
    *   The context mentions sanctions, a committee, a debate about rules. It feels like a "case" in the sense of a matter under scrutiny.
    *   However, WordNet sense 1 ("occurrence") is very broad. "A case of the flu" (Sense 1). "A case of theft" (Sense 1).
    *   If I say "The case of Real Madrid", is it an occurrence or an investigation? It's the incident.
    *   Let's check if "case" referring to a specific scandal/incident is Sense 1.
    *   Example: "The Watergate case". Usually mapped to Sense 1 (occurrence) or sometimes Sense 8. But Sense 1 "an occurrence of something" is the standard sense for "an instance of a disease, crime, etc."
    *   Let's look at the provided definitions again.
    *   Sense 1: "an occurrence of something".
    *   Sense 8: "a problem requiring investigation".
    *   The text says: "The provocation of a yellow card... is not a new practice... It is so extended that it part of the ethos... Part of the debate arisen in the related <t>case</t to the specific incident described (Real Madrid players getting cards).
    *   Is this incident an "occurrence"? Yes.
    *   Is it a "problem requiring investigation"? The investigation has happened (sanctions applied), but the debate continues. The primary sense here seems to be referring to the *event/incident* itself.
    *   However, in sports contexts, "case" often implies the "matter" or the "file" or the "situation" being handled by authorities.
    *   If I look at Sense 3 ("proceeding in a court"), the text mentions a "committee of discipline". This is the closest match for a formal "case" (like a legal case). "The related case" could refer to the proceedings brought by UEFA. "Part of the debate arisen in the related [proceedings]..." or "related [matter before the committee]".
    *   Which fits better? Sense 1 (occurrence) or Sense 3 (proceeding)?
    *   Context: "The provocation ... is not a new practice ... Part of the debate arisen in the related case..."
    *   The debate isn't just about the "occurrence" (the fact that it happened), but about the "case" as a situation involving sanctions and ethics.
    *   However, Sense 3 is specifically "lawsuit, suit, cause". UEFA disciplinary hearings are often equated to this.
    *   But often "case" simply means "situation" or "occurrence" in general contexts.
    *   Let's check Sense 1 again. "It was a case of bad judgment". This is about the *type* of occurrence.
    *   "The related case" refers to *this specific* occurrence.
    *   "An occurrence of something" (Sense 1) fits "A case of yellow card provocation". But here it's "The related case". This usually implies "The specific instance under discussion".
    *   Sense 8 "a problem requiring investigation". "The related problem requiring investigation".
    *   Actually, looking at Sense 1's synonyms: "instance, example".
    *   "Part of the debate arisen in the related instance..." -> Natural.
    *   "Part of the debate arisen in the related example..." -> Less natural.
    *   "Part of the debate arisen in the related event..." (Sense 2 synonym) -> Natural.
    *   "Part of the debate arisen in the related lawsuit..." (Sense 3 synonym) -> Plausible but specific.

    *   Let's distinguish Sense 1 and Sense 8.
    *   Sense 1 is generic occurrence. "There were three cases of measles."
    *   Sense 8 is a problem/mystery/investigation. "Detectives are working on the case."
    *   The Real Madrid situation involves a committee (investigation) and a debate.
    *   Often, high-profile incidents referred to as "cases" (like "the XYZ case") are Sense 8 because they carry the connotation of an inquiry or a matter to be solved/judged.
    *   However, the text contrasts it with general practice ("not a new practice").
    *   "Part of the debate arisen in the related case".
    *   I lean towards Sense 8 because there is an case of bad judgment"), it handles general instances.
    *   The example for Sense 8 ("Perry Mason solved the case of the missing heir") is very specific to the mystery/legal genre.
    *   Is the Real Madrid incident a "problem requiring investigation"? Yes, the committee investigated.
    *   Is it an "occurrence"? Yes.
    *   In similar WSD datasets (like SemCor), "case" referring to a specific event/scandal often gets Sense 1 (occurrence).
    *   Example: "In the case of the riots..." -> Sense 1 or 2?
    *   Let's look at Sense 2 again. "a special set of circumstances". "In that event...". This seems to be the conditional sense ("in case of").
    *   Let's look at Sense 1 again. "an occurrence of something". This is the most general count noun sense. "A specific case". "The related case".
    *   If I say "This is a difficult case", I might mean Sense 8 (investigation) or Sense 1 (occurrence).
    *   Given the explicit mention of the "committee of discipline", there is a formal aspect (Sense 3-ish).
    *   However, WordNet Sense 3 is "lawsuit... whereby an individual seeks a legal remedy". This is a disciplinary hearing, not a lawsuit in a court of law (though often metaphorically similar). Sense 8 is "problem requiring investigation".
    *   Let's consider Sense 1. "An occurrence". It is the safest and most accurate fit for "The related case" referring to the specific incident. "The related occurrence".
    *   Let's try to find reasons to reject Sense 1. Is it too abstract? No, occurrences are events.
    *   Let's try to find reasons to accept Sense 8. Does "related problem requiring investigation" fit? "Part of the debate arisen in the related problem requiring investigation is caused by..." It's clumsy. "Part of the debate arisen in the related investigation..." works better.
    *   Does "Part of the debate arisen in the related occurrence..." work? "Part of the debate arisen in the related incident..." Yes.
    *   Therefore, Sense 1 seems the best fit. It refers to the instance of the yellow card provocation.

    *   Wait, let's check the synonyms for Sense 1 again: "instance, example".
    *   Let's check the synonyms for Sense 8: none listed other than the definition.
    *   Let's check the synonyms for Sense 3: "lawsuit, suit, cause, causa".
    *   The context describes a debate about a specific incident.
    *   Usage: "the related case".
    *   If I say "The case of the missing will", it's Sense 8.
    *   If I say "A case of mistaken identity", it's Sense 1.
    *   Here: "The related case". The incident is being compared to "similar circumstances".
    *   "The provocation ... is not a new practice ... Part of the debate arisen in the related case..."
    *   The "case" here is the specific instance of Real Madrid doing it.
    *   Therefore, it is an instance (Sense 1).

    *   Let's double check Sense 3. The text mentions "The committee of discipline of the UEFA has sanctioned...". Is "the related case" referring to the disciplinary case?
    *   "Part of the debate arisen in the related [disciplinary proceeding]..."
    *   This is a very strong possibility. When a committee sanctions people, there is a "case" against them.
    *   However, the sentence continues: "...is caused by the fact that [it] has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization...".
    *   The debate is about the *act* (the provocation) and who did it (Real Madrid), not just the legal proceeding.
    *   The text distinguishes between the general practice ("not a new practice") and this specific "case" (occurrence).
    *   The specific "case" is the specific instance of the practice.
    *   "Case" as "occurrence/instance" (Sense 1) covers this usage.
    *   "Case" as "legal proceeding" (Sense 3) restricts it to the committee's work.
    *   Given the sentence "The provocation ... is not a new practice... but rather frequent... It is so extended... Part of the debate arisen in the related case...", the author is comparing this instance (case) to the general practice.
    *   Comparison requires Sense 1 (Instance/Example). "This case is an example of the practice."
    *   If it were Sense 3 (Legal case), you wouldn't compare a legal case to a practice in the same way. You would compare the *incident* to the practice.
    *   Therefore, "case" here means the specific occurrence/incident/instance.

    *   Final check:
    *   Sense 1: "an occurrence of something". Synonyms: instance, example.
    *   Context: "The related [instance/occurrence]".
    *   Fits perfectly.

    *   Selection: Sense 1.

    Wait, let me check if there is any nuance I missed.
    "The provocation of a yellow card... is not a new practice... Part of the debate arisen in the related case..."
    Does "related case" mean "related matter"?
    Is there a sense for "matter"? No.
    Sense 1 definition "an occurrence of something" is the standard wordnet mapping for "a specific case" (as in "a case of X").
    Example: "a case of bad judgment". This is Sense 1.
    The Real Madrid incident is a "case of deliberate time wasting / yellow card provocation".
    So it is Sense 1.

    Let's look at Sense 8 again just in case. "A problem requiring investigation".
    While there is an investigation, the word "case" here is used to identify the event/instance, not necessarily to foreground the investigation itself (though the investigation is context).
    "Part of the debate arisen in the related instance..."
    "Part of the debate arisen in the related investigation..."
    The debate is about the *event* and its ethics. "Is that type of behavior... contradictory?"
    The "case" is the behavior/event.
    Therefore Sense 1 is superior to Sense 8.

    Let's check Sense 2. "A special set of circumstances". Synonym "event".
    "Part of the debate arisen in the..."
    This actually fits quite well.
    WordNet Sense 2 examples: "in that event...", "it may rain in which case...".
    These examples suggest an anaphoric reference to a situation/condition, often conditional.
    "The related case" is a noun phrase. "In the related case".
    Sense 1 examples: "it was a case of bad judgment", "another instance occurred yesterday".
    These are concrete noun usages.
    "The related case" is a concrete noun usage.
    So Sense

provider: Amazon Bedrock


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: fact
Target surface form: fact
Context:
As we all know, a few minutes before the end of the game (that their team had already won), both players deliberately wasted time which made the referee show the second yellow card to both of them. This way, and since Real Madrid will finish as leader of its group, both players will fulfil the prescribed sanction during the next game of league, against Auxerre, and will be able to get rid of the cards the following phase. Finally, the committee of discipline of the UEFA has sanctioned with two games the trainer of the team, Jose Mourinho, and with different economic amounts the implied players. The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of football. It is so extended that it part of the ethos, of the unwritten rules, but followed nonetheless by this sport. Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the <t>fact</t> that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician. Anyway, the debate deals with if that type of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport, that is to say, if with these actions fraud is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful actions with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=fact%1:09:01:: | definition=a piece of information about circumstances that exist or events that have occurred | examples=first you must collect all the facts of the case
2. sense_key=fact%1:10:01:: | definition=a statement or assertion of verified information about something that is the case or has happened | examples=he supported his argument with an impressive array of facts
3. sense_key=fact%1:26:01:: | definition=an event known to have happened or something known to have existed | examples=your fears have no basis in fact; how much of the story is fact and how much fiction is hard to tell
4. sense_key=fact%1:09:02:: | definition=a concept whose truth can be proved | examples=scientific hypotheses are not facts

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the Target**: The target word is "fact", used as a noun. The specific context is: "Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the **fact** that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization..."

2.  **Analyze the Context**: The sentence discusses a controversy in football (soccer) regarding players deliberately getting yellow cards to clear their record for the next phase. The "fact" refers to the *actual occurrence* or *reality* of the action (the deliberate time-wasting/card provocation) performed by Real Madrid. The phrase "the fact that has been carried out" implies an event or state of affairs that actually happened.

3.  **Evaluate Candidate Senses**:

    *   **Sense 1 (fact%1:09:01::)**: "a piece of information about circumstances that exist or "he supported his argument with an impressive array of facts".
        *   *Analysis*: This usually a specific statement or datum. "The fact that [clause]" is a construction, but here "fact" acts as the abstract entity of the event being true, rather than a specific assertion made by someone (though it is verified).

    *   **Sense 3 (fact%1:26:01::)**: "an event known to have happened or something known to have existed". Example: "your fears have no basis in fact; how much of the story is fact and how much fiction is hard to tell".
        *   *Analysis*: This definition focuses on the *event* or *reality* itself, often contrasted with fiction or theory. The context says "the fact that has been carried out by team...". This refers to the specific act/event (the provocation). The debate is caused by the reality of the event. The construction "the fact that..." followed by a description of an event aligns strongly with the concept of an event known to have happened. The example "basis in fact" contrasts reality with fear/fiction. Here, the "fact" is the reality of Real Madrid's actions.

    *   **Sense 4 (fact%1:09:02::)**: "a concept whose truth can be proved". Example: "scientific hypotheses are not facts".
        *   *Analysis*: This is more abstract/scientific. Not fitting for a specific football scandal.

4.  **Compare Sense 1 and Sense 3**:
    *   Sense 1 is "a piece of information".
    *   Sense 3 is "an event known to have happened".
    *   The text says: "caused by the fact that has been carried out". "Has been carried out" refers to an action or event. The "fact" here is synonymous with the event itself or the reality of the event. While Sense 1 includes "events that have occurred", Sense 3's definition is explicitly "an event known to have happened". The contrast provided in Sense 3's examples (fact vs fiction) parallels the implicit contrast in the text (the debate is about the *nature* of what actually happened vs the "ethos" or unwritten rules).
    *   However, let's look closer at the syntax: "the fact that [relative clause]".
    *   Often, "fact" in the construction "the fact that..." is a generic noun introducing a proposition. Which sense covers this?
    *   Sense 3 examples: "how much of the story is fact...". This treats 'fact' as the event/reality component.
    *   Sense 1 examples: "collect all the facts". This treats 'fact' as a piece of data.
    *   The sentence says: "Part of the debate... is caused by the fact that has been carried out..." (Note: The text "that has been carried out" seems to be modifying 'fact' or introducing the content of the fact. Actually, reading the clumsy translation/style: "caused by the fact that has been carried out by team..." -> "caused by the fact [which] has been carried out..."). Or perhaps "the fact that [it] has been carried out...". The text is likely translated or slightly ungrammatical ("the fact that has been carried out by team"). Assuming it means "the fact that this was carried out by the team".
    *   If it refers to the *action* (the event) of Real Madrid doing this, Sense 3 ("an event known to have happened") is the best fit. It is the occurrence itself causing the debate.
    *   If we treat "fact" as "information about circumstances", Sense 1 is close. But usually, when we say "The fact is..." or "The fact that...", we are referring to the *reality* of the situation (Sense 3) rather than a collected datum (Sense 1).

    Let's refine the distinction between Sense 1 and Sense 3 in WordNet.
    Sense 1 (hypernym: information): a piece of information...
    Sense 3 (hypernym: event): an event known to have happened...

    In the context, the "fact" is the *event* of the provocation carried out by Real Madrid. The debate is caused by the event itself (and who did it). Therefore, Sense 3 is the precise choice for an event that occurred.

    Let's double-check the Sense 3 definition again: "an event known to have happened or something known to have existed".
    Context: "the fact that has been carried out". "Carried out" applies to an action/event. Thus, "fact" here is the event.

    Let's re-read the sentence carefully: "Part of the debate... is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid..."
    It implies: The fact (the event/action) of them doing this.
    Therefore, Sense 3 is the correct definition.

    Let's check Sense 2 again. "a statement or assertion...". No, the debate isn't caused by a statement, but by the action itself.

1 and 3.
    Sense 1: information.
    Sense 3: event.
    The debate is caused by the *occurrence* (the event), not just information about it. Although knowing about it (information) is necessary for the debate, the cause of the debate is the actual event (Real Madrid's unsportsmanlike conduct). The definition "an event known to have happened" captures the weight of the word here—referring to the historical reality of the players' actions.

    Decision: Sense 3.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: team
Target surface form: team
Context:
As we all know, a few minutes before the end of the game (that their team had already won), both players deliberately wasted time which made the referee show the second yellow card to both of them. This way, and since Real Madrid will finish as leader of its group, both players will fulfil the prescribed sanction during the next game of league, against Auxerre, and will be able to get rid of the cards the following phase. Finally, the committee of discipline of the UEFA has sanctioned with two games the trainer of the team, Jose Mourinho, and with different economic amounts the implied players. The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of football. It is so extended that it part of the ethos, of the unwritten rules, but followed nonetheless by this sport. Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by <t>team</t> of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician. Anyway, the debate deals with if that type of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport, that is to say, if with these actions fraud is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful actions with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=team%1:14:00:: | definition=a cooperative unit (especially in sports) | synonyms=squad
2. sense_key=team%1:14:01:: | definition=two or more draft animals that work together to pull something

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the Request:**
    *   Target lemma: "team".
    *   Target surface form: "team".
    *   Context: A text about football (soccer), Real Madrid, players getting yellow cards, Mourinho, UEFA sanctions.
    *   Candidate senses:
        *   1: "a cooperative unit (especially in sports)" | syn=squad.
        *   2: "two or more draft animals that work together to pull something".
    *   Output format: JSON `{"sense_index": X}`.

2.  **Analyze the Context:**
    *   The sentence containing the target word: "Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by **team** of the Real Madrid organization..."
    *   Wait, the sentence is slightly ungrammatical in the provided text ("fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization"). It likely means "by *the* team of..." or refers to the collective group of players.
    *   Preceding context: "...their team had already won...", "Real Madrid will finish as leader of its group", "players", "trainer of the team", "football".
    *   The context is explicitly about sports (football/soccer). Real Madrid is a famous football club. Mourinho is a famous football manager (trainer). Players get yellow cards.

3.  **Evaluate Candidate Senses:**
    *   Sense 1: "a cooperative unit (especially in sports)". Synonym: squad.
        *   Does this fit? Yes. Real Madrid's team. The players working together. The "team" mentioned in "trainer of the team" and "their team". This is the standard definition for a sports team.
    *   Sense 2: "two or more draft animals that work together to pull something".
        *   Does this fit? No. This refers to horses, oxen, etc., pulling a plow or wagon. There are no draft animals mentioned in this context.

4.  **Disambiguation:**
    *   The context is clearly sports-related.
    *   Sense 1 is specific to sports.
    *   Sense 2 is specific to animals.
    *   Therefore, Sense 1 is the correct choice.

5.  **Formulate Output:**
    *   The request asks for a JSON object: `{"sense_index": 1}`.

6.  **Final Verification:**
    *   Target word: "team".
    *   Context meaning: The group of players representing Real Madrid.
    *   Sense 1 definition: a cooperative unit (especially in sports). Matches perfectly.
    *   Index: 1.

provider: AtlasCloud


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: organization
Target surface form: organization
Context:
As we all know, a few minutes before the end of the game (that their team had already won), both players deliberately wasted time which made the referee show the second yellow card to both of them. This way, and since Real Madrid will finish as leader of its group, both players will fulfil the prescribed sanction during the next game of league, against Auxerre, and will be able to get rid of the cards the following phase. Finally, the committee of discipline of the UEFA has sanctioned with two games the trainer of the team, Jose Mourinho, and with different economic amounts the implied players. The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of football. It is so extended that it part of the ethos, of the unwritten rules, but followed nonetheless by this sport. Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid <t>organization</t> (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician. Anyway, the debate deals with if that type of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport, that is to say, if with these actions fraud is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful actions with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=organization%1:14:00:: | definition=a group of people who work together | synonyms=organisation
2. sense_key=organization%1:09:00:: | definition=an organized structure for arranging or classifying | synonyms=arrangement, organisation, system | examples=he changed the arrangement of the topics; the facts were familiar but it was in the organization of them that he was original
3. sense_key=organization%1:14:01:: | definition=the persons (or committees or departments etc.) who make up a body for the purpose of administering something | synonyms=administration, governance, governing body, establishment, brass, organisation | examples=he claims that the present administration is corrupt; the governance of an association is responsible to its members
4. sense_key=organization%1:04:00:: | definition=the act of organizing a business or an activity related to a business | synonyms=organisation | examples=he was brought in to supervise the organization of a new department
5. sense_key=organization%1:07:00:: | definition=an ordered manner; orderliness by virtue of being methodical and well organized | synonyms=organisation, system | examples=his compulsive organization was not an endearing quality; we can't do it unless we establish some system around here
6. sense_key=organization%1:04:01:: | definition=the activity or result of distributing or disposing persons or things properly or methodically | synonyms=organisation | examples=his organization of the work force was very efficient
7. sense_key=organization%1:04:02:: | definition=the act of forming or establishing something | synonyms=constitution, establishment, formation, organisation | examples=the constitution of a PTA group last year; it was the establishment of his reputation

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
Let me analyze the context to determine which sense of "organization" is being used.

The context is discussing Real Madrid football club and refers to "the Real Madrid organization". Let me look at the specific sentence:

"Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid <t>organization</t> (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous acts)"

The text is referring to Real Madrid as an organization - this is about the club/organization as an entity, a group of people who work together as a football club.

Let me examine each sense:

1. "a group of people who work together" - This could fit Real Madrid as a football club/organization.

2. "an organized structure for arranging or classifying" - This is about abstract organizational systems, not an entity like a club.

3. "the persons (or committees or departments etc.) who make up a body for the purpose of administering something" - This is about the administrative body of something, the governance structure. While Real Madrid has administrative aspects, this sense seems more focused on the administrative body itself rather than the organization as a whole.

4. "the act of organizing a business or an activity related to a business" - This is about the activity of organizing, not an entity.

5. "an ordered manner; orderliness by virtue of being methodical and well organized" - This is about being organized as a quality, not an entity.

6. "the activity or result of distributing or disposing persons or things properly or methodically" - This is about the activity of organizing.

7. "the act of forming or establishing something" - This is about the act of creating something.

The context clearly refers to Real Madrid as an organization - a club/entity. The most appropriate sense would be either 1 or 3.

Sense 1: "a group of people who work together" - Real Madrid is indeed a group of people who work together as a football club.

Sense 3: "the persons (or committees or departments etc.) who make up a body for the purpose of administering something" - This is more specifically about the administrative/governing body of an organization.

The context mentions "the Real Madrid organization" as an entity that has a hymn, has fined players, etc. This is referring to the club as a whole organization, not just its administrative structure. Sense 1 seems more appropriate because it captures the broader sense of an organization as a group of people working together (in this case, as a football club), while sense 3 is more narrowly focused on administration/governance.

Therefore, I believe sense 1 is the best fit.

{"sense_index": 1}

provider: DigitalOcean


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: nobility
Target surface form: nobility
Context:
As we all know, a few minutes before the end of the game (that their team had already won), both players deliberately wasted time which made the referee show the second yellow card to both of them. This way, and since Real Madrid will finish as leader of its group, both players will fulfil the prescribed sanction during the next game of league, against Auxerre, and will be able to get rid of the cards the following phase. Finally, the committee of discipline of the UEFA has sanctioned with two games the trainer of the team, Jose Mourinho, and with different economic amounts the implied players. The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of football. It is so extended that it part of the ethos, of the unwritten rules, but followed nonetheless by this sport. Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of <t>nobility</t> and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician. Anyway, the debate deals with if that type of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport, that is to say, if with these actions fraud is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful actions with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=nobility%1:14:00:: | definition=a privileged class holding hereditary titles | synonyms=aristocracy
2. sense_key=nobility%1:07:00:: | definition=the quality of elevation of mind and exaltation of character or ideals or conduct | synonyms=nobleness, magnanimousness, grandeur
3. sense_key=nobility%1:26:00:: | definition=the state of being of noble birth | synonyms=noblesse

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The target word is "nobility" in the context: "that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor"

Let me analyze the context carefully:

The passage is discussing Real Madrid football team's behavior where players deliberately got yellow cards to serve suspensions in a less important game. The author points out that Real Madrid's hymn (anthem) "presumes of nobility and honor" - meaning the team boasts about/prides itself on having nobility and honor as values.

The context is about moral character, ideals, and conduct - the team claims to uphold nobility and honor as principles, yet their actions (deliberately getting yellow cards) seem to contradict these principles.

Let me evaluate the senses:

1. sense_key=nobility%1:14:00:: | definition=a privileged class holding hereditary titles | synonyms=aristocracy
This refers to the social class of nobles - aristocrats, people with hereditary titles like dukes, counts, etc. This doesn't fit because a sports team's hymn wouldn't be claiming they are literally the aristocratic class.

2. sense_key=nobility%1:07:00:: | definition=the quality of elevation of mind and exaltation of character or ideals or conduct | synonyms=nobleness, magnanimousness, grandeur
This refers to nobility as a moral quality - elevated character, high ideals, noble conduct. This fits perfectly with the context where "nobility and honor" are mentioned together as values that Real Madrid's hymn boasts about. The passage is discussing whether their behavior contradicts "the principles of the sport" - it's about moral conduct and character.

3. sense_key=nobility%1:26:00:: | definition=the state of being of noble birth | synonyms=noblesse
This refers to being born into nobility - noble birth. This is more about the fact of being nobility by birth, not a moral quality.

The phrase "nobility and honor" in a team's hymn clearly refers to moral qualities/virtues that the team claims to embody, not to being literally of aristocratic birth. The context is about sportsmanship, ethics, and whether their actions align with these claimed values.

Sense 2 is the correct choice - it refers to nobility as a quality of character and ideals.

provider: Friendli


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: honor
Target surface form: honor
Context:
As we all know, a few minutes before the end of the game (that their team had already won), both players deliberately wasted time which made the referee show the second yellow card to both of them. This way, and since Real Madrid will finish as leader of its group, both players will fulfil the prescribed sanction during the next game of league, against Auxerre, and will be able to get rid of the cards the following phase. Finally, the committee of discipline of the UEFA has sanctioned with two games the trainer of the team, Jose Mourinho, and with different economic amounts the implied players. The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of football. It is so extended that it part of the ethos, of the unwritten rules, but followed nonetheless by this sport. Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and <t>honor</t>, and that has fined its players for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician. Anyway, the debate deals with if that type of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport, that is to say, if with these actions fraud is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful actions with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=honor%1:10:00:: | definition=a tangible symbol signifying approval or distinction | synonyms=award, accolade, honour, laurels | examples=an award for bravery
2. sense_key=honor%1:26:00:: | definition=the state of being honored | synonyms=honour, laurels
3. sense_key=honor%1:07:00:: | definition=the quality of being honorable and having a good name | synonyms=honour | examples=a man of honor
4. sense_key=honor%1:07:01:: | definition=a woman's virtue or chastity | synonyms=honour, purity, pureness

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the context**: The sentence is "that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous acts".
    *   **Context**: It discusses Real Madrid, a football team.
    *   **Subject**: The team's hymn (anthem) presumes/boasts of "nobility and honor".
    *   **Juxtaposition**: The team fined players for analogous acts (unsportsmanlike conduct/tactical fouls), implying a contradiction between their claimed values and their actions.
    *   **Semantic Field**: Moral qualities, reputation, principles, integrity.
    *   **Collocation**: "nobility and honor". "Nobility" here likely refers to high moral character rather than aristocracy (though the double meaning exists, especially with "Real" Madrid). "Honor" here is paired with nobility, suggesting a character trait or a state of being reputable.

2.  **Analyze the candidate senses**:

    *   **Sense 1 (honor%1:10:00::)**: "a tangible symbol signifying approval or distinction" (synonyms: award, accolade).
        *   *Fit*: Does the hymn presume of nobility and an award? No. It's talking about intrinsic qualities, not a trophy or medal.
        *   *Conclusion*: Incorrect.

    *   **Sense 2 (honor%1:26:00::)**: "the state of being honored" (synonyms: honour, laurels).
        *   *Fit*: Being honored by others? While Real Madrid is a famous club, the context suggests they are boasting *of* something intrinsic. "Presumes of nobility and honor" implies they possess these qualities. While one can be "in a state of being honored," this usually refers to the reception of honor. The context emphasizes the *ethos*, *unwritten rules*, and *fraud/contradiction* of principles.
        *   *Conclusion*: Weak fit.

    *   **Sense 3 (honor%1:07:00::)**: "the quality of being honorable and having a good name" (synonyms: honour).
        *   *Examples*: "a man of honor".
        *   *Fit*: This refers to integrity, honesty, and moral rectitude. The text contrasts the team's claimed "honor" with their "provocation" and "fraud". The debate is about whether their actions "contradict the principles of the sport". This aligns perfectly with "honor" as a moral quality/principle. The phrase "nobility and honor" refers to high moral standing.
        *   *Conclusion*: Strong fit.

    *   **Sense 4 (honor%1:07:01::)**: "a woman's virtue or chastity" (synonyms: honour, purity, pureness).
        *   *Fit*: This is a gender-specific sense usually applied to women (e.g., "defending her honor"). Real Madrid is a team/organization, not a woman.
        *   *Conclusion*: Incorrect.

3.  **Select the best sense**: Sense 3 fits best. The context is about moral integrity and reputation (good name), contrasted with the unsportsmanlike behavior of getting yellow cards on purpose. The team claims "honor" (integrity) in their anthem, but acts otherwise.

4.  **Format output**: JSON object with the index.
    Index 1 = award...
    Index 2 = state of being honored...
    Index 3 = quality of being honorable...
    Index 4 = woman's virtue...

    Target sense corresponds to index 3.

provider: StreamLake


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: player
Target surface form: players
Context:
As we all know, a few minutes before the end of the game (that their team had already won), both players deliberately wasted time which made the referee show the second yellow card to both of them. This way, and since Real Madrid will finish as leader of its group, both players will fulfil the prescribed sanction during the next game of league, against Auxerre, and will be able to get rid of the cards the following phase. Finally, the committee of discipline of the UEFA has sanctioned with two games the trainer of the team, Jose Mourinho, and with different economic amounts the implied players. The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of football. It is so extended that it part of the ethos, of the unwritten rules, but followed nonetheless by this sport. Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its <t>players</t> for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician. Anyway, the debate deals with if that type of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport, that is to say, if with these actions fraud is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful actions with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=player%1:18:01:: | definition=a person who participates in or is skilled at some game | synonyms=participant
2. sense_key=player%1:18:02:: | definition=someone who plays a musical instrument (as a profession) | synonyms=musician, instrumentalist
3. sense_key=player%1:18:00:: | definition=a theatrical performer | synonyms=actor, histrion, thespian, role player
4. sense_key=player%1:18:04:: | definition=a person who pursues a number of different social and sexual partners simultaneously
5. sense_key=player%1:18:03:: | definition=an important participant (as in a business deal) | examples=he was a major player in setting up the corporation

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the Request:**
    *   Target lemma: player (plural: players).
    *   Context: A text about a football (soccer) match involving Real Madrid, yellow cards, suspensions, Jose Mourinho, and UEFA. The players are wasting time to get suspended for a meaningless game.
    *   Candidate senses: 5 options provided with definitions, synonyms, and sometimes examples.
    *   Goal: Select the single best indexed sense.
    *   Output format: JSON object `{"sense_index": X}`.

2.  **Analyze the Context:**
    *   "both players deliberately wasted time which made the referee show the second yellow card..."
    *   "Real Madrid will finish as leader..."
    *   "trainer of the team, Jose Mourinho..."
    *   "world of football."
    *   "fined its players for analogous acts..."
    *   The context is clearly about sports, specifically football (soccer). The "players" are athletes participating in a game.

3.  **Analyze the Candidate Senses:**
    *   **Sense 1:** `player%1:18:01::` - Definition: "a person who participates in or is skilled at some game". Synonyms: participant.
        *   *Evaluation:* This fits perfectly. The context involves a football game, referees, cards, and teams. The "players" are the athletes on the field.
    *   **Sense 2:** `player%1:18:02::` - Definition: "someone who plays a musical instrument (as a profession)". Synonyms: musician, instrumentalist.
        *   *Evaluation:* Incorrect. No musical instruments are mentioned.
    *   **Sense 3:** `player%1:18:00::` - Definition: "a theatrical performer". Synonyms: actor, histrion, thespian, role player.
        *   *Evaluation:* Incorrect. While Mourinho is described as "histrionic", the "players" are athletes, not actors on a stage.
    *   **Sense 4:** `player%1:18:04::` - Definition: "a person who pursues a number of different social and sexual partners simultaneously".
        *   *Evaluation:* Incorrect. This is a slang/colloquial meaning regarding dating.
    *   **Sense 5:** `player%1:18:03::` - Definition: "an important participant (as in a business deal)". Example: "he was a major player in setting up the corporation".
        *   *Evaluation:* Incorrect. While "major player" is a common idiom in business, here the word refers to the specific role in a game, not a metaphorical participant in a business deal. The context specifies a referee, a game, cards, etc.

4.  **Synthesize and Decide:**
    *   The text is explicitly about a football match.
    *   The "players" refer to the athletes who received yellow cards.
    *   Sense 1 ("a person who participates in or is skilled at some game") is the exact definition for an athlete in a sport.

5.  **Format Output:**
    *   The chosen sense is Sense 1.
    *   Output: `{"sense_index": 1}`.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: act
Target surface form: acts
Context:
As we all know, a few minutes before the end of the game (that their team had already won), both players deliberately wasted time which made the referee show the second yellow card to both of them. This way, and since Real Madrid will finish as leader of its group, both players will fulfil the prescribed sanction during the next game of league, against Auxerre, and will be able to get rid of the cards the following phase. Finally, the committee of discipline of the UEFA has sanctioned with two games the trainer of the team, Jose Mourinho, and with different economic amounts the implied players. The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of football. It is so extended that it part of the ethos, of the unwritten rules, but followed nonetheless by this sport. Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous <t>acts</t>) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician. Anyway, the debate deals with if that type of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport, that is to say, if with these actions fraud is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful actions with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=act%1:10:01:: | definition=a legal document codifying the result of deliberations of a committee or society or legislative body | synonyms=enactment
2. sense_key=act%1:03:00:: | definition=something that people do or cause to happen | synonyms=deed, human action, human activity
3. sense_key=act%1:10:00:: | definition=a subdivision of a play or opera or ballet
4. sense_key=act%1:10:02:: | definition=a short theatrical performance that is part of a longer program | synonyms=routine, number, turn, bit | examples=he did his act three times every evening; she had a catchy little routine
5. sense_key=act%1:10:03:: | definition=a manifestation of insincerity | examples=he put on quite an act for her benefit

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

raw_output:
```json
{"sense_index": 2}
```

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 2}
```

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the Request:**
    *   **Task:** Fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation (WSD).
    *   **Target Lemma:** act.
    *   **Target Surface Form:** acts.
    *   **Context:** A passage discussing football (soccer), specifically players deliberately getting yellow cards to clear their record before the next phase (tactical fouls/unsportsmanlike conduct). It mentions Real Madrid, Mourinho, UEFA sanctions, and "analogous acts".
    *   **Candidate Senses:**
        1.  Legal document.
        2.  Something people do (deed/action).
        3.  Subdivision of a play.
        4.  Short theatrical performance.
        5.  Manifestation of insincerity.
    *   **Constraints:** Return only a JSON object: `{"sense_index": X}`.

2.  **Analyze the Context:**
    *   The sentence containing the target is: "...that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous <t>acts</t>..."
    *   The surrounding text discusses "provocation of a yellow card", "behavior not prohibited specifically", "these actions".
    *   The word "acts" here refers to specific behaviors or deeds done by the players (time-wasting, getting yellow cards on purpose).
    *   Synonyms in the text: "behavior", "actions".

3.  **Evaluate Candidate Senses:**

    *   **Sense 1 (Legal document):** Does "acts" mean a legal statute or codified law here? No. The club fined players for analogous *behaviors*, not for analogous *laws*.
    *   **Sense 2 (Something that people do / deed / human action):** Does "acts" mean deeds or actions here? Yes. The context is about the *actions* of the players (getting yellow cards, wasting time). The text explicitly uses synonyms like "behavior" and "actions". The players are fined for similar *actions* (acts).
    *   **Sense 3 (Subdivision of a play):** No, not a theatrical structure.
    *   **Sense 4 (Short theatrical performance):** While Mourinho is accused of "dramatization" and being "histrionic", the specific phrase "analogous acts" refers to the specific misconduct (getting yellow cards) for which they were fined. It's not referring to a "routine" or a "bit" in a show sense, though there is a metaphorical link to theater, the core meaning here is the *deed* itself. The "acts" are the fouls/time-wasting.
    *   **Sense 5 (Manifestation of insincerity):** While the text implies the players were acting (feigning/dramatizing), the phrase "analogous acts" refers to the misconduct incidents themselves (the getting of the yellow cards), which were "analogous" to previous incidents. The text distinguishes between the "dramatization orchestrated... by Mourinho" and the "acts" for which players were fined. However, even if one argues for the "insincerity" angle, Sense 2 is the hypernym and fits "deed/action" perfectly. Let's look closer.
        *   Context: "...has fined its players for analogous acts..." -> Fines are levied for actions/behaviors, not specifically "insincere displays" (though the displays were part of it). The act is the provocation of the card.
        *   Synonyms provided for Sense 2: deed, human action, human activity.
        *   The text uses "actions" later: "if with these actions fraud is committed".
        *   This strongly supports Sense 2.

4.  **Comparison:**
    *   Sense 2 is the general sense of "act" meaning an action or deed. This fits perfectly with "provocation of a yellow card" and "behavior".
    *   Sense 5 implies a specific *type* of act (insincerity/pretending). While the *context* involves simulation ("dramatization"), the specific phrase "analogous acts" refers to the incidents of getting cards (the deeds). The primary sense is "action/deed".
    *   Sense 1, 3, 4 are irrelevant.

5.  **Selection:** Sense 2.

6.  **Final Output Formatting:**
    *   JSON format: `{"sense_index": 2}`.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: history
Target surface form: history
Context:
As we all know, a few minutes before the end of the game (that their team had already won), both players deliberately wasted time which made the referee show the second yellow card to both of them. This way, and since Real Madrid will finish as leader of its group, both players will fulfil the prescribed sanction during the next game of league, against Auxerre, and will be able to get rid of the cards the following phase. Finally, the committee of discipline of the UEFA has sanctioned with two games the trainer of the team, Jose Mourinho, and with different economic amounts the implied players. The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of football. It is so extended that it part of the ethos, of the unwritten rules, but followed nonetheless by this sport. Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded <t>history</t> of histrionic and provoking technician. Anyway, the debate deals with if that type of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport, that is to say, if with these actions fraud is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful actions with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=history%1:28:00:: | definition=the aggregate of past events | examples=a critical time in the school's history
2. sense_key=history%1:10:00:: | definition=a record or narrative description of past events | synonyms=account, chronicle, story | examples=a history of France; he gave an inaccurate account of the plot to kill the president
3. sense_key=history%1:09:00:: | definition=the discipline that records and interprets past events involving human beings | examples=he teaches Medieval history; history takes the long view
4. sense_key=history%1:28:02:: | definition=the continuum of events occurring in succession leading from the past to the present and even into the future | examples=all of human history
5. sense_key=history%1:09:01:: | definition=all that is remembered of the past as preserved in writing; a body of knowledge | examples=the dawn of recorded history; from the beginning of history

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the target lemma and surface form:**
    *   Lemma: history
    *   Surface form: history
    *   Context snippet: "...who adds one more to his expanded *history* of histrionic and provoking technician."

2.  **Analyze the context:**
    *   The text discusses a football manager (Jose Mourinho) getting sanctioned.
    *   The specific phrase is "his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician" (referring to his behavior track record).
    *   The phrase "adds one more to his expanded history" implies a collection or accumulation of past actions/events associated with this person.
    *   It's not about the academic subject (sense 3).
    *   It's not about a written record or narrative book (sense 2).
    *   It's not about "all of human history" as a vast continuum (sense 4, though related, this is specific to a person).
    *   It's not "all that is remembered of the past as preserved in writing" (sense 5).
    *   It refers to a specific person's past actions/track record.

3.  **Evaluate the candidate senses:**

    *   **Sense 1 (history%1:28:00::):** "the aggregate of past events". Example: "a critical time in the school's history".
        *   Does this fit? Yes. Mourinho's "history" here is the aggregate of his past actions (provocations, histrionics). The phrase "his history of..." fits this definition perfectly. It refers to the collection of events that have happened to him or been done by him.

    *   **Sense 2 (history%1:10:00::):** "a record or narrative description of past events". Synonyms: account, chronicle, story. Example: "a history of France".
        *   Does this fit? While there is an implicit record, the focus is on the events themselves that make up his track record, not necessarily a written chronicle or a narrative account in the sense of a story told. However, "history" in "a history of [behavior]" often borders between the events and the record of them. But usually, "criminal history" or "history of [medical condition]" refers to the aggregate of events (Sense 1). Let's look at the specific phrase "his expanded history of histrionic...". This refers to the accumulation of acts.

    *   **Sense 3 (history%1:09:00::):** "the discipline that records and interprets past events". Example: "he teaches Medieval history".
        *   Clearly incorrect. He is not teaching history; he is living it.

    *   **Sense 4 (history%1:28:02::):** "the continuum of events occurring in succession leading from the past to the present...". Example: "all of human history".
        *   This is usually more abstract or grand in scale. While a personal history is a continuum, Sense 1 ("aggregate of past events") captures the specific usage "a history of [X]" better in WordNet hierarchies. Often WordNet distinguishes between "History" (the grand scale) and "history" (a person's past events). Sense 1 is the general "aggregate of past events". Sense 4 is the specific metaphysical continuum. "His history of histrionics" fits Sense 1 better.

    *   **Sense 5 (history%1:09:01::):** "all that is remembered of the past as preserved in writing...".
        *   Incorrect. This is about knowledge preservation.

4.  **Compare Sense 1 and Sense 2 more closely:**
    *   Sense 1: aggregate of past events.
    *   Sense 2: record or narrative description.
    *   In phrases like "a history of violence" or "his history of histrionics", the meaning is "a series of past events of a particular kind". The events *are* the history.
    *   If I say "He has a history of heart trouble", I mean the aggregate of his past medical events regarding his heart. This aligns with Sense 1.
    *   If I say "Write a history of Rome", I mean a narrative description. This aligns with Sense 2.
    *   The context says Mourinho *adds one more* to his history. He adds an event to the aggregate of his past actions. He isn't adding a chapter to a book (Sense 2), he is adding an event to his track record (Sense 1).
    *   Therefore, Sense 1 is the best fit.

5.  **Final Check:**
    *   Target: "adds one more to his expanded history..."
    *   Definition: "the aggregate of past events".
    *   Example: "a critical time in the school's history". (Analogy: a critical event in Mourinho's history).
    *   This fits well.

6.  **Construct the JSON output:**
    *   Index 1 corresponds to sense_key=history%1:28:00::.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: debate
Target surface form: debate
Context:
This way, and since Real Madrid will finish as leader of its group, both players will fulfil the prescribed sanction during the next game of league, against Auxerre, and will be able to get rid of the cards the following phase. Finally, the committee of discipline of the UEFA has sanctioned with two games the trainer of the team, Jose Mourinho, and with different economic amounts the implied players. The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of football. It is so extended that it part of the ethos, of the unwritten rules, but followed nonetheless by this sport. Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician. Anyway, the <t>debate</t> deals with if that type of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport, that is to say, if with these actions fraud is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful actions with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense. The matter examines the type of damage that is brought to the sporting spirit.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=debate%1:10:01:: | definition=a discussion in which reasons are advanced for and against some proposition or proposal | synonyms=argument, argumentation | examples=the argument over foreign aid goes on and on
2. sense_key=debate%1:10:00:: | definition=the formal presentation of a stated proposition and the opposition to it (usually followed by a vote) | synonyms=disputation, public debate

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The target word is "debate" in the context: "Anyway, the debate deals with if that type of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport..."

Let me analyze the context:
- This is about a controversy in football/soccer regarding deliberate yellow cards
- The "debate" here refers to a public discussion/argument about whether certain behavior contradicts the principles of sport
- It's an ongoing discussion about ethics, not a formal debate with propositions and voting
- The phrase "the debate deals with if..." suggests a discussion about an issue

Sense 1: "a discussion in which reasons are advanced for and against some proposition or proposal" - synonyms: argument, argumentation
Sense 2: "the formal presentation of a stated proposition and the opposition to it (usually followed by a vote)" - synonyms: disputation, public debate

In this context:
- The debate is about whether certain actions constitute fraud or contradict sporting principles
- This is NOT a formal debate with a vote
- It's an ongoing discussion/argument in the public sphere about an ethical issue in sports
- People are discussing reasons for and against whether this behavior is acceptable

The context describes a public discussion about ethics in sports - whether deliberately getting yellow cards to serve suspensions at convenient times is against the spirit of the sport. This is an informal, ongoing discussion, not a formal debate procedure.

Sense 1 fits better because:
- It's a discussion with reasons being advanced for and against a proposition (whether the behavior contradicts sporting principles)
- It's informal/ongoing, not a formal structured debate with a vote
- The synonyms "argument, argumentation" fit the context of people arguing about this issue

Sense 2 doesn't fit as well because:
- It's described as formal presentation followed by a vote
- This is not a formal debate setting

The best sense is 1.