[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: city
Target surface form: cities
Context:
Parents should be involved with their children's education at home, not in school. They should see to it that their kids do not play truant; they should make certain that the children spend enough time doing homework; they should scrutinize the report card. If parents are dissatisfied with a school, they should have the option of switching to another. -- "Community involvement "is an even worse idea. Here, the experience of New York City is decisive. Locally elected school boards, especially in our larger <t>cities</t>, become the prey of ambitious, generally corrupt, and invariably demagogic local politicians or would-be politicians. New York is in the process of trying to disengage itself from a 20-year-old commitment to this system of school governance, even as Chicago and other cities are moving to institute it.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=city%1:15:00:: | definition=a large and densely populated urban area; may include several independent administrative districts | synonyms=metropolis, urban center | examples=Ancient Troy was a great city
2. sense_key=city%1:15:01:: | definition=an incorporated administrative district established by state charter | examples=the city raised the tax rate
3. sense_key=city%1:14:00:: | definition=people living in a large densely populated municipality | synonyms=metropolis | examples=the city voted for Republicans in 1994

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the Target Word and Context:**
    *   **Target lemma:** city
    *   **Target surface form:** cities (plural)
    *   **Context snippet:** "Locally elected school boards, especially in our larger <t>cities</t>, become the prey of ambitious, generally corrupt, and invariably demagogic local politicians or would-be politicians."
    *   **Broader context:** The text discusses school governance, specifically "Community involvement," "Locally elected school boards," and comparing New York City, Chicago, and "other cities." It mentions politicians and administrative structures (school boards).

2.  **Analyze the Candidate Senses:**

    *   **Sense 1:** `city%1:15:00::`
        *   *Definition:* a large and densely populated urban area; may include several independent administrative districts.
        *   *Synonyms:* metropolis, urban center.
        *   *Examples:* Ancient Troy was a great city.
        *   *Focus:* Physical location, size, population density. "Urban area."

    *   **Sense 2:** `city%1:15:01::`
        *   *Definition:* an incorporated administrative district established by state charter.
        *   *Synonyms:* (None listed, but implies legal entity).
        *   *Examples:* the city raised the tax rate.
        *   *Focus:* Legal entity, administrative unit, governance. "The city" doing an action usually implies the government of the city.

    *   **Sense 3:** `city%1:14:00::`
        *   *Definition:* people living in a large densely populated municipality.
        *   *Synonyms:* metropolis.
        *   *Examples:* the city voted for Republicans in 1994.
        *   *Focus:* The population, the voting body. "The city" as a group of people.

3.  **Evaluate the Fit:**

    *   The sentence mentions "larger cities." This refers to the scale and size of the entity.
    *   The sentence discusses "locally elected school boards" and "local politicians." This implies a governmental or administrative structure.
    *   However, let's look at the distinction between Sense 1 and Sense 2 carefully.
    *   Sense 1 emphasizes the *urban area* (physical/concentration aspect). "Ancient Troy was a great city" fits Sense 1 because it describes the place/settlement.
    *   Sense 2 emphasizes the *administrative district* (political/legal aspect). "The city raised the tax rate" fits Sense 2 because a geographical location cannot raise taxes, only the legal entity/government can.
    *   Sense 3 emphasizes the *people*. "The city voted" fits Sense 3 (metonymy: city = citizens).

    *   In the context: "Locally elected school boards, especially in our larger **cities**..."
        *   Does "cities" refer to the specific legal entities (incorporated districts) where school boards operate? Yes.
        *   Does it refer to the physical urban sprawl? Maybe, but the text is about *governance* (school boards, politicians).
        *   Does it refer to the people? No, the sentence isn't about the citizens' action as a group (like voting or opinion), it's about the *location* where these political structures exist.

    *   *Comparing Sense 1 vs Sense 2:*
        *   Sense 1 (Urban area): Often used when contrasting with "country" or discussing geography.
        *   Sense 2 (Administrative district): Often used when discussing politics, taxes, laws, and local government bodies.
        *   The text discusses "school boards," "politicians," "governance," "state charter" (implied by the comparison of administrative systems).
        *   New York City, Chicago: These are specific incorporated entities with charters.
        *   The phrase "larger cities" generally refers to the municipalities defined by their boundaries and governments in this administrative context.
        *   However, WordNet distinctions can be tricky. Let's look at the example for Sense 1: "Ancient Troy was a great city." That's a settlement. Let's look at the definition of Sense 1: "may include several independent administrative districts." This fits NYC (5 boroughs).
        *   Let's look at the definition of Sense 2: "an incorporated administrative district established by state charter."
        *   The text contrasts "larger cities" with presumably smaller ones or rural areas regarding the *system of school governance*.
        *   Usually, when discussing political corruption, school boards, and governance, the concept of the city is acting as the *administrative unit* that contains or is preyed upon by these politicians.
        *   However, is "larger cities" a comment on the *population size* (Sense 1 trait) or the *legal status* (Sense 2 trait)?
        *   Sense 1 includes "large and densely populated."
        *   Sense 2 is just "incorporated administrative district."
        *   If I say "I live in a city," it's Sense 1 (location).
        *   If I say "The city passed an ordinance," it's Sense 2 (government).
        *   Here the usage is: "...especially in our larger [cities]..."
        *   This usage is locative ("in our larger cities"), but the *implication* is about the political environment of those places.
        *   Often, WordNet Sense 1 covers the general concept of the "city" as a place (urban center). Sense 2 is specifically the government acting as an agent.
        *   Let's check the WordNet hierarchy/definitions again.
        *   Sense 1: `city` (hypernym: `municipality`). Definition: "a large and densely populated urban area..."
        *   Sense 2: `city` (hypernym: `administrative district`). Definition: "an incorporated administrative district..."
        *   In the context "especially in our larger cities," the word refers to the *places* where this phenomenon happens. Even though the topic is political, the word itself acts as a location/container in the sentence structure ("in our larger cities").
        *   Does "larger" modify the administrative district or the urban area? "Larger" usually refers to size/population, which aligns with Sense 1's definition ("large and densely populated"). Sense 2 just says "incorporated administrative district" without the specific qualifier of size (though cities are generally larger than towns, the definition for Sense 1 explicitly mentions "large").
        *   The sentence says: "Locally elected school boards, especially in our larger cities..."
        *   If the sentence were "The city is corrupt," it would be Sense 2 (the administration).
        *   Since the sentence is "in our larger cities," it refers to the geographic/social entities.
        *   While the *discussion* is about administration, the *reference* of the word "cities" here points to the large urban centers (Sense 1).
        *   Let's verify against the "NYC" mention. NYC is an urban center (Sense 1) *and* an administrative district (Sense 2). But the phrase "larger cities" acts as a category of places.
        *   Standard WordNet annotation practice: When the city is the location/setting ("in the city"), it is usually Sense 1. When the city is the agent ("The city decided"), it is Sense 2. When the city is the people ("The city is celebrating"), it is Sense 3.
        *   Here: "in our larger cities". This is locative.
        *   Therefore, Sense 1 is the most appropriate.

    *   Let's double check Sense 2 nuances. Sense 2 examples: "the city raised the tax rate". The city is the subject/agent.
    *   Sense 1 examples: "Ancient Troy was a great city". The city is the object/description.
    *   The context "especially in our larger cities" puts the word in a prepositional phrase indicating location/scope.
    *   Therefore, Sense 1 (urban area/place) is the correct choice.

    *   Refining the decision:
        *   Context: "especially in our larger cities".
        *   Grammatical role: Object of preposition "in".
        *   Meaning: Large urban places.
        *   Sense 1 definition: "a large and densely populated urban area".
        *   Sense 2 definition: "an incorporated administrative district".
        *   Sense 2 is primarily used when personifying the city as a governing body. While the text discusses government, the word "cities" is used to designate the locations where the phenomenon occurs, defined by their size ("larger").
        *   Sense 1 specifically highlights "large" in the definition. Sense 2 does not. The context uses the adjective "larger". This points strongly to Sense 1.

    *   Conclusion: Sense 1.


attempt_kind: initial

status: success

[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: become
Target surface form: become
Context:
Parents should be involved with their children's education at home, not in school. They should see to it that their kids do not play truant; they should make certain that the children spend enough time doing homework; they should scrutinize the report card. If parents are dissatisfied with a school, they should have the option of switching to another. -- "Community involvement "is an even worse idea. Here, the experience of New York City is decisive. Locally elected school boards, especially in our larger cities, <t>become</t> the prey of ambitious, generally corrupt, and invariably demagogic local politicians or would-be politicians. New York is in the process of trying to disengage itself from a 20-year-old commitment to this system of school governance, even as Chicago and other cities are moving to institute it.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=become%2:30:00:: | definition=enter or assume a certain state or condition | synonyms=go, get | examples=He became annoyed when he heard the bad news; It must be getting more serious
2. sense_key=become%2:42:01:: | definition=undergo a change or development | synonyms=turn | examples=The water turned into ice; Her former friend became her worst enemy
3. sense_key=become%2:42:00:: | definition=come into existence | examples=What becomes has duration
4. sense_key=become%2:42:03:: | definition=enhance the appearance of | synonyms=suit | examples=Mourning becomes Electra; This behavior doesn't suit you!

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

finish_reason: stop

role: assistant

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the target word and context:**
    *   Target lemma: `become`
    *   Target surface form: `become`
    *   Context sentence: "Locally elected school boards, especially in our larger cities, <t>become</t> the prey of ambitious, generally corrupt, and invariably demagogic local politicians or would-be politicians."
    *   Surrounding context: The text discusses school governance, specifically criticizing "Community involvement" and locally elected school boards. It argues that these boards turn into targets for bad politicians.

2.  **Analyze the candidate senses:**

    *   **Sense 1:** `become%2:30:00::`
        *   Definition: enter or assume a certain state or condition
        *   Synonyms: go, get
        *   Examples: "He became annoyed...", "It must be getting more serious..."
        *   Analysis: This sense usually involves an adjectival complement (became annoyed, became clear) or describes a change of state (getting serious). In the context, the object is "the prey of ambitious... politicians". "The prey" is a noun phrase. While one can "become [noun]", Sense 1 is typically associated with states (becoming rich, becoming angry). However, "become the prey" implies a transformation of identity or role, which overlaps with sense 2.

    *   **Sense 2:** `become%2:42:01::`
        *   Definition: undergo a change or development
        *   Synonyms: turn
        *   Examples: "The water turned into ice", "Her former friend became her worst enemy"
        *   Analysis: This sense involves a change of identity or substance. "Water turned into ice" (substance change). "Friend became enemy" (role/relationship change). In the context, school boards "become the prey". This is a change of role or status. They transform from being administrative bodies to being victims/targets (prey) of politicians. The synonym "turn" fits well: "Locally elected school boards... *turn* into the prey...".

    *   **Sense 3:** `become%2:42:00::`
        *   Definition: come into existence
        *   Examples: "What becomes has duration"
        *   Analysis: This is a philosophical/existential sense. "School boards come into existence the prey..." doesn't make sense syntactically or semantically.

    *   **Sense 4:** `become%2:42:03::`
        *   Definition: enhance the appearance of
        *   Synonyms: suit
        *   Examples: "Mourning becomes Electra"
        *   Analysis: This is the "suitability" sense. "School boards suit the prey..." does not fit the context.

3.  **Compare Sense 1 and Sense 2 (The main contenders):**
    *   Sense 1 is "enter or assume a certain state or condition".
    *   Sense 2 is "undergo a change or development".
    *   The phrase is "become the prey".
    *   Is "the prey" a state or an identity/result of a change?
    *   Let's look at the examples for Sense 2: "Her former friend became her worst enemy." This is structurally identical to the context sentence: [Subject] became [Noun Phrase indicating new identity/role].
    *   Let's look at the examples for Sense 1: "He became annoyed" (adjective), "It must be getting more serious" (adjective). These are predicative adjectives describing a state.
    *   "The prey" is a noun phrase. While one can argue being prey is a state, the transformation aspect ("turn into") is stronger here. The school boards are changing into something else (prey).
    *   WordNet (3.0 or 3.1) distinctions:
        *   Sense 1 (v_1): "enter or assume a certain state or condition" -> often followed by adjectives.
        *   Sense 2 (v_2): "undergo a change or development" -> "The water turned into ice", "Her former friend became her worst enemy".
    *   The context sentence says boards "become the prey". This parallels "became her worst enemy" (Sense 2). It represents a change of nature or identity rather than just assuming a temporary state or condition (like becoming angry).
    *   Therefore, Sense 2 is the best fit because it captures the transformation of the subject into a new entity/role (the prey).

4.  **Select the index:**
    *   Sense 2 is indexed as 2 in the provided list.

5.  **Final Check:**
    *   Context: "boards... become the prey..."
    *   Definition: "undergo a change or development"
    *   Synonym: "turn" -> "boards... turn into the prey" (Works perfectly).
    *   Example match: "friend became enemy" vs "boards became prey".
    *   Conclusion: Sense 2 is correct.

format: unknown

native_finish_reason: stop

provider: DigitalOcean

currency: USD


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: ambitious
Target surface form: ambitious
Context:
Parents should be involved with their children's education at home, not in school. They should see to it that their kids do not play truant; they should make certain that the children spend enough time doing homework; they should scrutinize the report card. If parents are dissatisfied with a school, they should have the option of switching to another. -- "Community involvement "is an even worse idea. Here, the experience of New York City is decisive. Locally elected school boards, especially in our larger cities, become the prey of <t>ambitious</t>, generally corrupt, and invariably demagogic local politicians or would-be politicians. New York is in the process of trying to disengage itself from a 20-year-old commitment to this system of school governance, even as Chicago and other cities are moving to institute it.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=ambitious%3:00:00:: | definition=having a strong desire for success or achievement
2. sense_key=ambitious%5:00:00:difficult:00 | definition=requiring full use of your abilities or resources | synonyms=challenging | examples=ambitious schedule; performed the most challenging task without a mistake

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

raw_output:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the context:**
    *   Sentence: "Locally elected school boards, especially in our larger cities, become the prey of <t>ambitious</t>, generally corrupt, and invariably demagogic local politicians or would-be politicians."
    *   Target word: "ambitious" (adjective).
    *   Modifies: "local politicians or would-be politicians".
    *   Coordinated adjectives: "ambitious", "corrupt", "demagogic".
    *   Semantic field: Politics, power, corruption, negative connotation regarding the motives of politicians.

2.  **Analyze the candidate senses:**
    *   **Sense 1:** `ambitious%3:00:00::` | Definition: "having a strong desire for success or achievement".
        *   This refers to a personality trait or state of mind of a person (animate).
        *   Context fit: Politicians are people. They are described as "ambitious" alongside "corrupt" and "demagogic". In a political context, "ambitious" often implies a hunger for power, office, or status. This fits the "desire for success/achievement" definition, particularly success in the political sphere (gaining control of school boards).
    *   **Sense 2:** `ambitious%5:00:00:difficult:00` | Definition: "requiring full use of your abilities or resources" | Synonyms: challenging | Examples: "ambitious schedule".
        *   This refers to tasks, plans, or undertakings (inanimate or abstract concepts).
        *   Context fit: Does it make sense to say a politician is "requiring full use of abilities"? No. A schedule is ambitious. A project is ambitious. A person is ambitious (Sense 1), not ambitious (Sense 2) in the sense of being difficult. A person can be described as ambitious if they set high standards for themselves, but the core sense of "requiring full use of abilities" applies to the *goal* or *task*, not the agent in this syntactic position.

3.  **Evaluate the fit:**
    *   The text describes politicians ("would-be politicians") as "ambitious".
    *   The list of adjectives ("ambitious, generally corrupt, and invariably demagogic") describes the character/behavior of the people.
    *   Sense 1 describes a person's desire for achievement/success (often used in political contexts to mean power-hungry).
    *   Sense 2 describes a task/schedule/goal that is difficult.
    *   Therefore, Sense 1 is the correct choice.

4.  **Formulate the output:**
    *   The user wants a JSON object with the sense index.
    *   Sense 1 corresponds to index 1.
    *   Output: `{"sense_index": 1}`.

provider: Baidu


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: generally
Target surface form: generally
Context:
Parents should be involved with their children's education at home, not in school. They should see to it that their kids do not play truant; they should make certain that the children spend enough time doing homework; they should scrutinize the report card. If parents are dissatisfied with a school, they should have the option of switching to another. -- "Community involvement "is an even worse idea. Here, the experience of New York City is decisive. Locally elected school boards, especially in our larger cities, become the prey of ambitious, <t>generally</t> corrupt, and invariably demagogic local politicians or would-be politicians. New York is in the process of trying to disengage itself from a 20-year-old commitment to this system of school governance, even as Chicago and other cities are moving to institute it.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=generally%4:02:02:: | definition=usually; as a rule | synonyms=by and large, more often than not, mostly | examples=by and large it doesn't rain much here
2. sense_key=generally%4:02:01:: | definition=without distinction of one from others | synonyms=in general, in the main | examples=he is interested in snakes in general
3. sense_key=generally%4:02:00:: | definition=without regard to specific details or exceptions | synonyms=broadly, loosely, broadly speaking | examples=he interprets the law broadly

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the target word and context:**
    *   **Target lemma:** generally
    *   **Context:** "...become the prey of ambitious, <t>generally</t> corrupt, and invariably demagogic local politicians or would-be politicians."
    *   **Syntactic role:** Adverb modifying the adjective "corrupt".

2.  **Analyze the candidate senses:**

    *   **Sense 1:** `usually; as a rule`
        *   Synonyms: `by and large, more often than not, mostly`
        *   Examples: `by and large it doesn't rain much here`
        *   Core meaning: Frequency/typicality.

    *   **Sense 2:** `without distinction of one from others`
        *   Synonyms: `in general, in the main`
        *   Examples: `he is interested in snakes in general`
        *   Core meaning: Universality/collectiveness (applying to a whole group without exception or distinction).

    *   **Sense 3:** `without regard to specific details or exceptions`
        *   Synonyms: `broadly, loosely, broadly speaking`
        *   Examples: `he interprets the law broadly`
        *   Core meaning: Vagueness/imprecision.

3.  **Evaluate the context against senses:**

    *   The sentence describes a specific group of people: "ambitious, generally corrupt, and invariably demagogic local politicians".
    *   The word "generally" sits between "ambitious" and "corrupt".
    *   Let's test Sense 1 (Frequency): "ambitious, *usually* corrupt, and *invariably* demagogic".
        *   Does this fit? Yes. It suggests that while they are *invariably* (always) demagogic, they are only *usually* (mostly, but perhaps not every single one) corrupt. This contrasts well with "invariably".
    *   Let's test Sense 2 (Universality): "ambitious, *universally* corrupt..."
        *   This would imply every single one is corrupt. However, the text contrasts it with "invariably" (always) applied to "demagogic". If "generally" meant "universally/without distinction" here, it would be synonymous with "invariably". The contrast suggests a difference in degree. "Generally" usually implies "mostly but not entirely" in this sort of list structure when contrasted with "invariably".
        *   Wait, let's look at Sense 2 definition again: "without distinction of one from others". Example: "he is interested in snakes in general". This sense usually applies to topics or groups as a whole mass. It doesn't typically modify a scalar adjective like "corrupt" in a list of attributes to mean "universally". "Universally corrupt" is a specific colocation, but "generally" in the sense of "in general" (Sense 2) usually floats or acts as a sentence adverb.
    *   Let's test Sense 3 (Imprecision): "ambitious, *broadly* corrupt..."
        *   "Broadly corrupt" sounds like they are corrupt in many different ways or their corruption covers a wide scope. While possible, the contrast with "invariably" (a frequency/timing marker) strongly suggests "generally" is also functioning as a frequency marker here. "Invariably" means "always". The natural opposite or lower degree on the frequency scale is "usually" or "mostly".

4.  **Deep Dive into the "Generally" vs "Invariably" contrast:**
    *   "Invariably" = always / without fail.
    *   "Generally" in this context acts as a softener or a statistical probability.
    *   If the author meant "all of them are corrupt", they would likely use "invariably" or "universally".
    *   Using "generally" suggests that *most* of the politicians in this specific set are corrupt, but perhaps a few exceptions exist, whereas *all* of them are demagogic.
    *   This aligns perfectly with Sense 1's definition: "usually; as a rule".

5.  **Comparing Sense 1 and Sense 2 again:**
    *   Sense 2 ("in general") refers to a collective whole. E.g., "Generally, people like pizza." It doesn't sit comfortably as a modifier for an adjective in a list like this ("ambitious, in general corrupt..."). You wouldn't say "He is tall, in general handsome, and invariable smart." You would say "He is tall, mostly handsome..."
    *   Sense 1 ("usually") fits syntactically: "ambitious, usually corrupt..."

6.  **Conclusion:**
    The context indicates frequency or typicality. The politicians are ambitious (always?), generally (usually/mostly) corrupt, and invariably (always) demagogic. The contrast with "invariably" is the key clue. "Generally" serves as a frequency adverb here, synonymous with "mostly" or "usually".

    Therefore, Sense 1 is the correct choice.

    *   Sense 1: usually; as a rule. Fits "mostly corrupt".
    *   Sense 2: without distinction. Does not fit syntactically or semantically well in this adjectival modification context.
    *   Sense 3: broadly. Does not fit the contrast with "invariably".

    Result: Sense 1.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: corrupt
Target surface form: corrupt
Context:
Parents should be involved with their children's education at home, not in school. They should see to it that their kids do not play truant; they should make certain that the children spend enough time doing homework; they should scrutinize the report card. If parents are dissatisfied with a school, they should have the option of switching to another. -- "Community involvement "is an even worse idea. Here, the experience of New York City is decisive. Locally elected school boards, especially in our larger cities, become the prey of ambitious, generally <t>corrupt</t>, and invariably demagogic local politicians or would-be politicians. New York is in the process of trying to disengage itself from a 20-year-old commitment to this system of school governance, even as Chicago and other cities are moving to institute it.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=corrupt%3:00:00:: | definition=lacking in integrity | examples=humanity they knew to be corrupt...from the day of Adam's creation; a corrupt and incompetent city government
2. sense_key=corrupt%3:00:04:: | definition=not straight; dishonest or immoral or evasive | synonyms=crooked
3. sense_key=corrupt%5:00:00:imperfect:00 | definition=containing errors or alterations | synonyms=corrupted | examples=a corrupt text; spoke a corrupted version of the language
4. sense_key=corrupt%5:00:00:stale:00 | definition=touched by rot or decay | synonyms=tainted | examples=tainted bacon; `corrupt' is archaic

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the Request:**
    *   Target lemma: `corrupt`
    *   Target surface form: `corrupt`
    *   Context: A discussion about school governance, locally elected school boards, and politicians. The specific phrase is "ambitious, generally corrupt, and invariably demagogic local politicians".
    *   Goal: Choose the single best indexed sense from the provided list.
    *   Output format: JSON `{"sense_index": X}`.

2.  **Analyze the Context:**
    *   The sentence describes "locally elected school boards" becoming the "prey of ambitious, generally **corrupt**, and invariably demagogic local politicians".
    *   The context is political: "politicians", "school boards", "locally elected".
    *   The connotation is negative. The politicians are described as "ambitious" and "demagogic".
    *   "Corrupt" here refers to moral character, honesty in office, or integrity in the context of political power. It implies bribery, misuse of funds, or selling influence, which are standard negative traits associated with bad politicians.

3.  **Analyze the Candidate Senses:**

    *   **Sense 1:**
        *   `sense_key`: `corrupt%3:00:00::`
        *   Definition: "lacking in integrity"
        *   Examples: "humanity they knew to be corrupt...from the day of Adam's creation", "a corrupt and incompetent city government"
        *   Synonyms: None listed, but the definition fits.
        *   Fit: The example "a corrupt and incompetent city government" is extremely close to the context of politicians and city government. "Lacking in integrity" is the core definition of political corruption.

    *   **Sense 2:**
        *   `sense_key`: `corrupt%3:00:04::`
        *   Definition: "not straight; dishonest or immoral or evasive"
        *   Synonyms: `crooked`
        *   Fit: "Dishonest" fits, but the synonym "crooked" and the "not straight" aspect often lean slightly more towards physical shape or a slang term for dishonest. While close, Sense 1 is more specifically about integrity in a general or institutional sense ("lacking in integrity"). Let's compare 1 and 2. Sense 1 ("lacking in integrity") is the standard high-level definition for moral corruption. Sense 2 seems to be a variation or synonym mapping to "crooked". However, looking at WordNet structure, Sense 1 is the head of the adjective satellite cluster usually. Let's look at the definitions again.
        *   Sense 1: "lacking in integrity". This captures the essence of political corruption.
        *   Sense 2: "not straight; dishonest or immoral or evasive". This also applies.
        *   Distinction: Usually, the primary sense (Sense 1) covers the general concept of moral corruption/integrity. The example for Sense 1 ("corrupt and incompetent city government") mirrors the context ("corrupt... local politicians") almost perfectly.

    *   **Sense 3:**
        *   `sense_key`: `corrupt%5:00:00:imperfect:00`
        *   Definition: "containing errors or alterations"
        *   Examples: "a corrupt text"
        *   Fit: This refers to text or data. Politicians are not text (usually). Does not fit.

    *   **Sense 4:**
        *   `sense_key`: `corrupt%5:00:00:stale:00`
        *   Definition: "touched by rot or decay"
        *   Examples: "tainted bacon"
        *   Fit: This refers to physical rot. While one might metaphorically say a politician is rotting, the primary meaning here is moral/legal corruption, not biological decay. Does not fit.

4.  **Select the Best Sense:**
    *   It's definitely between Sense 1 and Sense 2.
    *   Context: "ambitious, generally corrupt... politicians".
    *   Sense 1 Example: "a corrupt and incompetent city government".
    *   Sense 1 Definition: "lacking in integrity".
    *   Sense 2 Definition: "not straight; dishonest or immoral or evasive".
    *   WordNet usually organizes senses by specificity or synonym sets. Sense 1 is often the most general "attribute" sense (lacking integrity), while Sense 2 ("crooked") focuses on the specific attribute of dishonesty/evasiveness.
    *   However, looking at the specific gloss and examples for Sense 1: "lacking in integrity" is the broad definition of political corruption. The example provided for Sense 1 is remarkably similar to the context (government/politicians).
    *   Sense 2 is synonymous with "crooked". While a politician can be crooked, "corrupt" in the context of "school boards" and "politicians" usually refers to the lack of integrity regarding power/money (Sense 1).
    *   Actually, in WordNet 3.0/3.1, the adjective `corrupt` has a head synset `corrupt, dishonest`. Let's look at the provided indices.
    *   Sense 1: `corrupt%3:00:00::` -> lacking in integrity.
    *   Sense 2: `corrupt%3:00:04::` -> not straight... synonyms=crooked.
    *   Usually, if Sense 2 is a satellite to `crooked`, it might mean "crooked" specifically. If Sense 1 is a head synset, it is the core meaning.
    *   The example for Sense 1 is the clincher: "a corrupt and incompetent city government". The context is about city government/school boards. The semantic domain matches perfectly.

    Therefore, Sense 1 is the best choice.

    Let's double check Sense 2. If Sense 2 maps to `crooked` (synonym provided), and the definition is "not straight; dishonest...", it is very similar. But the example for Sense 1 is specific to the domain. WordNet examples and glosses are schematic. "Lacking in integrity" is the defining quality of a corrupt politician. "Crooked" is a synonym, but the example in Sense 1 makes it the strongest candidate.

    Wait, let me look closer at the Sense 2 definition: "not straight; dishonest or immoral or evasive". This sounds like a definition for `crooked`.
    Sense 1 definition: "lacking in integrity".
    In the context: "ambitious, generally corrupt... politicians". Integrity is the issue.
    Also, the example for Sense 1 is "a corrupt and incompetent city government".
    The context is "locally elected school boards... corrupt... politicians".
    The domain match is high.

    Selection: Sense 1.

5.  **Format Output:**
    JSON: `{"sense_index": 1}`

provider: StreamLake


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: local
Target surface form: local
Context:
Parents should be involved with their children's education at home, not in school. They should see to it that their kids do not play truant; they should make certain that the children spend enough time doing homework; they should scrutinize the report card. If parents are dissatisfied with a school, they should have the option of switching to another. -- "Community involvement "is an even worse idea. Here, the experience of New York City is decisive. Locally elected school boards, especially in our larger cities, become the prey of ambitious, generally corrupt, and invariably demagogic <t>local</t> politicians or would-be politicians. New York is in the process of trying to disengage itself from a 20-year-old commitment to this system of school governance, even as Chicago and other cities are moving to institute it.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=local%3:00:01:: | definition=relating to or applicable to or concerned with the administration of a city or town or district rather than a larger area | examples=local taxes; local authorities
2. sense_key=local%3:01:01:: | definition=of or belonging to or characteristic of a particular locality or neighborhood | examples=local customs; local schools
3. sense_key=local%3:00:02:: | definition=affecting only a restricted part or area of the body | examples=local anesthesia

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the Target Lemma and Surface Form:** The word is "local", functioning as an adjective modifying "politicians or would-be politicians".

2.  **Analyze the Context:**
    *   The text discusses "Community involvement" in schools, specifically "Locally elected school boards".
    *   It mentions "New York City" and "our larger cities".
    *   The target phrase is "...corrupt, and invariably demagogic **local** politicians or would-be politicians."
    *   The context contrasts local governance (city/district level) with broader governance (implied by the discussion of the system of school governance and the specific mention of cities like New York and Chicago).
    *   The politicians are described as "local" because they operate within the specific city or district boundaries, seeking power on the school boards of those specific cities.

3.  **Evaluate Candidate Senses:**

    *   **Sense 1:** `relating to or applicable to or concerned with the administration of a city or town or district rather than a larger area` (Examples: local taxes; local authorities).
        *   *Analysis:* This fits perfectly. The text discusses "Locally elected school boards" and "school governance" within specific cities (New York, Chicago). The politicians are involved in the administration of a city/district (New York City schools) rather than a state or national level. They are "local politicians" in the sense of holding office or seeking office within the municipal or district jurisdiction.

    *   **Sense 2:** `of or belonging to or characteristic of a particular locality or neighborhood` (Examples: local customs; local schools).
        *   *Analysis:* While the politicians are *from* the locality, the primary meaning in political contexts regarding "local politicians" usually refers to their jurisdiction (Sense 1) rather than just being characteristic of a neighborhood (like "local color" or "local customs"). However, Sense 1 is much more precise regarding *administration* and *government*, which is the topic here. Sense 2 often implies a distinct flavor or identity specific to a small area, whereas Sense 1 implies the scope of authority. The phrase "local politicians" is standard terminology for politicians operating at the city/town level (Sense 1).

    *   **Sense 3:** `affecting only a restricted part or area of the body` (Examples: local anesthesia).
        *   *Analysis:* This is medical terminology. It does not apply to politics.

4.  **Differentiate Sense 1 and Sense 2:**
    *   Sense 1 focuses on administration/government scope (city vs. larger area).
    *   Sense 2 focuses on characteristic/belonging to a specific place.
    *   Context: "Locally elected school boards", "school governance", "New York City". The politicians are "ambitious" and seeking power within the *administrative* structure of the city. Therefore, they are politicians concerned with the administration of the city/district.
    *   "Local politicians" is a standard collocate for politicians working at the municipal level. This aligns with Sense 1's definition: "concerned with the administration of a city or town... rather than a larger area".
    *   Sense 2 is more appropriate for things like "local slang", "local vegetation", "local style".
    *   Therefore, Sense 1 is the best fit.

5.  **Final Decision:** Sense 1 captures the administrative/jurisdictional aspect of "local politicians" operating within a specific city governance structure.

provider: Novita


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: politician
Target surface form: politicians
Context:
Parents should be involved with their children's education at home, not in school. They should see to it that their kids do not play truant; they should make certain that the children spend enough time doing homework; they should scrutinize the report card. If parents are dissatisfied with a school, they should have the option of switching to another. -- "Community involvement "is an even worse idea. Here, the experience of New York City is decisive. Locally elected school boards, especially in our larger cities, become the prey of ambitious, generally corrupt, and invariably demagogic local <t>politicians</t> or would-be politicians. New York is in the process of trying to disengage itself from a 20-year-old commitment to this system of school governance, even as Chicago and other cities are moving to institute it.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=politician%1:18:01:: | definition=a leader engaged in civil administration
2. sense_key=politician%1:18:00:: | definition=a person active in party politics | synonyms=politico, pol, political leader
3. sense_key=politician%1:18:02:: | definition=a schemer who tries to gain advantage in an organization in sly or underhanded ways

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The context describes local politicians who are "ambitious, generally corrupt, and invariably demagogic" and who prey on locally elected school boards. Let me analyze the candidate senses:

1. "a leader engaged in civil administration" - This is a neutral description of someone in civil administration. The context describes people who are corrupt and demagogic, but they are still actual politicians involved in local governance.

2. "a person active in party politics" with synonyms "politico, pol, political leader" - This refers to someone active in party politics. The context mentions "locally elected school boards" becoming prey of "ambitious, generally corrupt, and invariably demagogic local politicians or would-be politicians." These are people involved in local politics.

3. "a schemer who tries to gain advantage in an organization in sly or underhanded ways" - This is the figurative/pejorative sense of "politician" meaning a schemer. While the context describes corrupt and demagogic behavior, these are still actual politicians - people engaged in local politics who have corrupted the school board system. They're not "politicians" in the metaphorical sense of office schemers; they're actual political figures.

The key is that the context uses "politicians" alongside "would-be politicians," suggesting these are actual people involved in politics (running for office, holding political positions on school boards). The description "ambitious, generally corrupt, and invariably demagogic" characterizes how they behave as politicians, but they are still politicians in the literal sense - people active in party politics or seeking political office.

Sense 2 seems most appropriate because these are people active in local politics (party politics at the local level), seeking to control school boards. They are "political leaders" in the sense of being involved in political activities, even if corruptly.

Sense 1 is about civil administration specifically, which might be too narrow.

Sense 3 is the figurative sense meaning "schemer" in any organization, which doesn't fit because these are actual political figures, not just office schemers.

I'll go with sense 2.

provider: SiliconFlow


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: politician
Target surface form: politicians
Context:
Parents should be involved with their children's education at home, not in school. They should see to it that their kids do not play truant; they should make certain that the children spend enough time doing homework; they should scrutinize the report card. If parents are dissatisfied with a school, they should have the option of switching to another. -- "Community involvement "is an even worse idea. Here, the experience of New York City is decisive. Locally elected school boards, especially in our larger cities, become the prey of ambitious, generally corrupt, and invariably demagogic local politicians or would-be <t>politicians</t>. New York is in the process of trying to disengage itself from a 20-year-old commitment to this system of school governance, even as Chicago and other cities are moving to institute it.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=politician%1:18:01:: | definition=a leader engaged in civil administration
2. sense_key=politician%1:18:00:: | definition=a person active in party politics | synonyms=politico, pol, political leader
3. sense_key=politician%1:18:02:: | definition=a schemer who tries to gain advantage in an organization in sly or underhanded ways

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the target word and context:**
    *   Target lemma: politician
    *   Target surface form: politicians
    *   Context snippet: "Locally elected school boards, especially in our larger cities, become the prey of ambitious, generally corrupt, and invariably demagogic local politicians or would-be politicians."
    *   Key descriptive words in context: "ambitious", "corrupt", "demagogic", "locally elected school boards".

2.  **Analyze the candidate senses:**
    *   Sense 1: "a leader engaged in civil administration". This is a neutral, administrative definition.
    *   Sense 2: "a person active in party politics". Synonyms: politico, pol, political leader. This is the standard, general definition for someone involved in politics.
    *   Sense 3: "a schemer who tries to gain advantage in an organization in sly or underhanded ways". This is a secondary, metaphorical, or pejorative sense often used in everyday language ("office politician"), but in this specific context, is it the *primary* meaning or just a connotation?

3.  **Evaluate the fit of each sense:**
    *   The text refers to "local politicians". These are people holding or seeking office in local government or school boards. They are clearly "persons active in party politics" (Sense 2) or "leaders engaged in civil administration" (Sense 1).
    *   The context *describes* them negatively ("corrupt", "demagogic"). Does this mean the word "politicians" *itself* takes on Sense 3 here?
    *   Sense 3 is usually used when "politician" refers to someone *not* necessarily in public office but engaging in scheming within a specific organization (e.g., "He's a real politician when it comes to getting promotions").
    *   Here, the text contrasts "politicians" with "would-be politicians". These are actual figures in the political sphere. They are active in local politics.
    *   While the author views them as schemers/corrupt, the *lexical meaning* of "politician" here refers to their role in the political system (local politics/school boards). The negative description is an attribute applied *to* the politicians, rather than the word "politician" being used metaphorically to mean "schemer" (Sense 3).
    *   However, let's look closer at Sense 2 vs Sense 1. Sense 2 ("person active in party politics") fits well with "ambitious" and "demagogic" (traits associated with campaigning and party maneuvering). Sense 1 ("leader engaged in civil administration") is a bit too bureaucratic for the context of "demagogic" behavior and "prey of ambitious... politicians". "Politico" (synonym for Sense 2) fits the slightly derogatory tone better than a dry civil administrator.
    *   Let's reconsider Sense 3. The context says "ambitious, generally corrupt, and invariably demagogic local politicians". If I say "That guy is a politician", I might mean he is a schemer (Sense 3). But if I say "Local politicians are corrupt", I am talking about actual political figures (Sense 2). The modifier "local" strongly implies the occupational role (Sense 2), not the metaphorical "schemer" sense. The phrase "would-be politicians" also implies people trying to enter the profession of politics, not trying to become "schemers" (which requires no election).

4.  **Select the best sense:**
    *   Sense 2 captures the role of someone active in politics. The negative adjectives modify this noun. The noun itself denotes the profession/role.
    *   Sense 1 is too specific to administration (civil administration) whereas these figures are described as demagogic and ambitious, suggesting political maneuvering (party politics) rather than just administration.
    *   Sense 3 is the "schemer" sense. While the context *depicts* them as schemers, the word "politicians" is used to refer to the *class of people* holding political power in the locality. If the sentence were "He's a real politician in the office," Sense 3 would be correct. Since it refers to "local politicians" vis-a-vis school boards, it refers to the vocation.

    Therefore, Sense 2 ("a person active in party politics") is the correct definition. The text is criticizing the class of people defined by Sense 2.

5.  **Final check:**
    *   Context: "local politicians" -> People active in local politics.
    *   Sense 2: "a person active in party politics".
    *   Match: Yes.

    Why not Sense 1? "Civil administration" is the function, but "party politics" (Sense 2) encompasses the ambition and demagoguery mentioned. WordNet Sense 2 is the default hypernymic sense.
    Why not Sense 3? The text doesn't use 'politician' as a synonym for a generic schemer in a non-political context. It uses it for actual political actors.

    Result: Sense 2.

provider: Chutes


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: process
Target surface form: process
Context:
They should see to it that their kids do not play truant; they should make certain that the children spend enough time doing homework; they should scrutinize the report card. If parents are dissatisfied with a school, they should have the option of switching to another. -- "Community involvement "is an even worse idea. Here, the experience of New York City is decisive. Locally elected school boards, especially in our larger cities, become the prey of ambitious, generally corrupt, and invariably demagogic local politicians or would-be politicians. New York is in the <t>process</t> of trying to disengage itself from a 20-year-old commitment to this system of school governance, even as Chicago and other cities are moving to institute it. -- In most states, increasing expenditures on education, in our current circumstances, will probably make things worse, not better.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=process%1:04:00:: | definition=a particular course of action intended to achieve a result | synonyms=procedure | examples=the procedure of obtaining a driver's license; it was a process of trial and error
2. sense_key=process%1:09:00:: | definition=(psychology) the performance of some composite cognitive activity; an operation that affects mental contents | synonyms=cognitive process, mental process, operation, cognitive operation | examples=the process of thinking; the cognitive operation of remembering
3. sense_key=process%1:10:00:: | definition=a writ issued by authority of law; usually compels the defendant's attendance in a civil suit; failure to appear results in a default judgment against the defendant | synonyms=summons
4. sense_key=process%1:09:01:: | definition=a mental process that you are not directly aware of | synonyms=unconscious process | examples=the process of denial
5. sense_key=process%1:08:00:: | definition=a natural prolongation or projection from a part of an organism either animal or plant | synonyms=outgrowth, appendage | examples=a bony process
6. sense_key=process%1:03:00:: | definition=a sustained phenomenon or one marked by gradual changes through a series of states | synonyms=physical process | examples=events now in process; the process of calcification begins later for boys than for girls

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

raw_output: sense_index": 6}

content: sense_index": 6}

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the Target Lemma and Surface Form:**
    *   Lemma: process
    *   Surface form: process (noun)

2.  **Analyze the Context:**
    *   Sentence: "New York is in the <t>process</t> of trying to disengage itself from a 20-year-old commitment to this system of school governance..."
    *   Key phrase: "in the process of trying to..."
    *   Meaning: New York is currently undergoing a course of action, a progression of events, or a state of transition. It is not a single instantaneous event, but a prolonged activity intended to achieve a result (disengaging itself).

3.  **Evaluate Candidate Senses:**

    *   **Sense 1 (process%1:04:00::):**: "the procedure%1:10:00::):** "a writ issued by authority of law...".
        *   Synonyms: summons.
        *   Fit: This is a legal document. Incorrect.

    *   **Sense 4 (process%1:09:01::):** "a mental process that you are not directly    *   **Sense 6 (process%1:03:00::):** "a sustained phenomenon or one marked by gradual changes through a series of states".
        *   Synonyms: physical process.
        *   Examples: "events now in process", "the process of calcification".
        *   Fit: This definition emphasizes "sustained phenomenon" and "gradual changes through a series of states". The phrase "in the process of" is very similar to the example "events now in process". This sense captures the ongoing, sustained nature of the activity.

    *   **). Example: "obtaining a driver's license".
        *   Sense 6 focuses on a "sustained phenomenon" or "gradual changes through a series of states". Example: "events now in process".
 1) like a step-by-step administrative act? Or is it a *sustained phenomenon/state* (Sense 6) indicating ongoing activity?
        *   The phrase "in the process of [verb-ing]" usually denotes that something is currently happening or ongoing. It aligns very closely with the example for Sense 6: "events now in process".
        *   However, Sense 1 ("course of action intended to achieve a result") is often used for intentional actions carried out by agents. New York is an agent here. "Trying to disengage" is a course of action.
        *   Let's look at the nuance.
        *   WordNet 3.1 often distinguishes between the "procedure" sense (Sense 1) and the "ongoing state/phenomenon" sense (Sense 6).
        *   "In the process of" functions idiomatically to mean "currently performing the action of". This maps strongly to the concept of a sustained generally maps to the state of the event occurring. While Sense 1 is "course of action", Sense 6 is "sustained phenomenon... marked by gradual changes".
        *   Disengaging from a 20-year commitment is a complex, sustained change, not necessarily a rigid "procedure" like getting a license.
        *   Let's consider standard dictionaries.
        *   Merriam-Webster: "something going on : proceeding".
        *   WordNet Sense 6 definition: "a sustained phenomenon or one marked by gradual changes through a series of states".
        *   The phrase "in the process of" is explicitly cited in the example for Sense 6 ("events now in process"). This is a strong signal.
        *   Sense 1 implies a defined procedure (synonym "procedure"). While disengaging involves action, the usage "in the process of" emphasizes the *ongoing nature* or the *state* of it happening, rather than the specific methodology/procedure.
        *   Therefore, Sense 6 seems the best fit for the specific idiom "in the process of", which denotes an ongoing series of changes or a sustained activity.

    *   Wait, let me double-check the distinction.
        *   Sense 1: procedure, method. "The legislative process."
        *   Sense 6: physical process, ongoing state. "The process of decay."
        *   Here we have "in the process of trying". a sustained phenomenon.
        *   If I say "The process for applying is complex", that is Sense 1.
        *   The sentence says "New York is in the process of trying...".
        *   WordNet example for Sense 6: "events now in process". This is extremely close to the target sentence structure.
        *   Sense 1 examples are nouns modified by prepositions indicating purpose ("of obtaining"), but Sense 6 examples include the phrase "in process".
        *   Therefore, Sense 6 is the intended mapping for the idiomatic phrase "in the process of".

    *   Let's verify against Sense 1 again. Could it be a "course of action intended to achieve a result"? Yes, New York is taking a course of action. But the word "procedure" as a synonym is quite restrictive (implies steps). The definition of Sense 6 "sustained phenomenon... marked by gradual changes" fits the *nature* of disengaging from a 20-year commitment better than just a "procedure". It involves a transition of states.
    *   Also, the example for Sense 6 "events now in process" is the clincher for the phraseology.

4.  **Final Decision:**
    *   Context: "New York is in the process of..."
    *   Sense 6 example: "events now in process"
    *   Sense 6 definition: "a sustained phenomenon or one marked by gradual changes through a series of states"
    *   This fits the context of an ongoing, complex political/administrative transition.

    *   Index: 6 corresponds to "process%1:03:00::" in the provided list (it is the 6th item).
    *   Let me check the numbering in the prompt carefully.
    *   1. process%1:04:00:: (procedure)
    *   2. process%1:09:00:: (psych)
    *   3. process%1:10:00:: (summons)
    *   4. process%1:09:01:: (unconscious)
    *   5. process%1:08:00:: (anatomy)
    *   6. process%1:03:00:: (sustained phenomenon)

    *   The target sense corresponds to item 6.

    *   Wait, let me look at WordNet 3.1 mappings usually found in NLP tasks (like SemCor).
    *   "in the process of" usually maps to the sense corresponding to "ongoing activity".
    *   WordNet 3.1 Sense 1: "a particular course of action intended to achieve a result" (procedure).
    *   WordNet 3.1 Sense 2: "(psychology) the performance of some composite cognitive activity..."
    *   WordNet 3.1 Sense 3: "a writ issued by authority of law..."
    *   WordNet 3.1 Sense 4: "a natural prolongation or projection..."
    *   WordNet 3.1 Sense 5: "a mental process that you are not directly aware of..."
    *   WordNet 3.1 Sense 6: "a sustained phenomenon or one marked by gradual changes through a series of states".
    *   Actually, WordNet sense ordering varies by version. The prompt provides specific indices 1 through 6. I must follow the prompt's indices.
    *   Prompt Index 6: "process%1:03:00:: | definition=a sustained phenomenon or one marked by gradual changes through a series of states | synonyms=physical process | examples=events now in process..."
    *   Prompt Index 1: "process%1:04:00:: | definition=a particular course of action intended to achieve a result | synonyms=procedure..."

    *   Argument for Index 6: The example "events now in process" is syntactically and semantically identical to the usage "in the process of...". The definition "sustained phenomenon" fits the timeframe (20-year-old commitment, trying to disengage).
    *   Argument for Index 1: "course of action". Disengaging is a course of action. But the synonym "procedure" feels too mechanical for "trying to disengage". "Procedure" usually implies a known set of steps. "Process" in "in the process of" often just means "happening/ongoing".

    *   Let's look at "physical process" as a synonym for Index 6. Is this a physical process? No, it's an administrative/political one. However, WordNet often uses "physical process" for the general sense of "process" as a state of change (like "process of erosion"). The example "events now in process" is abstract, not necessarily physical (though events can be physical).
    *   Wait, the definition of Index 6 is "a sustained phenomenon or one marked by gradual changes through a series of states".
    *   The definition of Index 1 is "a particular course of action intended to achieve a result".
    *   Usage: "In the process of trying..."
    *   Is the word "process" referring to the *method* (Sense 1) or the *ongoing occurrence* (Sense 6)?
    *   Phrase: "In the process of X".
    *   Meaning: "Currently doing X".
    *   Does "Currently doing X" align with "course of action" or "sustained phenomenon"?
    *   "Course of action" (Sense 1) is usually "The process of baking a cake involves..." (Method).
    *   "Sustained phenomenon" (Sense 6) is "The process of aging" (Series of states).
    *   "New York is in the process of trying..." implies a state of transition or ongoing activity.
    *   The specific example "events now in process" under Sense 6 is the strongest indicator provided by the prompt. In NLP annotation tasks, example match is a primary heuristic.
    *   Example match: "events now in process" (Sense 6 example) <-> "New York is in the process of..." (Target).
    *   This suggests Sense 6.

    *   Let's check if "process%1:03:00::" is the standard sense key for "ongoing activity". Yes, in WordNet 3.0/3.1, sense 3 (usually numbered differently depending on the ordering, but identified by the key 1:03:00) is the "sustained phenomenon" sense.
    *   In the provided list, Sense 6 has the key `process%1:03:00::`.
    *   In the provided list, Sense 1 has the key `process%1:04:00::`.
    *   (Note: WordNet sense keys are unique identifiers regardless of the order presented in a list).

    *   Conclusion: The usage "in the process of" corresponds to the sense of "ongoing activity/sustained phenomenon", which is represented by Sense 6 in this specific candidate list. The synonym "physical process" is a bit misleading for a social context, but the definition "sust the example "events now in process" are correct.

    *   Alternative view: Could it be Sense 1? "A particular course of action". Disengaging is a course of action. If one views "process" as "procedure", one might pick 1. But "trying to disengage" is not a rigid procedure. It's an active struggle or transition. It's an event in progress.
    *   Most WSD systems (and human annotators) tag "in the process of" as the "ongoing" sense (Sense 6 in this list).
    *   Comparison:
        *   "What is the process for applying?" -> Sense 1 (Procedure).
        *   "The process was slow and painful." -> Sense 6 (Sustained phenomenon).
        *   "I am in the process of moving." -> Sense 6 (Event in progress).
    *   Target: "in the process of trying..." -> Sense 6.

    *   I will select Sense 6.

provider: Amazon Bedrock


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: process
Target surface form: process
Context:
They should see to it that their kids do not play truant; they should make certain that the children spend enough time doing homework; they should scrutinize the report card. If parents are dissatisfied with a school, they should have the option of switching to another. -- "Community involvement "is an even worse idea. Here, the experience of New York City is decisive. Locally elected school boards, especially in our larger cities, become the prey of ambitious, generally corrupt, and invariably demagogic local politicians or would-be politicians. New York is in the <t>process</t> of trying to disengage itself from a 20-year-old commitment to this system of school governance, even as Chicago and other cities are moving to institute it. -- In most states, increasing expenditures on education, in our current circumstances, will probably make things worse, not better.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=process%1:04:00:: | definition=a particular course of action intended to achieve a result | synonyms=procedure | examples=the procedure of obtaining a driver's license; it was a process of trial and error
2. sense_key=process%1:09:00:: | definition=(psychology) the performance of some composite cognitive activity; an operation that affects mental contents | synonyms=cognitive process, mental process, operation, cognitive operation | examples=the process of thinking; the cognitive operation of remembering
3. sense_key=process%1:10:00:: | definition=a writ issued by authority of law; usually compels the defendant's attendance in a civil suit; failure to appear results in a default judgment against the defendant | synonyms=summons
4. sense_key=process%1:09:01:: | definition=a mental process that you are not directly aware of | synonyms=unconscious process | examples=the process of denial
5. sense_key=process%1:08:00:: | definition=a natural prolongation or projection from a part of an organism either animal or plant | synonyms=outgrowth, appendage | examples=a bony process
6. sense_key=process%1:03:00:: | definition=a sustained phenomenon or one marked by gradual changes through a series of states | synonyms=physical process | examples=events now in process; the process of calcification begins later for boys than for girls

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

[Assistant] sense_index": 6}

[User] Your previous answer was invalid. Choose one candidate index between 1 and 6. Return only valid JSON exactly like {"sense_index": 1}.

reasoning_content:
1.  **Analyze the Request:**
    *   **Task:** Fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation (WSD).
    *   **Target lemma:** "process".
    *   **Context:** A text discussing school governance, politicians, and New York City's attempt to disengage from a specific system. The specific sentence is: "New York is in the <t>process</t> of trying to disengage itself from a 20-year-old commitment..."
    *   **Candidate senses:** Six specific senses provided with definitions, synonyms, and examples.
    *   **Constraints:** Choose the single best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Do not return the sense key. Return only JSON `{"sense_index": X}`.

2.  **Analyze the Context Sentence:**
    *   Sentence: "New York is in the <t>process</t> of trying to disengage itself from a 20-year-old commitment to this system of school governance..."
    *   Meaning: The city is currently undergoing a series of actions or a state of transition to achieve a specific end (disengaging). It is an ongoing activity or course of action. It is not a single instant, but something happening over time.

3.  **Analyze the Candidate Senses:**

    *   **Sense 1:** "a particular course of action intended to achieve a result" (synonyms: procedure).
        *   *Analysis:* This fits "course of action". The phrase "in the process of [verb]ing" usually denotes an ongoing action. While valid, is it a "procedure" (like getting a license) or a broader phenomenon? "In the process of trying" suggests a state of transition or a sustained phenomenon/activity.
        *   *Critique:* "Procedure" implies a set of established steps (e.g., legal procedure, surgical procedure). While "process" can mean procedure, the phrase "in the process of trying" often leans more towards the sense of something ongoing or a series of states (Sense 6) or a course of action (Sense 1). Let's look closer at Sense 6.

    *   **Sense 2:** "(psychology) the performance of some composite cognitive activity..."
        *   *Analysis:* The context is politics/education governance, not psychology.
        *   *Result:* Incorrect.

    *   **Sense 3:** "a writ issued by authority of law..."
        *   *Analysis:* This is a legal summons. The context is about city governance and change, not serving legal papers to a defendant.
        *   *Result:* Incorrect.

    *   **Sense 4:** "a mental process that you are not directly aware of"
        *   *Analysis:* Psychological context again. Not relevant.
        *   *Result:* Incorrect.

    *   **Sense 5:** "a natural prolongation or projection from a part of an organism..."
        *   *Analysis:* Anatomical context (bony process). Not relevant.
        *   *Result:* Incorrect.

    *   **Sense 6:** "a sustained phenomenon or one marked by gradual changes through a series of states" (synonyms: physical process).
        *   *Analysis:* The definition mentions "sustained phenomenon" or "series of states". The example provided is "events now in process".
        *   *Comparison:* How does this differ from Sense 1?
            *   Sense 1 emphasizes *procedure* and *method* (steps to get a result).
            *   Sense 6 emphasizes *duration*, *change*, and *phenomenon* (series of states).
            *   Phrase: "In the process of [doing something]".
            *   Let's check WordNet hierarchy/usage for "in the process of".
            *   WordNet 3.1 (or similar versions) often maps "in the process of" to Sense 1 (course of action) or Sense 6.
            *   Example for Sense 1: "it was a process of trial and error".
            *   Example for Sense 6: "events now in process".
            *   The phrase "New York is in the process of trying..." refers to an ongoing activity.
            *   Let's look at the definition of Sense 1 again: "course of action intended to achieve a result". Trying to disengage is a course of action.
            *   Let's look at Sense 6 again: "sustained phenomenon... series of states".
            *   Common usage distinction: "The legislative process" (Sense 1 - procedure). "The process of decay" (Sense 6 - natural series of states).
            *   Here, "trying to disengage" is an intentional activity by an entity (New York). It feels like a course of action (Sense 1). However, the idiom "in the process of" is very common.
            *   Let's check the provided examples again.
            *   Sense 1 examples: "procedure of obtaining a driver's license" (very procedural). "trial and error" (method).
            *   Sense 6 examples: "events now in process" (ongoing state). "calcification" (natural phenomenon).
            *   "New York is in the process of trying..." refers to an ongoing set of actions.
            *   Often, WSD systems (like UKB or IMS) map "in the process of" to Sense 1 because it is an activity directed towards a goal.
            *   However, Sense 6 captures the "sustained phenomenon" aspect.
            *   Let's reconsider Sense 1 vs Sense 6. "Process" in "in the process of [verb]" usually denotes the progression of an action.
            *   Is it a procedure? No, there isn't a strict set of steps defined here (like obtaining a license).
            *   Is it a sustained phenomenon/series of states? Yes, they are currently engaged in the activity.
            *   Let's look at the synonyms.
            *   Sense 1: procedure.
            *   Sense 6: physical process. (Note: "physical process" is a strange synonym for "calcification" or "events now in process" in a social context, but WordNet definitions can be quirky. In some versions, Sense 6 is "physical process" but the definition allows for broader "series of states". In WN 3.0, sense 1 is "procedure", sense 2 is "cognitive process", sense 3 is "writ", sense 4 is "unconscious process", sense 5 is "outgrowth", sense 6 is "physical process").
            *   Wait, let's look at the mapping carefully.
                *   Sense 1: procedure.
                *   Sense 6: physical process (defined as sustained phenomenon/series of states).
            *   The phrase "in the process of" usually collocates with Sense 1 in many annotated datasets (like SemCor) when referring to human agency/intentionality, or sometimes Sense 6 if it's a natural event.
            *   "New York is in the process of trying..." involves agency and intent.
            *   However, the definition of Sense 1 "intended to achieve a result" fits perfectly. "Trying to disengage" is intended to achieve the result of disengagement.
            *   The definition of Sense 6 "series of states" fits, but "physical process" (the synonym) strongly suggests non-agentive natural phenomena (like calcification).
            *   The example for Sense 1 "trial and error" is a method. "Obtaining a license" is a method.
            *   The example for Sense 6 "events now in process" is very close to "New York is in the process...".
            *   Let's check the nuance. If I say "I am in the process of moving house", is it a procedure or a series of states? It's an ongoing action. WordNet often treats "process" (the general sense) as Sense 1. Sense 6 is usually reserved for physical/natural changes.
            *   Let's check the synonym for Sense 6 again: "physical process". This is a strong distractor. The context is social/political, not physical (physics/biology). The calcification example confirms the biological/physical leaning of Sense 6.
            *   Sense 1's synonym is "procedure". While "procedure" sounds bureaucratic, the definition "course of action intended to achieve a result" is the general definition for "process" in most dictionaries.
            *   Therefore, despite the "procedure" synonym potentially feeling too narrow (strict steps), the definition of Sense 1 is the standard definition for a course of action.
            *   Sense 6 (physical process) is likely incorrect for a social/governmental action because of the "physical" constraint implied by the synonym and the "calcification" example.
            *   Therefore, Sense 1 is the best fit among the choices. It describes a course of action intended to achieve a result (disengagement).

4.  **Final Decision Logic:**
    *   Context: "in the process of trying to disengage..." -> An ongoing course of action initiated by an agent to achieve a goal.
    *   Sense 1: "course of action intended to achieve a result". Fits agency and goal.
    *   Sense 6: "sustained phenomenon... series of states". Synonym "physical process". Fits the "ongoing" aspect but conflicts with the agentive/social nature suggested by "physical process" and biological examples.
    *   Sense 1 is the standard sense for "process" in "in the process of X" when X is an action performed by an agent.

    *   Let's double check Sense 1 vs Sense 6 in WordNet structure.
        *   1: (process, physical process) a sustained phenomenon...
        *   Wait. In some WordNet versions (e.g. 3.0):
            *   The first sense (most common) is usually "procedure".
            *   The sense "physical process" is distinct.
        *   Let's look at the provided definitions in the prompt again carefully.
        *   Sense 1: definition="a particular course of action intended to achieve a result".
        *   Sense 6: definition="a sustained phenomenon or one marked by gradual changes through a series of states".
        *   The phrase "in the process of" indicates that the action is currently happening.
        *   Does "New York is in the process of..." mean "New York is following a procedure"? Or "New York is undergoing a series of states"?
        *   The latter (Sense 6) captures the aspectual nature of "in the process of" (progressive aspect). "Events now in process" is the example for Sense 6.
        *   However, "process" in "process of trying" is a course of action.
        *   Let's look at SemCor annotations for "process". Often, "process of [verb]ing" is annotated as `process%1:04:00::` (Sense 1 in the list provided? Let's check indices).
        *   WordNet 3.0 Sense 1: process -- (a particular course of action intended to achieve a result) -> This matches Sense 1 in the prompt.
        *   WordNet 3.0 Sense 2: procedure, process -- (a sustained phenomenon...) -> This matches Sense 6 in the prompt? No, let's trace carefully.
        *   WN 3.0 Senses for process (noun):
            1. process, physical process (sustained phenomenon...) -> Matches Prompt Sense 6.
            2. process, unconscious process (mental process...) -> Matches Prompt Sense 4.
            3. process, cognitive process... -> Matches Prompt Sense 2.
            4. process, outgrowth, appendage... -> Matches Prompt Sense 5.
            5. process, summons... -> Matches Prompt Sense 3.
            6. process, procedure (course of action...) -> Matches Prompt Sense 1.
        *   Wait, the prompt indices are:
            1. course of action... (Sense 6 in WN 3.0?)
            6. sustained phenomenon... (Sense 1 in WN 3.0?)
        *   Let's check standard WSD datasets (like Senseval/Semeval) which often use 3.0 sense keys.
        *   If the prompt follows a specific sorting (likely frequency or alphanumeric), I must rely on the definitions provided in the prompt, not external numbering which varies by version.
        *   Prompt Sense 1: "course of action intended to achieve a result". Synonyms: "procedure".
        *   Prompt Sense 6: "sustained phenomenon... series of states". Synonyms: "physical process".
        *   Analysis of "New York is in the process of trying...":
            *   Is it a physical phenomenon? No.
            *   Is it a series of states? Yes, but defined as "physical process".
            *   Is it a course of action intended to achieve a result? Yes.
            *   Therefore, Sense 1 is the correct choice. Even though "in the process of" feels like a "state", the "physical" constraint on Sense 6 makes it the wrong choice for a political action. The "course of action" definition in Sense 1 applies to intentional activities.

    *   Let's verify the examples.
        *   Sense 1: "procedure of obtaining a driver's license", "trial and error". These are agentive actions.
        *   Sense 6: "events now in process", "calcification". One is neutral (events), one is biological.
        *   The "events now in process" example is tricky. It's very close to "New York is in the process".
        *   However, "trying to disengage" is a purposeful activity. It is a course of action.
        *   If I have to choose between "course of action intended to achieve a result" and "physical process" for a political maneuver, Sense 1 is vastly superior. The "procedure" synonym is the only sticking point, as "trying to disengage" isn't a formal procedure. But "course of action" is the main definition.
        *   Also, in many dictionaries, "process" (course of action) is the primary definition.
        *   Let's check if "in the process of" is an idiom listed separately. It's not here.
        *   Let's choose Sense 1.

    *   Let's re-read Sense 6 definition carefully: "a sustained phenomenon or one marked by gradual changes through a series of states".
    *   Let's re-read Sense 1 definition carefully: "a particular course of action intended to achieve a result".
    *   "New York is in the process of trying to disengage..." -> The activity is intended to achieve a result (disengagement). This fits Sense 1 perfectly.
    *   The only reason to consider Sense 6 is the "series of states" or "events now in process" example. But "physical process" as a synonym excludes it for a social context.
    *   Conclusion: Sense 1.

    *   Let's confirm the index. The prompt asks for `sense_index`.
    *   Sense 1 is index 1.

    *   Final check:
    *   Is it a summons? No (Sense 3).
    *   Is it a bony projection? No (Sense 5).
    *   Is it mental? No (Senses 2, 4).
    *   Is it physical/natural phenomenon? No (Sense 6 - "physical process").
    *   Is it a course of action? Yes (Sense 1).

    *   Therefore, the answer is 1.

provider: Together


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: try
Target surface form: trying
Context:
They should see to it that their kids do not play truant; they should make certain that the children spend enough time doing homework; they should scrutinize the report card. If parents are dissatisfied with a school, they should have the option of switching to another. -- "Community involvement "is an even worse idea. Here, the experience of New York City is decisive. Locally elected school boards, especially in our larger cities, become the prey of ambitious, generally corrupt, and invariably demagogic local politicians or would-be politicians. New York is in the process of <t>trying</t> to disengage itself from a 20-year-old commitment to this system of school governance, even as Chicago and other cities are moving to institute it. -- In most states, increasing expenditures on education, in our current circumstances, will probably make things worse, not better.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=try%2:41:00:: | definition=make an effort or attempt | synonyms=seek, attempt, essay, assay | examples=He tried to shake off his fears; The infant had essayed a few wobbly steps
2. sense_key=try%2:41:01:: | definition=put to the test, as for its quality, or give experimental use to | synonyms=test, prove, try out, examine, essay | examples=This approach has been tried with good results; Test this recipe
3. sense_key=try%2:41:06:: | definition=put on trial or hear a case and sit as the judge at the trial of | synonyms=judge, adjudicate | examples=The football star was tried for the murder of his wife; The judge tried both father and son in separate trials
4. sense_key=try%2:34:00:: | definition=take a sample of | synonyms=sample, try out, taste | examples=Try these new crackers; Sample the regional dishes
5. sense_key=try%2:41:05:: | definition=examine or hear (evidence or a case) by judicial process | synonyms=hear | examples=The jury had heard all the evidence; The case will be tried in California
6. sense_key=try%2:37:01:: | definition=give pain or trouble to | examples=I've been sorely tried by these students
7. sense_key=try%2:37:00:: | definition=test the limits of | synonyms=strain, stress | examples=You are trying my patience!
8. sense_key=try%2:30:00:: | definition=melt (fat or lard) in order to separate out impurities | synonyms=render | examples=try the yak butter; render fat in a casserole
9. sense_key=try%2:29:00:: | definition=put on a garment in order to see whether it fits and looks nice | synonyms=try on | examples=Try on this sweater to see how it looks

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
The target word is "trying" (present participle of "try") in the context:

"New York is in the process of trying to disengage itself from a 20-year-old commitment to this system of school governance..."

Let me analyze this context:

New York (the city) is making an effort or attempting to disengage itself from a commitment to a system of school governance. This is about making an attempt or effort to do something.

Let me look at the candidate senses:

1. sense_key=try%2:41:00:: | definition=make an effort or attempt | synonyms=seek, attempt, essay, assay | examples=He tried to shake off his fears; The infant had essayed a few wobbly steps

This fits perfectly. New York is making an effort to disengage itself from a commitment. The construction "trying to [verb]" (trying to disengage) is the classic pattern for this sense.

2. sense_key=try%2:41:01:: | definition=put to the test, as for its quality, or give experimental use to - This doesn't fit. New York isn't testing the disengagement.

3. sense_key=try%2:41:06:: | definition=put on trial or hear a case - Legal sense, doesn't fit.

4. sense_key=try%2:34:00:: | definition=take a sample of - Doesn't fit.

5. sense_key=try%2:41:05:: | definition=examine or hear (evidence or a case) by judicial process - Legal sense, doesn't fit.

6. sense_key=try%2:37:01:: | definition=give pain or trouble to - Doesn't fit.

7. sense_key=try%2:37:00:: | definition=test the limits of - Doesn't fit.

8. sense_key=try%2:30:00:: | definition=melt (fat or lard) - Doesn't fit.

9. sense_key=try%2:29:00:: | definition=put on a garment - Doesn't fit.

The clear answer is sense 1 - "make an effort or attempt." The phrase "trying to disengage" indicates New York is making an effort or attempting to disengage from a commitment.

provider: Friendli