[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: necessary
Target surface form: necessary
Context:
Although it was initially MathML oriented it can now be used by everyone with little mathematical knowledge. Here's a screenshot of kalgebra main window kalgebra main window kalgebra main window consists in a Console tab, a 2D Graph tab, a 3D Graph tab and a Dictionary tab. Below these tabs you will find an input field to type your functions or do your calculations. If we want to understand how it works, the best thing we can do is to realize that our input is being converted into MathML although it is not <t>necessary</t> to know MathML. I have based the syntax basically on common sense, it should not be hard for anyone.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=necessary%3:00:00:: | definition=absolutely essential
2. sense_key=necessary%5:00:00:inevitable:00 | definition=unavoidably determined by prior circumstances | examples=the necessary consequences of one's actions

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
**Analyzing the Nuances of "Necessary"**

Alright, let's break this down. The target word is "necessary," and the sentence reads "...although it is not necessary to know MathML." My immediate thought process is to consider the potential senses of "necessary" here. We've got two candidates, it seems: one implying absolute essentiality, and the other, inevitability.

The context is crucial, of course. It's about knowing MathML – so, "it is not *necessary* to know MathML" means not *essential*, *needed*, or *required*. Thinking about that, the first sense – absolutely essential – is the clear winner. The second sense, referring to unavoidable consequences, just doesn’t fit. It's not about MathML being an unavoidable result of something else; it's about whether it's *essential knowledge* in this particular circumstance. The first sense perfectly captures the idea that knowing MathML isn't absolutely required. Case closed.


attempt_kind: initial

status: success

[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: know
Target surface form: know
Context:
Although it was initially MathML oriented it can now be used by everyone with little mathematical knowledge. Here's a screenshot of kalgebra main window kalgebra main window kalgebra main window consists in a Console tab, a 2D Graph tab, a 3D Graph tab and a Dictionary tab. Below these tabs you will find an input field to type your functions or do your calculations. If we want to understand how it works, the best thing we can do is to realize that our input is being converted into MathML although it is not necessary to <t>know</t> MathML. I have based the syntax basically on common sense, it should not be hard for anyone.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=know%2:31:01:: | definition=be cognizant or aware of a fact or a specific piece of information; possess knowledge or information about | synonyms=cognize, cognise | examples=I know that the President lied to the people; I want to know who is winning the game!
2. sense_key=know%2:31:03:: | definition=know how to do or perform something | examples=She knows how to knit; Does your husband know how to cook?
3. sense_key=know%2:31:02:: | definition=be aware of the truth of something; have a belief or faith in something; regard as true beyond any doubt | examples=I know that I left the key on the table; Galileo knew that the earth moves around the sun
4. sense_key=know%2:31:00:: | definition=be familiar or acquainted with a person or an object | examples=She doesn't know this composer; Do you know my sister?
5. sense_key=know%2:31:04:: | definition=have firsthand knowledge of states, situations, emotions, or sensations | synonyms=experience, live | examples=I know the feeling!; have you ever known hunger?
6. sense_key=know%2:31:06:: | definition=accept (someone) to be what is claimed or accept his power and authority | synonyms=acknowledge, recognize, recognise | examples=The Crown Prince was acknowledged as the true heir to the throne; We do not recognize your gods
7. sense_key=know%2:31:15:: | definition=have fixed in the mind | examples=I know Latin; This student knows her irregular verbs
8. sense_key=know%2:35:00:: | definition=have sexual intercourse with | synonyms=sleep together, roll in the hay, love, make out, make love, sleep with | examples=This student sleeps with everyone in her dorm; Adam knew Eve
9. sense_key=know%2:31:11:: | definition=know the nature or character of | examples=we all knew her as a big show-off
10. sense_key=know%2:31:12:: | definition=be able to distinguish, recognize as being different | examples=The child knows right from wrong
11. sense_key=know%2:31:14:: | definition=perceive as familiar | examples=I know this voice!

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

raw_output:
```json
{"sense_index": 7}
```

finish_reason: stop

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 7}
```

role: assistant

reasoning_content:
**Analyzing the Best WordNet Sense for "know"**

Okay, so I need to pinpoint the most appropriate WordNet sense for "know" in the phrase "it is not necessary to know MathML." My initial thought is to analyze the context "know MathML." MathML, obviously, is a markup language, specifically a mathematical one. Given that, my brain immediately goes to the sense related to knowing a language, which, in WordNet, is sense 7: `know%2:31:15:: | have fixed in the mind`. The examples are spot on – "I know Latin," "This student knows her irregular verbs." That looks promising.

Let's quickly rule out other senses to be thorough. Sense 1, `know%2:31:01::`, "be cognizant or aware of a fact," seems less relevant. Sense 2, `know%2:31:03::`, "know how to do something," like "She knows how to knit," is also not the right fit here. Sense 4, `know%2:31:00::`, "be familiar with a person or object," is definitely out.

Now, revisiting sense 7, I'm confident that the core meaning of having a language "fixed in the mind" matches the context of knowing MathML. "I know Latin" is a solid analogy. Just to be completely certain, I check the WordNet entry.

Yep, a language is mapped to `know%2:31:15::`. Therefore, the best sense is indeed sense 7.

type: thinking

service_tier: default

currency: USD


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: base
Target surface form: based
Context:
Here's a screenshot of kalgebra main window kalgebra main window kalgebra main window consists in a Console tab, a 2D Graph tab, a 3D Graph tab and a Dictionary tab. Below these tabs you will find an input field to type your functions or do your calculations. If we want to understand how it works, the best thing we can do is to realize that our input is being converted into MathML although it is not necessary to know MathML. I have <t>based</t> the syntax basically on common sense, it should not be hard for anyone. I ve looked closely to maxima and maple s syntax so they look very similar.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=base%2:31:00:: | definition=use as a basis for; found on | synonyms=establish, ground, found | examples=base a claim on some observation
2. sense_key=base%2:42:04:: | definition=situate as a center of operations | examples=we will base this project in the new lab
3. sense_key=base%2:34:00:: | definition=use (purified cocaine) by burning it and inhaling the fumes | synonyms=free-base

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
**Analyzing the Usage of "Based"**

Okay, here's the breakdown. The word I need to work with is "based," which is the past tense of "base." The context is "I have based the syntax basically on common sense, it should not be hard for anyone." Right away, I start sifting through the possible meanings. I know "base" can have several senses, so I have to be precise.

My candidates are:

1.  *use as a basis for; found on* - This feels like a strong contender from the start. "Base a claim on an observation" is a good example.
2.  *situate as a center of operations* - This is about physical location, not relevant here.
3.  *use (purified cocaine) by burning it and inhaling the fumes* - Definitely not applicable.

Looking at the phrase "based the syntax...on common sense," the first sense jumps out. The structure "base [something] on [something]" perfectly fits. It's about using common sense as the *foundation* or *groundwork* for the syntax. I'm confident that sense 1 is correct.
So, the sense index is 1.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: hard
Target surface form: hard
Context:
Here's a screenshot of kalgebra main window kalgebra main window kalgebra main window consists in a Console tab, a 2D Graph tab, a 3D Graph tab and a Dictionary tab. Below these tabs you will find an input field to type your functions or do your calculations. If we want to understand how it works, the best thing we can do is to realize that our input is being converted into MathML although it is not necessary to know MathML. I have based the syntax basically on common sense, it should not be <t>hard</t> for anyone. I ve looked closely to maxima and maple s syntax so they look very similar.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=hard%3:00:06:: | definition=not easy; requiring great physical or mental effort to accomplish or comprehend or endure | synonyms=difficult | examples=a difficult task; nesting places on the cliffs are difficult of access
2. sense_key=hard%3:00:02:: | definition=dispassionate | examples=took a hard look; a hard bargainer
3. sense_key=hard%3:00:01:: | definition=resisting weight or pressure
4. sense_key=hard%5:00:00:strong:00 | definition=very strong or vigorous | synonyms=knockout, severe | examples=strong winds; a hard left to the chin
5. sense_key=hard%5:00:01:effortful:00 | definition=characterized by effort to the point of exhaustion; especially physical effort | synonyms=arduous, backbreaking, grueling, gruelling, heavy, laborious | examples=worked their arduous way up the mining valley; a grueling campaign
6. sense_key=hard%3:00:00:: | definition=produced without vibration of the vocal cords | synonyms=unvoiced, voiceless, surd | examples=unvoiced consonants such as `p' and `k' and `s'
7. sense_key=hard%3:00:05:: | definition=(of light) transmitted directly from a pointed light source | synonyms=concentrated
8. sense_key=hard%3:00:03:: | definition=(of speech sounds); produced with the back of the tongue raised toward or touching the velum | examples=Russian distinguished between hard consonants and palatalized or soft consonants
9. sense_key=hard%5:00:00:indulgent:00 | definition=given to excessive indulgence of bodily appetites especially for intoxicating liquors | synonyms=intemperate, heavy | examples=a hard drinker
10. sense_key=hard%5:00:00:alcoholic:00 | definition=being distilled rather than fermented; having a high alcoholic content | synonyms=strong | examples=hard liquor
11. sense_key=hard%5:00:00:bad:00 | definition=unfortunate or hard to bear | synonyms=tough | examples=had hard luck; a tough break
12. sense_key=hard%5:00:00:stale:00 | definition=dried out | examples=hard dry rolls left over from the day before

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

raw_output:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

reasoning_content:
**Analyzing the Meaning of "Hard"**

Okay, so I'm looking at the word "hard" in the sentence "I have based the syntax basically on common sense, it should not be hard for anyone." My job here is to pin down the precise meaning. Let's see... the system has provided a candidate list of senses. It's got the usual suspects, and I'm quickly filtering them based on context.

Sense 1, "not easy; requiring great physical or mental effort to accomplish or comprehend or endure," with "difficult" as a synonym, jumps out immediately. "It should not be difficult for anyone" – that fits like a glove. The intended meaning is clearly about the level of ease or difficulty of understanding the syntax.

The other senses are obviously wrong; no dispassion or physical resistance here. Sense 5 talks about effort, but that's not quite right. "Difficult" is the core meaning.

Therefore, sense index 1 it is. Case closed.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: closely
Target surface form: closely
Context:
kalgebra main window kalgebra main window consists in a Console tab, a 2D Graph tab, a 3D Graph tab and a Dictionary tab. Below these tabs you will find an input field to type your functions or do your calculations. If we want to understand how it works, the best thing we can do is to realize that our input is being converted into MathML although it is not necessary to know MathML. I have based the syntax basically on common sense, it should not be hard for anyone. I ve looked <t>closely</t> to maxima and maple s syntax so they look very similar. + - * /: Addition, subtraction, multiplication and division.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=closely%4:02:00:: | definition=in a close relation or position in time or space | examples=the onsets were closely timed; houses set closely together
2. sense_key=closely%4:02:02:: | definition=in an attentive manner | synonyms=close, tight | examples=he remained close on his guard
3. sense_key=closely%4:02:01:: | definition=in a close manner | synonyms=intimately, nearly | examples=the two phenomena are intimately connected; the person most nearly concerned

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

raw_output:
```json
{
  "sense_index": 2
}
```

content:
```json
{
  "sense_index": 2
}
```

reasoning_content:
**My Analysis of "Closely"**

Okay, the target word is "closely" in that sentence about comparing Maxima and Maple syntax. Let's break this down systematically. I need to figure out the intended meaning of "closely" in this context.

First, I pull up the candidate senses from my word sense inventory. I have three options here: a spatial or temporal sense, something like things being right next to each other, an "attentive manner" sense, and a sense meaning "intimately" or "nearly."

Given the phrase "looked closely," my initial intuition is the attentive manner sense. I "looked closely" at the syntax, meaning I examined it carefully, paying close attention. Definition 2, "in an attentive manner," seems like the strongest contender.

The synonyms listed, "close" and "tight," support this – in the context of examination, these words imply a thorough, detailed inspection. Looking at the example sentence for this sense, "he remained close on his guard," I can map it to how I was examining the Maxima and Maple syntax. I was "close" in my examination.

Therefore, after a quick mental parse, I can quickly confirm that sense 2, “in an attentive manner,” is the correct usage in the given sentence.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: look
Target surface form: look
Context:
kalgebra main window kalgebra main window consists in a Console tab, a 2D Graph tab, a 3D Graph tab and a Dictionary tab. Below these tabs you will find an input field to type your functions or do your calculations. If we want to understand how it works, the best thing we can do is to realize that our input is being converted into MathML although it is not necessary to know MathML. I have based the syntax basically on common sense, it should not be hard for anyone. I ve looked closely to maxima and maple s syntax so they <t>look</t> very similar. + - * /: Addition, subtraction, multiplication and division.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=look%2:39:00:: | definition=perceive with attention; direct one's gaze towards | examples=She looked over the expanse of land; Look at your child!
2. sense_key=look%2:39:01:: | definition=give a certain impression or have a certain outward aspect | synonyms=appear, seem | examples=She seems to be sleeping; This appears to be a very difficult problem
3. sense_key=look%2:29:00:: | definition=have a certain outward or facial expression | examples=How does she look?; The child looks unhappy
4. sense_key=look%2:39:02:: | definition=search or seek | synonyms=search | examples=We looked all day and finally found the child in the forest; Look elsewhere for the perfect gift!
5. sense_key=look%2:42:00:: | definition=be oriented in a certain direction, often with respect to another reference point; be opposite to | synonyms=front, face | examples=The house looks north; My backyard look onto the pond
6. sense_key=look%2:41:13:: | definition=take charge of or deal with | synonyms=attend, take care, see | examples=Could you see about lunch?; I must attend to this matter
7. sense_key=look%2:32:00:: | definition=convey by one's expression | examples=She looked her devotion to me
8. sense_key=look%2:31:00:: | definition=look forward to the probable occurrence of | synonyms=expect, await, wait | examples=We were expecting a visit from our relatives; She is looking to a promotion
9. sense_key=look%2:42:02:: | definition=accord in appearance with | examples=You don't look your age!
10. sense_key=look%2:31:02:: | definition=have faith or confidence in | synonyms=count, bet, depend, calculate, reckon | examples=you can count on me to help you any time; Look to your friends for support

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

raw_output:
```json
{"sense_index": 2}
```

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 2}
```

reasoning_content:
**Analyzing the Semantic Nuances of "Look"**

Okay, so the target is "look" in the phrase "...they look very similar," and I need to pin down the precise meaning. My immediate thought is, "they look very similar" must be about the syntax giving an impression or appearing a certain way. Let's see... I'll run through the possible senses.

First, "perceive with attention" (Sense 1) is clearly off; it's not about actively gazing. "Have a certain outward or facial expression" (Sense 3) is obviously wrong, this is about syntax, not faces! "Search or seek" (Sense 4) is totally irrelevant as well. Sense 5, "be oriented in a certain direction" doesn't fit the context. Sense 6, "take charge of or deal with" is not what is meant by "...they look very similar." Sense 7, "convey by one's expression" doesn't quite apply here, given syntax isn't an expression. Sense 8, "look forward to..." and Sense 9, "accord in appearance with" are also completely wrong. Finally, Sense 10, "have faith or confidence in" is not correct.

That leaves Sense 2: "give a certain impression or have a certain outward aspect; appear, seem." Yeah, that's the one. That's the correct way to phrase the meaning of the word 'look' in this context. "They appear very similar," or "They seem very similar" is the meaning I'm after. It's about the syntax *seeming* or *appearing* a certain way, based on my close examination.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: very
Target surface form: very
Context:
kalgebra main window kalgebra main window consists in a Console tab, a 2D Graph tab, a 3D Graph tab and a Dictionary tab. Below these tabs you will find an input field to type your functions or do your calculations. If we want to understand how it works, the best thing we can do is to realize that our input is being converted into MathML although it is not necessary to know MathML. I have based the syntax basically on common sense, it should not be hard for anyone. I ve looked closely to maxima and maple s syntax so they look <t>very</t> similar. + - * /: Addition, subtraction, multiplication and division.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=very%4:02:00:: | definition=used as intensifiers; `real' is sometimes used informally for `really'; `rattling' is informal | synonyms=really, real, rattling | examples=she was very gifted; he played very well
2. sense_key=very%4:02:01:: | definition=precisely so | examples=on the very next page; he expected the very opposite

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
**Analyzing the Meaning of "Very" in Context**

Okay, the task is to pinpoint the correct sense of "very" in the phrase "...so they look *very* similar." Right away, I see two candidate senses: a general intensifier and an emphasis on precision or exactness.

The first sense, tagged with "very%4:02:00::", defines "very" as an intensifier – essentially, "really." The examples listed, like "she was very gifted," immediately resonate. This feels like the correct direction. We're looking at the degree to which the similarity exists.

The second sense, "very%4:02:01::," focuses on precision. "Precisely so" is the key here. The examples provided – "on the very next page," "he expected the very opposite" – are about exactness, or identity. This doesn't quite fit the context. The "very" isn't emphasizing an identical similarity, but rather the degree of similarity.

Given the context of "very similar," where "very" is modifying the adjective "similar," it's apparent that Sense 1 is the appropriate choice. We're using "very" to intensify the meaning of "similar," to denote a high degree of similarity.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: similar
Target surface form: similar
Context:
kalgebra main window kalgebra main window consists in a Console tab, a 2D Graph tab, a 3D Graph tab and a Dictionary tab. Below these tabs you will find an input field to type your functions or do your calculations. If we want to understand how it works, the best thing we can do is to realize that our input is being converted into MathML although it is not necessary to know MathML. I have based the syntax basically on common sense, it should not be hard for anyone. I ve looked closely to maxima and maple s syntax so they look very <t>similar</t>. + - * /: Addition, subtraction, multiplication and division.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=similar%3:00:00:: | definition=marked by correspondence or resemblance | examples=similar food at similar prices; problems similar to mine
2. sense_key=similar%3:00:04:: | definition=having the same or similar characteristics | synonyms=alike, like | examples=all politicians are alike; they looked utterly alike
3. sense_key=similar%3:00:02:: | definition=resembling or similar; having the same or some of the same characteristics; often used in combination | synonyms=like | examples=suits of like design; a limited circle of like minds
4. sense_key=similar%5:00:00:synonymous:00 | definition=(of words) expressing closely related meanings
5. sense_key=similar%5:00:00:replaceable:00 | definition=capable of replacing or changing places with something else; permitting mutual substitution without loss of function or suitability | synonyms=exchangeable, interchangeable, standardized, standardised | examples=interchangeable electric outlets; interchangeable parts

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 2}
```

reasoning_content:
**Disambiguating "Similar" in Context**

Okay, so I'm looking at the word "similar" in the phrase "so they look very similar" when comparing Maxima and Maple's syntax. Let's break this down systematically. I've got a few candidate senses: one suggesting general resemblance, another focused on shared characteristics with synonyms like "alike," and some others that seem less relevant here. My initial thought is to compare the first two.

Sense 1 emphasizes "marked by correspondence or resemblance," while Sense 2 focuses on "having the same or similar characteristics," with "alike" as a synonym.  I keep thinking that  `similar%3:00:04::`  is the one I should focus on, due to the examples, but I have to really double check. Now, the context is "they look very similar."  This calls for a predicate adjective modifying "they" (the syntaxes).  This context aligns with examples in Sense 2, such as "they looked utterly alike".

I need to confirm that `similar` can function this way.  WordNet is my go-to, and the examples in the synset, `alike, similar, like`, are key.  The examples, "all politicians are alike" and "they looked utterly alike," are precisely in the format of the given context, "they look very similar."  Wait, in WordNet, is `alike` a predicate adjective?

Let me double-check WordNet's definition: "having the same or similar characteristics." The example in Sense 2, "they looked utterly alike,"  is the perfect match.  The example is a predicate adjective just like my context.  Now, the question is, why does WordNet have two separate synsets for "similar"?  Let's consider how these are distinguished in SemCor.

The distinction seems to be that when "similar" is used predicatively with a plural subject ("they are similar", "they look similar"), it is very often tagged as being the second synset, the one with `alike`. `alike` can *only* be used predicatively ("they are alike", "they looked utterly alike"). Sense 1 deals with "similar to" type uses. So the distinction *is* in the usage. "problems similar to mine" is different.

Therefore, because of the context, the key example, and how "similar" is used predicatively in "they look very similar," and its equivalence to "they look very alike", I'm going with **sense_key=similar%3:00:04::** and the synset  `alike, similar, like`.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: addition
Target surface form: Addition
Context:
kalgebra main window consists in a Console tab, a 2D Graph tab, a 3D Graph tab and a Dictionary tab. Below these tabs you will find an input field to type your functions or do your calculations. If we want to understand how it works, the best thing we can do is to realize that our input is being converted into MathML although it is not necessary to know MathML. I have based the syntax basically on common sense, it should not be hard for anyone. I ve looked closely to maxima and maple s syntax so they look very similar. + - * /: <t>Addition</t>, subtraction, multiplication and division. ^, **: Power, you can use them both.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=addition%1:06:00:: | definition=a component that is added to something to improve it | synonyms=add-on, improver | examples=the addition of a bathroom was a major improvement; the addition of cinnamon improved the flavor
2. sense_key=addition%1:04:02:: | definition=the act of adding one thing to another | examples=the addition of flowers created a pleasing effect; the addition of a leap day every four years
3. sense_key=addition%1:23:00:: | definition=a quantity that is added | synonyms=increase, gain | examples=there was an addition to property taxes this year; they recorded the cattle's gain in weight over a period of weeks
4. sense_key=addition%1:21:00:: | definition=something added to what you already have | synonyms=accession | examples=the librarian shelved the new accessions; he was a new addition to the staff
5. sense_key=addition%1:15:00:: | definition=a suburban area laid out in streets and lots for a future residential area
6. sense_key=addition%1:04:01:: | definition=the arithmetic operation of summing; calculating the sum of two or more numbers | synonyms=summation, plus | examples=the summation of four and three gives seven; four plus three equals seven

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

raw_output:
```json
{"sense_index": 6}
```

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 6}
```

reasoning_content:
**Disambiguating "Addition" in this Context**

Okay, let's break this down. The user is asking about the word "Addition" in this particular snippet: "... + - * /: Addition, subtraction, multiplication and division. ^, **: Power, you can use them both." My initial instinct is to go through the WordNet senses to find the appropriate one. I've got a list of potential senses here: a component added to improve something, the act of adding, a quantity added, something added to what you have, a suburban residential area, and finally, and this is the most promising, the arithmetic operation of summing or "plus".

Looking at the context, we're talking about a list of mathematical operators – plus, minus, multiplication, division, and exponentiation. That's a pretty clear signal that we're talking about arithmetic operations here. The phrase "addition, subtraction, multiplication and division" confirms this. Therefore, Sense 6, the arithmetic definition, is the only one that makes any sense. The other senses are completely irrelevant in this context. It is an easy disambiguation.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: subtraction
Target surface form: subtraction
Context:
kalgebra main window consists in a Console tab, a 2D Graph tab, a 3D Graph tab and a Dictionary tab. Below these tabs you will find an input field to type your functions or do your calculations. If we want to understand how it works, the best thing we can do is to realize that our input is being converted into MathML although it is not necessary to know MathML. I have based the syntax basically on common sense, it should not be hard for anyone. I ve looked closely to maxima and maple s syntax so they look very similar. + - * /: Addition, <t>subtraction</t>, multiplication and division. ^, **: Power, you can use them both.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=subtraction%1:04:01:: | definition=an arithmetic operation in which the difference between two numbers is calculated | synonyms=minus | examples=the subtraction of three from four leaves one; four minus three equals one
2. sense_key=subtraction%1:04:00:: | definition=the act of subtracting (removing a part from the whole) | synonyms=deduction | examples=he complained about the subtraction of money from their paychecks

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

reasoning_content:
**Analyzing the Target Word "Subtraction"**

Okay, here's the breakdown. The surrounding text gives me a clear operational context: "+ - * /" are explicitly mentioned as arithmetic operators, defining addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division. Now, the target word is "subtraction".

Given that clear framework, I've got two potential senses to consider. The first, subtraction%1:04:01::, is defined as "an arithmetic operation in which the difference between two numbers is calculated." The second, subtraction%1:04:00::, is "the act of subtracting (removing a part from the whole)."

Analyzing this, Sense 1 immediately strikes me as the more relevant definition. The context points to mathematical operations – a direct correlation with the term's explicit purpose and how it's used in this scenario. The text is using a mathematical notation, ergo, the mathematical meaning. While "removing a part from the whole" has its place, the operational focus strongly favors Sense 1. This really feels like a straightforward application of contextual semantic analysis.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: multiplication
Target surface form: multiplication
Context:
kalgebra main window consists in a Console tab, a 2D Graph tab, a 3D Graph tab and a Dictionary tab. Below these tabs you will find an input field to type your functions or do your calculations. If we want to understand how it works, the best thing we can do is to realize that our input is being converted into MathML although it is not necessary to know MathML. I have based the syntax basically on common sense, it should not be hard for anyone. I ve looked closely to maxima and maple s syntax so they look very similar. + - * /: Addition, subtraction, <t>multiplication</t> and division. ^, **: Power, you can use them both.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=multiplication%1:04:01:: | definition=the act of producing offspring or multiplying by such production | synonyms=generation, propagation
2. sense_key=multiplication%1:22:00:: | definition=a multiplicative increase | examples=repeated copying leads to a multiplication of errors; this multiplication of cells is a natural correlate of growth
3. sense_key=multiplication%1:04:00:: | definition=an arithmetic operation that is the inverse of division; the product of two numbers is computed | synonyms=times | examples=the multiplication of four by three gives twelve; four times three equals twelve

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

raw_output:
```json
{"sense_index": 3}
```

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 3}
```

reasoning_content:
**My Analysis of "Multiplication"**

Okay, here's the breakdown. The text presents "multiplication" within the context of basic arithmetic: addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division. This is a pretty straightforward disambiguation. My goal is to pinpoint the intended meaning of "multiplication" here.

Looking at the candidate senses, the first one, dealing with offspring and reproduction, is obviously irrelevant given the context of mathematical operations. The second sense, referring to a general "multiplicative increase," *could* be relevant in certain advanced mathematical discussions, but it's not the primary or most direct meaning in this setting. That leaves us with the third sense.

Sense 3, which defines multiplication as "an arithmetic operation that is the inverse of division; the product of two numbers is computed," perfectly aligns with the given context. It's the most common and direct meaning of "multiplication" within the framework of basic arithmetic. *That* is the correct sense. Therefore, I've got my index: 3.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: division
Target surface form: division
Context:
kalgebra main window consists in a Console tab, a 2D Graph tab, a 3D Graph tab and a Dictionary tab. Below these tabs you will find an input field to type your functions or do your calculations. If we want to understand how it works, the best thing we can do is to realize that our input is being converted into MathML although it is not necessary to know MathML. I have based the syntax basically on common sense, it should not be hard for anyone. I ve looked closely to maxima and maple s syntax so they look very similar. + - * /: Addition, subtraction, multiplication and <t>division</t>. ^, **: Power, you can use them both.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=division%1:14:00:: | definition=an army unit large enough to sustain combat | examples=two infantry divisions were held in reserve
2. sense_key=division%1:09:00:: | definition=one of the portions into which something is regarded as divided and which together constitute a whole | synonyms=part, section | examples=the written part of the exam; the finance section of the company
3. sense_key=division%1:04:00:: | definition=the act or process of dividing
4. sense_key=division%1:14:03:: | definition=an administrative unit in government or business
5. sense_key=division%1:10:00:: | definition=discord that splits a group | synonyms=variance
6. sense_key=division%1:14:06:: | definition=a league ranked by quality | synonyms=class | examples=he played baseball in class D for two years; Princeton is in the NCAA Division 1-AA
7. sense_key=division%1:14:05:: | definition=(biology) a group of organisms forming a subdivision of a larger category
8. sense_key=division%1:14:04:: | definition=(botany) taxonomic unit of plants corresponding to a phylum
9. sense_key=division%1:14:02:: | definition=a unit of the United States Air Force usually comprising two or more wings | synonyms=air division
10. sense_key=division%1:14:01:: | definition=a group of ships of similar type | synonyms=naval division
11. sense_key=division%1:04:01:: | definition=an arithmetic operation that is the inverse of multiplication; the quotient of two numbers is computed
12. sense_key=division%1:04:02:: | definition=the act of dividing or partitioning; separation by the creation of a boundary that divides or keeps apart | synonyms=partition, partitioning, segmentation, sectionalization, sectionalisation

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

raw_output:
```json
{"sense_index": 11}
```

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 11}
```

reasoning_content:
Okay, here's my assessment of the situation, given this text and my expertise:

**Determining the Appropriate Sense of "Division"**

Alright, let's break this down. My goal is to pinpoint the most accurate sense index for the word "division" within this context: "... + - * /: Addition, subtraction, multiplication and <t>division</t>. ^, **: Power, you can use them both." It's a fairly straightforward task, but we still need to be precise.

The provided sense definition, Sense 11: "an arithmetic operation that is the inverse of multiplication; the quotient of two numbers is computed," really jumps out at me. And I see that it aligns perfectly with the common understanding of division in a mathematical context. The surrounding terms (+, -, *, and potential power symbols) are all mathematical operations, which further support the idea.

Consequently, there's no real need for any ambiguity here. It's safe to conclude that candidate 11, with its associated sense index of 11, is the correct and most likely the *only* appropriate one. The definition given leaves no room for other interpretation.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: power
Target surface form: Power
Context:
Below these tabs you will find an input field to type your functions or do your calculations. If we want to understand how it works, the best thing we can do is to realize that our input is being converted into MathML although it is not necessary to know MathML. I have based the syntax basically on common sense, it should not be hard for anyone. I ve looked closely to maxima and maple s syntax so they look very similar. + - * /: Addition, subtraction, multiplication and division. ^, **: <t>Power</t>, you can use them both. Also it is possible to use the unicode ² characters.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=power%1:07:00:: | definition=possession of controlling influence | synonyms=powerfulness | examples=the deterrent power of nuclear weapons; the power of his love saved her
2. sense_key=power%1:19:00:: | definition=(physics) the rate of doing work; measured in watts (= joules/second)
3. sense_key=power%1:09:01:: | definition=possession of the qualities (especially mental qualities) required to do something or get something done | synonyms=ability | examples=danger heightened his powers of discrimination
4. sense_key=power%1:26:00:: | definition=(of a government or government official) holding an office means being in power | synonyms=office | examples=being in office already gives a candidate a great advantage; during his first year in office
5. sense_key=power%1:18:00:: | definition=one possessing or exercising power or influence or authority | synonyms=force | examples=the mysterious presence of an evil power; may the force be with you
6. sense_key=power%1:10:00:: | definition=a mathematical notation indicating the number of times a quantity is multiplied by itself | synonyms=exponent, index
7. sense_key=power%1:07:02:: | definition=physical strength | synonyms=might, mightiness
8. sense_key=power%1:14:00:: | definition=a state powerful enough to influence events throughout the world | synonyms=world power, major power, great power, superpower
9. sense_key=power%1:18:01:: | definition=a very wealthy or powerful businessman | synonyms=baron, big businessman, business leader, king, magnate, mogul | examples=an oil baron

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 6}
```

reasoning_content:
**Analyzing the Meaning of "Power" in a Mathematical Context**

Alright, let's break this down. The text presents "Power" within the context of mathematical operators – addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division. Hmm, that's a pretty clear indicator. Now I need to identify the correct sense of "power" in this specific scenario. The text explicitly mentions exponents and the use of the Unicode "²" characters. That really narrows it down.

Looking at the sense candidates, I see several possibilities, but most are irrelevant to the mathematical setting. We have options like "possession of controlling influence," "rate of doing work," "ability," and even "superpower." No, no, no. Those are definitely not what's intended here.

Then I get to sense 6, "a mathematical notation indicating the number of times a quantity is multiplied by itself (exponent, index)." Bingo! This perfectly aligns with the context and the Unicode character mention. This is the sense we're looking for, the exponent in the notation.

Therefore, the sense index is undoubtedly 6. Case closed.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: use
Target surface form: use
Context:
Below these tabs you will find an input field to type your functions or do your calculations. If we want to understand how it works, the best thing we can do is to realize that our input is being converted into MathML although it is not necessary to know MathML. I have based the syntax basically on common sense, it should not be hard for anyone. I ve looked closely to maxima and maple s syntax so they look very similar. + - * /: Addition, subtraction, multiplication and division. ^, **: Power, you can <t>use</t> them both. Also it is possible to use the unicode ² characters.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=use%2:34:01:: | definition=put into service; make work or employ for a particular purpose or for its inherent or natural purpose | synonyms=utilize, utilise, apply, employ | examples=use your head!; we only use Spanish at home
2. sense_key=use%2:34:02:: | definition=take or consume (regularly or habitually) | synonyms=habituate | examples=She uses drugs rarely
3. sense_key=use%2:34:00:: | definition=use up, consume fully | synonyms=expend | examples=The legislature expended its time on school questions
4. sense_key=use%2:41:14:: | definition=seek or achieve an end by using to one's advantage | examples=She uses her influential friends to get jobs; The president's wife used her good connections
5. sense_key=use%2:41:04:: | definition=avail oneself to | synonyms=practice, apply | examples=apply a principle; practice a religion
6. sense_key=use%2:41:03:: | definition=habitually do something (use only in the past tense) | examples=She used to call her mother every week but now she calls only occasionally; I used to get sick when I ate in that dining hall

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

reasoning_content:
**Analyzing the Sense of "Use"**

Okay, here's the breakdown. The word "use" in the sentence "Power, you can <t>use</t> them both" needs to be disambiguated. I've got six candidate senses to consider. The first, "put into service; make work or employ," seems like the strongest contender. The second, "take or consume," feels off in this context. Senses three, "use up, consume fully," doesn't fit either. Senses four and five, "seek or achieve an end by using" and "avail oneself to," are possibilities, but they lean toward a more strategic application that doesn't feel right for this simple sentence. The last one, "habitually do something," seems inapplicable.

Focusing on the context, "using them both" refers to employing or applying symbols – the caret and double asterisks – to represent "Power." Therefore, the first sense is the clear winner: the action of putting these symbols "into service" for the purpose of representing something, which aligns precisely with the meaning of utilizing them in this manner. That makes sense_index 1 the correct one.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: possible
Target surface form: possible
Context:
If we want to understand how it works, the best thing we can do is to realize that our input is being converted into MathML although it is not necessary to know MathML. I have based the syntax basically on common sense, it should not be hard for anyone. I ve looked closely to maxima and maple s syntax so they look very similar. + - * /: Addition, subtraction, multiplication and division. ^, **: Power, you can use them both. Also it is <t>possible</t> to use the unicode ² characters. Powers are one way to make roots too.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=possible%3:00:00:: | definition=capable of happening or existing | examples=a breakthrough may be possible next year; anything is possible
2. sense_key=possible%3:00:04:: | definition=existing in possibility | synonyms=potential | examples=a potential problem; possible uses of nuclear power

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
**My Analysis of "Possible" in Context**

Okay, so I need to nail down the best sense index for "possible" in this sentence: "Also it is <t>possible</t> to use the unicode ² characters." Let's break this down systematically, as I always do.

First, I've got two candidate senses to consider. Sense 1 is defined as "capable of happening or existing," which seems pretty broad. Sense 2, on the other hand, is defined as "existing in possibility," essentially synonymous with "potential." I know these are related, but the nuances are key.

Now, let's look closely at the sentence. "It is possible to use..." This phrase structure is critical. The "it" is a dummy pronoun, and "possible" is clearly functioning as a predicative adjective, modifying an implied action: *using* the Unicode characters. "It is possible *to do something*."

Considering Sense 1's definition, "capable of happening or existing," that seems like a good fit in this "it is possible to" context, right? "Capable of happening" describes the action of using Unicode characters. Could this be done? It is possible.

Sense 2, with its focus on "existing in possibility" or being "potential," just doesn't quite click as well here. We wouldn't say "it is potential to use..." or "it is a potential to use..." This sense feels more natural describing *attributes* of something, rather than the *possibility* of an action.

Ultimately, given the specific phrase "it is possible to [verb]" and the predicative adjective role, I'm confident that Sense 1 – "capable of happening or existing" – is the correct sense for "possible" in this instance.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: use
Target surface form: use
Context:
If we want to understand how it works, the best thing we can do is to realize that our input is being converted into MathML although it is not necessary to know MathML. I have based the syntax basically on common sense, it should not be hard for anyone. I ve looked closely to maxima and maple s syntax so they look very similar. + - * /: Addition, subtraction, multiplication and division. ^, **: Power, you can use them both. Also it is possible to <t>use</t> the unicode ² characters. Powers are one way to make roots too.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=use%2:34:01:: | definition=put into service; make work or employ for a particular purpose or for its inherent or natural purpose | synonyms=utilize, utilise, apply, employ | examples=use your head!; we only use Spanish at home
2. sense_key=use%2:34:02:: | definition=take or consume (regularly or habitually) | synonyms=habituate | examples=She uses drugs rarely
3. sense_key=use%2:34:00:: | definition=use up, consume fully | synonyms=expend | examples=The legislature expended its time on school questions
4. sense_key=use%2:41:14:: | definition=seek or achieve an end by using to one's advantage | examples=She uses her influential friends to get jobs; The president's wife used her good connections
5. sense_key=use%2:41:04:: | definition=avail oneself to | synonyms=practice, apply | examples=apply a principle; practice a religion
6. sense_key=use%2:41:03:: | definition=habitually do something (use only in the past tense) | examples=She used to call her mother every week but now she calls only occasionally; I used to get sick when I ate in that dining hall

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

reasoning_content:
**Analyzing the Meaning of "Use" in Context**

Okay, so I'm presented with the task of identifying the correct sense of "use" within the sentence: "Also it is possible to <t>use</t> the unicode ² characters." Given my expertise, I'm already mentally sifting through the potential meanings. The provided candidate senses give a good starting point. Let's see...

My first instinct is to think about the action, what is the agent doing with the unicode characters? Is it about employing them for a purpose? I see the possibilities:

*   **Sense 1: use%2:34:01::** "put into service; make work or employ for a particular purpose..." This feels like a strong contender. The example "we only use Spanish at home" is quite relevant, as it describes putting something into action.
*   **Sense 2: use%2:34:02::** "take or consume (regularly or habitually)" - This is completely off the mark. It implies consumption which is irrelevant in this context.
*   **Sense 3: use%2:34:00::** "use up, consume fully" - Again, this isn't relevant, doesn't describe the context.
*   **Sense 4: use%2:41:14::** "seek or achieve an end by using to one's advantage" - This could potentially work if we are exploiting the features of the characters, but the context doesn't indicate an advantage is sought.
*   **Sense 5: use%2:41:04::** "avail oneself to (practice, apply)" - This doesn't seem to fit the bill. Applying is not the same as employing them.
*   **Sense 6: use%2:41:03::** "habitually do something (past tense: used to)" - Clearly the incorrect sense.

Now I'm looking closer at Sense 1, and I think it's the best fit. I can quickly scan the list of synonyms, such as employ or utilize, and the provided example. It fits perfectly! "Put into service" describes exactly what is being done with the unicode characters. So, by eliminating the other senses, my final answer would be that **sense index is 1**.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: power
Target surface form: Powers
Context:
I have based the syntax basically on common sense, it should not be hard for anyone. I ve looked closely to maxima and maple s syntax so they look very similar. + - * /: Addition, subtraction, multiplication and division. ^, **: Power, you can use them both. Also it is possible to use the unicode ² characters. <t>Powers</t> are one way to make roots too. -gt: It s the way to specify the bounded variable in a function.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=power%1:07:00:: | definition=possession of controlling influence | synonyms=powerfulness | examples=the deterrent power of nuclear weapons; the power of his love saved her
2. sense_key=power%1:19:00:: | definition=(physics) the rate of doing work; measured in watts (= joules/second)
3. sense_key=power%1:09:01:: | definition=possession of the qualities (especially mental qualities) required to do something or get something done | synonyms=ability | examples=danger heightened his powers of discrimination
4. sense_key=power%1:26:00:: | definition=(of a government or government official) holding an office means being in power | synonyms=office | examples=being in office already gives a candidate a great advantage; during his first year in office
5. sense_key=power%1:18:00:: | definition=one possessing or exercising power or influence or authority | synonyms=force | examples=the mysterious presence of an evil power; may the force be with you
6. sense_key=power%1:10:00:: | definition=a mathematical notation indicating the number of times a quantity is multiplied by itself | synonyms=exponent, index
7. sense_key=power%1:07:02:: | definition=physical strength | synonyms=might, mightiness
8. sense_key=power%1:14:00:: | definition=a state powerful enough to influence events throughout the world | synonyms=world power, major power, great power, superpower
9. sense_key=power%1:18:01:: | definition=a very wealthy or powerful businessman | synonyms=baron, big businessman, business leader, king, magnate, mogul | examples=an oil baron

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 6}
```

reasoning_content:
**My Analysis of "Powers" in a Mathematical Context**

Okay, the target word is "Powers," and the context is clearly mathematical. My brain immediately starts running through potential senses. Let's see... I'm thinking about the possibilities: the possession of controlling influence, the rate of doing work in physics, general ability, holding an office, influence/authority, and, of course, the mathematical definition, which is a mathematical notation indicating the number of times a quantity is multiplied by itself. There's also physical strength, global influence, and wealthy businessmen, but those aren't hitting the mark.

Given the context of arithmetic operations and the phrasing "Powers are one way to make roots too," it's patently obvious. The sixth candidate, the mathematical sense of "exponent" or "index," is the only logical conclusion. The phrase explicitly links powers to roots, which is a fundamental concept. Fractional powers, like x^(1/2), are indeed a way to express roots. Case closed. The mathematical sense is the winner.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: way
Target surface form: way
Context:
I have based the syntax basically on common sense, it should not be hard for anyone. I ve looked closely to maxima and maple s syntax so they look very similar. + - * /: Addition, subtraction, multiplication and division. ^, **: Power, you can use them both. Also it is possible to use the unicode ² characters. Powers are one <t>way</t> to make roots too. -gt: It s the way to specify the bounded variable in a function.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=way%1:07:01:: | definition=how something is done or how it happens | synonyms=manner, mode, style, fashion | examples=her dignified manner; his rapid manner of talking
2. sense_key=way%1:04:01:: | definition=how a result is obtained or an end is achieved | synonyms=means, agency | examples=a means of control; an example is the best agency of instruction
3. sense_key=way%1:15:00:: | definition=a line leading to a place or point | synonyms=direction | examples=he looked the other direction; didn't know the way home
4. sense_key=way%1:26:00:: | definition=the condition of things generally | examples=that's the way it is; I felt the same way
5. sense_key=way%1:04:00:: | definition=a course of conduct | synonyms=path, way of life | examples=the path of virtue; we went our separate ways
6. sense_key=way%1:06:00:: | definition=any artifact consisting of a road or path affording passage from one place to another | examples=he said he was looking for the way out
7. sense_key=way%1:04:02:: | definition=a journey or passage | examples=they are on the way
8. sense_key=way%1:23:00:: | definition=space for movement | synonyms=room, elbow room | examples=room to pass; make way for
9. sense_key=way%1:07:02:: | definition=the property of distance in general | examples=it's a long way to Moscow; he went a long ways
10. sense_key=way%1:09:00:: | definition=doing as one pleases or chooses | examples=if I had my way
11. sense_key=way%1:09:01:: | definition=a general category of things; used in the expression `in the way of' | examples=they didn't have much in the way of clothing
12. sense_key=way%1:21:00:: | definition=a portion of something divided into shares | examples=they split the loot three ways

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 2}
```

reasoning_content:
**Analyzing the Semantic Nuances of "Way"**

Okay, so the target word is "way" in the sentence "Powers are one way to make roots too." My initial task is to disambiguate its meaning. Given the context "Powers are one <t>way</t> to make roots too. -gt: It s the way to specify the bounded variable in a function," I need to determine the most fitting sense from the candidate list.

Looking at the options, sense 1, "manner, mode, style, fashion (how something is done or how it happens)", and sense 2, "means, agency (how a result is obtained or an end is achieved)," are the front-runners. Sense 3, "direction (a line leading to a place or point)", is clearly irrelevant here.

Let's test sense 2. Rewriting the sentence, "Powers are one means/method to make roots too" seems to fit. The definition, "how a result is obtained or an end is achieved," is spot-on. "One way" is indeed a method or a means of achieving the end result of "making roots." So, "powers" act as a "means" or a "method" of making roots. This aligns perfectly with sense 2, particularly when considering the reference to the "bounded variable in a function". This reinforces the idea of "powers" acting as the "means" or the "method" to achieve the result of making roots. Sense 1 doesn't work; "powers" don't describe the "manner" in which it is done. Therefore, sense 2 is the clear winner here.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: root
Target surface form: roots
Context:
I have based the syntax basically on common sense, it should not be hard for anyone. I ve looked closely to maxima and maple s syntax so they look very similar. + - * /: Addition, subtraction, multiplication and division. ^, **: Power, you can use them both. Also it is possible to use the unicode ² characters. Powers are one way to make <t>roots</t> too. -gt: It s the way to specify the bounded variable in a function.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=root%1:20:00:: | definition=(botany) the usually underground organ that lacks buds or leaves or nodes; absorbs water and mineral salts; usually it anchors the plant to the ground
2. sense_key=root%1:15:00:: | definition=the place where something begins, where it springs into being | synonyms=beginning, origin, rootage, source | examples=the Italian beginning of the Renaissance; Jupiter was the origin of the radiation
3. sense_key=root%1:10:00:: | definition=(linguistics) the form of a word after all affixes are removed | synonyms=root word, base, stem, theme, radical | examples=thematic vowels are part of the stem
4. sense_key=root%1:23:00:: | definition=a number that, when multiplied by itself some number of times, equals a given number
5. sense_key=root%1:14:00:: | definition=the set of values that give a true statement when substituted into an equation | synonyms=solution
6. sense_key=root%1:18:00:: | definition=someone from whom you are descended (but usually more remote than a grandparent) | synonyms=ancestor, ascendant, ascendent, antecedent
7. sense_key=root%1:10:01:: | definition=a simple form inferred as the common basis from which related words in several languages can be derived by linguistic processes | synonyms=etymon
8. sense_key=root%1:08:00:: | definition=the part of a tooth that is embedded in the jaw and serves as support | synonyms=tooth root

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

raw_output:
```json
{"sense_index": 4}
```

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 4}
```

reasoning_content:
**Analyzing the Context of "Roots"**

Okay, the target word is "roots," with the lemma "root." The context "Powers are one way to make roots too" immediately orients me towards a mathematical interpretation, given the reference to powers, which immediately gets me thinking about computational algebra systems (CAS) like Maxima or Maple. The discussion of addition, subtraction, multiplication, division, and especially the power operator "^" and "**," as well as the mention of Unicode superscript characters, reinforces this mathematical programming context. The `-gt` syntax for bounded variables further grounds this in a functional programming or symbolic manipulation environment.

I need to nail down the specific sense of "roots" being used here, so I'm cycling through the possibilities: botany, origin, linguistics, the mathematical nth root (which is the most likely given the context!), root word, solution to an equation, ancestor, etymon, or tooth root.

Given "Powers are one way to make roots too," senses 4 (nth root) and 5 (solution/root of an equation) are the front runners. Specifically, sense 4 is most appropriate. The phrase suggests generating a root using fractional exponents (like x^(1/2) for the square root of x). So, the speaker is referring to the arithmetic operation, where taking fractional powers creates a root. Sense 4 is the clear winner here.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: too
Target surface form: too
Context:
I have based the syntax basically on common sense, it should not be hard for anyone. I ve looked closely to maxima and maple s syntax so they look very similar. + - * /: Addition, subtraction, multiplication and division. ^, **: Power, you can use them both. Also it is possible to use the unicode ² characters. Powers are one way to make roots <t>too</t>. -gt: It s the way to specify the bounded variable in a function.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=too%4:02:00:: | definition=to a degree exceeding normal or proper limits | synonyms=excessively, overly, to a fault | examples=too big
2. sense_key=too%4:02:01:: | definition=in addition | synonyms=besides, also, likewise, as well | examples=he has a Mercedes, too

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 2}
```

reasoning_content:
Okay, here's my interpretation of that thought process, from an expert's perspective:

**Deconstructing "Too" in Context**

Alright, let's break this down. The target word is "too" in that sentence, "Powers are one way to make roots too." My initial thought process involves immediately pulling up the potential senses of "too." We've got the classic two: the sense of "excessively" or "overly" – think "too big" or "too much." Then, there's the additive sense, the sense of "also," "in addition," "besides."

Now, the crucial step: contextualization. I'm taking that sentence, "Powers are one way to make roots too," and mentally substituting each sense. It's almost instant. I try "Powers are one way to make roots excessively." That just doesn't work; it doesn't make any sense, it's not even a valid sentence. You can't make something excessively.

Now, let's try sense two. I immediately try substituting "as well" or "also," which I know is the same thing, "Powers are one way to make roots *as well*." It's instantly clear, that the second sense, the "in addition" or "also" sense is the correct one. The sentence implies that there are other ways, and powers are just an *additional* way. No ambiguity; the meaning is easily understood, once both possible senses have been considered within the given context.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: way
Target surface form: way
Context:
I ve looked closely to maxima and maple s syntax so they look very similar. + - * /: Addition, subtraction, multiplication and division. ^, **: Power, you can use them both. Also it is possible to use the unicode ² characters. Powers are one way to make roots too. -gt: It s the <t>way</t> to specify the bounded variable in a function. (): It is used to specify a higher priority.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=way%1:07:01:: | definition=how something is done or how it happens | synonyms=manner, mode, style, fashion | examples=her dignified manner; his rapid manner of talking
2. sense_key=way%1:04:01:: | definition=how a result is obtained or an end is achieved | synonyms=means, agency | examples=a means of control; an example is the best agency of instruction
3. sense_key=way%1:15:00:: | definition=a line leading to a place or point | synonyms=direction | examples=he looked the other direction; didn't know the way home
4. sense_key=way%1:26:00:: | definition=the condition of things generally | examples=that's the way it is; I felt the same way
5. sense_key=way%1:04:00:: | definition=a course of conduct | synonyms=path, way of life | examples=the path of virtue; we went our separate ways
6. sense_key=way%1:06:00:: | definition=any artifact consisting of a road or path affording passage from one place to another | examples=he said he was looking for the way out
7. sense_key=way%1:04:02:: | definition=a journey or passage | examples=they are on the way
8. sense_key=way%1:23:00:: | definition=space for movement | synonyms=room, elbow room | examples=room to pass; make way for
9. sense_key=way%1:07:02:: | definition=the property of distance in general | examples=it's a long way to Moscow; he went a long ways
10. sense_key=way%1:09:00:: | definition=doing as one pleases or chooses | examples=if I had my way
11. sense_key=way%1:09:01:: | definition=a general category of things; used in the expression `in the way of' | examples=they didn't have much in the way of clothing
12. sense_key=way%1:21:00:: | definition=a portion of something divided into shares | examples=they split the loot three ways

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 2}
```

reasoning_content:
**Analyzing the "Way" Sense in Context**

Okay, so I need to nail down the best sense index for "way" in this snippet: "... -gt: It's the <t>way</t> to specify the bounded variable in a function." My initial approach is to consider each potential sense, keeping in mind the context. I'll go through the candidates and really think about the nuance.

First, I examine the candidate senses. I'm looking for the best fit, in this specific sentence.

*   Sense 1, "how something is done or how it happens" (manner, mode), immediately feels a little off, but I'll keep it in mind.
*   Sense 2, "how a result is obtained or an end is achieved" (means, agency) seems promising. The phrase "to specify the bounded variable" definitely reads like an end goal, or result.
*   The other senses, like "direction," "condition," "path," "road," "journey," "space for movement," "distance," "doing as one pleases," "category," and "portion" appear completely unrelated and can be quickly dismissed.

Focusing on the context, the meaning is essentially: "-gt is the means to specify the bounded variable / how one specifies / the method/means to achieve the result of specifying the bounded variable."

Now, let's zoom in on Sense 2: *way%1:04:01::* with its definition of "how a result is obtained or an end is achieved". The synonyms "means" and "agency" jump out. That perfectly captures the intended meaning. "-gt is the means to specify…"

Sense 1: *way%1:07:01::*, "how something is done or how it happens". I realize "way to do X" frequently aligns with "means" or "method," which is a good indicator.

The true test is substituting synonyms. If I substitute "means" for "way" does the sentence's meaning still hold?

"It's the means to specify the bounded variable." Absolutely.

In contrast, replacing it with something from sense 1, like: "It's the manner to specify the bounded variable," or "it's the mode to specify the bounded variable," feels awkward and doesn't fit at all.

Therefore, the best sense for "way" is clearly *way%1:04:01::* (means, agency).


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: specify
Target surface form: specify
Context:
I ve looked closely to maxima and maple s syntax so they look very similar. + - * /: Addition, subtraction, multiplication and division. ^, **: Power, you can use them both. Also it is possible to use the unicode ² characters. Powers are one way to make roots too. -gt: It s the way to <t>specify</t> the bounded variable in a function. (): It is used to specify a higher priority.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=specify%2:32:03:: | definition=specify as a condition or requirement in a contract or agreement; make an express demand or provision in an agreement | synonyms=stipulate, qualify, condition | examples=The will stipulates that she can live in the house for the rest of her life; The contract stipulates the dates of the payments
2. sense_key=specify%2:32:02:: | definition=decide upon or fix definitely | synonyms=set, determine, define, fix, limit | examples=fix the variables; specify the parameters
3. sense_key=specify%2:42:00:: | definition=determine the essential quality of | synonyms=define, delineate, delimit, delimitate
4. sense_key=specify%2:32:00:: | definition=be specific about | synonyms=particularize, particularise, specialize, specialise | examples=Could you please specify your criticism of my paper?
5. sense_key=specify%2:31:02:: | definition=define clearly | synonyms=pin down, peg down, nail down, narrow down, narrow | examples=I cannot narrow down the rules for this game
6. sense_key=specify%2:31:00:: | definition=design or destine | synonyms=intend, destine, designate | examples=She was intended to become the director
7. sense_key=specify%2:31:05:: | definition=select something or someone for a specific purpose | synonyms=assign, set apart | examples=The teacher assigned him to lead his classmates in the exercise

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
**Analyzing the Meaning of "Specify"**

Okay, let's break down this use of "specify" in the provided context. My immediate focus is on the nuances of the word itself. I'm seeing it used in the phrase "It's the way to *specify* the bounded variable in a function," and the subsequent mention of setting a higher priority.

I've got a list of possible senses, and I'm quickly filtering through them. Sense 1, with its contractual implications ("stipulate, qualify, condition"), feels like a poor fit. Similarly, Sense 3 ("define the essential quality of") and Sense 4 ("be specific about") are too broad here. Sense 6 ("intend, destine") and Sense 7 ("assign, set apart") also seem off-target. And sense 5 ("define clearly") is a bit vague.

That leaves Sense 2: "decide upon or fix definitely." The synonyms provided – "set, determine, define, fix, limit" – are already starting to resonate. Then I see those examples: "fix the variables; specify the parameters." Ah, now we're talking! That perfectly captures the mathematical/programming context I'm inferring from the phrase "bounded variable in a function". This is precisely what's happening when we're writing code or defining a function. We're *fixing* or *setting* those variables, not just defining them in some abstract sense, but giving them concrete values or constraints.

Considering the context, Sense 2 is the most logically congruent interpretation, aligning directly with the core meaning of setting and defining variables, making it the clear winner.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: variable
Target surface form: variable
Context:
I ve looked closely to maxima and maple s syntax so they look very similar. + - * /: Addition, subtraction, multiplication and division. ^, **: Power, you can use them both. Also it is possible to use the unicode ² characters. Powers are one way to make roots too. -gt: It s the way to specify the bounded <t>variable</t> in a function. (): It is used to specify a higher priority.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=variable%1:17:00:: | definition=something that is likely to vary; something that is subject to variation | examples=the weather is one variable to be considered
2. sense_key=variable%1:09:00:: | definition=a quantity that can assume any of a set of values | synonyms=variable quantity
3. sense_key=variable%1:17:01:: | definition=a star that varies noticeably in brightness | synonyms=variable star
4. sense_key=variable%1:10:00:: | definition=a symbol (like x or y) that is used in mathematical or logical expressions to represent a variable quantity

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 4}
```

reasoning_content:
**Analyzing the Meaning of "Variable" in a Technical Context**

Okay, so the target word is "variable," and it's used in a context that strongly suggests mathematical or programming syntax. My initial thought is to quickly consider the potential senses. I've got a few candidates: something subject to variation, a quantity that can vary, a star that varies in brightness, and *a symbol representing a variable quantity*.

The text's surrounding context is key. It's discussing how to specify the "bounded variable" within a function, likely in a system similar to Maxima or Maple. We're talking about syntax: plus, minus, powers, and how you define the variable in a function, like `x -> f(x)`. This points towards formal logic or mathematics.

Now, I'm trying to decide if the word "variable" here refers to the *symbol* itself (like `x` in `x -> f(x)`) or the *quantity* that `x` represents. The phrase "specify the bounded variable in a function" makes me lean towards the symbol. In the context of computer algebra or lambda calculus, that 'x' in the arrow syntax is the symbol.

Let's quickly check WordNet again. Sense 4, the one about the "symbol (like x or y) that is used in mathematical or logical expressions to represent a variable quantity," is looking promising. Sense 2, "a quantity that can assume any of a set of values," is related, but the context is more about the *specification* of the variable.

Thinking about "bound variable" in a mathematical context further solidifies the argument. A bound variable is, essentially, a placeholder symbol in a function's definition. The phrase like "-gt: It s the way to specify the bounded variable in a function" makes the most sense. The user here is specifying the symbol itself, for example 'x' in `x -> x^2`.

Therefore, the best fit here is indeed Sense 4: the symbol. It's the most precise and aligns perfectly with the textual cues and the user's focus on function syntax within this domain.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: function
Target surface form: function
Context:
I ve looked closely to maxima and maple s syntax so they look very similar. + - * /: Addition, subtraction, multiplication and division. ^, **: Power, you can use them both. Also it is possible to use the unicode ² characters. Powers are one way to make roots too. -gt: It s the way to specify the bounded variable in a <t>function</t>. (): It is used to specify a higher priority.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=function%1:24:00:: | definition=(mathematics) a mathematical relation such that each element of a given set (the domain of the function) is associated with an element of another set (the range of the function) | synonyms=mathematical function, single-valued function, map, mapping
2. sense_key=function%1:07:00:: | definition=what something is used for | synonyms=purpose, role, use | examples=the function of an auger is to bore holes; ballet is beautiful but what use is it?
3. sense_key=function%1:04:00:: | definition=the actions and activities assigned to or required or expected of a person or group | synonyms=office, part, role | examples=the function of a teacher; the government must do its part
4. sense_key=function%1:24:01:: | definition=a relation such that one thing is dependent on another | examples=height is a function of age; price is a function of supply and demand
5. sense_key=function%1:14:00:: | definition=a formal or official social gathering or ceremony | examples=it was a black-tie function
6. sense_key=function%1:11:00:: | definition=a vaguely specified social event | synonyms=affair, occasion, social occasion, social function | examples=the party was quite an affair; an occasion arranged to honor the president
7. sense_key=function%1:10:00:: | definition=a set sequence of steps, part of larger computer program | synonyms=routine, subroutine, subprogram, procedure

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

reasoning_content:
**Deconstructing the Meaning of "function"**

Okay, so I'm looking at this word "function," and based on the context, I believe the intended meaning is definitely the mathematical one, not a general procedure. I've been comparing Maxima and Maple syntax, and the "->," which I suspect is a typo for "->," used to specify a bounded variable, is a dead giveaway.

My first instinct was to pull up the candidate senses from my knowledge base. There's the mathematical definition (sense 1), the "what something is used for" sense (sense 2), the role of a person (sense 3), the dependence sense (sense 4), social gatherings (senses 5 and 6) and the computer programming subroutine sense (sense 7). The context strongly suggests this isn't a social event or a general "use" case.

My understanding is that in systems like Maple, the `->` operator is used to define a *mathematical function* (or anonymous function, or mapping, whatever you want to call it). I'm reminded of how we write, for example, `x -> x^2` to define a mapping, and this is where the bound variable is relevant.

So let's compare: Sense 1 is defined as "a mathematical relation such that each element of a given set (the domain of the function) is associated with an element of another set (the range of the function)". It has synonyms like "mathematical function", "mapping," etc. Sense 7 is a "set sequence of steps...part of a larger computer program." That syntax, particularly specifying a bound variable with `->` in a system like Maple, is how you define a mathematical function. In fact, Maple and Maxima are designed for computer algebra and mathematical computation, not general programming.

Given the presence of the `->` and the domain of the systems being discussed, the mathematical function sense (sense 1) is the clear winner here. I'm satisfied that this is correct; that specific use of a mapping is the function being described here.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: use
Target surface form: used
Context:
+ - * /: Addition, subtraction, multiplication and division. ^, **: Power, you can use them both. Also it is possible to use the unicode ² characters. Powers are one way to make roots too. -gt: It s the way to specify the bounded variable in a function. (): It is <t>used</t> to specify a higher priority. abc(params): When the parser finds a function, it checks if abc is an operator.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=use%2:34:01:: | definition=put into service; make work or employ for a particular purpose or for its inherent or natural purpose | synonyms=utilize, utilise, apply, employ | examples=use your head!; we only use Spanish at home
2. sense_key=use%2:34:02:: | definition=take or consume (regularly or habitually) | synonyms=habituate | examples=She uses drugs rarely
3. sense_key=use%2:34:00:: | definition=use up, consume fully | synonyms=expend | examples=The legislature expended its time on school questions
4. sense_key=use%2:41:14:: | definition=seek or achieve an end by using to one's advantage | examples=She uses her influential friends to get jobs; The president's wife used her good connections
5. sense_key=use%2:41:04:: | definition=avail oneself to | synonyms=practice, apply | examples=apply a principle; practice a religion
6. sense_key=use%2:41:03:: | definition=habitually do something (use only in the past tense) | examples=She used to call her mother every week but now she calls only occasionally; I used to get sick when I ate in that dining hall

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

reasoning_content:
**Analyzing the Usage of "Used"**

Okay, let's break this down. The target word is "used," and the context is "It is used to specify a higher priority." My first thought is to run through the possible senses. We've got six candidates to consider, each with its own sense key.

*   **Sense 1:** *use%2:34:01::* - Putting something into service, employing it for a specific purpose. This feels immediately relevant.
*   **Sense 2:** *use%2:34:02::* - Regular or habitual consumption. Not likely here.
*   **Sense 3:** *use%2:34:00::* - Using up or consuming fully. Doesn't fit the context.
*   **Sense 4:** *use%2:41:14::* - Seeking an advantage. No.
*   **Sense 5:** *use%2:41:04::* - Availing oneself of something, applying it. This seems closer, but still not quite right.
*   **Sense 6:** *use%2:41:03::* - Denoting a past habit ("used to"). Not applicable; the construction "is used to" is passive voice here, not the auxiliary verb.

Now, looking back at the original sentence "It is used to specify a higher priority," the meaning leans heavily toward something being *employed* or *put into service* to achieve a specific result. I'm thinking that "employed" or "utilized" is the best fit, and that lines up perfectly with Sense 1.

The other senses are easily dismissed. Sense 6, the "used to" construction, is a red herring. It would require the phrase to read more like "X used to specify..." which isn't the case. Sense 1 provides the exact connotation of purpose, operation and outcome within this particular sentence.
Therefore, Sense 1 (use%2:34:01::) is the correct sense.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: specify
Target surface form: specify
Context:
+ - * /: Addition, subtraction, multiplication and division. ^, **: Power, you can use them both. Also it is possible to use the unicode ² characters. Powers are one way to make roots too. -gt: It s the way to specify the bounded variable in a function. (): It is used to <t>specify</t> a higher priority. abc(params): When the parser finds a function, it checks if abc is an operator.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=specify%2:32:03:: | definition=specify as a condition or requirement in a contract or agreement; make an express demand or provision in an agreement | synonyms=stipulate, qualify, condition | examples=The will stipulates that she can live in the house for the rest of her life; The contract stipulates the dates of the payments
2. sense_key=specify%2:32:02:: | definition=decide upon or fix definitely | synonyms=set, determine, define, fix, limit | examples=fix the variables; specify the parameters
3. sense_key=specify%2:42:00:: | definition=determine the essential quality of | synonyms=define, delineate, delimit, delimitate
4. sense_key=specify%2:32:00:: | definition=be specific about | synonyms=particularize, particularise, specialize, specialise | examples=Could you please specify your criticism of my paper?
5. sense_key=specify%2:31:02:: | definition=define clearly | synonyms=pin down, peg down, nail down, narrow down, narrow | examples=I cannot narrow down the rules for this game
6. sense_key=specify%2:31:00:: | definition=design or destine | synonyms=intend, destine, designate | examples=She was intended to become the director
7. sense_key=specify%2:31:05:: | definition=select something or someone for a specific purpose | synonyms=assign, set apart | examples=The teacher assigned him to lead his classmates in the exercise

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 2}
```

reasoning_content:
**My Analysis of "Specify" in Context**

Okay, so the task is to pinpoint the correct sense of "specify" in the phrase "(): It is used to <t>specify</t> a higher priority." The parentheses immediately signal a technical context, likely mathematical or programming. I need to sift through the potential senses.

Let's see: sense 1, stipulating or qualifying a condition in an agreement, that’s immediately out. Sense 3, determining the essential quality, and sense 4, being specific about something, feel irrelevant to priority. Sense 5, defining clearly, is a little closer but doesn't quite capture it. Sense 6, designating or intending, also seems wrong. Sense 7, assigning something for a specific purpose, initially caught my attention, but it refers to selecting, and feels less relevant.

Now, Sense 2, "decide upon or fix definitely," with synonyms like "set, determine, define, fix, limit," that's the key. The examples given, like "fix the variables; specify the parameters," really resonate here. "Specify a higher priority" is essentially "set/fix a higher priority," which perfectly aligns with the function of parentheses in defining operator precedence in these contexts. I’m leaning strongly towards Sense 2.

To be extra certain, I considered the other senses in WordNet. Sense 7’s definition felt like it was referencing an assignment such as someone taking the lead. In contrast, Sense 2's definition of "decide upon or fix definitely" is directly on target with setting/fixing/determining the priority in mathematics or programming.

Therefore, my final judgement is that Sense 2, with its clear alignment with the notion of *setting* or *fixing* a higher priority, is the most accurate sense of "specify" in this context.