[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: define
Target surface form: define
Context:
(): It is used to specify a higher priority. abc(params): When the parser finds a function, it checks if abc is an operator. If it is, it will be treated as an operator, if it is not, it will be treated as a user function.: =: It is used to define a variable value.?: Piecewise condition definition. Piecewise is the way we can <t>define</t> conditional operations in kalgebra. If we introduce the condition before the? it will use this condition only if it is true, if it finds a? without any condition, it will enter in the last instance.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=define%2:42:00:: | definition=determine the essential quality of | synonyms=specify, delineate, delimit, delimitate
2. sense_key=define%2:32:00:: | definition=give a definition for the meaning of a word | examples=Define `sadness'
3. sense_key=define%2:42:01:: | definition=determine the nature of | examples=What defines a good wine?
4. sense_key=define%2:42:03:: | definition=show the form or outline of | synonyms=delineate | examples=The tree was clearly defined by the light; The camera could define the smallest object
5. sense_key=define%2:32:01:: | definition=decide upon or fix definitely | synonyms=specify, set, determine, fix, limit | examples=fix the variables; specify the parameters

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 5}
```

reasoning_content:
**Defining "Define" in Kalgebra's Conditional Operations**

Okay, so the target word is "define," and I'm thinking about how it applies to setting up conditional operations within Kalgebra. Piecewise functions are the tool for that, I remember. Essentially, I'm thinking about how to *specify* or *set up* these operations and their parameters.

Let me think… the fifth sense of "define" seems to click the most. It's about "deciding upon or fixing definitely" – synonyms like "specify," "set," "determine," "fix," and "limit." That rings a bell, particularly with examples like "fix the variables" or "specify the parameters." Sense 1 ("determine the essential quality of") and Sense 3 ("determine the nature of") are in the mix, but Sense 5 resonates strongly.

We're talking about programming and math, setting things up. We use `= : It is used to define a variable value" and "define conditional operations" here. So, yeah, Sense 5 nails it: we're *specifying the parameters* and *fixing the variables* of our conditional operations. That's the core of what we're trying to achieve with this word in this context. It's a precise fit.


attempt_kind: initial

status: success

[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: conditional
Target surface form: conditional
Context:
(): It is used to specify a higher priority. abc(params): When the parser finds a function, it checks if abc is an operator. If it is, it will be treated as an operator, if it is not, it will be treated as a user function.: =: It is used to define a variable value.?: Piecewise condition definition. Piecewise is the way we can define <t>conditional</t> operations in kalgebra. If we introduce the condition before the? it will use this condition only if it is true, if it finds a? without any condition, it will enter in the last instance.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=conditional%5:00:00:qualified:02 | definition=qualified by reservations
2. sense_key=conditional%3:00:00:: | definition=imposing or depending on or containing a condition | examples=conditional acceptance of the terms; lent conditional support

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

finish_reason: stop

role: assistant

reasoning_content:
**Analyzing the Nuance of "Conditional"**

Okay, so I'm looking at "conditional" in the context of "conditional operations in kalgebra," right? Immediately, the mathematical and programming sense of it pops to mind - the classic if-then scenarios. That's a strong starting point. Now, let's nail down the best definition. Looking at the dictionary definitions, the second sense, "imposing or depending on or containing a condition," it's a perfect fit. It's spot on with mathematical operations that *depend* on a specific state or condition being met before they're executed. The first sense, "qualified by reservations," that's more about stipulations or limits, like "conditional surrender," that's definitely not what we are discussing. Thus, sense 2 is the clear winner here.

type: thinking

service_tier: default

currency: USD


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: operation
Target surface form: operations
Context:
(): It is used to specify a higher priority. abc(params): When the parser finds a function, it checks if abc is an operator. If it is, it will be treated as an operator, if it is not, it will be treated as a user function.: =: It is used to define a variable value.?: Piecewise condition definition. Piecewise is the way we can define conditional <t>operations</t> in kalgebra. If we introduce the condition before the? it will use this condition only if it is true, if it finds a? without any condition, it will enter in the last instance.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=operation%1:26:00:: | definition=the state of being in effect or being operative | examples=that rule is no longer in operation
2. sense_key=operation%1:04:06:: | definition=a business especially one run on a large scale | examples=a large-scale farming operation; a multinational operation
3. sense_key=operation%1:04:03:: | definition=a planned activity involving many people performing various actions | examples=they organized a rescue operation; the biggest police operation in French history
4. sense_key=operation%1:22:00:: | definition=(computer science) data processing in which the result is completely specified by a rule (especially the processing that results from a single instruction) | examples=it can perform millions of operations per second
5. sense_key=operation%1:04:02:: | definition=activity by a military or naval force (as a maneuver or campaign) | synonyms=military operation | examples=it was a joint operation of the navy and air force
6. sense_key=operation%1:04:00:: | definition=a medical procedure involving an incision with instruments; performed to repair damage or arrest disease in a living body | synonyms=surgery, surgical operation, surgical procedure, surgical process | examples=they will schedule the operation as soon as an operating room is available; he died while undergoing surgery
7. sense_key=operation%1:04:05:: | definition=a process or series of acts especially of a practical or mechanical nature involved in a particular form of work | synonyms=procedure | examples=the operations in building a house; certain machine tool operations
8. sense_key=operation%1:22:01:: | definition=process or manner of functioning or operating | synonyms=functioning, performance | examples=the power of its engine determines its operation; the plane's operation in high winds
9. sense_key=operation%1:09:00:: | definition=(psychology) the performance of some composite cognitive activity; an operation that affects mental contents | synonyms=process, cognitive process, mental process, cognitive operation | examples=the process of thinking; the cognitive operation of remembering
10. sense_key=operation%1:04:01:: | definition=(mathematics) calculation by mathematical methods | synonyms=mathematical process, mathematical operation | examples=the problems at the end of the chapter demonstrated the mathematical processes involved in the derivation; they were learning the basic operations of arithmetic
11. sense_key=operation%1:04:07:: | definition=the activity of operating something (a machine or business etc.) | examples=her smooth operation of the vehicle gave us a surprisingly comfortable ride

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

raw_output:
```json
{"sense_index": 10}
```

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 10}
```

reasoning_content:
**Defining "Conditional Operations" in KAlgebra**

Okay, so we're talking about "conditional operations" in *kalgebra*. The context clearly centers around symbols: operators, variables, functions. It's safe to assume "operations" refers to mathematical or computational processes. But which sense applies?

I'm seeing two contenders: Sense 4, the computer science aspect of data processing, and Sense 10, the mathematical calculation angle. KAlgebra evaluates expressions, so is it purely mathematical (Sense 10), or also computational (Sense 4)? "Conditional operations" usually leans toward either mathematics or data processing.

Let's delve deeper. Sense 10 is "calculation by mathematical methods," which is pretty spot on. Sense 4 is "data processing in which the result is completely specified by a rule".

KAlgebra lets you define mathematical functions, so "conditional operations" *must* refer to operations used in creating functions. It's a calculator, so mathematically speaking, Sense 10 is a perfect fit, "the basic operations of arithmetic."

But wait, could Sense 4 be relevant too? Piecewise functions certainly have a computational element.

Ultimately, I'm leaning toward Sense 10. "Mathematical process, mathematical operation". I'm going with 10.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: introduce
Target surface form: introduce
Context:
abc(params): When the parser finds a function, it checks if abc is an operator. If it is, it will be treated as an operator, if it is not, it will be treated as a user function.: =: It is used to define a variable value.?: Piecewise condition definition. Piecewise is the way we can define conditional operations in kalgebra. If we <t>introduce</t> the condition before the? it will use this condition only if it is true, if it finds a? without any condition, it will enter in the last instance. {}: MathML container.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=introduce%2:32:00:: | definition=cause to come to know personally | synonyms=present, acquaint | examples=permit me to acquaint you with my son; introduce the new neighbors to the community
2. sense_key=introduce%2:36:00:: | definition=bring something new to an environment | synonyms=innovate | examples=A new word processor was introduced
3. sense_key=introduce%2:30:03:: | definition=introduce | synonyms=insert, enclose, inclose, stick in, put in | examples=Insert your ticket here
4. sense_key=introduce%2:38:00:: | definition=bring in a new person or object into a familiar environment | synonyms=bring in | examples=He brought in a new judge; The new secretary introduced a nasty rumor
5. sense_key=introduce%2:36:01:: | definition=bring in or establish in a new place or environment | examples=introduce a rule; introduce exotic fruits
6. sense_key=introduce%2:35:00:: | definition=put or introduce into something | synonyms=insert, infix, enter | examples=insert a picture into the text
7. sense_key=introduce%2:32:02:: | definition=bring before the public for the first time, as of an actor, song, etc. | synonyms=bring out
8. sense_key=introduce%2:31:00:: | definition=put before (a body) | examples=introduce legislation
9. sense_key=introduce%2:32:01:: | definition=furnish with a preface or introduction | synonyms=precede, preface, premise | examples=She always precedes her lectures with a joke; He prefaced his lecture with a critical remark about the institution
10. sense_key=introduce%2:30:00:: | definition=be a precursor of | synonyms=inaugurate, usher in | examples=The fall of the Berlin Wall ushered in the post-Cold War period

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

raw_output:
```json
{"sense_index": 6}
```

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 6}
```

reasoning_content:
**Analyzing the Implication of "Introduce" in This Context**

Okay, so the context is, "If we introduce the condition before the [?]...". My initial thought is about what "introduce" really *means* here, specifically how it relates to code or a formula. We need a clear definition to understand the behavior of the system. I see "introduce" as essentially *placing* or *inserting* the condition into the process.

Candidate 6, with its definition of "put or introduce into something" and synonyms like "insert," "infix," and "enter," feels like a strong contender. The examples, such as "insert a picture into the text," reinforce this idea of physically placing something within a larger structure. Candidate 3, while also mentioning "insert," seems broader, and I'm looking for precision.

The synonyms, like 'enter' and 'insert', especially in the example "If we introduce the condition before the ?" -> "If we enter/insert the condition", makes Candidate 6 even more relevant. The act of "entering" or "inserting" a condition into code feels like a good fit with Candidate 6's definition.

I'm confident that Candidate 6 is the best choice here.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: use
Target surface form: use
Context:
abc(params): When the parser finds a function, it checks if abc is an operator. If it is, it will be treated as an operator, if it is not, it will be treated as a user function.: =: It is used to define a variable value.?: Piecewise condition definition. Piecewise is the way we can define conditional operations in kalgebra. If we introduce the condition before the? it will <t>use</t> this condition only if it is true, if it finds a? without any condition, it will enter in the last instance. {}: MathML container.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=use%2:34:01:: | definition=put into service; make work or employ for a particular purpose or for its inherent or natural purpose | synonyms=utilize, utilise, apply, employ | examples=use your head!; we only use Spanish at home
2. sense_key=use%2:34:02:: | definition=take or consume (regularly or habitually) | synonyms=habituate | examples=She uses drugs rarely
3. sense_key=use%2:34:00:: | definition=use up, consume fully | synonyms=expend | examples=The legislature expended its time on school questions
4. sense_key=use%2:41:14:: | definition=seek or achieve an end by using to one's advantage | examples=She uses her influential friends to get jobs; The president's wife used her good connections
5. sense_key=use%2:41:04:: | definition=avail oneself to | synonyms=practice, apply | examples=apply a principle; practice a religion
6. sense_key=use%2:41:03:: | definition=habitually do something (use only in the past tense) | examples=She used to call her mother every week but now she calls only occasionally; I used to get sick when I ate in that dining hall

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

raw_output:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

reasoning_content:
**Analyzing the Meaning of "Use" in Context**

Okay, so the word in question is "use," specifically in this sentence: "If we introduce the condition before the? it will use this condition only if it is true..." My initial thought, given the context, is that the parser or program *employs* or *utilizes* the condition. It's essentially putting the condition into service, making it work.

That fits Sense 1 of the definition perfectly: "put into service; make work or employ for a particular purpose." It aligns precisely with how the condition is being leveraged within the program's logic.

Now, let's just quickly rule out the other senses to confirm this choice. Sense 2, "take or consume drugs," is completely irrelevant. Sense 3, "use up, expend," doesn't quite capture the conditional aspect. While the program is *expending* effort to *evaluate* the condition, the emphasis here is on the conditional's *utility*, not its consumption. Sense 4, "seek an end by using to one's advantage," is also off-base. There's no implication of a manipulative advantage here. Sense 5, "avail oneself to (practice)," also doesn't really work. Finally, Sense 6, "habitually do something," is a non-starter in this technical context.

Therefore, Sense 1 is definitively the most accurate and fitting definition of "use" in this sentence. The program is *employing* the condition as a tool to determine its execution path.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: true
Target surface form: true
Context:
abc(params): When the parser finds a function, it checks if abc is an operator. If it is, it will be treated as an operator, if it is not, it will be treated as a user function.: =: It is used to define a variable value.?: Piecewise condition definition. Piecewise is the way we can define conditional operations in kalgebra. If we introduce the condition before the? it will use this condition only if it is <t>true</t>, if it finds a? without any condition, it will enter in the last instance. {}: MathML container.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=true%3:00:00:: | definition=consistent with fact or reality; not false; ; - B. Russell | examples=the story is true; it is undesirable to believe a proposition when there is no ground whatever for supposing it true
2. sense_key=true%5:00:00:accurate:00 | definition=accurately placed or thrown | synonyms=dead on target | examples=his aim was true; he was dead on target
3. sense_key=true%5:00:02:faithful:00 | definition=devoted (sometimes fanatically) to a cause or concept or truth | examples=true believers bonded together against all who disagreed with them
4. sense_key=true%3:00:04:: | definition=expressing or given to expressing the truth | synonyms=truthful | examples=a true statement; gave truthful testimony
5. sense_key=true%5:00:00:typical:00 | definition=conforming to definitive criteria | examples=the horseshoe crab is not a true crab; Pythagoras was the first true mathematician
6. sense_key=true%5:00:00:trustworthy:00 | definition=worthy of being depended on | synonyms=dependable, honest, reliable | examples=a dependable worker; an honest working stiff
7. sense_key=true%5:00:00:sincere:00 | definition=not pretended; sincerely felt or expressed | synonyms=genuine, unfeigned | examples=genuine emotion; her interest in people was unfeigned
8. sense_key=true%5:00:00:real:02 | definition=rightly so called | examples=true courage; a spirit which true men have always admired
9. sense_key=true%5:00:00:geographic:00 | definition=determined with reference to the earth's axis rather than the magnetic poles | examples=true north is geographic north
10. sense_key=true%5:00:00:legitimate:00 | definition=having a legally established claim | synonyms=lawful, rightful | examples=the legitimate heir; the true and lawful king
11. sense_key=true%5:00:00:harmonious:00 | definition=in tune; accurate in pitch | synonyms=on-key | examples=a true note
12. sense_key=true%5:00:00:even:01 | definition=accurately fitted; level | synonyms=straight | examples=the window frame isn't quite true

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

reasoning_content:
**My Analysis of "True" in a Conditional Statement**

Okay, so the prompt is about the word "true" within a programming or mathematical context, specifically within a conditional statement. The phrase is something like "if we introduce the condition before the [something, like a function call or a block of code], it will use this condition only if it is <true>." Makes perfect sense.

My immediate thought is, in this context, "true" is undoubtedly referring to a boolean value. We're not talking about some philosophical truth or a metaphorical truth. It’s a very concrete, digital "true". We’re evaluating a condition—a statement that can be either valid or invalid—and we're interested in the case where it's *valid*.

Therefore, the appropriate definition of "true" here is the first sense: "consistent with fact or reality; not false." It represents a state where the condition being evaluated holds and is logically valid within the code. All other senses are clearly irrelevant for this context. We're dealing with strict boolean logic.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: find
Target surface form: finds
Context:
abc(params): When the parser finds a function, it checks if abc is an operator. If it is, it will be treated as an operator, if it is not, it will be treated as a user function.: =: It is used to define a variable value.?: Piecewise condition definition. Piecewise is the way we can define conditional operations in kalgebra. If we introduce the condition before the? it will use this condition only if it is true, if it <t>finds</t> a? without any condition, it will enter in the last instance. {}: MathML container.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=find%2:40:02:: | definition=come upon, as if by accident; meet with | synonyms=happen, chance, bump, encounter | examples=We find this idea in Plato; I happened upon the most wonderful bakery not very far from here
2. sense_key=find%2:39:02:: | definition=discover or determine the existence, presence, or fact of | synonyms=detect, observe, discover, notice | examples=She detected high levels of lead in her drinking water; We found traces of lead in the paint
3. sense_key=find%2:40:00:: | definition=come upon after searching; find the location of something that was missed or lost | synonyms=regain | examples=Did you find your glasses?; I cannot find my gloves!
4. sense_key=find%2:32:00:: | definition=establish after a calculation, investigation, experiment, survey, or study | synonyms=determine, find out, ascertain | examples=find the product of two numbers; The physicist who found the elusive particle won the Nobel Prize
5. sense_key=find%2:31:10:: | definition=come to believe on the basis of emotion, intuitions, or indefinite grounds | synonyms=feel | examples=I feel that he doesn't like me; I find him to be obnoxious
6. sense_key=find%2:39:01:: | definition=perceive or be contemporaneous with | synonyms=witness, see | examples=We found Republicans winning the offices; You'll see a lot of cheating in this school
7. sense_key=find%2:40:01:: | definition=get something or somebody for a specific purpose | synonyms=line up, get hold, come up | examples=I found this gadget that will serve as a bottle opener; I got hold of these tools to fix our plumbing
8. sense_key=find%2:36:00:: | definition=make a discovery, make a new finding | synonyms=discover | examples=Roentgen discovered X-rays; Physicists believe they found a new elementary particle
9. sense_key=find%2:31:09:: | definition=make a discovery | synonyms=discover | examples=She found that he had lied to her; The story is false, so far as I can discover
10. sense_key=find%2:40:03:: | definition=obtain through effort or management | examples=She found the time and energy to take care of her aging parents; We found the money to send our sons to college
11. sense_key=find%2:32:01:: | definition=decide on and make a declaration about | synonyms=rule | examples=find someone guilty
12. sense_key=find%2:30:00:: | definition=receive a specified treatment (abstract) | synonyms=receive, get, obtain, incur | examples=These aspects of civilization do not find expression or receive an interpretation; His movie received a good review
13. sense_key=find%2:39:05:: | definition=perceive oneself to be in a certain condition or place | examples=I found myself in a difficult situation; When he woke up, he found himself in a hospital room
14. sense_key=find%2:40:15:: | definition=get or find back; recover the use of | synonyms=recover, retrieve, regain | examples=She regained control of herself; She found her voice and replied quickly
15. sense_key=find%2:38:10:: | definition=succeed in reaching; arrive at | examples=The arrow found its mark
16. sense_key=find%2:30:13:: | definition=accept and make use of one's personality, abilities, and situation | synonyms=find oneself | examples=My son went to Berkeley to find himself

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

reasoning_content:
**Choosing the Right Verb for the Parser's Action**

Okay, so I'm thinking about the most precise way to describe what a parser does when it comes across a character, specifically the '?' symbol, in the text it's processing. The phrase "if it finds a ? without any condition..." is the key. My initial instinct was to consider options like "come upon" or "meet with", and these are leading me towards the right solution.

I started by considering "detect" or "observe," which are strong contenders, especially since a parser is, essentially, *discovering* something. I even considered how one might "detect high levels of lead" or "find traces of lead". But then, I thought about the context: "When the parser encounters a function..." and that feels more natural.

Then I considered the example "We find this idea in Plato," and realized this fits in with encountering the text. It's more of a sense of *encountering* the symbol. Sense 1 is "come upon, as if by accident; meet with," and that is what is happening here.

So, I circled back and considered "detect, observe, discover, notice," but these seem a bit too clinical. A parser *encounters* characters, almost like a chance meeting. It isn't necessarily a deliberate act of discovery.

The use of the word "find" in the phrase *finding* a token in a string is usually *encountering* it. I'm leaning towards the first definition, which aligns more closely with "encounter". It's not necessarily "detecting" in a purely analytical sense, even though that's what's happening.

Ultimately, although "find" could be considered in both senses, particularly since *finding* in a string can mean "detecting the presence of", but I am now convinced that the best fit is "encounter". I am selecting the first sense, because it is more apt to say the parser encounters the symbol. It's a slightly more casual, less deliberate action, fitting with how a parser steps through text.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: instance
Target surface form: instance
Context:
abc(params): When the parser finds a function, it checks if abc is an operator. If it is, it will be treated as an operator, if it is not, it will be treated as a user function.: =: It is used to define a variable value.?: Piecewise condition definition. Piecewise is the way we can define conditional operations in kalgebra. If we introduce the condition before the? it will use this condition only if it is true, if it finds a? without any condition, it will enter in the last <t>instance</t>. {}: MathML container.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=instance%1:11:00:: | definition=an occurrence of something | synonyms=case, example | examples=it was a case of bad judgment; another instance occurred yesterday
2. sense_key=instance%1:09:00:: | definition=an item of information that is typical of a class or group | synonyms=example, illustration, representative | examples=this patient provides a typical example of the syndrome; there is an example on page 10

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

raw_output:
```json
{
  "sense_index": 1
}
```

content:
```json
{
  "sense_index": 1
}
```

reasoning_content:
**My Analysis of "Instance" in This Context**

Okay, so the phrase is "if it finds a? without any condition, it will enter in the last instance." My initial thought is that "instance" here likely refers to a fallback or the final step in a process, almost like a conditional branch. The phrase "in the last instance" really solidifies this. It's not a generic usage.

Now, let's break down the word itself. I'm seeing two key senses in my mind. Firstly, an "instance" can be an *occurrence* of something - a specific case or example. Think "a case of bad judgment; another instance occurred yesterday." Then, secondly, an "instance" can be an item of information that's typical of a class or group, a representative example.

Given the context, the first sense – *occurrence* – really resonates. "In the last instance" is clearly idiomatic and speaks directly to a final case, the last time a condition is met. So, the meaning of "instance" here leans towards "the last case" or "the fallback situation". It's not about providing a representative example but rather about the ultimate occurrence of a specific scenario.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: use
Target surface form: used
Context:
: =: It is used to define a variable value.?: Piecewise condition definition. Piecewise is the way we can define conditional operations in kalgebra. If we introduce the condition before the? it will use this condition only if it is true, if it finds a? without any condition, it will enter in the last instance. {}: MathML container. It can be <t>used</t> to define a container. Mainly useful for working with piecewise.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=use%2:34:01:: | definition=put into service; make work or employ for a particular purpose or for its inherent or natural purpose | synonyms=utilize, utilise, apply, employ | examples=use your head!; we only use Spanish at home
2. sense_key=use%2:34:02:: | definition=take or consume (regularly or habitually) | synonyms=habituate | examples=She uses drugs rarely
3. sense_key=use%2:34:00:: | definition=use up, consume fully | synonyms=expend | examples=The legislature expended its time on school questions
4. sense_key=use%2:41:14:: | definition=seek or achieve an end by using to one's advantage | examples=She uses her influential friends to get jobs; The president's wife used her good connections
5. sense_key=use%2:41:04:: | definition=avail oneself to | synonyms=practice, apply | examples=apply a principle; practice a religion
6. sense_key=use%2:41:03:: | definition=habitually do something (use only in the past tense) | examples=She used to call her mother every week but now she calls only occasionally; I used to get sick when I ate in that dining hall

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

reasoning_content:
**Analyzing the Meaning of "Used"**

Okay, so the target word is "used," and its lemma is "use." The context is something about a MathML container and its purpose. My brain immediately jumps to the idea of *employment* or *utilization* – that the container is being *employed* or *utilized* to serve a specific function, in this case, definition. This aligns perfectly with the first sense of "use" in my mental lexicon: "put into service; make work or employ for a particular purpose." That seems like the most likely candidate. I'm thinking synonyms like "utilize," "apply," or "employ."

Let me just quickly run through the other possibilities, just to be sure. Sense two is about consuming drugs, that's definitely not it. Sense three, using something up or expending it, seems wrong too. Sense four, to exploit for one's advantage? Definitely not. Then, sense five: practicing a religion is obviously incorrect here. And finally, sense six, habitually doing something in the past? No, that doesn't fit the context at all.

So yeah, sense one is the only sensible option. It's the most straightforward and fits the context perfectly.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: define
Target surface form: define
Context:
: =: It is used to define a variable value.?: Piecewise condition definition. Piecewise is the way we can define conditional operations in kalgebra. If we introduce the condition before the? it will use this condition only if it is true, if it finds a? without any condition, it will enter in the last instance. {}: MathML container. It can be used to <t>define</t> a container. Mainly useful for working with piecewise.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=define%2:42:00:: | definition=determine the essential quality of | synonyms=specify, delineate, delimit, delimitate
2. sense_key=define%2:32:00:: | definition=give a definition for the meaning of a word | examples=Define `sadness'
3. sense_key=define%2:42:01:: | definition=determine the nature of | examples=What defines a good wine?
4. sense_key=define%2:42:03:: | definition=show the form or outline of | synonyms=delineate | examples=The tree was clearly defined by the light; The camera could define the smallest object
5. sense_key=define%2:32:01:: | definition=decide upon or fix definitely | synonyms=specify, set, determine, fix, limit | examples=fix the variables; specify the parameters

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

raw_output:
```json
{"sense_index": 5}
```

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 5}
```

reasoning_content:
Okay, let me break this down.

**Defining a Container in *kalgebra***

Right, so we're talking about *defining* something in kalgebra, just like we'd define a variable's value or set up a conditional statement. It's about pinning something down, fixing it in place – the core of programming and mathematical definitions. We need a precise term, something that captures this idea of establishing a parameter, specifying a configuration.

Candidate 5, "define%2:32:01:: | decide upon or fix definitely | specify, set, determine, fix, limit | fix the variables; specify the parameters," is spot-on. It's *exactly* what we need for "define a container" or "define a variable value." The language is clear; it encompasses the sense of definitively setting something, whether it be container or variable. This encapsulates the intent of the action. This is the definition.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: useful
Target surface form: useful
Context:
?: Piecewise condition definition. Piecewise is the way we can define conditional operations in kalgebra. If we introduce the condition before the? it will use this condition only if it is true, if it finds a? without any condition, it will enter in the last instance. {}: MathML container. It can be used to define a container. Mainly <t>useful</t> for working with piecewise. Now you could ask me, why should the user mind about MathML?

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=useful%3:00:00:: | definition=being of use or service | synonyms=utile | examples=the girl felt motherly and useful; a useful job
2. sense_key=useful%5:00:00:functional:00 | definition=having a useful function | synonyms=utilitarian | examples=utilitarian steel tables

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

reasoning_content:
**Deconstructing the Nuances of "Useful" in MathML**

Okay, so I'm thinking about how we're using "useful" here, specifically in relation to MathML and piecewise functions. The phrase is "Mainly useful for working with piecewise." Immediately, my mind jumps to the dictionary definitions. We have two main senses of "useful" here.

Sense 1: *being of use or service*. That's the core meaning, the general adjective. We're talking about the MathML container *serving a purpose* in the context of piecewise functions. This seems like a good fit, right? The container's utility is about *what* it can do.

Then we have Sense 2: *having a useful function*. This leans more towards "utilitarian," more about practicality than aesthetics. Hmmm, is a *software feature* truly "utilitarian" in the same way a tool might be? "Useful for working" definitely aligns with the *service* aspect more than simply a functional application. So, comparing the nuances of the two definitions, I think Sense 1 works best for describing MathML's capabilities here. It's about being of service to work with piecewise functions, not just providing a functional application.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: work
Target surface form: working
Context:
?: Piecewise condition definition. Piecewise is the way we can define conditional operations in kalgebra. If we introduce the condition before the? it will use this condition only if it is true, if it finds a? without any condition, it will enter in the last instance. {}: MathML container. It can be used to define a container. Mainly useful for <t>working</t> with piecewise. Now you could ask me, why should the user mind about MathML?

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=work%2:41:02:: | definition=exert oneself by doing mental or physical work for a purpose or out of necessity | examples=I will work hard to improve my grades; she worked hard for better living conditions for the poor
2. sense_key=work%2:41:00:: | definition=be employed | synonyms=do work | examples=Is your husband working again?; My wife never worked
3. sense_key=work%2:41:03:: | definition=have an effect or outcome; often the one desired or expected | synonyms=act | examples=The voting process doesn't work as well as people thought; How does your idea work in practice?
4. sense_key=work%2:35:02:: | definition=perform as expected when applied | synonyms=function, operate, go, run | examples=The washing machine won't go unless it's plugged in; Does this old car still run well?
5. sense_key=work%2:36:00:: | definition=shape, form, or improve a material | synonyms=work on, process | examples=work stone into tools; process iron
6. sense_key=work%2:29:00:: | definition=give a workout to | synonyms=exercise, work out | examples=Some parents exercise their infants; My personal trainer works me hard
7. sense_key=work%2:38:00:: | definition=proceed along a path | synonyms=make | examples=work one's way through the crowd; make one's way into the forest
8. sense_key=work%2:41:04:: | definition=operate in a certain place, area, or specialty | examples=She works the night clubs; The salesman works the Midwest
9. sense_key=work%2:41:05:: | definition=proceed towards a goal or along a path or through an activity | examples=work your way through every problem or task; She was working on her second martini when the guests arrived
10. sense_key=work%2:38:02:: | definition=move in an agitated manner | examples=His fingers worked with tension
11. sense_key=work%2:36:01:: | definition=cause to happen or to occur as a consequence | synonyms=bring, play, wreak, make for | examples=I cannot work a miracle; wreak havoc
12. sense_key=work%2:41:01:: | definition=cause to work | synonyms=put to work | examples=he is working his servants hard
13. sense_key=work%2:36:09:: | definition=prepare for crops | synonyms=cultivate, crop | examples=Work the soil; cultivate the land
14. sense_key=work%2:42:10:: | definition=behave in a certain way when handled | examples=This dough does not work easily; The soft metal works well
15. sense_key=work%2:41:10:: | definition=have and exert influence or effect | synonyms=influence, act upon | examples=The artist's work influenced the young painter; She worked on her friends to support the political candidate
16. sense_key=work%2:41:11:: | definition=operate in or through | examples=Work the phones
17. sense_key=work%2:41:12:: | definition=cause to operate or function | examples=This pilot works the controls; Can you work an electric drill?
18. sense_key=work%2:39:10:: | definition=provoke or excite | examples=The rock musician worked the crowd of young girls into a frenzy
19. sense_key=work%2:37:10:: | definition=gratify and charm, usually in order to influence | examples=the political candidate worked the crowds
20. sense_key=work%2:36:12:: | definition=make something, usually for a specific function | synonyms=shape, form, mold, mould, forge | examples=She molded the rice balls carefully; Form cylinders from the dough
21. sense_key=work%2:35:14:: | definition=move into or onto | examples=work the raisins into the dough; the student worked a few jokes into his presentation
22. sense_key=work%2:35:00:: | definition=make uniform | synonyms=knead | examples=knead dough; work the clay until it is soft
23. sense_key=work%2:34:10:: | definition=use or manipulate to one's advantage | synonyms=exploit | examples=He exploit the new taxation system; She knows how to work the system
24. sense_key=work%2:31:13:: | definition=find the solution to (a problem or question) or understand the meaning of | synonyms=solve, work out, figure out, puzzle out, lick | examples=did you solve the problem?; Work out your problems with the boss
25. sense_key=work%2:30:14:: | definition=cause to undergo fermentation | synonyms=ferment | examples=We ferment the grapes for a very long time to achieve high alcohol content; The vintner worked the wine in big oak vats
26. sense_key=work%2:30:13:: | definition=go sour or spoil | synonyms=sour, turn, ferment | examples=The milk has soured; The wine worked
27. sense_key=work%2:30:10:: | definition=arrive at a certain condition through repeated motion | examples=The stitches of the hem worked loose after she wore the skirt many times

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

reasoning_content:
**My Interpretation of "Working" in This Context**

Okay, so the target word is "working," and the context is "Mainly useful for working with piecewise" within the kalgebra environment. My mind immediately jumps to the implication of *doing* something, mentally or physically, to achieve a task. Thinking about it, "working with" something means the application of effort or the performance of a task, where the task involves the thing in question.

My first instinct goes to sense 1, the most general definition: "exert oneself by doing mental or physical work for a purpose or out of necessity". That feels right, but I want to be thorough. I consider if maybe sense 9 is better ("proceed towards a goal or along a path or through an activity"), but it feels less direct here. "Working on" implies activity, and in this context it is clear that working on this has an implication of sense 1. Also, sense 1 is usually the first definition for "working with".

Could it be sense 4, where "perform as expected when applied"? No, not directly. That would be applicable if a thing *was* working, but it isn't an agent. I'm focusing on the *act* of "working with piecewise," not that piecewise itself is working. So the act of "working with piecewise" means the act of working with the concept of piecewise, and sense 1 fits best here.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: now
Target surface form: Now
Context:
Piecewise is the way we can define conditional operations in kalgebra. If we introduce the condition before the? it will use this condition only if it is true, if it finds a? without any condition, it will enter in the last instance. {}: MathML container. It can be used to define a container. Mainly useful for working with piecewise. <t>Now</t> you could ask me, why should the user mind about MathML? That s easy. With this, we can operate with functions like cos(), sin(), any other trigonometric functions, sum () or product ().

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=now%4:02:05:: | definition=in the historical present; at this point in the narration of a series of past events | examples=President Kennedy now calls in the National Guard; Washington now decides to cross the Delaware
2. sense_key=now%4:02:00:: | definition=in these times; - Nancy Mitford | synonyms=nowadays, today | examples=it is solely by their language that the upper classes nowadays are distinguished; we now rarely see horse-drawn vehicles on city streets
3. sense_key=now%4:02:02:: | definition=used to preface a command or reproof or request | examples=now hear this!; now pay attention
4. sense_key=now%4:02:04:: | definition=at the present moment | synonyms=at present | examples=goods now on sale; the now-aging dictator
5. sense_key=now%4:02:01:: | definition=without delay or hesitation; with no time intervening | synonyms=immediately, instantly, straightaway, straight off, directly, right away | examples=he answered immediately; found an answer straightaway
6. sense_key=now%4:02:07:: | definition=(prefatory or transitional) indicates a change of subject or activity | examples=Now the next problem is...
7. sense_key=now%4:02:06:: | definition=in the immediate past | examples=told me just now

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 6}
```

reasoning_content:
**My Analysis of "Now" in Context**

Okay, so I'm looking at this sentence: "Now you could ask me, why should the user mind about MathML?" The word "Now" here really jumps out. I'm thinking, where does it *fit* in this explanation of Kalgebra and MathML? I've just finished laying out the previous concept, and this sentence signals a shift. It's a clear transition to a likely question the user might have, a bridge to a different facet of the discussion.

Thinking about the various definitions of "now," sense 6 feels spot-on: "(prefatory or transitional) indicates a change of subject or activity." That perfectly captures the function of "Now" here. It's like saying, "Okay, we've covered that, *now* let's move on to something else, specifically, a question you might have based on the previous information." The example given, "Now the next problem is...", is a textbook match. It's a smooth segue, and that's precisely how the author is using the word.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: ask
Target surface form: ask
Context:
Piecewise is the way we can define conditional operations in kalgebra. If we introduce the condition before the? it will use this condition only if it is true, if it finds a? without any condition, it will enter in the last instance. {}: MathML container. It can be used to define a container. Mainly useful for working with piecewise. Now you could <t>ask</t> me, why should the user mind about MathML? That s easy. With this, we can operate with functions like cos(), sin(), any other trigonometric functions, sum () or product ().

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=ask%2:32:00:: | definition=inquire about | synonyms=inquire, enquire | examples=I asked about their special today; He had to ask directions several times
2. sense_key=ask%2:32:01:: | definition=make a request or demand for something to somebody | examples=She asked him for a loan
3. sense_key=ask%2:32:02:: | definition=direct or put; seek an answer to | examples=ask a question
4. sense_key=ask%2:32:05:: | definition=consider obligatory; request and expect | synonyms=require, expect | examples=We require our secretary to be on time; Aren't we asking too much of these children?
5. sense_key=ask%2:32:04:: | definition=address a question to and expect an answer from | examples=Ask your teacher about trigonometry; The children asked me about their dead grandmother
6. sense_key=ask%2:42:00:: | definition=require as useful, just, or proper | synonyms=necessitate, postulate, need, require, take, involve | examples=It takes nerve to do what she did; success usually requires hard work
7. sense_key=ask%2:32:09:: | definition=require or ask for as a price or condition | examples=He is asking $200 for the table; The kidnappers are asking a million dollars in return for the release of their hostage

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 5}
```

reasoning_content:
**Deconstructing the Verb "Ask"**

Okay, so the target word is "ask" in that sentence: "Now you could ask me, why should the user mind about MathML?" I'm anticipating a reader's question here. The speaker is essentially saying they expect a response. Now, let's break down the senses of "ask". We have:

1.  Inquire about
2.  Make a request
3.  Direct or put; seek an answer to (ask a question)
4.  Consider obligatory
5.  Address a question to and expect an answer from (like "Ask your teacher..." or "The children asked me about...")
6.  Require as useful
7.  Require or ask for a price

Alright, let's start with sense 3, "direct or put; seek an answer to (ask a question)." The direct object of "ask" is "me," so really, this points more towards "address a question to" which is similar to sense 5.

Hang on... with "ask me, why should..." the direct object is indeed "me" (the person who's being asked) and the question is "why should..." That feels right, like sense 5: "address a question to and expect an answer from," with examples like "Ask your teacher about... The children asked me about...".

Sense 1, "inquire about," is a contender but sense 5 really nails the "ask [person] [question]" structure. Let's make sure sense 5 is still the strongest contender.

"Now you could ask me..." Yeah, it's clear: "address a question to" - perfectly. Sense 5 it is! The structure aligns perfectly with it.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: user
Target surface form: user
Context:
Piecewise is the way we can define conditional operations in kalgebra. If we introduce the condition before the? it will use this condition only if it is true, if it finds a? without any condition, it will enter in the last instance. {}: MathML container. It can be used to define a container. Mainly useful for working with piecewise. Now you could ask me, why should the <t>user</t> mind about MathML? That s easy. With this, we can operate with functions like cos(), sin(), any other trigonometric functions, sum () or product ().

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=user%1:18:00:: | definition=a person who makes use of a thing; someone who uses or employs something
2. sense_key=user%1:18:01:: | definition=a person who uses something or someone selfishly or unethically | synonyms=exploiter
3. sense_key=user%1:18:02:: | definition=a person who takes drugs | synonyms=drug user, substance abuser

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
**My Interpretation of "User" in this Context**

Okay, so we're talking about software, specifically *kalgebra*, and MathML. We have someone operating functions within this framework. My mind immediately goes to how "user" is being employed here. It's crucial to pin this down, given the word's potential baggage.

Let's break down the potential senses. The first, and most straightforward, is the one that's clearly applicable here: the **"user" as a consumer or operator of a tool**. This aligns perfectly with the context of software and someone *using* it, perhaps entering functions or interpreting output. It’s the intended definition.

I'm dismissing the other senses – the exploitative or the substance-dependent ones – as irrelevant to this mathematical computing environment. The focus is on interaction, functionality, and employing the capabilities of the software. I can confidently assume we're dealing with Sense 1.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: easy
Target surface form: easy
Context:
If we introduce the condition before the? it will use this condition only if it is true, if it finds a? without any condition, it will enter in the last instance. {}: MathML container. It can be used to define a container. Mainly useful for working with piecewise. Now you could ask me, why should the user mind about MathML? That s <t>easy</t>. With this, we can operate with functions like cos(), sin(), any other trigonometric functions, sum () or product (). It does not matter what kind it is.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=easy%3:00:01:: | definition=posing no difficulty; requiring little effort | examples=an easy job; an easy problem
2. sense_key=easy%5:00:00:unhurried:00 | definition=not hurried or forced | synonyms=easygoing, leisurely | examples=an easy walk around the block; at a leisurely (or easygoing) pace
3. sense_key=easy%3:00:02:: | definition=free from worry or anxiety | examples=knowing that I had done my best, my mind was easy; an easy good-natured manner
4. sense_key=easy%5:00:00:pleasing:00 | definition=affording pleasure | examples=easy good looks
5. sense_key=easy%5:00:00:light:08 | definition=having little impact | synonyms=gentle, soft | examples=an easy pat on the shoulder; gentle rain
6. sense_key=easy%5:00:00:impressionable:00 | definition=readily exploited or tricked | examples=an easy victim; an easy mark
7. sense_key=easy%5:00:00:rich:00 | definition=in fortunate circumstances financially; moderately rich | synonyms=comfortable, prosperous, well-fixed, well-heeled, well-off, well-situated | examples=they were comfortable or even wealthy by some standards; easy living
8. sense_key=easy%5:00:00:gradual:02 | definition=marked by moderate steepness | synonyms=gentle | examples=an easy climb; a gentle slope
9. sense_key=easy%5:00:00:comfortable:00 | definition=affording comfort | examples=soft light that was easy on the eyes
10. sense_key=easy%5:00:00:unchaste:00 | definition=casual and unrestrained in sexual behavior | synonyms=light, loose, promiscuous, sluttish, wanton | examples=her easy virtue; he was told to avoid loose (or light) women
11. sense_key=easy%5:00:00:available:00 | definition=less in demand and therefore readily obtainable | examples=commodities are easy this quarter
12. sense_key=easy%5:00:00:abundant:00 | definition=obtained with little effort or sacrifice, often obtained illegally | examples=easy money

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

reasoning_content:
**My Interpretation of "Easy"**

Okay, so the word we're focusing on is "easy," specifically in that context, "why should the user mind about MathML? That's easy."  My immediate interpretation is that it signifies the answer is straightforward and simple. The question of user concern about MathML is a non-issue, readily explained. It’s not complex, it doesn't present any significant hurdle in understanding or explanation. I'm going with Sense 1 here: "posing no difficulty; requiring little effort." That's the most appropriate fit for the given sentence.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: function
Target surface form: functions
Context:
If we introduce the condition before the? it will use this condition only if it is true, if it finds a? without any condition, it will enter in the last instance. {}: MathML container. It can be used to define a container. Mainly useful for working with piecewise. Now you could ask me, why should the user mind about MathML? That s easy. With this, we can operate with <t>functions</t> like cos(), sin(), any other trigonometric functions, sum () or product (). It does not matter what kind it is.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=function%1:24:00:: | definition=(mathematics) a mathematical relation such that each element of a given set (the domain of the function) is associated with an element of another set (the range of the function) | synonyms=mathematical function, single-valued function, map, mapping
2. sense_key=function%1:07:00:: | definition=what something is used for | synonyms=purpose, role, use | examples=the function of an auger is to bore holes; ballet is beautiful but what use is it?
3. sense_key=function%1:04:00:: | definition=the actions and activities assigned to or required or expected of a person or group | synonyms=office, part, role | examples=the function of a teacher; the government must do its part
4. sense_key=function%1:24:01:: | definition=a relation such that one thing is dependent on another | examples=height is a function of age; price is a function of supply and demand
5. sense_key=function%1:14:00:: | definition=a formal or official social gathering or ceremony | examples=it was a black-tie function
6. sense_key=function%1:11:00:: | definition=a vaguely specified social event | synonyms=affair, occasion, social occasion, social function | examples=the party was quite an affair; an occasion arranged to honor the president
7. sense_key=function%1:10:00:: | definition=a set sequence of steps, part of larger computer program | synonyms=routine, subroutine, subprogram, procedure

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

reasoning_content:
**Analyzing the Meaning of "Functions"**

Okay, so the task is to pinpoint the specific meaning of "functions" within this context. The context itself, mentioning things like `cos()`, `sin()`, "trigonometric functions", `sum()`, and `product()`, clearly screams *mathematics*.

My initial thought is to compare the available senses. Let's see: sense 1, "a mathematical relation," perfectly lines up with the idea of a "mathematical function." The synonyms reinforce this. Then there's sense 7, "a set sequence of steps, part of a larger computer program," which also seems feasible, given those parentheses we see.

The clincher, however, is the phrase "trigonometric functions." While you could argue that `cos()` and `sin()` are *implemented* as subroutines in programming, the context as a whole—especially "trigonometric functions" and the mention of "MathML"— strongly suggests mathematical functions are the intended meaning. "MathML" is after all a markup language designed for math.

The parentheses *are* throwing me a bit, as these often designate subroutines in a computer program, but when they're coupled with "trigonometric functions" it's really pointing to the underlying mathematical concept. Therefore, I believe sense 1 is the most appropriate.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: cos
Target surface form: cos()
Context:
If we introduce the condition before the? it will use this condition only if it is true, if it finds a? without any condition, it will enter in the last instance. {}: MathML container. It can be used to define a container. Mainly useful for working with piecewise. Now you could ask me, why should the user mind about MathML? That s easy. With this, we can operate with functions like <t>cos()</t>, sin(), any other trigonometric functions, sum () or product (). It does not matter what kind it is.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=cos%1:24:00:: | definition=ratio of the adjacent side to the hypotenuse of a right-angled triangle | synonyms=cosine
2. sense_key=cos%1:13:00:: | definition=lettuce with long dark-green leaves in a loosely packed elongated head | synonyms=cos lettuce, romaine, romaine lettuce
3. sense_key=carbon_monoxide%1:27:00:: | definition=an odorless very poisonous gas that is a product of incomplete combustion of carbon | synonyms=carbon monoxide, carbon monoxide gas, CO
4. sense_key=cobalt%1:27:00:: | definition=a hard ferromagnetic silver-white bivalent or trivalent metallic element; a trace element in plant and animal nutrition | synonyms=cobalt, Co, atomic number 27
5. sense_key=conscientious_objector%1:18:00:: | definition=one who refuses to serve in the armed forces on grounds of conscience | synonyms=conscientious objector, CO
6. sense_key=colorado%1:15:00:: | definition=a state in west central United States in the Rocky Mountains | synonyms=Colorado, Centennial State, CO

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

reasoning_content:
**Analyzing the Meaning of "cos()" in a Mathematical Context**

Okay, so we're looking at MathML and, specifically, the representation of mathematical functions. The focus is on the function "cos()". The surface form is clearly the textual representation of the function: "cos()". Now, the crucial part - the lemma, or the underlying meaning, of "cos." Given the context, the meaning that immediately springs to mind is the cosine function, defined as the "ratio of the adjacent side to the hypotenuse of a right-angled triangle." And, *that's it*. That definition perfectly aligns with the mathematical domain we're in. There's no ambiguity here; it's a straightforward, unambiguous association.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: sin
Target surface form: sin()
Context:
If we introduce the condition before the? it will use this condition only if it is true, if it finds a? without any condition, it will enter in the last instance. {}: MathML container. It can be used to define a container. Mainly useful for working with piecewise. Now you could ask me, why should the user mind about MathML? That s easy. With this, we can operate with functions like cos(), <t>sin()</t>, any other trigonometric functions, sum () or product (). It does not matter what kind it is.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=sin%1:07:00:: | definition=estrangement from god | synonyms=sinfulness, wickedness
2. sense_key=sin%1:04:00:: | definition=an act that is regarded by theologians as a transgression of God's will | synonyms=sinning
3. sense_key=sin%1:24:00:: | definition=ratio of the length of the side opposite the given angle to the length of the hypotenuse of a right-angled triangle | synonyms=sine
4. sense_key=sin%1:18:00:: | definition=(Akkadian) god of the Moon; counterpart of Sumerian Nanna
5. sense_key=sin%1:10:00:: | definition=the 21st letter of the Hebrew alphabet
6. sense_key=sin%1:04:01:: | definition=violent and excited activity | synonyms=hell | examples=they began to fight like sin

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

raw_output:
```json
{"sense_index": 3}
```

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 3}
```

reasoning_content:
**Analyzing the Definition of "sin()"**

Okay, so the target is "sin" and the specific form given is "sin()". The context uses terms like "MathML" and mentions "cos(), sin(), and other trigonometric functions." Given my expertise, this is unequivocally the trigonometric sine function. Therefore, let's look at the candidates. Candidate 3, which is "ratio of the length of the side opposite the given angle to the length of the hypotenuse of a right-angled triangle | synonyms=sine," immediately resonates. It's a perfect match for the intended meaning of "sin()" in this context. No further analysis is really needed here. Candidate 3 is correct.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: other
Target surface form: other
Context:
If we introduce the condition before the? it will use this condition only if it is true, if it finds a? without any condition, it will enter in the last instance. {}: MathML container. It can be used to define a container. Mainly useful for working with piecewise. Now you could ask me, why should the user mind about MathML? That s easy. With this, we can operate with functions like cos(), sin(), any <t>other</t> trigonometric functions, sum () or product (). It does not matter what kind it is.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=other%3:00:00:: | definition=not the same one or ones already mentioned or implied; - the White Queen | examples=today isn't any other day; the construction of highways and other public works
2. sense_key=other%5:00:00:past:00 | definition=recently past | examples=the other evening
3. sense_key=other%5:00:02:past:00 | definition=belonging to the distant past | synonyms=early, former | examples=the early inhabitants of Europe; former generations
4. sense_key=other%5:00:00:strange:00 | definition=very unusual; different in character or quality from the normal or expected; - Lance Morrow | examples=a strange, other dimension...where his powers seemed to fail

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

reasoning_content:
**Analyzing the Meaning of "Other"**

Okay, so the target word is "other," and it's used in the sentence about trigonometric functions. Let's break this down systematically. I need to figure out which sense of "other" is the intended meaning here, given the context.

My initial thought is to consider the potential senses: Is it about something *different* from what's already mentioned or implied? Perhaps something from the past? Maybe even something unusual or strange?

Looking at the options, the context is about listing functions. The phrase "...any other trigonometric functions..." clearly implies we're listing additional items within the same category. Therefore, the first sense – "not the same one or ones already mentioned or implied" – is the only logical fit. It's essentially adding to the list. This isn't about something in the past, or something that's strange. The meaning is very straightforward in this case. Case closed.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: sum
Target surface form: sum
Context:
If we introduce the condition before the? it will use this condition only if it is true, if it finds a? without any condition, it will enter in the last instance. {}: MathML container. It can be used to define a container. Mainly useful for working with piecewise. Now you could ask me, why should the user mind about MathML? That s easy. With this, we can operate with functions like cos(), sin(), any other trigonometric functions, <t>sum</t> () or product (). It does not matter what kind it is.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=sum%1:21:00:: | definition=a quantity of money | synonyms=sum of money, amount, amount of money | examples=he borrowed a large sum; the amount he had in cash was insufficient
2. sense_key=sum%1:09:01:: | definition=a quantity obtained by the addition of a group of numbers | synonyms=amount, total
3. sense_key=sum%1:14:00:: | definition=the final aggregate | synonyms=summation, sum total | examples=the sum of all our troubles did not equal the misery they suffered
4. sense_key=sum%1:09:00:: | definition=the choicest or most essential or most vital part of some idea or experience | synonyms=kernel, substance, core, center, centre, essence | examples=the gist of the prosecutor's argument; the heart and soul of the Republican Party
5. sense_key=sum%1:06:00:: | definition=the whole amount | synonyms=total, totality, aggregate
6. sense_key=sum%1:14:01:: | definition=a set containing all and only the members of two or more given sets | synonyms=union, join | examples=let C be the union of the sets A and B

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

raw_output:
```json
{"sense_index": 2}
```

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 2}
```

reasoning_content:
**Analyzing the Meaning of "Sum" in a MathML Context**

Okay, so I need to nail down the meaning of "sum" within the MathML framework, specifically in relation to functions like `cos()`, `sin()`, and other trigonometric functions, alongside `sum()` and `product()`. My immediate thought is that this is undoubtedly a mathematical operation, likely involving the addition of a sequence of numbers – pretty much the mathematical sigma notation or the direct application of a sum function.

I see that candidate 2, "sum%1:09:01:: | definition=a quantity obtained by the addition of a group of numbers | synonyms=amount, total," is a strong contender. Its definition directly aligns with what a `sum()` function does in a mathematical context, computing the additive result of a group of numbers.

Then, there's candidate 6, "sum%1:14:01:: union of sets". That's clearly wrong; it pertains to the union of sets, and this `sum()` is presented along with `product()`.

Hmm, I should probably double-check the candidate senses to make sure. Yes, sense 2 is exactly what I'm looking for - it's the sum of numbers, which fits perfectly within the context of the `sum()` function (as opposed to its pairing with the `product()` function). I am confident that I have the correct meaning.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: product
Target surface form: product
Context:
If we introduce the condition before the? it will use this condition only if it is true, if it finds a? without any condition, it will enter in the last instance. {}: MathML container. It can be used to define a container. Mainly useful for working with piecewise. Now you could ask me, why should the user mind about MathML? That s easy. With this, we can operate with functions like cos(), sin(), any other trigonometric functions, sum () or <t>product</t> (). It does not matter what kind it is.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=product%1:06:01:: | definition=commodities offered for sale | synonyms=merchandise, ware | examples=good business depends on having good merchandise; that store offers a variety of products
2. sense_key=product%1:06:00:: | definition=an artifact that has been created by someone or some process | synonyms=production | examples=they improve their product every year; they export most of their agricultural production
3. sense_key=product%1:09:00:: | definition=a quantity obtained by multiplication | synonyms=mathematical product | examples=the product of 2 and 3 is 6
4. sense_key=product%1:27:00:: | definition=a chemical substance formed as a result of a chemical reaction | examples=a product of lime and nitric acid
5. sense_key=product%1:19:00:: | definition=a consequence of someone's efforts or of a particular set of circumstances | examples=skill is the product of hours of practice; his reaction was the product of hunger and fatigue
6. sense_key=product%1:14:00:: | definition=the set of elements common to two or more sets | synonyms=intersection, Cartesian product | examples=the set of red hats is the intersection of the set of hats and the set of red things

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 3}
```

reasoning_content:
**My Reasoning on the Meaning of "Product" in a MathML Context**

Okay, so the task is to nail down the definition of "product" here, specifically within the MathML context, given the presence of functions like `cos()`, `sin()`, and – crucially – `sum()` and `product()`. The inclusion of those last two is the key. They immediately signal that we're talking about operations on sequences, not just generic concepts.

Therefore, when I see "product" alongside `sum()`, my mind immediately jumps to the mathematical product. The operational definition - multiplication over a sequence of numbers, denoted by that Pi notation that we're all familiar with.

Let's consider the candidates. Candidate 3, "a quantity obtained by multiplication," is spot on and resonates with what I'm thinking about. It directly describes the core concept of the mathematical product. Candidate 6, however, veers off into set intersection or the Cartesian product. That's a different domain altogether. The presence of `sum()` and `product()` functions explicitly rules that out.

So, after this internal dialogue and review, Candidate 3 is, without a doubt, the correct sense here. It's the only one that aligns perfectly with the MathML context presented.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: use
Target surface form: use
Context:
It can be used to define a container. Mainly useful for working with piecewise. Now you could ask me, why should the user mind about MathML? That s easy. With this, we can operate with functions like cos(), sin(), any other trigonometric functions, sum () or product (). It does not matter what kind it is. We can <t>use</t> plus(), times() and everything which has its operator. kalgebra's console is useful as a calculator.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=use%2:34:01:: | definition=put into service; make work or employ for a particular purpose or for its inherent or natural purpose | synonyms=utilize, utilise, apply, employ | examples=use your head!; we only use Spanish at home
2. sense_key=use%2:34:02:: | definition=take or consume (regularly or habitually) | synonyms=habituate | examples=She uses drugs rarely
3. sense_key=use%2:34:00:: | definition=use up, consume fully | synonyms=expend | examples=The legislature expended its time on school questions
4. sense_key=use%2:41:14:: | definition=seek or achieve an end by using to one's advantage | examples=She uses her influential friends to get jobs; The president's wife used her good connections
5. sense_key=use%2:41:04:: | definition=avail oneself to | synonyms=practice, apply | examples=apply a principle; practice a religion
6. sense_key=use%2:41:03:: | definition=habitually do something (use only in the past tense) | examples=She used to call her mother every week but now she calls only occasionally; I used to get sick when I ate in that dining hall

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

reasoning_content:
**My Interpretation of "Use" in This Context**

Okay, so we're looking at the word "use" in the context of mathematical operators – specifically `plus()` and `times()`. The phrase "We can use plus(), times() and everything which has its operator" is pretty straightforward. I need to figure out what "use" means as a verb here.

Let's break down the senses. Sense 2 (taking drugs) is obviously out. Sense 3 (use up) doesn't quite fit either; we aren't consuming `plus()` or `times()`. Sense 4 (exploit) is definitely off-base – we aren't *taking advantage* of these functions. Sense 5 (avail oneself to) is closer, but I don't think it captures the active nature of *what* we are doing with the functions. Sense 6 (habitually do) is also incorrect in this scenario.

That leaves Sense 1: "put into service; make work or employ for a particular purpose... (utilize, apply, employ)". That's it! *That's* the perfect fit. We are *putting into service* these mathematical functions. We are *employing* them to perform a specific task or achieve a particular result. We are *utilizing* them as tools. "Apply" also works nicely because we are applying mathematical processes. So, within this specific context, the best meaning for "use" is definitely this "utilize" or "employ" sense. It's about taking these functions and making them *work* for us.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: plus
Target surface form: plus()
Context:
It can be used to define a container. Mainly useful for working with piecewise. Now you could ask me, why should the user mind about MathML? That s easy. With this, we can operate with functions like cos(), sin(), any other trigonometric functions, sum () or product (). It does not matter what kind it is. We can use <t>plus()</t>, times() and everything which has its operator. kalgebra's console is useful as a calculator.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=plus%1:07:00:: | definition=a useful or valuable quality | synonyms=asset
2. sense_key=plus%1:04:00:: | definition=the arithmetic operation of summing; calculating the sum of two or more numbers | synonyms=summation, addition | examples=the summation of four and three gives seven; four plus three equals seven

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
Okay, here's my interpretation of this information, framed as my own thought process:

**Deconstructing Mathematical Operators**

Right, let's see, we're dealing with mathematical functions and operators here: `cos()`, `sin()`, `sum()`, `product()`, `times()`, `plus()`. The core of the issue seems to be disambiguating "plus." I need to determine what "plus" means in this particular context, given that it could have multiple senses.

The system is suggesting two potential senses for "plus": one related to "asset" – something beneficial, and another, and this is critical, being the arithmetic operation of summing, the classic addition. Aha! Now we're getting somewhere. Thinking about it, sense 2—the arithmetic meaning—is definitely the intended interpretation. This is because "plus()" is explicitly used alongside other arithmetic operators like "times()". That contextual clue nails it down. We're talking about basic arithmetic operations, not some abstract notion of added value. We have a clear sense in this instance.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: times
Target surface form: times()
Context:
It can be used to define a container. Mainly useful for working with piecewise. Now you could ask me, why should the user mind about MathML? That s easy. With this, we can operate with functions like cos(), sin(), any other trigonometric functions, sum () or product (). It does not matter what kind it is. We can use plus(), <t>times()</t> and everything which has its operator. kalgebra's console is useful as a calculator.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=times%1:28:01:: | definition=a more or less definite period of time now or previously present | examples=it was a sign of the times
2. sense_key=times%1:04:00:: | definition=an arithmetic operation that is the inverse of division; the product of two numbers is computed | synonyms=multiplication | examples=the multiplication of four by three gives twelve; four times three equals twelve
3. sense_key=time%1:11:00:: | definition=an instance or single occasion for some event | synonyms=time, clip | examples=this time he succeeded; he called four times
4. sense_key=time%1:28:05:: | definition=a period of time considered as a resource under your control and sufficient to accomplish something | synonyms=time | examples=take time to smell the roses; I didn't have time to finish
5. sense_key=time%1:28:00:: | definition=an indefinite period (usually marked by specific attributes or activities) | synonyms=time | examples=he waited a long time; the time of year for planting
6. sense_key=time%1:28:06:: | definition=a suitable moment | synonyms=time | examples=it is time to go
7. sense_key=time%1:03:00:: | definition=the continuum of experience in which events pass from the future through the present to the past | synonyms=time
8. sense_key=time%1:11:01:: | definition=a person's experience on a particular occasion | synonyms=time | examples=he had a time holding back the tears; they had a good time together
9. sense_key=clock_time%1:28:00:: | definition=a reading of a point in time as given by a clock | synonyms=clock time, time | examples=do you know what time it is?; the time is 10 o'clock
10. sense_key=fourth_dimension%1:28:00:: | definition=the fourth coordinate that is required (along with three spatial dimensions) to specify a physical event | synonyms=fourth dimension, time
11. sense_key=meter%1:07:00:: | definition=rhythm as given by division into parts of equal duration | synonyms=meter, metre, time
12. sense_key=prison_term%1:28:00:: | definition=the period of time a prisoner is imprisoned | synonyms=prison term, sentence, time | examples=he served a prison term of 15 months; his sentence was 5 to 10 years

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 2}
```

reasoning_content:
**Analyzing the Target Word "Times"**

Okay, so the target is "times" and it's definitely related to mathematical operations, specifically within a discussion that mentions "plus," "sum," "product," trigonometric functions like "cos" and "sin," and the general concept of "operators." We're looking for the right *sense* of the word here, and there's a clear fit.

The second sense, the one that defines "times" as the inverse of division – *multiplication* – is the obvious choice. It explicitly states that "the product of two numbers is computed," which lines up perfectly with the examples provided: like "four times three equals twelve." So, sense 2 is definitively the appropriate interpretation here. It's a straightforward match.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: have
Target surface form: has
Context:
It can be used to define a container. Mainly useful for working with piecewise. Now you could ask me, why should the user mind about MathML? That s easy. With this, we can operate with functions like cos(), sin(), any other trigonometric functions, sum () or product (). It does not matter what kind it is. We can use plus(), times() and everything which <t>has</t> its operator. kalgebra's console is useful as a calculator.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=have%2:40:00:: | definition=have or possess, either in a concrete or an abstract sense | synonyms=have got, hold | examples=She has $1,000 in the bank; He has got two beautiful daughters
2. sense_key=have%2:42:00:: | definition=have as a feature | synonyms=feature | examples=This restaurant features the most famous chefs in France
3. sense_key=have%2:39:06:: | definition=go through (mental or physical states or experiences) | synonyms=experience, receive, get | examples=get an idea; experience vertigo
4. sense_key=have%2:40:04:: | definition=have ownership or possession of | synonyms=own, possess | examples=He owns three houses in Florida; How many cars does she have?
5. sense_key=have%2:30:00:: | definition=cause to move; cause to be in a certain position or condition | synonyms=get, let | examples=He got his squad on the ball; This let me in for a big surprise
6. sense_key=have%2:34:00:: | definition=serve oneself to, or consume regularly | synonyms=consume, ingest, take in, take | examples=Have another bowl of chicken soup!; I don't take sugar in my coffee
7. sense_key=have%2:41:00:: | definition=have a personal or business relationship with someone | examples=have a postdoc; have an assistant
8. sense_key=have%2:36:00:: | definition=organize or be responsible for | synonyms=hold, throw, make, give | examples=hold a reception; have, throw, or make a party
9. sense_key=have%2:40:01:: | definition=have left | examples=I have two years left; I don't have any money left
10. sense_key=have%2:42:12:: | definition=be confronted with | examples=What do we have here?; Now we have a fine mess
11. sense_key=have%2:30:01:: | definition=undergo | synonyms=experience | examples=The stocks had a fast run-up
12. sense_key=have%2:29:02:: | definition=suffer from; be ill with | examples=She has arthritis
13. sense_key=have%2:32:00:: | definition=cause to do; cause to act in a specified manner | synonyms=induce, stimulate, cause, get, make | examples=The ads induced me to buy a VCR; My children finally got me to buy a computer
14. sense_key=have%2:40:05:: | definition=receive willingly something given or offered | synonyms=accept, take | examples=The only girl who would have him was the miller's daughter; I won't have this dog in my house!
15. sense_key=have%2:40:03:: | definition=get something; come into possession of | synonyms=receive | examples=receive payment; receive a gift
16. sense_key=have%2:29:05:: | definition=undergo (as of injuries and illnesses) | synonyms=suffer, sustain, get | examples=She suffered a fracture in the accident; He had an insulin shock after eating three candy bars
17. sense_key=have%2:40:02:: | definition=achieve a point or goal | synonyms=get, make | examples=Nicklaus had a 70; The Brazilian team got 4 goals
18. sense_key=have%2:29:00:: | definition=cause to be born | synonyms=give birth, deliver, bear, birth | examples=My wife had twins yesterday!
19. sense_key=have%2:35:00:: | definition=have sex with; archaic use | synonyms=take | examples=He had taken this woman when she was most vulnerable

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

reasoning_content:
**Analyzing the Meaning of "Has" in This Context**

Okay, so we're looking at "We can use plus(), times() and everything which *has* its operator." The target is "has," lemmatized to "have." The core meaning here is about something *possessing* or *featuring* its own operator. That's the crux of it.

Now, let's consider the senses. I've got a few candidates: "have or possess" (concrete or abstract), "have as a feature," and "have ownership." Given the context, "Everything which *has* its operator," I immediately gravitate towards "possess" or "feature."

Sense 1, "have or possess" in either concrete or abstract, or Sense 2, "have as a feature," seem like the strongest possibilities. Abstract possession seems to map well to the idea of having a property or attribute. Therefore, based on that, I'm leaning toward Sense 1 here.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: operator
Target surface form: operator
Context:
It can be used to define a container. Mainly useful for working with piecewise. Now you could ask me, why should the user mind about MathML? That s easy. With this, we can operate with functions like cos(), sin(), any other trigonometric functions, sum () or product (). It does not matter what kind it is. We can use plus(), times() and everything which has its <t>operator</t>. kalgebra's console is useful as a calculator.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=operator%1:24:00:: | definition=(mathematics) a symbol or function representing a mathematical operation
2. sense_key=operator%1:18:00:: | definition=an agent that operates some apparatus or machine | synonyms=manipulator | examples=the operator of the switchboard
3. sense_key=operator%1:18:01:: | definition=someone who owns or operates a business | examples=who is the operator of this franchise?
4. sense_key=operator%1:18:02:: | definition=a shrewd or unscrupulous person who knows how to circumvent difficulties | synonyms=hustler, wheeler dealer
5. sense_key=operator%1:18:03:: | definition=a speculator who trades aggressively on stock or commodity markets

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
Okay, here's my interpretation of this thought process, focusing on the MathML and mathematical operator context:

**Decoding the Mathematical Operator**

Alright, I'm focusing on this MathML discussion and these functions – *cos(), sin(), plus(), times()* – it's all about mathematical notation. The text highlights "anything which has its operator" and "kalgebra's console" which clearly points to the mathematical operator concept. So, what's being discussed here is the representation of mathematical operations. It's not about individuals, so those other senses are completely irrelevant. We're dealing with Sense 1, which clearly defines the operator as the symbol or function used to represent a mathematical action. Essentially, we're dissecting how to *represent* the operation itself, in this context, in code or a specific mathematical environment.