[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: honor
Target surface form: honor
Context:
As we all know, a few minutes before the end of the game (that their team had already won), both players deliberately wasted time which made the referee show the second yellow card to both of them. This way, and since Real Madrid will finish as leader of its group, both players will fulfil the prescribed sanction during the next game of league, against Auxerre, and will be able to get rid of the cards the following phase. Finally, the committee of discipline of the UEFA has sanctioned with two games the trainer of the team, Jose Mourinho, and with different economic amounts the implied players. The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of football. It is so extended that it part of the ethos, of the unwritten rules, but followed nonetheless by this sport. Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and <t>honor</t>, and that has fined its players for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician. Anyway, the debate deals with if that type of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport, that is to say, if with these actions fraud is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful actions with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=honor%1:10:00:: | definition=a tangible symbol signifying approval or distinction | synonyms=award, accolade, honour, laurels | examples=an award for bravery
2. sense_key=honor%1:26:00:: | definition=the state of being honored | synonyms=honour, laurels
3. sense_key=honor%1:07:00:: | definition=the quality of being honorable and having a good name | synonyms=honour | examples=a man of honor
4. sense_key=honor%1:07:01:: | definition=a woman's virtue or chastity | synonyms=honour, purity, pureness

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 3}
```

reasoning_content:
**Analyzing the Nuances of "Honor" in Context**

Alright, let's break this down. The target word is "honor" – not a difficult word, but the subtle shades of its meaning are always worth examining. Given the context – a hymn, nobility, players being fined for "analogous acts" – I'm leaning heavily towards the concept of **Sense 3: the quality of being honorable and having a good name**.

My expert intuition tells me this is the most likely interpretation. Sense 1, the award, seems off here. Sense 2, the state of being honored, is possible but less direct. It's the *quality* itself, the inherent character of honorableness, that feels most relevant to the situation. And, of course, Sense 4, the woman's virtue is completely unsuitable and can be discarded right away. The context of nobility, hymns, and player conduct firmly places us in the realm of character and reputation. Sense 3 it is, then!


attempt_kind: initial

status: success

[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: player
Target surface form: players
Context:
As we all know, a few minutes before the end of the game (that their team had already won), both players deliberately wasted time which made the referee show the second yellow card to both of them. This way, and since Real Madrid will finish as leader of its group, both players will fulfil the prescribed sanction during the next game of league, against Auxerre, and will be able to get rid of the cards the following phase. Finally, the committee of discipline of the UEFA has sanctioned with two games the trainer of the team, Jose Mourinho, and with different economic amounts the implied players. The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of football. It is so extended that it part of the ethos, of the unwritten rules, but followed nonetheless by this sport. Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its <t>players</t> for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician. Anyway, the debate deals with if that type of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport, that is to say, if with these actions fraud is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful actions with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=player%1:18:01:: | definition=a person who participates in or is skilled at some game | synonyms=participant
2. sense_key=player%1:18:02:: | definition=someone who plays a musical instrument (as a profession) | synonyms=musician, instrumentalist
3. sense_key=player%1:18:00:: | definition=a theatrical performer | synonyms=actor, histrion, thespian, role player
4. sense_key=player%1:18:04:: | definition=a person who pursues a number of different social and sexual partners simultaneously
5. sense_key=player%1:18:03:: | definition=an important participant (as in a business deal) | examples=he was a major player in setting up the corporation

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

raw_output:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

finish_reason: stop

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

role: assistant

reasoning_content:
**Analyzing "Players" in a Football Context**

Okay, so the task is to nail down the meaning of "players," and the context is definitely Real Madrid and Mourinho – classic football territory. Let's see, what are the possible senses here?

Alright, there's the obvious first one: a person involved in a game, someone who *participates* and, hopefully, is skilled. That's a strong contender. Then there's the musical sense – nope, not relevant here. Actor? Doesn't fit. Romantic player? Absolutely not. Finally, we have an "important participant in business," but again, it's a football match.

Given the sports-specific framing, sense 1, the "participant in a game" definition, is the only one that truly makes sense. No need to overcomplicate things; context is king, and this is a clear win for that first definition. Case closed.

type: thinking

service_tier: default

currency: USD


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: act
Target surface form: acts
Context:
As we all know, a few minutes before the end of the game (that their team had already won), both players deliberately wasted time which made the referee show the second yellow card to both of them. This way, and since Real Madrid will finish as leader of its group, both players will fulfil the prescribed sanction during the next game of league, against Auxerre, and will be able to get rid of the cards the following phase. Finally, the committee of discipline of the UEFA has sanctioned with two games the trainer of the team, Jose Mourinho, and with different economic amounts the implied players. The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of football. It is so extended that it part of the ethos, of the unwritten rules, but followed nonetheless by this sport. Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous <t>acts</t>) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician. Anyway, the debate deals with if that type of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport, that is to say, if with these actions fraud is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful actions with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=act%1:10:01:: | definition=a legal document codifying the result of deliberations of a committee or society or legislative body | synonyms=enactment
2. sense_key=act%1:03:00:: | definition=something that people do or cause to happen | synonyms=deed, human action, human activity
3. sense_key=act%1:10:00:: | definition=a subdivision of a play or opera or ballet
4. sense_key=act%1:10:02:: | definition=a short theatrical performance that is part of a longer program | synonyms=routine, number, turn, bit | examples=he did his act three times every evening; she had a catchy little routine
5. sense_key=act%1:10:03:: | definition=a manifestation of insincerity | examples=he put on quite an act for her benefit

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

raw_output:
```json
{"sense_index": 2}
```

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 2}
```

reasoning_content:
**Analyzing the Meaning of "Acts"**

Okay, here's the breakdown. The phrase is "analogous acts," and the context involves players intentionally drawing yellow cards by wasting time – classic gamesmanship. We know Real Madrid's been hitting their players with fines for similar behavior.

My immediate thought is, what's "acts" referring to here? Let's consider the senses. We're obviously not talking about a legal document, a subdivision of a play, a short performance, or some manifestation of insincerity. That leaves sense 2: "something that people do or cause to happen" – actions, deeds, human activity. Yep, that's the one. It’s the human *actions* the players are taking that are being punished. Simple as that. The actions are 'analogous' - similar - to each other, therefore warranting the same form of punishment.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: history
Target surface form: history
Context:
As we all know, a few minutes before the end of the game (that their team had already won), both players deliberately wasted time which made the referee show the second yellow card to both of them. This way, and since Real Madrid will finish as leader of its group, both players will fulfil the prescribed sanction during the next game of league, against Auxerre, and will be able to get rid of the cards the following phase. Finally, the committee of discipline of the UEFA has sanctioned with two games the trainer of the team, Jose Mourinho, and with different economic amounts the implied players. The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of football. It is so extended that it part of the ethos, of the unwritten rules, but followed nonetheless by this sport. Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded <t>history</t> of histrionic and provoking technician. Anyway, the debate deals with if that type of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport, that is to say, if with these actions fraud is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful actions with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=history%1:28:00:: | definition=the aggregate of past events | examples=a critical time in the school's history
2. sense_key=history%1:10:00:: | definition=a record or narrative description of past events | synonyms=account, chronicle, story | examples=a history of France; he gave an inaccurate account of the plot to kill the president
3. sense_key=history%1:09:00:: | definition=the discipline that records and interprets past events involving human beings | examples=he teaches Medieval history; history takes the long view
4. sense_key=history%1:28:02:: | definition=the continuum of events occurring in succession leading from the past to the present and even into the future | examples=all of human history
5. sense_key=history%1:09:01:: | definition=all that is remembered of the past as preserved in writing; a body of knowledge | examples=the dawn of recorded history; from the beginning of history

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 2}
```

reasoning_content:
**My Analysis of "History" in Context**

Okay, so the target word is "history," and it's used in this phrase: "who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician." My immediate thought is to consider the nuances. I'm dealing with the idea of a *record*, a *track record*, or maybe even the *aggregate of past events*. It's a bit ambiguous initially.

The first sense that pops to mind is the *aggregate of past events*. But when I dig deeper, I realize the phrase "his expanded history of histrionic..." leans more towards a *record* or *narrative description of past events* (sense 2). This resonates with the idea of a personal track record or account of his past actions. It fits the "histrionic" behavior.

I'm thinking, "his expanded history" does sound a bit like a track record. I need to make sure I am separating the aggregates and the records of the aggregate, and this is where "adds one more to his..." comes into play. It makes me think a record is more likely here.

I consider the examples. "A history of heart disease" seems to align more with sense 1, but "medical history" is also a specific kind of account and could fit. So it maps well with sense 2, under the "account" or chronicle. Thinking about it, "his expanded history" is analogous to a case history. The usage pattern is suggestive. The crucial phrase to analyze is "adds one more to his... history". This suggests a record, a chronicle, rather than the raw data of events. "adds" is more like an entry, right?

So, I'm going with sense 2: *a record or narrative description of past events*. It's a good fit.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: debate
Target surface form: debate
Context:
This way, and since Real Madrid will finish as leader of its group, both players will fulfil the prescribed sanction during the next game of league, against Auxerre, and will be able to get rid of the cards the following phase. Finally, the committee of discipline of the UEFA has sanctioned with two games the trainer of the team, Jose Mourinho, and with different economic amounts the implied players. The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of football. It is so extended that it part of the ethos, of the unwritten rules, but followed nonetheless by this sport. Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician. Anyway, the <t>debate</t> deals with if that type of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport, that is to say, if with these actions fraud is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful actions with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense. The matter examines the type of damage that is brought to the sporting spirit.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=debate%1:10:01:: | definition=a discussion in which reasons are advanced for and against some proposition or proposal | synonyms=argument, argumentation | examples=the argument over foreign aid goes on and on
2. sense_key=debate%1:10:00:: | definition=the formal presentation of a stated proposition and the opposition to it (usually followed by a vote) | synonyms=disputation, public debate

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

reasoning_content:
**Analyzing the Nuances of "Debate"**

Okay, so the word in question is "debate," and I need to figure out the right sense in this specific context. The context is something about whether a certain action in sports—specifically, intentionally getting yellow cards—contradicts the sport's principles, even if it's not explicitly prohibited.

My initial thought is to consider the two prominent senses of "debate." The first, `debate%1:10:01`, is a general discussion where people present arguments for and against something. The second, `debate%1:10:00`, refers to a much more formal debate, the kind with a proposition, opposition, and usually a vote at the end.

Given the context, the first sense seems like the obvious choice. We're talking about a general argument or discussion, not a formal presentation and vote. The phrase "the debate *deals with*" implies a more open-ended conversation, not a structured, adversarial presentation. Therefore, it's safe to say the text is referring to sense one, which is that of a general discussion in which reasons are advanced for and against some proposition or proposal.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: type
Target surface form: type
Context:
This way, and since Real Madrid will finish as leader of its group, both players will fulfil the prescribed sanction during the next game of league, against Auxerre, and will be able to get rid of the cards the following phase. Finally, the committee of discipline of the UEFA has sanctioned with two games the trainer of the team, Jose Mourinho, and with different economic amounts the implied players. The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of football. It is so extended that it part of the ethos, of the unwritten rules, but followed nonetheless by this sport. Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician. Anyway, the debate deals with if that <t>type</t> of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport, that is to say, if with these actions fraud is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful actions with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense. The matter examines the type of damage that is brought to the sporting spirit.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=type%1:09:00:: | definition=a subdivision of a particular kind of thing | examples=what type of sculpture do you prefer?
2. sense_key=type%1:18:00:: | definition=a person of a specified kind (usually with many eccentricities) | synonyms=character, eccentric, case | examples=a real character; a strange character
3. sense_key=type%1:14:01:: | definition=(biology) the taxonomic group whose characteristics are used to define the next higher taxon
4. sense_key=type%1:10:01:: | definition=printed characters | examples=small type is hard to read
5. sense_key=type%1:10:00:: | definition=all of the tokens of the same symbol | examples=the word `element' contains five different types of character
6. sense_key=type%1:06:00:: | definition=a small metal block bearing a raised character on one end; produces a printed character when inked and pressed on paper | examples=he dropped a case of type, so they made him pick them up

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

reasoning_content:
**Analyzing the Nuances of "Type"**

Okay, so the phrase is "that type of behavior," and my task is to pinpoint the intended meaning of "type" in this context. Immediately, I'm running through the various senses. Let's see... Sense 1 is "a subdivision of a particular kind of thing" – like, "what *type* of sculpture do you prefer?" Right away, this feels promising. It's about categorization, about grouping things into distinct categories. Then there's Sense 2, "a person of a specified kind". Hmm, "that person of behavior" doesn't quite fit, so I'll put that aside. Sense 3, a biological taxon, also doesn't seem relevant. And clearly, Sense 4, printed characters, 5, tokens of the same symbol and 6, the metal block for printing, are all irrelevant. So, after running through each possible meaning, it seems evident that Sense 1, the subdivision or kind of thing, is the best fit. I'm going to lean towards using "type" in the "kind of behavior" context.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: behavior
Target surface form: behavior
Context:
This way, and since Real Madrid will finish as leader of its group, both players will fulfil the prescribed sanction during the next game of league, against Auxerre, and will be able to get rid of the cards the following phase. Finally, the committee of discipline of the UEFA has sanctioned with two games the trainer of the team, Jose Mourinho, and with different economic amounts the implied players. The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of football. It is so extended that it part of the ethos, of the unwritten rules, but followed nonetheless by this sport. Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician. Anyway, the debate deals with if that type of <t>behavior</t> not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport, that is to say, if with these actions fraud is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful actions with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense. The matter examines the type of damage that is brought to the sporting spirit.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=behavior%1:04:00:: | definition=manner of acting or controlling yourself | synonyms=behaviour, conduct, doings
2. sense_key=behavior%1:26:00:: | definition=the action or reaction of something (as a machine or substance) under specified circumstances | synonyms=behaviour | examples=the behavior of small particles can be studied in experiments
3. sense_key=behavior%1:07:00:: | definition=(behavioral attributes) the way a person behaves toward other people | synonyms=demeanor, demeanour, behaviour, conduct, deportment
4. sense_key=behavior%1:04:01:: | definition=(psychology) the aggregate of the responses or reactions or movements made by an organism in any situation | synonyms=behaviour

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

reasoning_content:
**Analyzing the Nuances of "Behavior" in a Sporting Context**

Okay, so I'm dissecting this usage of "behavior" in relation to a sporting regulation. The core of the debate is whether a specific *action* – in this case, the deliberate acquisition of yellow cards – contravenes the overarching principles of the sport, even if not explicitly prohibited. The word "behavior" needs precise definition here.

I've got a few candidates to consider. First, there's the broad sense: "manner of acting or controlling yourself," essentially encompassing conduct and doings. That feels immediately promising. Then, we have the action or reaction of a machine or substance. Not relevant in this context, obviously. Candidate three is the way someone behaves *toward others* – demeanor and deportment. And, finally, a more psychologically-oriented definition.

Sense 1, the "manner of acting or controlling yourself," is the strongest contender. Deliberately getting a yellow card is clearly an *action* and a specific type of *conduct*. Now, just to be thorough, I'm going to quickly differentiate between sense 1 and sense 3. Sense 1 covers the *manner* of acting, while sense 3 focuses on how you behave *towards others*. This action is about the individual's *conduct* within the rules, which solidifies sense 1 as the proper interpretation. It's less about the demeanor *towards others* on the field. The deliberate action is central. So, I'm confident that sense 1 is the most accurate framing.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: principle
Target surface form: principles
Context:
This way, and since Real Madrid will finish as leader of its group, both players will fulfil the prescribed sanction during the next game of league, against Auxerre, and will be able to get rid of the cards the following phase. Finally, the committee of discipline of the UEFA has sanctioned with two games the trainer of the team, Jose Mourinho, and with different economic amounts the implied players. The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of football. It is so extended that it part of the ethos, of the unwritten rules, but followed nonetheless by this sport. Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician. Anyway, the debate deals with if that type of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the <t>principles</t> of the sport, that is to say, if with these actions fraud is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful actions with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense. The matter examines the type of damage that is brought to the sporting spirit.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=principle%1:09:03:: | definition=a basic generalization that is accepted as true and that can be used as a basis for reasoning or conduct | synonyms=rule | examples=their principles of composition characterized all their works
2. sense_key=principle%1:09:01:: | definition=a rule or standard especially of good behavior | examples=a man of principle; he will not violate his principles
3. sense_key=principle%1:09:00:: | definition=a basic truth or law or assumption | examples=the principles of democracy
4. sense_key=principle%1:09:04:: | definition=a rule or law concerning a natural phenomenon or the function of a complex system | synonyms=rule | examples=the principle of the conservation of mass; the principle of jet propulsion
5. sense_key=principle%1:10:00:: | definition=rule of personal conduct | synonyms=precept
6. sense_key=principle%1:09:02:: | definition=(law) an explanation of the fundamental reasons (especially an explanation of the working of some device in terms of laws of nature) | synonyms=rationale | examples=the rationale for capital punishment; the principles of internal-combustion engines

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

reasoning_content:
**Deconstructing the "Principles of the Sport"**

Okay, so I'm looking at this phrase "principles of the sport" and trying to nail down the precise meaning. My initial thought is it's about the fundamental truths, the inherent laws or assumptions *underlying* the sport – like the core tenets. That's leading me toward the "basic truth or law or assumption" sense (Sense 3), similar to how we might talk about "the principles of democracy." But wait, there's also Sense 1: a "basic generalization" that's used as a foundation for reasoning or action. And then there's Sense 2, referring to rules or standards of good behavior – like an individual's morals.

Hmm, digging deeper… "principles of the sport" – does it lean towards being a fundamental assumption (Sense 3)? Or maybe it’s closer to a “rule” guiding conduct (Sense 1)? The text keeps mentioning ethical behavior and contradicting the "sporting spirit," so Sense 2 (good behavior) is also coming into play. This is complicated.

The text also says "contradicts the principles of the sport... that is to say, if with these actions fraud is committed..." that they seem to elude its sense. Sense 2 feels the most relevant here, but it's typically applied to individuals, not the "sport" itself.

Let me go back and weigh Sense 1 and Sense 3. Sense 1 is about establishing a "basic generalization... basis for reasoning or conduct," which fits the idea of guiding rules. That seems right: "principles of the sport" are the rules of conduct within the sport. Alternatively, if we think of "principles of the sport" like "principles of democracy", Sense 3 fits. Then there is fair play, which suggests Sense 2. I have to choose between Sense 1 (rules) and Sense 2 (good behavior) or Sense 3 (basic truth). I think it’s best to use Sense 3.

But wait a minute, taking a step back... "principles of the sport" (like fair play). "principles of the game" (e.g. following rules), so let's pick Sense 1. This is the closest match to the spirit of the text and it encapsulates the concept of a rule.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: action
Target surface form: actions
Context:
This way, and since Real Madrid will finish as leader of its group, both players will fulfil the prescribed sanction during the next game of league, against Auxerre, and will be able to get rid of the cards the following phase. Finally, the committee of discipline of the UEFA has sanctioned with two games the trainer of the team, Jose Mourinho, and with different economic amounts the implied players. The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of football. It is so extended that it part of the ethos, of the unwritten rules, but followed nonetheless by this sport. Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician. Anyway, the debate deals with if that type of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport, that is to say, if with these <t>actions</t> fraud is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful actions with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense. The matter examines the type of damage that is brought to the sporting spirit.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=action%1:04:02:: | definition=something done (usually as opposed to something said) | examples=there were stories of murders and other unnatural actions
2. sense_key=action%1:26:00:: | definition=the state of being active | synonyms=activity, activeness | examples=his sphere of activity; he is out of action
3. sense_key=action%1:04:03:: | definition=a military engagement | synonyms=military action | examples=he saw action in Korea
4. sense_key=action%1:22:00:: | definition=a process existing in or produced by nature (rather than by the intent of human beings) | synonyms=natural process, natural action, activity | examples=the action of natural forces; volcanic activity
5. sense_key=action%1:10:00:: | definition=the series of events that form a plot | examples=his novels always have a lot of action
6. sense_key=action%1:07:00:: | definition=the trait of being active and energetic and forceful | examples=a man of action
7. sense_key=action%1:06:00:: | definition=the operating part that transmits power to a mechanism | synonyms=action mechanism | examples=the piano had a very stiff action
8. sense_key=action%1:04:01:: | definition=a judicial proceeding brought by one party against another; one party prosecutes another for a wrong done or for protection of a right or for prevention of a wrong | synonyms=legal action, action at law
9. sense_key=action%1:04:04:: | definition=an act by a government body or supranational organization | examples=recent federal action undermined the segregationist position; the United Nations must have the power to propose and organize action without being hobbled by irrelevant issues
10. sense_key=action%1:04:00:: | definition=the most important or interesting work or activity in a specific area or field | examples=the action is no longer in technology stocks but in municipal bonds; gawkers always try to get as close to the action as possible

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

reasoning_content:
**Analyzing the Nuances of "Actions" in This Context**

Okay, so the target word is "actions," and the context is all about player behavior – things like provoking yellow cards or, more broadly, exploiting the rules. The core phrase seems to be "if with these actions fraud is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful actions with the sport regulation..." My immediate instinct is to look at the different senses of "actions" to see which one fits best.

Given the discussion of specific acts, the first sense – "something done" – is clearly the most relevant. It's about observable behaviors, the actual *things* the players are doing. Let's briefly run through the other definitions though, just to be thorough and ensure nothing else jumps out. Being active is too broad, military engagements are way off base, a natural process, plot, trait, mechanism, legal action, government act, or most important work don't seem applicable here. No, sense one is definitive. This isn't about the *state* of being active or an underlying process; it's about the very *conduct* itself. So, sense one, "something done," is definitely the correct interpretation. This is where we should focus our analysis.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: fraud
Target surface form: fraud
Context:
This way, and since Real Madrid will finish as leader of its group, both players will fulfil the prescribed sanction during the next game of league, against Auxerre, and will be able to get rid of the cards the following phase. Finally, the committee of discipline of the UEFA has sanctioned with two games the trainer of the team, Jose Mourinho, and with different economic amounts the implied players. The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of football. It is so extended that it part of the ethos, of the unwritten rules, but followed nonetheless by this sport. Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician. Anyway, the debate deals with if that type of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport, that is to say, if with these actions <t>fraud</t> is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful actions with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense. The matter examines the type of damage that is brought to the sporting spirit.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=fraud%1:04:00:: | definition=intentional deception resulting in injury to another person
2. sense_key=fraud%1:18:00:: | definition=a person who makes deceitful pretenses | synonyms=imposter, impostor, pretender, fake, faker, sham
3. sense_key=fraud%1:04:01:: | definition=something intended to deceive; deliberate trickery intended to gain an advantage | synonyms=fraudulence, dupery, hoax, humbug, put-on

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

raw_output:
```json
{"sense_index": 3}
```

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 3}
```

reasoning_content:
**Analyzing the "Fraud" of Intentional Yellow Cards**

Okay, so the prompt is digging into whether intentionally earning a yellow card to manage a suspension constitutes "fraud" in football. Let's break this down from a legal and ethical perspective. The wording is crucial here: "if with these actions fraud is committed... they are respectful actions with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense." Right, so it's a legal grey area.

My initial thought is to consider the various definitions of "fraud." We've got intentional deception causing harm (Sense 1), a deceitful person (Sense 2), and deliberate trickery for advantage (Sense 3). Sense 1 doesn't quite fit – it's not directly injuring another person, even if it indirectly impacts the game. Sense 2 feels a bit too broad for the specific action here.

Ultimately, Sense 3, "deliberate trickery intended to gain an advantage," resonates the most. *That* seems like the core of it. The player is intentionally manipulating the system – the card, suspension, subsequent game – to achieve a specific competitive benefit. Whether it's to avoid a crucial match, reset a disciplinary count, or ensure they're available for a subsequent, strategically important game, the player is not playing in the "spirit" of the game's rules and regulations, even though technically they are adhering to them. This maneuver has the flavor of calculated deception. So, while compliant, it borders on the unethical, exploiting a loophole for personal/team gain.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: action
Target surface form: actions
Context:
This way, and since Real Madrid will finish as leader of its group, both players will fulfil the prescribed sanction during the next game of league, against Auxerre, and will be able to get rid of the cards the following phase. Finally, the committee of discipline of the UEFA has sanctioned with two games the trainer of the team, Jose Mourinho, and with different economic amounts the implied players. The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of football. It is so extended that it part of the ethos, of the unwritten rules, but followed nonetheless by this sport. Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician. Anyway, the debate deals with if that type of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport, that is to say, if with these actions fraud is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful <t>actions</t> with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense. The matter examines the type of damage that is brought to the sporting spirit.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=action%1:04:02:: | definition=something done (usually as opposed to something said) | examples=there were stories of murders and other unnatural actions
2. sense_key=action%1:26:00:: | definition=the state of being active | synonyms=activity, activeness | examples=his sphere of activity; he is out of action
3. sense_key=action%1:04:03:: | definition=a military engagement | synonyms=military action | examples=he saw action in Korea
4. sense_key=action%1:22:00:: | definition=a process existing in or produced by nature (rather than by the intent of human beings) | synonyms=natural process, natural action, activity | examples=the action of natural forces; volcanic activity
5. sense_key=action%1:10:00:: | definition=the series of events that form a plot | examples=his novels always have a lot of action
6. sense_key=action%1:07:00:: | definition=the trait of being active and energetic and forceful | examples=a man of action
7. sense_key=action%1:06:00:: | definition=the operating part that transmits power to a mechanism | synonyms=action mechanism | examples=the piano had a very stiff action
8. sense_key=action%1:04:01:: | definition=a judicial proceeding brought by one party against another; one party prosecutes another for a wrong done or for protection of a right or for prevention of a wrong | synonyms=legal action, action at law
9. sense_key=action%1:04:04:: | definition=an act by a government body or supranational organization | examples=recent federal action undermined the segregationist position; the United Nations must have the power to propose and organize action without being hobbled by irrelevant issues
10. sense_key=action%1:04:00:: | definition=the most important or interesting work or activity in a specific area or field | examples=the action is no longer in technology stocks but in municipal bonds; gawkers always try to get as close to the action as possible

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

reasoning_content:
Here's my analysis of the word "actions" in this context.

**Deconstructing "Actions" in a Regulatory Framework**

Okay, so the core of this is understanding "actions" as they relate to potential fraud within the sport's regulations. The text uses "actions" in a fairly straightforward way: "if with these actions fraud is committed...". My immediate instinct is to look at the different senses of the word to pin down the precise meaning.

Let's break this down. First, the text implicitly points towards *things that are done* by someone, presumably the players or manager, in this scenario, these are things like getting yellow cards on purpose. It's not about passive observation or statements, but concrete deeds.

Considering the dictionary definitions, sense 1 immediately clicks: something done, as opposed to something said. That's a perfect fit here, focusing on the *deeds* or *acts* committed. The other senses, such as "the state of being active," "legal action," or "an act by a government body," are less relevant in this context. While some of these senses could be applied to sports, they don't seem to be the intent here.

The key is that the "actions" in question are the tangible behaviors that are potentially violating the sports regulations. It's a fundamental understanding of "actions" as *events*.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: regulation
Target surface form: regulation
Context:
This way, and since Real Madrid will finish as leader of its group, both players will fulfil the prescribed sanction during the next game of league, against Auxerre, and will be able to get rid of the cards the following phase. Finally, the committee of discipline of the UEFA has sanctioned with two games the trainer of the team, Jose Mourinho, and with different economic amounts the implied players. The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of football. It is so extended that it part of the ethos, of the unwritten rules, but followed nonetheless by this sport. Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician. Anyway, the debate deals with if that type of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport, that is to say, if with these actions fraud is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful actions with the sport <t>regulation</t>, but they seem to elude its sense. The matter examines the type of damage that is brought to the sporting spirit.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=regulation%1:10:00:: | definition=an authoritative rule | synonyms=ordinance
2. sense_key=regulation%1:09:00:: | definition=a principle or condition that customarily governs behavior | synonyms=rule | examples=it was his rule to take a walk before breakfast; short haircuts were the regulation
3. sense_key=regulation%1:26:00:: | definition=the state of being controlled or governed
4. sense_key=regulation%1:22:00:: | definition=(embryology) the ability of an early embryo to continue normal development after its structure has been somehow damaged or altered
5. sense_key=regulation%1:04:01:: | definition=the act of bringing to uniformity; making regular | synonyms=regularization, regularisation
6. sense_key=regulation%1:04:00:: | definition=the act of controlling or directing according to rule | synonyms=regulating | examples=fiscal regulations are in the hands of politicians

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

reasoning_content:
**Analyzing the Nuances of "Sport Regulation"**

Okay, so I'm looking at this passage, and it's getting at something subtle regarding "sport regulation," which in this context, clearly refers to the official rulebook, the codified laws of the game. The text is specifically discussing actions that aren't explicitly *forbidden* by the rulebook. It's raising the question of whether such actions, while technically compliant with the written rules, somehow violate the *spirit* of the game. It’s a classic ethical dilemma.

My brain's doing a quick check on the connotations of "sport regulation" here. It's throwing up two definitions in my mind: the formal, *authoritative* rules – which is essentially an ordinance – and then there's the broader sense of a guiding principle or behavioral norm, that unwritten agreement of sorts.

Given the phrase "behavior not prohibited *specifically by the regulation*" and the earlier mention of "unwritten rules", I need to focus on the *written* rules. I'm focusing on "authoritative rule", which is Sense 1, and fits best in this situation. The phrase "respectful actions with the sport regulation" further reinforces this. It's the technical, official rulebook we're talking about, not the social code. Sense 1 it is.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: matter
Target surface form: matter
Context:
Finally, the committee of discipline of the UEFA has sanctioned with two games the trainer of the team, Jose Mourinho, and with different economic amounts the implied players. The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of football. It is so extended that it part of the ethos, of the unwritten rules, but followed nonetheless by this sport. Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician. Anyway, the debate deals with if that type of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport, that is to say, if with these actions fraud is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful actions with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense. The <t>matter</t> examines the type of damage that is brought to the sporting spirit. One of the advantages that include the sport spirit is the physical integrity of the opposite players, aspect that with these actions wasn't put into danger, that is to say, there was no violent game.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=matter%1:09:01:: | definition=a vaguely specified concern | synonyms=affair, thing | examples=several matters to attend to; it is none of your affair
2. sense_key=matter%1:09:00:: | definition=some situation or event that is thought about | synonyms=topic, subject, issue | examples=he kept drifting off the topic; he had been thinking about the subject for several years
3. sense_key=matter%1:03:00:: | definition=that which has mass and occupies space | examples=physicists study both the nature of matter and the forces which govern it
4. sense_key=matter%1:09:02:: | definition=a problem | examples=is anything the matter?
5. sense_key=matter%1:07:00:: | definition=(used with negation) having consequence | examples=they were friends and it was no matter who won the games
6. sense_key=matter%1:10:00:: | definition=written works (especially in books or magazines) | examples=he always took some reading matter with him on the plane

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 2}
```

reasoning_content:
**Analyzing the Semantic Landscape of "Matter"**

Okay, the target word is "matter," and the context is, "The matter examines the type of damage that is brought to the sporting spirit." Let's see... my mind immediately goes to the senses available. I need to pinpoint the precise meaning here.

Alright, the options are: a vaguely specified concern, something thought about (a topic, subject, or issue), that which has mass, a problem, having consequence (usually in the negative), and written works. "The matter examines..." Hmm.

My initial thought is that sense 2, "topic, subject, issue," is the clear winner. The sentence structure strongly suggests this. The "matter" is clearly referring to *what* is being examined. It's the subject under discussion. Hold on a second, that's it - "The matter examines" usually means, precisely, the subject or issue itself! Sense 2 fits perfectly. Done.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: type
Target surface form: type
Context:
Finally, the committee of discipline of the UEFA has sanctioned with two games the trainer of the team, Jose Mourinho, and with different economic amounts the implied players. The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of football. It is so extended that it part of the ethos, of the unwritten rules, but followed nonetheless by this sport. Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician. Anyway, the debate deals with if that type of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport, that is to say, if with these actions fraud is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful actions with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense. The matter examines the <t>type</t> of damage that is brought to the sporting spirit. One of the advantages that include the sport spirit is the physical integrity of the opposite players, aspect that with these actions wasn't put into danger, that is to say, there was no violent game.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=type%1:09:00:: | definition=a subdivision of a particular kind of thing | examples=what type of sculpture do you prefer?
2. sense_key=type%1:18:00:: | definition=a person of a specified kind (usually with many eccentricities) | synonyms=character, eccentric, case | examples=a real character; a strange character
3. sense_key=type%1:14:01:: | definition=(biology) the taxonomic group whose characteristics are used to define the next higher taxon
4. sense_key=type%1:10:01:: | definition=printed characters | examples=small type is hard to read
5. sense_key=type%1:10:00:: | definition=all of the tokens of the same symbol | examples=the word `element' contains five different types of character
6. sense_key=type%1:06:00:: | definition=a small metal block bearing a raised character on one end; produces a printed character when inked and pressed on paper | examples=he dropped a case of type, so they made him pick them up

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

reasoning_content:
**Analyzing the Word "Type"**

Okay, so the sentence is "The matter examines the type of damage that is brought to the sporting spirit," and I need to figure out the best meaning of "type" here. Let's see... I have a few candidates to consider.

First, "a subdivision of a particular kind of thing." That feels promising; it's like asking "what *kind* of damage?" That fits the context, so I'll keep that in mind.

Then we have "a person of a specified kind". Nope, that doesn't track. Doesn't make sense in this context.

"Biology" - no, not likely. This isn't a biological context.

"Printed characters" and "all of the tokens of the same symbol" - also not relevant. We aren't talking about writing or symbols here.

Finally, "a small metal block bearing a raised character." Definitely not. That is so far away from our usage it's not even worth consideration.

"Type of damage" strongly suggests "kind" or "subdivision" of damage. I think sense 1 ("a subdivision of a particular kind of thing") is the best fit. I can't imagine any other usage here. It's the most precise and contextually appropriate definition. It works perfectly.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: damage
Target surface form: damage
Context:
Finally, the committee of discipline of the UEFA has sanctioned with two games the trainer of the team, Jose Mourinho, and with different economic amounts the implied players. The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of football. It is so extended that it part of the ethos, of the unwritten rules, but followed nonetheless by this sport. Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician. Anyway, the debate deals with if that type of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport, that is to say, if with these actions fraud is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful actions with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense. The matter examines the type of <t>damage</t> that is brought to the sporting spirit. One of the advantages that include the sport spirit is the physical integrity of the opposite players, aspect that with these actions wasn't put into danger, that is to say, there was no violent game.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=damage%1:11:00:: | definition=the occurrence of a change for the worse | synonyms=harm, impairment
2. sense_key=damage%1:11:01:: | definition=loss of military equipment | synonyms=equipment casualty
3. sense_key=damage%1:04:00:: | definition=the act of damaging something or someone | synonyms=harm, hurt, scathe
4. sense_key=damage%1:21:00:: | definition=the amount of money needed to purchase something | synonyms=price, terms | examples=the price of gasoline; he got his new car on excellent terms
5. sense_key=damage%1:04:01:: | definition=any harm or injury resulting from a violation of a legal right | synonyms=wrong, legal injury

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

reasoning_content:
**Analyzing "Damage" in the Context of Sporting Spirit**

Okay, so I'm presented with "damage" in relation to the sporting spirit within the framework of football regulations. My immediate thought is to consider the nuances of this word, specifically the various senses it could imply. I've got a few options here: the detrimental effect itself (harm, impairment – sense 1), loss of equipment (not applicable), the *act* of damaging (sense 3), a price, or harm/injury from a legal violation.

The phrase "type of damage brought to the sporting spirit" really hones in on that "harm" or "change for the worse" aspect. I'm leaning heavily towards the idea of an *effect* – a negative *result* – rather than the *process* of causing that effect. The "bring damage to" phrasing supports this; it's not the *act* that's emphasized, but the *consequence*.

Let me just quickly confirm those definitions... Yep, that checks out. "damage%1:11:00:: the occurrence of a change for the worse" – that's the one I'm looking at. The result, the state of the thing being negatively impacted. I'm going with sense 1.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: advantage
Target surface form: advantages
Context:
The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of football. It is so extended that it part of the ethos, of the unwritten rules, but followed nonetheless by this sport. Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician. Anyway, the debate deals with if that type of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport, that is to say, if with these actions fraud is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful actions with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense. The matter examines the type of damage that is brought to the sporting spirit. One of the <t>advantages</t> that include the sport spirit is the physical integrity of the opposite players, aspect that with these actions wasn't put into danger, that is to say, there was no violent game. Another of these advantages to which it is alluded to with the fare-play is to avoid that the team of the lawbreaker players takes advantage unjustly of the opposite team, which did not happen either.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=advantage%1:07:00:: | definition=the quality of having a superior or more favorable position | synonyms=vantage | examples=the experience gave him the advantage over me
2. sense_key=advantage%1:23:00:: | definition=(tennis) first point scored after deuce
3. sense_key=advantage%1:07:01:: | definition=benefit resulting from some event or action | synonyms=reward | examples=it turned out to my advantage; reaping the rewards of generosity

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 3}
```

reasoning_content:
**Deconstructing the "Sporting Spirit" in Terms of Advantages**

Okay, so we're talking about the "sporting spirit" and its so-called "advantages." Immediately, I'm thinking, are we talking about the *spirit* itself, or the tangible *benefits* it yields? The text seems to be using "advantages" to mean the positive outcomes or favorable qualities associated with this spirit. The phrasing, "One of the advantages that include the sport spirit is the physical integrity..." clued me in that we are talking about outcomes. It's not a question of the *spirit* being an advantage, but rather the *results* of embodying that spirit.

Let's clarify that. There are multiple ways we could interpret the word "advantage". Sense 3, "a benefit resulting from some event or action" seems to align most closely with what is being discussed here. The text provides a good context for this as well.

Then, there is the example sentence "Another of these advantages to which it is alluded to with the fare-play is to avoid that the team... takes advantage unjustly". This reinforces the idea of positive outcomes and values. I would agree that the focus is on tangible, desirable outcomes, not a general concept of superior positioning. Therefore, I'm going with Sense 3 as the most accurate interpretation of "advantages" in this context: it all boils down to the benefits derived from embracing the sporting spirit, specifically things like physical integrity and fair play.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: integrity
Target surface form: integrity
Context:
The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of football. It is so extended that it part of the ethos, of the unwritten rules, but followed nonetheless by this sport. Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician. Anyway, the debate deals with if that type of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport, that is to say, if with these actions fraud is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful actions with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense. The matter examines the type of damage that is brought to the sporting spirit. One of the advantages that include the sport spirit is the physical <t>integrity</t> of the opposite players, aspect that with these actions wasn't put into danger, that is to say, there was no violent game. Another of these advantages to which it is alluded to with the fare-play is to avoid that the team of the lawbreaker players takes advantage unjustly of the opposite team, which did not happen either.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=integrity%1:26:00:: | definition=an undivided or unbroken completeness or totality with nothing wanting | synonyms=unity, wholeness | examples=the integrity of the nervous system is required for normal development; he took measures to insure the territorial unity of Croatia
2. sense_key=integrity%1:07:00:: | definition=moral soundness | examples=he expects to find in us the common honesty and integrity of men of business; they admired his scrupulous professional integrity

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

reasoning_content:
**Deconstructing "Integrity" in the Context of Physicality**

Okay, so the prompt throws "integrity" at me, specifically in relation to the "physical integrity of the opposite players." Let's break this down. My mind immediately goes to the different nuances of that word. The primary interpretation here, the relevant "sense 1", is clearly about *wholeness* – unbroken, undivided completeness. Think of it like the integrity of the nervous system, or the territorial integrity of a nation. Applying that concept to the human body, physical integrity means the *entirety* of the body, its unbroken state.

The second sense, "moral soundness," is irrelevant here. We aren't discussing ethical conduct or professional standards. The key phrase, "physical integrity," *unequivocally* points to the first definition. It is a state of bodily wholeness, free from damage or injury. The word "integrity", in this circumstance, means the physical well-being of the body. Simple.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: player
Target surface form: players
Context:
The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of football. It is so extended that it part of the ethos, of the unwritten rules, but followed nonetheless by this sport. Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician. Anyway, the debate deals with if that type of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport, that is to say, if with these actions fraud is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful actions with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense. The matter examines the type of damage that is brought to the sporting spirit. One of the advantages that include the sport spirit is the physical integrity of the opposite <t>players</t>, aspect that with these actions wasn't put into danger, that is to say, there was no violent game. Another of these advantages to which it is alluded to with the fare-play is to avoid that the team of the lawbreaker players takes advantage unjustly of the opposite team, which did not happen either.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=player%1:18:01:: | definition=a person who participates in or is skilled at some game | synonyms=participant
2. sense_key=player%1:18:02:: | definition=someone who plays a musical instrument (as a profession) | synonyms=musician, instrumentalist
3. sense_key=player%1:18:00:: | definition=a theatrical performer | synonyms=actor, histrion, thespian, role player
4. sense_key=player%1:18:04:: | definition=a person who pursues a number of different social and sexual partners simultaneously
5. sense_key=player%1:18:03:: | definition=an important participant (as in a business deal) | examples=he was a major player in setting up the corporation

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

reasoning_content:
**Analyzing the Nuances of "Players" in a Football Context**

Okay, the target word is "players," and we're knee-deep in football – yellow cards, Real Madrid, Mourinho... the usual suspects. My initial thought process immediately gravitates towards Sense 1: "a person who participates in or is skilled at some game." That's the clear, dominant meaning here. When we're talking about football, and especially in the context of tactics and disciplinary actions like yellow cards, "players" most likely refers to those *opposite players* on the field – the athletes engaged in the competition.

The other candidate meanings just don't fit. Someone who plays a musical instrument? Unlikely in this scenario. Theatrical performer? No. A person with multiple social and sexual partners? Definitely not relevant. An important participant in a business deal? Utterly unrelated. Sense 1 is the obvious choice. It aligns perfectly with the domain and the implied meaning. I'd confidently select it without much further deliberation.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: aspect
Target surface form: aspect
Context:
The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of football. It is so extended that it part of the ethos, of the unwritten rules, but followed nonetheless by this sport. Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician. Anyway, the debate deals with if that type of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport, that is to say, if with these actions fraud is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful actions with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense. The matter examines the type of damage that is brought to the sporting spirit. One of the advantages that include the sport spirit is the physical integrity of the opposite players, <t>aspect</t> that with these actions wasn't put into danger, that is to say, there was no violent game. Another of these advantages to which it is alluded to with the fare-play is to avoid that the team of the lawbreaker players takes advantage unjustly of the opposite team, which did not happen either.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=aspect%1:09:00:: | definition=a distinct feature or element in a problem | synonyms=facet | examples=he studied every facet of the question
2. sense_key=aspect%1:07:02:: | definition=a characteristic to be considered
3. sense_key=aspect%1:09:01:: | definition=the visual percept of a region | synonyms=view, prospect, scene, vista, panorama | examples=the most desirable feature of the park are the beautiful views
4. sense_key=aspect%1:24:00:: | definition=the beginning or duration or completion or repetition of the action of a verb
5. sense_key=aspect%1:07:01:: | definition=the feelings expressed on a person's face | synonyms=expression, look, facial expression, face | examples=a sad expression; a look of triumph

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 2}
```

reasoning_content:
**Deconstructing the Nuances of "Aspect"**

Okay, so the target word is "aspect" in this sentence, and I need to figure out the best definition. Hmm, it's referring to the "physical integrity of the opposite players" – that's the key. I immediately consider the two likely senses: one being a "distinct feature or element," and the other being "a characteristic to be considered."

My initial thought is that it's closer to "characteristic," but I need to be precise. The phrase "One of the advantages... is the physical integrity... aspect that..." pushes me toward considering it a feature *being* considered. The Spanish translation of "aspecto" is also coming into play here, and its broad meaning is making me stop and think.

I'm oscillating. I lean towards "characteristic" because that *feels* right, but "facet" as a synonym for Sense 1, a "distinct feature," is appealing, as it is used in a more general way. It's not a direct problem, but it’s still often used in a general sense.

I keep coming back to the core concept: "physical integrity" is *something* to be considered within the context of the sport. It's a key part of the advantage. So I want to choose Sense 2.

I think I'll go with Sense 2, and the physical integrity of the players is a feature or characteristic to be considered.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: action
Target surface form: actions
Context:
The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of football. It is so extended that it part of the ethos, of the unwritten rules, but followed nonetheless by this sport. Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician. Anyway, the debate deals with if that type of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport, that is to say, if with these actions fraud is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful actions with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense. The matter examines the type of damage that is brought to the sporting spirit. One of the advantages that include the sport spirit is the physical integrity of the opposite players, aspect that with these <t>actions</t> wasn't put into danger, that is to say, there was no violent game. Another of these advantages to which it is alluded to with the fare-play is to avoid that the team of the lawbreaker players takes advantage unjustly of the opposite team, which did not happen either.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=action%1:04:02:: | definition=something done (usually as opposed to something said) | examples=there were stories of murders and other unnatural actions
2. sense_key=action%1:26:00:: | definition=the state of being active | synonyms=activity, activeness | examples=his sphere of activity; he is out of action
3. sense_key=action%1:04:03:: | definition=a military engagement | synonyms=military action | examples=he saw action in Korea
4. sense_key=action%1:22:00:: | definition=a process existing in or produced by nature (rather than by the intent of human beings) | synonyms=natural process, natural action, activity | examples=the action of natural forces; volcanic activity
5. sense_key=action%1:10:00:: | definition=the series of events that form a plot | examples=his novels always have a lot of action
6. sense_key=action%1:07:00:: | definition=the trait of being active and energetic and forceful | examples=a man of action
7. sense_key=action%1:06:00:: | definition=the operating part that transmits power to a mechanism | synonyms=action mechanism | examples=the piano had a very stiff action
8. sense_key=action%1:04:01:: | definition=a judicial proceeding brought by one party against another; one party prosecutes another for a wrong done or for protection of a right or for prevention of a wrong | synonyms=legal action, action at law
9. sense_key=action%1:04:04:: | definition=an act by a government body or supranational organization | examples=recent federal action undermined the segregationist position; the United Nations must have the power to propose and organize action without being hobbled by irrelevant issues
10. sense_key=action%1:04:00:: | definition=the most important or interesting work or activity in a specific area or field | examples=the action is no longer in technology stocks but in municipal bonds; gawkers always try to get as close to the action as possible

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

reasoning_content:
**Analyzing the Player's Actions in Context**

Okay, so we're looking at a football match and some player behavior that led to a yellow card, right? The key sentence here is that these actions, whatever they were, didn't actually lead to "violent game". I need to understand what "actions" refers to specifically, in this context. Let's see... the text is highlighting a distinction about how the actions could be dangerous for the game.

Let me break down what the potential meanings could be: Candidate 1 is the most obvious and relevant – something done. Usually this is referring to the contrast between physical actions as opposed to verbal ones. Candidate 2, the state of being active, is broad, but less precise in this football context. And Candidate 8, legal action, is totally off-base. It's obviously not relevant to a football match.

Considering the phrasing of the sentence, "actions" most likely refers to the "acts" or "things done" by the players on the field. The actions in the context of the sentence would be considered "provocations" that led to a yellow card, therefore Candidate 1 is the best fit.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: danger
Target surface form: danger
Context:
The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of football. It is so extended that it part of the ethos, of the unwritten rules, but followed nonetheless by this sport. Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician. Anyway, the debate deals with if that type of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport, that is to say, if with these actions fraud is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful actions with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense. The matter examines the type of damage that is brought to the sporting spirit. One of the advantages that include the sport spirit is the physical integrity of the opposite players, aspect that with these actions wasn't put into <t>danger</t>, that is to say, there was no violent game. Another of these advantages to which it is alluded to with the fare-play is to avoid that the team of the lawbreaker players takes advantage unjustly of the opposite team, which did not happen either.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=danger%1:26:00:: | definition=the condition of being susceptible to harm or injury | examples=you are in no danger; there was widespread danger of disease
2. sense_key=danger%1:04:00:: | definition=a venture undertaken without regard to possible loss or injury | synonyms=risk, peril | examples=he saw the rewards but not the risks of crime; there was a danger he would do the wrong thing
3. sense_key=danger%1:26:01:: | definition=a cause of pain or injury or loss | examples=he feared the dangers of traveling by air
4. sense_key=danger%1:15:00:: | definition=a dangerous place | examples=He moved out of danger

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

reasoning_content:
**Analyzing "Danger" in Context**

Okay, so the phrase is "wasn't put into danger," and my task is to really dissect what "danger" means here. We're talking about the physical well-being of opposing players; that's the core of the context. Let's break down the possible senses of the word.

First, there's the most basic definition: the *condition* of being susceptible to harm or injury. Think, "You're in no danger here." That seems like a solid contender. Then, we've got the notion of a venture, a *risk* taken without considering potential losses or injury, maybe like a high-stakes bet. Doesn't quite feel right here. Next, we have "danger" as a *cause* of pain, injury, or even loss, like a specific threat. Still not quite nailing it for this context. Finally, there's "danger" as a *place* that is dangerous, which is obviously not applicable.

Putting it all together, the first definition – the *condition* of being vulnerable to harm or injury – is the clear winner. "Wasn't put into danger" clearly means they weren't exposed to the risk of being harmed or injured, which aligns perfectly with the discussion of physical integrity in the context. We're looking at the *state* of not being susceptible to harm.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: advantage
Target surface form: advantages
Context:
It is so extended that it part of the ethos, of the unwritten rules, but followed nonetheless by this sport. Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician. Anyway, the debate deals with if that type of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport, that is to say, if with these actions fraud is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful actions with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense. The matter examines the type of damage that is brought to the sporting spirit. One of the advantages that include the sport spirit is the physical integrity of the opposite players, aspect that with these actions wasn't put into danger, that is to say, there was no violent game. Another of these <t>advantages</t> to which it is alluded to with the fare-play is to avoid that the team of the lawbreaker players takes advantage unjustly of the opposite team, which did not happen either. However, the paradoxical thing about the action of the players of Real Madrid is that it did not comply to what we normally characterize as legal fraud, because the violation of the rules was not made secretly as to try to avoid the sanction, but their action was most evident and thus they received punishment from the referee.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=advantage%1:07:00:: | definition=the quality of having a superior or more favorable position | synonyms=vantage | examples=the experience gave him the advantage over me
2. sense_key=advantage%1:23:00:: | definition=(tennis) first point scored after deuce
3. sense_key=advantage%1:07:01:: | definition=benefit resulting from some event or action | synonyms=reward | examples=it turned out to my advantage; reaping the rewards of generosity

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 3}
```

reasoning_content:
**Analyzing "Advantages" in Context**

Okay, so the word is "advantages," and it's all about what comes from fair play and the sports spirit. Got it. Let's see... Candidate 1: "quality of having a superior position." Hmmm, not quite right, though it *could* fit in a very specific, almost strategic way. Candidate 2: "tennis point." No, clearly not. That's a very specific, sport-specific meaning. Candidate 3: "benefit resulting from some event or action (reward)." Aha! That's it. It's about *positive outcomes*. We're talking about the good things that come from fair play, like physical integrity, and not letting the cheaters unfairly win.

Hold on, I am going to double-check. "Advantage" *can* mean a positive characteristic. It depends on the situation. But comparing 1 and 3, in this context, "benefit" aligns much better with those positive things that the sports spirit provides. It feels like "benefit" is the more direct, broader concept. Therefore, I am going with option 3.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: team
Target surface form: team
Context:
It is so extended that it part of the ethos, of the unwritten rules, but followed nonetheless by this sport. Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician. Anyway, the debate deals with if that type of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport, that is to say, if with these actions fraud is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful actions with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense. The matter examines the type of damage that is brought to the sporting spirit. One of the advantages that include the sport spirit is the physical integrity of the opposite players, aspect that with these actions wasn't put into danger, that is to say, there was no violent game. Another of these advantages to which it is alluded to with the fare-play is to avoid that the <t>team</t> of the lawbreaker players takes advantage unjustly of the opposite team, which did not happen either. However, the paradoxical thing about the action of the players of Real Madrid is that it did not comply to what we normally characterize as legal fraud, because the violation of the rules was not made secretly as to try to avoid the sanction, but their action was most evident and thus they received punishment from the referee.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=team%1:14:00:: | definition=a cooperative unit (especially in sports) | synonyms=squad
2. sense_key=team%1:14:01:: | definition=two or more draft animals that work together to pull something

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

reasoning_content:
**Analyzing the Connotation of "Team"**

Alright, let's break this down. The target word is "team," and the context is pretty straightforward: we're dealing with a sporting scenario, likely a match involving Real Madrid, players, and a referee. The key phrase is "takes advantage unjustly of the opposite team," which immediately grounds us in the competitive dynamics of sports.

My initial assessment is focused on identifying the most relevant definition. Let's look at the candidates:

*   Candidate 1 suggests "a cooperative unit (especially in sports)."
*   Candidate 2 offers "two or more draft animals..."

Clearly, the first candidate is the only correct answer. In this context, "team" refers specifically to a group of players working together in pursuit of a common goal, particularly in a sports setting. Candidate 2 is entirely off-base, and that's that.