[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: rule
Target surface form: rules
Context:
The expulsion presumably forged by two players of Real Madrid (Xabi Alonso and Sergio Ramos) in the game played on the 23rd of November against Ajax in European Champions League has caused rivers of ink to be written about if such behavior is or is not unsportsmanlike and if, both players should be sanctioned by UEFA. As we all know, a few minutes before the end of the game (that their team had already won), both players deliberately wasted time which made the referee show the second yellow card to both of them. This way, and since Real Madrid will finish as leader of its group, both players will fulfil the prescribed sanction during the next game of league, against Auxerre, and will be able to get rid of the cards the following phase. Finally, the committee of discipline of the UEFA has sanctioned with two games the trainer of the team, Jose Mourinho, and with different economic amounts the implied players. The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of football. It is so extended that it part of the ethos, of the unwritten <t>rules</t>, but followed nonetheless by this sport. Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=rule%1:09:00:: | definition=a principle or condition that customarily governs behavior | synonyms=regulation | examples=it was his rule to take a walk before breakfast; short haircuts were the regulation
2. sense_key=rule%1:09:01:: | definition=something regarded as a normative example | synonyms=convention, normal, pattern, formula | examples=the convention of not naming the main character; violence is the rule not the exception
3. sense_key=rule%1:10:00:: | definition=prescribed guide for conduct or action | synonyms=prescript
4. sense_key=rule%1:10:01:: | definition=(linguistics) a rule describing (or prescribing) a linguistic practice | synonyms=linguistic rule
5. sense_key=rule%1:09:03:: | definition=a basic generalization that is accepted as true and that can be used as a basis for reasoning or conduct | synonyms=principle | examples=their principles of composition characterized all their works
6. sense_key=rule%1:28:00:: | definition=the duration of a monarch's or government's power | examples=during the rule of Elizabeth
7. sense_key=rule%1:26:00:: | definition=dominance or power through legal authority | synonyms=dominion | examples=France held undisputed dominion over vast areas of Africa; the rule of Caesar
8. sense_key=rule%1:10:02:: | definition=directions that define the way a game or sport is to be conducted | examples=he knew the rules of chess
9. sense_key=rule%1:10:03:: | definition=any one of a systematic body of regulations defining the way of life of members of a religious order | examples=the rule of St. Dominic
10. sense_key=rule%1:09:02:: | definition=a rule or law concerning a natural phenomenon or the function of a complex system | synonyms=principle | examples=the principle of the conservation of mass; the principle of jet propulsion
11. sense_key=rule%1:09:04:: | definition=(mathematics) a standard procedure for solving a class of mathematical problems | synonyms=formula | examples=he determined the upper bound with Descartes' rule of signs; he gave us a general formula for attacking polynomials
12. sense_key=rule%1:06:00:: | definition=measuring stick consisting of a strip of wood or metal or plastic with a straight edge that is used for drawing straight lines and measuring lengths | synonyms=ruler

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

reasoning_content:
**Analyzing the Sense of "Rules" in a Sports Context**

Okay, so I'm presented with the word "rules" in the context of "the ethos, of the unwritten rules, but followed nonetheless by this sport." My initial thought process involves parsing the potential meanings. It's a classic ambiguity problem. There are several senses of "rule" that could be relevant, ranging from a general principle governing behavior (regulation) to the formal, prescribed directions that define a game. The critical point is that these are *unwritten* rules within a sport.

My first thought is that, given the specific field, it might lean towards the formal "directions that define a game or sport is to be conducted" sense. Sports have explicit written rules, but the phrase "unwritten rules" immediately suggests something different. It is related to sense 8: "directions that define the way a game or sport is to be conducted".

However, the "unwritten" aspect prompts me to consider whether it refers to an accepted convention or behavioral norm. The context of "ethos" further pushes me towards "a principle or condition that customarily governs behavior." The reference to "ethos" - the characteristic spirit of a culture or community – leads me to consider the sense of "a principle or condition that customarily governs behavior".

I weigh the nuances of these definitions. Is the "unwritten rule" a formal direction, even if uncodified, or is it a custom? The phrase "followed nonetheless by this sport" is crucial; it does suggest an operational aspect, a practice that's integral to the sport's conduct.

My analysis also considers the distinction between different interpretations of this phrase: whether it is a prescribed guide (sense 3), or if it's more of a general principle (sense 1).

I realize that it's this nuance that is the key. Is this rule an actual direction, or a practice?

In this specific case, it's about a particular practice, a specific behavior that is not a stated rule. I need to zero in on how "unwritten" shapes the meaning. This "unwritten" status indicates that it's not a formally dictated rule, it's more of a guideline of behavior.

Considering examples such as "getting a yellow card to clear cards", it doesn't define how the game is played, it defines how players customarily behave. Thus, the best fit is "a principle or condition that customarily governs behavior". This really aligns with the concept of an unwritten rule. This suggests it's a normative convention, a practical pattern that is commonly followed.

Ultimately, although the presence of "sport" makes me consider "directions", the "unwritten" aspect and the nature of the example used makes me choose "a principle or condition that customarily governs behavior." This is reinforced by the context of "ethos" and the description of the behavior as a "practice".


attempt_kind: initial

status: success

[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: part
Target surface form: Part
Context:
As we all know, a few minutes before the end of the game (that their team had already won), both players deliberately wasted time which made the referee show the second yellow card to both of them. This way, and since Real Madrid will finish as leader of its group, both players will fulfil the prescribed sanction during the next game of league, against Auxerre, and will be able to get rid of the cards the following phase. Finally, the committee of discipline of the UEFA has sanctioned with two games the trainer of the team, Jose Mourinho, and with different economic amounts the implied players. The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of football. It is so extended that it part of the ethos, of the unwritten rules, but followed nonetheless by this sport. <t>Part</t> of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician. Anyway, the debate deals with if that type of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport, that is to say, if with these actions fraud is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful actions with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=part%1:24:00:: | definition=something determined in relation to something that includes it | synonyms=portion, component part, component, constituent | examples=he wanted to feel a part of something bigger than himself; I read a portion of the manuscript
2. sense_key=part%1:06:00:: | definition=something less than the whole of a human artifact | synonyms=portion | examples=the rear part of the house; glue the two parts together
3. sense_key=part%1:17:00:: | definition=a portion of a natural object | synonyms=piece | examples=they analyzed the river into three parts; he needed a piece of granite
4. sense_key=part%1:09:02:: | definition=that which concerns a person with regard to a particular role or situation | examples=it requires vigilance on our part; they resisted every effort on his part
5. sense_key=part%1:15:00:: | definition=the extended spatial location of something | synonyms=region | examples=the farming regions of France; religions in all parts of the world
6. sense_key=part%1:04:01:: | definition=the actions and activities assigned to or required or expected of a person or group | synonyms=function, office, role | examples=the function of a teacher; the government must do its part
7. sense_key=part%1:09:01:: | definition=an actor's portrayal of someone in a play | synonyms=character, role, theatrical role, persona | examples=she played the part of Desdemona
8. sense_key=part%1:21:00:: | definition=assets belonging to or due to or contributed by an individual person or group | synonyms=share, portion, percentage | examples=he wanted his share in cash
9. sense_key=part%1:09:00:: | definition=one of the portions into which something is regarded as divided and which together constitute a whole | synonyms=section, division | examples=the written part of the exam; the finance section of the company
10. sense_key=part%1:08:01:: | definition=a line of scalp that can be seen when sections of hair are combed in opposite directions | synonyms=parting | examples=his part was right in the middle
11. sense_key=part%1:10:00:: | definition=the melody carried by a particular voice or instrument in polyphonic music | synonyms=voice | examples=he tried to sing the tenor part
12. sense_key=part%1:04:03:: | definition=the part played by a person in bringing about a result | synonyms=contribution, share | examples=I am proud of my contribution in advancing the project; they all did their share of the work

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

raw_output:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

finish_reason: stop

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

role: assistant

reasoning_content:
**Analyzing the Lemma "Part" in Context**

Okay, so the target lemma is "part," and the context is "Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that...". My initial thought is to determine the correct sense of "part" here. I see it's likely referring to a portion or a section, something that constitutes a whole.

I'm considering a few candidate senses from my knowledge and resources: sense 1, "something determined in relation to something that includes it," sense 2, "something less than the whole of a human artifact," and sense 9, "one of the portions into which something is regarded as divided and which together constitute a whole."

"Part of the debate"... hmm. The word "debate" is abstract here. I interpret it as a specific portion or component of that debate.

Let's look more closely at sense 1: "something determined in relation to something that includes it." Examples are things like "a part of something bigger than himself," or "I read a portion of the manuscript". "Debate" is an activity, so what about if "part" is referring to some section or aspect of that activity? But I think sense 1 is more fitting.

I'm leaning towards sense 1 because the phrase "part of the debate" refers to a subset of the entire debate. Sense 9, with its emphasis on a clearly defined "section" or "division," seems less appropriate in this case.

I check WordNet to confirm my intuition and explore the hierarchy and similar usages of "part". My preliminary assessment aligns with sense 1 or sense 9, with sense 1 being more generic for mass and abstract concepts.

Okay, so let's check it. Is a "debate" divided into specific "portions"? Yes, here it means "some of the debate", a portion or component that is part of the whole. This usage corresponds to the definition from sense 1, "something determined in relation to something that includes it."

I believe sense 1 is the most appropriate. The phrase suggests a subset of the overall debate.

So, comparing sense 1's relation (something determined in relation to something that includes it) to sense 9's definition of "section, division". "Part of the debate" is essentially equivalent to "a portion of the debate."

This also fits as I consider the synonyms available for each sense: "portion, component, constituent" for sense 1 versus "section, division" for sense 9. It is "a portion of the debate", just like "I read a portion of the manuscript."

Sense 1 is the best fit.

type: thinking

service_tier: default

currency: USD


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: debate
Target surface form: debate
Context:
As we all know, a few minutes before the end of the game (that their team had already won), both players deliberately wasted time which made the referee show the second yellow card to both of them. This way, and since Real Madrid will finish as leader of its group, both players will fulfil the prescribed sanction during the next game of league, against Auxerre, and will be able to get rid of the cards the following phase. Finally, the committee of discipline of the UEFA has sanctioned with two games the trainer of the team, Jose Mourinho, and with different economic amounts the implied players. The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of football. It is so extended that it part of the ethos, of the unwritten rules, but followed nonetheless by this sport. Part of the <t>debate</t> arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician. Anyway, the debate deals with if that type of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport, that is to say, if with these actions fraud is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful actions with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=debate%1:10:01:: | definition=a discussion in which reasons are advanced for and against some proposition or proposal | synonyms=argument, argumentation | examples=the argument over foreign aid goes on and on
2. sense_key=debate%1:10:00:: | definition=the formal presentation of a stated proposition and the opposition to it (usually followed by a vote) | synonyms=disputation, public debate

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
**Analyzing the Usage of "Debate"**

Okay, so the task is to pinpoint the correct sense of "debate" in this context. The text offers a couple of clues: "Part of the debate arisen..." and "Anyway, the debate deals with..." I see immediately that the text isn't describing a formal, structured debate, like a legislative session or a high school debate club. The focus seems to be on the *content* of the discussion, the arguments for and against something – specifically, if deliberately getting yellow cards is unsportsmanlike.

Looking at the sense inventory, it's clear: "debate%1:10:01" – the general discussion, the back-and-forth arguments – is the better fit. The other option, "debate%1:10:00," the formalized presentation, just doesn't capture the essence of what's described in the text. This is a matter of interpretation, yes, but the context strongly favors the more general sense of "argument" or "discussion." I'm confident in choosing the first sense.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: case
Target surface form: case
Context:
As we all know, a few minutes before the end of the game (that their team had already won), both players deliberately wasted time which made the referee show the second yellow card to both of them. This way, and since Real Madrid will finish as leader of its group, both players will fulfil the prescribed sanction during the next game of league, against Auxerre, and will be able to get rid of the cards the following phase. Finally, the committee of discipline of the UEFA has sanctioned with two games the trainer of the team, Jose Mourinho, and with different economic amounts the implied players. The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of football. It is so extended that it part of the ethos, of the unwritten rules, but followed nonetheless by this sport. Part of the debate arisen in the related <t>case</t> is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician. Anyway, the debate deals with if that type of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport, that is to say, if with these actions fraud is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful actions with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=case%1:11:00:: | definition=an occurrence of something | synonyms=instance, example | examples=it was a case of bad judgment; another instance occurred yesterday
2. sense_key=case%1:26:00:: | definition=a special set of circumstances | synonyms=event | examples=in that event, the first possibility is excluded; it may rain in which case the picnic will be canceled
3. sense_key=case%1:04:00:: | definition=a comprehensive term for any proceeding in a court of law whereby an individual seeks a legal remedy | synonyms=lawsuit, suit, cause, causa | examples=the family brought suit against the landlord
4. sense_key=case%1:09:00:: | definition=the actual state of things | examples=that was not the case
5. sense_key=case%1:06:00:: | definition=a portable container for carrying several objects | examples=the musicians left their instrument cases backstage
6. sense_key=case%1:18:03:: | definition=a person requiring professional services | examples=a typical case was the suburban housewife described by a marriage counselor
7. sense_key=case%1:18:02:: | definition=a person who is subjected to experimental or other observational procedures; someone who is an object of investigation | synonyms=subject, guinea pig | examples=the subjects for this investigation were selected randomly; the cases that we studied were drawn from two different communities
8. sense_key=case%1:10:02:: | definition=a problem requiring investigation | examples=Perry Mason solved the case of the missing heir
9. sense_key=case%1:10:01:: | definition=a statement of facts and reasons used to support an argument | examples=he stated his case clearly
10. sense_key=case%1:23:00:: | definition=the quantity contained in a case | synonyms=caseful
11. sense_key=case%1:10:00:: | definition=nouns or pronouns or adjectives (often marked by inflection) related in some way to other words in a sentence | synonyms=grammatical case
12. sense_key=case%1:26:02:: | definition=a specific state of mind that is temporary | examples=a case of the jitters
13. sense_key=case%1:18:04:: | definition=a person of a specified kind (usually with many eccentricities) | synonyms=character, eccentric, type | examples=a real character; a strange character
14. sense_key=case%1:10:03:: | definition=a specific size and style of type within a type family | synonyms=font, fount, typeface, face
15. sense_key=case%1:08:00:: | definition=an enveloping structure or covering enclosing an animal or plant organ or part | synonyms=sheath
16. sense_key=case%1:06:06:: | definition=the housing or outer covering of something | synonyms=shell, casing | examples=the clock has a walnut case
17. sense_key=case%1:06:07:: | definition=the enclosing frame around a door or window opening | synonyms=casing | examples=the casings had rotted away and had to be replaced
18. sense_key=case%1:06:03:: | definition=(printing) the receptacle in which a compositor has his type, which is divided into compartments for the different letters, spaces, or numbers | synonyms=compositor's case, typesetter's case | examples=for English, a compositor will ordinarily have two such cases, the upper case containing the capitals and the lower case containing the small letters
19. sense_key=case%1:06:02:: | definition=bed linen consisting of a cover for a pillow | synonyms=pillowcase, slip, pillow slip | examples=the burglar carried his loot in a pillowcase
20. sense_key=case%1:06:01:: | definition=a glass container used to store and display items in a shop or museum or home | synonyms=display case, showcase, vitrine

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

reasoning_content:
**Deconstructing the Meaning of "Case" in Context**

Alright, let's break this down. The target word is "case," and the surrounding text mentions a situation involving Real Madrid players deliberately wasting time, leading to a UEFA disciplinary sanction. My initial thought is to figure out the exact nuance here, as "case" can mean several things.

Could this be a broad "occurrence of something," like the specific instance of the time-wasting itself, or is it a "problem requiring investigation" – a disciplinary case? Maybe it's even a "special set of circumstances." Given that UEFA's disciplinary committee was involved, "case" might refer to a formal proceeding, right?

The phrase "the debate arisen in the related case" is the key. The committee investigated, so, in the most literal sense, it could be a "case of bad judgement." However, looking at the wider context, the text talks about similar situations. So, it *could* be a related "instance" or "occurrence." Let's look at it more closely: "the provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one...Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that..." So, "this one" refers to the case/instance that's currently being discussed.

Checking the definitions... I am seeing that "case" (sense 1) means "an occurrence of something," with synonyms like instance or example. That seems right. Also, "case" (sense 8) means "a problem requiring investigation." Then sense 2 means "special circumstances." And sense 3 means "lawsuit."

So, given the context, particularly the "debate" around the *specific* incident and the fact that it's "related" to other similar incidents, I'm leaning toward the "instance" definition. It's a "case" in the sense of a specific occurrence being debated. The Spanish phrase "el caso en cuestión" (the case at hand) is used. The best translation of the phrase "in the related case" is the related "instance".

So, "an occurrence of something" is the best fit. I can discard other definitions: "problem requiring investigation" (since the debate is about the incident), a "special set of circumstances" and a "lawsuit" doesn't work. The best way to phrase it, is to say it's "in the related instance."


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: fact
Target surface form: fact
Context:
As we all know, a few minutes before the end of the game (that their team had already won), both players deliberately wasted time which made the referee show the second yellow card to both of them. This way, and since Real Madrid will finish as leader of its group, both players will fulfil the prescribed sanction during the next game of league, against Auxerre, and will be able to get rid of the cards the following phase. Finally, the committee of discipline of the UEFA has sanctioned with two games the trainer of the team, Jose Mourinho, and with different economic amounts the implied players. The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of football. It is so extended that it part of the ethos, of the unwritten rules, but followed nonetheless by this sport. Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the <t>fact</t> that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician. Anyway, the debate deals with if that type of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport, that is to say, if with these actions fraud is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful actions with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=fact%1:09:01:: | definition=a piece of information about circumstances that exist or events that have occurred | examples=first you must collect all the facts of the case
2. sense_key=fact%1:10:01:: | definition=a statement or assertion of verified information about something that is the case or has happened | examples=he supported his argument with an impressive array of facts
3. sense_key=fact%1:26:01:: | definition=an event known to have happened or something known to have existed | examples=your fears have no basis in fact; how much of the story is fact and how much fiction is hard to tell
4. sense_key=fact%1:09:02:: | definition=a concept whose truth can be proved | examples=scientific hypotheses are not facts

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

raw_output:
```json
{
  "sense_index": 3
}
```

content:
```json
{
  "sense_index": 3
}
```

reasoning_content:
**Deconstructing the Phrase "The Fact That Has Been Carried Out"**

Okay, so I'm dissecting this phrase. The context says something is "caused by the fact that has been carried out by the Real Madrid organization". The phrasing "the fact that has been carried out" is throwing me. It feels a bit clunky. It *implies* the event or the deed that was carried out, right? Like it's being used as a pronoun for the *action* itself, rather than the more typical "the fact that [some clause is true]". This could also be a dodgy translation from Spanish, maybe using "el hecho" directly, which means "the fact", but also "the event" or "the deed."

So, I'm going through the senses of "fact" to see which one fits best here. Let's see...

*   **Sense 1:** "a piece of information about circumstances that exist or events that have occurred". Nah, that doesn't feel right. Can information *be* carried out? No.
*   **Sense 2:** "a statement or assertion of verified information." Again, not a good fit.
*   **Sense 3:** "an event known to have happened or something known to have existed". Hmm, this is interesting. This feels like it might work. "The fact [deed/event] that has been carried out..."? Yeah, that makes sense. It's referring to the *event* itself.
*   **Sense 4:** "a concept whose truth can be proved". No, not applicable.

If it's "the fact that *it* has been carried out...", it represents the reality or the event. Both ways, it's referring to the event that happened. I need to make sure this fits the examples. Yeah, this feels right. The author is treating "fact" as the thing that was done or the event itself.

Okay, I'm pausing to consider a weird archaic or translation thing here. If it *is* grammatically correct as "the fact that has been carried out", the relative pronoun "that" is the *subject* of "has been carried out," so "fact" literally = the thing that was carried out. In that case, still, "fact" = event/action. So Sense 3, "an event known to have happened" fits.

Back to the senses, let me make sure.

*   **Sense 1:** Can information be carried out? No.
*   Can an "event" be carried out? Yes, an event or action.

So Sense 3 is the *only* one logically compatible with "has been carried out".

Now, let's look at "the fact that [X]". Is it a typo, or meant to be "the fact that it [X]"? If the latter, "the fact that" would be an introductory complementizer phrase and introducing a circumstance. In that case, is "the fact that" Sense 1 or Sense 3? WordNet doesn't distinguish between the two for "the fact that". Sense 1 is "a piece of information". But, given the text, it is "the fact that [event] has been carried out" – Still, it's referring to the event.

Okay, I'm pretty confident that Sense 3 works.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: team
Target surface form: team
Context:
As we all know, a few minutes before the end of the game (that their team had already won), both players deliberately wasted time which made the referee show the second yellow card to both of them. This way, and since Real Madrid will finish as leader of its group, both players will fulfil the prescribed sanction during the next game of league, against Auxerre, and will be able to get rid of the cards the following phase. Finally, the committee of discipline of the UEFA has sanctioned with two games the trainer of the team, Jose Mourinho, and with different economic amounts the implied players. The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of football. It is so extended that it part of the ethos, of the unwritten rules, but followed nonetheless by this sport. Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by <t>team</t> of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician. Anyway, the debate deals with if that type of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport, that is to say, if with these actions fraud is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful actions with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=team%1:14:00:: | definition=a cooperative unit (especially in sports) | synonyms=squad
2. sense_key=team%1:14:01:: | definition=two or more draft animals that work together to pull something

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

reasoning_content:
**Analyzing "Team" in Context**

Okay, so the target word is "team," pretty straightforward. The surface form is exactly "team," no surprises there. The context is a football game, Real Madrid and Jose Mourinho, that's important. I need to figure out which sense of "team" is being used in the phrase "...carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization...".

I'm given two potential senses to consider. The first, sense_key "team%1:14:00::," defines it as "a cooperative unit (especially in sports)," with "squad" as a synonym. Bingo. That immediately resonates with the football context.

The second sense, "team%1:14:01::," refers to "two or more draft animals that work together to pull something." That's clearly irrelevant here. Given the context of a football match involving Real Madrid, sense 1, the sports team definition, is the only plausible interpretation. Case closed.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: organization
Target surface form: organization
Context:
As we all know, a few minutes before the end of the game (that their team had already won), both players deliberately wasted time which made the referee show the second yellow card to both of them. This way, and since Real Madrid will finish as leader of its group, both players will fulfil the prescribed sanction during the next game of league, against Auxerre, and will be able to get rid of the cards the following phase. Finally, the committee of discipline of the UEFA has sanctioned with two games the trainer of the team, Jose Mourinho, and with different economic amounts the implied players. The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of football. It is so extended that it part of the ethos, of the unwritten rules, but followed nonetheless by this sport. Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid <t>organization</t> (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician. Anyway, the debate deals with if that type of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport, that is to say, if with these actions fraud is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful actions with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=organization%1:14:00:: | definition=a group of people who work together | synonyms=organisation
2. sense_key=organization%1:09:00:: | definition=an organized structure for arranging or classifying | synonyms=arrangement, organisation, system | examples=he changed the arrangement of the topics; the facts were familiar but it was in the organization of them that he was original
3. sense_key=organization%1:14:01:: | definition=the persons (or committees or departments etc.) who make up a body for the purpose of administering something | synonyms=administration, governance, governing body, establishment, brass, organisation | examples=he claims that the present administration is corrupt; the governance of an association is responsible to its members
4. sense_key=organization%1:04:00:: | definition=the act of organizing a business or an activity related to a business | synonyms=organisation | examples=he was brought in to supervise the organization of a new department
5. sense_key=organization%1:07:00:: | definition=an ordered manner; orderliness by virtue of being methodical and well organized | synonyms=organisation, system | examples=his compulsive organization was not an endearing quality; we can't do it unless we establish some system around here
6. sense_key=organization%1:04:01:: | definition=the activity or result of distributing or disposing persons or things properly or methodically | synonyms=organisation | examples=his organization of the work force was very efficient
7. sense_key=organization%1:04:02:: | definition=the act of forming or establishing something | synonyms=constitution, establishment, formation, organisation | examples=the constitution of a PTA group last year; it was the establishment of his reputation

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

reasoning_content:
**Analyzing the Meaning of "Organization" in Context**

Okay, so the target word is "organization," and the context mentions the "Real Madrid organization." My initial thought is to consider the possible senses, and the list presents a few options. Sense 1, "a group of people who work together," immediately strikes me as the most likely candidate, given that we're talking about a football club. Real Madrid is, after all, a corporate entity made up of players, staff, management, etc., all working towards a common goal.

Then I paused – could sense 3, "the persons... who make up a body for the purpose of administering something," be relevant? It seems plausible, because a sports club has administrators, committees, departments, and so on. But, thinking more broadly about how these entities are typically classified, "organization" in the context of a sports franchise is generally used to mean a group of people working together.

To confirm this, I should probably check WordNet. Let's see... WordNet's entry for sense 1:14:00 (a group of people who work together) does indeed encompass commercial enterprises, clubs, and franchises. That aligns perfectly with my initial assessment. So, given the context, I'm confident that sense 1, "a group of people who work together," is the most appropriate interpretation of "organization" in this case.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: nobility
Target surface form: nobility
Context:
As we all know, a few minutes before the end of the game (that their team had already won), both players deliberately wasted time which made the referee show the second yellow card to both of them. This way, and since Real Madrid will finish as leader of its group, both players will fulfil the prescribed sanction during the next game of league, against Auxerre, and will be able to get rid of the cards the following phase. Finally, the committee of discipline of the UEFA has sanctioned with two games the trainer of the team, Jose Mourinho, and with different economic amounts the implied players. The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of football. It is so extended that it part of the ethos, of the unwritten rules, but followed nonetheless by this sport. Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of <t>nobility</t> and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician. Anyway, the debate deals with if that type of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport, that is to say, if with these actions fraud is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful actions with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=nobility%1:14:00:: | definition=a privileged class holding hereditary titles | synonyms=aristocracy
2. sense_key=nobility%1:07:00:: | definition=the quality of elevation of mind and exaltation of character or ideals or conduct | synonyms=nobleness, magnanimousness, grandeur
3. sense_key=nobility%1:26:00:: | definition=the state of being of noble birth | synonyms=noblesse

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

raw_output:
```json
{"sense_index": 2}
```

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 2}
```

reasoning_content:
**Analyzing the Nuances of "Nobility"**

Alright, let's break this down. The target is "nobility," and the surface form matches. The context is interesting: "Part of the debate... Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous acts)..." That phrase "presumes of nobility and honor" is key here. My mind immediately jumps to the candidate senses.

Sense 1, **nobility%1:14:00::**, the "privileged class holding hereditary titles," seems immediately wrong. The context mentions Real Madrid's *hymn*, which is about ideals and aspirations, not social structures.

Sense 3, **nobility%1:26:00::**, the "state of being of noble birth," is closer, but still doesn't quite fit. While Real Madrid might aspire to a certain pedigree of sportsmanship, it's not directly about birthright.

That leaves **nobility%1:07:00::**, "the quality of elevation of mind and exaltation of character or ideals or conduct," which is exactly what I'm looking for. This hits the nail on the head. The "honor" paired with "nobility" in this context points to character, not social standing. Their hymn is likely praising a sense of good character, conduct, and ideals.

Therefore, **Sense 2 is the most appropriate sense.** Case closed.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: honor
Target surface form: honor
Context:
As we all know, a few minutes before the end of the game (that their team had already won), both players deliberately wasted time which made the referee show the second yellow card to both of them. This way, and since Real Madrid will finish as leader of its group, both players will fulfil the prescribed sanction during the next game of league, against Auxerre, and will be able to get rid of the cards the following phase. Finally, the committee of discipline of the UEFA has sanctioned with two games the trainer of the team, Jose Mourinho, and with different economic amounts the implied players. The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of football. It is so extended that it part of the ethos, of the unwritten rules, but followed nonetheless by this sport. Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and <t>honor</t>, and that has fined its players for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician. Anyway, the debate deals with if that type of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport, that is to say, if with these actions fraud is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful actions with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=honor%1:10:00:: | definition=a tangible symbol signifying approval or distinction | synonyms=award, accolade, honour, laurels | examples=an award for bravery
2. sense_key=honor%1:26:00:: | definition=the state of being honored | synonyms=honour, laurels
3. sense_key=honor%1:07:00:: | definition=the quality of being honorable and having a good name | synonyms=honour | examples=a man of honor
4. sense_key=honor%1:07:01:: | definition=a woman's virtue or chastity | synonyms=honour, purity, pureness

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

raw_output:
```json
{"sense_index": 3}
```

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 3}
```

reasoning_content:
**Analyzing the Concept of "Honor" in a Sporting Context**

Okay, so I'm looking at this phrase "presumes of nobility and honor" in relation to Real Madrid's anthem and their tactics. It's a bit of a head-scratcher, because we're talking about a team supposedly celebrating its "nobility and honor" while simultaneously engaging in time-wasting to get a yellow card. The contradiction needs a close examination.

The word "honor" immediately jumps out, and I need to determine which nuance is being invoked here. I'm going through the definitions, and I'm discarding the more literal ones first – no awards or literal symbols of approval are at play here. Also, since we are not considering a woman's virtue or chastity, I am discarding sense 4.

That leaves me with Sense 3: "the quality of being honorable and having a good name." That seems like the most fitting definition in this scenario. If we are examining the context of the hymn and the team's claimed values, "nobility and honor" in this context translates to "having a good name" and "being honorable." That's the core of the dilemma: how do they reconcile these moral claims with potentially unsportsmanlike conduct? So, Sense 3 is the clear winner here.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: player
Target surface form: players
Context:
As we all know, a few minutes before the end of the game (that their team had already won), both players deliberately wasted time which made the referee show the second yellow card to both of them. This way, and since Real Madrid will finish as leader of its group, both players will fulfil the prescribed sanction during the next game of league, against Auxerre, and will be able to get rid of the cards the following phase. Finally, the committee of discipline of the UEFA has sanctioned with two games the trainer of the team, Jose Mourinho, and with different economic amounts the implied players. The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of football. It is so extended that it part of the ethos, of the unwritten rules, but followed nonetheless by this sport. Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its <t>players</t> for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician. Anyway, the debate deals with if that type of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport, that is to say, if with these actions fraud is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful actions with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=player%1:18:01:: | definition=a person who participates in or is skilled at some game | synonyms=participant
2. sense_key=player%1:18:02:: | definition=someone who plays a musical instrument (as a profession) | synonyms=musician, instrumentalist
3. sense_key=player%1:18:00:: | definition=a theatrical performer | synonyms=actor, histrion, thespian, role player
4. sense_key=player%1:18:04:: | definition=a person who pursues a number of different social and sexual partners simultaneously
5. sense_key=player%1:18:03:: | definition=an important participant (as in a business deal) | examples=he was a major player in setting up the corporation

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

reasoning_content:
**Analyzing the Meaning of "Players"**

Okay, so the word I need to understand is "players." The context is Real Madrid, a football team, and specifically, something about them getting fined for "analogous acts." Clearly, we're talking about individuals involved in the sport. Let's see... I've got a few options here, based on my understanding of the lexical semantics:

1.  *player%1:18:01:: a person who participates in or is skilled at some game* - This feels right, given the football context.
2.  *player%1:18:02:: someone who plays a musical instrument (as a profession)* - Definitely not. The context is sports, not music.
3.  *player%1:18:00:: a theatrical performer* - Nope. While there's performance involved in football, this isn't the primary meaning here.
4.  *player%1:18:04:: a person who pursues a number of different social and sexual partners simultaneously* - Absolutely not. That's a completely irrelevant sense here.
5.  *player%1:18:03:: an important participant (as in a business deal)* - While "players" in a business deal is a common phrase, this is not the relevant sense here.

Based on the context, there's no question about it; sense 1 is the correct one. The word "players" refers to the individuals who participate in the football game, the athletes representing Real Madrid. That's the only logical interpretation given the surrounding information.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: act
Target surface form: acts
Context:
As we all know, a few minutes before the end of the game (that their team had already won), both players deliberately wasted time which made the referee show the second yellow card to both of them. This way, and since Real Madrid will finish as leader of its group, both players will fulfil the prescribed sanction during the next game of league, against Auxerre, and will be able to get rid of the cards the following phase. Finally, the committee of discipline of the UEFA has sanctioned with two games the trainer of the team, Jose Mourinho, and with different economic amounts the implied players. The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of football. It is so extended that it part of the ethos, of the unwritten rules, but followed nonetheless by this sport. Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous <t>acts</t>) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician. Anyway, the debate deals with if that type of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport, that is to say, if with these actions fraud is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful actions with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=act%1:10:01:: | definition=a legal document codifying the result of deliberations of a committee or society or legislative body | synonyms=enactment
2. sense_key=act%1:03:00:: | definition=something that people do or cause to happen | synonyms=deed, human action, human activity
3. sense_key=act%1:10:00:: | definition=a subdivision of a play or opera or ballet
4. sense_key=act%1:10:02:: | definition=a short theatrical performance that is part of a longer program | synonyms=routine, number, turn, bit | examples=he did his act three times every evening; she had a catchy little routine
5. sense_key=act%1:10:03:: | definition=a manifestation of insincerity | examples=he put on quite an act for her benefit

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 2}
```

reasoning_content:
**Analyzing the Meaning of "Acts" in Context**

Okay, so the word I'm dissecting is "acts," specifically in the phrase "...and that has fined its players for analogous acts..." Right, the context is football, where players are apparently getting fined for intentionally wasting time to get yellow cards. It's a behavior that's generating some discussion, which is important to consider.

Now, let's look at the candidate senses. I've got: a legal document, a deed or human action, a theatrical subdivision, a short performance, and a manifestation of insincerity. Given the situation, it's pretty clear that the appropriate sense is **act%1:03:00**, the one that covers something that people *do* or *cause to happen*—a deed, a human action, a human activity. That’s the most obvious fit.

The key here is that the players are being fined for *something they did*—their actions, their deeds, not a legal document or a theatrical performance. "Analogous acts" refers to similar *human actions*. It's a clear match. Sense 2 it is. Case closed.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: history
Target surface form: history
Context:
As we all know, a few minutes before the end of the game (that their team had already won), both players deliberately wasted time which made the referee show the second yellow card to both of them. This way, and since Real Madrid will finish as leader of its group, both players will fulfil the prescribed sanction during the next game of league, against Auxerre, and will be able to get rid of the cards the following phase. Finally, the committee of discipline of the UEFA has sanctioned with two games the trainer of the team, Jose Mourinho, and with different economic amounts the implied players. The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of football. It is so extended that it part of the ethos, of the unwritten rules, but followed nonetheless by this sport. Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded <t>history</t> of histrionic and provoking technician. Anyway, the debate deals with if that type of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport, that is to say, if with these actions fraud is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful actions with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=history%1:28:00:: | definition=the aggregate of past events | examples=a critical time in the school's history
2. sense_key=history%1:10:00:: | definition=a record or narrative description of past events | synonyms=account, chronicle, story | examples=a history of France; he gave an inaccurate account of the plot to kill the president
3. sense_key=history%1:09:00:: | definition=the discipline that records and interprets past events involving human beings | examples=he teaches Medieval history; history takes the long view
4. sense_key=history%1:28:02:: | definition=the continuum of events occurring in succession leading from the past to the present and even into the future | examples=all of human history
5. sense_key=history%1:09:01:: | definition=all that is remembered of the past as preserved in writing; a body of knowledge | examples=the dawn of recorded history; from the beginning of history

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

raw_output:
```json
{
  "sense_index": 1
}
```

content:
```json
{
  "sense_index": 1
}
```

reasoning_content:
**Analyzing the "History" of Mourinho's Behavior**

Okay, the target is "history" in the context of Mourinho's "expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician." This feels like a classic case for word sense disambiguation. The text's saying he's adding to his... well, what *is* his "history" here?

My initial instinct is that it refers to his track record, his past actions and behaviors. I'm immediately leaning towards either the "aggregate of past events" or a "record" of those events. Let's look at the candidates provided:

1.  "the aggregate of past events" - This seems promising, given it refers to an *accumulation* of behaviors, which seems to match the phrase "adds one more to his expanded history."
2.  "a record or narrative description of past events" - This could also be a possibility. It aligns with the idea of a "track record."
3.  "the discipline" - Obviously not relevant here.
4.  "the continuum of events" - Too broad; not quite what's being conveyed.
5.  "all that is remembered of the past as preserved in writing" - Also not the right fit.

The phrase "adds one more" implies a sequence or collection. It's similar to "adds to his track record." We're building a collection here. "His expanded history" strongly suggests a *personal* history, the build-up of his past actions.

The context indicates something like "he has a history of X." But is that the events themselves or just a "record" of them? It's a bit ambiguous. In WordNet, when we talk about a "history of heart disease," it's often a record of those events, but sometimes the actual events themselves. This is where it gets interesting...

Let's check WordNet. The dictionary describes "history" as: 1. the aggregate of past events, "a critical time in the school's history" and 2. a record or narrative description of past events, like "a history of France".

Okay, so is it the events themselves, or the record? The phrase "adds one more to his expanded history" makes me focus on the *action* of adding an *event* to something. It is analogous to "adding a chapter". It's a *collection*, not necessarily a narrative. The first sense "aggregate of past events" seems more apt in the phrase "adds one more to his expanded history". "Adds a chapter to his history" is a better fit for Sense 2.

WordNet's "history" (record) includes the synonyms "account, chronicle, story". This implies a *telling* or documentation, which isn't the primary meaning here. However, "a track record" is not a "narrative description", so sense 2 doesn't fit here.

However, consider the aggregate. Does it make sense to "add" one more event to the events themselves? Yes!

The translation from Spanish, "dilatado historial", is relevant. "Historial" more directly points to "record" or "dossier", but it can also refer to the aggregate of prior actions. "Track record" is a better analogy: a record of past performance or events in the aggregate.

In this context, the phrase is "adds one more [action/dramatization] to his expanded history...". Here, the addition is an action that is being added to a set of actions. This *strongly* points toward the aggregate.

It feels like the aggregate of his histrionic behavior is what is being talked about, meaning, his "history" is the collection of events, rather than an abstract record. "History of X" implies his *past* *X's*.

Okay, so I will select "the aggregate of past events" (Sense 1) as the most appropriate interpretation here. It reflects the idea of "building" or "expanding" his past actions in terms of behavior. This is further validated in considering examples like a "history of violence" - referring to the *collection* of events, not the record. The translation further reinforces this sense. Therefore, in the phrase "adds one more to his expanded history," "history" refers to the *collection* of past events.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: debate
Target surface form: debate
Context:
This way, and since Real Madrid will finish as leader of its group, both players will fulfil the prescribed sanction during the next game of league, against Auxerre, and will be able to get rid of the cards the following phase. Finally, the committee of discipline of the UEFA has sanctioned with two games the trainer of the team, Jose Mourinho, and with different economic amounts the implied players. The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of football. It is so extended that it part of the ethos, of the unwritten rules, but followed nonetheless by this sport. Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician. Anyway, the <t>debate</t> deals with if that type of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport, that is to say, if with these actions fraud is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful actions with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense. The matter examines the type of damage that is brought to the sporting spirit.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=debate%1:10:01:: | definition=a discussion in which reasons are advanced for and against some proposition or proposal | synonyms=argument, argumentation | examples=the argument over foreign aid goes on and on
2. sense_key=debate%1:10:00:: | definition=the formal presentation of a stated proposition and the opposition to it (usually followed by a vote) | synonyms=disputation, public debate

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

reasoning_content:
**My Analysis of the "Yellow Card" Debate**

Okay, so I'm reading about this whole "yellow card strategy" in football and the debate surrounding it. The text starts by acknowledging the discussion, noting that *part of the debate arises from the fact that...* and then mentions it deals with if the behavior is specifically prohibited. Right away, I'm thinking about how we use the word "debate." There are clearly two senses here, and I need to be precise.

It's pretty obvious the text isn't talking about some formal, structured debate with a vote at the end – you know, the parliamentary sort. *That's* the second definition, the formal presentation and opposition. No, what we have here is more of a general public discussion, an argumentation about whether the tactic is ethical, within the sport's unwritten principles.

Therefore, the first sense – a discussion in which reasons are advanced for and against some proposition or proposal – is the correct interpretation. It's a general conversation about the right and wrong of this yellow card strategy, not a formal debate in a set structure. My expertise and the context of the situation helps me to select the most appropriate meaning.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: type
Target surface form: type
Context:
This way, and since Real Madrid will finish as leader of its group, both players will fulfil the prescribed sanction during the next game of league, against Auxerre, and will be able to get rid of the cards the following phase. Finally, the committee of discipline of the UEFA has sanctioned with two games the trainer of the team, Jose Mourinho, and with different economic amounts the implied players. The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of football. It is so extended that it part of the ethos, of the unwritten rules, but followed nonetheless by this sport. Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician. Anyway, the debate deals with if that <t>type</t> of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport, that is to say, if with these actions fraud is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful actions with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense. The matter examines the type of damage that is brought to the sporting spirit.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=type%1:09:00:: | definition=a subdivision of a particular kind of thing | examples=what type of sculpture do you prefer?
2. sense_key=type%1:18:00:: | definition=a person of a specified kind (usually with many eccentricities) | synonyms=character, eccentric, case | examples=a real character; a strange character
3. sense_key=type%1:14:01:: | definition=(biology) the taxonomic group whose characteristics are used to define the next higher taxon
4. sense_key=type%1:10:01:: | definition=printed characters | examples=small type is hard to read
5. sense_key=type%1:10:00:: | definition=all of the tokens of the same symbol | examples=the word `element' contains five different types of character
6. sense_key=type%1:06:00:: | definition=a small metal block bearing a raised character on one end; produces a printed character when inked and pressed on paper | examples=he dropped a case of type, so they made him pick them up

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

reasoning_content:
**Analyzing the Meaning of "Type" in Context**

Okay, so the target is "type," and it appears as "type" in the text. The surrounding words are "...the debate deals with if that <t>type</t> of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation..." The key phrase is "that type of behavior".

Alright, let's consider the possible senses from the knowledge base.

*   **Sense 1** is about subdivisions, like "what type of sculpture do you prefer?".
*   **Sense 2** refers to a person, like "he's a strange type".
*   **Sense 3, 4, 5, and 6** are all about biology, typography, or language.

The phrase "type of behavior" definitely implies a "kind of behavior." Hmmm, that sounds a lot like the definition for sense 1: "a subdivision of a particular kind of thing."

Let's double-check. The example for sense 1 is "what type of sculpture do you prefer?" Yup, we can say "that type of behavior" in the same way. The other senses are completely irrelevant here. Sense 2 is about people, and the others aren't even on the same topic.

Therefore, sense index 1 seems the clear winner here.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: behavior
Target surface form: behavior
Context:
This way, and since Real Madrid will finish as leader of its group, both players will fulfil the prescribed sanction during the next game of league, against Auxerre, and will be able to get rid of the cards the following phase. Finally, the committee of discipline of the UEFA has sanctioned with two games the trainer of the team, Jose Mourinho, and with different economic amounts the implied players. The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of football. It is so extended that it part of the ethos, of the unwritten rules, but followed nonetheless by this sport. Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician. Anyway, the debate deals with if that type of <t>behavior</t> not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport, that is to say, if with these actions fraud is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful actions with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense. The matter examines the type of damage that is brought to the sporting spirit.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=behavior%1:04:00:: | definition=manner of acting or controlling yourself | synonyms=behaviour, conduct, doings
2. sense_key=behavior%1:26:00:: | definition=the action or reaction of something (as a machine or substance) under specified circumstances | synonyms=behaviour | examples=the behavior of small particles can be studied in experiments
3. sense_key=behavior%1:07:00:: | definition=(behavioral attributes) the way a person behaves toward other people | synonyms=demeanor, demeanour, behaviour, conduct, deportment
4. sense_key=behavior%1:04:01:: | definition=(psychology) the aggregate of the responses or reactions or movements made by an organism in any situation | synonyms=behaviour

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

reasoning_content:
**Analyzing the Nuances of "Behavior" in This Context**

Okay, so the target is "behavior", and the surface form is, well, "behavior." The context centers on this soccer team's controversial action – deliberately getting yellow cards. My immediate thought is to consider the possible senses. We've got a few: manner of acting, action/reaction of something, behavior toward others, and the more psychological definition.

Initially, Sense 1, "manner of acting or controlling yourself," seems like the strongest contender. It aligns with the idea of a specific "type of conduct" – these deliberate actions. "That type of behavior" essentially boils down to "that type of conduct/doings," right?

Now, let's contrast Sense 1 with Sense 3, which focuses on "demeanor/deportment," how one behaves *towards others.* That doesn't quite fit the bill here. This is about *actions*, about what the team *does*, "these actions," "analogous acts". "Doings" is the most appropriate.

Just to be absolutely sure, let's quickly cross-reference with WordNet. Behavior%1:04:00 is our "manner of acting" and behavior%1:07:00 is the "behavior toward others." Yep, we're solid. Sense 1 is the most fitting representation of "behavior".

So, "that type of behavior... if with these actions fraud is committed" makes perfect sense. The "behavior" is the action, or the *doings*, which aligns directly with Sense 1. This is the correct choice.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: principle
Target surface form: principles
Context:
This way, and since Real Madrid will finish as leader of its group, both players will fulfil the prescribed sanction during the next game of league, against Auxerre, and will be able to get rid of the cards the following phase. Finally, the committee of discipline of the UEFA has sanctioned with two games the trainer of the team, Jose Mourinho, and with different economic amounts the implied players. The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of football. It is so extended that it part of the ethos, of the unwritten rules, but followed nonetheless by this sport. Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician. Anyway, the debate deals with if that type of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the <t>principles</t> of the sport, that is to say, if with these actions fraud is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful actions with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense. The matter examines the type of damage that is brought to the sporting spirit.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=principle%1:09:03:: | definition=a basic generalization that is accepted as true and that can be used as a basis for reasoning or conduct | synonyms=rule | examples=their principles of composition characterized all their works
2. sense_key=principle%1:09:01:: | definition=a rule or standard especially of good behavior | examples=a man of principle; he will not violate his principles
3. sense_key=principle%1:09:00:: | definition=a basic truth or law or assumption | examples=the principles of democracy
4. sense_key=principle%1:09:04:: | definition=a rule or law concerning a natural phenomenon or the function of a complex system | synonyms=rule | examples=the principle of the conservation of mass; the principle of jet propulsion
5. sense_key=principle%1:10:00:: | definition=rule of personal conduct | synonyms=precept
6. sense_key=principle%1:09:02:: | definition=(law) an explanation of the fundamental reasons (especially an explanation of the working of some device in terms of laws of nature) | synonyms=rationale | examples=the rationale for capital punishment; the principles of internal-combustion engines

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 2}
```

reasoning_content:
**Analyzing "Principles of the Sport"**

Okay, here's the breakdown of my thinking. The core of this is figuring out the correct meaning of "principles" in "the principles of the sport." I started by listing the candidate definitions from WordNet and similar resources. My initial thought was that it could be similar to "principles of democracy," leaning towards a basic truth or assumption (Sense 3). However, the phrase "contradicts the principles of the sport" and the context of "sporting spirit" and ethical damage started pointing me toward something more behavioral, a rule or standard of good behavior (Sense 2).

Initially, I considered Sense 2 as typically being used for personal morality ("a man of principle"). But the context is explicitly about ethical behavior within the sport, and it's set in contrast to regulations, hinting at the unwritten rules of good conduct.  I saw that the idea of "sporting spirit" is related to moral principles, or ethics in sport.

I went back and forth, comparing Sense 2 ("good behavior") with Sense 3 ("basic truths/assumptions"), but the surrounding text ("fraud," "sporting spirit," the distinction between regulations and principles) made Sense 2 seem like the better fit. The reference to behavior contradicting principles, specifically. "violates his principles", this is Sense 2.

The key was "contradicts the principles" in connection with behavior. If we substitute "rules or standards of good behavior," it makes complete sense. I also considered basic tenets but it seems less in this specific context.  I also looked at Spanish equivalents.

Finally, I checked WordNet's definition for the senses, and read more examples. I saw it used in various contexts, from personal to institutional, like "principles of democracy," where ethical standards can be relevant.

Ultimately, given the specific phrase "contradicts the principles of the sport," particularly in connection with "sporting spirit" and "behavior," I conclude that Sense 2, "a rule or standard especially of good behavior," is the most accurate. The behavior is the key.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: action
Target surface form: actions
Context:
This way, and since Real Madrid will finish as leader of its group, both players will fulfil the prescribed sanction during the next game of league, against Auxerre, and will be able to get rid of the cards the following phase. Finally, the committee of discipline of the UEFA has sanctioned with two games the trainer of the team, Jose Mourinho, and with different economic amounts the implied players. The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of football. It is so extended that it part of the ethos, of the unwritten rules, but followed nonetheless by this sport. Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician. Anyway, the debate deals with if that type of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport, that is to say, if with these <t>actions</t> fraud is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful actions with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense. The matter examines the type of damage that is brought to the sporting spirit.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=action%1:04:02:: | definition=something done (usually as opposed to something said) | examples=there were stories of murders and other unnatural actions
2. sense_key=action%1:26:00:: | definition=the state of being active | synonyms=activity, activeness | examples=his sphere of activity; he is out of action
3. sense_key=action%1:04:03:: | definition=a military engagement | synonyms=military action | examples=he saw action in Korea
4. sense_key=action%1:22:00:: | definition=a process existing in or produced by nature (rather than by the intent of human beings) | synonyms=natural process, natural action, activity | examples=the action of natural forces; volcanic activity
5. sense_key=action%1:10:00:: | definition=the series of events that form a plot | examples=his novels always have a lot of action
6. sense_key=action%1:07:00:: | definition=the trait of being active and energetic and forceful | examples=a man of action
7. sense_key=action%1:06:00:: | definition=the operating part that transmits power to a mechanism | synonyms=action mechanism | examples=the piano had a very stiff action
8. sense_key=action%1:04:01:: | definition=a judicial proceeding brought by one party against another; one party prosecutes another for a wrong done or for protection of a right or for prevention of a wrong | synonyms=legal action, action at law
9. sense_key=action%1:04:04:: | definition=an act by a government body or supranational organization | examples=recent federal action undermined the segregationist position; the United Nations must have the power to propose and organize action without being hobbled by irrelevant issues
10. sense_key=action%1:04:00:: | definition=the most important or interesting work or activity in a specific area or field | examples=the action is no longer in technology stocks but in municipal bonds; gawkers always try to get as close to the action as possible

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

reasoning_content:
**Analyzing the Use of "Actions" in Context**

Okay, so the task is to pinpoint the correct sense of "actions" in this sentence. The surface form is "actions," and the target lemma is "action." The context is pretty clear: it's talking about behaviors that could constitute fraud within a sports regulation, specifically actions that might provoke a yellow card. My initial instinct, based on the context, is that this is about the *things done* by the players.

Let's quickly run through the candidate senses to be sure. I have: something done, the state of being active, a military engagement, a natural process, a plot element, energetic trait, a mechanism component, a judicial proceeding, a governmental act, and important work.

Hmm... sense 1, "something done," feels like the best fit right away. The phrasing "if with these actions fraud is committed... these actions... respectful actions..." reinforces that this is about the *behaviors* or *deeds* themselves. We are talking about "that type of behavior", "analogous acts", and "provocation of a yellow card". Those all align directly with "something done."

Yes, that makes perfect sense. I'm confident that sense 1 is the correct one. Therefore, the sense index is 1.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: fraud
Target surface form: fraud
Context:
This way, and since Real Madrid will finish as leader of its group, both players will fulfil the prescribed sanction during the next game of league, against Auxerre, and will be able to get rid of the cards the following phase. Finally, the committee of discipline of the UEFA has sanctioned with two games the trainer of the team, Jose Mourinho, and with different economic amounts the implied players. The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of football. It is so extended that it part of the ethos, of the unwritten rules, but followed nonetheless by this sport. Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician. Anyway, the debate deals with if that type of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport, that is to say, if with these actions <t>fraud</t> is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful actions with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense. The matter examines the type of damage that is brought to the sporting spirit.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=fraud%1:04:00:: | definition=intentional deception resulting in injury to another person
2. sense_key=fraud%1:18:00:: | definition=a person who makes deceitful pretenses | synonyms=imposter, impostor, pretender, fake, faker, sham
3. sense_key=fraud%1:04:01:: | definition=something intended to deceive; deliberate trickery intended to gain an advantage | synonyms=fraudulence, dupery, hoax, humbug, put-on

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 3}
```

reasoning_content:
**Analyzing "Fraud" in the Context of Tactical Yellow Cards**

Okay, so the target is "fraud" and we're looking at football players deliberately getting yellow cards to game the suspension system. I need to nail down the precise meaning here. The text hints at a conflict: actions respecting regulations but potentially violating the *spirit* of those regulations. That makes me think the meaning is likely a bit nuanced.

Let's look at the candidate senses. First, **fraud%1:04:00**, intentional deception causing injury. That feels a bit too broad. It's not a direct financial scam or a clear-cut case of someone being *injured* in the traditional sense. While there's a negative impact, it’s about a competitive disadvantage, not physical harm. Then, **fraud%1:18:00**, a person making deceitful pretenses – an imposter. Nope. We're dealing with *actions*, not an individual.

Now, **fraud%1:04:01**: something intended to deceive, deliberate trickery intended to gain an advantage. Bingo. The text explicitly says, "if with these actions fraud is committed." The players are *intentionally* manipulating the yellow card system. They are deliberately collecting cards in a strategically unimportant match (like Auxerre in this example) so they can serve their suspension and be clean for a more crucial game later. It's definitely trickery designed to create a competitive benefit. The advantage is clear: they are effectively side-stepping the intended penalty system. This sense is a perfect fit; it captures the essence of the maneuver. This is the definition.


[System] You are an English linguist performing fine-grained Word Sense Disambiguation. WordNet glosses are schematic. Use the sentence context, the examples, and the synonyms to choose the best indexed sense. Do not hedge. Choose the single best indexed sense.

[User]
Target lemma: action
Target surface form: actions
Context:
This way, and since Real Madrid will finish as leader of its group, both players will fulfil the prescribed sanction during the next game of league, against Auxerre, and will be able to get rid of the cards the following phase. Finally, the committee of discipline of the UEFA has sanctioned with two games the trainer of the team, Jose Mourinho, and with different economic amounts the implied players. The provocation of a yellow card in similar circumstances as this one is not a new practice, but rather frequent in the world of football. It is so extended that it part of the ethos, of the unwritten rules, but followed nonetheless by this sport. Part of the debate arisen in the related case is caused by the fact that has been carried out by team of the Real Madrid organization (that in its hymn presumes of nobility and honor, and that has fined its players for analogous acts) and by the dramatization orchestrated, apparently, by Mourinho, who adds one more to his expanded history of histrionic and provoking technician. Anyway, the debate deals with if that type of behavior not prohibited specifically by the regulation contradicts the principles of the sport, that is to say, if with these actions fraud is committed; then, indeed, they are respectful <t>actions</t> with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense. The matter examines the type of damage that is brought to the sporting spirit.

Candidate senses:
1. sense_key=action%1:04:02:: | definition=something done (usually as opposed to something said) | examples=there were stories of murders and other unnatural actions
2. sense_key=action%1:26:00:: | definition=the state of being active | synonyms=activity, activeness | examples=his sphere of activity; he is out of action
3. sense_key=action%1:04:03:: | definition=a military engagement | synonyms=military action | examples=he saw action in Korea
4. sense_key=action%1:22:00:: | definition=a process existing in or produced by nature (rather than by the intent of human beings) | synonyms=natural process, natural action, activity | examples=the action of natural forces; volcanic activity
5. sense_key=action%1:10:00:: | definition=the series of events that form a plot | examples=his novels always have a lot of action
6. sense_key=action%1:07:00:: | definition=the trait of being active and energetic and forceful | examples=a man of action
7. sense_key=action%1:06:00:: | definition=the operating part that transmits power to a mechanism | synonyms=action mechanism | examples=the piano had a very stiff action
8. sense_key=action%1:04:01:: | definition=a judicial proceeding brought by one party against another; one party prosecutes another for a wrong done or for protection of a right or for prevention of a wrong | synonyms=legal action, action at law
9. sense_key=action%1:04:04:: | definition=an act by a government body or supranational organization | examples=recent federal action undermined the segregationist position; the United Nations must have the power to propose and organize action without being hobbled by irrelevant issues
10. sense_key=action%1:04:00:: | definition=the most important or interesting work or activity in a specific area or field | examples=the action is no longer in technology stocks but in municipal bonds; gawkers always try to get as close to the action as possible

Instructions:
1. Choose the single best indexed sense for the target word in context.
2. WordNet glosses are schematic; use the context, synonyms, and examples together.
3. Do not answer with a WordNet sense key.
4. Return only a JSON object exactly like {"sense_index": 3}.

content:
```json
{"sense_index": 1}
```

reasoning_content:
**My Analysis of "Actions" in the Real Madrid Context**

Okay, so the target word is "actions," and it's pluralized in the surface form. The context is Real Madrid, specifically players deliberately getting yellow cards. Let's see... the sentence is: "then, indeed, they are respectful actions with the sport regulation, but they seem to elude its sense." Right, "actions" here clearly refers to the *acts* the players are performing – provoking the yellow cards.

Now, let's run through the senses to see which fits best. First, we've got "something done," the basic definition. Then, the state of being active, military engagement, a natural process, plot events, being active/energetic, a mechanism part, a legal proceeding, an act by a government, and important work.

Hmm. Considering this is a football context and we are talking about what the players are *doing*, that first sense, action%1:04:02::, "something done (usually as opposed to something said)," is the clear winner. The players are deliberately committing *actions*—provoking yellow cards—that are very much "something done," even if the intent might be less than straightforward. It's the most straightforward and direct match to the contextual meaning.