[User]
Which numbered sense of "toss" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: This time, it just got stronger and then the building started shaking violently up and down as though it were a child's toy block that was being <t>tossed</t>.

Senses:
1. definition=throw or toss with a light motion | examples=flip me the beachball
2. definition=lightly throw to see which side comes up | examples=I don't know what to do--I may as well flip a coin!
3. definition=throw carelessly | examples=chuck the ball
4. definition=move or stir about violently | examples=The feverish patient thrashed around in his bed
5. definition=throw or cast away | examples=Put away your worries
6. definition=agitate | examples=toss the salad

reasoning_content:
We need to identify which sense of "toss" is used in the sentence: "This time, it just got stronger and then the building started shaking violently up and down as though it were a child's toy block that was being <t>tossed</t>." The sentence describes a building shaking like a child's toy block being tossed. The action is throwing or moving something violently up and down? Actually, "tossed" here implies that the block is being thrown or moved around, likely with a light or careless motion? But the context is "shaking violently up and down" as though it were a child's toy block being tossed. This suggests a sense of moving or stirring about violently? However, note that "toss" can mean to throw, but here it's being used to describe the motion of the block. The sentence says "as though it were a child's toy block that was being tossed." Typically, when you toss a block, you throw it lightly. But the building is shaking violently, so the comparison is to a block being thrown around? Let's look at the senses:

1. throw or toss with a light motion (flip me the beachball)
2. lightly throw to see which side comes up (flip a coin)
3. throw carelessly (chuck the ball)
4. move or stir about violently (the feverish patient thrashed around)
5. throw or cast away (put away your worries)
6. agitate (toss the salad)

The sentence: "shaking violently up and down as though it were a child's toy block that was being tossed." The block is being tossed, which implies it's being thrown or moved. But the building is shaking, so it's like the block is being thrown around? The sense "move or stir about violently" (sense 4) seems to match "thrashed" but "toss" in that sense is used for a person thrashing. However, the example for sense 4 is "The feverish patient thrashed around in his bed" which uses "thrashed" not "tossed". Actually the definition says "move or stir about violently" and the example uses "thrashed". But "toss" can also mean to move or stir about violently? For example, "toss and turn" in bed. But here it's "tossed" as a verb. The sentence says "being tossed" which is passive. The block is being tossed, meaning someone is throwing it. But the building is shaking as if it were being tossed. That suggests the block is being moved violently? But the action of tossing a block is typically not violent; it's a light throw. However, the phrase "as though it were a child's toy block that was being tossed" might imply that the building is being shaken like a child would toss a block around? Possibly the sense is "throw carelessly" (sense 3) or "throw or toss with a light motion" (sense 1). But the word "violently" modifies the shaking, so the building is shaking violently, and the comparison is to a block being tossed. The block is not necessarily being tossed violently; it's just being tossed, which is a light action. But the analogy is that the building is moving like a block that is being thrown around? Actually, if you toss a block, you might throw it up and down, but typically it's not a violent shake. The sentence says "shaking violently up and down" so the building is moving violently. The block being tossed might be moving in a similar way? I think the intended sense is that the building is being moved as if it were a toy block being thrown around, which could be "throw or toss with a light motion" but that seems too gentle. Alternatively, "move or stir about violently" might fit because the building is being "tossed" around by the earthquake? Actually, the sentence: "This time, it just got stronger and then the building started shaking violently up and down as though it were a child's toy block that was being tossed." The "it" refers to something (likely an earthquake). So the building is shaking like a block being tossed. The word "tossed" here is used in the sense of being thrown about, which is sense 4? But sense 4 is "move or stir about violently" which is more like thrashing. However, a child's toy block being tossed is not necessarily violent; it's a playful toss. But the building is shaking violently, so the block's motion is also violent? Actually, the phrase "as though it were a child's toy block that was being tossed" suggests the building is moving in a similar way to how a block moves when it is tossed, which is a light, maybe erratic motion. But the word "violently" is describing the shaking, not the tossing. So it's saying the building started shaking violently, as if it were a toy block being tossed. That implies the block being tossed is also moving violently? No, it's a simile: the building's motion is like that of a block being tossed. So the sense of "toss" in the simile is the action of throwing a block. Which sense? Probably "throw or toss with a light motion" (sense 1) because it's a child's toy, often tossed lightly. But "throw carelessly" (sense 3) might also work. However, note that "toss" can also mean "to throw up in the air" like a coin. The context: "shaking violently up and down" - that's a vertical motion. A block being tossed might be thrown up and down. So sense 1 or 3? Let's examine the examples: sense 1: "flip me the beachball" - that's a light toss. Sense 3: "chuck the ball" - that's a careless throw. But the sentence uses "tossed" in the passive. The definition of sense 4: "move or stir about violently" is more about internal agitation, like thrashing. But "toss" can also mean "to throw something" and that is the common meaning. In the sentence, the block is being tossed, so it's being thrown. The building is shaking like it's being thrown. So the sense is probably a literal sense of throwing. Among the senses, 1, 3, and 5 are about throwing. 5 is "throw or cast away" which is like discard. That doesn't fit. 2 is about flipping a coin to see which side, which is a specific action. 6 is "agitate" like tossing salad. That's a different action (mixing). So the most likely is sense 1 or 3. Which one? "light motion" vs "carelessly". The sentence doesn't imply carelessness; it's just a child's toy block being tossed, which could be either. But "toss" commonly means a light throw. Also, the word "toss" is often used with "flip" but "flip" is more specific. I think sense 1 is the most general "throw or toss with a light motion". However, the example "flip me the beachball" uses "flip" not "toss". But the definition says "throw or toss with a light motion". The word "toss" is in the definition. So sense 1 is for a light throw. Sense 3 is for a careless throw. The sentence: "as though it were a child's toy block that was being tossed" - a child might toss a block gently or carelessly? Not sure. Given the context of violent shaking, the comparison is to something being thrown around, not necessarily light. But I think the intended sense is the basic meaning of "toss" meaning to throw. The senses are numbered. Let's read the sentence carefully: "shaking violently up and down as though it were a child's toy block that was being tossed." The block is being tossed, which is a simple action. Which sense best fits? The dictionary definitions are likely from a specific source. We need to choose the number. Often, "toss" as in "toss a ball" is sense 1. "toss" as in "toss and turn" is sense 4. "toss" as in "toss a coin" is sense 2. "toss" as in "toss the salad" is sense 6. So here it's "tossed" meaning thrown. So it's likely sense 1 or 3. But which one? The definition for sense 1 says "throw or toss with a light motion". That suggests a light motion. The block is being tossed, which is a light motion? The building is shaking violently, so it's a simile comparing the violent shaking to a light motion? That seems odd. Actually, it says "as though it were a child's toy block that was being tossed." The building is shaking violently, but the block is being tossed, which might not be violent. The simile is that the building's motion is like that of a block being tossed, meaning it's moving up and down in a similar manner. The block's motion when tossed is typically not violent; it's more of a gentle arc. But the building is shaking violently, so the comparison is more about the up and down motion rather than the force. So maybe it's sense 1. Alternatively, sense 3: "throw carelessly" - that might imply a less controlled motion. But "carelessly" is a bit different.

Given that the sentence uses "tossed" in the passive, and the building is being shaken, the action is being done to the block. The most common sense of "toss" is to throw something. The definition of sense 1 includes "toss" as a synonym. I think sense 1 is the primary sense for throwing. But we need to see the exact wording: The senses are numbered and each has a definition. Sense 1: "throw or toss with a light motion" - note that "toss" appears in the definition. That's circular. Actually, the word "toss" is used in the definition. So sense 1 is essentially the same as the word itself. But the examples: "flip me the beachball" - that uses "flip" not "toss". So it's a bit confusing. Perhaps the intended sense is that "toss" means to throw lightly. Another sense is "throw carelessly". Which one is more appropriate? The sentence says "as though it were a child's toy block that was being tossed." A child's toy block is often tossed around in play, possibly lightly. I think the best answer is 1. But let's see if there is any other clue. The word "tossed" is used in the sentence, and the building is shaking. The comparison is to a block being tossed. The block is not being "tossed" in the sense of "toss and turn" because that's a different usage. So it's likely the verb meaning to throw.

However, sense 4 is "move or stir about violently" which is more like "thrash". Could that be? For example, "the building was tossed about by the earthquake" - that uses "tossed" meaning moved violently. But here it's "as though it were a child's toy block that was being tossed" - the block is being tossed, not the building. So the block is the object being thrown. So it's the literal meaning of "toss" as in throw. So sense 4 would be if the building itself was being tossed, but here it's a simile; the block is being tossed. So the verb applies to the block, not the building. So the sense of "toss" in the sentence is the action of throwing a block. That is sense 1, 2, 3, or 5? Among those, 2 is specifically for coin flipping to see which side, which is not appropriate. 5 is "throw or cast away" - to discard. That doesn't fit either because the block is not being cast away; it's being tossed in play. So sense 1 or 3. Which one? The example for sense 3 is "chuck the ball", which is a careless throw. For sense 1, "flip me the beachball" is a light toss. So both are light or careless. However, the word "toss" itself can be used for both. The question is: which sense is the one used in the sentence? The sentence doesn't specify whether it's light or careless. But the phrase "child's toy block" might imply a playful toss, so perhaps light. Also, "toss" is often used for a light throw. So I'd lean towards sense 1.

But let's analyze the structure: The sentence is from a description of an earthquake or something. The building shakes violently. The comparison is to a child's toy block being tossed. If you think of a child tossing a block, they might throw it up and down, maybe not violently. So the building's motion is like that of a block being thrown, but the building is shaking violently, so the comparison is about the up-and-down motion, not the force. So it's still a throw.

I think the most straightforward answer is sense 1, because the definition "throw or toss with a light motion" matches the typical meaning of "toss" when you toss a toy. However, sense 3 "throw carelessly" also could be. But which one is more common? Since the dictionary has separate senses, we need to pick the one that best fits the context. The context does not indicate carelessness; it's just a general action. Also, the word "toss" in the definition of sense 1 is the same as the word being defined, which is a bit odd. The sense is likely "toss" as in to throw something lightly, like a ball.

Given that the sentence says "as though it were a child's toy block that was being tossed", it's a simile. The block is being tossed (thrown). So I'll go with sense 1.

But wait, there's also sense 6: "agitate" like "toss the salad". That's a different meaning. Not that.

So I think the correct answer is 1.

However, let's double-check: The sentence: "This time, it just got stronger and then the building started shaking violently up and down as though it were a child's toy block that was being tossed." The word "tossed" is the verb. In the context of an earthquake, a building might be "tossed" around, but here it's a block being tossed. So the block is being thrown. So the sense is "throw".

Thus, answer is 1.


attempt_kind: initial

status: success

[User]
Which numbered sense of "library" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: I was in the Berkeley Main <t>library</t> when it hit.

Senses:
1. definition=a room where books are kept | examples=they had brandy in the library
2. definition=a collection of literary documents or records kept for reference or borrowing
3. definition=a depository built to contain books and other materials for reading and study
4. definition=(computing) a collection of standard programs and subroutines that are stored and available for immediate use
5. definition=a building that houses a collection of books and other materials

finish_reason: stop

role: assistant

reasoning_content:
We need to determine which sense of "library" is used in the sentence: "I was in the Berkeley Main library when it hit." The context is a location: "in the Berkeley Main library" indicates a physical building or room. Sense 1: a room where books are kept, example "they had brandy in the library" (room). Sense 2: a collection of documents. Sense 3: a depository built to contain books and other materials for reading and study. Sense 4: computing. Sense 5: a building that houses a collection. Sense 1 is a room, sense 3 is a depository built, sense 5 is a building. The phrase "Berkeley Main library" suggests a specific library building, likely the main library of UC Berkeley. It's a building. Sense 5 says "a building that houses a collection of books and other materials". Sense 3 says "a depository built to contain books...". Both are similar, but sense 5 explicitly says "building". The sentence says "in the Berkeley Main library" meaning inside the building. Which numbered sense is most appropriate? Typically, "library" as a building is sense 5. Sense 3 also mentions a depository, but it's more about the structure serving as a depository. Sense 1 is a room, but "Berkeley Main library" is likely a whole building, not just a room. However, sometimes libraries are rooms within buildings, but "Main library" usually refers to a building. I'd pick sense 5. But let's check the list: sense 1 is "a room where books are kept", sense 3 is "a depository built to contain books and other materials for reading and study", sense 5 is "a building that houses a collection of books and other materials". The difference is that sense 3 emphasizes the building as a depository, while sense 5 is more general. The sentence does not specify it's a depository, just that the person was in it. Sense 5 seems straightforward. However, the instruction says "Return only the number of the correct sense." So answer should be the number.

Given typical usage, "Berkeley Main library" is a building, so sense 5. But let's double-check if sense 3 might also fit. Sense 3 says "a depository built to contain books..." That is essentially a building. But sense 5 explicitly says "building". Since both are numbers, we need to pick one. Often in such lists, sense 5 is the most common for "library" as a physical building. The example for sense 1 is "they had brandy in the library" which could be a room in a house. Not applicable. So I'll go with 5.

format: unknown

native_finish_reason: stop

provider: WandB

currency: USD


[User]
Which numbered sense of "hit" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: I was in the Berkeley Main library when it <t>hit</t>.

Senses:
1. definition=cause to move by striking | examples=hit a ball
2. definition=hit against; come into sudden contact with | examples=The car hit a tree
3. definition=deal a blow to, either with the hand or with an instrument | examples=He hit her hard in the face
4. definition=reach a destination, either real or abstract | examples=We hit Detroit by noon
5. definition=affect or afflict suddenly, usually adversely | examples=We were hit by really bad weather
6. definition=hit with a missile from a weapon
7. definition=encounter by chance | examples=I stumbled across a long-lost cousin last night in a restaurant
8. definition=gain points in a game | examples=The home team scored many times
9. definition=cause to experience suddenly | examples=Panic struck me
10. definition=make a strategic, offensive, assault against an enemy, opponent, or a target | examples=The Germans struck Poland on Sept. 1, 1939
11. definition=kill intentionally and with premeditation | examples=The mafia boss ordered his enemies murdered
12. definition=drive something violently into a location | examples=he hit his fist on the table
13. definition=reach a point in time, or a certain state or level | examples=The thermometer hit 100 degrees
14. definition=produce by manipulating keys or strings of musical instruments, also metaphorically | examples=The pianist strikes a middle C
15. definition=consume to excess | examples=hit the bottle
16. definition=hit the intended target or goal
17. definition=pay unsolicited and usually unwanted sexual attention to | examples=He tries to hit on women in bars

reasoning_content: We need to determine which sense of "hit" is used in the sentence: "I was in the Berkeley Main library when it <t>hit</t>." The context suggests that something happened suddenly, likely an earthquake or some event. The word "it" refers to something like an earthquake or a disaster. Sense 5: "affect or afflict suddenly, usually adversely" fits well. Also sense 9: "cause to experience suddenly" but sense 5 is more direct. Possibly sense 2? No, "hit against" doesn't fit. So answer is 5.

provider: Baidu


[User]
Which numbered sense of "endless" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: <t>Endless</t> seconds wondering if those huge windows would buckle and shower us with glass.

Senses:
1. definition=tiresomely long; seemingly without end | examples=endless debates
2. definition=infinitely great in number | examples=endless waves
3. definition=having no known beginning and presumably no end | examples=the dateless rise and fall of the tides
4. definition=having the ends united so as to form a continuous whole | examples=an endless chain

reasoning_content:
We need to determine which sense of "endless" is used in the sentence: "Endless seconds wondering if those huge windows would buckle and shower us with glass."

The sentence describes seconds that feel endless, likely meaning they seemed to go on for a long time, tiresomely long. The context is a moment of anxiety waiting for something to happen. Sense 1: "tiresomely long; seemingly without end" fits. Sense 2 is about infinite number (endless waves), but here it's about duration. Sense 3 is about no known beginning and end (tides), not fitting. Sense 4 is about continuous loop (endless chain), not fitting.

Thus answer is 1.

provider: DeepInfra


[User]
Which numbered sense of "second" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: Endless <t>seconds</t> wondering if those huge windows would buckle and shower us with glass.

Senses:
1. definition=1/60 of a minute; the basic unit of time adopted under the Systeme International d'Unites
2. definition=an indefinitely short time | examples=wait just a moment
3. definition=the fielding position of the player on a baseball team who is stationed near the second of the bases in the infield
4. definition=a particular point in time | examples=the moment he arrived the party began
5. definition=following the first in an ordering or series | examples=he came in a close second
6. definition=a 60th part of a minute of arc | examples=the treasure is 2 minutes and 45 seconds south of here
7. definition=the official attendant of a contestant in a duel or boxing match
8. definition=a speech seconding a motion | examples=do I hear a second?
9. definition=the gear that has the second lowest forward gear ratio in the gear box of a motor vehicle | examples=he had to shift down into second to make the hill
10. definition=merchandise that has imperfections; usually sold at a reduced price without the brand name

reasoning_content: We need to determine which sense of "second" is used in the sentence: "Endless <t>seconds</t> wondering if those huge windows would buckle and shower us with glass." The word "seconds" here refers to units of time, but not precisely 1/60 of a minute? The context describes a period of time, likely short but indefinite. The phrase "endless seconds" suggests a duration that feels long but is actually short. Sense 2 is "an indefinitely short time" with example "wait just a moment." That fits better than sense 1 which is a precise unit. Also sense 4 is "a particular point in time" but the sentence uses "seconds" as a duration, not a point. So sense 2 is appropriate. Answer: 2


[User]
Which numbered sense of "wonder" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: Endless seconds <t>wondering</t> if those huge windows would buckle and shower us with glass.

Senses:
1. definition=have a wish or desire to know something | examples=He wondered who had built this beautiful church
2. definition=place in doubt or express doubtful speculation | examples=I wonder whether this was the right thing to do
3. definition=be amazed at | examples=We marvelled at the child's linguistic abilities

reasoning_content: We need to identify which sense of "wonder" is used in the sentence: "Endless seconds <t>wondering</t> if those huge windows would buckle and shower us with glass." The word "wondering" here is followed by "if those huge windows would buckle..." This indicates a state of doubt or speculation about a possible event. Sense 2 is "place in doubt or express doubtful speculation" with example "I wonder whether this was the right thing to do". Sense 1 is about desire to know something, sense 3 is amazement. The sentence is about wondering if something would happen, which is speculative doubt. So answer is 2.

provider: StreamLake


[User]
Which numbered sense of "window" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: Endless seconds wondering if those huge <t>windows</t> would buckle and shower us with glass.

Senses:
1. definition=a framework of wood or metal that contains a glass windowpane and is built into a wall or roof to admit light or air
2. definition=a transparent opening in a vehicle that allow vision out of the sides or back; usually is capable of being opened
3. definition=a transparent panel (as of an envelope) inserted in an otherwise opaque material
4. definition=an opening that resembles a window in appearance or function | examples=he could see them through a window in the trees
5. definition=the time period that is considered best for starting or finishing something | examples=the expanded window will give us time to catch the thieves
6. definition=a pane of glass in a window | examples=the ball shattered the window
7. definition=an opening in a wall or screen that admits light and air and through which customers can be served | examples=he stuck his head in the window
8. definition=(computer science) a rectangular part of a computer screen that contains a display different from the rest of the screen

reasoning_content: We need to match the sentence: "Endless seconds wondering if those huge <t>windows</t> would buckle and shower us with glass." The word "windows" refers to large glass panes in a building or structure that could buckle under pressure and shatter, showering glass. This matches sense 6: "a pane of glass in a window" with example "the ball shattered the window." However, note that sense 1 is about the framework, but here the emphasis is on the glass itself buckling and showering glass. Also sense 6 explicitly mentions a pane of glass. The sentence says "windows would buckle" - buckle refers to the glass bending? Typically, windows (the whole unit) can buckle, but glass can also buckle. However, the phrase "shower us with glass" indicates the glass breaking. So the most specific is sense 6. But sense 1 also includes the glass? Actually, sense 1 is the framework containing glass. But the example "the ball shattered the window" is under sense 6. So I think sense 6 is correct. Return 6.

provider: AtlasCloud


[User]
Which numbered sense of "buckle" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: Endless seconds wondering if those huge windows would <t>buckle</t> and shower us with glass.

Senses:
1. definition=fasten with a buckle or buckles
2. definition=fold or collapse | examples=His knees buckled
3. definition=bend out of shape, as under pressure or from heat | examples=The highway buckled during the heat wave

reasoning_content: We need to match the usage of "buckle" in the sentence: "Endless seconds wondering if those huge windows would buckle and shower us with glass." The context suggests that the windows might bend, collapse, or give way under pressure. Sense 2 is "fold or collapse" with example "His knees buckled". Sense 3 is "bend out of shape, as under pressure or from heat" with example "The highway buckled". Which one fits better? The windows would likely bend or fold under pressure, possibly leading to collapse. "Fold or collapse" is more about giving way, while "bend out of shape" is about deformation. In this context, the windows might buckle (bend) and then shower glass, so it's likely bending under pressure. However, "fold or collapse" often implies a sudden giving way. The sentence is about wondering if they would buckle, meaning if they would fail structurally. I think sense 2 is more appropriate: "fold or collapse" because it implies a failure. But sense 3 also could be plausible. Let's see the exact definitions: sense 2 says "fold or collapse" with example of knees buckling, which is a sudden giving way. sense 3 says "bend out of shape" which is a deformation that might not necessarily lead to collapse. In the sentence, the windows would "buckle and shower us with glass" meaning they break, so they likely collapse. So sense 2 is better. I'll answer 2.


[User]
Which numbered sense of "shower" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: Endless seconds wondering if those huge windows would buckle and <t>shower</t> us with glass.

Senses:
1. definition=expend profusely; also used with abstract nouns | examples=He was showered with praise
2. definition=spray or sprinkle with | examples=The guests showered rice on the couple
3. definition=take a shower; wash one's body in the shower | examples=You should shower after vigorous exercise
4. definition=rain abundantly | examples=Meteors showered down over half of Australia
5. definition=provide abundantly with | examples=He showered her with presents

raw_output:
We need to identify which sense of "shower" is used in the sentence: "Endless seconds wondering if those huge windows would buckle and shower us with glass." The verb "shower" here means to cause something to fall or be distributed over someone, like glass from a broken window. It's similar to "spray or sprinkle" or "rain abundantly" or "provide abundantly with" but the specific action is glass falling on us. Let's examine the senses:

1. "expend profusely; also used with abstract nouns" - example: "He was showered with praise" - this is about giving praise, but the sentence is about glass, not abstract.
2. "spray or sprinkle with" - example: "The guests showered rice on the couple" - this is about scattering something like rice. That fits: showering glass on us, as if glass is being sprayed or sprinkled.
3. "take a shower; wash one's body" - not relevant.
4. "rain abundantly" - example: "Meteors showered down over half of Australia" - this is about things falling like rain. Also could fit, but the example uses "showered down" whereas the sentence has "shower us with glass" - the preposition "with" suggests sense 2 or 5.
5. "provide abundantly with" - example: "He showered her with presents" - this is about giving gifts, but again similar. However, "shower us with glass" is like providing glass, but it's not a positive gift.

The sentence: "shower us with glass" - the structure is "shower [someone] with [something]" which matches sense 2: "spray or sprinkle with" and sense 5: "provide abundantly with". But sense 2 says "spray or sprinkle with", and the example is "The guests showered rice on the couple" - that uses "on" not "with", but the definition says "spray or sprinkle with". Actually the example: "The guests showered rice on the couple" uses "on". The definition lists "spray or sprinkle with" but the example shows "showered rice on". However, sense 5: "provide abundantly with" example "He showered her with presents" uses "with". So the sentence uses "with". Let's check the exact wording: The provided senses are given with definitions and examples. Sense 2: "spray or sprinkle with | examples=The guests showered rice on the couple" - but that example uses "on", not "with". The definition says "spray or sprinkle with" but the example is "on". Possibly it's a typo? Actually the sense might be: "spray or sprinkle" and the example uses "on" but the definition includes "with". But the key is the structure. The sentence has "shower us with glass" which is like "shower with" - so sense 5 uses "with" in its example. Also sense 1 uses "with" as in "showered with praise". But sense 1 is about abstract nouns (praise), while glass is concrete. Both 2 and 5 could be concrete. However, sense 2's example is "showered rice on the couple" - that's a different preposition. Sense 5's example is "showered her with presents" - that matches the structure "with". So the sentence "shower us with glass" is exactly like "shower her with presents" - so sense 5 seems correct. But also sense 4: "rain abundantly" - example "Meteors showered down over half of Australia" - that uses "down" and no "with". So we need to see which sense the sentence aligns with. The sentence is about glass breaking and falling, like a shower of glass. The verb "shower" here means to cause to fall in a shower. The phrase "shower us with glass" implies we are being showered (as in, glass is being sprinkled on us). That is similar to sense 2: "spray or sprinkle with" - but the definition says "spray or sprinkle with", and the example uses "on". However, the phrase "shower with" is common: "shower someone with something" means to give them a lot of something, like gifts, or to cover them with something. In the context of glass, it's not a positive gift but a harmful rain. It's more like "rain down on". So I'd lean towards sense 2 or 4. But sense 4's example is about meteors raining down, not with a direct object "us". The sentence has "shower us with glass" - that's a direct object "us" and the thing "glass". So "shower" is being used transitively: "shower [someone] with [something]". In sense 2, the example is "showered rice on the couple" - that uses "on" not "with". But the definition says "spray or sprinkle with" - maybe it's "spray or sprinkle" and then "with" is part of the definition? Actually the sense is: "spray or sprinkle with" - the word "with" might be part of the definition phrase, not the preposition. For example, "spray or sprinkle with" could mean "to spray or sprinkle something" but then the example uses "on". I'm getting confused.

Let's look at the sense numbers: They are listed as:

1. definition=expend profusely; also used with abstract nouns | examples=He was showered with praise
2. definition=spray or sprinkle with | examples=The guests showered rice on the couple
3. definition=take a shower; wash one's body in the shower | examples=You should shower after vigorous exercise
4. definition=rain abundantly | examples=Meteors showered down over half of Australia
5. definition=provide abundantly with | examples=He showered her with presents

So sense 2 has "spray or sprinkle with" and the example uses "on". The preposition "with" appears in sense 1 (with abstract) and sense 5 (with presents). Actually sense 1 also uses "with" in its example: "He was showered with praise". So sense 1 is "expend profusely" and the example uses "with". Sense 5 is "provide abundantly with" and the example uses "with". So both 1 and 5 use "with". Sense 2 uses "on" in the example, but the definition says "spray or sprinkle with" - maybe it's "spray or sprinkle" and the "with" indicates the instrument? No, it's ambiguous.

In the sentence, "shower us with glass" - "us" is the object, "glass" is the thing being showered. This pattern is "shower [someone] with [something]" which matches sense 5 (provide abundantly with) and sense 1 (expend profusely on abstract). But sense 1 is for abstract nouns like praise, while glass is concrete. So sense 5 is about providing something concrete, like presents. However, "provide abundantly with" might imply giving gifts, while "shower" in the context of glass is more like a physical spray, not a gift. But the verb "shower" can mean to cover with a lot of something. Actually "shower" as a verb can mean "to cause to fall in a shower" or "to give in abundance". The sentence "shower us with glass" is about glass falling on us, which is a physical action. So sense 2: "spray or sprinkle with" - that is about scattering something like rice or water. That seems most appropriate because glass is like a spray of fragments. But the example uses "on" while the sentence uses "with". However, the definition itself says "spray or sprinkle with" - maybe it means "spray or sprinkle" and then "with" is part of the definition but not the preposition. Actually, many dictionaries define "shower" as "to rain or pour down" and "to give or bestow in abundance". The specific senses:
- to shower someone with something = to give them a lot of something (presents, praise)
- to shower something on someone = to cause something to fall on them (rice, confetti)

So there is a difference: "shower with" is more about giving, while "shower on" is about scattering. But the sentence uses "with", so it's "shower us with glass". That could be interpreted as "cause glass to fall on us" which is more like "shower glass on us" but the preposition changed. In common usage, "shower someone with something" can also mean to cover them with something, like "shower with bullets" or "shower with glass". So it's ambiguous.

Let's see the specific example for sense 5: "He showered her with presents" - that is giving presents, not scattering. For sense 2: "The guests showered rice on the couple" - that is scattering rice. The sentence is about windows buckling and showering us with glass - this is a physical scattering, like glass fragments flying. So it's more akin to "spray or sprinkle" (sense 2) or "rain abundantly" (sense 4). But sense 4's example uses "showered down" and no direct object. Sense 4 says "rain abundantly" with example "Meteors showered down" - that is intransitive. Our sentence is transitive: "shower us with glass". So sense 4 might not fit because it's "rain abundantly" often used intransitively (it rained, meteors showered down). The sentence has a direct object "us". So it's transitive.

Thus, the transitive senses are 1, 2, 5. Sense 1 is for abstract nouns, but glass is concrete. Sense 2 is "spray or sprinkle with" - but note that the example uses "on", but the definition says "spray or sprinkle with" - that might mean "spray or sprinkle something" like "shower rice on" is "spray rice on" or "sprinkle rice on". But "spray or sprinkle with" could also be "spray or sprinkle someone with something" - e.g., "spray someone with water" - that's similar. Actually "spray or sprinkle with" is a bit ambiguous: it could mean "to spray or sprinkle (someone) with (something)". For example, "They showered the bride with rice" is common. But the example given is "The guests showered rice on the couple" - that's different. So I think the sense 2 is actually "spray or sprinkle" and the example uses "on". But the definition includes "with" as part of the phrase? Let's read the entry: "2. definition=spray or sprinkle with | examples=The guests showered rice on the couple" - so the definition is "spray or sprinkle with" but the example uses "on". That's inconsistent. Possibly the definition is "spray or sprinkle" and "with" is a separate note? Actually the format: "definition=spray or sprinkle with" might be a shorthand. I'm leaning that sense 2 means "to scatter or distribute in the manner of a shower", and the example uses "on". The sentence "shower us with glass" uses "with". Which sense matches that? Sense 5 explicitly uses "with" in its example: "He showered her with presents". So the pattern "shower [someone] with [something]" is sense 5. Also sense 1 uses "with" as in "showered with praise". So sense 1 also uses "with" but for abstract. So we need to decide which sense is most appropriate for the physical act of glass breaking.

The sentence: "Endless seconds wondering if those huge windows would buckle and shower us with glass." This is a dramatic scene: windows might break and glass will fall like a shower. It's a physical event, not a metaphorical giving. So it's like a spray of glass fragments. That matches sense 2: "spray or sprinkle" - to spray something. But the dictionary may have a specific sense for "shower" meaning "to cause to fall in a shower" - that might be sense 4 "rain abundantly" but with a transitive usage? Sense 4 says "rain abundantly" and example is "showered down" (intransitive). However, "shower" can be transitive: "The window showered glass on us" - that would be like "showered glass". But the sentence uses "with", so it's "shower us with glass" which is a different construction.

Let's think of common usage: In the context of a window breaking, you might say "the window shattered, showering us with glass". That's a typical phrase. The word "shower" here means "to cause (something) to fall in a shower". I'd say it's like "spray" or "sprinkle". Many dictionaries list a sense: "to cause (a shower of something) to fall on", e.g., "shower confetti on the crowd". That would be "shower something on someone". But the sentence uses "with". Actually "shower someone with something" is also common: "They showered the couple with rice." That is exactly the same as "showered rice on the couple"? It's a bit different: "shower with" implies covering or giving a lot. In the case of rice, it's like throwing rice on them. So I think both constructions are used. For example, "shower someone with stones" would mean to throw stones at them. So it's plausible.

Given the options, sense 2: "spray or sprinkle with" - the word "spray" suggests a liquid or fine particles, but glass is like splinters. Sense 5: "provide abundantly with" - suggests giving gifts. While "provide" might be too generous, but "shower" can also mean to give a lot. But in the context of glass breaking, it's not a gift; it's a dangerous event. So I think sense 2 is more appropriate because it's about physical scattering. However, sense 5 is about "shower" as in "give in abundance" which is often used for praise or presents, but can be used for things like "showered with bullets" (meaning a lot of bullets). That's also physical. So it's not strictly just gifts. So both could apply.

Let's check the exact wording of the definition for sense 2: "spray or sprinkle with" - the "with" might indicate the object being sprayed, like "spray with water". So "spray or sprinkle with" could mean to cover someone or something with a spray or sprinkle. So "shower us with glass" means to cover us with glass fragments. That seems exactly the sense. Sense 5 is "provide abundantly with" which is more about providing a lot of something, like presents. "Provide" is a bit more deliberate, like giving, whereas "spray" is more like scattering. So I'd say sense 2 is better.

Also, the example for sense 2 is "The guests showered rice on the couple" - that uses "on", but the definition says "with". It's a bit inconsistent. But the key is the action: rice is being thrown, similar to glass. The example for sense 5 is "He showered her with presents" - that is giving gifts, usually not throwing. So I think the physical scattering is sense 2.

But we need to return the number. Let's see the context: The sentence is from a story about windows possibly breaking and glass falling. It is a physical action. So I'll pick sense 2. However, we should also consider that some dictionaries list "shower" as a verb meaning "to fall or cause to fall in a shower" as a separate sense. That might be sense 4. But sense 4 is "rain abundantly" with example "Meteors showered down" - which is intransitive, but it could be used transitively? The definition says "rain abundantly" - it doesn't specify transitive. So maybe sense 4 is for the "shower down" usage. The sentence has "shower us with glass" - that is "shower" with a direct object and "with", so it's not "shower down". So not sense 4.

Thus, between 2 and 5, which one? The example for sense 2 uses "on" while the sentence uses "with". But the definition says "spray or sprinkle with" - so "with" is in the definition, meaning it's the same construction. Actually, "spray or sprinkle with" means you are spraying or sprinkling someone with something, which takes "with". For example, "spray someone with water" - that's "with". So the definition uses "with". And the example given uses "on" - that's a different example. Possibly the example is just an example, not the exact preposition. So I think sense 2 is correct.

We should also consider sense 1: "expend profusely; also used with abstract nouns" - it says "also used with abstract nouns", meaning it's not limited to abstract? It says "also" so it can be used with concrete? But the example is "He was showered with praise" - praise is abstract. So sense 1 is for abstract, but the word "also" might imply that it can be used with concrete? Actually the definition says "expend profusely" - that is like spending a lot, and "also used with abstract nouns" - so it's typically for abstract things like praise, but might be used for concrete? However, the example is only abstract. So probably not.

Thus, I'll go with sense 2. But wait, there is also sense 5: "provide abundantly with" - that is similar to sense 1 but for concrete. The example "He showered her with presents" is concrete. So that's also possible. But which one is more common for "shower with glass"? I think "shower with" meaning to cover or bestow is common. But "shower" as in "a shower of glass" is like a rain. So both.

Let's look at the sentence: "shower us with glass" - this is like "a shower of glass" - the verb "shower" is being used as a transitive verb with a direct object "us" and a prepositional phrase "with glass". This is a common pattern for "shower" meaning to cause to fall in a shower. For instance, "They showered the crowd with confetti" - that's a typical usage. I think it's sense 2 or 5? Many dictionaries list "shower" as a verb with the sense "to pour down in large numbers or quantities" and "to give or bestow in abundance". The difference is subtle. But the example for sense 2 is "showered rice on the couple" - that uses "on". The example for sense 5 uses "with". So the sentence uses "with", which matches sense 5's example. However, note that sense 2's definition says "spray or sprinkle with", which includes "with", but the example uses "on". So maybe the sense is actually "spray or sprinkle" and the "with" in the definition is part of the phrase, not the preposition. Actually, let's think about the typical formatting: In a dictionary, senses are often given as "shower (verb) 1. to pour down in a shower: ... 2. to give in abundance: ...". The provided list seems to be from a specific source. The numbers might be from a word sense disambiguation task. Looking at the senses, they are numbered 1-5. Each has a definition and example. The example for sense 2 is "The guests showered rice on the couple" - this shows the construction "shower [something] on [someone]". The example for sense 5 is "He showered her with presents" - shows "shower [someone] with [something]". So the sentence is "shower us with glass" - that matches sense 5's construction. So we should pick sense 5.

But also, sense 1's example: "He was showered with praise" - passive construction "showered with". So also "with". So passive "showered with" is common. The sentence is active: "shower us with glass" - that's "shower" as a verb with object "us" and "with glass". That matches the active pattern of sense 5: "He showered her with presents" - active. So sense 5 is exactly that pattern.

Sense 2's example is "showered rice on the couple" - that's "shower rice on" - different pattern. So the sentence uses "with", not "on". Therefore, sense 5 is the correct one.

But wait, could it be sense 2? The definition says "spray or sprinkle with" - that might include "with" as the preposition, but the example uses "on" which is odd. Perhaps the example is just a sentence, not showing the precise preposition. In some dictionaries, "spray or sprinkle" can be used with either. For instance, "to shower someone with something" is a common phrase. So both are possible. However, given the explicit examples, the only sense that uses "with" in the example is sense 1 and sense 5. Sense 1 is for abstract, so sense 5 is for concrete. So I'll go with sense 5.

But let's double-check: The sentence is "shower us with glass". "Glass" is concrete, not abstract. So sense 1 is "expend profusely; also used with abstract nouns" - that suggests it's typically for abstract, but the example is abstract. So likely not. Sense 5 is "provide abundantly with" - that fits. So I'll go with 5.

However, we should consider that "shower" in the sense of "a shower of glass" is like a rain, which is sense 4. But sense 4 is "rain abundantly" and the example is "Meteors showered down", which is intransitive. The sentence is transitive, so not.

Thus, answer is 5.

But wait, there is also the possibility of sense 2 because "spray or sprinkle" could be a good fit for glass splinters. But the pattern is different. I think the key is the preposition. The sentence uses "with", so the sense that matches that pattern is sense 5 (and sense 1, but abstract). So I'll choose 5.

Let's see if there's any other clue: The word "shower" in the sense "to spray or sprinkle" often is used with "on" or "with"? Actually, common usage: "They showered the bride with confetti" - that's "with". "They showered confetti on the bride" - both. So both are possible. But the provided examples for sense 2 use "on", so the dictionary may have a specific sense for that. Given that the task is to return the number, we need to be precise based on the given definitions.

I'll re-read the definitions carefully:

1. definition=expend profusely; also used with abstract nouns | examples=He was showered with praise
2. definition=spray or sprinkle with | examples=The guests showered rice on the couple
3. definition=take a shower; wash one's body in the shower | examples=You should shower after vigorous exercise
4. definition=rain abundantly | examples=Meteors showered down over half of Australia
5. definition=provide abundantly with | examples=He showered her with presents

So sense 2 says "spray or sprinkle with" - the "with" here might be part of the definition (like "spray or sprinkle" and then "with" is a separate word? Actually "spray or sprinkle with" could be read as "to spray or sprinkle something with something" - that is, the verb takes a preposition "with". But the example uses "on". So it's inconsistent. Possibly the sense is "spray or sprinkle" and the "with" is just a note that it's often used with "with"? But the example uses "on".

Meanwhile, sense 5 says "provide abundantly with" - and the example uses "with". So sense 5 clearly indicates the "with" preposition. The sentence has "with", so sense 5 is a perfect match.

Thus, I think sense 5 is correct.

However, I should consider that "shower" as in "shower us with glass" could also be interpreted as "provide us with glass abundantly" which is odd because glass is not a gift. So it's more like "spray us with glass". But the definition of sense 5 says "provide abundantly with" - "provide" might be too generous, but it's still a verb meaning to give. In a disaster context, you might say "the building showered us with debris" - that's like providing. Actually, it's not providing; it's causing to fall. So sense 2 might be more accurate.

But given the choices, we have to pick one. The example for sense 2: "The guests showered rice on the couple" - that's a similar action of scattering. So the action is scattering rice, which is like glass. So sense 2 is about scattering. Sense 5 is about giving. Which one is more appropriate? In common language, "shower someone with something" can mean both: "shower with gifts" is giving, "shower with bullets" is attacking. So it's ambiguous.

To decide, let's see if the word "shower" in the sense of "spray" is often used with "on" or "with"? Actually, "shower" as a verb meaning "to fall in a shower" is intransitive: "The glass showered down". But transitive: "shower someone with something" is common. So I think both senses 2 and 5 are actually the same underlying meaning? Not exactly.

Probably the intended sense is 2 because it's about physical spraying. But the presence of "with" in the sentence might indicate sense 5. However, note that sense 2's definition says "spray or sprinkle with" which includes "with", so it might be that the definition itself specifies the preposition "with". So the example "showered rice on" is just an example of a different construction? Actually, "spray or sprinkle with" might mean "to spray or sprinkle" and then "with" is the object of the preposition, e.g., "spray with water". So "shower with glass" would be "spray with glass". That matches.

Given the ambiguity, I'll look at the sentence structure: "shower us with glass" - the word "us" is the indirect object? Actually "us" is the direct object? In "shower us with glass", "us" is the object, "with glass" is the means. So it's "shower [someone] with [something]". That is exactly the pattern of sense 5. Also sense 1 uses "with" for abstract. So sense 5 is the only one that explicitly has that pattern in the example. So I'll go with 5.

But wait, sense 2's definition says "spray or sprinkle with" - that could also be interpreted as "spray or sprinkle [someone] with [something]". The example is "showered rice on" - that is "spray or sprinkle [something] on [someone]". So it's a different pattern. So the definition might be incomplete.

I think the safest is to consider the verb "shower" and its typical senses. In many dictionaries, the verb "shower" has these senses: 1. to cause to fall in a shower (e.g., shower confetti on the crowd) 2. to give in abundance (e.g., shower with gifts). The sentence "shower us with glass" is closer to sense 1 because it's a physical event. But sense 1 in the list is "expend profusely" which is about spending, not falling. So not. Sense 2 is "spray or sprinkle" which is about falling. So I think sense 2 is correct.

However, the fact that the example for sense 2 uses "on" and the sentence uses "with" might not matter; "shower" can take both prepositions. So I'll check if there's any other clue: The word "shower" is used in the phrase "shower us with glass" - if you think of "shower" as in a rain of glass, that is like "a shower of glass" which is a noun. The verb "to shower" means to produce that. So sense 4 "rain abundantly" might fit if it's used transitively? But sense 4 says "rain abundantly" and example is "Meteors showered down" - that's an intransitive usage. So not.

Thus, I'm leaning towards sense 2. But let's see the number: The answer should be a single number. I need to decide.

Perhaps we can think of the typical usage in dictionaries: The Oxford English Dictionary or others. For instance, sense 2 is "to scatter or disperse in a shower" and sense 5 is "to bestow in abundance". The sentence "shower us with glass" is more like "to scatter glass on us" - so it's sense 2. But the definition given for sense 2 says "spray or sprinkle with" - that sounds like "spray with" meaning to cover with spray. So it's fine.

I'll also note that the word "shower" in the sentence is a verb, and it's being used to describe a potential action of windows breaking. That is a physical phenomenon, not an abstract giving. So sense 2 is more physical. Sense 5 is more about giving gifts. So I'll go with 2.

But wait, the example for sense 2: "The guests showered rice on the couple" - that is also physical scattering. So it's similar. So I'll pick 2.

However, the answer format asks to return only the number. So I'll think carefully.

Let's see if there is any context: The sentence is from a text about a potential disaster. "Endless seconds wondering if those huge windows would buckle and shower us with glass." The word "shower" is used as a verb meaning to cause glass to fall in a shower. That is exactly like "spray or sprinkle". So sense 2.

Also, sense 5 "provide abundantly with" would be a bit weird because "provide" implies giving, but the glass is not being provided; it's being forced upon. So sense 2 is better.

Thus, I choose 2.

But the definition of sense 2 includes "with", which matches the sentence. So it's fine.

I'll answer 2.2

provider: Wafer


[User]
Which numbered sense of "shower" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: Endless seconds wondering if those huge windows would buckle and <t>shower</t> us with glass.

Senses:
1. definition=expend profusely; also used with abstract nouns | examples=He was showered with praise
2. definition=spray or sprinkle with | examples=The guests showered rice on the couple
3. definition=take a shower; wash one's body in the shower | examples=You should shower after vigorous exercise
4. definition=rain abundantly | examples=Meteors showered down over half of Australia
5. definition=provide abundantly with | examples=He showered her with presents

[Assistant]
We need to identify which sense of "shower" is used in the sentence: "Endless seconds wondering if those huge windows would buckle and shower us with glass." The verb "shower" here means to cause something to fall or be distributed over someone, like glass from a broken window. It's similar to "spray or sprinkle" or "rain abundantly" or "provide abundantly with" but the specific action is glass falling on us. Let's examine the senses:

1. "expend profusely; also used with abstract nouns" - example: "He was showered with praise" - this is about giving praise, but the sentence is about glass, not abstract.
2. "spray or sprinkle with" - example: "The guests showered rice on the couple" - this is about scattering something like rice. That fits: showering glass on us, as if glass is being sprayed or sprinkled.
3. "take a shower; wash one's body" - not relevant.
4. "rain abundantly" - example: "Meteors showered down over half of Australia" - this is about things falling like rain. Also could fit, but the example uses "showered down" whereas the sentence has "shower us with glass" - the preposition "with" suggests sense 2 or 5.
5. "provide abundantly with" - example: "He showered her with presents" - this is about giving gifts, but again similar. However, "shower us with glass" is like providing glass, but it's not a positive gift.

The sentence: "shower us with glass" - the structure is "shower [someone] with [something]" which matches sense 2: "spray or sprinkle with" and sense 5: "provide abundantly with". But sense 2 says "spray or sprinkle with", and the example is "The guests showered rice on the couple" - that uses "on" not "with", but the definition says "spray or sprinkle with". Actually the example: "The guests showered rice on the couple" uses "on". The definition lists "spray or sprinkle with" but the example shows "showered rice on". However, sense 5: "provide abundantly with" example "He showered her with presents" uses "with". So the sentence uses "with". Let's check the exact wording: The provided senses are given with definitions and examples. Sense 2: "spray or sprinkle with | examples=The guests showered rice on the couple" - but that example uses "on", not "with". The definition says "spray or sprinkle with" but the example is "on". Possibly it's a typo? Actually the sense might be: "spray or sprinkle" and the example uses "on" but the definition includes "with". But the key is the structure. The sentence has "shower us with glass" which is like "shower with" - so sense 5 uses "with" in its example. Also sense 1 uses "with" as in "showered with praise". But sense 1 is about abstract nouns (praise), while glass is concrete. Both 2 and 5 could be concrete. However, sense 2's example is "showered rice on the couple" - that's a different preposition. Sense 5's example is "showered her with presents" - that matches the structure "with". So the sentence "shower us with glass" is exactly like "shower her with presents" - so sense 5 seems correct. But also sense 4: "rain abundantly" - example "Meteors showered down over half of Australia" - that uses "down" and no "with". So we need to see which sense the sentence aligns with. The sentence is about glass breaking and falling, like a shower of glass. The verb "shower" here means to cause to fall in a shower. The phrase "shower us with glass" implies we are being showered (as in, glass is being sprinkled on us). That is similar to sense 2: "spray or sprinkle with" - but the definition says "spray or sprinkle with", and the example uses "on". However, the phrase "shower with" is common: "shower someone with something" means to give them a lot of something, like gifts, or to cover them with something. In the context of glass, it's not a positive gift but a harmful rain. It's more like "rain down on". So I'd lean towards sense 2 or 4. But sense 4's example is about meteors raining down, not with a direct object "us". The sentence has "shower us with glass" - that's a direct object "us" and the thing "glass". So "shower" is being used transitively: "shower [someone] with [something]". In sense 2, the example is "showered rice on the couple" - that uses "on" not "with". But the definition says "spray or sprinkle with" - maybe it's "spray or sprinkle" and then "with" is part of the definition? Actually the sense is: "spray or sprinkle with" - the word "with" might be part of the definition phrase, not the preposition. For example, "spray or sprinkle with" could mean "to spray or sprinkle something" but then the example uses "on". I'm getting confused.

Let's look at the sense numbers: They are listed as:

1. definition=expend profusely; also used with abstract nouns | examples=He was showered with praise
2. definition=spray or sprinkle with | examples=The guests showered rice on the couple
3. definition=take a shower; wash one's body in the shower | examples=You should shower after vigorous exercise
4. definition=rain abundantly | examples=Meteors showered down over half of Australia
5. definition=provide abundantly with | examples=He showered her with presents

So sense 2 has "spray or sprinkle with" and the example uses "on". The preposition "with" appears in sense 1 (with abstract) and sense 5 (with presents). Actually sense 1 also uses "with" in its example: "He was showered with praise". So sense 1 is "expend profusely" and the example uses "with". Sense 5 is "provide abundantly with" and the example uses "with". So both 1 and 5 use "with". Sense 2 uses "on" in the example, but the definition says "spray or sprinkle with" - maybe it's "spray or sprinkle" and the "with" indicates the instrument? No, it's ambiguous.

In the sentence, "shower us with glass" - "us" is the object, "glass" is the thing being showered. This pattern is "shower [someone] with [something]" which matches sense 5 (provide abundantly with) and sense 1 (expend profusely on abstract). But sense 1 is for abstract nouns like praise, while glass is concrete. So sense 5 is about providing something concrete, like presents. However, "provide abundantly with" might imply giving gifts, while "shower" in the context of glass is more like a physical spray, not a gift. But the verb "shower" can mean to cover with a lot of something. Actually "shower" as a verb can mean "to cause to fall in a shower" or "to give in abundance". The sentence "shower us with glass" is about glass falling on us, which is a physical action. So sense 2: "spray or sprinkle with" - that is about scattering something like rice or water. That seems most appropriate because glass is like a spray of fragments. But the example uses "on" while the sentence uses "with". However, the definition itself says "spray or sprinkle with" - maybe it means "spray or sprinkle" and then "with" is part of the definition but not the preposition. Actually, many dictionaries define "shower" as "to rain or pour down" and "to give or bestow in abundance". The specific senses:
- to shower someone with something = to give them a lot of something (presents, praise)
- to shower something on someone = to cause something to fall on them (rice, confetti)

So there is a difference: "shower with" is more about giving, while "shower on" is about scattering. But the sentence uses "with", so it's "shower us with glass". That could be interpreted as "cause glass to fall on us" which is more like "shower glass on us" but the preposition changed. In common usage, "shower someone with something" can also mean to cover them with something, like "shower with bullets" or "shower with glass". So it's ambiguous.

Let's see the specific example for sense 5: "He showered her with presents" - that is giving presents, not scattering. For sense 2: "The guests showered rice on the couple" - that is scattering rice. The sentence is about windows buckling and showering us with glass - this is a physical scattering, like glass fragments flying. So it's more akin to "spray or sprinkle" (sense 2) or "rain abundantly" (sense 4). But sense 4's example uses "showered down" and no direct object. Sense 4 says "rain abundantly" with example "Meteors showered down" - that is intransitive. Our sentence is transitive: "shower us with glass". So sense 4 might not fit because it's "rain abundantly" often used intransitively (it rained, meteors showered down). The sentence has a direct object "us". So it's transitive.

Thus, the transitive senses are 1, 2, 5. Sense 1 is for abstract nouns, but glass is concrete. Sense 2 is "spray or sprinkle with" - but note that the example uses "on", but the definition says "spray or sprinkle with" - that might mean "spray or sprinkle something" like "shower rice on" is "spray rice on" or "sprinkle rice on". But "spray or sprinkle with" could also be "spray or sprinkle someone with something" - e.g., "spray someone with water" - that's similar. Actually "spray or sprinkle with" is a bit ambiguous: it could mean "to spray or sprinkle (someone) with (something)". For example, "They showered the bride with rice" is common. But the example given is "The guests showered rice on the couple" - that's different. So I think the sense 2 is actually "spray or sprinkle" and the example uses "on". But the definition includes "with" as part of the phrase? Let's read the entry: "2. definition=spray or sprinkle with | examples=The guests showered rice on the couple" - so the definition is "spray or sprinkle with" but the example uses "on". That's inconsistent. Possibly the definition is "spray or sprinkle" and "with" is a separate note? Actually the format: "definition=spray or sprinkle with" might be a shorthand. I'm leaning that sense 2 means "to scatter or distribute in the manner of a shower", and the example uses "on". The sentence "shower us with glass" uses "with". Which sense matches that? Sense 5 explicitly uses "with" in its example: "He showered her with presents". So the pattern "shower [someone] with [something]" is sense 5. Also sense 1 uses "with" as in "showered with praise". So sense 1 also uses "with" but for abstract. So we need to decide which sense is most appropriate for the physical act of glass breaking.

The sentence: "Endless seconds wondering if those huge windows would buckle and shower us with glass." This is a dramatic scene: windows might break and glass will fall like a shower. It's a physical event, not a metaphorical giving. So it's like a spray of glass fragments. That matches sense 2: "spray or sprinkle" - to spray something. But the dictionary may have a specific sense for "shower" meaning "to cause to fall in a shower" - that might be sense 4 "rain abundantly" but with a transitive usage? Sense 4 says "rain abundantly" and example is "showered down" (intransitive). However, "shower" can be transitive: "The window showered glass on us" - that would be like "showered glass". But the sentence uses "with", so it's "shower us with glass" which is a different construction.

Let's think of common usage: In the context of a window breaking, you might say "the window shattered, showering us with glass". That's a typical phrase. The word "shower" here means "to cause (something) to fall in a shower". I'd say it's like "spray" or "sprinkle". Many dictionaries list a sense: "to cause (a shower of something) to fall on", e.g., "shower confetti on the crowd". That would be "shower something on someone". But the sentence uses "with". Actually "shower someone with something" is also common: "They showered the couple with rice." That is exactly the same as "showered rice on the couple"? It's a bit different: "shower with" implies covering or giving a lot. In the case of rice, it's like throwing rice on them. So I think both constructions are used. For example, "shower someone with stones" would mean to throw stones at them. So it's plausible.

Given the options, sense 2: "spray or sprinkle with" - the word "spray" suggests a liquid or fine particles, but glass is like splinters. Sense 5: "provide abundantly with" - suggests giving gifts. While "provide" might be too generous, but "shower" can also mean to give a lot. But in the context of glass breaking, it's not a gift; it's a dangerous event. So I think sense 2 is more appropriate because it's about physical scattering. However, sense 5 is about "shower" as in "give in abundance" which is often used for praise or presents, but can be used for things like "showered with bullets" (meaning a lot of bullets). That's also physical. So it's not strictly just gifts. So both could apply.

Let's check the exact wording of the definition for sense 2: "spray or sprinkle with" - the "with" might indicate the object being sprayed, like "spray with water". So "spray or sprinkle with" could mean to cover someone or something with a spray or sprinkle. So "shower us with glass" means to cover us with glass fragments. That seems exactly the sense. Sense 5 is "provide abundantly with" which is more about providing a lot of something, like presents. "Provide" is a bit more deliberate, like giving, whereas "spray" is more like scattering. So I'd say sense 2 is better.

Also, the example for sense 2 is "The guests showered rice on the couple" - that uses "on", but the definition says "with". It's a bit inconsistent. But the key is the action: rice is being thrown, similar to glass. The example for sense 5 is "He showered her with presents" - that is giving gifts, usually not throwing. So I think the physical scattering is sense 2.

But we need to return the number. Let's see the context: The sentence is from a story about windows possibly breaking and glass falling. It is a physical action. So I'll pick sense 2. However, we should also consider that some dictionaries list "shower" as a verb meaning "to fall or cause to fall in a shower" as a separate sense. That might be sense 4. But sense 4 is "rain abundantly" with example "Meteors showered down" - which is intransitive, but it could be used transitively? The definition says "rain abundantly" - it doesn't specify transitive. So maybe sense 4 is for the "shower down" usage. The sentence has "shower us with glass" - that is "shower" with a direct object and "with", so it's not "shower down". So not sense 4.

Thus, between 2 and 5, which one? The example for sense 2 uses "on" while the sentence uses "with". But the definition says "spray or sprinkle with" - so "with" is in the definition, meaning it's the same construction. Actually, "spray or sprinkle with" means you are spraying or sprinkling someone with something, which takes "with". For example, "spray someone with water" - that's "with". So the definition uses "with". And the example given uses "on" - that's a different example. Possibly the example is just an example, not the exact preposition. So I think sense 2 is correct.

We should also consider sense 1: "expend profusely; also used with abstract nouns" - it says "also used with abstract nouns", meaning it's not limited to abstract? It says "also" so it can be used with concrete? But the example is "He was showered with praise" - praise is abstract. So sense 1 is for abstract, but the word "also" might imply that it can be used with concrete? Actually the definition says "expend profusely" - that is like spending a lot, and "also used with abstract nouns" - so it's typically for abstract things like praise, but might be used for concrete? However, the example is only abstract. So probably not.

Thus, I'll go with sense 2. But wait, there is also sense 5: "provide abundantly with" - that is similar to sense 1 but for concrete. The example "He showered her with presents" is concrete. So that's also possible. But which one is more common for "shower with glass"? I think "shower with" meaning to cover or bestow is common. But "shower" as in "a shower of glass" is like a rain. So both.

Let's look at the sentence: "shower us with glass" - this is like "a shower of glass" - the verb "shower" is being used as a transitive verb with a direct object "us" and a prepositional phrase "with glass". This is a common pattern for "shower" meaning to cause to fall in a shower. For instance, "They showered the crowd with confetti" - that's a typical usage. I think it's sense 2 or 5? Many dictionaries list "shower" as a verb with the sense "to pour down in large numbers or quantities" and "to give or bestow in abundance". The difference is subtle. But the example for sense 2 is "showered rice on the couple" - that uses "on". The example for sense 5 uses "with". So the sentence uses "with", which matches sense 5's example. However, note that sense 2's definition says "spray or sprinkle with", which includes "with", but the example uses "on". So maybe the sense is actually "spray or sprinkle" and the "with" in the definition is part of the phrase, not the preposition. Actually, let's think about the typical formatting: In a dictionary, senses are often given as "shower (verb) 1. to pour down in a shower: ... 2. to give in abundance: ...". The provided list seems to be from a specific source. The numbers might be from a word sense disambiguation task. Looking at the senses, they are numbered 1-5. Each has a definition and example. The example for sense 2 is "The guests showered rice on the couple" - this shows the construction "shower [something] on [someone]". The example for sense 5 is "He showered her with presents" - shows "shower [someone] with [something]". So the sentence is "shower us with glass" - that matches sense 5's construction. So we should pick sense 5.

But also, sense 1's example: "He was showered with praise" - passive construction "showered with". So also "with". So passive "showered with" is common. The sentence is active: "shower us with glass" - that's "shower" as a verb with object "us" and "with glass". That matches the active pattern of sense 5: "He showered her with presents" - active. So sense 5 is exactly that pattern.

Sense 2's example is "showered rice on the couple" - that's "shower rice on" - different pattern. So the sentence uses "with", not "on". Therefore, sense 5 is the correct one.

But wait, could it be sense 2? The definition says "spray or sprinkle with" - that might include "with" as the preposition, but the example uses "on" which is odd. Perhaps the example is just a sentence, not showing the precise preposition. In some dictionaries, "spray or sprinkle" can be used with either. For instance, "to shower someone with something" is a common phrase. So both are possible. However, given the explicit examples, the only sense that uses "with" in the example is sense 1 and sense 5. Sense 1 is for abstract, so sense 5 is for concrete. So I'll go with sense 5.

But let's double-check: The sentence is "shower us with glass". "Glass" is concrete, not abstract. So sense 1 is "expend profusely; also used with abstract nouns" - that suggests it's typically for abstract, but the example is abstract. So likely not. Sense 5 is "provide abundantly with" - that fits. So I'll go with 5.

However, we should consider that "shower" in the sense of "a shower of glass" is like a rain, which is sense 4. But sense 4 is "rain abundantly" and the example is "Meteors showered down", which is intransitive. The sentence is transitive, so not.

Thus, answer is 5.

But wait, there is also the possibility of sense 2 because "spray or sprinkle" could be a good fit for glass splinters. But the pattern is different. I think the key is the preposition. The sentence uses "with", so the sense that matches that pattern is sense 5 (and sense 1, but abstract). So I'll choose 5.

Let's see if there's any other clue: The word "shower" in the sense "to spray or sprinkle" often is used with "on" or "with"? Actually, common usage: "They showered the bride with confetti" - that's "with". "They showered confetti on the bride" - both. So both are possible. But the provided examples for sense 2 use "on", so the dictionary may have a specific sense for that. Given that the task is to return the number, we need to be precise based on the given definitions.

I'll re-read the definitions carefully:

1. definition=expend profusely; also used with abstract nouns | examples=He was showered with praise
2. definition=spray or sprinkle with | examples=The guests showered rice on the couple
3. definition=take a shower; wash one's body in the shower | examples=You should shower after vigorous exercise
4. definition=rain abundantly | examples=Meteors showered down over half of Australia
5. definition=provide abundantly with | examples=He showered her with presents

So sense 2 says "spray or sprinkle with" - the "with" here might be part of the definition (like "spray or sprinkle" and then "with" is a separate word? Actually "spray or sprinkle with" could be read as "to spray or sprinkle something with something" - that is, the verb takes a preposition "with". But the example uses "on". So it's inconsistent. Possibly the sense is "spray or sprinkle" and the "with" is just a note that it's often used with "with"? But the example uses "on".

Meanwhile, sense 5 says "provide abundantly with" - and the example uses "with". So sense 5 clearly indicates the "with" preposition. The sentence has "with", so sense 5 is a perfect match.

Thus, I think sense 5 is correct.

However, I should consider that "shower" as in "shower us with glass" could also be interpreted as "provide us with glass abundantly" which is odd because glass is not a gift. So it's more like "spray us with glass". But the definition of sense 5 says "provide abundantly with" - "provide" might be too generous, but it's still a verb meaning to give. In a disaster context, you might say "the building showered us with debris" - that's like providing. Actually, it's not providing; it's causing to fall. So sense 2 might be more accurate.

But given the choices, we have to pick one. The example for sense 2: "The guests showered rice on the couple" - that's a similar action of scattering. So the action is scattering rice, which is like glass. So sense 2 is about scattering. Sense 5 is about giving. Which one is more appropriate? In common language, "shower someone with something" can mean both: "shower with gifts" is giving, "shower with bullets" is attacking. So it's ambiguous.

To decide, let's see if the word "shower" in the sense of "spray" is often used with "on" or "with"? Actually, "shower" as a verb meaning "to fall in a shower" is intransitive: "The glass showered down". But transitive: "shower someone with something" is common. So I think both senses 2 and 5 are actually the same underlying meaning? Not exactly.

Probably the intended sense is 2 because it's about physical spraying. But the presence of "with" in the sentence might indicate sense 5. However, note that sense 2's definition says "spray or sprinkle with" which includes "with", so it might be that the definition itself specifies the preposition "with". So the example "showered rice on" is just an example of a different construction? Actually, "spray or sprinkle with" might mean "to spray or sprinkle" and then "with" is the object of the preposition, e.g., "spray with water". So "shower with glass" would be "spray with glass". That matches.

Given the ambiguity, I'll look at the sentence structure: "shower us with glass" - the word "us" is the indirect object? Actually "us" is the direct object? In "shower us with glass", "us" is the object, "with glass" is the means. So it's "shower [someone] with [something]". That is exactly the pattern of sense 5. Also sense 1 uses "with" for abstract. So sense 5 is the only one that explicitly has that pattern in the example. So I'll go with 5.

But wait, sense 2's definition says "spray or sprinkle with" - that could also be interpreted as "spray or sprinkle [someone] with [something]". The example is "showered rice on" - that is "spray or sprinkle [something] on [someone]". So it's a different pattern. So the definition might be incomplete.

I think the safest is to consider the verb "shower" and its typical senses. In many dictionaries, the verb "shower" has these senses: 1. to cause to fall in a shower (e.g., shower confetti on the crowd) 2. to give in abundance (e.g., shower with gifts). The sentence "shower us with glass" is closer to sense 1 because it's a physical event. But sense 1 in the list is "expend profusely" which is about spending, not falling. So not. Sense 2 is "spray or sprinkle" which is about falling. So I think sense 2 is correct.

However, the fact that the example for sense 2 uses "on" and the sentence uses "with" might not matter; "shower" can take both prepositions. So I'll check if there's any other clue: The word "shower" is used in the phrase "shower us with glass" - if you think of "shower" as in a rain of glass, that is like "a shower of glass" which is a noun. The verb "to shower" means to produce that. So sense 4 "rain abundantly" might fit if it's used transitively? But sense 4 says "rain abundantly" and example is "Meteors showered down" - that's an intransitive usage. So not.

Thus, I'm leaning towards sense 2. But let's see the number: The answer should be a single number. I need to decide.

Perhaps we can think of the typical usage in dictionaries: The Oxford English Dictionary or others. For instance, sense 2 is "to scatter or disperse in a shower" and sense 5 is "to bestow in abundance". The sentence "shower us with glass" is more like "to scatter glass on us" - so it's sense 2. But the definition given for sense 2 says "spray or sprinkle with" - that sounds like "spray with" meaning to cover with spray. So it's fine.

I'll also note that the word "shower" in the sentence is a verb, and it's being used to describe a potential action of windows breaking. That is a physical phenomenon, not an abstract giving. So sense 2 is more physical. Sense 5 is more about giving gifts. So I'll go with 2.

But wait, the example for sense 2: "The guests showered rice on the couple" - that is also physical scattering. So it's similar. So I'll pick 2.

However, the answer format asks to return only the number. So I'll think carefully.

Let's see if there is any context: The sentence is from a text about a potential disaster. "Endless seconds wondering if those huge windows would buckle and shower us with glass." The word "shower" is used as a verb meaning to cause glass to fall in a shower. That is exactly like "spray or sprinkle". So sense 2.

Also, sense 5 "provide abundantly with" would be a bit weird because "provide" implies giving, but the glass is not being provided; it's being forced upon. So sense 2 is better.

Thus, I choose 2.

But the definition of sense 2 includes "with", which matches the sentence. So it's fine.

I'll answer 2.2

[User] Your previous answer was invalid. Choose one candidate index between 1 and 5. Return only the integer.

reasoning_content:
We need to determine which numbered sense of "shower" is used in the sentence: "Endless seconds wondering if those huge windows would buckle and <t>shower</t> us with glass." The senses are defined with examples. Let's analyze each sense:

1. "expend profusely; also used with abstract nouns" - example: "He was showered with praise." That is about giving praise, not glass. Glass is concrete, so not this sense.

2. "spray or sprinkle with" - example: "The guests showered rice on the couple." This involves physically scattering something (rice) onto people. The action described in the sentence is windows breaking and glass being scattered onto us. That matches "spray or sprinkle with" (glass as the spray). The example uses "on" but the sense definition says "spray or sprinkle with" – the sentence uses "with" (shower us with glass). That fits.

3. "take a shower; wash one's body" - irrelevant.

4. "rain abundantly" - example: "Meteors showered down over half of Australia." This is intransitive (no direct object). The sentence has an object "us" and uses "with", so not intransitive. Not a match.

5. "provide abundantly with" - example: "He showered her with presents." That is giving gifts, a deliberate act of bestowing. The window breaking and glass falling is not a deliberate provision; it's an accident. Also, "provide" implies benevolence, not harm. So sense 5 is less fitting.

Thus, sense 2 is the most appropriate. The answer is 2.

provider: Io Net


[User]
Which numbered sense of "glass" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: Endless seconds wondering if those huge windows would buckle and shower us with <t>glass</t>.

Senses:
1. definition=a brittle transparent solid with irregular atomic structure
2. definition=a container for holding liquids while drinking
3. definition=the quantity a glass will hold
4. definition=a small refracting telescope
5. definition=an amphetamine derivative (trade name Methedrine) used in the form of a crystalline hydrochloride; used as a stimulant to the nervous system and as an appetite suppressant
6. definition=a mirror; usually a ladies' dressing mirror
7. definition=glassware collectively | examples=She collected old glass

reasoning_content: We need to identify which sense of "glass" is used in the sentence. The sentence: "Endless seconds wondering if those huge windows would buckle and shower us with <t>glass</t>." Here, glass refers to the material that windows are made of, which is a brittle transparent solid. Sense 1 matches: "a brittle transparent solid with irregular atomic structure". The other senses refer to drinking vessels, quantities, telescopes, drugs, mirrors, or glassware collectively. So answer is 1.


[User]
Which numbered sense of "book" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: Only a few <t>books</t> fell in the reading room.

Senses:
1. definition=a written work or composition that has been published (printed on pages bound together) | examples=I am reading a good book on economics
2. definition=physical objects consisting of a number of pages bound together | examples=he used a large book as a doorstop
3. definition=a compilation of the known facts regarding something or someone | examples=Al Smith used to say, `Let's look at the record'
4. definition=a written version of a play or other dramatic composition; used in preparing for a performance
5. definition=a record in which commercial accounts are recorded | examples=they got a subpoena to examine our books
6. definition=a collection of playing cards satisfying the rules of a card game
7. definition=a collection of rules or prescribed standards on the basis of which decisions are made | examples=they run things by the book around here
8. definition=the sacred writings of Islam revealed by God to the prophet Muhammad during his life at Mecca and Medina
9. definition=the sacred writings of the Christian religions | examples=he went to carry the Word to the heathen
10. definition=a major division of a long written composition | examples=the book of Isaiah
11. definition=a number of sheets (ticket or stamps etc.) bound together on one edge | examples=he bought a book of stamps

reasoning_content: We need to determine which sense of "book" is used in the sentence: "Only a few <t>books</t> fell in the reading room." The context: books fell, so they are physical objects. Sense 2 is about physical objects: "physical objects consisting of a number of pages bound together". The example is "he used a large book as a doorstop". That matches. Others are about written works, records, etc. So answer is 2.

provider: Parasail


[User]
Which numbered sense of "fall" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: Only a few books <t>fell</t> in the reading room.

Senses:
1. definition=descend in free fall under the influence of gravity | examples=The branch fell from the tree
2. definition=move downward and lower, but not necessarily all the way | examples=The temperature is going down
3. definition=pass suddenly and passively into a state of body or mind | examples=fall into a trap
4. definition=come under, be classified or included | examples=fall into a category
5. definition=fall from clouds | examples=rain, snow and sleet were falling
6. definition=suffer defeat, failure, or ruin | examples=We must stand or fall
7. definition=die, as in battle or in a hunt | examples=Many soldiers fell at Verdun
8. definition=touch or seem as if touching visually or audibly | examples=Light fell on her face
9. definition=be captured | examples=The cities fell to the enemy
10. definition=occur at a specified time or place | examples=Christmas falls on a Monday this year
11. definition=decrease in size, extent, or range | examples=The amount of homework decreased towards the end of the semester
12. definition=yield to temptation or sin | examples=Adam and Eve fell
13. definition=lose office or power | examples=The government fell overnight
14. definition=to be given by assignment or distribution | examples=The most difficult task fell on the youngest member of the team
15. definition=move in a specified direction | examples=The line of men fall forward
16. definition=be due | examples=payments fall on the 1st of the month
17. definition=lose one's chastity | examples=a fallen woman
18. definition=to be given by right or inheritance | examples=The estate fell to the oldest daughter
19. definition=come into the possession of | examples=The house accrued to the oldest son
20. definition=fall to somebody by assignment or lot | examples=The task fell to me
21. definition=be inherited by | examples=The estate fell to my sister
22. definition=slope downward | examples=The hills around here fall towards the ocean
23. definition=lose an upright position suddenly | examples=The vase fell over and the water spilled onto the table
24. definition=drop oneself to a lower or less erect position | examples=She fell back in her chair
25. definition=fall or flow in a certain way | examples=This dress hangs well
26. definition=assume a disappointed or sad expression | examples=Her face fell when she heard that she would be laid off
27. definition=be cast down | examples=his eyes fell
28. definition=come out; issue | examples=silly phrases fell from her mouth
29. definition=be born, used chiefly of lambs | examples=The lambs fell in the afternoon
30. definition=begin vigorously | examples=The prisoners fell to work right away
31. definition=go as if by falling | examples=Grief fell from our hearts
32. definition=come as if by falling | examples=Night fell

reasoning_content: We need to identify which numbered sense of "fall" is used in the sentence: "Only a few books fell in the reading room." The sentence means that a few books dropped or descended in the reading room. It's likely about books physically falling from a shelf or something? But the sentence says "only a few books fell in the reading room" – it could mean that they were placed or dropped? Let's examine the senses. The most straightforward is sense 1: "descend in free fall under the influence of gravity" with example "The branch fell from the tree." That seems appropriate. However, note that the context "in the reading room" might imply they fell from a shelf or something. But also sense 23: "lose an upright position suddenly" with example "The vase fell over" – but that's more about toppling. Sense 1 is general. Also, sense 24: "drop oneself to a lower or less erect position" but that's more about a person. The sentence is about books, so they physically fall. So sense 1 is likely. But we need to check if any other sense fits. For instance, sense 5: "fall from clouds" is about rain/snow. Not. Sense 8: "touch or seem as if touching visually or audibly" like light fell. Not. Sense 10: "occur at a specified time or place" – "Christmas falls on a Monday" – but here books fell, not an event. So unlikely. Sense 14: "to be given by assignment or distribution" – "The most difficult task fell on the youngest" – not about books physically falling. So sense 1 seems correct. The sentence: "Only a few books fell in the reading room." It describes books descending. So answer is 1.


[User]
Which numbered sense of "paint" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: Then the auto <t>paint</t> shop fire sent an evil-looking cloud of black smoke into the air.

Senses:
1. definition=a substance used as a coating to protect or decorate a surface (especially a mixture of pigment suspended in a liquid); dries to form a hard coating | examples=artists use `paint' and `pigment' interchangeably
2. definition=(basketball) a space (including the foul line) in front of the basket at each end of a basketball court; usually painted a different color from the rest of the court | examples=he hit a jump shot from the top of the key
3. definition=makeup consisting of a pink or red powder applied to the cheeks

reasoning_content: We need to determine which sense of "paint" is used in the sentence: "Then the auto paint shop fire sent an evil-looking cloud of black smoke into the air." The word is marked as <t>paint</t>. The sentence refers to an "auto paint shop" which is a place where cars are painted. So the paint here is the substance used for coating. That matches sense 1. The other senses are basketball court area and makeup. So answer is 1.


[User]
Which numbered sense of "shop" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: Then the auto paint <t>shop</t> fire sent an evil-looking cloud of black smoke into the air.

Senses:
1. definition=a mercantile establishment for the retail sale of goods or services | examples=he bought it at a shop on Cape Cod
2. definition=small workplace where handcrafts or manufacturing are done
3. definition=a course of instruction in a trade (as carpentry or electricity) | examples=I built a birdhouse in shop

reasoning_content: We need to parse the sentence: "Then the auto paint shop fire sent an evil-looking cloud of black smoke into the air." The word "shop" appears as part of "auto paint shop". This is a place where auto painting is done, likely a workplace for painting cars. That matches sense 2: small workplace where handcrafts or manufacturing are done. Sense 1 is a retail store, but an auto paint shop could also be retail? However, typically an auto paint shop is a place where they apply paint, a service or manufacturing, not just retail. The context of a fire sending smoke suggests it's a workshop. So sense 2. Return only the number.


[User]
Which numbered sense of "fire" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: Then the auto paint shop <t>fire</t> sent an evil-looking cloud of black smoke into the air.

Senses:
1. definition=the event of something burning (often destructive) | examples=they lost everything in the fire
2. definition=the act of firing weapons or artillery at an enemy | examples=hold your fire until you can see the whites of their eyes
3. definition=the process of combustion of inflammable materials producing heat and light and (often) smoke | examples=fire was one of our ancestors' first discoveries
4. definition=a fireplace in which a relatively small fire is burning | examples=they sat by the fire and talked
5. definition=once thought to be one of four elements composing the universe (Empedocles)
6. definition=feelings of great warmth and intensity | examples=he spoke with great ardor
7. definition=fuel that is burning and is used as a means for cooking | examples=put the kettle on the fire
8. definition=a severe trial | examples=he went through fire and damnation
9. definition=intense adverse criticism | examples=Clinton directed his fire at the Republican Party

reasoning_content: We need to identify which sense of "fire" is used in the sentence: "Then the auto paint shop <t>fire</t> sent an evil-looking cloud of black smoke into the air." The word "fire" here refers to a fire that is burning, producing smoke. It's not a destructive event (though it could be, but the sentence focuses on the smoke), not weapon fire, not a fireplace, not an element, not feelings, not cooking fuel, not a trial, not criticism. The best match is sense 3: "the process of combustion of inflammable materials producing heat and light and (often) smoke". The example matches: "fire was one of our ancestors' first discoveries" is about the phenomenon. The sentence describes a fire sending smoke. So the sense number is 3.

provider: AkashML


[User]
Which numbered sense of "send" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: Then the auto paint shop fire <t>sent</t> an evil-looking cloud of black smoke into the air.

Senses:
1. definition=cause to go somewhere | examples=The explosion sent the car flying in the air
2. definition=to cause or order to be taken, directed, or transmitted to another place | examples=He had sent the dispatches downtown to the proper people and had slept
3. definition=cause to be directed or transmitted to another place | examples=send me your latest results
4. definition=transport commercially
5. definition=assign to a station
6. definition=transfer | examples=The spy sent the classified information off to Russia
7. definition=cause to be admitted; of persons to an institution | examples=After the second episode, she had to be committed
8. definition=broadcast over the airwaves, as in radio or television | examples=We cannot air this X-rated song

reasoning_content: We need to determine which sense of "send" is used in the sentence: "Then the auto paint shop fire sent an evil-looking cloud of black smoke into the air." The action is that the fire caused the smoke to go into the air. Looking at the senses, sense 1: "cause to go somewhere" with example "The explosion sent the car flying in the air" is very similar. Sense 2 is about ordering to be taken to another place, sense 3 is about directing or transmitting, etc. Sense 1 seems most appropriate. So answer is 1.


[User]
Which numbered sense of "cloud" (marked with <t></t>) is used in the sentence below? Return only the number of the correct sense.

Sentence: Then the auto paint shop fire sent an evil-looking <t>cloud</t> of black smoke into the air.

Senses:
1. definition=any collection of particles (e.g., smoke or dust) or gases that is visible
2. definition=a visible mass of water or ice particles suspended at a considerable altitude
3. definition=out of touch with reality | examples=his head was in the clouds
4. definition=a cause of worry or gloom or trouble | examples=the only cloud on the horizon was the possibility of dissent by the French
5. definition=suspicion affecting your reputation | examples=after that mistake he was under a cloud
6. definition=a group of many things in the air or on the ground | examples=a swarm of insects obscured the light

reasoning_content: We need to identify which sense of "cloud" is used in the sentence: "Then the auto paint shop fire sent an evil-looking cloud of black smoke into the air." The cloud is described as a visible collection of black smoke particles. Sense 1: "any collection of particles (e.g., smoke or dust) or gases that is visible" fits perfectly. Sense 2 is about water/ice particles at altitude, not smoke. Others are metaphorical. So answer is 1.

provider: Cloudflare